HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Samuel J. Dubbin-Jungle Island Noise ImpactsSubmitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 City Clerk
Brooks Acoustics Corporation
Mr. Samuel J. Dubbin, Esq.
Dubbin & Kravetz, LLP
1200 Anastasia Avenue
Suite 300
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, Florida 33062 754-229-1450
7 June 2018
Subject: Acoustical Analysis — Jungle Island Noise Impacts on 1000 Venetian Way Residences
Dear Mr. Dubbin:
As requested, Brooks Acoustics Corporation (BAC) conducted a study of the acoustical report by
Edward Dugger + Associates (ED+A) conceming the proposed leasehold improvements and
attractions at Jungle Island, and the impact thereof on the adjacent residents at 1000 Venetian Way
on Biscayne Island.
BAC performed the following tasks:
• A review was made of the available documents on the subject matter, including the Dugger report
of 15 March 2018.
• A review was made of the potential noise impacts from events and activities which will occur in
connection with the proposed Jungle Island changes. These noise impacts particularly apply to
the residential neighborhoods adjacent to Jungle Island.
• A study was made to determine if the Dugger report adequately addressed the acoustical impacts
which would be generated by the proposed leasehold improvements.
This study shows that the Dugger report is at best preliminary and incomplete. It does not provide
adequate information that the beneficiaries of the proposed lease can rely upon, to ensure that the
lessee will provide all of the protections against noise disturbances for the existing residential
neighborhood, as required under the existing Lease Agreement.
Further, the Dugger report is misleading as it underestimates the noise emissions from the proposed
leasehold activities and overstates the ambient background sound levels on Biscayne Island. As
such, the Dugger report ignores the seriousness and intensity of the noise impacts of Jungle Island
on the adjacent residents.
Moreover, there are a number technical errors and omissions in the Dugger report which cast
additional doubt on its assertions.
Therefore, the Dugger report does not support the contention that there will be no noise impact on
existing adjacent residents, or provide confidence that the lessor be protected, as required.
On the contrary, a simple review of the Dugger report and the Jungle Island plan shows that the
operation is likely to cause significant negative noise impacts to the neighboring residents on
Biscayne Island, including those at 1000 Venetian Way.
\r),IktN N)\\N\\!t\) \1‘),V f -
\iy�6� 11A\\,.
t ‘,iti\; Cku\.l
Analysis
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 2
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
A review of the report by Edward Dugger + Associates, dated 15 March 2018 was conducted. A
copy of the report is attached.
A summary of the main points of deficiency in the Dugger report is given as follows:
1. Ambient background sound tests were not conducted at the residences on Biscayne
Island.
No background sound tests to establish the existing conditions were conducted on Biscayne
Island at the adjacent residences, such as 1000 Venetian Way.
An erroneous assumption was made in the Dugger report, on Page 3, stating, "Though
measurements could not be performed on Biscayne Island, it is likely that the residential
properties experience similar sound levels as observed on Watson Island".
This is in error for several reasons. First, the measurements reported by Dugger were made
at the current locations of the Kangaroo exhibit and at the Beach Club on Watson Island.
These locations are much closer to the MacArthur Causeway highway than are the residences
on Biscayne Island. And as Dugger states, also on Page 3, "traffic activity on the MacArthur
Causeway is the primary contributor to the sound environment with sustained increases in
measured sound pressure level during periods of higher traffic volume".
Since the Dugger test locations on Watson Island were dearly much closer to the highway
than the residences on Biscayne Island, the traffic noise will be much higher at those Watson
Island locations than at the residences. An aerial view, obtained by BAC, is shown attached.
Based on the distances involved, the difference in traffic noise level between Watson Island
and Biscayne Island can be calculated, and will be between 10 to 20 decibels (dB), with
Biscayne Island being that much lower, or less loud.
Thus, when Dugger shows in report Figure 1 that the LA90 background sound level is
between 50 and 60 A -weighted decibels (dBA) on Watson Island, it is more likely to be in the
35 to 45 dBA range on Biscayne Island. These lower background sound levels expose the
residents to intrusive disturbances to a greater degree than would occur in areas with higher
background sound levels.
2. No site plan or map was included in the Dugger report showing the background sound
test locations.
This omission makes it difficult to evaluate the impact of the background traffic sound, with
relation to the residences, and also discounts the effects on the tested sound levels of activities
near the Kangaroo exhibit and at the Beach Club at the times of the tests. This renders the
tests unreliable.
Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 3
3. In the Dugger Impact Analysis many errors and omissions were made.
The Dugger report addressed several activities and attractions to be offered by the proposed
lessee, Jungle Island. Included in the report as potentially disturbing noise sources are the
"Aerodium", "Flowrider", "Zip Line", "Flying Squirrel", and "Beach Club".
No map showing the locations of the noise sources and the residences is given.
There is no way to confirm the accuracy or validity of the Dugger calculations without knowing
the locations of the noise sources relative to the receivers. So these calculations cannot be
relied upon.
A proposed Jungle Island Master Plan, dated 03.27.2018, was obtained by BAC, please see
attached. This plan shows some of the attractions listed by Dugger, such as the "Aerodium",
"Flowrider" and "Flying Squirrel", but does not clearly show the "Zip Line" or the "Beach Club".
This may not even be the information that Dugger used, so the locations of the noise sources
used for the impact analysis are not known.
No source noise levels or calculations steps are shown.
Essential to any analysis are the source noise levels for each of these activities. Those source
noise levels are not included in the Dugger report. Only the calculated results at a variety of
locations, which are mostly on Watson Island, are shown. This makes it impossible to
evaluate or confirm the validity of Dugger's calculation procedure.
Further, each detailed step in the calculation from noise source to receiver should be shown
in a valid noise impact estimate. This was not done. Also, no graphic representations were
presented to aid in the evaluation of these impact calculations.
As there is no way to assess the accuracy or validity of these calculation results, they cannot
be relied upon by the Lessor to evaluate the Jungle Island proposal.
In fact, the noise impact calculation results are shown for only two out of the five noise sources
addressed in the report, the "Aerodium" and the "Flowrider".
Further, of the 11 receiver locations presented by Dugger, only 1 location is at a residence.
The other 10 locations are in Jungle Island. This demonstrates that the noise impact at the
residences was a lower priority for the Dugger study.
Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 - Dubbin & Kravetz LLP - 1000 Venetian Way Page 4
Y
L
Q)
Only mechanical noise was addressed for the "Aerodium" and "Flowrider", not rider N u
screaming and shouting 1-2 N Y
Q U
v
According to the Dugger report, the only noise sources at the "Aerodium" and the "Flowrider" Y co
are the pumps and fans which operate those devices. However, those facilities are used by 0 v N
people as thrill rides, which cause them to shout and scream. The screams can be much -a 00
louder than the mechanical noise and, of course, are much more difficult to control. Y o 0
E-o
The mechanical noises are still likely to be above the ambient background at the residences. N v ,
The rider screaming will be significantly higher in level and more disturbing than the °
mechanical noises.
The screams from the "Zip Line" are vastly underestimated.
Dugger used noise data obtained from a second hand source for two people passing on a zip
line, as 68 dBA at 50 feet. However, BAC has made first hand sound measurements for a
similar thrill ride, a water slide. These measured data show that the shouts and screams from
the water slide are significantly higher in level, at a greater distance from the ride than Dugger
allows.
The BAC data were taken at a residence near a Six Flags water park. The screams measured
at a distance of 365 feet from the water slide were routinely in the 65 to 75 dBA range at the
residence. An aerial photo of the water slide and the nearby residence is attached. Graphs
showing measured time history sound level data are also attached.
Using those water slide measured data, compared to the Dugger estimate, it is likely that the
scream sound levels from the "Zip Line" will be greater than 50 to 60 dBA, or even higher at
the Biscayne Island residences. This will put the screams at a higher level than the ambient
background sound level and make them intrusive and disturbing to residents. In fact, in the
case of the Six Flags water slide, a neighboring resident was driven to seek mental health
treatment due to the constant screaming heard at the home.
Many of the proposed attractions were not addressed by the Dugger report.
A view of the Jungle Island Master Plan, attached, shows significant noise sources which are
likely to have significant negative impacts on the residential neighbors. These include the
Amphitheater and the Crystal Lagoon, a very large swimming pool. These noise sources
were not addressed at all in the Dugger report.
With regard to the Crystal Lagoon, such a large swimming facility can accommodate hundreds
of bathers. The noise sources will be screaming and shouting similar to the water slide and
the zip line attractions, discussed above. However, the sound levels will be magnified by
having hundreds of active noise sources instead of just several at a time. The increase in
noise levels at the residences can be as much as 10 to 20 dB over the "Zip Line" levels.
Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 5
With regard to the Amphitheater, this is an outdoor music entertainment facility and will present
numerous noise control problems and impacts to the nearby residents.
Both of these attractions are on the north side of Watson Island, just across the water from
the residents on Biscayne Island, including those at 1000 Venetian Way. So, these attractions
are likely to have serious negative noise impacts on the residents.
Other noise generating attractions shown on the Master Plan but not addressed by Dugger
include the water slides, the adventure pool, the waterfall and treetop trekking facilities.
The effect of wind on noise transmission was misstated in the Dugger report.
The Dugger report states on Page 3, "Wind would provide further attenuation in regard to the
residential properties as it typically blows from the southeast". This is inaccurate on several
accounts.
Firstly, the wind in that local area is usually out of a general southerly direction. This will bring
the wind from the proposed Jungle Island location directly across the water to the residents
on Biscayne Island. As reported by a resident, out of 7 days in a week, the wind generally
comes from the south for 5 days, out the west 1 day and out of the north 1 day.
Secondly, noise transmission is increased in the direction of the wind. The noise is carried by
the wind, with a noise source being louder at a distance downwind than it is upwind. So with
the wind typically out of the south, the noise from Jungle Island to the residents will be
increased, not attenuated.
Taken as a whole, these errors and omissions in the Dugger report are misleading and cause
it to seriously underestimate the negative noise impact that the proposed Jungle Island
operation is likely to have on the neighboring residents.
4. The Dugger report does not present planned occupancies, or time of day, and day of
the week data.
No information was provided on the number of people who would be using the proposed
Jungle Island attractions at any one time, the occupancy Toad factors based on the time of day
or night, and the day of the week, or the total number of people to use the attraction during
any operating period.
No information was provided on what the operating hours and days would be. These
occupancy figures are undoubtedly available in the Jungle Island business plan, however they
were not used for the noise impact study.
Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062
111.
0
v
00
0
0
0
0
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 6
As none of the foregoing was provided, it could not be taken into account when calculating
the noise emissions of the proposed uses. Obviously, more people on the attractions
corresponds to more noise. Therefore on the basis of this lack of information, the noise impact
analysis cannot be relied upon.
Further, Jungle Island literature advertises the availability of a number of facilities which can
be used for private events. Please see the attached literature. These include outdoor facilities
which can accommodate capacities of hundreds to thousands of people. Many of these
events will include outdoor music productions, which can cause disturbances to the residential
neighbors.
Outdoor music entertainment will be used at the Beach, amphitheater and hotel, and at other
venues at Jungle Island that will be presented to the public and offered at private events and
functions (corporate events and weddings).
These private events are particularly difficult to regulate and will likely result in disturbances to
the neighbors and continual enforcement headaches for the City.
5. The Dugger report does not present a legitimate noise mitigation design.
Unfortunately, given the serious noise impacts that are likely to be imposed on the neighboring
residents from the proposed Jungle Island leasehold, very little noise control design effort was
presented in the Dugger report.
Mechanical systems and patron noise
Several vague design concepts were given by Dugger, including the use of "sound pillows"
for the "Aerodium" attraction without a definition of those devices or their expected noise
control performance.
Also, it was suggested by Dugger that the Beach Club roof deck have K-13 sound absorbent
material applied to the underside to prevent noise reflections. However, K-13 is not
appropriate in this application as it is not a weatherproof material and is specified only for
indoor use.
So, clearly, no detail design of noise control features for the many noise producing attractions
was done. No noise control strategies were developed for reducing the impact on nearby
residents of the screams and shouts of thrill ride or swimming lagoon patrons.
Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062
a)
U
T
CJ
0
0
N
0
0
0
c
0
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 7
Sound system noise
With regard to the "permanent sound system" for the Beach Club, the Dugger report indicates
the need for a locked or password protected system to limit the sound volume. The report
also recommends directional loudspeakers pointed inward toward the property and offers to
work with the Owner to develop such a system.
Obviously, that design effort has not been conducted, and so no one can know if such a design
could be successful in this case. So, there are no guarantees that this sound system will meet
the existing lease agreement noise requirements.
The Dugger report did not address the many other large entertainment venue sound systems
that could be installed, at the hotel or at other function spaces. It did mention "distributed
loudspeaker" systems, but no analysis was presented of the impact of such a system.
However, the report states, "a real-time noise monitoring system could prove to be useful to
management and other personnel at the Beach Club".
This statement implies that constant monitoring of the Jungle Island facility sound systems would
be needed to keep volumes from becoming intrusive. A sophisticated system is required to
perform the appropriate sound limiting function. However, no detail design for this was offered in
the report.
This type of sound monitoring is even more difficult for private function events, where a DJ or live
band brings in its own equipment. It is even more difficult to control such intrusive music noise
produced by an independent DJ or band that is hired by the private function host.
There is nothing in the Dugger report to indicate how the proposed permanent systems and event
systems will comply with the sound level requirements of the existing lease agreement.
Another aspect of sound system noise that the Dugger report did not address is the predominance
of loud thumping bass and drums in much of the music content that is likely to be played on those
systems at the entertainment and event venues.
The A -weighted sound levels (dBA) discussed by Dugger do not take into account the disturbing
low frequency (bass) content. The bass content from these sound systems can be much greater
than the ambient background levels as it reaches the nearby residences. It is likely that this will
be very intrusive and disturbing to residents. There is no evidence that design efforts were
undertaken to address this intrusive, thumping bass issue.
Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062
v
U
A
u
co
EO
O
o up
-a o
U a
V3j O
The traffic volume on MacArthur Causeway is less on the weekends than it is on weekdays, due to fewer
people traveling to and from work. With Tess traffic on the weekends, the traffic background noise will be
less. By contrast, the recreational use of the proposed Jungle Island attractions will be more intense on
the weekends. So the noise intrusions from Jungle Island will be greater on the weekends, at a time when
the nearby residents may wish to enjoy the quiet of their home.
There was no attempt presented in the Dugger report to investigate the actual sound propagation over
the channel between the islands. It was reported that residents at 1000 Venetian Way can clearly hear
the parrots squawking and the lions mating on Watson Island, particularly during the morning and evening
hours. This indicates the ease with which sound travels over the water, and the jeopardy for significant
negative noise impacts from the proposed Jungle Island activities.
Conclusions
Lacking credible noise control design specifics, for the mechanical noise, the patron produced noise
(screaming) and the sound system produced noise, there can be no confidence that the noise generated
by the proposed Lessee will not be disturbing and not violate the lease agreement noise requirements.
This situation, if allowed, is also likely to become an enforcement nightmare for the City.
Please contact me if you have any questions concerning these findings.
Very truly yours,
BROOKS ACOUSTICS CORPORATION
/3
Bennett M. Brooks, PE, FASA, INCE
President
Attachments
Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 8
N
Q
Discussion
v
-c
Other aspects of the proposed leasehold features that can have significant negative noise impact were 9
not addressed by the Dugger report. These include the traffic background noise variation during the week,
and the existing sound propagation over the water channel between Watson Island and Biscayne Island.
E
U
U
BAC Proiect Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz — Jungle Island noise Attachments
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS
1- ED+A (Dugger) noise impact report
2- Aerial view of Watson Island and Biscayne Island
(from Google Earth)
3- Jungle Island Master Plan 03.27.2018
4- Six Flags noise data
5- Jungle Island Special Events brochure
DiA
acoustics
E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
PROJECT MEMORANDUM
Date: 15 March 2018
To: Elie Mimoun
Manager
ESJ JI Operations, LLC
1111 Parrot Jungle Trail
Miami, Florida 33132
From: Sam Shroyer, ASA
Irineo Jaimes, ASA
Edward Dugger, FAIA ASA NCAC INCE
Cc: Brandon Torrellas
Amicon Management
7430 NE 4th Court
Miami, Florida 33138
Re: Acoustic Consulting Services — Acoustic Study
Jungle Island
1111 Parrot Jungle Trail
Miami, Florida 33132
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
Elie,
This report has been prepared to document analyses performed by Edward Dugger +
Associates, P.A. (ED+A) relating to future potential acoustical impacts associated with
Jungle Island in Miami, Florida. Acoustical measurements, site visits, and review of the
site plan and manufacturer documentation have enabled ED+A to model these impacts
and provide mitigation recommendations as necessary.
Overall, it has been determined that sound generated by new attractions at Jungle
Island will not negatively impact the facility's patrons or nearby residential properties,
but ED+A cannot speak to the specific sensitivities of the various animals on the
property. Recommendations have been provided to control sound generated
throughout the park so as not to disturb nearby residential properties.
Please contact ED+A with any questions, comments, or concerns regarding this report
or its contents.
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 1
EDA
acoustics
Introduction
Background
ESJ JI Operations, LLC ("the Owner") is proposing several modifications to Jungle
Island, located at 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail in Miami, Florida. While much of the property
will remain in its current state, several new attractions, exhibits, and activities are to be
added in the future. ED+A were commissioned by the Owner to determine whether any
of the new features could result in any negative acoustical impacts at nearby residential
properties or at several locations within the park.
E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
Property Information
Jungle Island is located at 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail on Watson Island in Miami, Florida.
The property has Parks and Recreation zoning and its primary land use is
Entertainment. The property is immediately adjacent to the MacArthur Causeway, a
high -traffic extension of Interstate-395 which connects downtown Miami to Miami
Beach, on its southwest and the Biscayne Bay on its north. There are many other
properties with Parks and Recreation on Watson Island directly to the east of the
property and on the opposite side of the MacArthur Causeway. Additionally, there are
several residential properties on Biscayne Island to the north with roughly 700-ft. to 800-
ft. of water separating the properties. Most of these residential properties are located
on the north side of the island across Venetian Way.
Noise -Sensitive Receivers
A condominium at 1000 Venetian Way is the nearest residential property to 1111 Parrot
Jungle Trail. Thus, it is the primary focus of this study in regard to noise which may be
generated by the project. The properties are separated by a minimum of 700-ft. at their
nearest point.
:'Methodology
Acoustical Measurements
Long-term acoustical measurements were conducted at two locations on the property to
document the existing ambient sound conditions. ED+A's acoustical measurement
system logged sound pressure levels near the current location of Kangaroo Exhibit from
Thursday, March 1 to Tuesday, March 6. The equipment was then relocated to the
Beach Club area on the western portion of the property, where it remained until it was
retrieved by ED+A personnel on Thursday, March 8. Details relating to ED+A's
measurement equipment have been included in Table 1.
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 2
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
IED+A
acoustics
E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
Existing Ambient Sound Environment
The resulting data indicate that traffic activity on the MacArthur Causeway is the primary
contributor to the sound environment with sustained increases in measured sound
pressure level during periods of higher traffic volume. While the measured sound levels
do not vary considerably between the two locations, it is apparent that the contributing
sound sources — particularly the MacArthur Causeway — have greater impact at the
Beach Club area on the northwest end of the property.
Figure 1 demonstrates A -weighted equivalent -continuous sound pressure levels (LAeq)
and ninetieth -percentile -exceeded sound pressure levels (LA90) for each one -hour
increment of the measurement period. LAeq is a time -averaged value which represents
the logarithmic average of all sound measured during a given time period and LA90 is
representative of the "residual sound level" at a measurement location as it excludes the
greatest values measured (the upper -tenth percentile) to reduce the impact of any
inconsistent sound sources. LA90 is particularly useful when evaluating sound in
relatively quiet residential areas.
The measured values are consistent with what ANSI/ASA S12.9-2013 Part 3: Quantities
and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound — Part 3:
Short-term Measurements with an Observer Presenti'l identifies as "very noisy urban
residential" and "noisy urban residential" land use categories (see Table 2). Though
measurements could not be performed on Biscayne Island, it is likely that the residential
properties experience similar sound levels as observed on Watson Island, though they
would be expected to be slightly less, particularly during late -night and early -morning
hours. Therefore, ED+A believe that sound pressure levels on Biscayne Island would
be consistent with LAso measured on Watson Island.
Impact Analysis
Sound sources which may be of concern to the City of Miami or nearby residents are
addressed individually in the following sections. Modeled sound pressure levels are
included in Tables 5 and 6. It is important to note that ED+A's calculations did not
account for several factors which would further attenuate sound including the obstructed
acoustical Tine -of -sight conditions created by heavy foliage and building structures on
the property, as well as some atmospheric conditions such as wind velocity and
direction. Wind would provide further attenuation in regard to the residential properties
as it typically blows from the southeast. Sound absorption provided by air was included
in the modeling process, but the air attenuation coefficients used were taken from
ANSI/ASA S1.26-2014 Methods Used for Calculation of the Absorption of Sound by the
Atmosphere [2] data provided for an air temperature of 35° Celsius (95° Fahrenheit) and
100% relative humidity to account for the Tess favorable weather conditions which are
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 3
ED+A
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
typical of Miami's climate. Additionally, prior research [3] has concluded that the
standard calculation procedures [4] used to model sound propagation are just as
accurate when modeling the travel of sound over water as they are land.
Though sound pressure levels as they would exist at the various animal exhibits have
been calculated, ED+A are not experienced in animal bioacoustics and cannot comment
on what would or would not be appropriate for any specific species aside from humans.
For this reason, unweighted sound pressure levels calculated by ED+A have been
included in a separate section as they can be adjusted to reflect varying sensitivity to
sound. The A -weighting spectrum accounts for human sensitivity to sound across the
frequency spectrum and is the appropriate measure for sound at all areas where the
impact of sound to guests or residential properties is a concern.
Aerodium
The most significant source of sound to be introduced to the property is an Aerodium
wind tunnel, an enclosure with a large fan which provides an experience similar to
skydiving. Aerodium Technologies provided ED+A with sound level data which could be
used to model the attraction's impact to both nearby areas and to 1000 Venetian Way.
It should be noted that an acoustically -absorptive sound barrier will be provided by the
manufacturer and installed around the equipment.
The distance between the Aerodium and 1000 Venetian Way has been estimated by
ED+A to be nearly 1,100-ft., which would result in sound attenuation by geometric
divergence of 36 dB. Accounting for air absorption, the attraction would generate 43
dBA at 1000 Venetian Way and would therefore not result in any clearly discernible
impact. Aerodium Technologies documents also demonstrated the effect of "sound
pillows" which may be installed for further sound attenuation; ED+A did not account for
the use of this type of product during the calculation process, but would recommend
their use to further reduce sound levels which would be experienced by those nearby on
the Jungle Island property.
Flowrider
Flowrider provided ED+A with sound pressure level data measured by Eilar Associates
at an existing attraction in California. While the equipment is similar, the model which is
to be installed at Jungle Island features one additional pump. For this reason, 3 dB
were added to each octave -band sound pressure level to account for a second source
of sound. The attraction was then modeled in a similar fashion as the Aerodium,
resulting in 45 dBA at 1000 Venetian Way.
However, the design and installation of the Flowrider will effectively serve to greatly
reduce this level to render its impact insignificant. Not only will the Restaurant Pavilion
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 4
L
Q:
U
0
0
ED+A
acoustics
E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
obstruct the acoustical line -of -sight between the attraction and receiving property, but
sound generated by the Flowrider's pumps will be mostly contained within the attraction
and will quickly diminish as observers move away from the equipment.
Zip Line
Though ED+A did not have the ability to measure sound levels associated with an
existing zip line, J.C. Brennan & Associates, Inc. reported in a Nevada Environmental
Impact Statement [5] that "two individuals passing by on (a) zip line resulted in a
maximum noise level of 68 dBA... at a distance of 50 feet." The document indicated
that their measured data included "people yelling, and the metal -on -metal sound from
the cable and the sheave wheel. Per the inverse -square law, the maximum sound level
that would be generated by a zip line at a distance of 700-ft. would be roughly 45 dBA.
As this sound level is substantially lower than the ambient sound level, ED+A can state
with certainty that the zip line will not create any detrimental acoustical impact at any
residential properties. It is important to note that the zip lines will be at an even greater
distance from 1000 Venetian Way.
Flying Squirrel
The Flying Squirrel feature is an indoor attraction for children featuring a trampoline.
The most notable sounds associated with the Flying Squirrel will result from children's
enjoyment of the attraction in the form of yelling and screaming. However, the
trampoline is enclosed within a building structure so these sounds will only be audible
within and immediately outside of the Flying Squirrel.
Beach Club
It is recommended that the Beach Club have a permanent sound system, or "house
system," which will be used by all performers and DJ's. It is also advised that any digital
signal processor utilized in the audio system have the ability to limit sound at various
frequencies to specific output levels. It is beneficial if the system be set to the
appropriate settings and be locked or password -protected so that only management or
assigned personnel can make further adjustments.
Directional line -array loudspeakers can be utilized to direct sound to the appropriate
areas and away from Biscayne Island. These types of loudspeakers are designed to
direct sound only in the intended direction and not to their rear. In general, the
loudspeakers and live entertainment should be pointed in the southwest, facing inward
toward the property. ED+A will work with the Owner further to review any loudspeaker
specifications and provide feedback as requested.
A distributed audio system throughout the venue consisting of multiple smaller
loudspeakers is recommended, as opposed to using a few large loudspeakers. A
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 5
EDiA
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
distributed speaker system reduces the need for increasing the overall output level to
enable sound to reach all of the necessary areas as the loudspeaker system does not
need to compensate for sound level attenuation provided by the distance between the
source and its receivers. These same methods of noise control are also recommended
for any speakers which may be located outside of the structure in the beach area.
Sound pressure levels at a specified distance from a loudspeaker can be calculated by
utilizing the reference sound power levels or sound pressure levels provided by
loudspeaker manufacturers. There is an approximate 900-ft. distance between the
Beach Club and 1000 Venetian Way, which would result in an attenuation of 48 dB from
a point source. However, this value could vary based on the specifications of the
loudspeakers which comprise the audio system.
Although not imperative, a real-time noise monitoring system could prove to be useful to
management and other personnel at the Beach Club. Such a system would provide
instant feedback and visual decibel readings as they are generated by the
entertainment occurring at the time, allowing for adjustments to be made if the levels
are deemed to be inappropriate. At the request of the Owner, ED+A can assist in the
selection and installation of this equipment.
Finally, if the Beach Club is to have an exposed roof deck, an acoustically -absorptive
product such as International Cellulose Corporation's K-13 spray -on material or a
similar product should be added to the underside of the deck. This will prevent
reflections and reduce the propagation of sound to other areas while providing a more
acoustically satisfying environment for patrons. ED+A will provide additional information
for products that can be used at the Owner's request.
Conclusion
This investigation of future sound sources and operations at Jungle Island has led to
ED+A's conclusion that they will not create any detrimental impact on neighboring
residential properties. It should again be noted that this conclusion was reached
although ED+A's modeling and calculations were performed in a conservative manner.
ED+A have provided recommendations that will enable the Beach Club to operate in a
manner consistent with its surroundings and will continue to work with the Owner to
ensure that this is achieved.
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 6
V
v N
N Co)
Q
CO
o E N
L. o
& o
0
_o o
0 v
V) L. o
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
References
[1] ANSI/ASA S12.9-2013/Part 3 American National Standard Quantities and
Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound — Part 3:
Short -Term Measurements with an Observer Present
[2] ANSI/ASA S1.26-2014 American National Standard Methods for Calculation of the
Absorption of Sound by the Atmosphere
[3] Kelsall, Tim. (2012). Measurements of Propagation of Sound Over Water at Low to
Mid Frequencies Applicable to Wind Turbine Noise Calculation. Canadian Acoustics
/Acoustique Canadienne, Vol. 40 (3), pp. 58-59.
[4] ISO 9613(2) Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors — Part 2: General
Method of Calculation
[5] Unknown author. (2014). Heavenly Mountain Resort Epic Discovery Project
E/R/EIS/EIS Noise. Retrieved from Tahoe Regional Planning Agency website:
http://www.trpa.org/wp-content/uploads/3.06_Noise_082014.pdf
Figures and Tables
e.i
Laboratory
Calibration Date
Manufacturer
Model
Serial No.
Bruel and Kjaer
Type 2250 Hand
Held Analyzer
3023769
12/11/2017
Bruel and Kjaer
Type 4952A Outdoor
Microphone
2788753
12/22/2017
Bruel and Kjaer
Type 4231 Sound
Calibrator
2394124
8/2/2017
5011�
EUCGB
V ri
Residential land use category
DNL
range,
dBA
,
Typical
DNL,
dBA
Day
level,
dBA
Night
level,
dBA
People
per
square
mile
People
per
square
km
Very noise urban residential
> 65
67
66
58
63,840
24,650
Noisy urban residential
60 to 65
62
61
54
20,000
7.722
Urban and noisy suburban
residential
55 to 60
57
55
49
6,384
2,465
Quiet urban and normal suburban
residential
50 to 55
52
50
44
2,000
772
Quiet suburban residential
45 to 50
47
45
39
638
247
Very quiet suburban and rural
residential
< 45
42
40
34
200
77
'Originally published by the US Department of Transportation in "A Re -analysis of Day -night Sound Level (DNL) as a Function of
Population in the United States," (February 2010).
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 7
a
Y
a`)
U
00
r1
0
N
00
0
c
O
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
Figure 1- Measured Sound Levels
80
70
Q 60
m
.)
ar
H
40
d
30
20
10 ...................._ . .._..._.__.. _ __..
3/1 0:00 3/2 0:00 3/3 0:00 3/4 0:00 3/5 0:00 3/6 0:00 3/7 0:00 3/8 0:00 3/9 0:00
LAeq (Loc 1) LA90 (Loc 1) ,- -LA90 (Loc 2) LAeq (Loc 2)
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 8
7
a
0
c
E
v7
a
H
Y
L
U
®-A
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
0:00
1:00
58.3
59
59
57.2
56.7
61.2
60.7
1:00
2:00
57.1
59.3
58.6
57.2
54.9
59.6
60.1
2:00
3:00
56.1
58.9
59.4
57.2
55.6
59.3
58.4
3:00
4:00
55.6
57.1
58.4
55
55.5
58.3
57.9
4:00
5:00
56.2
56.6
57.9
55
53.8
58.6
58.5
5:00
6:00
57
56
57.9
55.6
54.9
59.9
58.4
6:00
7:00
58.2
66.9
57.5
58.4
58.7
61.9
62.2
7:00
8:00
61.2
62.8
58.5
61.9
60.9
65.1
64.2
8:00
9:00
61.1
62
60.6
65.1
63.3
65.2
65.1
9:00
10:00
60.4
60
61.4
64.6
60.7
64.8
64.6
10:00
11:00
62.4
63.1
61.5
64.3
64.4
64.4
64.5
11:00
12:00
61.4
60.2
62
60.2
64.2
65.6
64.9
12:00
13:00
61.4
61.1
61.7
60.6
61.6
60.8
64.9
65.2
13:00
14:00
60.5
60.1
59.8
59.1
59.6
60.9
65.6
64.4
14:00
15:00
61.2
59.9
59.8
62.2
59.8
61.7
64.4
15:00
16:00
61
60
61.4
63.2
60.3
61.5
60.2
16:00
17:00
59
62.4
61.3
68.4
58.5
60.6
65.2
59.5
17:00
18:00
70.7
74
61.6
60.6
68.3
61.9
61.7
18:00
19:00
71.8
70.8
64.9
61
70.5
64.3
64
19:00
20:00
59.9
60.1
59.6
60.2
58.3
62.7
63.4
20:00
21:00
60.3
58.5
58.6
60.2
57.9
63.6
62.9
21:00
22:00
59.2
60.2
59
61
57.5
62.4
62.2
22:00
23:00
58.3
59.4
59.3
59.8
58.5
63
63.2
23:00
24:00
59.2
59.5
60.3
59.3
57.5
65.9
62.9
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 9
Y
V
V
00
0
N
0000
0
to
0
c
0
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
ED+A
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
10:00 11:00
11:00 12:00
12:00 13:00
13:00 14:00
14:00 15:00
15:00 16:00
16:00 17:00
17:00 18:00
18:00 19:00
19:00 20:00
20:00 21:00
21:00 22:00
22:00 23:00
55.8
55.7
56.6
56.6
53.5
56.7
57.8
56.7
55.5
55.4
55.2
54.7
53
51.8
51.2
51.9
53.2
55.3
57.1
56.9
56.8
54.1
52.1
51.5
50.9
51.6
52.5
55.1
57.3
57.6
56.1
52.2
51
50.2
49.7
49.9
51.7
53.4
55.2
56.4
55.3
55.9
54.1
52.8
52.4
53.4
55.2
57.9
60.8
61.2
60.3
56.2
55.3
53.2
52
52.7
53.7
56.9
59.8
61.5
60.8
56.5 55.5 56.5 55.2 55.2 60.2 60.7
56.4
55.9
55.8
53.7
52.1
52.8
62.5
55.2
54.6
55.7
55.8
55.4 55.1 54.6 56.5
54.4 54.3 54.3 55.8
53.7 54.1
54.2 56.3
61.7 61.2
61.2 61
61.8 60.9
54.6 54.6 54.6 57.5 60.6
55.9 55.8 54 57.8 54.7
55.9 56.5 52.8 57.4 58.4 53.8
56.1 55.7 53.1
56.1 56.9 54.8
56.2 56.9 54.2
53.3 56.4 53.6
56 56.3 53.5
56.4 55.8 53.5
57.4 57
60.3 59.7
58.7 58.9
58.1 58.5
57.8 57.5
58.3 58.4
23:00 24:00 55.2 56.2 56.6 55.6 53.3 57.8 58.2
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 10
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
-7E' k'‘
Ai-4,4ci.:..,:--
\r'Va ' •-''
.,-- ''''.
, •
T,:'''"
,
-Cer•
-, ''''''''
---
. "
' "
,i ,',,i'
kHz
-d-... ,,
kHz
Restaurant
Pavilion
Aerodium
60
51.9
48.7
43.1
51
50.4
51
45.8
39
28.6
Flowrider
77
-
64.3
68
68.5
69
68.9
70.1
68.2
63.6
TOTAL
77
51.9
64.4
68
68.6
69.1
69
70.1
68.2
63.6
Petting Zoo
Aerodium
63
55.2
52.1
46.4
54.4
53.9
54.5
49.8
43.4
33.7
Flowrider
61
-
48.8
52.5
52.9
53.3
52.9
53.5
50.9
44.7
TOTAL
65
55.2
53.8
53.5
56.7
56.6
56.8
55
51.6
45
Kangaroo
Habitat
Aerodium
65
56.9
53.7
48.1
56
55.5
56.2
51.6
45.4
35.9
Flowrider
60
-
48.1
51.8
52.2
52.6
52.2
52.7
50
43.7
- TOTAL
66
56.9
54.8
53.3
57.5
57.3
57.7
55.2
51.3
44.4
Orangutan
Night
Housing
Aerodium
60
51.9
48.7
43.1
51
50.4
51
45.8
39
28.6
Flowrider
55
-
43
46.7
47.1
47.4
46.7
46.6
43.1
35.2
TOTAL
61
51.9
49.7
48.3
52.5
52.2
52.4
49.2
44.5
36.1
Orangutan
Habitat
Domes
Aerodium
62
53.7
50.5
44.9
52.8
52.3
52.9
48
41.4
31.4
Flowrider
53
-
41.8
45.5
45.9
46.1
45.3
45
41.3
32.8
TOTAL
62
53.7
51
48.2
53.6
53.2
53.6
49.8
44.4
35.2
Adventure
Pool
Aerodium
71
62.5
59.4
53.7
61.7
61.2
62.1
57.7
51.8
43
Flowrider
55
-
43.4
47.1
47.6
47.8
47.2
47.2
43.7
36
TOTAL
71
62.5
59.5
54.6
61.9
61.4
62.2
58.1
52.4
43.8
Bar
Aerodium
64
56.1
52.9
47.3
55.2
54.7
55.4
50.7
44.4
34.8
Flowrider
53
-
41.6
45.2
45.7
45.9
45.1
44.7
40.9
32.4
TOTAL
64
56.1
53.2
49.4
55.7
55.2
55.8
51.7
46
36.8
Courtyard
Improvement
s
Aerodium
61
52.7
49.6
43.9
51.8.
51.3
51.8
46.8
40.1
29.9
Flowrider
52
-
40.4
44.1
44.5
44.7
43.7
43.2
39.1
30
TOTAL
61
52.7
50.1
47
52.5
52.2
52.4
48.4
42.6
33
100 m
Aerodium
61
52.8
49.7
44
52
51.4
52
47
40.3
30.2
Flowrider
58
-
45.9
49.6
50.1
50.4
49.9
50.2
47.2
40.3
TOTAL
63
52.8
51.2
50.7
54.2
53.9
54.1
51.9
48
40.7
200 m
Aerodium
55
46.8
43.7
38
45.9
45.2
45.3
39.3
31.5
19.4
Flowrider
51
-
39.9
43.6
44
44.1
43.1
42.5
38.2
28.8
TOTAL
56
46.8
45.2
44.7
48.1
47.7
47.3
44.2
39
29.3
1000
Venetian
Way
Aerodium
50
42.4
39.2
33 5
41 4
40.4
40
32.8
23.5
9 3
Flowrider
48
-
37.2
40.8
41.2
41.2
39.8
38.5
33.3
22
TOTAL
52
42.4
41.3
41.5
44.3
43.8
42.9
39.5
33.7
22.2
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 11
a.
_Ne
7.)
C3
acoustics
EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Consultants in Architectural Acoustics
d^B
n
E
19
Restaurant
Pavilion
Aerodium
54
12.5
22.5
27.5
42.4
47.2
50.6
47
40.1
28.2
Flowrider
76
-
38.1
51.9
59.9
65.8
68.9
71.3
69.2
62.5
TOTAL
77
12.7
38.2
51.9
60
65.9
69
71.3
69.2
62.5
Petting Zoo
Aerodium
58
15.9
25.8
30.9
45.8
50.7
54.2
50.9
44.4
33.2
Flowrider
59
-
22.6
36.4
44.3
50.1
52.9
54.7
51.9
43.6
TOTAL
61
16
27.5
37.5
48.1
53.4
56.6
56.2
52.6
44
Kangaroo
Habitat
Aerodium
59
17.5
27.5
32.5
47.4
52.3
55.9
52.8
46.4
35.4
Flowrider
58
-
21.9
35.7
43.6
49.4
52.2
53.9
51
42.6
TOTAL
62
17.6
28.6
37.4
48.9
54.1
57.4
56.4
52.3
43.4
Orangutan
Night
Housing
Aerodium
54
12.5
22.5
27.5
42.4
47.2
50.6
47
40.1
28.2
Flowrider
52
-
16.8
30.6
38.5
44.2
46.7
47.8
44.1
34.1
TOTAL
56
12.7
23.5
32.3
43.9
49
52.1
50.4
45.6
35.1
Orangutan
Habitat
Domes
Aerodium
56
14.3
24.3
29.3
44.2
49.1
52.6
49.1
42.4
30.9
Flowrider
51
-
15.6
29.4
37.3
42.9
45.3
46.2
42.3
31.7
TOTAL
57
14.5
24.8
32.4
45
50
53.3
50.9
45.4
34.3
Adventure
Pool
Aerodium
65
23.2
33.1
38.2
53.1
58
61.8
58.9
52.8
42.5
Flowrider
53
-
17.2
31
39
44.6
47.2
48.4
44.7
34.9
TOTAL
65
23.2
33.2
39
53.3
58.2
61.9
59.3
53.4
43.2
Bar
Aerodium
59
16.7
26.7
31.7
46.6
51.5
55.1
51.9
45.4
34.3
Flowrider
51
-
15.4
29.1
37.1
42.7
45.1
45.9
41.9
31.3
TOTAL
59
16.8
27
33.6
47.1
52
55.5
52.9
47
36.1
Courtyard
Improvement
s
Aerodium
55
13.4
23.3
28.3
43.2
48.1
51.5
48
41.1
29.4
Flowrider
49
-
14.2
28
35.9
41.5
43.7
44.4
40.1
28.9
TOTAL
56
13.6
23.8
31.2
43.9
49
52.2
49.6
43.6
32.2
100 m
Aerodium
55
13.5
23.5
28.5
43.4
48.2
51.7
48.2
41.3
29.7
Flowrider
56
-
19.7
33.5
41.5
47.2
49.9
51.4
48.2
39.2
TOTAL
58
13.7
25
34.7
45.6
50.7
53.9
53.1
49
39.7
200 m
Aerodium
48
7.5
17.4
22.5
37.3
42
45
40.5
32.6
19
Flowrider
48
-
13.7
27.5
35.4
40.9
43.1
43.7
39.2
27.7
TOTAL
51
8.2
18.9
28.7
39.5
44.5
47.2
45.4
40.1
28.2
1000
Venetian
Way
Aerodium
43
5.2
13
18
32.8
37.2
39.6
33.9
24.6
9.1
Flowrider
45
-
11
24.7
32.6
38
39.8
39.7
34.3
20.9
TOTAL
47
6.3
15.1
25.5
35.7
40.6
42.7
40.7
34.7
21.2
1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997
Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667
Page 12
Y
V
4
c
O
Jungle Island
Biscayne Island
1000 Venetian Way
Proposed
Jungle Island
Figure 1. Aerial photograph of Biscayne Island and 1000 Venetian Way compared to Jungle Island.
.telr,DMMIINIMU=RtaRDVA;
m
c
CD
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
LEGEND
1 AMPHITHEATER UPGRADES
2 WATERFRONT BAR
3 CRYSTAL LAGOON
4 WET BAR
6 RESTAURANT PAVILION
6 LAZY RIVER
7 SPLASH PAD
8 FLOW RIDER
9 EVENT LAWN
10 EVENT BARN
11 RESTROOMS
12 NEST
13 BANYAN DECK
14 PETTING ZOO
15 FLAMINGO HABITAT
16 TREETOP TREKKING
17 KANGAROO HABITAT
18 VIEWING DECK
19 TREETOP TREKKING 11
20 AERODIUM
21 DINING DECK
22 WATERFALL UPGRADES
23 ORANGUTAN HABITAT
24 FOOD TRUCK
25 TREETOP TREKKING III
26 FICUS RE-IGIOSA
27 TIKI BAR
28 ADVENTURE POOL
29 WATER SLIDES
30 RESTROOMS
31 DIMINO TERRACE
32 AMPHITHEATER SEATING
33 COURTYARD UPGRADES
34 FLYING SQUIRREL
•
JUNGLE ISLAND - MASTER PLAN
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
SCALE: 1/32" .1' - 0' O
EoA ■E■E! THRESHOLD
GROUP
Residence nest
location
Water Slide
Figure 2. Aerial photograph of Six Flags Water Slide compared to nearby residence.
BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01
m
co
c
m
N
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
Submitted into the public
recordrecord for item(s)Clerk
on 06/08/2018 City
Resident
Six Flags Noise Impact Study
Agawam, MA
A -Weighted
Sound
Pressure
Level
in dB
re: 20 NPa
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
Measured Noise Levels - Typhoon Ride Operating
Side yard near house deck
365 feet from ride
Representative Screams from Typhoon Ride
Ambient Background
Noise Level
measured Sat 4/07/2007
L90 = 49 dBA
Date: 26 May 07
Time: 14:28:07
Position: 2
20
2:20 PM 2:30 PM 2:40 PM 2:50 PM 3:00 PM 3:10 PM 3:20 PM 3:30 PM 3:40 PM 3:50 PM 4:00 PM 4:10 PM 4:20 PM
BAC Time History TH2007-0526-001 TIME
-o
00Zrd Jafl 1
L 00-9Z90-LOOZHl 4
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
Resident
Six Flags Noise Impact Study
Agawam, MA
90 —
80
70
A -Weighted
Sound 60
Pressure
Level
50
in dB
re: 20 NPa
40
30 —
20
4:48 4:49 4:50 4:51 4:52 4:53 4:54 4:55 4:56 4:57 4:58 4:59 5:00 5:01 5:02 5:03 5:04 5:05 5:06 5:07 5:08 5:09 5:10 5:11
PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM
Ambient Background
Noise Level
measured Sat 4/07/2007
L90 = 45.6 dBA
Measured Ambient Background Noise Levels
Side yard near house deck
365 feet from ride
Representative Screams
from Typhoon Ride
IN
Date: 02 Jun 07
Time: 16:48:36
Position: 2
BAC Time History TH2007-0602-003
TIME
1.01-£1.60-LOOZfd Ja1101 lea
£00-Z090-LOOZH1 4
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
NGL
AND
THE ICONIC EVENT DESTINATION
IN THE HEART OF MIAMI
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
THE ICONIC EVENT DESTINATION
IN THE HEART OF MIAMI
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter from our CEO 3
Introduction 4
Event Spaces 6
Social Gatherings 7
Corporate Events 8
Capacity Charts 9
Contact 10
In the ever -changing events landscape, providing exceptional service
in a contemporary space has always been at the heart of Jungle Island's
philosophy. Now more than ever and as part of Jungle Island's complete
overhaul of its event spaces, the core philosophy of providing authentic,
innovative experiences and superior service remains constant.
After our closure due to Hurricane Irma, we have enhanced Jungle Island's
lush, primal, interactive environment by pairing it off with highly experiential
amenities. The opening of our improved event spaces and catering services
will also provide immersive opportunities that exceed expectations and turn
concepts into real -life experiences.
Currently, featuring nearly 58,000 (200,000) square feet of event space,
Jungle Island provides the ideal venue with high -luxury touchpoints that
raises the standard for all events in Miami. With the opening of the new
Bloom Ballroom, reimagined by Edge of Architecture, the grand space
provides a sensory and cinematic experience that complements any theme,
or event type, whether a corporate function, a children's play party, a team
building adventure, to a full on production.
We invite you to experience these carefully crafted services during your next
event, and we look forward to having you become more than a client, but a
close friend at our home.
Sincerely,
/chi, .geir
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
The newest premier event
destination conveniently
located in the heart of Miami.
Visit us at Watson Island on the MacArthur Causeway with over
200,000 sq feet of event space being released throughout 2018.
Our freshly renovated ballroom and event spaces are sure to be a new
spectacular setting for functions of any size, including parties, corporate
meetings, galas and weddings. Our renowned culinary team is always ready to
please the most discerning palates. Let us guide you with every single detail of
your dream event.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
200,000 Square feet of indoor
& outdoor atmospheres designed
with breathtaking vistas.
•
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/20i8 , City Clerk
TIMELESS BALLROOM
& EVENT SPACES
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
BLOOM SPACES
AREA
MAX SEATING
SQUARE FEET
Ballroom
Salons
Foyers
Terrace
2,000
40 -120
500
600
13,824
1,944
1,928 - 3,036
5,280
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
$OCIAL GATHERING$
Our event specialists will create your personalized event
solution, from extraordinary menus under the direction of
Executive Chef Mark Borowski, to world class atmospheres
and event experiences. From weddings and birthdays to bar
mitzvahs, we will help you design your dream event.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
CORPORATE EVENTS
Whether you are hosting a few guests or a few thousand, our
goal is to ensure that each person feels part of an intimate
ballroom affair. When planning your next team retreat,
conference, holiday party or luncheon, let us create the
perfect experience.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 r
on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk
THIRD FLOOR
Cocktail
Seating
Banquet
Seating
Theatre
Seating
Classroom
Seating
Conference
Seating
U-Shape
Seating
Width/
Length
Square
Feet
Ceiling
Height
Bloom Ballroom+Tanana
2.000
1,000
1500
600
n/a
Na
144'x96'
13.824
14
Bloom South
550
300
550
200
Na
MI
48' x 96'
4.608
14
Bloom Cannel
650
300
550
200 ,
n/a
n/a
48' a 96'
4.608
14
Bloom North
650
300
550
200
n/a
n/a
48' x 96'
4408
14
Bloom South Foyer
500
n/a
n/a
We
n/a
n/a
34' x 70
3,036
12
Bloom North Foyer
n/a
n/a
Na
n/a
n/a
97 x 16'
1928
12
Bloom Terrace
600
250
n/a
Na
Na
n/a
220 a24'
5,280
12
Bloom Baynew
150
120
150
120
40
60
54' x 36'
1,944
12
Bayriew South
684
12
Bayataw Central
666
12
Bayatew North
684
12
Bloom Bayview Foyer
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Na
77x 16'
1152
12
Bloom Bridal Suite
185'x14'
259
12
PARK ENTRY
Main Plaza
Cocktail
Seating
1500
Banquet Theatre Classroom Conference U-Shape Width/ Square Ceiling
Seating Seating Seating Seating Seating Length Feet Height
600
600
n/a
n/a
n/a
8.370 n/a
PARK NEAR WATER
Beach Club
--- Cocktail Banquet Theatre Clateroonl CaMarenee U-Shape: Width(
Seating :Seating. Seating - Saattng Spatleg Seating Langth
300-500
n/e Na n/a n/a
Waterfall Beach
80
n/a n/a n/a n/a
Flamingo Lake
50-100 200-250 n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Square. Ceiling
Feet Height
20.000
1,000
n/a
n/a
n/a
THROUGHOUT PARK
- -
Cocktail
Seating'
Banquet
Seating
Theatre
Seating
n/a
Classroom
Seating
n/a
Conference
Seating _
n/a
U-Shape '
Seating
nta
Width/'.
Length 'r
n/a
Square
Feet
1,000
Ceiling
Height
n/a
The Baryon Tree
50
30
Garden Pavilion 1
75
n/a
36' x 24'
864
Garden Pavilion 2
75
n/a
36' x 24'
864
Garden Pavilion 3
75
n/a
36' x 24'
864
Party Pavilion 1
40
25
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
16' x 24
384
Party Pavilion 2
40
25
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
16 x 24
384
Party Pavilion 3
40
25
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
16' x 24
384
Party Pavilion 4
40
25
n/a
n/a
Na
n/a
16' x 24
384
Upper Level Parking Lot
Ma
n/a
37,500
nla
Lower Level Parking Garage
n/a
n/a
37,500
OPENING �N 2019 1THA011t3tiC'..T PAPK)
,Cocktail i-
Seating
100
Banquet -
Seating
200
Theatre
Seating
n/a
i�laaaroom
Seating
n/a
Conference
Seating
n/a
i Li -Shane
Seating
n/a
Width/
Length
n/a
Square
Feet
1.850
Ceiling
Height -
Japanese Garden
Event Lawn
n/a
n/a
n/a
12.500
n/a
Miami Experiencelroottop)
n/a
n/a
n/a
5.500
n.a
Jungle Theatre
500
n/a
n/a
n/a
F + B Pavilion
1,000
n/a
n/a
n/a
Carousel Bar/Destination Bar Area
60-80
•
n/a
Na
n/a
1C
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) SP.2 .
on 06/08/2018 City Clerk
Address
1111 Parrot Jungle Trail
Miami, Florida 33132
Phone
305-400-7230
Website
jungleisland.com/events
Email
events@jungleisland.comm