Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Samuel J. Dubbin-Jungle Island Noise ImpactsSubmitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 City Clerk Brooks Acoustics Corporation Mr. Samuel J. Dubbin, Esq. Dubbin & Kravetz, LLP 1200 Anastasia Avenue Suite 300 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, Florida 33062 754-229-1450 7 June 2018 Subject: Acoustical Analysis — Jungle Island Noise Impacts on 1000 Venetian Way Residences Dear Mr. Dubbin: As requested, Brooks Acoustics Corporation (BAC) conducted a study of the acoustical report by Edward Dugger + Associates (ED+A) conceming the proposed leasehold improvements and attractions at Jungle Island, and the impact thereof on the adjacent residents at 1000 Venetian Way on Biscayne Island. BAC performed the following tasks: • A review was made of the available documents on the subject matter, including the Dugger report of 15 March 2018. • A review was made of the potential noise impacts from events and activities which will occur in connection with the proposed Jungle Island changes. These noise impacts particularly apply to the residential neighborhoods adjacent to Jungle Island. • A study was made to determine if the Dugger report adequately addressed the acoustical impacts which would be generated by the proposed leasehold improvements. This study shows that the Dugger report is at best preliminary and incomplete. It does not provide adequate information that the beneficiaries of the proposed lease can rely upon, to ensure that the lessee will provide all of the protections against noise disturbances for the existing residential neighborhood, as required under the existing Lease Agreement. Further, the Dugger report is misleading as it underestimates the noise emissions from the proposed leasehold activities and overstates the ambient background sound levels on Biscayne Island. As such, the Dugger report ignores the seriousness and intensity of the noise impacts of Jungle Island on the adjacent residents. Moreover, there are a number technical errors and omissions in the Dugger report which cast additional doubt on its assertions. Therefore, the Dugger report does not support the contention that there will be no noise impact on existing adjacent residents, or provide confidence that the lessor be protected, as required. On the contrary, a simple review of the Dugger report and the Jungle Island plan shows that the operation is likely to cause significant negative noise impacts to the neighboring residents on Biscayne Island, including those at 1000 Venetian Way. \r),IktN N)\\N\\!t\) \1‘),V f - \iy�6� 11A\\,. t ‘,iti\; Cku\.l Analysis BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 2 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk A review of the report by Edward Dugger + Associates, dated 15 March 2018 was conducted. A copy of the report is attached. A summary of the main points of deficiency in the Dugger report is given as follows: 1. Ambient background sound tests were not conducted at the residences on Biscayne Island. No background sound tests to establish the existing conditions were conducted on Biscayne Island at the adjacent residences, such as 1000 Venetian Way. An erroneous assumption was made in the Dugger report, on Page 3, stating, "Though measurements could not be performed on Biscayne Island, it is likely that the residential properties experience similar sound levels as observed on Watson Island". This is in error for several reasons. First, the measurements reported by Dugger were made at the current locations of the Kangaroo exhibit and at the Beach Club on Watson Island. These locations are much closer to the MacArthur Causeway highway than are the residences on Biscayne Island. And as Dugger states, also on Page 3, "traffic activity on the MacArthur Causeway is the primary contributor to the sound environment with sustained increases in measured sound pressure level during periods of higher traffic volume". Since the Dugger test locations on Watson Island were dearly much closer to the highway than the residences on Biscayne Island, the traffic noise will be much higher at those Watson Island locations than at the residences. An aerial view, obtained by BAC, is shown attached. Based on the distances involved, the difference in traffic noise level between Watson Island and Biscayne Island can be calculated, and will be between 10 to 20 decibels (dB), with Biscayne Island being that much lower, or less loud. Thus, when Dugger shows in report Figure 1 that the LA90 background sound level is between 50 and 60 A -weighted decibels (dBA) on Watson Island, it is more likely to be in the 35 to 45 dBA range on Biscayne Island. These lower background sound levels expose the residents to intrusive disturbances to a greater degree than would occur in areas with higher background sound levels. 2. No site plan or map was included in the Dugger report showing the background sound test locations. This omission makes it difficult to evaluate the impact of the background traffic sound, with relation to the residences, and also discounts the effects on the tested sound levels of activities near the Kangaroo exhibit and at the Beach Club at the times of the tests. This renders the tests unreliable. Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 3 3. In the Dugger Impact Analysis many errors and omissions were made. The Dugger report addressed several activities and attractions to be offered by the proposed lessee, Jungle Island. Included in the report as potentially disturbing noise sources are the "Aerodium", "Flowrider", "Zip Line", "Flying Squirrel", and "Beach Club". No map showing the locations of the noise sources and the residences is given. There is no way to confirm the accuracy or validity of the Dugger calculations without knowing the locations of the noise sources relative to the receivers. So these calculations cannot be relied upon. A proposed Jungle Island Master Plan, dated 03.27.2018, was obtained by BAC, please see attached. This plan shows some of the attractions listed by Dugger, such as the "Aerodium", "Flowrider" and "Flying Squirrel", but does not clearly show the "Zip Line" or the "Beach Club". This may not even be the information that Dugger used, so the locations of the noise sources used for the impact analysis are not known. No source noise levels or calculations steps are shown. Essential to any analysis are the source noise levels for each of these activities. Those source noise levels are not included in the Dugger report. Only the calculated results at a variety of locations, which are mostly on Watson Island, are shown. This makes it impossible to evaluate or confirm the validity of Dugger's calculation procedure. Further, each detailed step in the calculation from noise source to receiver should be shown in a valid noise impact estimate. This was not done. Also, no graphic representations were presented to aid in the evaluation of these impact calculations. As there is no way to assess the accuracy or validity of these calculation results, they cannot be relied upon by the Lessor to evaluate the Jungle Island proposal. In fact, the noise impact calculation results are shown for only two out of the five noise sources addressed in the report, the "Aerodium" and the "Flowrider". Further, of the 11 receiver locations presented by Dugger, only 1 location is at a residence. The other 10 locations are in Jungle Island. This demonstrates that the noise impact at the residences was a lower priority for the Dugger study. Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062 BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 - Dubbin & Kravetz LLP - 1000 Venetian Way Page 4 Y L Q) Only mechanical noise was addressed for the "Aerodium" and "Flowrider", not rider N u screaming and shouting 1-2 N Y Q U v According to the Dugger report, the only noise sources at the "Aerodium" and the "Flowrider" Y co are the pumps and fans which operate those devices. However, those facilities are used by 0 v N people as thrill rides, which cause them to shout and scream. The screams can be much -a 00 louder than the mechanical noise and, of course, are much more difficult to control. Y o 0 E-o The mechanical noises are still likely to be above the ambient background at the residences. N v , The rider screaming will be significantly higher in level and more disturbing than the ° mechanical noises. The screams from the "Zip Line" are vastly underestimated. Dugger used noise data obtained from a second hand source for two people passing on a zip line, as 68 dBA at 50 feet. However, BAC has made first hand sound measurements for a similar thrill ride, a water slide. These measured data show that the shouts and screams from the water slide are significantly higher in level, at a greater distance from the ride than Dugger allows. The BAC data were taken at a residence near a Six Flags water park. The screams measured at a distance of 365 feet from the water slide were routinely in the 65 to 75 dBA range at the residence. An aerial photo of the water slide and the nearby residence is attached. Graphs showing measured time history sound level data are also attached. Using those water slide measured data, compared to the Dugger estimate, it is likely that the scream sound levels from the "Zip Line" will be greater than 50 to 60 dBA, or even higher at the Biscayne Island residences. This will put the screams at a higher level than the ambient background sound level and make them intrusive and disturbing to residents. In fact, in the case of the Six Flags water slide, a neighboring resident was driven to seek mental health treatment due to the constant screaming heard at the home. Many of the proposed attractions were not addressed by the Dugger report. A view of the Jungle Island Master Plan, attached, shows significant noise sources which are likely to have significant negative impacts on the residential neighbors. These include the Amphitheater and the Crystal Lagoon, a very large swimming pool. These noise sources were not addressed at all in the Dugger report. With regard to the Crystal Lagoon, such a large swimming facility can accommodate hundreds of bathers. The noise sources will be screaming and shouting similar to the water slide and the zip line attractions, discussed above. However, the sound levels will be magnified by having hundreds of active noise sources instead of just several at a time. The increase in noise levels at the residences can be as much as 10 to 20 dB over the "Zip Line" levels. Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062 BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 5 With regard to the Amphitheater, this is an outdoor music entertainment facility and will present numerous noise control problems and impacts to the nearby residents. Both of these attractions are on the north side of Watson Island, just across the water from the residents on Biscayne Island, including those at 1000 Venetian Way. So, these attractions are likely to have serious negative noise impacts on the residents. Other noise generating attractions shown on the Master Plan but not addressed by Dugger include the water slides, the adventure pool, the waterfall and treetop trekking facilities. The effect of wind on noise transmission was misstated in the Dugger report. The Dugger report states on Page 3, "Wind would provide further attenuation in regard to the residential properties as it typically blows from the southeast". This is inaccurate on several accounts. Firstly, the wind in that local area is usually out of a general southerly direction. This will bring the wind from the proposed Jungle Island location directly across the water to the residents on Biscayne Island. As reported by a resident, out of 7 days in a week, the wind generally comes from the south for 5 days, out the west 1 day and out of the north 1 day. Secondly, noise transmission is increased in the direction of the wind. The noise is carried by the wind, with a noise source being louder at a distance downwind than it is upwind. So with the wind typically out of the south, the noise from Jungle Island to the residents will be increased, not attenuated. Taken as a whole, these errors and omissions in the Dugger report are misleading and cause it to seriously underestimate the negative noise impact that the proposed Jungle Island operation is likely to have on the neighboring residents. 4. The Dugger report does not present planned occupancies, or time of day, and day of the week data. No information was provided on the number of people who would be using the proposed Jungle Island attractions at any one time, the occupancy Toad factors based on the time of day or night, and the day of the week, or the total number of people to use the attraction during any operating period. No information was provided on what the operating hours and days would be. These occupancy figures are undoubtedly available in the Jungle Island business plan, however they were not used for the noise impact study. Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062 111. 0 v 00 0 0 0 0 BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 6 As none of the foregoing was provided, it could not be taken into account when calculating the noise emissions of the proposed uses. Obviously, more people on the attractions corresponds to more noise. Therefore on the basis of this lack of information, the noise impact analysis cannot be relied upon. Further, Jungle Island literature advertises the availability of a number of facilities which can be used for private events. Please see the attached literature. These include outdoor facilities which can accommodate capacities of hundreds to thousands of people. Many of these events will include outdoor music productions, which can cause disturbances to the residential neighbors. Outdoor music entertainment will be used at the Beach, amphitheater and hotel, and at other venues at Jungle Island that will be presented to the public and offered at private events and functions (corporate events and weddings). These private events are particularly difficult to regulate and will likely result in disturbances to the neighbors and continual enforcement headaches for the City. 5. The Dugger report does not present a legitimate noise mitigation design. Unfortunately, given the serious noise impacts that are likely to be imposed on the neighboring residents from the proposed Jungle Island leasehold, very little noise control design effort was presented in the Dugger report. Mechanical systems and patron noise Several vague design concepts were given by Dugger, including the use of "sound pillows" for the "Aerodium" attraction without a definition of those devices or their expected noise control performance. Also, it was suggested by Dugger that the Beach Club roof deck have K-13 sound absorbent material applied to the underside to prevent noise reflections. However, K-13 is not appropriate in this application as it is not a weatherproof material and is specified only for indoor use. So, clearly, no detail design of noise control features for the many noise producing attractions was done. No noise control strategies were developed for reducing the impact on nearby residents of the screams and shouts of thrill ride or swimming lagoon patrons. Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062 a) U T CJ 0 0 N 0 0 0 c 0 BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 7 Sound system noise With regard to the "permanent sound system" for the Beach Club, the Dugger report indicates the need for a locked or password protected system to limit the sound volume. The report also recommends directional loudspeakers pointed inward toward the property and offers to work with the Owner to develop such a system. Obviously, that design effort has not been conducted, and so no one can know if such a design could be successful in this case. So, there are no guarantees that this sound system will meet the existing lease agreement noise requirements. The Dugger report did not address the many other large entertainment venue sound systems that could be installed, at the hotel or at other function spaces. It did mention "distributed loudspeaker" systems, but no analysis was presented of the impact of such a system. However, the report states, "a real-time noise monitoring system could prove to be useful to management and other personnel at the Beach Club". This statement implies that constant monitoring of the Jungle Island facility sound systems would be needed to keep volumes from becoming intrusive. A sophisticated system is required to perform the appropriate sound limiting function. However, no detail design for this was offered in the report. This type of sound monitoring is even more difficult for private function events, where a DJ or live band brings in its own equipment. It is even more difficult to control such intrusive music noise produced by an independent DJ or band that is hired by the private function host. There is nothing in the Dugger report to indicate how the proposed permanent systems and event systems will comply with the sound level requirements of the existing lease agreement. Another aspect of sound system noise that the Dugger report did not address is the predominance of loud thumping bass and drums in much of the music content that is likely to be played on those systems at the entertainment and event venues. The A -weighted sound levels (dBA) discussed by Dugger do not take into account the disturbing low frequency (bass) content. The bass content from these sound systems can be much greater than the ambient background levels as it reaches the nearby residences. It is likely that this will be very intrusive and disturbing to residents. There is no evidence that design efforts were undertaken to address this intrusive, thumping bass issue. Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062 v U A u co EO O o up -a o U a V3j O The traffic volume on MacArthur Causeway is less on the weekends than it is on weekdays, due to fewer people traveling to and from work. With Tess traffic on the weekends, the traffic background noise will be less. By contrast, the recreational use of the proposed Jungle Island attractions will be more intense on the weekends. So the noise intrusions from Jungle Island will be greater on the weekends, at a time when the nearby residents may wish to enjoy the quiet of their home. There was no attempt presented in the Dugger report to investigate the actual sound propagation over the channel between the islands. It was reported that residents at 1000 Venetian Way can clearly hear the parrots squawking and the lions mating on Watson Island, particularly during the morning and evening hours. This indicates the ease with which sound travels over the water, and the jeopardy for significant negative noise impacts from the proposed Jungle Island activities. Conclusions Lacking credible noise control design specifics, for the mechanical noise, the patron produced noise (screaming) and the sound system produced noise, there can be no confidence that the noise generated by the proposed Lessee will not be disturbing and not violate the lease agreement noise requirements. This situation, if allowed, is also likely to become an enforcement nightmare for the City. Please contact me if you have any questions concerning these findings. Very truly yours, BROOKS ACOUSTICS CORPORATION /3 Bennett M. Brooks, PE, FASA, INCE President Attachments Brooks Acoustics Corporation 49 N. Federal Highway Pompano Beach, FL 33062 BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz LLP —1000 Venetian Way Page 8 N Q Discussion v -c Other aspects of the proposed leasehold features that can have significant negative noise impact were 9 not addressed by the Dugger report. These include the traffic background noise variation during the week, and the existing sound propagation over the water channel between Watson Island and Biscayne Island. E U U BAC Proiect Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 — Dubbin & Kravetz — Jungle Island noise Attachments Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk ATTACHMENTS 1- ED+A (Dugger) noise impact report 2- Aerial view of Watson Island and Biscayne Island (from Google Earth) 3- Jungle Island Master Plan 03.27.2018 4- Six Flags noise data 5- Jungle Island Special Events brochure DiA acoustics E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics PROJECT MEMORANDUM Date: 15 March 2018 To: Elie Mimoun Manager ESJ JI Operations, LLC 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail Miami, Florida 33132 From: Sam Shroyer, ASA Irineo Jaimes, ASA Edward Dugger, FAIA ASA NCAC INCE Cc: Brandon Torrellas Amicon Management 7430 NE 4th Court Miami, Florida 33138 Re: Acoustic Consulting Services — Acoustic Study Jungle Island 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail Miami, Florida 33132 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk Elie, This report has been prepared to document analyses performed by Edward Dugger + Associates, P.A. (ED+A) relating to future potential acoustical impacts associated with Jungle Island in Miami, Florida. Acoustical measurements, site visits, and review of the site plan and manufacturer documentation have enabled ED+A to model these impacts and provide mitigation recommendations as necessary. Overall, it has been determined that sound generated by new attractions at Jungle Island will not negatively impact the facility's patrons or nearby residential properties, but ED+A cannot speak to the specific sensitivities of the various animals on the property. Recommendations have been provided to control sound generated throughout the park so as not to disturb nearby residential properties. Please contact ED+A with any questions, comments, or concerns regarding this report or its contents. 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 1 EDA acoustics Introduction Background ESJ JI Operations, LLC ("the Owner") is proposing several modifications to Jungle Island, located at 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail in Miami, Florida. While much of the property will remain in its current state, several new attractions, exhibits, and activities are to be added in the future. ED+A were commissioned by the Owner to determine whether any of the new features could result in any negative acoustical impacts at nearby residential properties or at several locations within the park. E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk Property Information Jungle Island is located at 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail on Watson Island in Miami, Florida. The property has Parks and Recreation zoning and its primary land use is Entertainment. The property is immediately adjacent to the MacArthur Causeway, a high -traffic extension of Interstate-395 which connects downtown Miami to Miami Beach, on its southwest and the Biscayne Bay on its north. There are many other properties with Parks and Recreation on Watson Island directly to the east of the property and on the opposite side of the MacArthur Causeway. Additionally, there are several residential properties on Biscayne Island to the north with roughly 700-ft. to 800- ft. of water separating the properties. Most of these residential properties are located on the north side of the island across Venetian Way. Noise -Sensitive Receivers A condominium at 1000 Venetian Way is the nearest residential property to 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail. Thus, it is the primary focus of this study in regard to noise which may be generated by the project. The properties are separated by a minimum of 700-ft. at their nearest point. :'Methodology Acoustical Measurements Long-term acoustical measurements were conducted at two locations on the property to document the existing ambient sound conditions. ED+A's acoustical measurement system logged sound pressure levels near the current location of Kangaroo Exhibit from Thursday, March 1 to Tuesday, March 6. The equipment was then relocated to the Beach Club area on the western portion of the property, where it remained until it was retrieved by ED+A personnel on Thursday, March 8. Details relating to ED+A's measurement equipment have been included in Table 1. 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 2 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk IED+A acoustics E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics Existing Ambient Sound Environment The resulting data indicate that traffic activity on the MacArthur Causeway is the primary contributor to the sound environment with sustained increases in measured sound pressure level during periods of higher traffic volume. While the measured sound levels do not vary considerably between the two locations, it is apparent that the contributing sound sources — particularly the MacArthur Causeway — have greater impact at the Beach Club area on the northwest end of the property. Figure 1 demonstrates A -weighted equivalent -continuous sound pressure levels (LAeq) and ninetieth -percentile -exceeded sound pressure levels (LA90) for each one -hour increment of the measurement period. LAeq is a time -averaged value which represents the logarithmic average of all sound measured during a given time period and LA90 is representative of the "residual sound level" at a measurement location as it excludes the greatest values measured (the upper -tenth percentile) to reduce the impact of any inconsistent sound sources. LA90 is particularly useful when evaluating sound in relatively quiet residential areas. The measured values are consistent with what ANSI/ASA S12.9-2013 Part 3: Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound — Part 3: Short-term Measurements with an Observer Presenti'l identifies as "very noisy urban residential" and "noisy urban residential" land use categories (see Table 2). Though measurements could not be performed on Biscayne Island, it is likely that the residential properties experience similar sound levels as observed on Watson Island, though they would be expected to be slightly less, particularly during late -night and early -morning hours. Therefore, ED+A believe that sound pressure levels on Biscayne Island would be consistent with LAso measured on Watson Island. Impact Analysis Sound sources which may be of concern to the City of Miami or nearby residents are addressed individually in the following sections. Modeled sound pressure levels are included in Tables 5 and 6. It is important to note that ED+A's calculations did not account for several factors which would further attenuate sound including the obstructed acoustical Tine -of -sight conditions created by heavy foliage and building structures on the property, as well as some atmospheric conditions such as wind velocity and direction. Wind would provide further attenuation in regard to the residential properties as it typically blows from the southeast. Sound absorption provided by air was included in the modeling process, but the air attenuation coefficients used were taken from ANSI/ASA S1.26-2014 Methods Used for Calculation of the Absorption of Sound by the Atmosphere [2] data provided for an air temperature of 35° Celsius (95° Fahrenheit) and 100% relative humidity to account for the Tess favorable weather conditions which are 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 3 ED+A acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics typical of Miami's climate. Additionally, prior research [3] has concluded that the standard calculation procedures [4] used to model sound propagation are just as accurate when modeling the travel of sound over water as they are land. Though sound pressure levels as they would exist at the various animal exhibits have been calculated, ED+A are not experienced in animal bioacoustics and cannot comment on what would or would not be appropriate for any specific species aside from humans. For this reason, unweighted sound pressure levels calculated by ED+A have been included in a separate section as they can be adjusted to reflect varying sensitivity to sound. The A -weighting spectrum accounts for human sensitivity to sound across the frequency spectrum and is the appropriate measure for sound at all areas where the impact of sound to guests or residential properties is a concern. Aerodium The most significant source of sound to be introduced to the property is an Aerodium wind tunnel, an enclosure with a large fan which provides an experience similar to skydiving. Aerodium Technologies provided ED+A with sound level data which could be used to model the attraction's impact to both nearby areas and to 1000 Venetian Way. It should be noted that an acoustically -absorptive sound barrier will be provided by the manufacturer and installed around the equipment. The distance between the Aerodium and 1000 Venetian Way has been estimated by ED+A to be nearly 1,100-ft., which would result in sound attenuation by geometric divergence of 36 dB. Accounting for air absorption, the attraction would generate 43 dBA at 1000 Venetian Way and would therefore not result in any clearly discernible impact. Aerodium Technologies documents also demonstrated the effect of "sound pillows" which may be installed for further sound attenuation; ED+A did not account for the use of this type of product during the calculation process, but would recommend their use to further reduce sound levels which would be experienced by those nearby on the Jungle Island property. Flowrider Flowrider provided ED+A with sound pressure level data measured by Eilar Associates at an existing attraction in California. While the equipment is similar, the model which is to be installed at Jungle Island features one additional pump. For this reason, 3 dB were added to each octave -band sound pressure level to account for a second source of sound. The attraction was then modeled in a similar fashion as the Aerodium, resulting in 45 dBA at 1000 Venetian Way. However, the design and installation of the Flowrider will effectively serve to greatly reduce this level to render its impact insignificant. Not only will the Restaurant Pavilion 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 4 L Q: U 0 0 ED+A acoustics E D W A R D DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics obstruct the acoustical line -of -sight between the attraction and receiving property, but sound generated by the Flowrider's pumps will be mostly contained within the attraction and will quickly diminish as observers move away from the equipment. Zip Line Though ED+A did not have the ability to measure sound levels associated with an existing zip line, J.C. Brennan & Associates, Inc. reported in a Nevada Environmental Impact Statement [5] that "two individuals passing by on (a) zip line resulted in a maximum noise level of 68 dBA... at a distance of 50 feet." The document indicated that their measured data included "people yelling, and the metal -on -metal sound from the cable and the sheave wheel. Per the inverse -square law, the maximum sound level that would be generated by a zip line at a distance of 700-ft. would be roughly 45 dBA. As this sound level is substantially lower than the ambient sound level, ED+A can state with certainty that the zip line will not create any detrimental acoustical impact at any residential properties. It is important to note that the zip lines will be at an even greater distance from 1000 Venetian Way. Flying Squirrel The Flying Squirrel feature is an indoor attraction for children featuring a trampoline. The most notable sounds associated with the Flying Squirrel will result from children's enjoyment of the attraction in the form of yelling and screaming. However, the trampoline is enclosed within a building structure so these sounds will only be audible within and immediately outside of the Flying Squirrel. Beach Club It is recommended that the Beach Club have a permanent sound system, or "house system," which will be used by all performers and DJ's. It is also advised that any digital signal processor utilized in the audio system have the ability to limit sound at various frequencies to specific output levels. It is beneficial if the system be set to the appropriate settings and be locked or password -protected so that only management or assigned personnel can make further adjustments. Directional line -array loudspeakers can be utilized to direct sound to the appropriate areas and away from Biscayne Island. These types of loudspeakers are designed to direct sound only in the intended direction and not to their rear. In general, the loudspeakers and live entertainment should be pointed in the southwest, facing inward toward the property. ED+A will work with the Owner further to review any loudspeaker specifications and provide feedback as requested. A distributed audio system throughout the venue consisting of multiple smaller loudspeakers is recommended, as opposed to using a few large loudspeakers. A 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 5 EDiA acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics distributed speaker system reduces the need for increasing the overall output level to enable sound to reach all of the necessary areas as the loudspeaker system does not need to compensate for sound level attenuation provided by the distance between the source and its receivers. These same methods of noise control are also recommended for any speakers which may be located outside of the structure in the beach area. Sound pressure levels at a specified distance from a loudspeaker can be calculated by utilizing the reference sound power levels or sound pressure levels provided by loudspeaker manufacturers. There is an approximate 900-ft. distance between the Beach Club and 1000 Venetian Way, which would result in an attenuation of 48 dB from a point source. However, this value could vary based on the specifications of the loudspeakers which comprise the audio system. Although not imperative, a real-time noise monitoring system could prove to be useful to management and other personnel at the Beach Club. Such a system would provide instant feedback and visual decibel readings as they are generated by the entertainment occurring at the time, allowing for adjustments to be made if the levels are deemed to be inappropriate. At the request of the Owner, ED+A can assist in the selection and installation of this equipment. Finally, if the Beach Club is to have an exposed roof deck, an acoustically -absorptive product such as International Cellulose Corporation's K-13 spray -on material or a similar product should be added to the underside of the deck. This will prevent reflections and reduce the propagation of sound to other areas while providing a more acoustically satisfying environment for patrons. ED+A will provide additional information for products that can be used at the Owner's request. Conclusion This investigation of future sound sources and operations at Jungle Island has led to ED+A's conclusion that they will not create any detrimental impact on neighboring residential properties. It should again be noted that this conclusion was reached although ED+A's modeling and calculations were performed in a conservative manner. ED+A have provided recommendations that will enable the Beach Club to operate in a manner consistent with its surroundings and will continue to work with the Owner to ensure that this is achieved. 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 6 V v N N Co) Q CO o E N L. o & o 0 _o o 0 v V) L. o acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics References [1] ANSI/ASA S12.9-2013/Part 3 American National Standard Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound — Part 3: Short -Term Measurements with an Observer Present [2] ANSI/ASA S1.26-2014 American National Standard Methods for Calculation of the Absorption of Sound by the Atmosphere [3] Kelsall, Tim. (2012). Measurements of Propagation of Sound Over Water at Low to Mid Frequencies Applicable to Wind Turbine Noise Calculation. Canadian Acoustics /Acoustique Canadienne, Vol. 40 (3), pp. 58-59. [4] ISO 9613(2) Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors — Part 2: General Method of Calculation [5] Unknown author. (2014). Heavenly Mountain Resort Epic Discovery Project E/R/EIS/EIS Noise. Retrieved from Tahoe Regional Planning Agency website: http://www.trpa.org/wp-content/uploads/3.06_Noise_082014.pdf Figures and Tables e.i Laboratory Calibration Date Manufacturer Model Serial No. Bruel and Kjaer Type 2250 Hand Held Analyzer 3023769 12/11/2017 Bruel and Kjaer Type 4952A Outdoor Microphone 2788753 12/22/2017 Bruel and Kjaer Type 4231 Sound Calibrator 2394124 8/2/2017 5011� EUCGB V ri Residential land use category DNL range, dBA , Typical DNL, dBA Day level, dBA Night level, dBA People per square mile People per square km Very noise urban residential > 65 67 66 58 63,840 24,650 Noisy urban residential 60 to 65 62 61 54 20,000 7.722 Urban and noisy suburban residential 55 to 60 57 55 49 6,384 2,465 Quiet urban and normal suburban residential 50 to 55 52 50 44 2,000 772 Quiet suburban residential 45 to 50 47 45 39 638 247 Very quiet suburban and rural residential < 45 42 40 34 200 77 'Originally published by the US Department of Transportation in "A Re -analysis of Day -night Sound Level (DNL) as a Function of Population in the United States," (February 2010). 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 7 a Y a`) U 00 r1 0 N 00 0 c O acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics Figure 1- Measured Sound Levels 80 70 Q 60 m .) ar H 40 d 30 20 10 ...................._ . .._..._.__.. _ __.. 3/1 0:00 3/2 0:00 3/3 0:00 3/4 0:00 3/5 0:00 3/6 0:00 3/7 0:00 3/8 0:00 3/9 0:00 LAeq (Loc 1) LA90 (Loc 1) ,- -LA90 (Loc 2) LAeq (Loc 2) 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 8 7 a 0 c E v7 a H Y L U ®-A acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics 0:00 1:00 58.3 59 59 57.2 56.7 61.2 60.7 1:00 2:00 57.1 59.3 58.6 57.2 54.9 59.6 60.1 2:00 3:00 56.1 58.9 59.4 57.2 55.6 59.3 58.4 3:00 4:00 55.6 57.1 58.4 55 55.5 58.3 57.9 4:00 5:00 56.2 56.6 57.9 55 53.8 58.6 58.5 5:00 6:00 57 56 57.9 55.6 54.9 59.9 58.4 6:00 7:00 58.2 66.9 57.5 58.4 58.7 61.9 62.2 7:00 8:00 61.2 62.8 58.5 61.9 60.9 65.1 64.2 8:00 9:00 61.1 62 60.6 65.1 63.3 65.2 65.1 9:00 10:00 60.4 60 61.4 64.6 60.7 64.8 64.6 10:00 11:00 62.4 63.1 61.5 64.3 64.4 64.4 64.5 11:00 12:00 61.4 60.2 62 60.2 64.2 65.6 64.9 12:00 13:00 61.4 61.1 61.7 60.6 61.6 60.8 64.9 65.2 13:00 14:00 60.5 60.1 59.8 59.1 59.6 60.9 65.6 64.4 14:00 15:00 61.2 59.9 59.8 62.2 59.8 61.7 64.4 15:00 16:00 61 60 61.4 63.2 60.3 61.5 60.2 16:00 17:00 59 62.4 61.3 68.4 58.5 60.6 65.2 59.5 17:00 18:00 70.7 74 61.6 60.6 68.3 61.9 61.7 18:00 19:00 71.8 70.8 64.9 61 70.5 64.3 64 19:00 20:00 59.9 60.1 59.6 60.2 58.3 62.7 63.4 20:00 21:00 60.3 58.5 58.6 60.2 57.9 63.6 62.9 21:00 22:00 59.2 60.2 59 61 57.5 62.4 62.2 22:00 23:00 58.3 59.4 59.3 59.8 58.5 63 63.2 23:00 24:00 59.2 59.5 60.3 59.3 57.5 65.9 62.9 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 9 Y V V 00 0 N 0000 0 to 0 c 0 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk ED+A acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 10:00 11:00 11:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 18:00 18:00 19:00 19:00 20:00 20:00 21:00 21:00 22:00 22:00 23:00 55.8 55.7 56.6 56.6 53.5 56.7 57.8 56.7 55.5 55.4 55.2 54.7 53 51.8 51.2 51.9 53.2 55.3 57.1 56.9 56.8 54.1 52.1 51.5 50.9 51.6 52.5 55.1 57.3 57.6 56.1 52.2 51 50.2 49.7 49.9 51.7 53.4 55.2 56.4 55.3 55.9 54.1 52.8 52.4 53.4 55.2 57.9 60.8 61.2 60.3 56.2 55.3 53.2 52 52.7 53.7 56.9 59.8 61.5 60.8 56.5 55.5 56.5 55.2 55.2 60.2 60.7 56.4 55.9 55.8 53.7 52.1 52.8 62.5 55.2 54.6 55.7 55.8 55.4 55.1 54.6 56.5 54.4 54.3 54.3 55.8 53.7 54.1 54.2 56.3 61.7 61.2 61.2 61 61.8 60.9 54.6 54.6 54.6 57.5 60.6 55.9 55.8 54 57.8 54.7 55.9 56.5 52.8 57.4 58.4 53.8 56.1 55.7 53.1 56.1 56.9 54.8 56.2 56.9 54.2 53.3 56.4 53.6 56 56.3 53.5 56.4 55.8 53.5 57.4 57 60.3 59.7 58.7 58.9 58.1 58.5 57.8 57.5 58.3 58.4 23:00 24:00 55.2 56.2 56.6 55.6 53.3 57.8 58.2 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 10 acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics -7E' k'‘ Ai-4,4ci.:..,:-- \r'Va ' •-'' .,-- ''''. , • T,:'''" , -Cer• -, '''''''' --- . " ' " ,i ,',,i' kHz -d-... ,, kHz Restaurant Pavilion Aerodium 60 51.9 48.7 43.1 51 50.4 51 45.8 39 28.6 Flowrider 77 - 64.3 68 68.5 69 68.9 70.1 68.2 63.6 TOTAL 77 51.9 64.4 68 68.6 69.1 69 70.1 68.2 63.6 Petting Zoo Aerodium 63 55.2 52.1 46.4 54.4 53.9 54.5 49.8 43.4 33.7 Flowrider 61 - 48.8 52.5 52.9 53.3 52.9 53.5 50.9 44.7 TOTAL 65 55.2 53.8 53.5 56.7 56.6 56.8 55 51.6 45 Kangaroo Habitat Aerodium 65 56.9 53.7 48.1 56 55.5 56.2 51.6 45.4 35.9 Flowrider 60 - 48.1 51.8 52.2 52.6 52.2 52.7 50 43.7 - TOTAL 66 56.9 54.8 53.3 57.5 57.3 57.7 55.2 51.3 44.4 Orangutan Night Housing Aerodium 60 51.9 48.7 43.1 51 50.4 51 45.8 39 28.6 Flowrider 55 - 43 46.7 47.1 47.4 46.7 46.6 43.1 35.2 TOTAL 61 51.9 49.7 48.3 52.5 52.2 52.4 49.2 44.5 36.1 Orangutan Habitat Domes Aerodium 62 53.7 50.5 44.9 52.8 52.3 52.9 48 41.4 31.4 Flowrider 53 - 41.8 45.5 45.9 46.1 45.3 45 41.3 32.8 TOTAL 62 53.7 51 48.2 53.6 53.2 53.6 49.8 44.4 35.2 Adventure Pool Aerodium 71 62.5 59.4 53.7 61.7 61.2 62.1 57.7 51.8 43 Flowrider 55 - 43.4 47.1 47.6 47.8 47.2 47.2 43.7 36 TOTAL 71 62.5 59.5 54.6 61.9 61.4 62.2 58.1 52.4 43.8 Bar Aerodium 64 56.1 52.9 47.3 55.2 54.7 55.4 50.7 44.4 34.8 Flowrider 53 - 41.6 45.2 45.7 45.9 45.1 44.7 40.9 32.4 TOTAL 64 56.1 53.2 49.4 55.7 55.2 55.8 51.7 46 36.8 Courtyard Improvement s Aerodium 61 52.7 49.6 43.9 51.8. 51.3 51.8 46.8 40.1 29.9 Flowrider 52 - 40.4 44.1 44.5 44.7 43.7 43.2 39.1 30 TOTAL 61 52.7 50.1 47 52.5 52.2 52.4 48.4 42.6 33 100 m Aerodium 61 52.8 49.7 44 52 51.4 52 47 40.3 30.2 Flowrider 58 - 45.9 49.6 50.1 50.4 49.9 50.2 47.2 40.3 TOTAL 63 52.8 51.2 50.7 54.2 53.9 54.1 51.9 48 40.7 200 m Aerodium 55 46.8 43.7 38 45.9 45.2 45.3 39.3 31.5 19.4 Flowrider 51 - 39.9 43.6 44 44.1 43.1 42.5 38.2 28.8 TOTAL 56 46.8 45.2 44.7 48.1 47.7 47.3 44.2 39 29.3 1000 Venetian Way Aerodium 50 42.4 39.2 33 5 41 4 40.4 40 32.8 23.5 9 3 Flowrider 48 - 37.2 40.8 41.2 41.2 39.8 38.5 33.3 22 TOTAL 52 42.4 41.3 41.5 44.3 43.8 42.9 39.5 33.7 22.2 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 11 a. _Ne 7.) C3 acoustics EDWARD DUGGER + ASSOCIATES, P.A. Consultants in Architectural Acoustics d^B n E 19 Restaurant Pavilion Aerodium 54 12.5 22.5 27.5 42.4 47.2 50.6 47 40.1 28.2 Flowrider 76 - 38.1 51.9 59.9 65.8 68.9 71.3 69.2 62.5 TOTAL 77 12.7 38.2 51.9 60 65.9 69 71.3 69.2 62.5 Petting Zoo Aerodium 58 15.9 25.8 30.9 45.8 50.7 54.2 50.9 44.4 33.2 Flowrider 59 - 22.6 36.4 44.3 50.1 52.9 54.7 51.9 43.6 TOTAL 61 16 27.5 37.5 48.1 53.4 56.6 56.2 52.6 44 Kangaroo Habitat Aerodium 59 17.5 27.5 32.5 47.4 52.3 55.9 52.8 46.4 35.4 Flowrider 58 - 21.9 35.7 43.6 49.4 52.2 53.9 51 42.6 TOTAL 62 17.6 28.6 37.4 48.9 54.1 57.4 56.4 52.3 43.4 Orangutan Night Housing Aerodium 54 12.5 22.5 27.5 42.4 47.2 50.6 47 40.1 28.2 Flowrider 52 - 16.8 30.6 38.5 44.2 46.7 47.8 44.1 34.1 TOTAL 56 12.7 23.5 32.3 43.9 49 52.1 50.4 45.6 35.1 Orangutan Habitat Domes Aerodium 56 14.3 24.3 29.3 44.2 49.1 52.6 49.1 42.4 30.9 Flowrider 51 - 15.6 29.4 37.3 42.9 45.3 46.2 42.3 31.7 TOTAL 57 14.5 24.8 32.4 45 50 53.3 50.9 45.4 34.3 Adventure Pool Aerodium 65 23.2 33.1 38.2 53.1 58 61.8 58.9 52.8 42.5 Flowrider 53 - 17.2 31 39 44.6 47.2 48.4 44.7 34.9 TOTAL 65 23.2 33.2 39 53.3 58.2 61.9 59.3 53.4 43.2 Bar Aerodium 59 16.7 26.7 31.7 46.6 51.5 55.1 51.9 45.4 34.3 Flowrider 51 - 15.4 29.1 37.1 42.7 45.1 45.9 41.9 31.3 TOTAL 59 16.8 27 33.6 47.1 52 55.5 52.9 47 36.1 Courtyard Improvement s Aerodium 55 13.4 23.3 28.3 43.2 48.1 51.5 48 41.1 29.4 Flowrider 49 - 14.2 28 35.9 41.5 43.7 44.4 40.1 28.9 TOTAL 56 13.6 23.8 31.2 43.9 49 52.2 49.6 43.6 32.2 100 m Aerodium 55 13.5 23.5 28.5 43.4 48.2 51.7 48.2 41.3 29.7 Flowrider 56 - 19.7 33.5 41.5 47.2 49.9 51.4 48.2 39.2 TOTAL 58 13.7 25 34.7 45.6 50.7 53.9 53.1 49 39.7 200 m Aerodium 48 7.5 17.4 22.5 37.3 42 45 40.5 32.6 19 Flowrider 48 - 13.7 27.5 35.4 40.9 43.1 43.7 39.2 27.7 TOTAL 51 8.2 18.9 28.7 39.5 44.5 47.2 45.4 40.1 28.2 1000 Venetian Way Aerodium 43 5.2 13 18 32.8 37.2 39.6 33.9 24.6 9.1 Flowrider 45 - 11 24.7 32.6 38 39.8 39.7 34.3 20.9 TOTAL 47 6.3 15.1 25.5 35.7 40.6 42.7 40.7 34.7 21.2 1239 SE Indian Street, Suite 103, Stuart, Florida 34997 Office: (772) 286-8351 www.edplusa.com AA 26000667 Page 12 Y V 4 c O Jungle Island Biscayne Island 1000 Venetian Way Proposed Jungle Island Figure 1. Aerial photograph of Biscayne Island and 1000 Venetian Way compared to Jungle Island. .telr,DMMIINIMU=RtaRDVA; m c CD Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk LEGEND 1 AMPHITHEATER UPGRADES 2 WATERFRONT BAR 3 CRYSTAL LAGOON 4 WET BAR 6 RESTAURANT PAVILION 6 LAZY RIVER 7 SPLASH PAD 8 FLOW RIDER 9 EVENT LAWN 10 EVENT BARN 11 RESTROOMS 12 NEST 13 BANYAN DECK 14 PETTING ZOO 15 FLAMINGO HABITAT 16 TREETOP TREKKING 17 KANGAROO HABITAT 18 VIEWING DECK 19 TREETOP TREKKING 11 20 AERODIUM 21 DINING DECK 22 WATERFALL UPGRADES 23 ORANGUTAN HABITAT 24 FOOD TRUCK 25 TREETOP TREKKING III 26 FICUS RE-IGIOSA 27 TIKI BAR 28 ADVENTURE POOL 29 WATER SLIDES 30 RESTROOMS 31 DIMINO TERRACE 32 AMPHITHEATER SEATING 33 COURTYARD UPGRADES 34 FLYING SQUIRREL • JUNGLE ISLAND - MASTER PLAN Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk SCALE: 1/32" .1' - 0' O EoA ■E■E! THRESHOLD GROUP Residence nest location Water Slide Figure 2. Aerial photograph of Six Flags Water Slide compared to nearby residence. BAC Project Letter PJ2018-1268-L01 m co c m N Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk Submitted into the public recordrecord for item(s)Clerk on 06/08/2018 City Resident Six Flags Noise Impact Study Agawam, MA A -Weighted Sound Pressure Level in dB re: 20 NPa 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Measured Noise Levels - Typhoon Ride Operating Side yard near house deck 365 feet from ride Representative Screams from Typhoon Ride Ambient Background Noise Level measured Sat 4/07/2007 L90 = 49 dBA Date: 26 May 07 Time: 14:28:07 Position: 2 20 2:20 PM 2:30 PM 2:40 PM 2:50 PM 3:00 PM 3:10 PM 3:20 PM 3:30 PM 3:40 PM 3:50 PM 4:00 PM 4:10 PM 4:20 PM BAC Time History TH2007-0526-001 TIME -o 00Zrd Jafl 1 L 00-9Z90-LOOZHl 4 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk Resident Six Flags Noise Impact Study Agawam, MA 90 — 80 70 A -Weighted Sound 60 Pressure Level 50 in dB re: 20 NPa 40 30 — 20 4:48 4:49 4:50 4:51 4:52 4:53 4:54 4:55 4:56 4:57 4:58 4:59 5:00 5:01 5:02 5:03 5:04 5:05 5:06 5:07 5:08 5:09 5:10 5:11 PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Ambient Background Noise Level measured Sat 4/07/2007 L90 = 45.6 dBA Measured Ambient Background Noise Levels Side yard near house deck 365 feet from ride Representative Screams from Typhoon Ride IN Date: 02 Jun 07 Time: 16:48:36 Position: 2 BAC Time History TH2007-0602-003 TIME 1.01-£1.60-LOOZfd Ja1101 lea £00-Z090-LOOZH1 4 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk NGL AND THE ICONIC EVENT DESTINATION IN THE HEART OF MIAMI Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk THE ICONIC EVENT DESTINATION IN THE HEART OF MIAMI Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from our CEO 3 Introduction 4 Event Spaces 6 Social Gatherings 7 Corporate Events 8 Capacity Charts 9 Contact 10 In the ever -changing events landscape, providing exceptional service in a contemporary space has always been at the heart of Jungle Island's philosophy. Now more than ever and as part of Jungle Island's complete overhaul of its event spaces, the core philosophy of providing authentic, innovative experiences and superior service remains constant. After our closure due to Hurricane Irma, we have enhanced Jungle Island's lush, primal, interactive environment by pairing it off with highly experiential amenities. The opening of our improved event spaces and catering services will also provide immersive opportunities that exceed expectations and turn concepts into real -life experiences. Currently, featuring nearly 58,000 (200,000) square feet of event space, Jungle Island provides the ideal venue with high -luxury touchpoints that raises the standard for all events in Miami. With the opening of the new Bloom Ballroom, reimagined by Edge of Architecture, the grand space provides a sensory and cinematic experience that complements any theme, or event type, whether a corporate function, a children's play party, a team building adventure, to a full on production. We invite you to experience these carefully crafted services during your next event, and we look forward to having you become more than a client, but a close friend at our home. Sincerely, /chi, .geir Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk The newest premier event destination conveniently located in the heart of Miami. Visit us at Watson Island on the MacArthur Causeway with over 200,000 sq feet of event space being released throughout 2018. Our freshly renovated ballroom and event spaces are sure to be a new spectacular setting for functions of any size, including parties, corporate meetings, galas and weddings. Our renowned culinary team is always ready to please the most discerning palates. Let us guide you with every single detail of your dream event. Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk 200,000 Square feet of indoor & outdoor atmospheres designed with breathtaking vistas. • Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/20i8 , City Clerk TIMELESS BALLROOM & EVENT SPACES Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk BLOOM SPACES AREA MAX SEATING SQUARE FEET Ballroom Salons Foyers Terrace 2,000 40 -120 500 600 13,824 1,944 1,928 - 3,036 5,280 Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk $OCIAL GATHERING$ Our event specialists will create your personalized event solution, from extraordinary menus under the direction of Executive Chef Mark Borowski, to world class atmospheres and event experiences. From weddings and birthdays to bar mitzvahs, we will help you design your dream event. Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk CORPORATE EVENTS Whether you are hosting a few guests or a few thousand, our goal is to ensure that each person feels part of an intimate ballroom affair. When planning your next team retreat, conference, holiday party or luncheon, let us create the perfect experience. Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 r on 06/08/2018 , City Clerk THIRD FLOOR Cocktail Seating Banquet Seating Theatre Seating Classroom Seating Conference Seating U-Shape Seating Width/ Length Square Feet Ceiling Height Bloom Ballroom+Tanana 2.000 1,000 1500 600 n/a Na 144'x96' 13.824 14 Bloom South 550 300 550 200 Na MI 48' x 96' 4.608 14 Bloom Cannel 650 300 550 200 , n/a n/a 48' a 96' 4.608 14 Bloom North 650 300 550 200 n/a n/a 48' x 96' 4408 14 Bloom South Foyer 500 n/a n/a We n/a n/a 34' x 70 3,036 12 Bloom North Foyer n/a n/a Na n/a n/a 97 x 16' 1928 12 Bloom Terrace 600 250 n/a Na Na n/a 220 a24' 5,280 12 Bloom Baynew 150 120 150 120 40 60 54' x 36' 1,944 12 Bayriew South 684 12 Bayataw Central 666 12 Bayatew North 684 12 Bloom Bayview Foyer n/a n/a n/a n/a Na 77x 16' 1152 12 Bloom Bridal Suite 185'x14' 259 12 PARK ENTRY Main Plaza Cocktail Seating 1500 Banquet Theatre Classroom Conference U-Shape Width/ Square Ceiling Seating Seating Seating Seating Seating Length Feet Height 600 600 n/a n/a n/a 8.370 n/a PARK NEAR WATER Beach Club --- Cocktail Banquet Theatre Clateroonl CaMarenee U-Shape: Width( Seating :Seating. Seating - Saattng Spatleg Seating Langth 300-500 n/e Na n/a n/a Waterfall Beach 80 n/a n/a n/a n/a Flamingo Lake 50-100 200-250 n/a n/a n/a n/a Square. Ceiling Feet Height 20.000 1,000 n/a n/a n/a THROUGHOUT PARK - - Cocktail Seating' Banquet Seating Theatre Seating n/a Classroom Seating n/a Conference Seating _ n/a U-Shape ' Seating nta Width/'. Length 'r n/a Square Feet 1,000 Ceiling Height n/a The Baryon Tree 50 30 Garden Pavilion 1 75 n/a 36' x 24' 864 Garden Pavilion 2 75 n/a 36' x 24' 864 Garden Pavilion 3 75 n/a 36' x 24' 864 Party Pavilion 1 40 25 n/a n/a n/a n/a 16' x 24 384 Party Pavilion 2 40 25 n/a n/a n/a n/a 16 x 24 384 Party Pavilion 3 40 25 n/a n/a n/a n/a 16' x 24 384 Party Pavilion 4 40 25 n/a n/a Na n/a 16' x 24 384 Upper Level Parking Lot Ma n/a 37,500 nla Lower Level Parking Garage n/a n/a 37,500 OPENING �N 2019 1THA011t3tiC'..T PAPK) ,Cocktail i- Seating 100 Banquet - Seating 200 Theatre Seating n/a i�laaaroom Seating n/a Conference Seating n/a i Li -Shane Seating n/a Width/ Length n/a Square Feet 1.850 Ceiling Height - Japanese Garden Event Lawn n/a n/a n/a 12.500 n/a Miami Experiencelroottop) n/a n/a n/a 5.500 n.a Jungle Theatre 500 n/a n/a n/a F + B Pavilion 1,000 n/a n/a n/a Carousel Bar/Destination Bar Area 60-80 • n/a Na n/a 1C Submitted into the public record for item(s) SP.2 . on 06/08/2018 City Clerk Address 1111 Parrot Jungle Trail Miami, Florida 33132 Phone 305-400-7230 Website jungleisland.com/events Email events@jungleisland.comm