HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittals at 09-07-16 PZAB Mtng9/i12016 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes Online Sunshine
re, 6: or -Cc - 171) 4*
Select Year: 2016 11 Go
The 201.6 Florida Statutes
Title XI Chapter 163 View Entire
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL Chapter
RELATIONS PROGRAMS
163.3215 Standing to enforce local comprehensive plans through development orders.—
(1) Subsections (3) and (4) provide the exclusive methods for an aggrieved or adversely affected party to
appeal and challenge the consistency of a development order with a comprehensive plan adopted under this part.
The local government that issues the development order is to be named as a respondent in all proceedings under
this section. Subsection (3) shall not apply to development orders for which a local government has established a
process consistent with the requirements of subsection (4). A local government may decide which types of
development orders will proceed under subsection (4). Subsection (3) shall apply to all other development orders
that are not subject to subsection (4).
(2) As used in this section, the term "aggrieved or adversely affected party" means any person or local
government that will suffer an adverse effect to an interest protected or furthered by the local government
comprehensive plan, including interests related to health and safety, police and fire protection service systems,
densities or intensities of development, transportation facilities, health care facilities, equipment or services, and
environmental or natural resources. The alleged adverse interest may be shared in common with other members of
the community at large but must exceed in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons.
The term includes the owner, developer, or applicant for a development order.
(3) Any aggrieved or adversely affected party may maintain a de novo action for declaratory, injunctive, or
other relief against any local government to challenge any decision of such local government granting or denying an
application for, or to prevent such local government from taking any action on, a development order, as defined in
s. 163.3164, which materially alters the use or density or intensity of use on a particular piece of property which is
not consistent with the comprehensive plan adopted under this part, The de novo action must be filed no later
than 30 days following rendition of a development order or other written decision, or when all local administrative
appeals, if any, are exhausted, whichever occurs later.
(4) If a local government elects to adopt or has adopted an ordinance establishing, at a minimum, the
requirements listed in this subsection, the sole method by which an aggrieved and adversely affected party may
challenge any decision of local government granting or denying an application for a development order, as defined
in s, 163.3164, which materially alters the use or density or intensity of use on a particular piece of property, on
the basis that it is not consistent with the comprehensive plan adopted under this part, is by an appeal filed by a
petition for writ of certiorari filed in circuit court no later than 30 days following rendition of a development order
or other written decision of the local government, or when all local administrative appeals, if any, are exhausted,
whichever occurs later. An action for injunctive or other relief may be joined with the petition for certiorari.
Principles of judicial or administrative res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to these proceedings. Minimum
components of the local process are as follows:
(a) The local process must make provision for notice of an application for a development order that materially
alters the use or density or intensity of use on a particular piece of property, including notice by publication or
mailed notice consistent with the provisions of ss, 125.66(4)(b)2. and 3. and 166.041(3)(c)2.b. and c., and must
require prominent posting at the job site. The notice must be given within 10 days after the filing of an application
for a development order; however, notice under this subsection is not required for an application for a building
http://www.legstote.11.us/Statutes/index,ei'm3Aph_mode=l0isplay_Statute&Search_String•&URL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163 321 S,httnl 1/3
1I? sty.-
121e4/e ve, 4/ FUTURE LAND USE
Goal LU-1: Maintain a kd use pattern that (1) protects nd enhances the quality of life in
the City's neighborhoods throu h co uni lan in , (2) fosters redevelopment and
revitalization of blighted or declining areas; (3) promotes and facilitates economic
development and diversification, and the growth of job opportunities n warkfor
develo meat 2.11116i in the city; (4) fosters the growth and developme owntown as a
regional center of domestic and International commerce, culture .x en a inment; (5)
promotes the efficient use of land and minimizes land use conf ,hile p a;tecting and
preserving residential sections within neighborhoods; (6) prof- a d� s es the ci
significant natural and coastal resources; and-(7) protects t in �� rift' a quality
City's existing neighborhoods by insuring public n• e, g`f 't appella
regarding changes in existing zoning and land use :rions:+� 6 discou
roHferation of urban sprawl$ per Ch163.3177i
Objective LU-1.1: Ensure that land and
fostering a high quality of life in
facilities that meet or exceed the rr
the Capital Improvements Elemen
Plan.
Policy LU-1.1.1: Deve
that results in
upon the avail
standar adopte
pot water, park
an a s provided to me
vements Eam
ervices and facili
Board and Ioal
nt to pare
ent regulation _ onajtent with
uding the ti f public
el service LO •dopted in
e Miami e e Neighborhood
ers author'
e density
Ilc facilities)
n the CIE, sped al
and recre
new de lent or redevelopment
of land use shall be contingent
or exceed the minimum LOS
sewer, solid waste, stormwater,
ation facilities. The public services
quirements shall be consistent with the
uaranteed in an enforceable agreement. The
public schools when the Miami -Dade County
is in the county implement school concurrency
...........____._.
)(i), F.S
Planning Department, with the assistance of various City
encies, will (1) continuously monitor land development activities to
with the adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map (contained in
f the MCNP including FLUM, Weilfield Protection Area, Wetlands and
aps as amended from time to time) and the goals, objectives, and
e Future Land Use element of the MCNP; (2) monitor all proposed
ents to land development regulations to ensure consistency with the MCNP
d will forward its recommendation on such amendments to the Planning Advisory
nlnr„and Agog Board and to the City Commission; (3) continuously monitor the
current and projected LOS standards provided by public facilities; and (4) will perform
the required concurrency review of proposed development, as required by Florida
Statutes and administrative rules,
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015
1
Requested Comprehensive Plan Amendments
PZAB
Wednesday, September 7, 2016
Elvis Cruz 631 NE 57 Street Miami, Florida 33137
(305) 754-1420 ElvisCruz@mac.com
First request: Strike the proposed modification of Goal LU-1, "through community planning"
Second and third requests: Note that the city requires maintaining low density uses in west
Flagami:
Policy LU-1,1.9, The City will maintain low to moderate density uses in the West
Flagami area of the city...
Using that same authority to maintain low density in a neighborhood, and to Maintain a land use
pattern that protects and enhances the quality of life in the City's neighborhoods, here are two
requested Comp Plan amendments:
The City will maintain the current low density uses in its low -density residential single family
and duplex (T3) neighborhoods and protect them from intrusive up -zonings or incompatible
uses, Incompatible uses includeparking facilities or any structure higher than two stories.
Any transitions created between arterial streets corridors and abutting low -density residential
single family and duplex (T3) neighborhoods shall be accomplished by downzoning the property
along the corridor to T4, and not by up -zoning the residential T3 property.
Forth request; Regarding Historic Preservation, there is nothing in the Comp Plan that gives
historic preservation any enforceable teeth. Here is a requested amendment:
historically designated properties and districts shall be protected from any structural or zoning
changes which adversely affect their historic, architectural, or aesthetic character. Historic
properties or districts shall not be up -zoned.