HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit A - SUBExhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
Volume 1
MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
GOALS
OBJECTIVES
POLICIES
City of Miami Planning Department
444 SW 2nd Avenue • Miami, FL 33130
October 2015 December 2017
The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989 and has
been amended by the City Commission through ct bcr 22, 2015. December 14, 2017.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
i
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
ii
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
Volume 1
MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
GOALS OBJECTIVES POLICIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF AMENDING ORDINANCES VI
FUTURE LAND USE 1
URBAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 14
The Downtown Miami Master Plan 15
REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTERS 15
Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center 16
Health District Regional Activity Center 17
INTERPRETATION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP 19
CONSERVATION 19
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION 19
COMMERCIAL RECREATION 20
MARINE FACILITIES 20
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 20
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL 21
Low DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 21
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 21
HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 22
Little Havana Target Area 22
Southeast Overtown/Park West 22
Brickell, Omni, and River Quadrant 22
Low DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL 22
MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL 23
MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 23
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL 23
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) 24
GENERAL COMMERCIAL 24
INDUSTRIAL 25
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) 25
CORRESPONDENCE TABLE - ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 27
HOUSING 28
SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS 35
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE 40
POTABLE WATER 41
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 44
TRANSPORTATION 47
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES 80
PORT OF MIAMI 80
MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 81
PORT OF MIAMI RIVER 82
PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 87
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 99
NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION 107
EDUCATION 112
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 121
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 130
APPENDICES
Appendix LU-1
2020 Future Land Use Map
Urban Central Business District
Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center
Residential Density Increase Areas
Edgewater Intensity Increase Area
Health/Civic Center District
Wellfield Protection Area
Wetlands Map
General Soils Map
Appendix PW-1
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update - September 10, 2015
Appendix TR-1
Existing and Future Transportation Map Series and analytical assumption used to determine the
existing and projected levels of services for roadways, bicycles and pedestrian facilities.
Appendix PA-1
Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Property Table — July 22, 2010
Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Property Map -- July 22, 2010
Appendix CM-1
Floodplains Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Map
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
iv
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
Appendix EDU-1
Public school and ancillary facility locations
Appendix CI-1
Capital Improvements Program and Multi -Year Capital Plan
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
v
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
LIST OF AMENDING ORDINANCES
The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted in 1989 and substantially amended in 1991 in
response to Florida Department of Community Affairs review comments. The ordinance adopting the
Comprehensive Plan, including subsequent text amendments (only), are as follows:
Ordinance
Date of Adoption
Description of Ordinance
10544
February 9, 1989
Adopted the MCNP 1989-2000 with modifications that supersedes the
MCNP (September 1985) and Addendum, provided support documents are
not adopted with the plan.
10700
January 11, 1990
Amended the definition of the Land Use Element to refine the definitions of
Residential, Office and Industrial; amended the Housing Element Objective
1.3 and Policy 1.3.4 and deleted Policy 1.3.5 pertaining to community -based
residential facilities, adult congregate living facilities, family homes and
family group and group homes; and corrected a scrivener's error.
10701
January 11, 1990
Amended the Drainage Sub -Element, Policy No. 2.1.3, specifying which
storm sewers in the city will be designed for a 1-in-5 year event and
establishing a specific LOS standard for the remainder of the storm sewers;
Coastal Management Sub -Element, Policy 4.1.2, defining and designating
the Coastal High -Hazard Area within the city; and adopted consistent LOS
standards in both the Drainage Sub -Element and Policy No. 1.2.3 (d) of the
CIP Element.
10832
January 24, 1991
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Interpretation of Future Land Use
Maps; Housing; Sanitary and Storm Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge; Potable Water; Solid Waste Collection; Transportation; Ports,
Aviation & Related Facilities; Parks, Recreation & Open Space; Coastal
Management; Natural Resource Conservation; and Capital Improvements
and Intergovernmental Coordination elements.
10833
January 24, 1991
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Map Plan by changing land use
designations that affect approximately 5-percent of the total land area of the
City.
11207
December 1, 1994
Allowed professional offices, tourist & guest homes, and museums within
historic districts/structures within single family, duplex and medium density
multi -family residential areas.
11242
March 27, 1995
Allowed small-scale, limited commercial uses as accessory uses within
medium, density multi -family areas.
11496
May 22, 1997
Allowed professional offices, tourist & guest homes, museums, and private
clubs or lodges within historic districts/structures within single family, duplex
and medium density multi -family residential areas; density and intensity
restricted to the structure(s).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
vi
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
Ordinance
Date of Adoption
Description of Ordinance
11779
March 23, 1999
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Housing; Sanitary and Storm
Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Potable Water; Solid
Waste Collection; and Parks, Recreation & Open Space elements according
to 1995 EAR -based recommendations.
11781
March 23, 1999
Amended the Interpretation of Future Land Use Map to conditionally include
residential uses to the general commercial land use designation.
11782
March 23, 1999
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map to add
"Restricted Parks and Recreation" and "Marine Facilities" land use
classifications.
11864
November 16, 1999
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Element to adopt the designation of
an "urban infill" area to meet State requirements regarding school siting and
co -location.
11961
September 14, 2000
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Element, Policy LU-1.1.11, to exclude
Virginia Key, Watson Island, and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay
having a "conservation" land use and zoning classification from the Urban
Infill Area.
12332
February 27, 2003
Amended the Transportation Element of the MCNP in accordance with
recommendations of the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal Report; revisions to
the "Report of Sufficiency Issues with Responses by the City of Miami" in
response to the Florida Department of Community Affairs; affirmation of the
designation of an "urban infill" area adopted by Ordinance 11864; and in
accordance with the designation of an "urban streets" category of public
thoroughfares.
12333
February 27, 2003
Amended the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element of the MCNP to
include specific goals associated with a new park in Little Haiti.
12346
March 27, 2003
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map to add a
"Light Industrial" land use classification.
12442
November 25, 2003
Rescinded Ordinance Nos. 12332, 12333 and 12346; updated the
Transportation Element, added policies associated with a new park in Little
Haiti, and added the "Light Industrial" land use classification.
12445
November 25, 2003
Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to include the
designation of "Regional Activity Centers" within the City of Miami.
12446
November 25, 2003
Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to designate the
Buena Vista Regional Activity Center, and amended the Future Land Use
Map to designate the Florida East Coast (FEC) Buena Vista Yard as a
Regional Activity Center.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
vii
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
Ordinance
Date of Adoption
Description of Ordinance
12536
May 6, 2004
Amended the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the MCNP in
accordance to recommendations from the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal
Report; amended the Future Land Use Element by deleting an objective and
policies related to Intergovernmental Coordination by transferring them into
the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
12635
December 4, 2004
Amended the Coastal Management, Natural Resource Conservation and
Capital Improvements elements of the MCNP in accordance to
recommendations from the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
12741
November 3, 2005
Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP and the Future Land
Use Map to designate the Downtown Miami Master Plan an Urban Central
Business District.
12786
March 23, 2006
Amends certain policies of the Future Land Use, Housing, Parks Recreation
& Open Space, Coastal Management and Capital Improvements elements
of the MCNP to incorporate language necessary to implement the Miami 21
project.
12966
January 24, 2008
Adding a new Educational Element and amending and adding certain
policies to the Capital Improvement and Intergovernmental element of the
MCNP to incorporate language necessary to implement Public School
Concurrency.
13043
November 13, 2008
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Housing; Sanitary and Storm
Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Potable Water; Solid
Waste Collection, Transportation, Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities,
Parks, Recreation & Open Space, Coastal Management, Natural Resource
Conservation, Capital Improvements; and Intergovernmental Coordination
elements according to 2005 EAR -based recommendations.
13049
January 29, 2009
Amended the MCNP by incorporating the annual update to the Capital
Improvements Element and 2008 — 2009, Five (5) year Schedule of Capital
Improvements.
13115
October 22, 2009
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map
section, to remove, modify and incorporate new land use categories, as well
as to adjust the density and intensity provisions within the land use
categories to implement the Miami 21 project.
13144
February 25, 2010
Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to designate the
Health District Regional Activity Center, and amended the 2020 Future Land
Use Map to designate the Health District as a Regional Activity Center.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
viii
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THE
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END OF
THIS DOCUMENT.
13157
April 22, 2010
Amending the MCNP Natural Ground Water, Potable Water, Natural
Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements and Intergovernmental
Coordination elements to incorporate a 20-year Water Supply Facilities
Work Plan.
13043
July 22, 2010
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities
Port of Miami River Sub -element; and Coastal Management Element
according to the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between the Intervenor
"The Miami River Marine Group Inc.", The Department of Community Affairs
and the City of Miami.
13356
January 10, 2013
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map; Parks,
Recreation & Open Space, and Capital Improvements elements, in order to
revise the Level Of Service standard for Parks, Recreation and Open Space
for concurrency purposes.
13416
Ocotber 24, 2013
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map to
establish the Park West Residential Density Increase Area Overlay
permitting up to 500 dwelling units per acre.
13550
September 10, 2015
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use, Potable Water, Coastal
Management, Natural Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements and
Intergovernmental Coordination Elements to incorporate a 20-year Water
Supply Facilities Work Plan Update.
13567
October 22, 2015
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map to
establish the Miami River Residential Density Increase Area Overlay
permitting up to 400 dwelling units per acre.
13666
February 23, 2017
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use, Interpretation of the Future Land Use
Map, and Housing elements to accommodate a residential density increase
when development accommodates a specific mix of workforce, affordable,
and extremely low income housing.
December 14, 2017
Amended the Transportation Element of the MCNP in accordance to
recommendations from the 2015 Evaluation and Appraisal Review as well
as minor changes to the Future Land Use, Housing, Capital Improvements,
Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities, and Intergovernmental Coordination
Elements to ensure internal consistency.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
ix
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
FUTURE LAND USE
Goal LU-1: Maintain a land use pattern that (1) protects and enhances the quality of life in the
City's neighborhoods; (2) fosters redevelopment and revitalization of blighted or declining
areas; (3) promotes and facilitates economic development and the growth of job opportunities
in the city; (4) fosters the growth and development of downtown as a regional center of
domestic and international commerce, culture and entertainment; (5) promotes the efficient
use of land and minimizes land use conflicts while protecting and preserving residential
sections within neighborhoods; (6) protects and conserves the city's significant natural and
coastal resources; and (7) protects the integrity and quality of the City's existing
neighborhoods by insuring public notice, input and appellant rights regarding changes in
existing zoning and land use regulations.
Objective LU-1.1: Ensure that land and development regulations are consistent with
fostering a high quality of life in all areas, including the timely provision of public
facilities that meet or exceed the minimum level of service (LOS) standards adopted in
the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan.
Policy LU-1.1.1: Development orders authorizing new development or redevelopment
that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon
the availability of public facilities that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards
adopted in the CIE, specifically sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water,
parks and recreation, and transportation facilities. The public services and facilities
provided to meet concurrency requirements shall be consistent with the Capital
Improvements Element, or guaranteed in an enforceable agreement. The public
services and facilities will include public schools when the Miami -Dade County School
Board and local governments in the county implement school concurrency pursuant to
paragraph 163.3177(12)(i), F.S.
Policy LU-1.1.2: The City's Planning Department, with the assistance of various City
departments and agencies, will (1) continuously monitor land development activities to
ensure compliance with the adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map (contained in Appendix
LU-1 of the MCNP including FLUM, Wellfield Protection Area, Wetlands and General
Soils maps as amended from time to time) and the goals, objectives, and policies of the
Future Land Use element of the MCNP; (2) monitor all proposed amendments to land
development regulations to ensure consistency with the MCNP and will forward its
recommendation on such amendments to the Planning Advisory Board and to the City
Commission; (3) continuously monitor the current and projected LOS standards
provided by public facilities; and (4) will perform the required concurrency review of
proposed development, as required by Florida Statutes and administrative rules.
Policy LU-1.1.3: The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all areas of the
city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2) the adverse impacts of
future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public health and safety, or
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
natural or man-made amenities; (3) transportation policies that divide or fragment
established neighborhoods; and (4) degradation of public open space, environment, and
ecology. Strategies to further protect existing neighborhoods through the development
of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements will be incorporated into
the City's land development regulations.
Policy LU-1.1.4: The City will continue to aggressively address code violations in its
neighborhoods through the implementation of code enforcement strategies and
initiatives with the intent of preserving and enhancing neighborhood environmental
conditions.
Policy LU-1.1.5: The Planning Department, with the assistance of various City
departments and agencies, shall annually monitor steps taken to fulfill the Goals,
Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) of the MCNP and biennially report the status of the
GOPs to the Planning Advisory Board and City Commission, including, but not limited
to, improving measurability of objectives.
Policy LU-1.1.6: The City's street and storm sewer improvement projects will provide
curb and gutter, and street landscaping, unless deemed to be physically or economically
infeasible.
Policy LU-1.1.7: Land development regulations and policies will allow for the
development and redevelopment of well -designed mixed -use neighborhoods that
provide for the full range of residential, office, live/work spaces, neighborhood retail, and
community facilities in a walkable area and that are amenable to a variety of
transportation modes, including pedestrianism, bicycles, automobiles, and mass transit.
Policy LU-1.1.8: The City's Planning Department will be responsible for coordinating
the City's land development regulations and policies with those of Miami -Dade County
and adjacent municipalities, and in particular: with respect to impacts to infrastructure,
contiguous development with regard to physical height and mass transitions, and public
open space.
Policy LU-1.1.9: The City will maintain low to moderate density uses in the West
Flagami area of the city (as shown on Figure 111.1 of Volume II — Data and Analysis of
the MCNP) as necessary to protect the secondary aquifer recharge area. (See Natural
Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Policy AR-1.2.1.)
Policy LU-1.1.10: The City's land development regulations will encourage high density
residential development and redevelopment in close proximity to Metrorail and
Metromover stations.(See Transportation Policy TR 1.5.2 TR-2.1.3 and Housing Policy
HO-1.1.9.)
Policy LU-1.1.11: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia
Key, Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay, that have a land use
and zoning classification of Conservation, as an Urban Infill Area pursuant to Miami -
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 2
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Dade County's designation of an Urban Infill Area lying generally east of the Palmetto
Expressway and including all of the City of Miami. Within this area, the concentration
and intensification of development around centers of activity shall be emphasized with
the goals of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and the viability of
commercial areas. Priority will be given to infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive
reuse of underutilized land and structures, the redevelopment of substandard sites,
downtown revitalization and the development of projects that promote public
transportation (See Policy TR-1.1.1.). Maintenance of transportation levels of service
within this designated Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency Exception Area shall be
in accordance with the adopted Transportation Corridors level of service standards and
the City of Miami Person Trip Methodology as set forth in Objective TR-1.7. and related
Policies Policies TR-1.1.2 and 1.1.3 of the Transportation Element of the MCNP as well
as Appendix TR-1.
Policy LU-1.1.12: In order to encourage the development and maintenance of
educational facilities in the City of Miami, the City's Land Use policies permit schools in
all land use classifications except Conservation, Public Parks and Recreation, and
Industrial. During pre -development program planning and site selection activities, the
City shall coordinate with Miami -Dade Public Schools and continue to seek, where
feasible and mutually acceptable, to co -locate schools with other facilities such as parks,
libraries, and community centers to the extent possible.
Policy LU-1.1.13: The City shall review and evaluate the areas designated Urban Infill
Area (UIA) and/or Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) within two years
of the adoption of this policy to determine, but not limited to, the following: the
appropriateness of the areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; the benefits and/or
disadvantages resulting from the inclusion (or exclusion) of these areas within the UTA
and/or the TCEA; the strategies to support mobility and alternative modes of
transportation within those areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; and the
strategies to address urban design and network connectivity to improve mobility within
those areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA.
Policy LU-1.1.14: Improve facility and program accessibility through implementation of
the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Policy LU-1.1.15: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.1.16: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.1.17: The City will integrate the existing and planned multi -modal
transportation systems with existing and future developments. (See Objective TR-2.1)
Policy LU-1.1.18: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.1.19: The City will encourage the incorporation of transit facilities within
private development to integrate access to alternative modes with direct access and
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 3
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
synergies within new mixed use developments. This includes the co -location of transit
stations and public common areas of private developments. (See Policy TR- 2.1.4.)
Objective LU-1.2: Promote, facilitate, and catalyze the redevelopment and
revitalization of blighted, declining or threatened residential, commercial and
industrial areas through a variety of public, private, and public -private redevelopment
initiatives and revitalization programs including, where appropriate, historic
designations.
Policy LU-1.2.1: The City defines blighted neighborhoods as areas characterized by
the prevalence of older structures with major deficiencies and deterioration, high
residential vacancies, widespread abandonment of property, litter and poor
maintenance of real property. Declining neighborhoods are defined as areas
characterized by the prevalence of structures having minor deficiencies, a general need
for improvements in real property, significant declines in real property values, high
vacancy rates in commercial structures and increasing difficulty in obtaining insurance.
Neighborhoods threatened with decline are defined as areas characterized by significant
but infrequent property maintenance neglect, an aging housing stock, declining property
values, general exodus of traditional residents and influx of lower income households.
Policy LU-1.2.2: The City's land development policies will be consistent with affordable
housing objectives and policies adopted in the Housing Element of the MCNP.
Policy LU-1.2.3: The City's priorities in implementing, facilitation, and encouraging
redevelopment and revitalization projects shall be determined on an area specific basis
in accordance with the adopted Consolidated Plan, Fiscal Years 2004-2009, adopted
redevelopment plans, specific neighborhood and area plans, the 2007 Parks and Public
Spaces Master Plan, and the land development regulations, as appropriate and as
incorporated in the MCNP by reference in accordance with F.A.C. 9J-5.005(2)(g).
Policy LU-1.2.4: The City will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding
Community Redevelopment Districts and will continue to implement plans for the Omni
and Southeast Overtown/Park West as Community Redevelopment Districts.
Policy LU-1.2.5: The City will continue to develop information programs on the
availability of redevelopment opportunities within the city.
Objective LU-1.3: The City will continue to encourage commercial, office and industrial
development within existing commercial, office and industrial areas; increase the
utilization and enhance the physical character and appearance of existing buildings;
encourage the development of well -designed, mixed -use neighborhoods that provide
for a variety of uses within a walkable area in accordance with neighborhood design
and development standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land
development regulations and other initiatives; and concentrate new commercial and
industrial activity in areas where the capacity of existing public facilities can meet or
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 4
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
exceed the minimum standards for Level of Service (LOS) adopted in the Capital
Improvement Element (CIE).
Policy LU-1.3.1: The City will continue to provide incentives for commercial
redevelopment and new construction in designated Neighborhood Development Zones
(NDZ), the Empowerment Zone, the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfield Redevelopment
Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted areas. Such commercial
redevelopment and new construction shall be conducted in accordance with
neighborhood design and development standards adopted as a result of the
amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives. Such
incentives may be offered through the building facade treatment program, Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and other redevelopment assistance
programs.
Policy LU-1.3.2: The City will continue to encourage the expansion of existing buildings
and new construction through the private sector by assisting in making available
commercial loan funds for rehabilitation and small business loans and seed moneys,
particularly to local minority businesses and encouraging the maximum participation,
especially through public/private partnerships, of financial institutions, chambers of
commerce, the Beacon Council, other business organizations, property owners and
residents of the areas. Priority areas include, but are not limited to, designated
Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ), the Empowerment Zone, the Enterprise
Zone, the Brownfield Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other
targeted areas.
Policy LU-1.3.3: Pursuant to Ch.163.3177(6)(a),F.S., the City shall maintain regulatory
incentives and criteria that encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial
Working Waterfronts as defined in Ch.342.07,F.S.., particularly in the "Port of Miami
River" Subelement to guide future development within the Miami River Corridor.
Policy LU-1.3.4: The City will continue to work with the Miami -Dade County School
Board to ensure the expansion of educational facilities in areas that are easily accessible
by public transit and facilitate the expansion of job training/job placement programs
offered to youths (full time and summer terms) and low-income persons.
Policy LU-1.3.5: The City will continue to promote through its land development
regulations, the creation of high intensity activity centers which may be characterized by
mixed -use and specialty center development. Such activity centers will be in accordance
with the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and neighborhood design and
development standards adopted as a result of amendments to the City's land
development regulations and other initiatives.
Policy LU-1.3.6: The City will continue to encourage a diversification in the mix of
industrial and commercial activities and tenants through strategic and comprehensive
marketing and promotion efforts so that the designated Neighborhood Development
Zones (NDZ), the Empowerment Zone, the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfield
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 5
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted areas are
buffered from national and international cycles.
Policy LU-1.3.7: The City will continue to use the City's Enterprise Zone, Empowerment
Zone, Commercial Business Corridors, and Brownfield Redevelopment Area strategies
to stimulate economic revitalization, and encourage employment opportunities. (Policy
PA-3.3.10)
Policy LU-1.3.8: The City will foster or develop and implement job training, vocational,
and educational programs to assist the City's existing and future residents, water
dependent and water related businesses and uses along the Miami River, in achieving
economic self-sufficiency utilizing government resources as necessary, and will
continue to work with appropriate State and County agencies to direct training programs
and other technical assistance, to support minority and semi -skilled residents of the city
including, without limitation, their involvement in recreational and commercial working
waterfronts along the Miami River as defined by Ch. 342.07, F.S. (Policy PA-3.3.11).
Policy LU-1.3.9: The City will continue to concentrate Community Development efforts
in small geographic areas that have special opportunities and/or potential for
redevelopment consistent with implementation of small -area action plans that have the
support of neighborhood residents and business owners.
Policy LU-1.3.10: The City will continue to aggressively address code violations in its
neighborhoods through the implementation of ongoing and new neighborhood
improvements, and code enforcement strategies and initiatives; and will adopt and
enforce performance standards appropriate to preserve and enhance the physical
condition and appearance of commercial and industrial areas in the city by July 2009.
The City will report on an annual basis, what has been accomplished to fulfill the
requirements of this policy.
Policy LU-1.3.11: The City's land use regulations will provide incentives for the inclusion
of day care facilities near major employment centers.
Policy LU-1.3.12: The City's land use regulations will permit neighborhood -based health
care facilities.
Policy LU-1.3.13: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.3.14: The City will continue to enforce urban design guidelines for public
and private projects which shall be consistent with neighborhood character, history, and
function, and shall be in accordance with the neighborhood design and development
standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land development
regulations and other initiatives.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
6
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy LU-1.3.15: The City will continue to encourage a development pattern that
enhances existing neighborhoods by developing a balanced mix of uses including areas
for employment, shopping, housing, and recreation in close proximity to each other.
Objective LU-1.4: Continue the growth of Downtown Miami, expand its role as a center
of domestic and international commerce, further its development as a regional center
for the performing arts and other cultural and entertainment activities and develop an
urban residential base.
Policy LU-1.4.1: [Reserved].
Policy LU-1.4.2: The City will continue to investigate and, where appropriate, create
management districts, funded by special assessments to provide extra services and
special events needed to attract visitors and residents to the retail core, and other
special retail shopping areas in downtown.
Policy LU-1.4.3: The City will continue to promote an active pedestrian sidewalk
environment along the ground floor frontage of buildings on "pedestrian streets" through
land development regulations.
Policy LU-1.4.4: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.4.5: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.4.6: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.4.7: The City will continue to enforce regulations within downtown to ensure
that retail signage is of high quality and consistent with the design and development
objectives for downtown.
Policy LU-1.4.8: The City will continue to enforce land development regulations as
necessary in order to encourage rehabilitation and sensitive, adaptive reuse of historic
properties and older structures in downtown, and to exempt rehabilitation projects from
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) mitigation fees.
Policy LU-1.4.9: The City will continue to promote rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of
vacant and underutilized spaces and provide incentives for rehabilitation of older
buildings in downtown.
Policy LU-1.4.10: The City will continue to develop modifications to existing regulations
with the intent of providing greater flexibility in the design and implementation of mixed -
use developments within the general Downtown area and particularly along the Miami
River up to and including 5th Street consistent with the Port or Miami River Sub -Element.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
7
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy LU-1.4.11: The City will continue to streamline the development application for
development approvals to simplify and standardize the process, while ensuring that the
regulatory intent of the approvals is maintained.
Policy LU-1.4.12: The City will continue to implement the Downtown DRI development
orders for downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West, and seek approval for future
increments of development in a timely manner.
Objective LU-1.5: Land development regulations will protect the city's unique natural
and coastal resources, its neighborhoods, and its historic and cultural heritage.
Policy LU-1.5.1: Development orders in the city will be consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies contained in the Natural Resource Conservation and Coastal
Management elements of the MCNP.
Policy LU-1.5.2: Land use regulations and development policies will be consistent with
the intent and purpose of Miami -Dade County's Waterfront Charter Amendment,
Shoreline Development Review Ordinance, rules of the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve
Management Area, and other appropriate requirements regarding waterfront access and
management.
Policy LU-1.5.3: Notice of application for special permits or other such administrative
land use or zoning permits provided for in the future, shall be provided to any NET
registered homeowners associations or neighborhood associations thirty days prior to
issuance of the special permit or such administrative land use or zoning permits provided
for in the future zoning and land use regulations and promptly after issuance of the
decision with explanation of appeal procedures allowing sufficient time for such appeals.
Policy LU-1.5.4: Notice of application requiring public hearings shall be provided to any
NET registered homeowner and neighborhood associations and to owners within a
certain number of feet as provided for in the City code.
Objective LU-1.6: Regulate the development or redevelopment of real property within
the city to insure consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy LU-1.6.1: The City hereby adopts the 2020 Future Land Use Map, referenced
and contained in Appendix LU-1 of the MCNP. The "Interpretation of the Future Land
Use Map" section of this element, which follows these land use goals, objectives and
policies, establishes the activities and facilities allowed within each land use category
appearing on the adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map, and the City's land development
regulations shall be consistent with the 2020 Future Land Use Map.
Policy LU-1.6.2: [Reserved]
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
8
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy LU-1.6.3: The City's Planning Department shall review all proposals to amend
the City's Zoning Ordinance and any other land development regulations, and shall
report as to the consistency between any proposed amendment and the MCNP, to the
Planning Advisory Board, the City's "local planning agency," which will then forward its
recommendation to the City Commission for approval and adoption.
Policy LU-1.6.4: Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning Atlas that has been deemed
to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by the Planning Department,
shall require a level of service (LOS) review and a finding from the Planning Department
that the proposed amendment will not result in a LOS that falls below the adopted
minimum standards described in Policy CI-1.2.3, and will not be in conflict with any
element of the MCNP. Based on its evaluation, and on other relevant planning
considerations, the Planning Department will forward a recommended action on said
amendment to the Planning Advisory Board, which will then forward its recommendation
to the City Commission.
Policy LU-1.6.5: The City may continue to use special district designations as a land
development regulation instrument for the purpose of accomplishing specific
development objectives in particular areas of the city.
Policy LU-1.6.6: The City will continue to enforce signage regulations to ensure the
quality of life in the city's neighborhoods.
Policy LU-1.6.7: The City will provide adequate opportunity for public comment
regarding zoning changes and variances within neighborhoods.
Policy LU-1.6.8: The City's land development regulations and policies will encourage
and/or require, as set forth in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space element of this
plan the provision of open space in development projects in both residential and
commercial areas.
Policy LU-1.6.9: The City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to
mitigate the potentially adverse impacts of new development on existing neighborhoods
through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements.
Policy LU-1.6.10: The City's land development regulations and policies will allow for the
provision of safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking and will provide
access by a variety of transportation modes, including pedestrianism, bicycles,
automobiles, and transit.
Policy LU-1.6.11: The City's land development regulations and policies will insure that
areas designated conservation are protected from development other than that which
promotes its passive appreciation.
Policy LU-1.6.12: The City's land development regulations will direct recreational
activities to areas of the city where facilities and services are available.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
9
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective LU-1.7: Ensure that the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan is updated
as needed to meet changing conditions and, improve its effectiveness and success.
Policy LU-1.7.1: Update the MCNP by January 2009, to include a detailed list of
definition of terms used by the MCNP with an effective time line showing coordination
and consultation with various City departments and stakeholders.
Objective LU-1.8: The location, design and management practices of development and
redevelopment in the City shall ensure the protection of natural resources and systems
by recognizing, and sensitively responding to constraints posed by climate change and
sea level rise.
Policy LU-1.8.1: The City shall assist Miami -Dade County in their analysis on climate
change and its impacts on the built environment addressing development standards and
regulations related to investments in infrastructure, development/redevelopment and
public facilities in hazard prone areas including areas vulnerable to sea level rise, tidal
flooding and other impacts of climate change. Recommendations from the analysis shall
address appropriate changes to land use designations and zoning of impacted
properties, and development standards, among other relevant considerations.
Policy LU-1.8.2: The City shall make the practice of adapting the built environment to
the impacts of climate change and sea level rise, an integral component of all planning
processes, including but not limited to comprehensive planning, infrastructure planning,
building and life safety codes, emergency management and development regulations,
stormwater management, and water resources management.
Policy LU-1.8.3: The City shall actively participate in the Southeastern Florida Regional
Climate Change Compact and collaborate to increase regional climate change resiliency
by sharing technical expertise, assessing regional vulnerabilities, advancing agreed
upon mitigation and adaptation strategies and developing joint state and federal
legislation policies and programs.
Policy LU-1.8.4: The City shall work with Miami -Dade County to determine the feasibility
of designating areas in the City as Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section
163.3177(6)(g)(10), Florida Statute, and designate Adaptation Action Areas as provided
by Section 163.3164(1), Florida Statute, in order to determine those areas vulnerable to
coastal storm surge and sea level rise impacts for the purpose of developing policies for
adaptation and enhance the funding potential of infrastructure adaptation projects.
Policy LU-1.8.5: The City shall work with Miami -Dade County to support the
implementation of climate related policies, through education, advocacy and incentive
programs such as public outreach, including workshops and a website with relevant
information.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
10
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Goal LU-2: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification,
evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of Miami's
historic, architectural and archaeological resources. (See Coastal Management Goal CM-5.)
Objective LU-2.1: Maintain, update, and amplify the City of Miami portion of the
Miami -Dade County Historic Survey, which identifies and evaluates the City's historic,
architectural, and archaeological resources, and continue to increase the number of
eligible properties included in the Miami -Dade County Historical Survey (See Coastal
Management Objective CM-5.1.).
Policy LU-2.1.1: The City will continue to identify potential historic districts and conduct
additional historic surveys to identify eligible historic resources. (See Coastal
Management Policy CM-5.1.1.)
Policy LU-2.1.2: The City will continue to maintain and update the computerized
database of all relevant information for all sites in the Miami -Dade County Historic
Survey. This listing will show, in three categories, all properties of historic, architectural
or archaeological significance; together with their priority ranking for presentation. (See
Coastal Management Policy CM-5.1.2.)
Objective LU-2.2: Protect archaeological resources within the city from destruction and
loss.
Policy LU-2.2.1: The City will pursue the designation of significant archaeological zones
under the Historic Preservation Article of the City Code.
Policy LU-2.2.2: The City will continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County
Archaeologist in monitoring building activities near archeological sites.
Policy LU-2.2.3: The City will require, as part of the building permit application, pursuant
to state law, that the City of Miami archaeologist be notified of construction schedules in
significant historical of archaeological zones and where potentially significant historical
or archaeological artifacts are uncovered during construction, permit state and local
archaeological officials the opportunity of surveying and excavating the site.
Policy LU-2.2.4: The City shall adopt an ordinance levying civil penalties for failure to
report the discovery of an archaeological site during construction.
Objective LU-2.3: Encourage the preservation of all historic, architectural, and
archaeological resources that have major significance to the city by continuing to
increase the number of nationally and locally designated sites for the period 2008-2013.
Policy LU-2.3.1: The City will continue to review nominations to the National Register
of Historic Places through the Certified Local Government Program. (See Coastal
Management Policy CM-5.1.4.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
11
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy LU-2.3.2: The City had designated 67 historic sites and five historic districts
pursuant to the Historic Preservation Article of the City Code. An additional 26 sites (or
groups of multiple sites) and six districts have been identified as potentially worthy of
designation. The City will seek to increase its locally designated historic resources by
2010. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-5.1.3.)
Objective LU-2.4: Increase the number of historic structures that have been preserved,
rehabilitated or restored, according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation. (See Coastal Management Objective CM-5.2.)
Policy LU-2.4.1: The City will encourage the conservation, rehabilitation, restoration
and adaptive reuse of historic and architecturally significant housing resources through
low interest housing rehabilitation loans that may be offered by City agencies.
Policy LU-2.4.2: The City will continue to utilize the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation as the minimum standards for the treatment of historic
properties. To receive public financial support from the City, designated privately owned
structures must meet these standards. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-5.2.1.)
Policy LU-2.4.3: The City currently owns nine historic sites and other potential
archaeological sites. If it is deemed in the public benefit for the City to transfer title of
City properties of historic, architectural or archaeological significance, such transfers will
include restrictive covenants to ensure the protection and preservation of such
properties. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-5.2.2.)
Policy LU-2.4.4: The City will continue to work with other local governments that have
title to properties of major historic or architectural significance to ensure the
conservation, preservation and adaptive and sensitive reuse of such properties.
Objective LU-2.5: Increase public awareness of the historical, architectural,
archaeological resources and cultural heritage of the city, and public policy and
programs to protect and preserve this heritage, through public information and
education programs.
Policy LU-2.5.1: The City will continue to develop a series of publications relating to
historic preservation in general and the city's historic resources in particular.
Policy LU-2.5.2: The City will maintain an historic marker program for designated
properties and other key areas, and will publish same.
Policy LU-2.5.3: [Reserved]
Policy LU-2.5.4: The City will continue to provide information on the City's historic,
architectural and cultural heritage for inclusion in public information, economic
development promotion and tourism materials. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-
5.1.5.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
12
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Goal LU-3: Encourage urban redevelopment in identified Urban Infill Areas and Urban
Redevelopment Areas.
Objective LU-3-1: Promptly review and act on petitions for land use plan amendments
and rezoning of property in Urban Infill Areas or Urban Redevelopment Areas to
facilitate redevelopment.
Policy LU-3.1.1: Continue review of existing zoning regulations to determine if they
provide adequate flexibility to promote redevelopment with a mix of uses in Urban Infill
Areas or Urban Redevelopment Areas and, if not, revise said existing zoning regulations
or adopt new zoning regulations to promote redevelopment.
Policy LU-3.1.2: Create Regional Activity Centers if appropriate in Urban Infill Areas
and Urban Redevelopment Areas to facilitate mixed -use development, encourage mass
transit, reduce the need for automobile travel, provide public open space and parks as
required in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space element of this plan, provide
incentives for quality development, and give definition to the urban form. The permitted
uses and density and intensity of uses within a RAC shall be governed by the underlying
future land use map designations of the subject property, except as otherwise limited by
the designation of the RAC in the comprehensive plan. A designated RAC shall routinely
provide service to, or be regularly used by, a significant number of citizens of more than
one county; contain adequate existing public facilities as defined in Rule 9J-5, F.A.C.,
or committed public facilities, as identified in the capital improvements element of the
City's comprehensive plan; and shall be proximate and accessible to interstate or major
arterial roadways.
Policy LU-3.1.3: Designate the Downtown Miami Master Plan area an Urban Central
Business District in order to increase the Development of Regional Impact threshold for
development within those portions of downtown Miami that are not already in the DRI
area.
Objective 3-2: [Reserved]
Policy LU-3.2.1: [Reserved]
Policy LU-3.2.2: [Reserved]
Goal LU-4: Incentivize sustainable, affordable housing solutions while continually improving the
quality of life for all who live in the City of Miami.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
13
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective LU-4.1: By 2023, five percent (5%) of the new housing stock to be built will
be reserved for mixed income developments, as described in the applicable land
development regulations.
Objective LU-4.2: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable and attainable mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land
development regulations, will be reserved for housing low-income elderly households.
Objective LU-4.3: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable and attainable mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land
development regulations, will be reserved for workforce housing.
Policy LU-4.1.1: Developers building residential projects for low-income households,
as identified in the applicable land development regulations, are encouraged to build
additional units per acre to increase the amount of sustainable housing solutions
available for households that are cost -burdened relative to housing expenses. The
additional density is permitted subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land
development regulations.
Urban Central Business District
An Urban Central Business District (UCBD) identifies the single urban core area within the City
of Miami. The UCBD shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use
Map, shall contain mass transit service as defined in Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C., and shall contain
high intensity, high density multi -use development to include: retail; professional and
governmental office uses; cultural, recreational and entertainment facilities; high density
residential; hotels and motels; and appropriate industrial activities. In accordance with Chapter
28-24.014(10)(a), F.A.C., the guidelines and standards of development, a designated Urban
Central Business District within the City of Miami shall:
1. Increase the threshold for residential, hotel, motel, office, or retail development by
fifty -percent (50%);
2. Increase the threshold for applicable multi -use guidelines and standards by one -
hundred percent (100%), provided that one land use of the multi -use development
is residential and the residential development amounts to not less than thirty-five
percent (35%) of the City of Miami's applicable residential threshold; and
3. Increase the threshold for resort or convention hotel development by one hundred -
fifty percent (150%).
The following area has been designated an Urban Central Business District (UCBD) on the
City of Miami Future Land Use Map (FLUM) within Appendix LU-1:
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 14
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
The Downtown Miami Master Plan
The Downtown Miami Master Plan was adopted by the Miami City Commission by Resolution
Number 89-990 on October 26, 1989. The Downtown Miami Master Plan contains
approximately 1, 354 acres and is bounded on the north by: Northwest 20th Street on the north;
Biscayne Bay, including Brickell Key (Claughton Island), on the east; Southwest 15th Road on
the south; and Interstate 95, the Miami River, Northwest 5th Street, Interstate 395 and the
Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way on the west (see the Future Land Use Map within
Appendix LU-1 for exact boundaries).
Permitted Uses:
Permitted uses within the Urban Central Business District shall be those of the underlying land
use classification within the current Downtown Miami Master Plan, which includes: Central
Business District; Major Institutional Public Facilities, Transportation & Utilities; Office;
Restricted Commercial; General Commercial; Industrial; Recreation; High -Density Multifamily
Residential; and Medium -Density Multifamily Residential (see descriptions in Interpretation of
the Future Land Use Map).
The following minimum and maximum development thresholds shall apply:
The following numerical guidelines and standards shall be applied within the City of Miami's
Urban Central Business District according to Chapter 28-24.014(11), F.S.:
1. A development that is at or below eighty -percent (80%) of all numerical thresholds
shall not be required to undergo development -of -regional -impact review.
2. A development that is between eighty -percent (80%) and one -hundred (100%)
percent of a numerical threshold shall be presumed to not require development of
regional impact review.
3. A development that is at one -hundred percent (100%) or between one -hundred
percent (100%) and one -hundred twenty percent (120%) of a numerical threshold
shall be presumed to require development -of -regional -impact review.
4. A development that is at or above one -hundred twenty percent (120%) of any
numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development -of -regional -impact
review.
Regional Activity Centers
Regional Activity Center (RAC). A Regional Activity Center designation is intended to
encourage and promote large-scale development and redevelopment as well as small parcel
infill development and redevelopment that facilitates a balanced mix of land uses by providing
maximum flexibility for development and redevelopment activities.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 15
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
In accordance with Chapter 28-24.014(10)(c)2, F.A.C., a Regional Activity Center in the City
of Miami shall be a compact, high intensity, high density multi -use area designated as
appropriate for intensive growth as an urban infill or urban redevelopment area by the City and
may include: residential use; commercial; office; cultural and community facilities; recreational
and entertainment facilities; hotels or motels; transportation facilities; utilities; and appropriate
industrial activities. The major purposes of this designation are to facilitate mixed -use
development, encourage mass transit, reduce the need for automobile travel, provide
incentives for quality development and give definition to the urban form.
For an area to qualify as a Regional Activity Center, the following criteria must be met:
1. The type of land uses permitted within each Regional Activity Center and the density
of residential uses shall be specified herein and within the City of Miami 2020 Future
Land Use Map.
2. Regional Activity Centers shall include mixed land uses of regional significance.
3. Regional Activity Centers shall consist of active pedestrian environments through
high quality design of public spaces and buildings that create an appropriate human
scale at street level and provide for connectivity of places through the creation of a
system of pedestrian linkages.
4. Each Regional Activity Center shall be a defined geographical area of no less than
20 acres and shall be delineated on the City of Miami 2020 Future Land Use Map.
5. Regional Activity Centers shall be proximate and accessible to interstate or major
arterial roadways.
The following area has been designated Regional Activity Center within the City of Miami 2020
Future Land Use Map:
Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center
The Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center is designated to be a Chapter 380 Regional
Activity Center and, subject to amendment of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South
Florida by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as a regional development district (a
geographic area specifically designated as highly suitable for increased threshold intensity) for
the purpose of increasing DRI thresholds.
General Location:
South of Northeast 36t" Street, North of Northeast 29th Street, East of North Miami Avenue and
West of the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC) right-of-way; excluding certain properties
located along Northeast 29th Street. (See Future Land Use Map within Appendix LU-1 for exact
boundaries).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 16
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Permitted Uses:
Permitted uses shall be as for the underlying land use classification; however, the following
minimum and maximum development thresholds shall apply:
Residential: 2,000 units minimum / 4,500 units maximum
Commercial: 500,000 s.f. minimum / 1,200,000 s.f. maximum
Office: 80,000 s.f. minimum / 100,000 s.f. maximum
Compatibility:
The City shall develop and implement design standards to address compatibility of
development within the Buena Vista Regional Activity Center with the surrounding area, which
design standards should further the following concepts:
■ New streets and avenues should connect to the existing street grid.
■ Sidewalks, as principal pedestrian throughways, should be designed to create a
comfortable outdoor public space to accommodate a range of active and passive
pedestrian activities.
■ Buildings should have ground floor uses that activate the street and relate new
development to surrounding areas.
■ The context and scale of new development should be reflected in new building
design, including the setting back of upper floors in order to accommodate height
while maintaining human scale at the pedestrian level.
Health District Regional Activity Center
The Health District Regional Activity Center is hereby designated to be a Regional Activity
Center pursuant to Florida Statute, Chapter 380 and, subject to amendment by the Strategic
Regional Policy Plan for South Florida by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as a
regional development district (a geographic area specifically designated as highly suitable for
increased threshold intensity) for the purpose of increasing DRI thresholds.
General Location:
South of NW 20th Street, North of State Road 836, East of NW 17th Avenue, and West of
Interstate 95.
Permitted Uses:
Permitted uses shall be as for the underlying land use classification; whether uses shall be
required to undergo additional regional review shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter
380, Florida Statutes and Chapter 28, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), as such may be
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 17
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
amended from time to time, pursuant to the designation of the Health District as a Regional
Activity Center. The following maximum thresholds shall apply:
(1) Maximum thresholds shall be consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C., as such may be
amended from time to time.
Residential: Maximum units consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Commercial: Maximum square feet consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Office: Maximum square feet consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Hotel: Maximum units consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
18
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map
The 2020 Future Land Use Map (contained in Appendix LU-1 of the MCNP as amended from time
to time) is a planning instrument designed to guide the future development and distribution of land
uses within the city in a manner that is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP).
The 2020 Future Land Use Map is a generalized map that does not depict areas of less than 2 acres.
The Planning Director is responsible for making all determinations of concurrency as defined in state
statutes, and will also interpret the map based on all applicable state laws and administrative
regulations and on the consistency between the proposed change or changes and the goals,
objectives and policies expressed in the MCNP. The Planning Director will also determine whether
or not proposed zoning changes require an amendment to the comprehensive plan.
Land development regulations and policies are to be consistent with the 2020 Future Land Use Map.
The land development regulations further define and describe all requirements applicable to zoning
categories contained under each land use designation, permitting the treatment of new development
according to the particular conditions existing in different areas, and always consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of the MCNP, and specifically with the Land Use Element and its Future Land
Use Map. The land use designations are general designations that may include more than one
zoning category. All activities and uses within each designation are compatible with each other by
virtue of their scale, intensity and character, or by additional conditions required by the land
development regulations, more specifically by the City Zoning Ordinance, which describes and
regulates development within zoning districts in order to achieve more definite goals and objectives.
The land use designations that appear in the 2020 Future Land Use Map are arranged following the
"pyramid concept" of cumulative inclusion, whereby subsequent categories are inclusive of those
listed previously except as otherwise noted. These designations, and the uses allowed in them, are
defined as follows:
Conservation: This land use designation is restricted to environmentally sensitive areas that
are to be left in an essentially natural state. Only activities that reinforce this character are
allowed. Public access to these areas, including off-street parking, may be limited when
unregulated access may present a threat to wildlife and plant life within such areas.
Public Parks and Recreation: The primary intent of this land use classification is to conserve
open space and green spaces of a park while allowing access and uses which will not interfere
with the preservation of any significant environmental features which may exist within the park.
This land use designation allows only open space and park uses with recreational and cultural
uses where the total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one
(1) acre of more may cover no more than 25% of the park land area (See related Policy PR-
2.1.3.). Both passive and active recreational uses shall be permitted including but not limited
to nature trails, interpretive centers, picnic areas, playgrounds, canoe trails and launches,
small concession stands, restrooms, gyms, swimming pools, athletic fields, cultural facilities,
marine and marina facilities and other facilities supporting passive and active recreational and
cultural uses.
Lands under this designation with specific qualities that make them desirable for commercial
photography shall be allowed to be used in this manner conditionally, and only when it is
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
19
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
determined that conducting such commercial photography will not endanger significant
environmental features within the area. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.]
Commercial Recreation: This land use designation only allows privately -owned recreation
uses open to the public or to private groups.
Marine Facilities: This land use designation is intended to apply to waterfront properties which
are primarily public properties and intended to be developed and utilized in a manner which
will facilitate public access to waterfront activities. Permissible uses within this designation
include marine and marina facilities, marine stadiums, waterfront specialty centers (including
restaurants, cafes and retailing), recreational activities including water theme parks, cultural,
educational and entertainment facilities and accessory hotel accommodations with maximum
FAR limitations between the range of 0.65 to 1.72 and a maximum density of 130 hotel units
per acre; the higher FAR may be approved only upon demonstration and finding that the
application of the higher limitations will not adversely affect access. Permanent living facilities
are not permitted within this classification. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.]
Nonresidential floor area is the sum of areas for nonresidential use on all floors of buildings,
measured from the outside faces of the exterior walls, including interior and exterior halls,
lobbies, enclosed porches and balconies used for nonresidential uses. Not countable as
nonresidential floor area are:
(a) Parking and loading areas within buildings;
(b) Open terraces, patios, atriums or balconies; or
(c) Stairways, elevator shafts, mechanical rooms.
Single Family Residential: Areas designated as "Single Family Residential" allow single
family structures of one dwelling unit each to a maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre,
subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the
maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requirements.
Supporting services such as foster homes and family day care homes for children and/or
adults; and community based residential facilities2 (6 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol
or correctional rehabilitation facilities also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law.
Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care
centers are permissible in suitable locations within single family residential areas.
Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been
designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable
locations within single family residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development
regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and
intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s).
2 A "Community based residential facility" provides room (with or without board), resident services, and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a facility
functions as a single housekeeping unity. This category includes adult congregate living facilities, facilities for physically disabled and handicapped
persons, for developmentally disabled persons, for non dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent children, as licensed by the Florida
Department of Health, and juvenile and adult residential correctional facilities, including halfway houses, as licensed or approved by an authorized
regulatory agency.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
20
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Duplex Residential: Areas designated as "Duplex Residential" allow residential structures of
up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, subject to
the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance
of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted
concurrency management requirements.
Community based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or
correctional rehabilitation facilities) also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places
of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers
are permissible in suitable locations within duplex residential areas.
Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been
designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable
locations within duplex residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations
and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity
limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s).
Low Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Low Density Multifamily
Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 36 dwelling units per acre,
and maximum residential density may be increased by up to one hundred percent (100%),
subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the
maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requirements.
Supporting services such as community -based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not
including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be allowed pursuant to
applicable state law; day care centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable
locations.
Permissible uses within low density multifamily residential areas also include commercial
activities that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the building
or building complex, small scale limited commercial uses as accessory uses; and places of
worship, primary and secondary schools, and accessory post -secondary educational facilities;
all of which are subject to the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations
and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses.
Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been
designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable
locations within low density multifamily residential areas, pursuant to applicable land
development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses.
Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing
structure(s).
Medium Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Medium Density Multifamily
Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 65 dwelling units per acre,
and maximum residential density may be increased by up to one hundred percent (100%),
subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the
maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requirements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
21
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Supporting services such as community -based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not
including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be allowed pursuant to
applicable state law; community -based residential facilities (15-50 clients) and day care
centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable locations.
Permissible uses within medium density multifamily areas also include commercial activities
that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the building or building
complex, small scale limited commercial uses as accessory uses, subject to the detailed
provisions of applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels
of service for such uses, places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and accessory
post -secondary educational facilities.
Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been
designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable
locations within medium density multifamily residential areas, pursuant to applicable land
development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses.
Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing
structure(s).
High Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "High Density Multifamily
Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 150 dwelling units per acre,
and maximum residential density may be increased by up to one hundred percent (100%),
subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the
maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requirements. Higher densities may be allowed as shown
for these specially -designated areas:
Little Havana Target Area 200 units per acre*
Southeast Overtown 300 units per acre*
Miami River 400 units per acre*
Brickell, Omni, Park West and River Quadrant 500 units per acre*
*Indicates maximum residential density may be increased by up to one hundred percent
(100%) subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and
the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requirements.
Supporting services such as offices and commercial services and other accessory activities
that are clearly incidental to principal uses are permitted; community -based residential facilities
(14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be
allowed pursuant to applicable state law; community -based residential facilities (15+ clients),
places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and day care centers for children and
adults may be permissible in suitable locations.
Low Density Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Low Density Restricted
Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent
to "Low Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory
residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use,
clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and
primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve
the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 22
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing,
personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services,
restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation
facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities
whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This
category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Low Density
Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 3.0 times the net lot area of
the subject property.
Medium Density Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Medium Density Restricted
Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent
to "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory
residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use,
clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and
primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve
the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal
auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing,
personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services,
restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation
facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities
whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This
category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Medium Density
Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of
the subject property.
Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities: Areas designated as
"Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" allow facilities for federal,
state and local government activities, major public or private health, recreational, cultural,
religious or educational activities, and major transportation facilities and public utilities.
Residential facilities ancillary to these uses are allowed up to a maximum density equivalent
to "High Density Multifamily Residential" or if applicable the least intense abutting/adjacent
residential zoning district, subject to the same limiting conditions.
Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities allow
nonresidential uses to a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the
subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation
and Utilities" in the Health / Civic Center District allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0
times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public
Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Urban Central Business District allow a maximum
FLR of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property.
Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses
(except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily
Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions and a finding by the Planning Director that
the proposed site's proximity to other residentially zoned property makes it a logical extension
or continuation of existing residential development and that adequate services and amenities
exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents; transitory
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
23
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use;
clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and
primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve
the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal
auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing,
personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services,
restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation
facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities
whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This
category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Restricted
Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the subject
property; such FLR may be increased upon compliance with the detailed provisions of the
applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed a total FLR of 11.0 times
the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in
the Edgewater Area allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 17.0 times the net lot area of the
subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in the Urban Central
Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center allow a maximum floor lot
ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities
and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Nonresidential floor area is the floor area that supports nonresidential uses within the inside
perimeter of the outside walls of the building including hallways, stairs, closets, thickness of
walls, columns and other features, and parking and loading areas, and excluding only open air
corridors, porches, balconies and roof areas.
Central Business District (CBD): The area designated as "Central Business District (CBD)
is intended to apply to the central commercial, financial and office core of the metropolitan
region, and allows all activities included in the "Restricted Commercial," and "Major
Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" designations. Residential facilities
(except for rescue missions) alone or in combination with other uses are allowable to a
maximum density of 1,000 dwelling units per acre, and maximum residential density may be
increased by up to one hundred percent (100%), subject to the detailed provisions of the
applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for
facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Also permitted is a mix of uses ranging from high density multifamily residential to high intensity
office uses with retail uses on the lower floors of structures. Intensity of uses within the CBD
land use designation are generally higher than those allowed in other areas of the city. Areas
designated as CBD allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 40 times the net lot area of the
subject property.
General Commercial: Areas designated as "General Commercial" allow all activities included
in the "Restricted Commercial" designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution activities
that generally serve the needs of other businesses; generally require on and off loading
facilities; and benefit from close proximity to industrial areas. These commercial activities
include retailing of second hand items, automotive repair services, new and used vehicle sales,
parking lots and garages, heavy equipment sales and service, building material sales and
storage, wholesaling, warehousing, distribution and transport related services, light
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 24
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use
impacts are similar to those uses described above. Multifamily residential structures of a
density equal to High Density Multifamily Residential, are allowed subject to the detailed
provisions of the applicable land development regulations.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "General
Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the subject
property; such FLR may be increased upon compliance with the detailed provisions of the
applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed a total FLR of 11.0 times
the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "General Commercial" in the
Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center allow a
maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities
and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Industrial: The areas designated as "Industrial" allow manufacturing, assembly and storage
activities. The "Industrial" designation generally includes activities that would otherwise
generate excessive amounts of noise, smoke, fumes, illumination, traffic, hazardous wastes,
or negative visual impact unless properly controlled. Stockyards, rendering works, smelting
and refining plants and similar activities are excluded. Residential uses are not permitted in
the "Industrial" designation, except for rescue missions, and live-aboards in commercial
marinas.
Areas designated as "Industrial" allow a maximum Areas designated as "Industrial" allow a
maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Furthermore,
all such uses shall be subject to the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and
services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Light Industrial (LI): The primary intent of this land use classification is to allow mixed use
development within this land use classification, and further, to facilitate the ability of developing
a mixed occupancy within a unit in which more than one type of use is provided under
Live/Work or Work/Live zoning districts of the City's land development regulations.
Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow all activities included in the "Restricted
Commercial" and "General Commercial" designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution
activities that generally serve the needs of other businesses; generally require on and off
loading facilities; and benefit from close proximity to general commercial areas. These
commercial activities (beyond those permitted in the "Restricted Commercial" and "General
Commercial" designations) include retailing of second hand items, new and used vehicle sales,
parking lots and garages, wholesaling, warehousing, light manufacturing and assembly and
other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses
described above.
This category also allows commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels for transients.
This land use category shall not permit storing, packaging, handling, processing or distribution
of explosive, flammable or otherwise hazardous materials; scrap yards; and health clinics.
The hazard level of an activity shall be one of the determining factors as to whether that activity
shall be permissible within a Light Industrial district; the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations shall prohibit high-level hazard activities within live/work
developments.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
25
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow residential uses to a maximum density of 36
dwelling units per acre, and the nonresidential portions of developments within areas
designated as "Light Industrial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 10.0 times the net lot
area of the subject property
Affordable housing developments that are certified by the City as having a complete
application for development as of the effective date of the proposed Land Development
Regulations shall be permitted with densities up to 150 dwelling units per acre but must obtain
all building permits by December 17, 2012, at which time any rights herein to building permits
shall expire.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities
and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
26
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Correspondence Table — Zoning and Comprehensive Plan
Transect
Miami 21
Transect Zone
October 2009 MCNP
Future Land Use
Dwelling Units Per
Acre Max.
T3
R, L
SUB -URBAN
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
9 du/ac
T3
0
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
18 du/ac
T4
R
GENERAL URBAN
LOW DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
36 du/ac*
T4
LOW DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL
du ac
T5
R
URBAN CENTER
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
65 du/ac*
T5
MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL
du ac
T6-(8 — 48)
R
URBAN CORE
HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
150 du/ac*
T6-(8 — 48)
L, 0
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, GENERAL COMMERCIAL
D1
WORK PLACE
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
36 du/ac
D2
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
N/A
D3
MARINE
INDUSTRIAL
N/A
T6-80
R,L,0
URBAN CORE
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
1000 du/ac*
CI
CIVIC INSTIUTIONAL
MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES,
TRANSPORTATION, AND UTILITIES
150 du/ac
CI -HD
CIVIC INSTITUTION —
HEALTH DISTRICT
MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES,
TRANSPORTATION, AND UTILITIES
150 du/ac*
CS
CIVIC SPACE/PARKS
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION
N/A
COMMERCIAL RECREATION
N/A
T1
NATURAL
CONSERVATION
N/A
* Indicates maximum residential density may be increased by up to one hundred percent (100%), subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land
development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management
requirements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
27
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
HOUSING
Goal HO-1: Increase the supply of safe, affordable and sanitary housing for extremely low-,
very low-, low-, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current standards
and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) and the elderly by alleviating shortages of
extremely low, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing, rehabilitating older homes,
maintaining, and revitalizing residential neighborhoods in order to meet the needs of all
income groups.
Objective HO-1.1: Provide and/or encourage a local regulatory, investment, and
neighborhood environment that will assist the private sector in increasing the stock of
affordable housing for all income levels, including extremely low-, very low-, low-, and
moderate -income (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD
and the State of Florida), within the City by at least 10 percent by 2010.
Policy HO-1.1.1: The City defines affordable (moderate -income) housing in accordance
with the current standards and regulations of the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). The City continues to promote equal access to housing
opportunities. The City, with other governmental agencies and non-profit organizations,
will educate appropriate parties regarding fair housing and refer fair housing concerns
to the appropriate enforcement agency.
Policy HO-1.1.2: Continue and expand the City's current affordable housing programs
and continue its participation in federal housing programs and the County Documentary
Stamp Surtax Program.
Policy HO-1.1.3: The City will continue to develop comprehensive neighborhood
redevelopment plans and programs that encourage private developers to build new, or
rehabilitate old, residential structures and ensure that public investments are
coordinated with private sector developments to increase the overall attractiveness of
redeveloping neighborhoods.
Policy HO-1.1.4: Tax Increment Financing districts, which are designated by Miami -
Dade County, as a mechanism for financing public improvements in residential areas
and stimulating neighborhood revitalization, will continue to be used.
Policy HO-1.1.5: The City will continue to enforce, and where necessary strengthen
those sections of the land development regulations that are intended to preserve and
enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods and to
buffer such neighborhoods from incompatible uses through the implementation and
enforcement of transition and buffering standards.
Policy HO-1.1.6: The City will continue to encourage the designation, restoration, and
adaptive and sensitive reuse of historic or architecturally significant housing through
zoning and other incentives deemed appropriate.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 28
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy HO-1.1.7: The City will continue to control, through restrictions in the City's land
development regulations, large scale and/or intensive commercial and industrial land
development which may negatively impact any residential neighborhood and will provide
appropriate transitions between high-rise and low-rise residential developments.
Policy HO-1.1.8: Through the land development regulations, the City will protect
existing viable neighborhoods in those areas suitable for housing and, where
appropriate, enhance them in a manner compatible with their existing character.
Policy HO-1.1.9: The City's land development regulations will encourage high -density
residential development and redevelopment in close proximity to Metrorail and
Metromover stations. (See Land Use Policy LU-1.1.10 and Transportation Policy TR-
1.5.2.2.1.3.)
Policy HO-1.1.10: The City shall report annually the extent to which the housing
recommendations set forth in the adopted City of Miami Consolidated Plan (as they may
be amended from time to time) are being realized including those relating to:
1) the preservation of affordable rental housing through the rehabilitation of existing
rental stock and the encouragement of new rental housing construction, with a focus
on serving the needs of small families and single person households, such as the
elderly and person with HIV/AIDS;
2) assistance to residents to achieve homeownership by seeking to increase the
inventory of affordably priced units through new construction and the creation of a
Purchase Rehab program by providing second mortgage, down payment and
closing cost assistance to first-time homebuyers; and
3) stimulation of affordable housing development through the implementation of policy
with respect to:
a. the creation of a land acquisition program for Infill
b. identification of additional funding for affordable housing
c. the continued provision of Affordable Housing incentives
d. the provision of training/workshops to developers on City programs and
regulations
e. streamlining of the RFP process and the provision of multi -year funding
f. Increasing the capacity of non-profit housing providers.
Policy HO-1.1.11: [Reserved]
Objective HO-1.2: Conserve the present stock of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and
moderate -income housing (in accordance with the current standards and regulations
of HUD and the State of Florida) within the City and reduce the number of substandard
units through rehabilitation, reduce the number of unsafe structures through demolition
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 29
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
or rehabilitation, and insure the preservation of historically significant housing through
identification and designation.
Policy HO-1.2.1: The City defines extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income
housing (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State
of Florida) in accordance with the current standards and regulations of the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the State of Florida.
Policy HO-1.2.2: The City will continue, and when necessary expand extremely low-,
very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing programs with the intent of preventing a
net loss of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing (in accordance
with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) units within
the City.
Policy HO-1.2.3: The City's housing programs will provide for a diverse range of
housing types in all areas of the City, including housing that is affordable to extremely
low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current
standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) as an alternative to the
geographic concentration of low-income housing.
Policy HO-1.2.4: The City will continue to assist non-profit, community -based
organizations in the development and provision of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and
moderate -income housing (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of
HUD and the State of Florida) projects to augment the public sector provision of
extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing. This assistance will
include, but not be limited to, technical assistance, marketing and financial planning
assistance, and the provision of public improvements, such as street improvements,
curbing, landscaping and public open spaces, proper drainage and street lighting.
Policy HO-1.2.5: The City defines substandard housing as any residential unit that lacks
either complete kitchen or plumbing facilities, does not satisfy health and safety codes,
or detracts from the physical appearance of neighborhoods in the City's definition of
substandard housing as compliant with the State's definition of substandard housing in
s.420.0004(12), F.S.
Policy HO-1.2.6: With the intent of preserving and enhancing neighborhood character,
the City will utilize code enforcement to prevent the illegal conversion of single-family
residences into multifamily units.
Policy HO-1.2.7: The City will continue to enforce and implement neighborhood specific
design and development standards that may be developed as a result of the
amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives to
strengthen those sections of the Zoning Ordinance that are intended to preserve and
enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
30
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy HO-1.2.8: The City will increase code enforcement efforts in areas where
significant concentrations of substandard units are likely to exist. The City will implement
programs to assist extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households (in
accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida)
in rehabilitating their units. Owners of substandard units will be required to make needed
repairs in a timely manner and vacant or abandoned property will be required to be
secured so as not to represent a public health or safety hazard.
Policy HO-1.2.9: The City will monitor conditions and if necessary formally request that
Miami -Dade County maintain an acceptable quality of public housing within the City.
Policy HO-1.2.10: The City will, through its building code enforcement, demolish all
structures determined to be structurally unsafe.
Policy HO-1.2.11: Historically significant housing in the City will be identified and subject
to Chapter 23 and other appropriate sections of the City's Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Objective HO-1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of housing in non -
isolated residential areas for community -based residential facilities and foster care
facilities (including those funded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative
Services).
Policy HO-1.3.1: The City will permit the operation of group homes, foster care facilities
and Adult Congregate Living Facilities (ACLFs), subject to restrictions reflected in the
City Zoning Ordinance, in all residential areas at the residential densities for which those
areas are zoned.
Policy HO-1.3.2: The City's land development regulations will be reviewed and
amended where warranted, to prevent concentrations of group homes, foster care
facilities, and Adult Congregate Living Facilities (ACLFs) in any area of the City.
Policy HO-1.3.3: [Reserved]
Policy HO-1.3.4: [Reserved]
Objective HO-1.4: The City will continue to participate in a regional effort to provide
adequate shelter for the homeless.
Policy HO-1.4.1: The City, along with Miami -Dade County, Broward County, the major
municipalities of the region, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the State
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services will participate in the development of
a coordinated plan to address the problem of homelessness in South Florida.
Policy HO-1.4.2: [Reserved]
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
31
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy HO-1.4.3: The City will assist in providing, when necessary, temporary
emergency shelter facilities to serve homeless families and children.
Policy HO-1.4.4: The City's land development regulations will permit temporary crisis
intervention facilities and short-term transitional facilities (aimed at assisting the
homeless to become self-supporting members of society) to be located proximate to
areas where social assistance and economic opportunities are available.
Policy HO-1.4.5: The City will continue and expand its efforts to acquire and administer
federal and state financial aid for homeless assistance.
Policy HO-1.4.6: The City will provide regulations for, and permit the siting of, homeless
shelters within its land development regulations and take appropriate measures to
prevent a net loss of shelter capacity. The City will develop a ten-year plan designed to
end chronic homelessness by working toward a more equitable distribution of facilities
throughout Miami -Dade County.
Objective HO-1.5: Provide assistance to displaced occupants where public
redevelopment programs require relocation.
Policy HO-1.5.1: The City's housing program will continue to provide for assistance to
occupants displaced by public redevelopment projects so that suitable relocation
housing in proximity to employment and necessary public services is available prior to
the demolition or replacement of existing housing serving extremely low-, very low-, low-
, and moderate -income occupants.
Objective HO-1.6: [Reserved]
Policy HO-1.6.1: [Reserved]
Goal HO-2: Achieve a livable city center with a variety of urban housing types for persons of
all income levels in a walkable, mixed -use, urban environment.
Objective HO-2.1: Design and create pedestrian friendly environments and
neighborhoods with varied housing prototypes and amenities catering to persons of
diverse social, economic and cultural backgrounds, with a variety of urban housing
types for persons of all income levels including those of extremely low-, very low-, low-
, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current standards and
regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) provided in a walkable, mixed -use, urban
environment.
Policy HO-2.1.1: Through the land development regulations, the City will continue to
protect and enhance existing neighborhoods in downtown.
Policy HO-2.1.2: The City will continue to revise residential zoning district regulations
to provide greater flexibility for the design and development of a variety of contemporary
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 32
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
housing types and mixed -use developments with the application of new higher density
zoning in accordance with neighborhood specific design and development standards
that might be adopted as a result of amendments to the City's land development
regulations and other neighborhood planning initiatives.
Policy HO-2.1.3: The City will continue to assure that necessary support services,
institutions and amenities are available to existing neighborhoods.
Policy HO-2.1.4: The City will continue to promote development of new, high quality,
dense urban neighborhoods along the Miami River
Policy HO-2.1.5: The City will continue to encourage adaptive reuse of commercial
space for residential use by working to eliminate unnecessary residential requirements
in the Zoning Ordinance that inhibit reasonable adaptive reuse.
Policy HO-2.1.6: The City will continue to target available governmental housing
assistance programs and funds to assist with development of affordable housing in
existing viable neighborhoods and publicly designated redevelopment districts while
avoiding undue concentrations of assisted housing.
Policy HO-2.1.7: Working together with private developers, the City will continue to
apply for Urban Development Action Grants (UDAG's), Housing Development Action
Grants (HoDAG's), and other potential grant programs in the Southeast Overtown/Park
West, Lummus Park, River Quadrant and West Brickell areas, where housing can be
developed as a part of mixed -use projects.
Policy HO-2.1.8: Through changes in the City's land development regulations, the City
will continue to expand the areas in which new commercial development may receive
incentives for Housing Trust Fund contributions.
Policy HO-2.1.9: [Reserved]
Objective HO-2.2: By 2023, five percent (5%) of the new housing stock will be mixed
income developments, as described in the applicable land development regulations.
Objective HO-2.3: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable and attainable mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land
development regulations, will be reserved for housing low-income elderly residents.
Objective HO-2.4: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable and attainable mixed -income programs will be reserved for Workforce
Housing, as described in the applicable land development regulations.
Policy HO-2.4.1: Developers building residential projects that are built for Extremely
Low Income Housing and Workforce Housing, as described in the applicable land
development regulations, are encouraged to build additional units per acre to increase
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 33
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
the amount of sustainable housing solutions available for households that are cost -
burdened relative to housing expenses. The additional density is permitted subject to
the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
34
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
Goal SS-1: Ensure a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper maintenance,
timely provision and efficient operation of a centralized wastewater treatment and ancillary
sewerage system.
Objective SS-1.1: All residences and businesses within the City that have been
approved are served by sanitary sewers, and the City will continue to replace and repair
aging segments of the system as required, and will coordinate with Miami -Dade County
on the extension of, or increase in the capacity of, treatment facilities to meet future
needs.
Policy SS-1.1.1: The City will continue to implement existing plans to extend the
sewerage system to all approved areas of the City.
Policy SS-1.1.2: The City will complete those sanitary sewer projects described in the
City's Capital Improvement Program as scheduled.
Policy SS-1.1.3: The City will monitor progress on all sanitary sewer related capital
improvement projects on an annual basis as part of its capital improvement
implementation procedures.
Policy SS-1.1.4: Although the City has no authority with respect to Miami -Dade
County's wastewater treatment programs, the City shall, through its Intergovernmental
Coordination Policies, continue to support, and cooperate with, Miami -Dade Water and
Sewer Department (M-DWASD) actions to expand the capacities of its wastewater
treatment facilities as expressed in that Department's Wastewater Facilities Master Plan,
dated April 2008, as may be amended from time to time.
Objective SS-1.2: Ensure that the practice of wastewater management is consistent with
the protection and preservation of natural resources.
Policy SS-1.2.1: Although the City has no authority with respect to Miami -Dade
County's wastewater treatment programs, the City shall, through its Intergovernmental
Coordination Policies, support and encourage M-DWASD to continue to adhere to its
current policies of: no discharge of wastewater to surface fresh waters; advanced waste
treatment at all "package" treatment plants that are granted variances from "no
discharge" requirements; secondary treatment prior to discharge from ocean outfalls;
secondary treatment, proven design, local operating experience and compliance with all
regulatory agency requirements prior to discharge from injection wells; and secondary
or higher levels of treatment, as required by regulations, prior to discharge to shallow
groundwater to ensure no negative impact on the ability of the receiving waters to meet
Federal Drinking Water Standards.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
35
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy SS-1.2.2: In the design and construction of new sewers, and in the repair and
replacement of old sewers, the City will use appropriate design and construction
techniques to eliminate infiltration of storm waters into the sanitary sewer system, or the
overflow of wastewater into the storm sewer system.
Policy SS-1.2.3: The City will use its authority under local codes and ordinances to
cooperate with Miami -Dade County DERM to identify and eliminate any sites where
there may be illegal connections of sanitary sewers to the storm sewer system.
Policy SS-1.2.4: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
negotiate with M-DWASD to seek cooperative agreements to ensure that the operation
of the Central District wastewater treatment facility on Virginia Key does not degrade the
natural environment or limit the public's access to recreational opportunities on the
island.
Objective SS-1.3: The City's land development regulations will ensure that approval of
development or redevelopment will not occur until there exists adequate wastewater
transmission capacity to serve that development.
Policy SS-1.3.1: The level of service standard to determine adequate transmission
capacity is 141 gallons per capita per day (GPCD).
Policy SS-1.3.2: All improvements for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity
of the sanitary sewer transmission network shall be compatible with the level of service
standard adopted in Policy 1.3.1.
Policy SS-1.3.3: Since the sanitary sewer network is an interconnected Countywide
system, the departments of Public Works and Planning will cooperate with M-DWASD
to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of
system demand and capacity.
Policy SS-1.3.4: The City will monitor the permitting of any development or
redevelopment occurring outside of the City's boundaries which by gravity connects to
the City's sewer transmission network.
Objective SS-1.4: The City's sanitary sewer collection system is a valuable and costly
element of the urban infrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient
manner.
Policy SS-1.4.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system that
sanitary sewer and storm sewers shall be in place to serve new development or
redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
equivalent. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS-2.5.1.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
36
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Goal SS-2: Provide adequate stormwater drainage to reasonably protect against flooding in
areas of intensive use and occupation, while preventing degradation of quality in receiving
waters.
Objective SS-2.1: In accordance with the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan and
subsequent updates, the City will address the most critical drainage problems. The
City's goals for retrofitting subcatchment areas within the City will meet or exceed the
five-year frequency, 24-hour duration standard while utilizing water quality design
criteria. The City will confer with local agencies, namely the Miami -Dade County
Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) when retrofitting City
projects to incorporate design criteria and best management practices (BMPs).
Policy SS-2.1.1: The City will adhere to its 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan and
subsequent updates as the long-range policy guideline for improving its storm drainage
management system, and will update the estimated cost of implementing that Plan
through the annual updates to the City's Capital Improvements Program included in the
Capital Improvements element of the MCNP. The City will rank the projects specified in
the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, with priority given to addressing the most critical
problem areas within the City, and implement those projects supported by a financing
plan according to the provisions of Chapter 18, Article VIII of the City Code, entitled
"Storm Water Utility System." The 1986 plan will be updated by 2010 with measurable
Goals and Objectives. The plan will be reported and reviewed annually and at time of
EAR.
Policy SS-2.1.2: The City will continue to monitor progress on all storm sewer -related
capital improvement projects on an annual basis as part of its capital improvement
implementation procedures.
Policy SS-2.1.3: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system,
that sanitary sewer and storm sewers shall be in place to serve new development or
redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
equivalent. Issuance of any development permit shall require compliance with a
drainage level of service standard of a one -in -five-year storm event while incorporating
water quality considerations.
Objective SS-2.2: The practice of stormwater management within the City will be
designed to reduce pollutant -loading rates to surface waters.
Policy SS-2.2.1: The City will retrofit the number of storm water outfalls that discharge
into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. If
positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible
method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be
designed and constructed to retain grease and oil, and minimize pollutant discharges.
(See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR-1.1.2 and Coastal Management Policy
CM-1.1.2.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
37
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy SS-2.2.2: In order to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay
via the Miami and Little rivers, the Solid Waste Department should be encouraged to
increase the frequency and extent of street sweeping. (See Solid Waste Policy SW-
1.3.3.)
Policy SS-2.2.3: The City will continue to seek cooperative agreements and funding
support from Miami -Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District,
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies
in order to protect the quality of its surface waters and reduce pollutant loadings into the
Miami River, its tributaries, the Little River, and directly into Biscayne Bay.
Policy SS-2.2.4: The City shall require that "best management practices" shall be used
in the design and construction of stormwater management systems to minimize pollutant
load eventually discharged to natural drainage systems, as well as to regulate the
volume and timing of storm water delivered to natural systems.
Policy SS-2.2.5: The City will continue to enforce Florida Building Code requirements
for the on -site retention of the first inch of storm water runoff. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Policy NR-2.1.2.)
Policy SS-2.2.6: The City will consider the inclusion of stormwater quality control
structures in any new projects for major road improvements and commercial parking
areas.
Objective SS-2.3: As the City implements the storm water management improvements
specified in the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, it will ensure that stormwater
management contributes to the conservation of ground water as a future potable water
supply.
Policy SS-2.3.1: In its stormwater management practices, the City will promote
infiltration of storm water to surficial or artesian aquifers to prevent further saltwater
intrusion, where such infiltration is deemed to be feasible and cost efficient, and is not
likely to represent an environmental hazard.
Objective SS-2.4: All areas of the City are now served by storm drainage facilities, and
the City will continue to coordinate the replacement, repair, extension, and capacity
increases of the system consistent with development and redevelopment needs.
Policy SS-2.4.1: Through enforcement of its Storm Water Utility System as provided in
Chapter 53.5 of the City Code, the City will use its authority "to construct, reconstruct,
improve, and extend stormwater utility system and to issue revenue bonds and other
debts if needed to finance in whole or part the cost of such system and to establish just
and equitable rates, fees, and charges for the services and facilities provided by the
system."
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
38
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective SS-2.5: The City's storm drainage system is a valuable and costly element of
the urban infrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient manner to
serve this fully developed community.
Policy SS-2.5.1: The City will use its land development regulations to ensure that
development and redevelopment is consistent with the capacity of the storm drainage
system. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS-1.4.1.)
Objective SS-2.6: The City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System discharges to the
surface waters of the United States. These discharges are regulated by the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency. The City shall meet the requirements of the permit
when operating its drainage facilities.
Policy SS-2.6.1: The City will comply with the conditions in its NPDES permit.
Policy SS-2.6.2: The operation of the City's drainage system to meet NPDES
requirements shall meet the following criteria:
} The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) shall be consistent with
stormwater management program elements as defined in the NPDES permit.
■ Stormwater projects and activities shall be consistent with the current local,
state and federal regulations at the time of implementation.
■ Stormwater capital improvement and operation and maintenance projects shall
be implementable.
Policy SS-2.6.3: The City will, through its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit, enforce and educate all construction sites and operators of
such construction sites, for compliance with the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) requirements and the Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
39
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE
Goal AR-1: Protect the functions of the natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas within the
City.
Objective AR-1.1: Ensure that stormwater management practices contribute to
conservation of groundwater as a future potable water supply.
Policy AR-1.1.1: As the City implements the projects identified in its 1986 Storm
Drainage Master Plan and subsequent updates, it will promote the infiltration of storm
water to surficial or artesian aquifers to prevent further saltwater intrusion, where such
infiltration is deemed to be feasible, not to represent an environmental hazard, and to
be cost efficient.
Policy AR-1.1.2: The City will coordinate with and support local, state and federal
agencies to achieve regional aquifer recharge protection objectives, including those
pertaining to the quality and quantity of groundwater resources.
Policy AR-1.1.3: The City will continue to support the South Florida Water Management
District efforts to monitor the water levels at the salinity control structures within the City
to prevent against further saltwater intrusion and protect the aquifer recharge areas and
cones of influence of wellfields from contamination. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Policy NR-2.1.3.)
Objective AR-1.2: The City will use its land use and development regulations to ensure
that land uses for areas within the City deemed to be aquifer recharge areas by the
South Florida Water Management District, maintain adequate recharge for the aquifer.
Policy AR-1.2.1: The City will maintain low to moderate density uses in the West
Flagami area of the City (as shown on Figure 111.1 of the Data and Analysis) as necessary
to protect the secondary aquifer recharge area. (See Land Use Policy LU-1.1.9.)
Policy AR-1.2.2: The City will work with Miami -Dade County to implement the County
management plan that identifies potential areas of water withdrawals, potential sources
of contamination, the impact of potential withdrawals to other legal users, and the
development of practices that will maintain this aquifer as a viable water supply source.
Policy AR-1.2.3: In accordance with the South Florida Water Management District's
Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan and Objective PW-1.3, and its related
policies, the City's coordination with MDWASD shall develop alternative water supply
sources to supplement withdrawals from the Biscayne Aquifer. Such sources may
include withdrawals from the Floridan Aquifer, implementation of water conservation
methods, and development of reclaimed and wastewater reuse strategies.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
40
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
POTABLE WATER
Goal PW-1: Ensure that all residents and workers within the City have adequate access to
safe drinking water through the efficient operation of centralized, County operated potable
water treatment facilities and ancillary potable water transmission system.
Objective PW-1.1: Land development regulations will ensure that approval of
development or redevelopment will not be granted unless and until there exists
adequate potable water transmission capacity to serve that development.
Policy PW-1.1.1: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, Countywide
system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department
(MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating
estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve
development exists. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR-2.1.4.)
Objective PW-1.2: The City shall coordinate with the MDWASD to ensure adequate
levels of safe potable water are available to meet the needs of the City. (See Natural
Resource Conservation Objective NR-2.1.)
Policy PW-1.2.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system
that potable water facilities shall be in place to serve new development or redevelopment
no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent in
compliance with level of service standards for transmission capacity of 92.05 gallons
per capita per day (GPCD). (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR-2.1.5 and
Capital Improvements Policy CI-1.2.3.)
Policy PW-1.2.2: Pursuant to Chapter 163.3177(6)(c), F.S., the City adopted an
updated Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (contained in Appendix PW-1 of the MCNP)
for a 20-year planning period (2014-2033) that is consistent with the current Lower East
Coast Water Supply Plan Update approved by the South Florida Water Management
District (SRWMD) and the current adopted County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.
The City's Work Plan and the County's Work Plan are incorporated into the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The City's work plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years
and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's approval of
an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Policy NR-2.1.7.)
Policy PW-1.2.3: The City will cooperate and participate to the fullest extent possible
with Miami -Dade County to maintain procedures and programs to monitor levels of
service of each water supply, water treatment and wastewater treatment facility for use
by agencies that issue development orders or permits. Such procedures may include
the establishment of water and wastewater allocation processes to assure that adequate
water supply, and water and wastewater transmission and treatment capacity is
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
41
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
available prior to issuance of development orders or permits pursuant to Chapter
163.3180(2)(a), F.S.
Policy PW-1.2.4: The City will continue to coordinate through the Planners Technical
Committee and Miami -Dade County to utilize, expand and pursue the development of
new potable water wellfields and alternative water supplies to meet the City's existing
and future water supply needs. Such coordination efforts will include the transmittal of
information for large scale future land use changes, population and demand projections,
water supply needs, implementation of alternative water supply projects, establishment
of level of service standards, and servicing of newly annexed areas.
Policy PW-1.2.5: In the development of its future potable water supplies, the City shall,
to the maximum extent feasible, utilize methods which preserve the integrity of the
Biscayne Aquifer, protect the quality of surface water and related ecosystems,
considered compatible with the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East
Coast Regional Water Supply Plan, and comply with that land use and environmental
protection policies of the City MCNP, the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South
Florida, and the State Comprehensive Plan.
Objective PW-1.3: The City shall coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Water Supply
Facilities Work Plan to identify and develop those water supply projects necessary to
meet the City's projected water demands for a 20-year period.
Policy PW-1.3.1: The City's adopted Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update (Work
Plan), dated September 2015, is incorporated as follows in Appendix PW-1 of the
MCNP. This document is designed to: assess current and projected potable water
demands; evaluate the sources and capacities of available water supplies; and identify
those water supply projects, using all available technologies, necessary to meet the
City's water demands for a 20-year period. The Work Plan shall remain consistent with
projects as listed in the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast
Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5
years and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's
approval of an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan
shall address climate change and sea level rise that may impact the potable water
infrastructure and sources. The potable water supply facilities necessary to satisfy
projected water demands for the City of Miami during the 2014-2033 period are shown
in Appendix A of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Appendix PW-1).
Policy PW-1.3.2: The City shall be consistent with the current approved version of
South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply
Plan and the current adopted County's Water Supply Facilities Work Plan in
developing and updating its 20-Year Work Plan.
Policy PW-1.3.3: The City shall support Miami -Dade County efforts to consider areas
that will be impacted by sea level rise when building, expanding or planning for new
facilities such as water treatment plants,
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 42
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PW-1.3.4: The City shall take all necessary steps to ensure that all
future development shall comply with the landscape standards in Sections 18-
A and 18-B of Miami -Dade County Code. (See related Policies NR-2.1.8 and
NR-2.1.9)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
43
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
Goal SW-1: Ensure a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper maintenance,
timely provision and efficient operation of an integrated solid waste disposal and ancillary
solid waste collection system.
Objective SW-1.1: The City will continue to provide solid waste collection services to
City residents and businesses in a manner that ensures public health and safety, and a
clean urban environment.
Policy SW-1.1.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system,
that solid waste capacity shall be in place to serve new development and/or
redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
equivalent in compliance with a level of service standard of seven (7) lbs. per person
per day, which is equivalent to 1.28 tons per person per year.
Policy SW-1.1.2: Commercial structures and high density residential areas will continue
to be served by either the City's Solid Waste Department or by private sector providers
of solid waste collection services. The City will require levels of service to be complied
with by private haulers operating within the City's boundaries, and will enforce all City
regulations regarding the disposal and collection of solid waste.
Policy SW-1.1.3: The City shall maintain solid waste collection equipment as required
to serve the public needs according to the service standard adopted in Policy SW-1.1.1.
Policy SW-1.1.4: The City will take appropriate measures to ensure compliance with its
"Garbage and Trash Ordinance," Chapter 22 of the Municipal Code.
Policy SW-1.1.5: Land development regulations will be consistent with the provision of
solid waste collection services in accordance with the adopted level of service.
Policy SW-1.1.6: In the allocation of funds for the provision of solid waste services, first
priority will be given to those improvements and programs that are necessary to protect
the health, safety and the integrity of the environment, and meet federal, state and local
legal and regulatory requirements. Second priority in the allocation of funds will be
assigned to improvements that are necessary to meet existing deficiencies in capacity
or service, or required to replace or repair needed equipment, while third priority will be
assigned to those projects that increase the extent of services.
Policy SW-1.1.7: The City shall, through enforcement of its powers to regulate solid
waste collection services, require promoters of major public events to reimburse the City
for extraordinary trash and garbage collection services required as a result of such
events.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
44
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective SW-1.2: Although the City has no authority governing solid waste transfer
and disposal, it will continue to support Miami -Dade County efforts intended to ensure
that transfer stations and disposal sites are sufficient to meet the needs of City
residents according to the service standards adopted in Policy 1.1.1.
Policy SW-1.2.1: The City's departments of Solid Waste and Planning, through the
City's Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, shall request the Miami -Dade County
Department of Solid Waste to jointly develop methodologies and procedures to
biennially update estimates of system demand and capacity.
Policy SW-1.2.2: The City shall support Miami -Dade County's policy to implement the
County's Solid Waste Disposal and Resources Recovery Management Plan.
Policy SW-1.2.3: The City will continue to explore the development of resource recovery
and cogeneration activities and, subject to concurrence by Miami -Dade County,
consider the implementation of programs and procedures that decentralize solid waste
disposal and reduce the volume of solid waste that is disposed of at County landfills.
Policy SW-1.2.4: The City will work with, and support, the County's efforts to identify
generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enforce procedures for the proper
collection and disposal of hazardous waste. Its departments will support the County's
program to enforce all non -household producers of hazardous waste in identifying waste
and disposing of it according to EPA, State, and local standards. The City will support
Miami -Dade County's development of a hazardous waste temporary storage and
transfer facility in a non -populated area. In coordination with Miami -Dade County, the
City will work to meet the Region's objective to reduce the incidence of improper
hazardous materials and waste handling and disposal. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Policy NR-1.1.8.)
Policy SW-1.2.5: The City shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
encourage the County to utilize "amnesty days" to encourage small volume, non-
commercial producers of hazardous waste to safely dispose of such waste, and to
develop a permanent system for households, small business and other low volume
generators to safely dispose of hazardous wastes.
Objective SW-1.3: It shall be the City's policy that solid waste collection procedures
shall be conducted in a manner that will reduce the quantity of litter, trash and
abandoned personal property on city streets.
Policy SW-1.3.1: The City will continue to actively support and implement neighborhood
clean-up and beautification efforts through public awareness and information programs.
Policy SW-1.3.2: The City shall, through enforcement of those provisions of the City
Code that protect and enhance the appearance of neighborhoods, ensure that streets
and yards remain clean and attractive. Where the City Code falls short of the provisions
necessary to accomplish this, revisions shall be proposed to the City Commission.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 45
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy SW-1.3.3: The Solid Waste Department should be encouraged to increase street
sweeping frequencies in order to reduce pollution to surface waters via storm water
runoff and to reduce or eliminate litter in areas where significant problems may exist.
(See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS-2.2.2.)
Objective SW-1.4: Although the City has no authority governing solid waste transfer
and disposal, it will continue to support and cooperate with Miami -Dade County efforts
to encourage the recycling of solid waste materials and reduce the volume of waste set
aside for collection and disposal.
Policy SW-1.4.1: The City shall, through its publicity programs and mechanisms,
encourage the use of recyclable packaging materials.
Policy SW-1.4.2: The City shall evaluate the development of reuse and/or recycling
programs for used tires, waste oils and similar recyclable materials and make
recommendations for applicable additions or amendments to City procedures governing
the disposal of these materials.
Policy SW-1.4.3: The City shall, through its publicity programs and mechanisms,
encourage residents to reduce the volume of yard and tree trimmings set aside for
disposal by promoting the use of composting.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
46
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
TRANSPORTATION
Goal TR-1: Maintain an effective and cost efficient traffic circulation network within the City of Miami
that provides transportation for all persons and facilitates commercial activity, and which is consistent
protects and enhances the natural environment.
Objective TR-1.1: All arterial and collcctor roadways under County and State
jurisdiction that lie within the City's boundaries will operate at levels of service
established by the respective agency. All other City streets will operate at levels of
service that are based upon the multi -modal capacity of the transportation system
which recognizes the frequency of existing and programmed public transit servico
operating within an urban center and characterized by a mixture of compact
development and modcratc4e-high residential densities Esc intensities, along
with single family residential and mixed -use neighborhoods, located within a
transportation concurrency exception area (TCEA). The City will monitor the levels of
service of all arterial and collcctor roadways to continue to develop and enhance
transportation strategies that promote public transit and minimize the impacts of the
TCEA. See Appendix TR-1 of the MCNP which contains the Transportation Element Data
to address existing and projected levels of service for roadways, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities.
Policy TR 1.1.1: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia Key,
Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay that have a land use and
County's designation of an Urban Infill Area lying generally east of the Palmetto
Expressway and including all of the City of Miami. Within this area, the concentration
and intensification of development around centers of activity shall be emphasized with
the goals of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and the viability of
commercial areas. Priority will be given to infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive
reuse of underutilized land and structures, the redevelopment of substandard sites,
downtown revitalization and the development of projects that promote public
transportation. Maintenance of transportation levels of service within this designated
Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency Exception Area shall be in accordance with the
adopted Transportation Corridors level of service standards and the City of Miami
Person Trip Methodology as set forth in Policics TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3 of the
Transportation Element of the MCNP. (See Land Use Policy LU 1.1.11.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
47
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-1.1.2: The City of Miami originated and continues to utilize a person trip
methodology for measurement of local level of service (LOS) on a transportation facility,
which may be a roadway, maw transit service, pedestrian way, bikeway, or any other
transportation mode alone or in combination with others. The Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan (adopted as Ordinance 10511 on February 9, 1989) established
under Policies TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3 that within designated Transportation Corridors,
the capacity of all transportation modes will be used in the measurement of future, peak
hour level of service standards. The City of Miami "Methodology for Calculating Peak
Hour Person Trip Capacity" was incorporated into the Transportation Element of the
MCNP under Policies TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3 on January 21, 1991 (adopted as
Ordinance 10832), and was separately published as a report entitled "Transportation
Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami", September 1990.
The City of Miami Person Trip Methodology calculates the total person trip capacity of
all transportation modes utilizing a transportation facility against the total person trip
demand for travel on that facility expressing the resulting ratio in letter grades LOS A
through LOS F in the same manner as used by the conventional volume over capacity
(V/C) methodology. The measurement of LOS is made for the peak period (the average
of the two highest consecutive hours of trip volume during a weekday), where an overall
minimum peak period LOS standard of E (100 percent utilization of person trip capacity)
will be maintained. Issuance of development orders for new development or significant
expansion of existing development shall be contingcnt upon compliance with these LOS
standards, subject to the modifications described in subparagraphs 1.1.2.1 through
1.1.2.3 below, and any applicable provisions of the Urban Infill Transportation
Concurrency Exception Area.
1.1.2.1: Where no public transit exists, and private passenger vehicles are the
only vehicular mode available for travel on the facility: minimum LOS E (100
percent of capacity) shall apply.
1.1.2.2: Where local bus transit service on minimum 20 minute headways ib
available parallel to and within 1/2 mile of the facility, the facility shall operate at no
greater than 120 percent of capacity.
1.1.2.3: Where express bus transit and/or premium transit service on minimum
20 minute headways is available parallel to and within 1/2 mile of the facility, the
facility shall operate at no greater than 150 percent of capacity.
Policy TR-1.1.3: Notwithstanding the foregoing, as required by s. 163.3180(10) F.S.,
the following standards established by rule by the Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT) are adopted by the City of Miami as its minimum LOS standards for Florida
Intrastate Highway System (FINS) roadways within the City subject to any applicable
provisions governing requirements of the Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency
Exception Area (see Policy TR 1.1.1):
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
48
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
1.1.3.1: Limited access FIRS highways shall operate at LOS D or better, except
that where exclusive through lanes exist, such roadways may operate at LOS E.
1.1.3.2: Controlled access FIHS highways shall operate at LOS D or better,
cxccpt that whcrc such roadways arc parallcl to cxclusivc transit facilities or are
located within a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), roadways
may operate at LOS E.
1.1.3.3: Where FDOT has determined that a FIRS roadway is constrained or
backlogged, such roadways operating bclow thc foregoing minimums must be
managed so as not to cause significant deterioration, which is defined as an
average annual daily traffic increase in two way traffic volume of 10 percent or
more, or a 10 percent or greater reduction in operating speed for the peak
direction in the 1000 hig,,,"�, -ho
Policy TR 1.1.4: Within eighteen months of the adoption of this policy, the City will
update the City of Miami Person Trip Methodology to reinforce the Transportation
Corridors plan to identify, describe, measure, and evaluate the multimodal transportation
corridors, facilities and terminals in the City of Miami and recommend measures to
cnhancc vchicular and mass transit operations provide for greater pedestrian access•
the TCEA. The City of Miami Person Trip Methodology will pay particular attention to
the differing characteristics of Miami's neighborhoods such as land use, population
density, economic activity,
and will develop detailed standards for transportation facilities and services that will
complement neighborhood development, redevelopment, and conservation. Miami's
downtown will be the subject of special attention, to ensure that its new residential
development will enjoy the benefits of an improved multimodal transportation system
that will improve transit access within neighborhoods, while improving their connectivity
system wide as described in the Miami Downtown Transportation Master Plan, dated
May 2003. As a component of this effort, the City will assess how the Person Trip
Methodology could be enhanced to identify projected transit needs and programming
on a route by route basis in coordination with the MPO and Miami Dade Transit.
Policy TR-1.1.5: The City, through its membership and regular attendance at meetings
of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council (TPC), and through its Intergovernmental
Coordination Policies, will support the County's efforts to increase the efficiency and
cnhancc thc safety of thc cxisting thoroughfare network by such methods as improved
signal timing, better intersection and street design, car pooling, and encouraging
staggered work schedules. The City will continue to enforce the Transportation Control
Measures Ordinance pursuant to Section 11 182 of thc City Codc, to improvc thc
cfficicncy of thc cxisting transportation infrastructurc and to support the TCEA.
Policy TR-1.1.6: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will
annually coordinate with Miami Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public
bus transit system, including new service and the expansion of neighborhood based
local circulator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. The City
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
49
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
will work with Miami Dade County to promote the transit oriented development policies
found in the Miami Dade County's CDMP to support the TCEA .
Policy TR-1.1.7: The City shall seek, where appropriate, based on operational analysis,
cost effectiveness, land development regulations, and the concurrence of Miami Dade
County or FDOT, to restore cxisting one way streets to two way operation to improve
access and reduce trip length and vehicular speeds, particularly in the very high density
areas of the City such as Little Havana and Downtown/Brickell/Omni, where access to
existing buildings and garages will not be diminished or impeded.
Policy TR-1.1.8: Through enforcement, amendment, and interpretation of its land
development regulations, the City shall require the provision of adequate vehicular
parking facilities with energy efficiency lighting consistent with parking demand at
locations that are not disruptive to nearby residential communities.
Policy TR 1.1.9: Require new development in downtown to implement transportation
control measure provisions in accordance with Section 11 182, "Transportation Control
Measures" of the City Code, to promote a general reduction in vehicular traffic by
increasing auto occupancy and transit ridership to support the TCEA. Within one year
of the adoption of this policy, the City shall revise the "Transportation Control Measures"
to include additional transportation demand management requirements for all future and
existing developments (as applicable pursuant to Scction 11 182), such as parking
management and ridesharing programs to promote carpooling, vanpooling, car sharing
incentive programs, staggered work schedules, flexible work hours, compressed work
amenities, transit stops, transit drop off locations or pull out bays, bicycle storage
facilities and additional transportation demand management strategies and criteria
established bctwccn thc City and thc business community.
Policy TR-1.1.10: Within one year of the adoption of this policy, the City will publish an
update map that will depict the location of existing and planned future major parking
facilities that will be updated annually and will be available for public use through thc
City of Miami website.
Policy TR 1.1.11: The City will continue to relocate and/or extend streets that do not fit
the developed street grid system of downtown, and have contributed to the disruption of
circulation.
Policy TR-1.1.12: The City will, through its membership and regular attendance at
meetings of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, encourage Miami -Dade County to improve
downtown connections to the expressway system by providing a means of access to
and from 195 at Northwest 20th Street, redesigning the existing 1395 to improve its
capacity and aesthetics in Overtown, Park West and Omni, facilitate access to
Overtown, and construct a truck tunnel connecting the seaport to 1395.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 50
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR 1.1.13: New development shall be required to contribute to established
transportation impact mitigation fees pursuant to applicable provisions in the City Code
to fund mobility in the TCEA.
Policy TR-1.1.14: The City will, through its membership on the MPO's Transportation
Planning Council (TPC) continue to participate in Miami Dade County's formulation of
transportation policies, and will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
support the County's efforts to increase reliance on parking at outlying Metrorail stations
and express bus stops to support the TCEA.
Policy TR 1.1.15: Through enforcement of minimum and maximum on site parking
City Code, the City will manage the downtown parking supply to maintain an appropriatc
balance among the need to promote economic growth, to facilitate local traffic
circulation, and to encourage public transportation use to support the TCEA.
Policy TR 1.1.16: Through enforcement of applicable provisions of Section 11 182
"Transportation Control Measures" of the City Code, regarding downtown parking
requirements, together with the powers of the City's Off Street Parking Authority
Department, the City will actively pursue the development of public and privatc
peripheral parking garages near the expressway and arterial entrances to downtown in
order to reduce congestion in the core area and promote the use of alternative travel
modes to support the TCEA. In addition, the City will continue to enforce the maximum
parking provisions mandated in Section 11 182.
Policy TR-1.1.17: The City of Miami will coordinate with South Florida Commuter
Services and the Florida Department of Transportation to support and encourage City
cmploycc participation in altcrnativc modes of transportation by offering Downtown
cmploycrs and thcir cmploycc's altcrnativcs to driving to work alone. The City will also
work with the South Florida Commuter Services to ensure consistent implementation of
the City's Section 14 182 "Transportation Control Measures" and provide assistance to
employers and businesses required to implement the measures. In addition, the City
will utilize the South Florida Commuter Services to establish the transportation demand
management (TDM) requirements for all future and existing employers with more than
50 employees in the City. The City of Miami will lead by example in developing TDM
strategies for City employees to support the TCEA.
Policy TR 1.1.18: The City will work with representatives of the Miami Dade Transit
Agency to increase the number of MDT bus routes operating within the City that
participate in the Agency's Bike and Ride Program to promote the use of alternative
travel modes to support the TCEA.
Policy TR-1.1.19: The City will promotc multi modal transportation initiativcs and the
recommendations of the adopted Miami Downtown Transportation Master Plan dated
May 2003, to promote the use of alternative travel modes to support the TCEA.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
51
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-1.1.20: The City will utilize funds provided through the People's
Transportation Plan and funds collected from traffic impact mitigation fees as specified
in the Capital Improvement Element of the MCNP, to fund mobility in the TCEA, and to
ffund t cost of plan? programs and physical ovemon o s r�ye t
residents, employees and visitors of the RAC.
Objective TR-1.2: At the time of all development reviews, the City will determine rights
of -way and corridors needed for existing transportation nctworks and ensure those
rights -of -way will be designated and reserved prior to development.
Policy TR-1.2.1: The City will maintain and enforce, and where necessary revise, the
minimum right of way requirements established in its City Code to ensure the continuity
and effectiveness of the thoroughfare network.
Policy TR-1.2.2: The City will continue to maintain a comprehensivc public rights of
way improvements program for those major commercial streets that are under the City's
jurisdiction and have high levels of pedestrian activity.
Objective TR-1.3: The City's transportation system will enhance safe person trip and
through design. Beginning January 1, 2004, the City will implement the prioritized
Policy TR 1.3.1: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe system
for controlling vehicular traffic by adhering to design standards and procedures and
recognizing those relevant standards and procedures applicable to the agency with
jurisdiction over the roadway or transportation facility.
Policy TR 1.3.2: The City, through its membership and regular attendance at meetings
of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its Intergovernmental
Coordination Policies, will annually coordinate with Miami Dade County to support thc
monitoring of locations of high accident frequency on the city's streets and its
identification of design improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions,
cspccially to pedestrians. The City shall utilizc safcty as an cvaluation criteria when
improvements are incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Element.
Policy TR_1.3.3: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe system
for pedestrian access by adhering to design standards and procedures which comply
with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and which arc rcquircd by thc
Engineering Standards for Design and Construction published by the Department of
Public Works in December 2005
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
52
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Ob7oetive TR-4 4: The City's-street--lie rk will be utilized to proteet-and-enhance the
character of the city's residential neighborhoods and neighborhood commercial
centers through coordination with the Land Use Plan, Zoning Code, and adopted
Neighborhood plans and recommendations. Proposed measures for neighborhood
calming plans.
Policy TR-1.4.1: The City will seek cooperative agreements, as necessary, with Miami
Dade County and with FDOT to ensure that the County and State's transportation
improvements are designed to minimize the intrusion of commuter traffic on City
residential streets, do not sever or fragment well defined neighborhoods, and do not
result in major disruption to pedestrian traffic.
Policy TR 1.4.2: The City will coordinate with Miami Dade County and with FDOT to
cncouragc local traffic to use altcrnativcs to the Florida Intrastate Highway System
roadways, where practicable, to support the TCEA and to protect its interregional and
intrastate functions.
Policy TR 1.4.3: The City will develop a streetscape design program that will guide
landscaping, lighting and construction of sidewalks and bicycle paths along city streets,
streets.
Policy TR 1.4.4: As streets undergo major repairs or renovation, the City will seek to
the physical appearance and quality of the City's neighborhoods and districts.
Policy TR-1.4.5: A new category of public thoroughfares is created entitled "Urban
Streets," defining the Urban Street as a pedestrian and vehicular way whose primary
function is to serve adjoining residential neighborhoods and the businesses that serve
them in the City of Miami. Characteristics and standards for such streets will be defined
and spccifications cr atcd on a casc by casc basis in cooperation with the
governmental entity having ownership of the street, local residents and homeowner
associations. Principles that will guide the design process will include, as appropriate:
lower design speeds and control of traffic volumes utilizing traffic calming devices
including but not limited to modification of lane widths consistent with lower design
speeds; wide sidewalks; medians; roundabouts; landscaping; attractive lighting; creative
and informative signage; on street parking; and other design features and amenities as
appropriate. Urban Streets shall be subject to the level of service standards described
In Policies TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3. The first such Urban Streets to be designated shall
b
Biscayne Boulevard
Grand Avenuc
Calle Ocho from Brickcll Avcnuc to S.W. 27 Avcnuc
Coral Way from Brickell Avenue to S.W. 37 Avenue
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
53
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
N.E. 2 Avenue from N.E. 36 Street to the North City Limit.
Additional streets may be designated from time to time by Resolution of the City
Commission upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Department, based
upon criteria developed in connection with the neighborhood planning studies conducted
as part of the comprehensive update and revision of the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan in 2005. (Resolution No. 01 1126, adopted by the City Commission
October2l, 2001).
Policy TR-1.4.6: Develop and encourage bicycle paths and bicycle lanes throughout
the City of Miami in coordination with FDOT, Miami Dade County and the MPO to
promote alternative travel modes in the TCEA.
Policy TR 1.4.7: The City of Miami shall continue to respond to neighborhood traffic
concerns by developing and implementing neighborhood traffic calming measures using
standard traffic flow modification procedures in place by Miami Dade County and FDOT
to evaluate traffic calming proposals. Neighborhood traffic calming measures may
incl de bit ore not limited to traffic circles median modifications mid block raiser!
medians and streetscape improvements in coordination with Miami Dade County and
FDOT as appropriate .
Objective TR-1.5: The City of Miami's continued development requires the provision of
effective public transit and paratransit scrviccs that serve existing and future land uscs,
the provision of safe and convenient public transit pa,senger transfer terminal
uscs, and the accommodation of the special needs of the City of Miami's population,
many of whom are transportation disadvantaged. Therefore, the City of Miami will
support Miami Dade County in the provision of these essential public transit scrviccs.
(See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR-3.2.2.)
Policy TR-1.5.1: The City will, through its membership and regular attendance at
meetings of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, continually encourage Miami Dade County to
improve connections between transit modes using, but not limited to, local circulator
transit services.
Policy TR 1.5.2: The City shall conduct appropriate land use and zoning analysis of the
areas surrounding each existing and future premium transit station as such station sites
are approved by Miami Dade County or the City of Miami for development in order to
determine whether appropriate land use and zoning changes should be implemented
that foster the development and use of the stations while protecting adjacent
neighborhoods from incompatible development (examining height, density and intensity,
use and scale). Such land use and zoning changes shall include minimum and maximum
density and intensity standards at the time of implementation.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
54
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-1.5.3: The City shall encourage the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial
Hospital to participate in transportation management initiatives and strategies to assist
in meeting the demands of the Health District/Civic Center expansion and helping to
shall encourage the Health District/Civic Center stakeholders and facility operators to
work together to increase Metrorail ridership and utilization of the transit station to help
decrease the need for excessive surface parking demand.
Policy TR-1.5.4: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
Quadrant area of downtown.
Policy TR 1.5.5: [Reserved].
Policy TR-1.5.6: The City will, through its membership and regular attendance at
meetings of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, assist Miami Dade County as necessary, in
Transportation Plan. The City will utilize land development regulations to help direct
development where it will support the densities required for premium transit systems.
Policy TR-1.5.7: The City shall, through its membership and regular attendance at
meetings of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
Intergovernmental Coordination Policics, rcqucst that Miami Dadc County includc
appropriate public transit systems in its Transportation Plan to connect the following:
Bayside to Flagler Street, the seaport to Metromover, the Miami International Airport to
Downtown, Southeast Bayshore Drive to Metromover, , Stadium to Health District/Civic
Center, Miami Beach to Downtown and the FEC Corridor to Downtown.
Policy TR-1.5.8: The City will ensure a stronger interface between the development or
redevelopment of neighborhood activity centers and the public transportation system by
cstablishing dcsign guidclincs for connectivity and transit infrastructure to be
incorporated into the development/redevelopment program. The City shall require all
new development and redevelopment in existing and planned transit corridors to be
planned and designed to promote pedestrianism and transit usage through the following:
A. The City shall encourage development of a wide variety of residential and non
residential landusesand activities in nodes around rapid transit stations to producc
short trips, minimize transfers, attract transit ridership, and promote transit
operational and financial efficiencies. Land uses that may be approved around
transit stations shall include housing, shopping, and offices in moderate to high
density and intensity, complemented by compatible entertainment, cultural uses and
human services in varying mixes. The particular uses that are approved in a given
station area should respect the character of the n arby ncighborhood, strive to serve
the noodle of the neighborhood anal promote balance in the range of exit ting and
e
planned land uses along the subject transit line.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
55
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
B. It is the policy of the City of Miami to accommodate new development around rapid
transit stations that is well designed, conducive to both pedestrian and transit use.
and architecturally attractive. In recognition that many transit riders begin and end
their trips as pedestrians, pedestrian accommodations shall include, as appropriate,
continuous sidewalks to the transit station, small blocks and closely intersecting
streets, buildings oriented to the street or other pedestrian paths, parking lots
predominantly to the rear and sides of buildings, primary building entranccs as closc
to the street or transit stop as to the parking lot, shade trees, awnings and other
weather protection for pedestrians.
C. On all arterial and collector streets served by public transit new non residential
buildings and substantial alterations to existing non residential buildings, and
residential buildings wherever practical shall provide at least one full time building
cntrancc that is rccognizablc and acccsciblc from thc strcct and is comparably as
close to the street and/or transit stop as it is to the primary parking lot.
D. New residential and non-residential developments, subdivisions and replats shall
provide for buildings that front the transit street, or provide streets or pedestrian
connections that intersect with the transit street in close proximity to transit stops
not more than 700 feet apart.
E. Redevelopment of property within one half mile of existing and planned transit
stations and bus routes shall not cause an increase in walking distance from nearby
areas to the transit services and shall, wherever practical, be done in a manner that
reduces walking distances and is comfortable and attractive to pedestrians.
F. Land uses that are not conducive to public transit ridership such as car dealerships,
car oriented food establishments, and container yards should not be permitted to
locate or expand within'/ mile of a rapid transit station.
G. The City of Miami seeks to increase the density of development within walking
distance of rapid transit stations in a manner appropriate to the particular setting of
each transit station and consistent with the policies of the MCNP that specify that
existing abutting residential neighborhoods are to be protected and preserved.
Policy TR-1.5.9A: The City will, through its membership and regular attendance at
meetings of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, encourage Miami Dade County to approve thc
use of private jitneys where it is determined that there exists public need for such
services and where conventional bus transit services do not satisfactorily meet the need.
Policy TR-1.5.9B: The City will promote water borne transportation as a commuter
transit service and through its membership and regular attendancc at meetings of thc
MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its Intergovernmental Coordination
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
56
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policies will encourage Miami Dade County to approvc thc usc of watcr bornc
transportation as a commuter transit service.
Policy TR-1.5.10: Through application of the provisions of its land development
regulations, the City shall encourage residential development near large employment
centers in order to minimize Commutes within the City and near the large employment
centers. The City shall continue to update the land development regulations, as
necessary, to ensure the regulations promote residential development near large
employment centers and investigate opportunities for mixed -use developments.
Policy TR 1.5.11: Through enforcement of applicable provisions of Section 11 182
"Transportation Control Measures" of the City Codc, thc City will rcquirc new large scalc
development to adopt and enforce measures that will reduce the generation of new
single occupant passenger car trips in areas of high density development, and
cncouragc thc usc of multiplc occupant vehicles, including public transit, for homc
based work trips. The City will coordinate with the South Florida Commuter Services to
provide support for transportation demand initiatives undertaken by new developments.
Within one year of the adoption of this policy, the City shall modify Article 17 of the City
Zoning Code to incorporate Transportation Control Measures into the Major Use Special
Permit application process.
Policy TR-1.5.12: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will
continue to support Miami -Dade Transit in its efforts to increase transit ridership. The
City will coordinate with Miami Dade Transit to develop weekday peak hour transit
ridership data to ensure that a baseline can be established to support the City's person
trip methodology level of service measurements and to support Miami Dade Transit's
efforts to improvc transit services.
Policy TR 1.5.13: The City shall annually coordinate with Miami Dade County and its
update of the Five Year Transit Development Program (TDP) to addresc transit needs
consistent with the adopted level of service standard and transit planning guidelines,
cstablishcd by Miami Dade County, and population growth trends within the City of
Miami.
Policy TR 1.5.14: The City will publish an annual listing of the updated MDT Transit
Development programmed improvements within the City of Miami.
Policy TR 1.5.15: The City will publish an annual listing of the updated Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) improvements
within the City of Miami.
Objective TR 1.6: The City shall through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
The City will annually monitor programs sponsored by the State of Florida and seek
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 57
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-1.6.1: The City shall coordinate its transportation planning activities with the
annual update to the Metropolitan Planning Organization and Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) Five Year Transportation Improvement Program and the
Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long Range Transportation Plan Update.
Objective TR-1.7: The City shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
expansion and improvement magi be facilitated
Policy TR-1.7.1: The City shall use its land development regulations to ensure that
adequate public rights of way are preserved for transportation purposcs, which includcc
the need for transit services.
Policy TR 1.7.2: Within two years of the adoption of this policy, The City shall develop
a transit corridor right of way map to use when evaluating new projects and their
proximity to existing and future planned transit service.
Objective TR-1.8: The City shall regularly coordinate the transportation system and tho
information provided in the Transportation Element with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Land Use element, including coordination with the land use, map,
population densities, housing, employment patterns, projected development and
redevelopment, urban infill, and other similar characteristics use that have an
Policy TR 1.8.1: The City shall continue to assure provision of a properly designed and
safe system for controlling vehicular accessibility to major thoroughfares through
adopted design standards and procedures as contained in the City Public Works Manual
as adopted for use in the review process, which at a minimum addrecf,':
1. Adequate storage and turning bays;
2. Spacing and design of median openings and curb cuts;
3. Provision of service roads along major thoroughfares, where applicable;
'1. Driveway access and spacing; and
5. Traffic operations, including the provision of turning bays and bus bays for
bus transit.
Policy TR-1.8.2: The Transportation Element will be amended to reflect changes to the
Land Use Element every five years, or as nece&sary, and will include updated
information based upon changes to the land use map, population densities, housing,
similar characteristics of land use impacting the transportation system.
Policy TR 1.8.3: The Transportation Element updates provided as part of Evaluation
and Appraisal Report (EAR) will utilize a long range planning horizon of a minimum of
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 58
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
20 years in order to achieve the maximum consistency with the Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).
Objective TR-1.9: The City shall seek to achieve consistency and coordination with the Port
of Miami, Port of Miami River and the Miami International Airport plans and the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan.
Policy TR 1.9.1: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will
annually coordinate with the Port of Miami, Port of Miami River and Miami International
Airport to ensure consistency between the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
and the port and airport master plans, and to improve accecc to and compatibility with
port and airport facilities. (2011168)
GOAL TR-1: MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE AND COST EFFICIENT CIRCULATION NETWORK
THAT PROVIDES TRANSPORTATION FOR ALL PERSONS WHILE REDUCING BOTH THE
DEPENDENCY ON AUTOMOBILES AND OVERALL ROADWAY CONGESTION
Objective TR-1.1: Encourage sustainable growth and development that aims to improve
mobility, reduce congestion, and supports the overall growth strategy of the City.
Policy TR-1.1.1: As an Urban Infill Area (UIA) and/or a Transportation Concurrence
Exemption Area (TCEA); established by Miami -Dade County, Laws and
Regulations, and illustrated in Appendix TR-1, Map TR-143.1, of the Data and
Analysis, the City will encourage the concentration and intensification of development
around centers of activity with the goal of enhancing the livability of residential
neighborhoods, supporting economic development, and the viability of commercial
areas. Infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and
structures, redevelopment of substandard sites, downtown revitalization, and
development projects that promote public transportation will be heavily encouraged.
(See Policy LU-1.1.11.) (200516)
Policy TR-1.1.2: The City will provide; and coordinate with other agencies; (Florida
Department of Transportation and the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization
and Miami -Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works sufficient multimodal
transportation facilities and services to address existing level of service deficiencies and
to promote and accommodate the City's growth strategy by linking centers of activity
with effective transportation options, thereby improving accessibility.
Policy TR-1.1.3: Through application of the provisions of its land development
regulations, the City will encourage residential development near large employment
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
59
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
centers in order to minimize commutes within the City and investigate opportunities for
mixed -use developments.
Policy TR-1.1.4: The City will implement growth strategies that encourage infill and
redevelopment in order to take advantage of the multimodal transportation options
available, thereby reducing the dependency on automobiles for new developments.
Policy TR-1.1.5: The City will encourage new development to be structured to reinforce
a pattern of neiqhborhoods and urban centers by focusing growth along transit corridors
and around transit nodes and centers.
Policy TR-1.1.6: The City will design and promote transportation facilities that are
consistent with adjacent land uses, preserve natural features, protect historic and
cultural resources, and enhance community appearance and vibrancy.
Policy TR-1.1.7: The City will approve developments that minimize impacts to and help
retain the City's natural infrastructure and visual character derived from its unique
location and climate, including topography, landscape, and coastline.
Objective TR-1.2: Encourage the development of an efficient transportation network
that minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles traveled, and reduces the
demand for parking. (2008/4 & 2008/8)
Policy TR-1.2.1: The City will continue to promote the development of public and private
peripheral parking qaraqes near the expressways and arterial entrances to downtown.
Policy TR-1.2.2: The City will continue to support the County's efforts to increase
reliance on parking at satellite park -and -ride lots such as outlying Metrorail stations and
express bus stops to reduce vehicle miles traveled downtown and promote the use of
alternative travel modes.
Policy TR-1.2.3: The City will encourage that all roadway and transportation protects
use a context -sensitive approach to minimize impacts to neiqhborhoods by conserving
energy resources, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and limiting air pollution. Priority
for fundinq should be given to protects which support safety, reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions, reducing roadway congestion, and encourage multi-modalism. (200814
& 200818)
Policy TR-1.2.4: The City will provide reduced, shared or alleviated parking
requirements within the Land Development Regulations for developments located within
a 1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2 mile from Metrorail stations or Metromover station
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
60
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
(as illustrated in Appendix TR-1, Map TR-143.2, titled Centers and Transit Corridors.
Specific measures to accommodate this policy include:
A.The number of parking spaces required for new development and
redevelopment within a 1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2 mile from Metrorail
stations or Metromover stations will be reduced while limiting the maximum
number of allowable parking spaces.
B. New surface parking lots are discouraged to achieve the ultimate objective of
reduced parking as a primary use within a 1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2
mile from Metrorail stations or Metromover stations.
Policy TR-1.2.5: The City will update the map on an annual basis to be scheduled by
the City of Miami depicting the location of existing and planned future major parking
facilities (200 or more parking spots), which will also be available for public use through
the City of Miami website. Map TR-3 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and
Analysis section of this element illustrates the existing parking facilities (200 or more
parking spots) within the City.
Policy TR-1.2.6: The City will manage the downtown parking supply through
enforcement of minimum and maximum on -site parking limitations, as provided for in
Section 14-182.
Policy TR-1.2.7: The City requires implementation of "Transportation Control
Measures" such as those identified in 14-184 and 14-182 of the City Code, including
future updates and expansion of recommended measures. The City encourages
developments to be innovative in proposing Transportation Control Measures that
balance the objective of reducing congestion and increasing person throughput with the
need to promote economic growth, to facilitate local traffic circulation, and to encourage
public transportation use. (See Policy TR-1.5.2.)
Policy TR-1.2.8: By the end of 2020, the City will develop a citywide transportation
master plan that prioritizes projects based on the needs to improve mobility, reduce
congestion, promote public transit, and support economic development and will be
updated concurrently with future updates to the Transportation Element of the MCNP.
(See Policy TR-2.1.8.)
Objective TR-1.3: Address the impact of new developments or redevelopment on
existing right-of-way and transportation infrastructure prior to approving new
development or redevelopment to ensure sustainable growth patterns.
Policy TR-1.3.1: The City will maintain, enforce, and where necessary revise, the
minimum right-of-way requirements established in its City Code to ensure the continuity
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
61
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
and effectiveness of the thoroughfare network to support sustainable growth and
economic development.
Policy TR-1.3.2: The City will continue to maintain a comprehensive public rights -of -
way improvements program to identify infrastructure needs especially along major
commercial corridors and other areas within the City's jurisdiction that have high levels
of pedestrian activity.
Policy TR 1.3.3: Thc City will rc uirc a cncralizc Traffic Statement cumcntin thc
tri cncrati n an sitc access f r cvcl mcnts an rc cvcl mcnts that cncratc a
minimum maximum f 2 ncw cak h ur tri s. A ctailc Traffic an Nci h rh
Im act Analysis will c rc uirc f r cvcl mcnts an rc cvcl mcnts that cncratc
rn rcthan 2 ncw cakh ur tri s. ctcrminati n f -- -_ - _ _ _
r icctc t result fr m thc cvcl mcnt will c calculatc acc r in t thc latest vcrsi n
f thc ITE Tri Ccncrati n Manual. Thc ctailc Traffic an Nci h rh Im act
Analysis will rc uirc thc a licant c r inatc with thc City t rcvicw an a r vc
mcth I y ri r t c n uctin any ctailc traffic im act analysis. A vancc rcvicw f
mcth I y r sc is rcc mmcn c t cnsurc thc analysis a rcsscs s ccial
circumstanccs an charactcristics f cach uni uc cvcl mcnt such as arkin , valct
crati ns, an ucuin analysis. Thc City rcscrvcs thc ri ht t makc chan cs t tho
r sc me ---- - - -• ' - - '-- -
rc uirc a iti nal analysis n a casc y casc asis.
Policy TR-1.3.3: The City will require a Traffic Statement documenting the trip
generation, site access and maneuverability diagram for developments and
redevelopments that generate 20 or more peak hour trips based on the latest version of
the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Following review of the traffic statement the City
reserves the right to require a more in-depth traffic impact analysis based on location,
project intensity, and existing traffic level of service.
Policy TR-1.3.3.1: By December 201;8, the City will formalize submittal procedures
in a manual to provide guidance to applicants in preparing for advance reviews of
methodologies to be used in their analyses. (See Policy TR-2.7.3. and CI-1.2.3.f.)
Policy TR-1.3.3.2: The Cit will require the implementation of trans.ortation control
measures for all new developments or redevelopment, including an implementation
plan and schedule to enforce provision of such measures to mitigate traffic impacts
identified in the traffic analysis.
Policy TR-1.3.3.3: City of Miami Office of Transportation Management has the
discretion to request the applicant to submit Traffic Impact Studies and Traffic Study
Methodologies as necessary. The City's Office of Transportation Management may
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
62
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
request that these studies be sent to Miami Dade County Transportation, Miami
Dade Public Works, or FDOT, or any combination of these agencies, for review or
feedback, prior to final City approval.
Objective TR-1.4: Implement neighborhood traffic management and traffic calming
programs to protect and enhance the character of the city's residential neighborhoods
and neighborhood commercial corridors through coordination with the Future Land
Use Map, Land Development Regulations, and adopted Neighborhood plans and
recommendations.
Policy TR-1.4.1: The City will seek cooperative inter -local agreements, ILA, as
necessary, with Miami -Dade County and with the FDOT to ensure that the County and
State's transportation improvements are designed to minimize the intrusion of
commuter traffic on City residential streets, do not sever or fragment well-defined
neighborhoods, and do not result in major disruption to pedestrian traffic. (See Policy
IC-3.1.3.)
Policy TR-1.4.2: As streets undergo major repairs or renovation, the City will seek to
eliminate dirt shoulders and provide curbing, gutters, sidewalks, crosswalks, and
bicycle facilities to improve the physical appearance, mobility, and quality of the City's
neighborhoods and districts.
Policy TR-1.4.3: The City will continue to respond to neighborhood traffic concerns
by developing and implementing neighborhood traffic calming measures using
standard traffic flow modification procedures in place by Miami -Dade County and
FDOT to evaluate traffic calming proposals. Neighborhood traffic calming measures
may include but are not limited to traffic circles, median modifications, mid -block raised
medians, chicanes, diagonal diverters, raised crosswalks, curb extensions, on -street
parking, road closures, reduced lane widths, streetscape improvements, bicycle
boulevards, and inclusion of bicycle facilities.
Policy TR-1.4.4: In an effort to better identify problems and select proper traffic
calming solutions in residential neighborhoods to reduce traffic speeds and cut-
throuqh traffic, the City will encourage and promote more citizen and stakeholder
involvement to build support for neiqhborhood traffic calming plans.
Objective TR-1.5: Implement and monitor Transportation Control Measures in
coordination with other public agencies and private developers to reduce the
dependency on automobiles and roadway congestion.
Policy TR-1.5.1: The City will support the County's efforts to increase the efficiency and
safety of the existing thoroughfare network by improving and coordinating signal timing,
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
63
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
providing and promoting more transportation choices, and encouraging staggered work
schedules.
Policy TR-1.5.2: The City will require all new developments to implement transportation
control measures in an effort to promote a general reduction in vehicular traffic by
increasing auto occupancy and transit ridership. These measures can include, but not
be limited to, parking management and ridesharinq programs to promote carpooling,
vanpoolinq, car sharing and use of hybrid or electric vehicles, transit discount and fare
subsidy programs, transit fare tax incentive programs, car charging stations, flexible
work hours, compressed work weeks, telecommutinq programs, the construction of on -
site transit shelters, transit amenities, transit stops, transit drop-off locations or pull-out
bays, bicycle storage facilities, bicycle share programs, and park -and -ride lots. (See
Policy TR-1.2.7.)
Policy TR-1.5.3: The City will continue to utilize and coordinate with FDOT's South
Florida Commuter Services (SFCS) program to establish and implement transportation
demand manaqement strategies for all future and existing employers with more than 50
employees. The City will lead by example in developing transportation demand
manaqement strateqies for City employees. (See Policy IC-2.1.4.)
Policy TR-1.5.4: The City will continue to encourage large employers such as the
University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Health District/Civic Center
stakeholders, and other local facility operators to participate in transportation
management initiatives and strategies to help increase transit ridership and decrease
the demand for surface parking in an effort to improve accessibility, traffic circulation,
and reduce parking problems.
Policy TR-1.5.5: The City will require new large-scale developments defined as all
projects that exceed 200,000 total square feet and/or a minimum of 199 total dwelling
units to adopt and enforce measures that will reduce the generation of new single -
occupant passenger car trips in areas of high -density development, and encourage the
use of high -occupant vehicles, including public transit, for home -based work trips.
Policy TR-1.5.6: The City will, pursuant to Chapter 163 of the State Statute, apply credit
against future transportation concurrency requirements for property owners based on
the property owner's contribution of right-of-way that expands a state transportation
facility as set forth in a legally binding agreement with the City. (2007110)
Objective TR-1.6: All arterial and collector roadways within the City's boundaries will
operate at the acceptable levels of service (LOS) established by the agency responsible
for maintenance.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
64
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-1.6.1: Within its jurisdiction, the City has adopted FDOT's minimum vehicle -
trip LOS targets for State of Florida Strategic Intermodal
System (PSIS) roadways and non-SIS roadways to plan, design and operate at an
acceptable level of service for the traveling public during peak travel hours of "D" in
urbanized areas. The City of Miami recognizes that a number of facilities are
experiencing a level of service below this target and the following activities area planned
to address substandard performance.,
Policy TR-1.6.1.1: The City will conduct a citywide visioninq process to identify
specific multimodal strategies and projects in collaboration with its partner
agencies to identify remedial implementation plans for Complete Streets and
Transportation System Management & Operations projects and solutions with an
eye toward emerging technologies and communications.
Policy 1.6.1.2: Prepare a multimodal transportation master plan to identify timing
and cost associated with priority solutions vetted during the visioning process.
Policy 1.6.1.3: Provide significant input to the next long-range transportation plan
cycle to 2045 for projects and funding implications/strategies to ensure successful
and timely implementation of priority projects.
1.6.1.1: Limitcd acccss FIHS highways will peratc at L S r bcttcr. R adways
with exclusive thr ugh lanes may cratc at L S E.
1.6.1.2: C ntr Ile acccss FIHS hi hways will cratc at L SE r cttcr.
1.6.1.3: Where F T has dctcrmincd that a FIHS r a way is c nstraincd r
back) ggcd, such r a ways Gratin bcl w thc f rcq ing minimums must be
many cd s as n t t cause significant dctcri rati n, which is dcfincd as an
average annual daily traffic increase in tw way traffic v lumc f 10 perccnt r
m rc, r a 10 perccnt r grcatcr rcducti n in crating spccd f r thc cak
dirccti n in thc 100th highest h ur.
Policy TR-1.6.2: The City will continue to monitor these vehicle-tri LOS (as illustrated
in Map TR-8 of wi.t.I4i44 Appendix TR 1, ) and
recommend transportation control measures, signal improvements and management
strategies for t ensure that all roadways (SIS and non-SIS) within the City, n t
ctcri rate y rcc mmcn in an im Icmcntin the trans rtati n c ntr I measures.
Policy TR-1.6.3: The City will retain the level of service target for urbanized areas as
outlined in FDOT Planning Topic No. 525-000-006a for SIS facilities to be a level of
service "D" during peak travel hours for automobiles. Quality/level of service for other
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
65
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
highway modes on SIS facilities (e.g. bus, pedestrian, bicycle) will be determined on a
case by case basis.
Policy TR-1.6.4: Person Trip LOS methodology is not applicable for SIS facilities. The
vehicle -trip LOS measures will be applied to all evaluations of SIS facilities and any other
facilities of state importance.
Objective TR-1.7: Utilize the person -trip methodology when evaluating new downtown
developments and redevelopment's impact on the local roadway level of service.
Policy TR-1.7.1: The City's updated Person -Trip LOS will be implemented for non-SIS
local roadways in Centers (as depicted on Map TR-143.2 within Appendix TR-1, the
Data Inventory and Analysis section). Within these non-SIS roadways the Person-Tri.
LOS methodology will only be applied to those non-SIS Centers and Transit Corridors
arc@swithin the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Increment III (DDRI III) and
the Southeast Overtown Park West DRI Increment III (SEOPW DRI III). Non-SIS
Centers and Transit Corridors feature frequent transit service defined
as transit routes ^ with cumulative transit headways of 10 minutes or
less4 and access to bicycle facilities.
Policy TR-1.7.2: The City will utilize a tiered LOS analysis when reviewing traffic
impacts for new developments whereby the Person -Trip LOS methodology will only be
applied within areas identified as a Center while the traditional automobile LOS
methodology will be applied to all other areas within the City. Both methodologies are
then expressed as a ratio corresponding to letter grades LOS A throuqh LOS F based
on the volume -to -capacity ratio in the same manner as used by the traditional LOS
methodology. Both the Person -Trip LOS and traditional automobile LOS may, at the
discretion of the City, require the analysis of traffic impacts during periods traditionally
defined as non -peak. (See CI-1.2.3.f.)
Policy TR-1.7.3: When calculating person -trip volumes for the existing conditions,
projected conditions without the development, and projected conditions with the
development, the Person -Trip LOS will use roadway average annual daily traffic
(AADT), an assumed automobile occupancy rate of 4=4 people per automobile (as
defined in Trans rtati n C rri rs: Mcctin. thc Challcn c f Gr wth Mana cmcnt in
the appropriate Development of Regional Impact Increment
for that proiect area), a possible combined trip reduction rate that reflects pedestrian and
bicycle mode split (based on recent U.S. Census American Community Survey data or
locally -specific travel surveys),
crs n tri ca acitics, thc Pcrs n Tri L S willl use cxistin r a way ca @city a iustc
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
66
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
by an ccu ancy ratc f 1.4 and cxisting transit ca acity data. (Scc A cndix TR 1, thc
ata invcnt ry an analysis cha to f thc Trans rtati n Elcmcnt f ram rc ctailc
cscri ti n f thc Pcrs n Tri L S mcth I y an thc v Iumc-t ca acity f rmula). ,
and existing transit ridership. When calculating the person trip capacities, the Person
Trip LOS shall use existing roadway capacity adjusted by an occupancy rate and
existing transit capacity data. (See Appendix TR-1 for Data Inventory and Analysis.)
Policy TR-1.7.4: Issuance of development orders for new development or significant
expansion of existing development will be contingent upon development of an approved
mitigation plan for areas at LOS E (100 percent of capacity) standard or beyond within
centers, transit corridors, and all other areas. (See CI-1.2.3.f.)
Policy TR-1.7.5: The City will continue to monitor, and will update by December 2018,
the Person -Trip Methodology and designation of transit corridors (as illustrated in Map
TR-134.2 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section). This update
will include adjustment for modal splits and improvements or changes to existing transit
services and bicycle facilities to better identify, describe, measure, and evaluate the
multimodal transit corridors, facilities and terminals.
Policy TR-1.7.6: Person Trip Methodology is not applicable for SIS facilities. Instead,
the traditional automobile level of service methodology that measures vehicle trips will
be used to evaluate SIS facilities and other facilities of state importance.
Future updates will also consider changes in existing and future land use, population
density, economic activity, housinq, business type and quality, and neiqhborhood plans.
As a component of this effort, the City will assess how the Person -Trip Methodology
could be enhanced to identify proiected transit needs and programming on a route-bv-
route basis in coordination with the MPO and Miami -Dade County.
GOAL TR-2: PROVIDE A BALANCED, ACCESSIBLE, SAFE, AND SUSTAINABLE MULTI -
MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LINKING HIGHWAYS, TRANSIT, GREENWAYS,
BIKEWAYS, AND SIDEWALKS INTO A SEAMLESS NETWORK
Objective TR-2.1: Integrate the existinq and planned multi -modal transportation system
with existinq and future developments.
Policy TR-2.1.1: The City will regularly coordinate information provided in the
Transportation Element with the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use
element. See Policy LU 1.1.114, including coordination with the land use maps,
population densities, housing, employment patterns, proiected development and
redevelopment, urban infill, and other similar characteristics of land use that have an
impact on transportation.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
67
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-2.1.2: The City will assist Miami -Dade County in developing the premium
transit protects identified in the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) within
the City limits. The City will utilize land development regulations and other incentives to
help direct development where it will best support existing and planned transit services.
(See Policy IC-2.1.5.)
Policy TR-2.1.3: The City will encourage increased density of development within
walking distance of transit corridors and Metrorail stations (as referenced in Policy LU-
1.1.10. and HO-1.1.9).
Policy TR-2.1.4: The City will ensure a strong interface between (re)developments and
the public transportation system by encouraaina Multimodal Design
Guidelines listed below that emphasize improved connectivity between transit facilities
and (re)developments and incorporate a balanced streetscape design program to
consider the followin• :
A. Encouraging development of a wide variety of residential and non-residential
land -uses and activities in nodes around rapid transit stations to produce short
trips, minimize transfers, attract transit ridership, and promote transit
operational and financial efficiencies. The particular uses that are approved in
a given station area should respect the character of the nearby neighborhood,
strive to serve the needs of the neighborhood, and promote balance in the
range of existing and planned land uses along the subject transit line.
B. Accommodate new development around rapid transit stations that is well
designed, conducive to both pedestrian and transit use, and architecturally
attractive.
C. In recognition that many transit riders begin and end their trips as pedestrians,
pedestrian accommodations will include, as appropriate, continuous sidewalks
to the transit station, small blocks and closely intersecting streets, buildings
oriented to the street or other pedestrian paths, parking lots predominantly to
the rear and sides of buildings, primary building entrances as close to the street
or transit stop as to the parking lot, shade trees, awnings and other weather
protection for pedestrians. On all arterial and collector streets served by public
transit new non-residential buildings and substantial alterations to existing non-
residential buildings, and residential buildings wherever practical will provide
at least one full-time building entrance that is recognizable and accessible from
the street and is comparably as close to the street and/or transit stop as it is to
the primary parking lot.
D. New residential and non-residential developments, subdivisions and replats
will provide for buildings that front the transit street, or provide streets or
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
68
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
pedestrian connections that intersect with the transit street in close proximity
to transit stops not more than 700 feet apart.
E. New residential and non-residential developments, subdivisions, and replats
will provide for bicycle and pedestrian connections that intersect with the transit
street in close proximity to transit stops.
F. Redevelopment of property within one-half mile of existing and planned transit
stations and bus routes will not cause an increase in walking distance from
nearby areas to the transit services and will, wherever practical, be done in a
manner that reduces walking distances and is comfortable and attractive to
pedestrians.
G. Land uses that are not conducive to public transit ridership such as car
dealerships, car -oriented food establishments, and container yards should not
be permitted to locate or expand within one -quarter mile of a rapid transit
station.
H. Increase the density of development within walking distance of rapid transit
stations in a manner appropriate to the particular setting of each transit station
and existing abutting residential neiqhborhoods are to be protected and
preserved.
I. Encouraqe incorporation of transit stations within private development to
inteqrate access to alternative modes with direct access and synergies within
new mixed use developments. This includes the co -location of transit stations
and public common areas of private developments.. (See Policy LU-1.1.19.)
Policy TR-2.1.5: The City will encourage the utilization of Road/Mobility Impact Fees on
arterials/collectors, transit protects and bicycle facilities within the City, and will include
said projects in the LRTP. (See Policy TR-2.2.5.) (2013113)
Policy TR-2.1.6: The City will respect the character of existing neighborhoods when
establishing design guidelines for connectivity and transit infrastructure that are
incorporated into future development/redevelopment programs.
Policy TR-2.1.7: The City will encourage Miami -Dade Transit to prioritize its transit
facility and service improvements along identified transit corridors and adjacent to
Metrorail stations.
Policy TR-2.1.8: The Transportation Element will be updated, at a minimum, every five
years and will utilize a long range planning horizon of a minimum of 20 years in order to
achieve the maximum consistency with the MPO's LRTP. (2008/8)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
69
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective TR-2.2: Promote and encourage a balanced multimodal transportation system
that provides a variety of connected transportation options to improve mobility and
accessibility for residents and visitors of all aqes.
Policy TR-2.2.1: The City will continue to foster the development of bicycle and
pedestrian friendly neighborhoods and commercial centers that enhance the
environment, improve public health, and overall quality of life.
Policy TR-2.2.2: The City will use its land development regulations to designate space
in the public right-of-way to accommodate alternative travel modes, including transit,
pedestrians, bicycles, and shared transportation options consistent with the Miami -Dade
County Complete Streets Manual.
Policy TR-2.2.3: The City will continue to support the trolley system (as illustrated in
Map TR-5.2 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section) that
provides feeder services and first-mile/last-mile connections to regional, premium transit
options such as Metrorail, Metromover, and Tri-Rail.
Policy TR-2.2.4: The City will seek to improve mobility by funding the cost of studies,
plans, programs, and physical improvements identified in its Capital Improvement plans
utilizing funds provided through the People's Transportation Plan, the Transportation
Trust Fund, and other funds collected with the sole purpose of improving the
transportation network. (2013113)
Policy TR-2.2.5: By December 2020, the City will seek to study and determine the
feasibility of establishing a mobility impact fee that would be collected to fund or
supplement the cost of transportation system improvements including potential
investments in the ex.ansion of the Miami Trolle com.lete streets improvements
enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities, water taxi services, Light Rail/Streetcar
plans, and other transportation improvements identified in future plans. (See Policy TR-
2.1.5.) (2013113)
Policy TR-2.2.6: The City will encourage Miami -Dade County to support cooperation
with private transportation network providers in the enhanced delivery of public
transportation services.
Policy TR-2.2.7: The City will support Miami -Dade County's plans for the provision of
water taxi services along Biscayne Bay and the Miami River at a minimum.
Policy TR-2.2.8: The City will regularly monitor transportation trends on an annual basis
using indicators such as transit ridership, jobs/housing balance, mode split, and motor
vehicle registrations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
70
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-2.2.9: The City will consider the income, age, ability, and vehicle ownership
patterns of populations throuqhout the city when developing transportation systems and
facilities improvements so that all residents, especially those most in need, have access
to a wide range of affordable travel options.
Policy TR-2.2.10: The City will continue to seek funding opportunities to implement the
planned Light Rail that connects downtown to Midtown and support the regional effort
for connections to the City of Miami Beach. The alignment for this Beach Connection
service is illustrated in Map TR-23 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and
Analysis section.
Policy TR-2.2.11: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County to implement
resiliency policies to mitigate and protect vulnerable roadways and critical evacuation
routes (illustrated in Maps TR-15 and TR-11 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory
and Analysis section respectively) within the City. (See Policy IC-2.1.6.)
Policy TR-2.2.12: The City will encourage the coordination of the intermodal surface
and water transportation access service to the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront
(See Policy PA-3.2.1.and Policy IC-2.1.30.)
Objective TR-2.3: Continue to support, promote, and implement Complete Streets
improvements along City roadways consistent with adjacent land use and context.
Policy TR-2.3.1: t €^mbor}The City will dcvcl encourage a balanced
streetscape design program that accommodates all roadway users and pays special
attention to non -vehicular modes by focusing on landscaping treatments, pedestrian -
scaled lighting, and the construction of sidewalks and bicycle paths along city streets.
These improvements will be coordinated with major repairs, roadway resurfacing, and
other renovations when possible. (See Policy TR-2.1.4)
Policy TR-2.3.2: The City will prioritize the implementation of Complete Streets
improvements for roadways that lead to transit nodes, are within transit corridors, or
connect to bicycle/pedestrian paths (i.e. - Miami River Greenwav, Bavwalk, Underline,
Overtown Greenwav) to improve roadway safety, reduce conflicts among transportation
modes, and to better connect surrounding developments and neighborhoods. These
improvements will be implemented with all appropriate phases of roadway projects and
will include enhanced transit infrastructure and amenities, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities, landscaping, streetscapinq, and traffic calming.
Policy TR-2.3.3: The City will prioritize bicycle facilities that are protected as a means
of providing safe bicycle facilities for cyclists of all ages and abilities.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 71
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective TR-2.4: The City will seek opportunities to improve access to transit and
improve regional mobility by coordinating with other local transportation aqencies,
plans, and initiatives.
Policy TR-2.4.1: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County's SMART Plan, which
specifically aims to provide premium transit service along roadways in the City including
Biscayne Boulevard and West Flagler Street. (See Policy IC-2.1.7.)
Policy TR-2.4.2: To improve regional mobility, the City will regularly coordinate with, but
not limited to, Miami -Dade County, FDOT, MPO, South Florida Regional Transportation
Authority (SFRTA), the Port of Miami, the Miami River Commission, the Miami
International Airport and other public agencies to ensure that future improvements to the
transportation network within the City from these aqencies' are consistent with the qoals,
obiectives, and policies of the City of Miami's MCNP. (See Policy IC-2.1.8.)
Policy TR-2.4.3: The City will improve transportation connections to urban centers from
all neiqhborhoods, particularly by providing a variety of affordable travel options
(pedestrian, transit, and bicycle facilities) and by being attentive to the needs of
vulnerable and historically marginalized populations.
Policy TR-2.4.4: The City will improve connections to transit by prioritizing sidewalk and
bicycle infrastructure investments adjacent to transit routes, bus stops, and transit
stations that also improve safety and comfort for transit users. These infrastructure
investments should include, but are not limited to, bike racks, exclusive protected bike
lanes, street furnishings, street trees, enhanced crosswalks, pedestrian -scaled lighting,
and wayfindinq siqnage.
Policy TR-2.4.5: The City will continue to coordinate with SFRTA, FDOT, Miami -Dade
County, and other local agencies to support and develop plans to implement the FEC
Coastal Link Commuter Rail. (See Policy IC-2.1.9.)
Policy TR-2.4.6: The City will coordinate its transportation planning activities with the
annual update to the MPO's Five -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and
their LRTP update. (See Policy IC-2.1.10.) (200712)
Policy TR-2.4.7: The City will require all (re)development in existing and planned transit
corridors to be well designed and conducive to pedestrian and transit use. In recognition
that many transit riders begin and end their trips as pedestrians, pedestrian
accommodations will be made that include, as appropriate, continuous sidewalks to the
transit station, small blocks and closely intersecting streets, buildings that front the street
or other pedestrian paths, parking lots predominantly to the rear and sides of buildings,
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
72
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
primary building entrances as close to the street or transit stop as to the parking lot,
shade trees, awnings and other weather protection for pedestrians.
Policy TR-2.4.8: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to
promote public transit and shared transportation services by educating and informing
the public of these services via app-based technologies, informative websites, and other
means of communication to increase transit ridership. (See Policy IC-2.11.)
Policy TR-2.4.9: The City will publish an annual list compiling the programmed transit -
related improvements from MDT's Transit Development Plan (TDP) and the MPO's
LRTP and TIP that are within the City and will include this information on the City's
website.
Policy TR-2.4.10: The City will regularly coordinate with other agencies to market and
promote the use of multimodal transportation options using social media, educational
opportunities, and any other form of public outreach. (See Policy IC-2.1.12.)
Objective TR-2.5: Develop and expand the public transit system within the City as part
of its multi -modal transportation network to improve the efficiency, reliability, and
overall level of service for public transit.
Policy TR-2.5.1: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to
improve the east -west transit services within the City to alleviate traffic congestion. (See
Policy IC-2.1.13.)
Policy TR-2.5.2: The City will support provisions for transit passenger amenities that
enhance convenience such as real-time bus arrival information, shelters, clear route
signage, adequate pedestrian -scaled lighting, and pre -boarding fare payment systems.
These improvements will be prioritized within transit corridors and near Metrorail
stations.
Policy TR-2.5.3: The City will require that transit facilities, such as turn -out bays, transit
priority signals, high -occupancy vehicle lanes, bus -only lanes, and transit shelter
locations, be included in roadway design proposals, as appropriate, especially for
proposals within transit corridors or in close to proximity to transit stations.
Policy TR-2.5.4: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to
address the transit needs consistent with transit planning guidelines while considering
population growth trends within the City and the metropolitan area. (See Policy IC-
2.1.14.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
73
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-2.5.5: The City will coordinate annually with Miami -Dade County on
improving the efficiency of its public bus transit system, including new service and the
expansion of neiqhborhood-based local circulator services to promote alternative travel
modes within the TCEA. (See Policy IC-2.1.27.) (200516)
Objective TR-2.6: Desiqn, promote, and maintain an efficient and interconnected
roadway system that accommodates pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as part
of its multi -modal transportation network.
Policy TR-2.6.1: The City will encourage Miami -Dade County and FDOT to include
improved connections between all modes of transportation, with emphasis on
connections to non -motorized modes, as they are implementing transportation
enhancements within City boundaries.
Policy TR-2.6.2: The City, in coordination with FDOT, Miami -Dade County and the
MPO, will continue to develop and encourage more bicycle paths, protected bicycle
lanes, bicycle boulevards, cycle tracks, and sharrows throughout the City to expand the
bicycle network and connect any gaps while promoting alternative travel modes. The
City will also promote the implementation of enhanced bicycle amenities such as bicycle
racks, lockers and bicycle wayfindinq signage that helps to encourage more bicycle use.
Map TR-6 (within Appendix TR-1) illustrates the existing bicycle facilities in the City.
(See Policy IC-2.1.15.)
Policy TR-2.6.3: The City will in coordination with Miami -Dade Transit and FDOT
develop, prioritize, and implement sidewalk and bicycle infrastructure improvements that
are adjacent to transit routes/corridors and transit stations in order to improve
connectivity between transit and other non -motorized modes of transportation while
promoting the use of alternative travel modes. (See Policy IC-2.1.16.)
Objective TR-2.7: Encouraqe transit -supportive development patterns that promote
walkable, mixed use neighborhoods that help to increase transit ridership, reduce
automobile trips, and provide increased mobility for all people.
Policy TR-2.7.1: The City will preclude land uses within 1/2 mile of a transit corridors,
Metrorail stations, and Metromover stations that are not conducive to public transit
ridership such as car dealerships, car -oriented food establishments, and container
yards. Conversely, the City will support the expanded development and design of a
transit system that helps shape the desired land use patterns.
Policy TR-2.7.2: The City will regularly coordinate with Miami -Dade County to improve
the efficiency of its public transit system by supporting transit -oriented development
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
74
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
policies and promoting the use of alternative travel modes within the City. (See Policy
IC-2.1.17.1
Policy TR-2.7.3: The City will conduct appropriate land use and zoning analysis of the
areas surrounding each transit station area and transit corridor in order to determine
whether appropriate land use and zoning changes should be implemented that foster
transit -oriented development (as defined by Section 163.3164 F.S.) while protecting the
adjacent neighborhoods from incompatible development. Such land use and zoning
changes will include minimum and maximum density and intensity standards at the time
of implementation. The City will consider the height, density, intensity, use and scale of
new developments when determining the compatibility with existing neighborhoods.
(See Policy TR-1.3.3.)
Policy TR-2.7.4: The City will require site and building design for new developments
within a half mile of a Metrorail station or transit corridor to be coordinated with public
transit, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. Requirements may include, but not be limited
to, pedestrian crossinqs, access to transit stations, access to transit vehicles, transit
vehicle access to buildings, transfer centers, shelters, sidewalks, dedicated bicycle
lanes and shared -use paths, bicycle racks, and wavfindinq signage.
Policy TR-2.7.5: Through its Land Development Regulations, the City will continue to
control the mix, type, density and design of activity centers and growth corridors that
promote and facilitate walking, bicycling and the use of public transportation.
Policy TR-2.7.6: The City will work with Miami -Dade County to promote the transit -
oriented development (TOD) policies found in the Miami -Dade County's Comprehensive
Development Master Plan (CDMP) to support the TCEA as defined in Section 163.3164
(46) F.S, (2011/32), as well as illustrated in Appendix TR-1, Map 143.2, titled Centers
and Transit Corridors. (See Policy IC-2.1.28.)
Objective TR-2.8: Enhance safety and minimize conflicts between all modes of
transportation through engineering, education, and enforcement best practices.
Policy TR-2.8.1: The City will promote the multimodal transportation initiatives and
recommendations from the adopted Miami Downtown Transportation Master Plan that
aim to rebalance downtown roadways toward transit, pedestrians, and cyclists as well
as enhancing safety and walkability through the implementation of a Pedestrian Priority
Zone including design elements such as the following:
• Clear, unobstructed pedestrian paths on all sidewalks
• Perpendicular curb ramps at all intersections
• Crosswalks at all intersections
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
75
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
• Automatic countdown timers with more crossing time at all traffic controlled
intersections
• Appropriate lane widths for driving lanes, turning lanes, and sharrow lanes
• Sidewalk bulbouts where feasible at all street intersections with curb radii not
exceeding 15 feet
• Mid -block lighting
• Shade tree canopy on all sidewalks that consider width of passage, adjacent
building canopies, overhangs, or other architectural devices that provide
shade
• Travel speeds and turning movement design as appropriate to intersection
• Seating areas at transit stops
Policy TR-2.8.2: Through coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, the City will
continue to support the monitoring of "high crash" locations on city streets and identify
design improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions, especially to pedestrians
and bicyclists. The City will utilize safety as an evaluation criterion when improvements
are prioritized and incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Element.
Policy TR-2.8.3: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe system
for pedestrian access by adhering to design standards and procedures which comply
with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Policy TR-2.8.4: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe system
for controlling vehicular accessibility to major thorouqhfares by adhering to the adopted
design standards and procedures applicable to the agency with jurisdiction over the
roadway facility, which at a minimum addresse6:
• Adequate storage and turning bays;
• Spacing and design of median openings and curb cuts;
• Provision of service roads along major thoroughfares, where applicable;
• Driveway access and spacing; and
• Traffic operations, including the provision of turning bays and bus bays for bus
transit.
Policy TR-2.8.5: Through its Land Development Regulations, the City will ensure that
blocks are easily walkable to maximize pedestrian and bicycle access to the transit
station areas and beyond.
Policy TR-2.8.6: To improve pedestrian mobility, for all new/(re)development, provide
pedestrian access for building frontages in accordance with Land Development
Regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
76
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-2.8.7: Through its Land Development Regulations, the City will, where
appropriate, designate primary and secondary streets so that most buildings are
oriented to primary streets to create superior pedestrian environments while service
functions such as parking and loading can be accommodated along secondary streets.
Policy TR-2.8.8: By December 2020, the City will develop a modal hierarchy for all
street classifications within the City that prioritizes the use by pedestrians, bicyclists,
transit riders, and motorists. This modal hierarchy will be used to determine the types of
Complete Streets accommodations that will be provided within each street classification.
Objective TR-2.9: Provide a safe and effective bikeway/sidewalWgreenway network that
advances healthy lifestyles, improves quality of life, better links oriqins and
destinations, and provides alternative mode choices to automobile trips.
Policy TR-2.9.1: The City will continue to support the implementation of the Underline,
the Ludlam Trail, and other `preen corridors', which aim to improve the local bicycle
network with enhanced amenities that encourage a more active, healthy lifestyle and
the use of alternative modes of transportation. (2011153)
Policy TR-2.9.2: The City will continue to support the implementation of the Riverwalk
and Baywalk initiatives, whose goal is to improve access to Biscayne Bay and the Miami
River, by coordinating with the development community to obtain easements along the
Miami River and Biscayne Bay to connect any gaps in the Riverwalk and Baywalk
alignments.
Policy TR-2.9.3: The City will work with the MPO to develop a comprehensive active
transportation plan for Miami that integrates bicycle, pedestrian, and greenway
components by conducting a network pap analysis and developing a list of prioritized
projects based on objective criteria. These criteria should include road classification;
proximity to transit stops and park -and -ride lots; proximity to schools, parks, or other
public facilities; proximity to activity centers and transit corridors; consideration of high -
crash locations; potential to connect paps in existing sidewalk, greenwav, and other non -
motorized transportation network. (See Policy IC-2.1.18.)
Policy TR-2.9.4: The City will require that sidewalks and other essential non -motorized
amenities and facilities be included in development plans prior to receiving approval
from the City.
Policy TR-2.9.5: The City will prioritize enhancements of pedestrian and bicycle
circulation, access, and safety in the downtown, near activity centers, along transit
corridors, near schools, libraries, and parks.
Policy TR-2.9.6: The City will require that pedestrian mobility be included in
Maintenance -of -Traffic (MOT) reviews.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 77
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-2.9.7: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County and FDOT to design
the City's thoroughfares strategically to disperse and reduce the length of automobile
trips and to encourage walking and bicycling. (See Policy IC-2.1.19.)
Policy TR-2.9.8: The City will encourage the provision of bicycle support facilities, such
as secured bicycle racks, personal lockers and showers for new and existing office
developments and employment centers to encourage bicycling as an alternative mode
for work commutes.
Policy TR-2.9.9: The City will include the expansion and continuity of the bicycle
network in capital protects city-wide with a focused emphasis on areas within transit
corridors in an effort to reduce the reliance on automobiles and encourage the use of
alternative modes of transportation.
Policy TR-2.9.10: The City will remove barriers that prevent the connection of existing
bicycle and pedestrian facilities, which include but are not limited to railroad corridors,
inadequate roadway conditions, physical obstructions and unsafe conditions to crossing
the Miami River, and other physical and psychological barriers. The City will work to
connect the gaps in the existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities as illustrated in Maps
TR-6 and TR-7, within Appendix TR-1.
Policy TR-2.9.11: The City will, in coordination with the MPO, FDOT, and Miami -Dade
County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensure consistency with the
LRTP. (See Policy IC-2.1.20.)
Policy TR-2.9.12: The City will work to improve its status as a bicycle -friendly city as
defined by the League of American Bicyclists.
Objective TR-2.10: Integrate innovative technologies to improve the transportation
network.
Policy TR-2.10.1: Through the use and integration of cell phone and app-based
technologies and in coordination with other public and private agencies, the City will
seek to provide real-time travel information to roadway users regarding City services
such as parking availability, trolley arrival information, traffic congestion updates, and
other transportation related information. The City will aim to build on the individual efforts
of universities, the commercial shared -ride sector, commercial data aggregators to
generate improved real-time information for public consumption.
Policy TR-2.10.2: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
leverage technology to provide user-friendly trip planning services that include all
transportation modes. (See Policy IC-2.1.21.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
78
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy TR-2.10.3: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
promote and share all existing transportation -related data, sources, and tools to the
public in an effort to create an open and user-friendly data repository that could be used
for analysis and future private or public technology development that aims to improve
the efficiency of the transportation network. (See Policy IC-2.1.22.)
Policy TR-2.10.4: The City will encourage the use and proliferation of electric vehicles
for City fleet vehicles and personal automobile, and will promote electric vehicle
recharge stations in parking garages, park and ride Tots, surface parking Tots, and
strategic on -street parking locations.
Policy TR-2.10.5: The City will seek opportunities to further the implementation of
automated and connected vehicle communications technology for City fleet vehicles and
personal automobiles to address congestion and safety issues.
Policy TR-2.10.6: In coordination with Miami -Dade County, FDOT, and other public
agencies, the City will facilitate the development and maintenance of real-time traffic
and traveler data that helps monitor the overall transportation system and evaluate its
performance. This information should be made available to the public and should be
delivered to users in a familiar way that promotes data sharing, thus benefiting the wider
community. (See Policy IC-2.1.23.)
Objective TR-2.11: Regularly update necessary data to improve the transportation
network's mobility, safety, and accessibility.
Policy TR-2.11.1: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
regularly collect necessary data for better estimating vehicle occupancy rates and
means of travel pursuant to updating the person -trip methodology as required. (See
Policy IC-2.1.24.)
Policy TR-2.11.2: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
periodically collect bicycle and pedestrian count data throughout the City to better
understand and analyze the use and demand of the non -motorized transportation
network and to develop and implement improvement projects based on needs. (See
Policy IC-2.1.25.)
Policy TR-2.11.3: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
identify any transit service adjustments and improvements to the bicycle network as to
maintain an updated understanding of the existing transit corridors for the interpretation
and implementation of the person -trip LOS methodology. (See Policy IC-2.1.26.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
79
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES
Port of Miami
Goal PA-1: Ensure that the development and expansion of Miami -Dade County's Port of Miami
is compatible with and furthers the physical development of Miami's greater downtown area
while mitigating negative impacts to neighborhoods, yet protecting the Port's economic
function, operation, and potential improvements.
Objective PA-1.1: The City of Miami, through its land development regulations, shall
coordinate land use in areas of the city adjacent to the Port of Miami with the
transportation related activity which occurs within the port to ensure compatibility and
complementary land uses and activities while mitigating negative impacts to
neighborhoods, yet protecting the Port's economic function, operation, and potential
improvements.
Policy PA-1.1.1: The City of Miami shall, through its land development regulations,
encourage facility improvement which will further both the land development, coastal
management and conservation goals and objectives of the City of Miami and the port
development goals of Miami -Dade County and the Port of Miami.
Policy PA-1.1.2: The City shall, through its land development regulations, encourage
the availability of an adequate amount of commercial and industrial land to complement
planned expansions of port activity, and will establish a "free trade zone" within adequate
proximity to the Port of Miami.
Policy PA-1.1.3: All surface transportation improvements providing access to the Port
must be compatible with the needs, goals and objectives of the City of Miami as related
to the development of the greater downtown area, and such improvements will be
financed with an appropriate share of County, state and federal funds.
Policy PA-1.1.4The Port shall prepare guidelines that will serve as design criteria for
the construction, renovation and landscaping of its facilities and such guidelines must
comply with all City of Miami Code requirements.
Policy PA-1.1.5: The City shall, through its land development regulations, cooperate
with Miami -Dade County and its Port of Miami operation to mitigate adverse structural
and non-structural impacts from the Port of Miami upon adjacent natural resources and
land uses.
Policy PA-1.1.6: The City shall, through its land development regulations, cooperate
with Miami -Dade County and its Port of Miami operation to protect and conserve natural
resources.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
80
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Miami International Airport
Goal PA-2: Ensure that the development and expansion of Miami -Dade County's Miami
International Airport is compatible with and furthers the physical development of the City of
Miami.
Objective PA-2.1: The City of Miami, through its land development regulations, shall
coordinate land use in areas of the city adjacent to Miami International Airport with the
transportation related activity which occurs within that facility to ensure compatible and
complimentary land uses and activities. Through such land development regulations,
the City will mitigate negative impacts to neighborhoods that might result from airport
activities, while protecting the airport's economic function, operation, and potential
improvements.
Policy PA-2.1.1: The City of Miami shall, through its land development regulations,
encourage facility improvement which will further both the land development, coastal
management and conservation goals and objectives of the City of Miami and the
development goals of Miami -Dade County and Miami International Airport.
Policy PA-2.1.2: All surface transportation improvements providing access to Miami
International Airport and impacting upon transportation within the City of Miami must be
compatible with the needs, goals and objectives of the City and such improvements will
be financed with the appropriate share of County, state and federal funds.
Policy PA-2.1.3: The City shall, through its land development regulations, ensure that
zoning within the city protects existing aviation flight paths.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
81
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Port of Miami Rivers Sub -Element
Goal PA-3: The Port of Miami River shall be encouraged to continue operation as a valued
and economically viable component of he City's maritime industrial base.
Objective PA-3.1: (PLANNING AND ZONING). The City shall protect the Port of Miami
River from encroachment by non water -dependent or non water -related land uses, and
shall regulate the Port of Miami River's expansion and redevelopment in coordination
with applicable future land use and coastal management goals, objectives, policies (See
Policy LU-1.3.3 and Goal CM-3).
Policy PA-3.1.1: The City shall maintain a Working Waterfront Table of Properties to
guide future development within the Miami River Corridor. The Table shall clearly depict
the location and description of all properties of recreational and commercial working
waterfront uses on the River, as defined in Ch. 342.07 F.S. (hereinafter referenced as
the "Working Waterfront"). The Table shall classify working waterfront properties into
Categories "A" and "B". The Table shall be incorporated as supporting data and analysis
within Appendix PA-1.
Policy PA-3.1.2 Category A: The City may adopt a comprehensive plan future land use
map (FLUM) amendment for properties designated "Industrial" on the FLUM, along the
Miami River only if the proposed amendment complies with this sub -element. The future
land use designation for any of the properties identified "Industrial" therein may be
amended only through the large-scale comprehensive plan amendment process.
Applications for such amendments shall demonstrate that either of the following
conditions exists:
1. The Development — redevelopment as industrial is not economically feasible
based on a market and site analysis using a professionally acceptable
methodology that has been peer reviewed; or
2. The Proposal includes an equivalent transfer or expansion of industrially
designated property offsite to another location on the Miami River within
the City of Miami.
Policy PA-3.1.3 Category B: All Category "B" properties shall maintain a working
waterfront use. Additionally, the City shall require that any residential development with
a density greater than duplex residential or any mixed use development include Working
Waterfront use component per Ch. 342.07, F.S. or other amenities that is accessible to
the public which promotes the enjoyment of the Miami River unless prohibited by the
Miami -Dade Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM).
1 The "Pod of Miami River" is a shallow draft riverine port consisting of independent, privately -owned small shipping companies, fisheries, vessel repair
facilities marinas and other Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront uses, as defined in Ch. 342.07, F.S., located along the banks of the
Miami River and its tributaries and canals where Working Waterfront uses are located. The Port of Miami River is not a deepwater port as defined in
Ch. 403.021(9), F.S. The Port of Miami River extends from the salinity dam in unincorporated Miami -Dade County to Biscayne Bay in the City of
Miami, as identified in Appendix PA-1.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
82
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PA-3.1.4: The City shall encourage the establishment and maintenance of
Working Waterfront uses along the banks of the Miami River, and to discourage
encroachment by incompatible uses.
Policy PA-3.1.5: The City shall encourage the development and expansion of the Port
of Miami River Working Waterfront consistent with the future land use, coastal
management and conservation elements of the City's comprehensive plan.
Policy PA-3.1.6: The City shall encourage only those developments, rezoning, and
land use amendments in the vicinity of the Working Waterfront lands designated
"Industrial" on the adopted future land use map that are compatible and suitable with the
existing "Industrial" use of property.
Policy PA-3.1.7: The City shall, through its land development regulations, adopt and
enforce appropriate setbacks and buffering requirements for Non -Working Waterfront
properties along the Miami River in order to protect the existing Working Waterfront use
from encroachment of incompatible and unsuitable uses.
Policy PA-3.1.8: There shall be no net loss of recreational wet -slips along the Miami
River.
Policy PA-3.1.9: The City shall require from new residential development and
redevelopment located along the Miami River a recorded covenant acknowledging and
accepting the presence of the existing Working Waterfront 24-hour operations as
permitted.
Policy PA-3.1.10: In its commitment to support the Port of Miami River, the City of
Miami shall continue its support of the dredging of the River.
Policy PA-3.1.11: The City of Miami shall facilitate and expedite municipal permitting
for water -dependent, water -related, commercial, industrial and recreational working
waterfronts along the Miami River by expediting the application process for such uses.
Objective PA-3.2: (TRANSPORTATION). The City shall encourage with appropriate
agencies the coordination of surface transportation access to the Port of Miami River
Working Waterfront with the traffic and mass transit system shown on the traffic
circulation map series.
Policy PA-3.2.1: The City shall through the Transportation Element of the
comprehensive plan, encourage the coordination of the intermodal surface and water
transportation access service to the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront (See
Objective TR 1.9, Policy TR 1.9.1) See Policy .TR-2.2.12. and Policy IC-2.1.30.).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
83
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective PA-3.3: (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & COORDINATION). The City shall
coordinate its Port of Miami River Working Waterfront planning activities with the
multiple regulators and stakeholders who have an interest in the Miami River.
Policy PA-3.3.1: Give the Miami River's multi jurisdictional and regulatory nature, the
City shall coordinate with:
1. The United States Army Corp of Engineers regarding the dredging,
navigation, and commerce on the Miami River; and
2. The United States Coast Guard regarding security and safety on the Miami
river; and
3. The Miami -Dade County Planning Department to evaluate the
interdependence and effectiveness of the County's Port of Miami River sub -
element in its comprehensive plan with that of that of the City's; and
4. The Miami -Dade County's Department of Environmental Resource
Management and the Manatee Protection Plan Committee regarding the
protection of manatees and establishment of new wet and dry marine slips
on or near the Miami River; and
5. The Miami -Dade County Property Appraiser to ensure that all Port of Miami
River Working Waterfront properties are assessed by the "current use"
pursuant to Section 4, Article VI I of the Florida constitution and S.193.704,
Fla. Stat.
Policy PA-3.3.2: The City shall remain an active member of the Miami River
Commission, as established by Ch.163.06, F.S. and shall continue to request and
consider from the Miami River Commission written recommendations related to policy,
planning, development and other River issues within the scope established by the
Florida Legislature.
Policy PA-3.3.3: Within 18 months of adoption of this policy, the City shall consider
approving a joint planning agreement with the Miami River Commission and Miami -Dade
County to revise and adopt the "Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan" as the strategic
plan for the Miami River.
Policy PA-3.3.4: Within three years of the adoption of this policy, the City along with
Miami River stakeholders, property owners and businesses shall consider submitting an
application to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Waterfronts Florida
Partnership Program, for assistance in protecting and promoting the Miami River
traditional Working Waterfront.
Policy PA-3.3.5: The City shall coordinate with Miami River stakeholders, property
owners and businesses to prepare reasonable Working Waterfront code compliance
and enforcement policies to eliminate unsafe, abandoned, and blighted conditions along
the river banks.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
84
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PA-3.3.6: The City of Miami shall provide technical assistance to Working
Waterfront businesses along the Miami River.
Policy PA-3.3.7: The City shall work to improve the economic vitality of the Miami River
in cooperation with other concerned public and governmental agencies and
organizations. (See Miami -Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan,
Port of Miami River Sub -element Policy PMR-1C)
Policy PA-3.3.8: The City will work with property owners along the Miami River to
secure Enterprise Zone tax incentives to businesses for creation of jobs and
revitalization. Such incentives consist of the following and are based on availability:
Enterprise Zone Incentives
1. Jobs Tax Credit
2. Business Equipment Sales Tax Refund
3. Building Materials Sales Tax Refund
4. Property Tax Credit
5. Community Contribution Tax Credit Program
Policy PA-3.3.9: The City will continue to use Brownfield redevelopment Area strategies
to stimulate economic revitalization to Working Waterfronts. Such incentives consist of
the following and are based on availability:
a. Financial Incentives
i.35% Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits
ii.$2500 Brownfields Bonus Refund
iii.Low-interest loans
iv.Sales Tax Credit on Building Materials
v.Up to 5 years of State Loan Guarantees of Loan Loss Reserves
vi.Site-Specific Activities Grant, and
National Brownfields Assessment, Revolving Loan Fund, Cleanup Grants, and
HUD Brownfield Economic Development Loans
b. Regulatory Benefits
i.Risk Based Corrective Action
ii.Cleanup Liability Protection
iii. Review of Voluntary Cleanup Projects at FDEP Conducted Separately
From Enforcement Mandated Cleanups by Responsible Parties
iv. Expedited Review and Response to Technical Reports and
Correspondence
v.CERCLA Site Clearance Issued by EPA, and
vi.Lender Liability Protection to the extend allowed by applicable laws
Policy PA-3.3.10: The City will continue to use the City's Enterprise Zone,
Empowerment Zone, Commercial Business Corridors, and Brownfield Redevelopment
Area strategies to stimulate economic revitalization, and encourage employment
opportunities within the Port of Miami River. (Policy LU-1.3.7.).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 85
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PA-3.3.11: The City will foster or develop and implement job training, vocational,
and educational programs to assist the City's existing and future residents, and water
dependent and water related businesses along the Miami River, in achieving economic
self-sufficiency, and will continue to work with appropriate State and County agencies
to direct training programs and other technical assistance to support minority and semi-
skilled residents of the City including, without limitation, their involvement in recreational
and commercial working waterfronts along the Miami River as defined by Ch.342.07,
F.S. (Policy LU-1.3.8.)
Policy PA-3.3.12: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, shall
support and coordinate with other governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the
River to support and enhance the Miami River's economic importance and viability. The
functions of the Miami River shall be consistent with the future goals and objectives of
the City's Comprehensive Plan, particularly with respect to the unique characteristics of
the Miami River's location and its economic position and functioning within the local
maritime industry.
Objective PA-3.4: (MONITORING & EFFECTIVENESS). The City shall monitor track the
effectiveness of its goals, objectives, and policies designated to preserve and promote
the Port of Miami River as a valued and economically viable component of the City's
maritime industrial base.
Policy PA-3.4.1: City staff shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report on
the status of the Planning and Zoning, Economic Development and Coordination, and
Transportation Objectives and Policies contained in this Sub -element, which shall be
presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing.
Policy PA-3.4.2: City staff shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report on
the loss or gain of recreational and commercial Working Waterfront lands and uses,
which shall be presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
86
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Goal PR-1: Provide sufficient opportunities for active and passive recreation to all City
residents based on access to parks, recreation and open space, per capita park funding, and
regular surveys of residents on park and recreation needs.
Objective PR-1.1: The City shall work to achieve a medium -term objective of providing
a park within a ten minute walk of every resident.
Policy PR-1.1.1: The City will establish a new hierarchy for the City park system to
reflect Miami's urban condition, as described in the Miami Parks and Public Spaces
Master Plan dated May 2007 and adopted by the City Commission. The hierarchy will
have the following elements:
• Regional Parks — A park typically greater than 30 acres in size with a variety of
park landscapes, facilities and programs for city residentis, regional visitors, and
tourists, or any park serving as a tourist destination of historical, cultural or
architectural significance.2
• Citywide parks:
o Destination parks — four types: conservation, waterfront one acre
or more, sports complex and aquatic, specialty (unique programs)
o Community parks - parks not less than one-half acre that include
active recreation facilities
o Linear parks — greenways and trails
• Neighborhood parks — all remaining parks under one acre that do not fit in other
categories
Policy PR-1.1.2: The City will focus on park land acquisition according to the following
four equal priorities that emerged from community preferences during the 2007 Parks
Master Plan process: land with water views and/or water access; land for "walk -to"
parks, including neighborhood parks, in underserved areas of the City identified in
Citywide and NET -area maps in the 2007 Parks Master Plan and any subsequent
updates to these maps; land to expand destination and community parks; land for
expansion or creation of linear park segments. Information on target priorities and target
areas for new parks will be disseminated to all relevant City departments to enhance the
potential for parkland acquisition in conjunction with infrastructure and other projects.
Ideally, new parks should be at least one-half acre in size, but smaller areas may be
suitable, depending on the surroundings and proposed uses.
Policy PR-1.1.3: The City will provide areas for safe, passive use in all parks, including
those in active recreational use parks. The passive areas will include usable green
space with plantings, shade and seating.
1.1.3.1: The City, through its land development regulations, will designate a zoning
category for parks separate from Civic Space. That category will permit a variety of
areas for passive and/or greater intensity of recreational use opportunities in parks
and open spaces.
2 Source: Recreation and Park Department Management Information System Division — data dictionary as of 6/21/04. City of San Francisco, California.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 87
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-1.1.4: The City of Miami's Level of Service for Parks, Recreation and Open
Space is to provide a municipally -owned park within a ten-minute barrier -free walk to
park entrances by 72% of the city's population as measured by GIS pedestrian
network analysis. A ten-minute walk will be defined as a one-half mile, barrier -free
distance on a safe pedestrian route. Barrier -free means a continuous walk on a
sidewalk or designated pedestrian route that may include crossing streets but does not
encounter barriers such as walls or highway embankments that impede passage.
Safe pedestrian routes include those that may include crossing of streets with speed
limits of up to 40 mph.
Every three years, the City will develop and update a map that shows which residential
areas fall within the ten-minute walk buffer for City -owned parks, and which do not. This
map will then be overlaid on a population map showing the most current U.S. Census
population data available in order to calculate if at least 72% of the city's population lives
within the ten-minute walk buffer.
1.1.4.1: Every three years, when the City updates the Parks and Recreation Level
of Service Map for parks owned by the City of Miami, the City will also perform a
study based on the national model established by the Trust for Public Land
ParkScoreTM system. The study will include the following: 1) creation and updating
of a GIS layer that includes all park and recreation land open to the public in the City
of Miami, including linear parks, whether or not the land is owned by the City; 2)
creation of maps that show a ten-minute barrier -free walk for all parks (regardless
of ownership and including linear parks), and similarly, for parks of at least'/2 acre
in size and parks of at least 1 acre in size; 3) identification of median park size
(regardless of ownership); 4) identification of the percentage of all city acres that
are parks (regardless of ownership); 4) the number of playgrounds per 10,000
residents; and 5) the total spending (both operational and capital) on parks and
recreation per resident over the preceding three fiscal years. The purpose of this
study is to provide the City with analysis to support decision -making on acquisition
of park land and on park and recreation services, as well as to compare the city's
park resources with other cities.
Policy PR-1.1.5: The City will review and enact provisions and create a plan to remedy
deficiencies for residents who do not have access to a park within a ten minute, barrier -
free walk, including financing for acquisition to remedy deficiencies.
Policy PR-1.1.6: The City of Miami will work towards providing a park of approximately
one acre or more within a ten-minute, barrier -free walk to park entrances for 66% of the
city's population.
Objective PR-1.2: Provide sufficient per capita funds for the parks system to support
the parks, recreation and open space standards expected by the public, as indicated in
surveys and other responses to public outreach, for resources and programs that
benefit the community. The City will strive to meet and exceed a benchmark level
annual of spending, for operations and capital improvements combined, of $100 per
capita in 2007 dollars, within fiscal limits and based on identified needs.
Policy PR-1.2.1: The City will establish the cost of providing park and recreation
programs and services, identify which core park and recreation services are to be
offered according to criteria related to level of benefits to individuals and the community
as a whole, identify which services and programs should be free, and formulate how a
fee structure should be set for other services and programs.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 88
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-1.2.2: The City will develop annual parks and recreation budgets that explain
the rationale behind the program, operational and maintenance standards that the City
intends to meet; the costs of meeting those standards; and the per capita budget in
comparison with similar cities, including cities in Florida.
Policy PR-1.2.3: The City will allocate program revenues generated by the Parks and
Recreation Department to the department's budget.
Policy PR-1.2.4: The City will work to identify and create a dedicated funding source
for the park system.
Policy PR-1.2.5: The City will seek grants and other funding for new resources,
including land, activities, and programs. Some of these funds may come from nonprofit
partnership groups that may be formed, such as a potential Miami Parks Foundation.
Objective PR-1.3: Pursue expanded and new opportunities identified in the 2007 Parks
Master Plan (and any subsequent updates) to share park, recreation and open space
resources with the school district, the housing authority, churches, nonprofit
organizations, transportation agencies and other groups that may be able to share land
and programs with the City Parks and Recreation Department.
Policy PR-1.3.1: The City will establish communication with and liaisons to agencies
and groups that have existing and potential recreation and open space resources in
order to pursue access to these resources by City residents.
Policy PR-1.3.2: The City will evaluate current costs, benefits and procedures for
sharing resources and programming and will develop policies and procedures that will
maximize benefits for City residents.
Objective PR-1.4: Expand existing and create new greenways and trails to meet
resident needs.
Policy PR-1.4.1: The City will continue to work with transit agencies to coordinate the
park system and pedestrian connections with opportunities to improve and expand the
Metro -Path Trail.
Policy PR-1.4.2: The City will continue to work with transportation agencies to
implement the Commodore Trail improvements and the Flagler Trail (FEC Corridor
Greenway).
Policy PR-1.4.3: The City will continue to work to implement the Overtown Greenway
plan to link the Miami River through Overtown to Downtown.
Policy PR-1.4.4: The City will work with Miami -Dade County and other groups to ensure
that greenway, trail and park systems within the City are effectively linked to proposed
regional trails such as the Venetian Connector, the Unity Trail, the Perimeter Trail, the
Ludlum Trail, and the East-West Trail. The City will continue to advocate for funding of
trails identified in the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization 2030 Long -Range
Transportation Plan.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
89
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-1.4.5: The City will designate as scenic transportation corridors those
segments of roadways that have significant vegetative features, and will encourage the
development of bicycle and pedestrian paths along such corridors, where appropriate.
Future land development regulations will encourage the provision of sufficient land areas
for uses that are compatible with and encourage the flow of bicycle and pedestrian traffic
along these corridors.
Objective PR-1.5: Ensure that future development and redevelopment pay an equitable,
proportional share of the cost of public open space and recreational facilities required
to maintain adopted LOS standards.
Policy PR-1.5.1: The City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to
meet expanded demand for Citywide parks, neighborhood parks, and recreational
programs resulting from new residential development, including, but not limited to,
impact fees, Zoning Ordinance intensity bonuses and contributions in lieu of land that
will be used to provide new park and recreation resources to serve new development.
The City will review these fees annually in accordance with recreation and open space
needs and revise them as necessary to reflect increases in the cost of providing public
open space and recreational facilities to meet its adopted Level of Service for parks,
recreation and open space.
Policy PR-1.5.2: The City will continue to work with developers of mixed use and
nonresidential projects to ensure the creation of appropriate public spaces.
Policy PR-1.5.3: The City will consider the use of special assessment districts to help
fund open space and recreational facilities projects whose public benefits tend to be
localized to specific geographic sub areas of the City.
Goal PR-2: Preserve and enhance existing parks and recreation facilities.
Objective PR-2.1: Protect existing park land.
Policy PR-2.1.1: The City has a no -net -loss policy for public park land and will adopt
procedures to this effect for park land in the City Zoning Ordinances, as described in the
2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan. These will allow only recreation and cultural
facilities to be built on park land, will limit building footprint on any such land, will require
that conversion of park land for any other purposes be subject to public procedures, and
replace the converted park land with land similar in park, recreation or conservation
value in terms of usefulness and location.
Policy PR-2.1.2: The City will continue to define and protect conservation areas in the
zoning code, as well as other parks and recreation areas.
Policy PR-2.1.3: The City will amend the zoning code to limit the amount of total
building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre or more
to no more than 25% of the park land area. Buildings and parking surfaces will continue
to be limited to recreational and cultural uses and accessory elements that serve park
and recreation goals. Any request to expand this percentage will require a special permit
(warrant) and public hearings with residents within a half -mile area surrounding the park.
Objective PR-2.2: Maintain and enhance existing parks and recreation facilities.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
90
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-2.2.1: The City will provide appropriate staffing, services, equipment, and
maintenance at all parks. Criteria for appropriateness will include park category
(Citywide or neighborhood), recreation programs, demand for passive and active spaces
and activities, sizes, and facilities.
Policy PR-2.2.2: The City will maintain and staff as many public swimming pools to be
open all year round as possible given funding constraints and will strive to identify new
funding sources to expand access to year-round swimming.
Policy PR-2.2.3: The City, through the Parks and Recreation Department, will continue
to develop and implement maintenance level of service standards, identify associated
costs, and address funding those costs, including replacement programs for equipment
and vehicles, before adding more assignments.
Policy PR-2.2.4: The Parks and Recreation Department will maintain and regularly
update the Inventory and Evaluation of City -Owned Parks that was prepared for the
2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan.
Goal PR-3: Increase public access to all parks, recreation, facilities and open spaces
including waterfront areas and the Picnic Islands in Biscayne Bay.
Objective PR-3.1: Enhance public access by pedestrians and bicyclists to parks and
recreation sites
Policy PR-3.1.1: The City will continue to implement sidewalk and shade tree planting
programs along public roadways that connect to parks and other community
destinations. The improvements will be targeted to pedestrian routes that provide a 10
minute walk to a park to the greatest number of persons.Tree planting programs will be
implemented in accordance with the 2007 City of Miami Tree Master Plan.
Policy PR-3.1.2: The City through the Parks and Recreation Department will work with
neighborhood groups to identify the ten-minute pedestrian routes within a half -mile
radius of parks that are appropriate for improvements to sidewalks, lighting, street trees,
crosswalks and pedestrian count -down signals, and signage, as described in the 2007
Parks and Public Spaces Plan.
Policy PR-3.1.3: Bicycle parking facilities such as bike racks shall be provided in
existing and future park projects.
Objective PR-3.2: Enhance the public's visual and physical access to waterfront
areas.
Policy PR-3.2.1: The City will continue to work to complete the Baywalk, encompassing
as much of the Biscayne Bay waterfront as possible, and to complete the Riverwalk and
the Miami River Greenway.
Policy PR-3.2.2: All City -owned waterfront property, including the Miami River
shorelines, will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline.
3.2.2.1: The City will continue to promote creation of pocket parks at waterfront
locations, such as "PlayStreets" created on dead-end streets, in order to enhance
public access to waterfronts.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
91
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-3.2.3: The City will incorporate provisions for public physical and/or visual
access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations. (See Coastal Management
Policy CM-2.1.7.)
Policy PR-3.2.4: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety and promotion
of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas, future land
development regulations will require non -water dependent or related development
and/or redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and Miami River
shorelines. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-2.1.1.)
Policy PR-3.2.5: The City will continue to expand launch areas for personal
kayaks/canoes, kayak/canoe rentals and other boating programs at parks on Biscayne
Bay, the Miami River and the South Fork of the Miami River.
Policy PR-3.2.6: The City will pursue creation of water shuttles or water taxis that will
expand public access to the Picnic Islands in Biscayne Bay off the Upper Eastside and
the Dinner Key islands off Coconut Grove.
Policy PR-3.2.7: The City will work with other organizations and agencies to identify
public recreational opportunities, including boating, on the smaller waterways in the City,
such as Wagner Creek, the Little River, and the canals.
Policy PR-3.2.8: All renovations and improvements to City parks and recreational
facilities will be designed to enhance rather than obstruct waterfront views.
Policy PR-3.2.9: The City will increase public recreational opportunities on Virginia Key
through implementation of the Virginia Key Master Plan and will introduce land use
designations and/or zoning, as appropriate, to permit use of previously disturbed land
areas on Virginia Key for amenities and uses that support passive and active park
recreation at suitable locations on Virginia Key.
Policy PR-3.2.10: The City shall continue to ensure that park and recreational lands
open to the public are included in redevelopment projects for Watson Island and will
monitor the project after construction to ensure continued public access without any
requirements for the public to make purchases or any other barriers to open public use.
Policy PR-3.2.11: As specified in the City of Miami Charter and Related Laws, and more
specifically the Waterfront Charter Amendment, all new development and
redevelopment along the downtown waterfront is required to provide a waterfront
setback, and those developments that require publicly accessible shoreline walkways,
will design them in conformance with the "Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards." (See
Coastal Management Policy CM-2.1.8.) The City will monitor these areas to ensure
continued public access, as required.
Objective PR-3.3: Park and recreational facilities will be accessible to handicapped
persons and provide opportunities for special needs groups.
Policy PR-3.3.1: All renovations, expansions, and development of park and recreation
facilities will be designed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
requirements, including handicapped parking spaces, ramps, handrails, pathways and
other accessibility improvements to be appropriately located with respect to recreational
facilities.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
92
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-3.3.2: Designs for renovations, expansions, and developments of park and
recreation facilities will be evaluated to ensure that there are sufficient facilities within
the service area to provide for the recreation, education, and safety needs of preschool
age children, the elderly, persons with disabilities and other special needs groups.
Goal PR-4: Enhance the quality of recreational and educational opportunities for all age
groups, persons with disabilities, and other special needs groups.
Objective PR-4.1: Continue to improve the quality and diversity of recreational
programs offered at destination and community parks, and neighborhood parks
where such programs may be offered.
Policy PR-4.1.1: The City will use participant evaluation surveys, at the completion of
recreational programs to evaluate program success, online public opinion surveys at
least once every three years, and scientific surveys at least once every seven years to
identify needed and desired programs.
Policy PR-4.1.2: The City will increase staff and hours of operation where necessary
and fiscally feasible, provide professional development opportunities for park and
recreation staff, and encourage staff to be certified by the Florida Recreation and Parks
Association.
Policy PR-4.1.3: The City will continue to provide interpretive displays, educational
programs, wildlife observation locations, and picnic areas in parks and open spaces for
outdoor recreation activities.
Policy PR-4.1.4: The City will continue to coordinate with nonprofit providers of social
services to the elderly, youth, and other special needs groups, so as to permit such
providers to use public park facilities for meeting the recreational and educational needs
of these groups.
Goal PR-5: Improve management and operations in the park and recreation system.
Objective PR-5.1: Increase the efficiency of park operations, while improving the quality
of recreation services and strengthening the financial support of the parks and
recreation service system.
Policy PR-5.1.1: The vision and mission of the Parks and Recreation Department will
be revised to include the protection of green spaces and natural areas in addition to the
existing focus on recreational and cultural activities.
Policy PR-5.1.2: The City's operating budget and the Capital Improvements Element
(CIE) will give priority to the quality of programs in, and the physical condition of, existing
park facilities and to meeting existing deficiencies, before constructing new facilities for
parks and recreation. This policy does not preclude the use of impact fees or other funds
to purchase additional land to be held in inventory for new parks in underserved
neighborhoods.
Policy PR-5.1.3: A projection and analysis of operational and maintenance costs
associated with all park and recreation related capital projects which exceed $50,000,
with their anticipated funding sources, will be required and made publicly available prior
to the decision to appropriate public funds for capital improvements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
93
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-5.1.4: The City will continue to implement innovative management and
maintenance alternatives designed to minimize operating and maintenance costs while
not reducing the extent and quality of programs or adversely affecting the physical
condition of park facilities. This will be done through establishment of core services
according to level of benefit to the community, identifying costs and potential revenues,
improving management accountability, establishing preventive maintenance and
replacement programs, establishing formal policies and systems for working with groups
that sponsor programs that use City facilities, and strengthening support services.
Policy PR-5.1.5: The City will continue to assign staff time to develop and manage a
network of volunteer "friends" groups for individual parks.
Policy PR-5.1.6: The City will continue to develop and implement public/private
partnerships to contribute to the maintenance and enhancement of parks, recreational
facilities, and public spaces, while ensuring that public spaces remain freely open to the
public.
Policy PR-5.1.7: The City will encourage creation of a Citywide Miami Parks Foundation
by non-govermental groups and individuals to serve as a nonprofit partner to focus
attention on the park system, raise money to help support maintenance, enhance and
expand parks and recreational programs, attract volunteers, and broaden the
constituency for the park system.
Objective PR-5.2: Create institutions and procedures to ensure resident and
community consultation in the development of system wide policies and planning for
park and recreation program improvements.
Policy PR-5.2.1: The City will continue to work with a permanent Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board made up of residents who are park users, program participants, and
representatives of groups with special relevant expertise. The Board's responsibilities
will include advising elected officials and staff on implementation of the 2007 Parks and
Public Spaces Master Plan and any adopted subsequent updates to that Plan. The
Board will be supported by staff from the Parks and Recreation Department, and will
report annually to the Mayor and City Commission on progress in implementing the
Master Plan, including financial reports, holding at least one public hearing on the draft
report before submitting it to the Mayor and Commission. The Board will also review
and advise on capital plans and designs based on the Master Plan and advise the
Commission on any proposals to expend more than $50,000 to acquire new park land,
to diminish or convert existing park land, to accept donated land for parks, or to sell City
land that may be suitable for parks. The City will periodically review and refine the
mission and charge of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in order to ensure
maximum opportunities for public involvement and effectiveness in addressing parks
and recreation needs. Proposed changes to the mission and charge of the Board will
not be implemented until after a public hearing by the appropriate public board.
Policy PR-5.2.2: The City will survey City residents to monitor preferences, needs and
satisfaction with the park system on a regular basis, at a minimum through evaluations
of all programs by program participants to evaluate program success, online surveys
every three years, and scientific surveys every ten years (starting from the Parks Master
Plan survey of 2006).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
94
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-5.2.3: The City will develop regular procedures to provide opportunities for
park user and neighborhood consultation in the planning and design of park and
recreation facilities improvements and new parks and programs.
Policy PR-5.2.4: The City will develop a full update on the Parks and Public Spaces
Master Plan at least once every ten years, to coincide with a scientific survey of
residents' park and recreation needs.
Policy PR-5.2.5: The Parks and Recreation annual Capital Improvement Plan will be
provided to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for their review and comment. The
Board may request presentations on park projects, on a project by project basis, and
have 60 days to review and provide comments and recommendations.
Objective PR-5.3: Continue to increase public safety and security within City parks.
Policy PR-5.3.1: The City will continue to equip all parks with adequate energy efficient
night lighting as parks are updated with improvements and will continue to use remote
computer scheduling of lighting in order to advance energy efficiency in the park system.
Policy PR-5.3.2: Citywide and neighborhood parks will increase their hours of operation
and enhance their programs, whenever feasible, so as to encourage a greater public
presence in the parks.
Policy PR-5.3.3: The City's Police Department will continue to work with neighborhood
residents to create and support community crime watch groups to assist in park safety
and crime prevention.
Policy PR-5.3.4: The City will continue regular, uniformed police patrols and presence
in and around Citywide and neighborhood parks.
Policy PR-5.3.5: In all parks with active recreation the City will maintain an adequate
number of trained staff based on standards recognized by professional organizations
such as the Florida Recreation and Park Association or the National Recreation and
Park Association, and on a regular basis will conduct safety inspections of equipment
and structural facilities.
Policy PR-5.3.6: The City will disseminate information to the public on proper safety
procedures that are to be followed while using park facilities.
Policy PR-5.3.7: When parks are being renovated or designed, the City will evaluate
the park's safety, consulting with park users, neighborhood residents, and the police
whether high fences, gates, or other obtrusive security measures remain necessary.
Goal PR-6: Develop and enhance the quality of parks and open spaces within the City's
downtown and other neighborhoods in a manner that meets the Level of Service standard
and addresses the needs of City residents, workers and visitors, and strengthens the City's
economic development.
Objective PR-6.1: Implement the NET Area Visions in the 2007 Parks and Public
Spaces Master Plan, using the NET Area Implementation Tasks and Park
Opportunities section of the Plan as a guide to enhancing and expanding Citywide
and neighborhood parks, recreational facilities and programs.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
95
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-6.1.1: The City will annually review implementation sections of the 2007
Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan to include implementation actions in developing
an annual work plan and capital improvements plan for parks and recreation facilities
and programs.
Policy PR-6.1.2: The City will work to implement the specific master plans that include
parks and recreation facilities, such as the Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan, the
Museum Park Master Plan, and the Virginia Key Master Plan, and create pedestrian and
water linkages among Fern Isle Park, Sewell Park, the recently acquired Police
Benevolent Association property, and Curtis Park to create a Miami "Central Park." As
depicted in the Waterfront Master Plan and programmed in the CIE, the City will provide
a continuous network of public parks and major attractions along the downtown
waterfront.
Policy PR-6.1.3: The City will continue to redevelop Lummus Park in the Riverside
District to provide an activity/program center for history, riverfront activities and
recreational facilities for visitors and City residents.
Policy PR-6.1.4: The City will create a specialty "Fishermen's Wharf" cafe district and
marine services center in the Riverside District along N.W. North River Drive on the
Miami River.
Objective PR-6.2: Improve and enhance public spaces and linkages in the City.
Policy PR-6.2.1: The City will continue to encourage development of urban street
promenade linkages with widened sidewalks, high quality materials, shade trees,
landscaping, lighting, graphics and furnishings.
Policy PR-6.2.2: The City will continue to work toward improving landscaping and
pedestrian -oriented amenities along major boulevards, including Biscayne Boulevard,
Brickell Avenue, and North 1st Avenue, and other major transportation corridors, to
create distinctive images and unifying elements between downtown districts.
Policy PR-6.2.3: The City will continue to work towards enhancement of public spaces
(entrances, plazas, lobbies, courtyards and atriums) and gateways through artwork. The
City will use, whenever appropriate, the "Art in Public Places" allocation in public facility
construction budgets as well as the assistance of the County Arts Council staff, and
encourage private organizations to construct civic monuments at gateway locations.
Goal PR-7: Develop public parks and open spaces that are aesthetically appealing and
enhance the character and image of the City.
Objective PR-7.1: Improve the aesthetic qualities of parks and recreation facilities.
Policy PR-7.1.1: The City will use the design principles in the 2007 Parks and Public
Spaces Master Plan as a basic framework for the design and redesign of parks and park
improvements, and prepare more specific design guidelines as needed.
Policy PR-7.1.2: The Parks and Recreation Department will continue to have
landscape architects on staff who have knowledge of best practices in park and
recreation facility design and will be employed to design park improvements, and to
review and monitor park design projects, when designers are retained on contract.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
96
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Goal PR-8: Encourage the development of high quality cultural arts facilities and programs
within the City.
Objective PR-8.1: Continue to develop and support cultural districts, facilities and
programs.
Policy PR-8.1.1: The City will continue to support development of a downtown cultural
arts district as described in the proposed Downtown Master Plan, through land
development regulations and other strategies.
Policy PR-8.1.2: The City will support cultural and heritage programs and facilities in
selected areas of the City such as, but not restricted to, Overtown, the Design District,
and Little Havana, including small performing arts venues, heritage trails, street fairs,
and similar programs, through land development regulations and other strategies.
Goal PR-9: Establish sustainable and green practices in park design, maintenance, building,
planting and energy efficiency.
Objective PR-9.1: Protect and restore native plant communities, where feasible and
appropriate, and provide educational programs and interpretive signage about South
Florida environments.
Policy PR-9.1.1: The City will continue its program of native plant protection and
restoration and elimination of exotic plants at Simpson Park and the Virginia Key nature
area; expand this program to the conservation area at Wainwright Park; restore native
vegetation in woodland, shoreline and streamfront edges of parks, where appropriate;
establish, where appropriate, native plantings that require limited water and fertilizer in
parks; and establish native plantings in public road, rail, drainage and utility corridors
that are not suitable for pedestrian and recreation access.
Policy PR-9.1.2: The City will continue to establish and maintain coastal hammock
exhibit plantings as part of environmental education programs and exhibits in community
parks.
Policy PR-9.1.3: The City will continue to promote the planting and preservation of
native species by property owners in the City through educational materials and
programs.
Objective PR-9.2: Introduce sustainable and energy -efficient materials and methods
in park maintenance and operations.
Policy PR-9.2.1: The City will employ life -cycle costing to evaluate costs of new park
structures and make efforts to incorporate energy- and water -efficient methods and
materials, in new and renovated park structures including the use of green roofs, solar
panels, and other innovative approaches.
Policy PR-9.2.2: The City will implement best management practices such as water
conservation, integrated pest management, water conservation, elimination of toxic
chemicals, and similar sustainable practices.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
97
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy PR-9.2.3: The City will implement to all pesticide and herbicide methods of
application for all sodded areas compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
98
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Goal CM-1: Maintain, protect, and enhance the quality of life and appearance of Miami's
Coastal Zone including the preservation of natural resources as well as the enhancement of
the built environment.
Objective CM-1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems including wetlands
and beach/dune systems within Virginia Key and those portions of Biscayne Bay that
lie within the City's boundaries; and improve water quality within the Miami River, its
tributaries, and the Little River.
Policy CM-1.1.1: As a precondition to the development or redevelopment of Virginia
Key, a comprehensive assessment will be made of environmental hazards that are the
result of past disposal activities at the Virginia Key landfill and other relevant
environmental concerns. Such assessment will be made in cooperation with appropriate
County, State and Federal environmental agencies, and an action plan to reduce or
eliminate any hazards will be formulated. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy
NR-1.1.1.)
Policy CM-1.1.2: The City will retrofit the number of storm water outfalls that discharge
into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. If
positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible
method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be
designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges.
(See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR-1.1.2 and Sanitary and Storm Sewers
Policy SS-2.2.1.)
Policy CM-1.1.3: [Reserved]
Policy CM-1.1.4: The City will encourage the reduction in point and non -point sources
of pollution into Biscayne Bay through coordination with the Miami River Commission,
Miami -Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies in order
to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay.
Policy CM-1.1.5: Within the Coastal Zone, or along the Miami and Little Rivers, no land
uses which represent a likely and significant source of pollution to surface waters will be
permitted, unless measures which substantially eliminate the threat of contamination are
implemented as conditions for approval of development or redevelopment.
Policy CM-1.1.6: The City will adhere to Miami -Dade County DERM standards and
require DERM approvals in its permitting procedures to ensure that all fuel storage
facilities in the Coastal Zone or near major canals do not pose a significant threat to
water quality.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
99
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy CM-1.1.7: The City will regulate development on Virginia Key and the intermittent
wetland areas of the coast of Coconut Grove to ensure that there will be no net loss of
functional wetlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be degraded
or disrupted; that when non-native vegetation is removed, it will be replaced with native
species; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora will be protected.
Priority will be given to water dependent land uses, and to development that enhances
the natural environment and ensures adequate physical public access to Virginia Key.
Policy CM-1.1.8: Because of its unique character and environmental significance, all
development on Virginia Key will be in conformance with the 1987 Virginia Key Master
Plan and/or any subsequent plans for Virginia Key that have been or might be adopted
by the City and, if necessary, the preparation of an updated plan.
Policy CM-1.1.9: Site development criteria will ensure that development or
redevelopment within the Coastal Zone will not adversely affect the natural environment
or lead to a net loss of public access to the City's natural resources.
Policy CM-1.1.10: [Reserved]
Policy CM-1.1.11: All City owned property within the Coastal Zone that may be identified
as areas of significant or unique natural resources will be designated as Environmental
Preservation Districts, and the City will also consider designating private properties
within the coastal with significant or unique natural resources as Environmental
Preservation Districts.
Policy CM-1.1.12: The City will continue to implement and enforce that all new and
renovated marinas meet marina siting requirements and receive appropriate county,
state, and federal approvals in the land development regulations.
Policy CM-1.1.13: The City will continue to work with the appropriate agencies to
support provisions of the committee that prevent new development and redevelopment
along the shorelines from directly discharging storm water runoff into surface waters and
to get support for state and county funding for any infrastructure improvements deemed
necessary to support development of Virginia Key and Watson Island.
Policy CM-1.1.14: The City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County in fostering the
protection of coastal wildlife and wildlife habitat through the protection of nesting areas,
the establishment of wildlife corridors, the protection of travel corridors, and the
promotion of public awareness of wildlife resources.
Policy CM-1.1.15: The City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County in the
implementation of any antidegradation targets developed to protect Outstanding Florida
Waters and Outstanding National Resources Waters of Biscayne Bay.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
100
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective CM-1.2: The City will continue to follow and enforce the Florida Building Code,
which establishes construction standards that minimize the impacts of man-made
structures on beach and dune systems.
Policy CM-1.2.1: The City will increase inspection and code enforcement efforts for
coastal area construction to ensure the proper standards are met.
Objective CM-1.3: In order to enhance the built environment of the coastal area,
redevelop and revitalize blighted, declining, or threatened coastal areas.
Policy CM-1.3.1: The City will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding
the designation of Community Redevelopment Districts in appropriate coastal areas of
the city.
Policy CM-1.3.2: Through increased citywide code enforcement of coastal areas with
deteriorated conditions the City will report any structures in severe condition to the
unsafe structures board to either force improvements or facilitate the demolition of the
structure.
Objective CM-1.4: Ensure that land development regulations and policies for the
Coastal Zone are consistent with the City's ability to provide the capital facilities
required to maintain adopted LOS standards and those needed to maintain or enhance
the quality of life within the Coastal Zone of the city. (See Capital Improvements
Objective CI-1.2.)
Policy CM-1.4.1: The Coastal Zone of the City will adhere to the level of service
standards as adopted and amended in the Capital Improvements Element, and more
specifically Policy CI-1.2.3 of that element.
Policy CM-1.4.2: Rise in sea level projected by the federal government, and refined by
the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken into
consideration in all future decisions regarding the design, location, and development of
infrastructure and public facilities in the City. (See related policy CI-1.2.6)
Goal CM-2: Improve public awareness, appreciation, and use of Miami's coastal resources by
preserving water -dependent and water -related uses, ensuring adequate public access to
such uses, and minimizing user conflicts.
Objective CM-2.1: Wherever feasible, increase, physical and visual public access to Biscayne
Bay, the Miami River, the City's shorelines, and publicly -owned islands.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
101
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy CM-2.1.1: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety and promotion
of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas, future land
development regulations will require non -water dependent or related development or
redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and Miami River shorelines.
(See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR-3.2.4)
Policy CM-2.1.2: Where appropriate, City owned waterfront property, including the
Miami River shorelines, shall provide for public open spaces that allow similar access to
County owned public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline where
appropriate.
Policy CM-2.1.3: The City will continue development of the river walk and bay walk
along City owned property as funds become available and will continue to require
development of the bay walk and river walk along private property through its land
development regulations.
Policy CM-2.1.4: The City shall continue to implement design guidelines along the
baywalk and riverwalk in accordance with the Miami River Greenway Action Plan and
other adopted plans as appropriate.
Policy CM-2.1.5: [Reserved]
Policy CM-2.1.6: The City will incorporate provisions for public physical and/or visual
access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations (See Parks, Recreation and
Open Space Policy PR- 3.2.3.)
Policy CM-2.1.7: As specified in the City of Miami Charter and related laws, and more
specifically the Waterfront Charter Amendment and Ordinance Zoning Ordinance for the
City of Miami all new development and redevelopment along the downtown waterfront
is required to provide a waterfront setback, and those developments within Special
Districts (SDs) that require publicly accessible shoreline walkways, will design them in
conformance with the "Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards." (See Parks, Recreation
and Open Space Policy PR- 3.2.11.)
Policy CM-2.1.8: The City will continue to work toward increased physical public access
to Virginia Key and Watson Island by pursuing appropriate development and
redevelopment as directed by the Virginia Key and Watson Island master plans.
Policy CM-2.1.9: The City will ensure that development regulations are not altered so
as to prohibit water dependent facilities or uses such as swimming, boating, and fishing
and will encourage and support such facilities and uses.
Objective CM-2.2: [Reserved]
Policy CM-2.2.1: [Reserved]
Policy CM-2.2.2: [Reserved]
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
102
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Goal CM-3: Pursuant to Ch. 163.3178(2)(g), F.S., The City shall maintain strategies that will
be used to preserve and adequate supply of land for recreational and commercial Working
Waterfront uses defined in Ch. 342.07, F.S.3
Objective CM-3.1: The City shall strive to allow no net loss of acreage devoted to recreational
and commercial Working Waterfront uses in the coastal area of the City of Miami.
Policy CM-3.1.1: The comprehensive plan and land development regulations will
encourage water -dependent uses along the shoreline, and strategies that will be used
to preserve recreational and commercial Working Waterfronts as defined in Ch. 342.07,
F.S., particularly on the Miami River. (See Goal PA-3 and Policy LU-1.3.3).
Goal CM-4: Ensure public safety and the protection of property within the Coastal Zone from
the threat of hurricanes.
Objective CM-4.1: Minimize the potential for loss of human life and the destruction of
property from hurricanes.
Policy CM-4.1.1: Enforce building code standards that protect against the destruction
of structures by hurricane winds and tidal swells.
Policy CM-4.1.2: Continue to direct population away from the Coastal High Hazard
Area, which is defined as the areas below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge
line, as established by a Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH)
computerized storm surge model as depicted on the CHHA map in Appendix CM-1. (See
map following Appendix CM-1.)
Policy CM-4.1.3: The City shall continue to implement measures for the protection of
City owned historic properties from destruction in the event of a major storm, and plans
for each site's restoration in the event of destruction or major damage will remain in
effect.
Policy CM-4.1.4: Immediately subsequent to the event of a major storm, the adequacy
of existing building standards and the appropriateness of land uses and development
regulations in the Coastal High Hazard Area will be reviewed, and all modifications to
standards, zoning or land use policies required to reduce future risk of loss of life and
property damage will be adopted prior to the approval of long term, post disaster
redevelopment plans.
Policy CM-4.1.5: Each proposed future land use map change within the Coastal High
Hazard area of the city will require an analysis of its potential impact on evacuation times
and shelter needs in the event of a hurricane.
3 Additional strategies to preserve and encourage recreational and commercial Working Waterfront uses are contained in the Ports, Aviation, and
Related Facilities element, "Port of Miami River" Sub -element.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 103
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy CM-4.1.6: [Reserved]
Policy CM-4.1.7: The City will incorporate into its Comprehensive Plan any relevant
recommendations of interagency hazard mitigation reports as they become available.
Policy CM-4.1.8: The City will work in cooperation with regional and state agencies to
adopt plans and policies that protect public and private property and human lives from
the effects of natural disasters.
Policy CM-4.1.9: The City will work in cooperation with regional and state agencies in
the preparation of advance plans for the safe evacuation of coastal residents.
Policy CM-4.1.10: The City will adhere to its "Emergency Operations Plan for Civil
Defense in War and Natural Emergencies" and "The Emergency Procedures Manual"
for immediate repair and cleanup actions needed to protect public health and safety.
The City will update these manuals on an annual basis.
Objective CM-4.2: The City will adhere to and cooperate with the County in executing
evacuation procedures as well as annually update information and procedural
brochures for the public; these brochures will contain information on evacuation
procedures and routes, and will be distributed to city residents at local businesses and
government agencies.
Policy CM-4.2.1: The City's fire and police departments will continue to work with Miami -
Dade County and regional emergency agencies to update and revise, as needed
coordinated peacetime emergency and evacuation plans.
Policy CM-4.2.2: The City will annually update and distribute an informational brochure
to establish public awareness and information programs that educate as to the need for
evacuation, and indicate evacuation routes and procedures.
Policy CM-4.2.3: The City will follow the County in providing appropriate evacuation
route markers within City boundaries as part of a Countywide coordinated program.
Objective CM-4.3: Minimize the potential for loss of human life and destruction of
property from hurricanes in the Coastal High Hazard Area.
Policy CM-4.3.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the Coastal High Hazard
area will be limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain
adopted LOS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time,
or reduce the threat to public health and safety from storm events. (See Capital
Improvements Policy CI-1.4.1.)
Policy CM-4.3.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the Coastal High Hazard
Area intended to further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 104
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Neighborhood Plan will be limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the
risk to public health and safety from storm damage. (See Capital Improvements Policy
CI-1.4.2.)
Policy CM-4.3.3: Each proposed future land use map change to a residential land use
category within the Coastal High Hazard area of the city will require an analysis of its
potential impact on evacuation times and shelter needs in the event of a category 5
storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale.
Policy CM-4.3.4: Proposed future land use map changes to a residential land use
category within the Coastal High Hazard Area shall only be approved if one of the
following standards is met:
a. A no greater than 16 hour level of service for out of county hurricane evacuation
is maintained for a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson
scale;
b. A no greater than 12 hour evacuation time to shelter is maintained for a category
5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale and shelter space
reasonably expected to accommodate the residents of the development
contemplated by the proposed comprehensive plan amendment is available; or
c. Appropriate mitigation is provided that will satisfy the provisions of
subparagraph a. or subparagraph b. Appropriate mitigation shall include,
without limitation, payment of money, contribution of land, and construction of
hurricane shelters and transportation facilities. Required mitigation shall not
exceed the amount required for the development to accommodate impacts
reasonably attributable to development. The City and applicant for the plan
amendment shall enter into a binding agreement to memorialize the mitigation
plan.
Policy CM-4.3.5: The City shall consider the use of undeveloped land in the Coastal
High Hazard Area for public or private recreational uses and open space.
Policy CM-4.3.6: The City will prohibit the construction of new mobile home parks in the
Coastal High Hazard Area.
Goal CM-5: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification,
evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of Miami's
historic, architectural and archaeological resources. (See Land Use Goal LU-2.)
Objective CM-5.1: Maintain, update and increase the number of eligible properties
contained in the Miami -Dade County Historic Survey, which identifies and evaluates the
City's historic, architectural and archaeological resources. (See Land Use Objective LU-
2.1.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
105
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy CM-5.1.1: The City will continue to identify potential historic districts and conduct
further surveys of contributing and noncontributing buildings. (See Land Use Policy LU-
2.1.1.)
Policy CM-5.1.2: The City will continue to maintain a computerized database of all
relevant information for all sites in the Miami -Dade County Historic Survey. (See Land
Use Policy LU-2.1.2.)
Policy CM-5.1.3: The City has designated numerous historic sites and historic districts
pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code. The City will continue to designate sites
and districts as appropriate and warranted. (See Land Use Policy LU-2.3.2.)
Policy CM-5.1.4: The City will continue to review nominations to the National Register
of Historic Places through the Certified Local Government Program. (See Land Use
Policy LU-2.3.1.)
Policy CM-5.1.5: The City will continue to include information on the City's historic,
architectural and cultural heritage for inclusion in public information, economic
development promotion and tourism materials. (See Land Use Policy LU-2.5.4.)
Objective CM-5.2: Increase the number of historic structures that have been preserved,
rehabilitated or restored, according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation. (See Land Use Objective LU-2.4.)
Policy CM-5.2.1: The City will continue to utilize the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation as the minimum standards for preservation of historic
properties. To receive public financial support from the City, designated privately owned
structures must meet these standards. (See Land Use Policy LU-2.4.2.)
Policy CM-5.2.2: The City currently owns historic sites and other potential
archaeological sites. If it is deemed in the public interest for the City to transfer title of
City properties of historic, architectural, or archaeological significance, such transfer will
include restrictive covenants to ensure the protection and preservation of such
properties. (See Land Use Policy LU-2.4.3.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
106
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION
Goal NR-1: Maintain, preserve, enhance and restore the quality of natural resources within
the context of the city's urban environment.
Objective NR-1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems within Virginia Key,
the Dinner Key spoil islands, and those portions of Biscayne Bay that lie within the
City's boundaries.
Policy NR-1.1.1: The City shall continue to take actions to protect and restore the
natural environment of Virginia Key in cooperation with appropriate County, State and
Federal environmental agencies. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-1.1.1.)
Policy NR-1.1.2: The City will continue retrofitting the number of storm water outfalls
that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into
Biscayne Bay in accordance with water quality improvement programs and adopted
plans. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only
feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will
be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges.
(See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy 2.2.1 and Coastal Management Policy
CM-1.1.2.)
Policy NR-1.1.3: [Reserved]
Policy NR-1.1.4: The City will continue to participate in the State funded SWIM program
for funding support in order to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into
Biscayne Bay.
Policy NR-1.1.5: Regulate development on Virginia Key to ensure that there will be no
net loss of functional wetlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be
degraded or disrupted; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora
will be protected.
Policy NR-1.1.6: Through land development regulations, ensure that development or
redevelopment within the Coastal Zone will not adversely affect the natural environment
or lead to a net loss of public access or public use of public owned property (consistent
with protection of natural systems) to the city's natural resources.
Policy NR-1.1.7: The City will increase code enforcement to prevent illegal disposal of
hazardous waste into the city's natural resources such as the Miami River and Biscayne
Bay, and will encourage Miami -Dade County to approve and post signs warning against
illegal disposal.
Policy NR-1.1.8: The City will work with, and support the County's efforts to identify
generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enforce procedures for the proper
collection and disposal of hazardous waste. The City will support Miami -Dade County's
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
107
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
development of a hazardous waste temporary storage facility in a non -populated area.
(See Solid Waste Collection Policy SW-1.2.4.)
Objective NR-1.2: Improve the water quality of, and ensure health safety within, the
Miami River, its tributaries and the Little River.
Policy NR-1.2.1: The City will continue to work with the Biscayne Bay Management
Plan Committee and with the appropriate agencies in order to encourage and support
Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management in the
monitoring of contaminants within these water bodies and to ensure that the City is kept
adequately informed of environmental conditions.
Policy NR-1.2.2: Continue to implement the Biscayne Bay Management Plan and other
relevant plans in order to reduce the level of contaminants in these water bodies and
improve the water quality within them.
Policy NR-1.2.3: Participate in state and federally funded programs to remove
abandoned and repair leaking underground fuel storage tanks on City owned properties.
Policy NR-1.2.4: The City of Miami will continue to cooperate with the Miami River
Commission, which has been granted broad powers over environmental and other
issues related to the Miami River by state statute. Among the issues to be addressed by
the commission are those related to acceptable water quality standards for the Miami
River and its tributaries.The City of Miami will cooperate with the Miami River
Commission in establishing such standards and, to the extent feasible, achieving them.
Objective NR-1.3: Maintain and enhance the status of native species of fauna and flora.
Policy NR-1.3.1: Continue and, where necessary, expand the use of scenic corridor
and Environmental Preservation District designation.
Policy NR-1.3.2: Identify City -owned land with significant native vegetative features or
wildlife habitats, and designate those areas as Environmental Preservation Districts.
Policy NR-1.3.3: Continue designating private properties with significant or unique
resources as Environmental Preservation Districts.
Policy NR-1.3.4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any adverse
impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine
life, and establish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts.
Policy NR-1.3.5: Through the development review and approval process, ensure that
off -site mitigation for disruption or degradation of significant natural resources occurs in
an orderly and sound manner, so as to maximize benefits to the overall natural system.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
108
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy NR-1.3.6: Through the development review process, deny the use of intrusive
exotic plant species, encourage the use of native plant species, and those species that
do not require the excessive use of fertilizers, excessive watering, are not prone to insect
infestation or disease, and do not have invasive root systems.
Policy NR-1.3.7: Permit applications for all boating facilities located on city shorelines
shall be evaluated in the context of their cumulative impact on manatees and marine
resources.
Policy NR-1.3.8: Slow or idle speed zones shall be adopted in areas frequented by
manatees and enforcement of speed zones will be improved.
Policy NR-1.3.9: To the extent that there are wetlands on the Resources of Regional
Significance, State Save Our Rivers, or Dade County Environmentally Endangered
Lands acquisition lists within the City of Miami, consideration will be given to public
acquisition and management of such properties when such actions are feasible.
Objective NR-1.4: Maintain, protect and enhance the City's tree canopy and significant
trees.
Policy NR-1.4.1: The City will continue to protect the tree canopy and significant trees
through the Tree Protection Ordinance.
Policy NR-1.4.2: The City will work with public and private partners to achieve the 2007
Tree Master Plan goal of 30% tree canopy coverage citywide by 2020.
Policy NR-1.4.3: The City will develop an ordinance describing criteria for designation
of City of Miami Historic Trees, procedures for nomination of a Miami Historic Tree, and
procedures for official designation and signage identifying Miami Historic Trees.
Goal NR-2: Maintain an adequate and safe supply of water for the city residents.
Objective NR-2.1: Ensure adequate levels of safe potable water are available to meet
the needs of the city. (See Potable Water Objective PW-1.2.)
Policy NR-2.1.1: In periods of regional water shortage, the City will support the South
Florida Water Management District's policies and regulations regarding water
conservation.
Policy NR-2.1.2: The City will continue to enforce Florida Building Code requirements
for the on -site retention of the first inch of storm water runoff. (See Sanitary and Storm
Sewers Policy SS-2.2.5.)
Policy NR-2.1.3: The City will continue to support the South Florida Water Management
District efforts to monitor the water levels at the salinity control structures within the city
to prevent against further saltwater intrusion and protect the aquifer recharge areas and
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 109
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
cones of influence of wellfields from contamination. (See Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge Policy AR-1.1.3.)
Policy NR-2.1.4: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, countywide
system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department
(MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating
estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve
development exists. (See Potable Water Policy PW-1.1.1.)
Policy NR-2.1.5: Ensure potable water supplies meet the established level of service
standards for transmission capacity as set in the Capital Improvements Element. (See
Potable Water Policy PW-1.2.1 and Capital Improvements Policy CI-1.2.3.)
Policy NR-2.1.6: [Reserved]
Policy NR-2.1.7: The City adopted an Updated Water Supply Facilities Work Plan
(contained in Appendix PW-1 of the MCNP) for a 20-year planning period, from 2014 to
2033, that is consistent with the current South Florida Water Management District Lower
East Coast Water Supply Plan Updates approved by the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD) and the current adopted County Water Supply Facilities
Work Plan. The City's Work Plan and the County's Work Plan are incorporated into the
City's Comprehensive Plan (See Potable Water Policy PW-1.2.2.)
Policy NR-2.1.8: The City will continue to practice water conservations measures (i.e.
new residential and commercial development will be required to install high efficiency
plumbing fixtures and appliances) that are enforced through Chapter 8 — Building Code
and 32 — Water and Sewer Regulations, of the Miami Dade County Code of Ordinances,
updated September 2, 2008.
Policy NR-2.1.9: The City will continue to implement the same or more stringent water
conservation measures as provided through Chapter 8 — Building Code (updated
September 2, 2008), Chapter 32 — Water and Sewer Regulations (updated September
2, 2008), and Chapter 18A and 18B — Landscape Ordinance (updated May 5, 2009), of
the Miami -Dade County Code of Ordinances.
Goal NR-3: Attain and maintain a degree of air quality that is safe and to meet all attainment
standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the city as a whole.
Objective NR-3.1: Improve the monitoring of air quality within areas perceived to have
the highest potential for air quality problems.
Policy NR-3.1.1: The City shall continue working with County, State and federal
environmental agencies to ensure that the number of air quality monitoring stations
maintained by these agencies are sufficient to ensure accurate ongoing monitoring of
air quality standards.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
110
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective NR-3.2: Prevent the degradation of ambient air quality within the city.
Policy NR-3.2.1: Establish vehicular transportation patterns that reduce the
concentration of pollutants in areas known to have ambient air quality problems.
Policy NR-3.2.2: The City of Miami continues to support the provision of efficient transit
and paratransit services that serve existing and future trip generators and attractors, the
provision of safe and convenient transit passenger transfer terminal facilities, and the
accommodation of the special needs of the City of Miami's population. Therefore, the
City of Miami will support Miami -Dade County in the provision of these essential transit
services. (See Transportation Objective 1.5)
Policy NR-3.2.3: The City will work with the Miami -Dade County transportation planning
agencies to continue to increase the quality of transit services within the city.
Policy NR-3.2.4: The City will work with the appropriate federal, state, regional, and
county agencies to ensure that owners of buildings and facilities with unacceptable
levels of asbestos (according to EPA and State Standards) in ambient air test remove,
treat and seal asbestos -containing materials as long as this action will not cause further
degradation to the air quality.
Policy NR-3.2.5: The City will monitor developers to ensure that they appropriately treat
exposed construction areas by means such as mulching, spraying or grass coverings,
to minimize air pollution.
Policy NR-3.2.6: The City will reduce human exposure to air pollution by taking into
consideration climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies from the
recommendations of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with all applicable regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
111
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
EDUCATION
GOAL EDU-1: DEVELOP, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION BY
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY AND OTHER
APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, WHICH WILL STRIVE TO IMPROVE THE
QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO THE
CITIZENRY OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Objective EDU-1.1: Work towards the reduction of the overcrowding which currently
exists in the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, while striving to attain an optimum
level of service pursuant to Objective EDU-1.2. Provide additional solutions to
overcrowding so that citywide enrollment in Miami -Dade County's public schools will
meet state requirements for class size by September 1, 2010.
Policy EDU-1.1.1: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to continue to provide new student stations through the Capital Outlay program,
in so far as funding is available.
Policy EDU-1.1.2: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to develop and implement alternative educational facilities, such as primary
learning centers, which can be constructed on small parcels of land and relieve
overcrowding at elementary schools, in so far as funding and rules permit.
Policy EDU-1.1.3: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to provide public school facilities to the students in the City, which operate at
optimum capacity, in so far as funding available. Operational alternatives may be
developed and implemented, where appropriate, which mitigate the impacts of
overcrowding while maintaining the instructional integrity of the educational program.
Policy EDU-1.1.4: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to maintain and/or improve the established level of service (LOS), for Public
Educational Facilities, as established for the purposes of school concurrency.
Policy EDU-1.1.5: The Miami -Dade County School Board (School Board) comments
shall be sought and considered on comprehensive plan amendments and other land
use and zoning decisions which could impact the school district, in order to be consistent
with the terms of the state mandated Interlocal Agreement pursuant to Sections 1013.33
and 163.31777, Florida Statutes.
Policy EDU-1.1.6: Capital improvement programming by the Miami -Dade Public
Schools should be based on future enrollment projections and demographic shifts and
targeted to enhance the effectiveness of the learning environment. The future
enrollment projections should utilize student population projections based on information
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
112
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant
to Section 216.136, Florida Statutes, where available, as modified by the School Board
based on development data and agreement with the City of Miami, the State Office of
Educational Facilities and the State SMART Schools Clearinghouse. The School Board
may request adjustment to the estimating conferences' projections to reflect actual
enrollment and development trends. In formulating such a request, the School Board
will coordinate with the City regarding development trends and future population
projections.
Policy EDU-1.1.7: The City will through the Staff Working Group of the Interlocal
Agreement for Public School Facility coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public
Schools, and applicable Cities to review annually the Education Element and school
enrollment projections.
Objective EDU-1.2: The City of Miami shall coordinate new residential development with
the future availability of public school facilities4 consistent with the adopted level of
service standards for public school concurrency, to ensure the inclusion of those
projects necessary to address existing deficiencies in the 5-year schedule of capital
improvements, and meet future needs based upon achieving and maintaining the
adopted level of service standards throughout the planning period.
Policy EDU-1.2.1: Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted level of service (LOS)
standard for all Miami -Dade County public school facilities is 100% utilization of Florida
Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms).This LOS
Standard, shall be applicable in each public school concurrency service area (CSA),
defined as the public school attendance boundary established by the Miami -Dade
County Public Schools.
Policy EDU-1.2.2: It is the goal of Miami -Dade County Public Schools and The City of
Miami for all public school facilities to achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No
Relocatable Classrooms) capacity by January 1, 2018. To help achieve the desired
100% utilization of Permanent FISH by 2018, Miami -Dade County Public Schools should
continue to decrease the number of relocatable classrooms over time. Public school
facilities that achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH capacity should, to the extent
possible, no longer utilize relocatable classrooms, except as an operational solution2.
By December 2010, the City and County in cooperation with Miami -Dade County Public
Schools will assess the viability of modifying the adopted LOS standard to 100%
utilization of Permanent FISH (No Relocatable Classrooms) for all CSAs.
4 Level of Service standards for public school facilities to those traditional educational facilities, owned and operated by the Miami -Dade County Public
Schools, that are required to serve the residential development within their established Concurrency Service Area. Level of Service standards do not
apply to charter schools. However, the capacity of both charter and magnet schools will be credited against the impact of development. No credit
against the impact of development shall be given for either magnet or charter schools if their district wide enrollment is at, or above, 100% FISH
Capacity
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
113
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy EDU-1.2.3: In the event the adopted LOS standard of a CSA cannot be met as
a result of a proposed development's impact, the development may proceed provided
at least one of the following conditions is met:
1.2.3.1: The development's impact can be shifted to one or more adjacent CSAs
that have available capacity located, either in whole or in part, within the same
Geographic Areas (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, or Southeast, see Figures 1A,
2A and 3C within Appendix EDU-1) as the proposed development; or
1.2.3.2: The development's impact is mitigated, proportionate to the demand for
public schools it created, through a combination of one or more proportionate share
mitigation options as defined in Section 163.3180 (13)(e)1, Florida Statutes. The
intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation of residential development
impacts on public school facilities, guaranteed by a legal binding agreement,
through mechanisms that include, one or more of the following: contribution of land;
the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a
permanent public school facility; or, the creation of a mitigation bank based on the
construction of a permanent public school facility in exchange for the right to sell
capacity credits. The proportionate share mitigation agreement is subject to
approval by Miami -Dade County School Board and Miami -Dade County Board of
County Commission and must be identified in the Miami -Dade County Public
Schools Facilities Work Program.
1.2.3.3: The development's impacts are phased to occur when sufficient capacity
will be available. If none of the above conditions is met, the development shall not
be approved.
Policy EDU-1.2.4: Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) shall be delineated to: 1)
maximize capacity utilization of the facility, 2) limit maximum travel times and reduce
transportation costs, 3) acknowledge the effects of court -approved desegregation plans,
4) achieve socio-economic, racial, cultural and diversity objectives, and 5) achieve other
relevant objectives as determined by the School Board's policy on maximization of
capacity. Periodic adjustments to the boundary or area of a CSA may be made by the
School Board to achieve the above stated factors. Other potential amendments to the
CSAs shall be considered annually at the Staff Working Group meeting to take place
each year no later than April 30 or October 31, consistent with Section 9 of the Interlocal
Agreement for Public School Facility Planning.
Policy EDU-1.2.5: The City through the implementation of the concurrency
management system and Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program
for educational facilities, shall ensure that existing deficiencies are addressed and the
capacity of schools is sufficient to support residential development at the adopted level
of service (LOS) standards throughout the planning period in the 5-year schedule of
capital improvements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
114
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy EDU-1.2.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will
be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will
continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period.
Objective EDU-1.3: Obtain suitable sites for the development and expansion of public
education facilities
Policy EDU-1.3.1: In the selection of sites for future educational facility development,
the City encourages the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to consider whether a
school is in close proximity to residential areas and is in a location that would provide a
logical focal point for community activities.
Policy EDU-1.3.2: Where possible, the Miami -Dade County Public Schools should
seek sites which are adjacent to existing or planned public recreation areas, community
centers, libraries, or other compatible civic uses for the purpose of encouraging joint use
facilities or the creation of logical focal points for community activity.
Policy EDU-1.3.3: The City acknowledges and concurs that, when selecting a site, the
Miami -Dade County Public Schools will consider if the site meets the minimum size
criteria as recommended by the State Department of Education or as determined to be
necessary for an effective educational environment.
Policy EDU-1.3.4: When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility,
the Miami -Dade County Public Schools should review the adequacy and proximity of
other public facilities and services necessary to the site such as roadway access,
transportation, fire flow and portable water, sanitary sewers, drainage, solid waste,
police and fire services, and means by which to assure safe access to schools, including
sidewalks, bicycle paths, turn lanes, and signalization.-
Policy EDU-1.3.5: When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility
the Miami Dade County Public Schools should consider whether the present and
projected surrounding land uses are compatible with the operation of an educational
facility.
Policy EDU-1.3.6: The City shall encourage and cooperate with the Miami -Dade County
Public Schools in their effort for public school siting reviews to help accomplish the
objectives and policies of this element and other elements of the MCNP. The City shall
cooperate with the Public Schools to establish provisions for a scoping or pre -application
meeting as part of the educational facilities review process, if determined to be
warranted.
Policy EDU-1.3.7: The City will continue to cooperate with Miami -Dade County Public
Schools in utilizing Miami -Dade County Public Schools as emergency shelters during
county emergencies.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
115
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Objective EDU-1.4: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools, in conjunction with the City
of Miami and other appropriate agencies, will strive to improve security and safety for
students and staff.
Policy EDU-1.4.1: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools
to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to reduce the incidence of
violence, weapons and vandalism on school campuses. Encourage the design of
facilities, which do not encourage criminal behavior and provide clear sight lines from
the street.
Policy EDU-1.4.2: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools
to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to reduce the number of
incidents related to hazardous conditions as reported by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the fire marshal, the State Department of Education (DOE), and other
appropriate sources.
Policy EDU-1.4.3: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools
to provide for the availability of alternative programs for at -risk students at appropriate
public educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.4.4: Coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools and
municipalities to provide for pedestrian and traffic safety in the area of schools, and
signalization for educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.4.5: Coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Division of
School Police and other law enforcement agencies, where appropriate, to improve and
provide for a secure learning environment in the public schools and their vicinity.
Objective EDU-1.5: Continue to develop programs and opportunities to bring the
schools and community closer together.
Policy EDU-1.5.1: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to provide "full service" schools, parent resource centers, adult and community
schools and programs as appropriate.
Policy EDU-1.5.2: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to continue to provide opportunities for community and business leaders to serve
on committees and task forces, which relate to the development of improved provision
of public educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.5.3: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to continue
to work with the development industry to encourage partnerships in the provision of sites
and educational facilities including early childhood centers.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
116
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy EDU-1.5.4: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools through
agreement with appropriate agencies to increase medical, psychological, and social
services for children and their families as appropriate.
Objective EDU-1.6: Miami -Dade County Public Schools will continue to enhance
effectiveness of the learning environment.
Policy EDU-1.6.1: Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continue the
design and construction of educational facilities which create the perception of feeling
welcome, secure and positive about the students' school environment and experiences.
Policy EDU-1.6.2: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continue
to design and construct facilities which better provide student access to technology
designed to improve learning, such as updated media centers and science laboratories.
Policy EDU-1.6.3: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encourage to continue to
improve existing educational facilities, in so far as funding is available, through
renovation and expansion to better accommodate increasing enrollment, new
educational programs and other activities, both curricular and extra -curricular.
Objective EDU-1.7: The School Board, the City, and other appropriate jurisdictions shall
establish and implement mechanism for ongoing coordination and communication, to
ensure the adequate provision of public educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.7.1: The City shall coordinate and cooperate with the Miami -Dade County
Public Schools, the State, municipalities and other appropriate agencies to develop or
modify rules and regulations in order to simplify and expedite proposed new educational
facility developments and renovations.
Policy EDU-1.7.2: The location of future educational facilities should occur where
capacity of other public facilities and services is available to accommodate the
infrastructure needs of the educational facility.
Policy EDU-1.7.3: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools should coordinate school
capital improvement plans with the planned capital improvement projects of other
County and municipal agencies.
Policy EDU-1.7.4: The City shall cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools
in their efforts to ensure that they are not obligated to pay for off -site infrastructure in
excess of their fair share of the costs.
Policy EDU-1.7.5: City of Miami and the Miami -Dade County Public Schools will
annually review the Educational Element and the City will make amendments, if
necessary.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
117
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy EDU-1.7.6: The City shall seek to coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public
Schools in formalizing criteria for appropriate sharing of responsibility for required off -
site facility improvements attributable to construction of new public schools or expansion
of existing ones.
Policy EDU-1.7.7: The City shall coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public
Schools and Miami -Dade County to eliminate infrastructure deficiencies surrounding
existing school sites.
Policy EDU-1.7.8: The City and the Miami -Dade County Public Schools shall coordinate
efforts to ensure the availability of adequate sites for the required educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.7.9: The City and the Miami -Dade County Public Schools shall
coordinate the appropriate roles and responsibilities of affected governmental
jurisdictions in ensuring the timely, orderly and efficient provision of adequate
educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.7.10: The City will work with Miami -Dade County will account for the
infrastructure needs of new, planned or expanded educational facilities when
formulation and implementing its own capital improvement plans.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM
In order to enable the preparation of the periodic Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) as required
by Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-5.0053, F.A.C., this section will outline the
procedures for the monitoring and evaluating of the Element and its implementation.
Monitoring Requirements
The primary mechanism to monitor progress in achieving the objectives and policies in this Element
is the collection and update of appropriate baseline data. Further, as required by the State
Requirements for Educational Facilities, at least once every five (5) years the School Board shall
arrange for an educational plant survey to be conducted. This plant survey will include data regarding
existing facilities and a five (5) year projection of student population. The written report from this
survey shall include the following:
Inventory An inventory of existing ancillary and educational plants and auxiliary
facilities.
Student An analysis of past and projected student population.
Population
Capital Outlay An analysis of expenditures and projected capital outlay funds.
Facilities Statements of proposed types of facilities, grade structure, and list student
capacity.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 118
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Funding A proposed funding plan.
The information obtained from the educational plant survey will be used to generally monitor the
progress of the objectives and policies contained in the Educational Element and will provide specific
indicators for Objective EDU-1.1 and Objective EDU-1.4.
The enforcement or adoption of interlocal agreements shall be explored as a means to help
implement components of the Educational Element, and to coordinate the efficient provision of
public educational facilities. The performance of any agreements related to objectives of this element
will be monitored as they are set in place.
Objective EDU-1.1 policies relating to the maintenance and improvement of specific level of
service for public educational facilities, as specified in the Educational Facilities Impact Fee
Ordinance, shall be reviewed annually. Each year, the Miami -Dade County Public Schools
will compare the official enrollment of the school system with the number of student stations
available to determine the current operating LOS.
Objective EDU-1.2 will be measured through an annual review of the latest adopted Miami -
Dade County Public Schools Facility Work Program in order to determine if the adopted
concurrency level of service standard (including the Interim LOS standards) is being achieved.
The number of development orders approved, those disapproved and those that have
achieved LOS standards through mitigation options will also be reviewed.
Objective EDU-1.3 will be monitored through the annual inventory and assessment by the
Miami -Dade County Public Schools of School Board owned property. The number of new
sites shall be reported annually and in the full review period reported in the EAR.
Objective EDU-1.4 will be monitored through the review and analysis of the statistics relating
to school safety, as compiled annually, by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Division of
Police. A review and analysis of new and existing reactive and proactive safety and crime
prevention programs will also be conducted on an annual basis.
Objective EDU-1.5 shall be monitored by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools by reporting
and reviewing the progress and number of new and existing community oriented programs,
including an enrollment analysis, by age and ethnicity, of adult, community and vocational
programs.
Objective EDU-1.6 shall be monitored by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools by reporting
the number of educational facility enhancements such as media centers, art/music suite, and
science laboratories.
Objective EDU-1.7 will be addressed by implementing and tracking the development of
appropriate mechanisms, including interlocal agreements and coordination efforts, which
serve to expedite the provision or enhancement of public educational facilities.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
119
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Monitoring methods may be added or deleted as circumstances and criteria evolve. Any significant
modifications to the monitoring process will be dealt with, as appropriate, through the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan amendment process.
Evaluation
Available data regarding the various public educational facilities will be used to assess progress on
specific objectives. In order to evaluate the level of service being provided, student capacity totals
will be reviewed in comparison to student enrollment to determine the status of the current level of
service being provided. Similarly, performance in terms of achieving other objectives can also be
analyzed by tracking the number of completed capital projects, as well as the development and
implementation of other programs associated with each objective. Results of these calculations and
measures will be analyzed and changing circumstances and opportunities will be considered.
Any actions, changes or modifications to the Goal, Objectives, and Policies will be explained in
accordance with the results of this process of continued monitoring and evaluation. Any necessary
changes will be made through the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan amendment process.
Future Conditions Maps
Consistent with Section 163.3177(12) (g), Florida Statutes, maps showing existing and future
conditions are included in the element. A map series (Figures 1A, 2B and 3C within Appendix EDU-
1) indicate the public school and ancillary facility locations as December 31, 2007.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
120
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Goal CI-1: Adhere to sound fiscal management policies that ensure the timely provision of
public capital facilities required to maintain existing public infrastructure, that meet the need
for public facilities resulting from future development and redevelopment, and that enable the
provision of public capital facilities that enhance the quality of life within the city.
Objective CI-1.1: The Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan will
provide for the sound fiscal planning of capital facility needs and assess the financial
capacity of the City to undertake capital improvement projects.
Policy CI-1.1.1: The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) represent the means by which the capital facilities needs of the city will
be addressed, and both the CIE and CIP will be revised on an annual basis to reflect
changes in the economic, social and public fiscal environment.
Policy CI-1.1.2: All capital expenditures in excess of $5,000 per distinct project must
appear within the CIE and CIP, with the exception of expenditures required to meet
public emergencies or unforeseeable contractual obligations.
Policy CI-1.1.3: The City will adopt a Capital Budget that corresponds to the first year
of the CIE and CIP.
Policy CI-1.1.4: As capital projects are incorporated into the CIE and CIP, consideration
will be given to the elimination of public hazards, the elimination of shortfalls between
the adopted level of service (LOS) standards and the existing capacity of public facilities;
the impact of proposed capital projects on the capital and operating budgets of the City;
the fiscal capacity of the City to meet future capital spending needs; the economic and
social benefits to be generated by proposed projects; the environmental impacts of
proposed projects; the public facility requirements of new development or
redevelopment; consistency between proposed capital projects and the goals and
objectives set forth in the various elements of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan; and the coordination between proposed City projects and those projects and
programs of federal, state, and county agencies and the South Florida Water
Management District and Miami -Dade County Public Schools.
Policy CI-1.1.5: In the appropriation of capital funds priority will be given to the
maintenance, repair and replacement of existing public capital facilities.
Policy CI-1.1.6: All bond authorizations must be in conformance with the capital facilities
needs, programs and expenditure requirements as expressed within the City's Capital
Improvement Element.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
121
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy CI-1.1.7: The City will continue to seek the advice of qualified counsel to ensure
the proper timing of debt issuance and efficient management of its capital financing
resources.
Policy CI-1.1.8: Debt issuance timing, size, and amortization schedules will be planned
and executed to maintain a level repayment and minimize fluctuations in the ad valorem
tax rate.
Policy CI-1.1.9: Competitive sale will be utilized whenever possible to assure that the
City obtains the most competitive interest rate in the municipal markets.
Policy CI-1.1.10: The City will maintain its long standing policy of avoiding the issuance
of short term financing in the form of Bond Anticipation Notes, and Revenue Anticipation
Notes, unless there is a compelling need or extraordinary circumstance for such interim
financing.
Policy CI-1.1.11: The ratio of net direct general obligation debt as a percentage of the
assessed valuation of taxable property will not exceed 25% of the Charter -mandated
limit of 15% of the assessed valuation, or 3.75% of assessed valuation.
Policy CI-1.1.12: Total debt service payments as a percentage of the Combined
General Fund, Enterprise Fund, and Debt Service Fund expenditures shall not exceed
15%.
Policy CI-1.1.13: To the greatest extent possible, capital projects financed through the
issuance of general obligation bonds shall have an expected useful life commensurate
with the period of the financing.
Policy CI-1.1.14: Direct net general obligation and special obligation debt shall be
maintained at below $1,000 per capita.
Policy CI-1.1.15: The City will seek to attain a bond rating of investment grade to ensure
that its citizens benefit from the lowest possible interest rates on its bonds.
Policy CI-1.1.16: The City will assist where possible Miami -Dade County Public Schools
and Miami Dade County in providing school concurrency related capital improvements
and seeking to expand the funding sources available to meet those requirements.
Objective CI-1.2: Ensure through the City's land development regulations that
development orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an
increase in the density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon the availability
of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards for
sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, adequate water supply, parks
and recreation, and transportation facilities, and that land use map changes maintain
the financial feasibility of the MCNP. (See Coastal Management Objective CM-1.4 or
Educational Objective EDU-1.2.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 122
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy CI-1.2.1: The impact of proposed future land use map changes on meeting
adopted LOS standards and public capital facility needs will be assessed for their effect
on the financial feasibility of the MCNP before such proposals are adopted and no land
use map change will be approved if the change causes the MCNP not to be financially
feasible.
Policy CI-1.2.2: All development orders authorizing changes in permitted land uses for
new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity
of land use will be contingent upon the ability of existing or programmed public facilities
to continue to provide service at or above the adopted LOS standard for the public
facilities listed in Policy CI-1.2.3. The public facilities to serve the new development or
redevelopment shall be in place and available to serve new development as follows:
a) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, potable water facilities and adequate water supply
shall be in place and available to serve new development or redevelopment no
later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent.
The concurrency requirement for sanitary sewer may be met through the use
of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems approved by the Department
of Health. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the
city shall consult with the Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department
(MDWASD) to determine whether the adequate water supplies to serve the new
development will be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance of
a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. Furthermore, MDWASD
shall be responsible for monitoring the availability of water supplies for all water
users of MDWASD and for implementing a system that links water supplies to
the permitting of new development.
b) Park and recreation facilities shall be in place or under construction to serve
new development or redevelopment no later than one (1) year after the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. The acreage
for such facilities shall be dedicated or acquired by the city prior to issuance of
a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, or funds in the amount of
the developer's fair share shall be committed no later than approval to
commence construction.
c) Transportation facilities shall be in place and available to serve new
development or redevelopment no later than three (3) years after the issuance
of a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation,
consistent with the provisions of Objective TR-1.7 & related Policies and Policy
TR-1.3.3 Policy TR 1.1.1, TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3. If the funds in the CIE are
insufficient to fully fund the transportation facility improvement required, the City
may enter into a binding proportionate -share agreement sufficient to mitigate
the impacts by paying for one or more improvements which will significantly
benefit the impacted transportation system, which improvements shall be
adopted into the 5 year capital improvements schedule at the next annual CIE
update.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 123
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
d) Storm -sewer. Issuance of any development permit shall require compliance
with the stormwater level of service standard.
Policy CI-1.2.3: Acceptable Level of Service Standards for public facilities in the City of
Miami are:
a) Recreation and Open Space — Provide a municipally -owned park within a ten-
minute barrier -free walk to park entrances by 72% of the city's population as
measured by GIS pedestrian network analysis. A ten-minute walk will be
defined as a one-half mile, barrier -free distance on a safe pedestrian route.
Barrier -free means a continuous walk on a sidewalk or designated pedestrian
route that may include crossing streets but does not encounter barriers such as
walls or highway embankments that impede passage. Safe pedestrian routes
include those that may include crossing of streets with speed limits of up to 40
mph. (See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4.).
b) Potable Water Transmission Capacity — 92.05 gallons/ resident/ day. (See
Potable Water Policy PW-1.2.1 and Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR-
2.1.5.).
c) Sanitary Sewer Transmission Capacity — 141 gallons/ resident/day. (See
Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS-1.3.1.)
d) Storm Sewer Capacity — One -in -five-year storm event. (See Sanitary and Storm
Sewers Policy SS-2.1.3.)
e) Solid Waste Collection Capacity — 1.28 tons/resident/year. (See Solid Waste
Collection Policy SW-1.1.1.)
f) Traffic Circulation The minimum level of service standard on limited access,
Corridors is the peak period LOS E, with allowable exceptions and justification&
with LOS measured by conventional methodology pursuant to Objective TR
1.1, Policy TR 1.1.1, Policy TR 1.1.2 and Policy TR 1.1.3. The measurement
of LOS is made for the peak period (which is the average of the two highest
consecutive hours of trip volume during a weekday). Within designated
Transportation Corridors, which include approximately 95% of the roadway
mileage within the City of Miami, a minimum peak period LOS E is also
maintained, but the measurement methodology is based on the peak period
person trips wherein the capacities of all modcs, including mass transit, arc
used in calculating the LOS. An overall minimum peak period LOS standard of
E (100 percent utilization of person trip capacity) will be maintained on
Transportation Corridors. Specific levels of service by location and mode are
set out in Policies TR 1.1.2 (addressing transportation corridors) and TR 1.1.3
(addressing FIHS facilities) from the Transportation Element of the MCNP. The
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 124
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
g)
City will utilize a tiered LOS analysis when reviewing traffic impacts for new
developments whereby the Person -Trip LOS methodology will only be applied
within areas identified as a Center (as depicted on Map TR-14.2 within Appendix
TR-1, the Data Inventory and Analysis) while the traditional automobile LOS
methodology will be applied to all other areas within the City. Both
methodologies are then expressed as a ratio corresponding to letter grades
LOS A through LOS F based on the volume -to -capacity ratio in the same
manner as used by the traditional LOS methodology.
Issuance of development orders for new development or significant expansion
of existing development will be contingent upon the development of an
approved mitigation plan for an area at LOS E (100 percent of capacity)
standard or beyond within centers, transit corridors, and all other areas.
The City will require a qeneralized Traffic Statement documenting the trip
generation and site access for developments and redevelopments that generate
a minimum of 20 new peak hour trips. A detailed Traffic and Neighborhood
Impact Analysis will be required for developments and redevelopments that
generate more than 20 new peak hour trips. Determination of the number of
new peak hour trips proiected to result from the development will be calculated
according to the latest version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. (See Policy
TR-1.3.3. and Objective TR-1.7. & related Policies for additional information).
The City has adopted FDOT's minimum LOS targets for Florida Intrastate
Highway System (FINS) roadways. (See Objective TR-1.6.)
Miami -Dade Public Schools - Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted level of
service (LOS) standard for all Miami -Dade County public school facilities is
100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (With
Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS standard shall be applicable in each public
school concurrency service area (CSA), defined as the public school
attendance boundary established by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools.
h) Adequate Water Supply -- As determined by the Miami -Dade County Water and
Sewer Department.
Policy CI-1.2.4: The latest point in the application process for determination of
concurrency shall be prior to the approval of an application for development order or
permit that contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and
intensities of development. Concurrency will be determined by the Planning
Department during the review of a Major Use Special Permit, rezoning, and special
permits and exceptions pursuant to the City's land development regulations.
Policy CI-1.2.5: The Planning Department, with the assistance of various City
departments and agencies, shall be responsible for monitoring and ensuring adherence
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
125
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
of the issuance of development orders to the adopted level of service standards, the
schedule of capital improvements and the availability of public facility capacity.
Policy CI-1.2.6: Rise in sea level projected by the federal government, and refined by
the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken into
consideration in all future decisions regarding the design, location, and development of
infrastructure and public facilities in the City to meet or exceed adopted Level of
Service (LOS) Standards. (See related policy CM-1.4.2)
Objective CI-1.3: Ensure that future development and redevelopment pay an
equitable, proportional share of the cost of public facilities required to maintain
adopted LOS standards.
Policy CI-1.3.1: The City will continue to use developer contributions, including
development impact fees, to help fund the cost of public facilities needed to serve new
development or redevelopment.
Policy CI-1.3.2: The City will periodically revise all fees related to the impact of new
development and redevelopment to reflect increases in the cost of providing public
capital facilities.
Policy CI-1.3.3: The City will consider the use of special assessment districts to help
fund capital projects whose public benefits tend to be localized to specific geographic
sub areas of the city.
Policy CI-1.3.4: The City will take appropriate measures to ensure that increased
property values resulting from new development and redevelopment are accurately
reflected on the County Tax Assessor's property tax rolls in a timely manner.
Policy CI-1.3.5: The City will work with the Miami Dade County and the Miami -Dade
County Public Schools to identify appropriate funding mechanisms in order to assure
the fiscal resources to maintain acceptable levels of service.
Policy CI-1.3.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will
be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will
continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period.
Objective CI-1.4: Ensure that public capital expenditure within the Coastal Zone does
not encourage private development that is subject to significant risk of storm damage.
(See Coastal Management Objective CM-4.3.)
Policy CI-1.4.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal high hazard area
will be limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain adopted
LOS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time, or reduce
the threat to public health and safety from storm events. (See Coastal Management
Policy CM-4.3.1.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 126
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy CI-1.4.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal zone intended to
further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan will be
limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the risk to public health and
safety from storm damage. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-4.3.2.)
Objective CI-1.5: The City's Capital Improvements Program and Schedule is adopted
as follows in Appendix CI-1 of the MCNP.
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Concurrency refers to a provision of Florida law that requires certain public facilities and
services to be available when the impact of land development occurs. They must be
available "current with" the impact of development.
Paraphrasing Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes, each county and municipality must
incorporate specific and detailed provisions which shall provide that public facilities and
services meet or exceed the Levels of Service (LOS) standards established in the Plan's
Capital Improvements Element and are available when needed for the development, or that
the development orders or permits are conditioned on the availability of these public facilities
and services necessary to serve the proposed development.
Levels of Service (LOS) are measures that determine the capacity of the public facility per
unit of demand. Local governments are required to adopt LOS standards for the following
services:
Recreation and Open Space
Potable Water
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Drainage
Solid Waste
Traffic Circulation
Educational/ Public School Facilities
The Levels of Service for each element are adopted by the local government in its
Comprehensive Plan and approved by the state. Consequently, if any of the facilities or
services are not available, or are deficient in their LOS, development cannot take place until
they are provided at the required level, and "concurrent with" the impact of the development.
Because the City of Miami is a fully developed city, its adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map
is designed so that the land use densities and intensities shown on it are supported by
appropriate infrastructure that will meet the cities adopted LOS standards. Moreover,
Miami's zoning regulations have been made consistent with its adopted 2020 Future Land
Use Maps required by Florida's Growth Management Laws. Therefore, development or
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
127
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
redevelopment that does not exceed allowable zoned uses and intensities will not require
concurrency review as a condition of issuance, because it is generally supported by
adequate infrastructure.
If a development permit being requested requires a Land Use/ Zoning change, or a Major
Use Special Permit or similar consideration, a concurrency review will be required. Impacts
of the proposed development on the required LOS standards will be calculated, and a
determination made as to whether the required infrastructure capacity will be available
concurrent with the impact of development. Planning Department will consult departments
of PW, SW, Parks & Recreation. , and others as appropriate for input to the LOS impact
evaluation.
An affirmative principal concurrency determination will be required before a prospective
developer can obtain a subsequent development order.
Public School Facilities:
Necessary public school facilities must be in place or under actual construction within three
years after of final issuances of final subdivision of site plan approval, or the functional
equivalent.
The City in coordination with the Miami -Dade County Public School shall by ordinance,
include proportionate share mitigation methodologies and options for public school facilities
in its concurrency management program and Interlocal Local Agreement for Public Facility
Planning between Miami -Dade County Public Schools, Miami -Dade County and the Cities
in Miami -Dade County, consistent with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
The intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation of residential development impacts
on public school facilities, guaranteed by a legal binding agreement, through mechanisms
that include, one or more of the following: contribution of land; the construction, expansion,
or payment for land acquisition or construction of a permanent public school facility; or, the
creation of a mitigation bank based on the construction of a permanent public school facility
in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits.
Capital improvements associated with the construction of educational facilities are the
responsibility of the Miami -Dade County Public School. To address financial feasibility
associated with school concurrency, the Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work
Program dated September 2007 for educational facilities will be incorporated by reference
in the CIE.
The City shall coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, to annually update its
Facilities Work Program to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5-year and
long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard,
including interim standards, will continue to be achieved and maintained. The City, through
its annual update to the Capital Improvements Schedule, will incorporate by reference the
latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational
facilities. The City and the Miami -Dade County Public School will coordinate their planning
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 128
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
efforts prior to and during the MCNP Amendment process and during updates to the Miami -
Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
129
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
Goal IC-1: Increase effectiveness and efficiency in the delivery of government services
through the appropriate coordination of local government actions.
Objective IC-1.1: To establish formal procedures for coordinating City planning and
operating functions that are directly related to the City's comprehensive plan with the
Miami -Dade County School Board, Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Authority
Department, Miami -Dade County Public Works Department, Solid Waste Division,
Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM), the
Seaport Department (Port of Miami), Aviation Department (Miami International Airport),
the Miami -Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Miami -Dade County
Shoreline Development Review Committee, Miami -Dade Transit, the South Florida
Regional Transportation Authority, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the
South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services, the Division of Historical Resources, Department of State,
adjacent local governments, and any other state, local or federal agency whose
cooperation is required to accomplish the goals and objectives of the comprehensive
plan.
Policy IC-1.1.1: By 2005, establish by interlocal or other formal agreement with
appropriate jurisdictions joint processes for collaborative decision making on issues
including, but not limited to, the location and extension of public facilities subject to
concurrency and the siting of facilities with countywide significance, including locally
unwanted land uses.
Policy IC-1.1.2: The City will continue implementation activities associated with the
Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning in Miami -Dade County, effective
February 27, 2003, including, but not limited to, coordinating City, County, and School
Board plans based upon consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of
population growth and student enrollment; participating in decision -making, through
floating membership on the School Board's School Site Planning and Construction
Committee, regarding potential sites for new schools and proposals for significant
renovation, the location of relocatables or additions to existing buildings, and potential
closure of existing schools; and collaborating to identify options aimed to provide the
capacity to accommodate anticipated student enrollment demand associated with
increases in residential development potential.
Policy IC-1.1.3: [Reserved]
Policy IC-1.1.4: The City will continue to seek membership on the Biscayne Bay
Management Committee, the principal coordinating body for Biscayne Bay, as a means
of expressing its policies pertaining to Biscayne Bay.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
130
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy IC-1.1.5: The City shall maintain its membership and involvement with
committees and groups addressing the environmental healthy and water quality of
Biscayne Bay.
Policy IC-1.1.6: The city will coordinate with county, state and local governments,
districts and agencies to create partnerships to share open spaces and recreational
facilities and promote enhancement and expansion of parks, recreational facilities and
programs, greenways, trails and similar resources for use by Miami residents.
Policy IC-1.1.7: The City will continue to implement the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit addressing the requirements for compliance with the Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) for pollutants entering city bound water bodies and ultimate Biscayne Bay.
Policy IC-1.1.8: The City shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD) to accommodate its water supply and management planning and
permitting process, the City's adopted population projections, spatial characteristics of
the MCNP Land Use Plan map, and policies of the MCNP Land Use, Natural
Groundwater Aquifer Recharge and Coastal Management Elements. It is further City
policy to accommodate future population and economic growth by utilizing the range of
alternative water supply technologies outlined under MCNP Potable Water Element
Objective PW-1.2, including sources from expanded and/or new Florida Aquifer
wellfields, Floridian Aquifer storage and recover (ASR) techniques, water conservation
methods, water reclamation, water and wastewater reuse and other advanced
technologies.
Policy IC-1.1.9: In its development of future potable water supplies and the Water
Supply Facilities Work Plan as outlined in Objective PW-1.3, the City shall consider, and
be compatible, with the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast
Regional Water Supply Plan.
Policy IC-1.1.10: The City of Miami shall coordinate with Miami -Dade County WASD by
requiring applications to be reviewed by MDWASD during the site plan review process
prior to approving a Building Permit, in order to determine whether adequate water
supplies will be available to serve the development by the anticipated issuance date of
the certificate of occupancy for properties located within the City of Miami. The City will
monitor proposed amendments to the Miami -Dade County Comprehensive
Development Master Plan as they relate to water supply planning and sea level rise in
the City of Miami and provide input as necessary.
Policy IC-1.1.11: The City shall participate in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate
Change Compact and shall coordinate with other agencies, local municipalities, and the
private sector to develop initiatives and goals to address climate change mitigation and
adaptation. Climate related goals that support regional climate change objectives shall
be integrated into the City's Comprehensive Plan as appropriate.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
131
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
Policy IC-1.1.12. All City departmental master plans and strategic business plans shall
include and prioritize climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climate
change related amendments shall be recommended through the next feasible, regularly
scheduled amendment process or departmental master plan update for each respective
planning document.
a) Each City department shall consider extending planning horizons as appropriate
to adequately address (i.e. 30, 50, 75-year plans) the projected long-term climate
change impacts into resource allocation recommendations.
b) All new departmental climate change policies and programs shall be monitored
for effectiveness.
Goal IC-2: Promote orderly and appropriate regional land development and transportation
policies through consultations with Miami -Dade County, adjacent counties, the region, and
locally impacted municipalities.
Objective IC-2.1: To further and strengthen existing and potential planning coordination
mechanisms to ensure that consideration is given to both the impacts of land
development and transportation policies within Miami on areas outside the City's
jurisdiction and the impacts of land development outside the City's boundaries on the
City of Miami.
Policy IC-2.1.1: The City will continue its active participation in the Miami -Dade
Planners' Technical Committee (PTC) for the purpose of addressing common concerns
and sharing resources toward solving planning problems, water supply needs and
coordinate water use and sea level rise issues as needed with particular emphasis on
examining State of Florida planning requirements in the context of Miami -Dade County's
unique governmental structure to more effectively coordinate local planning efforts.
Policy IC-2.1.2: Working through the Planners' Technical Committee, the City will share
copies of its comprehensive plan and plan amendments as well as information regarding
scheduled comprehensive planning -related public hearings for the benefit of adjacent
and other interested jurisdictions, and will encourage other participating jurisdictions to
provide this information as well.
Policy IC-2.1.3: The City will support the South Florida Regional Planning Council in
developing informal coordination mechanisms such as regional issue study groups that
coordinate land development and transportation policies among local governments; and
to establish mediation mechanisms to resolve potential regional conflicts. (See
Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC-3.1.1.)
Policy IC-2.1.4: The City will continue to utilize and coordinate with FDOT's South
Florida Commuter Services (SFCS) program to establish and implement transportation
demand management strategies for all future and existing employers with more than 50
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 132
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
employees. The City will lead by example in developing transportation demand
management strategies for City employees. (See Policy TR-1.5.3.)
Policy IC-2.1.5: The City will assist Miami -Dade County in developing the premium
transit projects identified in the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) within
the City limits. The City will utilize land development regulations and other incentives to
help direct development where it will best support existing and planned transit services.
(See Policy TR-2.1.2.)
Policy IC-2.1.6: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County to implement
resiliency policies to mitigate and protect vulnerable roadways and critical evacuation
routes (illustrated in Maps TR-15 and TR-11 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory
and Analysis section respectively) within the City. (See Policy TR-2.2.11.)
Policy IC-2.1.7: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County's SMART Plan, which
specifically aims to provide premium transit service along roadways in the City including
Biscayne Boulevard and West Flagler Street. (See TR- 2.4.1.)
Policy IC-2.1.8 To improve regional mobility, the City will regularly coordinate with, but
not limited to, Miami -Dade County, FDOT, MPO, South Florida Regional Transportation
Authority (SFRTA), the Port of Miami, the Miami River Commission, the Miami
International Airport and other public agencies to ensure that future improvements to the
transportation network within the City from these aqencies' are consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the City of Miami's MCNP. (See Policy TR-2.4.2.)
Policy IC-2.1.9: The City will continue to coordinate with SFRTA, FDOT, Miami -Dade
County, and other local agencies to support and develop plans to implement the FEC
Coastal Link Commuter Rail. (See TR-2.4.5.)
Objective IC-2.2: [Reserved]
Policy IC-2.2.1: [Reserved]
Goal IC-3: Contribute to an atmosphere of cooperation among local governments within
Miami -Dade County.
Objective IC-3.1: Maximize the use of informal, cooperative agreements as mechanisms
for intergovernmental conflict resolution within Miami -Dade County and minimize the
use of litigation.
Policy IC-3.1.1: The City will exhaust all efforts to solve intergovernmental conflicts
arising from adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans through informal
mechanisms, including but not limited to working through the Miami -Dade Planners'
Technical Committee or utilizing the Miami -Dade County League of Cities and the South
Florida Regional Planning Council's mediation process, before seeking remedies
through the judicial system, provided that efforts at informal resolution do not prevent
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
133
Exhibit A - File ID 1034
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION. THI
ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEAN AT THE END 0
THIS DOCUMENT.
the City from seeking legal remedies, or jeopardize the City's ability to prevail in any
legal action. (See Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC-2.1.3.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
134
SUBSTITUTED
Volume 1
MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
GOALS
OBJECTIVES
PoLIcI
City of Miami Planning Department
444 SW 2nd Avenue • Miami, FL 33130
Octobcr 2015 December 2017
The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9,
1959 and has been amended by the City Commission through October 22, 2015.February 23, 2017.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
1
Volume 1
MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
GOALS OBJECTIVES POLICIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF AMENDING ORDINANCES 5
FUTURE LAND USE 9
URBAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 23
The Downtown Miami Master Plan 23
24
Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center 25
Health District Regional Activity Center 26
INTERPRETATION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP 27
REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTERS
CONSERVATION
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMERCIAL RECREATION
MARINE FACILITIES
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
Low DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
27
27
28
28
28
29
29
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL . 29
HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 30
Little Havana Target Area 30
Southeast Overtown/Park West. 30
Brickell, Omni, and River Qusdrant 30
Low DENSITY RESTRICTED COMME' IAL 30
MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED C• MERCIAL 31
MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, P :LIC FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES 31
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL 31
CENTRAL BUSINESS DIST• T (CBD) 32
GENERAL COMMERCIAL 32
INDUSTRIAL 33
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ( ) 33
CORRESPONDENCTABLE — ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 35
HOUSING 36
SANITAR AND STORM SEWERS 43
NATURA GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE 48
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 2
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
POTABLE WATER
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION . 52
TRANSPORTATION 55
PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES 88
PORT OF MIAMI 88
MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 89
PORT OF MIAMI RIVER 90
PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 95
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 107
NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION 115
EDUCATION 120
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 129
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 138
APPENDICES
Appendix LU-1
2020 Future Land Use Map
Urban Central Business District
Buena Vista Yards Regional tivity Center
Residential Density Incre.:e Areas
Edgewater Intensity In ease Area
Health/Civic Center District
Wellfield Protect Area
Wetlands Ma
General Sails Map
Appendix PW-
Wa •r Supply Facilities Work Plan Update - September 10, 2015
Append' TR-1
Existing and Future Transportation Map Series and analytical assumption used to
determine the existing and projected levels of services for roadways, bicycles and
pedestrian facilities.
Appendix PA-1
Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Property Table — July 22, 2010
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 3
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Property Map -- July 22, 2010
Appendix CM-1
Floodplains Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Map
Appendix EDU-1
Public school and ancillary facility locations
Appendix CI-1
Capital Improvements Program and Multi -Year Capital P
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
4
SUBSTITUTED
LIST OF AMENDING ORDINANCES
The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted in 1989 and substantially ame,x Jed in
1991 in response to Florida Department of Community Affairs review comments. The ordinance
adopting the Comprehensive Plan, including subsequent text amendments (only), are as follows:
Ordinance
Date of Adoption
Description of Ordi ance
10544
February 9, 1989
Adopted the MCNP 1989-2000 with m ifications that supersedes the
MCNP (September 1985) and Addendu , provided support documents are
not adopted with the plan.
10700
January 11, 1990
Amended the definition of the Land Use Element to refine the definitions of
Residential, Office and Industrial; amended the Housing Element Objective
1.3 and Policy 1.3.4 and deletea Policy 1.3.5 pertaining to community -based
residential facilities, adult ongregate living facilities, family homes and
family group and group ho es; and corrected a scrivener's error.
10701
January 11, 1990
Amended the Drainaa Sub -Element, Policy No. 2.1.3, specifying which
storm sewers in th city will be designed for a 1-in-5 year event and
establishing a spe ' is LOS standard for the remainder of the storm sewers;
Coastal Manage- ent Sub -Element, Policy 4.1.2, defining and designating
the Coastal Hi; -Hazard Area within the city; and adopted consistent LOS
standards in .oth the Drainage Sub -Element and Policy No. 1.2.3 (d) of the
CIP Eleme. .
10832
January 24, 1991
Amend:a the MCNP Future Land Use; Interpretation of Future Land Use
Maps. ousing; Sanitary and Storm Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recarge; Potable Water; Solid Waste Collection; Transportation; Ports,
Aviation & Related Facilities; Parks, Recreation & Open Space; Coastal
Management; Natural Resource Conservation; and Capital Improvements
and Intergovernmental Coordination elements.
10833
January 24, 1991
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Map Plan by changing land use
designations that affect approximately 5-percent of the total land area of the
City.
11207
December 1, 1994
Allowed professional offices, tourist & guest homes, and museums within
historic districts/structures within single family, duplex and medium density
multi -family residential areas.
11242
M 'ch 27, 1995
Allowed small-scale, limited commercial uses as accessory uses within
medium, density multi -family areas.
11496
May 22, 1997
Allowed professional offices, tourist & guest homes, museums, and private
clubs or lodges within historic districts/structures within single family, duplex
and medium density multi -family residential areas; density and intensity
restricted to the structure(s).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
5
SUBSTITUTED
Ordinance
Date of Adoption
Description of Ordinance
11779
March 23, 1999
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Housing; Sa► tary and Storm
Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; P• able Water; Solid
Waste Collection; and Parks, Recreation & Open Sp. ' e elements according
to 1995 EAR -based recommendations.
11781
March 23, 1999
Amended the Interpretation of Future Land Use ap to conditionally include
residential uses to the general commercial la • use designation.
11782
March 23, 1999
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of th Future Land Use Map to add
"Restricted Parks and Recreation" , d "Marine Facilities" land use
classifications.
11864
November 16, 1999
Amended the MCNP Future Land se Element to adopt the designation of
an "urban infill" area to meet Sta • requirements regarding school siting and
co -location.
11961
September 14, 2000
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Element, Policy LU-1.1.11, to exclude
Virginia Key, Watson Island, and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay
having a "conservation" land use and zoning classification from the Urban
Infill Area.
12332
February 27, 2003
Amended the Transportation Element of the MCNP in accordance with
recommendations of the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal Report; revisions to
the "Report o ufficiency Issues with Responses by the City of Miami" in
response to e Florida Department of Community Affairs; affirmation of the
designatia, of an "urban infill" area adopted by Ordinance 11864; and in
accordance with the designation of an "urban streets" category of public
thoro • hfares.
12333
February 27, 2003
Am- nded the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element of the MCNP to
i lude specific goals associated with a new park in Little Haiti.
12346
March 27, 2003
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map to add a
"Light Industrial" land use classification.
12442
November 25, 2003
Rescinded Ordinance Nos. 12332, 12333 and 12346; updated the
Transportation Element, added policies associated with a new park in Little
Haiti, and added the "Light Industrial" land use classification.
12445
Nove ber 25, 2003
Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to include the
designation of "Regional Activity Centers" within the City of Miami.
12446
ovember 25, 2003
Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to designate the
Buena Vista Regional Activity Center, and amended the Future Land Use
Map to designate the Florida East Coast (FEC) Buena Vista Yard as a
Regional Activity Center.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
6
SUBSTITUTED
Ordinance
Date of Adoption
Description of Ordinance /
12536
May 6, 2004
Amended the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of, the MCNP in
accordance to recommendations from the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal
Report; amended the Future Land Use Element by dele ' g an objective and
policies related to Intergovernmental Coordination byransferring them into
the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.
12635
December 4, 2004
Amended the Coastal Management, Natural R: ource Conservation and
Capital Improvements elements of the CNP in accordance to
recommendations from the 1995 Evaluation d Appraisal Report.
12741
November 3, 2005
Amended the Future Land Use Element the MCNP and the Future Land
Use Map to designate the Downtown iami Master Plan an Urban Central
Business District.
12786
March 23, 2006
Amends certain policies of the F ure Land Use, Housing, Parks Recreation
& Open Space, Coastal Management and Capital Improvements elements
of the MCNP to incorporate :nguage necessary to implement the Miami 21
project.
12966
January 24, 2008
Adding a new Edu :tional Element and amending and adding certain
policies to the Ca• al Improvement and Intergovernmental element of the
MCNP to incorporate language necessary to implement Public School
Concurrency.
13043
November 13, 2008
Amended he MCNP Future Land Use; Housing; Sanitary and Storm
Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Potable Water; Solid
Was Collection, Transportation, Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities,
Pa s, Recreation & Open Space, Coastal Management, Natural Resource
nservation, Capital Improvements; and Intergovernmental Coordination
elements according to 2005 EAR -based recommendations.
13049
January 29, 2009
Amended the MCNP by incorporating the annual update to the Capital
Improvements Element and 2008 — 2009, Five (5) year Schedule of Capital
Improvements.
13115
October , 2009
Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map
section, to remove, modify and incorporate new land use categories, as well
as to adjust the density and intensity provisions within the land use
categories to implement the Miami 21 project.
13144
February 25, 2010
Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to designate the
Health District Regional Activity Center, and amended the 2020 Future Land
Use Map to designate the Health District as a Regional Activity Center.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
7
SUBSTITUTED
Ordinance
Date of Adoption
Description of Ordinance
13157
April 22, 2010
Amending the MCNP Natural Ground Water, Potable ater, Natural
Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements and I ergovernmental
Coordination elements to incorporate a 20-year Wate; Supply Facilities
Work Plan.
13043
July 22, 2010
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities
Port of Miami River Sub -element; and Co..taI Management Element
according to the Stipulated Settlement Agre ent between the Intervenor
"The Miami River Marine Group Inc.", The Department of Community Affairs
and the City of Miami.
13356
January 10, 2013
Amended the MCNP Interpretation oft►e 2020 Future Land Use Map; Parks,
Recreation & Open Space, and Cal. al Improvements elements, in order to
revise the Level Of Service stand . d for Parks, Recreation and Open Space
for concurrency purposes.
13416
Ocotber 24, 2013
Amended the MCNP Inter retation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map to
establish the Park W t Residential Density Increase Area Overlay
permitting up to 500 dwelling units per acre.
13550
September 10, 2015
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use, Potable Water, Coastal
Managemen Natural Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements and
Intergover ental Coordination Elements to incorporate a 20-year Water
Supply F cilities Work Plan Update.
13567
October 22, 2015
Am- ded the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map to
e .blish the Miami River Residential Density Increase Area Overlay
•ermitting up to 400 dwelling units per acre.
13666
February 23, 201
Amended the MCNP Future Land Use, Interpretation of the Future Land Use
Map, and Housing elements to accommodate a residential density increase
when development accommodates a specific mix of workforce, affordable,
and extremely low income housing.
XXXXX
Dece ' .er XX, 2017
Amended the Transportion, Future Land Use, Housing, Capital
Improvements, Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities, and
Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of the MCNP in accordance to
recommendations from the 2015 Evaluation and Appraisal Review.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
8
SUBSTITUTED
FUTURE LAND USE
Goal LU-1: Maintain a land use pattern that (1) protects and enhances the quality of 'e in the
City's neighborhoods; (2) fosters redevelopment and revitalization of blighted o declining
areas; (3) promotes and facilitates economic development and the growth of job f pportunities
in the city; (4) fosters the growth and development of downtown as a re.'nal center of
domestic and international commerce, culture and entertainment; (5) pro • tes the efficient
use of land and minimizes land use conflicts while protecting and pr erving residential
sections within neighborhoods; (6) protects and conserves the city's significant natural and
coastal resources; and (7) protects the integrity and quality the City's existing
neighborhoods by insuring public notice, input and appellant rig s regarding changes in
existing zoning and land use regulations.
Objective LU-1.1: Ensure that land and development gulations are consistent with
fostering a high quality of life in all areas, includin» the timely provision of public
facilities that meet or exceed the minimum level of service (LOS) standards adopted in
the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan.
Policy LU-1.1.1: Development orders .4 horizing new development or redevelopment
that results in an increase in the densi - or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon
the availability of public facilities tr.t meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards
adopted in the CIE, specifically s itary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water,
parks and recreation, and tra portation facilities. The public services and facilities
provided to meet concurre y requirements shall be consistent with the Capital
Improvements Element, o; guaranteed in an enforceable agreement. The public
services and facilities wi include public schools when the Miami -Dade County School
Board and local gover ents in the county implement school concurrency pursuant to
paragraph 163.3177 2)(i), F.S.
Policy LU-1.1. The City's Planning Department, with the assistance of various City
departments d agencies, will (1) continuously monitor land development activities to
ensure comp iance with the adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map (contained in Appendix
LU-1 of the MCNP including FLUM, Wellfield Protection Area, Wetlands and General
Soils ps as amended from time to time) and the goals, objectives, and policies of the
Futur Land Use element of the MCNP; (2) monitor all proposed amendments to land
de lopment regulations to ensure consistency with the MCNP and will forward its
recommendation on such amendments to the Planning Advisory Board and to the City
Commission; (3) continuously monitor the current and projected LOS standards
/
provided by public facilities; and (4) will perform the required concurrency review of
proposed development, as required by Florida Statutes and administrative rules.
Policy LU-1.1.3: The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all areas of the
city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2) the adverse impacts of
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
9
SUBSTITUTED
future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public health and safety, or
natural or man-made amenities; (3) transportation policies that divide or f agment
established neighborhoods; and (4) degradation of public open space, enviro ent, and
ecology. Strategies to further protect existing neighborhoods through the velopment
of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements will be in rporated into
the City's land development regulations.
Policy LU-1.1.4: The City will continue to aggressively address code violations in its
neighborhoods through the implementation of code enforc . ent strategies and
initiatives with the intent of preserving and enhancing neig orhood environmental
conditions.
Policy LU-1.1.5: The Planning Department, with t assistance of various City
departments and agencies, shall annually monitor eps taken to fulfill the Goals,
Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) of the MCNP an iennially report the status of the
GOPs to the Planning Advisory Board and City Commission, including, but not limited
to, improving measurability of objectives.
Policy LU-1.1.6: The City's street and stor sewer improvement projects will provide
curb and gutter, and street landscaping, u ess deemed to be physically or economically
infeasible.
Policy LU-1.1.7: Land develop nt regulations and policies will allow for the
development and redevelopme, of well -designed mixed -use neighborhoods that
provide for the full range of residential, office, live/work spaces, neighborhood retail, and
community facilities in a Ikable area and that are amenable to a variety of
transportation modes, incl .ing pedestrianism, bicycles, automobiles, and mass transit.
Policy LU-1.1.8: The ' ity's Planning Department will be responsible for coordinating
the City's land development regulations and policies with those of Miami -Dade County
and adjacent mun 'ipalities, and in particular: with respect to impacts to infrastructure,
contiguous deve •pment with regard to physical height and mass transitions, and public
open space.
Policy L 1.1.9: The City will maintain low to moderate density uses in the West
Flagami .rea of the city (as shown on Figure 111.1 of Volume II — Data and Analysis of
the MP) as necessary to protect the secondary aquifer recharge area. (See Natural
Gro , ndwater Aquifer Recharge Policy AR-1.2.1.)
olicy LU-1.1.10: The City's land development regulations will encourage high density
residential development and redevelopment in close proximity to Metrorail and
Metromover stations.(See Transportation Policy TR 1.5.2 TR-2.1.3 and Housing Policy
HO-1.1.9.)
Policy LU-1.1.11: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia
Key, Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay, that have a land use
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 10
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
and zoning classification of Conservation, as an Urban Infill Area pursuant to Mia
Dade County's designation of an Urban Infill Area lying generally east of the Pal ;motto
Expressway and including all of the City of Miami. Within this area, the conce ation
and intensification of development around centers of activity shall be emphased with
the goals of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and the lability of
commercial areas. Priority will be given to infill development on vacant par Is, adaptive
reuse of underutilized land and structures, the redevelopment of sue: andard sites,
downtown revitalization and the development of projects that promote public
transportation (See Policy TR-1.1.1.). Maintenance of transportation levels of service
within this designated Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency E .`eption Area shall be
in accordance with the adopted Transportation Corridors level • service standards and
the City of Miami Person Trip Methodology as set forth in Ob. ctive TR-1.7. and related
Policies Policies TR-1.1.2 and 1.1.3 of the Transportation ement of the MCNP as well
as Appendix TR-1.
Policy LU-1.1.12: In order to encourage the development and maintenance of
educational facilities in the City of Miami, the City' Land Use policies permit schools in
all land use classifications except Conservati• , Public Parks and Recreation, and
Industrial. During pre -development program anning and site selection activities, the
City shall coordinate with Miami -Dade P ic Schools and continue to seek, where
feasible and mutually acceptable, to co-lo'.te schools with other facilities such as parks,
libraries, and community centers to the -xtent possible.
Policy LU-1.1.13: The City shall r: iew and evaluate the areas designated Urban Infill
Area (UIA) and/or Transportatio oncurrency Exception Area (TCEA) within two years
of the adoption of this polic, to determine, but not limited to, the following: the
appropriateness of the area: included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; the benefits and/or
disadvantages resulting frm the inclusion (or exclusion) of these areas within the UTA
and/or the TCEA; the strategies to support mobility and alternative modes of
transportation within hose areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; and the
strategies to addre, urban design and network connectivity to improve mobility within
those areas incl ed in the UTA and/or the TCEA.
Policy LU-1,..14: Improve facility and program accessibility through implementation of
the Ameri ans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Polio
U-1.1.15:
ic LU-1.1.16:
Reserved
Reserved
Policy LU-1.1.17: The City will integrate the existing and planned multi -modal
transportation systems with existing and future developments. (See Obiective TR-2.1)
Policy LU-1.1.18: [Reserved]
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
11
SUBSTITUTED
Policy LU-1.1.19: The City will encourage the incorporation of transit facilities wit
private development to integrate access to alternative modes with direct access nd
synergies within new mixed use developments. This includes the co -location of ansit
stations and public common areas of private developments. (See Policy TR- 2..4.)
Objective LU-1.2: Promote, facilitate, and catalyze the redeye pment and
revitalization of blighted, declining or threatened residential, c -mmercial and
industrial areas through a variety of public, private, and public -private redevelopment
initiatives and revitalization programs including, where appropriate, historic
designations.
Policy LU-1.2.1: The City defines blighted neighborhoods .s areas characterized by
the prevalence of older structures with major deficie ies and deterioration, high
residential vacancies, widespread abandonment property, litter and poor
maintenance of real property. Declining neighb• hoods are defined as areas
characterized by the prevalence of structures havin; minor deficiencies, a general need
for improvements in real property, significant . clines in real property values, high
vacancy rates in commercial structures and in easing difficulty in obtaining insurance.
Neighborhoods threatened with decline are d: ined as areas characterized by significant
but infrequent property maintenance negle• , an aging housing stock, declining property
values, general exodus of traditional resients and influx of lower income households.
Policy LU-1.2.2: The City's land devlopment policies will be consistent with affordable
housing objectives and policies a
pted in the Housing Element of the MCNP.
Policy LU-1.2.3: The City's ,,riorities in implementing, facilitation, and encouraging
redevelopment and revitaliz ion projects shall be determined on an area specific basis
in accordance with the a.•pted Consolidated Plan, Fiscal Years 2004-2009, adopted
redevelopment plans, specific neighborhood and area plans, the 2007 Parks and Public
Spaces Master Plan and the land development regulations, as appropriate and as
incorporated in the : CNP by reference in accordance with F.A.C. 9J-5.005(2)(g).
Policy LU-1.2.: The City will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding
Community development Districts and will continue to implement plans for the Omni
and Southeast Overtown/Park West as Community Redevelopment Districts.
Policy LU-1.2.5: The City will continue to develop information programs on the
availability of redevelopment opportunities within the city.
Objec)ve LU-1.3: The City will continue to encourage commercial, office and industrial
deve opment within existing commercial, office and industrial areas; increase the
unzation and enhance the physical character and appearance of existing buildings;
Encourage the development of well -designed, mixed -use neighborhoods that provide
for a variety of uses within a walkable area in accordance with neighborhood design
and development standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 12
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
development regulations and other initiatives; and concentrate new commercial d
industrial activity in areas where the capacity of existing public facilities can met or
exceed the minimum standards for Level of Service (LOS) adopted in the ,apital
Improvement Element (CIE).
Policy LU-1.3.1: The City will continue to provide incentives for; commercial
redevelopment and new construction in designated Neighborhood Dev- •pment Zones
(NDZ), the Empowerment Zone, the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfiel. Redevelopment
Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted areas Such commercial
redevelopment and new construction shall be conducted accordance with
neighborhood design and development standards adopteas a result of the
amendments to the City's land development regulations a other initiatives. Such
incentives may be offered through the building facade trea ent program, Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and othe redevelopment assistance
programs.
Policy LU-1.3.2: The City will continue to encourag the expansion of existing buildings
and new construction through the private sec •r by assisting in making available
commercial loan funds for rehabilitation and sr°gall business loans and seed moneys,
particularly to local minority businesses and -ncouraging the maximum participation,
especially through public/private partners ► ps, of financial institutions, chambers of
commerce, the Beacon Council, other • siness organizations, property owners and
residents of the areas. Priority area- include, but are not limited to, designated
Neighborhood Development Zones o DZ), the Empowerment Zone, the Enterprise
Zone, the Brownfield Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other
targeted areas.
Policy LU-1.3.3: Pursuant
incentives and criteria that
Working Waterfronts as
River" Subelement to
to h.163.3177(6)(a),F.S., the City shall maintain regulatory
ncourage the preservation of recreational and commercial
efined in Ch.342.07,F.S.., particularly in the "Port of Miami
ide future development within the Miami River Corridor.
Policy LU-1.3.4: e City will continue to work with the Miami -Dade County School
Board to ensure e expansion of educational facilities in areas that are easily accessible
by public tran and facilitate the expansion of job training/job placement programs
offered to yo hs (full time and summer terms) and low-income persons.
Policy-1.3.5: The City will continue to promote through its land development
regula '•ns, the creation of high intensity activity centers which may be characterized by
mix -:-use and specialty center development. Such activity centers will be in accordance
wi the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and neighborhood design and
velopment standards adopted as a result of amendments to the City's land
development regulations and other initiatives.
Policy LU-1.3.6: The City will continue to encourage a diversification in the mix of
industrial and commercial activities and tenants through strategic and comprehensive
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 13
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
marketing and promotion efforts so that the designated Neighborhood Development
Zones (NDZ), the Empowerment Zone, the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfield
Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted are are
buffered from national and international cycles.
Policy LU-1.3.7: The City will continue to use the City's Enterprise Zone, E owerment
Zone, Commercial Business Corridors, and Brownfield Redevelopment A a strategies
to stimulate economic revitalization, and encourage employment opportunities. (Policy
PA-3.3.10)
Policy LU-1.3.8: The City will foster or develop and implement j• II training, vocational,
and educational programs to assist the City's existing and 'uture residents, water
dependent and water related businesses and uses along the iami River, in achieving
economic self-sufficiency utilizing government resourc-.r as necessary, and will
continue to work with appropriate State and County agen•'es to direct training programs
and other technical assistance, to support minority and .emi-skilled residents of the city
including, without limitation, their involvement in rec ational and commercial working
waterfronts along the Miami River as defined by C . 342.07, F.S. (Policy PA-3.3.11).
Policy LU-1.3.9: The City will continue to conc ntrate Community Development efforts
in small geographic areas that have special opportunities and/or potential for
redevelopment consistent with implementation of small -area action plans that have the
support of neighborhood residents and business owners.
Policy LU-1.3.10: The City will con ' ue to aggressively address code violations in its
neighborhoods through the im ementation of ongoing and new neighborhood
improvements, and code enfor'ement strategies and initiatives; and will adopt and
enforce performance standa s appropriate to preserve and enhance the physical
condition and appearance • commercial and industrial areas in the city by July 2009.
The City will report on annual basis, what has been accomplished to fulfill the
requirements of this poly
Policy LU-1.3.11: T e City's land use regulations will provide incentives for the inclusion
of day care facilits near major employment centers.
Policy LU-1..12: The City's land use regulations will permit neighborhood -based health
care facilities.
Policy -1.3.13: [Reserved]
Po 'cy LU-1.3.14: The City will continue to enforce urban design guidelines for public
d private projects which shall be consistent with neighborhood character, history, and
unction, and shall be in accordance with the neighborhood design and development
standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land development
regulations and other initiatives.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
14
SUBSTITUTED
Policy LU-1.3.15: The City will continue to encourage a development pattern that
enhances existing neighborhoods by developing a balanced mix of uses includiareas
for employment, shopping, housing, and recreation in close proximity to eacly6ther.
Objective LU-1.4: Continue the growth of Downtown Miami, expand its ro as a center
of domestic and international commerce, further its development as a egional center
for the performing arts and other cultural and entertainment activitie and develop an
urban residential base.
Policy LU-1.4.1: [Reserved].
Policy LU-1.4.2: The City will continue to investigate a , where appropriate, create
management districts, funded by special assessment o provide extra services and
special events needed to attract visitors and resid- is to the retail core, and other
special retail shopping areas in downtown.
Policy LU-1.4.3: The City will continue to • omote an active pedestrian sidewalk
environment along the ground floor frontage •' buildings on "pedestrian streets" through
land development regulations.
Policy LU-1.4.4: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.4.5: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.4.6: [Reserved]
Policy LU-1.4.7: The City ill continue to enforce regulations within downtown to ensure
that retail signage is of igh quality and consistent with the design and development
objectives for downto n.
Policy LU-1.4.8: he City will continue to enforce land development regulations as
necessary in or er to encourage rehabilitation and sensitive, adaptive reuse of historic
properties an' older structures in downtown, and to exempt rehabilitation projects from
Developm- t of Regional Impact (DRI) mitigation fees.
Policy U-1.4.9: The City will continue to promote rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of
vac. ' and underutilized spaces and provide incentives for rehabilitation of older
bu .ings in downtown.
Policy LU-1.4.10: The City will continue to develop modifications to existing regulations
with the intent of providing greater flexibility in the design and implementation of mixed -
use developments within the general Downtown area and particularly along the Miami
River up to and including 5th Street consistent with the Port or Miami River Sub -Element.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
15
SUBSTITUTED
Policy LU-1.4.11: The City will continue to streamline the development application for
development approvals to simplify and standardize the process, while ensuring thai the
regulatory intent of the approvals is maintained.
Policy LU-1.4.12: The City will continue to implement the Downtown DRI development
orders for downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West, and seek approval for future
increments of development in a timely manner.
Objective LU-1.5: Land development regulations will protect the cit s unique natural
and coastal resources, its neighborhoods, and its historic and cul ral heritage.
Policy LU-1.5.1: Development orders in the city will be c%nsistent with the goals,
objectives and policies contained in the Natural Resource onservation and Coastal
Management elements of the MCNP.
Policy LU-1.5.2: Land use regulations and develop nt policies will be consistent with
the intent and purpose of Miami -Dade County' Waterfront Charter Amendment,
Shoreline Development Review Ordinance, rules •f the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve
Management Area, and other appropriate requir2ments regarding waterfront access and
management.
Policy LU-1.5.3: Notice of application special permits or other such administrative
land use or zoning permits provided •r in the future, shall be provided to any NET
registered homeowners association or neighborhood associations thirty days prior to
issuance of the special permit or s administrative land use or zoning permits provided
for in the future zoning and la %` use regulations and promptly after issuance of the
decision with explanation of ap peal procedures allowing sufficient time for such appeals.
Policy LU-1.5.4: Notice of pplication requiring public hearings shall be provided to any
NET registered homeo er and neighborhood associations and to owners within a
certain number of feet s provided for in the City code.
Objective LU-1.6: Reg ate the development or redevelopment of real property within
the city to insure onsistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive PI
Policy LU=1.6.1: The City hereby adopts the 2020 Future Land Use Map, referenced
and co ained in Appendix LU-1 of the MCNP. The "Interpretation of the Future Land
Use ap" section of this element, which follows these land use goals, objectives and
poll es, establishes the activities and facilities allowed within each land use category
arJ earing on the adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map, and the City's land development
regulations shall be consistent with the 2020 Future Land Use Map.
Policy LU-1.6.2: [Reserved]
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
16
SUBSTITUTED
Policy LU-1.6.3: The City's Planning Department shall review all proposals to am;,nd
the City's Zoning Ordinance and any other land development regulations, and shall
report as to the consistency between any proposed amendment and the MCNF to the
Planning Advisory Board, the City's "local planning agency," which will then forward its
recommendation to the City Commission for approval and adoption.
Policy LU-1.6.4: Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning Atlas that his been deemed
to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by the PI. ' ning Department,
shall require a level of service (LOS) review and a finding from the anning Department
that the proposed amendment will not result in a LOS that f s below the adopted
minimum standards described in Policy CI-1.2.3, and will n. be in conflict with any
element of the MCNP. Based on its evaluation, and oother relevant planning
considerations, the Planning Department will forward a rcommended action on said
amendment to the Planning Advisory Board, which will t ,.n forward its recommendation
to the City Commission.
Policy LU-1.6.5: The City may continue to use •ecial district designations as a land
development regulation instrument for the purpose of accomplishing specific
development objectives in particular areas of e city.
Policy LU-1.6.6: The City will continue • enforce signage regulations to ensure the
quality of life in the city's neighborhood
Policy LU-1.6.7: The City will p .vide adequate opportunity for public comment
regarding zoning changes and v. lances within neighborhoods.
Policy LU-1.6.8: The City's land development regulations and policies will encourage
and/or require, as set fort in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space element of this
plan the provision of o'en space in development projects in both residential and
commercial areas.
Policy LU-1.6.9: T»e City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to
mitigate the pote sally adverse impacts of new development on existing neighborhoods
through the devopment of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements.
Policy LU- .6.10: The City's land development regulations and policies will allow for the
provision •f safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking and will provide
access •y a variety of transportation modes, including pedestrianism, bicycles,
auto -obiles, and transit.
Iicy LU-1.6.11: The City's land development regulations and policies will insure that
areas designated conservation are protected from development other than that which
promotes its passive appreciation.
Policy LU-1.6.12: The City's land development regulations will direct recreational
activities to areas of the city where facilities and services are available.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
17
SUBSTITUTED
Objective LU-1.7: Ensure that the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan is updated
as needed to meet changing conditions and, improve its effectiveness and success.
Policy LU-1.7.1: Update the MCNP by January 2009, to include a detailed li: of
definition of terms used by the MCNP with an effective time line showing coord ation
and consultation with various City departments and stakeholders.
Objective LU-1.8: The location, design and management practices of devel • • ment and
redevelopment in the City shall ensure the protection of natural resources = nd systems
by recognizing, and sensitively responding to constraints posed by climate change and
sea level rise.
Policy LU-1.8.1: The City shall assist Miami -Dade County in th r analysis on climate
change and its impacts on the built environment addressing de lopment standards and
regulations related to investments in infrastructure, develo ent/redevelopment and
public facilities in hazard prone areas including areas vulnerable to sea level rise, tidal
flooding and other impacts of climate change. Recommendations from the analysis shall
address appropriate changes to land use designations and zoning of impacted
properties, and development standards, among other relevant considerations.
Policy LU-1.8.2: The City shall make the practi e of adapting the built environment to
the impacts of climate change and sea level ri e, an integral component of all planning
processes, including but not limited to comprehensive planning, infrastructure planning,
building and life safety codes, emergency management and development regulations,
stormwater management, and water resources management.
Policy LU-1.8.3: The City shall acti -ly participate in the Southeastern Florida Regional
Climate Change Compact and col,. 'orate to increase regional climate change resiliency
by sharing technical expertise assessing regional vulnerabilities, advancing agreed
upon mitigation and adapta on strategies and developing joint state and federal
legislation policies and pro• ams.
Policy LU-1.8.4: The C. shall work with Miami -Dade County to determine the feasibility
of designating areas n the City as Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section
163.3177(6)(g)(10)lorida Statute, and designate Adaptation Action Areas as provided
by Section 163.3 .4(1), Florida Statute, in order to determine those areas vulnerable to
coastal storm s rge and sea level rise impacts for the purpose of developing policies for
adaptation a : enhance the funding potential of infrastructure adaptation projects.
Policy-1.8.5: The City shall work with Miami -Dade County to support the
imple -ntation of climate related policies, through education, advocacy and incentive
prog ms such as public outreach, including workshops and a website with relevant
inf• mation.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
18
SUBSTITUTED
Goal LU-2: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification,
evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of Miami's
historic, architectural and archaeological resources. (See Coastal Management Goal CM-5.)
Objective LU-2.1: Maintain, update, and amplify the City of Miami portion of the
Miami -Dade County Historic Survey, which identifies and evaluates the City's histori ,
architectural, and archaeological resources, and continue to increase the number of
eligible properties included in the Miami -Dade County Historical Survey (See CoStal
Management Objective CM-5.1.). 1
Policy LU-2.1.1: The City will continue to identify potential historic districts
additional historic surveys to identify eligible historic resources.
Management Policy CM-5.1.1.)
d conduct
ee Coastal
Policy LU-2.1.2: The City will continue to maintain and updat: the computerized
database of all relevant information for all sites in the Miami-,ade County Historic
Survey. This listing will show, in three categories, all properties •f historic, architectural
or archaeological significance; together with their priority ran ' g for presentation. (See
Coastal Management Policy CM-5.1.2.)
Objective LU-2.2: Protect archaeological resources withi he city from destruction and
loss.
Policy LU-2.2.1: The City will pursue the designa on of significant archaeological zones
under the Historic Preservation Article of the C. Code.
Policy LU-2.2.2: The City will continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County
Archaeologist in monitoring building actiy ies near archeological sites.
Policy LU-2.2.3: The City will requir , as part of the building permit application, pursuant
to state law, that the City of Miami rchaeologist be notified of construction schedules in
significant historical of archaeol ical zones and where potentially significant historical
or archaeological artifacts ar uncovered during construction, permit state and local
archaeological officials the opportunity of surveying and excavating the site.
Policy LU-2.2.4: The City shall adopt an ordinance levying civil penalties for failure to
report the discovery of an archaeological site during construction.
Objective LU-2.3: Endourage the preservation of all historic, architectural, and
archaeological reso rces that have major significance to the city by continuing to
increase the numb of nationally and locally designated sites for the period 2008-2013.
Policy L2.3.1: The City will continue to review nominations to the National Register
of Historic Places through the Certified Local Government Program. (See Coastal
Management Policy CM-5.1.4.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
19
SUBSTITUTED
Policy LU-2.3.2: The City had designated 67 historic sites and five historic distris
pursuant to the Historic Preservation Article of the City Code. An additional 26 site (or
groups of multiple sites) and six districts have been identified as potentially wo' y of
designation. The City will seek to increase its locally designated historic reso ces by
2010. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-5.1.3.)
Objective LU-2.4: Increase the number of historic structures that have be: preserved,
rehabilitated or restored, according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior' Standards for
Rehabilitation. (See Coastal Management Objective CM-5.2.)
Policy LU-2.4.1: The City will encourage the conservation, re :bilitation, restoration
and adaptive reuse of historic and architecturally significant hosing resources through
low interest housing rehabilitation loans that may be offered City agencies.
Policy LU-2.4.2: The City will continue to utilize the . Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation as the minimum stands +s for the treatment of historic
properties. To receive public financial support from t • City, designated privately owned
structures must meet these standards. (See Coas I Management Policy CM-5.2.1.)
Policy LU-2.4.3: The City currently owns ine historic sites and other potential
archaeological sites. If it is deemed in the • blic benefit for the City to transfer title of
City properties of historic, architectural or . chaeological significance, such transfers will
include restrictive covenants to ens °= the protection and preservation of such
properties. (See Coastal Managemen policy CM-5.2.2.)
Policy LU-2.4.4: The City will continue to work with other local governments that have
title to properties of major ► storic or architectural significance to ensure the
conservation, preservation an adaptive and sensitive reuse of such properties.
Objective LU-2.5: Increase public awareness of the historical, architectural,
archaeological resources . d cultural heritage of the city, and public policy and
programs to protect an preserve this heritage, through public information and
education programs.
Policy LU-2.5.7 The City will continue to develop a series of publications relating to
historic pres ation in general and the city's historic resources in particular.
Policy L1-2.5.2: The City will maintain an historic marker program for designated
properties and other key areas, and will publish same.
Policy LU-2.5.3: [Reserved]
olicy LU-2.5.4: The City will continue to provide information on the City's historic,
architectural and cultural heritage for inclusion in public information, economic
development promotion and tourism materials. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-
5.1.5.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
20
SUBSTITUTED
Goal LU-3: Encourage urban redevelopment in identified Urban Infill Areas and rban
Redevelopment Areas.
Objective LU-3-1: Promptly review and act on petitions for land use plan endments
and rezoning of property in Urban Infill Areas or Urban Redevelop -ent Areas to
facilitate redevelopment.
Policy LU-3.1.1: Continue review of existing zoning regulation to determine if they
provide adequate flexibility to promote redevelopment with a m of uses in Urban Infill
Areas or Urban Redevelopment Areas and, if not, revise said -' fisting zoning regulations
or adopt new zoning regulations to promote redevelopmen
Policy LU-3.1.2: Create Regional Activity Centers if
and Urban Redevelopment Areas to facilitate mixed -
transit, reduce the need for automobile travel, prov
required in the Parks, Recreation and Open
incentives for quality development, and give de
uses and density and intensity of uses within
future land use map designations of the su
the designation of the RAC in the compre
provide service to, or be regularly use
one county; contain adequate existin
propriate in Urban Infill Areas
e development, encourage mass
e public open space and parks as
pace element of this plan, provide
nition to the urban form. The permitted
RAC shall be governed by the underlying
ect property, except as otherwise limited by
nsive plan. A designated RAC shall routinely
y, a significant number of citizens of more than
public facilities as defined in Rule 9J-5, F.A.C.,
or committed public facilities, as identified in the capital improvements element of the
City's comprehensive plan; and shall be proximate and accessible to interstate or major
arterial roadways.
Policy LU-3.1.3: Designs the Downtown Miami Master Plan area an Urban Central
Business District in orde to increase the Development of Regional Impact threshold for
development within those portions of downtown Miami that are not already in the DRI
area.
Objective 3-2: [Reser ed]
Policy LU- ..1: [Reserved]
Policy-3.2.2: [Reserved]
Goal LU-4: Ince tivize sustainable, affordable housing solutions while continually
improving the quality of life for all who live in the City of Miami.
Objective LU-4.1: By 2023, five percent (5%) of the new housing stock to be built will
be reserved for mixed income developments, as described in the applicable land
development regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
21
SUBSTITUTED
Objective LU-4.2: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable and attainable mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land
development regulations, will be reserved for housing low-income elderly households
Objective LU-4.3: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable and attainable mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land
development regulations, will be reserved for workforce housing.
Policy LU-4.1.1: Developers building residential projects for low-income households,
as identified in the applicable land development regulations, are enco ged to build
additional units per acre to increase the amount of sustainable housi g solutions
available for households that are cost -burdened relative to housin expenses. The
additional density is permitted subject to the detailed provisions the applicable land
development regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
22
SUBSTITUTED
Urban Central Business District
An Urban Central Business District (UCBD) identifies the single urban core area within the City
of Miami. The UCBD shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use
Map, shall contain mass transit service as defined in Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C., and shall contain
high intensity, high density multi -use development to include: retail; professional an
governmental office uses; cultural, recreational and entertainment facilities; high den ty
residential; hotels and motels; and appropriate industrial activities. In accordance with C :pter
28-24.014(10)(a), F.A.C., the guidelines and standards of development, a designate• rban
Central Business District within the City of Miami shall:
1. Increase the threshold for residential, hotel, motel, office, or retail de elopment by
fifty -percent (50%);
2. Increase the threshold for applicable multi -use guidelines anstandards by one -
hundred percent (100%), provided that one land use of the Iti-use development
is residential and the residential development amounts to of less than thirty-five
percent (35%) of the City of Miami's applicable residential threshold; and
3. Increase the threshold for resort or convention hotel ,evelopment by one hundred -
fifty percent (150%).
The following area has been designated an Urban Cen .I Business District (UCBD) on the
City of Miami Future Land Use Map (FLUM) within Appndix LU-1:
The Downtown Miami Master Plan
The Downtown Miami Master Plan was adopte by the Miami City Commission by Resolution
Number 89-990 on October 26, 1989. e Downtown Miami Master Plan contains
approximately 1, 354 acres and is bounded on the north by: Northwest 20th Street on the north;
Biscayne Bay, including Brickell Key (Claughton Island), on the east; Southwest 15th Road on
the south; and Interstate 95, the Miami River, Northwest 5th Street, Interstate 395 and the
Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way on the west (see the Future Land Use Map within
Appendix LU-1 for exact boundaries).
Permitted Uses:
Permitted uses within the . rban Central Business District shall be those of the underlying land
use classification withi he current Downtown Miami Master Plan, which includes: Central
Business District; M°or Institutional Public Facilities, Transportation & Utilities; Office;
Restricted Commer• al; General Commercial; Industrial; Recreation; High -Density Multifamily
Residential; and -dium-Density Multifamily Residential (see descriptions in Interpretation of
the Future Land Use Map).
The followi minimum and maximum development thresholds shall apply:
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
23
SUBSTITUTED
The following numerical guidelines and standards shall be applied within the City of Mi
Urban Central Business District according to Chapter 28-24.014(11), F.S.:
1. A development that is at or below eighty -percent (80%) of all numerica hresholds
shall not be required to undergo development -of -regional -impact revi
2. A development that is between eighty -percent (80%) and on
percent of a numerical threshold shall be presumed to not re
regional impact review.
undred (100%)
ire development of
3. A development that is at one -hundred percent (100% or between one -hundred
percent (100%) and one -hundred twenty percent (12110) of a numerical threshold
shall be presumed to require development-of-regio : -impact review.
4. A development that is at or above one-hundrd twenty percent (120%) of any
numerical threshold shall be required to undergo development -of -regional -impact
review.
Regional Activity Centers
Regional Activity Center (RAC). A RegioniActivity Center designation is intended to
encourage and promote large-scale level, ment and redevelopment as well as small parcel
infill development and redevelopment thfacilitates a balanced mix of land uses by providing
maximum flexibility for development a 6 redevelopment activities.
In accordance with Chapter 28-214(10)(c)2, F.A.C., a Regional Activity Center in the City
of Miami shall be a compact, igh intensity, high density multi -use area designated as
appropriate for intensive grow as an urban infill or urban redevelopment area by the City and
may include: residential us- commercial; office; cultural and community facilities; recreational
and entertainment faciliti- ; hotels or motels; transportation facilities; utilities; and appropriate
industrial activities. T e major purposes of this designation are to facilitate mixed -use
development, enco '.ge mass transit, reduce the need for automobile travel, provide
incentives for qualit development and give definition to the urban form.
For an area to qualify as a Regional Activity Center, the following criteria must be met:
1. he type of land uses permitted within each Regional Activity Center and the density
of residential uses shall be specified herein and within the City of Miami 2020 Future
Land Use Map.
2. Regional Activity Centers shall include mixed land uses of regional significance.
3. Regional Activity Centers shall consist of active pedestrian environments through
high quality design of public spaces and buildings that create an appropriate human
scale at street level and provide for connectivity of places through the creation of a
system of pedestrian linkages.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 24
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
4. Each Regional Activity Center shall be a defined geographical area of no less an
20 acres and shall be delineated on the City of Miami 2020 Future Land Us: ap.
5. Regional Activity Centers shall be proximate and accessible to interst
arterial roadways.
to
or major
The following area has been designated Regional Activity Center within the y of Miami 2020
Future Land Use Map:
Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center
The Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center is designated to •e a Chapter 380 Regional
Activity Center and, subject to amendment of the Strategic R-•ional Policy Plan for South
Florida by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as a : egional development district (a
geographic area specifically designated as highly suitable for increased threshold intensity) for
the purpose of increasing DRI thresholds.
General Location:
South of Northeast 36th Street, North of Northeast 29th Street, East of North Miami Avenue and
West of the Florida East Coast Railroad (F ;) right-of-way; excluding certain properties
located along Northeast 29th Street. (See Fut e Land Use Map within Appendix LU-1 for exact
boundaries).
Permitted Uses:
Permitted uses shall be as for the underlying land use classification; however, the following
minimum and maximum develop ° ent thresholds shall apply:
Residential: 2,000 u
Commercial: 500
Office: 80,000 s
Compatibility:
its minimum / 4,500 units maximum
0 s.f. minimum / 1,200,000 s.f. maximum
minimum / 100,000 s.f. maximum
The City shall develop and implement design standards to address compatibility of
development 'thin the Buena Vista Regional Activity Center with the surrounding area, which
design stan arils should further the following concepts:
■ / New streets and avenues should connect to the existing street grid.
Sidewalks, as principal pedestrian throughways, should be designed to create a
comfortable outdoor public space to accommodate a range of active and passive
pedestrian activities.
■ Buildings should have ground floor uses that activate the street and relate new
development to surrounding areas.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 25
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
■ The context and scale of new development should be reflected in new building
design, including the setting back of upper floors in order to accommodate hght
while maintaining human scale at the pedestrian level.
Health District Regional Activity Center
The Health District Regional Activity Center is hereby designated to be a Regional Activity
Center pursuant to Florida Statute, Chapter 380 and, subject to amen
Regional Policy Plan for South Florida by the South Florida Region
regional development district (a geographic area specifically desi
increased threshold intensity) for the purpose of increasing DRI t
General Location:
ent by the Strategic
Planning Council, as a
ated as highly suitable for
resholds.
South of NW 20th Street, North of State Road 836, East of NW 17th Avenue, and West of
Interstate 95.
Permitted Uses:
Permitted uses shall be as for the underlyng land use classification; whether uses shall be
required to undergo additional regional r iew shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter
380, Florida Statutes and Chapter 28, orida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), as such may be
amended from time to time, pursua to the designation of the Health District as a Regional
Activity Center. The following maximum thresholds shall apply:
(1) Maximum thresholds shbe consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C., as such may be
amended from time to ' e.
Residential: M imum units consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Commercial. aximum square feet consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Office: Ma imum square feet consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Hotel: Maximum units consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
26
SUBSTITUTED
Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map
The 2020 Future Land Use Map (contained in Appendix LU-1 of the MCNP as amended f •m time
to time) is a planning instrument designed to guide the future development and distribu '•n of land
uses within the city in a manner that is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies •f the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP).
The 2020 Future Land Use Map is a generalized map that does not depict areas of less than 2 acres.
The Planning Director is responsible for making all determinations of concurrenc; as defined in state
statutes, and will also interpret the map based on all applicable state laws and administrative
regulations and on the consistency between the proposed change or changes and the goals,
objectives and policies expressed in the MCNP. The Planning Director will also determine whether
or not proposed zoning changes require an amendment to the comprehe sive plan.
Land development regulations and policies are to be consistent with t 2020 Future Land Use Map.
The land development regulations further define and describe all re uirements applicable to zoning
categories contained under each land use designation, permitting e treatment of new development
according to the particular conditions existing in different areas, d always consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of the MCNP, and specifically with the nd Use Element and its Future Land
Use Map. The land use designations are general design ons that may include more than one
zoning category. All activities and uses within each desig tion are compatible with each other by
virtue of their scale, intensity and character, or by ditional conditions required by the land
development regulations, more specifically by the C. Zoning Ordinance, which describes and
regulates development within zoning districts in order ° o achieve more definite goals and objectives.
The land use designations that appear in the 202E Future Land Use Map are arranged following the
"pyramid concept" of cumulative inclusion, whereby subsequent categories are inclusive of those
listed previously except as otherwise noted. These designations, and the uses allowed in them, are
defined as follows:
Conservation: This land use designation is restricted to environmentally sensitive areas that
are to be left in an essentially natural state. Only activities that reinforce this character are
allowed. Public access to these areas, including off-street parking, may be limited when
unregulated access may present a threat to wildlife and plant life within such areas.
Public Parks and Recre ion: The primary intent of this land use classification is to conserve
open space and green aces of a park while allowing access and uses which will not interfere
with the preservation c any significant environmental features which may exist within the park.
This land use des ',nation allows only open space and park uses with recreational and cultural
uses where the •tal building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one
(1) acre of mor= may cover no more than 25% of the park land area (See related Policy PR-
2.1.3.). Both •assive and active recreational uses shall be permitted including but not limited
to nature .ils, interpretive centers, picnic areas, playgrounds, canoe trails and launches,
small co ession stands, restrooms, gyms, swimming pools, athletic fields, cultural facilities,
marine nd marina facilities and other facilities supporting passive and active recreational and
cultur:I uses.
L ds under this designation with specific qualities that make them desirable for commercial
otography shall be allowed to be used in this manner conditionally, and only when it is
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
27
SUBSTITUTED
determined that conducting such commercial photography will not endanger significant
environmental features within the area. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.]
Commercial Recreation: This land use designation only allows privately -owned recreation
uses open to the public or to private groups.
Marine Facilities: This land use designation is intended to apply to waterfront properties which
are primarily public properties and intended to be developed and utilized in a man -r which
will facilitate public access to waterfront activities. Permissible uses within this .-signation
include marine and marina facilities, marine stadiums, waterfront specialty cent: s (including
restaurants, cafes and retailing), recreational activities including water theme arks, cultural,
educational and entertainment facilities and accessory hotel accommodatio : with maximum
FAR limitations between the range of 0.65 to 1.72 and a maximum density •f 130 hotel units
per acre; the higher FAR may be approved only upon demonstration d finding that the
application of the higher limitations will not adversely affect access. Pem'anent living facilities
are not permitted within this classification. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.]
Nonresidential floor area is the sum of areas for nonresidential u on all floors of buildings,
measured from the outside faces of the exterior walls, includi g interior and exterior halls,
lobbies, enclosed porches and balconies used for nonresi ntial uses. Not countable as
nonresidential floor area are:
(a) Parking and loading areas within buildings;
(b) Open terraces, patios, atriums or balconies; or.
(c) Stairways, elevator shafts, mechanical rooms.
Single Family Residential: Areas designate • as "Single Family Residential" allow single
family structures of one dwelling unit each to maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre,
subject to the detailed provisions of the a►.licable land development regulations and the
maintenance of required levels of servic for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requ -ments.
Supporting services such as foster Tomes and family day care homes for children and/or
adults; and community based resid tial facilities2 (6 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol
or correctional rehabilitation faci ' ies also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law.
Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care
centers are permissible in sui ble locations within single family residential areas.
Professional offices, tour': and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contribu ' g structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been
designated by the Hi: orical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable
locations within sin• e family residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development
regulations and th = maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and
intensity limitatio for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s).
2 A "Community based r' idential facility" provides room (with or without board), resident services, and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a facility
functions as a single .usekeeping unity. This category includes adult congregate living facilities, facilities for physically disabled and handicapped
persons, for develo% entally disabled persons, for non dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent children, as licensed by the Florida
Department of Heth, and juvenile and adult residential correctional facilities, including halfway houses, as licensed or approved by an authorized
regulatory agen
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
28
SUBSTITUTED
Duplex Residential: Areas designated as "Duplex Residential" allow residential structures of
up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, subject to
the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance
of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted
concurrency management requirements.
Community based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol c
correctional rehabilitation facilities) also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places
of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers
are permissible in suitable locations within duplex residential areas.
Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts th. have been
designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and a - in suitable
locations within duplex residential areas, pursuant to applicable land develop ►-nt regulations
and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Den; y and intensity
limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing stru► ure(s).
Low Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Lo Density Multifamily
Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 3 dwelling units per acre,
and maximum residential density may be increased by up to on unfired percent (100%),
subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land devel ment regulations and the
maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and s rvices included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requirements.
Supporting services such as community -based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not
including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation f ilities) will be allowed pursuant to
applicable state law; day care centers for children any adults may be permissible in suitable
locations.
Permissible uses within low density multifamil
activities that are intended to serve the retailin
or building complex, small scale limited com
worship, primary and secondary schools, a
all of which are subject to the detailed pr
and the maintenance of required levels
residential areas also include commercial
and personal services needs of the building
ercial uses as accessory uses; and places of
accessory post -secondary educational facilities;
sions of applicable land development regulations
service for such uses.
Professional offices, tourist and g Est homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing struct es within historic sites or historic districts that have been
designated by the Historical a Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable
locations within low density ultifamily residential areas, pursuant to applicable land
development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses.
Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing
structure(s).
Medium Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Medium Density Multifamily
Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 65 dwelling units per acre,
and maximum residential density may be increased by up to one hundred percent (100%),
subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the
maintenance required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted con rrency management requirements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
29
SUBSTITUTED
Supporting services such as community -based residential facilities (14 clients or less, r•t
including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be allowed pursua to
applicable state law; community -based residential facilities (15-50 clients) and da, care
centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable locations.
Permissible uses within medium density multifamily areas also include commerc':I activities
that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the buildi ' g or building
complex, small scale limited commercial uses as accessory uses, subject • the detailed
provisions of applicable land development regulations and the maintenance required levels
of service for such uses, places of worship, primary and secondary schoo s, and accessory
post -secondary educational facilities.
Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or histor. districts that have been
designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation oard and are in suitable
locations within medium density multifamily residential areas pursuant to applicable land
development regulations and the maintenance of required I els of service for such uses.
Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing
structure(s).
High Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "High Density Multifamily
Residential" allow residential structures to a maximu► density of 150 dwelling units per acre,
and maximum residential density may be increas: i by up to one hundred percent (100%),
subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the
maintenance of required levels of service for acilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrency management requirem- ts. Higher densities may be allowed as shown
for these specially -designated areas:
Little Havana Target Area 200 units per acre*
Southeast Overtown 300 units per acre*
Miami River 400 units per acre*
Brickell, Omni, Park West „nd River Quadrant 500 units per acre*
*Indicates maximum resid= tial density may be increased by up to one hundred percent
(100%) subject to the det led provisions of the applicable land development regulations and
the maintenance of re• aired levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's
adopted concurrenc anagement requirements.
Supporting services uch as offices and commercial services and other accessory activities
that are clearly inci%ental to principal uses are permitted; community -based residential facilities
(14 clients or le , not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be
allowed pursu t to applicable state law; community -based residential facilities (15+ clients),
places of wo hip, primary and secondary schools, and day care centers for children and
adults may •e permissible in suitable locations.
Low D: nsity Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Low Density Restricted
Com I-rcial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent
to " •w Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory
re- dential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use,
cjnics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and
primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
30
SUBSTITUTED
the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal
auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general reta'ling,
personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial se ices,
restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and re reation
facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commerci activities
whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described %a ove. This
category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated "Low Density
Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 3.0 time he net lot area of
the subject property.
Medium Density Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Medium Density Restricted
Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a m. ' imum density equivalent
to "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same I. iting conditions; transitory
residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category . o allows general office use,
clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention f. ilities, places of worship, and
primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve
the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically equiring easy access by personal
auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing,
personal and professional services, real estate, b; nking and other financial services,
restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainm- 't facilities, private clubs and recreation
facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainm- t facilities and other commercial activities
whose scale and land use impacts are similar in ature to those uses described above. This
category also includes commercial marinas aniving quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developme s within areas designated as "Medium Density
Restricted Commercial" allow a maximu loor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of
the subject property.
Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities: Areas designated as
"Major Institutional, Public Faciliti , Transportation and Utilities" allow facilities for federal,
state and local government ac ' 'ties, major public or private health, recreational, cultural,
religious or educational acti ies, and major transportation facilities and public utilities.
Residential facilities ancillar to these uses are allowed up to a maximum density equivalent
to "High Density MultifamResidential" or if applicable the least intense abutting/adjacent
residential zoning district, subject to the same limiting conditions.
Areas designated a'Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities allow
nonresidential us-: to a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the
subject property roperties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation
and Utilities" i , he Health / Civic Center District allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0
times the net .t area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public
Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Urban Central Business District allow a maximum
FLR of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property.
Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses
(except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily
Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions and a finding by the Planning Director that
e proposed site's proximity to other residentially zoned property makes it a logical extension
or continuation of existing residential development and that adequate services and amenities
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
31
SUBSTITUTED
exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents; transitory
residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use;
clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and
primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve
the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal
auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing,
personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services,
restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation
facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities
whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This
category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Restricted
Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the subject
property; such FLR may be increased upon compliance with the detaied provisions of the
applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed Total FLR of 11.0 times
the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated asstricted Commercial" in
the Edgewater Area allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 17.0 .Imes the net lot area of the
subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Com rcial" in the Urban Central
Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Ce ter allow a maximum floor lot
ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject prope y.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations and the maintenance of :equired levels of service for facilities
and services included in the City's adopted concurre r'y management requirements.
Nonresidential floor area is the floor area that su, .orts nonresidential uses within the inside
perimeter of the outside walls of the building inuding hallways, stairs, closets, thickness of
walls, columns and other features, and parkin • .nd loading areas, and excluding only open air
corridors, porches, balconies and roof areas
Central Business District (CBD): The area designated as "Central Business District (CBD)
is intended to apply to the central co rnercial, financial and office core of the metropolitan
region, and allows all activities i uded in the "Restricted Commercial," and "Major
Institutional, Public Facilities, Tran ortation and Utilities" designations. Residential facilities
(except for rescue missions) al e or in combination with other uses are allowable to a
maximum density of 1,000 dwe ng units per acre, and maximum residential density may be
increased by up to one hun ed percent (100%), subject to the detailed provisions of the
applicable land developmen egulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for
facilities and services incl ed in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Also permitted is a mix uses ranging from high density multifamily residential to high intensity
office uses with retai ses on the lower floors of structures. Intensity of uses within the CBD
land use designati are generally higher than those allowed in other areas of the city. Areas
designated as CBD allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 40 times the net lot area of the
subject property.
General Commercial: Areas designated as "General Commercial" allow all activities included
in the "Restricted Commercial" designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution activities
that ge rally serve the needs of other businesses; generally require on and off loading
faciliti-:; and benefit from close proximity to industrial areas. These commercial activities
inclu►e retailing of second hand items, automotive repair services, new and used vehicle sales,
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
32
SUBSTITUTED
parking lots and garages, heavy equipment sales and service, building material sales and
storage, wholesaling, warehousing, distribution and transport related services, light
manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use
impacts are similar to those uses described above. Multifamily residential structures of a
density equal to High Density Multifamily Residential, are allowed subject to the detailed
provisions of the applicable land development regulations.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Gen: al
Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the s eject
property; such FLR may be increased upon compliance with the detailed provisions •f the
applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed a total FLR of 1 .1 times
the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "General Commerial" in the
Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Ce►er allow a
maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject prope, y.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of ervice for facilities
and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management r uirements.
Industrial: The areas designated as "Industrial" allow manufacturing, assembly and storage
activities. The "Industrial" designation generally includes activis that would otherwise
generate excessive amounts of noise, smoke, fumes, illuminatio , traffic, hazardous wastes,
or negative visual impact unless properly controlled. Stockyards, rendering works, smelting
and refining plants and similar activities are excluded. Residential uses are not permitted in
the "Industrial" designation, except for rescue missions, and live-aboards in commercial
marinas.
Areas designated as "Industrial" allow a maximum A as designated as "Industrial" allow a
maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot ea of the subject property. Furthermore,
all such uses shall be subject to the maintenance required levels of service for facilities and
services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements.
Light Industrial (LI): The primary intent of t► s land use classification is to allow mixed use
development within this land use classificati , and further, to facilitate the ability of developing
a mixed occupancy within a unit in wh'' more than one type of use is provided under
Live/Work or Work/Live zoning districts %' the City's land development regulations.
Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow all activities included in the "Restricted
Commercial" and "General Comm: cial" designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution
activities that generally serve t - needs of other businesses; generally require on and off
loading facilities; and benefit rom close proximity to general commercial areas. These
commercial activities (beyon those permitted in the "Restricted Commercial" and "General
Commercial" designations) ' clude retailing of second hand items, new and used vehicle sales,
parking lots and garages wholesaling, warehousing, light manufacturing and assembly and
other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses
described above.
This category als• allows commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels for transients.
This land use ca -gory shall not permit storing, packaging, handling, processing or distribution
of explosive, fl-,mmable or otherwise hazardous materials; scrap yards; and health clinics.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
33
SUBSTITUTED
The hazard level of an activity shall be one of the determining factors as to whether that activity
shall be permissible within a Light Industrial district; the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations shall prohibit high-level hazard activities within live/work
developments.
Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow residential uses to a maximum defisity of 36
dwelling units per acre, and the nonresidential portions of developments , within areas
designated as "Light Industrial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 10.0 es the net lot
area of the subject property
Affordable housing developments that are certified by the City as aving a complete
application for development as of the effective date of the propos: i Land Development
Regulations shall be permitted with densities up to 150 dwelling units er acre but must obtain
all building permits by December 17, 2012, at which time any rights herein to building permits
shall expire.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable
land development regulations and the maintenance of req ''ed levels of service for facilities
and services included in the City's adopted concurrency nagement requirements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
34
SUBSTITUTED
Correspondence Table — Zoning and Comprehensive Plan
Transect
Miami 21
Transect Zone
October 2009 MCNP
Future Land Use
Dw ling Units Per
Acre Max.
T3
R, L
SUB -URBAN
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
9 du/ac
T3
0
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
18 du/ac
T4
R
GENERAL URBAN
LOW DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDE IAL
36 du/ac*
T4
LOW DENSITY RESTRICTED COS- MERCIAL
du ac
T5
R
URBAN CENTER
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFA Y RESIDENTIAL
65 du/ac*
T5
MEDIUM DENSITY REST" ICTED COMMERCIAL
du ac
T6-(8 — 48)
R
URBAN CORE
HIGH DENSITY LTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
150 du/ac*
T6-(8 — 48)
L, 0
RESTRICTED Co MERCIAL, GENERAL COMMERCIAL
D1
WORK PLACE
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
36 du/ac
D2
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
N/A
D3
MARINE
INDUSTRIAL
N/A
T6-80
R,L,0
URBAN CORE
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
1000 du/ac*
CI
CIVIC INSTIUTIONAL
MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES,
TRANSPORTATION, AND UTILITIES
150 du/ac
CI -HD
CIVIC INSTITUTIO —
HEALTH DISTR ' T
MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES,
TRANSPORTATION, AND UTILITIES
150 du/ac*
CS
CIVIC SPA ' /PARKS
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION
N/A
COMMERCIAL RECREATION
N/A
T1
NATURAL
CONSERVATION
N/A
* Indicates maximum re dential density may be increased by up to one hundred percent (100%), subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land
development regulati. s and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management
requirements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
35
SUBSTITUTED
HOUSING
Goal HO-1: Increase the supply of safe, affordable and sanitary housing for extremely 1 .;w-,
very low-, low-, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current stan . . rds
and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) and the elderly by alleviating shorty • es of
extremely low, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing, rehabilitating olde homes,
maintaining, and revitalizing residential neighborhoods in order to meet the n eds of all
income groups.
Objective HO-1.1: Provide and/or encourage a local regulatory, investment, and
neighborhood environment that will assist the private sector in increasing the stock of
affordable housing for all income levels, including extremely low- very low-, low-, and
moderate -income (in accordance with the current standards a regulations of HUD
and the State of Florida), within the City by at least 10 percent y 2010.
Policy HO-1.1.1: The City defines affordable (moderate-1
with the current standards and regulations of the Unite
and Urban Development (HUD). The City continues t
opportunities. The City, with other governmental a
will educate appropriate parties regarding fair h
to the appropriate enforcement agency.
come) housing in accordance
States Department of Housing
promote equal access to housing
ncies and non-profit organizations,
sing and refer fair housing concerns
Policy HO-1.1.2: Continue and expand th City's current affordable housing programs
and continue its participation in federal h-.using programs and the County Documentary
Stamp Surtax Program.
Policy HO-1.1.3: The City will ontinue to develop comprehensive neighborhood
redevelopment plans and progr, s that encourage private developers to build new, or
rehabilitate old, residential tructures and ensure that public investments are
coordinated with private set or developments to increase the overall attractiveness of
redeveloping neighborho•ds.
Policy HO-1.1.4: Ta Increment Financing districts, which are designated by Miami -
Dade County, as a, echanism for financing public improvements in residential areas
and stimulating n: ghborhood revitalization, will continue to be used.
Policy HO-1. i.5: The City will continue to enforce, and where necessary strengthen
those secti s of the land development regulations that are intended to preserve and
enhance e general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods and to
buffer ch neighborhoods from incompatible uses through the implementation and
enforcement of transition and buffering standards.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
36
SUBSTITUTED
Policy HO-1.1.6: The City will continue to encourage the designation, restoration, and
adaptive and sensitive reuse of historic or architecturally significant housing through
zoning and other incentives deemed appropriate.
Policy HO-1.1.7: The City will continue to control, through restrictions in the City's land
development regulations, large scale and/or intensive commercial and industrial Ian
development which may negatively impact any residential neighborhood and will prove
appropriate transitions between high-rise and low-rise residential developments.
Policy HO-1.1.8: Through the land development regulations, the City
existing viable neighborhoods in those areas suitable for housing
appropriate, enhance them in a manner compatible with their existing cha
protect
1d, where
cter.
Policy HO-1.1.9: The City's land development regulations will enco -ge high -density
residential development and redevelopment in close proximit to Metrorail and
Metromover stations. (See Land Use Policy LU-1.1.10 and Tra .portation Policy TR-
1.5.2.2.1.3.)
Policy HO-1.1.10: The City shall report annually the e ent to which the housing
recommendations set forth in the adopted City of Miami C%nsolidated Plan (as they may
be amended from time to time) are being realized inclu ng those relating to:
1) the preservation of affordable rental housing rough the rehabilitation of existing
rental stock and the encouragement of new r: tal housing construction, with a focus
on serving the needs of small families ansingle person households, such as the
elderly and person with HIV/AIDS;
2) assistance to residents to achieve omeownership by seeking to increase the
inventory of affordably priced unit hrough new construction and the creation of a
Purchase Rehab program by oviding second mortgage, down payment and
closing cost assistance to first ime homebuyers; and
3) stimulation of affordable h r sing development through the implementation of policy
with respect to:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
the creation of a land acquisition program for Infill
identifica
the con
the p
re
n of additional funding for affordable housing
nued provision of Affordable Housing incentives
vision of training/workshops to developers on City programs and
ations
s eamlining of the RFP process and the provision of multi -year funding
ncreasing the capacity of non-profit housing providers.
Policy 0-1.1.11: [Reserved]
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
37
SUBSTITUTED
Objective HO-1.2: Conserve the present stock of extremely low-, very low-, low-, d
moderate -income housing (in accordance with the current standards and regula 'ons
of HUD and the State of Florida) within the City and reduce the number of subst dard
units through rehabilitation, reduce the number of unsafe structures through demolition
or rehabilitation, and insure the preservation of historically significant housing through
identification and designation.
Policy HO-1.2.1: The City defines extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income
housing (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State
of Florida) in accordance with the current standards and regulatio u. of the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and theState of Florida.
Policy HO-1.2.2: The City will continue, and when neces ry expand extremely low-,
very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing programs ith the intent of preventing a
net loss of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate ncome housing (in accordance
with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) units within
the City.
Policy HO-1.2.3: The City's housing progra ' s will provide for a diverse range of
housing types in all areas of the City, includ g housing that is affordable to extremely
low-, very low-, low-, and moderate-incom- ouseholds (in accordance with the current
standards and regulations of HUD and, e State of Florida) as an alternative to the
geographic concentration of low-inco housing.
Policy HO-1.2.4: The City will continue to assist non-profit, community -based
organizations in the developme and provision of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and
moderate -income housing (in . cordance with the current standards and regulations of
HUD and the State of Flo .da) projects to augment the public sector provision of
extremely low-, very low- low-, and moderate -income housing. This assistance will
include, but not be limi ' d to, technical assistance, marketing and financial planning
assistance, and the provision of public improvements, such as street improvements,
curbing, landscaping and public open spaces, proper drainage and street lighting.
Policy HO-1.2.5 The City defines substandard housing as any residential unit that lacks
either complet2 kitchen or plumbing facilities, does not satisfy health and safety codes,
or detracts from the physical appearance of neighborhoods in the City's definition of
substandard housing as compliant with the State's definition of substandard housing in
s.420.0004(12), F.S.
Pol' y HO-1.2.6: With the intent of preserving and enhancing neighborhood character,
t City will utilize code enforcement to prevent the illegal conversion of single-family
esidences into multifamily units.
Policy HO-1.2.7: The City will continue to enforce and implement neighborhood specific
design and development standards that may be developed as a result of the
amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives to
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 38
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
strengthen those sections of the Zoning Ordinance that are intended to preserve
enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods.
Policy HO-1.2.8: The City will increase code enforcement efforts in arewhere
significant concentrations of substandard units are likely to exist. The City wil mplement
programs to assist extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income h%useholds (in
accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the ate of Florida)
in rehabilitating their units. Owners of substandard units will be requireto make needed
repairs in a timely manner and vacant or abandoned property wil be required to be
secured so as not to represent a public health or safety hazard.
Policy HO-1.2.9: The City will monitor conditions and if necessary formally request that
Miami -Dade County maintain an acceptable quality of public housing within the City.
Policy HO-1.2.10: The City will, through its building code enforcement, demolish all
structures determined to be structurally unsafe.
Policy HO-1.2.11: Historically significant housing ?n the City will be identified and subject
to Chapter 23 and other appropriate sections of the City's Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Objective HO-1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of housing in non -
isolated residential areas for community -based residential facilities and foster care
facilities (including those funded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative
Services).
Policy HO-1.3.1: The City will p mit the operation of group homes, foster care facilities
and Adult Congregate Living cilities (ACLFs), subject to restrictions reflected in the
City Zoning Ordinance, in all sidential areas at the residential densities for which those
areas are zoned.
Policy HO-1.3.2: Th City's land development regulations will be reviewed and
amended where w ranted, to prevent concentrations of group homes, foster care
facilities, and Adu Congregate Living Facilities (ACLFs) in any area of the City.
Policy HO-1.?.3: [Reserved]
Policy HC-1.3.4: [Reserved]
Objective HO-1.4: The City will continue to participate in a regional effort to provide
adequate shelter for the homeless.
olicy HO-1.4.1: The City, along with Miami -Dade County, Broward County, the major
municipalities of the region, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the State
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services will participate in the development of
a coordinated plan to address the problem of homelessness in South Florida.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
39
SUBSTITUTED
Policy HO-1.4.2: [Reserved]
Policy HO-1.4.3: The City will assist in providing, when necessary, tempora
emergency shelter facilities to serve homeless families and children.
Policy HO-1.4.4: The City's land development regulations will permit temporary crisis
intervention facilities and short-term transitional facilities (aimed at assi ing the
homeless to become self-supporting members of society) to be located p ximate to
areas where social assistance and economic opportunities are available.
Policy HO-1.4.5: The City will continue and expand its efforts to acqui and administer
federal and state financial aid for homeless assistance.
Policy HO-1.4.6: The City will provide regulations for, and perm the siting of, homeless
shelters within its land development regulations and take appropriate measures to
prevent a net loss of shelter capacity. The City will develop;. ten-year plan designed to
end chronic homelessness by working toward a more equitable distribution of facilities
throughout Miami -Dade County.
Objective HO-1.5: Provide assistance to disploccupants where public
redevelopment programs require relocation.
Policy HO-1.5.1: The City's housing progra ' will continue to provide for assistance to
occupants displaced by public redevelo ent projects so that suitable relocation
housing in proximity to employment and ecessary public services is available prior to
the demolition or replacement of existi housing serving extremely low-, very low-, low-
, and moderate -income occupants.
Objective HO-1.6: [Reserved]
Policy HO-1.6.1: [Reserved
Goal HO-2: Achieve a livable city • •nter with a variety of urban housing types for persons of
all income levels in a walkable, ixed-use, urban environment.
Objective HO-2.1: • sign and create pedestrian friendly environments and
neighborhoods with aried housing prototypes and amenities catering to persons of
diverse social, ec• omic and cultural backgrounds, with a variety of urban housing
types for persons of all income levels including those of extremely low-, very low-, low-
, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current standards and
regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) provided in a walkable, mixed -use, urban
environme
P Iicy HO-2.1.1: Through the land development regulations, the City will continue to
protect and enhance existing neighborhoods in downtown.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
40
SUBSTITUTED
Policy HO-2.1.2: The City will continue to revise residential zoning district regulations
to provide greater flexibility for the design and development of a variety of contemporary
housing types and mixed -use developments with the application of new higher density
zoning in accordance with neighborhood specific design and development standards
that might be adopted as a result of amendments to the City's land development
regulations and other neighborhood planning initiatives. /
Policy HO-2.1.3: The City will continue to assure that necessary support services,
institutions and amenities are available to existing neighborhoods. /t
Policy HO-2.1.4: The City will continue to promote development of new, high quality,
dense urban neighborhoods along the Miami River
Policy HO-2.1.5: The City will continue to encourage adaptive reuse of commercial
space for residential use by working to eliminate unnecessary resi ential requirements
in the Zoning Ordinance that inhibit reasonable adaptive reuse.
Policy HO-2.1.6: The City will continue to target availab governmental housing
assistance programs and funds to assist with developm t of affordable housing in
existing viable neighborhoods and publicly designated development districts while
avoiding undue concentrations of assisted housing.
Policy HO-2.1.7: Working together with private ..velopers, the City will continue to
apply for Urban Development Action Grants (U►AG's), Housing Development Action
Grants (HoDAG's), and other potential grant programs in the Southeast Overtown/Park
West, Lummus Park, River Quadrant and -st Brickell areas, where housing can be
developed as a part of mixed -use projects
Policy HO-2.1.8: Through changes in t e City's land development regulations, the City
will continue to expand the areas in f4' hich new commercial development may receive
incentives for Housing Trust Fund ontributions.
Policy HO-2.1.9: [Reserved]
Objective HO-2.2: By 2023, fi - percent (5%) of the new housing stock will be mixed
income developments, as d: cribed in the applicable land development regulations.
Objective HO-2.3: By d23, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable and attaina' e mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land
development regula ' • ns, will be reserved for housing low-income elderly residents.
Objective HO-2.-: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under
affordable an attainable mixed -income programs will be reserved for Workforce
Housing, as described in the applicable land development regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
41
SUBSTITUTED
Policy HO-2.4.1: Developers building residential projects that are built for Extre y
Low Income Housing and Workforce Housing, as described in the applicable and
development regulations, are encouraged to build additional units per acre to in&ease
the amount of sustainable housing solutions available for households that are cost -
burdened relative to housing expenses. The additional density is permitted subject to
the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
42
SUBSTITUTED
SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
Goal SS-1: Ensure a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper mairyt'enance,
timely provision and efficient operation of a centralized wastewater treatment an ancillary
sewerage system.
Objective SS-1.1: All residences and businesses within the City at have been
approved are served by sanitary sewers, and the City will continue to eplace and repair
aging segments of the system as required, and will coordinate with Miami -Dade County
on the extension of, or increase in the capacity of, treatment facilities to meet future
needs.
Policy SS-1.1.1: The City will continue to implement -xisting plans to extend the
sewerage system to all approved areas of the City.
Policy SS-1.1.2: The City will complete those san .ry sewer projects described in the
City's Capital Improvement Program as schedul
Policy SS-1.1.3: The City will monitor pro
improvement projects on an annual
implementation procedures.
ess on all sanitary sewer related capital
sis as part of its capital improvement
Policy SS-1.1.4: Although the C. - has no authority with respect to Miami -Dade
County's wastewater treatment programs, the City shall, through its Intergovernmental
Coordination Policies, continue • support, and cooperate with, Miami -Dade Water and
Sewer Department (M-DWA 0) actions to expand the capacities of its wastewater
treatment facilities as expre .ed in that Department's Wastewater Facilities Master Plan,
dated April 2008, as may ►e amended from time to time.
Objective SS-1.2: Ensure t at the practice of wastewater management is consistent with
the protection and preservation of natural resources.
Policy SS-1.2.1: Although the City has no authority with respect to Miami -Dade
County's was -water treatment programs, the City shall, through its Intergovernmental
CoordinatioPolicies, support and encourage M-DWASD to continue to adhere to its
current p• icies of: no discharge of wastewater to surface fresh waters; advanced waste
treatm- t at all "package" treatment plants that are granted variances from "no
discharge" requirements; secondary treatment prior to discharge from ocean outfalls;
se .ndary treatment, proven design, local operating experience and compliance with all
regulatory agency requirements prior to discharge from injection wells; and secondary
or higher levels of treatment, as required by regulations, prior to discharge to shallow
/groundwater to ensure no negative impact on the ability of the receiving waters to meet
Federal Drinking Water Standards.
43
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policy SS-1.2.2: In the design and construction of new sewers, and in the repair and
replacement of old sewers, the City will use appropriate design and construction
techniques to eliminate infiltration of storm waters into the sanitary sewer system, or the
overflow of wastewater into the storm sewer system.
Policy SS-1.2.3: The City will use its authority under local codes and ordinances to
cooperate with Miami -Dade County DERM to identify and eliminate any sits where
there may be illegal connections of sanitary sewers to the storm sewer syst
Policy SS-1.2.4: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coordi ation Policies,
negotiate with M-DWASD to seek cooperative agreements to ensure at the operation
of the Central District wastewater treatment facility on Virginia Key d es not degrade the
natural environment or limit the public's access to recreational pportunities on the
island.
Objective SS-1.3: The City's land development regulations MI ensure that approval of
development or redevelopment will not occur until there Exists adequate wastewater
transmission capacity to serve that development.
Policy SS-1.3.1: The level of service standard tg'determine adequate transmission
capacity is 141 gallons per capita per day (GPC
Policy SS-1.3.2: All improvements for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity
of the sanitary sewer transmission networshall be compatible with the level of service
standard adopted in Policy 1.3.1.
Policy SS-1.3.3: Since the sanitar sewer network is an interconnected Countywide
system, the departments of Publi orks and Planning will cooperate with M-DWASD
to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of
system demand and capacity.
Policy SS-1.3.4: The ity will monitor the permitting of any development or
redevelopment occurrin outside of the City's boundaries which by gravity connects to
the City's sewer trans fission network.
Objective SS-1.4: The ' ity's sanitary sewer collection system is a valuable and costly
element of the urba nfrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient
manner.
Policy S 1.4.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system that
sanita sewer and storm sewers shall be in place to serve new development or
redev., opment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
equ;valent. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS-2.5.1.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
44
SUBSTITUTED
Goal SS-2: Provide adequate stormwater drainage to reasonably protect against flooding in
areas of intensive use and occupation, while preventing degradation of quality in receiving
waters.
Objective SS-2.1: In accordance with the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan and
subsequent updates, the City will address the most critical drainage problems. Th
City's goals for retrofitting subcatchment areas within the City will meet or exceed e
five-year frequency, 24-hour duration standard while utilizing water quality d:-ign
criteria. The City will confer with local agencies, namely the Miami -Dade County
Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) when retrofit ' ng City
projects to incorporate design criteria and best management practices (BMP).
Policy SS-2.1.1: The City will adhere to its 1986 Storm Drainage aster Plan and
subsequent updates as the long-range policy guideline for improving ;r storm drainage
management system, and will update the estimated cost of impl-menting that Plan
through the annual updates to the City's Capital Improvements Program included in the
Capital Improvements element of the MCNP. The City will rank e projects specified in
the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, with priority given to a►dressing the most critical
problem areas within the City, and implement those proje supported by a financing
plan according to the provisions of Chapter 18, Article II of the City Code, entitled
"Storm Water Utility System." The 1986 plan will be u.,ated by 2010 with measurable
Goals and Objectives. The plan will be reported an. eviewed annually and at time of
EAR.
Policy SS-2.1.2: The City will continue to mo ' or progress on all storm sewer -related
capital improvement projects on an annual .asis as part of its capital improvement
implementation procedures.
Policy SS-2.1.3: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system,
that sanitary sewer and storm sew- °s shall be in place to serve new development or
redevelopment no later than the i uance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
equivalent. Issuance of any I' velopment permit shall require compliance with a
drainage level of service stan.:rd of a one -in -five-year storm event while incorporating
water quality considerations
Objective SS-2.2: The practice of stormwater management within the City will be
designed to reduce pollutant -loading rates to surface waters.
Policy SS-2.2.1: The City will retrofit the number of storm water outfalls that discharge
into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. If
positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible
method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be
designed nd constructed to retain grease and oil, and minimize pollutant discharges.
(See N ural Resource Conservation Policy NR-1.1.2 and Coastal Management Policy
CM-1 .2.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
45
SUBSTITUTED
Policy SS-2.2.2: In order to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne
via the Miami and Little rivers, the Solid Waste Department should be encourag
increase the frequency and extent of street sweeping. (See Solid Waste Poli
1.3.3.)
y
to
SW -
Policy SS-2.2.3: The City will continue to seek cooperative agreement and funding
support from Miami -Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District,
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and any other appropriate state any, ederal agencies
in order to protect the quality of its surface waters and reduce pollut. `t loadings into the
Miami River, its tributaries, the Little River, and directly into Bisca e Bay.
Policy SS-2.2.4: The City shall require that "best manageme practices" shall be used
in the design and construction of stormwater management s tems to minimize pollutant
load eventually discharged to natural drainage system , as well as to regulate the
volume and timing of storm water delivered to natural s; stems.
Policy SS-2.2.5: The City will continue to enforce ' lorida Building Code requirements
for the on -site retention of the first inch of stor ater runoff. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Policy NR-2.1.2.)
Policy SS-2.2.6: The City will consider e inclusion of stormwater quality control
structures in any new projects for major road improvements and commercial parking
areas.
Objective SS-2.3: As the City implem is the storm water management improvements
specified in the 1986 Storm Drai ge Master Plan, it will ensure that stormwater
management contributes to the c servation of ground water as a future potable water
supply.
Policy SS-2.3.1: In its stormwater management practices, the City will promote
infiltration of storm w ter to surficial or artesian aquifers to prevent further saltwater
intrusion, where su infiltration is deemed to be feasible and cost efficient, and is not
likely to represent; n environmental hazard.
Objective SS-2.4: areas of the City are now served by storm drainage facilities, and
the City will co nue to coordinate the replacement, repair, extension, and capacity
increases of th system consistent with development and redevelopment needs.
Polic
Ch..
SS-2.4.1: Through enforcement of its Storm Water Utility System as provided in
ter 53.5 of the City Code, the City will use its authority "to construct, reconstruct,
rove, and extend stormwater utility system and to issue revenue bonds and other
ebts if needed to finance in whole or part the cost of such system and to establish just
and equitable rates, fees, and charges for the services and facilities provided by the
system."
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
46
SUBSTITUTED
Objective SS-2.5: The City's storm drainage system is a valuable and costly elemen f
the urban infrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient man r to
serve this fully developed community.
Policy SS-2.5.1: The City will use its land development regulations to ensure that
development and redevelopment is consistent with the capacity of the storm drainage
system. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS-1.4.1.)
Objective SS-2.6: The City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System discharges to the
surface waters of the United States. These discharges are regulated by the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency. The City shall meet the requirements of the permit
when operating its drainage facilities.
Policy SS-2.6.1: The City will comply with the conditions in its NPDES permit.
Policy SS-2.6.2: The operation of the City's • ainage system to meet NPDES
requirements shall meet the following criteria:
The Miami Comprehensive Neighbor- ood Plan (MCNP) shall be consistent with
stormwater management program lements as defined in the NPDES permit.
• Stormwater projects and activitis shall be consistent with the current local,
state and federal regulations . the time of implementation.
• Stormwater capital improve rent and operation and maintenance projects shall
be implementable.
Policy SS-2.6.3: The City w , through its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit, e orce and educate all construction sites and operators of
such construction sites, f• compliance with the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) requi -ments and the Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
47
SUBSTITUTED
NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE
Goal AR-1: Protect the functions of the natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas within
City.
Objective AR-1.1: Ensure that stormwater management practices contribute to
conservation of groundwater as a future potable water supply.
Policy AR-1.1.1: As the City implements the projects identified in !is 1986 Storm
Drainage Master Plan and subsequent updates, it will promote the i filtration of storm
water to surficial or artesian aquifers to prevent further saltwater in usion, where such
infiltration is deemed to be feasible, not to represent an environmental hazard, and to
be cost efficient.
Policy AR-1.1.2: The City will coordinate with and support local, state and federal
agencies to achieve regional aquifer recharge protecti• objectives, including those
pertaining to the quality and quantity of groundwater resources.
Policy AR-1.1.3: The City will continue to support t►e South Florida Water Management
District efforts to monitor the water levels at the inity control structures within the City
to prevent against further saltwater intrusion a protect the aquifer recharge areas and
cones of influence of wellfields from ' ontamination. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Policy NR-2.1.3.)
Objective AR-1.2: The City will use its Ian - use and development regulations to ensure
that land uses for areas within the Cit, deemed to be aquifer recharge areas by the
South Florida Water Management Dis ict, maintain adequate recharge for the aquifer.
Policy AR-1.2.1: The City maintain low to moderate density uses in the West
Flagami area of the City (as own on Figure 111.1 of the Data and Analysis) as necessary
to protect the secondary .uifer recharge area. (See Land Use Policy LU-1.1.9.)
Policy AR-1.2.2: Th- ity will work with Miami -Dade County to implement the County
management plan t'.t identifies potential areas of water withdrawals, potential sources
of contamination he impact of potential withdrawals to other legal users, and the
development of .ractices that will maintain this aquifer as a viable water supply source.
Policy AR-'.2.3: In accordance with the South Florida Water Management District's
Lower E..t Coast Regional Water Supply Plan and Objective PW-1.3, and its related
policie , the City's coordination with MDWASD shall develop alternative water supply
sour : s to supplement withdrawals from the Biscayne Aquifer. Such sources may
inc de withdrawals from the Floridan Aquifer, implementation of water conservation
thods, and development of reclaimed and wastewater reuse strategies.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
48
SUBSTITUTED
POTABLE WATER
Goal PW-1: Ensure that all residents and workers within the City have adequate access to
safe drinking water through the efficient operation of centralized, County operated potable
water treatment facilities and ancillary potable water transmission system.
Objective PW-1.1: Land development regulations will ensure that approvof
development or redevelopment will not be granted unless and until there exists
adequate potable water transmission capacity to serve that development.
Policy PW-1.1.1: Since the potable water network is an interconnecte
system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Se
(MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for bi
estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that suffici
development exists. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy
, Countywide
er Department
nnually updating
t capacity to serve
R-2.1.4.)
Objective PW-1.2: The City shall coordinate with the MDW' . D to ensure adequate
levels of safe potable water are available to meet the need of the City. (See Natural
Resource Conservation Objective NR-2.1.)
Policy PW-1.2.1: The City will ensure, through its 'oncurrency management system
that potable water facilities shall be in place to sery ew development or redevelopment
no later than the issuance of a certificate of ocpancy or its functional equivalent in
compliance with level of service standards fo transmission capacity of 92.05 gallons
per capita per day (GPCD). (See Natural R: ource Conservation Policy NR-2.1.5 and
Capital Improvements Policy CI-1.2.3.)
Policy PW-1.2.2: Pursuant to Chaf er 163.3177(6)(c), F.S., the City adopted an
updated Water Supply Facilities Wo Plan (contained in Appendix PW-1 of the MCNP)
for a 20-year planning period (201 ' -2033) that is consistent with the current Lower East
Coast Water Supply Plan Updapproved by the South Florida Water Management
District (SRWMD) and the cu rent adopted County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.
The City's Work Plan and e County's Work Plan are incorporated into the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Th- ity's work plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years
and within 18 months er the South Florida Water Management District's approval of
an updated Lower E.' t Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Polic R-2.1.7.)
Policy PW-1.2 : The City will cooperate and participate to the fullest extent possible
with Miami-D:de County to maintain procedures and programs to monitor levels of
service of -:ch water supply, water treatment and wastewater treatment facility for use
by agenc:'-s that issue development orders or permits. Such procedures may include
the establishment of water and wastewater allocation processes to assure that adequate
water supply, and water and wastewater transmission and treatment capacity is
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
49
SUBSTITUTED
available prior to issuance of development orders or permits pursuant to Cha
163.3180(2)(a), F.S.
Policy PW-1.2.4: The City will continue to coordinate through the Planners -chnical
Committee and Miami -Dade County to utilize, expand and pursue the dev: opment of
new potable water wellfields and alternative water supplies to meet the t ty's existing
and future water supply needs. Such coordination efforts will include t transmittal of
information for large scale future land use changes, population and de and projections,
water supply needs, implementation of alternative water supply pro cts, establishment
of level of service standards, and servicing of newly annexed are
Policy PW-1.2.5: In the development of its future potable wa : r supplies, the City shall,
to the maximum extent feasible, utilize methods which p -serve the integrity of the
Biscayne Aquifer, protect the quality of surface wa - r and related ecosystems,
considered compatible with the South Florida Water M.: agement District's Lower East
Coast Regional Water Supply Plan, and comply wit hat land use and environmental
protection policies of the City MCNP, the Strate! c Regional Policy Plan for South
Florida, and the State Comprehensive Plan.
Objective PW-1.3: The City shall coordinate wit he Miami -Dade County Water Supply
Facilities Work Plan to identify and develop t •se water supply projects necessary to
meet the City's projected water demands fo a 20-year period.
Policy PW-1.3.1: The City's adopte• ater Supply Facilities Work Plan Update (Work
Plan), dated September 2015, is ncorporated as follows in Appendix PW-1 of the
MCNP. This document is desied to: assess current and projected potable water
demands; evaluate the source: and capacities of available water supplies; and identify
those water supply projects using all available technologies, necessary to meet the
City's water demands for . 0-year period. The Work Plan shall remain consistent with
projects as listed in the south Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast
Regional Water Supp Plan. The Work Plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5
years and within 1 months after the South Florida Water Management District's
approval of an up..ted Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan
shall address c.' ate change and sea level rise that may impact the potable water
infrastructure :nd sources. The potable water supply facilities necessary to satisfy
projected w er demands for the City of Miami during the 2014-2033 period are shown
in Appen.' A of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Appendix PW-1).
Polic PW-1.3.2: The City shall be consistent with the current approved version of
So Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply
P .n and the current adopted County's Water Supply Facilities Work Plan in
eveloping and updating its 20-Year Work Plan.
Policy PW-1.3.3: The City shall support Miami -Dade County efforts to consider areas
that will be impacted by sea level rise when building, expanding or planning for new
facilities such as water treatment plants,
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 50
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policy PW-1.3.4: The City shall take all necessary steps to ensure t .t all
future development shall comply with the landscape standards in Secti%ns 18-
A and 18-B of Miami -Dade County Code. (See related Policies NR- .1.8 and
NR-2.1.9)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
51
SUBSTITUTED
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
Goal SW-1: Ensure a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper maintena e,
timely provision and efficient operation of an integrated solid waste disposal and an lary
solid waste collection system.
Objective SW-1.1: The City will continue to provide solid waste collection -rvices to
City residents and businesses in a manner that ensures public health and = afety, and a
clean urban environment.
Policy SW-1.1.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system,
that solid waste capacity shall be in place to serve new development and/or
redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of oc► pancy or its functional
equivalent in compliance with a level of service standard of .even (7) lbs. per person
per day, which is equivalent to 1.28 tons per person per ye-r.
Policy SW-1.1.2: Commercial structures and high den ' y residential areas will continue
to be served by either the City's Solid Waste Depart ' ent or by private sector providers
of solid waste collection services. The City will re• ire levels of service to be complied
with by private haulers operating within the City'. boundaries, and will enforce all City
regulations regarding the disposal and collectiof solid waste.
Policy SW-1.1.3: The City shall maintain -olid waste collection equipment as required
to serve the public needs according to th-'service standard adopted in Policy SW-1.1.1.
Policy SW-1.1.4: The City will take
"Garbage and Trash Ordinance,"
Policy SW-1.1.5: Land devel
propriate measures to ensure compliance with its
apter 22 of the Municipal Code.
ment regulations will be consistent with the provision of
solid waste collection services in accordance with the adopted level of service.
Policy SW-1.1.6: In the allocation of funds for the provision of solid waste services, first
priority will be given t• hose improvements and programs that are necessary to protect
the health, safety a the integrity of the environment, and meet federal, state and local
legal and regula %ry requirements. Second priority in the allocation of funds will be
assigned to im ovements that are necessary to meet existing deficiencies in capacity
or service, or required to replace or repair needed equipment, while third priority will be
assigned to those projects that increase the extent of services.
Policy SW-1.1.7: The City shall, through enforcement of its powers to regulate solid
wast collection services, require promoters of major public events to reimburse the City
for xtraordinary trash and garbage collection services required as a result of such
ents.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
52
SUBSTITUTED
Objective SW-1.2: Although the City has no authority governing solid waste transfer
and disposal, it will continue to support Miami -Dade County efforts intended to ensure
that transfer stations and disposal sites are sufficient to meet the needs of City
residents according to the service standards adopted in Policy 1.1.1.
Policy SW-1.2.1: The City's departments of Solid Waste and Planning, through th
City's Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, shall request the Miami -Dade County
Department of Solid Waste to jointly develop methodologies and procedures to
biennially update estimates of system demand and capacity.
Policy SW-1.2.2: The City shall support Miami -Dade County's policy to im ement the
County's Solid Waste Disposal and Resources Recovery Management PI
Policy SW-1.2.3: The City will continue to explore the development of source recovery
and cogeneration activities and, subject to concurrence by M mi-Dade County,
consider the implementation of programs and procedures that de'entralize solid waste
disposal and reduce the volume of solid waste that is disposed •f at County landfills.
Policy SW-1.2.4: The City will work with, and support, the County's efforts to identify
generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enf• ce procedures for the proper
collection and disposal of hazardous waste. Its depart ents will support the County's
program to enforce all non -household producers of hazardous waste in identifying waste
and disposing of it according to EPA, State, and I ;al standards. The City will support
Miami -Dade County's development of a haza ous waste temporary storage and
transfer facility in a non -populated area. In co rdination with Miami -Dade County, the
City will work to meet the Region's objece to reduce the incidence of improper
hazardous materials and waste handling and disposal. (See Natural Resource
Conservation Policy NR-1.1.8.)
Policy SW-1.2.5: The City shall, th ugh its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
encourage the County to utilize 'amnesty days" to encourage small volume, non-
commercial producers of hazar ous waste to safely dispose of such waste, and to
develop a permanent system, or households, small business and other low volume
generators to safely dispose of hazardous wastes.
Objective SW-1.3: It shall be the City's policy that solid waste collection procedures
shall be conducted in a anner that will reduce the quantity of litter, trash and
abandoned personal pr• •erty on city streets.
Policy SW-1.3.. The City will continue to actively support and implement neighborhood
clean-up and %eautification efforts through public awareness and information programs.
Policy S -1.3.2: The City shall, through enforcement of those provisions of the City
Code t .t protect and enhance the appearance of neighborhoods, ensure that streets
and y, rds remain clean and attractive. Where the City Code falls short of the provisions
ne ssary to accomplish this, revisions shall be proposed to the City Commission.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 53
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policy SW-1.3.3: The Solid Waste Department should be encouraged to increase s'ireet
sweeping frequencies in order to reduce pollution to surface waters via storm water
runoff and to reduce or eliminate litter in areas where significant problems may exist.
(See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS-2.2.2.)
Objective SW-1.4: Although the City has no authority governing solid aste transfer
and disposal, it will continue to support and cooperate with Miami -Da County efforts
to encourage the recycling of solid waste materials and reduce the vciume of waste set
aside for collection and disposal.
Policy SW-1.4.1: The City shall, through its publicity programs and mechanisms,
encourage the use of recyclable packaging materials.
Policy SW-1.4.2: The City shall evaluate the development of reuse and/or recycling
programs for used tires, waste oils and similar ecyclable materials and make
recommendations for applicable additions or amenents to City procedures governing
the disposal of these materials.
Policy SW-1.4.3: The City shall, through ' s publicity programs and mechanisms,
encourage residents to reduce the volu of yard and tree trimmings set aside for
disposal by promoting the use of compo ing.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
54
SUBSTITUTED
TRANSPORTATION
Goal TR-1: Maintain an effective and cost efficient traffic circulation network within the City .f Miami
that provides transportation for all persons and facilitates commercial activity, and which i onsistent
with, and furthers, neighborhood plans, supports economic development, conserves -nergy, and
protects and enhances the natural environment.
Objective TR-1.1: All arterial and collector roadways under C -unty and State
jurisdiction that lie within the City's boundaries will operate a levels of service
established by the respective agency. All other City streets wi operate at levels of
service that arc based upon the multi -modal capacity of the ransportation system
which recognizes the frequency of existing and programm•d public transit service
operating within an urban center and characterized ,y a mixture of compact
development and moderate -to -high residential densities - _ - - e intensities, along
with single family residential and mixed -use neigh orhoods, located within a
transportation concurrency exception arcs (TCEA). T c City will monitor the levels of
service of all arterial and collector roadways to • • ntinuc to develop and enhance
transportation strategics that promote public tra it and minimize the impacts of the
TCEA. See Appendix TR-1 of the MCNP which co, ains the Transportation Element Data
facilities.
Policy TR-1.1.1: The City hereby a. opts designation of the City, excluding Virginia Key,
Watson Island and the uninhabit-• islands of Biscayne Bay that have a land use and
zoning classification of Conser ation, as an Urban Infill Area pursuant to Miami Dadc
County's designation of an rban Infill Area lying generally east of the Palmetto
Expressway and including .II of the City of Miami. Within this area, the concentration
and intensification of devopment around centers of activity shall be emphasized with
the goals of enhancin: the livability of residential neighborhoods and the viability of
commercial areas. P ority will be given to infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive
reuse of underutili ed land and structures, the redevelopment of substandard sites,
downtown revit ization and the development of projects that promote public
transportation. Maintenance of transportation levels of service within this designated
Urban Infill T nsportation Concurrency Exception Area shall be in accordance with the
adopted T' nsportation Corridors level of service standards and the City of Miami
Person ip Methodology as set forth in Policics TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1 -of the
rtation Element of the MCNP. (See Land Use Policy LU 1.1.11.)
Trans!.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
55
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR 1.1.2: The City of Miami originated and continues to utilize a person trip
methodology for measurement of local level of service (LOS) on a transportation facility,
which may be a roadway, mass transit service, pedestrian way, bikeway, or any othe'
transportation mode alone or in combination with others. The Miami Comprehence
Neighborhood Plan (adopted as Ordinance 10511,1 on February 9, 1989) establ'' ed
under Policies TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3 that within designated Transportation Co' idors,
the capacity of all transportation modes will be used in the measurement of fut.re, peak
del of service standards. The City of Miami "Methodology for Calc sting Peak
Hour Person Trip Capacity" was incorporated into the Transportation E ' ment of the
MCNP under Policies TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3 on January 21, 199 (adopted as
Ordinance 10832), and was separately published as a report entitle- "Transportation
Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami", September 1990.
The City of Miami Person Trip Methodology calculates the total . -rson trip capacity of
all transportation modes utilizing a transportation facility agai t the total person trip
demand for travel on that facility expressing the resulting ra '• in letter grades LOS A
through LOS F in the same manner as used by the conve ' onal volume over capacity
(V/C) methodology. The m asurcmcnt of LOS is madc fo thc p ak period (thc avcragc
of the two highest consecutive hours of trip volume duri►. a weekday), where an overall
minimum peak period LOS standard of E (100 perce utilization of person trip capacity)
will be maintained. Issuance of development order: for new development or significant
pansion of existing development shall be conti dent upon compliance with these LOS
standards, subject to the modifications descr.ed in subparagraphs 1.1.2.1 through
1.1.2.3 below, and any applicable provi,'.ns of the Urban Infill Transportation
Concurrency Exception Area.
1.1.2.1: Where no public trans' exists, and private passenger vehicics are thc
only vehicular mode availably for travel on the facility: minimum LOS E (100
percent of capacity) shall alp,. y.
1.1.2.2: Where local b transit service on minimum 20 minute headways is
available parallel to a o within 1/2 mile of the facility, the facility shall operate at no
greater than 120 pe ent of capacity.
1.1.2.3: Where ' xpress bus transit and/or premium transit service on minimum
20 minute he sways is available parallel to and within 1/2 mile of the facility, thc
facility shall operate at no greater than 150 percent of capacity.
Policy TR- .1.3: Notwithstanding the foregoing, as required by s. 163.3180(10) F.S.,
the follow' g standards established by rule by the Florida Department of Transportation
(FOOT) re adopted by the City of Miami as its minimum LOS standards for Florida
Intras •te Highway System (FINS) roadways within the City subject to any applicable
pro sions governing requirements of the Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency
ception Area (see Policy TR 1.1.1):
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
56
SUBSTITUTED
1.1.3.1: Limited access FIRS highways shall operate at LOS D or better, except
that where exclusive through lanes exist, such roadways may operate at LOS E.
1.1.3.2: Controlled access FIHS highways shall operate at LOS D or better,
cxccpt that whcrc such roadways arc parallel to exclusive transit facilities or are
located within a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), roadway
may operate at LOS E.
1.1.3.3: Where FDOT has determined that a FIHS roadway is constr ' ed or
backlogged, such roadways operating below the foregoing minimums ust be
managed so as not to cause significant deterioration, which is def. ed as an
average annual daily traffic increase in two way traffic volume of 1 percent or
more, or a 10 percent or greater reduction in operating spee,, for the peak
direction in the 100Th hi h
Policy TR-1.1.4: Within eighteen months of the adoption of thi : policy, the City will
update the City of Miami Person Trip Methodology to reinfoe the Transportation
Corridors plan to identify, describe, measure, and evaluate the ' ultimodal transportation
corridors, facilities and terminals in the City of Miami an. ecommend measures to
cnhancc vchicular and mass transit operations, providc f. gr otcr pcdestrian access
and amenity, and offer incentives for use of alternative transportation modes to support
the TCEA. The City of Miami Person Trip Methodolo ; will pay particular attention to
the differing characteristics of Miami's neighborhoo ds such as land use, population
density, economic activity, housing, business type d quality, and neighborhood plans,
and will develop detailed standards for transpor .tion facilities and services that will
complement neighborhood development, rede -lopment, and conservation. Miami's
downtown will be the subject of special att tion, to ensure that its new residential
development will enjoy the benefits of an it proved multimodal transportation system
that will improve transit access within neig' .orhoods, while improving their connectivity
system wide as described in the Miami 'owntown Transportation Master Plan, dated
May 2003. As a component of this fort, the City will assess how the Person Trip
Methodology could be enhanced to ' entify projected transit needs and programming
on a route by route basis in coordi -tion with the MPO and Miami Dade Transit.
Policy TR-1.1.5: The City, through its membership and regular attendance at meetings
of the MPO's Transportation ' anning Council (TPC), and through its Intergovernmental
Coordination Policies, will upport the County's efforts to increase the efficiency and
cnhancc thc safcty of th► cxisting thoroughfarc nctwork by such methods as improved
signal timing, better ' tersection and street design, car pooling, and encouraging
staggered work sch_.ules. The City will continue to enforce the Transportation Control
Measures Ordina e pursuant to Scction 11 182 of thc City Codc, to improvc thc
efficiency of the • isting transportation infrastructure and to support the TCEA.
Policy TR- .1.6: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will
annually .ordinate with Miami Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public
bus tra it system, including new service and the expansion of neighborhood based
local ' culator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. The City
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
57
SUBSTITUTED
will work with Miami Dade County to promote the transit oriented development polic s
found in the Miami Dade County's CDMP to support the TCEA .
Policy TR-1.1.7: The City shall seek, where appropriate, based on operational . nalysis,
cost effectiveness, land development regulations, and the concurrence of ami Dade
County or FDOT, to restore existing one way streets to two way operatito improve
access and reduce trip length and vehicular speeds, particularly in the v: y high density
areas of the City such as Little Havana and DowntownlBrickelllOmni here access to
cxisting buildings and garages will not be diminished or impeded.
Policy TR-1.1.8: Through enforcement, amendment, and in -rpretation of its land
development regulations, the City shall require the provisiof adequate vehicular
parking facilities with energy efficiency lighting consiste with parking demand at
locations that are not disruptive to nearby residential comunities.
Policy TR 1.1.9: Require new development in dow own to implement transportation
control measure provisions in accordance with Sec on 11 182, "Transportation Control
Measures" of the City Code, to promote a ge -ral reduction in vehicular traffic by
increasing auto occupancy and transit ridershi• to support the TCEA. Within one year
of the adoption of this policy, the City shall re 'se the "Transportation Control Measures"
to include additional transportation demananagement requirements for all future and
cxisting developments (as applicable p-rsuant to Scction 11 182), such as parking
management and ridesharing program : to promote carpooling, vanpooling, car sharing
and use of hybrid vehicles, transit discount and fare subsidy programs, transit fare tax
incentive programs, staggered wo schedules, flexible work hours, compressed work
weeks, telecommuting programs, the construction of on site transit shelters, transit
amenities, transit stops, tran t drop off locations or pull out bays, bicycle storage
facilities and additional tr sportation demand management strategies and criteria
established between the y and the business community.
Policy TR-1.1.10: Wi • in one year of the adoption of this policy, the City will publish an
update map that wi depict the location of existing and planned future major parking
facilities that will .- updated annually and will be available for public use through the
City of Miami w:.site.
Policy TR-1 .11: The City will continue to relocate and/or extend streets that do not fit
the devel..ed street grid system of downtown, and have contributed to the disruption of
circulati
Pol' y TR 1.1.12: The City will, through its membership and regular attendance at
etings of the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
tergovernmental Coordination Policies, encourage Miami Dade County to improve
downtown connections to the expressway system by providing a means of access to
and from 195 at Northwest 20th Street, redesigning the existing 1395 to improve its
capacity and aesthetics in Overtow� Dark West and Omni facilitate access too
Overtown, and construct a truck tunnel connecting the seaport to 1395.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 58
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-1.1.13: New development shall be required to contribute to establi: ed
transportation impact mitigation fees pursuant to applicable provisions in the Cit Code
to fund mobility in the TCEA.
Policy TR-1.1.14: The City will, through its membership on the MPO's Tr, sportation
Planning Council (TPC) continue to participate in Miami Dade County's "ormulation of
transportation policies, and will, through its Intergovernmental Coor.' ation Policies,
support the County's efforts to increase reliance on parking at outlyin• etrorail stations
and express bus stops to support the TCEA.
Policy TR 1.1.15: Through enforcement of minimum and
limitations, as provided for in Scction 11 182 "Transportatio
City Code, the City will manage the downtown parking sup
balance among the need to promote economic gr
circulation, and to encourage public transportation us
ximum on site parking
Control Mcasures" of the
to maintain an appropriatc
h, to facilitate local traffic
o support the TCEA.
Policy TR-1.1.16: Through enforcement of app ' able provisions of Section 11 182
"Transportation Control Measures" of the Cit Code, regarding downtown parking
requirements, together with the powers of e City's Off Street Parking Authority
Department, the City will activcly pursue the dcvclopmcnt of public and privatc
peripheral parking garages near the expr: sway and arterial entrances to downtown in
order to reduce congestion in the core . rea and promote the use of alternative travel
modes to support the TCEA. In addit''4n, the City will continue to enforce the maximum
parking provisions mandated in Se on 11 182.
Policy TR-1.1.17: The City oMiami will coordinate with South Florida Commuter
Services and the Florida Dep rtment of Transportation to support and encourage City
cmploycc participation in crnativc modes of transportation by offering Downtown
grnpleycrs and thcir emple cc's altcrnativcs to driving to work alone. The City will also
work with the South Flor.4a Commuter Services to ensure consistent implementation of
the City's Section 11 1:2 "Transportation Control Measures" and provide assistance to
employers and busi sses required to implement the measures. In addition, the City
will utilize the Sout Florida Commuter Services to establish the transportation demand
management (TI ) requirements for all future and existing employers with more than
50 employees i' the City. The City of Miami will lead by example in developing TDM
strategies for ity employees to support the TCEA.
Policy T--1.1.18: The City will work with representatives of the Miami -Dade Transit
Agency o increase the number of MDT bus routes operating within the City that
participate in the Agency's Bike and Ride Program to promote the use of alternative
tray I modes to support the TCEA.
olicy TR-1.1.19: The City will promote multi modal transportation initiativcs and the
recommendations of the adopted Miami Downtown Transportation Master Plan dated
May 2003, to promote the use of alternative travel modes to support the TCEA.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
59
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-1.1.20: The City will utilize funds provided through the People's
Transportation Plan and funds collected from traffic impact mitigation fees as specified
in the Capital Improvement Element of the MCNP, to fund mobility in the TCEA, and t►
fund the cost of studios, plans, programs and physical improvements to serve c
residcnts, employees and visitors of the RAC.
Objective TR-1.2: At the time of all dcvclopmcnt reviews, the City will dctcrmi rights
of -way and corridors needed for existing transportation networks and cn- re thoso
rights -of -way will be designated and reserved prior to dcvclopmcnt.
Policy TR-1.2.1: The City will maintain and enforcc, and where nec• sary revise, thc
minimum right of way requirements established in its City Code to esure the continuity
and effectiveness of the thoroughfare network.
Policy TR-1.2.2: The City will continue to maintain a compr' ensive public rights of
way improvements program for those major commercial str= -ts that are under the City's
jurisdiction and have high levels of pedestrian activity.
Objective TR-1.3: The City's transportation syste
will enhance safe person -trip and
through design. Beginning January 1, 2004, c City
resurfacing and reconstruction.
will implement the prioritized
Policy TR-1.3.1: The City will contin ,e to provide a properly designed and safe system
for controlling vehicular traffic by dhering to design standards and procedures and
recognizing those relevant sta '.arils and procedures applicable to the agency with
jurisdiction over the roadway • transportation facility.
Policy TR-1.3.2: The City hrough its membership and regular attendance at meetings
of the MPO's Transpo' ation Planning Council and through its Intergovernmental
Coordination Policies ill annually coordinate with Miami Dade County to support thc
monitoring of loca 'ens of high accident frequency on the city's streets and its
identification of 'design improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions,
especially to p-'icstrians. The City shall utilize safety as an evaluation criteria when
improvementr are incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Element.
Policy T-_1.3.3: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe system
for pedtrian access by adhering to design standards and procedures which comply
with e Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and which are required by thc
En• neering Standards for Design and Construction published by the Department of
lic Works in December 2005
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
60
SUBSTITUTED
centers through coordination with the Land Use Plan, Zoning Code, and adopted
Neighborhood plans and recommendations. Proposed measures for neighborhood
calming plans.
Policy TR-1.4.1: The City will seek cooperative agreements, as necessary, with mi
Dade County and with FDOT to ensure that the County and State's transp► ation
improvements are designed to minimize the intrusion of commuter traffi on City
residential streets, do not sever or fragment well-defined neighborhoods, nd do not
result in major disruption to pedestrian traffic.
Policy TR 1.4.2: The City will coordinate with Miami Dade County d with FDOT to
cncouragc local traffic to use altcrnativcs to the Florida Intrasta Highway System
roadways, where practicable, to support the TCEA and to prote its interregional and
intrastate functions.
Policy TR-1.4.3: The City will develop a streetscape de '•n program that will guide
landscaping, lighting and construction of sidewalks and b ycle paths along city streets,
and such improvements will be coordinated with maj• repairs and renovation of city
streets.
Policy TR-1.4.4: As streets undergo major rep
climinatc dirt shouldcrs and providc curbing,
the physical appearance and quality of the C.
s or renovation, the City will seek to
tcrs and sidcwalks in order to improve
's neighborhoods and districts.
Policy TR 1.4.5: A new category of p .lic thoroughfares is created entitled "Urban
Streets," defining the Urban Street as - pedestrian and vehicular way whose primary
function is to serve adjoining reside 'al neighborhoods and the businesses that serve
them in the City of Miami. Charac ristics and standards for such streets will be defined
and specifications created o a case -by -case basis in cooperation with the
governmental entity having o nership of the street, local residents and homeowner
associations. Principles th will guide the design process will include, as appropriate:
lower design speeds an. control of traffic volumes utilizing traffic calming devices
including but not limiteto modification of lane widths consistent with lower design
speeds; wide sidewal ; medians; roundabouts; landscaping; attractive lighting; creative
and informative sig ge; on street parking; and other design features and amenities a&
appropriate. Urb Streets shall be subject to the level of service standards described
in Policies TR 1 .2 and TR 1.1.3. The first such Urban Streets to be designated shall
cayne Boulevard
rand Avcnuc
Calle Ocho from Brickell Avenue to S.W. 27 Avenue
Coral Way from Brickcll Avcnuc to S.W. 37 Avcnuc
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
61
SUBSTITUTED
N.E. 2 Avenue from N.E. 36 Street to the North City Limit.
Additional streets may be designated from time to time by Resolution of t City
Commission upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Departme , based
upon criteria developed in connection with the neighborhood planning studie onducted
as part of the comprehensive update and revision of the Miami C•- prehensive
Neighborhood Plan in 2005. (Resolution No. 01 1126, adopted by the C. y Commission
OGtober211, 2001).
Policy TR-1.4.6: Develop and encourage bicycle paths and bic le lanes throughout
the City of Miami in coordination with FDOT, Miami Dade C.,unty and the MPO to
promote alternative travel modes in the TCEA.
Policy TR 1.4.7: The City of Miami shall continue to re:.ond to neighborhood traffic
concerns by developing and implementing neighborhoo► traffic calming measures using
standard traffic flow modification procedures in place 'y Miami Dade County and FDOT
to evaluate traffic calming proposals. Neighbor .od traffic calming measures may
include but are not limited to traffic circles, m: Sian modifications, mid block raised
medians and streetscape improvements in co dination with Miami Dade County and
FDOT as appropriate .
Objective TR-1.5: The City of Miami's conti ed development requires the provision of
effective public transit and paratransit se cos that serve existing and future land uses,
the provision of safe and convcnic public transit passenger transfer terminal
uses, and the accommodation of t special needs of the City of Miami's population,
many of whom arc transportatio disadvantaged. Therefore, thc City of Miami will
support Miami -Dade County in e provision of these e..,sential public transit services.
(Scc Natural Resource Consc ation Policy NR-3.2.2.}
Policy TR-1.5.1: Th- City will, through its membership and regular attendance at
meetings of the PO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
Intergovernmental ' oordination Policies, continually encourage Miami Dade County to
improve connec •ns between transit modes using, but not limited to, local circulator
transit services
Policy TR- .5.2: The City shall conduct appropriate land use and zoning analysis of thc
areas sur ounding each existing and future premium transit station as such station sites
are ap oved by Miami Dade County or the City of Miami for development in order to
deter ine whether appropriate land use and zoning changes should be implemented
th foster the development and use of the stations while protecting adjacent
ighborhoods from incompatible development (examining height, density and intensity,
use and scale). Such land use and zoning changes shall include minimum and maximum
density and intensity standards at the time of implementation.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
62
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-1.5.3: The City shall encourage the University of Miami/Jackson Memo'al
Hospital to participate in transportation management initiatives and strategies to ,_silt
in meeting the demands of the Health District/Civic Center expansion and heking to
solve the consequent accessibility, traffic circulation and parking problems. he City
shall encourage the Health District/Civic Center stakeholders and facility o'ierators to
work together to increase Metrorail ridership and utilization of the transit -tion to help
decrease the need for excessive surface parking demand.
Policy TR-1.5.4: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Co
encourage Miami -Dade County to provide a premium transit stat'•n
Quadrant area of downtown.
Policy TR-1.5.5: [Reserved].
rdination Policies,
to serve the River
Policy TR-1.5.6: The City will, through its member ip and regular attendance at
meetings of the MPO's Transportation Plan ' g Council and through its
Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, assist M'.mi Dade County as necessary, in
developing the premium transit projects ide ified in the MPO's Long Range
Transportation Plan. The City will utilize land development regulations to help direct
development where it will support the densiti: required for premium transit systems.
Policy TR-1.5.7: The City shall, throu• its membership and regular attendance at
meetings of the MPO's Transpoation Planning Council and through its
Intergovernmental Coordination Po'cies, request that Miami -Dade County include
appropriate public transit systems n its Transportation Plan to connect the following:
Bayside to Flagler Street, the seaport to Metromover, the Miami International Airport to
Downtown, Southeast Baysho - Drive to Metromover, , Stadium to Health District/Civic
Center, Miami Beach to Do ntown and the FEC Corridor to Downtown.
Policy TR-1.5.8: The Ci will ensure a stronger interface between the development or
redevelopment of neig►.orhood activity centers and the public transportation system by
establishing design guidelines for connectivity and transit infrastructure to bc
incorporated into t - development/redevelopment program. The City shall require all
new developme and redevelopment in existing and planned transit corridors to bc
planned and de gned to promote pedestrianism and transit usage through the following:
A. The Ci shall encourage development of a wide variety of residential and non
resid: tial land uses and activities in nodes around rapid transit stations to produce
she trips, minimize transfers, attract transit ridership, and promote transit
o'4erational and financial efficiencies. Land uses that may be approved around
ransit stations shall include housing, shopping, and offices in moderate to high
density and intensity, complemented by compatible entertainment, cultural uses and
human services in varying mixes. The particular uses that are approved in a given
the needs of the neighborhood and promote balance in the range of existing and
e
planned land uses along the subject transit line.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
63
SUBSTITUTED
B. It is the policy of the City of Miami to accommodate new development around rapid
transit stations that is well designed, conducive to both pedestrian and transit us-.,
and architecturally attractive. In recognition that many transit riders begin and = d
their trips as pedestrians, pedestrian accommodations shall include, as appropate,
continuous sidewalks to the transit station, small blocks and closely intersecting
streets, buildings oriented to the street or other pedestrian paths, pa ing Tots
predominantly to the rear and sides of buildings, primary building entran s as closc
to the street or transit stop as to the parking lot, shade trees, awni •s and other
weather protection for pedestrians.
C. On all arterial and collector streets served by public transit -w non residential
buildings and substantial alterations to existing non resi.• ntial buildings, and
residential buildings wherever practical shall provide at le one full time building
cntrancc that is rccognizablc and acccsciblc from thc str ct and is comparably a&
close to the street andlortransit stop as it is to the prim.ry parking lot.
D. New residential and non-residential development subdivisions and replats shall
provide for buildings that front the transit stree or provide streets or pedestrian
connections that intersect with the transit stre in close proximity to transit stops
not more than 700 feet apart.
E. Redevelopment of property within one alf mile of existing and planned transit
stations and bus routes shall not caul- -n increase in walking distance from nearby
areas to the transit services and sha , wherever practical, be done in a manner that
reduces walking distances and is •mfortable and attractive to pedestrians.
F. Land uses that are not conduc e to public transit ridership such as car dealerships,
car oriented food establish r-nts, and container yards should not be permitted to
locate or expand within'/ ile of a rapid transit station.
G. The City of Miami seks to increase the density of development within walking
distance of rapid tr ' sit stations in a manner appropriate to the particular setting of
qach transit statio' and consistent with the policies of the MCNP that specify that
isting abuttin• residential neighborhoods are to be protected and preserved.
Policy TR-1 .9A: The City will, through its membership and regular attendance at
meetings the MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its
Intergove mental Coordination Policies, encourage Miami Dade County to approve thc
use of .rivate jitneys where it is determined that there exists public need for such
servi s and where conventional bus transit services do not satisfactorily meet the need.
P licy TR-1.5.9B: The City will promote water borne transportation as a commuter
ransit service and through its membership and regular attendance at meetings of the
MPO's Transportation Planning Council and through its Intergovernmental Coordination
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 64
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policies will encourage Miami Dade County to approve the use of water borne
transportation as a commuter transit service.
Policy TR-1.5.10: Through application of the provisions of its land development
regulations, the City shall encourage residential development near large employment
centers in order to minimize Commutes within the City and near the large employme
centers. The City shall continue to update the land development regulations, is
necessary, to ensure the regulations promote residential development near :rge
employment ccntcrs and investigate opportunitics for mixcd use developments.
Policy TR-1.5.11: Through enforcement of applicable provisions of Sec '•n 11 182
"Transportation Control Mcacures" of thc City Codc, thc City will rcquirc n largo scale
development to adopt and enforce measures that will reduce the ge -ration of new
single occupant pascenger car trips in areas of high density development, and
encourage thc use of multiple occupant vehicles, including publi• transit, for homc
based work trips. The City will coordinate with the South Florida Commuter Services to
provide support for transportation demand initiatives undertake sy new developments.
Within one year of the adoption of this policy, the City shall m.dify Article 17 of the City
Zoning Code to incorporate Transportation Control Measur into the Major Use Special
Permit application process.
Policy TR 1.5.12: The City, through its Intergover ental Coordination Policies, will
continue to support Miami Dade Transit in its effo to increase transit ridership. The
City will coordinate with Miami Dade Transit t• develop weekday peak hour transit
ridership data to ensure that a baseline can be - ctabliched to support the City's person
trip methodology level of service measurem• nts and to support Miami Dade Transit's
efforts to improve transit services.
Policy TR-1.5.13: The City shall ann Ily coordinate with Miami Dade County and its
update of the Five Year Transit Dev• opment Program (TDP) to address transit needs
consistent with the adopted level .f service standard and transit planning guidelines,
established by Miami Dade Co , ty, and population growth trends within the City of
Miami.
Policy TR-1.5.14: The Ci will publish an annual listing of the updated MDT Transit
Development program -d improvements within the City of Miami.
Policy TR-1.5.15: T e City will publish an annual listing of the updated Metropolitan
Planning Organiz ion (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) improvements
within the City o iami.
Objective TR-1.6• he City shall through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies,
annually coor•' ate and communicate itsportation plans and itAesit
annually monitor programs sponsored by the State of Florida and seek
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
65
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-1.6.1: The City shall coordinate its transportation planning activities wi • the
annual update to the Metropolitan Planning Organization and Florida Depart ►ent of
Transportation (FDOT) Fivc Y ar Transportation Improvcmcnt Program •nd thc
Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long Range Transportation Plan Upd- e.
Objective TR-1.7: The City shall, through its Intergovernmental Coordin tion Policies,
expansion and improvement man• be facilitated
Policy TR-1.7.1: The City shall use its land development r-gulations to ensure that
adequate public rights of way are preserved for transportati• purposes, which includes
the need for transit services.
Policy TR-1.7.2: Within two years of the adoption of is policy, The City shall develop
a transit corridor right of way map to use when -valuating new projects and their
proximity to existing and future planned transit s- ice.
Objective TR-1.8: The City shall regularly coord' ate thc transportation system and tho
information provided in the Transportation . ement with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Land Use clement, includ' g coordination with the land use, map,
population densities, housing, employ • cnt patterns, projected development and
redevelopment, urban infill, and other - milar characteristics of land use that have an
Policy TR-1.8.1: The City sha continue to assure provision of a properly designed and
cafe system for controllin• vehicular accessibility to major thoroughfares through
adopted design standards -nd procedures as contained in the City Public Works Manual
as adopted for use in the review process, which at a minimum address:
1. Adequate torage and turning bays;
2. Spacin• and design of median openings and curb cuts;
3. Provi on of service roads along major thoroughfares, where applicable;
/1. Dri -way access and spacing; and
5. raffic operations, including the provision of turning bays and bus bays for
bus transit.
Polic TR-1.8.2: The Transportation Element will be amended to reflect changes to the
La Use Element every five years, or as necessary, and will include updated
•rmation based upon changes to the land use map, population densities, housing,
ployment patterns, projected development and redevelopment, urban infill, and other
similar characteristics of land use impacting the transportation system.
Policy TR-1.8.3: The Transportation Element updates provided as part of Evaluation
and Appraisal Report (EAR) will utilize a long range planning horizon of a minimum of
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 66
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
20 years in order to achieve the maximum consistency with the Metropolitan Plann g
Organization (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP).
Objective TR 1.9: The City shall seek to achieve consistency and coordination wit he Port
of Miami, Port of Miami River and the Miami International Airport plans and he Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan.
Policy TR-1.9.1: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordina on Policies, will
annually coordinate with the Port of Miami, Port of Miami River and ' iami International
Airport to ensure consistency between the Miami Comprehensiv• Neighborhood Plan
and the port and airport master plans, and to improve access t►, and compatibility with
port and airport facilities. (2011168)
GOAL TR-1: MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE AND COST EF CIENT CIRCULATION NETWORK
THAT PROVIDES TRANSPORTATION FOR ALL PER •NS WHILE REDUCING BOTH THE
DEPENDENCY ON AUTOMOBILES AND OVERALL R• DWAY CONGESTION
Objective TR-1.1: Encourage sustainable . owth and development that aims to improve
mobility, reduce congestion, and suppo s the overall growth strategy of the City.
Policy TR-1.1.1: As an Urban I III Area (UIA) and/or a Transportation Concurrency
Exemption Area (TCEA); :: established by Miami -Dade Count Laws and
Regulations, and illustrated ' the Appendix TR-1, Map TR-143.1, of the Data and
Analysis, the City will enc rage the concentration and intensification of development
around centers of acti ity with the goal of enhancing the livability of residential
neighborhoods, supprting economic development, and the viability of commercial
areas. InfiII develop ent on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and
structures, red- 'elopment of substandard sites, downtown revitalization, and
development p ojects that promote public transportation will be heavily encouraged.
(See Policy -1.1.11.) (200516)
Policy -1.1.2: The City will provide; and coordinate with other agencies; Florida
Depar ent of Transportation and the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization
and iami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works sufficient multimodal
tr. s•ortation facilities and services to address existing level of service deficiencies and
• promote and accommodate the City's growth strategy by linking centers of activity
with effective transportation options, thereby improving accessibility.
Policy TR-1.1.3: Through application of the provisions of its land development
regulations, the City will encourage residential development near large employment
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
67
SUBSTITUTED
centers in order to minimize commutes within the City and investigate opportunities for
mixed -use developments.
Policy TR-1.1.4: The City will implement growth strategies that encouraqe infill . d
redevelopment in order to take advantage of the multimodal transportation oions
available, thereby reducing the dependency on automobiles for new developm: ts.
Policy TR-1.1.5: The City will encourage new development to be structured o reinforce
a pattern of neighborhoods and urban centers by focusing growth along tr„ nsit corridors
and around transit nodes and centers.
Policy TR-1.1.6: The City will design and promote transportati• facilities that are
consistent with adjacent land uses, preserve natural feature , protect historic and
cultural resources, and enhance community appearance and '.rancv.
Policy TR-1.1.7: The City will approve developments that ' inimize impacts to and help
retain the City's natural infrastructure and visual ch.,.cter derived from its unique
location and climate, including topography, landscap:, and coastline.
Objective TR-1.2: Encourage the development of . efficient transportation network
that minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, vehie miles traveled, and reduces the
demand for parking. (2008/4 & 2008/8)
Policy TR-1.2.1: The City will continue o promote the development of public and private
peripheral parking garages near the -xpressways and arterial entrances to downtown.
Policy TR-1.2.2: The City will
reliance on parking at satellit
express bus stops to redu
alternative travel modes.
ontinue to support the County's efforts to increase
ark -and -ride lots such as outlying Metrorail stations and
vehicle miles traveled downtown and promote the use of
Policy TR-1.2.3: Th: City will encourage that all roadway and transportation projects
use a context-sen ive approach to minimize impacts to neighborhoods by conserving
energy resource:, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and limiting air pollution. Priority
for funding sh-.uld be given to projects which support safety, reductions in greenhouse
gas emissis, reducing roadway congestion, and encourage multi-modalism. (200814
& 200818
Poli TR-1.2.4: The City will provide reduced, shared or alleviated parking
re• irements within the Land Development Regulations for developments located within
1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2 mile from Metrorail stations or Metromover station
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
68
(as illustrated in Appendix TR-1, Map TR-143.2, titled Centers and Transit Corridors.
Specific measures to accommodate this policy include:
A.The number of parking spaces required for new development and
redevelopment within a 1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2 mile from Metrorail
stations or Metromover stations will be reduced while limiting the maximu
number of allowable parking spaces.
B. New surface parking lots are discouraged to achieve the ultimate obje• ive of
reduced parking as a primary use within a 1/4 mile of transit corridoor 1/2
mile from Metrorail stations or Metromover stations.
Policy TR-1.2.5: The City will update the map on an annual basis to b-. cheduled by
the City of Miami depicting the location of existing and planned futu - major parking
facilities (200 or more parking spots), which will also be available for .ublic use through
the City of Miami website. Map TR-3 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and
Analysis section of this element illustrates the existing parkin • facilities (200 or more
parking spots) within the City.
Policy TR-1.2.6: The City will manage the downt• n parking supply through
enforcement of minimum and maximum on -site parki►. limitations, as provided for in
Section 14-182.
Policy TR-1.2.7: The City requires imple -ntation of "Transportation Control
Measures" such as those identified in 14-18and 14-182 of the City Code, including
future updates and expansion of recomr ended measures. The City encourages
developments to be innovative in prop -,sing Transportation Control Measures that
balance the objective of reducing conq tion and increasing person throughput with the
need to promote economic growth, t► facilitate local traffic circulation, and to encourage
public transportation use. (See Po cy TR-1.5.2.)
Policy TR-1.2.8: By the end o ! :2020, the City will develop a citywide transportation
master plan that prioritizes .rojects based on the needs to improve mobility, reduce
congestion, promote pus c transit, and support economic development and will be
updated concurrently h future updates to the Transportation Element of the MCNP.
(See Policy TR-2.1
Objective TR-1.3: dress the impact of new developments or redevelopment on
existing right-of-wy and transportation infrastructure prior to approving new
development or rdevelopment to ensure sustainable growth patterns.
Policy T '-1.3.1: The City will maintain, enforce, and where necessary revise, the
minim right-of-way requirements established in its City Code to ensure the continuity
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
69
SUBSTITUTED
and effectiveness of the thoroughfare network to support sustainable growth d
economic development.
Policy TR-1.3.2: The City will continue to maintain a comprehensive public ghts-of-
way improvements program to identify infrastructure needs especially . onq malor
commercial corridors and other areas within the City's Jurisdiction that h e high levels
of pedestrian activity.
Policy TR-1.3.3: The City will require a generalized Traffic Statem t documenting the
trip generation and site access for developments and redevelop ents that generate a
maximum of 20 new peak hour trips. A detailed Traffic a • Neighborhood Impact
Analysis will be required for developments and redevelopmes that generate more than
20 new peak hour trips. Determination of the number of ►-w peak hour trips projected
to result from the development will be calculated acco •ing to the latest version of the
ITE Trip Generation Manual. The detailed Traffic and leighborhood Impact Analysis will
require the applicant coordinate with the City to re-iew and approve methodology prior
to conducting any detailed traffic impact anal sis. Advance review of methodology
proposed is recommended to ensure the anal is addresses special circumstances and
characteristics of each unique developm: t such as parking, valet operations, and
queuing analysis. The City reserves t►e right to make changes to the proposed
methodology for the detailed Traffic .nd Neighborhood Impact Analysis or require
additional analysis on a case by ca basis.
Policy TR-1.3.3.1: By Dece ► ser 201;8, the City will formalize submittal procedures
in a manual to provide q •ance to applicants in preparing for advance reviews of
methodologies to be u ' d in their analyses. (See Policy TR-2.7.3. and CI-1.2.3.f.)
Policy TR-1.3.3.2: e City will require the implementation of transportation control
measures for all ► -w developments or redevelopment, including an implementation
plan and schele to enforce provision of such measures to mitigate traffic impacts
identified in e traffic analysis.
Policy 1.3.3.3: City of Miami Office of Transportation Management has the
discre on to request the applicant to submit Traffic Impact Studies and Traffic Study
Me odologies as necessary. The City's Office of Transportation Management may
r: .uest that these studies be sent to Miami Dade County Transportation, Miami
lade Public Works, or FDOT, or any combination of these agencies, for review or
feedback, prior to final City approval.
Ob'-ctive TR-1.4: Implement neiqhborhood traffic management and traffic calming
oqrams to protect and enhance the character of the city's residential neighborhoods
and neiqhborhood commercial corridors through coordination with the Future Land
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
70
SUBSTITUTED
Use Map, Land Development Regulations, and adopted Neighborhood plans d
recommendations.
Policy TR-1.4.1: The City will seek cooperative inter -local agreements LA, as
necessary, with Miami -Dade County and with the FDOT to ensure that the county and
State's transportation improvements are designed to minimize the intrusion of
commuter traffic on City residential streets, do not sever or fragm: t well-defined
neighborhoods, and do not result in major disruption to pedestrian affic. (See Policy
IC-3.1.3.)
Policy TR-1.4.2: As streets undergo major repairs or renov. on, the City will seek to
eliminate dirt shoulders and provide curbing, gutters, s •ewalks, crosswalks, and
bicycle facilities to improve the physical appearance, mo ility, and quality of the City's
neighborhoods and districts.
Policy TR-1.4.3: The City will continue to respo o to neighborhood traffic concerns
by developing and implementing neighborhood traffic calming measures using
standard traffic flow modification procedure in place by Miami -Dade County and
FDOT to evaluate traffic calming proposal:. Neiqhborhood traffic calming measures
may include but are not limited to traffic c cles, median modifications, mid -block raised
medians, chicanes, diagonal diverter , raised crosswalks, curb extensions, on -street
parking, road closures, reduced ne widths, streetscape improvements, bicycle
boulevards, and inclusion of bicy► e facilities.
Policy TR-1.4.4: In an effo► to better identify problems and select proper traffic
calming solutions in resi. •ntial neighborhoods to reduce traffic speeds and cut -
through traffic, the City ill encourage and promote more citizen and stakeholder
involvement to build s , •port for neighborhood traffic calming plans.
Objective TR-1.5: Impl • ment and monitor Transportation Control Measures in
coordination with of -r public agencies and private developers to reduce the
dependency on auto obiles and roadway congestion.
Policy TR-1 •.1: The City will support the County's efforts to increase the efficiency and
safety of t existing thorouqhfare network by improving and coordinating signal timinq,
providi • and promoting more transportation choices, and encouraging staggered work
sche• les.
P - icy TR-1.5.2: The City will require all new developments to implement transportation
ontrol measures in an effort to promote a general reduction in vehicular traffic by
increasing auto occupancy and transit ridership. These measures can include, but not
be limited to, parking management and ridesharinq programs to promote carpooling,
vanpoolinq, car sharing and use of hybrid or electric vehicles, transit discount and fare
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
71
SUBSTITUTED
subsidy programs, transit fare tax incentive programs, car charging stations, flexible
work hours, compressed work weeks, telecommutinq programs, the construction of on -
site transit shelters, transit amenities, transit stops, transit drop-off locations or pull-o
bays, bicycle storage facilities, bicycle share programs, and park -and -ride lots. :ee
Policy TR-1.2.7.)
Policy TR-1.5.3: The City will continue to utilize and coordinate with FD• 's South
Florida Commuter Services (SFCS) program to establish and implement transportation
demand manaqement strategies for all future and existing employers witmore than 50
employees. The City will lead by example in developing trans••rtation demand
management strategies for City employees. (See Policy IC-2.1.4.)
Policy TR-1.5.4: The City will continue to encourage large ployers such as the
University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Hea District/Civic Center
stakeholders, and other local facility operators to p.rticipate in transportation
management initiatives and strategies to help increase ansit ridership and decrease
the demand for surface parking in an effort to improv accessibility, traffic circulation,
and reduce parking problems.
Policy TR-1.5.5: The City will require new la •e-scale developments defined as all
projects that exceed 200,000 total square fe: and/or a minimum of 199 total dwelling
units to adopt and enforce measures tha will reduce the generation of new single -
occupant passenger car trips in areas of iqh-density development, and encourage the
use of high -occupant vehicles, includi • public transit, for home -based work trips.
Policy TR-1.5.6: The City will, pur ant to Chapter 163 of the State Statute, apply credit
against future transportation co currency requirements for property owners based on
the property owner's contrib ion of right-of-way that expands a state transportation
facility as set forth in a legbinding agreement with the City. (2007110)
Objective TR-1.6: All arteriand collector roadways within the City's boundaries will
operate at the acceptable - vels of service (LOS) established by the agency responsible
for maintenance.
Policy TR-1.6. Within its jurisdiction, the City has adopted FDOT's minimum vehicle -
trip LOS tar• -ts for State of Florida Strategic Intermodal
S stem—..'SIS roadwa s and non-SIS roadways to plan, design and operate at an
acceptae level of service for the traveling public during peak travel hours of "D" in
urban ed areas. The City of Miami recognizes that a number of facilities are
exp- riencing a level of service below this target and the following activities area planned
t• address substandard performance. , which state
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
72
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-1.6.1.1: The City will conduct a citywide visioning process to identify
specific multimodal strategies and projects in collaboration with its partner
agencies to identify remedial implementation plans for Complete Streets and
Transportation System Management & Operations projects and solutions with an
eve toward emerging technoloqies and communications.
Policy 1.6.1.2: Prepare a multimodal transportation master plan to identify ti ' ing
and cost associated with priority solutions vetted during the visioning proc: s.
Policy 1.6.1.3: Provide significant input to the next long-range transpo .tion plan
cycle to 2045 for projects and funding implications/strategies to ensu - successful
and timely implementation of priority projects.
1.6.1.1: Limitcd acccss FIHS highways will peratc at L S D . bcttcr. R adways
with cxclusivc thr u h Iancs may cratc at L S E.
1.6.1.2: C ntr Ilcd acccss FIHS highways will cratc L SE r bcttcr.
1.6.1.3: Whcrc F T has ctcrminc that a FIH r a way is c nstrainc r
back) ggcd, such r adways crating bcl w thf rcq in minimums must be
manaqcd s as n t t causc significant dctcrati n, which is dcfincd as an
avcragc annual daily traffic incrcasc in tw ay traffic v lumc f 10 crccnt r
m rc, r a 10 perccnt r qrcatcr rcduc ' n in peratinq spccd f r thc pock
irccti n in thc 1 th hi hcst h ur.
Policy TR-1.6.2: The City will continue to onitor these vehicle-tri LOS (as illustrated
in Map TR-8 of 44144 Appendix TR 1 - _ -- -_ --) and
recommend transportation control measures, signal improvements and management
strategies for t cnsurc that all ro--dways (SIS and non-SIS) within the City. n t
dctcri ratc by rccommcndinq an im Icmcntinq thc trans rtati n c ntr I mcasurcs.
Policy TR-1.6.3: The City w retain the level of service target for urbanized areas as
outlined in FDOT Plannin; Topic No. 525-000-006a for SIS facilities to be a level of
service "D" during peak ravel hours for automobiles. Quality/level of service for other
highway modes on S : facilities (e.g. bus, pedestrian, bicycle) will be determined on a
case by case basis
Policy TR-1.6.- . Person Trip LOS methodology is not applicable for SIS facilities. The
vehicle -trip LS measures will be applied to all evaluations of SIS facilities and any other
facilities of tate importance.
Objective T--1.7: Utilize the person -trip methodology when evaluating new downtown
developm is and redevelopment's impact on the local roadway level of service.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
73
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-1.7.1: The City's updated Person -Trip LOS will be implemented for n%n-SIS
local roadways in Centers (as depicted on Map TR-143.2 within Appendix -1, the
Data Inventory and Analysis section). Within these non-SIS roadways, the 'erson-Trip
LOS methodology will only be applied to those non-SIS Centers and Tr. sit Corridors
a within the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Increment I (DDRI III) and
the Southeast Overtown Park West DRI Increment III (SEOPW RI III). Non-SIS
Centers and Transit Corridors feature frequent tr, sit service Oefined
as transit routes a with cumulative transit hea ays of 10 minutes or
less a and access to bicycle facilities.
Policy TR-1.7.2: The City will utilize a tiered LOS an, ysis when reviewing traffic
impacts for new developments whereby the Person -Tr'. LOS methodology will only be
applied within areas identified as a Center whit- the traditional automobile LOS
methodology will be applied to all other areas wit n the City. Both methodologies are
then expressed as a ratio corresponding to lett: grades LOS A through LOS F based
on the volume -to -capacity ratio in the same anner as used by the traditional LOS
methodology. Both the Person -Trip LOS . d traditional automobile LOS may, at the
discretion of the City, require the analys of traffic impacts during periods traditionally
defined as non -peak. (See CI-1.2.3.f.)
Policy TR-1.7.3: When calculat''q person -trip volumes for the existing conditions,
proiected conditions without t development, and proiected conditions with the
development, the Person -Tr'. LOS will use roadway average annual daily traffic
(AADT), an assumed aut• obile occupancy rate of 4=4 people per automobile (as
defined in Trans rtati Corri rs: Mcctin. thc Challcn c f Gr wth Mana cmcnt in
the appropriate Development of Regional Impact Increment
for that proiect area) possible combined trip reduction rate that reflects pedestrian and
bicycle mode spli based on recent U.S. Census American Community Survey data or
locally -specific avel surveys),
crs n tri .;citics, thc Pcrs n Tri L S willl use cxistin r a way ca ;city a iustc
van cc 'ancv ratc f 1.4 an cxistin transit ca ;city ata. (Scc A cn ix TR 1, thc
ata invr° t an analysis cha to f thc Trans rtati n Elcmcnt f ram rc ctailc
cscr'-ti n f thc Pcrs n Tri L S mcth I y an thc v Iumc-t ca ;city f rmula).
anexisting transit ridership. When calculating the person trip capacities, the Person
Tp LOS shall use existing roadway capacity adjusted by an occupancy rate and
existing transit capacity data. (See Appendix TR-1 for Data Inventory and Analysis.)
Policy TR-1.7.4: Issuance of development orders for new development or significant
expansion of existing development will be contingent upon development of an approved
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
74
SUBSTITUTED
mitigation plan for areas at LOS E (100 percent of capacity) standard or beyond
centers, transit corridors, and all other areas. (See CI-1.2.3.f.)
Policy TR-1.7.5: The City will continue to monitor, and will update by Decem►-r 2018,
the Person -Trip Methodology and designation of transit corridors (as illustr, ed in Map
TR-134.2 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section This update
will include adjustment for modal splits and improvements or changes r, existing transit
services and bicycle facilities to better identify, describe, measure and evaluate the
multimodal transit corridors, facilities and terminals.
Policy TR-1.7.6: Person Trip Methodology is not applicable f.r SIS facilities. Instead,
the traditional automobile level of service methodology tha easures vehicle trips will
be used to evaluate SIS facilities and other facilities of ste importance.
Future updates will also consider changes in existin• and future land use, population
density, economic activity, housing, business type . d quality, and neighborhood plans.
As a component of this effort, the City will ass how the Person -Trip Methodology
could be enhanced to identify projected trans' eeds and programming on a route-bv-
route basis in coordination with the MPO an Miami -Dade County.
GOAL TR-2: PROVIDE A BALANCED, ACCES = LE, SAFE, AND SUSTAINABLE MULTI -
MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LINK G HIGHWAYS, TRANSIT, GREENWAYS,
BIKEWAYS, AND SIDEWALKS INTO A SEAM SS NETWORK
Objective TR-2.1: Integrate the exis " q and planned multi -modal transportation system
with existing and future develop ' ents.
Policy TR-2.1.1: The ty will regularly coordinate information provided in the
Transportation Elemen ith the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use
element. See Polic LU 1.1.114, including coordination with the land use maps,
population densit '-s, housinq, employment patterns, projected development and
redevelopment, rban infill, and other similar characteristics of land use that have an
impact on tra portation.
Policy T 2.1.2: The City will assist Miami -Dade County in developing the premium
transit , ojects identified in the MPO's Lonq Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) within
the y limits. The City will utilize land development regulations and other incentives to
he • direct development where it will best support existing and planned transit services.
ee Policy IC-2.1.5.)
Policy TR-2.1.3: The City will encourage increased density of development within
walking distance of transit corridors and Metrorail stations (as referenced in Policy LU-
1.1.10. and HO-1.1.9).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 75
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-2.1.4: The City will ensure a strong interface between (re)developments and
the public transportation system by &stab-4144g encouraging Multimodal Desi•n
Guidelines listed below that emphasize improved connectivity between transit faciliti
and (re)developments and incorporate a balanced streetscape design proara to
consider the followin• :
A. Encouraging development of a wide variety of residential and non---sidential
land -uses and activities in nodes around rapid transit stations to pv•duce short
trips, minimize transfers, attract transit ridership, and p •mote transit
operational and financial efficiencies. The particular uses thare approved in
a given station area should respect the character of the ne-,rby neighborhood,
strive to serve the needs of the neighborhood, and pr , ote balance in the
range of existing and planned land uses along the su•'-ct transit line.
B. Accommodate new development around rapid t nsit stations that is well
designed, conducive to both pedestrian and trsit use, and architecturally
attractive.
C. In recognition that many transit riders begi
pedestrian accommodations will include,
to the transit station, small blocks an
oriented to the street or other pede
the rear and sides of buildings, pri
or transit stop as to the parkin
protection for pedestrians. 0
transit new non-residential
residential buildings, an
at least one full-time b
the street and is co
the primary parki
nd end their trips as pedestrians,
s appropriate, continuous sidewalks
closely intersecting streets, buildings
Ian paths, parking lots predominantly to
ary building entrances as close to the street
ot, shade trees, awnings and other weather
all arterial and collector streets served by public
ildinqs and substantial alterations to existing non-
residential buildings wherever practical will provide
ding entrance that is recognizable and accessible from
arable as close to the street and/or transit stop as it is to
lot.
D. New residenti. and non-residential developments, subdivisions and replats
will provide •r buildings that front the transit street, or provide streets or
pedestria connections that intersect with the transit street in close proximity
to trans stops not more than 700 feet apart.
E. New esidential and non-residential developments, subdivisions, and replats
wi provide for bicycle and pedestrian connections that intersect with the transit
reet in close proximity to transit stops.
Redevelopment of property within one-half mile of existing and planned transit
stations and bus routes will not cause an increase in walking distance from
nearby areas to the transit services and will, wherever practical, be done in a
manner that reduces walking distances and is comfortable and attractive to
pedestrians.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 76
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
G. Land uses that are not conducive to public transit ridership such as car
dealerships, car -oriented food establishments, and container yards should not
be permitted to locate or expand within one -quarter mile of a rapid transit
station.
H. Increase the density of development within walking distance of rapid trans
stations in a manner appropriate to the particular setting of each transit sta '•n
and existing abutting residential neighborhoods are to be protecte• and
preserved.
I. Encouraqe incorporation of transit stations within private development to
integrate access to alternative modes with direct access and sy -rgies within
new mixed use developments. This includes the co -location of ransit stations
and public common areas of private developments.. (See P•licv LU-1.1.19.)
Policy TR-2.1.5: The City will encourage the utilization of Road/ obility Impact Fees on
arterials/collectors, transit projects and bicycle facilities within e City, and will include
said projects in the LRTP. (See Policy TR-2.2.5.) (2013113)
Policy TR-2.1.6: The City will respect the character o existing neiqhborhoods when
establishing design guidelines for connectivity an► transit infrastructure that are
incorporated into future development/redevelopme programs.
Policy TR-2.1.7: The City will encourage Mia► 1-Dade Transit to prioritize its transit
facility and service improvements along ide- ified transit corridors and adjacent to
Metrorail stations.
Policy TR-2.1.8: The Transportation El- ent will be updated, at a minimum, every five
years and will utilize a long range pla ing horizon of a minimum of 20 years in order to
achieve the maximum consistency ith the MPO's LRTP. (200818)
Objective TR-2.2: Promote and enc • raqe a balanced multimodal transportation system
that provides a variety of conn - ted transportation options to improve mobility and
accessibility for residents and isitors of all aqes.
Policy TR-2.2.1: The ity will continue to foster the development of bicycle and
pedestrian friendly neighborhoods and commercial centers that enhance the
environment, impr, e public health, and overall quality of life.
Policy TR-2.2 : The City will use its land development regulations to designate space
in the publi right-of-way to accommodate alternative travel modes, including transit,
pedestria► , bicycles, and shared transportation options consistent with the Miami -Dade
County omplete Streets Manual.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
77
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-2.2.3: The City will continue to support the trolley system (as illustrate. in
Map TR-5.2 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section that
provides feeder services and first-mile/last-mile connections to regional, premiu ' transit
options such as Metrorail, Metromover, and Tri-Rail.
Policy TR-2.2.4: The City will seek to improve mobility by funding the c►st of studies,
plans, programs, and physical improvements identified in its Capital Im► ovement plans
utilizinq funds provided throuqh the People's Transportation Plan, e Transportation
Trust Fund, and other funds collected with the sole purpo of improving the
transportation network. (2013113)
Policy TR-2.2.5: By December 2020, the City will seek t► study and determine the
feasibility of establishing a mobility impact fee that w• Id be collected to fund or
supplement the cost of transportation system imovements including potential
investments in the expansion of the Miami Trolley complete streets improvements,
enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities, wat- taxi services, Light Rail/Streetcar
plans, and other transportation improvements id • ntified in future plans. (See Policy TR-
2.1.5.) (2013/13)
Policy TR-2.2.6: The City will encouraq: iami-Dade County to support cooperation
with private transportation network oviders in the enhanced delivery of public
transportation services.
Policy TR-2.2.7: The City will s •port Miami -Dade County's plans for the provision of
water taxi services along Bisc. ne Bay and the Miami River at a minimum.
Policy TR-2.2.8: The City II regularly monitor transportation trends on an annual basis
using indicators such a ransit ridership, jobs/housing balance, mode split, and motor
vehicle registrations.
Policy TR-2.2.9: e City will consider the income, age, ability, and vehicle ownership
patterns of pop .tions throughout the city when developing transportation systems and
facilities impr► ements so that all residents, especially those most in need, have access
to a wide r ge of affordable travel options.
Policy R-2.2.10: The City will continue to seek funding opportunities to implement the
plan -d Light Rail that connects downtown to Midtown and support the regional effort
for connections to the City of Miami Beach. The alignment for this Beach Connection
service is illustrated in Map TR-23 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and
Analysis section.
Policy TR-2.2.11: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County to implement
resiliency policies to mitigate and protect vulnerable roadways and critical evacuation
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 78
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
routes (illustrated in Maps TR-15 and TR-11 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Invent►,ry
and Analysis section respectively) within the City. (See Policy IC-2.1.6.)
Policy TR-2.2.12: The City will encourage the coordination of the intermodsurface
and water transportation access service to the Port of Miami River Workin• aterfront
(See Policy PA-3.2.1.and Policy IC-2.1.30.)
Objective TR-2.3: Continue to support, promote, and impleme Complete Streets
improvements along City roadways consistent with adjacent lan
Policy TR-2.3.1: By nocombor 202n +The City will cv•
streetscape desiqn program that accommodates all ro
attention to non -vehicular modes by focusing on Ian
scaled lighting, and the construction of sidewalks a
These improvements will be coordinated with m
use and context.
encoura e a balanced
way users and pays special
caging treatments, pedestrian-
d bicycle paths along city streets.
r repairs, roadway resurfacinq, and
other renovations when possible. (See Policy T''-2.1.41
Policy TR-2.3.2: The City will prioritize he implementation of Complete Streets
improvements for roadways that lead to ransit nodes, are within transit corridors, or
connect to bicycle/pedestrian paths (i. - Miami River Greenway, Baywalk, Underline,
Overtown Greenway) to improve ro..way safety, reduce conflicts among transportation
modes, and to better connect su oundinq developments and neighborhoods. These
improvements will be impleme -d with all appropriate phases of roadway projects and
will include enhanced tran infrastructure and amenities, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities, landscaping, stre scapinq, and traffic calming.
Policy TR-2.3.3: The ' itv will prioritize bicycle facilities that are protected as a means
of providing safe bic le facilities for cyclists of all ages and abilities.
Objective TR-2.4: Th City will seek opportunities to improve access to transit and
improve regional obility by coordinating with other local transportation agencies,
plans, and initiat" es.
Policy -2.4.1: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County's SMART Plan, which
spec' ally aims to provide premium transit service along roadways in the City including
Bis'avne Boulevard and West Flagler Street. (See Policy IC-2.1.7.)
olicy TR-2.4.2: To improve regional mobility, the City will regularly coordinate with, but
not limited to, Miami -Dade County, FDOT, MPO, South Florida Regional Transportation
Authority (SFRTA), the Port of Miami, the Miami River Commission, the Miami
International Airport and other public agencies to ensure that future improvements to the
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
79
SUBSTITUTED
transportation network within the City from these agencies' are consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the City of Miami's MCNP. (See Policy IC-2.1.8.)
Policy TR-2.4.3: The City will improve transportation connections to urban centers fr%m
all neighborhoods, particularly by providing a variety of affordable travel oions
(pedestrian, transit, and bicycle facilities) and by being attentive to the n-eds of
vulnerable and historically marginalized populations.
Policy TR-2.4.4: The City will improve connections to transit by prioritizin• sidewalk and
bicycle infrastructure investments adjacent to transit routes, bus s %ps, and transit
stations that also improve safety and comfort for transit users. Tr -se infrastructure
investments should include, but are not limited to, bike racks, ex sive protected bike
lanes, street furnishings, street trees, enhanced crosswalks, pe
and wayfindinq signage.
estrian-scaled lighting,
Policy TR-2.4.5: The City will continue to coordinate wit SFRTA, FDOT, Miami -Dade
County, and other local agencies to support and deve •p plans to implement the FEC
Coastal Link Commuter Rail. (See Policy IC-2.1.9.)
Policy TR-2.4.6: The City will coordinate its tra portation planning activities with the
annual update to the MPO's Five -Year Transp•rtation Improvement Program (TIP) and
their LRTP update. (See Policy IC-2.1.10.) 007/2)
Policy TR-2.4.7: The City will require all re)development in existing and planned transit
corridors to be well designed and con. Give to pedestrian and transit use. In recognition
that many transit riders begin nd end their trips as pedestrians, pedestrian
accommodations will be made th, include, as appropriate, continuous sidewalks to the
transit station, small blocks anclosely intersecting streets, buildings that front the street
or other pedestrian paths, p king lots predominantly to the rear and sides of buildings,
primary building entranc-: as close to the street or transit stop as to the parking lot,
shade trees, awnings .' d other weather protection for pedestrians.
Policy TR-2.4.8: e City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to
promote public transit and shared transportation services by educatinq and informing
the public of th- e services via app-based technologies, informative websites, and other
means of comunication to increase transit ridership. (See Policy IC-2.11.)
Policy "-2.4.9: The City will publish an annual list compiling the programmed transit-
relat-. improvements from MDT's Transit Development Plan (TDP) and the MPO's
L P and TIP that are within the City and will include this information on the City's
ebsite.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
80
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-2.4.10: The City will regularly coordinate with other agencies to market and
promote the use of multimodal transportation options using social media, educational
opportunities, and any other form of public outreach. (See Policy IC-2.1.12.)
Objective TR-2.5: Develop and expand the public transit system within the City as par
of its multi -modal transportation network to improve the efficiency, reliability, a ' d
overall level of service for public transit.
Policy TR-2.5.1: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade C%unty to
improve the east -west transit services within the City to alleviate traffic cong-:tion. (See
Policy IC-2.1.13.)
Policy TR-2.5.2: The City will support provisions for transit passen• r amenities that
enhance convenience such as real-time bus arrival information, elters, clear route
siqnaqe, adequate pedestrian -scaled lighting, and pre -boarding f e payment systems.
These improvements will be prioritized within transit corrithrs and near Metrorail
stations.
Policy TR-2.5.3: The City will require that transit facilitie , such as turn -out bays, transit
priority signals, high -occupancy vehicle lanes, bus •nly lanes, and transit shelter
locations, be included in roadway design proposs, as appropriate, especially for
proposals within transit corridors or in close to pr• imity to transit stations.
Policy TR-2.5.4: The City will continue to oordinate with Miami -Dade County to
address the transit needs consistent with .nsit planning guidelines while considering
population growth trends within the Cit and the metropolitan area. (See Policy IC-
2.1.14.)
Policy TR-2.5.5: The City will oordinate annually with Miami -Dade County on
improving the efficiency of its p •Iic bus transit system, including new service and the
expansion of neighborhood-b-.sed local circulator services to promote alternative travel
modes within the TCEA. (S-e Policy IC-2.1.27.) (2005/6)
Objective TR-2.6: Design, •romote, and maintain an efficient and interconnected
roadway system that acc 'dmmodates pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as part
of its multi -modal tran • ortation network.
Policy TR-2.6 : The City will encourage Miami -Dade County and FDOT to include
improved c nections between all modes of transportation, with emphasis on
connectio to non -motorized modes, as they are implementing transportation
enhanc ments within City boundaries.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
81
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-2.6.2: The City, in coordination with FDOT, Miami -Dade County and e
MPO, will continue to develop and encourage more bicycle paths, protected b''ycle
lanes, bicycle boulevards, cycle tracks, and sharrows throughout the City to exp: nd the
bicycle network and connect any qaps while promoting alternative travel m•des. The
City will also promote the implementation of enhanced bicycle amenities sut as bicycle
racks, lockers and bicycle wayfindinq signage that helps to encourage m. e bicycle use.
Map TR-6 (within Appendix TR-1) illustrates the existing bicycle fac ties in the City.
(See Policy IC-2.1.15.)
Policy TR-2.6.3: The City will in coordination with Miami-D.oe Transit and FDOT
develop, prioritize, and implement sidewalk and bicycle infrast cture improvements that
are adjacent to transit routes/corridors and transit stons in order to improve
connectivity between transit and other non -motorized ► odes of transportation while
promoting the use of alternative travel modes. (See P. icy IC-2.1.16.)
Objective TR-2.7: Encourage transit -supportive de elopment patterns that promote
walkable, mixed use neighborhoods that help t. increase transit ridership, reduce
automobile trips, and provide increased mobilit for all people.
Policy TR-2.7.1: The City will preclude I. d uses within 1/2 mile of a transit corridors,
Metrorail stations, and Metromover s ions that are not conducive to public transit
ridership such as car dealerships, ' ar-oriented food establishments, and container
yards. Conversely, the City will s , •port the expanded development and design of a
transit system that helps shape e desired land use patterns.
Policy TR-2.7.2: The City w regularly coordinate with Miami -Dade County to improve
the efficiency of its public transit system by supporting transit -oriented development
policies and promoting e use of alternative travel modes within the City. (See Policy
IC-2.1.17.
Policy TR-2.7.3: he City will conduct appropriate land use and zoning analysis of the
areas surroun.'ng each transit station area and transit corridor in order to determine
whether appropriate land use and zoning changes should be implemented that foster
transit -on : ted development (as defined by Section 163.3164 F.S.) while protecting the
adjace neighborhoods from incompatible development. Such land use and zoning
chant -s will include minimum and maximum density and intensity standards at the time
of i plementation. The City will consider the height, density, intensity, use and scale of
-w developments when determininq the compatibility with existing neighborhoods.
(See Policy TR-1.3.3.)
Policy TR-2.7.4: The City will require site and building design for new developments
within a half mile of a Metrorail station or transit corridor to be coordinated with public
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
82
SUBSTITUTE
transit, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. Requirements may include, but not be limi -d
to, pedestrian crossings, access to transit stations, access to transit vehicles, t :nsit
vehicle access to buildings, transfer centers, shelters, sidewalks, dedicated •icycle
lanes and shared -use paths, bicycle racks, and wayfindinq signage.
Policy TR-2.7.5: Through its Land Development Regulations, the City I continue to
control the mix, type, density and design of activity centers and grow corridors that
promote and facilitate walking, bicycling and the use of public transportation.
Policy TR-2.7.6: The City will work with Miami -Dade County • promote the transit -
oriented development (TOD) policies found in the Miami -Dade ' ounty's Comprehensive
Development Master Plan (CDMP) to support the TCEA as • -fined in Section 163.3164
(46) F.S, (2011132), as well as illustrated in Appendix T' 1 Map 143.2, titled Centers
and Transit Corridors. (See Policy IC-2.1.28.)
Objective TR-2.8: Enhance safety and minimize
nflicts between all modes of
transportation through engineering, education, and nforcement best practices.
Policy TR-2.8.1: The City will promote the ultimodal transportation initiatives and
recommendations from the adopted Miami iowntown Transportation Master Plan that
aim to rebalance downtown roadways t• and transit, pedestrians, and cyclists as well
as enhancing safety and walkability th •ugh the implementation of a Pedestrian Priority
Zone including design elements sucas the following:
• Clear, unobstructed pe• -strian paths on all sidewalks
• Perpendicular curb r PS at all intersections
• Crosswalks at all i ersections
• Automatic coun -.own timers with more crossing time at all traffic controlled
intersections
• Appropriat- ane widths for driving lanes, turning lanes, and sharrow lanes
• Sidewal .ulbouts where feasible at all street intersections with curb radii not
excee► ng 15 feet
• Mid •lock lighting
• S' ade tree canopy on all sidewalks that consider width of passage, adjacent
•uildinq canopies, overhangs, or other architectural devices that provide
shade
• Travel speeds and turning movement design as appropriate to intersection
• Seating areas at transit stops
Policy TR-2.8.2: Through coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, the City will
continue to support the monitoring of "high crash" locations on city streets and identify
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
83
SUBSTITUTED
design improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions, especially to pedestrians
and bicyclists. The City will utilize safety as an evaluation criterion when improvements
are prioritized and incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Element.
Policy TR-2.8.3: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe s tem
for pedestrian access by adhering to design standards and procedures which omply
with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Policy TR-2.8.4: The City will continue to provide a properly designed a i safe system
for controlling vehicular accessibility to major thoroughfares by adheri to the adopted
design standards and procedures applicable to the agency with j isdiction over the
roadway facility, which at a minimum addresse6:
• Adequate storage and turning bays;
• Spacing and design of median openings and curb ts;
• Provision of service roads along major thoroughfares, where applicable;
• Driveway access and spacing; and
• Traffic operations, including the provision o urninq bays and bus bays for bus
transit.
Policy TR-2.8.5: Through its Land Develop 'ent Regulations, the City will ensure that
blocks are easily walkable to maximize . -destrian and bicycle access to the transit
station areas and beyond.
Policy TR-2.8.6: To improve pedest an mobility, for all new/(re)development, provide
pedestrian access for building f •ntages in accordance with Land Development
Regulations.
Policy TR-2.8.7: Through i : Land Development Regulations, the City will, where
appropriate, designate pri► ary and secondary streets so that most buildings are
oriented to primary stre s to create superior pedestrian environments while service
functions such as parki-q and loading can be accommodated along secondary streets.
Policy TR-2.8.8: B - December 2020, the City will develop a modal hierarchy for all
street classificati• s within the City that prioritizes the use by pedestrians, bicyclists,
transit riders, a motorists. This modal hierarchy will be used to determine the types of
Complete Str-ets accommodations that will be provided within each street classification.
Objective TR-2 :: Provide a safe and effective bikeway/sidewalWgreenway network that
advances healthy lifestyles, improves quality of life, better links oriqins and
destinatio s, and provides alternative mode choices to automobile trips.
P • Iicy TR-2.9.1: The City will continue to support the implementation of the Underline,
he Ludlam Trail, and other `preen corridors', which aim to improve the local bicycle
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
84
SUBSTITUTED
network with enhanced amenities that encourage a more active, healthy lifestyle and
the use of alternative modes of transportation. (2011/53)
Policy TR-2.9.2: The City will continue to support the implementation of the Riverwalk
and Baywalk initiatives, whose goal is to improve access to Biscayne Bay and the Miami
River, by coordinating with the development community to obtain easements along t
Miami River and Biscayne Bay to connect any gaps in the Riverwalk and Ba alk
alignments.
Policy TR-2.9.3: The City will work with the MPO to develop a comprehen ve active
transportation plan for Miami that integrates bicycle, pedestrian, a greenway
components by conducting a network gap analysis and developing a li: of prioritized
projects based on objective criteria. These criteria should include r..d classification;
proximity to transit stops and park -and -ride lots; proximity to schools, parks, or other
public facilities; proximity to activity centers and transit corridors. onsideration of high -
crash locations; potential to connect gaps in existing sidewalk, • eenway, and other non -
motorized transportation network. (See Policy IC-2.1.18.)
Policy TR-2.9.4: The City will require that sidewalks another essential non -motorized
amenities and facilities be included in development • ans prior to receiving approval
from the City.
Policy TR-2.9.5: The City will prioritize enh,ncements of pedestrian and bicycle
circulation, access, and safety in the down •wn, near activity centers, along transit
corridors, near schools, libraries, and park
Policy TR-2.9.6: The City will req - re that pedestrian mobility be included in
Maintenance -of -Traffic (MOT) revie
Policy TR-2.9.7: The City will co
the City's thoroughfares strat
trips and to encouraqe walki
rdinate with Miami -Dade County and FDOT to design
ically to disperse and reduce the length of automobile
and bicycling. (See Policy IC-2.1.19.)
Policy TR-2.9.8: The Ci i will encourage the provision of bicycle support facilities, such
as secured bicycle r s, personal lockers and showers for new and existing office
developments and : ployment centers to encourage bicycling as an alternative mode
for work commut
Policy TR-2.:.9: The City will include the expansion and continuity of the bicycle
network in apital protects city-wide with a focused emphasis on areas within transit
corridors n an effort to reduce the reliance on automobiles and encourage the use of
altern, ive modes of transportation.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
85
SUBSTIT TED
Policy TR-2.9.10: The City will remove barriers that prevent the connection of exis ' g
bicycle and pedestrian facilities, which include but are not limited to railroad corr 4 ors,
inadequate roadway conditions, physical obstructions and unsafe conditions to ossing
the Miami River, and other physical and psychological barriers. The City w work to
connect the gaps in the existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities as illustred in Maps
TR-6 and TR-7, within Appendix TR-1.
Policy TR-2.9.11: The City will, in coordination with the MPO, FDO , and Miami -Dade
County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensur- onsistency with the
LRTP. (See Policy IC-2.1.20.)
Policy TR-2.9.12: The City will work to improve its status .s a bicycle -friendly city as
defined by the League of American Bicyclists.
Objective TR-2.10: Integrate innovative technologie- to improve the transportation
network.
Policy TR-2.10.1: Through the use and in -gration of cell phone and app-based
technologies and in coordination with othe public and private agencies, the City will
seek to provide real-time travel information to roadway users regarding City services
such as parking availability, trolley arr' al information, traffic congestion updates, and
other transportation related informati• . The City will aim to build on the individual efforts
of universities, the commercial s- ared-ride sector, commercial data aggregators to
generate improved real-time inf• mation for public consumption.
Policy TR-2.10.2: The Cit ill, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
leverage technology to • ovide user-friendly trip planning services that include all
transportation modes. ( ee Policy IC-2.1.21.)
Policy TR-2.10.3: T e City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
promote and shar' all existing transportation -related data, sources, and tools to the
public in an effor to create an open and user-friendly data repository that could be used
for analysis a + future private or public technology development that aims to improve
the efficien - of the transportation network. (See Policy IC-2.1.22.)
Policy T'-2.10.4: The City will encourage the use and proliferation of electric vehicles
for Ci 1 fleet vehicles and personal automobile, and will promote electric vehicle
rec :rqe stations in parking qaraqes, park and ride lots, surface parking lots, and
strategic on -street parking locations.
olicy TR-2.10.5: The City will seek opportunities to further the implementation of
automated and connected vehicle communications technology for City fleet vehicles and
personal automobiles to address congestion and safety issues.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
86
SUBSTITUTED
Policy TR-2.10.6: In coordination with Miami -Dade County, FDOT, and other pu► is
agencies, the City will facilitate the development and maintenance of real-time affic
and traveler data that helps monitor the overall transportation system and eva ate its
performance. This information should be made available to the public and : ould be
delivered to users in a familiar way that promotes data sharing, thus benefit' g the wider
community. (See Policy IC-2.1.23.)
Objective TR-2.11: Regularly update necessary data to improve t e transportation
network's mobility, safety, and accessibility.
Policy TR-2.11.1: The City will, in coordination with Miami-1.de County and FDOT,
regularly collect necessary data for better estimating ve cle occupancy rates and
means of travel pursuant to updating the person -trip m: hodoloqy as required. (See
Policy IC-2.1.24.)
Policy TR-2.11.2: The City will, in coordination h Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
periodically collect bicycle and pedestrian co ' t data throughout the City to better
understand and analyze the use and demd of the non -motorized transportation
network and to develop and implement i .rovement projects based on needs. (See
Policy IC-2.1.25.)
Policy TR-2.11.3: The City will, in 'oordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT,
identify any transit service adjust ►ents and improvements to the bicycle network as to
maintain an updated understan• nq of the existing transit corridors for the interpretation
and implementation of the pe' on -trip LOS methodology. (See Policy IC-2.1.26.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
87
SUBSTITUTED
PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES
Port of Miami
Goal PA-1: Ensure that the development and expansion of Miami -Dade County's Port of Miami
is compatible with and furthers the physical development of Miami's greater downt n area
while mitigating negative impacts to neighborhoods, yet protecting the Port's economic
function, operation, and potential improvements.
Objective PA-1.1: The City of Miami, through its land development regulations, shall
coordinate land use in areas of the city adjacent to the Port c'r Miami with the
transportation related activity which occurs within the port to ens .re compatibility and
complementary land uses and activities while mitigating egative impacts to
neighborhoods, yet protecting the Port's economic function, peration, and potential
improvements.
Policy PA-1.1.1: The City of Miami shall, through it and development regulations,
encourage facility improvement which will further b• the land development, coastal
management and conservation goals and objectives of the City of Miami and the port
development goals of Miami -Dade County and t - Port of Miami.
Policy PA-1.1.2: The City shall, through its ;and development regulations, encourage
the availability of an adequate amount of commercial and industrial land to complement
planned expansions of port activity, and will establish a "free trade zone" within adequate
proximity to the Port of Miami.
Policy PA-1.1.3: All surface tan ortation improvements providing access to the Port
must be compatible with the ne s, goals and objectives of the City of Miami as related
to the development of the g ater downtown area, and such improvements will be
financed with an appropriat share of County, state and federal funds.
Policy PA-1.1.4The Po shall prepare guidelines that will serve as design criteria for
the construction, ren ation and landscaping of its facilities and such guidelines must
comply with all City f Miami Code requirements.
Policy PA-1.1.;a. The City shall, through its land development regulations, cooperate
with Miami-D e County and its Port of Miami operation to mitigate adverse structural
and non-structural impacts from the Port of Miami upon adjacent natural resources and
land use
Poli PA-1.1.6: The City shall, through its land development regulations, cooperate
wit Miami -Dade County and its Port of Miami operation to protect and conserve natural
ources.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
88
SUBSTITUTED
Miami International Airport
Goal PA-2: Ensure that the development and expansion of Miami -Dade County's Miami
International Airport is compatible with and furthers the physical development of the City of
Miami.
Objective PA-2.1: The City of Miami, through its land development regulations, shall
coordinate land use in areas of the city adjacent to Miami International Airport with the
transportation related activity which occurs within that facility to ensure compatible and
complimentary land uses and activities. Through such land development r gulations,
the City will mitigate negative impacts to neighborhoods that might result rom airport
activities, while protecting the airport's economic function, operation and potential
improvements.
Policy PA-2.1.1: The City of Miami shall, through its land devlopment regulations,
encourage facility improvement which will further both the land development, coastal
management and conservation goals and objectives of th City of Miami and the
development goals of Miami -Dade County and Miami Inter tional Airport.
Policy PA-2.1.2: All surface transportation improvem .nts providing access to Miami
International Airport and impacting upon transportati within the City of Miami must be
compatible with the needs, goals and objectives of t e City and such improvements will
be financed with the appropriate share of County, state and federal funds.
Policy PA-2.1.3: The City shall, through its Land development regulations, ensure that
zoning within the city protects existing aviation flight paths.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
89
SUBSTITUT
Port of Miami River1 Sub -Element
Goal PA-3: The Port of Miami River shall be encouraged to continue operation as a alued
and economically viable component of he City's maritime industrial base.
Objective PA-3.1: (PLANNING AND ZONING). The City shall protect the P•rt of Miami
River from encroachment by non water -dependent or non water -related : nd uses, and
shall regulate the Port of Miami River's expansion and redevelopmen n coordination
with applicable future land use and coastal management goals, objec es, policies (See
Policy LU-1.3.3 and Goal CM-3).
Policy PA-3.1.1: The City shall maintain a Working Waterfr. t Table of Properties to
guide future development within the Miami River Corridor. T e Table shall clearly depict
the location and description of all properties of recreatial and commercial working
waterfront uses on the River, as defined in Ch. 342.07, .S. (hereinafter referenced as
the "Working Waterfront"). The Table shall classify orking waterfront properties into
Categories "A" and "B". The Table shall be incorpor, ed as supporting data and analysis
within Appendix PA-1.
Policy PA-3.1.2 Category A: The City may . •opt a comprehensive plan future land use
map (FLUM) amendment for properties de gnated "Industrial" on the FLUM, along the
Miami River only if the proposed amend ;r-nt complies with this sub -element. The future
land use designation for any of the . operties identified "Industrial" therein may be
amended only through the large- ale comprehensive plan amendment process.
Applications for such amendme s shall demonstrate that either of the following
conditions exists:
1. The Development — redevelopment as industrial is not economically feasible
based on a ' arket and site analysis using a professionally acceptable
methodology that has been peer reviewed; or
2. The Pr •osal includes an equivalent transfer or expansion of industrially
desi� ated property offsite to another location on the Miami River within
the City of Miami.
Policy PA--.1.3 Category B: All Category "B" properties shall maintain a working
waterfron se. Additionally, the City shall require that any residential development with
a densi - greater than duplex residential or any mixed use development include Working
Wate►" ont use component per Ch. 342.07, F.S. or other amenities that is accessible to
the •ublic which promotes the enjoyment of the Miami River unless prohibited by the
Ms:mi-Dade Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM).
1 The "Pod of -mi River" is a shallow draft riverine port consisting of independent, privately -owned small shipping companies, fisheries, vessel repair
facilities mar as and other Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront uses, as defined in Ch. 342.07, F.S., located along the banks of the
Miami Riveand its tributaries and canals where Working Waterfront uses are located. The Port of Miami River is not a deepwater port as defined in
Ch. 403.r 1(9), F.S. The Port of Miami River extends from the salinity dam in unincorporated Miami -Dade County to Biscayne Bay in the City of
Miami, :s identified in Appendix PA-1.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
90
SUBSTITUT
Policy PA-3.1.4: The City shall encourage the establishment and maintenan
Working Waterfront uses along the banks of the Miami River, and to disc
encroachment by incompatible uses.
u
of
rage
Policy PA-3.1.5: The City shall encourage the development and expansi• of the Port
of Miami River Working Waterfront consistent with the future Ian, use, coastal
management and conservation elements of the City's comprehensive Ian.
Policy PA-3.1.6: The City shall encourage only those develop ents, rezoning, and
land use amendments in the vicinity of the Working Wate ont lands designated
"Industrial" on the adopted future land use map that are comp.: ible and suitable with the
existing "Industrial" use of property.
Policy PA-3.1.7: The City shall, through its land development regulations, adopt and
enforce appropriate setbacks and buffering require nts for Non -Working Waterfront
properties along the Miami River in order to protect e existing Working Waterfront use
from encroachment of incompatible and unsuitab uses.
Policy PA-3.1.8: There shall be no net losof recreational wet -slips along the Miami
River.
Policy PA-3.1.9: The City shall reuire from new residential development and
redevelopment located along the Mia i River a recorded covenant acknowledging and
accepting the presence of the existing Working Waterfront 24-hour operations as
permitted.
Policy PA-3.1.10: In its commitment to support the Port of Miami River, the City of
Miami shall continue its suport of the dredging of the River.
Policy PA-3.1.11: Tha City of Miami shall facilitate and expedite municipal permitting
for water-depender)k water -related, commercial, industrial and recreational working
waterfronts along 145e Miami River by expediting the application process for such uses.
Objective PA-3.2: RANSPORTATION). The City shall encourage with appropriate
agencies the co dination of surface transportation access to the Port of Miami River
Working Wate ront with the traffic and mass transit system shown on the traffic
circulation map series.
Policy PA-3.2.1: The City shall through the Transportation Element of the
c mprehensive plan, encourage the coordination of the intermodal surface and water
ransportation access service to the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront (See
Objective TR 1.9, Policy TR 1.9.1 } See Policy .TR-2.2.12. and Policy IC-2.1.30.).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
91
SUBSTITUTED
Objective PA-3.3: (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & COORDINATION). The City shall
coordinate its Port of Miami River Working Waterfront planning activities with the
multiple regulators and stakeholders who have an interest in the Miami River.
Policy PA-3.3.1: Give the Miami River's multi jurisdictional and regulatory natur:, the
City shall coordinate with:
1. The United States Army Corp of Engineers regarding the dredging,
navigation, and commerce on the Miami River; and
2. The United States Coast Guard regarding security and safe on the Miami
river; and
3. The Miami -Dade County Planning Department o evaluate the
interdependence and effectiveness of the County's Po of Miami River sub -
element in its comprehensive plan with that of that of the City's; and
4. The Miami -Dade County's Department of Environmental Resource
Management and the Manatee Protection Plan Committee regarding the
protection of manatees and establishment of new wet and dry marine slips
on or near the Miami River; and
5. The Miami -Dade County Property Appraiser to ensure that all Port of Miami
River Working Waterfront properties re assessed by the "current use"
pursuant to Section 4, Article VI I of e Florida constitution and S.193.704,
Fla. Stat.
Policy PA-3.3.2: The City shall rema an active member of the Miami River
Commission, as established by Ch.16 I6, F.S. and shall continue to request and
consider from the Miami River Comm'- ion written recommendations related to policy,
planning, development and other ' er issues within the scope established by the
Florida Legislature.
Policy PA-3.3.3: Within 18 ►•nths of adoption of this policy, the City shall consider
approving a joint planning as -ement with the Miami River Commission and Miami -Dade
County to revise and ado, the "Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan" as the strategic
plan for the Miami River
Policy PA-3.3.4: thin three years of the adoption of this policy, the City along with
Miami River stake olders, property owners and businesses shall consider submitting an
application to e Florida Department of Community Affairs, Waterfronts Florida
Partnership P ogram, for assistance in protecting and promoting the Miami River
traditional rking Waterfront.
Policy PA-3.3.5: The City shall coordinate with Miami River stakeholders, property
owne p and businesses to prepare reasonable Working Waterfront code compliance
an nforcement policies to eliminate unsafe, abandoned, and blighted conditions along
t river banks.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
92
SUBSTITUTED
Policy PA-3.3.6: The City of Miami shall provide technical assistance to Working
Waterfront businesses along the Miami River.
Policy PA-3.3.7: The City shall work to improve the economic vitality of the Miami River
in cooperation with other concerned public and governmental agencies and
organizations. (See Miami -Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Pla
Port of Miami River Sub -element Policy PMR-1C)
Policy PA-3.3.8: The City will work with property owners along the Miami ver to
secure Enterprise Zone tax incentives to businesses for creation of j bs and
revitalization. Such incentives consist of the following and are based on availability:
Enterprise Zone Incentives
1. Jobs Tax Credit
2. Business Equipment Sales Tax Refund
3. Building Materials Sales Tax Refund
4. Property Tax Credit
5. Community Contribution Tax Credit Program
Policy PA-3.3.9: The City will continue to use Brownfield r development Area strategies
to stimulate economic revitalization to Working Waterfr nts. Such incentives consist of
the following and are based on availability:
a. Financial Incentives
i. 35% Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits
ii. $2500 Brownfields Bonus Refund
iii. Low -interest loans
iv. Sales Tax Credit on Building :terials
v. Up to 5 years of State Loan uarantees of Loan Loss Reserves
vi. Site -Specific Activities Grt, and
National Brownfields Asses ent, Revolving Loan Fund, Cleanup Grants, and
HUD Brownfield Economi Development Loans
b. Regulatory Benefits
i. Risk Based Cor--ctive Action
ii. Cleanup Liab y Protection
iii. Review of ioluntary Cleanup Projects at FDEP Conducted Separately
From Enf,rcement Mandated Cleanups by Responsible Parties
iv. Expedi ' d Review and Response to Technical Reports and
Corr-:pondence
v. CE''CLA Site Clearance Issued by EPA, and
vi. nder Liability Protection to the extend allowed by applicable laws
Policy P-3.3.10: The City will continue to use the City's Enterprise Zone,
Empow' rment Zone, Commercial Business Corridors, and Brownfield Redevelopment
Area trategies to stimulate economic revitalization, and encourage employment
op.•rtunities within the Port of Miami River. (Policy LU-1.3.7.).
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
93
SUBSTITUTED
Policy PA-3.3.11: The City will foster or develop and implement job training, vocatio
and educational programs to assist the City's existing and future residents, and ater
dependent and water related businesses along the Miami River, in achieving economic
self-sufficiency, and will continue to work with appropriate State and County agencies
to direct training programs and other technical assistance to support minorit, and semi-
skilled residents of the City including, without limitation, their involvement i► recreational
and commercial working waterfronts along the Miami River as define. •y Ch.342.07,
F.S. (Policy LU-1.3.8.)
Policy PA-3.3.12: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, shall
support and coordinate with other governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the
River to support and enhance the Miami River's economic im rtance and viability. The
functions of the Miami River shall be consistent with the fu re goals and objectives of
the City's Comprehensive Plan, particularly with respect t► the unique characteristics of
the Miami River's location and its economic position d functioning within the local
maritime industry.
Objective PA-3.4: (MONITORING & EFFECTIVENES : ). The City shall monitor track the
effectiveness of its goals, objectives, and policie designated to preserve and promote
the Port of Miami River as a valued and econo ically viable component of the City's
maritime industrial base.
Policy PA-3.4.1: City staff shall prep , or cause to be prepared, an annual report on
the status of the Planning and Zoni r , Economic Development and Coordination, and
Transportation Objectives and Po ' ies contained in this Sub -element, which shall be
presented to the City Commissiat a dully noticed public hearing.
Policy PA-3.4.2: City staff shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report on
the loss or gain of recreaional and commercial Working Waterfront lands and uses,
which shall be presentee to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
94
SUBSTITUTED
PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Goal PR-1: Provide sufficient opportunities for active and passive recreation to .II City
residents based on access to parks, recreation and open space, per capita park fun ing, and
regular surveys of residents on park and recreation needs.
Objective PR-1.1: The City shall work to achieve a medium -term objecti - of providing
a park within a ten minute walk of every resident.
Policy PR-1.1.1: The City will establish a new hierarchy for the City park system to
reflect Miami's urban condition, as described in the Miami Parks and Public Spaces
Master Plan dated May 2007 and adopted by the City Commission. The hierarchy will
have the following elements:
• Regional Parks — A park typically greater than 30 cres in size with a variety of
park landscapes, facilities and programs for city esidentis, regional visitors, and
tourists, or any park serving as a tourist destination of historical, cultural or
architectural significance.2
• Citywide parks:
o Destination parks — four types: conservation, waterfront one acre
or more, sports complex a d aquatic, specialty (unique programs)
o Community parks - par not less than one-half acre that include
active recreation facilit s
o Linear parks — green ays and trails
• Neighborhood parks — all remaing parks under one acre that do not fit in other
categories
Policy PR-1.1.2: The City will focus on park land acquisition according to the following
four equal priorities that emerged from community preferences during the 2007 Parks
Master Plan process: land with water views and/or water access; land for "walk -to"
parks, including neighborhood parks, in underserved areas of the City identified in
Citywide and NET -area maps in the 2007 Parks Master Plan and any subsequent
updates to these maps; land to expand destination and community parks; land for
expansion or creation of linear park segments. Information on target priorities and target
areas for new parks will be disseminated to all relevant City departments to enhance the
potential for parkland acquisition in conjunction with infrastructure and other projects.
Ideally, new parks should be at least one-half acre in size, but smaller areas may be
suitable, depending on the surroundings and proposed uses.
Policy PR-1 .3: The City will provide areas for safe, passive use in all parks, including
those inlive recreational use parks. The passive areas will include usable green
space wit plantings, shade and seating.
1.1.3.1: The City, through its land development regulations, will designate a zoning
category for parks separate from Civic Space. That category will permit a variety of
areas for passive and/or greater intensity of recreational use opportunities in parks
and open spaces.
2 So ce: Recreation and Park Department Management Information System Division — data dictionary as of 6/21/04. City of San Francisco, California.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
95
SUBSTITUTED
Policy PR-1.1.4: The City of Miami's Level of Service for Parks, Recreation and Open
Space is to provide a municipally -owned park within a ten-minute barrier -free walk to
park entrances by 72% of the city's population as measured by GIS pedestrian
network analysis. A ten-minute walk will be defined as a one-half mile, barrier -free
distance on a safe pedestrian route. Barrier -free means a continuous walk on a
sidewalk or designated pedestrian route that may include crossing streets but do not
encounter barriers such as walls or highway embankments that impede passag,,.
Safe pedestrian routes include those that may include crossing of streets with speed
limits of up to 40 mph.
Every three years, the City will develop and update a map that shows which residential
areas fall within the ten-minute walk buffer for City -owned parks, and w ch do not. This
map will then be overlaid on a population map showing the most c ent U.S. Census
population data available in order to calculate if at least 72% of the city's population lives
within the ten-minute walk buffer.
1.1.4.1: Every three years, when the City updates the P. s and Recreation Level
of Service Map for parks owned by the City of Miami, e City will also perform a
study based on the national model established b the Trust for Public Land
ParkScoreTM system. The study will include the folio, ing: 1) creation and updating
of a GIS layer that includes all park and recreation I.nd open to the public in the City
of Miami, including linear parks, whether or not the land is owned by the City; 2)
creation of maps that show a ten-minute barri'-free walk for all parks (regardless
of ownership and including linear parks), ansimilarly, for parks of at least'/2 acre
in size and parks of at least 1 acre in si w, 3) identification of median park size
(regardless of ownership); 4) identificatiof the percentage of all city acres that
are parks (regardless of ownership); the number of playgrounds per 10,000
residents; and 5) the total spending .oth operational and capital) on parks and
recreation per resident over the pr-. eding three fiscal years. The purpose of this
study is to provide the City with a .lysis to support decision -making on acquisition
of park land and on park and recreation services, as well as to compare the city's
park resources with other citie
Policy PR-1.1.5: The City will -view and enact provisions and create a plan to remedy
deficiencies for residents whdo not have access to a park within a ten minute, barrier -
free walk, including financi for acquisition to remedy deficiencies.
Policy PR-1.1.6: The ty of Miami will work towards providing a park of approximately
one acre or more with. a ten-minute, barrier -free walk to park entrances for 66% of the
city's population.
Objective PR-1.2: Pr
the parks, recreatio
surveys and oth
benefit the co
annual of spe
capita in 200
vide sufficient per capita funds for the parks system to support
and open space standards expected by the public, as indicated in
responses to public outreach, for resources and programs that
unity. The City will strive to meet and exceed a benchmark level
ing, for operations and capital improvements combined, of $100 per
dollars, within fiscal limits and based on identified needs.
Poly PR-1.2.1: The City will establish the cost of providing park and recreation
grams and services, identify which core park and recreation services are to be
ered according to criteria related to level of benefits to individuals and the community
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
96
SUBSTITUTED
as a whole, identify which services and programs should be free, and formulate how a
fee structure should be set for other services and programs.
Policy PR-1.2.2: The City will develop annual parks and recreation budgets that explain
the rationale behind the program, operational and maintenance standards that the City
intends to meet; the costs of meeting those standards; and the per capita budget in
comparison with similar cities, including cities in Florida.
Policy PR-1.2.3: The City will allocate program revenues generated by the Par s and
Recreation Department to the department's budget.
Policy PR-1.2.4: The City will work to identify and create a dedicated funding source
for the park system.
Policy PR-1.2.5: The City will seek grants and other funding for new resources,
including land, activities, and programs. Some of these funds may •me from nonprofit
partnership groups that may be formed, such as a potential Miami arks Foundation.
Objective PR-1.3: Pursue expanded and new opportunities ide fied in the 2007 Parks
Master Plan (and any subsequent updates) to share park, re eation and open space
resources with the school district, the housing autho ty, churches, nonprofit
organizations, transportation agencies and other groups t =t may be able to share land
and programs with the City Parks and Recreation Department.
Policy PR-1.3.1: The City will establish communi :tion with and liaisons to agencies
and groups that have existing and potential recration and open space resources in
order to pursue access to these resources by C. residents.
Policy PR-1.3.2: The City will evaluate c rrent costs, benefits and procedures for
sharing resources and programming and will develop policies and procedures that will
maximize benefits for City residents.
Objective PR-1.4: Expand existing and create new greenways and trails to meet
resident needs.
Policy PR-1.4.1: The City will continue to work with transit agencies to coordinate the
park system and pedestrian connections with opportunities to improve and expand the
Metro -Path Trail.
Policy PR-1.4.2: The City will continue to work with transportation agencies to
implement the Commodore Trail improvements and the Flagler Trail (FEC Corridor
Greenway).
Policy PR-1.4.3: he City will continue to work to implement the Overtown Greenway
plan to link the'-``iami River through Overtown to Downtown.
Policy PR- .4.4: The City will work with Miami -Dade County and other groups to ensure
that gree ay, trail and park systems within the City are effectively linked to proposed
regional rails such as the Venetian Connector, the Unity Trail, the Perimeter Trail, the
Ludlu ► rail, and the East-West Trail. The City will continue to advocate for funding of
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
97
SUBSTITUTED
trails identified in the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization 2030 Long-Ra •e
Transportation Plan.
Policy PR-1.4.5: The City will designate as scenic transportation corridor those
segments of roadways that have significant vegetative features, and will enc• rage the
development of bicycle and pedestrian paths along such corridors, where .. propriate.
Future land development regulations will encourage the provision of suffici: t land areas
for uses that are compatible with and encourage the flow of bicycle and pdestrian traffic
along these corridors.
Objective PR-1.5: Ensure that future development and redevelopme pay an equitable,
proportional share of the cost of public open space and recreatio- al facilities required
to maintain adopted LOS standards.
Policy PR-1.5.1: The City's land development regulations II establish mechanisms to
meet expanded demand for Citywide parks, neighbor •od parks, and recreational
programs resulting from new residential developmen including, but not limited to,
impact fees, Zoning Ordinance intensity bonuses ancontributions in lieu of land that
will be used to provide new park and recreation re •urces to serve new development.
The City will review these fees annually in accordce with recreation and open space
needs and revise them as necessary to reflect i reases in the cost of providing public
open space and recreational facilities to meet its adopted Level of Service for parks,
recreation and open space.
Policy PR-1.5.2: The City will continue to work with developers of mixed use and
nonresidential projects to ensure the cr tion of appropriate public spaces.
Policy PR-1.5.3: The City will cons[ er the use of special assessment districts to help
fund open space and recreations! facilities projects whose public benefits tend to be
localized to specific geographic : b areas of the City.
Goal PR-2: Preserve and enhance exi ing parks and recreation facilities.
Objective PR-2.1: Protect ex'-ting park land.
Policy PR-2.1.1: Th: City has a no -net -loss policy for public park land and will adopt
procedures to this - 'ect for park land in the City Zoning Ordinances, as described in the
2007 Parks and P , .Iic Spaces Master Plan. These will allow only recreation and cultural
facilities to be lot ` t on park land, will limit building footprint on any such land, will require
that conversion, of park land for any other purposes be subject to public procedures, and
replace the,lonverted park land with land similar in park, recreation or conservation
value in to s of usefulness and location.
Policy R-2.1.2: The City will continue to define and protect conservation areas in the
zoni code, as well as other parks and recreation areas.
Pr icy PR-2.1.3: The City will amend the zoning code to limit the amount of total
building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre or more
to no more than 25% of the park land area. Buildings and parking surfaces will continue
/
to be limited to recreational and cultural uses and accessory elements that serve park
and recreation goals. Any request to expand this percentage will require a special permit
(warrant) and public hearings with residents within a half -mile area surrounding the park.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
98
SUBSTITUTE
Objective PR-2.2: Maintain and enhance existing parks and recreation facilities.
Policy PR-2.2.1: The City will provide appropriate staffing, services, equipm t, and
maintenance at all parks. Criteria for appropriateness will include park category
(Citywide or neighborhood), recreation programs, demand for passive and active spaces
and activities, sizes, and facilities.
Policy PR-2.2.2: The City will maintain and staff as many public swimming pools to be
open all year round as possible given funding constraints and will strive to identify new
funding sources to expand access to year-round swimming.
Policy PR-2.2.3: The City, through the Parks and Recreation Department, will continue
to develop and implement maintenance level of service sta ards, identify associated
costs, and address funding those costs, including replace ' nt programs for equipment
and vehicles, before adding more assignments.
Policy PR-2.2.4: The Parks and Recreation Depa ent will maintain and regularly
update the Inventory and Evaluation of City -Owner, Parks that was prepared for the
2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan.
Goal PR-3: Increase public access to all parks, recreation, facilities and open spaces
including waterfront areas and the Picnic Islands in = scayne Bay.
Objective PR-3.1: Enhance public access --y pedestrians and bicyclists to parks and
recreation sites
Policy PR-3.1.1: The City will conti, ue to implement sidewalk and shade tree planting
programs along public roadways that connect to parks and other community
destinations. The improvement will be targeted to pedestrian routes that provide a 10
minute walk to a park to the gr atest number of persons.Tree planting programs will be
implemented in accordance ith the 2007 City of Miami Tree Master Plan.
Policy PR-3.1.2: The Ci through the Parks and Recreation Department will work with
neighborhood groups t identify the ten-minute pedestrian routes within a half -mile
radius of parks that ar% appropriate for improvements to sidewalks, lighting, street trees,
crosswalks and pedestrian count -down signals, and signage, as described in the 2007
Parks and Public Spaces Plan.
Policy PR-3.1.3: Bicycle parking facilities such as bike racks shall be provided in
existing and ture park projects.
Objective P: -3.2: Enhance the public's visual and physical access to waterfront
areas.
Policy PR-3.2.1: The City will continue to work to complete the Baywalk, encompassing
as much of the Biscayne Bay waterfront as possible, and to complete the Riverwalk and
the Miami River Greenway.
Policy PR-3.2.2: All City -owned waterfront property, including the Miami River
shorelines, will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
99
SUBSTITUTED
3.2.2.1: The City will continue to promote creation of pocket parks at waterfront
locations, such as "PlayStreets" created on dead-end streets, in order to enhance
public access to waterfronts.
Policy PR-3.2.3: The City will incorporate provisions for public physical and/or vie al
access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations. (See Coastal Manag: ent
Policy CM-2.1.7.)
Policy PR-3.2.4: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety an..romotion
of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas future land
development regulations will require non -water dependent or related development
and/or redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and Miami River
shorelines. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-2.1.1.)
Policy PR-3.2.5: The City will continue to expand launch areas for personal
kayaks/canoes, kayak/canoe rentals and other boating programs at parks on Biscayne
Bay, the Miami River and the South Fork of the Miami River.
Policy PR-3.2.6: The City will pursue creation of water
expand public access to the Picnic Islands in Biscayne
the Dinner Key islands off Coconut Grove.
s uttles or water taxis that will
y off the Upper Eastside and
r
Policy PR-3.2.7: The City will work with other or, °• nizations and agencies to identify
public recreational opportunities, including boatin►, on the smaller waterways in the City,
such as Wagner Creek, the Little River, and th canals.
Policy PR-3.2.8: All renovations and imovements to City parks and recreational
facilities will be designed to enhance rath: than obstruct waterfront views.
Policy PR-3.2.9: The City will increas: public recreational opportunities on Virginia Key
through implementation of the Virg is Key Master Plan and will introduce land use
designations and/or zoning, as ap%ropriate, to permit use of previously disturbed land
areas on Virginia Key for amenties and uses that support passive and active park
recreation at suitable locations ° n Virginia Key.
Policy PR-3.2.10: The Cit shall continue to ensure that park and recreational lands
open to the public are in'`uded in redevelopment projects for Watson Island and will
monitor the project aft construction to ensure continued public access without any
requirements for the p 4•lic to make purchases or any other barriers to open public use.
Policy PR-3.2.11: s specified in the City of Miami Charter and Related Laws, and more
specifically the Waterfront Charter Amendment, all new development and
redevelopmen along the downtown waterfront is required to provide a waterfront
setback, andose developments that require publicly accessible shoreline walkways,
will design em in conformance with the "Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards." (See
Coastal anagement Policy CM-2.1.8.) The City will monitor these areas to ensure
continu-. public access, as required.
Objective R-3.3: Park and recreational facilities will be accessible to handicapped
person and provide opportunities for special needs groups.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
100
SUBSTITUTED
Policy PR-3.3.1: All renovations, expansions, and development of park and recreation
facilities will be designed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
requirements, including handicapped parking spaces, ramps, handrails, pathways and
other accessibility improvements to be appropriately located with respect to recreational
facilities.
Policy PR-3.3.2: Designs for renovations, expansions, and developments of park an
recreation facilities will be evaluated to ensure that there are sufficient facilities wi ' in
the service area to provide for the recreation, education, and safety needs of press ool
age children, the elderly, persons with disabilities and other special needs group
Goal PR-4: Enhance the quality of recreational and educational opportunities f• all age
groups, persons with disabilities, and other special needs groups.
Objective PR-4.1: Continue to improve the quality and diversity • recreational
programs offered at destination and community parks, and neig •orhood parks
where such programs may be offered.
Policy PR-4.1.1: The City will use participant evaluation surveys, at the completion of
recreational programs to evaluate program success, online public opinion surveys at
least once every three years, and scientific surveys at least once every seven years to
identify needed and desired programs.
Policy PR-4.1.2: The City will increase staff and hours of operation where necessary
and fiscally feasible, provide professional develop ent opportunities for park and
recreation staff, and encourage staff to be certified the Florida Recreation and Parks
Association.
Policy PR-4.1.3: The City will continue to provide interpretive displays, educational
programs, wildlife observation locations, and picnic areas in parks and open spaces for
outdoor recreation activities.
Policy PR-4.1.4: The City will continuto coordinate with nonprofit providers of social
services to the elderly, youth, and o, er special needs groups, so as to permit such
providers to use public park facilities for meeting the recreational and educational needs
of these groups.
Goal PR-5: Improve management and operations in the park and recreation system.
Objective PR-5.1: Increase the -fficiency of park operations, while improving the quality
of recreation services and strengthening the financial support of the parks and
recreation service system.
Policy PR-5.1.1:
be revised to incl
existing focus
e vision and mission of the Parks and Recreation Department will
de the protection of green spaces and natural areas in addition to the
recreational and cultural activities.
Policy PR-4.1.2: The City's operating budget and the Capital Improvements Element
(CIE) will give priority to the quality of programs in, and the physical condition of, existing
park fac''ties and to meeting existing deficiencies, before constructing new facilities for
parks recreation. This policy does not preclude the use of impact fees or other funds
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
101
SUBSTITUTED
to purchase additional land to be held in inventory for new parks in underseryd
neighborhoods.
Policy PR-5.1.3: A projection and analysis of operational and maintenan costs
associated with all park and recreation related capital projects which excee. ',50,000,
with their anticipated funding sources, will be required and made publicly available prior
to the decision to appropriate public funds for capital improvements.
Policy PR-5.1.4: The City will continue to implement innovative ►.nagement and
maintenance alternatives designed to minimize operating and maint ance costs while
not reducing the extent and quality of programs or adversely a' ecting the physical
condition of park facilities. This will be done through establish' ent of core services
according to level of benefit to the community, identifying cost •nd potential revenues,
improving management accountability, establishing prev-`ntive maintenance and
replacement programs, establishing formal policies and sys ms for working with groups
that sponsor programs that use City facilities, and strengt'ening support services.
Policy PR-5.1.5: The City will continue to assign stafr time to develop and manage a
network of volunteer "friends" groups for individual parks.
Policy PR-5.1.6: The City will continue to develop and implement public/private
partnerships to contribute to the maintenance nd enhancement of parks, recreational
facilities, and public spaces, while ensuring t .t public spaces remain freely open to the
public.
Policy PR-5.1.7: The City will encouracreation of a Citywide Miami Parks Foundation
by non-govermental groups and ind'-iduals to serve as a nonprofit partner to focus
attention on the park system, raise oney to help support maintenance, enhance and
expand parks and recreational programs, attract volunteers, and broaden the
constituency for the park syste
Objective PR-5.2: Create institutions and procedures to ensure resident and
community consultation in t ; development of system wide policies and planning for
park and recreation progra- improvements.
Policy PR-5.2.1: Th- ity will continue to work with a permanent Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board m.e up of residents who are park users, program participants, and
representatives o groups with special relevant expertise. The Board's responsibilities
will include advirr ng elected officials and staff on implementation of the 2007 Parks and
Public Space aster Plan and any adopted subsequent updates to that Plan. The
Board will b supported by staff from the Parks and Recreation Department, and will
report an 4ally to the Mayor and City Commission on progress in implementing the
Master P;. n, including financial reports, holding at least one public hearing on the draft
report ►,efore submitting it to the Mayor and Commission. The Board will also review
and . •vise on capital plans and designs based on the Master Plan and advise the
Co mission on any proposals to expend more than $50,000 to acquire new park land,
iminish or convert existing park land, to accept donated land for parks, or to sell City
nd that may be suitable for parks. The City will periodically review and refine the
mission and charge of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in order to ensure
maximum opportunities for public involvement and effectiveness in addressing parks
and recreation needs. Proposed changes to the mission and charge of the Board will
not be implemented until after a public hearing by the appropriate public board.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
102
SUBSTITUTED
Policy PR-5.2.2: The City will survey City residents to monitor preferences, need .nd
satisfaction with the park system on a regular basis, at a minimum through eval :tions
of all programs by program participants to evaluate program success, online .urveys
every three years, and scientific surveys every ten years (starting from the Pa s Master
Plan survey of 2006).
Policy PR-5.2.3: The City will develop regular procedures to provide ••portunities for
park user and neighborhood consultation in the planning and de '• n of park and
recreation facilities improvements and new parks and programs.
Policy PR-5.2.4: The City will develop a full update on the Pa s and Public Spaces
Master Plan at least once every ten years, to coincide wi a scientific survey of
residents' park and recreation needs.
Policy PR-5.2.5: The Parks and Recreation annual Ca• al Improvement Plan will be
provided to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for eir review and comment. The
Board may request presentations on park projects, o a project by project basis, and
have 60 days to review and provide comments and -commendations.
Objective PR-5.3: Continue to increase public safe, and security within City parks.
Policy PR-5.3.1: The City will continue to e
night lighting as parks are updated with im
computer scheduling of lighting in order t
p all parks with adequate energy efficient
rovements and will continue to use remote
dvance energy efficiency in the park system.
Policy PR-5.3.2: Citywide and neighborhood parks will increase their hours of operation
and enhance their programs, whe ver feasible, so as to encourage a greater public
presence in the parks.
Policy PR-5.3.3: The City's P. ice Department will continue to work with neighborhood
residents to create and sup.•rt community crime watch groups to assist in park safety
and crime prevention.
Policy PR-5.3.4: The City will continue regular, uniformed
in and around Citywi and neighborhood parks.
Policy PR-5.3.5: all parks with active recreation the City will maintain an adequate
number of traind staff based on standards recognized by professional organizations
such as the Florida Recreation and Park Association or the National Recreation and
Park Association, and on a regular basis will conduct safety inspections of equipment
and structural facilities.
police patrols and presence
Policy R-5.3.6: The City will disseminate information to the public on proper safety
procedures that are to be followed while using park facilities.
P icy PR-5.3.7: When parks are being renovated or designed, the City will evaluate
e park's safety, consulting with park users, neighborhood residents, and the police
whether high fences, gates, or other obtrusive security measures remain necessary.
Goal -6: Develop and enhance the quality of parks and open spaces within the City's
dow own and other neighborhoods in a manner that meets the Level of Service standard
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
103
SUBSTITUTED
and addresses the needs of City residents, workers and visitors, and strengthens the City's
economic development.
Objective PR-6.1: Implement the NET Area Visions in the 2007 Parks and Publ;c
Spaces Master Plan, using the NET Area Implementation Tasks and P=rk
Opportunities section of the Plan as a guide to enhancing and expanding Cit ide
and neighborhood parks, recreational facilities and programs.
Policy PR-6.1.1: The City will annually review implementation sections • , the 2007
Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan to include implementation actions ideveloping
an annual work plan and capital improvements plan for parks and recreation facilities
and programs.
Policy PR-6.1.2: The City will work to implement the specific master plans that include
parks and recreation facilities, such as the Coconut Grove Wate +ont Master Plan, the
Museum Park Master Plan, and the Virginia Key Master Plan, a • create pedestrian and
water linkages among Fern Isle Park, Sewell Park, the -cently acquired Police
Benevolent Association property, and Curtis Park to create - Miami "Central Park." As
depicted in the Waterfront Master Plan and programmed i he CIE, the City will provide
a continuous network of public parks and major at-.ctions along the downtown
waterfront.
Policy PR-6.1.3: The City will continue to redevelop Lummus Park in the Riverside
District to provide an activity/program center ror history, riverfront activities and
recreational facilities for visitors and City residents.
Policy PR-6.1.4: The City will create a sp laity "Fishermen's Wharf" cafe district and
marine services center in the Riverside ►istrict along N.W. North River Drive on the
Miami River.
Objective PR-6.2: Improve and enhan
Policy PR-6.2.1: The City will
promenade linkages with wi
landscaping, lighting, graphic
public spaces and linkages in the City.
ontinue to encourage development of urban street
ned sidewalks, high quality materials, shade trees,
and furnishings.
Policy PR-6.2.2: The C. will continue to work toward improving landscaping and
pedestrian -oriented am ities along major boulevards, including Biscayne Boulevard,
Brickell Avenue, and orth 1st Avenue, and other major transportation corridors, to
create distinctive im.•es and unifying elements between downtown districts.
Policy PR-6.2.3• he City will continue to work towards enhancement of public spaces
(entrances, plas, lobbies, courtyards and atriums) and gateways through artwork. The
City will use, henever appropriate, the "Art in Public Places" allocation in public facility
constructio►' budgets as well as the assistance of the County Arts Council staff, and
encoura., private organizations to construct civic monuments at gateway locations.
Goal PR-7: Dev op public parks and open spaces that are aesthetically appealing and
enhance the ch racter and image of the City.
Objec ' e PR-7.1: Improve the aesthetic qualities of parks and recreation facilities.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
104
SUBSTITUTED
Policy PR-7.1.1: The City will use the design principles in the 2007 Parks and Public
Spaces Master Plan as a basic framework for the design and redesign of parks and park
improvements, and prepare more specific design guidelines as needed.
Policy PR-7.1.2: The Parks and Recreation Department will continue to have
landscape architects on staff who have knowledge of best practices in park and
recreation facility design and will be employed to design park improvements, and
review and monitor park design projects, when designers are retained on contract.
Goal PR-8: Encourage the development of high quality cultural arts facilities and pro, rams
within the City.
Objective PR-8.1: Continue to develop and support cultural districts, fa%lities and
programs.
Policy PR-8.1.1: The City will continue to support development of a downtown cultural
arts district as described in the proposed Downtown Master Plan, through land
development regulations and other strategies.
Policy PR-8.1.2: The City will support cultural and heritage ;ograms and facilities in
selected areas of the City such as, but not restricted to, Ov_ own, the Design District,
and Little Havana, including small performing arts venue heritage trails, street fairs,
and similar programs, through land development regulati►, s and other strategies.
Goal PR-9: Establish sustainable and green practices in park • esign, maintenance, building,
planting and energy efficiency.
Objective PR-9.1: Protect and restore native pl •;'t communities, where feasible and
appropriate, and provide educational program and interpretive signage about South
Florida environments.
Policy PR-9.1.1: The City will continua; its program of native plant protection and
restoration and elimination of exotic plants at Simpson Park and the Virginia Key nature
area; expand this program to the conservation area at Wainwright Park; restore native
vegetation in woodland, shoreline . d streamfront edges of parks, where appropriate;
establish, where appropriate, nat -e plantings that require limited water and fertilizer in
parks; and establish native pla ings in public road, rail, drainage and utility corridors
that are not suitable for pedes Ian and recreation access.
Policy PR-9.1.2: The Ci will continue to establish and maintain coastal hammock
exhibit plantings as part • environmental education programs and exhibits in community
parks.
Policy PR-9.1.3: The City will continue to promote the planting and preservation of
native species y property owners in the City through educational materials and
programs.
Objective PR-9'.2: Introduce sustainable and energy -efficient materials and methods
in park maintenance and operations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
105
SUBSTITUTE[
Policy PR-9.2.1: The City will employ life -cycle costing to evaluate costs of new p
structures and make efforts to incorporate energy- and water -efficient methods
materials, in new and renovated park structures including the use of green roofs
panels, and other innovative approaches.
k
nd
solar
Policy PR-9.2.2: The City will implement best management practices s h as water
conservation, integrated pest management, water conservation, elimi .tion of toxic
chemicals, and similar sustainable practices.
Policy PR-9.2.3: The City will implement to all pesticide and rbicide methods of
application for all sodded areas compliance with the Nation. Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
106
SUBSTITUTED
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Goal CM-1: Maintain, protect, and enhance the quality of life and appearance of Miami's
Coastal Zone including the preservation of natural resources as well as the enhancement of
the built environment.
Objective CM-1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems including wetlands
and beach/dune systems within Virginia Key and those portions of-iscayne Bay that
lie within the City's boundaries; and improve water quality within he Miami River, its
tributaries, and the Little River.
Policy CM-1.1.1: As a precondition to the development • redevelopment of Virginia
Key, a comprehensive assessment will be made of environmental hazards that are the
result of past disposal activities at the Virginia y landfill and other relevant
environmental concerns. Such assessment will be m. le in cooperation with appropriate
County, State and Federal environmental agenci: , and an action plan to reduce or
eliminate any hazards will be formulated. (See ► atural Resource Conservation Policy
NR-1.1.1.)
Policy CM-1.1.2: The City will retrofit the number of storm water outfalls that discharge
into the Miami River and its tributaries, t Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. If
positive drainage systems to these w er bodies are deemed to be the only feasible
method of maintaining adequate s rm drainage, then these storm sewers will be
designed and constructed to retai, grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges.
(See Natural Resource Conserv, tion Policy NR-1.1.2 and Sanitary and Storm Sewers
Policy SS-2.2.1.)
Policy CM-1.1.3: [Reserv%d]
Policy CM-1.1.4: The City will encourage the reduction in point and non -point sources
of pollution into Biscayne Bay through coordination with the Miami River Commission,
Miami -Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies in order
to reduce poi and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay.
Policy Chi-1.1.5: Within the Coastal Zone, or along the Miami and Little Rivers, no land
uses w► ch represent a likely and significant source of pollution to surface waters will be
perm ed, unless measures which substantially eliminate the threat of contamination are
im. -mented as conditions for approval of development or redevelopment.
olicy CM-1.1.6: The City will adhere to Miami -Dade County DERM standards and
require DERM approvals in its permitting procedures to ensure that all fuel storage
facilities in the Coastal Zone or near major canals do not pose a significant threat to
water quality.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
107
SUBSTITUTED
Policy CM-1.1.7: The City will regulate development on Virginia Key and the intermittent
wetland areas of the coast of Coconut Grove to ensure that there will be no net loss
functional wetlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be degra. -d
or disrupted; that when non-native vegetation is removed, it will be replaced with tive
species; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora will be pr. ected.
Priority will be given to water dependent land uses, and to development that : hances
the natural environment and ensures adequate physical public access to Vir•inia Key.
Policy CM-1.1.8: Because of its unique character and environmental : gnificance, all
development on Virginia Key will be in conformance with the 1987 Vi inia Key Master
Plan and/or any subsequent plans for Virginia Key that have been might be adopted
by the City and, if necessary, the preparation of an updated plan.,
Policy CM-1.1.9: Site development criteria will ensur that development or
redevelopment within the Coastal Zone will not adversely of ct the natural environment
or lead to a net loss of public access to the City's natural resources.
Policy CM-1.1.10: [Reserved]
Policy CM-1.1.11: All City owned property within e Coastal Zone that may be identified
as areas of significant or unique natural resour es will be designated as Environmental
Preservation Districts, and the City will als, consider designating private properties
within the coastal with significant or unique natural resources as Environmental
Preservation Districts.
Policy CM-1.1.12: The City will co inue to implement and enforce that all new and
renovated marinas meet marina ing requirements and receive appropriate county,
state, and federal approvals in t - land development regulations.
Policy CM-1.1.13: The Cit will continue to work with the appropriate agencies to
support provisions of the mmittee that prevent new development and redevelopment
along the shorelines fro ' directly discharging storm water runoff into surface waters and
to get support for stat: and county funding for any infrastructure improvements deemed
necessary to suppo development of Virginia Key and Watson Island.
Policy CM-1.1. 4: The City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County in fostering the
protection of •astal wildlife and wildlife habitat through the protection of nesting areas,
the establi ment of wildlife corridors, the protection of travel corridors, and the
promotio of public awareness of wildlife resources.
Polio, CM-1.1.15: The City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County in the
imp mentation of any antidegradation targets developed to protect Outstanding Florida
ters and Outstanding National Resources Waters of Biscayne Bay.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
108
SUBSTITUTED
Objective CM-1.2: The City will continue to follow and enforce the Florida Building Code,
which establishes construction standards that minimize the impacts of man-made
structures on beach and dune systems.
Policy CM-1.2.1: The City will increase inspection and code enforcement efforts for
coastal area construction to ensure the proper standards are met.
Objective CM-1.3: In order to enhance the built environment of the coastal . rea,
redevelop and revitalize blighted, declining, or threatened coastal areas.
Policy CM-1.3.1: The City will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding
the designation of Community Redevelopment Districts in appropriate cotal areas of
the city.
Policy CM-1.3.2: Through increased citywide code enforcement o coastal areas with
deteriorated conditions the City will report any structures in se ere condition to the
unsafe structures board to either force improvements or facilite the demolition of the
structure.
Objective CM-1.4: Ensure that land development regulations and policies for the
Coastal Zone are consistent with the City's ability to provide the capital facilities
required to maintain adopted LOS standards and those eeded to maintain or enhance
the quality of life within the Coastal Zone of the ity. (See Capital Improvements
Objective CI-1.2.)
Policy CM-1.4.1: The Coastal Zone of tha'City will adhere to the level of service
standards as adopted and amended in the Capital Improvements Element, and more
specifically Policy CI-1.2.3 of that elemeri.
Policy CM-1.4.2: Rise in sea level p jected by the federal government, and refined by
the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken into
consideration in all future decisi s regarding the design, location, and development of
infrastructure and public faciliti s in the City. (See related policy CI-1.2.6)
Goal CM-2: Improve public aware ss, appreciation, and use of Miami's coastal resources by
preserving water -dependent a water -related uses, ensuring adequate public access to
such uses, and minimizing us conflicts.
Objective CM-2.1: Wh-rever feasible, increase, physical and visual public access to Biscayne
Bay, the Miami Rive:', the City's shorelines, and publicly -owned islands.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
109
SUBSTITUTED
Policy CM-2.1.1: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety and promo ' n
of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas, future and
development regulations will require non -water dependent or related develop ent or
redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and Miami River shorelines.
(See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR-3.2.4)
Policy CM-2.1.2: Where appropriate, City owned waterfront propert , including the
Miami River shorelines, shall provide for public open spaces that allow imilar access to
County owned public open spaces that provide access to th shoreline where
appropriate.
Policy CM-2.1.3: The City will continue development of the rider walk and bay walk
along City owned property as funds become available and will continue to require
development of the bay walk and river walk along private property through its land
development regulations.
Policy CM-2.1.4: The City shall continue to implement design guidelines along the
baywalk and riverwalk in accordance with the Miany'River Greenway Action Plan and
other adopted plans as appropriate.
Policy CM-2.1.5: [Reserved]
Policy CM-2.1.6: The City will incorporat%provisions for public physical and/or visual
access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations (See Parks, Recreation and
Open Space Policy PR- 3.2.3.)
Policy CM-2.1.7: As specified in „he City of Miami Charter and related laws, and more
specifically the Waterfront Char r Amendment and Ordinance Zoning Ordinance for the
City of Miami all new develo.° ent and redevelopment along the downtown waterfront
is required to provide a w. erfront setback, and those developments within Special
Districts (SDs) that requirpublicly accessible shoreline walkways, will design them in
conformance with the ":aywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards." (See Parks, Recreation
and Open Space Poli' PR- 3.2.11.)
Policy CM-2.1.8: he City will continue to work toward increased physical public access
to Virginia K- ° and Watson Island by pursuing appropriate development and
redevelopme' as directed by the Virginia Key and Watson Island master plans.
Policy C -2.1.9: The City will ensure that development regulations are not altered so
as to p •hibit water dependent facilities or uses such as swimming, boating, and fishing
and ill encourage and support such facilities and uses.
Objec ' e CM-2.2: [Reserved]
Policy CM-2.2.1: [Reserved]
Policy CM-2.2.2: [Reserved]
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
110
SUBSTITUTED
Goal CM-3: Pursuant to Ch. 163.3178(2)(g), F.S., The City shall maintain strategies tha ' will
be used to preserve and adequate supply of land for recreational and commercial W rking
Waterfront uses defined in Ch. 342.07, F.S.3
Objective CM-3.1: The City shall strive to allow no net loss of acreage devoted tj recreational
and commercial Working Waterfront uses in the coastal area of the City of Mi
Policy CM-3.1.1: The comprehensive plan and land developm t regulations will
encourage water -dependent uses along the shoreline, and strate ies that will be used
to preserve recreational and commercial Working Waterfronts a defined in Ch. 342.07,
F.S., particularly on the Miami River. (See Goal PA-3 and Policy LU-1.3.3).
Goal CM-4: Ensure public safety and the protection of property within the Coastal Zone from
the threat of hurricanes.
Objective CM-4.1: Minimize the potential for loss of {Gman life and the destruction of
property from hurricanes.
Policy CM-4.1.1: Enforce building code standards that protect against the destruction
of structures by hurricane winds and tidal s ells.
Policy CM-4.1.2: Continue to direct i•pulation away from the Coastal High Hazard
Area, which is defined as the areas Below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge
line, as established by a Sea, La- and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH)
computerized storm surge mode .s depicted on the CHHA map in Appendix CM-1. (See
map following Appendix CM-1
Policy CM-4.1.3: The Cit shall continue to implement measures for the protection of
City owned historic prop • rties from destruction in the event of a major storm, and plans
for each site's restoration in the event of destruction or major damage will remain in
effect.
Policy CM-4.1.- Immediately subsequent to the event of a major storm, the adequacy
of existing bu sing standards and the appropriateness of land uses and development
regulations ' the Coastal High Hazard Area will be reviewed, and all modifications to
standard zoning or land use policies required to reduce future risk of loss of life and
propert damage will be adopted prior to the approval of long term, post disaster
redev• opment plans.
P j icy CM-4.1.5: Each proposed future land use map change within the Coastal High
azard area of the city will require an analysis of its potential impact on evacuation times
and shelter needs in the event of a hurricane.
3 Addi final strategies to preserve and encourage recreational and commercial Working Waterfront uses are contained in the Ports, Aviation, and
Rela d Facilities element, "Port of Miami River" Sub -element.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 111
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policy CM-4.1.6: [Reserved]
Policy CM-4.1.7: The City will incorporate into its Comprehensive Plan any relev..nt
recommendations of interagency hazard mitigation reports as they become availa e.
Policy CM-4.1.8: The City will work in cooperation with regional and state a
adopt plans and policies that protect public and private property and huma
the effects of natural disasters.
ncies to
lives from
Policy CM-4.1.9: The City will work in cooperation with regional and .tate agencies in
the preparation of advance plans for the safe evacuation of coastal --silents.
Policy CM-4.1.10: The City will adhere to its "Emergency 0%erations Plan for Civil
Defense in War and Natural Emergencies" and "The Emerg cy Procedures Manual"
for immediate repair and cleanup actions needed to protepublic health and safety.
The City will update these manuals on an annual basis.
Objective CM-4.2: The City will adhere to and coopera - with the County in executing
evacuation procedures as well as annually upd-`e information and procedural
brochures for the public; these brochures will •ntain information on evacuation
procedures and routes, and will be distributed to , ty residents at local businesses and
government agencies.
Policy CM-4.2.1: The City's fire and police departments will continue to work with Miami -
Dade County and regional emergen agencies to update and revise, as needed
coordinated peacetime emergency . d evacuation plans.
Policy CM-4.2.2: The City will a ually update and distribute an informational brochure
to establish public awareness d information programs that educate as to the need for
evacuation, and indicate ev- uation routes and procedures.
Policy CM-4.2.3: The ty will follow the County in providing appropriate evacuation
route markers within y boundaries as part of a Countywide coordinated program.
Objective CM-4.3: Mi mize the potential for loss of human life and destruction of
property from hurric - nes in the Coastal High Hazard Area.
Policy CM-
area will
adopte
or re
Im
.3.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the Coastal High Hazard
e limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain
OS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time,
ce the threat to public health and safety from storm events. (See Capital
ovements Policy CI-1.4.1.)
olicy CM-4.3.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the Coastal High Hazard
Area intended to further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
112
SUBSTITUTED
Neighborhood Plan will be limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the
risk to public health and safety from storm damage. (See Capital Improvements Policy
CI-1.4.2.)
Policy CM-4.3.3: Each proposed future land use map change to a residential land use
category within the Coastal High Hazard area of the city will require an analysis of it.
potential impact on evacuation times and shelter needs in the event of a categor 5
storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale.
Policy CM-4.3.4: Proposed future land use map changes to a residential land use
category within the Coastal High Hazard Area shall only be approved if one of the
following standards is met:
a. A no greater than 16 hour level of service for out of county hurricane evacuation
is maintained for a category 5 storm event as measured o the Saffir-Simpson
scale;
b. A no greater than 12 hour evacuation time to shelter i aintained for a category
5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simps• scale and shelter space
reasonably expected to accommodate the r-:idents of the development
contemplated by the proposed comprehensive Ian amendment is available; or
c. Appropriate mitigation is provided th ' will satisfy the provisions of
subparagraph a. or subparagraph b. ppropriate mitigation shall include,
without limitation, payment of money, ' ontribution of land, and construction of
hurricane shelters and transportati. facilities. Required mitigation shall not
exceed the amount required for the development to accommodate impacts
reasonably attributable to deve •pment. The City and applicant for the plan
amendment shall enter into a •ending agreement to memorialize the mitigation
plan.
Policy CM-4.3.5: The City shal consider the use of undeveloped land in the Coastal
High Hazard Area for public or,+rivate recreational uses and open space.
Policy CM-4.3.6: The City w prohibit the construction of new mobile home parks in the
Coastal High Hazard Are
Goal CM-5: Preserve and protec the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification,
evaluation, rehabilitation, ad, 'aye reuse, restoration and public awareness of Miami's
historic, architectural and ar haeological resources. (See Land Use Goal LU-2.)
Objective CM-5.1: iVlaintain, update and increase the number of eligible properties
contained in the Miami -Dade County Historic Survey, which identifies and evaluates the
City's historic, architectural and archaeological resources. (See Land Use Objective LU-
2.1.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
113
SUBSTITUT D
Policy CM-5.1.1: The City will continue to identify potential historic districts and cond ct
further surveys of contributing and noncontributing buildings. (See Land Use Polic U-
2.1.1.)
Policy CM-5.1.2: The City will continue to maintain a computerized database of all
relevant information for all sites in the Miami -Dade County Historic Survey. (See Land
Use Policy LU-2.1.2.)
Policy CM-5.1.3: The City has designated numerous historic sites and historic districts
pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code. The City will continue to designate sites
and districts as appropriate and warranted. (See Land Use Policy LU-2.3.2.)
Policy CM-5.1.4: The City will continue to review nominatins to the National Register
of Historic Places through the Certified Local Governm t Program. (See Land Use
Policy LU-2.3.1.)
Policy CM-5.1.5: The City will continue to includ- information on the City's historic,
architectural and cultural heritage for inclusi , in public information, economic
development promotion and tourism materials. ee Land Use Policy LU-2.5.4.)
Objective CM-5.2: Increase the number of his ric structures that have been preserved,
rehabilitated or restored, according to the U. . Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation. (See Land Use Objective LU-2.4.)
Policy CM-5.2.1: The City will c tinue to utilize the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Rehabilitation as he minimum standards for preservation of historic
properties. To receive public fi ncial support from the City, designated privately owned
structures must meet these standards. (See Land Use Policy LU-2.4.2.)
Policy CM-5.2.2: Th- City currently owns historic sites and other potential
archaeological sites. I it is deemed in the public interest for the City to transfer title of
City properties of hi oric, architectural, or archaeological significance, such transfer will
include restrictiv- covenants to ensure the protection and preservation of such
properties. (See and Use Policy LU-2.4.3.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
114
SUBSTITUTE
NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION
Goal NR-1: Maintain, preserve, enhance and restore the quality of natural resourc- within
the context of the city's urban environment.
Objective NR-1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems with' Virginia Key,
the Dinner Key spoil islands, and those portions of Biscayne Bay t =t lie within the
City's boundaries.
Policy NR-1.1.1: The City shall continue to take actions to protect and restore the
natural environment of Virginia Key in cooperation with appropriate County, State and
Federal environmental agencies. (See Coastal Manageme Policy CM-1.1.1.)
Policy NR-1.1.2: The City will continue retrofitting theumber of storm water outfalls
that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into
Biscayne Bay in accordance with water quality i-provement programs and adopted
plans. If positive drainage systems to these wa -r bodies are deemed to be the only
feasible method of maintaining adequate stor ► drainage, then these storm sewers will
be designed and constructed to retain greas- .nd oil and minimize pollutant discharges.
(See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Poli 2.2.1 and Coastal Management Policy
CM-1.1.2.)
Policy NR-1.1.3: [Reserved]
Policy NR-1.1.4: The City will c• tinue to participate in the State funded SWIM program
for funding support in order . reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into
Biscayne Bay.
Policy NR-1.1.5: Regul e development on Virginia Key to ensure that there will be no
net loss of functional etlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be
degraded or disrup ' d; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora
will be protected.
Policy NR-1. .6: Through land development regulations, ensure that development or
redevelop nt within the Coastal Zone will not adversely affect the natural environment
or lead to:. net loss of public access or public use of public owned property (consistent
with pr• ection of natural systems) to the city's natural resources.
Policy NR-1.1.7: The City will increase code enforcement to prevent illegal disposal of
-`zardous waste into the city's natural resources such as the Miami River and Biscayne
ay, and will encourage Miami -Dade County to approve and post signs warning against
illegal disposal.
Policy NR-1.1.8: The City will work with, and support the County's efforts to identify
generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enforce procedures for the proper
collection and disposal of hazardous waste. The City will support Miami -Dade County's
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
115
SUBSTITUTED
development of a hazardous waste temporary storage facility in a non -populated area.
(See Solid Waste Collection Policy SW-1.2.4.)
Objective NR-1.2: Improve the water quality of, and ensure health safety within, the
Miami River, its tributaries and the Little River.
Policy NR-1.2.1: The City will continue to work with the Biscayne Bay Man gement
Plan Committee and with the appropriate agencies in order to encourage an support
Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Manage ent in the
monitoring of contaminants within these water bodies and to ensure that t e City is kept
adequately informed of environmental conditions.
Policy NR-1.2.2: Continue to implement the Biscayne Bay Management Plan and other
relevant plans in order to reduce the level of contaminants in these water bodies and
improve the water quality within them.
Policy NR-1.2.3: Participate in state and federally f ded programs to remove
abandoned and repair leaking underground fuel storage nks on City owned properties.
Policy NR-1.2.4: The City of Miami will continue to cooperate with the Miami River
Commission, which has been granted broad p• ers over environmental and other
issues related to the Miami River by state statut; . Among the issues to be addressed by
the commission are those related to accept. • e water quality standards for the Miami
River and its tributaries.The City of Mii will cooperate with the Miami River
Commission in establishing such standar►,s and, to the extent feasible, achieving them.
Objective NR-1.3: Maintain and enhance ` e status of native species of fauna and flora.
Policy NR-1.3.1: Continue and, here necessary, expand the use of scenic corridor
and Environmental PreservatioDistrict designation.
Policy NR-1.3.2: Identify Cty-owned land with significant native vegetative features or
wildlife habitats, and designate those areas as Environmental Preservation Districts.
Policy NR-1.3.3: Continue designating private properties with significant or unique
resources as Envi nmental Preservation Districts.
Policy NR-1..4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any adverse
impacts on ejacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine
life, and e- ablish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts.
Polic R-1.3.5: Through the development review and approval process, ensure that
off- e mitigation for disruption or degradation of significant natural resources occurs in
orderly and sound manner, so as to maximize benefits to the overall natural system.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
116
SUBSTITUTED
Policy NR-1.3.6: Through the development review process, deny the use of intrusive
exotic plant species, encourage the use of native plant species, and those species that
do not require the excessive use of fertilizers, excessive watering, are not prone to insect
infestation or disease, and do not have invasive root systems.
Policy NR-1.3.7: Permit applications for all boating facilities located on city shoreline
shall be evaluated in the context of their cumulative impact on manatees and mar e
resources.
Policy NR-1.3.8: Slow or idle speed zones shall be adopted in areas frequ nted by
manatees and enforcement of speed zones will be improved.
Policy NR-1.3.9: To the extent that there are wetlands on the Resour•-s of Regional
Significance, State Save Our Rivers, or Dade County Environme .Ily Endangered
Lands acquisition lists within the City of Miami, consideration will se given to public
acquisition and management of such properties when such actio - are feasible.
Objective NR-1.4: Maintain, protect and enhance the City's tre= canopy and significant
trees.
Policy NR-1.4.1: The City will continue to protect the tie canopy and significant trees
through the Tree Protection Ordinance.
Policy NR-1.4.2: The City will work with public a d private partners to achieve the 2007
Tree Master Plan goal of 30% tree canopy cov rage citywide by 2020.
Policy NR-1.4.3: The City will develop an •rdinance describing criteria for designation
of City of Miami Historic Trees, procedur for nomination of a Miami Historic Tree, and
procedures for official designation and •ignage identifying Miami Historic Trees.
Goal NR-2: Maintain an adequate and safe pply of water for the city residents.
Objective NR-2.1: Ensure adequa:-- levels of safe potable water are available to meet
the needs of the city. (See Pota • e Water Objective PW-1.2.)
Policy NR-2.1.1: In periods of regional water shortage, the City will support the South
Florida Water Management District's policies and regulations regarding water
conservation.
Policy NR-2.1.. The City will continue to enforce Florida Building Code requirements
for the on -sit etention of the first inch of storm water runoff. (See Sanitary and Storm
Sewers Pol' y SS-2.2.5.)
Policy )iR-2.1.3: The City will continue to support the South Florida Water Management
Distri efforts to monitor the water levels at the salinity control structures within the city
to p; event against further saltwater intrusion and protect the aquifer recharge areas and
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
117
SUBSTITUTED
cones of influence of wellfields from contamination. (See Natural Groundwater Aquifer
Recharge Policy AR-1.1.3.)
Policy NR-2.1.4: Since the potable water network is an interconnected,
system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer
(MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biann
estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient c
development exists. (See Potable Water Policy PW-1.1.1.)
c• 4 ntywide
Department
ly updating
acity to serve
Policy NR-2.1.5: Ensure potable water supplies meet the established level of service
standards for transmission capacity as set in the Capital Impro";ements Element. (See
Potable Water Policy PW-1.2.1 and Capital Improvements Policy CI-1.2.3.)
Policy NR-2.1.6: [Reserved]
Policy NR-2.1.7: The City adopted an Updated Water Supply Facilities Work Plan
(contained in Appendix PW-1 of the MCNP) for a 2r-year planning period, from 2014 to
2033, that is consistent with the current South Flo .da Water Management District Lower
East Coast Water Supply Plan Updates a%proved by the South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD) and the curr- t adopted County Water Supply Facilities
Work Plan. The City's Work Plan and the .unty's Work Plan are incorporated into the
City's Comprehensive Plan (See Potabl-, ater Policy PW-1.2.2.)
Policy NR-2.1.8: The City will contin "e to practice water conservations measures (i.e.
new residential and commercial development will be required to install high efficiency
plumbing fixtures and appliance ° that are enforced through Chapter 8 — Building Code
and 32 — Water and Sewer Re! Iations, of the Miami Dade County Code of Ordinances,
updated September 2, 2008
Policy NR-2.1.9: The C. will continue to implement the same or more stringent water
conservation measur: as provided through Chapter 8 — Building Code (updated
September 2, 2008 Chapter 32 — Water and Sewer Regulations (updated September
2, 2008), and Ch..ter 18A and 18B — Landscape Ordinance (updated May 5, 2009), of
the Miami -Dade ounty Code of Ordinances.
Goal NR-3: Attain and aintain a degree of air quality that is safe and to meet all attainment
standards set by the .S. Environmental Protection Agency for the city as a whole.
Objective N -3.1: Improve the monitoring of air quality within areas perceived to have
the highest potential for air quality problems.
olicy NR-3.1.1: The City shall continue working with County, State and federal
environmental agencies to ensure that the number of air quality monitoring stations
maintained by these agencies are sufficient to ensure accurate ongoing monitoring of
air quality standards.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
118
SUBSTITUTE
Objective NR-3.2: Prevent the degradation of ambient air quality within the city.
Policy NR-3.2.1: Establish vehicular transportation patterns that redu the
concentration of pollutants in areas known to have ambient air quality proble
Policy NR-3.2.2: The City of Miami continues to support the provision of e icient transit
and paratransit services that serve existing and future trip generators an attractors, the
provision of safe and convenient transit passenger transfer terminal cilities, and the
accommodation of the special needs of the City of Miami's popula'.n. Therefore, the
City of Miami will support Miami -Dade County in the provision of ese essential transit
services. (See Transportation Objective 1.5)
Policy NR-3.2.3: The City will work with the Miami -Dade Co my transportation planning
agencies to continue to increase the quality of transit ser es within the city.
Policy NR-3.2.4: The City will work with the approlate federal, state, regional, and
county agencies to ensure that owners of buildi 'is and facilities with unacceptable
levels of asbestos (according to EPA and State andards) in ambient air test remove,
treat and seal asbestos -containing materials as long as this action will not cause further
degradation to the air quality.
Policy NR-3.2.5: The City will monitor developers to ensure that they appropriately treat
exposed construction areas by meansuch as mulching, spraying or grass coverings,
to minimize air pollution.
Policy NR-3.2.6: The City will r duce human exposure to air pollution by taking into
consideration climate chap mitigation and adaptation strategies from the
recommendations of the S utheast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with all applicable regulations.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
119
SUBSTITUTED
EDUCATION
GOAL EDU-1: DEVELOP, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF PUBLIC EDUCATI
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY AND
APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, WHICH WILL STRIVE TO IMPR
QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AVAILAB
CITIZENRY OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
BY
THER
E THE
TO THE
Objective EDU-1.1: Work towards the reduction of the overcrowdin• which currently
exists in the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, while striving to ttain an optimum
level of service pursuant to Objective EDU-1.2. Provide ad • °`tional solutions to
overcrowding so that citywide enrollment in Miami -Dade Coun s public schools will
meet state requirements for class size by September 1, 2010.
Policy EDU-1.1.1: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to continue to provide new student stations through the Capital Outlay program,
in so far as funding is available.
Policy EDU-1.1.2: Cooperate with the Miami ade County Public Schools in their
efforts to develop and implement alternativ educational facilities, such as primary
learning centers, which can be construct d on small parcels of land and relieve
overcrowding at elementary schools, in so ar as funding and rules permit.
Policy EDU-1.1.3: Cooperate with e Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to provide public school facies to the students in the City, which operate at
optimum capacity, in so far as nding available. Operational alternatives may be
developed and implemented, where appropriate, which mitigate the impacts of
overcrowding while maintaini • the instructional integrity of the educational program.
Policy EDU-1.1.4: Coo
efforts to maintain an
Educational Facilities
rate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
r improve the established level of service (LOS), for Public
as established for the purposes of school concurrency.
Policy EDU-1.1.4: The Miami -Dade County School Board (School Board) comments
shall be sough and considered on comprehensive plan amendments and other land
use and zoni • decisions which could impact the school district, in order to be consistent
with the ter' s of the state mandated Interlocal Agreement pursuant to Sections 1013.33
and 163. 1777, Florida Statutes.
Poli EDU-1.1.6: Capital improvement programming by the Miami -Dade Public
Sc»ools should be based on future enrollment projections and demographic shifts and
rgeted to enhance the effectiveness of the learning environment. The future
enrollment projections should utilize student population projections based on information
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
120
SUBSTITUTED
produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant
to Section 216.136, Florida Statutes, where available, as modified by the School Board
based on development data and agreement with the City of Miami, the State Office of
Educational Facilities and the State SMART Schools Clearinghouse. The School Board
may request adjustment to the estimating conferences' projections to reflect actual
enrollment and development trends. In formulating such a request, the School Boar
will coordinate with the City regarding development trends and future popula •n
projections.
Policy EDU-1.1.7: The City will through the Staff Working Group of the !nterlocal
Agreement for Public School Facility coordinate with Miami -Dade Co my Public
Schools, and applicable Cities to review annually the Education Elemer, and school
enrollment projections.
Objective EDU-1.2: The City of Miami shall coordinate new residential development with
the future availability of public school facilities4 consistent with the adopted level of
service standards for public school concurrency, to ensure a inclusion of those
projects necessary to address existing deficiencies in the 5- ear schedule of capital
improvements, and meet future needs based upon achie ing and maintaining the
adopted level of service standards throughout the plannin period.
Policy EDU-1.2.1: Beginning January 1, 2008, theadopted level of service (LOS)
standard for all Miami -Dade County public school cilities is 100% utilization of Florida
Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (W. Relocatable Classrooms).This LOS
Standard, shall be applicable in each public school concurrency service area (CSA),
defined as the public school attendance ••undary established by the Miami -Dade
County Public Schools.
Policy EDU-1.2.2: It is the goal of Mi. i-Dade County Public Schools and The City of
Miami for all public school facilities achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No
Relocatable Classrooms) capacit, by January 1, 2018. To help achieve the desired
100% utilization of Permanent F : H by 2018, Miami -Dade County Public Schools should
continue to decrease the nu a ser of relocatable classrooms over time. Public school
facilities that achieve 100% 4tilization of Permanent FISH capacity should, to the extent
possible, no longer utilize elocatable classrooms, except as an operational solution2.
By December 2010, t - City and County in cooperation with Miami -Dade County Public
Schools will asses: the viability of modifying the adopted LOS standard to 100%
utilization of Per anent FISH (No Relocatable Classrooms) for all CSAs.
4 Level of Service standards for iublic school facilities to those traditional educational facilities, owned and operated by the Miami -Dade County Public
Schools, that are required to rve the residential development within their established Concurrency Service Area. Level of Service standards do not
apply to charter schools. ever, the capacity of both charter and magnet schools will be credited against the impact of development. No credit
against the impact of de lopment shall be given for either magnet or charter schools if their district wide enrollment is at, or above, 100% FISH
Capacity
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
121
SUBSTITUTED
Policy EDU-1.2.3: In the event the adopted LOS standard of a CSA cannot be met s
a result of a proposed development's impact, the development may proceed pro ded
at least one of the following conditions is met:
1.2.3.1: The development's impact can be shifted to one or more adjacent CSAs
that have available capacity located, either in whole or in part, wit n the same
Geographic Areas (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, or Southeast, --e Figures 1A,
2A and 3C within Appendix EDU-1) as the proposed developmen , or
1.2.3.2: The development's impact is mitigated, proportiona - to the demand for
public schools it created, through a combination of one or m re proportionate share
mitigation options as defined in Section 163.3180 (13)( )1, Florida Statutes. The
intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation •f residential development
impacts on public school facilities, guaranteed by a legal binding agreement,
through mechanisms that include, one or more of t , following: contribution of land;
the construction, expansion, or payment for Ian acquisition or construction of a
permanent public school facility; or, the creati•' of a mitigation bank based on the
construction of a permanent public school f ility in exchange for the right to sell
capacity credits. The proportionate sha mitigation agreement is subject to
approval by Miami -Dade County Schoo :oard and Miami -Dade County Board of
County Commission and must be i.' ntified in the Miami -Dade County Public
Schools Facilities Work Program.
1.2.3.3: The development's impacts are phased to occur when sufficient capacity
will be available. If none of the above conditions is met, the development shall not
be approved.
Policy EDU-1.2.4: Concur -ncy Service Areas (CSA) shall be delineated to: 1)
maximize capacity utilizat'•n of the facility, 2) limit maximum travel times and reduce
transportation costs, 3) < knowledge the effects of court -approved desegregation plans,
4) achieve socio-econ , ic, racial, cultural and diversity objectives, and 5) achieve other
relevant objectives :s determined by the School Board's policy on maximization of
capacity. Periodic adjustments to the boundary or area of a CSA may be made by the
School Board t•. achieve the above stated factors. Other potential amendments to the
CSAs shall b: considered annually at the Staff Working Group meeting to take place
each year n►, later than April 30 or October 31, consistent with Section 9 of the Interlocal
Agreeme for Public School Facility Planning.
Polio EDU-1.2.5: The City through the implementation of the concurrency
ma .gement system and Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program
educational facilities, shall ensure that existing deficiencies are addressed and the
apacity of schools is sufficient to support residential development at the adopted level
of service (LOS) standards throughout the planning period in the 5-year schedule of
capital improvements.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
122
SUBSTITUTED
Policy EDU-1.2.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will
be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will
continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period.
Objective EDU-1.3: Obtain suitable sites for the development and expansiop'of public
education facilities
Policy EDU-1.3.1: In the selection of sites for future educational facility development,
the City encourages the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to consider whether a
school is in close proximity to residential areas and is in a location that would provide a
logical focal point for community activities.
Policy EDU-1.3.2: Where possible, the Miami -Dade Co my Public Schools should
seek sites which are adjacent to existing or planned publi recreation areas, community
centers, libraries, or other compatible civic uses for the rpose of encouraging joint use
facilities or the creation of logical focal points for com unity activity.
Policy EDU-1.3.3: The City acknowledges and concurs that, when selecting a site, the
Miami -Dade County Public Schools will consi er if the site meets the minimum size
criteria as recommended by the State Depa ent of Education or as determined to be
necessary for an effective educational envi nment.
Policy EDU-1.3.4: When considering site for possible use as an educational facility,
the Miami -Dade County Public Sch••Is should review the adequacy and proximity of
other public facilities and service: necessary to the site such as roadway access,
transportation, fire flow and po'able water, sanitary sewers, drainage, solid waste,
police and fire services, and m ns by which to assure safe access to schools, including
sidewalks, bicycle paths, tur► lanes, and signalization.-
Policy EDU-1.3.5: When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility
the Miami Dade Co sty Public Schools should consider whether the present and
projected surroundir• land uses are compatible with the operation of an educational
facility.
Policy EDU-1 .6: The City shall encourage and cooperate with the Miami -Dade County
Public Sch••Is in their effort for public school siting reviews to help accomplish the
objective .nd policies of this element and other elements of the MCNP. The City shall
coopere with the Public Schools to establish provisions for a scoping or pre -application
meeti'g as part of the educational facilities review process, if determined to be
war nted.
Policy EDU-1.3.7: The City will continue to cooperate with Miami -Dade County Public
/Schools in utilizing Miami -Dade County Public Schools as emergency shelters during
county emergencies.
123
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Objective EDU-1.4: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools, in conjunction with the City
of Miami and other appropriate agencies, will strive to improve security and safety for
students and staff.
Policy EDU-1.4.1: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Sc► •ols
to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to reduce the incid- nce of
violence, weapons and vandalism on school campuses. Encourage the • -sign of
facilities, which do not encourage criminal behavior and provide clear sigh Ines from
the street.
Policy EDU-1.4.2: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade Cou Public Schools
to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to re► ce the number of
incidents related to hazardous conditions as reported by the Env: onmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the fire marshal, the State Department of Edu tion (DOE), and other
appropriate sources.
Policy EDU-1.4.3: Continue to cooperate with the Miam lade County Public Schools
to provide for the availability of alternative programs fo at -risk students at appropriate
public educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.4.4: Coordinate with the Mia -Dade County Public Schools and
municipalities to provide for pedestrian and traffic safety in the area of schools, and
signalization for educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.4.5: Coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Division of
School Police and other law enforcemit agencies, where appropriate, to improve and
provide for a secure learning enviro ent in the public schools and their vicinity.
Objective EDU-1.5: Continue to deirelop programs and opportunities to bring the
schools and community closer together.
Policy EDU-1.5.1: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to provide "full s: vice" schools, parent resource centers, adult and community
schools and program .s appropriate.
Policy EDU-1.5. Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their
efforts to contin - to provide opportunities for community and business leaders to serve
on committee and task forces, which relate to the development of improved provision
of public ed national facilities.
Policy ' • U-1.5.3: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to continue
to wor with the development industry to encourage partnerships in the provision of sites
and educational facilities including early childhood centers.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
124
SUBSTITUTED
Policy EDU-1.5.4: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools through
agreement with appropriate agencies to increase medical, psychological, and social
services for children and their families as appropriate.
Objective EDU-1.6: Miami -Dade County Public Schools will continue to enhance
effectiveness of the learning environment.
Policy EDU-1.6.1: Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continu- the
design and construction of educational facilities which create the perception of eeling
welcome, secure and positive about the students' school environment and expriences.
Policy EDU-1.6.2: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encourag ` to continue
to design and construct facilities which better provide student acces to technology
designed to improve learning, such as updated media centers and sci . ce laboratories.
Policy EDU-1.6.3: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools is en urage to continue to
improve existing educational facilities, in so far as fundin is available, through
renovation and expansion to better accommodate incr asing enrollment, new
educational programs and other activities, both curricular a d extra -curricular.
Objective EDU-1.7: The School Board, the City, and other appropriate jurisdictions shall
establish and implement mechanism for ongoing coordination and communication, to
ensure the adequate provision of public educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.7.1: The City shall coordinate an cooperate with the Miami -Dade County
Public Schools, the State, municipalities an other appropriate agencies to develop or
modify rules and regulations in order to simplify and expedite proposed new educational
facility developments and renovations.
Policy EDU-1.7.2: The location of future educational facilities should occur where
capacity of other public facilitie and services is available to accommodate the
infrastructure needs of the educ ional facility.
Policy EDU-1.7.3: The Mia i-Dade County Public Schools should coordinate school
capital improvement plan with the planned capital improvement projects of other
County and municipal agencies.
Policy EDU-1.7.4: e City shall cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools
in their efforts to - sure that they are not obligated to pay for off -site infrastructure in
excess of their f it share of the costs.
Policy ED-1.7.5: City of Miami and the Miami -Dade County Public Schools will
annually -view the Educational Element and the City will make amendments, if
necess
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
125
SUBSTITUTED
Policy EDU-1.7.6: The City shall seek to coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Pu
Schools in formalizing criteria for appropriate sharing of responsibility for require
site facility improvements attributable to construction of new public schools or ex
of existing ones.
is
off-
nsion
Policy EDU-1.7.7: The City shall coordinate with the Miami -Dade aunty Public
Schools and Miami -Dade County to eliminate infrastructure deficienci s surrounding
existing school sites.
Policy EDU-1.7.8: The City and the Miami -Dade County Public Scools shall coordinate
efforts to ensure the availability of adequate sites for the requir
educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.7.9: The City and the Miami -Dade C•.4nty Public Schools shall
coordinate the appropriate roles and responsibilitie of affected governmental
jurisdictions in ensuring the timely, orderly and e' icient provision of adequate
educational facilities.
Policy EDU-1.7.10: The City will work with Mi, i-Dade County will account for the
infrastructure needs of new, planned or expanded educational facilities when
formulation and implementing its own capitalprovement plans.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRA
In order to enable the preparation of the periodic
by Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (F.S.), a
procedures for the monitoring and evaluating
Monitoring Requirements
aluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) as required
Rule 9J-5.0053, F.A.C., this section will outline the
f the Element and its implementation.
The primary mechanism to monitor p egress in achieving the objectives and policies in this Element
is the collection and update of . propriate baseline data. Further, as required by the State
Requirements for Educational F. ilities, at least once every five (5) years the School Board shall
arrange for an educational plan urvey to be conducted. This plant survey will include data regarding
existing facilities and a five year projection of student population. The written report from this
survey shall include the following:
Inventory An inventory of existing ancillary and educational plants and auxiliary
facilities.
Student
Population
Capital 0 a
Facilit' s
An analysis of past and projected student population.
An analysis of expenditures and projected capital outlay funds.
Statements of proposed types of facilities, grade structure, and list student
capacity.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 126
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTE
Funding A proposed funding plan.
The information obtained from the educational plant survey will be used to generally m• itor the
progress of the objectives and policies contained in the Educational Element and will prov Se specific
indicators for Objective EDU-1.1 and Objective EDU-1.4.
The enforcement or adoption of interlocal agreements shall be explored as . means to help
implement components of the Educational Element, and to coordinate the eicient provision of
public educational facilities. The performance of any agreements related to objectives of this element
will be monitored as they are set in place.
Objective EDU-1.1 policies relating to the maintenance and impr vement of specific level of
service for public educational facilities, as specified in the Ed ational Facilities Impact Fee
Ordinance, shall be reviewed annually. Each year, the Mia i-Dade County Public Schools
will compare the official enrollment of the school system with the number of student stations
available to determine the current operating LOS.
Objective EDU-1.2 will be measured through an an al review of the latest adopted Miami -
Dade County Public Schools Facility Work Program in order to determine if the adopted
concurrency level of service standard (including t Interim LOS standards) is being achieved.
The number of development orders approv:, those disapproved and those that have
achieved LOS standards through mitigation • •tions will also be reviewed.
Objective EDU-1.3 will be monitored t '•ugh the annual inventory and assessment by the
Miami -Dade County Public Schools o chool Board owned property. The number of new
sites shall be reported annually and the full review period reported in the EAR.
Objective EDU-1.4 will be monitored through the review and analysis of the statistics relating
to school safety, as compiled annually, by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Division of
Police. A review and analysis of new and existing reactive and proactive safety and crime
prevention programs will . o be conducted on an annual basis.
Objective EDU-1.5 s
and reviewing the p
including an enro
programs.
II be monitored by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools by reporting
gress and number of new and existing community oriented programs,
ent analysis, by age and ethnicity, of adult, community and vocational
Objective U-1.6 shall be monitored by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools by reporting
the numb of educational facility enhancements such as media centers, art/music suite, and
science aboratories.
Objective EDU-1.7 will be addressed by implementing and tracking the development of
appropriate mechanisms, including interlocal agreements and coordination efforts, which
erve to expedite the provision or enhancement of public educational facilities.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
127
SUBSTITUTED
Monitoring methods may be added or deleted as circumstances and criteria evolve. Any significant
modifications to the monitoring process will be dealt with, as appropriate, through the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan amendment process.
Evaluation
Available data regarding the various public educational facilities will be used to assess progress on
specific objectives. In order to evaluate the level of service being provided, student capa y totals
will be reviewed in comparison to student enrollment to determine the status of the curr t level of
service being provided. Similarly, performance in terms of achieving other objective can also be
analyzed by tracking the number of completed capital projects, as well as the de elopment and
implementation of other programs associated with each objective. Results of thes- calculations and
measures will be analyzed and changing circumstances and opportunities will b: considered.
Any actions, changes or modifications to the Goal, Objectives, and Policies will be explained in
accordance with the results of this process of continued monitoring and e .luation. Any necessary
changes will be made through the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood 'Ian amendment process.
Future Conditions Maps
Consistent with Section 163.3177(12) (g), Florida Statutes,
conditions are included in the element. A map series (Figures 1
1) indicate the public school and ancillary facility locations as
s showing existing and future
2B and 3C within Appendix EDU-
ecember 31, 2007.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
128
SUBSTITUTED
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Goal CI-1: Adhere to sound fiscal management policies that ensure the timely provision of
public capital facilities required to maintain existing public infrastructure, that meet the need
for public facilities resulting from future development and redevelopment, and that enable t
provision of public capital facilities that enhance the quality of life within the city.
Objective CI-1.1: The Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive P : n will
provide for the sound fiscal planning of capital facility needs and assess the financial
capacity of the City to undertake capital improvement projects.
Policy CI-1.1.1: The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and the Capi . I Improvement
Program (CIP) represent the means by which the capital facilities needs of the city will
be addressed, and both the CIE and CIP will be revised on an annual basis to reflect
changes in the economic, social and public fiscal environment.
Policy CI-1.1.2: All capital expenditures in excess of $5,00i per distinct project must
appear within the CIE and CIP, with the exception of exnditures required to meet
public emergencies or unforeseeable contractual obligati►,ns.
Policy CI-1.1.3: The City will adopt a Capital Budg- that corresponds to the first year
of the CIE and CIP.
Policy CI-1.1.4: As capital projects are incorpo'.ted into the CIE and CIP, consideration
will be given to the elimination of public ha ,yrds, the elimination of shortfalls between
the adopted level of service (LOS) standar• and the existing capacity of public facilities;
the impact of proposed capital projects • the capital and operating budgets of the City;
the fiscal capacity of the City to meet ture capital spending needs; the economic and
social benefits to be generated by roposed projects; the environmental impacts of
proposed projects; the public facility requirements of new development or
redevelopment; consistency b- een proposed capital projects and the goals and
objectives set forth in the varis elements of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan; and the coordination •etween proposed City projects and those projects and
programs of federal, ste, and county agencies and the South Florida Water
Management District a • Miami -Dade County Public Schools.
Policy CI-1.1.5: I the appropriation of capital funds priority will be given to the
maintenance, rep.ir and replacement of existing public capital facilities.
Policy CI-1.1 •: All bond authorizations must be in conformance with the capital facilities
needs, pro ; ams and expenditure requirements as expressed within the City's Capital
Improve nt Element.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
129
SUBSTITUTED
Policy CI-1.1.7: The City will continue to seek the advice of qualified counsel to ens e
the proper timing of debt issuance and efficient management of its capital fins ing
resources.
Policy CI-1.1.8: Debt issuance timing, size, and amortization schedules will be planned
and executed to maintain a level repayment and minimize fluctuations in th2 ad valorem
tax rate.
Policy CI-1.1.9: Competitive sale will be utilized whenever possible to assure that the
City obtains the most competitive interest rate in the municipal mai kets.
Policy CI-1.1.10: The City will maintain its long standing colic of avoiding the issuance
of short term financing in the form of Bond Anticipation Note , and Revenue Anticipation
Notes, unless there is a compelling need or extraordinary ircumstance for such interim
financing.
Policy CI-1.1.11: The ratio of net direct general o ki'gation debt as a percentage of the
assessed valuation of taxable property will not exceed 25% of the Charter -mandated
limit of 15% of the assessed valuation, or 3.75°•` of assessed valuation.
Policy CI-1.1.12: Total debt service pa ents as a percentage of the Combined
General Fund, Enterprise Fund, and De• Service Fund expenditures shall not exceed
15%.
Policy CI-1.1.13: To the greatest : tent possible, capital projects financed through the
issuance of general obligation b• ds shall have an expected useful life commensurate
with the period of the financin
Policy CI-1.1.14: Direct
maintained at below $1,
t general obligation and special obligation debt shall be
0 per capita.
Policy CI-1.1.15: T City will seek to attain a bond rating of investment grade to ensure
that its citizens be efit from the lowest possible interest rates on its bonds.
Policy CI-1.1 6: The City will assist where possible Miami -Dade County Public Schools
and Miami Pade County in providing school concurrency related capital improvements
and seeki-g to expand the funding sources available to meet those requirements.
Objective 1-1.2: Ensure through the City's land development regulations that
develop P -nt orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an
increa in the density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon the availability
of p •Iic facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards for
sa ' ary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, adequate water supply, parks
aid recreation, and transportation facilities, and that land use map changes maintain
the financial feasibility of the MCNP. (See Coastal Management Objective CM-1.4 or
Educational Objective EDU-1.2.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 130
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTE
Policy CI-1.2.1: The impact of proposed future land use map changes on me ing
adopted LOS standards and public capital facility needs will be assessed for thei„ effect
on the financial feasibility of the MCNP before such proposals are adopted and no land
use map change will be approved if the change causes the MCNP not to be financially
feasible.
Policy CI-1.2.2: All development orders authorizing changes in permitted land uses for
new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the ensity or intensity
of land use will be contingent upon the ability of existing or progra - med public facilities
to continue to provide service at or above the adopted LOS •ndard for the public
facilities listed in Policy CI-1.2.3. The public facilities to serve e new development or
redevelopment shall be in place and available to serve new . velopment as follows:
a) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, potable water facilitis and adequate water supply
shall be in place and available to serve new delopment or redevelopment no
later than the issuance of a certificate of occ •ancy or its functional equivalent.
The concurrency requirement for sanitary ewer may be met through the use
of onsite sewage treatment and disposa ystems approved by the Department
of Health. Prior to approval of a buildi • permit or its functional equivalent, the
city shall consult with the Miami-D..e County Water and Sewer Department
(MDWASD) to determine whether e adequate water supplies to serve the new
development will be available n•`later than the anticipated date of issuance of
a certificate of occupancy or i functional equivalent. Furthermore, MDWASD
shall be responsible for mo ' oring the availability of water supplies for all water
users of MDWASD and f•r implementing a system that links water supplies to
the permitting of new development.
b) Park and recreatio
new developme
issuance of a c
for such facili
a certificat
the dev
comm
facilities shall be in place or under construction to serve
or redevelopment no later than one (1) year after the
ificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. The acreage
'es shall be dedicated or acquired by the city prior to issuance of
f occupancy or its functional equivalent, or funds in the amount of
per's fair share shall be committed no later than approval to
ce construction.
c) Trsportation facilities shall be in place and available to serve new
velopment or redevelopment no later than three (3) years after the issuance
of a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation,
consistent with the provisions of Obiective TR-1.7 & related Policies and Policy
TR-1.3.3 Policy TR 1.1.1, TR 1.1.2 and TR 1.1.3. If the funds in the CIE are
insufficient to fully fund the transportation facility improvement required, the City
may enter into a binding proportionate -share agreement sufficient to mitigate
the impacts by paying for one or more improvements which will significantly
benefit the impacted transportation system, which improvements shall be
adopted into the 5 year capital improvements schedule at the next annual CIE
update.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 131
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTE
d) Storm -sewer. Issuance of any development permit shall require compliance
with the stormwater level of service standard.
Policy CI-1.2.3: Acceptable Level of Service Standards for public facilities in the y of
Miami are:
a) Recreation and Open Space — Provide a municipally -owned park hin a ten-
minute barrier -free walk to park entrances by 72% of the city's copulation as
measured by GIS pedestrian network analysis. A ten-minu walk will be
defined as a one-half mile, barrier -free distance on a safe edestrian route.
Barrier -free means a continuous walk on a sidewalk or de gnated pedestrian
route that may include crossing streets but does not encounter barriers such as
walls or highway embankments that impede passage. Safe pedestrian routes
include those that may include crossing of streets with speed limits of up to 40
mph. (See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4.).
b) Potable Water Transmission Capacity — 92.95 gallons/ resident/ day. (See
Potable Water Policy PW-1.2.1 and Natural source Conservation Policy NR-
2.1.5.).
c) Sanitary Sewer Transmission Capa 'y — 141 gallons/ resident/day. (See
Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy S:-1.3.1.)
d) Storm Sewer Capacity — One -in- e-year storm event. (See Sanitary and Storm
Sewers Policy SS-2.1.3.)
e) Solid Waste Collection C. .acity — 1.28 tons/resident/year. (See Solid Waste
Collection Policy SW-1..1.)
f) Traffic Circulation The minimum Icvcl of scrvicc standard on limited access,
arterial, and colle . or roadways that are not within designated Transportation
Corridors is the '4eak period LOS E, with allowable exceptions and justifications
with LOS me-.sured by conventional methodology pursuant to Objective TR
1.1, Policy ' 1.1.1, Policy TR 1.1.2 and Policy TR 1.1.3. The measurement
of LOS is ade for the peak period (which is the average of the two highest
consec ive hours of trip volume during a weekday). Within designated
Transportation Corridors, which include approximately 95% of the roadway
Anil: _ge within the City of Miami, a minimum peak period LOS E is also
:intained, but the measurement methodology is based on the peak period
.erson trips wherein the capacities of all modes, including mass transit, are
used in calculating the LOS. An overall minimum peak period LOS standard of
E (100 percent utilization of person trip capacity) will be maintained on
Transportation Corridors. Spccific Icvcls of scrvicc by location and modc arc
set out in Policies TR 1.1.2 (addressing transportation corridors) and TR 1.1.3
(addressing FIHS facilities) from the Transportation Element of the MCNP. The
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 132
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
g)
City will utilize a tiered LOS analysis when reviewing traffic impacts for new
developments whereby the Person -Trip LOS methodology will only be applied
within areas identified as a Center (as depicted on Map TR-14.2 within Appendix
TR-1, the Data Inventory and Analysis) while the traditional automobile LOS
methodology will be applied to all other areas within the City. Both
methodologies are then expressed as a ratio corresponding to letter grade
LOS A through LOS F based on the volume -to -capacity ratio in the s. e
manner as used by the traditional LOS methodology.
Issuance of development orders for new development or significant - pansion
of existing development will be contingent upon the develop ►ent of an
approved mitigation plan for an area at LOS E (100 percen of capacity)
standard or beyond within centers, transit corridors, and all oth: areas.
The City will require a generalized Traffic Statement d• umenting the trip
qeneration and site access for developments and redevel.. ments that generate
a minimum of 20 new peak hour trips. A detailed Tr fic and Neighborhood
Impact Analysis will be required for developments nd redevelopments that
generate more than 20 new peak hour trips. Det- mination of the number of
new peak hour trips projected to result from the • -velopment will be calculated
according to the latest version of the ITE Trip eneration Manual. (See Policy
TR-1.3.3. and Objective TR-1.7. & related P. icies for additional information).
The City has adopted FDOT's minimu, LOS targets for Florida Intrastate
Highway System (FINS) roadways. (S: - Objective TR-1.6.)
Miami -Dade Public Schools - Beg ning January 1, 2008, the adopted level of
service (LOS) standard for all iami-Dade County public school facilities is
100% utilization of Florida Inv' ntory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (With
Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS standard shall be applicable in each public
school concurrency serce area (CSA), defined as the public school
attendance boundary established by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools.
h) Adequate Water Surply -- As determined by the Miami -Dade County Water and
Sewer Department.
Policy CI-1.2.4: Th latest point in the application process for determination of
concurrency shall prior to the approval of an application for development order or
permit that cont ns a specific plan for development, including the densities and
intensities of evelopment. Concurrency will be determined by the Planning
Department during the review of a Major Use Special Permit, rezoning, and special
permits and exceptions pursuant to the City's land development regulations.
Policy CI-1.2.5: The Planning Department, with the assistance of various City
depa:tments and agencies, shall be responsible for monitoring and ensuring adherence
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
133
SUBSTITUTED
of the issuance of development orders to the adopted level of service standards, the
schedule of capital improvements and the availability of public facility capacity.
Policy CI-1.2.6: Rise in sea level projected by the federal government, and reed by
the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, shall be taken in
consideration in all future decisions regarding the design, location, and de elopment of
infrastructure and public facilities in the City to meet or exceed adopted evel of
Service (LOS) Standards. (See related policy CM-1.4.2)
Objective CI-1.3: Ensure that future development and redevelopment pay an
equitable, proportional share of the cost of public facilities required to maintain
adopted LOS standards.
Policy CI-1.3.1: The City will continue to use devel per contributions, including
development impact fees, to help fund the cost of publi facilities needed to serve new
development or redevelopment.
Policy CI-1.3.2: The City will periodically revise all fees related to the impact of new
development and redevelopment to reflect increases in the cost of providing public
capital facilities.
Policy CI-1.3.3: The City will consider the use of special assessment districts to help
fund capital projects whose public be fits tend to be localized to specific geographic
sub areas of the city.
Policy CI-1.3.4: The City will ke appropriate measures to ensure that increased
property values resulting fro new development and redevelopment are accurately
reflected on the County Tax ssessor's property tax rolls in a timely manner.
Policy CI-1.3.5: The City will work with the Miami Dade County and the Miami -Dade
County Public School , to identify appropriate funding mechanisms in order to assure
the fiscal resources • maintain acceptable levels of service.
Policy CI-1.3.6.
be evaluated
continue to
he Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will
an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will
e achieved and maintained throughout the planning period.
Objective CI-.4: Ensure that public capital expenditure within the Coastal Zone does
not encourage private development that is subject to significant risk of storm damage.
(See Coa al Management Objective CM-4.3.)
olicy CI-1.4.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal high hazard area
will be limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain adopted
LOS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time, or reduce
the threat to public health and safety from storm events. (See Coastal Management
Policy CM-4.3.1.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 134
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED/
Policy CI-1.4.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal zone intended to
further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Pla ill be
limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the risk to public h-alth and
safety from storm damage. (See Coastal Management Policy CM-4.3.2.)
Objective CI-1.5: The City's Capital Improvements Program and Sched - e is adopted
as follows in Appendix CI-1 of the MCNP.
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRA
Concurrency refers to a provision of Florida law that requires -rtain public facilities and
services to be available when the impact of land develop 'ent occurs. They must be
available "current with" the impact of development.
Paraphrasing Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes, ea n county and municipality must
incorporate specific and detailed provisions which s .II provide that public facilities and
services meet or exceed the Levels of Service (LO standards established in the Plan's
Capital Improvements Element and are available en needed for the development, or that
the development orders or permits are condition: 1 on the availability of these public facilities
and services necessary to serve the propose • .evelopment.
Levels of Service (LOS) are measures thdetermine the capacity of the public facility per
unit of demand. Local governments are equired to adopt LOS standards for the following
services:
Recreation and Open pace
Potable Water
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Drainage
Solid Waste
Traffic Circulation
Educational Public School Facilities
The Levels ofjService for each element are adopted by the local government in its
Comprehensi e Plan and approved by the state. Consequently, if any of the facilities or
services ar; not available, or are deficient in their LOS, development cannot take place until
they are ► ovided at the required level, and "concurrent with" the impact of the development.
Bec. se the City of Miami is a fully developed city, its adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map
is ►,esigned so that the land use densities and intensities shown on it are supported by
..propriate infrastructure that will meet the cities adopted LOS standards. Moreover,
iami's zoning regulations have been made consistent with its adopted 2020 Future Land
Use Maps required by Florida's Growth Management Laws. Therefore, development or
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
135
SUBSTITUTED
redevelopment that does not exceed allowable zoned uses and intensities will not require
concurrency review as a condition of issuance, because it is generally supported by
adequate infrastructure.
If a development permit being requested requires a Land Use/ Zoning change, or a ajor
Use Special Permit or similar consideration, a concurrency review will be required. I pacts
of the proposed development on the required LOS standards will be calculat-•, and a
determination made as to whether the required infrastructure capacity will b• available
concurrent with the impact of development. Planning Department will consul .epartments
of PW, SW, Parks & Recreation. , and others as appropriate for input to the LOS impact
evaluation.
An affirmative principal concurrency determination will be required before a prospective
developer can obtain a subsequent development order.
Public School Facilities:
Necessary public school facilities must be in place or under ctual construction within three
years after of final issuances of final subdivision of sit plan approval, or the functional
equivalent.
The City in coordination with the Miami -Dade County Public School shall by ordinance,
include proportionate share mitigation methodologies and options for public school facilities
in its concurrency management program and Interlocal Local Agreement for Public Facility
Planning between Miami -Dade County Public Schools, Miami -Dade County and the Cities
in Miami -Dade County, consistent with th- requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
The intent of these options is to provide f• the mitigation of residential development impacts
on public school facilities, guaranteed .y a legal binding agreement, through mechanisms
that include, one or more of the follo ``ing: contribution of land; the construction, expansion,
or payment for land acquisition or onstruction of a permanent public school facility; or, the
creation of a mitigation bank ba ' d on the construction of a permanent public school facility
in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits.
Capital improvements as-ociated with the construction of educational facilities are the
responsibility of the Mi i-Dade County Public School. To address financial feasibility
associated with scho• concurrency, the Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work
Program dated Sep mber 2007 for educational facilities will be incorporated by reference
in the CIE.
The City shall oordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, to annually update its
Facilities Work Program to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5-year and
long-termplanning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard,
includi interim standards, will continue to be achieved and maintained. The City, through
its anual update to the Capital Improvements Schedule, will incorporate by reference the
latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational
facilities. The City and the Miami -Dade County Public School will coordinate their planning
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 136
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
efforts prior to and during the MCNP Amendment process and during updates to the Miami -
Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
137
SUBSTITUTED
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
Goal IC-1: Increase effectiveness and efficiency in the delivery of government ervices
through the appropriate coordination of local government actions.
Objective IC-1.1: To establish formal procedures for coordinating City
operating functions that are directly related to the City's comprehensi
Miami -Dade County School Board, Miami -Dade County Water an
Department, Miami -Dade County Public Works Department, So
Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Ma
Seaport Department (Port of Miami), Aviation Department (Mia
the Miami -Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization
Shoreline Development Review Committee, Miami -Dade
Regional Transportation Authority, the South Florida R
South Florida Water Management District, the Florida D
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, the
Rehabilitative Services, the Division of Historical
adjacent local governments, and any other st
cooperation is required to accomplish the goal
plan.
lanning and
e plan with the
Sewer Authority
'd Waste Division,
gement (DERM), the
International Airport),
the Miami -Dade County
ransit, the South Florida
ional Planning Council, the
artment of Transportation, the
orida Department of Health and
esources, Department of State,
e, local or federal agency whose
and objectives of the comprehensive
Policy IC-1.1.1: By 2005, establish .y interlocal or other formal agreement with
appropriate jurisdictions joint proce -es for collaborative decision making on issues
including, but not limited to, the I• ation and extension of public facilities subject to
concurrency and the siting of facilities with countywide significance, including locally
unwanted land uses.
Policy IC-1.1.2: The City ill continue implementation activities associated with the
interlocal Agreement for ublic School Facility Planning in Miami -Dade County, effective
February 27, 2003, in uding, but not limited to, coordinating City, County, and School
Board plans based •on consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of
population growth and student enrollment; participating in decision -making, through
floating membership on the School Board's School Site Planning and Construction
Committee, r:•arding potential sites for new schools and proposals for significant
renovation, e location of relocatables or additions to existing buildings, and potential
closure of -xisting schools; and collaborating to identify options aimed to provide the
capacit to accommodate anticipated student enrollment demand associated with
incre.:es in residential development potential.
P icy IC-1.1.3: [Reserved]
Policy IC-1.1.4: The City will continue to seek membership on the Biscayne Bay
Management Committee, the principal coordinating body for Biscayne Bay, as a means
of expressing its policies pertaining to Biscayne Bay.
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
138
SUBSTITUTED
Policy IC-1.1.5: The City shall maintain its membership and involvement h
committees and groups addressing the environmental healthy and water qual of
Biscayne Bay.
Policy IC-1.1.6: The city will coordinate with county, state and local go,ernments,
districts and agencies to create partnerships to share open spaces anrecreational
facilities and promote enhancement and expansion of parks, recreatio :I facilities and
programs, greenways, trails and similar resources for use by Miami r-:'dents.
Policy IC-1.1.7: The City will continue to implement the FI%rida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), National Pollutant Elimin. on System (NPDES)
Permit addressing the requirements for compliance with the Tytal Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) for pollutants entering city bound water bodies and timate Biscayne Bay.
Policy IC-1.1.8: The City shall coordinate with the So 4 h Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD) to accommodate its water suppl and management planning and
permitting process, the City's adopted population • ojections, spatial characteristics of
the MCNP Land Use Plan map, and policies of the MCNP Land Use, Natural
Groundwater Aquifer Recharge and Coastal anagement Elements. It is further City
policy to accommodate future population aneconomic growth by utilizing the range of
alternative water supply technologies out ed under MCNP Potable Water Element
Objective PW-1.2, including sources ,°om expanded and/or new Florida Aquifer
wellfields, Floridian Aquifer storage an% recover (ASR) techniques, water conservation
methods, water reclamation, wat and wastewater reuse and other advanced
technologies.
Policy IC-1.1.9: In its develo
Supply Facilities Work Plan
be compatible, with the S
Regional Water Supply
ment of future potable water supplies and the Water
outlined in Objective PW-1.3, the City shall consider, and
th Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast
an.
Policy IC-1.1.10: T - City of Miami shall coordinate with Miami -Dade County WASD by
requiring applicatk s to be reviewed by MDWASD during the site plan review process
prior to approving a Building Permit, in order to determine whether adequate water
supplies will . available to serve the development by the anticipated issuance date of
the certifica • of occupancy for properties located within the City of Miami. The City will
monitor 4roposed amendments to the Miami -Dade County Comprehensive
Develop' ent Master Plan as they relate to water supply planning and sea level rise in
the C. of Miami and provide input as necessary.
Pi icy IC-1.1.11: The City shall participate in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate
Change Compact and shall coordinate with other agencies, local municipalities, and the
/private sector to develop initiatives and goals to address climate change mitigation and
adaptation. Climate related goals that support regional climate change objectives shall
be integrated into the City's Comprehensive Plan as appropriate.
139
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
SUBSTITUTED
Policy IC-1.1.12. All City departmental master plans and strategic business plans shall
include and prioritize climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climate
change related amendments shall be recommended through the next feasible, regular)
scheduled amendment process or departmental master plan update for each respec ' e
planning document.
a) Each City department shall consider extending planning horizons as
to adequately address (i.e. 30, 50, 75-year plans) the projected long-t
change impacts into resource allocation recommendations.
appropriate
m climate
b) All new departmental climate change policies and programs shall be monitored
for effectiveness.
Goal IC-2: Promote orderly and appropriate regional land develop ' ent and transportation
policies through consultations with Miami -Dade County, adjacent ounties, the region, and
locally impacted municipalities.
Objective IC-2.1: To further and strengthen existing and potential planning coordination
mechanisms to ensure that consideration is giv to both the impacts of land
development and transportation policies within iami on areas outside the City's
jurisdiction and the impacts of land developmen . utside the City's boundaries on the
City of Miami.
Policy IC-2.1.1: The City will continue its active participation in the Miami -Dade
Planners' Technical Committee (PTC) .r the purpose of addressing common concerns
and sharing resources toward solv g planning problems, water supply needs and
coordinate water use and sea lev: rise issues as needed with particular emphasis on
examining State of Florida plann g requirements in the context of Miami -Dade County's
unique governmental structur- o more effectively coordinate local planning efforts.
Policy IC-2.1.2: Working ' ough the Planners' Technical Committee, the City will share
copies of its comprehen ' e plan and plan amendments as well as information regarding
scheduled comprehe .ive planning -related public hearings for the benefit of adjacent
and other intereste.> urisdictions, and will encourage other participating jurisdictions to
provide this information as well.
Policy IC-2.1 : The City will support the South Florida Regional Planning Council in
developing € formal coordination mechanisms such as regional issue study groups that
coordinat land development and transportation policies among local governments; and
to est.• ish mediation mechanisms to resolve potential regional conflicts. (See
Inter.,ivernmental Coordination Policy IC-3.1.1.)
P
IC-2.1.4: The Cit will continue to utilize and coordinate with FDOT's South
lorida Commuter Services (SFCS) program to establish and implement transportation
demand management strategies for all future and existing employers with more than 50
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
140
SUBSTITUTED
employees. The City will lead by example in developing transportation demand
management strategies for City employees. (See Policy TR-1.5.3.)
Policy IC-2.1.5: The City will assist Miami -Dade County in developing the premium
transit protects identified in the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) within
the City limits. The City will utilize land development regulations and other incentives t
help direct development where it will best support existing and planned transit servi ' s.
(See Policy TR-2.1.2.)
Policy IC-2.1.6: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County to i ' element
resiliency policies to mitigate and protect vulnerable roadways and critical vacuation
routes (illustrated in Maps TR-15 and TR-11 within Appendix TR-1, the ):ta Inventory
and Analysis section respectively) within the City. (See Policy TR-2.2.1
Policy IC-2.1.7: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County's
specifically aims to provide premium transit service along roadwa
Biscayne Boulevard and West Flagler Street. (See TR- 2.4.1.)
ART Plan, which
in the City including
Policy IC-2.1.8 To improve regional mobility, the City will r: •ularly coordinate with, but
not limited to, Miami -Dade County, FDOT, MPO, South F .rida Regional Transportation
Authority (SFRTA), the Port of Miami, the Miami ''fiver Commission, the Miami
International Airport and other public agencies to ens e that future improvements to the
transportation network within the City from these ac - ncies' are consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the City of Miami's M P. (See Policy TR-2.4.2.)
Policy IC-2.1.9: The City will continue to coordinate with SFRTA, FDOT, Miami -Dade
County, and other local agencies to supp• ' and develop plans to implement the FEC
Coastal Link Commuter Rail. (See TR-2., .5.)
Objective IC-2.2: [Reserved]
Policy IC-2.2.1: [Reserved]
Goal IC-3: Contribute to an atmosp -re of cooperation among local governments within
Miami -Dade County.
Objective IC-3.1: Maximize t - use of informal, cooperative agreements as mechanisms
for intergovernmental conflict resolution within Miami -Dade County and minimize the
use of litigation.
Policy IC-3.1.1 • The City will exhaust all efforts to solve intergovernmental conflicts
arising from . soption and implementation of comprehensive plans through informal
mechanism:, including but not limited to working through the Miami -Dade Planners'
Technica. ommittee or utilizing the Miami -Dade County League of Cities and the South
Florida egional Planning Council's mediation process, before seeking remedies
throu► the judicial system, provided that efforts at informal resolution do not prevent
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
141
SUBSTITUTED
the City from seeking legal remedies, or jeopardize the City's ability to prevail in
legal action. (See Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC-2.1.3.)
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
Goals Objectives Policies
October 2015 December 2017
142