HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdvisory Legal Opinion - User Fees10/2/2017 Advisory Legal Opinion - User Fees
Florida Attorney General
Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 91-55
Date: July 22, 1991
Subject: User Fees
Mr. William P. Burtrey
Escambia County Attorney
RE: COUNTIES -TAXATION -SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -USER FEES -county may not impose
user fee where there is no relation between collection of fee and use of
public facility.
QUESTION:
May Escambia County impose a user fee on the sale of tickets for events at
the civic center to fund the Historic Pensacola Preservation Board and The
Arts Council of Northwest Florida?
SUMMARY:
Escambia County may not impose a user fee on tickets sold to civic center
events in order to fund the Historic Pensacola Preservation Board and The
Arts Council of Northwest Florida when such fee has no relation to the use
of the facility.
You state that the county wishes to impose a twenty-five cent per ticket
surcharge on each ticket sold at the civic center in order to fund the
Historic Pensacola Preservation Board and The Arts Council of Northwest
Florida. You suggest that the purposes of the board[1] and council[2] have
no apparent relation to the collection of the surcharge, yet funding of
these entities would allow the county to attract tourism and enhance the
cultural development of the citizens of Escambia County.
While noncharter counties have full authority to carry on county
government acting through the exercise of home rule powers,[3] the power
to tax or levy special assessments is not derived from such home rule
powers and must be authorized by law.[4] By general law, counties are
authorized to levy and collect taxes, both for county purposes and for
providing municipal services within any municipal service taxing unity,
and levy and collect special assessments.[5]
A special assessment is a charge against property which derives a special
benefit from the expenditure of the money collected by the assessment in
addition to the general benefit accruing to all property or citizens.[6]
The imposition of a surcharge on tickets sold at the civic center,
however, is not a charge against property, nor, as you have stated, does
the charge relate to the use of the civic center.
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/ago.nsf/printview/CEF5981 F1 BD08309852562AC0050E559 1/3
10/2/2017 Advisory Legal Opinion - User Fees
Counties are generally authorized to "[p]rovide parks, preserves,
playgrounds, recreation areas, libraries, museums, historical commissions,
and other recreation and cultural facilities and programs."[7] The Board
of County Commissioners of Escambia County is statutorily authorized to
make appropriations annually "from such funds as may be available" for the
Historic Pensacola Preservation Board.[8]
The statutory authority to appropriate funds for the historic preservation
board, however, does not constitute authority to levy and collect a tax or
special assessment for that particular purpose. As you indicate, there is
no statutory or constitutional authority for the county to collect the
twenty-five cents per ticket fee to fund the historic preservation board
or the arts council.
It would appear that the general support of historical preservation and
cultural development in Escambia County is provided by the county for the
benefit of all the citizens.[9] While this office has recognized the
validity of imposing charges or fees for the use of public facilities by
members of the public, such fees and charges may not be imposed for the
performance of a governmental duty owed to the public at large.[10]
Furthermore, in the absence of a specific facility of program, the use of
or participation in which can be identified to individual members of the
public, a user fee or charge may not be imposed.[11]
Accordingly, the county may not impose a user fee or charge on sales of
tickets at the civic center to fund historical preservation or cultural
development, when such purposes have no relation to the use of the civic
center facility.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Butterworth
Attorney General
RAB/tls
[1] Section 266.101(1), F.S., gives the purpose for the Historic Pensacola
Preservation Board as to "acquire, restore, preserve, maintain,
reconstruct, reproduce, and operate for the use, benefit, education,
recreation, enjoyment, and general welfare of the people of this state and
nation certain ancient or historic landmarks, sites, cemeteries, graves,
military works, monuments, locations, remains, buildings, and other
objects of historical or antiquarian interest of the City of Pensacola and
surrounding areas."
[2] You state that the purpose of the arts council is to "preserve the
local cultural heritage and to develop, advance, enhance and sustain the
cultural life of the Northwest Florida area by providing a range of local
arts agency services for the areas of Escambia, Santa Rosa and Okaloosa
Counties . . . ."
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/ago.nsf/printview/CEF5981 F1 BD08309852562AC0050E559 2/3
10/2/2017 Advisory Legal Opinion - User Fees
[3] See s. 125.01(1), F.S. (1990 Supp.) and Speer v. Olson, 367 So.2d 207
(Fla. 1978).
[4] See AGO 83-64 (special assessments are levied under the taxing power
and are a peculiar species of taxation).
[5] See s. 125.01(1)(r), F.S. (1990 Supp.).
[6] See 48 Fla. Jur.2d Special Assessments s. 1.
[7] Section 125.01(1)(f), F.S. (1990 Supp.).
[8] Section 266.108, F.S.
[9] Cf. AGO 86-8 (restoration and maintenance of a municipality's harbor,
a natural body of water which is not a public facility or system, is a
governmental duty owed to the public at large).
[10] See AGO's 85-101, 82-9 and 74-55 (user fees connote fees or charges
for the use of public facilities; governmental body is without power to
contract expressly or impliedly with a member of the public to charge for
a governmental duty owed to the public at large or for the benefit of all.
[11] Cf. Contractors and Builders Association v. City of Dunedin, 329
So.2d 314, 320 (Fla. 1976) (raising expansion capital by setting water and
sewer connection charges which do not exceed a pro rata share of
reasonably anticipated costs of expansion is permissible where expansion
is reasonably required and if use of the money collected is limited to
meeting the cost of the expansion).
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/ago.nsf/printview/CEF5981 F1 BD08309852562AC0050E559 3/3