The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBiscayne_I-395 Tunnel OptionSR 836 /1-395 and SR 5 / US 1 / Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept Evaluation FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6 October 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Figure 1.A: Compendium of General Concerns 2. Figure 1.B: Supplemental Rendering 3. Evaluation Memorandum a. Potential Utility Impacts b. Potential Operational / Mobility Impacts c. Potential Right of Way Impacts d. Potential Infrastructure Impacts e. Potential Constructability Impacts f. Potential Design / Geometrical Concerns g. Potential 1-395 Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Concerns h. Additional Alternative i. Cost Estimate Summary 4. Figure 2: Geometric Concerns 5. Figure 3: Traffic Circulation and Multimodal Concerns 6. Figure 4: Infrastructure, Maintenance of Traffic (MOT), Aesthetics, and Controversy Potential Concerns 7. Figure 5: Environmental & Utility Concerns 8. Figure 6: Additional Right of Way Impacts Appendix A: Right of Way Cost Estimates Appendix B: Contaminated Soil Disposal Cost Estimate Appendix C: Rendering received on September 3, 2014 Appendix D: 1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Tunnel Project Cost Estimate Florida Department of Transportation FDOT I Detailed Description General Impacts Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 ENGINEERING Multimodal MPed/ Transit/ Bicyclist) Geometric Operational X MOT/ Constructability X Linkage/ Circulation 0 O z W 0 U co Parking X R/W X Aesthetic X ENVIRONMENTAL Contamination X Flooding/ Evacuation \/ X Community Cohesion X X COST Utilities X RAN X re uy x pControversy Project Schedule X Potential v ,/� Compendium of General Concerns FIGURE 1A Florida Department of Transportation FDOT7 e ail of Proposed Concept FIGURE 1B Evaluation Memorandum The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6 Design office was asked to evaluate a conceptual rendering involving depressing a portion of the 1-395 freeway as well as a portion of SR 5/Biscayne Boulevard near downtown Miami provided by Miami -Dade County Commissioner Xavier Suarez (see Figure 1A and 1B). This concept was presented as an alternative option to the current Project Development & Environment (PD&E) study for the 1-395. Below please find our comments; please note that these comments are based only on the conceptual rendering provided. Potential Utility Impacts: 1. Impact to existing Florida Gas Transmission (FGT) west/east lateral line that crosses Biscayne Blvd. just north of NE 15th Street that feeds the Miami Beach Area (See Figure 5). As per the FGT Global Settlement Agreement with the State of Florida and FDOT the relocation of the permitted FGT facility will have to be performed at FDOT's expense and relocated to a suitable location as determined by FGT. One of the requirements for the suitable location is that the gas line has to accommodate an accessible width of 15' on both sides measured from the pipe edge plus 25' of temporary workspace on one of the sides. This entails rerouting the FGT line through an available side street north of NE 17th Terrace to clear the tunnel and then rerouting the line south through N. Bayshore Drive to tap into the existing line prior to its crossing of Biscayne Bay. In addition to the relocation costs and traffic disruptions the FGT line is the sole supplier of TECO Gas Company which supplies gas services to the whole Miami Beach area. Hence, disruption of the FGT line will directly impact gas services to thousands of Miami Beach residents and businesses. Portions of costs associated with the relocation of the FGT line would be part of the overall cost for construction of this concept, but were not estimated as part of this analysis due to lack of information from the utility agency regarding preferred relocation routes at the time this report was developed. 2. Impacts to other underground utilities along Biscayne Blvd. include but are not limited to Miami Dade Water and Sewer and their regional pump station components and connecting lines, AT&T, and Florida Power & Light (FP&L) (See Figure 5). A preliminary "ballpark" estimate for the relocation of the Comcast, FPL, Level 3, Verizon, MDWASD, Teco Peoples Gas, and AT&T utilities along Biscayne Blvd. is approximately $58 Million. It should be noted that these costs, although additional with respect to the total cost of the project, should be borne by the utility agencies/owners if they are within the FDOT right of way by permit. 3. Impacts to overhead facilities in the 1-395 vicinity including FP&L and AT&T. Potential Operational/Mobility Impacts: 1. Lock -down of the Biscayne Blvd. and 1-395 "tunnels" during a hurricane event (for purposes of flood protection) will close two major thoroughfares in an already very congested area of coastal Miami -Dade County. These two facilities currently act as evacuation routes for the downtown area of Miami as well as the barrier island of Miami Beach. Closure of these two facilities would force traffic to seek alternate routes to evacuate the area which are not equipped to handle increased traffic in case of an emergency. 2. Loss of public parking, both on -street and public parking lots (See Figure 4). Page 1 of 6 3. The geometric requirements of both tunnels will greatly impact the circulation patterns of 10 bus routes affecting a high number of existing bus stops and inconveniences to many patrons. The "tunnel" along Biscayne Blvd. will force pedestrians to access bus stops along the frontage roads that are proposed at limited locations since the roadway would be underground in a two block area. 4. Impacts to the existing circulation of the Miami Dade Transit bus terminal located at the Biscayne Blvd. and NE 15th Street intersection (See Figure 3). 5. Even though the intent of the "tunnel" concept is to provide a more pedestrian friendly connection, the portion of the roadway that would be depressed along Biscayne Blvd. actually eliminates approximately 14 existing crosswalks across Biscayne Blvd. currently located at signalized intersections and one upcoming mid -block crossing that is to be installed between NE 15th Terrace and NE 16th Street (See Figure 3). It is important to note that an independent connection between the Aarsht Center and Bicentennial Park is not being proposed with this concept as pedestrians would still have to cross surface roadways at the proposed roundabout location. 6. Impacts to the traffic connectivity between Biscayne Blvd. (south of 1-395) and the proposed site for the Resort World Miami Project (See Figure 3). 7. The proposed interruption of NE 13th Street between Bayshore Drive and NE 2nd Avenue would create significant circulation problems and could create gridlock conditions along NE 14th Street east of NE 2nd Avenue (See Figure 3). 8. Impacts to the Biscayne Blvd. northbound access for all land uses between NE 11th Street and NE 9th Street and NE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Blvd. It will require vehicles in this area to first travel southbound along either NE 2nd Avenue or the Biscayne Blvd. Frontage road to then use NE 8th Street to access the Biscayne Blvd. northbound tunnel (See Figure 3). Potential Right of Way Impacts: 1. Based on the tunnel concept rendering, the proposed depressed typical section of roadway along Biscayne Blvd. was assumed to consist of four (4) 12' lanes, 14' median including 4' inside shoulders, 8' outside shoulders, and 2' concrete U-wall. The frontage roads consist of two (2) 11' lanes, 6' inside shoulder, curb & gutter on the outside, and 6' sidewalk which sums up to a total typical section width of 154'. This section cannot be accommodated within the existing 100' right of way along Biscayne Blvd. north of the I- 395 without acquiring additional right of way and affecting the existing building structures along the corridor. Approximately 32' of additional right of way will be required on the west side and 22' of additional right of way on the east side (See Figure 6). Nine (9) private parcels will be impacted yielding a total acquisition cost of approximately $81 Million (See Appendix A). 2. At a minimum, the elevated profiles along N. Miami Avenue, NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue as a consequence to the 1-395 vertical alignment would have detrimental access and right of way impacts not only along these corridors but also along its intersecting side streets (NE 13th Street, NE 13th Terrace, NE 11th Terrace and NE 11th Street). Approximately 5' of additional right of way will be required along both the west and east sides, respectively (See Figure 6). Fifty (50) parcels will be impacted yielding a total acquisition cost of approximately $44 Million (See Appendix A). Page 2 of 6 Potential Infrastructure Impacts: 1. Impacts to the existing Miami Dade Transit Metro Mover structure (existing pier columns) at the NE 11th Terrace and NE 15th Street intersections with Biscayne Blvd. Service will be temporarily disrupted between the School Board, Adrienne Arsht Center, and Museum Park to the rest of the downtown area (See Figure 2). For reference purposes, the cost for the Miami International Airport People Mover in 2013 was $270 Million for 1.25 miles which equals to $41,000.00 per linear foot. Hence, the approximate reconstruction cost of the impacted downtown people mover segments (Total of approximately 308 Feet) at the NE 11th Terrace and NE 15th Street intersections with Biscayne Blvd will be approximately $13 Million. 2. Impacts to signals throughout the Biscayne Blvd. corridor as well as adjacent parallel roadways. Potential Constructability Impacts: 1. Maintenance of Traffic along Biscayne Blvd. during construction of this concept may require the complete shutdown of the corridor, which in this case would require diverting northbound traffic through NW 6th Street, NE 1st Avenue, NW 14th Street, NE 2nd Avenue, and NE 17th Terrace to continue north along Biscayne Blvd. Biscayne Blvd. southbound traffic will be diverted through NE 17th Terrace, NE 2nd Avenue, and NW 7th Street to continue south on Biscayne Blvd. The corridors to be used for the detours already operate at a high level of capacity and with the addition of the Biscayne Blvd. traffic severe gridlocks would be expected throughout the downtown Miami area for a substantial period of time (See Figure 4). 2. Construction of this project would take a substantial amount of time and would impact several communities in a very dense and urban area with many points of destination nearby. 3. Impact to residents and tourists with the limitation of staging areas, dirt, noise, restrictions in public life, and aesthetics would also be of concern for residents in this area. 4. Impact to businesses and economic sustainability of the area. 5. As per the Contamination Screening Evaluation Report prepared for the 1-395 PD&E, two high risk contamination sites were identified near Biscayne Blvd. The high risk contamination sites are where the Perfect Service Station and the Belcher Oil Company Terminal & Tank Farm used to operate (See Figure 5). The construction of the tunnels will require a very detailed analysis and survey of the contaminated sites; just the study alone and obtaining the corresponding permits may take a couple of years. Based on the most recent information obtained from the environmental agencies' files for the Belcher Oil and Perfect Oil sites, the contamination appears to extend approximately 1,300 feet along the proposed construction corridor for the subject project. It is estimated that the project cost to address the contaminated material will be approximately $27.3 Million (See Appendix B). It is also estimated that it will require approximately 106 days Toad -out and disposing of this contaminated material (approximately 526,000 tons) to a Class 1 Landfill. The cost of addressing the contaminated material does not include the construction and operation cost of a required temporary water treatment facility. Page 3 of 6 Potential Design/Geometrical Concerns: 1. The proposed tunnel concept Vertical alignment along 1-395 will exceed the maximum grade requirements and not meet the minimum curve length for a freeway as per the FDOT standards and criteria. The restriction of having to maintain a minimum vertical clearance at the intersecting FEC railroad corridor and the limited distance to the west approach tunnel portals forces the 1-395 profile to exceed the maximum allowable vertical grade. Furthermore, even with a substandard 1-395 profile,N. Miami Avenue, NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue would need to be raised to allow the 1-395 tunnel to run underneath them (See Figure 2). 2. The new required N. Miami Avenue profile will interrupt the continuity of NW/NE 14th Street. NW 14th Street is the only east/west facility in the area connecting the Civic Center/Health District west of 1-95 with Biscayne Blvd, therefore maintaining its connectivity is vital for linkage and emergency response reasons (See Figure 2). 3. It is our understanding that the concept presented involves "raising" the grade elevations to allow the top of the 1-395 "tunnel" to be 10 feet above the current grade. This raised area would create grade changes along NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue which can lead to deficiencies in stopping sight distance, special structural designs, and roadway vertical alignment concerns along these surface streets. Potential 1-395 PD&E Concerns: 1. 1-395 requires a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that may require an additional five (5) years to complete. The Record of Decision issued on July, 2010 is for a bridge. Both a tunnel and an open cut tunnel were evaluated in PD&E and determined not to be feasible due to impacts to Overtown. The Supplemental EIS would need to mitigate impacts to Overtown for the tunnel to be considered a viable alternative (See Figure 4). Additional Alternative: On September 3, 2014, the Department was provided with an additional artistic rendering depicting a slightly modified layout of the proposed public space which, from a roadway and transportation standpoint, provided some changes from the rendering that was originally reviewed as part of this evaluation memorandum (See Appendix C). A cursory review was performed on this new alternative; the following are some concerns that were observed: • It is unclear from the rendering whether the surface "paths" shown are intended to be for vehicular traffic or pedestrian traffic. • Assuming that they are for pedestrian traffic, circulation patterns for vehicular traffic would be limited given that there would be no surface access for vehicles exiting the Downtown Miami area in the northbound direction to travel in the eastbound direction towards Miami Beach via the MacArthur Causeway. • The roundabout originally proposed as part of the first rendering provided seems to have been replaced by a monument or sculpture; this elimination would limit the circulation pattern of vehicles exiting the Downtown Miami area and force vehicles north onto a network of local streets that may not be able to handle the additional traffic flows. • It is unclear from this image where the exit point for the "tunnel" portion of Biscayne Blvd. would be located; it is assumed that it would be near the same location as that shown in the original rendering provided. Page 4 of 6 In short, more information would be needed regarding the depressed sections of roadways proposed as part of this alternative in order to be able to more accurately evaluate the impacts and costs associated with this concept. It should be noted that because of its artistic nature, this rendering was assumed to be a modified representation of the overall concept being evaluated by this report and in no way an engineering document meant to substitute the original rendering reviewed by FDOT. Cost Estimate Summary: As per the 1-395 PD&E evaluation, the Signature Bridge was selected as the preferred alternative. Total cost for the entire Signature Bridge project was estimated at $600 Million with the Signature Bridge structure alone accounting for $70 Million. A conceptual cost estimate based on the rendering involving depressing a portion of the 1-395 freeway as well as a portion of SR 5/Biscayne Boulevard near downtown Miami provided by Miami -Dade County Commissioner Xavier Suarez was prepared in order to evaluate net change in cost (See Appendix D). The net increase in cost between the 1-395 /Biscayne Boulevard tunnel concept and the 1-395 Signature Bridge Project evaluated the cost of both alternatives within the limits defined by the rendering (See Figure 1.A). A summary of the cost estimate is presented below: Table 1: Cost of I-395/Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept No. Description Cost 1 Total Construction Cost for 1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept including roadway reconstruction of Miami Avenue, NE 1st Avenue, NE 2nd Avenue, and Biscayne Boulevard Frontage Road (As shown in Figure 2). $1,322,368,301 2 Cost for additional impacts associated with the 1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept • Utility Impacts: $58 Million (costs assumed not to be reimbursable; to be paid for by the utility agency/owner) • Right of Way Acquisition: $125 Million • Miami Dade Transit Metro Mover Infrastructure Impacts: $13 Million • Contamination Mitigation: $27.3 Million $165,300,000 3 Grand Total $1,487,668,301* *Grand total does not include additional reimbursable costs associated with relocation of the FGT gas line Page 5 of 6 Table 2: Cost of 1-395 Signature Bridge Project within Limits Defined by Rendering No. Description Cost Cost for Signature Bridge Structure, 1-395 Mainline / Ramp 1 Connections, and local roads directly impacted and replaced by the proposed 1-395 Tunnel concept. $171,518,658 Net Increase in cost = (Cost of I-395/Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept) — (Cost of 1-395 Signature Bridge Project within Limits Defined by Rendering) $1, 316,149, 643* Based on the cost estimates shown above, the net estimated increase in cost of the I- 395/Biscayne Boulevard tunnel concept when compared to the 1-395 signature bridge project amounts to a total of $1,316,149,643*. Page 6 of 6 Florida Department of Transportation MIAMI AVE PROFILE EL 2o Is EL 2241 Miami Ave 11 1100' I NW 14 Street is the only east -west facility in the area connecting the Civic Center/Health District west of 1-95 with Biscayne Boulevard, thus maintaining its connectivity is vital for linkage and emergency service reasons. The new required Miami Avenue profile will interrupt the continuity of NW/NE 14 Street. The higher elevated profiles of several surface street facilities (i.e., NE 13 Street, NE 11 Terrace, North Miami Avenue, NE 1 Avenue, NE 2 Avenue, etc.) will result in the need to truncate such facilities as NE 13 Street and NE 14 Street. Thereby creating community cohesion concerns and high controversy potential. NE 1 AVE PROFILE NE 1 Ave EL 12.31 The NE 2 Avenue profile would also have to be elevated (see NE 2AVE PROFILE). This higher profile would not only have detrimental access and right of way impacts along NE 2 Avenue EL 22.03,, Lr w EL 1831 The NE 1 Avenue profile would have to be elevated. This higher profile would not only have detrimental access and right of way impacts along NE 1 Avenue but also along NE 13 Street, NE 13 Terrace, NE 11 Terrace and NE 11 Street. NE 2AVE PROFILE NE 2 Ave E1 14.14 The required profile modification along NE - 2 Avenue, NE 11 Terrace and NE 15 Street would require major reconstruction of the Miami -Dade Metromover, a vital Downtown transit link. EL 12-77 EL 15.32 20 w Z EL 9.47 Geometric Concerns FIGURE 2 Florida Department of Transportation 13 Due to flooding potential, both Biscayne Boulevard and 1-395 tunnels will likely be closed during certain xx '4 hurricane events. These two facilities are vital 1.`1 evacuation routes for Downtown Miami and the .1,/ barrier islands of Miami Beach and their closure 1 would force traffic diversion to less effective routes. zzzr�� N W 14 Street is the only east -west facility in the area connecting the Civic CenterlHealth District west of , 1-95 with Biscayne Boulevard, thus maintaining its connectivity is vital for linkage and emergency service reasons. The new required Miami , Avenue profile will interrupt the y continuity of NW/NE 14 Street. it EB 1-395 traffic destined to areas north of downtown would be precluded easy access to Biscayne Boulevard as a l connecting link and thus would be forced j r a to use the local street network, creating , additional congestion and inconveniences. ..� --- Route from NB Biscayne wA' to WB I-395 - -- Route from NB Biscayne to Resort World Miami AIL -- Parallel SB roadways Traffic Circulation � ec ? Multimodal 'f Geometric requirements of both proposed tunnels will greatly impact the circulation patterns of 10 bus routes (i.e., M, 120, 10, 6, 9, 3, 93, 95, C, S) affecting a high number of existing bus stops and inconveniences many existing patrons. NE 17 ST The proposed interruption of N 13 Street between Bayshore Drive and NE 2 Avenue would 1 create significant circulation problems and would create Ad gridlock conditions along NE 14 Street east of NE 2 Avenue. NE13ST IFNorthbound access for all land uses between NE 11 Street and NE 9 Street and NE 2 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard would be circuitous and would require first to travel southbound along either NE 2 Avenue or the southbound service road and then northbound at the Biscayne Boulevard NE 8 intersection. r.. r Geometric requirements of the Biscayne Boulevard tunnel will greatly impact the existing circulation of the Miami -Dade Transit, bus terminal located at the Biscayne Boulevard/NE 15 Street intersection. roposed Resort World G� The traffic connectivity between Biscayne Boulevard (south of 1-395) and the proposed site for the Resort World Miami project, (a potential future key downtown landmark) is poor at best. It would require for the NB traffic to use the proposed Biscayne Boulevard tunnel exit at NE 17 Street turn right at NE 17 Terrace and SB along North Bayshore Drive. Proposed Biscayne Boulevard tunnel will create a pedestrian barrier effect across a heavily used prime pedestrian corridor and will eliminate 14 signalized pedestrian cross walks across Biscayne Boulevard. The NB Biscayne Boulevard traffic destined WB on 1-395 would have to traverse a circuitous (and difficult to sign) route to reach its destination. First the NB service road, then the NE 11 Terrace/Biscayne Boulevard roundabout, WB on NE 11 Terrace, NB on NE 1 Avenue and WB along NE 13 Street before reaching the WB entrance ramp. fiafiGib G'�GgW] .r ••� r Traffic Circulation and Multimodal Concerns FIGURE 3 Florida Department of Transportation Biscayne Blvd NB detour route NE 15 ST The required elevated profiles along NE 1 Avenue and NE 2 Avenue create a visual obstruction across the intended open space (park) extending between NE 1 Avenue and Bayshore Drive. Moreover, the additional cover (mounds) on top of the 1-395 tunnel footprint will also create a visual barrier partially blocking the view of Bicentennial Park from the Pac. MOT along Biscayne Boulevard may require the complete shutdown of the corridor and would require diverting NB traffic through NW 6 Street, NE 1 Avenue, NE 14 Street, NE 2 Avenue, and NE 17 Terrace to continue north along Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard SB traffic will be diverted through NE 17 Terrace, NE 2 Avenue, and NW 7 Street to continue south on Biscayne Boulevard. The corridors to be used for the detours already operate at a high level of capacity and with the addition of the Biscayne Boulevard traffic severe gridlock conditions would be expected throughout the downtown Miami area for a substantial period of time. Il!I s Both a tunnel and an open cut tunnel were evaluated in PD&E and found non -viable. The new proposed tunnels would require a supplemental EIS that will likely delay the project schedule by another 5 years. Lf Adrienne Over 120 off street parking spaces, many serving the Arsht Center would be eliminated. In addition, on street spaces will also be displaced due to geometric impacts. Proposed Resort World useum The proposed project has a very high controversy potential since it will impact several communities in a dense urban area with multiple origin and destination points. The drastic impacts in terms of delays, noise, aesthetics, etc. to both resident, businesses and tourists in the very center of downtown Miami for an extended period of time could have disastrous consequences. kjaWritaisa nviSifie V ,Afitl del LEGEND Aesthetics Infrastructure MOT & Constructability • Controversy Potential structure, MOT, Aesthetics and Controversy Potential Concerns FIGURE 4 Florida Department of Transportation The two proposed tunnels would require extensive excavation in high risk contamination areas east of Biscayne Boulevard. This area was previously occupied by the Belcher oil terminal and tank farm and the Perfect service station. Detailed survey and analysis might take up to three years to complete and the contamination treatment cost up to $27.3 Million. elchhroff-f� & Tank Far Multiple impacts to underground utilities along Biscayne Boulevard (e.g. —ATT, FP&L, MDWS, TECO, etc.) would cost approximately $58 million. In addition, required cross street profiles associated with the I- 395 tunnel construction would also impact all elevated utilities (e.g. — FP&L, ATT, etc.). Environmental Utilities Interruption of Florida Gas Transmission line 'drn e �� s`ht i4.0 Cent The proposed Biscayne Boulevard tunnel will impact all Biscayne Boulevard utilities connecting to the existing Miami -Dade Water and Sewer regional pump station. J - Belcher oil Terminal & :Tank Farm Both tunnels would require aboveground retaining walls in the floodplain to prevent roadway flooding since they are within flood hazard zone AE. However, the provision of these walls would partially defeat the prime objective of the tunnel(s) which is to place the facility out of sight b placing it underground. (;%1 iJ1h i t Environmental a Utility Concerns FIGURE 5 Florida Department of Transportation $44M estimated RIW cost for all three avenues crossing 1-395 NE14 RAN Impacts - Potential Fee Parcels N BAYSHQRE DR $81 M estimated R/W cost from NE 14 Street to NE 17 Terrace Museum Park Atm"Trican Additional Right of Way Impacts FIGURE 6 Appendix A (Right of Way Cost Estimates) Monday, July 28, 2014 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY COST ESTIMATE I.S. Number: UNKNOWN District: 6 State Road No.: 5 Proj. Name: C.E. Date: 7/23/14 County: MIAMI-DADE From: NE 14 STREET BISCAYNE TU Alt: T-1 To: NE 17 TERR EST. NO. OF PARCELS Business: Residential: Uninproved: 0 Govt./TIITF: TOTAL: 8 0 9 EST. RELOCATEES Business: 0 Residential: 0 Signs: Special: TOTAL: 0 0 0 R/W SUPPORT COSTS (PHASE 41) 1. Direct Labor Cost (No. of Parcel X $30,000) 2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels - TIITF X $0.00) 3. Line 1 + Line 2 TOTAL PHASE 41 PDC (RD) R/W OPS (PHASE 4B) 4. Appraisal Fees (State): 5. Business Damages CPA Fees: 6. Court Reporter Witness Fees: 7. Demolition Contracts: 8. Move Cost Estimate Fees: 9. Attorney Fees (Outside Counsel): 10. Title Search: 11. Hazardous Waste Investigations $740,000 $20,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,500 $0 Other: $0 12. Total (Lines 4 thru Other ......... . . TOTAL PHASE 4B RNV LAND COST (PHASE 43) 13. Land Improvement and Severance Damages: 14. Water Retention Area: 15. SUBTOTAL (Lines 13 and 14): 16. Adm. Sttlmnt. (40% of Line 15) X 80%: 17. Litig. Awards (10% of Line 15) X 45%: 18. Business Damages ( 1 x $3,000,000 ): 19. Owner Appraisal Fees ( 9 x $41,100 ): 20. Owner CPA Fees ( 1 x $20,000 21. Def. Att. Fees (Ant. Dep. $54,230.600 x 0). 22. Oth Cond Csts.(Ant. Dep $54,230,600 x . 23. SUBTOTAL (Lines 1, thru 22): 24. Total (Lines 15 + 23) R!W AQUISITION CONSULTANT ( 25. Total Contract Estimate RELOCATION COSTS (PHA Replacement Hous 26. Owner: 27. Tenant: 31. Total Coritract ate 32. Relocation Service ost: R/W UTILITY COSTS (PHASE 46) 33. Total Contract Estimate S36,153,700 $0 $11 69,20 00 2,200 5,423,000 $270,000 6,153,700 (NP) $43,701,400 (NP) TOTATL PHASE 43 PDC (RD) TOTAL PHASE 42 PDC (RD) Moving Costs 28. Residential: $00 29. Business/Farm: 30. Personal Property: TOTAL PHASE 45 PDC (RD) $00 (Not in Phase Total) 34. Proje MultipIierLL iivided bv Lin Est. By r Date: Cost Estinla Seq nce Number: Update Number: Amount $00 $00 $00 $0 TOTAL PHASE 46 PDC (RD1 TOTAL ALL PHASES PDC . . 1- 1 209 Rvwd. Supersed4i/EstimateVatOd: Data Input Completion Date: $270,000 $818,500 $79,855,100 $45,000 $00 $00 $80,988,600 f e: Note: The above estimate provided is not intended to be an appraisal and should not be used as such. This Report is a cost estimate and therefore limited in scope. The work performed is different from the work required to complete an appraisal report. Riaht of Wav Cost Estimates measure cost and not value. Remarks: THE RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON PRESENT DAY COSTS. DUE TO THE PRELIMANARY STAGE OF THIS ESTIMATE, DEMOLITION COSTS AND POTENTIAL RELOCATION COSTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED. THIS CE ADDRESSES COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRING RW FOR A BISCAYNE TUNNEL PROJECT. THE ACQUISITONS ARE BETWEEN NE 14 ST AND NE 17 TERR AND ARE 22STRIP TAKES ON THE EAST SIDE AND 32' STRIP TAKES ON THE WEST SIDE OF BISCAYNE BLVD. PARCEL AREAS AND BLDG C/Rs ARE SCALED ESTIMATES. (*C/Rs AREAS ARE CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES AND COULD BE MORE DEPENDING ON LOAD BEARING WALL ANALYSIS). WP - NO *C/R = BUILDING CUT AND REFACE Friday, August 01, 2014 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY COST ESTIMATE I.S. Number: UNKNOWN State Road No.: 5 District: 6 Proj. Name: C.E. Date: 7/31/14 County: MIAMI-DADE From: I-395 TUNNEL Alt.: A-1 To: EST. NO. OF PARCELS Business: 37 Uninproved: 10 Residential: 1 Govt./TIITF: 2 TOTAL: 50 EST. RELOCATEES Business: 0 Signs: 0 Residential: 0 Special: 0 TOTAL: 0 RIW SUPPORT COSTS (PHASE 41) 1. Direct Labor Cost (No. of Parcel X $30,000) $1,500,000 2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels - TIITF X $0.00) $0 3. Line 1 + Line 2 TOTAL PHASE 41 PDC (RD) $1,500,000 R/W OPS (PHASE 4B) 4. Appraisal Fees (State): $2,430,000 5. Business Damages CPA Fees: $200,000 6. Court Reporter Witness Fees: $170,000 7. Demolition Contracts: $0 8. Move Cost Estimate Fees: $0 9. Attorney Fees (Outside Counsel): $0 10. Title Search: $72,000 11. Hazardous Waste Investigations $0 Other: $0 12. Total (Lines 4 thru Other TOTAL PHASE 4B P'«�� $2,872,000 R/W LAND COST (PHASE 43) 13. Land Improvement and Severance Damages: $18,829,000 14. Water Retention Area: •,0 15. SUBTOTAL (Lines 13 and 14): 16. Adm. Sttlmnt. (40% of Line 15) X 80%: 17. Litig. Awards (10% of Line 15) X 45%: 18. Business Damages ( 10 x $72,500 ): 19. Owner Appraisal Fees ( 50 x $24,600 ): 20. Owner CPA Fees ( 10 x $20,00 ' 0,000 21. Def. Att. Fees (Ant. Dep. $23,154,000 x :). ,261,600 22. Oth Cond Csts.(Ant. Dep $23,154,000 x .1 $2,315,400 23. SUBTOTAL (Lines hru 22): $20,604,600 (NP) 24. Total (Lines 15 + 23) j' , TOTATL PHASE 43 PDC (RD) RIW AQUISITION CONSULTANT 25. Total Contract Estimate TOTAL PHASE 42 PDC (RD) $00 RELOCATION COSTS (PH Replacement Housl .j . • V' Moving Costs Amount 26. Owner: $00 28. Residential: $00 27. Tenant: $00 29. Business/Farm: $00 30. Personal Property: $00 31. Total Contract Este TOTAL PHASE 45 PDC (RD) 32. Relocation Service ost: $00 (Not in Phase Total) 18,829,000 (NP) $39,433,600 $00 R/W UTILITY COSTS (PHASE 46) 33. Total Contract Estimate 34. Proj�Multipli me 23 Divided by Lin Est. Sy: d,,1l Date: Cost Esti ate Se uence Number: Update Number: TOTAL PHASE 46 PDC (RDI TOTAL ALL PHASES PDC . . 1 Rvwd.By: Supersedes imate Da Data Input Completion Datb: $00 $43,805,600 ate: Note: The above estimate provided is not intended to be an appraisal and should not be used as such. This Report is a cost estimate and therefore limited in scope. The work performed is different from the work required to complete an appraisal report. Right of Wav Cost Estimates measure cost and not value. Remarks: THE RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON PRESENT DAY COSTS. DUE TO THE PRELIMANARY STAGE OF THIS ESTIMATE, DEMOLITION COSTS AND POTENTIAL RELOCATION COSTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED. THIS CE ADDRESSES COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRING RW FOR BRIDGES AT NE 1ST AND 2ND AVENUE AND MIAMI AVENUE OVER A HYPOTHETICAL 1-395 TUNNEL. THE ACQUISITONS ARE STRIP TAKES OF 5' ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AVENUES, AS PER CONCEPTUAL SKETCH PROVIDED. PARCEL AREAS AND BLDG C/Rs ARE SCALED ESTIMATES. (*CIRs AREAS ARE CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES AND COULD BE MORE DEPENDING ON LOAD BEARING WALL ANALYSIS). CONFIDENCE LEVEL - LOW DEGREE DUE TO SEVERE TIME RESTRAINTS. WP- NO *C/R = BUILDING CUT AND REFACE Appendix B (Contaminated Soil Disposal Cost Estimate) CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 106 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day: 10 hours Description SUMMARY NE 8th Street to NE 11 th Street: Labor $ 951,582.75 Equipment $ 242,250.00 Construction and Heavy Equipment $ 279,862.50 Expendables $ 25,993.00 Analytical $ 117,211.50 Transport and Disposal $ 20,215,296.00 Pass-throughs $ 2,550.00 btotal $ 21,834,745.75 NE 14th Street to NE 17th Street: Labor $ 239,949.00 Equipment $ 59,850.00 Construction and Heavy Equipment $ 69,142.50 Expendables ‘° $ 6,421.80 Analytical $ 30,744.00 Transport and Disposal $ 5,053,824.00 Pass-throughs $ 630.00 Subtotal $ 5,460,561.30 TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT $ 27,295,307.05 TOTAL REQUESTED AMOUNT � $ 27,295,307.00 c4<:v 1 of 7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 8th St. to NE llth St.) WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 85 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QTY Unit Type Unit QTY Total No. of Units Unit Rate Cost Direct Labor Project Management 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 45 45 $ 122.50 $ 5,512.50 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 170 170 $ 04.75 $ 17,807.50 1-5 Task Manager 1 hour 85 85 $ 90.75 $ 7,713.75 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 85 85 8.75 $ 4,143.75 Health & Safety Plan Preparation 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 1 $ 122.50 $ 122.50 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 1 04.75 $ 104.75 1-8 Certified Industrial Hygienist 1 hour $ 58.00 $ 116.00 1-9 Industrial Hygienist 1 hour : 8 $ 58.00 $ 464.00 Project Kick-off Meeting 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 4 4 $ 122.50 $ 490.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 4 $ 104.75 $ 419.00 1-5 Task Manager 1 4 $ 90.75 $ 363.00 1-6 Project Scientist ho 4 4 $ 100.00 $ 400.00 1-7 Staff Scientist r 4 4 $ 90.00 $ 360.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant h 4 4 $ 48.75 $ 195.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 our 4 4 $ 82.00 $ 328.00 1-18 Field Foreman our 4 4 $ 69.25 $ 277.00 1-20 Equipment Operator 5 hour 4 20 $ 55.00 $ 1,100.00 1-21 Truck Driver hour 4 16 $ 55.00 $ 880.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer 4 hour 4 16 $ 58.00 $ 928.00 Soil Load -out and Dis al Ac ' s" 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 850 850 $ 90.00 $ 76,500.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 hour 680 680 $ 82.00 $ 55,760.00 1-17 Supervisor (• 1 hour 170 170 $ 123.00 $ 20,910.00 1-18 Field Fore 1 hour 680 680 $ 69.25 $ 47,090.00 1-18 Field F. • 1 hour 170 170 $ 104.00 $ 17,680.00 1-20 Equi•me or •-. rs) 4 hour 680 2720 $ 55.00 $ 149,600.00 1-20 • • t •. -tor (loaders) (OT) 4 hour 170 680 $ 82.50 $ 56,100.00 1-20 quip t Ope . (dozer) 1 hour 680 680 $ 55.00 $ 37,400.00 1-20 'u'' -nt Operator (dozer) (OT) 1 hour 170 170 $ 82.50 $ 14,025.00 1-21 Driver (dump trucks) 4 hour 680 2720 $ 55.00 $ 149,600.00 1-21 Truc 'ver (dump trucks) (OT) 4 hour 170 680 $ 82.50 $ 56,100.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) 4 hour 680 2720 $ 58.00 $ 157,760.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) (OT) 4 hour 170 680 $ 87.00 $ 59,160.00 Source Removal Report 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 4 4 $ 122.50 $ 490.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 8 8 $ 104.75 $ 838.00 1-6 Project Scientist 1 hour 40 40 $ 100.00 $ 4,000.00 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 60 60 $ 90.00 $ 5,400.00 1-13 Draftsperson 1 hour 20 20 $ 62.50 $ 1,250.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 4 4 $ 48.75 $ 195.00 Direct Labor Total $ 951,582.75 2 of 7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 8th St. to NE 11th St.) WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 85 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QTY Unit Type Unit QTY Total No. of Units Unit Rate Cost Equipment 2-4 Pick-up Truck 8 day 85 680 $ 75.00 $ 51,000.00 2-5 Truck (dump, 15 CY) 4 day 85 340 $ 50.00 $ 187,000.00 3-15 Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA)/ Flame Ionization Detector (FID) 1 day 85 85 $ 50.00 $ 4,250.00 Equipment Total $ 242,250.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment 6-7 Dozer CAT D-6 1 day 375.00 $ 31,875.00 6-22 Storage Trailer 1 day $ 17.50 $ 1,487.50 6-28 Wheel Loader, (Cat 966) 4 day 181501 40 $ 725.00 $ 246,500.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment Total $ 279,862.50 Expendables 8-28 Visqueen 4 oll/p ay 340 $ 76.45 $ 25,993.00 Expendables Total $ 25,993.00 Analytical 9-3 Kerosene Analytical Group each 1 610 $ 192.15 $ 117,211.50 Analytical Total $ 117,211.50 Transport and Dispos- 12 4 Transportation & Dis. :-petr•leu Contaminated Soil n-haz. •us) 1 ton 421,152 421,152 $ 48.00 $ 20,215,296.00 Transport • •os• •tal $ 20,215,296.00 Pass-t P• t I 4 day 85.00 340.00 $ 7.50 $ 2,550.00 •ughs .tal $ 2,550.00 Es ed Total $ 21,834,745.75 Legend and Comments Section * = Estimated production of 5,000 tons per day and no night or weekend work FID = Flame Ionization Detector No = Number OT = overtime OVA = Organic Vapor Analyzer QTY = Quantity 3 of 7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 14th St. to NE 17th St.) WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 21 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QTY Unit Type Unit QTY Total No. of Units Unit Rate Cost Direct Labor Project Management 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 12 12 $ 1 2.50 $ 1,470.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 42 42 $ .75 $ 4,399.50 1-5 Task Manager 1 hour 21 21 $ .75 $ 1,905.75 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 21 21 .75 $ 1,023.75 Health & Safety Plan Preparation 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 1 122.50 $ 122.50 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 1 4.75 $ 104.75 1-8 Certified Industrial Hygienist 1 hour 1 1 $ 58.00 $ 58.00 1-9 Industrial Hygienist 1 hour 4 58.00 $ 232.00 Project Kick-off Meeting 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 2 $ 122.50 $ 245.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 2 $ 104.75 $ 209.50 1-5 Task Manager 1 2 $ 90.75 $ 181.50 1-6 Project Scientist 1 ho 2 2 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 1-7 Staff Scientist r 2 2 $ 90.00 $ 180.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant h 2 2 $ 48.75 $ 97.50 1-17 Supervisor ur 2 2 $ 82.00 $ 164.00 1-18 Field Foreman 2 2 $ 69.25 $ 138.50 1-20Equipment \sliliFur Operatorhour210 $55.00 $550.00 1-21 Truck Driver hour 2 8 $ 55.00 $ 440.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer 4 hour 2 8 $ 58.00 $ 464.00 Soil Load -out and ' osal A 'ties* 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 210 210 $ 90.00 $ 18,900.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 hour 168 168 $ 82.00 $ 13,776.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 hour 42 42 $ 123.00 $ 5,166.00 1-18 Field F. an 1 hour 168 168 $ 69.25 $ 11,634.00 1-18 Field rema ' 1 hour 42 42 $ 104.00 $ 4,368.00 1-20 E•ui• ' -rator •-ders) 4 hour 168 672 $ 55.00 $ 36,960.00 1-20 • • ,en -rator (loaders) (OT) 4 hour 42 168 $ 82.50 $ 13,860.00 1-20 Equi. ent 0• tor (dozer) 1 hour 168 168 $ 55.00 $ 9,240.00 1-20 ent Operator (dozer) (OT) 1 hour 42 42 $ 82.50 $ 3,465.00 1-21 ck Driver (dump trucks) 4 hour 168 672 $ 55.00 $ 36,960.00 1-21 Tr 'river (dump trucks) (OT) 4 hour 42 168 $ 82.50 $ 13,860.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) 4 hour 168 672 $ 58.00 $ 38,976.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) (OT) 4 hour 42 168 $ 87.00 $ 14,616.00 Source Removal Report 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 2 2 $ 122.50 $ 245.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 3 3 $ 104.75 $ 314.25 1-6 Project Scientist 1 hour 20 20 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 30 30 $ 90.00 $ 2,700.00 1-13 Draftsperson 1 hour 10 10 $ 62.50 $ 625.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 2 2 $ 48.75 $ 97.50 Direct Labor Total $ 239,949.00 4 of 7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 14th St. to NE 17th St.) WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 21 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QTY Unit Type Unit QTY Total No. of Units Unit Rate Cost Equipment 2-4 Pick-up Truck 8 day 21 168 $ 75.00 $ 12,600.00 2-5 Truck (dump, 15 CY) 4 day 21 84 $ 0.00 $ 46,200.00 3-15 Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA)/ Flame Ionization Detector (FID) 1 day 21 21 $ .00 $ 1,050.00 Equipment Total $ 59,850.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment 6-7 Dozer CAT D-6 1 day 21 5.00 $ 7,875.00 6-22 Storage Trailer 1 day 2 21 $ 17.50 $ 367.50 6-28 Wheel Loader, (Cat 966) 4 day 2 725.00 iefritio, $ 60,900.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment Total $ 69,142.50 Expendables 8-28 Visqueen 4 ro 21 84 $ 76.45 $ 6,421.80 Expendables Total $ 6,421.80 Analytical 9-3 Kerosene Analytical Group each 160 160 $ 192.15 $ 30,744.00 Analytical Total $ 30,744.00 Transport and Dispo 12-4 Transportation & Di sal-p trol Contaminated S on-h dous) 1 ton 105,288 105,288 $ 48.00 $ 5,053,824.00 Transpo 'sp Tot $ 5,053,824.00 Pass • •-L- ntal 4 day 21 84 $ 7.50 $ 630.00 rough otal $ 630.00 ated Total $ 5,460,561.30 Legend and Comments Section * = Estimated production of 5,000 tons per day and no night or weekend work FID = Flame Ionization Detector No = Number OT = overtime OVA = Organic Vapor Analyzer QTY = Quantity 5 of 7 Biscayne Tunnel Assessment I. Volume of excavation from NW 8th St. to NE 11th St.: W (ft.) D (ft.) L (ft.) V (CF) V (CY) F (Tn/CY) Wt (Tn) 82 80 1284 8,423,040 311,964 1.35 421,152 Legend: CF = Cubic Feet CY = Cubic Yard F = Conversion Factor ft. = Feet D = Depth ft. = Feet L = Length Tn = Ton V = Volume W = Width Wt = Weight II. Volume of excavation from NE 14th St. to NE 17th St.: W (ft.) D (ft.) L (ft.) V (CF) V (CY) W(Tn) 82 80 1284 8,423,040 311,964ittimm145 j 105,288 Legend: % = Percent estimated for disposal CF = Cubic Feet CY = Cubic Yard F = Conversion Factor ft. = Feet D = Depth ft. = Feet L = Length Tn = Ton V = Volume W = Widt Wt = III. CB&I Field Person Staff Scientist Supervisor Field Foreman Operators Truck Drivers Laborers 1 5 4 4 Total 16 6 of 7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Biscayne Tunnel Assessment IV. CB&I Construction Equipment Pickup Trucks 8 Dump Trucks 4 OVA 1 Dozer 1 Storage Trailer 1 Loader 4 Port-o-let 4 V. Assumptions: a. Soil to be excavated by the contractor b. Soil to be loaded into dump trucks by the contractor c. Production estimated at 5,000 tons per day d. No hazardous waste is encountered e. No night or weekend work f. 10-hour work days; 5 days per week; estimate 106 total days g. Staging area to be provided by the contractor h. Minimum staging area of approximately 3 to 5 acres required i. No dewatering and/or groundwater treatment is included in this cost est VI. CB&I Scope: a. Provide equipment and personnel to truck the soils to the s b. Provide equipment and personnel to manage the staging a c. Provide equipment and personnel to load -put and di -.se pe d. Provide equipment and personnel to sample and na ntaminated soils p-r the requirements of FAC 62-713 7 of 7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Appendix C (Rendering Received on September 3, 2014) Appendix D (1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Tunnel Project Cost Estimate) Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Scheme: Tunnel Section Estimated Construction Cost 1-395 EAST BOUND Conceptual Level ITEM NO. PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE PER CATEGORY 1 WEST APPROACH SECTION (EB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 23,100 SF 15.64 361,284 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 60 TN 4940 296,400 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 25,860 CY 59.89 1,548,755 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 5,930 CY 940 5,574,200 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 1,415 CY 567 802,305 400-0-11 SIDEWALK 60 CY 444 .,640 • 415-1-8 REINFORCING 1,851,250 LBS 2.6 4 3,250 451-70 TIE DOWNS 140 EA 3253 420 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 10,500 SF 12 S00 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 1,070 CY 32, 550-10-344 FENCING 840 FT 100 84,00 TOTAL ITEM 1 $14,120,354.40 2 EAST APPROACH SECTION (EB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 35,200 S� 15.64 550,528 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 4940 395,200 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 0 59.89 1,459,519 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 6,9 CY 940 6,518,900 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 50 CY 567 1,219,050 400-0-11 SIDEWALK CY 444 39,960 415-1-8 REINFORCING 3,750 LBS 2.6 5,963,750 451-70 TIE DOWNS 214 EA 3253 696,142 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION RD 16,000 SF 12 192,000 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPAC 1,625 CY 30 48,750 550-10-344 FENCING - 1,280 FT 100 128,000 TOTAL ITEM 2 $17,211,799.30 CUT AND COVER 400-4-5 CON 19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-4 CONC . 19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-11 _ 'ET' LLS 8,245 CY 567 4,674,915 400-0-11 SIDE KS 201 CY 444 89,244 415-1-8 'E ' ♦RCING 12,048,000 LBS 2.6 31,324,800 400-0-11 IESEAL 20,530 CY 444 9,115,320 451-70 TIE ► NS ' 1,490 EA 3253 4,846,970 125-1 EXCAVATION 157,400 CY 59.89 9,426,686 445-133-2 SHEETING 149,000 SF 14 2,086,000 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 1,340 TN 4940 6,619,600 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 270,200 SF 12 3,242,400 400-0-11 3" MUD SLAB TO PROTECT W.P. 830 CY 444 368,520 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 3,385 CY 30 101,550 125-3 BACKFILL ON ROOF AND COMPACT 32,505 CY 30 975,150 TOTAL ITEM 3 $110,226,755.00 Sub -Total $141,558,908.70 T:\DesignGroup_Manso\,DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_Construction Cost_09042014 1 Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Scheme: Tunnel Section Estimated Construction Cost 1-395 WEST BOUND ITEM NO. PAY ITEM Conceptual Level DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE PER CATEGORY 4 WEST APPROACH SECTION (WB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 23,100 SF 15.64 361,284 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 60 TN 4940 296,400 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 25,860 CY 59.89 1,548,755 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 5,930 CY 940 5,574,200 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 1,415 CY 567 802,305 400-0-11 SIDEWALK 60 CY 444 6,640 415-1-8 REINFORCING 1,851,250 LBS 2.6 13,250 451-70 TIE DOWNS 140 EA 3253 ,420 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 10,500 SF 12 000 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 1,070 CY 550-10-344 FENCING 840 FT 100 84,000 TOTAL ITEM 4 $14,120,354.40 5 EAST APPROACH SECTION (WB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 35,200 S 15.64 550,528 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) - 4940 395,200 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 0 _ 59.89 1,459,519 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 6,9 CY 940 6,518,900 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 50 CY 567 1,219,050 400-0-11 SIDEWALK CY 444 39,960 415-1-8 REINFORCING 3,750 LBS 2.6 5,963,750 451-70 TIE DOWNS 214 EA 3253 696,142 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION RD 16,000 SF 12 192,000 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPAC 1,625 CY 30 48,750 550-10-344 FENCING 1,280 FT 100 128,000 TOTAL ITEM 5 $17,211,799.30 6 CUT AND CO RS 400-4-5 CON 19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-4 C0NC19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-11 •ET' LLS 8,245 CY 567 4,674,915 400-0-11 SIDE KS 201 CY 444 89,244 415-1-8 'E ' •RCING 12,048,000 LBS 2.6 31,324,800 400-0-11 ' IE SEAL 20,530 CY 444 9,115,320 451-70 TIE ► NS 1,490 EA 3253 4,846,970 125-1 EXCAVATION 157,400 CY 59.89 9,426,686 445-133-2 SHEETING 149,000 SF 14 2,086,000 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 1,340 TN 4940 6,619,600 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 270,200 SF 12 3,242,400 400-0-11 3" MUD SLAB TO PROTECT W.P. 830 CY 444 368,520 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 3,385 CY 30 101,550 125-3 BACKFILL ON ROOF AND COMPACT 32,505 CY 30 975,150 TOTAL ITEM 6 $110,226,755.00 Sub -Total $141,558,908.70 T5DesignGroup_Manso\DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_Construction Cost_09042014 2 Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Scheme: Tunnel Section Estimated Construction Cost Conceptual Level BISCAYNE BLVD. ITEM NO. PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE PER CATEGORY 7 NORTH APPROACH SECTION (SB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 23,100 SF 15.64 361,284 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 60 TN 4940 296,400 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 24,370 CY 59.89 1,459,519 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 5,930 CY 940 5,574,200 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 1,415 CY 567 802,305 400-0-11 SIDEWALK 60 CY 444 26,640 415-1-8 REINFORCING 1,851,250 LBS 2.6 4,813,250 451-70 TIE DOWNS 140 EA 3253 455,420 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 10,500 SF 12 126,000 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 1,070 CY 30 3 550-10-344 FENCING 840 FT 100 7 $28,062,236.60 8 SOUTH APPROACH SECTION (NB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 35,200 SF 5►,528 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 80 95,200 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 24,370 C 5` 1,459,519 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 6,935 CY 94. 6,518,900 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 2,150 7 1,219,050 400-0-11 SIDEWALK Y 444 39,960 415-1-8 REINFORCING 93, 2.6 5,963,750 451-70 TIE DOWNS 4 EA 3253 696,142 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD F 12 192,000 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 25 CY 30 48,750 550-10-344 FENCING FT 100 128,000 TOTAL ITEM 8 $34,423,598.60 9 CUT AND COVER SECTION 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-4 CONCRETE ROOF 19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-11 CONCRETE W • - 8,245 CY 567 4,674,915 400-0-11 SIDEWALKS 201 CY 444 89,244 415-1-8 REINFOR' 12,048,000 LBS 2.6 31,324,800 400-0-11 TREMIESEA. 20,530 CY 444 9,115,320 451-70 TI 1,490 EA 3253 4,846,970 125-1 CAVAI N 157,400 CY 59.89 9,426,686 445-133-2 ETI' 149,000 SF 14 2,086,000 460-2-15 B' G (WALES AND STRUTS) 1,340 TN 4940 6,619,600 AT `•OFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 270,200 SF 12 3,242,400 400-0-11 3" MUD AB TO PROTECT W.P. 830 CY 444 368,520 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 3,385 CY 30 101,550 125-3 BACKFILL ON ROOF AND COMPACT 32,505 CY 30 975,150 TOTAL ITEM 9 $220,453,510.00 10 FRONTAGE ROADS 160-4 STABILIZATION 15,980 SY 2.06 32,919 285-709 OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 9 15,980 SY 19.15 306,017 334-1-13 TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TLC)(2.5") 2,198 TN 94.63 207,997 337-7-73 FC-9.5 (TLC) (1") (PG 76-22) (ARB) 880 TN 107.18 94,318 520-1-10 CURB & GUTTER TYPE F 5,136 LF 22.03 113,146 522-1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (4") 3,424 SY 39.15 134,050 TOTAL ITEM 10 $1,776,893.24 Sub -Total $284,716,238.44 T:\DesignGroup_Manso\ DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_ Construction Cost_09042014 Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Estimated Construction Cost 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. - Additional Considerations ITEM NO. PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION Scheme: Tunnel Section Conceptual Level QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE PER CATEGORY 11 DEWATERING 60 MONTHS 70,000 4,200,000 TOTAL ITEM 11 4,200,000 12 STREET RECONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING WALLS AND BRIDGES) NE 2nd AVE. 1 LS 8,000,000 8,000,000 NE 1st AVE. 1 LS 8,000,000 8,000,000 Miami AVE. 1 LS 12,000,000 12,000,000 13 PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS WEARING SURFACE 14 FINISH WORK WALL AND CEILING FINISH WORK 15 VENTILATION BLDG. (2 EA.) TOTAL ITEM 12 28,000,000 4,575 TN 100 TOTAL + 13 457,500 360,000 SF t 2,880,000 TOTAL ITEM 14 2,880,000 SUMP AND SETTLING BASIN 8 70 577,500 VEN. BLDG. ABOVE ROADWAY 30,0 SF 90 2,700,000 16 ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL 17 18 19 TOTAL ITEM 15 3,277,500 ELECTRICAL 1 LS 5,000,000 5,000,000 MECHANICAL / 1 LS 10,000,000 10,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 16 15,000,000 FLOOD SAND ' LS 5,000,000 5,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 17 5,000,000 F EXISTING STRUCTURES 1 LS 35,000,000 35,000,000 DRAINAGE 1 TOTAL ITEM 18 35,000,000 LS 60,000,000 60,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 19 60,000,000 T:\DesignGroup_Manso`DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel. Section_Construction Cost_09042014 4 20 SIGNALIZATION 20 PI 400,000 8,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 20 8,000,000 21 FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM 1 LS 5,000,000 5,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 21 5,000,000 SUB -TOTAL $166,815,000 Total 734,649,056 ITS 5% $36,732,453 LIGHTING 5% $36,732,453 SPM 2% $14,692,981 MOT 20% $146,929,811 Mobilization 15% $110,197,358 Contingencies 10% $73,464,906 CEI 8% $58,771,924 Eng/Admin/Legal 15% $110,197,358 Total $1,322,368,301 T:\DesignGroup_Manso\ DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_ Construction Cost_09042014_revised_GP_comments 2