HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-07-16 PZAB Supporting DocsFile ID:
Title:
PZAB.3
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
FACT SHEET
16-00896 Quasi -Judicial
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS
BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE OF
THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), APPROVING THE
DOWNTOWN MIAMI DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT,
ENCOMPASSING AN AREA OF THE CITY OF MIAMI UNDER THE
JURISDICTION OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WITH
THE EXCEPTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST AREA,
AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, PURSUANT TO AN
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROPOSED BY THE
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY; AUTHORIZING AN
INCREMENT III DEVELOPMENT ORDER; APPROVING SAID
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AFTER CONSIDERING THE
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL
PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING ZONING AND
APPEALS BOARD, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE INCREMENT III
DEVELOPMENT ORDER ATTACHED HERETO AS "EXHIBIT A", THE
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, INCORPORATED HEREIN
BY REFERENCE, AND THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, INCORPORATED
HEREIN BY REFERENCE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING THAT THE INCREMENT III
DEVELOPMENT ORDER SHALL BE BINDING ON THE APPLICANT AND
SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST; DIRECTING TRANSMITTALS DIRECTING
THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO FULFILL
THE CITY'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INCREMENT III DEVELOPMENT
ORDER; PROVIDING FOR A TERMINATION DATE; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Location: Citywide
Applicant(s):
Purpose:
Finding(s):
Planning and Zoning
Department
Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager, on behalf of City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, FL 33133
(305) 250-5400
This will amend the Downtown Development of Regional Impact ("DRI") by
authorizing an Increment III Development Order. Changes created by this
Development Order will be addressed by amendments in Chapters 13 and 14 in
the City Code.
Recommends approval.
Planning, Zoning and Scheduled for September 7, 2016.
City of Miami
Planning and Zoning Department
Community Planning Division
Discussion / Analysis
Downtown Development of Regional Impact
Increment III
File Id: 16-00896
Applicant(s): Alyce M. Robertson, Executive Director, Downtown Development Authority,
200 S. Biscayne Blvd, Miami, FL 33131 and
Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager, on behalf of the City of Miami, 3500 Pan
American Drive, Miami, FL 33133
Location: The area contained within the boundary of the Downtown Development
Authority with the exception of Southeast Overtown Park West
Request
The City requests approval of the Development Order for Increment III of the Downtown
Development of Regional Impact.
Background
The State of Florida adopted the Environmental Land and Water Management Act in 1972 as a
response to an intense drought that was accompanied by severe wildfires throughout the
Everglades and saltwater intrusion in the Biscayne Bay Aquifer. This Act created the regulatory
process for Developments of Regional Impact ("DRIs"). A DRI is defined as a "development
which, because of its character, magnitude, or location, would have a substantial effect on the
health, safety, or welfare of citizens of more than one county (FL Statute 380.06).1
The City of Miami has a total of 16 DRIs. About half of these DRIs are located in the urban core
and were approved between 1979 and 1986. Examples of these DRI projects include the
Intercontinental Hotel (f/k/a Southeast Financial Center) and the Miami Tower (aka Total Bank
Building) (f/k/a Miami World Trade Center). Until 1986, in downtown Miami, all DRI projects, like
large office buildings, hotels, convention centers, etcetera underwent rigorous DRI reviews on
an individual, inharmonious basis through all regulatory agencies (e.g. City of Miami, Dade
County, FDOT, RPC, State of Florida).
In 1987, the Downtown Development Authority and the City co -applied to the Department of
Community Affairs to create a DRI that encompassed the downtown area, The Downtown DRI
boundaries were coterminous with the boundaries served by the Downtown Development
i Joseph Van Rooy. The Development of Regional Impact in Florida's Growth Management Scheme: the Changing
Role in Regionalism. Journal of Land Use. Vol. 19:2. Pp 255-296.
https://localgov.fsu.edu/readings_papers/Growth%2oManag/Vanrooy_DRIs_Regionalism.pdf
Authority, with the exception of Southeast Overtown Park West. Through this approach, the City
created a DRI that covered almost the entire urban core, with studies that informed a master
planned approach to the City's growth over the next two decades. This particular approach to
large-scale downtown development is explicitly contemplated in FL Statute 380.06 (22):
A downtown development authority may submit a development -of -regional impact
application for development approval pursuant to this section. The area described in the
application may consist of any or all of the land over which a downtown development
authority has the power described in s. 380.011 (5). For the purposes of this subsection,
a downtown development authority shall be considered the developer whether or not the
development will be undertaken by the downtown development authority.
The process to complete studies on the regional impacts of the Downtown Development of
Regional Impact (DDRI) area, relative to air quality, the regional economy, transportation
systems, historical assets, housing stock (including affordable housing), storm water, natural
resources, and sanitary sewer took the City of Miami nearly three years. The conclusion of
these studies was that a measured approach to development through three phases, over time,
would be tracked by "development credits." Development credits are derived differently for each
land use, as summarized in the table below:
Table 1
Land Uses and the Basis for Their
Corresponding Development Credits
Land Use Basis for Development Credits
OfficeSquare Footage
Government Office Square Footage_
Retail Square Footage
Hotel Rooms
Residential Units
Square Footage
Square Footage
Institutional Square Footage
Attractions Seats
Convention
Industrial
History of the Downtown DRI
1. The Downtown DRI was created in 1987 by Resolution 87-1148 through a Master
Development Order. This Master Development Order conceptualized development of the
downtown urban core in three Increments. Companion Resolution 87-1149 created
Increment I Development Order. These Development Orders established development
guidelines which included development credits for Increments I, II, and III for proscribed
land uses. The table below summarizes the downtown development as conceptualized
in the original Development Order. In its original conceptualization, downtown Miami was
envisioned to become an area with concentrated commercial, retail and industrial uses.
Minimal hotel and residential uses were originally anticipated for Miami's downtown
area.
Downtown DDR Increment 111
File Id 16-00896
Page 2 of 8
Table 2
Summary of Land Use Credit Allocations
As Adopted by Resolution 87-1148
Land Use
Increment I
Increment II
Increment III
Total
Office (sf)
7,100, 000
3,600,000
3,700,000
14, 400, 000
Government Office (sf)
300,000
250,000
200,000
750,000
Retail (sf)
1,050,000
400,000
500,000
1,950,000
Hotel (rooms)
1,000
500
1,100
2,600
Residential (units)
3,550
2,550
2,920
9,020
Convention (sf)*
500,000
-
-
500,000
Industrial (sf)
1,050,000
-
1,050,000
2,100,000
Institutional (sf)
300,000
-
300,000
600,000
Attractions (seats)
3,400
1,600
5,000
10,000
A map of the DDRI is provided here.
Figure 1 Map of the DDRI.
istrIct
Arts & Entertainment
== Brlokell
CBD
iu
DDRI Boundary
,..,...- Roadways '\
_,.. Water
Downtown DDR Increment III
File Id 16-00896
Page 3 of 8
2. Between 1987 and 2002, the Downtown DRI was modified nine times by resolution or
ordinance. Changes to the DDRI included changes to the dates when Increments would
build out as well as simultaneous increases and decreases in credits between land uses.
3. In 2002 Increment II of the Downtown DRI was adopted through Resolution 02-1307.
Changes in land use credit allocations in Increment I reflect the DRI program's
modifications to realities that unfolded over time. By 2002, it was becoming clear that
there was more demand for living downtown than originally anticipated. The initial vision
of a downtown Miami with a concentration of commercial towers was moving into a more
mixed -use vision of a downtown where people live, recreate, and work, as illustrated by
the distribution of development credits in the table below.
Table 3
Development Credits for Downtown DRI
As Proposed and Adopted by Resolution 02-1307
Land Use
Increment I
(approved)
Increment II
(original)
Increment II
(proposed & approved)
Increment III
(proposed & approved)
Office (sf)
3,681,890
3,600,000
1,300,000
3,700,000
Government Office (sf)
300,000
250,000
**
200,000
Retail (sf)
1,453,500
400,000
750,000
500,000
Hotel (rooms)
4,500
500
1,500
1,100
Residential (units)
10,550
2,550
7,500
2,920
Convention (sf)*
500,000
-
500,000
-
Industrial (sf)
1,050,000
-
750,000
1,050,000
Institutional (sf)
200,000
-
450,000
300,000
Attractions (seats)
30,500
1,600
60,000
5,000
Marine Facilities (sf)
100,000
-
**
-
*500,000sf of unused Convention land use credits rolled over from Increment Ito Increment II.
**Rolled into Office.
4. Increment Ili of the Downtown DRI is proposed for adoption by the City Commission in
November 2016. A downtown Miami, activated by a thriving commercial sector, bustling
nightlife, and charming, walkable, multi -family neighborhoods is a vision realized. There
is still room to grow, and Increment III is proposed for adoption to facilitate this growth.
The table below summarizes the proposed development program for Increment III.
Downtown DDR Increment III
File Id 16-00896
Page 4 of 8
Table 4
Increment III Development Credits Proposed
for DDRI, Autumn 2016
Land Use
Increment I
Increment II
Increment III
Office (sf)
3,681,890
1,220,000
2,500,000
GovernmentOffice(sf)
300,000
-
Retail (sf)
1,453,500
747,774
758,000
Hotel (rooms)
4,500
1,605
2,000
Residential (units)
10,550 'l
6,750
18,000
Convention (sf)*
500,000
300,000
-
Industrial (sf)
1,050,000 =
550,000
250,000
Institutional (sf)
200,000
350,000
150,000
Attractions (seats)
30,500
59,000
2,000
Marine Facilities (sf)
100,000*
50 (wet slips) **
-
**Additional 42slips are vested from DRI review pursuant to DCA BLIVR 11003-001.
Review of Application and Its Findings
The DRI review process consists of the host jurisdiction, the county in which the development is
located, adjacent local governments, school board, and state and regional agencies, including
the Florida Departments of Economic Opportunity, Environmental Protection, State,
Transportation, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Water Management
District, and the Metropolitan Planning Organization. The review process includes: 1. Pre -
Application; 2. Application for Development Approval; 3. Impact Assessment Report; and 4.
Recommendation to Department of Economic Opportunity regarding the adopted Development
Order's consistency with rules and regulations.
Increment III of the City of Miami's DDRI application has been reviewed by all relevant
regulatory agencies. The main agency coordinating these reviews is the South Florida Regional
Council (SFRC).
Review of Regional Impacts
Positive Impacts
Based on the application submitted by the City of Miami and DDA, the review process found
that the DDRI will have positive regional impacts at buildout:
1. Project costs of $7.3 billion, of which $5.8 will be spent in the Region.
2. 13,674 non -construction jobs will be created.
3. An estimated $268 million non -recurring and $134 million recurring revenue through
2024.
4. The construction or rehabilitation of at least 2,700 affordable housing units.
5. Over $6 million in transit and roadway improvements.
Adequate Housing
The Development Order assures that 15 percent of the number of dwelling or housing units
proposed for development in the Increment are affordably priced. Affordable housing ranges are
Downtown DDR Increment III
File Id 16-00896
Page 5 of 8
contemplated for households that are extremely -low, very -low, low, moderate, and workforce
income levels.
Education
The School Board identified concerns relating to school concurrency due to the projection of the
development of 18,000 residential units by the conclusion of Increment 11I. The City, DDA, Miami
Parking Authority, and Miami -Dade County School Board have formed an Education Task Force
to identify solutions to increase student stations in the urban core.
Sea Level Rise
Although addressing sea level rise is not required for DRI review, the issue was contemplated
for Increment III due to the project area's proximity to Biscayne Bay and Miami's sensitivity to
sea level rise in general. In the Development Order, the City and DDA have voluntarily agreed
to consider the findings of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact in
decisions concerning design, location, and development of infrastructure and public facilities in
the project area.
Transportation and Mobility
Person Trip methodology is used to estimate development's impact on the transportation
network. Florida Administrative Code establishes the standard used to determine adverse and
significant impacts on regional networks through a two -prong test:
1. The traffic projected to be generated at the end of any stage or phase of proposed
development, cumulatively, will utilize five percent or more of the adopted peak hour
level of service maximum service volume of the roadway; and
2. The roadway is projected to be operating below the adopted level of service standard at
buildout.
Based on requirements of 73C-40.045 Florida Administrative Codes (FAC), the DDRI is not
projected to create adverse and significant impacts to the regional transportation network.
However, the Development Order conditions the City to pay, contract or otherwise commit to
pay or cause payment of $6,005,829 (2016 dollars) to Miami -Dade County to expend on some
or all of the following transit projects2:
Government Center Station Upgrade
Historic Overtown/Lyric Theater Station Upgrade
Brickell Metrorail/Metromover Station Upgrade
Downtown Intermodal Bus Terminal
Bus -Only Lanes in Downtown Miami.
Discussion
To date, a total of 85 projects have been built in the DDRI. These projects are increasingly
mixed -use, with a growing trend toward residential development. Increment II was modified
once (04-0425), with a simple boundary expansion to add Watson Island. Since 2002, it is
2 City administrators negotiated these conditions with Dade County in the preparation of the Conditions of the
Development Order.
Downtown DDR Increment III
File Id 16-00896
Page 6 of 8
evident that Attractions, Institutional, Industrial and Convention land uses had the least
development (see Table 5 below). Residential uses saw the most development-165% of
development credits have been used for this land use category. Other categories have been
developed at more than half.
With regard to the development of residential uses, Florida Statute 380.06 and the DDRI
Development Order allow for the simultaneous increase and decrease of land uses. This is
facilitated through Land Use Exchange Rates (See Exhibit A). By exchanging a land use in high
demand with another with surplus supply (i.e. credits), residential land use credits can be
restored.
Table 5
Disposition of Development Credits
in the DDRI, August 2016
Land Use
Credits Allocated,
Increments I & II
Used Credits,
Increments I & II
N
Office (sf)
4,981,890
3,908,757
1,073,133
78%
Retail (sf)
2,203,500
2,062,183
141,317
94%
Hotel (rooms)
6,000
3,208
2,792
53%
Residential (units)
18,050
29,792
(11,742)
165%
Convention (sf)*
500,000
97,220
402,780
19%
Industrial (sf)
1,800,000
-
1,800,000
0%
Institutional (sf)
650,000
130,720
519,280
20%
Attractions (seats)
90,500
30,446
60,054
34%
Marine Facilities (sf)
100,000
50 wet slips*
100,000
N/A
* An additional 42 slips are vested from DRI review pursuant to DCA BLIVR 11003-001
Staff Assessment
Living, working, and playing in downtown Miami has become an attractive option for people of
all ages. Miami is witnessing a successful reversal of the pull of suburban sprawl. The DDRI is a
critical tool for the City to manage its development. The DDRI allows the City to masterplan the
growth of the urban core.
The tracking of development credits creates a basis for monitoring growth. Development credits
also create a simple, straight -forward whole -number multiplier to assess DRI fees that mitigate
the impacts created by development. Without the DDRI program, growth will continue under the
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) and Miami 21 Zoning Ordinance in a
piecemeal fashion without the benefit that comes from review from the SFRC and other state
agencies. Additionally, the measureable value that comes from DRI fees provides support for
valuable amenities in the urban core.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DDRI)
Increment III Development Order and implementation of the Development Program under the
DDRI with the condition that the Downtown Development Authority be responsible for Condition
Downtown DDR Increment III
File Id 16-00896
Page 7 of 8
10 in the Conditions of the Development Order, maintaining a distribution of labor for the
implementation of the DDRI between the City of Miami and the DDA as established by
paragraph 16 in Resolution 02-1307, adopted on December 11, 2001 •
CQ(L,-)
ana L. Gonzalez, Assistant Director
Planning and Zoning Department
City of Miami
S. Trone
Downtown DDR Increment III
File Id 16-00896
Page8of8
DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI INCREMENT III UPDATE
LAND USE EXCHANGE RATES
TO:
OFFICE
(KSF)
RETAIL
(KSF)
HOTEL
(ROOM)
RESIDENTIAL
(DU)
INSTITUTIONAL
(KSF)
ATTRACTION
(SEAT)
INDUSTRIAL
(KSF)
FROM:
P.M. Peak External
Vehicle Trip Rate
0.6501
1.6492
0.3214
0.1829
1.3541
0.0373
0.0938
OFFICE
(KSF)
0.6501
1.0000
0.3942
2.0227
3.5544
0.4801
17.4290
6.9307
RETAIL
(KSF)
1.6492
2.5368
1.0000
5.1313
9.0169
1.2179
44.2145
17.5821
HOTEL
(ROOM)
0.3214
0.4944
0.1949
1.0000
1.7572
0.2374
8.6166
3.4264
RESIDENTIAL
(DU)
0.1829
0.2813
0.1109
0.5691
1.0000
0.1351
4.9035
1.9499
INSTITUTIONAL
(KSF)
1.3541
2.0829
0.8211
4.2131
7.4035
1.0000
36.3029
14.4360
ATTRACTION
(SEAT)
0.0373
0.0574
0.0226
0.1161
0.2039
0.0275
1.0000
0.3977
INDUSTRIAL
(KSF)
0.0938
0.1443
0.0569
0.2918
0.5128
0.0693
2.5147
1.0000
Notes:
(1)Exchange rates are derived by dividing the P.M. external trip rate of the "From" land use by the P.M. external trip rate of the "To" land use.
(2 Example: The exchange rate from office to residential is 1,000 square feet (1 KSF) of office for every 3.5544 residential dwelling units (DU).
v .4zazgX2
EXHIBIT B
FORM DEO-BCP-BIENNIAL REPORT-1
Rule 73C-40.010, FAC. Effective 6-01-03
(Renumbered 10-01-11)
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
DIVISION OF COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
The Caldwell Building, MSC 160
107 East Madison Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
ANNUAL REPORT
Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes, (F.S.) places the responsibility on the developer
of an approved development of regional impact (DRI) for submitting an annual report to the
local government, the regional planning agency, the Department of Economic Opportunity, and
to all affected permit agencies, on the date specified in the development order. The failure of a
developer to submit the report on the date specified in the development order may result in
the temporary suspension of the development order by the local government until the biennial
report is submitted to the review agencies. This requirement applies to all developments of
regional impact which have been approved since August 6, 1980. If you have any questions
about this required report, call the DRI Planner at (850) 717-8475 or the South Florida Regional
Council at (954) 985-4416.
Send the original completed annual report to the designated local government official
stated in the development order with one copy to each of the following:
43
a) South Florida Regional Council
3440 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite 140
Hollywood, Florida 33021
(954) 985-4416
b) All affected permitting agencies;
c) Division of Community Development
Bureau of Comprehensive Planning
107 East Madison
Caldwell Building, MSC 160
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
d) District VI Office of Planning
602 South Miami Avenue
Miami, Florida, 33130
44
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
Reporting Period: to
Month/Day/Year Month/Day/Year
Development:
Location:
Name of DRI
City County
Developer Name:
Company Name
Address:
Street Location
City, State, Zip
1. Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development, phasing, or in the
representations contained in the Application for Development Approval since the
Development of Regional Impact received approval. Note any actions (substantial
deviation determinations) taken by local government to address these changes.
45
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit A a detailed
description of each change and copies of the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit A
should also address the following additional items if applicable:
a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting year
and for the subsequent years;
b) State any known incremental DRI applications for development approval or
requests for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the
reporting year and to be filed during the next year;
c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a development order or the
subsequent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by
the developer pursuant to Paragraph 380.06(15)(f), F.S.
2. Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the
development since the development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local
government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Provide a copy of
the order adopted by the annexing local government.
3. Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc., not previously
submitted.
Note: If a response is to be more than one or two sentences, attach as Exhibit B.
4. Provide a summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually
conducted for the reporting year as well as a cumulative total of development proposed
and actually conducted to date.
46
Example: Number of dwelling units constructed, site improvements, lots sold, acres
mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits
obtained, etc.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit C.
5. Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than individual single-
family Tots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and
the buyer. Provide maps which show the tracts involved.
Tract
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit D.
6. Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the original DRI site subsequent
to issuance of the development order. Identify such land, its size, and intended use on a
site plan and map.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit E.
47
7 List any substantial local, state and federal permits which have been obtained, applied
for, or denied during this reporting period. Specify the agency, type of permit, and duty
for each.
Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit F.
8. Provide a list specifying each development order conditions and each developer
commitment as contained in the ADA. State how and when each condition or
commitment has been complied with during the annual report reporting period.
Note: Attach as Exhibit G.
9. Provide any information that is specifically required by the development order to be
included in the annual report.
10. Provide a statement certifying that all persons have sent copies of the biennial report in
conformance with Subsections 380.06(15) and (18), F.S.
Person completing the questionnaire:
Title:
Representing:
48
Question 4
LAND USE TYPE
PROPOSED THIS
PERIOD
BUILT THIS
PERIOD
MEASURE
TOTAL PROPOSED
TO DATE
TOTAL BUILT
TO DATE
MEASURE
Other development activity
conducted
49
EXHIBIT C
Downtown Miami - Increment III - Development of Regional Impact
Transit Mode
Project Name
Location
Description
Capital Costs
18% Shared Requested by DTPW
Metrorail
Government Center Station
Upgrade
101 NW 1st Street
This project consists of upgrades to the existing Government Center Metrorail Station in the form
of new elevators, escalators, new pedestrian bridge connecting to adjacent Brightline Station
(Intercity Passenger Rail/Tri-Rail Downtown Link (Commuter Rail), upgrades to existing flooring
and roofing, fare collection updates, security equipment updates, new rolling gales and automatic
sliding doors -
$14,094,000
62.536.920
Historic Overtown/Lyric
Theatre
100 NW 6th Street
This project consist of upgrades to the existing Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre Metrorail Station
in the form of new elevators, escalators, upgrades to existing flooring, fare collection, fare gates,
and Ticket Vending Machines (TVM) updates, security equipment updates. This project will also
reconfigure the alleyway between Overtown Transit Village and the Station to include new
stamped concrete as well as a shared use Promenade with canopy from NW 6th Street to NW 8th
Street.
i
$5,356,000
$964.060
Metrorail
Metromover
Brickell Station
1001 SW 1st Avenue
The Brickell Station serves as an intermodal station that provides passenger connections with the
local circulator (City of Miami Trolley), local fixed route service (Metrobus), regional bus service,
regional bus (BCT 1-595 Express) as well as Metromover and Metrorail. The station area is a
linear site that spans between SW 8th Street and SW 13th Street. The primary goal of the
Brickell Metrorail/Metromover Station improvements is to enhance passenger and pedestrian
access to transit. Specifically, the recommended implementation plan includes additional bus
passenger pick-up/drop areas, additional shuttle pick-up/drop-off capacity, provide a new
designated kiss-n-ride area. upgrade pedestrian connections between neighboring development
and improve passenger convenience through wayfinding, upgraded/ADA compliant sidewalks,
continuous passenger canopies, and additional bike storage
$2,300.00
$414.000
Metrobus
Downtown Intermodal
Terminal
112 NW 3rd Street
This project consists of construction of a new downtown bus terminal with approximately 27 bus
bays, customer service areas including but not limited to passenger waiting areas with seating,
ticket vending machines, video/audio displays, restrooms as well as security office, service
support areas(driver comfort area, janitor/supply I closet, bus supervisor booth, stall parking8
PP 1 PPY P -
spaces total), and bicycle parking/station, kiss -and -ride area. conversion of NW 1st Street to bus
drop-off area with 7 saw -tooth bus bays, dedicated taxi and jitney areas, landscaping, lighting and
unified directional signage
10,705,716
_ 1,977,029
Bus -Only Lanes in
Downtown Miami
Various Locations in
Downtown
(total length approximately
4 55 miles)
SW/SE 1st Street (from I-95 to SE 1st Avenue)
NE/NW 1st Street (from NE 2nd Avenue to 1-95)
NE/NW 6th Street (from Biscayne Blvd., to 1-95)
NW 5th Street (from 1-95 to NW 1st Avenue)
NE 2nd Avenue (from NE 20th Street to NE lst Street)
EE/NE 1st Avenue (south of NE 6th Street) (from SE 1st Street to NE 17th Street)
NE 1st Avenue (north of NE 6th Street)_(rrom NE 6th Street to NE 17th Street)
$910.000
$163,800
TOTALS
533,365,716
6,005,929
50
EXHIBIT D
MAPy�LEGEND
y� Housing Supply Area
City of Miami Boundary
O10 Mile Radius
51
EXHIBIT E
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DOWNTOWN DRI:
(DDRI Boundaries as of February 1, 2004)
Begin at the intersection of the centerline of N.W. Fifth Street and N.W. Third Avenue (east side of N-S
Expressway (I-95)), thence run southerly along the centerline of N.W. Third Avenue and the easterly side
of N-S Expressway to the centerline of West Flagler Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said
West Flagler Street to the centerline of the Miami River, thence meandering southeasterly along the
centerline of said Miami River to a point of intersection with the easterly right-of-way line of Metro
Rapid Transit right-of-way (formerly Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad right-of-way) said right-of-way
line being 50 feet easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit right-of-way;
thence run southerly and southwesterly along said easterly right-of-way line of Metro Rapid Transit to the
intersection with the centerline of S.W. 15th Road; thence southeasterly along the centerline of 15th Road
to a point of intersection with the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of Costa Bella Development
Subdivision (107-14); thence northeasterly, northwesterly and northeasterly along said westerly line of
Costa Bella to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane; thence
southeasterly, northeasterly, northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way
line of S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection with the northwesterly property line of lot
31, block 2 of amended plat of Point View as recorded in plat book 2 at page 93 of the public records of
Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said lot 31, to the
northeasterly side of the existing ten -foot alley in block 2 of said Point View; thence southeasterly along
the northeasterly side of said ten -foot alley to the intersection with the property line between lots 4 and 5
of said block 2 of Point View, thence northeasterly along said line of lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation
thereof to the centerline of S.E. 14th Street; thence southeasterly along said centerline of S.E. 14th Street
to a point of intersection with the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering
northerly along the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the
52
southerly boundary of Claughton Island Bridge; thence easterly along the said southerly right-of-way line
of Claughton Island Bridge to the intersection with the westerly bulkhead line of Claughton Island, said
bulkhead line being part of the Metropolitan Miami -Dade County bulkhead line as recorded in plat book
73 at page 18 of the public records; thence southerly, easterly, northerly and westerly, following said
existing bulkhead and its westerly prolongation thereof around the island to the intersection with the
mainland on the easterly shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering in a northwesterly and westerly
direction along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay and the Miami River to the intersection with the easterly
right-of-way line of Brickell Avenue Bridge (S.E. Second Avenue); thence north along said bridge to the
existing bulkhead on the northerly shoreline of the Miami River; said bulkhead line also being the
southerly boundary of the Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property; thence
northeasterly along the southerly boundary of Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture
property to a point of intersection with the easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center
Limited Partnership; said property line being along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence northerly along
said easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership property along
Biscayne Bay to the southerly property line of Bayfront Park; thence continuing northerly, northeasterly
and northwesterly along the bulkhead line of Bayfront Park and the Bayfront Park Miamarina; thence
continuing northerly along the bulkhead line of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the centerline
of N.E. 17th Street extended easterly; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 17th Street and its
extension thereof to a point of intersection with the centerline of North Bayshore Drive; thence northerly
and northeasterly along the centerline of North Bayshore Drive to a point of intersection with easterly
extension of the northerly lot line of lot 1 of block 1 of Seaport amended as recorded in plat book 149 at
page 79 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northwesterly along the northerly
lot line of lot 1 and its extension thereof across a 15-foot-wide alley to the easterly extension of the
northerly lot line of lot 6 of block 8 of Miramar amended as recorded in plat book 5 at page 4 of the
public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northwesterly along the northerly lot line of lot 6
to a point of intersection with centerline of N.E. 4th Avenue; thence southwesterly and northerly along the
53
centerline of N.E. Fourth Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of N.E. 19th Street; thence
westerly along the centerline of N.E. 19th Street to a point of intersection with southerly extension of the
easterly lot line of lot 4 of block 1 of Miramar amended as recorded in plat book 5 at page 4 of the public
records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 4 and its
extension thereof to the southerly lot line of lot 8 of Coral Park as recorded in plat book 2 at page 66 of
the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence easterly along the southerly lot line of lot 8 to
the southeast corner of said lot 8; thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 8 to the southerly right-
of-way line of N.E. 20th Street; thence easterly along the southerly right-of-way line of N.E. 20th Street
to the southerly extension of the easterly lot line of lot 7 of said Coral Park (2-66); thence northerly along
the easterly lot line of lot 7 and its extension thereof to the northeast corner of lot 7; thence westerly along
the northerly lot line of lot 7 to a point of intersection with the southerly extension of the easterly lot line
of lot 7 of block 4 of Bayside Park amended as recorded in plat book 2 at page 40 of the public records of
Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 7 and its extension thereof
across a 15-foot-wide alley to the northeast corner of lot 7; thence continuing northerly across the right-
of-way of N.E. 20th Terrace to the southeast corner of lot 7 of block 1 of Bayside Park amended (2-40);
thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 7 to the northeast corner of said lot 7; thence across a 15-
foot-wide alley to the southeast corner of lot 5 block 3 of Bayonne Subdivision as recorded in plat book 2
at page 35 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northerly along the easterly lot
line of lot 5, and the northerly extension of its easterly lot line thereof, to the centerline of N.E. 21st
Street; thence easterly along the centerline of N.E. 21 st Street to a point of intersection with the southerly
extension of the easterly lot line of lot 3 of block 1 of Bayonne Subdivision (2-35); thence northerly along
the easterly lot line and its extension thereof, to the southerly lot line of tract a of Caruso Subdivision as
recorded in plat book 79 at page 23 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence easterly
along the southerly tract line of tract A to the southerly extension of the easterly right-of-way line of N.E.
Fourth Avenue; thence northerly along the easterly right-of-way line of N.E. Fourth Avenue and its
extension thereof to the centerline of N.E. 24th Street; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 24th
54
Street to the centerline of N.E. Second Avenue; thence southerly along the centerline of N.E. Second
Avenue to the centerline of N.E. 17th Street; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 17th Street and
N.W. 17th Street to the easterly right-of-way line of the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly
right-of-way line of the FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of I-395; thence southeasterly
and easterly along the limited access right-of-way of 1-395 to the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard;
thence southerly along the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard to the centerline of N.E. 5`h Street, thence
westerly along the centerline of N.E; and N.W. 5th Street to the point of beginning.
55
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UPLAND PARCEL
Commence at a point shown limited by an 5/8" diameter iron rod and Cap Stamped F.D.O.T., shown as
P.T. Sta. 25+50 on the "Official Map of Location and Survey of a portion of Section 8706, designated as
part of State Road A-1-A in Dade County, Florida", prepared by the State Road Department of the State
of Florida, as recorded in Map Book 56, at Page 71 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said
point being the point of tangency of the original center line of the Douglas MacArthur Causeway running
Easterly and South Easterly from the Westerly limits (West Bridge) of Watson Island as shown on Sheet
3 of the State Road Department Right -of -Way Map, Section No. (8706-112) 87060-2117, revised March
25, 1959, said most Northerly curve having a radius of 1432.69 feet and a central angle of 62° 00' 00
seconds"; thence South 59° 51' 26" West departing radially from said centerline a distance of 987.36 feet
to a Projected Bulkhead line; thence North 17° 12' 21" West along said bulkhead line, a distance of
238.86 feet to the point and place of beginning; thence North 17° 12' 21" West, continuing along said
bulkhead line a distance of 924.70 feet to the Southerly right of way line of State Road A-1-A Douglas
MacArthur Causeway; thence along said Southerly right of way line the following courses and distances;
South 89° 10' 55" East a distance of 73.08 feet; thence North 86° 44' 00" East, a distance of 67.09 feet to
non -tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radial line bears North 39° 29' 18" East having a radius
of 160.00 feet and central angle of 22° 09' 33"; thence along said curve an arc length of 61.88 feet; thence
South 72° 40' 15" East continuing along said Southerly right of way line a distance of 276.49 feet; to a
curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 600.00 feet and central angel of 46° 17' 39" thence
along said curve an arc length of 484.79 feet to a point of tangency; thence South 26° 22' 36" East
continuing along the southwesterly right of way line of State Road A-1-A, a distance of 196.59 feet;
thence South 54° 07' 39" West Departing Said right of way line, a distance of 532.16 feet; thence North
35° 54' 03" West, a distance of 132.74 feet; thence South 54° 07' 39" West, a distance of 150.14 feet to
the point of beginning.
The combined Upland and Submerged Parcels contain approximately 24.2+/- acres
56
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBMERGED PARCEL
Commence at a point marked by an 5/8" diameter iron rod and Cap Stamped F.D.O.T., shown as P.T. Sta.
25+50 on the "Official Map of Location and Survey of a portion of Section 8708, designated as part of
State Road A-1-A in Dade County, Florida", prepared by the State Road Department of the State of
Florida, as recorded in Map Book 56, at Page 71 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said
point being the point of tangency of the original center line of the Douglas MacArthur Causeway running
Easterly and South Easterly from the Westerly limits (West Bridge) of Watson Island as shown on Sheet
3 of the State Road Department Right -of -Way Map, Section No. (8706-112) 87060-2117, revised March
25, 1959, said most Northerly curve having a radius of 1432.69 feet and a central angle of 62° 00' 00"
thence South 59° 51' 26" West departing radially from said centerline, a distance of 987.36 feet to a
projected bulkhead line; thence North 17° 12' 21" West along said bulkhead line, a distance of 238.86 feet
to the point and place of beginning; thence South 49° 32' 57" West departing said bulkhead line a distance
of 550.92 feet to a point of intersection of lines of turning basin limit as established by U.S. Army Corps
of engineers and position by coordinates North 527,878.62 feet, East 926,135.22 feet (based on North
American Daturn 1983-NAC83); thence North 31° 03' 50" West, along the limits of said turning basin a
distance of 428.44 feet to a point of intersection with the East right of way line of the intracoastal
waterway; thence North 03° 27' 54" West along said East right of way line a distance of 874.43 feet to a
point of intersection with the Southerly right of way line of said Douglas MacArthur Causeway, said
point of intersection being a point on a curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 10,716.59 feet, a
radial line to said point bears South 01° 15' 15" East; thence run Easterly for 387.46 feet along the arc of
said curve and along said Southerly right of way line, through a central angle of 02° 04' 17" to a point of
tangency; thence South 89° 10' 55" East continuing Easterly along the said Southerly right of way line, a
distance of 31.87 feet more or less to a point of intersection with an existing bulkhead line; thence South
17° 12' 21" East along said bulkhead line a distance of 924.70 feet to the point of beginning.
The combined Upland and Submerged Parcels contain approximately 24.2+/- acres
#40877359_v1
57
Exhibit F: Downtown DRI Location
■■■1■■illMINE
MI ANNIE MIN
1�
■■Ik1
■II:
iii‘
vim
.. ikvo
lialiSoli
um sh.4.-.-EINNENIN.
IN Vfif ----010
NIi
II1
o'll
•
4,
■
■
■
■
■
■
1
■
■
■
v.%
ARTS
& ENTERTAINMEIfT
DISTRICT
e remma
e▪ t
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
=tun
wira
i‘
■
■ ■
I l�l l I
Maws
•
��•
•
.
IRIMMOMONIRIBMIM lin MIME II II
•
I
116.11111
1111111111111111111
■
■
■
i
BRICKELL;
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
**�
t'
• ■W
441,/
till EMMEN
■
0.5
DDRI District
Arts & Entertainment
Brickell
CBD
1*▪ ■■■■■■■■� DDRI Boundary
Roadways
Water
0.25
0
0.5 Miles