Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-John Snyder-Letter with PetitionsDr. John Snyder Chairman, South Grove Neighborhood Association 3980 Hardie Ave Coconut Grove FI 33133 City Commission The City of Miami City Hall, Coconut Grove, 331333 Re: Temporary Plat 4384 Ingraham Hwy. Dear Commissioners, July 29, 2016 Please find attached 129 signatures on petitions from many of our neighbors in Coconut Grove. We share a concern for the pattern of over -development which is taking place in our community. Single-family building sites are becoming subdivisions in our midst, comprised of multiple over -sized houses crammed onto tightly spaced lots where canopy trees will never be able to grow again. This formula is crowding out canopy trees as well as the dense tropical foliage for which Coconut Grove is known.... This errant development is taking place via a systematic effort to circumvent the protective Neighborhood Conservation District Zoning contained in Miami-21. The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density. This is justified by the fragile nature of our infrastructure; as Miami Celebrates its' 120th year we celebrate and also need to remember that Cocoanut Grove's first post office was opened in Jan.1873, and is arguably the oldest community in Miami. Our lane- like roads and historic community were laid out more than 100 years ago, before automobiles were omnipresent. There are no sanitary sewers in the South Grove, little or no storm water controls; canopy trees over arch the narrow roads and right of ways. This is a place where neighbors enjoy their regular walks, where they run, bike and visit. Visitors often bike and stroll on these roads as well, while they "take in" the ambiance of this magical place. We are a true community, we want to remain so, not be fractured & segmented into separate districts, those dominated by huge out of scale "monster homes" devoid of canopy in juxtaposition to the homes where the vanishing species of "Grovites" reside. We cherish and seek to preserve this lovely environment & community while we attempt to hang on to what vestiges of the vanishing "Grove" remain. They simply want to be able to enjoy their lives in this historic community they work hard to be able to reside in, without having to continually visit city hall. We ask that the commission assist us in stopping this destruction of the nature and character of our neighborhood by simply enforcing the letter and intent of the Miami-21 zoning code and in particular the tenets of Appendix A3. It is a model code, well thought out and written; it reflects what our time honored leaders considered to be in the community's best interests. If we do not protect our Neighborhood Conservation Districts it will ultimately lead to the demise of established communities and may even "kill the goose that laid the golden egg." We respectfully request that this re -plat be denied. John P. Snyder Submitted into the public record or itemi s) PF-t. 5 on 7 2q / City Clerk \-- 3\\ (AVt'i VJA e\-\\-i inns We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 "Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon -to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code hftp://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the c• • e above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print na 2 S•Qned! Print name /,31 tr;ti 3.Signed Print name 4.SignecN Address —1 0° El Pry Pl vc Address 32 l-4 LAY4 3t L/% Print name 2i C K F-ie n ckr-, 51) n t9 Submitted into the public; on 1.1 City Clerk record or i m(s) We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height? and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as d. fined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name 2.Siqned Li filext\Nka Address4) 47 ?rade iR/r,1 J E-mail Address oteo ` /9 +� I Print name ME `C L I rN)) A ►z,,T E-E-mail 3.Sidned Address Print name E-mail 4.Signed Address Print name E-mail .10 We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height.' and under section G on page 18 °Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory (s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shell thereafter constitete only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant.' This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modem development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subcfrvisions. 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove €I (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miaml21.orgffinal_code_May2O15.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Sioned ( 1-0411712 Print name n s ' Address g 114 ‘isad-b`r 2.S'. ned /7/ ‘L.67, . c Address gg�o� Print name 3.Sipned fi f�'?!ce a 5,,Yyo E-mail Print name .7oh112 P- 5"Al y2E 4.Signed Address (9980 /90"/6 ,41 . E-mail Address Print name E-mail 02/ We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 'The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 "Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory buiiding(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one -building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in.density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.orgIfinal_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000.square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name (11W & (k l.. r r "w`( ,1j 2.Skined Print name 3.Signed Print name 4.Signed Print name as c� L-- )) tYt,Iblt- John G- Dek.sars • kiA kte6 Address .2CQIA bblAn - A -e. Address 3 le ( S►toze,,Ept_ •/�- E-mail Address 42.05 Levivi C E-mail �2 Address 41* 3IN E-mailkiwr44Q,dailrk lei We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name __pa 11c-taw:NA 2.Signed Print name 3.Si• ned Address Lk b9k- 1 Oa ( sin fatsiT Address 40 15 t,ZA A i (> L-�P (� RAIIA E-r f i Address lT j `7 / 87z-e- Print name �13 Sit 3 >✓ 1 S02.si 4.Sioned Address 09.9 Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 "Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such Tots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed� Print name -1)2A0Clad( \ -Oet Y\ 2.Signed • Dwitd E Address 4 2 5 L€,flrtO)c c3r. G 1 vV. Address sq (p TkrO1; Q., GAR , C_, 6ec Print name IhegaeRA • bli gif1ovsnA J(E- 3.Signed • ai.AXOt14 Address f9q - - GteOt .Q, • G, GP( Print name)I0W"Rd 1_ 01:3“ LO d X E 4.Sioned gier7 �.�/eima,t Address 3o7y it sp"k 5 r Print name 10 h r / .). , 8ren,?C-, E-1 a4. 1 U U O We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such Tots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Sioned Print name 3.Si Print name Print name dress 751- C " Addres E-mail U We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 'The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such Tots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.orglfinal_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site ,as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. Print name 2.Siqned Print name G (a- r nVe/e jjnyLrs 3.Signed 0 Print name - , 774 _D/X-C 4.Signed Address ;3-12 P144. m.,,,Ai TL Address E-m Address Print name C ' `1 :3l o Le 2/2 x) Pi‹ Address 1'0 ti 33'3133 a Ca. MAY _ { Print name Tt-•rt fr t'� E. 0 0 `-, L-'I 3.Signed Address g 3-1 �-0 vA'� +'iv 0 = tu 0 t. 0 Print name -CO jT- .. 12 l'�(,q)-( = c 4.Signed Address rlij ‘-{-A/1¢ -AVO Print name E-mail U We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17'The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20`h century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1`Signed Print name 64ST'()IJ 1,(" 1.4Y1 vz-- Address `Z i c-- 2.Slgned Address a7 We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No budding sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in Tight of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. b L) .c;;1" U 2.Signed °' Print name o E 2 w 3.Signed v 1- o Print name Addressf\` Address -ES E-mail Address ce 17 e--- E-mail 4.Sioned Address Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015,asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Address 3Sa u Print name 126J141 Lb �1�'�/ E-mail v 774. I 2.Sioned U Address c Print name E-mail 3.Signed Address Print name E-mail 4.Signed Address Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.orgifinal_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signe U• V� v �e( >, Print name�� CRCreV,A--e i,Csv� � U ,tu..<` A) Oak/ o, 2.Signed .2 Print name r: in( -a 0 4, o I 3.Signed Address vD ,. o L 2 i= •,:rP v e I 4ddress L 3( p v Address 3 5-2 D 730L Print name E-mail 4.Signed Address 30 Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height" and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. Print name 2.Signed Print name 9411 3.Sioned Address S4f6 (fit I^h2 Address Print name E-mail 4.Signed Print name g iv4 C,�Z Address 3/ ,vet ! S'1 We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height" and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted Tots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant" This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Siane�l/J�'�iL%�l// /9- L7 . Address Print name 2.Signed Address Print name E-mail 3.Signed Address Print name E-mail 4.Signed Address Print name E-mail 3a • t4. U C/A $.4 0 We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant" This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in Tight of this pattern, we object .tothe issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name C Or'In v CiJ1 2.Signed r. -GM i 2 ( �SO� Print name� � � 3.Sioned Print name Address �/ !/ Address VV P j PCX Address E-mail 4.Sianed Address 33 Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. /? 1.Signed C Print name /a/14M Address N `i j 1.0(i(Q'/ 111/6 fr} ►t ! i I c ► l-- 2.Signed Address Print name E-mail 3.Signed Address Print name E-mail 4.Signed Address Print name E-mail 3� We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17'The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami2l.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name 2.Sioned --Akizsoin Vlotk.VJuee' Print nameMl 4 itAve-S Address 241 "" uiravLt Address C &- R E-ma 3.Si P 4.Si Address *it L'6YI,L.1Ec/, Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.orgifinal_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site ajs defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name Loevki 2.Sicgned z.1.6f_10,e/L, 414sb LytlYtr Address Address / 6,9e, n, Print name WY 6- at -WON 3.Signed �--� { Print name Address YOD V�%1p r iJ (� 4.Sian&L 1 �,f�� Address 0-S Print name 3� We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the r of the Miami-71 - zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17'The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the Intrusion of additional density, uses, and height` and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory b g(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant? This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modemdevelopment. in Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (400% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http:/hrrww.miami21.orgliinal_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name 2.Sioned /21 c- M. Lo40 Adders 3 " L; 4' 41v Print name 3.Sttned Print name 4.Signed Address ) l l i�d)w A�� .3 i°64Z, Address ��!" 6 O lir e_itv T'uA& ' Peg—geLi Address Print name 37 E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking Place when developerspurchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 °The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height° and under section G on page 18 "Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant.' This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code htipJMrww.miam►21.Qrg?inai_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Sig Address 11-C Gt.- , (SFc� rint name] FkS Address .3 Lt LQc1af- E-mail {{ "mil Address 3 `t v La 7jus:t 7 4v-e 1 (21lc( E-mail 3 5 b( /'t 110 Cci ,6 4q We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17'The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 "Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be complletely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.i`r O sA Address Wit( C, ) et - Print name 514+ i 2 Lr P c C bra 2.Signed y Address cilia (t A a9 3 Lv Print name)(-t N E 3.Signed V / ,242A t I t l.ti �1.c..w --- Address 14 1 S Q t'Z 1) b Preod - Print name ?EAJAJ/ J4lATW,0 4.Signed ,s/t / Address y LS0..ko O\• 'rint name 1 2q c� �-� k� g9 We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted Tots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4101 & 4111 Hardie and 4100 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature Address 1x :-P, lS e,ik, T 24S C:e.nho b& (heottLd`gtr J`e 33133 Print Name e-mail RSLL Signature 2x PAM x ks) Print Name Address �2ys C CALL 3313 e-mail Q, . Signature 3X� c 'V 6- rint Name w4. flSusQr► c/1 w o Signature 4X e-�ewsf�r Address /O t OCear. /Yv ,ciy, Jl1 fo e-mail Address c , 3 3/4q Print Name e-mail tg We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. We demand stop work orders be put in place at the 3 sites listed above. Further, in light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the city enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. Print name j4I f l ho rmo" 2.Signed Print name WO-144c E5iif4/1 3.Signed Print name 4.Signed Print name T/ E-mail Address'302 / tgraAa v 9 E-mail Address s J-re� E-mail Address LlBU /M). E-mail U U We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways -with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. in light of this pattern, We object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the City of Miami, Florida enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building ite as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name 2.Sicned Print name 3.Signed Address 4/2-S1C 13nel/43c( Vet—SI-UZI/1A E-mail Address (f?-fi pd , ( oat E-mail k\o-e-by Address 3Fs�PeuLic Print name 41 1 ce_ri <Pro p_n_ E-mail 4.Sicined , AZA Address II/60 (k1v Print name b(hinn II(. S% 1 C�Z E-mail 0 We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. In Tight of this pattern, We object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the City of Miami, Florida enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed !/(47/ 4e ai> Address �6(a'd %C./f( 1, Print name E-mail 2.Sianed 1--ilAddress U I N r eijr\ 1--kt Print name 4 r1►1(kliNQ2(0 i.} (\ E-mail 3.Signed Address Print name E-mail ,CGS tei&�,,fz_4 14.crar� 4.Signed Address 442 Print name E-mail tiJQC-kvXO-o Address 950 I?a,\< "Dciv€ E-mail Address 14 ccD.- 'rya ka trn We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. In Tight of this pattern, We object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the City of Miami, Florida enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name 2.Si• ned Print name J U a', Yab1 o f kba W E-ma 3.Signed Address E-mail 4.Signed Address Print name E-mail �3 We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17'The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height." and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami2l.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. In light of this pattern, We object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the City of Miami, Florida enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defined jafy the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name Pa-v-(6 E-mail 2.Signed LA(2 (-LA E V A "C- a 'd Print name 0 • Moil Address ` o-N t") ° fL1 0 Address 4-VA V4 bcS Vt E-mail 3.Signed Address E .v 0 c Print name E-mail 4.Signed Address Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large lots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height" and under section G on page 18 'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.org/final_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. In light of this pattern, We object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the City of Miami, Florida enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family build)ng site as defined by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Signed Print name 2.Signed (sk r :c Address 37 «ft?K t&c �t►� �3 f2'r E-mail Address - }c �� C"' ='ti `n'' / ` /ti /r Print name <� Z kf /t,1 - Ye% `/ ) J E-mail 3.Si fined Print name Address E-mail 4.Signed Address 3(3" 3)(31 Print name E-mail We the undersigned object to the overdevelopment which is taking place in the South Grove. This is taking place when developers purchase single family homes on large Tots, demolish the existing house, and sub -divide the lot(s) into multiple building sites. This is contrary to the spirit and to the letter of the Miami-21 zoning code: Appendix A-3 page 17 "The single family residential district is intended to protect the low density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height" and under section G on page 18'Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single- family residence except by Warrant.... No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant." This code was developed in recognition of the fragile, late 19th and early 20th century infrastructure existing in our neighborhood. Further, we do not want the disruption and destruction that would result from attempting to build 4 lane roadways with curbside parking, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, and underground utilities characteristic of more modern development. In Europe and older Western Hemisphere cities it is not uncommon to control vehicular traffic and development to preserve communities. These subdivisions: 4384 Ingraham Hwy (400% increase in density)., 4200 Grove St (300% increase in density)., and 3737 Justison (100% increase in density), appear to be completely against the spirit and the letter of the current zoning code http://www.miami21.orgffinal_code_May2015.asp Appendix A-3 which spells out our neighborhood conservation district zoning laws. In light of this pattern, We object to the issuance of any waiver for demolition of any residence located on a lot of 10,000 square feet or more in NCD-3 unless and until the City of Miami, Florida enters into a binding covenant with the owner(s) to construct only one single family residence. Management controls need to be implemented to ensure that re -platting of any single-family building site as defi ► -d by the code above may only be done by warrant. 1.Si • ned : ��s� i' �� Address 12 , REAl- Y 1 7,,(4- phi Print name $ -L. t- 0.4424 F b E-mail 2.SRined Address Print name E-mail 3.Sianed Address Print name E-mail 4.Signed Address Print name E-mail We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted Tots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in Iigf• of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoninc code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such he been produced. In Tight of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can bE certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signa 1X Print Name .0(A Dp\\/1 Address 35s�G�- e-mail 1 c„MA _ , 313 3 Signature CD— Q. 0 .c cip�o Address 4-22S Lie, d , F->_ 33i3`. Print Name MANTA 0 Signature 3X Print Name AL-ls ` ru(.1Cr Signatur 4X e-mail Address iZZ 5 Le N!J©4_ De. t1 Ani FL 3s1.5( e-mail Address 39601RD Ave.. Print Name oWF rc d .i.. abe'1 ardey' e-mail l We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/N and has long been a single family residence Tying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, c appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Gr.( g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family resident except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4101 & 4111 Hardie and 4100 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reasor place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, A UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot wi approximately 6000 sq. feet. _ _ - - The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same z( code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of suc been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we cE certain that zoning wil t approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the co will be enforced.. Signature 1x Print Name sk Address �� 3 �� gfiel /41 /Yl�1...r e-mail Signature Address 2X3iio gr-L, __JAL f c 33133 Print Name e-mail Q.1.) P Signature Y = 3X o -ci o Print - me e-mail o V U-. ri, $. o Address 5 OMar -e, V Signature Address 4X Print Name e-mail 2 We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in Iighi of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such ha: been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced, that the large lot will be protected for solely one single family residence use. Signature 1x Print Name Address e-mail Signature 2X( Print Name Signature 3X Print Name Address C k),Ad -moo, 4cur-du4,_ Ave ) 3 /33 e-mail Address e-mail A%' 2 e/A/19v s/VVI9 Signatu Address (� 4X & �'f(of Print Name e-mail 1 hUDd�a A3 D6tf lek 1 6\A-66,Q_ jthit , Ncityvta,6{If-trf o We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 Single- Family Residential District of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 Single- Family Residential District (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie,and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, each tc be placed on the lot where there was formerly a single family house with one bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such ha: been produced. In Tight of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced. Siena, re Address 1x Print Name /tpeuA �'✓ k; gigs a4 4e ini/N/ fr 3393 Signat re Address 2X `%/-/cj ?,c Vve_ �'i 3s/3� Print Name U U f `' /(J'JiP. L Ahu/ Signatures Address .461,/ ea,-e/3313� 3X d Print INif me 01)k e-mail Signature 4X Print Name tsw 616b Address 6-r i UfizAti, k,1.J(74,i -c it- 3Y)3 1' O We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence Tying on one lot. Section 3.6 Single- Family Residential District of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 Single- Family Residential District (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted Tots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie,and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft, each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, each to be placed on the lot where there was formerly a single family house with one bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced. Signat re 1X Print Address V035- 7/I -4-6 �e-- ,h4-#(/ 1 ( e m Signature 2X Address Print Name e-m Signature 3X l<6-1—e—e,t.c... Print Name V/ N tc Signature 4X t Address `/'� e-mail �v _. J -- Address *it, ai P-7M)� 6L-) Print Name e-mail V M/ Pc f\A s- We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4101 & 4111 Hardie and 4100 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature 1 X Print Name Signature 2X Address 4/2y t9 Zcs-D), -33(3 uyS e-mail Address Print Name e-mail -1x1/L-a'Z-c% 0 Signature(, 3X F Address Cl2 Print Name �� email /�14 �-� Signature 4X Print Name 4P Address e-mail 74 tie 1) We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such ha: been produced. In Tight of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature ffo 1X Printme Address /1/1(44442 3 k°t o-k �r e-rr Signature Address 2X -`— u. ij Print Name e-mail C..1- , 1-c-k JQ.tJ1 u Q Signature Address 'z, 1 2 n-'z- 12- c 3X K-114'41- FL c 'U i- Print Name e-mail L l C,1:3i t� p & LC 4., o u 4 VI 0 Signa Address �� 4X �- -(f LJ� Print Name e-mail ,I�, 1? 7 U ..O cti 0 We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 Single- Family Residential District of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 Single- Family Residential District (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such Tots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie,and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, each to be placed on the lot where there was formerly a single family house with one bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced. Signa 1 X • Address rMO /6-„.(2 Print ame a -mall tJ�G1 n L 604-17 Signature i G 2X \br Address x Print Name e-mail U Signa - e 3X Signature Address ame e-mail ocEct (c-770 Address 4X Print Name e-mail 33 We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has Tong been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 Single- Family Residential District of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 Single- Family Residential District (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in Tight of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie,and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, each to be placed on the lot where there was formerly a single family house with one bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In Tight of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced. Signature Address 1X Ant 1� ; . flrL,33i Print Na =1 e-mail Signature Address 2X e-mail Print Name Signatu{e Addres 9- 0 / i roil/ 3X ill (/ 144 ice- TtL(.T Print Name e. 11.J- JLr ' n Zmll\e-mail ignature Address 4X Print Name e-mail We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE --FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature 1x Print Name giNGAt Sign. ure 2X Pri Signature 3X c• am• C o I Signature cnciuc Address 1J U Address +� 4 -L / S tkpirsie x. )) rL e-mail Address Print Name e-mail Address 4X Print Name e-mail tO • We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence Tying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted Tots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4101 & 4111 Hardie and 4100 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such ha: been produced. In light of this pattern, we ob - .t to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not - : • rov: such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature 1x Print Name 4 3 o 1-, N Address C( s- z'Je , '' p�gti� e-mail Signature Address 2X /9(4 k /� /�i.5 `n Print Name e-mail V 6366 L ,7T7e ,fir 3.3/3 5 Signature Address 3X 0 Print Name e-mail 6�� 0 Signature Address 4X Print Name e-mail I.1 _ Ca — We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in lighl of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such ha; been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature 1X Print . me �� 1J( �67Cc Address Signature Address 2X t .. Print Name e-mail Signature Address 3X o u Print Name e-mail v w I~ 0 o Signature Address 4X Print Name e-mail 12 We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4101 & 4111 Hardie and 4100 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Sign 1 X -7 Q/�'?� Print Na e Signature 2X Address e-mail Address 472 Por-iA±2 . 3 3 33 Print Name e-mail V v Signature Address sa. 3X o Print Name e-mail c. • 0 Signature Address Cr) • ' 0 4X Print Name e-mail We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature Address Print Name Ct 1-�egt U S Signature Address 2X Print Name e-mail Sl ,� Signature Address CL A 3X o Print Name e-mail 0 B ° Ov I~ 0 Signature Address 4X Print Name e-mail I`( We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence Tying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE —FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. , (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature 1X Print Name RtcHARD G.TtBERtUS Address If-30o Lennox Dr: Mtam; FL,33)33-6Ta3 Signature Address 2X Print Name e-mail Signature Address 3X Print Name e-mail B 0 o Signature Address 4X Print Name e-mail We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. If such waiver is granted, we wish to appeal. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 SINGLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements., (pg. A-18) 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4101 & 4111 Hardie and 4100 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, ALL 4 UNITS to be placed on the lot where there was formerly ONE single family house with 1 bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6000 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such ha: been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced.. Signature Address NMI 1X Rt Print 3,ri.em e-mail Signature Address 2X x ,� Print Name - e-mail U Signature Address c, 3X o ••••• =� Print Name e-mail c Signature Address 4X Print Name e-mail We the undersigned neighborhood residents wish to lodge our request that the waiver request for demolition of 4197 Braganza Ave be denied. This property is in zoning designation T3-R/NCD-3 and has long been a single family residence lying on one lot. Section 3.6 Single- Family Residential District of the appendix to the current zoning code specifies that such properties shall not be subdivided. Appendix A.Sec 3.6 Single- Family Residential District (Neighborhood conservation district for Coconut Grove) g. Additional Limitations and requirements. 1. Lots and building sites: Wherever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Mr. Chris Torres, with the zoning department told us that the Braganza property cannot be subdivided. However, in light of what has happened at 4200 Grove Street, now 4110 & 4120 Hardie,and 4110 & 4120 Bonita, we have no reason to place any trust in this assurance. Plans there are for 4 units of 3500 sq. ft. each with 5 bedrooms and 5 baths, each to be placed on the lot where there was formerly a single family house with one bathroom. Each lot will be approximately 6500 sq. feet. The developer of 4197 Braganza, has subdivided the lot at 3737 Justison Road in violation of the same zoning code. Apparently the zoning commission has approved these exceptions to the code although no record of such has been produced. In light of this pattern, we object to the issuance of the application for demolition until such time that we can be certain that zoning will not approve such exceptions with regard to 4197 Braganza in the future and that the code will be enforced. Signature ix cDOh Print Name John C. Dolson Address 4205 Lennox Drive Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Signature Address 2X g , a-."--"--4205 Lennox Drive Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Print Name Deborah.A. Dolson Signature Address c 3X --5 Print Name e-mail � 6 . A a d Signature Address n .tf7 4X `� n - Print Name e-mail - LS4 t7