HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibitSubstantial Amendment #2016.1 to NSP3 (Proposed)
1. NSP3 Grantee Information
NSP3 Program Administrator Contact Information
Name (Last, First)
Mensah, George
Email Address
gmensah@miamigov.com
Phone Number
305-416-1978
Mailing Address
City of Miami, 444 S.W. 2"D Ave, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL 33130
2. Areas of Greatest Need
Map Submission
The maps supplied with this amendment were generated using ESRI and the NSP3 Mapping Tool and
are included as a part of this attachment.
Data Sources Used to Determine Areas of Greatest Need
Describe the data sources used to determine the areas of greatest need.
Response: The City of Miami's Consolidated Plan and HUD provided data, as well as the
Department's listing of owned parcels were used to determine the new areas of greatest
needs.
Determination of Are
Greatest Need
Describe how the areas of greatest need were established.
Response:
During the economic decline, the City of Miami had experienced a deterioration in its
neighborhoods due to the negative effects of a high number (percentage) of homes that had
'been foreclosed upon or abandoned. With limited funding in round 3 of NSP, the City looked
at areas where we could address this decline, stabilize neighborhoods, and provide rental
opportunities for the citizens who had lost their homes. As a priority of NSP3, rental housing
to our citizens was of the highest importance to the City. By providing opportunities in the
targeted Areas of Greatest Need (AGN), the City aimed at providing opportunities to
displaced homeowners (who are now renters) to stay within their communities and continue
to stabilize the population of these AGNs. The City identified areas which had the highest
foreclosure rates and few vacancies. The City continues to consider utilizing its NSP3
resources to further the availability of rental units in the AGN.
As market conditions improved and property values increased, homeownership
opportunities have become more challenging for families of lower fixed incomes. The City
utilized its NSP1 funding to acquire vacant residential lots in the NSP Areas of Greatest
Needs with the intent to make available homeownership opportunities for NSP and NSP3
eligible individuals.
In its original NSP3 Plan, the City had identified three Areas of Greatest Needs (AGN) which
encompassed the neighborhoods of the Upper East Side, East Little Havana and the Flagler
area. After accomplishments in this area were completed/reported, and in order to
efficiently implement the recently acquired NSP3 program income funds, the City conducted
a new analysis to better determine where to use its NSP3 program income funds, while also
aiming for activities that leveraged existent investments in eligible City neighborhoods. As
encouraged by HUD, the City has attempted to keep the new target areas small, so that the
dollars will have a visible impact on the neighborhood in accordance with the NSP3 targeting
requirements. To that end, the City is proposing the following new AGNs in this Substantial
Amendment:
• Central AGN (aka Allapattah area). Although this is a very small target area, it
accommodates the site of one parcel purchased with NSP1 funding (under the Land
Banking strategy). As such, the NSP3 program income dollars would be used to
support previous affordable housing investment made by the City in that area.
• South AGN (aka West Grove). This area has a dire need for affordable single-family
homeownership opportunities for low -to -moderate income persons. The West
Grove typically sees above average home median sales prices and assessments,
when compared to the rest of the City. Vacancy rates here are also extremely low.
Although the City does not presently own any lots in this area, the use of NSP3
program income here would complement other sources of federal funding available
in this particular District.
• Finally, the North AGN (aka Liberty City/Model City) is home to the largest group of
City owned or City purchased (with NSP1 funds) scattered site parcels. As such, the
NSP3 dollars would be used to support previous and current affordable housing
investment made by the City in that area. It is here that the City anticipates being
able to fund a multi -family building to satisfy the LMMI requirements articulated in
this document.
These City owned/purchased sites mentioned above are generally located in stable,
longstanding neighborhoods where other single-family homes exist. Vacant parcels are
eyesores in these communities and often become illegal dumping grounds. Developing
scattered sites like these ensures that the neighborhoods remain stable. All of these areas
also met the NSP3 threshold score of at least 17. Please see the maps and NSP3 Planning
Data sheets generated by the HUD NSP3 Tool for more information about these areas.
Proposed
AGN
Select Block
Groups
within the
following
Census
Tracts
Need
Score
Total
Housing
Units in AGN
Other factors
North
15.01,
15.02,
19.01,
19.03,
19.04,
20.03,
22.02
19.42
3805
• 15,257 residential addresses
registered to the number of units
noted means this area is primarily
comprised of multi -family
offerings and offers few new,
single-family housing options.
Thereby investment would further
fair housing choice.
• Extremely high poverty rates in
these tracts spanning from 36% to
65.2%.
• These tracts encompass several
neighborhoods in Liberty City (aka
Model City), and with the
exception of Block Groups 20.03
and 22.02, all are included in the
designated Target Area identified
in our Consolidated Plan as Model
City.
Central
24.02
17
389
• The City presently owns a parcel in
this area (Allapattah) which it
would like to develop.
South
71.01,
72.00
18.49
2430
• Extremely low vacancy rates — 5%
(see NSP Planning Data Sheet)
• These tracts encompass the West
Grove neighborhood (Coconut
Grove), one of the designated
Target Areas identified in our most
recent Consolidated Plan.
We believe that these revised AGNs will allow us to meet our goals and utilize the program
income funds that remain unencumbered in an expeditious manner.
3. Definitions and Descriptions
Definitions
Term
Definition
Blighted Structure
Policy LU-1.2.1 of the City of Miami's Comprehensive Plan defines
"blighted neighborhoods" as areas characterized by the prevalence of
older structures with major deficiencies and deterioration, high residential
vacancies, widespread abandonment of property, litter and poor
maintenance of real property.
In addition, slum is defined by Florida Statutes as an area which there is a
predominance of buildings, residential or commercial, that are either
deteriorated, dilapidated or by reason of obsolescence, is a detriment to
the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. Florida Statutes define
"blight" as an area determined by the local government to have the
characteristics of a slum area or one or more of the following
characteristics:
1. Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout.
2. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or
usefulness.
3. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions.
4. Deterioration of site or other improvements.
5. Inadequate and outdated building density standards.
6. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of
the land.
7. Inadequate transportation and parking facilities; and
8. Diversity of property ownership or defective or unusual conditions
of title.
The City uses a combination of the two definitions above to define a
"blighted structure/'
Affordable Rents
The City defines "affordable rents" as rental payments that do not place
unnecessary burden to households. Affordable means that monthly rents
do not exceed 30% of the monthly gross income of eligible households.
The City of Miami will use HUD's income and rent limits which are updated
on an annual basis to ensure that housing provided through the NSP3
program is affordable. See table below:
Low Income and below
Income limits for 50% of
AMI for the area as
published by HUD on
annual basis.
Moderate Income
Income limits for 80% of
AMI for the area as
published by HUD on
annual basis.
Middle Income
Income limits for 120% of
AMI for the area as
published by HUD on
annual basis.
Descriptions
Term
Definition
Long -Term
Affordability
The City will ensure that NSP-assisted properties remain affordable to
households with incomes at or below 120 percent of AMI. The City will
adhere to its Housing Program Policies for both Homeownership and Rental
activities as approved by its City Commission. These standards set
affordability periods of 30 years. The City monitors affordability of all its
projects and activities on an annual basis and ensures that housing units that
were assisted with federal funding remain affordable for the full affordability
period.
Housing Rehabilitation
Standards
These remain the same as originally filed.
Vicinity Hiring
In order to comply with vicinity hiring, the City will request that developers
receiving NSP3 funds and contractors directly hired by the City to work on
NSP3 projects make every effort to hire within the proposed target areas.
Developers and contractors will be asked to make every effort to purchase
supplies and contract with small businesses that are owned and operated by
persons residing in the vicinity of the NSP3 projects. They will also be
required to adhere to the City's Section 3 Plan.
In the event that the City was to purchase and rehabilitate properties utilizing
NSP3 funding, the City will give extra consideration to firms that are located
or that hire individuals who reside in the vicinity where the projects are
located.
4. Low -Income Targeting
Low -Income SetAside Amount
Enter the low-income set -aside percentage in the first field. The field for total funds set aside will
populate based on the percentage entered in the first field and the total NSP3 grant.
Identify the estimated amount of funds appropriated or otherwise made available under the NSP3 to
be used to provide housing for individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of
area median income.
Response:
If this Substantial Amendment #1 is approved, we are looking at the following:
Total low-income set -aside percentage (must be no less than 25 percent): approximately 51% of
total NSP3 grant
Total funds set aside for low-income individuals in this Sub. Amendment #1 = $200,000
Originally, the City had indicated it would set aside $1,200,000 of its original grant award (amounting to
26%) for low-income individuals in order to meet the 25% minimum low-income set aside as per Title III
of HERA. As of May 2016, the City has expended $3,310,766 under the low-income set -aside which
amounts to 49% of the total NSP3 grant funds expended, well above the goal. However, continuing to
pursue housing opportunities for low-income families remains one of Miami's top priorities. As such,
the City is setting aside approximately $200,000 from the total Program Income amount of this
Substantial Amendment towards the low-income set -aside and may limit the income of prospective
households in order to meet this new set -aside goal.
Meeting Low-income T
et
Provide a summary that describes the manner in which the low-income targeting goals will be met.
Response:
The estimated amount of funds appropriated or otherwise made available under the NSP3 program
to be used to purchase and redevelop abandoned, vacant or foreclosed upon homes or residential
properties for housing individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of the area
median income is approximately $200,000 from the amount addressed in this Substantial
Amendment. This goal will be met by Strategy E properties.
The City will meet the Low -Income Target through the allocation of NSP3 program income funding for
the development of affordable rental opportunities for the eligible income group.
Low-income targeting:
Strategy E: Purchase and rehabilitate or redevelop single family homes and residential multifamily
properties that have been abandoned or foreclosed upon or vacant, in order to rent or redevelop
such homes and properties. $200,000
For more detailed information regarding the activities/strategy listed above, please refer to the
Attachment entitled: NSP3 Information by Activity.
5. Acquisition and Relocation
Demolition or Conversion of Lilfil Units
Does the grantee intend to demolish or convert any low- and moderate -income
dwelling units (i.e., <_ 80% of area median income)?
No
If yes, fill in the table below.
Question
Number of
Units
The number of low- and moderate -income dwelling units—i.e., < 80% of area
median income —reasonably expected to be demolished or converted as a direct
result of NSP3-assisted activities.
5
The number of NSP3 affordable housing units made available to low-, moderate-,
and middle -income households—i.e., <_ 120% of area median income —reasonably
expected to be produced by activity and income level as provided for in DRGR, by
each NSP3 activity providing such housing (including a proposed time schedule for
commencement and completion).
5
The number of dwelling units reasonably expected to be made available for
households whose income does not exceed 50 percent of area median income.
4
6. Public Comment
Citizen Participation Plan
Briefly describe how the grantee followed its citizen participation plan regarding this proposed
substantial amendment or abbreviated plan.
Response:
Substantial Amendment#1: The City's Dept. of Community Economic Development advertised notice of
the draft of the NSP 3 Sub. Amendment #1 in the newspaper of greatest general circulation on May 10,
2016, and posted a notice with additional details on its website. In the posted notice it detailed the
comment period (15 days) for the Substantial Amendment which spanned from May 23, 2016 through
June 6, 2016, along with noting where, and to whom, comments to the Sub. Amendment could be
submitted. The ad also indicated where the public could access a copy of the Substantial Amendment
draft including both on the Department's website and at the Dept.'s office at 444 SW 2nd Ave., Second
Floor.
Comments (in writing) should be submitted to:
NSP3 Substantial Amendment #1 Comments
City of Miami, Department of Community & Economic Development
Attn: Alfredo Duran
444 SW 2nd Avenue, 2nd Floor
Miami, Florida 33130
E-mail: aduran@miamigov.com
Summary of Public Comments Received.
The summary of public comments received will be included as an attachment.
7. NSP Information by Activity
Enter each activity name and fill in the corresponding information. If you have fewer than seven
activities, please delete any extra activity fields. (For example, if you have three activities, you should
delete the tables labeled "Activity Number 4," "Activity Number 5," "Activity Number 6," and "Activity
Number 7." If you are unsure how to delete a table, see the instructions above.
The field labeled "Total Budget for Activity" will populate based on the figures entered in the fields
above it.
Consult the NSP3 Program Design Guidebook for guidance on completing the "Performance Measures"
component of the activity tables below.
Activity Number 3
Activity Name
Strategy E: Acquisition, Redevelopment of demolished or vacant properties.
Uses
Select all that apply:
Eligible Use A: Financing Mechanisms
Eligible Use B: Acquisition and
Reha bilitation/Construction
Eligible Use C: Land Banking
Eligible Use D: Demolition
X Eligible Use E: Redevelopment
CDBG Activity or
Activities
24 CFR 570.202 Eligible rehabilitation and preservation activities for demolished or
vacant properties. 24 CFR 570.201(A) Acquisition.
National Objective
Low, Moderate and Middle Income Housing (LMMH)
Activity Description
Purchase and Rehabilitation (New Construction) Program of Multi -Family and
Scattered Single -Family Units
This program allows for the City to purchase and redevelop or to provide assistance,
fully or partially, to a developer for the purchase of vacant (unoccupied structures
or vacant lots) of multi -family structures or single family scattered site structures
and rehabilitate/redevelop them, if necessary, to meet the requirements of the
South Florida Building Code and the NSP Rehabilitation Standards. This program
also allows for the City to purchase and redevelop or provide assistance, fully or
partially, to a developer for the purchase of vacant (non -built upon lots) land and/or
to construct new multi -family structures or single-family scattered site units to
meet the requirements of the South Florida Building Code and the City's NSP Green
Standards. This activity will be designated as a rental or homeownership activity.
All units, or a pro-rata share of them, shall be rented or sold to low-, moderate-, or
middle -income families whose income does not exceed 120% of HUD's Area Median
Income, adjusted for family size. Properties will be managed by the owner entity
receiving NSP assistance.
Substantial Amendment #1: This activity will be modified to allow for the City to
purchase and/or develop, or provide assistance, fully or partially, to a developer for
the purchase of vacant (non -built upon lots) land and to construct new multi -family
structures or single-family scattered site units to meet the requirements of the
South Florida Building Code and the City's NSP Green Standards, but to also
designate this activity for homeownership (home purchase) units given the recent
changes in market conditions. Specifically, the most recent U.S. Census indicated
that that only 26% of the city's housing stock is comprised of one -unit detached
structures with the bulk of Miami's housing units now in multi -family buildings. This
is a reversal from the 2000 Census where single-family homes still comprised the
majority of the City's housing stock. Miami home prices have also been trending up
with the current Case-Shiller Home Price Index (Jan. 2016) at 207.92, up from 206.92
in Dec. 2015 and up from 194.74 one year ago. This is a change of 6.77% from one
year ago. Zillow indicates that the median sales price for a home in Miami (as of
March 2016) is $311,750 which is well beyond what low- to moderate -income
families can afford.
The City's First-time Homebuyer Program has also been significantly affected by the
escalation in Miami home prices and the number of assisted households has
dropped by more than 50% in the last four years. Even though construction has
spiked in Miami, and additional housing options are now available, we have seen a
significant decline in requests (general interest) in the City's available first-time
homebuyer loans for low -to -moderate income persons/families (80% AMI and
below) seeking to live in the City. We believe this drop in applications/requests is
directly related to the City's escalating home prices and the inability of low -to -
moderate income persons to find an eligible home, and afford to maintain it.
As such, the City felt NSP3 monies would be well used in making additional
homeownership opportunities available. As such, the DCED feels that the current
local housing market supports the use of NSP3 program income funds to create new
homeownership opportunities in the selected AGNs. Also, a single-family scattered
site project is to be defined as one (1) single family home.
All units, or a pro-rata share of them, shall be sold to low-, moderate-, or middle -
income families whose income does not exceed 120% of HUD's Area Median
Income, adjusted for family size.
See NSP3 Information By Activity attachment for details.
Location Description
Substantial Amendment #1: West Grove (South), Liberty City (North), and Allapattah
(Central).
Source of Funding
Dollar Amount
Budget
NSP3 Program Income (FY 16-17)
$1,987,894
Total Budget for
Activity
$ 1,987,894
Performance
Measures
Eligible tenants at or below 120 percent of the Area Median Income- LMMI income
tenants, occupying the rehabbed, or newly constructed property on vacant land.
Projected housing units are 16.
Projected Start Date
January 1, 2017
Projected End Date
December 31, 2017
Responsible
Organization
Name
City of Miami or Developer
Location
444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, Miami, Florida
Administrator Contact Info
Alfredo J. Duran, 305-416-2080
Activity Number 4
Activity Name
Program Administration
Uses
Select all that apply: Eligible Program Administration
Eligible Use A: Financing Mechanisms
Eligible Use B: Acquisition and
Rehabilitation
Eligible Use C: Land Banking
Eligible Use D: Demolition
Eligible Use E: Redevelopment
CDBG Activity or
Activities
24 CFR 570.206
National Objective
Activity Description
Payment of reasonable administrative costs and carrying charges related to the
planning and execution of community development activities assisted in whole or in
part with funds provided under this part and where applicable.
Location Description
Source of Funding
Dollar Amount
Budget
NSP3 Program Income (FY 16-17)
$220,877
Total Budget for
Activity
$220,877
Performance
Measures
Successful completion of the projects.
Projected Start Date
January 1, 2107
Projected End Date
December 31, 2017
Responsible
Organization
Name
City of Miami
Location
444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, Miami, Florida
Administrator Contact Info
Alfredo J. Duran, 305-416-2080
City of Miami
NSP3 - Proposed Areas of Greatest Needs
4
490
3
49.02
58.01
50.01
50.02
66,01
55.02
63.01
63,02
70.01
70.02
14.02
24.03 24.04
51.03 51,
0.54.05 52.01 62.02
I54.06
64.09 53.03 63,02
54.0764.10 53.04 --
14.01
36,01
64.01 164.02 64.03
66.03 66.04
Legend
Areas of Greatest Needs
North AGN - Census Tracts 15.01, 18.01, 19.01, 19.03, 19.04 ,20.03, 22.02
Central AGN - Census Tracts 50.01, 58.01, 58.02
South AGN - Census Tracts 71.01, 72.00
City of Miami
NSP3 ® Proposed Areas of Greatest Needs
NW 33R
2404
NW 3OTHST.
NW 29TH TER
1003
NW 27TH ST
1004
2012 2013
2016 2015
NW 1ST ST
Legend
Areas of Greatest Needs
Central AGN
NW21fiTTER
30.03
NW 20TH ST
NW 32ND ST b
NW 31 ST ST
N 28TH ST
NW 27TH ST
NW 26TH, ST
Clty of Miami
NSP3 - Proposed Areas of Greatest Needs
CAMILO AVE-
-
ALE DOME__ u_„ ALEDO AVE SW 27TH LN j
ALEDOAVE__ "' �.
CAD IMA i.
MAAVE SW 28TH ST
.-�..-::. CADIMAAAVEVE W .._.»."._ .
CADIMAAVE-
ALESIOAVE g
VISCAYAAVE
VISCAYAAVE n
.02
ci,FLUVIAAVE D i P. W N SW ...,,.._. �i�nem/F -r ,<»,ro' ..,.-.'''' »..-. ! -,!29THSt
H ST fr w-ti,....,_,
£I I< x <
fm i o im '' m
m w 5(
VELAR4 AVE ."..:.:x2 1 w : `� 29�N'C
SW 4OTH ST m _ � ..£
iz o PEACOCK AVE
D 77DD�J
€� a 0
ALTARAAVE y'{
SSAN sLORENZO AVE ORANGE ST
.N F-£ 1(D
rw O+
2 xi
M1 D
t< r <SW
m N'. Rl
SW 28TH TOR
CANDAAVE •€o CANDIA AVE_" i0
VILABELLAAVE
ALMINAR AVE
CADAGUAAVE
GRECO AVE,• ..,.
Qs
OG�
e_
BLUE RD A GRAND AV
m_......:.. 202
�•M
2023"
. 2025
?0202726
»..202
SANSOVINOAVE
2013
z SW 29T
a rn
SHIPPINGAVP .
i SAN LORE NZO AVE
00V
1003
KAVE $0E
014 4013FR0
4015 t 4012
4016 4017
Im
CASTANIAAVE / O
BIANCAAVE n
PERUGIA AVE
MILLER RD
PAMONAAVE ? ENSENADAVE
VITTORIOAVE ? ""'
t VENTURA AVE
Legend
Areas of Greatest Needs
South AGN
SWz27TH WAY
SW 27TH LN_-
8TH ST w _ SN`128�N "'�,..w.,<,
w w j < S D�X�EN' ,
,z z
m
o 'o
Oi T.
JACKSON AVE
0
O
7'1.04
RUTH STZ
ORANGE ST -,
DAY AVE
LIME CT
LOQUATAVE
005MOIL
,1VAL.AVE„'-
= AVOCADOAVE
im -o
IRVINGTON AVE
1 PALMETTO AVE
CRAWFORDAVE
:ROYAL PALM AVE ,
FOINCIANAAVE_,.,,_.., ,
LEAFY WAY
ARLERAVE
HE
24.04
City of Miami
NSP3 - Proposed Areas of Greatest Needs
NW 70TH T
NW 69TH TER
NW 69TH ST
NW68THTER
N 8TH ST
6TH ST
5TH ST r
1TH ST_
RD ST
3 3004
8
100
1010 1+1
1013
3005
6001
NW71STTER I0 0
NW68THST_
NW 681IH TER N
NW68fHST
NW, 65T1 TEg
z
> 1W54TH„ST i
liN 6317bIER
2034 , '662N[ 2N
tyT
2035 +� 203 0 tt W 5009
6000 5001 5000
6002 6003 '5002 5003
6006 6004 5006 5005
5006 6007�
6009
NW 71STST, r*
69TH ST
A
n
6008
2000 7001 7000
* 7002
7005 --
7006
2007
2008
2014
2015
1000 8001
z 1003 I 8002
NW 51� T TER
NW 5 .T ST
NW 49TH T
NW 48TH ST
1
NW 44TH ST
NW
z
05
5007.
5010
4001
7003' 4002
7004
7007
7009 7008
8000
4006
S, 5004
5008
5009
4000
4003
2
NW 69TH ST
m
NW 68TH ST
NW 64TH ST
NW 66TH ST 4 z
NW 64TH ST 01;
NW RD ST 12-1
5008 N
4001 '* 4000
4002 . 4003
4006, , < 4004 '.
4006
4009 4008
4007
62ND ST ;
NW61StST
• 3015
1008 1007
1010 1011 11012
3
NW 55TH TER 1017 11016
4007 I N 55TH ST (
NW 54TH S 1020 11021
4010 1029 1028 1027_
3001 NW 53RD ST ;j ! 2006 2005 004-
7y
m.
NW 60TH ST
3012
30
1006
1013
6
00
01
8003 3002 N 52ND ST
NW 50TH ST
i
<n
m ±—
2ND ST D
z w
� z
- z Ste.„,Po ^ t *c, * 14W 43RD ST
n z lR' N-i _...,>,.W 42NDST
T.,.0 i 2
NW41SST )<1,2
NW 40TH ST 1
8R 112 95 RAMP `
SR.11:2BAnerL
2008 m a. 2009
018
1003
1015 '1024
1022
010
•
1023
1026
200
z 2
3019
00
02
U
1000
20
ci
w1
'cc),
z z z i4 0i.
'0 m
m
NW 70TH.ST 1
NW 69TH ST
NW 68TH TER
NW 68TH ST
NW 67TH ST ;
N W BST
0:i
Z
a0
,60T
l'
m
-- «'SNW 59TH TER
NW 59`.TH ST
NN7 60TH
NW 58TH ST _�.._ NW 58TH ST
Iz i ,� W57THS NW57THST
i
;ix4020 N S8THST
01 %Y" m {j DmC ._„..,.: 7 T 301•'S
4015 4016 4017(4018 4019
2001 :00+ - 6001
011' 2012 2013.
NW 51ST ST
4W 49TH ST
,m z NW 47T. TER
NVy47THST CO
z D_
NW 3 TH ST 1 -^�
36THST
N
34TH ST I
m
z
NWASTH ST 1zm
z NW44TH ST NW 44TH ST sue...„„,,,,
zz t 1 I
<z
"1 NW 35TH ST
NW 33RD ST
NW 38TH:ST
NW 37.TH ST
J
02
w =z NW 35TH ST
l i = NW 34TH +ST
w
00
6003.
6000 * 1002
0, 6004
m 6005
•
`NW 50TH ST0Je,
NW 49TH Sit-1:i
NW48THS'
10 NW 46TH ST
2 NW'45TH ST
1-.11003
R' 1008
1009'
2002
2007
010 301
2 8
301
1001
1004
1007
1010
2001
2003
2006
2009
2013 2012
2014 - 2016.
D
n
1000
----NE
1005
1006
011
NE 70TH ST
NE 69TH,STii
NE 68TH TER"
NE 68TH ST
I NE 67TTH S ,
66TH.ST
ST NE 65TFH ST
NE 64TN
E;64TH ST `
NE%63RD ST it.
� 8
a 1 NE162ND ST
N 61STST
ER
NE 60TH ST
E 59TH TES
NE 59TH ST
j N557THS1i
z ,f NES3THST t1•
NE 55TH ST
NE a• 4THS'
ONE 5312D ST
2NDTER
52ND SST -.
51 ST ST
NIE51STST
NE50THTER
NE 50TH ST
NE 49TH ST
NE 48TH ST
1024
NE 47TH ST, -w
2064 N 46TH ST
2000 -
-I 2004
2005
2010
2011
20162005
NW 44TH ST 3001 3000
NW43RDST
!NW 42NDST
NW 41ST ST
NW 40TH ST
q i NW 39THST
NW 38TH ST
z
1
m
NW 33RD ST
NW
NW 42ND ST
NW.34TH TER
5qp, NW 34THST ry
NE 43RD ST
NE 42ND ST
NE 41 6T STD
NE 4011H ST
NE39THSTz
O
NE 36T1 STFj
13/
Qa ti
« �t
w
Legend
Areas of Greatest Needs
North AGN
Neighborhood ID: 5182220
NSP3 Planning Data
Grantee Address: 444 sw 2 ave Miami Florida 33130
Grantee Email: ajorge@miamigov.com
Neighborhood Name: New Central 4292016
Date:2016-04-29 00:00:00
NEW NSP Score
New target neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an
individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified new target geography that is not less
than the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a
state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If,
however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum
need of 15, If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the
Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified
neighborhood.
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 17
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 389
Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates)
Vacancy Estimate
USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of
whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that
neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a
very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem.
The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However,
it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development,
and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are
NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified.
In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the
residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially
different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For
example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may
be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer
addresses than housing units.
USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 989
Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 26
Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 17
Foreclosure Data (NEVI
HUD has assembled recent data on foreclosure activity and vacant foreclosed properties from the firm
RealtyTrac. Recognizing that the foreclosure patterns have shifted in many communities over the past
several years, HUD is providing updated foreclosure measures to ensure that remaining NSP funds and
program income are targeted to the neediest communities. Data points include:
1/3
Total Housing Units ACS 2005-2009: 389
REO Transaction since third quarter 2011 (as of October 2012): 6
Currently Vacant Properties (as of October 2013) with a previous REO Sale the past 7 years: 1
Vacant Properties previous REO or Foreclosure Action: 3
Total of Pre -Foreclosures & REO since 3rd quarter 2011, and Vacant with a Previous Pre -Foreclosure or
REO Transaction since 2005: 18
Combined Pre -Foreclosures & REO since 3rd quarter 2011, and Vacant with a Previous Pre -Foreclosure or
REO Per 1000 Housing Units: 39
HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a
visible impact on the neighborhood.
Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of currently vacant
properties with a previous REO or Foreclosure action): 0.6
Supporting Data
To assist grantees in planning for their target neighborhood investment, HUD is providing sales data from the
firm DataQuick at the census tract level. While this data covers a large number of neighborhoods in large
metropolitan areas, some areas where transaction volumes are low may not contain data.
Number of Sales transactions 2002-2004: 30
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2002-2004 (REO SLD): 0
Median Sale Price 2002-2004 (non -distressed): 135000
Median Sale Price 2002-2004 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2004-2006: 53
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2004-2006 (REO SLD): 0
Median Sale Price 2004-2006 (non -distressed): 146000
Median Sale Price 2004-2006 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2006-2008: 30
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2006-2008 (REO SLD): 2
Median Sale Price 2006-2008 (non -distressed): 159900
Median Sale Price 2006-2008 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2008-2010: 12
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2008.2010 (REO SLD): 6
Median Sale Price 2008.2010 (non -distressed): 49500
Median Sale Price 2008-2010 (distressed): 50
Number of Sales transactions 2010-2012: 52
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2010-2012 (REO SLD): 5
Median Sale Price 2010-2012 (non -distressed): 200
Median Sale Price 2010-2012 (distressed): 43700
Market Analysis:
HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy
development. Some things to consider:
1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration
should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy.
2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of
falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment
assistance program may be an effective strategy.
2/3
3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of
a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition
rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered.
4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental
to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered.
5. Historically high cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies?
A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered.
Latitude and Longitude of corner points
-80.22974729552516 25.80198188380248-80.22358894362696 25.80203983905414 -80.22348165526637
25.79844655985832 -80.22964000716456 25.798272688747012 -80.22974729552516 25.80198188380248
Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood
120860024021000, 120860024021002, 120860024021006, 120860024021008, 120860024021009,
120860024021007, 120860024021005, 120860024021001,
3/3
Neighborhood ID: 6512390
NSP3 Planning Data
Grantee Address: 444 sw 2 ave Miami Florida 33130
Grantee Email: ajorge@miamigov.com
Neighborhood Name: New South AGN
Date:2016-04-29 00:00:00
NEW NSP Score
New target neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an
individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified new target geography that is not less
than the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a
state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If,
however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum
need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the
Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified
neighborhood.
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 18.49
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 2430
Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates)
Vacancy Estimate
USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of
whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that
neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a
very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem.
The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However,
it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development,
and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are
NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified.
In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the
residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially
different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For
example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may
be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer
addresses than housing units.
USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 17213
Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 861
Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 4430
Foreclosure Data (NEW)
HUD has assembled recent data on foreclosure activity and vacant foreclosed properties from the firm
RealtyTrac. Recognizing that the foreclosure patterns have shifted in many communities over the past
several years, HUD is providing updated foreclosure measures to ensure that remaining NSP funds and
program income are targeted to the neediest communities. Data points include:
1/3
Total Housing Units ACS 2005-2009: 2430
REO Transaction since third quarter 2011 (as of October 2012): 32
Currently Vacant Properties (as of October 2013) with a previous REO Sale the past 7 years: 15
Vacant Properties previous REO or Foreclosure Action: 69
Total of Pre -Foreclosures & REO since 3rd quarter 2011, and Vacant with a Previous Pre -Foreclosure or
REO Transaction since 2005: 161
Combined Pre -Foreclosures & REO since 3rd quarter 2011, and Vacant with a Previous Pre -Foreclosure or
REO Per 1000 Housing Units: 60
HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a
visible impact on the neighborhood.
Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of currently vacant
properties with a previous REO or Foreclosure action): 13,8
Supporting Data
To assist grantees in planning for their target neighborhood investment, HUD is providing sales data from the
firm DataQuick at the census tract level. While this data covers a large number of neighborhoods in large
metropolitan areas, some areas where transaction volumes are low may not contain data.
Number of Sales transactions 2002-2004: 1833
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2002-2004 (REO SLD): 0
Median Sale Price 2002-2004 (non -distressed): 185290.53
Median Sale Price 2002-2004 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2004-2006: 2133
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2004-2006 (REO SLD): 0
Median Sale Price 2004-2006 (non -distressed): 330833.21
Median Sale Price 2004-2006 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2006-2008: 1448
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2006-2008 (REO SLD): 100
Median Sale Price 2006-2008 (non -distressed): 343403.07
Median Sale Price 2006-2008 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2008-2010: 771
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2008-2010 (REO SLD): 282
Median Sale Price 2008-2010 (non -distressed): 171418.13
Median Sale Price 2008-2010 (distressed): 3059.81
Number of Sales transactions 2010-2012: 552
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2010-2012 (REO SLD): 99
Median Sale Price 2010-2012 (non -distressed): 210079.84
Median Sale Price 2010-2012 (distressed): 50994.51
Market Analysis:
HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy
development. Some things to consider:
1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration
should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy.
2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of
falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment
assistance program may be an effective strategy.
2/3
3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of
a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition
rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered.
4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental
to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered.
5. Historically high cost rental market, Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies?
A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered.
Latitude and Longitude of corner points
-80.26161670451984 25.723604775573175 -80.25792598491535 25.72368210026814
-80.25775432353839 25.72426203387778 -80.25333404308185 25.724416682362722 -80.253380536451
25.723946292399926 -80.24947524012532 25.72407194464285 -80.24951815546956 25.7249128446976
-80.2487027652387 25.724883848242964 -80.24701833797735 25.72479685883667-80.24698615146917
25.724303917665665 -80.24622440410894 25.723694987515774 -80.24499058665242
25.724999834019066 -80.24448633135762 25.725966377753824 -80.24421811045613
25.726352993048028 -80.24371385516133 25.726787933751513 -80.24509787501302
25.72802508972068 -80.24550557078328 25.727986428791496-80.24593472422566 25.73692643457105
-80.2495074266335 25.735631383571082 -80.2504193783534 25.735293121657428 -80.25221109397535
25.734123694482427-80.25459289492574 25.731978103963286 -80.255901812925 25.73118557875272
-80.25564432151441 25.72750316641087-80.2577149868739 25.72747417058787 80.25835871703748
25.72755149276681 -80.25946378715162 25,72747417058787-80.2593350411189 25.72524147098421
-80.26160955436353 25.725135150909818 -80.26161670451984 25.723604775573175
Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood
120860072003003, 120860070023000, 120860071004000, 120860071004017, 120860071004016,
120860071004015, 120860071004014, 120860071004013, 120860071004012, 120860071004011,
120860071004010, 120860071004009, 120860071004008, 120860071004007, 120860071004006,
120860071004005, 120860071004004, 120860071004001, 120860071004003, 120860071004002,
120860071005000, 120860071005001, 120860071005003, 120860071005005, 120860071005007,
120860071005016, 120860071005015, 120860071005014, 120860071005013, 120860071005012,
120860071005011, 120860071005010, 120860071005009, 120860071005008, 120860071005020,
120860071005019,120860071005018,120860071005017,120860071005006,120860071005004,
120860071005002, 120860072001000, 120860072001008, 120860072001007, 120860072001006,
120860072001005, 120860072001004, 120860072001001, 120860072001003, 120860072001002,
120860072002000, 120860072002002, 120860072002003, 120860072002001, 120860072002004,
120860072002006, 120860072002008, 120860072002009, 120860072002007, 120860072002005,
120860072003000, 120860072003001, 120860072003002, 120860072003008, 120860072003010,
120860072003009, 120860072003007, 120860072004000, 120860072004005, 120860072004001,
120860072004006, 120860072004008, 120860072004010, 120860072004018, 120860072004020,
120860072004019, 120860072004011, 120860072004009, 120860072004007,
3/3
Neighborhood ID: 2241455
NSP3 Planning Data
Grantee Address: 444 sw 2 ave Miami Florida 33130
Grantee Email: ajorge@miamigov.com
Neighborhood Name: The New North Area
Date2016-04-28 00:00:00
NEW NSP Score
New target neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an
individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified new target geography that is not less
than the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a
state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If,
however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum
need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the
Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified
neighborhood.
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 19.42
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 3805
Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates)
Vacancy Estimate
USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of
whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that
neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a
very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem.
The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However,
it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development,
and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are
NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified.
In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the
residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially
different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For
example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may
be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer
addresses than housing units.
USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 15257
Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 1811
Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 804
Foreclosure Data (NEW
HUD has assembled recent data on foreclosure activity and vacant foreclosed properties from the firm
RealtyTrac. Recognizing that the foreclosure patterns have shifted in many communities over the past
several years, HUD is providing updated foreclosure measures to ensure that remaining NSP funds and
program income are targeted to the neediest communities. Data points include:
1/4
Total Housing Units ACS 2005-2009: 3805
REO Transaction since third quarter 2011 (as of October 2012): 38
Currently Vacant Properties (as of October 2013) with a previous REO Sale the past 7 years: 36
Vacant Properties previous REO or Foreclosure Action: 198
Total of Pre -Foreclosures & REO since 3rd quarter 2011, and Vacant with a Previous Pre -Foreclosure or
REO Transaction since 2005: 331
Combined Pre -Foreclosures & REO since 3rd quarter 2011, and Vacant with a Previous Pre -Foreclosure or
REO Per 1000 Housing Units: 82
HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a
visible impact on the neighborhood.
Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of currently vacant
properties with a previous REO or Foreclosure action): 39.6
Supporting Data
To assist grantees in planning for their target neighborhood investment, HUD is providing sales data from the
firm DataQuick at the census tract level. While this data covers a large number of neighborhoods in large
metropolitan areas, some areas where transaction volumes are low may not contain data.
Number of Sales transactions 2002-2004: 1991
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2002-2004 (REO SLD): 0
Median Sale Price 2002-2004 (non -distressed): 72878.23
Median Sale Price 2002-2004 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2004-2006: 1389
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2004-2006 (REO SLD): 12
Median Sale Price 2004-2006 (non -distressed): 160169.78
Median Sale Price 2004-2006 (distressed): 0
Number of Sales transactions 2006-2008: 692
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2006-2008 (REO SLD): 100
Median Sale Price 2006-2008 (non -distressed): 171967.74
Median Sale Price 2006-2008 (distressed): 108.8
Number of Sales transactions 2008-2010: 538
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2008-2010 (REO SLD): 251
Median Sale Price 2008-2010 (non -distressed): 34348.13
Median Sale Price 2008-2010 (distressed): 19356.36
Number of Sales transactions 2010-2012: 143
Number of Distressed Sales transactions 2010-2012 (REO SLD): 62
Median Sale Price 2010-2012 (non -distressed): 33476.18
Median Sale Price 2010-2012 (distressed): 11678.96
Market Analysis:
HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy
development. Some things to consider:
1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration
should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy.
2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of
falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment
assistance program may be an effective strategy.
2/4
3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of
a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition
rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered.
4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental
to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered.
5. Historically high cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies?
A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered.
Latitude and Longitude of corner points
-80.22466659836937 25.823080012027344 -80.22037506394554 25.823195901859368
-80.22067547135521 25.82833357041958 -80.21144867234398 25.828642596005768
-80.21127701096702 25.824818347597088 -80.21093368821312 25.82489560636335
- 80.21089077286888 25.822925492074848 -80.20398140244652 25.823234531778166
-80.20398140244652 25.822191519546696-80.20187855057884 25.822268780027073
-80.20174980454613 25.817633061976288 -80.19973278336693 25.817633061976288
-80.19968986802269 25.816744528625613 -80.19556999497581 25.816860424658092
-80.19604206376243 25.8253205286766 -80.1963424711721 25.82790865892131 -80.20029068284202
25.827715516826977 -80.20033359818626 25.827985915670798 -80.20217895798851
25.82783140212139-80.20213604264427 25.826865687868146 -80.20784378342796 25.82682705913414
- 80.20784378342796 25.82871985227626 -80.20848751359154 25.828642596005768 -80.2084445982473
25.829685551402967 -80.21149158768822 25.829569667923757 -80.21144867234398
25.829955945746583 -80.21256447129417 25.829917318021018 -80.21265030198265
25.833046122946435-80.21677017502952 25.8328529892352 -80.21672725968529 25.83200319716152
-80.22016048722435 25.831848688856216 -80.22007465653587 25.833355136228835
-80.22303581528831 25.83323925634248 -80.22303581528831 25.832930242757516
-80.22505283646751 25.83289161600266 -80.22466659836937 25.823080012027344
Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood
3/4
120860015012034, 120860015012031, 120860015012030, 120860015012057, 120860015012056,
120860015012055, 120860015012054, 120860015012053, 120860015012038, 120860015012037,
120860015012036, 120860015012035, 120860015013005, 120860015013004, 120860015021078,
120860019013016, 120860019013015, 120860019013014, 120860019013012, 120860019013018,
120860019013017, 120860019014000, 120860019014001, 120860019014002, 120860019014004,
120860019014006, 120860019014008, 120860019014009, 120860019014007, 120860019014005,
120860019014003, 120860019015008, 120860019015009,
120860019035009, 120860019035008, 120860019035007,
120860019035002, 120860019035003, 120860019035005,
120860019036002, 120860019036004, 120860019036006,
120860019036007, 120860019036005, 120860019036003,
120860019037004, 120860019037006, 120860019037008,
120860019037005, 120860019037003, 120860019037001,
120860019041006, 120860019041027, 120860019041026,
120860019041014, 120860019041013, 120860019041024,
120860019041005, 120860019041003, 120860019041004,
120860019042012, 120860019042011, 120860019042010,
120860019042002, 120860019042003, 120860019048000,
120860019048003, 120860020033017, 120860020033016,
120860020033018, 120860020034014, 120860020034020,
120860020034017, 120860020034016, 120860020034015,
120860022021002, 120860022021004, 120860022021006,
120860022021011, 120860022021009, 120860022021007,
120860022022000, 120860022022004, 120860022022006,
120860022022015, 120860022022013, 120860022022012,
120860022022009, 120860022022007, 120860022022005,
120860022022002, 120860022026000, 120860022026005,
120860022026002,120860022026003,
120860019035000,120860019035010,
120860019035006,120860019035001,
120860019035004,120860019036000,
120860019036008,120860019036009,
120860019036001,120860019037000,
120860019037009,120860019037007,
120860019037002,120860019041000,
120860019041025,120860019041015,
120860019041023,120860019041022,
120860019042000,120860019042013,
120860019042004,120860019042001,
120860019048001,120860019048002,
120860020033015,120860020033019,
120860020034019,120860020034018,
120860022021000,120860022021001,
120860022021008,120860022021010,
120860022021005,120860022021003,
120860022022008,120860022022016,
120860022022011,120860022022010,
120860022022003,120860022022001,
120860022026004,120860022026001,
4/4