The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPZAB 12-17-14 PZAB Supporting DocumentationFile ID: Title: PZAB.3 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD FACT SHEET 11-011961 u 1 Quasi -Judicial A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, PURSUANT TO SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT PROCEDURES SUBJECT TO §163.3187, FLORIDA STATUTES, BY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 220 NORTHEAST 43RD STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA, LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED, FROM "MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION & UTILITIES" AND "SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL" TO "MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL"; MAKING FINDINGS; DIRECTING TRANSMITTALS TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Location: Approximately 220 NE 43rd Street [Commissioner Keon Hardemon - District 5] Applicant(s): Purpose: Javier E. Fernandez, Esquire, on behalf of 4201 NE 2nd Avenue, LLC and Miami Design District Associates, LLC 150 W Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 789 - 3501 This will change the land use designation for the above property from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and "Single Family Residential" to "Medium Density Restricted Commercial". Finding(s): Planning & Zoning: Recommended approval. See companion File ID's 11-01196ap2 and 11-01196da2. Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board: Continued from November 5, 2014; Continued from December 3, 2014, due to lack of quorum. ANALYSIS FOR FUTURE LAND USE CHANGE REQUEST Approximately 220 Northeast 43rd Street File ID 11-011961u1 REQUEST The proposal is for a change to the Future Land Use Map of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan designation of portions of certain properties from "Single Family Residential" and "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation, and Utilities" to "Medium Density Restricted Commercial". (A complete legal description is on file at the Hearing Boards Office). FUTURE LAND USE Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) Policy LU-1.6.1 established future land use categories according to the 2020 Future Land Use Map and the "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map." The "Single Family Residential" future land use category allows single family structures of one dwelling unit each to a maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Supporting services such as foster homes and family day care homes for children and/or adults; and community based residential facilities (6 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within single family residential areas. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable locations within single family residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s). The "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation, and Utilities" future land use category allows facilities for federal, state and local government activities, major public or private health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational activities, and major transportation facilities and public utilities. Residential facilities ancillary to these uses are allowed up to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" or if applicable the least intense abutting/adjacent residential zoning district, subject to the same limiting conditions. Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities allow nonresidential uses to a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Health / Civic Center District allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Urban Central Business District allow a maximum FLR of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. The "Medium Density Restricted Commercial" future land use category allows residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" (65 dwelling units per acre) subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use, clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Medium Density Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. DISCUSSION The subject area consists of portions of two (2) parcels comprising approximately 1.86 acres. Both of these parcels front NE 2nd Avenue. The subject parcels are in the LITTLE HAITI NET Area. The parcel located at 220 NE 43rd Street is bounded by NE 43rd Street to the north, NE 2nd Avenue to the west, NE 42nd Street to the south, and North Federal Highway to the east. This parcel is currently designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation, and Utilities" on the southern half and "Single Family Residential" on the northeast quarter. The surrounding area to the south is designated "General Commercial"; the area to the north is designated "Single Family Residential"; and the areas to the east and west is designated "Restricted Commercial". ANALYSIS The Planning Department is recommending APPROVAL of the amendment as presented based on the following findings: • MCNP Housing Policy HO-1.1.7 states the City will continue to control, through restrictions in the City's land development regulations, large scale and/or intensive commercial and industrial land development which may negatively impact any residential neighborhood and will provide appropriate transitions between high-rise and low-rise residential developments. The proposed designations maintain appropriate transitions between the commercial areas and the residential neighborhoods. • MCNP Policy LU-1.3.15, states that the City will continue to encourage a development pattern that enhances existing neighborhoods by developing a balanced mix of uses including areas for employment, shopping, housing, and recreation in close proximity to each other. This change will allow for the addition of commercial uses and increased housing capacity, which will serve the surrounding residential neighborhoods, without impacting it. • MCNP Policy LU-1.3.6 states that the City will continue to encourage a diversification in the mix of industrial and commercial activities and tenants through strategic and comprehensive marketing and promotion efforts so that the designated Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ), the Empowerment Zone, the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfield Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted areas are buffered from national and international cycles. The subject area is located in a Brownfield Redevelopment Area and an Empowerment Zone. The proposed designation will allow for an increased mix of activities and tenants in the area. • MCNP Policy LU-1.6.10 states that the City's land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking and will provide access by a variety of transportation modes, including pedestrianism, bicycles, automobiles, and transit. This site is in close proximity to a Miami -Dade County Metrobus Routes 9, 10, and 202 (Little Haiti Connection) and may support additional density and commercial uses. • MCNP Land Use Policy 1.1.1 provides that new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards adopted in the Capital Improvements Element. These findings support the position that the Future Land Use Map at this location and for this neighborhood SHOULD be changed to the proposed designation. Proposal No 11-011961u1 Date: 10/15/14 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LAND USE MAP WITHIN A TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AMENDMENT INFORMATION CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Applicant 4201 NE 2 AV LLC and Miami Design District Associates, LLC Address: 220 NE 43 ST Boundary Streets: North: NE 43 ST East: NE 4 AV South: NE 42 ST West: NE 2 AV Proposed Change: From: Major Inst. Public Fac. Transp. & Utilities To: Medium Density Restricted Commercial Existing Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 0.6300 acres @ 9 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Other sq.ft. @ FAR Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Other Proposed Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 0.6300 acres @ 65 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Other sq.ft. @ FAR Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Other Net Increment With Proposed Change: Population Dwelling Units Peak Hour Person -Trips Planning District County Wastewater Collection Zone Drainage Subcatchment Basin Solid Waste Collection Route Transportation Corridor Name 6 DU's 8 0 sq.ft. 41 DU's 27 0 sq.ft. 0 91 35 19 LITTLE HAITI 308 E3 109 NE 2 AV RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Population Increment, Residents Park Within 10 Minute Barrier -Free Walk % Population Outside of Barrier Free Walk A Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff -91 Yes N/A N/A OK POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents 91 Transmission Requirement, gpd 14,054 Excess Capacity Before Change See Note 1. Excess Capacity After Change See Note 1. Concurrency Checkoff WASD Permit Required SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents Transmission Requirement, gpd Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 91 12,784 See Note 1. 27 WASD Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration System Before Change Exfiltration System After Change Concurrency Checkoff On -site On -site OK RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Land Use Goal LU-1 Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Land Use Policy 1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 a - g (See attachment 1) SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Population Increment, Residents Solid Waste Generation, tons/year Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 91 116 800 916 OK TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Population Increment, Residents Peak -Hour Person -Trip Generation LOS Before Change LOS After Change Concurrency Checkoff 91 19 B B OK NOTES: 1. Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department (WASD). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known. Medium Density Restricted Commercial: Allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels;general office use; clinics and laboratories commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubas and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature of those uses described above, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of workship, and primary and secondary schools. .This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. Allow max heigh 7 stories (height up to 25 ft for the ground floor and up to 14 ft for each additional floor CM 1 IN 03/13/90 ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMENTS Population increment is assumed to be all new residents. Peak -period trip generation is based on ITE Trip Generation, 5th Edition at 1.4 ppv average occupancy for private passenger vehicles. Transportation Corridor capacities and LOS are from Table PT-2(R1), Transportation Corridors report. Potable water and wastewater transmission capacities are in accordance with Metro -Dade County stated capacities and are assumed correct. Service connections to water and sewer mains are assumed to be of adequate size; if not, new connections are to be installed at owner's expense. Recreation/Open Space acreage requirements are assumed with proposed change made. FUTURE LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) 1_J11111 Duplex - Resident'al NE 42ND ST NE41STST NE40THST � U Single Family - Residential NE 43RD ST Major Inst;lPublic ,Facilities, TranspT&° � Utilities ESNNE 39tH SS 0 150 300 I i I 600 Feet J ADDRESS: 220 NE 43 ST FUTURE LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) MP It E 7 Dup ex - m Res'dential 2 NE 42ND ST Density Restricted Commercial NE 41ST ST NE 40TH ST 0 150 300 I I 600 Feet I ADDRESS: 220 NE 43 ST 0 150 300 I 600 Feet ADDRESS: 220 NE 43 ST City of Miami Legislation PZAB Resolution City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com File Number: 11-011961u1 Final Action Date: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 10544, AS AMENDED, THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, PURSUANT TO SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT PROCEDURES SUBJECT TO §163.3187, FLORIDA STATUTES, BY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 220 NORTHEAST 43RD STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA, LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED, FROM "MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION & UTILITIES" AND "SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL" TO "MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL"; MAKING FINDINGS; DIRECTING TRANSMITTALS TO AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. LOCATION: Approximately 220 NE 43rd Street [Commissioner Keon Hardemon District 5] APPLICANT(S): Javier E. Fernandez, Esquire, on behalf of 4201 NE 2nd Avenue, LLC and Miami Design District Associates, LLC FINDING(S): PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: Recommended approval. See companion File ID's 11-01196ap2 and 11-01196da2. PURPOSE: This will change the land use designation for the above property from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and "Single Family Residential" to "Medium Density Restricted Commercial". WHEREAS, the Miami Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, at its meeting on November 5, 2014, following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No. PZAB-R-*-* by a vote of * to * (*- *), item no. PZAB.1, recommending *of the Future Land Use Change as set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, after careful consideration of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change of land use designation as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Ordinance are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. City of Miami Page 1 of 3 File Id: 11-011961u1 (Version: 1) Printed On: 10/29/2014 File Number: 11-011961u1 Section 2. Ordinance No. 10544, as amended, the Future Land Use Map of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, pursuant to small scale amendment procedures subject to §163.3187, Florida Statutes, is further amended by changing the Future Land Use designation of 1.86± acres of real properties located at approximately 220 Northeast 43rd Street, Miami, Florida, from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation & Utilities" and "Single Family Residential" to "Medium Density Restricted Commerical", as legally described in "Exhibit A", attached and incorporated. Section 3. It is found that this Comprehensive Plan designation change involves a use of 10 acres or fewer and: (a) Is necessary due to changed or changing conditions; (b) The cumulative annual effect of the acreage for all small scale development amendments adopted by the local government does not exceed a maximum of 120 acres in a calendar year; (c) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to goals, policies, and objectives of the local government's comprehensive plan, but proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site -specific development. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with the small scale Future Land Use Map amendment shall be permissible; (d) Is one which is not located within an area of critical state concern as designated by §380.0552, Florida Statutes or by the Administration Commission pursuant to §380.05(1), Florida Statutes; (e) Density will be "Medium Density Restricted Commercial", or sixty-five (65) dwelling units per acre, per the Miami Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and intensity will be as established in Article 4 of the City of Miami Zoning Ordinance, the Miami 21 Code, as amended; and (f) The proposed amendment complies with the applicable acreage and density limitations set forth in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act including, without limitation, §163.3187, Florida Statutes. Section 4. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of the Planning and Zoning Department to promptly transmit a certified copy of this Ordinance after its adoption on second reading to: the reviewing agencies pursuant to §163.3184, Florida Statutes; and any other person or entity requesting a copy. Section 5. If any section, part of a section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected. Section 6. This Ordinance may not become effective until thirty-one (31) days after second reading and adoption thereof pursuant and subject to §163.3187, Florida Statutes. {1} APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: City of Miami Page 2 of 3 File Id: 11-011961u1 (Version: 1) Printed On: 10/29/2014 File Number: 11-011961u1 VICTORIA MENDEZ CITY ATTORNEY Footnotes: {1} This Ordinance shall become effective as specified herein unless vetoed by the Mayor within ten days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Ordinance, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission or upon the effective date stated herein, whichever is later. City of Miami Page 3 of 3 File Id: 11-011961u1 (Version: 1) Printed On: 10/29/2014 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description All of Block 2 of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof, recorded in plat book 40, at page 66, of the public records of Dade County, FL. Also known as: Lot 5, Block 2 of BRENTWOOD, according to the Plan thereof as recorded in Plat Book 40, at Page 66 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida and Tract 2 of REVISED PLAT OF TRACT "A" and block 1,2,3,8,9,10,11 and 12 of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof in plat book 44 at page 6 of the Public Records of Dade County, FL. TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL AREA PLAN 1 — Letter of Intent 2 - Comprehensive Plan Application 3 - SAP Application 4 — Survey 5 — Zoning Referral 6 — Warranty Deed 7 — Exhibit "A" — Legal Description of Parcels 8 — Property Photographs 9 — Lobbyist Registration 10 — Affidavit of Authority to Act 11 — Disclosure of Ownership 12 — Company Documents ➢ Articles of Organization ➢ Certificate of Good Standing ➢ Power of Attorney 13 — Certified List of Owners Within 500' 14 — Disclosure of Consideration Provided or Committed 15 — Public School Concurrency Management 16 - Code Enforcement Violation/Finance Lien Search Letter 17 — Existing and Proposed Land Use map 18 — Traffic Study Methodology 19 -- EXHIBIT C: Miami Design District Retail Street SAP — Regulating Plan Proposed Revisions 20 — EXHIBIT D: Miami Design District Retail Street SAP — Concept Book Revisions & Proposed Block 5 East Concept Book 21 — Development Impact Study 22 — EXHIBIT E: Miami Design District Retail Street SAP - Development Spreadsheet 23 — BLANK 24 -- BLANK #3651838 v2 STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. October 27, 2014 Ms. Olga Zamora, Deputy Clerk & Administrator Office of Hearing Boards Department of Planning & Zoning City of Miami 444 S.W. 2"d Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 Javier E. Fernandez 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, FL 33130 Direct: (305) 789-3501 Fax: (305) 789-2620 Email: jefernandez@stearnsweaver.com RE: Revised Letter of Intent - Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan 2"d Amendment — Addition of 220 NE 43rd Street, Miami, FL ("Block 5 East") Dear Ms. Zamora: On behalf of our client, 4201 NE 2"d Ave LLC (hereinafter, the "Owner" or "Applicant"), we are pleased to submit this revised application to further amend the Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan (the "Design District SAP") to allow for the incorporation of an abutting parcel of land located at 220 NE 43rd Street (the "Property" or "Block 5 East") pursuant to the requirements of Miami 21, Section 3.9. During the preparation of this submittal and the revisions to the same, the Applicant has worked closely with the principals of Miami Design District Associates (Del.) LLC ("MDDA"), specifically Craig Robins, to procure their support for and consent to this requested amendment to the SAP. The Applicant has also closely consulted with representatives of the neighboring community associations, specifically the Buena Vista East Historic Neighborhood Association ("BVEHNA") and Brentwood Homeowners Association ("BHA"), and staff from the City of Miami ("City") Planning & Zoning Department ("Department") regarding the requested amendment to the Design District SAP ("SAP Amendment"), including the transect designation changes specific to the Property. The product of those many meetings is reflected in the revisions to the enclosed application. To that end, the Owner seeks the City's approval of the SAP Amendment to incorporate the Property (a total of 1 .89 acres +/-) and modify the Property's existing transect designations of Civic Institution ("CI") and Sub -Urban Transect Zone ("T3") to General Urban Transect Zone Limited ("T4-L") and Urban Center Transect Zone Open ("T5-O"). The zoning will be applied to two (2) newly platted lots comprising the entirety of the Property. The northernmost tract will be designated T4-L and maintain a minimum dimension of 50' from the northern Property boundary bordering NE 43'd Street. Such a designation will ensure a proper transition in density and intensity from the proposed improvements located on the Property to the abutting T3 district. The southernmost tract will encompass the balance of the Property and be designated T5-O. In addition to the foregoing transect designation changes, the Applicant is also requesting limited revisions to the SAP's Regulating Plan. Such modifications will help to ensure that the envelope of any building constructed on the Property is responsive to and consistent with the desires of the community. Each of the requested changes will permit the site to be redeveloped in a manner that will create a Civic Space Garden and companion Open Space (collectively, the "Public Space"), totaling in excess of 12,600 square feet (0.3 acres +/-), as well as approximately 100 Residential units and up to an additional 100,000 MIAMI • FORT LAUDERDALE • TAMPA • TALLAHASSEE October 27, 2014 Page 2 square feet of Commercial space. The proposed Public Space will provide abutting neighbors with a needed recreational amenity and complement the linear park improvements proposed by MDDA for portions of NE 42nd Street. All of the above improvements, when developed in a manner consistent with the SAP Amendment, will provide a rational terminus of the commercial district and an appropriate transition to the abutting residential neighborhoods to the north and guard against future commercial encroachment. For the above reasons, we respectfully request the City's favorable consideration and approval of the requested SAP Amendment. Sincerely, Javier E. Fernandez Cc: Francisco Garcia, Director, Department of Planning & Zoning Cesar Garcia -Pons, Deputy Director, Department of Planning & Zoning David Snow, Planner II, Department of Planning & Zoning #3843084 vl STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION Please refer to Section 62-31 of the Miami City Code for Comprehensive Plan information. 1. Applicant(s): 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC and Miami Design District Associates, LLC 2. Subject property address(es) and folio number(s): 220 NE 43 Street, Miami, FL 33137; Folio 01-3219-009-0070 3. Present designation(s): Major Institutional Public Facility, Transportation & Utilities, Single Family Residential 4. Future designation(s): Medium Density Restricted Commerical 5. If the requested Land Use is approved, will a Rezoning be requested for consistency with the Zoning Atlas, per F.S. 163.3184(3)(e)? X If yes, please contact Planning at 305-416-1400. 6. Has the designation of this property been changed in the last year? If so, when? no 7. Do you own any other property within 200 feet of the subject property? no/yes If yes, has the property been granted a Land Use Change within the last year? no 8. One (1) original, two (2) 11 x17" copies and one (1) 81/2x11 copy of the survey of the property prepared by a State of Florida registered land surveyor within six (6) months from the date of the application. 9. A clear and legible copy of the recorded warranty deed and tax forms of the most current year showing the present owner(s) and legal description of the property to match the legal description on the survey. 10. A clear and legible copy of the subject property address(es) and legal description(s) on a separate sheet, labeled as "Exhibit A", to match with the current survey's legal description. 11. At least two photographs showing the entire property showing land and improvements. 12. Copy of the lobbyist registration processed by the Office of the City Clerk, if applicable. 13. Affidavit of Authority to Act and the Disclosure of Ownership of all owner —and contract purchasers, if applicable —of the subject property. 14. For all corporations and partnerships indicated: a) Articles of Incorporation; b) Certificate from Tallahassee showing good standing, less than one (1) year old; c) Corporate Resolution or a Power of Attorney signed by the secretary of the Corporation authorizing the person who signed the application to do so; d) Non-profit organizations: A list of Board of Directors less than one (1) year old. 15. Certified list of owners of real estate within 500 feet of the subject property. 16. Original Disclosure of Consideration Provided or Committed for Agreement to Support or Withhold Objection Affidavit. 17. Original Public School Concurrency Management System Entered Requirements form. Rev. 07-2013 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION 18. The subject property(ies) cannot have any open code enforcement/lien violations. 19. What is the acreage of the project/property site? 1.9 +/- acres 20. What is the purpose of this application/nature of proposed use? Retail/Multi-family Development 21. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone? Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department on the 3rd Floor for information. No 22. Is the property within the boundaries of an Environmental Preservation District? Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department on the 3rd Floor for information. No 23. Is the property within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA)? Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department on the 3rd Floor for information and further instructions. No 24. What would be the anticipated duration of the presentation in front of the: ❑ Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board 20 and/or ❑ City Commission 15 25. Cost of processing according to Section 62-22 of the Miami City Code*: a. Application to Amend the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan per acre b. Advertising c. School Concurrency Processing d. Mail notice fee per notice e. Meeting package mailing fee per package $ 5,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 150.00 $ 4.50 $ 6.00 *Fees over $25,000.00, shall be paid in the form of a certified check, cashier's check, or money order. Signature Name Telephone 305-789-3501 Address 150 W. Flagler Street, Suite 2200 E-mail Miami, FL 33130 jefernandez@stearnsweaver.com STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE p The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 11 day of July 20 14 by Javier E.Fernandez who is a(n) individual/partner/agent/corporation of 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC a )_- individual/partnership/corporation. He/She is prabnally.kna who has .roduc as identification and who did (did no1)4jfk (Stamp) LILIANA ARRAZOLA ',':010 iSSIC . EE 186523 ?E0 e 11, 2016 :ionded ;xu ;+arar; r•ubtic Underwriters Signature Rev. 07-2013 3 SPECIAL AREA PLAN APPLICATION Please refer to Articles 3.9 of the Miami Code for Special Area Plans information. 1. Project name: Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Block 5 East 2. Applicant(s): 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC and Miami Design District Associates, LLC 3. Subject property address(es) and folio number(s): 220 N.E. 43 Street, Miami, FL 33137; Folio 01- 3219-009-0070 4. One (1) original survey dated within six (6) months from the date of application prepared by a State of Florida registered land surveyor. 5. One (1) original 24x36" plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida registered architect or engineer showing property boundaries and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 6. After Hearing Boards, Public Works, Zoning and Planning initial and date the plans, 11x17" copies of the original plan, including the survey, to be incorporated in the Special Area Plan binders. 7. After final City Commission approval, submittal of all documents in "InDesign" software. 8. Current Zoning Referral and Write -Up signed by the Office of Zoning designee. 9. A clear and legible copy of the recorded warranty deed and tax forms of the most current year showing the present owner(s) and legal description of the property to match the legal description on the survey. 10. A clear and legible copy of the subject property address(es) and legal description(s) on a separate sheet, labeled as "Exhibit A", to match with the current survey's legal description. 11. At least two photographs showing the entire property showing land and improvements. 12. Copy of the lobbyist registration processed by the Office of the City Clerk, if applicable. 13. Affidavit of Authority to Act and the Disclosure of Ownership of all owner —and contract purchasers, if applicable —of the subject property. 14. For all corporations and partnerships indicated: a) Articles of Incorporation; b) Certificate from Tallahassee showing good standing, less than one (1) year old; c) Corporate Resolution or a Power of Attorney signed by the secretary of the Corporation authorizing the person who signed the application to do so; d) Non-profit organizations: A list of Board of Directors less than one (1) year old. 15. Certified list of owners of real estate within 500 feet of the subject property. 16. Original Disclosure of Consideration Provided or Committed for Agreement to Support or Withhold Objection Affidavit. 17. Original Public School Concurrency Management System Entered Requirements form. Rev. 07-2013 3 SPECIAL AREA PLAN APPLICATION 18. The subject property(ies) cannot have any open code enforcement/lien violations. 19. What is the acreage of the project/property site? 1.9 +/- acres 20. What is the purpose of this application/nature of proposed use? Retail/Multi-famliy Development 21. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone? Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department on the 3rd Floor for information. No 22. Is the property within the boundaries of an Environmental Preservation District? Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department on the 3rd Floor for information. No 23. What would be the anticipated duration of the presentation in front of the: ❑ Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board 20 and/or ❑ City Commission 20 24. An executed Traffic Sufficiency Letter from the City of Miami's traffic consultant. 25. Maps showing the adopted comprehensive plan and existing zoning designations of the area. 26. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project. 27. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, rezonings or exemptions. 28. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 29. Twenty (20) Special Area Plan books —including one original —containing 8Y2x11" copies of the above documents, including this application and any other pertinent documents. 30. One (1) electronic copy of every document included in the book, individually scanned in ".pdf" form. For example: 1) Outside Cover; 2) Inside Cover; 3) Table of Contents; etc. 31. Cost of processing according to Section 62-22 of the Miami City Code*: a. Special Area Plan (SAP) per acre b. Advertising (SAP) c. Development Agreement (for City Commission) d. Advertising (Development Agreement) e. School Concurrency Processing f. Mail notice fee per notice g. Meeting package mailing fee per package h. Traffic Study (separate check) $ 5,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 150.00 $ 4.50 $ 6.00 $ 6,000.00 *Fees over $25, 000.00, shall be paid in the form of a certified check, cashier's check, or money order. Rev. 07-2013 4 SPECIAL AREA PLAN APPLICATION Downtown Development of Regional Impact fee, Southeast Overtown Park West Development of Regional Impact fee and Public School Concurrency fee may apply. Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department once development program is finalized. Signatur v Address 150 W. Flabler Street, Suite 2200 Name Javier E. Fernandez Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone 305-789-3501 E-mail Jefernandez(a�stearnsweaver.com STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing was acknowledged before me this /1 day of July, 2014, by... Jay.ie,r E. Fernandez, who is an agent of 4201 N.E. 2nd Ave LLC, a company. He is pe illy known to M. as identification and o did (did not) or who has produced (Stamp) i ?Q1•� • ULIANA ARRAZOLA my ^0mi./bSSION f,` EE 186523 .'::.' EXPRF1E5: June 11, 2016 'k' pF ;;: Bonded i nru Notary Public Underwriters i Signature Rev. 07-2013 5 r Signatur-e�l� Name v/CUL-Ai C i -C/4 tCW AREA PLAN APPLICATION t of Regional Impact fee, Southeast Overtown Park West Development of ublic School Concurrency fee may apply. Please contact the Planning and g Department once development program is finalized. caei� �, Lie +' 'TiaF 4,ec Co-App�,e�,�l Address Telephone J 0 S` 5 3 f-V1 OO 3SL-11 nl P UE 4 LiOo rC. 33)3'7 E-mail S .uEAledOcra .eorn STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Thpforegoing,was acknowledged before me this 1 day of J U i y 20 /, by _VEni C 12E EniStuAl who is a(n) ' VPo aa) tEsiyrd iliteiatci,1L!a(n) individual/partnership/corporation. He/She is personally known to me or who has produced _ as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) a6';,.Y-fNo Al.1CIAALONSd-WELCH * MY COMMISSION # Ef 859276 ° EXPIRES: April 18, 2017 140F no0 Bonded pro Budget Notary Setvices LiuU (.)JL Signature Rev. 07-2013 5 uJ 17$ —R=25700 L=39.45. Tan=25.18. - — — 49-7, 63o, eto 63 0 eS PARKWAY 386.99' ( R & M ) • a • • . -• : • • •'211 . . . ....... • • •••• •••• •• • • • • • •• ••••••••••••-•••-•••••• • \,•• • • • :r'v,;g•ar.•• ••••••11•:•:-l- . • . • .. • ... • :• •• ••••••••••••:70,•••i:•:•::-• !•.• •-••••:•.•,• .. w000 . . ..... .. .......... NOID 7 448g A...1:EELIALEE. ONE STOW CALS. BUILDING P. It R25.00 ri 259.06' R & M ) (I) ey 15' PAItKWAY a Tan=24.82' - A=89.35.08. 20' ASPHALT PAVEMENT IO ROL AT, N.E 42nd STREET TREE CHART OIAMEIER SPAN 25' 30' 25' 30' 30' 40' SAW OAK 15' IT 10 SAW GAK 50' 11 SAIN [IAN RAIN ON( 15` 20' 16 20' 14 SAW OAK 50' sEr 15 MANGO TREE 16 MANGO TREE la' IT 17 AUVIGO TREE 11, 20' PANG, TREE MANGO TREE R=90 L= 0 0.11f &=76.28"01" C. 1/I / ""I'Lnavo,VIVITT" IA go, ELEVATION BA.pED ON LOC.# 310L caw, C-243 ELV. 15.13f SLIMETOLS.M1/0...1.1/111.-1,001/WICHOPMIll S1101,11/0.1101.1ii.SIGHATUREN. s,s/sq,s/ //,,,,ns,ssss.ssss,sus,ssosssss,sp/sssss,ssyssss,s=ssRssss,s/ssgss, A1313/110,1ALMSCRICTION,./9110.0W/111/15111.Plr/14/....TBEFOUNDIN.E1/11BLICUC01/.401/1.1 CO.rnr. 81CoN-rAcr THEAPPROP.VM ovniffrarIT Marro., o.laN wo.roB.B.od0.1OWNDIC form...MK ALVITIONSORBE.TONSIOSUANSTIVIMSCRILUCR.BYOTHErritklinIESI..OPAICYCI,PIUTESIS nEEE.rtm vEm.Err mErrEFE.E co.ruoF TH, sEEz.e p.zrox flEARINIESNI-E1451/10.111,1EREFERASOTOSSAMWDVALIJE-OFSAltlf, p,g 6 . ALTA SURVEY or -nee. Addregoy 43. Miarnl, FL. gm., Certildie Kelm Eguitles, 1.1C, a New York limited Bahr. company; %lateen and Harbert PA., FicWitg NaVonal -ride Sun, done according to FIdelltg National iltle Insurance Company Order Nog 4765396 Effecove Date:March 06,2014 , All Schedule 6-11 Otle exceptions are blanket in nature and not plottahle. legal DesuleVon. All of Block 2, of BRENTWOOD, accord., to the Oat thereof as recorded in Plat Book Q. Page 66, Polak Records of MiarngOade Count, Florkla, ALSO KNOWN AS: .5, Block 2, of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book ., Page 66. Public Reco.s of Dade County, Florida and Tract 2. of recorded Plat Book 44, Page 6, Public Records of Miami - ...rzff-faFLE 1..,!•Zinr•11.32.-RE5r7 • • . 7-TiSaaz- SINCE/US BLANCO SURVEYORS INC. (3*61065.13. ga,,30616I6,6,0 FLOOD ZONE: s PANEL 0304 '17i"“ 171-0, SUFFIX 1 DA. 9/11/09 .SE N/A MAIM.. 120650 l'"" 10—.5 L=39.45. Tan=25.18. Z UJ > = uJ ( OOO. N N.E 43rd STREET e S 386.99' ( R a.) ONE STORY CALS. 81.111.1:111111 go 259.06.( R M) R=25.00. I N PARKWAY h' PARKWAY 1 P t R=90. IHOID 0 n=91' 70. L= 0.11' /- A=76.2W01. jy_ 20' ASPILAINT PA y MCAT_ 11=1Me:18°— (50' TOTAL I ( N.E 42nd STREET TREE CHART SAW OAK SAW OAK 50' so. 30' 40' 00, 10' 10' 10' 10 SAW OAK 3' 11 SAW OAK 15' 15' 12 .121, OAK 15' 13 SAW OAK 15. 14 W GAK 15 MANGO MEE 15. MARGO TREE 17 AII.NO0 MEE MANGO TREE 20 MEE '*"..ZYPIA57R'S SEAr II‘A\ T.73 /1. 21.7 03.3 7TH CELIFO°-2°11rEnELV°.1.5L.T3.'' HIPHIMIALPIS.rucrtoxs.DISHOWNONTMSSUIVEVTHAT MAYBE FOUNDINT112 PUB. 112.00.108 Or THIS coutirr. MACH,. APPROPPY.11 q.10MMIUDIll'Onem DEVON WOPSFOR AND ZONING A0011101. DELPTIONS.10 SLIllvEvliwPs 00.11.1,0111s exoDIERTIAN THES.101.allo pAllri OR FARMS IS PRO1Onfra, anni0119,./ITAN COW.' OFTNESIGtaNGPARITORPAMIES WARW. WHEN sHOH.N.H. REFERRED TO 41fisstNEDYLLUEOP H•Hg/HIPAHE - ALTA SURVEY gertifted icH Helm Equities, WS, a New York limited .comoan, Mate.. and Nether, Natlonal Tale Insurance ComPao, ELT.ive'Da.., :arch 05,101.1 - Schedule title exceptions are blanket in nature and not plottable. ye, I Ip_lecrl lom Ail of Block 2, of BRENTWOOD, according Public Records. lAWni.Oade County, Florida, ALSO KNOWN A.S: Wt S, Mod( 2, of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 40, Page 66, Public liefordS of Dade Count, Florida a. Tract 2. of REVISED P. OF TRACT "A' AND BLOCKS 2. 3,8, 9,10, It recorded in Plat BOok 64, Page 6, Public Records of Warn, Dade County, Florlda. 13,24c0 SURVEYORS PO* 225.12oo baNADRAPvconcuppano. cam Fax: 305) 8654010 FR/ 9 rgHr 14 _22 5 TAL W N.E 43rd STREET R25.00.— Tan=25.18. D 2 la > uJ 2 t 8 ' R.25.00. 139.09 A=89.35.0r FD Gyp e 0 386.99. (R M ) M1 METAL F 16.1,13,k AV so — A t -1r —4.11 eo 259.06. R&Mj I PARKWAY TREE CHART 0 ,,15. PAVEL. I N.E 42nd STREET DIAMEIEN SPAN SAWOrill S.,14/ ClASS SAWC1All 16 SAW6•11( 11 SAWOAK 12 8914'0AH 16 19 S4Y1,6•Ill 16' 1.1 SAIVOAN 15 XIANG01REE 151 16 AIANGOTRES 16 17 MANGO TREE 16 44INGOTREE HANG, 'FEE 26 oe R=25.00' Tan=31.73' zb, R=90 an=70.011 ELEVATION EAEE0 ON LOC. /A 31 04 SLIBM01121.01S, 11014.0.510 SUBleCTTOONNION Oran., 2,NOT VALID WM-1001111¢ SIONATURBAND ewl9B1g9EAL OF AFLORIng LICENSMSkievFvoll AND klAPPEA3,11BSUILVETLIEMTEDIMPEISNO,COVIgkEDBT FROFESSIONALLIPHILITY IICKMANCE, UNDERMOIRMalakakailegENTSNOrLaC0.11. ”ElEVATIONS ONNWOONALGPODEnCYMUICALBAng.10,1929 6) OwnEitSing0F gekCES gREUNKNOwN AnOMONALREFIRICRONSNDT 1,119 krlevErkikAT MAT BEFOUMkrk,711,11BLICRE.CORDSOFTElik COUNT, 310UNTACI-11-1E APPROPRIATE AUTBORM'NUORTDANY DESIGN WOMPOILBUillkeNOANDZ .0111.5.0111.11-11CNS, 1951,11YEg kkgeos,00.17.0ZS:L...0171,NTRESION11.1.0P., ORM/MESE, egniiikat MEN PPEREFERPSD MAN ASSUMED VALZFP;e7FlAGE 6 - ALTA SURVEY rag-Med To: Nelrn Egultles, L., a New York limited liability Insurance Cornea.. Survey done according to Rdelgll Dkle ...ranee Company 0Aer No.,765398 Effective Dace:March 05, Ma - Schedule 8,11 title exceptIons are blanket In nature and not p.o.e. legal Degcriolion: All of Block 2, of BRENTWOOD, accordlng Public Records of Nang -Dade County, Florida, ALSO gNOWN AS: Lot 5, Block 1, of BREN1WOOD, according to the plat thereof as recorded In Flat Book 40, Page BB, Public Regards of Dade County, Honda and Track 2, of REVISED PUT OP TRACT WAND BLOCKS 1, 2,3,8,9, 10, 11 AND 12, OF BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof as recorded In PLat Book ,14, Page S. Publ. Records of Miami - Dade County, florlda MC. I an Btroro SURVEYORS INC. Nkkoni BEA.. ek arm I 1306111113-1100 erkolt don.oggregoisin.gyonockeern Fax,305)8657810 TENTATIVE PLAT BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND TENTATIVE PLAT OF HELM DESIGN A REPLAT OF LOT 5, BLOCK 2, OF BRENTWOOD, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 40, PAGE 66, PUBLIC RECORDS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND TRACT 2, OF REVISED PLAT OF TRACT 'A' AND BLOCKS 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, AND 12, OF BRENTWOOD, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 44, PAGE 6, PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR 4201 NE 2ND AVE LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY C/O HELM EQUITES, LLC 150 BROADWAY, SUITE 800 NEW YORK, NY 10038 PHONE: (305) 789-3335 NOTES 1) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON CITY OF MMIAMI-DADE O COUNTY OETIC VERTICAL BENCHMARK NO C-243, DATUM OF 1929: ELEVATION: 13,39 ELEVATION: 15 13 E (CITY OF MIAMI DATUM). NE 37 C/L PROJECTED FROM 2) FLOOD ZONE: % PANEL 50 0304L: MA 09/11/09. NONE 3) THIS SITE LIES IN SECTION 19. TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH. RANGE 42 EAST. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 5) RR E AND THE LOCATION OF ACCEPT RESPONSIBIL, FOR THIS INFORMATION BEFORE EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION CONTACT UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, THIS FIRM. HOWEVER. DOES NO7 APPROPRIATE UTILITY OR FIELD VERIFICATION. 8) THEHORIZONTALCOMPANIES POSITIONAL ACCURACY OF WELL DEFINED IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS SURVEY IS THIS T ACCURACYOF ELEVATIONS OF WELL DEFINED IMPROVEMENTS ON HIS 8) THIS 4735398, PREPARED BY FIDEL, NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, NA, AN EFFECTIVE DATE THE FOLLOWING3 & RN ADDRESSED. AESCHEDULE EXCEPTIONS TO SAID COMMITMENT: AFFECTITEM 5-MATTERS AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 40. PAGE 66, AND PLAT BOOK 44. PAGE 6. AFFECT THIS SITE AS DEPICTED HEREON ITEM 6-AT&T FIBER OPTIC CABLE INSTALLATION LITIGATION IN 0 R.B 26284, PAGE 4511, AFFECTS THIS SITE BUT IS NOT PLOTTABLE. ITEM 7-AMENDED EASEMENT DEED IN O.R.B. 28495. PAGE 1054. AFFECTED BY O.R.B. 28922. PAGE 4035, SITE BUT ARE NOT PLOTTABLE ITEM 8-NOTADDRESSED. 9) THIS IS ZONED. T3-L. SUB URBAN ZONE AND CI, CIVIC INSTITUTIONAL. PER MIAMI 21 ZONING CODE 10) NUMBER PROPOSED 11) THEREWAS N0 OBSERVED EVIDENCE OF CURRENT EARTH MOVING WORK. 0R BUILDING 12) T� LINES. THERE WAS NO IDENCE OF RECENT STREET OF SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR. 13) THERE NO OBSERVED EVIDENCE OF SITE USE AS A SOLID WASTE DUMP, SUMP OR SANITARY 14) LANDFILL. SHEET 2 OF 5. o FEET PER 15) PARCEL i0 BE SERVED BY MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT. 15)) TH _ _ -FOOT UTIL, EASEMENT PLATTED BY BRENTWOOD, PLAT BOOK 40, PAGE 66, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, COPYRIGHT 2014 BY PULICE LAND SURVEYORS, INC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS SURVEY MAY BE REPRODUCED. IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS. WITHOUT PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM AN OFFICER OF PLILICE LAND SURVEYORS, INC. LOCATION MAP A PORTION OF SECTION 19, DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION LAND USE SOUARE FEET HOUPS RETAIL NT,L (MULT,AIALY) UNITS RETAIL CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION PULICE LAND SURVEYORS INC. - JANE STORMS TELEPHONE NUMBER. 954- 5 2- FA, NUMBER: 95a-572-177S LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 5, BLOCH 2, OF BRENTWOOD, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 56. AND ND 12.. OF BRENTWOOD, ACCORDING PUBLIC7RACT 2, OF REVISED PLAT OF E AND BLOCKS 1, 2 O THERACT PLATTHEREOFAS RECORDED A INAPLATBOOK 44, PAGE 6, PUBLIC Ft:CORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COLA, FLORIDA. SAID FLORIDA. AND BEINGS SITUATE, LYING AND AND CONTAINING 80,980SCUARE HET (1,8590 ACRMIAMI-DADE ES) MOREOR LESS? CERTIFICATION: STRUCTURES ON THE LANDS HEREIN DESCRIBED, OTHER THAN SHOWN. AND THA7 7HIS TENTATIVE PLAT AS SHOWN I HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES. IMPF?0,MENTS OR IN WITH THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SE�T A FORTH BY THE FLORIDAFLORIDADEPARTMENTOFAGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES ("DOACS") NUMBEF? 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027. FLORIDA STATUES COPIES OF THIS SKETCH ARE INVALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE SEAL OF THE UNDERSIGNED STATE OF FL'ORIDA (8!E NE ,BRD HELM DESIGN HE M K H 81-04OE COUNTY, FLORIDA, Sam REVIBINS BY BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC, TREE SURVEY AND TENTATIVE PLAT PULICE LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 5381 NOB HILL ROAD SUNRISE, FLORIDA 33351 TELEPHONE: (954) 57TTT 954) 572-1778 veys®pull CERTIFICATE of AUTHORIZATION Lep3e 0 �WN 080 F:Z NE SAM8A.A4Z ORDER NO. .EB09e r R=25.00' I CA=90°25'00 A=39.45' TRACT 3 "REVISED PLAT OF TRACT "A" AND BLOCKS 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 OF BRENTWOOD" PLAT BOOK 44, PAGE 6, M.D.C.R. , b, PROPOSED TRACT 'A' Sr- eery„ 18,676 SQUARE FEET 0.4287 ACRES _ ELECTRIC ROOM gw<w� 889'35 00"E 453.93' 6,7dE N.E,. 43RDn,STREE,T _ 1 STORY RESIDENCE 1 STORY RESIDENCE N89'3500"W 225.18' 0 35'00 E 234 S89'35_00"E 385.60' S89'35'00°8 293.90' N.E. 42ND STREET TRACT 1 1 STORY RESIDENCE "REVISED PLAT AND BLOCKS 2 PLAT 9004KF 44. PAGE06.O000" MDCR, S89'35'00"E 108.48 PROPOSED TRACT 'B' 62,304 SQUARE FEET 1.4303 ACRES te rses3011 I 9.08 RESIDENCE TRACT A / "REVISED PLAT OF TRACT "A" AND BLOCKS 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 OF BRENTW000" PLAT BOOK 44, PAGE 6, M.D.C.R. ;; R-25.00' h CA=103'31'59' A=45.17' 52.30' 02 GRAPHIC SCALE LEC3END CONCRETE ELEVATION —5— UNDERGROUND GAS LINE UNDERGROUND WATER LINE UNDERGROUND WATER LINE OVERHEAD I I ASPHALT PAVEMENT IL CENTERLINE MONUMENT LINE OFFICIAL RECORDS P INFORMATION TRAVERSE (ONLY) NT (FOR RADIUS CA CENTRAL ANGLE CB CHORD BEARING CD CHORD DISTANCE HELM DESIGN 220 I. 43ED STREET 1.1.1.11—DADE COMM ROFIDA, SOW BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC, TREE SURVEY AND TENTATIVE PLAT PLS PULICE LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 5381 NOB HILL ROAD SUNRISE, FLORIDA 33351 TELEPHONE (95a) 572-1777 x: (954) 57— 6 eysWulrcelandsurveyars.com CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION 113g3870 DRA 3, AC CHECKED El, ORDER NO; S0090 MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SPECIAL AREA PLAN SECOND AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT SPECIAL AREA PLAN, SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ORDINANCE 13114, AS AMENDED, THE CITY CODE, AND ALL APPLICABLE CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS. Pursuant to the Miami 21 Code, Ordinance 13114, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal is the second amendment to the Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan ("MDDRS SAP"), to include additional acreage (approximately 1.86 acres +/-) to the previously approved MDDRS SAP. The amendment has been reviewed subject to all applicable criteria found in the Miami 21 Code. SPECIAL AREA PLAN, pursuant to ARTICLE 3, Section 3.9 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8, to allow parcels greater than nine (9) abutting acres in size to be master planned so as to allow greater integration of public improvements and infrastructure, and greater flexibility so as to result in higher or specialized quality Building and Streetscape design. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to include approximately 80,976 square feet (approx. 1.86 acres +/-) of Lot Area bounded by NE 43`d Street to the north, NE 42nd Street to the south, NE 4th Avenue to the east, and NE 2rd Avenue to the west, also known as Block 5 East, to the previously approved MDDRS SAP, for a new total of 995,668 square feet or 22.86 acres +/- within the overall development site. Upon approval, Block 5 East will be developed as part of the original MDDRS SAP. The new program includes a Residential component of 82 Dwelling Units, Commercial (retail) space of approximately 70,000 square feet, and 304 Parking spaces (210 below grade; 94 above -grade) in support of such Uses for a total of 350,000 square feet of Floor Area. The new program also provides 4,205 square feet of Civic Space (approx. 5% of the Lot Area) and an additional 8,410 square feet of Open Space for a total of 12,615 square feet of combined Civic and Open Space (or approximately 15% of the Lot Area). The amended MDDRS SAP will, therefore, provide a total of 3,050,000 square feet of Floor Area. These square footages are approximate and may increase or decrease at time of Building permit not to exceed a total of 3,355,000 square feet of Floor Area or less than 45,940 square feet of Civic Space. Note: 1. Applicant proposes to modify the existing Transect Zone regulations for the MDDRS SAP to the extent indicated herein, as well modify the Transect designation for Block 5 East from Civic Institution ("Cl") and Sub -Urban Transect Zone ("T3") to General Urban Zone ("T4") and Urban Center Transect Zone ("T5"). Where a section is not modified in the MDDRS SAP, as amended, the regulations and restrictions of the Miami 21 Code shall apply. P. mela Stanton Z. ning Plans Processor Date tdel- Prepared By and Return To: Thomas R, Harbert Mateer & Harbert, P.A. 225 E. Robinson St., Suite 600 Post Office Box 2854 Orlando, Florida 32802 Parcel Identification No.: 01-3219-009-0070 space above this line for processing data space above this line for processing data SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS, INCORPORATED, a Florida not -for -profit corporation (the "Grantor"), whose address is 1701 Robie Avenue, Mt. Dora, Florida 32757 in consideration of the sum of $10,00 and other good and valuable consideration received from 4201 NE 2ND AVE LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the "prantee"), whose address is 150 Broadway, Suite 800, New York, New York 10038, hereby on this day of July, 2014, grants, bargains, sells, aliens and conveys to the Grantee the real property in Miami -Dade County, Florida, described as: All of Block 2, of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 40, Page 66, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, ALSO KNOWN AS: Lot 5, Block 2, of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 40, Page 66, Public Records of Dade County, Florida AND Tract 2, of REVISED PLAT OF TRACT 'AAND BLOCKS 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, AND 12, OF BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 44, Page 6, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. Grantor hereby covenants that the property is free of all encumbrances except those matter set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, that lawful seisin of and good right to convey the property are vested in Grantor, and that Grantor hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever claiming by through or under Grantor, but not otherwise. [SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW] Witnessed on this ay ofJuly, 2014. SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS, INCORPORATED, a Florida not -for -profit corporation By: Name: Hubert J. Mo e , Presid (Corporate Seal) STATE OF COUNTY OF A.lik The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 2014, by Hubert J. Morel, Jr., as President of SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS, INCORPORATED, a Florida not -for -profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He is Z) personally known to me or El produced (type of identification) as identification. (Affix Notarial S 447,1P, THOMAS R. HARBERT Commission # OD 972627 1 Expires July 1E1, 2014 ronded Thru Troy Fain Insurance BC)-365-7DID Notary Public - State Flor, Printed Name: Commission No.: My Commission Expires: ,/‘////7-- Witnessed on this jday of July, 2014. SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS, INCORPORATED, a Florida not -for -profit corporation By: t?. egory OY af, Executive ecretary (Corporate Seal) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July, 2014, by Gregory O. Mack, as Executive Secretary of SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS, INCORPORATED, a Florida not -for -profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He personally known to me or Lil produced (type of identification) as identification. (Affix No ND: 4833-6543-5419, v. 1 .¢,761.204,11 THOMAS R. HARBERT Commission # DD 972627 Expires July 18, 2014 Bonded 1Thru Truy Fain Insurance 800-305-70 Notary Public -"le-of Flofic17 Printed Name: „.%-e*,5--4 Commission No.: My Commission Expires: EXHIBIT "A" Permitted Encumbrances 1. Taxes and assessments for the year 2014 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. 2. Matters as set forth on the plat of Brentwood as recorded in Plat Book 40, Page 66 and on the plat of Revised Plat of Tract "A" and Blocks 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of Brentwood recorded in Plat Book 44, Page 6, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. AT&T Fiber Optic Cable Installation Litigation as set forth in Supplemental Final Order and Judgment recorded March 24, 2008 in Official Records Book 26284, Page 4511, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 4. Amended Easement Deed by Court Order in Settlement of Landowners Action recorded February 19, 2013 in Official Records Book 28495, Page 1054; Easement Deed by Court Order in Settlement and Landowner Action recorded November 21, 2013 in Official Records Book 28922, Page 4035; Notice of Substitution of Easement Deed by Court Order in Settlement of Landowner Action recorded January 27, 2014 in Official Records Book 29004, Page 1694, Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. 5. Matters set forth on the survey by Blanco Surveyors Inc. dated 4/21/2014, Job No. 14-295, as follows: a. 10 foot Utility Easement along the center of the property running east and west in which buildings are built over said easement. b. Concrete sidewalk extends west of property line. c. Concrete driveway extends past property lines on the east. ND: 4841-0160-8476, v. 1 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description All of Block 2 of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof, recorded in plat book 40, at page 66, of the public records of Dade County, FL. Also known as: Lot 5, Block 2 of BRENTWOOD, according to the Plan thereof as recorded in Plat Book 40, at Page 66 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida and Tract 2 of REVISED PLAT OF TRACT "A" and block 1,2,3,8,9,10,11 and 12 of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof in plat book 44 at page 6 of the Public Records of Dade County, FL. #3593954 v1 DESIGN DISTRICT AERIAL DESIGN DISTRICT MIXED USE mlAmi, FLORIDA 4565 PONCE DE LEON 9LDD NATE 201 CONN 04.ED F10404 /Eo 4 4a9N0o, SITE AERIAL N SITE LOCATION DESIGN DISTRICT SPECIAL AREA PLAN 24 11/NE 2014 DESIGN DISTRICT MIXED USE MIAMI, FLORIDA Sib POEECE DE :EON 9, SUITE .1 CORAL CABLES, F.0910E. 3E1E, NORTH EAST 43RD STREET - NORTH NORTH EAST 43RD STREET - SOUTH EXISTING SITE CONTEXT DESIGN DISTRICT SPECIAL AREA PLAN 24 JUNE 2014 . • • DESIGN DISTRICT MIXED USE LAIAP,I, FLORIDA 4.54.5 PONCE OE LEON 9,1, SIAM 201 F10,10A 32146 AR9A1r. NORTH EAST 4TH AVENUE - EAST NORTH EAST 4TH AVENUE - WEST EXISTING SITE CONTEXT 005100 DISTRICT SPECIAL AREA PLAN 24 LUNE 2014 DESIGN DISTRICT MIXED USE MIAMI, FLORIDA .4543. 30663£13.31.306453, SUM 301 CORAL 063-ES ,060.4 3,146 no It AS9.90 NORTH EAST 42ND STREET NORTH EAST A 2ND STREET EXISTING SITE CONTEXT DESIGN DISTRICT "41' MAL AREA PLAN 24 JUNE .2014 DESIGN DISTRICT MIXED USE MIAMI, FLORIDA <565 PONCE DE :6054 5,00, 500E20.. C056,065LES FLO<556 32.6 NORTH EAST 2ND AVENUE- EAST NORTH EAST 2ND AVENUE -WEST EXISTING SITE CONTEXT DESIGN DISTRICT SPECIAL AREA PLAN 24 l/NE 20. Print Form CITY OF MIAMI Office of the City Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, FL 33133 Phone: (305) 250-5360 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION (1) Lobbyist Name: Javier E. Fernandez Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial Business Phone: 305-789-3501 For Office Check# Use Only: Receipt# Ethics Certificate Business Address 150 W. Flagler Street, Suite 2200, Miami, FL Zip 33130 E-Mail Address Jefernandez@stearnsweaver.com (2) Principal Represented Helm Equities (3) Principal's Business Address150 Broadway, Suite 800, NY, NY Zip 10038 (If different from above) Specific issue lobbyist has been retained to lobby (if representing a corporation, partnership or trust, give business address of chief officer, partner, or beneficiary of same, and the names and addresses of all persons holding, directly or indirectly, at least five percent (5%) ownership interest in said corporation, partnership or trust). Land use and zoning amendments for property located at 220 N.E. 43 Street, Miami, FL 33137 (4) Lobbyists shall state the extent of any business association or financial relationship with any member(s) of the City Commission, any member of City staff before whom he/she lobbies or intends to lobby. (If applicable, please explain) n/a Lobbyists shall pay all registration fees ($525.00 annually, plus $105.00 for each principal represented and for each issue a lobbyist has been retained to lobby on behalf of any one principal), and specifically define the issue for which they are employed. The Clerk shall reject any statement which does not detail the issue for which the lobbyist has been employed. Lobbyist t shall also SE.lhntit a certificate of s olnplctiorl of an ethics course p r,\ lr;lr:'td by the Nli;:Eur6• i➢,.Etle (uuri), (. otnnliSS 0Ei on nil Et';; DEL l'uI lic trust or (.itof 'Mi:utii complt.i&d no more titan oric (I) year prior t0 rE.`gltiti.'7'in , 1 do solemnly swear that all of the foregoing facts are true and correct, and I have read or am familiar with the provisions contained in Sections 2-651 through 2-658 of the City of Miarni Code, as amended, including "annual registration, withdrawal, reporting requirements, definitions, examinations, penalties for violations and contingency fees." State of Florida, County of Miami -Dade Sworn to and subscribed before me his ?1C day ofj t/,1 , `) / ULIANAARRAZOLA '.% MY COMMISSION # EE 186523 EXPIRES: June 11, 2016 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Lobbyist Signature Notary or Deputy rk Note: Annual Registration Fee: Effective through 12/31/2012 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORITY TO ACT Before me this day, the undersigned personally appeared Javier E. Fernandez , who being by me first deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the public hearing application as required by the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as listed on the foregoing pages. 2. That all owners who he/she represents, if any, have given his/her full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the foregoing petition, 0 including or 0 not including responses to day to day staff inquires. 3. That the foregoing and following pages are part of this affidavit and contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions of the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. That the facts, as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit, are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Javier E. Fernandez Applicant(s) Name A . licapt( ) SignaiurE STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 20 14 by Javier E. Fernandez who is a(n) individual/partner individual/partnership/corporation. as identification an (Stamp) day of July or • oration of 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC he is pers ho did (did not) tak " UUANA ARRAZOLA t*: MY COMMISSION # EE 186523 t41t := # EXPIRES: June 11, 2016 1, Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Rev. 07-2013 4 SPECIAL AREA PLAN APPLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORITY TO ACT Before me this day, the undersigned personally appeared Javier E. Fernandez, who being by me first deposes and says: 1. That he is the owner or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the public hearing application as required by the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as listed on the foregoing pages. 2. That all owners who he represents, if any, have given his full and complete permission for him to act in his behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the foregoing petition, 0 including or 0 not including responses to day to day staff inquires. 3. That the foregoing and following pages are part of this affidavit and contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions of the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. That the facts, as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit, are true and correct. Further Affiant sayeth not. Javier E. Fernandez Applicant(s) Name Applicant(s) Signatu)e STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing was acknowledged before me this I t' day of July, 2014 Fernandez who is an agent of 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC a comps . He who has produced as ideatio nd who did (did (Stamp) Signature MAW ARRA7.OlA MY COMMISSION #. EE 186523 EXPIRES: June 11. 201e.. bowled Thru Notary Public UndF .. Rev. 07-2013 6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. List the owner(s) of the subject property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Miami City Code requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, with respect to a presentation, request or petition. Accordingly, disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their address(es) and proportionate interest are required. Please supply additional lists, if necessary. Owner's Name(es) See enclosed exhibit Percentage of Ownership See enclosed exhibit Subject Property Address(es) 220 N.E. 43 Street, Miami, FL 33137 2. List all street address(es) and legal description(s) of any property located within 500 feet of the subject property owned by any and all parties listed in question #1 above. Please supply additional lists, if necessary. Street Address(es): Legal Description(s): Javier E. Fernandez Owner(s) or Attorney Name STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing was acknowledged before me this Z( day of 2014 by Javier E. Fernandez who is a(n) individual/partne ageniorporation of 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC �( individual/partnership/corporation. He/She is p1oonally know to me�or who ha,Vprod as identification and who did (did not) ke a aatth. G'L44 (Stamp) EXPIRES: June 11, 2016 1,8r Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters uwwn ARRAZOIA MY COMMISSION # EE 186523 Signature Rev. 07-2013 5 SPECIAL AREA PLAN APPLICATION DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. List the owner(s) of the subject property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Miami City Code requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, with respect to a presentation, request or petition. Accordingly, disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their address(es) and proportionate interest are required. Please supply additional lists, if necessary. Owner's Name(es) See enclosed exhibit Percentage of Ownership See enclosed exhibit Subject Property Address(es) 220 N.E. 43 Street, Miami, FL 33137 2. List all street address(es) and legal description(s) of any property located within 500 feet of the subject property owned by any and all parties listed in question #1 above. Please supply additional lists, if necessary. Street Address(es): Legal Description(s): N/A Javier E. Fernandez Owner(s) or Attorney Name N/A Own orney Signature STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing was acknowledged before me this '0 day of July, 2014, by Javier E. Fernandez who is an agent of 4201 N.E. 2nd Ave LLC, a company. He is. personally-krrowr to me or who has produced as idenif cation and wh id (did not) „f$ke an oath. (Stamp) 1. Y .;.91'�' hLH fANA ARRAZOLA *: i f :,r_ MY COMMISSION # EE 186523 �rd '•-'sue 4`- EXPIRES; June 11, 2016 Ajte,tilts' Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Signature Rev. 07-2013 7 CITY OF MIAMI SPECIAL AREA PLAN APPLICATION Project Name: Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Second Amendment — Block 5 East DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP Exhibit SAP Parcel 64: Block 5 East SUBJECT PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS(ES): 220 NE 43rd Street (Folio No. 01-3219-009-0070) SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of Block 2 of BRENTWOOD, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 40, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, FL. Also known as: Lot 5, Block 2 of Brentwood, according to the Plat thereof„ as recorded in lat Book 40, at Page 66, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida AND Tract"2 of REVISED PLAT OF TRACT 2 OF REVISED PLAT OF TRACT "A" and Block 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of Brentwood, according to the Plat thereof, in Plat Book 44 at Page 6 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. OWNER'S NAME(S): OWNERSHIP INTEREST (%) 4201 NE 2ND AVE LLC 100% • 4201 NE 2''`D AVE LLC is owned as follows: > Gindi Group 50% ➢ Bailey Group 50% ■ Gindi Group is owned as follows: ➢ Isaac A. Gindi 25% > Raymond Gindi 25% ➢ Isaac S. Gindi 16.66% ➢ Eddie Gindi 16.66% > Jack Gindi 16.66% ■ Bailey Group is owned as follows: > Ayal Horovits 80% ➢ David Escava 20% From: Division s orporatio 14 JUN 27 AM if: 08 11 3 a . 003 fl Florida Department of State Division of Corporations Electronic Filing Cover Sheet Note: Please print this page and use it as a cover sheet. Type the fax audit number (shown below) on the top and bottom of all pages of the document. (((H14000154813 3))) II11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIbI11IIbIIIIINIII11IIIIIIIIIIRIYIIpINIIIIIIIIIIIIRIIIIIIIIIIII Note: DO NOT hit the REFRESH/RELOAD button on your browser from this page. Doing so will generate another cover sheet. . To: From: Division of Corporations Fax Number : (850)617-6383 Account Name : NATIONAL CORPORATE RESEARCH, LTD. Account Number. : 120000000088 Phone (800) 221-0102 ✓�':;•N,i Fax Number : (800) 944-6607 i� .•;� v: -71 **Enter the email address for this business entity to be used for futurg?•' Q annual report mailings. Enter only one email address please.** E57'1 rW Email Address: S }Q,""C e cj `+ ,r>!'n , nAn\ LpcC .CA' FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY CO. 220NE43LLC Certificate of Status Certified Copy Page Count Estimated Charge 0 03 ! 5125.00 Electronic Filing Menu Corporate Filing Menu Help https://efile•sunbiz,org/scripts/efilcovr.exe ro • rn 0 N. Culligan .14hVi ge141 From:, . 0612612014 22:13 #968 P.002/003 (((T-114000154813 3))) ARDC LESOFORGANTZATION PORR.O UDALIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ARTICLE 1- Name: The name of the Limited Liability Company Is: 220 NE 43 LLC • (Must end with the words "Limited Liability Company, "L.L.C.," or "LLC.") ARTICLE 11 - Address: The mailing address and street address of the prinoipal office of the Limited Liability Company Is: Principal Office Address: c/a Helm Equines LLC 160 Broadway, Salta 800 Maiiipa Address: ua Heim Equities LLC S90 Broadway, fluke 800 New York, New York 10038 New York, New York 10038 ARTICLE I11 - Registered Agent, Registered Office, & Registered Agent's Signature: (The Limited Liability Company cannot serve as its own Registered Agent. You must designate an individual or,. ,..,,,. another business entity with an active Florida registration,) T';:;, `".-a' The name and the Florida street address of the registered agent are: . -: ,: 7-1— National Corporate Research, Ltd., Inc. t. ` N Name :: "" t 155 Office Plaza Drive -r7 C) Plorlda street address (P.O. Box NOT acceptable) r'" �=i Tallahassee FL 32301 * c City Zip N Having been named as registered agent and to accept service of process for the above stated limited liability company at the place designated In this certYlcate, ! hereby accept the appointment as registered agent and agree to act .ln this capacity, 1 further agree to comply with the provisions of all statutes relating to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and I am familiar with and accept the obligations of my position as registered agent as provided for In Chapter 605, F..S,. d� Maryys� CC:in irnr j C., i Ct b j Registered Agent'a•Signetttfe (RF,i)UIitED) `� (CONTINUED) Page] of2 W114000154813 3))) From • Filing Fees; 5125.00 Filing tree for Articles of Organization and Designation of Registered Agent $ 30.00 Certified Copy (Optional) $ 5.00 Certificate of Status (Optional) 06/26/2014 22:13 #966 P.003/003 (((H14000154813 3))) ARTICLE IV - The Hume and address of each person authorized to manage and control the Limited Liability Company: �tle: "AMk3R" - Authorized Member "MGR" - Manager MGR Name and Address: °avid Eacava, do Helm @qultlea LLC 150 Broadway, Buda 600 Now York, New York 10036 MGR Mid Hpbvaa, oto Norm @Kula°. LLC 150 Broadway, eu0e 800 Now York, Now Yak 10036 (Use attachment if necessary) ARTICLE V: Effective date, if other than the date °filling: . (OPTIONAL) (Lien effective date is listed, the date must be specific and cannot be more than five business days prior to or 90 days after the date of filing) ARTICLE VI: Other provisions, if any. REOUIRE» SIGNATUR S1gna ure of a member or a . ut orized rc resentativ f a member. (In accordance with section 605.0203 (1) .). Florida Statutes, the execution of this document constitutes an affirmation under the penalties of perjury that the facts stated herein are true. 1 am aware that any false Information submitted in document to the Department of State constitutes a third degree felony as provided for in s.817.155_, F.S.) , e ra "(1r1n t P t t D Fc�cesa t (� x^ n Typed or prr ted name o signet . `V • —•t -11 Page2of2 T.; !V (((H14000154813 3))) o7�oi201 4/400/150 Florida Department of State Division of Corporations Electronic Filing Cover Sheet Note: Please print this page and use it as a cover sheet. Type the fax audit number (shown below) on the top and bottom of all pages of the document. (((H14000157674 3))) ia111i1111iiiaAiiiu11iii111i11Niam111immuuuiiii1111111111iiiiiimioiiiNau Note: DO NOT hit the REFRESH/RELOAD button on your browser from this page. Doing so will generate another cover sheet. To: From: Division of Corporations Fax Number : (850) 617-6383 Account Name : NATIONAL CORPORATE RESEARCH, LTD. Account Number : 120000000088 Phone : (800)221-0102 Fax Number (800)944-6607 **Enter the email address for this business entity to be used for future annual report mailings. Enter only one email address please.** 'Email Addroee: LLC AMND/RESTATE/CORRECT OR M/MG RESIGN 220 NE 43 LLC Certificate of Status a Certified Cope ilv Pa e Count "•J 01 C7 C T""� stimated Charge $25.00 Electronic Filing Menu Corporate Filing Menu Help httpb://efile.sunbiz.org/scripts/efilcovr.exe (((H 1400015 7674 3))) ar co QD 7/1/2014 From: 07/01/2014 00:39 #978 P.002/005 (((H 14000157674 3))) COVER LETTER TO: Registration Section Division of Corporations SLJB.IECT: 220 NE 43 LLC Name of Limited Liability Company The enclosed Articles of Amendment and fee(s) are submitted for filing. Please return all correspondence concerning this matter to the following: Nina Roket, Esq. Nine of Person Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP Pirm/Company 65 East 55th Street Addreas New York, New York 10022 City/State and Zip Code nroket@olshanlaw.com E-mail address: (to be used for fltture annual report notification) For farther informntion concerning this matter, please call: Nina Roket, Esq. Name of Person at (212) 451-2335 Arca Code Daytime Telephone Number Enclosed is a check for the following amount: $25.00 Filing Fee 0 $30.00 Filing Fee & 0 $55.00 Filing Fee & Certificate of Status Certified Copy (additional copy is enclotod) MAILING ADDRESS: Registration Section Division of Corporations P.O. Box 6327 Tallahassee, FL 32314 o $60,00 Filing Fee, Certificate of Status & Certified Copy (additional copy is enclosed) STREET/COURIER ADDRESS: Registration Section Division of Corporations Clifton Building 2661 Executive Center Circle Tallahassee, FL 32301 (((H14000157674 3))) From: 07/01/2014 00:39 (((I-114000157674 3))) ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION OF 220 NE 43 LLC ameotet m t (( 4 Om any a ety imited t C nywmpaTanyj,7ri On our rccerda,l Irnhil The Articles of Organization for this Limited Liability Company were filed on 6/27/2014 Florida document number L 14000103744• This amendment is submitted to amend the following: A. If amending name, enter the new name of the limited liability company here: 4201 NE 2ND AVE LLC #978 Ptt.003/005 EC al rl:,t l� r a' 39 A N4 S SEF �l 711Elf rc and assigned The new name must be distinguishable and end with the words "Limited Liability Company," the designation "LLC" or the abbreviation'7,,L.C." Enter new principal offices address, if applicable: (Principal office address MUST BE A STREET ADDRESS) Enter new mailing address, if applicable: Wailing address ,MA ¥BEA POST OFFICE BOXY B. If amending the registered agent and/or registered office address on our records, enter the name of the new registered agent and/or the new registtertd pfilee address here: Name of New Registered Agent: New 1t.e�stere¢ Office Adc4tsss: Enter Florida street addrnrs , Florida City Zip Code New Registered Agent's Signature, Ifchringing Registered Agent: 1 hereby accept the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this capacity, 1 further agree to comply with the provisions of all statutes relative to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and 1 am familiar with and accept the obligations of my position as registered agent as provided for in Chapter 605, F.S. Or, if this document is being filed to merely reflect a change in the registered office address, 1 hereby confirm that the limited liability company has been notified in writing of this change. If Changing Registered Agent, Signature of New Registered Agspt Page 1 of 3 (((H14000157674 3))) From: 07/01/2014 00:39 #978 P.004/005 (((H14000157674 3))) If emending the Managers or Authorized Member on our records, enter the title, name, imd address of e ackMgnager or Authorized Member being added or removed from our records: MGtt o Manager AMBR - Authorized Member Title Name Address Tyne of Action Q Add 0 Remove O Add 0 Remove 0 Add 0 Remove O Add O Remove 0 Add 0 Remove 0 Add Page 2 of 3 (((H €4000 1 57674 3))) O Remove From: 07/01/2014 00:39 #978 P.005/005 (((H 14000157674 3))) D. If amending any other information, enter change(s) here: (Attach additional sheets, ifnecessary.) E. Effective date, if other than the date of filing: (optional) (The effective date mast he specific, cannot he prior to date of receipt or filed date and cannot he mote than 90 days utter the date this document is filed by the Florida Department of State) Dated June 30 2014 , Signature on member or authorized representative ofa Int:tuber Danielle Frank, authorized representative Typed or printed name ofsignc:c Page 3 of 3 Filing Fee: $25.00 (((1-114000157674 3))) State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that 4201 NE 2ND AVE LLC, is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on June 27, 2014. The document number of this company is L14000103744. I further certify that said limited liability company has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2014, and its status is active. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Sixteenth day of July, 2014 Vox 044A Secretary of State Authentication ID: CU9794118025 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this ID, and then follow the instructions displayed. https://efile.sunbiz.org/certauthver.html Prepared By and Return To: Javier Fernandez, Esq. Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. 150 West Flagler Street Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: AYAL HOROVITS, hereinafter referred to as Manager, of 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC, a Florida limited liability company, does hereby appoint JAVIER FERNANDEZ, as Manager's true and lawful attorney. In Manager's name, and for Manager's use and benefit, JAVIER FERNANDEZ, is hereby authorized: To execute, acknowledge, and deliver escrow instructions, covenants, agreements, assignment of agreement, affidavits, settlement statements, and other written instruments of whatever kind and nature, all upon such terms and conditions as said attorney shall approve, in reference to the Land Use and Zoning Applications of the following described property located at 220 N.E. 43 Street, Miami, FL which has the legal description of: All of Block 2 of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof, recorded in plat book 40, at page 66, of the public records of Dade County, FL. Also known as: Lot 5, Block 2 of BRENTWOOD, according to the Plan thereof as recorded in Plat Book 40, at Page 66 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida and Tract 2 of REVISED PLAT OF TRACT "A" and block 1,2,3,8,9,10,11 and 12 of BRENTWOOD, according to the plat thereof in plat book 44 at page 6 of the Public Records of Dade County, FL. Giving and granting to said attorney full power and authority to do all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done on Principal's behalf as fully and to all intents and purposes as Principal might or could do if personally present. All that said attorney shall lawfully do or cause to be done under the authority of this power of attorney is expressly approved. [REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] [SIGNATURE AND NOTARIZATION APPEARS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] #3615887 v1 41477-0001 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Manager described above sets his hand and seal on this day of July, 2014. Signed, sealed, and delivered in the presence of: WITNESSES: Wit ss Signature AYAL HO Print Name: Witness Signature Print Name: mQ l/ SS a /1 /0I 1 i.OV Ct STATE OF 11/64"' 4O .kC )ss: COUNTY OF aLCQ„,S ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /4' day of July, 2014, by AYAL HOROVITS. He is (check one) personally known to me, or has presented as identification and did not take an oath. My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF Print Name: Commission No. LARRY A. GATTEGNO Notary Pubic, State of New York o. Qualified in Qusen� s County Commission E9ires September 30, 2014 Page 2 of 2 CONSUELO M. QUINTANA ISABEL T. QUINTANA REAL ESTATE DATA RESEARCHERS 12872 SW 46TH Terrace, Miami, FL 33175-4620 0 305.858.2287, 305.222.4695 F 305.222.4698 Mobile 786-258-4119 (E-mail) quintana c(bellsouth.net, cmgcorpna.bellsouth.net June 24, 2014 CITY OF MIAMI HEARING BOARDS PO BOX 330708 MIAMI, FL 33233-0708 RE: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP LIST 500' FEET FROM: 220 NE 43 STREET MIAMI, FL 33137 F#01-3219-009-0070 (STREET ADDRESS) TRACT 2 & LOT 5 BLOCK 2 OF PLAT BOOK 40-66 BRENTWOOD REVISED PLAT PLAT BOOK 44-6 (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) DADE COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED OWNERSHIP LIST, MAP AND MAILING MATRIX IS A COMPLETE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE REAL ESTATE PROPERTY AND PROPERTY OWNERS 500' FEET FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LISTED ABOVE. THIS REFLECTS THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS ON FILE IN THE DADE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'STM OFFICE. SINCERELY,* ISA: E i T. QUI TANA ( 98 LABELS ) ORIGINALLY 109 NAMES (INV-4525) (MIA-3050) (L-2292) (C-1944) (TX-06/24/14) 1 L-2292L (80 LABELS) (87 NAMES) 1 STATE OF FLA DOT 401 NW 2ND AVE #520 MIAMI FL 33128-1740 FEC RR CO % J P WILLIAMS RE MGR 1 MALAGA STREET ST AUGUSTINE FL 32084 SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY 1450 NE 2 AVE MIAMI , FL 33132-1308 BOY BLUE LLC ATTN: MARIO LEJTMAN 915 N MANSFIELD AVE HOLLYWOOD , CA 90038 DACRA DESIGN 4141 LLC 3841 NE 2 AVE STE 400 MIAMI , FL 33137 GIRAUD FEVRIN 201 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137 C ALPAZILE &W CLEMENCE 211 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3446 HORACE GLENN HIGGINBOTHAM JOHN L HARRISON 213 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137 RONALD C HILL &W MARGARET E 231 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3446 HILDA GOMEZ 251 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3446 PHYLLIS E WILLIAMS ETALS JTRS THOMAS WILLIAMS JR JTRS TERESA WILLIAMS JTRS, ROSLYN WILLIAMS JTRS SHEILA RUSSELL JTRS, TOMETRA MCCLENDON JTRS 1220 GORHAM ST JACKSONVILLE , FL 32226 EDDIE BODDEN &W MARBETH BODDEN 260 NW 44TH ST MIAMI , FL 33137 MARIE R MESADIEU 250 NE 44 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3434 FRANCAIS EXIL &W LUCIEN 240 NE 44 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3434 230NE44LLC 927 LINCOLN RD # 212 MIAMI BEACH , FL 33139 SONIA FRANCIS 220 NE 44 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3434 HENRY GALIANO TRS AMAPOLA INTERNATIONAL TRUST 31 9426NW2PL MIAMI SHORES , FL 33150 CARLOS CARRILLO JR 200 NE 44 STREET MIAMI , FL 33137 FAIDHERE BOYER & EDWIDGE DANTICAT 203 NE 44 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3433 ELISSON DORIVAL &W LYDIA 211 NE 44 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3433 THOMAS W JOULE 221 NORTHEAST 44 ST MIAMI , FL 33137 VANINA J JELINEK JTRS ANDRES SCAYOLA JTRS 231 NE44ST MIAMI , FL 33137 ANDREW F MILLER 251 NE44ST MIAMI , FL 33137 LUZ M ARROYO 261 NE 44 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3433 BLANCA N FRANQUI MICHELLE V RODRIGUEZ 270 NE 45 ST MIAMI , FL 33137 VICTOR JOHNAKIN 261 NE 45 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3435 DORSAINVIL SIMILIEN FLORAINE SIMILIEN 250 NE 45 ST MIAMI , FL 33137 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC C/O BANK OF AMERICA 450 AMERICAN ST SIMI VALLEY , CA 93065 SILVIA DOMINGUEZ 230 NE 45 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3436 TONY SINGH &W IRMA 220 NE 45 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3436 L-2292L (80 LABELS) (87 NAMES) 2 ANTONIO GOMEZ ORODEA 2551 SW 21 ST MIAMI , FL 33145 FRANCES HALL 200 NE 45 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3436 3900 BISCAYNE LLC 2915 BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 200 MIAMI , FL 33137-4197 GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FED 4200 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI , FL 33137-3210 PRH 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD LLC 315 S BISCAYNE BLVD 4 FLOOR MIAMI , FL 33131 FROST REAL EST HOLDINGS LLC 4400 BISCAYNE BLVD MIAMI , FL 33137-3212 SDBM INC C/O CHARIFF 4141 NE 2 AVE #200B MIAMI , FL 33137 DACRA DESIGN MOORE LLC 3841 NE 2 AVE SUITE # 400 MIAMI , FL 33137 MOSAIC LLC 3841 NE 2 AVE SUITE 400 MIAMI , FL 33137 FCAA LLC 3841 NE 2 AVE #400 MIAMI , FL 33137 FCAA LLC 3841 NE 2 AVE STE 400 MIAMI , FL 33137 SCARLET BEGONIA HOLDINGS LLC 3841 NE 2 AVE #400 MIAMI , FL 33137 JANET DALMOND 120 NE 42 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3524 FLAGLER HOLDING GRP INC 4218 NE 2 AVE MAIMI , FL 33137-3520 MDDA MORNING DEW LLC 3841 NE2AVE#400 MIAMI , FL 33137 RAMZI ACHI TRS 176 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3412 DESIGN DISTRICT DEV LLC 3841 NE 2 AVE SUITE 400 MIAMI , FL 33137 FRANK MARTINEZ MARIA ELENA CASTELLANOS 160NE43ST MIAMI , FL 33127 ELIAS TOBON 144NE43ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3412 WASHINGTON F GAMBOA 126 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137 MDDA BLUE SKY LLC 3841 NE2AVE#400 MIAMI , FL 33137 NIEVES HERNANDEZ 145 NE 42 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3517 AVON T & CARRIE E BROWN 151 NE 42 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3517 CESAR H CHACON &W MAYRA CHACON 161 NE 42 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3556 DAVID AMOR &W GRACIELA 13921 SW 38 TERR MIAMI , FL 33175-6418 BEST REALTY VALUE INC P 0 BOX 85215 HALLANDALE , FL 33008 4314 NE 2ND AVE LLC 4330 NE 2 AVE MIAMI , FL 3313 WILD HORSES MOSAIC LLC MATS R B TYLOSKOG LNL LLC 3841 NE 2 AVENUE 150 NE 43 ST 4545 N MARIDIAN AVE #400 MIAMI , FL 33137-3412 MIAMI BEACH , FL 33140-2944 MIAMI , FL 33137 L-2292L (80 LABELS) (87 NAMES) 3 DJL LOT LLC 4330 NE 2 AVE MIAMI , FL 33137 SINUHE VEGA 168NE44ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3416 NIKOLAOS DOULIS JACQUELINE S DOULIS 1200 NE 82 ST MIAMI , FL 33138 PIXNEFUL LTD 701 BRICKELL AVE # 2050 MIAMI , FL 33131 PETER HAWRYLEWICZ JTRS KENNETH LIEBER JTRS 1749 NE MIAMI COURT #101 MIAMI , FL 33132 ARISTON J LOUIS &W ANNE N 136NE44ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3416 WILLIAM W CHARLES &W JANIS L JTRS 1218 MADRID CORAL GABLES , FL 33134 BARTIMUS C PHLLIPS 135 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3411 MADAGIO INC % MARIO MOLINARI 1179 BAY DR MIAMI BEACH , FL 33141-362 SEAN KEENAN & HEATHER GORMAN 151 NE 43 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3411 SDW NE 43 ST LLC 757 NE 77 TERR MIAMI , FL 33138 DJL LOT LLC 4330 NE 2 AVE MIAMI , FL 33137 RONIT RICHMAN 2424 PRAIRIE AVE MIAMI BEACH , FL 33140-3405 HARIKLIA R GIOSMAS 4414NE2AVE MIAMI , FL 33137 BRIAN T JAMES &W NATHALIE CADET 775 NE 74 ST MIAMI , FL 33138-5231 EVELYN CADET 182 NE 45 ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3420 CAUSEWAY CONSULTING & CAPITAL LLC 450 ALTON RD #1103 & 1104 MIAMI BEACH , FL 33139 BARDOMIANO TALAVERA 153NE44ST MIAMI , FL 33137-3415 ELIANE ELLERN 169NE44ST MIAMI , FL 33137 BUENA VISTA IN STYLE LLC C/O C KAMPS 1040 BISCAYNE APT 2106 MIAMI , FL 33132 C-1944L (16 LABELS) (22 NAMES) 1 BISCAYNE BLVD HOLDINGS LLC 1401 BRICKELL AVE #500 MIAMI , FL 33131-3507 EVELIO & HILDA GILMOND & MARIA GONZALEZ 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD #103 MIAMI , FL 33137-3256 PROSPERITY INVESTMENTS & PROP LLC 4300 BISCANE BLVD #201 MIAMI , FL 33137 PEPUS 13 LLC 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD #204 MIAMI , FL 33137 CIFUENTES MARRERO PA & PEPUS 13 LLC 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD #204 MIAMI , FL 33137-3255 MICHAEL CHOLOBEL P A 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD #205 MIAMI , FL 33137-3255 URBANO LLC 1915 BRICKELL AVE #513 MIAMI , FL 33129-1736 207 8 (4300 BISC) LLC 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD #207 MIAMI , FL 33137-3255 CHARLOTTE SOWMA TRS 10567 NW 52 TER DORAL , FL 33178 WABASH INVESTMENTS LLC 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD #302 MIAMI , FL 33137-3255 STATVEL ONE LLC P O BOX 170910 HIALEAH , FL 33017 RMG PROPERTIES LLC 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD #304 MIAMI , FL 33137-3255 STATVEL ONE LLC 815 NW 57 AVE STE 405 MIAMI , FL 33126-2054 ANTHONY LEON 4300 BISCAYNE BLVD # G-04 MIAMI , FL 33137 TRIPLE R PROPERTIES LLC 730 E PROSPECT ROAD OAKLAND PARK , FL 33334 MOIRA WOLOFSKY TRS 150 BRADLEY PLACE #611 PALM BEACH , FL 33480 CITY OFMIAMI DISCLOSURE OF CONSIDERATION PROVIDED OR COMMITTED FOR AGREEMENT TO SUPPORT OR WITHHOLD OBJECTION The City of Miami requires any person or entity requesting approval relief or other action from the City Commission or any of its boards, authorities, agencies, councils or committees, to disclose at the commencement (or continuance) of the hearing(s) on the issue, any consideration provided or committed, directly or on its behalf, to any entity or person for an agreement to support or withhold objection to the requested approval, relief or action. "Consideration" includes any gift, payment, contribution, donation, fee, commission, promise or grant of any money, property, service, credit or financial assistance of any kind or value, whether direct or implied, or any promise or agreement to provide any of the foregoing in the future. Individuals retained or employed by a principal as a lobbyist as defined in Sec. 2-653, and appearing before the City Commission or any of its boards, authorities, agencies, councils or committees solely in the capacity of a lobbyist and not as the applicant, or owners' legal representative are not required to fill out this form. NAME: Javier E. Fernandez (First Name) (Middle) (Last Name) HOMEADDRESS: Stearns Weaver Miller Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. (Address Line 1) 150 W. Flagler Street, Suite 2200 (Address Line 2) CITY: Miami STATE: Florida LIP: 33130 HOME PHONE: (305) 789-3501 CELL PHONE: FAX: (305) 789-3395 EMAIL: jefernandez@stearnsweaver.com BUSSINESS or APPLICANT or ENTITY NAME 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC BUSINESS ADDRESS: c/o Helm Equities (Address Line 1) 150 Broadway, Suite 800, New York, NY 10038 (Address Line 2) 1. Please describe the issue for which you are seeking approval, relief or other action from the City Commission, board, authority, agency, council, or committee. Zoning atlas map amendment 2. Has any consideration been provided or committed, directly or on your behalf, to any entity or person for an agreement to support or withhold objection to the requested approval, relief or action? ❑ YES ❑X NO If your answer to Question 2 is No, do not answer questions 3, 4 & 5 proceed to read and execute the Acknowledgment. If your answer to Question 2 is Yes, please answer questions 3, 4 & 5 and read and execute the Acknowledgement. Doc. No.:86543 3. Please provide the name, address and phone number of the person(s) or entities to whom consideration has been provided or committed. Name Address Phone b. c. * Additional names can be placed on a separate page attached to this form. 4. Please describe the nature of the consideration. 5. Describe what is being requested in exchange for the consideration. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby acknowledge that it is unlawful to employ any device, scheme or artifice to circumvent the disclosure requirements of Ordinance 12918 and such circumvention shall be deemed a violation of the Ordinance; and that in addition to the criminal or civil penalties that may be imposed under the City Code, upon determination by the City Commission that the foregoing disclosure requirement was not fully and timely satisfied the following may occur: 1. the application or order, as applicable, shall be deemed void without further force or effect; and 2. no application from any person or entity for the same issue shall be reviewed or considered by the applicable board(s) until expiration of a period of one year after the nullification of the application or order. PERSON SUBMITTING DISCLOSURE: S nature Javier E. Fernandez Print Name Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of July . 20014 . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Javier E. Fernandez , who has produced as identification and/or is personally known to me and who did/did not take an oath. STATE OF FLORIDA CITY OF MIAMI MY COMMISSION Notary EXPIRES: Print Name Enclosure{s) Doc. No.:86543 Page 2 City of Miami Public School Concurrency Concurrency Management System Entered Requirements Applicant Fields Information Application Type Public Hearing Application Sub -Type Land Use Application Name * 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC (Miami Design District Retail Street SAP) Application Phone * 212-608-5100 Application Email * ahorovits@helmequities.com Application Address * 150 Broadway, Ste. 800, New York, NY 10038 Contact Fields Information Contact Name * Javier E. Fernandez Contact Phone * 305-789-3501 Contact Email * jefernandez@stearnsweaver.com Local Govt. Name City of Miami Local Govt. Phone 305-416-1400 Local Govt. Email GDGav rr.ci.miami.fl.us Local Govt. App. Number (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Property Fields Information Master Folio Number * 01-3219-009-0070 Additional Folio Number Total Acreage * 1.9 acres +/- Proposed Land Use/Zoning * Medium Density Restricted Commerciall Single -Family Detached Units * 0 Single -Family Attached Units (Duplex) * 0 Multi -Family Units * 124 Total # of Units * 124 Redevelopment Information (MUSPs) - Re -development applications are for those vacant sites for which a local govemment has provided vested rights; or for an already improved property which does not have to be re -platted as deemed by the local govemment. The number of units to be Input Into the CMS is the net difference between the existing vested number of units and the newly proposed number of units. Example: an existing 20-unit structure will be torn down for redevelopment. The newly proposed development calls for 40 total units. Local government shall input 20 units in the CMS (net difference between the 20 units vested less the newly proposed 4 units). Required Fields for Application * r Ljav/ . "I"<fe-,Lo c 2 Owner(s)/Attorney/Applicant Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE plicant Signature The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by who is a(n) individual/partner/agent/corporation of — a(n) individual/partnership/corporation. He/She is pet'senally-knr . n tto . has produced _ as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Stamp) r,,,, LUANA ARRAZOLA MY COMMISSION # EE 186523 ^= EXPIRES: June 11, 2016 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters Signature City of Miami Public School Concurrency Concurrency Management System Entered Requirements Applicant Fields Information Application Type Public Hearing Application Sub -Type Zoning Application Name * 4201 NE 2nd Ave LLC (Miami Design District Retail Street SAP) Application Phone * 212-608-5100 Application Email * ahorovits@helmequities.com Application Address * 150 Broadway, Ste. 800, New York, NY 10038 Contact Fields Information Contact Name * Javier E. Fernandez Contact Phone * 305-789-3501 Contact Email * jefernandez@stearnsweaver.com Local Govt. Name City of Miami Local Govt. Phone 305-416-1400 Local Govt. Email GDGav%&,ci.miami.f1.us Local Govt. App. Number (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) Property Fields Information Master Folio Number * 01-3219-009-0070 Additional Folio Number Total Acreage * 1.9 acres +/- Proposed Land Use/Zoning * T5 Single -Family Detached Units * 0 Single -Family Attached Units (Duplex) * 0 Multi -Family Units * 124 Total # of Units * 124 Redevelopment Information (MUSPs) - Re -development applications are for those vacant sites for which a local govemment has provided vested rights; or for an already Improved property which does not have to be re -platted as deemed by the local govemment. The number of units to be input into the CMS is the net difference between the existing vested number of units and the newly proposed number of units. Example: an existing 20-unit structure will be tom down for redevelopment. The newly proposed development calls for 40 total units. Local govemment shall input 20 units in the CMS (net difference between the 20 units vested less the newly proposed 4 units). Required Fields for Application * Owner(s)/ omey pplicant Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 20 , by who is a(n) individual/partner/agent/corporation of individual/partnership/corporation. He/She is p as identification and who did (did not) take (Stamp) „1Y 111„� UUANA ARR ZOLA $tip.;%; 5MY COMMISSION # EE 186523 y= EXPIRES: June 11, 2016 iie Bonded Thm No Public Underwriters ignature Dear Constituent: Welcome to the City of Miami! This package is intended to provide you with all open Code Enforcement violations and liens attached to the subject property, or properties, as of the current date and time the following report was created. Closed violations and future violations are not included. Please go to http://portal.miamigov.com/landmanagement/docs/opencertificatereport.pdf to see if your folio number is listed. If it is, please contact Finance Customer Service at 305-416-1570 for additional information. A violation may become a lien when the property owner does not timely remedy the violation. This report may include two types of liens: Certified liens and non -certified liens. Certified liens have a set amount to be paid. Conversely, most non -certified liens continue to accrue interest or a per diem fine; therefore, those liens must be satisfied with the City as quickly as possible. All outstanding violations and liens must be satisfactorily resolved before the City can issue a Certificate of Use (CU); however, the City inspects all properties prior to the issuance of a CU and those inspections may yield additional items, which must be addressed by the owner at the property prior to issuance of a CU. This search does not include encumbrances, other liens, restrictions or the like, recorded in the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Please contact Miami -Dade County for the aforementioned items. Code Violation/Lien Inquiry Letter Estoppel Document • 1 City of Miami JAVIER FERNANDEZ STEARNS WEAVER MILLER 150 W. FLAGLER STREET, STE. 2200 MIAMI, FL 33130 Page 1 of 3 06/25/2014 Property Search Notice Per your request (copy attached), the undersigned has searched the records of the Director of Finance in and for the City of Miami, Florida, for any liens and other fees outstanding against the following described property as of: 06/25/2014. The result is valid up to 30 days from the processing date. In addition, due to daily penalty and interest calculations, the amount shown is subject to change as reflected below. Folio Number: 01-3219-009-0070 Property Address: 220 NE 43 ST Legal Description: BRENTWOOD REV PL PB 44-6 TR 2 & LOT 5 BLK 2 OF PB 40-66 OR 14486-1841 0390 6 Amount Payable On: 06/24/2014 to 07/25/2014 0.00 This notice does not include liens imposed by federal, state, county or City agencies or boards or any other liens recorded in the public records of Miami -Dade County. Jose M. Fernandez Finance Director To ensure proper credit of your payment, include a copy of all pages of the property search findings along with your payment and mail to: City of Miami, Treasury Management/Payment Processing, 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 6th Floor, Room 636-1, Miami, FL 33130. If you have any questions, please call (305) 416-1570. Please retain this page for your records. Estoppel Document • 2 City of Miami JAVIER FERNANDEZ STEARNS WEAVER MILLER 150 W. FLAGLER STREET, STE. 2200 MIAMI, FL 33130 Page 2 of 3 06/25/2014 Folio Number: 01-3219-009-0070 Property Address: 220 NE 43 ST Legal Description: BRENTWOOD REV PL PB 44-6 TR 2 & LOT 5 BLK 2 OF PB 40-66 OR 14486-1841 0390 6 Lien No. (Case Number) Property Search Findings - Pending Liens Description Address If you have any questions, please call (305) 416-1570. Please retain this page for your records. Estoppel Document • 3 City of Miami JAVIER FERNANDEZ STEARNS WEAVER MILLER 150 W. FLAGLER STREET, STE. 2200 MIAMI, FL 33130 Page 3 of 3 06/25/2014 Folio Number: 01-3219-009-0070 Property Address: 220 NE 43 ST Legal Description: BRENTWOOD REV PL PB 44-6 TR 2 & LOT 5 BLK 2 OF PB 40-66 OR 14486-1841 0390 6 Invoice Reference No. Property Search Findings - Open Invoices Lien No. Description Sub -Total If you have any questions, please call (305) 416-1570. Please retain this page for your records. Amount Due 0.00 Estoppel Document • 4 Page 1 of 1 Violations Detail Report 25-JUN-2014 10:28:52 Folio Number: 01-3219-009-0070 Property Address: NO OPEN VIOLATIONS FOUND. Violation Document • 1 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing Future Land Use Map DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Maps Proposed Future Land Use Map AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 i av11H/!4 A1.6 Traffic Impact Analysis For Submittal to the City of Miami Miami Design District Special Area Plan (SAP) Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida Kimley >» Horn © 2014 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. September 2014 Traffic Impact Analysis for Submittal to the City of Miami Miami Design District Special Area Plan (SAP) Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida Prepared for: Helm Equities New York, New York Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Kimley>»Horn ©2014 Itlmlay-Horn and Assoclatas, Inc. Saptambar 2014 043647000 per * NO. 77731 r .b Alt ��SSII�MA�1�� 11�1f111� All . Hanes, P.E. Florida Registration Number 77731 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 600 North Pine Island Road, Suite 450 Plantation, Florida 33324 CA fl 00000696 Kirn ey > Horn Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 DATA COLLECTION 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 5 Level of Service Standard 5 Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology 5 Intersection Level of Service Methodology 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS 7 Transportation Corridors 7 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 13 Background Area Growth 13 Committed Developments 14 PROJECT TRAFFIC 16 Previously Approved and Proposed Land Uses 16 Project Access 16 Trip Generation 17 Trip Distribution and Assignment 19 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC 24 FUTURE CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS 27 Future Background Traffic Conditions 27 Future Total Traffic Conditions 29 CONCLUSION 32 K:\FTC TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment k2\Report\Miami Design District TIA_rev.doa Page - i September 2014 Kimley >> Horn Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location Map 2 Figure 2: Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 4 Figure 3: Future Background Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 Figure 4: A.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution 20 Figure 5: A.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment 21 Figure 6: P.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution 22 Figure 7: P.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment 23 Figure 8: A.M. Future Total Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 25 Figure 9: P.M. Future Total Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 26 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds 6 Table 2: Existing Peak Hour Roadway Volumes 7 Table 3: 2014 Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions 9 Table 4: 2014 A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 10 Table 5: 2014 P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 11 Table 6: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 12 Table 7: Area Growth Determination 13 Table 8: Proposed Trip Generation 18 Table 9: Cardinal Trip Distribution 19 Table 10: Future Background A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 28 Table 11: Future Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 28 Table 12: Future Background Intersection Conditions 29 Table 13: Future Total A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 30 Table 14: Future Total P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 30 Table 15: Future Total Intersection Conditions 31 K:\FTL_TPTD\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment P2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docv Page- ii September 2014 Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Appendix H: Appendix I: Appendix J: Appendix K: Appendix L: LIST OF APPENDICES Conceptual Site Plan Methodology Correspondence Traffic Count Data Miami -Dade Transit Data Existing Conditions Analysis Growth Trend Analyses Vested Development Trip Information Trip Generation Cardinal Trip Distribution Volume Development Worksheets Future Background Conditions Analysis Future Total Conditions Analysis K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment 42\Report\Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page- iii September 2014 Kimley >> torn Traffic Impact Analysis INTRODUCTION Helm Equities is proposing a redevelopment within the Miami Design District. The area proposed for redevelopment is generally bounded by NE 43rd Street to the north, NE 38th Street to the south, North Miami Avenue to the west, and Biscayne Boulevard to the east, and is currently occupied by a church. The previously approved Miami Design District Special Area Plan (SAP) development plan consisted of 1,089,833 square feet of retail development, 32,267 square feet of restaurant development, 52 hotel rooms, 561 multi -family residential dwelling units, and 181,146 square feet of office space including the most recent Amendment (Amendment #1). Currently, the SAP is being amended to include 82 apartment dwelling units and 78,929 square feet of specialty retail. A site location map is provided as Figure 1 and a conceptual site plan is provided in Appendix A. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has completed this traffic impact analysis for submittal to the City of Miami. The purpose of the study is to assess the amendment's impact on the surrounding transportation network and determine if adequate capacity is available to support future demand. This report is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of a SAP amendment application. The study's methodology is consistent with the requirements outlined by the City of Miami for traffic impact analyses. This report summarizes the data collection, project trip generation and distribution, and capacity analyses. All methodology correspondence is included in Appendix B. K:\FTL_TPTO\D43647000 - Design District SAP Amendment d2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 1 September 2014 /•-• • •••' iti4 • ski NOT TO SCALE Kimley>>>Horn 0 2014 /.4 11141 L1.1 '4& ••• • ,„ - Previously Approved SAP -" Boundary - Proposed SAP Boundary 1 * • Wr„ Figure 1 Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 Location Map City of Miami, Florida Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis DATA COLLECTION A.M. peak period (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and P.M. peak period (4:00 to 6:00 P.M.) turning movement counts were collected on August 13, 2014 (Wednesday) at the following intersections: • NE 43rd Street and NE 2nd Avenue • NE 42nd Street and NE 2nd Avenue • NE 39th Street and NE 2nd Avenue • NE 39th Street and Federal Highway • NE 38th Street and Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) • NE 36th Street and NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway The volumes were collected in 15-minute intervals and the peak hour was determined for each intersection. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) peak season conversion factor was applied to the traffic counts to adjust the traffic to peak season volumes. The appropriate peak season conversion factor for the week when the traffic counts were collected is 1.05. The turning movement counts, FDOT peak season factor category report, and signal timing data provided by Miami -Dade Public Works and Waste Management Department — Traffic Signal and Signs Division are included in Appendix C. Figure 2 presents the A.M. and P.M. peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections. K:\FTC TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment N2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.does Page - 3 September 2014 NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street v 09 N w> z< _ L2 3 414 r0 0 (6) (1) (7) L 2 (1) - 0 (3) 414 r2 (14) NE 42nd Street 0 (12) (0) (9) 5.t • I 06.► 13 4)1It) NE 39th Street 0 NE 36th Street (12) 13 (29) 34 �► (18) 8 11, Q 89 (148) F 9 (108) r 61 (57) 4 14 1► htt • Legend — Study Roadway O Study Intersection XX A.M. Peak Hour Traffic (XX) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic m u. v co NE 39th Street tO m 10 9) N L 45 (33) 84 (171) (50) 70 , r 43 (44) (9) 9 m.31 '1 t (18) 24 ,i4i4 (59) 25 (129) 114 J (540) 385 �.► (90) 189 '3 Kimley>>> Horn © 2014 • L 72 (36) R.. 44 (32) 221 (428) t, 4114 m L 219 (384) 4mg 79 (134) r 377 (428) NE 38th Street Figure 2 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida) Kimley >>Horn Traffic Impact Analysis CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Level of Service Standard Level of service (LOS) is the traffic performance measure generally used in traffic impact analysis. Levels of service range from LOS A (free -flow with negligible delays) to LOS F (heavily congested with long delays). The City of Miami has adopted LOS E as its minimum level of service standard. Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology Transportation corridor traffic conditions were examined applying the methodology outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. This methodology considers the person -trip capacity (including transit) for transportation corridors rather than evaluating only the vehicular capacity of a roadway. Level of service analyses were performed to assess the capacity of the transportation corridors evaluated in this study based on a comparison between person -trip volume and person -trip capacity within the corridors. The analyses of person -trip volumes and person -trip capacities account for both passenger vehicle and transit service within the corridors. Table 1 illustrates the level of service thresholds for each study corridor. The corridor level of service thresholds, measured in volume (v) to capacity (c) ratios, were developed from the 2013 version of FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 Design District SAP Amendment #2\Report \Miami Design District TIA rev.docx Page - 5 September 2014 Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds LOS NE 2nd Avenue Peak Hour Directional Volume Thresholds (NB/SB) V/C Ratio A (1) - B (1) C 266/493(2) <0.46/<0.43 D 540/1,100(2) <0.94/<0.96 E 576/1,148(2) >1.0 F - - Notes: (1) Cannot be achieved per Table 7 from FDOT's 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. (2) Based on Class II roadway capacities found in Table 7 of FDOT's 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook; Northbound = 2-lane undivided Major City/County Road (10% reduction) with no right -turn lanes (20% reduction); Southbound = 4-lane undivided Major City/County Road (10% reduction) with no left or right -turn lanes (25% reduction). Intersection Level of Service Methodology Level of service analyses were performed for study intersections using Trafficware's SYNCHRO 8.0 Software, which applies methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2000/2010 Edition. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment O2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 6 September 2014 Kimley>>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS Transportation Corridors Vehicular roadway conditions and transit ridership were examined to determine current level of service for the transportation corridors examined in this study. Table 2 presents the unadjusted 2014 peak hour directional traffic volumes, peak season conversion factors, and the 2014 peak season peak hour directional traffic volumes for the study corridors. Table 2: Existing Peak Hour Roadway Volumes Roadway Segment Direction 2014 A.M. Peak Hour Volumes 2014 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes FDOT Peak Season Adjustment Factor 2014 Peak Season A.M. Peak Hour Volumes 2014 Peak Season P.M. Peak Hour Volumes NE 2nd Avenue NB 248 421 1.05 261 442 SB 426 317 1.05 447 333 Existing transit conditions were examined considering the ridership on and capacity of the Miami -Dade Transit (MDT) bus service operating in the corridors. MDT staff was contacted to obtain the A.M. and P.M. peak hour ridership and capacities for the transit service. Three (3) Miami -Dade transit routes presently serve the study area during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours: • Route 9 operates with 30 minute headways southbound and 12 minute headways northbound along NE 2nd Avenue • Route 10 operates with 30 minute headways in both directions along NE 2nd Avenue • Route 202 operates with 60 minute headways in both directions along NE 2nd Avenue To be conservative, the City of Miami Trolley ridership and capacity were not included. K:\FTl TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment R2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 7 September 2014 Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis The ridership capacities for the bus routes were calculated for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours using the appropriate headways and capacities. Metrobus route maps are included in Appendix D. Ridership data was obtained from Miami -Dade Transit for the identified transit routes. The data reflects typical ridership on the routes using the most recent ridership information available. Table 3 presents the existing A.M. and P.M. peak hour ridership on the routes studied; the ridership data obtained from Miami -Dade Transit is included in Appendix D. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment k2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_re,docx Page - 8 September 2014 Kimsey )> Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 3: 2014 Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions Transit Route Information Direction of Travel Peak Hour Headways A.M. (P.M.) in minutes Buses per Hour A.M. (P.M.) Average Capacity (riders) Peak Hour Directional Person -Trip Capacity A.M. (P.M.) Peak Hour Average Directional Route Ridership A.M. (P.M.) v c a > a N Z Route 9 Northbound 12 (12) 5 (5) 38 190 (190) 15 riders per bus (25 riders per bus) Southbound 30 (30) 2 (2) 38 76 (76) 42 riders per bus (18 riders per bus) Route 10 Northbound 30 (30) 2 (2) 38 76 (76) 9 riders per bus (20 riders per bus) Southbound 30 (30) 2 (2) 38 76 (76) 21 riders per bus (13 riders per bus) Route 202 Northbound 60 (60) 1 (1) 38 38 (38) 4 riders per bus (1 riders per bus) Southbound 60 (60) 1 (1) 38 38 (38) 3 riders per bus (3 riders per bus) Total Northbound 8 (8) 304 (304) 13 riders per bus (17 rider per bus) Southbound 5 (5) 190 (190) 26 riders per bus (11 riders per bus) In order to determine person -trip level of service for the study area's transportation corridors, total person -trip volumes (vehicular and transit) were compared to the total person -trip capacities. The person -trip volume to capacity (v/c) ratios were compared to the person -trip v/c level of service designations outlined in Table 1. Tables 4 and 5 present the existing transportation corridor level of service. As indicated in these tables, the transportation corridors have excess person -trip capacity and operate at acceptable levels of service. Peak hour capacity analyses were also performed for the study intersections. Table 6 presents the results of the analyses. All study intersections operate at adopted level of service standards (LOS E or better). Detailed information from the existing conditions intersection capacity analysis is included in Appendix E. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment p2\Report \Miami Design District TIA rev.docx Page - 9 September 2014 Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 4: 2014 A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadways Peak Season A.M. Peak Hour RoadwayVolumes A.M. Peak Hour Transit Ridership A.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) Directional Peak Hour Vehicular Capacity i2J p tY A.M. Peak Hour Transit Capacity p y A.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C)Total p y Adjusted Peak Hour Capacity (3) A.M. Peak Hour Excess Capacity A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Vehicles Person- Trips (1) Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicles Person- Trips Ili Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS NE 2nd Avenue NB 261 365 97 462 576 806 304 1,110 1,332 870 0.347 C SB 447 626 129 755 1,148 1,607 190 1,797 2,156 1,401 0.350 C (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2013 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook and the Miami -Downtown DRI. (3) LOS E + 20% allowed due to transit headways. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment #2\Report \ Miami Design District T!A rev.docx Page - 10 September 2014 Kimley>>>Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 5: 2014 P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadways Peak Season P.M. Peak Hour RoadwayVolumes P.M. Peak Hour Transit Ridership P.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) Directional Peak Hour Vehicular Capacity1�1 P.M. Peak Hour Transit Ca Capacity p P.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity C p () Adjusted Peak Hour Total Capacity (31 P.M. Peak Hour Excess Capacity P.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Vehicles Person- Trips )11 Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicles Person- Trips i1i Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS NE 2nd Avenue NB 442 619 166 785 576 806 304 1,110 1,332 547 0.589 D SB 333 466 65 531 1,148 1,607 190 1,797 2,156 1,625 0.246 C (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2013 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook and the Miami -Downtown DRI. (3) LOS E + 20% allowed due to transit headways K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docc Page - 11 September 2014 Kimley>>>Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 6: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection Peak Hour Overall Level of Service A.M. (P.M.) LOS Delay (secs) NE 43rd Street & NE 2nd Avenue (two-way, stop -controlled)(') B (B) 12.8 (14.6) NE 42nd Street & NE 2Dd Avenue (two-way, stop -controlled)(') B (C) 12.4 (18.1) NE 39th Street & NE 2nd Avenue (signalized) A (A) 6.8 (7.4) NE 39th Street & Federal Highway (signalized)(2) B (B) 17.3 (17.0) NE 38th Street & Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) (signalized)(3) D (D) 41.1 (53.5) NE 36th Street & NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway (signalized)(2) E (E) 60.9 (72.2) Note: (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way s op -controlled intersections. The minor street with the greatest amount of delay's indicated. (2) HCM 2010 does not support more than four approaches; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (3) HCM 2010 does not support turning movement with shared and exclusive lanes; therefore HCM 2000 was used. K:\FTL TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment P2\ Report \ Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 12 September 2014 Kimley »Horn Traffic Impact Analysis FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Future background traffic conditions are defined as the expected traffic conditions on the study roadway network in the Year 2017 (corresponding to total build -out of the development) without development of the proposed project. The background traffic volumes are the sum of the existing traffic and additional "background" traffic to account for expected traffic growth in the study area. Background Area Growth Future traffic growth on the transportation network was determined based upon historic growth trends, at nearby FDOT traffic count stations, and a comparison of the 2005 and 2035 traffic volume plots from the Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model (SERPM). Table 3 provides a summary of the analysis. The following FDOT count stations were referenced for this analysis: • FDOT count station no. 0143 located on US 1,200 feet south of NE 36th Street • FDOT count station no. 5059 located on US 1,200 feet north of NE 36th Street Table 7: Area Growth Determination Linear Growth Exponential Growth SERPM Forecast Area wide Final Growth Rate 5-year 10-year 5-year 10-year 2005 2035 Growth Rate US 1 south of NE 36th Street 4.02% -2.13% 3.80% -2.34% 262,407 398,783 1.73% ° 1.73% US 1 north of NE 36th Street 8.31% ° 0.84% ° 7.44% ° 0.81/0 Average 6.17% -0.65% 5.62% -0.77% As indicated in Table 7, the 5-year historical trend analysis determined the growth rate to be 6.17 percent (6.17%) using a linear growth and 5.62 percent (5.62%) using exponential growth. The 10-year historical trend analysis determined the growth rate to be -0.65 percent (-0.65%) K:\FTL TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment p2\ Repo rt\Miami Design District TIArev.Aocx Page - 13 September 2014 Kimley>>>hlorn Traffic Impact Analysis using linear growth and -0.77 percent (-0.77%) using exponential growth. Traffic volumes for area roadways obtained from the SERPM plots were used to calculate a linear growth rate. The SERPM growth rate analysis considered a broader area that includes the overall Miami Design District. The calculations for the SERPM volumes determined a linear growth rate of 1.73 percent (1.73%). A compound growth rate of 1.73 percent (1.73%) was used in the analysis. Historical traffic count data, SERPM model volume plots, and growth trend calculations are included in Appendix F. Committed Developments City of Miami staff was contacted to determine if any projects that have been approved but not yet completed in the vicinity of the project site should be accounted for in this analysis. The City determined that Edgewater, NW 36th Street at NW 3rd Avenue, Park Lane Tower, SoHo Condominiums, The Boulevard, Urbana Tower, Midtown Miami Three, Midtown Miami Five, Miami Design District SAP April 2012, and Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 are committed developments. These developments were included as background conditions. Available information for these developments is included in Appendix G. Figures 3 presents the A.M. and P.M. peak hour background conditions intersection volumes. K:\FTL TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment P2\Report\Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 14 September 2014 f N NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street NE 42nd Street 16 2 (6) 3 (1) J14 ° o) (12) 1 4 '1 1 (3) 1 y (12) 7 414 0 2 4. 0 r2 Legend — Study Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX A.M. Peak Hour Traffic (XX) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic (23) 5 J 1 1 e t) (0) 0 I* CU ; (13) 14 .1d 3 o m m ry ki ` 94 (218) N R 8 Ri r.i F 9 (128) m `r' e N m J14 O r"4 (80) J1 4 Z47 (35) NE 39th Street , 88 (240) o g (13) 14 J h 1 I) (73) 74 ..1r 45 (46) C (44) 36 (my (72) 9 . ` * r L 231 (404) (19) 8 S (20) 25 '1 1 f �' �. - 83 (171) ,Fit- is- - op14 r 397 (457) NE 36th Street 4414 (62) 26 (136) 120 J (583) 405 EEO (109) 182 7 Kimley>>>Horn © 2014 • • 1. 76 (40) 46 (68) - 233 (482) 1r' 4 NE 39th Street NE 38th Street Figure 3 Future Background Peak Hour Traffic Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida) Kimley »Horn Traffic Impact Analysis PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic is defined as the vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project, and the distribution and assignment of this traffic over the roadway network. Previously Approved and Proposed Land Uses The previously approved Miami Design District SAP development plan consisted of 1,089,830 square feet of shopping center, 181,146 square feet of general office, 32,267 square feet of high -turnover restaurant, 52 hotel rooms, and 561 condominium units. As previously indicated, the project development will include the addition of 82 apartments and 78,929 square -feet of specialty retail. Construction is expected to be completed and the project occupied by the year 2017. Project Access Access to the site is proposed via two (2) driveways. A driveway for exclusive residential use will be provided along the east side of the development, and a driveway for exclusive retail use will be provided along the south side of the development. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment tt2\Report\Miami Design District TIA jev.docx Page - 16 September 2014 Kimley »Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Trip Generation Proposed vehicular trip generation for the project was calculated using rates and equations contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 9th Edition. ITE Land Use Codes 220 (Apartment) and 826 (Specialty Retail Center) were used. Project trips were estimated for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. In order to account for the urban environment in which the project site is located, a transit (multimodal) reduction factor was applied to the site. It is expected that a portion of visitors and residents of the site as well as employees will utilize transit. Miami -Dade County Transit (MDT) provides bus service several routes in the vicinity of the site, in addition to the Metromover and Metrorail. The multimodal reduction factor was calculated for the site using rates outlined in the City of Miami's Development of Regional Impact (DRI) — Increment I and Increment II, which provides multimodal reduction factors to be applied to certain parts of the City. Typically, a multimodal reduction of 14.2 percent (14.2%) is used for the Miami Design District area. However, at the city's request, 10.0 percent (10.0%) was utilized for the multimodal reduction. A portion of the trips generated by the development will be captured internally on the site. Internal capture trips were determined based upon values contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE), Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004. The expected internal capture rate is 27.6 percent (27.6%) during the A.M. peak hour and 13.8 percent (13.8%) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE trip generation assumes a vehicle occupancy rate of 1.2 persons per vehicle; however, the City of Miami has determined that 1.4 persons per vehicle are more appropriate for the local area. Therefore, vehicular trips will be reduced by 16 percent to adjust for these vehicle occupancy assumptions. The project is expected to generate 29 net new A.M. peak hour vehicular trips and 163 net new P.M. peak hour vehicular trips. A summary of the proposed trip K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment p2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 17 September 2014 Kimley )>Horn Traffic Impact Analysis generation is provided in Table 4. Detailed trip generation calculations for the project are presented in Appendix H. Table 8: Proposed Trip Generation A.M.(P.M.) Peak Hour Driveway Volume Entering Exiting Future Land Use Net Project (ITE Code) Scale Trips % Trips % Trips Proposed Development Shopping Center (820) 1,089,830 sf 446 62% 304 38% 142 (2,472) (48%) (1,177) (52%) (1,295) General Office Building (710) 181,146 sf 250 (202) 7% (117%) 242 (8) 3% (883%) 8 (194) Hotel (310) 52 rooms 17 59% 12 41% 5 (14) (51%) (7) (49%) (7) Residential Condominiums (230) 561 du 124 (112) 17% (67%) 0 (97) 83% (33%) 124 (15) High -Turnover Restaurant (932) 32,267 sf 181 (193) 55% (60%) 108 (128) 45% (40%) 73 (65) Apartments (220) 82 du 26 20% 0 80% 26 (28) (65%) (24) (35%) (4) Specialty Retail Center (826) 78,929 sf 0 (176) 0% (44%) 0 (76) 0% (56%) 0 (100) Net New Development Sub -total 1,044 666 378 (3,197) (1,517) (1,680) ITE/Miami vehicular occupancy 167 107 60 adjustment (16% reduction) (512) (243) (269) Total vehicle trips 877 559 318 (2,685) (1,274) (1,411) Previously Approved SAP 848 (2,522) 559 (1,196) 289 (1,326) Net New Vehicle Trips (vehicles per hour) 29 (163) 0 (78) 29 (85) K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment N2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.dotx Page - 18 September 2014 Kimley »Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Trip Distribution and Assignment The likely distribution of project traffic was forecasted for the trips expected to be generated by the proposed development. The trip distribution was based on a cardinal trip distribution for the project site's traffic analysis zones (TAZs) obtained from the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization's 2035 Cost Feasible Plan travel demand model. The project is located within TAZ 383. The cardinal distribution is shown in Table 5. Detailed cardinal distribution calculations are contained in Appendix I. Table 9: Cardinal Trip Distribution Cardinal Direction Percentage of Trips North -Northeast 15.81% East -Northeast 5.75% East -Southeast 5.57% South -Southeast 15.67% South -Southwest 16.17% West -Southwest 12.87% West -Northwest 11.33% North -Northwest 16.83% Total 100 %� Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7 show the project trip distribution and assignment at the project driveways and adjacent intersections for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The project traffic was then distributed and assigned to the roadway network. K:\FTL_TPTO\043617000 - Design District SAP Amendment P2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 19 September 2014 f N NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street NE 42nd Street NE 39th Street vv N d zQ 25.0% (4► J14 Legend — Study Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX% Entering Trip Distribution (XX%) Exiting Trip Distribution SITE Residential Driveway (100.0%) a, :4 3 m (26.0%) (25.0%) (49.0%) 0 04 A L30.0% • (100.0%) 0) rf a 100.00,6 =► W (0 LL to 2 0 NE 39th Street m m g, 0 N m 4.0%, 1 414 NE 36th Street Kimley>>>Horn © 2014 g. (7 0%) 5.0% 20% , 23.0% F 11,0% NE 38th Street Figure 4 AM Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida ( t it, NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street NE 42nd Street NE 39th Street Legend c a — Study Roadway W 0 Study Intersection z a XX Peak Hour Project Traffic J14 Le -7 r 14 SITE Residential Driveway _ 3 0 * 29 29 ors 0- J1i• NE 36th Street Kimley>>>Horn © 2014 2 , • P. > d 7 NE 39th Street m NE 38th Street Figure 5 AM Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida.) NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street NE 42nd Street NE 39th Street 1 SITE Residential Driveway T ij L (26.0%) (25.0%) (49.0%) (94.0%) (94.0%) 25.0% (m► r, 8 o Q, 30.0% J14 NE 36th Street 2.0% Kimley>>>Horn © 2014 29.0 % J 71.099 • (7.0%) 1` 5.0% Legend — Study Roadway 0 Study Intersection XX% Entering Trip Distribution (XX%) Exiting Trip Distribution • D LL � Z 7 NE 39th Street m �1p�p 11 — 23.0% 11.0% NE 38th Street Figure 6 PM Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida t N NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street NE 42nd Street NE 39th Street 1 4 20 m1 �14 3J NE 36th Street Kimley>>>Horn ©2014 1 L 22 21 \ 42 SITE Residential Driveway > — ai > 80 23�% 55 L 23 4.1 1 • 4 6 J • Legend — Study Roadway O Study Intersection XX Peak Hour Project Traffic • 3m_ .2' G1 � u_ cu 2 0 NE 39th Street m m g, u m 4 18 NE 38th Street Figure 7 PM Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC Total traffic volumes considered in the future year (2017) analysis for this project are the sum of 2017 background traffic volumes and the expected project traffic volumes. Figures 8 and 9 present the total traffic for the study area during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Total turning movement volume development worksheets for the study intersections are included in Appendix J. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment tt2\Report\Miami Design District TIA rev.doo Page- 24 September 2014 NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street Legend — Study Roadway w0 Study Intersection z < XX Peak Hour Traffic L2 3 J14 r° Oz. (11 r 7'' L 10 - 7 .J14 `16 NE 42nd Street 0 NE 39th Street 5 J 411 0 - 14 11. 14 1 36 8 7 NE 36th Street Kimley>>>Horn © 2014 L 94 9 r 64 4144 SITE Residential Driveway ij - 33 7 4414 26 .• 120 405 my 182 L 76 46 233 • 1)1r 4 A J 1 It 76 Jr 9 sal 25 1 29 • • L 47 88 r 45 titr d NE 39th Street m g, c+ Li 414 L 231 63 r 397 NE 38th Street '11r Figure 8 AM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida J NOT TO SCALE NE 43rd Street NE 42nd Street NE 39th Street Legend c W — Study Roadway w> 0 Study Intersection z Q XX Peak Hour Traffic 414 12J 3- 12 S 4114 • 23 J 20 y 13 014 16 44 r • L6 4- r 7 L 23 4 24 r 57 SITE Residential Driveway ij - 99 1 80 7 '1 1 e sex L 241 128 r80 23 J 75 �y 41 1► • • h1f' 79 J 72 19 i 20 NE 36th Street Kimley>>>Horn © 2014 L 40 72 ~ 462 64 .� 136 J 583 — 109 h'11f' 4 b • 11 2 RI 2 a v 1L 0 2 0 NE 39th Street m g, m c> ie 1P L 35 4.1 258 r 46 414 L 404 - 180 r 457 NE 38th Street Figure 9 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Miami Design District SAP Amendment #2 City of Miami, Florida Kimley ) Horn Traffic Impact Analysis FUTURE CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS Two separate future conditions peak hour capacity analyses were performed: • A transportation corridor (person -trip) capacity analysis • Intersection capacity analyses at study intersections Future Background Traffic Conditions Tables 10 and 11 present the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2017 A.M. and P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. As indicated in Tables 10 and 11, the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at adopted levels of service (LOS E). Table 12 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2017 A.M. and P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. All intersections are expected to operate at adopted levels of service or better. It should be noted that the signal timing at the intersection of NE 36th Street and NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway was optimized during the P.M. peak hour. With this improvement, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS E. Detailed SYNCHRO 8 outputs are included in Appendix K. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment N2\ Report \ Miami Design District TIArev.docx Page - 27 September 2014 Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 10: Future Background A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadways Existing A.M. Peak Hour Volume Background Growth Peak Hour Volume (11 Committed Traffic Volume Committed Traffic Volume t21 2017 A.M. Peak Hour Background Volume (31 2017 A.M. Peak Hour Background Capacity (C) 2017 A.M. Peak Hour Excess Capacity 2017 A.M. Peak Hour Background Level of Service Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicle- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS NE 2"d Avenue NB 462 486 4 6 492 1,332 840 0.369 C SB 755 795 1 2 797 2,156 1,359 0.370 C (1) An annual growth rate (1.73 percent) was applied to the 2014 A.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2017 background volume. (2) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (3) The summation of 2017 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. Table 11: Future Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadways Existing P.M. Peak Hour Volume Background Growth Peak Hour Volume (1) Committed Traffic Volume Committed Traffic Volume t2) 2017 P.M. Peak Hour Background Volume (3) 2017 P.M. Peak Hour Background Capacity (C) 2017 P.M. Peak Hour Excess Capacity 2017 P.M. Peak Hour Background Level of Service Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicle- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS NE 2nd Avenue NB 785 826 41 57 883 1,332 449 0.663 D SB 531 559 72 101 660 2,156 1,496 0.306 C (1) An annual growth rate (1.73 percent) was applied to the 2014 P.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2017 background volume. (2) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (3) The summation of 2017 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. K:\FTLTPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Report\Miami Design District TIA_rev.docr Page - 28 September 2014 Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 12: Future Background Intersection Conditions Intersection Peak Hour Overall Level of Service A.M. (P.M.) LOS Delay (secs) NE 43rd Street & NE 2nd Avenue (two-way, stop -controlled)(') B (C) 13.1 (16.4) NE 42" Street & NE 2nd Avenue (two-way, stop -controlled)(') B (C) 12.8 (21.5) NE 39th Street & NE 2nd Avenue (signalized) A (A) 7.0 (8.7) NE 39th Street & Federal Highway (signalized)(2) B (C) 17.6 (26.7) NE 38th Street & Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) (signalized)(3) D (E) 45.7 (70.1) NE 36th Street & NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway (signalized)(2) 4) E (E) 63.0 (77.4) 4) Note: (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. The minor street with the greatest amount of delay is indicated. (2) HCM 2010 does not support more than four approaches; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (3) HCM 2010 does not support turning movement with shared and exclusive lanes; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (4) Signal timings optimized. Future Total Traffic Conditions Tables 13 and 14 present the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for 2017 A.M. and P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. As indicated in Tables 13 and 14, all corridors are expected to have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at adopted levels of service (LOS E or better). Table 15 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2017 A.M. and P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. All of the intersections are expected to operate at adopted level of service standard or better. It should be noted that the signal timing at the intersection of NE 36th Street and NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway was optimized during the P.M. peak hour. With this improvement, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS E during the P.M. peak hour. Detailed SYNCHRO 8 outputs are included in Appendix L. K:\FTL TPTO\043647000- Design District SAP Amendment 42\ Report \ Miami Design District TlA—rev.docx Page - 29 September 2014 Kimley>»Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 13: Future Total A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadways 2017 Peak Hour Background Volume Project Peak Hour Distribution (Maximum) Project Peak Hour Assignment 2017 Peak Hour Total Volume (V) (1) 2017 Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) 2017 Peak Hour Excess Capacity 2017 Peak Hour Total Level of Service Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Raga LOS NE 2nd Avenue 56% In 0 NB 492 500 1,332 832 0.375 C 26% Out 8 19%In 0 SB 797 811 2,156 1,345 0.376 C 49% Out 14 (1) 2017 peak hour total volume (V) is defined as the sum of the 2017 background volume and the project person -trips Table 14: Future Total P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Principal Roadways 2017 Peak Hour Background Volume Project Peak Hour Distribution (Maximum) Project Peak Hour Assignment 2017 Peak Hour Total Volume ail (V) 2017 Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) 2017 Peak Hour Excess Capacity 2017 Peak Hour Total Level of Service Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips VAC Ratio LOS NE 2nd Avenue 56% In 44 NB 883 949 1,332 383 0.712 D 26% Out 22 19%In 15 SB 660 717 2,156 1,439 0.333 C 49% Out 42 (1) 2017 peak hour to al volume (V) is defined as the sum of the 2017 background volume and the project person -trips K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Report\Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 30 September 2014 Kimley>»Hlorn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 15: Future Total Intersection Conditions Intersection Peak Hour Overall Level of Service A.M. (P.M.) LOS Delay (secs) NE 43rd Street & NE 2"d Avenue (two-way, stop-controlled)(1) B (C) 13.2 (17.1) NE 42"d Street & NE 2"d Avenue (two-way, stop-controlled)(�) B (E) 14.8 (35.7) NE 39th Street & NE 2"d Avenue (signalized) A (A) 7.1 (9.2) NE 39th Street & Federal Highway (signalized)(2) B (C) 17.8 (27.9) NE 38th Street & Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) (signalized)(3) D (E) 45.7 (70.6) NE 36th Street & NE 2"d Avenue/Federal Highway (signalized)(2) E (E)(4) 63.7 (78.6)(4) Retail Driveway (one-way, stop -controlled) A (A) 1.0 (8.8) Residential Driveway (one-way, stop -controlled) A (A) 8.4 (8.7) Note: (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. The minor street with the greatest amount of delay is indicated. (2) HCM 2010 does not support more than four approaches; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (3) HCM 2010 does not support turning movement with shared and exclusive lanes; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (4) Signal timings optimized. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment P2\Report \Miami Design District TIA_rev.docx Page - 31 September 2014 Kimley » Horn Traffic Impact Analysis CONCLUSION This traffic impact study assesses the impacts of the SAP amendment that is being proposed by Helm Equities. The SAP is generally bounded by NE 43rd Street to the north, NE 38th Street to the south, North Miami Avenue to the west, and Biscayne Boulevard to the east. The previously approved Miami Design District Special Area Plan (SAP) development plan consisted of 1,089,833 square feet of retail development, 32,267 square feet of restaurant development, 52 hotel rooms, 561 multi -family residential dwelling units, and 181,146 square feet of office space. Currently, the SAP is being amended to include 82 apartment dwelling units and 78,929 square feet of specialty retail. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the City of Miami requirements, analyzing transportation corridor intersections. Trip generation calculations indicate that the project is expected to generate 29 new vehicular trips during the A.M. peak hour and 163 new vehicular trips during the PM. peak hour. Project trips were assigned to the roadway network based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2035 Cost Feasible Plan. Transportation corridor segment capacity analyses and intersection capacity analyses were performed for existing and future conditions with and without amendment project traffic. Results of the analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and intersections in the vicinity of the project site operate at adopted levels of service during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. It should be noted that the signal timing at the intersection of NE 36th Street and NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway was optimized during the P.M. peak hour. With this improvement, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS E under future background and future total conditions. Project driveways were also analyzed for 2017 peak hour total traffic conditions. All project driveways are projected to operate acceptably under stop -controlled cond itions. K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Report \Miami Design District 'DA_rev.docx Page- 32 September 2014 APPENDIX A: Site Plan ‘to4 \ VP- > , 3fIH3AV ONL 3,1 APPENDIX B: Methodology Correspondence Kimley )> Horn MEMORANDUM To: Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E. City of Miami From: Ali N. Hanes, P.E. ✓ I John McWilliams, P.E. fiL. Cc: Date: July 18, 2014 Javier E. Fernandez, Esq. Subject: Design District Special Area Plan (SAP) Amendment #2 Traffic Study Methodology The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the traffic study methodology as discussed at our July 11th meeting. The proposed development is bounded by NE 43rd Street to the north, NE 42nd Street to the south, NE 2nd Avenue to the west, and NE 4th Avenue to the east. The development includes the demolition of the existing 23,534 square feet of church and related space on the site. The proposed development plan consists of 104 rental apartments and 70,000 square feet of specialty retail space. One (1) full -access driveway will be provided along NE 42nd Street and one (1) full access driveway will be provided along NE 4th Avenue. Additionally, a porte-cochere will be provided on the corner of NE 4th Avenue and NE 42nd Street. A site plan is forthcoming. Data Collection The peak periods for this study are 7:00 to 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 to 6:00 P.M. on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday). Turning movement counts will be collected in 15-minute intervals during the peak period and include pedestrian and heavy vehicles. All traffic counts will be adjusted to peak season conditions using the appropriate Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) peak season category factors. Traffic signal timing information will be obtained from Miami - Dade County Public Works and Waste Management Department. All background traffic data collected will be provided in the Appendix of the traffic impact study. Trip Generation Trip generation calculations for the proposed development were performed using the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE's) Trip Generation, 9th Edition. Trip generation for the proposed development was determined using ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 220 (Apartment) and ITE LUC 826 (Specialty Retail). Credit will be taken for the existing church and related space space using ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 560 (Church). kimley-horn.com 600 North Pine Island Road, Suite 450, Plantation, FL 33324 954-535-5100 Kimley »> Horn Mr. Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E., July 18, 2014, Page 2 The trip generation calculations indicate that the proposed development is expected to generate 55 trips during the A.M. peak hour and 166 trips during the P.M. peak hour. These values do not consider credit for the existing church on the site. In addition, a 16 percent (16%) trip generation reduction will be applied to account for vehicle occupancy and a 10 percent (10%) trip generation reduction will be applied to account trip interaction with the site and the overall SAP. These reductions will be included in the final report. Detailed trip generation information is included in Attachment A. Trip Distribution Trip distribution will be determined using the cardinal distribution from the appropriate Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) in the Miami -Dade County's MPO 2035 Cost Affordable Plan model. The appropriate TAZ for this development is 383. The cardinal distribution from the model for TAZ 383 is provided in Attachment B. Background Growth Rate/Major Committed Development A background growth rate will be calculated based on historic growth trends at nearby FDOT traffic count stations. Additionally, growth rates based on Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) project 2005 and 2035 model network volumes will be examined. Documentation will be provided in the Appendix of the traffic impact study. The following committed projects will be reviewed and included in the background traffic: • Edgewater • NW 36'h St @ NW 3rd Ave • Park Lane Tower • SoHo Condominiums • The Boulevard • Urbana Tower • Midtown Miami Three • Midtown Miami Five • Miami Design District SAP April 2012 • Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 Study Area The following intersections, in addition to the project driveways will be examined as part of the study: • NE 2nd Avenue and NE 43rd Street • NE 2nd Avenue and NE 42nd Street • NE 2nd Avenue and NE 39th Street • NE 2nd Avenue and NE 36th Street and N Federal Highway • N Federal Highway and NE 39th Street • US 1/Biscayne Boulevard and NE 38`h Street Additionally, the NE 2nd Avenue corridor will be analyzed in the study. kimley-horn.com 600 North Pine Island Road, Suite 450, Plantation, FL 33324 954-535-5100 Kimley>>>Horn Mr. Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E., July 18, 2014, Page 3 An aerial map of the study area including the study intersections is provided in Attachment C. Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses will be conducted for the A.M. peak hour and P.M. peak hour at all identified intersections and corridors. Intersection analyses will be performed using Trafficware's Synchro 8.0 traffic engineering analysis software, which applies Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 and 2010 methodologies. Capacity analyses will be conducted for three (3) scenarios: existing, build -out without project, and build -out with project. The build -out year will be specified in the analysis. If intersection deficiencies are identified, strategies and improvements will be developed as mitigation measures. The following graphics will be included for the study intersections: 1. Existing conditions 2. Trip distribution 3. Trip assignment 4. Future background conditions (with growth rate and committed development traffic) 5. Future total traffic conditions (with project) Documentation The results of the traffic analysis will be summarized in a report. The report will include supporting documents including signal timings, lane geometry, and software output sheets. The report will also include text and graphics necessary to summarize the assumptions and analysis. Maneuverability Analysis A maneuverability analysis for loading vehicle access will be performed utilizing AutoTURN software. Deficiencies related to maneuverability and vehicular conflicts will be documented in a technical memorandum. K:\FTL_TPTOAIiHanes\Projects\DDSAP\DDSAP Amend 2 Traffic Study Methodology 071814.docx kimley-horn.com 600 North Pine Island Road, Suite 450, Plantation, FL 33324 954-535-5100 ATTACHMENT A PROPOSED PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION PROPOSED AM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION GROSS VOLUMES INTERNAL CAPTURE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS -BY CAPTURE NET NEW EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale RE Units Percent In Out Total Percent IC Trips In Out Total Percent PB Trips In Out Total In Out G R O U P 1 1 Apartment 9 220 104 du 20% 80% 11 44 55 0.0% 0 11 44 55 0.0% 0 11 44 55 2 spedety Retai Center 9 826 70 ksf 0% 0% 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation Total: 11 44 55 11 44 55 11 44 55 220 826 Y=0.49*(X)+3.73 Y=0(X) PROPOSED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION GROSS VOLUMES INTERNAL CAPTURE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS -BY CAPTURE NET NEW EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use RE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units _ Percent In Out Total Percent IC Trips In Out Total Percent PB Trips In Out Total In Out G R O U P 2 1 Apartmert 9 220 104 du 65% 35% 49 26 75 26.7% 20 39 16 55 0.0% 0 39 16 55 2 Specialty Retaa Center 9 826 70 ksf 44% 56% 83 106 189 10.6% 20 73 96 169 34.0% 58 44 67 111 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation Total: 132 132 264 15.2% 40 112 112 224 25.9% 58 83 83 166 220 826 Y=0.55'(X)+17.65 Y=2.4*(X)+21.48 K:\FTL_TPTO\AliHanes\Projects\DDSAP\TRIP GEN 9.xlsx: PRINT -PEAK HOUR 7/17/2014,10:54 AM ITE MULTI -USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (Source: Chapter 7, ITE Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004) Enter from Extemal: Exit to Extemal: Demand Balanced Demandl 9.0% Land Use B: Retail (Specialty Retail) ITE Land Use Code 826 Size: I Total Internal Edema! Enter 83 7 76 Exit 106 13 93 Total 189 20 169 % 100% 11% 89% Enter from External: Exit to External: ICv2.4 PM.xls li 76 93 Demand 36 19 53.0 7 7 14 31.0 % 13 I 12.0 % Demand 13 Demand Balanced Demand 15 I 20.0% 0 0 Balanced Demand 20.0 Balanced Demand I 20.0% 20.0 Enter from External: Exit to Extemal: 21 0 0 Demand Balanced Land Use A: Residential (Apartment) ITE Land Use Code 220 Size: I Total Internal External Enter 49 13 36 Exit 26 7 19 Total 75 20 55 % 100% 27% 73% Demand Balanced Demand I 53.0% 14 0 I 9.0 % • 0 Demand Demand Balanced Demand Land Use C: Retail I 31.0% 15 0 I 12.0 % 0 ITE Land Use Code Size: I Total Internal External Enter 0 0 0 Exit 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 Project Number: Project Name: Scenario: Analysis Period: PM Peak Analyst: I 31.0°6 Demand Balanced Demand Demand Balanced Demand Demand I 20.0% Demand Balanced 17 0 15 0 12.0% 20.0 % 0 20.0% 0 I 20.0% NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT Category Land Use Total A B C D Enter Exit 36 76 0 0 112 19 93 0 0 112 Total 55 169 0 0 224 Single Use Trip Gen Estimate 75 189 0 0 264 26.7% 10.6% Overall Internal Capture = 15.15% 0 Demand Balanced Demand 0 Land Use D: Retail ITE Land Use Code Size: I Total internal External Enter 0 0 0 Exit 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 Enter from External: Exit to External: Demand Balanced Demand 0 i1 0 0 7/17/2014 10:53 AM ATTACHMENT B MIAMI-DADE 2035 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY PERCENT NNE 16.05 ENE 0.78 ESE 3.35 CARDINAL DIRECTIONS WSW 20 WNW 14.53 NNW 18.21 ORIGIN ZONE SSE 3.35 SSW 23.73 TOTAL 375 3075 TRIPS 1220 78 163 293 911 638 467 549 4,319 PERCENT 28,25 1,81 3.77 6.78 21.09 14.77 10.81 12.71 376 3076 TRIPS 1096 95 248 284 1324 992 705 931 5,675 PERCENT 19.31 1.67 4.37 5 23.33 17.48 12.42 16.41 377 3077 TRIPS 800 155 138 193 931 753 560 545 4,075 PERCENT 19.63 3.8 3.39 4.74 22.85 18.48 13.74 13.37 378 3078 TRIPS 609 212 131 131 917 752 656 747 4,155 PERCENT 14.66 5.1 3.15 3.15 22.07 18,1 15.79 17.98 379 3079 TRIPS 1163 252 277 157 1478 1009 1264 1294 6,894 PERCENT 16.87 3.66 4.02 2.28 21.44 14.64 18.33 18.77 380 3080 TRIPS 674 170 201 85 973 927 848 884 4,762 PERCENT 14.15 3,57 4.22 1.78 20.43 19,47 17.81 18.56 381 3081 TRIPS 354 132 189 228 737 592 436 455 3,123 PERCENT 11.34 4.23 6.05 7.3 23.6 18.96 13.96 14.57 382 3082 TRIPS 1508 501 386 992 1731 1482 1171 1600 9,371 PERCENT 16.09 5.35 4.12 10.59 18.47 15.81 12.5 17.07 383 3083 TRIPS 2732 994 963 2708 2794 2224 1957 2908 17,280 PERCENT 15.81 5.75 5.57 15.67 16.17 12.87 11.33 16.83 384 3084 TRIPS 569 121 413 979 821 545 368 438 4,254 PERCENT 13.38 2.84 9.71 23,01 19.3 12.81 8.65 10.3 385 3085 TRIPS 9 5 7 21 22 29 23 15 131 PERCENT 6.87 3.82 5.34 16.03 16.79 22.14 17.56 11.45 386 3086 TRIPS 508 135 328 934 951 739 454 453 4,502 PERCENT 11.28 3 7.29 20,75 21.12 16.41 10.08 10.06 387 3087 TRIPS 1513 690 657 1083 935 758 653 695 6,984 PERCENT 21.66 9.88 9.41 15.51 13.39 10.85 9.35 9.95 388 3088 TRIPS 104 29 57 119 161 154 97 82 803 PERCENT 12.95 3.61 7.1 14.82 20.05 19.18 12,08 10.21 389 3089 TRIPS 244 85 100 292 345 305 227 237 1,835 PERCENT 13.3 4.63 5.45 15.91 18.8 16.62 12.37 12.92 390 3090 TRIPS 137 52 58 176 197 159 161 137 1,077 PERCENT 12.72 4.83 5.39 16.34 18.29 14.76 14.95 12.72 391 3091 TRIPS 228 68 75 349 385 359 300 225 1,989 PERCENT 11.46 3.42 3.77 17.55 19.36 18.05 15.08 11.31 392 3092 TRIPS 382 63 132 206 590 502 370 529 2,774 PERCENT 13.77 2.27 4.76 7,43 21.27 18.1 13.34 19.07 393 3093 TRIPS 784 188 269 625 1652 1364 655 758 6,295 PERCENT 12.45 2.99 4.27 9.93 26.24 21.67 10.41 12.04 394 3094 TRIPS 350 96 65 110 629 491 341 349 2,431 PERCENT 14,4 3.95 2.67 4.52 25.87 20.2 14.03 14.36 395 3095 TRIPS 1170 335 349 1419 1593 1306 661 761 7,594 PERCENT 15.41 4.41 4.6 18.69 20.98 17.2 8.7 10.02 396 3096 TRIPS 943 276 270 735 1467 974 662 833 6,160 PERCENT 15.31 4.48 4.38 11.93 23,81 15.81 10.75 13.52 397 3097 TRIPS 1085 246 228 325 1464 1178 906 990 6,422 PERCENT 16.9 3.83 3.55 5.06 22.8 18.34 14.11 15.42 398 3098 TRIPS 436 102 201 285 675 466 288 298 2,751 PERCENT 15.85 3.71 7.31 10.36 24.54 16.94 10.47 10.83 399 3099 TRIPS 808 429 338 784 933 514 389 458 4,653 PERCENT 17.37 9.22 7.26 16.85 20.05 11.05 8.36 9.84 400 3100 TRIPS 176 174 94 294 241 158 129 121 1,387 PERCENT 12.69 12.55 6.78 21.2 17.38 11.39 9.3 8.72 401 3101 TRIPS 45 25 22 43 40 35 41 56 307 PERCENT 14.66 8.14 7.17 14.01 13.03 11.4 13.36 18.24 402 3102 TRIPS 52 9 13 25 43 28 25 37 232 PERCENT 22.41 3.88 5.6 10.78 18.53 12.07 10.78 15.95 403 3103 TRIPS 499 349 261 294 355 194 231 278 2,461 PERCENT 20.28 14.18 10.61 11.95 14.43 7.88 9.39 11.3 404 3104 TRIPS 514 173 342 815 710 501 333 375 3,763 PERCENT 13.66 4.6 9.09 21.66 18.87 13.31 8.85 9.97 405 3105 TRIPS 292 123 98 254 261 163 182 193 1,566 PERCENT 18.65 7.85 6.26 16.22 16.67 10.41 11.62 12.32 406 3106 TRIPS 473 183 255 755 617 657 275 352 3,567 PERCENT 13.26 5.13 7.15 21.17 17.3 18.42 7.71 9.87 407 3107 TRIPS 1569 507 564 1113 799 664 617 776 6,609 PERCENT 23.74 7.67 8.53 16.84 12.09 10.05 9.34 11.74 408 3108 TRIPS 398 536 318 734 505 498 257 331 3,577 B-12 ATTACHMENT C Design District SAP Amendment #2 Mixed Use Development Study Area Map ! 14+1111114H, *lid la •. 'i1N19111il131411'101trit Y 4 ,4 ' ! Legend Li Site Study Intersections 0 60 120 240 360 Feet Kimley>»Horn APPENDIX C: Traffic Count Data Intersection Turning Movement Counts NE 43RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MARISA CRUZ NOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code 00140176 Start Date: 0B/13/14 File I.D. 43ST_2AV Page : 1 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 43RD STREET INE 2ND AVENUE INE 43RD STREET From North From East (From South (From West I I UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right I Total Date 08/13/14 - - - 07:00 0 0 33 0] 0 0 0 0] 0 0 17 0] 0 0 0 2] 52 07:15 0 0 53 1] 0 0 0 0] 0 0 31 0] 0 0 0 0 1 85 07:30 0 1 56 0] 0 0 1 0] 0 0 28 0] 0 1 0 1] 88 07:45 0 0 73 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 34 0 1 0 0 0 2! 110 Hr Total 0 1 215 2 1 0 0 1 0! 0 0 110 0 1 0 1 0 5] 335 08:00 0 0 78 1 0 0 1 0 j 1 1 34 0] 0 0 0 2] 118 08:15 0 0 84 1 0 0 0 1; 0 0 32 0( 0 0 0 1( 119 08:30 0 0 120 1 0 0 2 1] 0 1 35 0] 0 0 0 3] 163 08:45 0 1 87 0 0 0 0 0] 1 3 52 0 l 0 1 1 1. 1 147 Hr Total 0 1 369 3 0 0 3 2] 2 5 153 0] 0 1 1 7] 547 * BREAK * 16:00 0 0 59 1] 0 2 0 1] 0 3 82 0 1 0 2 1 2] 153 16:15 0 2 55 1] 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 60 0] 0 0 2 1] 126 16:30 0 2 72 1] 0 1 1 2( 0 1 77 0] 0 3 0 1] 161 16:45 0 0 57 3 1 0 2 1 2] 0 5 91 1] 0 1 0 2 1 165 Hr Total 0 4 243 6 0 7 2 6 1 0 11 310 1 0 6 3 6 1 605 17:00 0 1 66 1] 0 0 0 0] 0 1 87 0] 0 4 0 3 i 163 17:15 0 1 59 3 1 0 0 0 2] 0 1 109 2] 0 2 3 4] 186 7:30 1 0 62 1 1 0 5 0 2] 0 1 88 0] 0 3 0 1] 164 17:45 0 1 51 2) 0 0 1 0! 2 4 76 0 f 0 1 0 1] 139 Hr Total 1 3 238 7 0 5 1 4 2 7 360 2 0 10 3 9 652 *TOTAL* 1 9 1065 18 1 0 12 7 12 ] 4 23 933 3 0 18 7 27 2139 NE 43RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MARISA CRUZ NOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D, : 43ST 2AV Page : 2 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 43RD STREET [NE 2ND AVENUE INE 43RD STREET From North [From East 'From South IFrom West UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right I Total Date 06/13/14 --- Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 to 09:00 on 08/13/14 Peak start 08:00 08:00 08:00 Volume 0 1 369 3 0 0 3 2 2 5 153 0 Percent 0% 0% 99% 1% 0% 0% 60% 40% 1% 3% 96% 0% Pk total 373 5 160 Highest 08:30 08:30 08:45 Volume 0 0 120 1 0 0 2 1] 1 3 52 0 Hi total 121 ( 3 56 PHF .77 .42 .71 0 0 3 3 NE 2ND AVENUE 369 369 373 1 1 1 153 2 156 08:00 0 1 1 '7 0% 11% 11% 78% 9 08:30 0 0 0 3 3 .75 0 0 529 I 2 NE 43RD STREET 2 7 3 13 3 1 1 1 1 9 7 7 0 0 • ALL VEHICLES 22 7 Intersection Total 547 0 369 7 376 536 7 7 NE 2ND AVENUE 160 • 153 153 3 5 3 0 0 2 NE 43RD STREET 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 NE 43RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MARISA CRUZ NOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES NE 2ND AVENUE INE 43RD STREET INE 2ND AVENUE From North IFrom East IFrom South UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Date 08/13/14 ----- Site Code : 00140176 Start Date; 08/13/14 File I.D. 43ST_2AV Page : 3 INE 43RD STREET From West Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right I Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 08/13/14 Peak start 16:45 16:45 16:45 16:45 Volume 1 2 244 8 0 7 1 6 0 8 375 3 0 10 3 10 Percent 0% 1% 96% 3% 1 0% S08 78 438 I 0% 28 97% 18 I 08 438 13% 43% Pk total 255 1 14 386 23 Highest 17:00 17:30 17:15 17:15 Volume 0 1 66 1 0 5 0 2 0 1 109 2 0 2 3 4 Hi total 68 7 112 9 PHF .94 .50 .86 .64 iimmimmiLoil •8 0 8 NE 43RD STREET 8 1 8 17 10 10 3 NE 2ND AVENUE 244 244 255 3 23 10 10 0 0 J 3 3 646 10 375 6 391 0 • ALL VEHICLES 40 23 Intersection Total 678 7 244 10 261 647 8 8 NE 2ND AVENUE 0 6 6 14 1 386 375 375 1 7 7 9 NE 43RD STREET 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 NE 43RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: MARISA CRUZ 'TOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 PEDESTRIANS Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. : 43ST_2AV Page 1 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 43RD STREET INE 2ND AVENUE 1NE 43RD STREET From North !From East 'From South !From West I I I I Left Thru Right Peds ! Left Thru Right Peds I Left Thru Right Peds I Left Thru Right Peds 1 Total Date 08/13/14------- 07:00 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 2] 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 3 I 5 07 : 15 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 1 ', 0 0 0 1 I 3 07:30 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 07:45 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 4 Hr Total 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 7] 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 6 I 16 08:00 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 1 1 3 08:15 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 5] 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 0 1 7 08:30 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 1 1 2 08:45 0 0 0 3] 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 o! 0 0 0 o I 4 Hr Total 0 0 0 5] 0 0 0 7] 0 0 0 2( 0 0 0 2 1 16 * BREAK * 16:00 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 1] 2 16:15 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 2 I 3 16:30 0 0 0 1] 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 2] 3 16:45 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 2 I 4 Hr Total 0 0 0 3 I 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 7! 12 17:00 0 0 0 3 I 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 3 I 6 7:15 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 3 I 5 7:30 0 0 0 1( 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 5] 0 0 0 0 I 6 17:45 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 0 I 1 Hr Total 0 0 0 7 I. 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 6 I 18 *TOTAL* 0 0 0 17 I 0 0 0 15 ! 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 21 ! 62 i d w Iv 43sr� 4-4 1 Robloa I v IL_ A I `1 1.-;e1- i I Ewllo � P4VG.Yvl.1 F-LoC1G`k 64406ts'C 131 zd t4 J �a1/4..)NA lad'. Luic, Po1/410M1 n v vLoT s;3naliLed r-3E. A 3 sr NE 42ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO NOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. : 42ST 2AV Page : 1 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 42ND STREET INE 2ND AVENUE INE 42ND STREET From North 'From East !From South !From west i UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right j UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right I Total Date 08/13/14 .... ..-.. _ __....._.__.___.. 07:00 0 0 34 0] 0 0 0 0] 0 3 14 0 I 0 3 0 O I 54 07:15 0 0 51 1 I 0 0 0 0] 0 2 31 0 I 0 1 0 1 I 87 07:30 0 0 56 1 I 0 0 0 0 J 1 1 26 0( 0 1 1 3 I 90 07:45 0 0 72 2 1 0 1 0 0] 0 2 35 0 f 0 0 0 1 I 113 Hr Total 0 0 213 4 0 1 0 0 1 8 106 0 0 5 1 5. 344 08:00 0 0 76 3 1 0 0 0 0] 0 2 32 0 1 0 3 0 2 I 118 08:15 0 0 84 3 I 0 2 0 1 I 0 3 29 1 I 0 2 0 4 I 129 08:30 0 2 119 1 I 0 0 0 0 I 1 1 36 3 I 0 0 0 1 I 164 08:45 0 0 82 6] 0 0 0 1! 0 3 57 1 1 0 0 0 5 I 155 Hr Total 0 2 361 13 0 2 0 2 1 9 154 5 0 5 0 12 , 566 * BREAK * 16:00 0 1 62 3 I 0 4 0 0] 1 8 82 8 1 0 1 0 3] 173 16:15 1 0 57 1 I 0 3 0 1] 1 3 59 3! 0 0 0 2] 131 16 : 3 0 0 1 70 1 I 0 3 0 1 J 3 5 77 3 0 0 0 2] 166 16 : 4 5 0 0 60 2 1 0 3 0 0] 0 3 99 2 '.. 0 3 0 2) 174 Hr Tota1 1 2 249 7 1 0 13 0 2 5 19 317 16 ' 0 4 0 9 1 644 17:00 0 4 65 2 0 4 1 0 I 0 1 87 2 0 4 0 2) 172 17:15 1 1 56 5 j 0 2 0 0 I 0 10 114 2 0 3 0 4( 198 7:30 0 1 62 1 I 0 4 2 1 I 0 5 90 5 0 1 0 1] 173 17:45 0 0 52 2 0 0 0 0] 0 6 82 0] 0 0 1 1 l 144 Hr Tota1 1 6 235 10 ! 0 10 3 1 0 22 373 9 0 8 1 8 687 *TOTAL* 2 10 1058 34 I 0 26 3 5 7 58 950 30 0 22 2 34 I 2241 NE 42ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO NOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 42ST_2AV Page : 2 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 42ND STREET INE 2ND AVENUE INE 42ND STREET From North 'From East (From South (From West UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right ( UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right ( Total Date 08/13/14 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 to 09:00 on 08/13/14 Peak start 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 Volume 0 2 361 13 1 0 2 0 2 1 9 154 5 I 0 S 0 12 Percent 0% 1% 96% 3% 0% 50% 0% 50% 1% 5% 91% 3% { 0% 29% 0% 71% Pk total 376 4 169 17 Highest 08:30 08:15 08:45 08:15 Volume 0 2 119 1 0 2 0 1 0 3 57 1 0 2 0 4 Hi total 122 3 61 f 6 PHF .77 .33 .69 1 .71 0 0 NE 42ND STREET 10 0 23 13 5 5 0 13 13 0 17 12 12 0 NE 2ND AVENUE 361 361 376 2 2 537 5 154 2 161 • ALL VEHICLES 40 11 Intersection Total 566 544 2 10 361 12 375 10 NE 2ND AVENUE 169 • 154 154 0 0 2 2 0 4 0 2 2 7 NE 42ND STREET 2 0 5 5 5 0 0 NE 42ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO NOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. : 42ST_2AV Page : 3 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 42ND STREET INE 2ND AVENUE 1NE 42ND STREET I From North 1From East 1From South 1From West I I I I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right ( UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right I Total Date 08/13/14 - Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 08/13/14 Peak start 16:45 I 16:45 16:45 16:45 1 Volume 1 6 243 10 1 0 13 3 1 1 0 19 390 11 0 11 0 9 Percent 0% 28 938 4% I 08 768 188 6% 0% 58 938 3% 0% 55% 0% 45% 1 Pk total 260 I 17 420 20 I Highest 17:00 17:30 17:15 17:15 Volume 0 4 65 2 0 4 2 i t 0 10 114 2 0 3 0 4 1 Hi total 71 7 1 126 7 I PHF .92 .61 .83 .71 I 0 0 NE 42ND STREET 19 3 32 10 11 11 0 10 10 0 20 9 9 0 0 NE 2ND AVENUE 243 243 260 7 7 662 11 390 1 402 • ALL VEHICLES 52 35 Intersection Total 717 685 13 19 243 9 265 19 NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 1 1 17 3 420 • 390 390 3 13 13 18 NE 42ND STREET 7 0 11 11 0 0 NE 42ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS PALOMINO NOT SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 PEDESTRIANS Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File T.D. : 42ST_2AV Page : 1 NE 2ND AVENUE 1NE 42ND STREET 1NE 2ND AVENUE 1NE 42ND STREET 1 From North 1From East 'From South 1From West 1 I I 1 Left Thru Right Peds ', Left Thru Right Peds ( Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds 1 Total Date 08/13/14 07.00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 3 1 4 07:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 3 07:30 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 07:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 3 Hr Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 6 1 10 08:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I 4 08:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 I 2 08:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 I 2 Hr Total 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 9 * BREAK * 16:00 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 6 1 13 16:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 ', 10 16: 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Hr Total 0 0 0 3 I 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 6 1 25 17:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 7:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 9 12 ':30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 1 11 17:45 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 1 12 Hr Total 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 23 ( 40 *TOTAL* 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 19 1 0 0 0 38 1 84 iiv V Adri ana ( tb), 101 as 1 1 L...d i A VI i EAZsr —, M&yi IFLot i ck A‘A.51,ks-r- 13 i Zo 14 ‹rak.on b' Luis et)o..lowtiriu wo-c siyvat,iLed NE 39TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: AMBER PALOMINO SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 39ST_2AV Page : 1 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 39TH STREET !NE 2ND AVENUE INE 39TH STREET From North !From East ;From South !From West UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right ( UTurn Left Thru Right I Total Date 08/13/14 07:00 0 4 28 4 1 0 3 3 8 1 0 1 15 3 0 0 5 3; 77 07:15 0 14 47 1 1 0 2 1 13 1 0 1 27 1] 0 0 2 2] 111 07:30 0 10 53 1 1 0 8 0 13 0 2 22 2 0 1 0 3 ', 115 07:45 0 10 70 2 1 0 10 0 22 0 0 28 4 0 2 6 4 158 Hr Total 0 38 198 8 0 23 4 56 0 4 92 10 0 3 13 12 461 08:00 0 13 69 5 0 11 1 19 08:15 0 14 80 6 j 0 12 4 20 08:30 0 20 107 5 0 23 0 15 08:45 0 24 80 2 ( 0 12 4 31 Hr Total 0 71 336 18 j 0 58 9 85 * BREAK * 0 2 29 3 0 4 6 2 164 0 4 22 4 1 0 1 9 2 1 178 0 1 39 1 1 0 3 7 3 1 224 0 3 61 3 I 0 4 10 1 1 235 0 10 151 11 I 0 12 32 8 1 801 16:00 0 11 58 3 1 0 9 8 48 I 0 7 53 4 0 7 8 10 1 226 16:15 0 8 59 5 1 0 14 18 25 I 0 4 45 1 1 0 3 11 5 198 16:30 0 11 68 8 0 9 18 32 ' 0 6 61 4 1 0 5 6 7 I 235 16:45 0 8 58 6 1 0 15 20 30 0 3 71 3 0 4 11 4 1 233 Hr Total 0 38 243 22 1 0 47 64 135 0 20 230 12 1 0 19 36 26 1 892 17:00 0 12 65 7 1 0 16 32 41 0 1 53 5 0 2 5 2 241 17:15 0 5 60 3 1 0 15 27 35 i 0 4 66 3 0 5 4 6 1 233 7:30 0 8 63 6] 0 8 24 35 0 1 72 7 1 0 0 8 5] 237 17:45 0 6 57 7 1 0 16 25 23 0 7 57 2 1 0 2 5 7 1 214 Hr Total 0 31 245 23 1 0 55 108 134 0 13 248 17 1 0 9 22 20 925 *TOTAL* 0 178 1022 71 I 0 183 185 410 I 0 47 721 50 0 43 103 66 3079 NE 39TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: AMBER PALOMINO SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 39ST2AV Page : 2 NE 2ND AVENUE jNE 39TH STREET INE 2ND AVENUE INE 39TH STREET From North From East !From South !From West 1 ! I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right ' UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right 1 Total Date 08/13/14 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 to 0900 on 08/13/14 Peak start 0800 1 0800 0800 1 08:00 Volume 0 71 336 18 0 58 9 85 0 10 151 11 1 0 12 32 8 Percent 0% 17% 79W 4% 1 0% 38% 6% 56% 1 0% 6% 88% 6% 0%. 23W 62% 15% Pk total 425 152 1 172 152 Highest 0830 1 0845 08:45 I 08:45 Volume 0 20 107 5 0 12 4 31 1 0 3 61 3 0 4 10 1 Hi total 132 1 47 I 67 15 PHF .80 1 .81 I .64 .87 0 0 NE 39TH STREET 10 9 37 18 12 12 32 NE 2ND AVENUE 18 336 71 18 336 71 425 673 32 52 8 8 0 0 89 12 151 85 248 • ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 801 574 58 10 336 8 402 10 NE 2ND AVENUE 266 0 0 85 85 9 152 9 58 58 114 NE 39TH STREET 172 • 151 151 1 71 32 11 11 0 0 NE 39TH STREET t NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: AMBER PALOMINO 'IJNALIZEP Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLE$ Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.A. : 396T 2AV Page : 3 NE 2ND AVENUE From North VTurn Left Thru Date 08/13/14 ENE 39TH STREET INE 2ND AVENUE !From East From South Right I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 uTurn Left INE 39TH STREET (From Wept Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right I TOW. Peak Hour Analyeie Sy Entire Intereeotion for the Period: 16:00 t Peak start 16:45 16:45 Volume 0 33 246 22 0 54 103 141 Percent 0# 11% 82% 74 0t 18% 354 974 Pk total 301 298 Highest 17.00 17:00 Volume 0 12 65 7 0 Hi total 84 89 PHF .90 .84 • 0 • 0 iminmeii NE 39TH STREET 9 103 134 22 11 11 28 16 32 41 18:00 on OB/13/14 16:45 0 9 0t 3% 289 17:30 0 1 72 80 .90 NE 2ND AVENUE 22 246 33 22 246 33 301 715 28 56 17 17 190 11 262 141 414 • ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 944 606 54 9 246 17 317 9 NE 2N AVENUE 262 LI 91% 6t 7 298 377 289 • 262 262 16:45 0 0% 56 16:45 0 19 .74 11 28 17 20t 50# 30% 1 1 4 11 4 141 141 103 103 54 54 79 NE 39TH STREET 0 0 33 28 18 NE 39TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED AY: AMBER PALOMINO SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey 624 Garde Delray Beach, Phone (56 Specialists, Inc. nia Terrace Florida 33444 7) 272-3255 PEDESTRIANS Site Code : Start Date: File T.D. Page 00140176 06/13/14 39ST_2AV 1 NE 2ND AVENUE INE 39TH STREET From North 'From East Left Thru Right Reds 1 Left Thru Date 08/13/14 INE 2ND AVENUE I From South Right Pods I Left 07;00 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 07:15 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 07;30 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 Q7;45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Hr Total 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 Hr Total 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 PRIM * 1 0 3 2 6 INE 39TH STREET (From West I I Thru Right Pecls 1 Left Thru Right Pede I Total 0 0 0 3 I 0 0 0 10 1 18 O 0 0 o f 0 0 0 1 1 6 O 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 14 O 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 31 9 O 0 0 9 0 0 0 15 I 47 6 I 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 1 1 9 3 0 0 0 3 I 0 0 0 3 1 12 8 I 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 1 1 18 5 1 0 0 0 5] 0 0 0 1 1 13 22 I 0 0 0 11 I 0 0 0 6 I 52 16:00 0 0 0 6 I 0 0 0 9 I 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 7 24 16:15 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 10 I 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 1 28 16:30 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 6 I 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 21 1 38 16:45 0 0 0 } I 0 0 0 3 I 0 0 .1 1 1 0 0 0 12 I 17 Hr Total 0 0 0 22 1 0 0 0 28 1 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 45 I 107 17:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 I 0 0 0 s I 0 0 0 9 j 26 '7:15 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 9 I 0 0 0 5 18 7;30 0 0 0 s l 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 9 14 17;45 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 4 I 0 0 0 7 90 Hr Total 0 0 0 9 I 0 0 0 21 I 0 0 0 18 1 0 0 0 30 I 78 •TOTAL" 0 0 0 61 I 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 0 96 204 • (pooritr Moy&i k:Lf) f i c\k, I�N9U,6'T" 13i 2cp14 b(s. L1ts PaoiYO Sr0.JiLe6\ NE 39TH STREET & FEDERAL HIGHWAY MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: WAYNE ASSAM SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey S,aecialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VE:.ICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 39ST_US1 Page : 1 FEDERAL HIGHWAY INE 39TH STREET ;FEDERAL HIGHWAY INE 39TH STREET From North 1From East ;from South 1From West UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right 1 Total Date 08/13/14 07:00 0 0 29 3] 0 1 9 5 0 2 23 0 I 0 1 2 5 80 07:15 0 0 35 4 I 0 1 10 5 0 1 28 0 I 0 5 1 8 98 07:30 0 0 42 9 1 0 6 9 3, 0 4 41 0 I 0 4 4 4 126 07:45 0 1 54 10 I 2 6 17 15 1 0 4 49 2 j 0 7 1 6 174 Hr Total 0 1 160 26 2 14 45 28 0 11 141 2 0 17 8 23 478 08:00 1 1 62 14 3 6 17 7 0 2 46 1 I 0 6 6 3 1 175 08:15 0 0 93 16 0 6 17 14 ! 1. 5 62 0 1 18 1 6 1 240 08:30 0 3 89 20 2 8 20 5 0 4 68 0 0 15 0 10 I 244 08:45 0 1 89 20 5 11 26 17 1 0 3 86 0 0 27 2 4 1 291 Hr Total 1 5 333 70 10 31 80 43 ] 1 14 262 1 1 66 9 23 950 _..__...._._. • BREAK •-----.. ....._._.. ._.. .. 16:00 0 0 47 16 2 7 39 4 I 0 8 84 4 1 0 17 3 3 234 16:15 0 1 48 13 4 9 39 1 0 4 73 1 I 0 14 0 8 215 16:30 0 1 35 11 2 6 38 6, 0 10 93 1 I 0 11 4 6 224 16:45 0 1 41 18 3 8 43 9 f 0 5 97 3 I 0 15 3 5 1 251 Hr Total 0 3 171 58 11 30 159 20 i 0 27 347 9 0 57 10 22 ( 924 17:00 0 0 63 27 j 1 8 45 11 0 13 105 0 0 13 1 7 294 '7:15 0 1 58 26 1 1 7 41 10 0 15 129 0 II 0 10 1 2 301 :30 0 1 51 23 I 3 11 41 6 I 0 5 109 1 0 12 5 6 1 274 17:45 0 1 44 19 I 2 9 36 4) 0 9 119 2 0 13 2 0 1 260 Hr Total 0 3 216 95 I 7 35 163 31 1 0 42 462 3 ', 0 48 9 15 1 1129 •TOTAL" 1 12 880 249 ] 30 110 447 122 I 1 94 1212 15 ! 1 188 36 83 ( 3481 NE 39TH STREET & FEDERAL HIGHWAY MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: WAYNE ASSAM SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 39ST_US1 Page : 2 FEDERAL HIGHWAY INE 39TH STREET FEDERAL HIGHWAY INE 39TH STREET From North 1From East 'From South 'From West UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right Date 06/13/14 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 60 0900 on 08/13/14 Peak start 0800 0800 1 0800 08:00 Volume 1 5 333 70 10 31 80 43 1 1 14 262 1 1 66 9 23 Percent 0% 1% 81% 17% 6% 19% 49% 26% 0% 58 94% 0% 1% 67% 9% 23% Pk total 409 164 276 1 99 Highest 08:30 08:45 08:45 1 08:45 Volume 0 3 89 20 5 11 26 17 0 3 86 0 0 27 2 4 Hi total 112 59 1 89 33 PHF .91 1 .69 1 .78 1.75 0 0 NE 39TH STREET 15 80 165 70 67 67 9 70 70 9 99 23 23 0 0 FEDERAL HIGHWAY 264 333 333 409 6 6 781 67 262 43 372 • ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 950 675 41 15 333 23 397 15 FEDERAL HIGHWAY 180 0 Total 0 43 43 164 80 278 • 262 262 1 1 1 80 41 41 16 NE 39TH STREET 6 9 1 0 0 NE 39TH STREET & FEDERAL HIGHWAY MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: WAYNE ASSAM '?IGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. : 39ST_US1 Page : 3 FEDERAL HIGHWAY INE 39TH STREET ;FEDERAL HIGHWAY INE 39TH STREET I From North From East ;From South 1From West I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right ( UTurn Left Thru Right ! Total Date 08/13/14 . Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 08/13/14 Peak start 17:00 17:00 ; 17:00 17:00 Volume 0 3 216 95 7 35 163 31 ; 0 42 462 3 ; 0 48 9 15 Percent 0% 1% 69% 30% 3% 15% 69% 13% ( 0% 8% 91% 1% ( 0% 67% 12% 218 Pk total 314 236 1 507 72 Highest 17:00 17:00 ; 17:15 ; 17:30 Volume 0 0 63 27 1 8 45 11 ; 0 15 129 0 0 12 5 6 Hi total 90 65 I 144 ( 23 PHF .87 .91 ( .88 .78 0 0 NE 39TH STREET 42 163 300 95 48 48 9 95 95 FEDERAL HIGHWAY 216 216 314 9 72 15 15 0 0 1 1 372 3 3 855 48 462 31 541 • ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 1,129 780 42 42 216 15 273 42 FEDERAL HIGHWAY 251 0 0 31 31 236 163 507 • 462 462 163 42 42 15 NE 39TH STREET 3 9 3 0 0 NE 39TH STREET & FEDERAL HIGHWAY MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: WAYNE ASSAM SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 PEDESTRIANS Site Code 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 39ST_US1 Page : 1 FEDERAL HIGHWAY 1NE 39TH STREET IFEDERAL HIGHWAY (NE 39TH STREET From North 'From East IFrom South !From West Left Thru Right Pede Left Thru Right Pede 1 Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds 1 Total Date 08/13/14 -- -' 07:00 0 0 0 3 j 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 07:15 0 0 0 2] 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 s l 0 0 0 0 1 13 07:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 10 07:45 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 l 4 Hr Total 0 0 0 7] 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 30 08:00 0 0 0 2] 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 7 08:15 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 I 4 08:30 0 0 0 9] 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 17 08:45 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 Hr Total 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 13 i 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 40 - * BREAK * 16:00 0 0 0 2 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 16:15 0 0 0 2] 0 0 0 2 '� 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 8 16 : 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0[ 7 16 : 4 5 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0) 5 Hr Total 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0( 23 17:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 7:15 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 7:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 17:45 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 Hr Total 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 •TOTAL• 0 0 0 42 1 0 0 0 33 1 0 0 0 30 1 0 0 0 0 1 105 L Nual ,N 1 1 \77 WO" Ft-swrk d AlutsT" 13 ( zD 14 ddau,�✓� loc : LS?OOVUVtO s ioJ (1 Cd.(.?-€ G' Con atiutchn 3g- NE 38TH STREET & US 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: ROLANDO MARTINEZ SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 A:i, VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 38ST US1 Page : 1 US 1 INE 38TH STREET IUS 1 INE 38TH STREET j From North From East jFrom South From West j UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Rignt j UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 Total Date 08/13/14 -'- 07:00 1 75 191 1 1 0 30 6 17 j 0 10 87 69 j 0 0 0 0 J 487 07:15 0 102 242 4 I 0 42 9 15 j 0 5 86 108 0 0 0 0 j 613 07:30 0 108 288 2 I 0 50 11 32 j 0 5 116 116 0 0 0 0 j 728 07:45 0 131 306 11 1 0 81 21 36 1 0 12 93 120 1 0 0 0 0 j 811 Hr Total 1 416 1027 18 j 0 203 47 100 j 0 32 382 413 0 0 0 0 j 2639 08:00 0 111 340 8 j 0 86 18 44 j 0 7 135 143 1 0 0 0 0 j 892 08:15 0 106 331 5 j 0 74 15 46 j 0 12 134 143 j 0 0 0 0 j 866 08:30 0 122 300 4 1 112 21 46 1 0 10 167 137 j 0 0 0 0 1 920 0B:45 1 89 344 10 j 0 86 21 73 0 20 175 140 0 0 0 0 1 959 Hr Total 1 428 1315 27 1 1 358 75 209 0 49 611 563 ( 0 0 0 0 3637 * BREAK * 16:00 0 62 204 13 j 1 93 26 90 j 0 15 248 103 0 0 0 0 j 855 16:15 0 70 209 12 j 0 105 32 71 0 7 268 95 j 0 0 0 0 869 16:30 0 53 172 10 j 0 98 33 85 0 12 279 102 j 0 0 0 0 844 16:45 0 60 216 12 1 0 80 35 87 1 0 10 303 97 1 0 0 0 0 1 900 Hr Total 0 245 801 47 1 1 376 126 333 j 0 44 1098 397 0 0 0 0 3468 17:00 0 85 189 13 1 0 92 40 90 j 0 9 293 110 J 0 0 0 0 921 ,7:15 1 81 236 16 ( 0 107 33 87 j 0 10 288 106 0 0 0 0 1 965 ':30 0 70 224 13 ( 0 101 32 98 j 0 10 314 101 0 0 0 0 J 963 17:45 0 76 216 12 1 105 23 91 1 0 7 291 94 0 0 0 0 j 916 Hr Total 1 312 865 54 1 405 128 366 j 0 36 1186 411 0 0 0 0 j 3765 *TOTAL* 3 1401 4008 146 I 3 1342 376 1008 0 161 3277 1784 ( 0 0 0 0 I 13509 NE 38TH STREET & US 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: ROLANDO MARTINEZ SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. : 38ST_U51 Page : 2 US 1 INE 38TH STREET jUS 1 1NE 38TH STREET I From North 'From East IFrom South 1From West I I I UTurn Left Thru Right UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right I Total Date 08/13/14 Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 to 09:00 on 08/13/14 Peak start 08:00 ( 08:00 08:00 ' 08:00 Volume 1 428 1315 27 1 1 358 75 209 ' 0 49 611 563 0 0 0 0 Percent 0% 24% 74% 2% 0% 56% 12% 33% 1 0% 4% 50% 46% ' 0% 0% 0% 0% Pk total 1771 643 1223 ' 0 Highest 08:00 1 08:30 08:45 ( 07:00 I Volume 0 111 340 8 1 1 112 21 46 1 0 20 175 140 ' 0 0 0 0 I Hi total 459 j 180 1 335 ' 0 PHF .96 .89 .91 1 .0 0 0 27 NE 38TH STREET 49 75 151 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 US 1 • 1,315 429 27 1,315 1,771 429 2,591 0 611 209 820 • ALL VEHICLES 151 1,635 Intersection Total 3,637 359 1,315 0 1,674 2,897 49 US 1 49 0 0 209 209 643 75 1,223 611 611 75 359 359 992 NE 38TH STREET 429 0 563 563 563 0 0 NE 38TH STREET & US 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: ROLANDO MARTINEZ 'IGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. 38ST_US1 Page : 3 US 1 1NE 38TH STREET IUS 1 1NE 38TH STREET From North From East !From South !From West 1 1I 1 UTurn Left Thru Right I UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right 1 UTurn Left Thru Right 1 Total Date 08/13/14 -—- Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 08/13/14 Peak start 17:00 17:00 17:00 1 17:00 Volume 1 312 865 54 1 405 128 366 1 0 36 1186 411 I 0 0 0 0 Percent 0% 25% 70% 48 ' 0% 458 14% 41% 09 28 73% 25% 1 08 09 09 09 Pk total 1232 900 1 1633 1 0 Highest 17:15 17:30 ] 17:30 I 07:00 Volume 1 81 236 16 0 101 32 98 0 10 314 101 I 0 0 0 0 Hi total 334 231 425 0 PHF .92 .97 .96 .0 0 0 NE 38TH STREET 36 128 218 54 0 0 0 54 US 1 865 313 0 1,186 366 54 865 1,232 0 0 0 0 0 0 313 1,552 2,784 • ALL VEHICLES 218 1,624 Intersection Total 3,765 2, 904 0 0 366 366 900 128 1,633 406 36 • 1,186 865 0 1,271 36 1,186 US 1 128 406 406 724 NE 38TH STREET 313 0 411 411 411 0 0 NE 38TH STREET & US 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED HY: ROLANDO MARTINEZ SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 PEDESTRIANS Site Code 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 File I.D. : 38ST_US1 Page : 1 US 1 1NE 38TH STREET 1US 1. (NE 38TH STREET 1 From North ]From East From South 'From West Left Thru Right Peds ] Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds 1 Left Thru Right Peds 1 Total Date 08/13/14 07:00 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 3 07:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 07:30 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 07:45 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 Hr Total 0 0 0 5] 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 14 08:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 08:30 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 08:45 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 Hr Total 0 0 0 7] 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 12 * BREAK * 16:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0] 2 16 : 15 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 5] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 5 16:30 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 4 16:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Hr Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 13 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 01 1 '7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 17:45 0 0 0 0] 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 Hr Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4] 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 *TOTAL* 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 25 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5] 43 o 1/ • I v 1 n i A 1 A 51,;= NE 38sr- IJ i Iv1.60.,Yvi IFl-OCiciG`, AaSu.sT l3 1 Zo Vt- i'exy,folix b11. Luis 1Pojolulivl.o NE 36TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE & FEDERAL HIGHWAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & R. ESPADA SIGNALIZED Traffi: Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Study Name: 36S2AV,1 Site Code 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 Page : 1 ALL VEHICLES INE 2ND AVENUE 'FEDERAL HIGHWAY 155 36TH STREET 1NE 2ND AVENUE ]NE 36TH STREET (From North ]From Northeast ;From East !From South IFrom West Start I HARD ! HARD HARD'.' SOFT I SOFT Ilntvl Time 1 LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT] Left Thru Right RIGHT( Left Thru Right RIGHT'. Left Thru RIGHT RIGHTI Left LEFT THRU RIGHTITotal 08/13/14 1 I 1 07:001 0 5 17 71 2 22 4 21 0 34 5 111 7 12 8 71 3 8 77 131 244 07:151 2 9 29 51 2 15 3 1, 0 37 6 61 3 16 8 61 7 22 95 141 286 07:301 0 14 28 131 5 28 12 1 0 51 5 161 9 14 14 81 5 17 91 171 348 07:451 4 13 42 181 5 33 12 01 0 42 5 111 11 17 20 6] 2 27 103 321 405 Hour] 6 41 116 431 14 98 31 4j 0 164 21 441 30 59 50 291 17 74 366 761 1283 1 1 1 I 1 I 08:001 0 12 37 161 9 33 14 ! 0 59 15 14] 9 12 26 41 6 15 92 391 413 08:151 2 15 56 291 14 67 16 '1 0 45 5 241 12 24 25 131 6 26 75 431 498 08:301 0 10 61 281 11 59 22 1! 0 43 7 131 15 22 35 91 5 28 108 341 511 08:451 1 12 51. 201 12 57 21 ; 0 63 15 181 22 42 44 61 7 40 92 451 569 Hour] 3 49 205 931 46 216 73 '. 0 21.0 42 691 58 100 130 321 24 109 367 1611 1991 1 1 1 I I (BREAK! ..___.. 1_____.. __.. _.. .._. .. .' 1 ! .... I I i 1 I 1 161001 2 18 32 171 9 26 21 0 0 95 li 61 38 41 63 19! 7 21 128 291 583 16:151 2 8 15 141 10 32 18 0 0 117 10 41 22 24 43 91 12 21 122 21I 504 16:301 0 26 51 341 9 28 17 1 0 100 15 31 33 45 62 241 13 34 78 28] 601 16:451 0 22 34 281 8 26 18 4 0 95 7 81 28 40 63 121 13 26 126 371 595 Hour] 4 74 132 931 36 112 74 _. 0 407 43 211 121 150 231 641 45 102 454 1151 2283 1 1 1 1 1 17:001 0 28 28 301 15 30 25 )1 0 99 7 121 39 42 66 241 12 29 117 351 638 17:151 0 19 26 321 12 37 29 )1 1 105 6 121 38 58 84 171 18 42 128 211 685 17:301 1 20 34 241 12 31 14 01 0 109 5 11 48 50 86 131 16 17 133 121 626 7:451 0 13 38 221 7 25 23 01 0 95 12 91 32 41 68 151 10 35 136 181 599 Hour] 1 80 126 1081 46 123 91 (1 1 408 30 341 157 191 304 691 56 123 514 861 2548 1 1 1 1 1 I Total] 14 244 579 3371 142 549 269 1:] 1 1189 136 1681 366 500 715 1941 142 408 1701 4381 8105 % Apr.; 1.1 20.7 49.3 28.7', 14.5 56.4 27.6 1.:1 - 79.5 9.1 11.21 20.6 28.1 40.2 10.91 5.2 15.1 63.2 16.21 5 Int. 0.1 3.0 7.1 4.1'. 1.7 6.7 3.3 0.11 - 14.6 1.6 2.0I 4.5 6.1 8.8 2.31 1.7 5.0 20.9 5.41 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 NE 36TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE & FEDERAL HIGHWAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & R. ESPADA SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Study Name: 36S2AV_I Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 Page 2 ALL VEHICLES 1NE 2ND AVENUE !FEDERAL HIGHWAY !NE 36TH STREET 1NE 2ND AVENUE 1NE 36TH STREET !From North ]From Northeast From East IFrom South 1From West Start 1 HARD 1 HARD] HARD! SOFT SOFT �Intvl Time LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHT! Left Thru Right RIGHT! Left Thru Right RIGHT! Left Thru RIGHT RIGHT1 Left LEFT THRU RIGHTlTotal Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 07:00 on 08/13/14 to 08:45 on 08/13/14 1 Time 08:00 1 08:00 1 08:00 1 08:00 08:00 1 Vol. 3 49 205 931 46 216 73 4! 0 210 42 69! 58 100 130 32! 24 109 367 161! Pct. 0.8 14.0 58.5 26.5! 13.5 63.7 21.5 1.1! 0.0 65.4 13.0 21.4! 18.1 31.2 40.6 10.0! 3.6 16.4 55.5 24.3! Total 350 1 339 1 321 1 320 1 661 High 08:15 1 08:15 1 08:45 1 08:45 1 08:45 1 Vol, 2 15 56 291 14 67 16 11 0 63 15 181 22 42 44 61 7 40 92 45! Total 102 1 98 ( 96 1 114 1 184 I PHF 0.858 10.865 10.836 10.702 10.898 NE 36TH STREET 434 24 109 367 161 NE 2ND AVENUE 93 205 49 3 170 520 08/13/14 08:00am 08:45am FEDERAL HIGHWAY 4/ 4 73 216 4.46 650 0 311 1095 1991 815 N 902 582 58 130 10032 NE 2ND AVENUE 2.1 69 42 210 -3 494 NE 36TH STREET NE 36TH STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE & FEDERAL, HIGHWAY, MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: I. GONZALEZ & R. ESPADA SIGNALIZED Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Study Name: 36S2AV_1 Site Code : 00140176 Start Date: 08/13/14 Page : 3 ALL VEHICLES INE 2ND AVENUE 'FEDERAL HIGHWAY 1NE 36TH STREET ]NE 2ND AVENUE INE 36TH STREET 'From North 'From Northeast [From East 1From South 1From West Start 1 HARD I HARDI HARDI. SOFT I SOFT (Intv1 Time I LEFT LEFT THRU RIGHTS Left Thru Right RIGHTI Left Thru Right RIGHT, Left Thru RIGHT RIGHTI Left LEFT THRU RIGHTITotal Peak Hour Analysis Hy Entire Intersection for the Period: 16:00 on 08/13/14 to 17:45 on 08/13/14 Time 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. ( 1 80 126 1081 46 123 91 01 1 408 30 341 157 191 304 691 56 123 514 861 Pct. 0.3 25.3 40.0 34.21 17.6 47.3 35.0 0.01 0.2 86.2 6.3 7.11 21.7 26.4 42.1 9.51 7.1 15.7 65.9 11.01 Total J 315 1 260 1 473 1 721 1 779 High 17:00 17:15 1 17:15 17:15 17:15 Vol. 1 0 28 28 301 12 37 29 01 1 105 6 121 38 58 84 171 18 42 128 211 Total 1 86 1 78 I 124 1 197 1 209 PHF 0.916 10.833 10.954 10.915 �0.932 NE 36TH STREET 764 56 123 1543 514 - 86 71. NE 2ND AVENUE 108 i36 80 1 277 592 08/13/14 05 : 00pre 05 : 45pm ki FEDERAL HIGHWAY 91 123 446 722 462 2548 118E 1057 157 304 33NE 2ND9AVENUE9 Z 34 T-- 30 408 \F- -4 709 NE 36TH STREET • • --7 1 1 giavAk i (FLoci c10.. AAykST 13 20 14 6.›.›-At) (o LAAZS ?o,t, o v•ki tel,o n ex,i,iZeci Peak Season Factor Category Report *10 *11 *12 *13 *14 *15 *16 *17 *18 *19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 1 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 2013 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY FPPORT CATEGORY: 8700 MIAMI-DADE NORTH WEEK DATES 1 01/01/2013 2 01/06/2013 3 01/13/2013 4 01/20/2013 5 01/27/2013 6 02/03/2013 * 7 02/10/2013 * 8 02/17/2013 * 9 02/24/2013 03/03/2013 03/10/2013 03/17/2013 03/24/2013 03/31/2013 04/07/2013 04/14/2013 04/21/2013 04/28/2013 05/05/2013 05/12/2013 05/19/2013 05/26/2013 06/02/2013 06/09/2013 06/16/2013 06/23/2013 06/30/2013 07/07/2013 07/14/2013 07/21/2013 07/28/2013 08/04/2013 08/11/2013 08/18/2013 08/25/2013 09/01/2013 09/08/2013 09/15/2013 09/22/2013 09/29/2013 10/06/2013 10/13/2013 10/20/2013 10/27/2013 11/03/2013 11/10/2013 11/17/2013 11/24/2013 12/01/2013 12/08/2013 12/15/2013 12/22/2013 12/29/2013 * PEAK SEASON 01/05/2013 01/12/2013 01/19/2013 01/26/2013 02/02/2013 02/09/2013 02/16/2013 02/23/2013 03/02/2013 03/09/2013 03/16/2013 03/23/2013 03/30/2013 04/06/2013 04/13/2013 04/20/2013 04/27/2013 05/04/2013 05/11/2013 05/18/2013 05/25/2013 06/01/2013 06/08/2013 06/15/2013 06/22/2013 06/29/2013 07/06/2013 07/13/2013 07/20/2013 07/27/2013 08/03/2013 08/10/2013 08/17/2013 08/24/2013 08/31/2013 09/07/2013 09/14/2013 09/21/2013 09/28/2013 10/05/2013 10/12/2013 10/19/2013 10/26/2013 11/02/2013 11/09/2013 11/16/2013 11/23/2013 11/30/2013 12/07/2013 12/14/2013 12/21/2013 12/28/2013 12/31/2013 REPORT TYPE: ALL MOCF: 0.97 PSCF :. 03 1.03 1.03 .01 .00 0.99 0.97 ).96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 C.99 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.01 :..01 J .02 1.02 7_ . 0 3 1.04 1.05 1.03 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.02 L.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.00 0. 99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.07 1.06 1.06 1.051 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.06 1.06 18-FEB-2014 08:46:31 830UPD 6 8700 PKSEASON.TXT Signal Timing Print Date: 8/9/2014 TOD Schet._.e Report for 2098: Federal Hwy&NE 36 St&NE 2 Av Print Time: 8:11 AM TOD TOD Active Active Asset Intersection Schedule Oa Mode Plan # Cycle Offset Setting PhaseBank Maximum 2098 Federal Hwy&NE 36 St&NE 2 Av DOW-7 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 Max 0 Splits PHI PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PH 7 PH 8 EBL WBT SWT SET NBT EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -I 4" 1 t "N* Phase Bank 1 Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Yellow Red Phase Bank 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 EBL 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 8- 8- 8 2- 2 - 2 6- 6- 6 40 - 40 - 40 3 0 2 WBT 7 - 7 - 7 20 - 20 - 20 7 - 7 - 7 1 - 1 - 1 30 - 30 - 30 0 - 0 - 0 4 4.5 3 SWT 0 - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 7 - 7 - 7 2.5 -2.5 - 2.5 10 - 10 - 10 38 - 38 - 38 4 2.4 4 SET 7 - 7- 7 17-17 -17 7 - 7 - 7 2.5-2.5-2.5 10- 10- 10 58 -58-25 4 2.8 5 NBT 7 - 7- 7 18-18 -18 7 - 7 - 7 2.5-2.5-2.5 10- 10- 10 58 -58-58 4 2.2 6 EBT 7 - 7 - 7 20 - 20 - 20 7 - 7 - 7 1 - 1 - 1 30 - 30 - 30 0 - 0 - 0 4 4.5 7- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 8- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 Last In Service Date: unknown Permitted Phases 12345678 Default 123456— External Permit 0-23456— Extemal Permit 1-23456— Extemal Permit 2-23456-- Page 1 of 2 Print Date: 8/9/2014 TOD Scheuale Report for 2098: Federal Hwy&NE 36 St&NE 2 Av Print Time: 8:11 AM Current Cycle 1 EBL 2 WBT 3 SWT Green Time 6 EBT 7 8 Ring Offset Offset 4 SET 5 NBT TOD Schedule Plan 1 115 11 21 13 16 23 35 0 0 0 68 2 130 9 27 13 25 25 39 0 0 0 74 3 190 6 80 14 15 44 89 0 0 0 142 4 140 15 40 13 16 25 58 0 0 0 49 5 160 14 50 15 25 25 67 0 0 0 35 6 120 10 27 11 16 25 40 0 0 0 35 7 140 11 41 14 18 25 55 0 0 0 97 9 160 12 44 25 18 30 59 0 0 0 100 11 140 9 40 17 18 25 52 0 0 0 91 16 180 9 50 34 19 38 62 0 0 0 130 17 180 20 48 22 26 33 71 0 0 0 26 18 120 10 27 10 17 25 40 0 0 0 67 19 140 13 42 13 16 25 58 0 0 0 90 21 140 15 40 13 16 25 58 0 0 0 88 22 120 10 27 13 14 25 40 0 0 0 74 23 97 13 13 8 16 16 29 0 0 0 21 24 180 15 67 25 14 28 85 0 0 0 130 Current Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings* Day of Week SuMTWThFS Local TOD Schedule Time 0000 0000 0115 0500 0600 0700 1000 1100 1400 1600 1600 2000 2200 2200 Plan 1 18 23 2 19 9 4 7 5 17 21 11 6 22 DOW M T W Th F Su M T W Th F M T W Th F Su M T W Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F Su M T W Th F M T W Th F Su Local Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings * Day of Week SuMTWThFS No Calendar Defined/Enabled * Settings Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max 2 1 - Phase Bank 2, Max 1 2 - Phase Bank 2, Max 2 3 - Phase Bank 3, Max 1 4 - Phase Bank 3, Max 2 5 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 1 6 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 2 7 - X-PED OMIT 8-TBA Page 2of2 SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN Direction EB WB SEB SWB NB Ped Heads — N • Timing Phases Head No. 1/6 6 2 3/8 8/8S 8R 3A/8A 8A 7/4 4 P2 P6 P4 P8 Movements/Display/Actuy 0(1+6) Dwell <G/G+ G R R R G> R �R R R DW W/F 'DW DW EB c 2+6 <Y/G G R R• R Y R R R R DW DW DW DW 8R 6 e NE36ST s 6 _ r P6 (ACTUATED) o 0(2+6) Dwell G GGR RR R R R R W/F W/F DW DW E/W 3 Y YYR RR R R R R DW DW DW DW P2 2 *4," RR I i,` es 4 Y Y Y R R_ R R R R R DW DW DW DW RECOVERY 5 Y Y Y R R R R .R R R DW DW DW DW ►'i t 1/6 NE36ST ' (RECALL) P.,6 P6 03 Dwell R R R R R R <G/G G R' R DW DW W/F DW 4 R RRR RR Y Y R R DW DW DW DW . SWB I e 5 R RRR RR Y Y R R DW DW DW DW r` — ► a 1+6 R RRR RR Y Y R R DW DW DW DW 8A 3A/8A FED HWAY r 2+6 R R R R R R Y Y R R DW DW DW DW a (ACTUATED) 04 Dwell R R R <G/G G G> R R R R DW DW DW W/F 5 R RR Y Y R R R R R DW DW DW DW SEB I e 1+6 RRRY Y R R R R R DW DW DW DW a 2+6 R RRY Y R R R R R DW DW DW DW 8R 0 NE2AV 8 3/8 o P8j (ACTUATED) ' 05 Dwell R R R R R R R R <GIG G DW�DW W/F DW P4 1+6 R RRR RR R R Y Y DW DW DW DW NB ' 2+6 R RRR RR R R Y Y DW DW DW DW 7/4 r 4,, FED HWAY IE.") t 0 (ACTUATED) [] Dwell R R •R R R R <G/G G R R DW DW DW DW • RR 1+6 Y YRR RR R R R R DW DW DW DW PRE I 2+6 R RYR RR R R R R DW DW DW DW EMPTION : 3 R R R R R R <G/G G R R DW DW DW DW r 4 R RRR R G> R R R R DW DW DW DW 0 5 R RRR RR R R Y R DW DW DW DW Flashing Operation F FY FY FY FR . FR FR FR FR FR FR Page 1 of 2 Miami -bade Counteublic Works Department Drawn WILLIAM RIVERA PAZ Date 12/1/2006 NE 36 ST & FEDERAL HWAY & NE 2 AV Checked Nk'MUt>.hi Date l"11La12e04 Placed in Service Phasing No. Asset Number . (.l • k1. Date L t (h.1104 IBY 1.,t1 _ 4 2098• Blank98 SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN Direction El:, WB SEB SWB NB Ped Heads il N Timing Phases Head No. 1/6 6 2 3/8 8/8S 8R 3A/8A 8A 7/4 4 P2 P6' P4 P8 Movements/DIsplay/ActuatIon Dwell R R R R R R <G/G G R R DW DW DW DW RR RED R1RRR R Y Y Y R R DW DW DW DW ' ,s‘'' i (i: e DWELL Br 1 NN. t 1 N N Dwell c e a r t 0 . Dwell - c 1 e a . r 1 t 0 , • Dwell c e a r t 0 'Dwell c e el r t 0 Flashing Operation F; FY FY ' FRIFR FFIFR FR FR FR Page 2 of 2 Miami -bade County PublicWorks Department Drawn WILLIAM RIVERA PAZ Date 12/1/06 NE 36 ST & FEDERAL HWAY & NE 2 AV Checked Dote Placed In Service Phasing No. Asset Number , 4. 41.9.4-Jr›,),Met... 12..;i tat lc. I 4 2098 Print Date: 8/9/2014 TOD Sate.. .Ie Report for 2099: US 1 &NE 38 St Print Time: 8:11 AM TOD TOD Active Active Asset Intersection Schedule Op Mode Plan # Cvcle Offset Setting PhaseBank Maximum 2099 US 1&NE 38 St DOW-7 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 Max 0 Splits PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PH 7 PH 8 SBT WBT SBL NBT - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Yellow Red Phase Bank 1 2 3 1 2 3 I 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 2 SBT 0 - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 7 - 7 - 7 1 - 1 - 1 30 - 30 - 30 0 - 50 - 50 4 2 3- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 4 WBT 7 - 7 - 7 16 - 16 - 16 7 - 7 - 7 3.5 -2.5 - 3.5 23 - 23 - 23 60 - 50 - 50 4 2.6 5 SBL 0 - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 5 - 5 - 5 2 - 2 - 2 10 - 10 - 10 60 - 41 - 41 4 2 6 NBT 7 - 7- 7 11-11 -11 7 - 7 - 7 1 -1 - 1 30- 30- 30 0 -50-50 4 2 7- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 8- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 Last In Service Date: unknown Permitted Phases 12345678 Default -2-456— Extemal Permit 0-2-4-6-- External Permit 1-2-4-6-- Extemal Permit 2-2-4-6-- Page 1 of 2 Print Date: 8/9/2014 TOD Sche, __,e Report for 2099: US 1 &NE 38 St Print Time: 8:11 AM Current Cycle 1 2 - SBT Green Time 6 NBT 7 8 - _ Ring Offset Offset 3 4 - WBT 5 SBI., TOD Schedule Plan 1 115 0 70 0 32 20 44 0 0 0 55 2 130 0 78 0 39 25 47 0 0 0 36 3 190 0 137 0 40 35 96 0 0 0 58 4 140 0 98 0 29 20 72 0 0 0 32 5 160 0 113 0 34 25 82 0 0 0 152 6 120 0 83 0 24 19 58 0 0 0 16 7 140 0 103 0 24 19 78 0 0 0 50 9 160 0 107 0 40 35 66 0 0 0 57 11 140 0 98 0 29 20 72 0 0 0 58 16 180 0 126 0 41 38 82 0 0 0 76 17 180 0 132 0 35 25 101 0 0 0 146 18 110 0 75 0 22 11 58 0 0 0 55 19 140 0 93 0 34 20 67 0 0 0 53 21 140 0 83 0 44 15 62 0 0 0 65 22 120 0 68 0 39 21 41 0 0 0 50 24 180 0 126 0 41 38 82 0 0 0 76 25 180 0 126 0 41 38 82 0 0 0 125 Current Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings * Dav of Week SuM T W ThF S Local TOD Schedule Time 0000 0000 0115 0300 0500 0600 0700 1000 1100 1400 1600 1600 2000 2200 2200 Plan 1 18 Flash Flash 2 19 9 4 7 5 17 21 11 6 22 DOW MTWThF Su MTWThF Su M TW Th F Su MTWThF MTWThF M TW Th F MTWThF M TW Th F Su MTWThF M TWThF Su Local Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings * Dav of Week SuM T W ThF S No Calendar Defined/Enabled * Settings Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max 2 1 - Phase Bank 2, Max 1 2 - Phase Bank 2, Max 2 3 - Phase Bank 3, Max 1 4 - Phase Bank 3, Max 2 5 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 1 6 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 2 7 - X-PED OMIT 8-TBA Page 2of2 SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN 11 N Direction; N 5' W Ped Heads Timing Phases Head No, 6 5,49, 2 ' V7 4R P6 * pit movements/Display/Acivation • • . Dwell • . . , • . • . . . , , . , Sa L.,.....r •---572, Ok7..147.il ) Dwell R <VG g . R/P DW. . DW .• , • g .A. R/y> DV DW' • • • A . • • •$• .. (2+6) N-5 (Fteoan) Dwell G G G iR R W/F • DW 1 1 sif / I 1 1 I • 1 i 1 . a 1 (4) Y y Y R R DVV . DW •I • • • • ' 6. :'' — — • ...., •\;ieil T., 1• a a . • • • , • , • Dwell 1 n • . • . . . (4J vv.8 (i74 7:,/ /77-Cei ) Dwell R • R R • • <3.7g G DW ' wit'. _ „. _ $ 4P, L. .... _ - izi 1 0 (2+) R ! R R . . • Y Y DW DW (44) R i R IR Nr Y bw Dw i E3 a , • < 1 V7 13 • •-—— . • Flashing Operation I Fy FY FY m FR • Page 1 of .1 Miami -Dade County Public Works Department Drawn 1.4 , fr-93 Pt /6' • • 1.6, /. pate . 713 • t as ..t. - 4 NEI Clieickad . . 1_,,fj ,,,, & )12 6...._ Date, / / 0 i i i,..3 Placed.in Service I Phasing No, Asset Number Date /0/..zoi; 3 IBYeroi,;Z'Mer,d . Q 0 71 TwoPhaseConoPeds Print Date: 7/23/2014 TOD Schet.u/e Report for 2102: NE 2 Av&NE 39 St Print Time: 12:32 PM Asset 2102 Intersection NE 2 Av&NE 39 St TOD TOD Active Active Schedule Op Mode Plan # Cycle Offset Setting PhaseBank Maximum DOW-4 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 Max 0 Splits PHI PH 2 PH3 PH4 PH 5 MI PH7 PH 8 SBT WBT - NBT EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase Bank: PhaseBank 1 T 114 Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Yellow Red Phase Bank 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 2 SBT 7 - 7 - 7 10- 10 - 10 7 - 7 - 7 1 - 1 - 1 30- 30 - 30 0 - 20 - 30 4 0 3- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 4 WBT 7 - 7- 7 10-10 -10 7 - 7 - 7 2.5-3.5-2.5 15- 30- 15 50 -50-50 4 0.2 5- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 6 NBT 7 - 7- 7 10-10 -10 7- 7 - 7 1 -1 - 1 30- 30- 30 0 -20-30 4 0 7- 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 8 EBT 7 - 7 - 7 10- 10 - 10 7 - 7 - 7 2.5 -3.5 - 2.5 15- 30 - 15 50 - 50 - 50 4 0.2 Last In Service Date: unknown Permitted Phases 12345678 Default-2-4-6-8 External Permit 0 Extemal Permit 1 External Permit 2 Page 1 of 2 Print Date: 7/23/2014 TOD Schc,_.ile Report for 2102: NE 2 Av&NE 39 St Print Time: 12:32 PM Current Cycle 1 2 - SBT Green Time 6 NBT 7 8 - EBT Ring Offset Offset 3 4 - WBT 5 - TOD Schedule Plan 1 110 0 75 0 27 0 75 0 27 0 75 2 115 0 80 0 27 0 80 0 27 0 90 3 90 0 32 0 50 0 32 0 50 0 70 4 90 0 36 0 46 0 36 0 46 0 7 5 05 0 1 r 41 0 ;�, 0 16 6 90 0 41 0 41 0 41 0 41 0 82 9 85 0 50 0 27 0 50 0 27 0 49 11 70 0 36 0 26 0 36 0 26 0 10 16 90 0 41 0 41 0 41 0 41 0 4 17 80 0 36 0 36 0 36 0 36 0 28 19 60 0 26 0 26 0 26 0 26 0 15 23 80 0 45 0 27 0 45 0 27 0 40 Current Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings * Dav of Week --2- SuM T W ThF S Local TOD Schedule Time 0000 0115 0300 0500 0600 0900 1000 1100 1400 1600 1800 2100 Plan 11 Free Free 19 11 :3 6 6 17 4 3 5 11 DOW SuMTWThF S M T W Th F Su S M T W Th F Su S MTWThF M T W Th F Su S M T W Th F M T W Th F SuMTWThF S M T W Th F SuMTWThF S Local Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings * Dav of Week ---2- SuM T W ThF S No Calendar Defined/Enabled * Settings Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max 2 1 - Phase Bank 2, Max 1 2 - Phase Bank 2, Max 2 3 - Phase Bank 3, Max 1 4 - Phase Bank 3, Max 2 5 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 1 6 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 2 7 - X-PED OMIT 8 - TBA Page 2 of 2 SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN Direction NB EB wB Ped Heads . U N liming Phases Head No. T 6 2 8 4 P2 P4 P6 P8 Movements/Display/Actuatic , Dwell, c e a r t 1 I ! 1 o 1 i 1 Dwell i ; 1• c I ! I I 1 I i , 1 1 I e $ ! I I r I t I 1 ! o 1 1 , I ! (2+6) . N/SB NE2 AV (RECALL) Dwell I G 1 1 G 1 R ! R W/F DW W/F DW P6 c 4+8 , Y : Y R R DW DW DW DW 1 I , I , • ...___+. 6 e a 1 ! . 1 2 t 0 1 I i I i 1 I I P2 Dwell I , 1 ! I , c I 1 I i 1 i l I I 1 e a I I i ! 1 I r I , I I I I t 0 I I I I I I i I, (4+8) E/WB NE 39 ST (ACTUATED) Dwell i I R 1 1 R [ G G DW W/F DW W/F -- - ----- -0 c 2+6 I R 1 R I Y 1 Y DW DW DW DW P4 4 I I 1 1 4 e a I I * r 1 , o I , , I , LI -' 8 P8 1 1 i i 0 Dwell c i 1 I I 1 I ! ! , 0 I r I I I t a I 1 I I Flashing Operation FY 1 1 FY 1 FR FR Page 1 of 1 ill Miami -Dade County Public orks Department Drawn WILLIAM RIVERA PAZ Date 6/7/2007 NE 2 AV & NE 39 ST Checked Retie Placed in Service Phasing No. Asset Number , — (ot ( .1.14,0 Date c b Oh 7 IBY .i. c 0 I 3 I 2102 Blank12 Print Date: 5/1/2014 TOD Scht_.de Report for 3298: Federal Hwy&NE 38 St&NE 39 St Print Time: 8:23 AM TOD Asset Intersection Schedule Op Mode 3298 Federal Hwy&NE 38 St&NE 39 St DOW-5 Plan # SDlits PH 1 PH 2 PH 3 PH 4 PH 5 PH 6 PH 7 PH 8 - SBT - NBT WBT EBT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 6-1.* Phase Bank 1 N/A TOD Active Active Cycle Offset Setting PhaseBank Maximum 0 0 N/A 0 Max 0 Phase Walk Don't Walk Min Initial Veh Ext Max Limit Max 2 Yellow Red Phase Bank 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 - 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 - 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 2 SBT 7 - 7 - 7 10 - 10 - 10 7 - 7 - 7 1 - 1 - 1 50 - 50 - 50 0 - 50 - 50 4 0.8 3 - 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 4 - 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 5 - 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0 - 0 0- 0- 0 0- 0- 0 0 0 6 NBT 7 - 7 - 7 10 - 10 - 10 7 - 7 - 7 1 - 1 - 1 50 - 50 - 50 0 - 50 - 50 4 0.8 7 WBT 7 - 7 - 7 10 - 10 - 10 7 - 7 - 7 2.5 -2.5 - 2.5 20 - 20 - 20 35 - 30 - 30 4 0.6 8 EBT 7 - 7 - 7 8 - 8 - 8 10 - 7 - 7 2.5 -2.5 - 2.5 20 - 20 - 20 30 - 30 - 30 4 0.6 Last In Service Date: unknown Permitted Phases 12345678 Default-2--678 External Permit 0 --- External Permit 1 External Permit 2 Current Cycle 1 2 - SBT Green Time 6 NBT 7 WBT 8 EBT Ring Offset Offset 3 - 4 5 - - TOD Schedule Plan 1 80 0 22 0 0 0 22 27 16 0 22 2 90 0 32 0 0 0 32 27 16 0 28 3 90 0 32 0 0 0 32 31 12 0 78 4 90 0 36 0 0 0 36 20 19 0 10 5 85 0 18 0 0 0 18 33 19 0 5 6 90 0 20 0 0 0 20 31 24 0 77 9 110 0 42 0 0 0 42 33 20 0 40 11 70 0 12 0 0 0 12 27 16 0 2 16 90 0 31 0 0 0 31 26 18 0 0 17 80 0 20 0 0 0 20 25 20 0 25 19 60 0 15 0 0 0 15 20 10 0 8 23 80 0 22 0 0 0 22 27 16 0 22 Current Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings * Day of Week SuMTWThFS Local TOD Schedule Time 0000 0115 0300 0500 0600 0700 0900 1000 1100 1400 1600 1800 2100 2200 Plan 11 Flash 23 19 11 16 6 6 17 4 3 5 11 11 DOW SuMTWThF S M T W Th F Su S M T W Th F Su S M T W Th F M T W Th F Su S M T W Th F M T W Th F SuMTWThF S M T W Th F F Su M T W Th S Local Time of Day Function Time Function 0000 TOD OUTPUTS Settings * Day of Week SuMTWThFS No Calendar Defined/Enabled * Settings Blank - FREE - Phase Bank 1, Max 1 Blank - Plan - Phase Bank 1, Max 2 1 - Phase Bank 2, Max 1 2 - Phase Bank 2, Max 2 3 - Phase Bank 3, Max 1 4 - Phase Bank 3, Max 2 5 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 1 6 - EXTERNAL PERMIT 2 7 - X-PED OMIT 8-TBA Page 2of2 SIGNAL OPERATING PLAN Direction 31i 463 40/ g; E 13 Ped Heads U rning Phases Head No 2, ,.., 6 1+ 4A 8 84 p6 ph, IRA is Movements/Display/Actuatic , Dwel) Ggn f g _ W/tf: i)v,J Du) 01A) r c 7 _C4" Y \(R. r R .1Z, L,ti Po t,.)1,0 ow ' )\ I 0/5 R •I‹ f R. 2 R rz._ Do pi-o 64.)/,L,0 z. 't 6 1 .. ... _... .... __,_ . .._... Dwell g R G 4-,, G. R R., _ ow 1,?„ /Z, vvrL c 1 2,-vo 17, R. '' ' RR... t.ie. 3,s 57 : PE rz g- ( ri<'.'-' 12, Do OW Du.): . , s-------D AcTuAeiet, 1 LtA. ' . Dwell P. rz. R iz & t/(.1. bw D to blA) W/F1 g 7-1-6, / A', 1 R. (e. \t' Y W) Ea C 1 p6-: fe. a. tz.. \( y • hi) Do .1),A;) bo a , rfe., I - I t•-•--____. ---'\ Ac_Tru ATED I & _ . Dwell r R it R G.,- rY& D,A) bq.,,) p,...) ,r)(.,0 (e-- a, fr, R \( \( 1)1 1).0 64.) PO i,VA c _ , a . Y ..' o Fc..: Dwell CT Cy- g R._ rz., [?,..,,, vVic: ow DIA, I we - Di/ 12., Y a ii la a .,Dti., tg.„..) c4c.)/,..p..,.3, 2 /I' ' ' PC 1 Rec-A 1 / o I a PL060 k k G- 4 Yer 2..-1-6, R _ fa-, --- 13 ° ?3 rz, a. y .1 R., Ac41, Ti •-• - Dwell R ! f.z, , iz g, G. R-P . 1(''' ‘ , .ty,4) bo....% bu) i- P A R R Eil g, iz sl Y . f)14, bco v.) 6(..o ,...p• -------_-44/ ' e e r 111111 • •-,-, - t Flashing Operation ':' -./ L F--," ,- p, rg. Fiz f _ Page 1 of 1 , Miami -Dade County Public Works Department ) wn H*.FRANCI‘ no -I Date 7/z7/o 4 reaeR.A.4, ,.1 1 , D tilecked bate pia cecrin ervice' Phasing /\lo. Asset NumEer 111. 71187-t-)PL-2-- , '7 /7.1 /0'q Date 'By 500? • Bl�nkl2 APPENDIX D: Miami -Dade Transit Data Route Maps/Schedule/Ridership Data ROUTE 9 Route 9 Trips before 6:00 a.m. DO NOT USE NE 10 Ave between Miami Gardens Dr and NE 167 St Use NE 6 Ave m cp w z Miami Gardens Dr NE 167St NE 167St North Miami NORTH MAP NOT TO SCALE 06/09 > Q z N cp w z N O r W z CC N W z NE 206 St Aventura 1. � NE 203St I a) Lin NE202St w Aventura .X Mall Miami Gardens Dr NE 124 St ��NE123St O�1 m N W z Downtown Bus Terminal JSW/SE1 St Miami Shore NE17St NW/NE1 St North Miami Beach Bus Terminal NE 167 St Home Depot Wal-Mart 163 St Mall NE 163 St Miami -Dade !ounty - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 1 of 3 Miami-Dac►e County Miami -Dade Transit Routes Schedule Schedule Back to previous; page (iavascript: historv.qo(-1) ) Service: WEEKDAY Direction: NORTHBOUND Downtown NE 36 St NE 2 Ave NE 125 St 163 Street Aventura Bus & 2 Ave & 79 St & 6 Ave Mall Mall Termina 04:58AM 05:11AM 05:21AM 05:32AM 05:48AM 06:16AM 05:35AIb. 05:48AM 05:58AM 06:12AM 06:32AM 07:04AM 05:48AM 06:02AM 06:14AM 06:28AM 06:48AM 07:20AM 06:10AP 1 06:24AM 06:36AM 06:50AM 07:14AM 07:46AM 06:30AI ii 06:44AM 06:56AM 07:13AM 07:37AM 08:09AM 06:42AI / 06:56AM 07:09AM 07:26AM 07:50AM 06:54AIJ 07:10AM 07:23AM 07:40AM 08:04AM 08:36AM 07:08AIvI 07:24AM 07:37AM 07:54AM 08:18AM 07:20Ahi 07:36AM 07:49AM 08:06AM 08:30AM 09:03AM 07:32A.\1 07:48AM 08:01AM 08:18AM 08:42AM 07:44AA1 08:OOAM 08:13AM 08:30AM 08:54AM 09:27AM 07:56A \1 08:12AM 08:25AM 08:42AM 09:06AM 08:08AM 08:24AM 08:37AM 08:54AM 09:18AM 09:51AM 08:20AP1 08:36AM 08:49AM 09:06AM 09:30AM 10:03AM 08:32F,M 08:48AM 09:01AM 09:17AM 09:41AM 08:44A6V1 09:01 AM 09:14AM 09:30AM 09:54AM 10:27AM 08:56A VI 09:13AM 09:26AM 09:42AM 10:06AM 09:08.WI 09:25AM 09:38AM 09:54AM 10:18AM 10:51AM 09:37AM 09:54AM 10:07AM 10:23AM 10:47AM 11:20AM 10:07\M 10:24AM 10:37AM 10:53AM 11:17AM 11:50AM 10:37AM 10:54AM 11:07AM 11:23AM 11:47AM 12:20PM 11:Oi AM 11:24AM 11:37AM 11:53AM 12:17PM 12:50PM 11:37,\M 11:54AM 12:07PM 12:23PM 12:47PM 01:20PM 12:07''M 12:24PM 12:37PM 12:53PM 01:17PM 01:50PM 12:37PM 12:54PM 01:08PM 01:28PM 01:52PM 02:25PM 01:07PM 01:24PM 01:38PM 01:58PM 02:22PM 02:55PM http://w\c w.miamidade.gov/transit/routes_schedule.asp?R 1=WEEKDAY&R2=Northbound... 4/9/2013 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 2 of 3 01:15PM 01:32PM 01:46PM 02:06PM 02:30PM 01:37PM 01:54PM 02:08PM 02:28PM 02:52PM 03:25PM 01:50PM 02:07PM 02:21PM 02:41PM 03:06PM 02:07PM 02:24PM 02:38PM 02:58PM 03:23PM 03:56PM 02:20PM 02:37PM 02:51PM 03:11PM 03:36PM 02:37PM 02:54PM 03:08PM 03:28PM 03:53PM 04:26PM 02:50PM 03:09PM 03:23PM 03:43PM 04:08PM 02:58PM 03:17PM 03:31PM 03:51PM 04:16PM 04:49PM 03:12PM 03:31PM 03:45PM 04:05PM 04:30PM 05:03PM 03:24PM 03:43PM 03:57PM 04:17PM 04:42PM 03:36PM 03:55PM 04:09PM 04:29PM 04:54PM 05:27PM 03:48PM 04:07PM 04:21PM 04:41PM 05:07PM 04:OOPM 04:19PM 04:33PM 04:53PM 05:19PM 05:52PM 04:12PM 04:31PM 04:45PM 05:05PM 05:31PM 04:26PM 04:45PM 04:59PM 05:19PM 05:45PM 06:18PM 04:36PM 04:55PM 05:09PM 05:28PM 05:54PM 04:48PM 05:08PM 05:22PM 05:41PM 06:07PM 06:37PM 05:OOPM 05:20PM 05:34PM 05:53PM 06:19PM 05:12PM 05:32PM 05:46PM 06:05PM 06:27PM 06:57PM 05:24PM 05:44PM 05:58PM 06:17PM 06:39PM 05:36PM 05:56PM 06:10PM 06:25PM 06:47PM 07:17PM 05:48PM 06:08PM 06:21PM 06:36PM 06:58PM 06:OOPM 06:17PM 06:30PM 06:45PM 07:07PM 07:37PM 06:20PM 06:37PM 06:50PM 07:05PM 07:27PM 06:40PM 06:57PM 07:10PM 07:25PM 07:47PM 08:17PM 07:06PM 07:23PM 07:36PM 07:51PM 08:13PM 07:36PM 07:53PM 08:06PM 08:21PM 08:43PM 09:13PM 08:06PM 08:23PM 08:36PM 08:51PM 09:13PM 08:36PM 08:53PM 09:06PM 09:18PM 09:35PM 09:59PM 09:06PM 09:18PM 09:28PM 09:40PM 09:57PM 09:35PM 09:47PM 09:57PM 10:09PM 10:26PM 10:43PM 10:55PM 11:05PM 11:17PM 11:34PM 11:27PM 11:39PM 11:49PM 12:01AM 12:18AM Back to previous page (lavascript: history.go(-1) ) http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/routes schedule.asp?R1=WEEKDAY&R2=Northbound... 4/9/2013 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 1 of 3 Miami -Dade County Miami -Dade Transit Routes Schedule Schedule Back to previous page (iavascript: historv.go(-1) ) Service: WEEKDAY Direction: SOUTHBOUND Aventura 163 Street NE 125 St NE 2 Ave NE 36 St Downtown Mall Mall & 6 Ave & 79 St & 2 Ave Bus Terminal 04:42AM 04:58AM 05:09AM 05:18AM 05:33AM 05:14AM 05:30AM 05:41AM 05:50AM 06:08AM 05:32AM 05:48AM 05:59AM 06:10AM 06:28AM 05:23AM 05:42AM 05:58AM 06:11 AM 06:22AM 06:40AM 05:50AM 06:10AM 06:23AM 06:34AM 06:52AM 05:39AM 05:58AM 06:18AM 06:31AM 06:42AM 07:06AM 06:10AM 06:30AM 06:43AM 06:54AM 07:18AM 06:20AM 06:40AM 06:53AM 07:06AM 07:30AM 06:04AM 06:29AM 06:49AM 07:05AM 07:18AM 07:42AM 06:39AM 07:01AM 07:17AM 07:30AM 07:54AM 06:26AM 06:51AM 07:13AM 07:29AM 07:42AM 08:06AM 07:03AM 07:25AM 07:41AM 07:54AM 08:18AM 06:46AM 07:15AM 07:37AM 07:53AM 08:06AM 08:30AM 07:27AM 07:49AM 08:05AM 08:18AM 08:42AM 07:39AM 08:01AM 08:17AM 08:30AM 08:54AM 07:22AM 07:51AM 08:13AM 08:29AM 08:42AM 09:06AM 07:53AM 08:22AM 08:44AM 09:OOAM 09:13AM 09:35AM 08:20AM 08:49AM 09:14AM 09:30AM 09:43AM 10:05AM 09:OOAM 09:25AM 09:41AM 09:54AM 10:16AM 08:50AM 09:19AM 09:44AM 10:OOAM 10:13AM 10:35AM 09:20AM 09:49AM 10:14AM 10:30AM 10:43AM 11:05AM 09:50AM 10:19AM 10:44AM 11:OOAM 11:13AM 11:35AM 10:20AM 10:49AM 11:14AM 11:30AM 11:43AM 12:05PM 10:50AM 11:19AM 11:44AM 12:OOPM 12:13PM 12:35PM 11:20AM 11:49AM 12:14PM 12:30PM 12:43PM 01:05PM 11:49AM 12:18PM 12:43PM 01:OOPM 01:13PM 01:35PM http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/routes_schedule.asp?R1=WEEKDAY&R2=Southbound... 4/9/2013 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 2 of 3 12:18PM 12:47PM 01:13PM 01:30PM 01:43PM 02:05PM 12:45PM 01:17PM 01:43PM 02:0OPM 02:13PM 02:35PM 01:06PM 01:38PM 02:04PM 02:21PM 02:34PM 02:56PM 01:19PM 01:51PM 02:17PM 02:34PM 02:47PM 03:10PM 02:03PM 02:29PM 02:46PM 02:59PM 03:22PM 01:43PM 02:15PM 02:41PM 02:58PM 03:11PM 03:34PM 02:27PM 02:53PM 03:10PM 03:23PM 03:46PM 02:39PM 03:05PM 03:22PM 03:35PM 03:58PM 02:19PM 02:51PM 03:17PM 03:34PM 03:47PM 04:10PM 03:07PM 03:31PM 03:48PM 04:01 PM 04:24PM 02:44PM 03:17PM 03:41PM 03:58PM 04:1 1 PM 04:34PM 03:29PM 03:53PM 04:10PM 04:23PM 04:46PM 03:08PM 03:41PM 04:05PM 04:22PM 04:35PM 04:58PM 03:53PM 04:17PM 04:34PM 04:47PM 05:10PM 03:32PM 04:05PM 04:29PM 04:46PM 04:59PM 05:22PM 03:44PM 04:17PM 04:41PM 04:58PM 05:11PM 05:34PM 04:29PM 04:53PM 05:10PM 05:23PM 05:46PM 04:08PM 04:41PM 05:05PM 05:22PM 05:35PM 05:58PM 04:28PM 05:01 PM 05:25PM 05:42PM 05:55PM 06:18PM 04:54PM 05:27PM 05:51PM 06:08PM 06:19PM 06:38PM 05:23PM 05:55PM 06:19PM 06:34PM 06:45PM 07:04PM 06:01PM 06:29PM 06:49PM 07:04PM 07:15PM 07:34PM 06:31PM 06:59PM 07:19PM 07:34PM 07:45PM 08:04PM 07:01PM 07:29PM 07:49PM 08:04PM 08:15PM 08:34PM 07:31PM 07:59PM 08:19PM 08:34PM 08:45PM 09:04PM 08:06PM 08:34PM 08:54PM 09:09PM 09:18PM 09:33PM 09:29PM 09:50PM 10:06PM 10:17PM 10:26PM 10:41PM 10:13PM 10:34PM 10:50PM 11:01PM 11:10PM 11:25PM Back to previous page (iavascript: history.go(-1) ) Page Last Edited: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:29:39 AM (http://www.centerdigitalgov.com/survey/88/2012) PEST OF THE WEB http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/routes_schedule.asp?R 1=WEEKDAY&R2=Southbound... 4/9/2013 ROUTE 10 Route 10 Wynwood E c� NORTH MIAMI BEACH U) N w z NORTH MIAMI NE 125 St Miami Gardens Dr Miami Shores El Portal U) N w z Little Haiti w Miami NE 119 St NE 17 St NE 163 St Adrienne Arsht Center Metromover Station/Bus Terminal NE 15 St 0 N NE14St m z NORTH MAP NOT TO SCALE 12/2009 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 1 of 2 Miami -Dade County Miami -Dade Transit Routes Schedule Schedule Back to previous page (iavascript: historv.go(-1) ) Service: WEEKDAY Direction: NORTHBOUND A Arsht NE 36 St NE 2 Ave NE 125 St NE 135 St 163 Street NE 185 St Mover/Bus & 2 Ave & 79 St & 6 Ave & 12 Ave Mall & 18 Ave Terminal 05:43AM 05:51AM 06:03AM 06:19AM 06:25AM 06:35AM 06:42AM 06:25AM 06:34AM 06:46AM 07:05AM 07:11AM 07:23AM 07:31AM 06:56AM 07:06AM 07:19AM 07:38AM 07:44AM 07:56AM 08:04AM 07:28AM 07:38AM 07:51AM 08:10AM 08:16AM 08:28AM 08:36AM 07:58AM 08:08AM 08:21AM 08:40AM 08:46AM 08:58AM 09:06AM 08:28AM 08:38AM 08:51AM 09:11AM 09:17AM 09:28AM 09:36AM 08:58AM 09:09AM 09:22AM 09:42AM 09:48AM 09:59AM 10:07AM 09:28AM 09:39AM 09:52AM 10:12AM 10:18AM 10:29AM 10:37AM 09:58AM 10:09AM 10:22AM 10:42AM 10:48AM 10:59AM 11:07AM 10:28AM 10:39AM 10:52AM 11:12AM 11:18AM 11:29AM 11:37AM 10:58AM 11:09AM 11:22AM 11:42AM 11:48AM 11:59AM 12:07PM 11:28AM 11:39AM 11:52AM 12:12PM 12:18PM 12:29PM 12:37PM 11:58AM 12:09PM 12:22PM 12:42PM 12:48PM 12:59PM 01:07PM 12:28PM 12:39PM 12:52PM 01:12PM 01:18PM 01:29PM 01:37PM 12:58PM 01:09PM 01:22PM 01:42PM 01:48PM 01:59PM 02:07PM 01:28PM 01:39PM 01:52PM 02:12PM 02:18PM 02:29PM 02:37PM 01:58PM 02:09PM 02:22PM 02:42PM 02:48PM 02:59PM 03:07PM 02:28PM 02:39PM 02:52PM 03:14PM 03:21 PM 03:33PM 03:41PM 02:59PM 03:11PM 03:25PM 03:47PM 03:54PM 04:06PM 04:14PM 03:29PM 03:41PM 03:55PM 04:17PM 04:24PM 04:36PM 04:44PM 03:59PM 04:11PM 04:25PM 04:47PM 04:54PM 05:06PM 05:14PM 04:29PM 04:41PM 04:55PM 05:17PM 05:24PM 05:36PM 05:44PM 05:OOPM 05:12PM 05:26PM 05:47PM 05:54PM 06:06PM 06:13PM 05:30PNI 05:42PM 05:56PM 06:17PM 06:23PM 06:33PM 06:40PM 06:02PNI 06:12PM 06:24PM 06:41PM 06:47PM 06:57PM 07:04PM 06:29PM 06:39PM 06:51PM 07:08PM 07:14PM 07:24PM 07:31PM http://www.miamidade.goy/transit/routes_schedule.asp?R1=WEEKDAY &R2=Northbound... 4/9/2013 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 2 of 2 06:59PM 07:09PM 07:21PM 07:38PM 07:44PM 07:54PM 08:01 PM 07:29PM 07:39PM 07:51PM 08:08PM 08:14PM 08:24PM 08:31PM 07:59PM 08:09PM 08:21PM 08:38PM 08:44PM 08:54PM 09:01 PM 08:29PM 08:39PM 08:51PM 09:08PM 09:12PM 09:21PM 09:27PM 09:01 PM 09:09PM 09:19PM 09:32PM 09:36PM 09:45PM 09:51PM 09:26PM 09:34PM 09:44PM 09:57PM 10:01 PM 10:10PM 10:16PM 10:16PM 10:24PM 10:34PM 10:47PM 10:51 PM 11:OOPM 11:06PM 11:46PM 11:54PM 12:04AM 12:17AM 12:21AM 12:30AM 12:36AM Back to previous page (javascript: history.go(-1) ) Page Last Edited: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:29:39 AM fhttp.//www.centerdiaitalaov.com/survev/88/2012 ) BEST OF THE WEB v. http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/routes_schedule.asp?R 1 =W EEKDA Y &R2=N orthbound... 4/9/2013 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 1 of 2 Miami -Dade County Miami -Dade Transit Routes Schedule Schedule Back to previous paoe (lavascript: history.po(-1) ) Service: WEEKDAY Direction: SOUTHBOUND NE 185 St 163 Street NE 135 St NE 125 St NE 2 Ave NE 36 St A Arsht & 18 Ave Mali & 12 Ave & 6 Ave & 79 St & 2 Ave Mover/Bus Terminal 04:48AM 04:57AM 05:06AM 05:11 AM 05:24AM 05:33AM 05:41AM 05:24AM 05:33AM 05:42AM 05:47AM 06:02AM 06:13AM 06:23AM 06:03AM 06:13AM 06:23AM 06:30AM 06:45AM 06:56AM 07:07AM 06:26AM 06:36AM 06:46AM 06:53AM 07:13AM 07:26AM 07:37AM 06:53AM 07:04AM 07:15AM 07:23AM 07:43AM 07:56AM 08:07AM 07:23AM 07:34AM 07:45AM 07:53AM 08:13AM 08:26AM 08:37AM 07:53AM 08:04AM 08:15AM 08:23AM 08:43AM 08:56AM 09:07AM 08:25AM 08:36AM 08:47AM 08:55AM 09:15AM 09:28AM 09:39AM 08:57AM 09:08AM 09:19AM 09:26AM 09:45AM 09:58AM 10:09AM 09:28AM 09:38AM 09:49AM 09:56AM 10:15AM 10:28AM 10:39AM 09:58AM 10:08AM 10:19AM 10:26AM 10:45AM 10:58AM 11:09AM 10:28AM 10:38AM 10:49AM 10:56AM 11:15AM 11:28AM 11:39AM 10:58AM 11:08AM 11:19AM 11:26AM 11:45AM 11:58AM 12:09PM 11:28AM 11:38AM 11:49AM 11:56AM 12:15PM 12:28PM 12:39PM 11:58AM 12:08PM 12:19PM 12:26PM 12:45PM 12:58PM 01:09PM 12:28PM 12:38PM 12:49PM 12:56PM 01:15PM 01:28PM 01:39PM 12:58PM 01:08PM 01:19PM 01:26PM 01:45PM 01:58PM 02:09PM 01:28PM 01:38PM 01:49PM 01:56PM 02:15PM 02:28PM 02:39PM 01:57PM 02:07PM 02:18PM 02:25PM 02:44PM 02:57PM 03:O8PM 02:27PM 02:37PM 02:48PM 02:55PM 03:14PM 03:27PM 03:38PM 02:54PM 03:05PM 03:17PM 03:25PM 03:44PM 03:57PM 04:08PM 03:24PM 03:35PM 03:47PM 03:55PM 04:14PM 04:27PM 04:38PM 03:54PM 04:05PM 04:17PM 04:25PM 04:44PM 04:57PM 05:08PM 04:24PM 04:35PM 04:47PM 04:55PM 05:14PM 05:27PM 05:38PM 04:57PM 05:08PM 05:20PM 05:28PM 05:47PM 06:OOPM 06:09PM 05:32PM 05:43PM 05:55PM 06:03PM 06:19PM 06:30PM 06:39PM http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/routes_ schedule.asp?R 1 =WEEKDAY&R2=Southbound... 4/9/2013 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 2 of 2 06:06PM 06:16PM 06:26PM 06:33PM 06:49PM 07:OOPM 07:09PM 06:36PM 06:46PM 06:56PM 07:03PM 07:19PM 07:30PM 07:39PM 07:06PM 07:16PM 07:26PM 07:33PM 07:49PM 08:OOPM 08:09PM 07:36PM 07:46PM 07:56PM 08:03PM 08:19PM 08:30PM 08:39PM 08:09PM 08:19PM 08:29PM 08:36PM 08:52PM 09:03PM 09:11PM 09:09PM 09:18PM 09:27PM 09:32PM 09:45PM 09:54PM 10:02PM 10:33PM 10:42PM 10:51PM 10:56PM 11:09PM 11:18PM 11:26PM Back to previous page (iavascript: history.qo(-1)) Page Last Edited: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:29:39 AM (httpl/www.centerdiqitalqoy.com/suryey/88/2012) BEST OP THE WEB http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/routes_schedule .asp?R 1 =WEEKDAY &R2=Southbound... 4/9/2013 ROUTE 202 Route 202 Little Haiti Connection z a �1 1 -4- 1 z1 1 NW83St Q' ,.E,.,.-----,. ; Biscayne L >Shopping ■ NE81 St Plazaz 1 1 m o1 Q 1 NW 81 Stz 21 `c 1 1 w zl NE 79 St zl fIl .�' NW 79 St I..o..N--m..nn.me...BNBNB.o.�.n.n.m.n.n..nmum :;.85 st I Q z1 1`c 1 1 z 1 I� munonNit co NW 83 St WEEKDAY MIDDAY TO BISCAYNE PLAZA 1 NW 83 St - - - Village Carver NW/NE 71 St NW/NE 62 St Edison Middle School NW/NE 54 St Douglas Gardens Post Office NE 39 St _± E Miami Design Center 2 WEEKDAY MIDDAY TO NE 36 ST WEEKDAY MIDDAY ONLY III Saba! Palm al N W IZ i NORTH MAP NOT TO SCALE 012011 z NE 36 St Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 1 of 2 Miami -Dade County Miami -Dade Transit Routes Schedule Schedule Back to previous page (iavascript: history.go(-1) ) Service: WEEKDAY Direction: NORTHBOUND North NE 54 St NE 62 St NW 71 St NW 85 St NW 83 St NE 80 St Miami Ave & 2 Ave & 2 Ave & NW 2 Ave Rd & 5 & NW 5 Ave & 5 Ave & 38 St Ave 08:30AM 08:34AM 08:42AM 08:49AM 08:56AM 08:57AM 09:05AM 09:30AM 09:34AM 09:42AM 09:48AM 09:55AM 09:56AM 10:04AM 10:15AM 10:19AM 10:27AM 10:33AM 10:40AM 10:41 AM 10:49AM 11:OOAM 11:04AM 11:12AM 11:18AM 11:25AM 11:26AM 11:34AM 11:45AM 11:49AM 11:57AM 12:03PM 12:10PM 12:11PM 12:19PM 12:30PM 12:34PM 12:42PM 12:48PM 12:55PM 12:56PM 01:04PM 01:15PM 01:19PM 01:27PM 01:33PM 01:40PM 01:41PM 01:49PM 02:OOPM 02:04PM 02:12PM 02:18PM 02:25PM 02:26PM 02:34PM 02:45PM 02:49PM 02:57PM 03:04PM 03:11PM 03:40PM 03:44PM 03:52PM 03:59PM 04:06PM 04:45PM 04:49PM 04:57PM 05:04PM 05:11PM 05:46PM 05:50PM 05:58PM 06:05PM 06:12PM Back to previous page ((avascript: history.go(-1) ) Page Last Edited: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:29:39 AM (http://www.centerdiqitalqov.com/survey/88/2012) HEST OF THE WEB http://www.miamidade.gov/transit/routes schedule.asp?R1=WEEKDAY&R2=Northbound... 4/9/2013 Miami -Dade County - Miami -Dade Transit - Routes Schedule Page 1 of 2 Miami -Dade County Miami -Dade Transit Routes Schedule Schedule Back to previous page (lavascript: history.go(-1) ) Service: WEEKDAY Direction: SOUTHBOUND NE 80 St NW 83 St NW 85 St NW 71 St NE 62 St NE 54 St North & 5 Ave & NW 5 Ave Rd & 5 & NW 2 Ave & 2 Ave & 2 Ave Miami Ave Ave & 38 St 07:56AM 08:05AM 08:11AM 08:19AM 08:24AM 08:56AM 09:05AM 09:11AM 09:18AM 09:23AM 09:30AM 09:40AM 09:42AM 09:50AM 09:56AM 10:03AM 10:08AM 10:15AM 10:25AM 10:27AM 10:35AM 10:41AM 10:48AM 10:53AM 11:OOAM 11:10AM 11:12AM 11:20AM 11:26AM 11:33AM 11:38AM 11:45AM 11:55AM 11:57AM 12:05PM 12:11PM 12:18PM 12:23PM 12:30PM 12:40PM 12:42PM 12:50PM 12:56PM 01:03PM 01:08PM 01:15PM 01:25PM 01:27PM 01:35PM 01:41PM 01:48PM 01:53PM 02:OOPM 02:10PM 02:12PM 02:20PM 02:26PM 02:33PM 02:38PM 02:50PM 03:01 PM 03:03PM 03:12PM 03:19PM 03:26PM 03:31PM 04:06PM 04:15PM 04:22PM 04:29PM 04:34PM 05:11PM 05:20PM 05:27PM 05:34PM 05:39PM Back to previous page (javascript: history.qo(-1)) Page Last Edited: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:29:39 AM (http://www.centerdigitalgov.com/survey/88/2012 ) w41.01,0113 HEST OF THE WEB http://www. miami dade.gov/transit/routes_schedule.asp?R 1=WEEKDAY &R2=Southbound... 4/9/2013 Ridership Data NE 2nd Avenue Route_Pat ROUTE 1117711 DIPESTIaN 77:177747 TINEPERTaD TINE PEF191 342STOF ASTOR AN144STP AOFF 9 , 9 0 SC4171111.911111, 014 Pea k .70 102 NE 2 .1,3, NE 37 ST 9 o SOUTHEND 91C AM Peak 111 PeaE PO 108 nE 2 11.2., NE 27 ST 1.1 18.4 9 0 9 o SOUTFEESMND ,-,20 2174 Peak AM Peak 10.8 NE 2 ...7 NE 37 ST .0 1.8 13.1 9 9 o SOUTEESNNE AM Peak 491 Peak 90 8.0 7.5 9 9 o SOUTHESUND G87 Al Pea',, 1,1 Ppak 103 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST .G 9 9 9 o :aoUTHE,C,I.ID .91,1 Peak .344 Pea k 39 .1 1.8 13.9 9 9 9 0 soummoom 703 AM Peak AM Peak 90 103 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST 3 1.2 13.7 9 9 9 0 SOUTHBOUND 722 AM Peak AM Peak 90 103 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST 2.1 14.3 9 9 9 0 souTHBouND 727 AM Peak AM Peak 90 103 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST 1.6 2.4 23.9 9 9 9 0 SODTHBOUND 739 AM Peak AM Peak 90 103 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST .5 1.5 19.2 9 9 9 0 SOUTHBOUND 753 AM Peak AM Peak 90 103NE 2 AV NE 37 ST 1.2 2.9 41.9 9 9 9 0 SOUTHBOUND 820 AM Peak AM Peak 90 103 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST .1 .9 8.4 9 9 9 o SOUTHBOUND 850 AM Peak AM Peak 90 10300 2 AV NE 37 ST .1 1.1 10.5 9 9 9 a ir,PTHBOUND G10 AM Peak 1111 Peak 71 3637 5.0 9 9 9 a NORTH:33,17, 9.30 7711 7.7 Peak 81 2-2 NE 2 A,' APPPON 9 9 a 1.51,370EUND 942 AM PeaE AM Peak 71 1.7 7712.2 9 9 9 1 NORTHE-EUND 354 Ar Peak AM PeaE 91 23 NE 2 A23 APPRON e 8.0 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 708 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 3.0 11.8 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 720 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.1 1.5 14.7 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 732 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 :8 9.1 9 a 9 1 NORTABOUND 744 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.4 .6 11.3 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 756 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 .5 .8 5.6 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 808 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.9 .9 14.6 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 820 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 .6 7.0 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 832 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.2 .1 7.2 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 844 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.2 .5 10.1 9 9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 856 AM Peak AM Peak 91 23 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.0 .6 9.0 Route_Pat ROUTE R,1TE AAI71G1TN DIRECTICN TRIPTIM TINE REF=L 7444TOP ASTOPANAMSTP ACN ASEE 10 40 10 , !11711T17ElOT_:1:7 :::5, AM Peal: 711 ReaR r:,, 1.4 10 ao lc, a NERTNE7UNE G57 AM Peak AM -.5,1., 71 .4 10 10 10 1 NORTHBOUND 728 AM Peak AM Peak 91 13 NE 2 AV APPROX * 3699 2.3 .1 7.9 10 10 10 1 NORTHBOUND 758 AM Peak AM Peak 91 13 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 .6 .0 7.9 10 10 10 1 NORTHBOUND 828 AM Peak AM Peak 91 13 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.7 .2 8.4 10 10 10 1 NORTHBOUND 858 AM Peak AM Peak 91 13 NE 2 AV APPROX # 3699 1.6 8.2 10 10 10 0 SOUTRBWND ,:.: E AM Peak AM Peak 90 10 113 10 0 .3.531JT1E,7111111 .7924 72,1 Peak ,,,,1 peek 70 10 ao 10 SOUTEREUND 653 AN PeaR AM Peak 10 10 10 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 723 AM Peak AM Peak 90 10 10 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 753 AM Peak AM Peak 90 10 10 10 0 SOUTRBOUND 825 AM Peak AM Peak 90 10 10 10 SOMEBOUND 857 AM Peak AM Peak 90 Route_Pat ROUTE 11,OUTE AATIRSTN DIRECTIN11 TR1PTIME 'TIME PERISD_ 202 202 202 1 NORTHBOUND 830 AM Peak AM Peak 6799 202 202 202 SOUTHBOUND 756 AM Peak AM Peak 6770 202 202 202 SOUTHBOUND 856 AM Peak AM Peak 6770 97 NE 2 A,' NE 37 ST 87 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST 87 NE 2 AV NM 37 ST 87 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST 87 NE 2 AV NE 37 ST AZTOP 4,111.1411TP 1.2 5 NE 2 AV NE 44 ST 2.5 46 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST 46 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST 2.2 1.6 3.7 1.9 3.3 ASFE .0 19-7 16.9 15.5 20.9 13.9 12.3 3.5 .0 .0 1.5 .0 2.3 NE 2nd Ave ROUTE AADRCTN DIRECTION TRIPTIME'IME PERIOD:ME PERIOD AQSTOP ASTOP ANAMSTP AON AOFF ALOAD 202 0 SOUTHBOUND 1606 PM Peak PM Peak 6770 46 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST .0 .0 1.3 202 0 SOUTHBOUND 1711 PM Peak PM Peak 6770 46 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST .0 .0 1.4 202 1 NORTHBOUND 930 Midday Midday 6797 3 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .0 .0 2.0 202 1 NORTHBOUND 1540 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 3 NE 2 AV HE 40 ST 2.0 .0 5.0 202 1 NORTHBOUND 1645 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 3 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .0 .0 2.0 202 1 NORTHBOUND 1746 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 3 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST 1.0 .0 3.0 ROUTE AADRCTN DIRECTION TRIPTIN.E'IME PERIOD:ME PERIOD AQSTOP AST0?ANAMST? AON AOFF ALOAD 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1548 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .1. .0 14.4 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1600 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .6 .0 17.9 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1612 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .2 .0 24.8 9. 1 NORTHBOUND 1626 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .0 .1 14.0 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1636 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .2 .0 17.2 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1648 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .5 .1 24.5 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1700 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .4 .0 14.8 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1712 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .1 .0 17.1 9. 1 NORTHBOUND 1724 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .2 .2 21.5 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1736 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .1 .3 13.8 9 1 NORTHBOUND 1748 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 24 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .4 .1 21.0 ROUTE AADRCTN DIRECTION TRIPTI`Y 'IM6 PERIOD MPER70D AQSTOP ?;TOP ANAMSTP AON AOFF ALOAD 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 1524 PM Peak. PM Peak 6770 86 NE 2 AV NE 39 a_ .2 8.1 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 1554 PM Peak PM Peak 6770 86 NE 2 _d NE 39 ST .4 .1 10.6 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 1624 PM Peak PM Peak 6770 86 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST .2 .1 7.3 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 1657 PM Peak PM Peak 6770 86 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST .3 .2 13.4 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 1732 PM Peak PM Peak 6770 86 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST .1 .0 7.6 10 0 SOUTHBOUND 1806"' Evening Evening 6770 86 NE 2 AV NE 39 ST .6 .1 12.1 ROUTE AADRCTN DIRECTION TRIPTINE'IME :ERIOD-ME PERIOD AQSTOP ASTOP ANAMSTP 7,ON AOFF ALOAD 10 1 NORTHBOUND 1529 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 14 NE 2 AV NE. 40 0_ 2.0 .1 15.3 10 1 NORTHBOUND 1559 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 14 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .6 .0 12.0 10 1 NORTHBOUND 1629 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 14 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .3 .1 19.8 10 1 NORTHBOUND 1700 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 14 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .2 .0 16.8 10 1 NORTHBOUND 1730 PM Peak PM Peak 6797 14 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .2 .1 17.0 10 1 NORTHBOUND 1802 Evening Evening 6797 14 NE 2 AV NE 40 ST .1 . _ 8.9 APPENDIX E: Existing Conditions Analysis AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 TWSC 1: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 1 7 0 3 2 7 161 0 1 387 3 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 5 0 2 2 0 5 2 0 7 7 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 8 0 4 2 8 192 0 1 461 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 686 683 475 688 685 204 469 0 0 197 0 0 Stage1 470 470 213 213 - Stage 2 216 213 - 475 472 - - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 362 372 590 360 371 837 1093 - 1376 Stage 1 574 560 - 789 726 - - Stage 2 786 726 - 570 559 Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 352 366 584 348 365 829 1087 - 1368 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 352 366 - 348 365 Stage 1 567 557 779 717 Stage 2 769 717 557 556 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 12.2 B WB 12.8 B NB 0.3 Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1087 - 513 470 1368 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - 0.021 0.013 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.337 0 - 12.2 12.8 7.634 0 HCM Lane LOS A A BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.023 0.064 0.038 0.003 Notes SB 0 : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 2: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street/NE 4th Avenue Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 5 0 13 2 0 2 11 162 5 2 379 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 2 2 0 1 3 0 3 3 0 3 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length - - 150 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 0 15 2 0 2 13 188 6 2 441 16 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 675 677 454 682 683 196 459 0 0 196 0 0 Stage 1 455 455 219 219 - Stage 2 220 222 463 464 - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 368 375 606 364 372 845 1102 - 1377 - Stage 1 585 569 - 783 722 - - Stage 2 782 720 579 564 - Time blocked -Platoon, % - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 362 369 603 350 366 841 1099 - 1374 - Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 362 369 350 366 - Stage 1 577 567 - 772 712 - Stage 2 769 710 562 562 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 12.4 B WB 12.4 B NB 0.5 Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1099 - 509 494 1374 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 0.041 0.009 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.314 12.4 12.4 7.625 0 HCM Lane LOS A BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.035 0.128 0.029 0.005 Notes SB 0 : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn Timings 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Existing AM Peak Hour Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4 4i Volume (vph) 13 34 61 9 11 159 75 353 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street p2 (R) 4--- p4 45s 1 45s 1 { 1 I p6 (R) "--1138 45 s i 45 s i K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street Existing AM Peak Hour f 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4* 4 M. Volume (veh/h) 13 34 8 61 9 89 11 159 12 75 353 19 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.97 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 245 367 69 330 77 242 181 591 42 327 1024 53 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 185 1297 243 404 271 854 43 1635 117 337 2833 148 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 64 0 0 188 0 0 214 0 0 278 0 247 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1725 0 0 1530 0 0 1795 0 0 1655 0 1664 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.6 Prop In Lane 0.23 0.14 0.38 0.56 0.06 0.07 0.32 0.09 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 681 0 0 649 0 0 814 0 0 804 0 601 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3104 0 0 2836 0 0 3268 0 0 3009 0 2956 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 5.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 7.6 Lane Grp LOS A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 64 188 214 525 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 6.8 6.1 7.1 Approach LOS A A A A Timer Assigned Phs 8 4 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.7 10.7 12.3 12.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.8 40.8 41.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 4.1 3.9 4.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.8 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn Timings 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street `\ t L* 1 "� Lane Group EBL EBR2 NBL NBT SBL2 SBT NWL2 NWL Lane Configurations aN r 4 41 ) V Volume (vph) 9 24 16 275 6 350 43 84 Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 7 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 2 2 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.6 22.6 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.6 22.6 Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 31.0 31,0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 25.6% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 34.4% 34.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Existing AM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated nd Phases: 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street 1 02 (R) � \0 7 ¢� 36 s I 1 t ts6 �) 36 s I 1�15 i 23 s i K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street Existing AM Peak Hour rLI( f"‘ 41.\ Movement EBL2 EBL EBR2 NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR NWL2 NWL NWR Lane Configurations ti ri 4 41, 1 'tYr Volume (vph) 70 9 24 16 275 1 6 350 74 43 84 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4,8 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 1594 1545 1857 3445 1750 1684 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 1594 1545 1791 3278 1750 1684 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 11 29 20 335 1 7 427 90 52 102 55 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 96 3 0 356 0 0 512 0 52 157 0 Confl, Peds. (#/hr) 20 13 7 13 13 7 20 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.4 9.4 53.0 53.0 13.6 13.6 Effective Green, g (s) 9.4 9.4 53.0 53.0 13.6 13.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.59 0.59 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 166 161 1054 1930 264 254 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.00 c0.20 0.16 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.02 0.34 0.27 0.20 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 38.4 36.2 9.5 9.0 33.4 35.8 Progression Factor 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.9 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.3 3.8 Delay (s) 35.4 36.2 10.4 9.3 33.7 39.6 Level of Service D D B A C D Approach Delay (s) 35.6 10.4 9.3 38.1 Approach LOS D B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn Timings 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street C k- -\ t Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r ►j 11 Ti Volume (vph) 377 79 219 51 642 450 1381 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 29.6 29.6 29.6 24.0 24.0 11.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 72.0 72.0 41.0 113.0 Total Split (%) 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% 45.0% 45.0% 25.6% 70.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Existing AM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 57 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street 1 oz IR) _ 411ro4 113 s I 47 s {' 05 I o6 (R) 41s I 72s K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street Existing AM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations "►S 4 r ) +I '1 + Volume (vph) 0 0 0 377 79 219 51 642 591 450 1381 28 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1713 1542 1769 3226 1770 3528 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.06 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1713 1542 328 3226 105 3528 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 397 83 231 54 676 622 474 1454 29 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 187 0 105 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 238 242 44 54 1194 0 474 1482 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 1 4 4 1 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 30.7 30.7 30.7 65.0 65.0 116.7 116.7 Effective Green, g (s) 30.7 30.7 30.7 65.0 65.0 116.7 116.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.41 0.41 0.73 0.73 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 322 328 295 133 1310 552 2573 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.14 c0.37 c0.25 0.42 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.16 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.15 0.41 0.91 0.86 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 60.9 60.9 53.8 33.8 44.8 47.0 10.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.9 8,7 0.3 9.0 11.0 12.1 0.9 Delay (s) 69.7 69.5 54.1 42.7 55.8 59.2 11.1 Level of Service EEDD E E B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 64.6 55.3 22.7 Approach LOS A E E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 41.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn Timings 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Existing AM Peak Hour 4- Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations + + ft N 1+ 'i T g N r i' Volume (vph) 25 114 385 221 105 137 48 227 77 51 215 98 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split NA Split NA Prot NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 41 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 35.5 35.5 31.2 31.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 30.8 30.8 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 68.0 53.0 36.0 36.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 9.4% 9.4% 42.5% 33.1 % 22.5% 22.5% 19.4% 19.4% 19.4% 15.6% 15.6% Yellow Time (s) 3,0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min None None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 100 (63%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highwa 01 { s.#03 �25s 4 p5 �1- � 02 (R) 15s I 53s I 31s I 1 36s I I -111'06 (R) 9 68 s l K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Existing AM Peak Hour Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations Ti 'Pi► I li Volume (vph) 25 114 385 169 221 44 72 61 105 137 34 48 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1708 3324 3074 1770 1788 1770 Flt Permitted 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 644 3324 3074 1770 1788 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 28 130 438 192 251 50 82 69 119 156 39 55 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 35 0 17 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 158 595 0 366 0 0 0 188 189 0 55 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 28 49 11 28 49 21 28 22 22 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split Split NA Split Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 5 3 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 47.1 47.1 30.9 22.6 22.6 28.4 Effective Green, g (s) 47.1 47.1 30.9 22.6 22.6 28,4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 277 978 593 250 252 314 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.18 0.12 c0.11 0.11 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.61 0.62 0,75 0.75 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 44.3 48.5 59.1 66.0 66,0 55.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 2.8 4.8 11.5 11.0 0.2 Delay (s) 46.1 51.3 63.9 77.5 77.0 56.1 Level of Service D D E E E E Approach Delay (s) 50.3 63.9 77.2 Approach LOS D E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 60.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 30.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Existing AM Peak Hour Movement SBT SBR SBR2 SEL2 SEL SER SER2 Lanelconfigurations t g, aN rr r Volume (vph) 227 77 4 3 51 215 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0,85 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0,88 Adj. Flow (vph) 258 88 5 3 58 244 111 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 76 0 0 0 0 78 Lane Group Flow (vph) 258 17 0 0 61 244 33 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 28 49 22 11 21 Turn Type NA Prot Split NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 28.4 28.4 34.0 34.0 47.2 Effective Green, g (s) 28.4 28.4 34.0 34.0 47.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6,8 6.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 330 280 376 336 466 v/s Ratio Prot c0,14 0.01 0.03 c0.15 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 0.06 0.16 0.73 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 62,8 54.7 51.4 58.7 40.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 11.0 0.1 0.1 7.1 0.0 Delay (s) 73.9 54,8 51.5 65.8 40.7 Level of Service E D D E D Approach Delay (s) 67.1 57.0 Approach LOS E E Intersection Summary K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing AM.syn PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 TWSC 1: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 11 3 11 7 1 6 8 394 3 3 256 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 0 6 6 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 8 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 3 12 8 1 7 9 433 3 3 281 9 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 762 760 301 766 763 450 297 0 0 443 0 0 Stage 1 299 299 - 459 459 - - Stage 2 463 461 - 307 304 - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3,318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 322 336 739 320 334 609 1264 - 1117 Stage 1 710 666 582 566 Stage 2 579 565 703 663 Time blocked -Platoon, % - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 311 328 730 306 326 601 1256 - 1110 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 311 328 - 306 326 - Stage 1 700 660 573 558 Stage 2 563 557 681 657 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 14.2 14.6 0.2 0.1 B B Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1256 - 420 390 1110 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.065 0.039 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.886 0 14.2 14.6 8.253 0 HCM Lane LOS A A BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.021 0.209 0.123 0.009 Notes : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 2: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street/NE 4th Avenue Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 12 0 9 14 3 1 20 410 12 7 255 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 16 0 9 9 0 16 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - - None - None Storage Length 150 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 13 0 10 15 3 1 22 451 13 8 280 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 811 816 305 814 815 476 295 0 0 467 0 0 Stage 1 305 305 504 504 Stage 2 506 511 - 310 311 - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 298 311 735 297 312 589 1266 - 1094 Stage 1 705 662 550 541 Stage 2 549 537 700 658 Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 284 301 723 282 302 580 1249 - - 1079 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 284 301 282 302 - Stage 1 691 654 539 530 - Stage 2 528 526 - 675 650 - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15 18.1 0.4 0.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1249 - 384 294 1079 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - 0.06 0.067 0.007 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.934 - 15 18,1 8.36 0 HCM Lane LOS A C C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.054 - 0.191 0.215 0.022 - Notes : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn Timings 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street Existing PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 4 4 41+ Volume (vph) 12 29 57 108 9 275 35 258 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 70 (78%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street ;1 02 (R) 41- 04 36s I 54s to6 (R) '008 36 s i 54 s i K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street Existing PM Peak Hour 1r it/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 41+ Volume (veh/h) 12 29 18 57 108 148 9 275 19 35 258 23 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 209 345 167 222 226 257 148 599 40 226 1045 88 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 134 1038 502 181 680 773 19 1691 112 169 2948 249 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 60 0 0 319 0 0 309 0 0 171 0 151 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1673 0 0 1634 0 0 1822 0 0 1731 0 1636 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.7 Prop In Lane 0.20 0.30 0.18 0.47 0.03 0.06 0.21 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 722 0 0 706 0 0 787 0 0 780 0 580 V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3162 0 0 3205 0 0 2343 0 0 2166 0 1997 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1,4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.6 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 7.1 Lane Grp LOS A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 60 319 309 322 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.1 7.4 8.0 6.9 Approach LOS A A A A Timer Assigned Phs 8 4 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.9 12.9 13.3 13.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 49.8 49.8 32.0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 6.1 5.4 3.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.4 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn Timings 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street Ni t kAf Lane Group EBL EBR2 NBL NBT SBL2 SBT NWL2 NWL Lane Configurations N r 4 4 "I ¥ Volume (vph) 9 16 44 485 3 227 44 171 Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 7 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 2 2 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.6 22.6 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.6 22.6 Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 18.9% 41.1 % 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Existing PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 78 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street !1o2OR) 411.\)0I p9 37 s I 1 } I P6 (R) 37 s 1367 I 17 s K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street Existing PM Peak Hour Movement EBL2 EBL EBR2 NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR NWL2 NWL NWR Lane Configurations Z r 41* 'I V Volume (vph) 50 9 16 44 485 3 3 227 100 44 171 33 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0,95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1717 1559 1853 3377 1764 1735 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1717 1559 1759 3217 1764 1735 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0,94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 53 10 17 47 516 3 3 241 106 47 182 35 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 63 2 0 566 0 0 314 0 47 217 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 4 2 4 4 2 6 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 8.3 51.5 51.5 16.2 16.2 Effective Green, g (s) 8.3 8.3 51.5 51.5 16.2 16.2 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.57 0.57 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 143 1006 1840 317 312 vls Ratio Prot c0.13 vls Ratio Perm 0.04 0.00 c0.32 0,10 0,03 vlc Ratio 0.40 0.01 0.56 0.17 0.15 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 38.5 37.1 12.1 9.1 31.1 34.6 Progression Factor 0.97 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.86 0.86 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.1 5.2 Delay (s) 38.5 37.1 11.0 9.3 26,8 35.1 Level of Service D D B A C D Approach Delay (s) 38.2 11.0 9.3 33.6 Approach LOS D B A C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn Timings 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street 4' 4\ t �► 1 Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 'I 4 r 441+ Volume (vph) 426 134 384 38 1245 329 908 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 29.6 29.6 29.6 24.0 24.0 11.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 107.0 107.0 31.0 138.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 59.4% 59.4% 17.2% 76.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Existing PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 146 (81%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street ' p2 (R) V 34 138 s 1 142 s p5 Ip6CR) 31s 1 107s I 11 K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street Existing PM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 4 r ) fi 'i 'h'F+ Volume (vph) 0 0 0 426 134 384 38 1245 432 329 908 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1724 1583 1770 3368 1770 3508 Fit Permitted 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.04 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1724 1583 542 3368 70 3508 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 435 137 392 39 1270 441 336 927 58 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 19 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 283 289 183 39 1692 0 336 983 0 Conti. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 34.1 34.1 34.1 101.0 101.0 133.3 133.3 Effective Green, g (s) 34.1 34.1 34.1 101.0 101.0 133.3 133.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0,19 0.19 0.19 0.56 0.56 0.74 0.74 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 318 326 299 304 1889 300 2597 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.17 0.50 c0.16 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.07 c0.67 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.89 0.61 0.13 0.90 1.12 0.38 Uniform Delay, d1 71.1 71.1 66.9 18.7 34.8 66.7 8.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 25.1 24.2 3.9 0.9 7.1 88.3 0.4 Delay (s) 96.3 95.3 70.7 19.6 41.9 154.9 8.8 Level of Service F F EBD F A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 85.6 41.4 46.0 Approach LOS A F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.5 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 180.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service D 18.6 F K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn Timings 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Existing PM Peak Hour 3* ' t �. 1 d �► \ Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR SEL SER Lane Configurations 1t Tl+ N 1 1 T a N r Volume (vph) 59 129 540 1 428 201 319 48 129 96 84 132 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm NA Split NA Split NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 Detector Phase 1 1 6 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 35.5 35.5 35.5 31.2 31.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 30.8 30.8 Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 80.0 57.0 57.0 39.0 39.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 12.8% 12.8% 44.4% 31.7% 31.7% 21.7% 21.7% 15.6% 15.6% 15.6% 18.3% 18,3% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 26 (14%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highwa pl 4 p3 4 1 o5 4- ' p2 (R) 23s [ 57s I 28s 1 33s 1 39s 11 '�o6 (R) V 80 s l K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn Timings 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Existing PM Peak Hour 411 Lane Group SER2 Lanej"Oonfigurations r Volume (vph) 113 Turn Type pt+ov Protected Phases 4 1 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Intersection Summary K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Existing PM Peak Hour 3 ., -+ 'N, c .0- 4\ 'i t P Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations ° ft. N '�r Volume (vph) 59 129 540 90 1 428 32 36 165 201 319 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.97 1,00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.98 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1753 3390 3361 1770 1799 Fit Permitted 0.20 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 369 3390 3206 1770 1799 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 63 139 581 97 1 460 34 39 177 216 343 77 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 202 670 0 0 531 0 0 0 393 417 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 42 39 39 20 42 44 20 12 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm NA Split Split NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 5 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 56.2 56.2 35.1 55.0 55.0 Effective Green, g (s) 56.2 56.2 35.1 55.0 55.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0,20 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 254 1058 625 540 549 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.20 0.22 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.63 0.85 0.73 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 49.8 53.1 69.9 55.8 56.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.7 2.9 13.5 4.6 5.7 Delay (s) 64.5 55.9 83.4 60.4 62.2 Level of Service E E F E E Approach Delay (s) 57.9 83.4 61.3 Approach LOS E F E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 72.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 180.0 Sum of lost time (s) 30.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 123.2% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Existing PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Existing PM Peak Hour Movement SBL SBT SBR SEL2 SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations 1 T g N r ri Volume (vph) 48 129 96 1 84 132 113 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.4 6,4 6.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 52 139 103 1 90 142 122 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 Lane Group Flow (vph) 52 139 103 0 91 142 28 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 44 42 12 39 44 Turn Type Split NA Prot Split NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 22.7 22.7 40.8 Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 22.7 22.7 40.8 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 178 188 160 223 199 358 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.07 0.07 0.05 c0.09 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.29 0.74 0.64 0.41 0.71 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 74.9 78.6 77.8 72.5 75.5 54.8 Progression Factor 0.96 0.95 0.95 1,10 1.09 2.59 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 13.3 7.6 0.9 10.7 0.1 Delay (s) 72.7 88.3 81.8 80.3 92.9 142.0 Level of Service E F F F F F Approach Delay (s) 83.3 106.6 Approach LOS F F Intersection Summary K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\SynchrolExisting PM.syn APPENDIX F: Growth Trend Analysis Historic FDOT Count Station Growth Calculations Growth Rate Calculations from 5-year and 10-year Historical Data Station Number Location Historical Growth 5-year Linear 5-year Exponential 10-year Linear 10-year Exponential 5059 SR 5/US Highway 1 North of NE 36th Street 8.31% 0 7.44% 0 0.84% 0 0.81% 0143 SR 5/US Highway 1 South of NE 36th Street 4.02% 3.80% -2.13% -2.34% Total 6.17% 5.62% -0.65% -0.77% K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Growth \Historical\Growth Rate Comparison.xls 70000 60000 T fB 30000 1l0000 50000 T 0 1000 L 10000 0 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' South of NE 36th Street County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 143 SR5/USHwy 1 Observed Count -Fitted Curve 2009 2014 2019 2024 Year 2026 2031 ** Annual Trend Increase: 1,15C Trend R-squared: 31.0% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 4.02% Trend Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): 3.49% Printed: 20-Aug-14 Straight Line Growth Option 2036 Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2009 31000 28600 2010 29000 29800 2011 28500 30900 2012 29500 32100 2013 36500 33200 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 36700 2 17 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 37800 2018 Design Year Trend 2018 N/A 39000 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends "Axle -Adjusted 50000 45000 0000 115000 .0000 g5000 1D000 45000 co L 'i0000 5000 0 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' South of NE 36th Street County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 143 SR 5 / US Hwy 1 oObserved Count Fitted Curve 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2031 2036 Year **Annual Trend Increase: -782 Trend R-squared: 23.5% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: -2.13% Trend Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): -2.64% Printed: 20-Aug-14 Straight Line Growth Option Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2004 38000 36500 2005 43500 35700 2006 29500 35000 2007 33000 34200 2008 31500 33400 2009 31000 32600 2010 29000 31800 2011 28500 31000 2012 29500 30300 2013 36500 29500 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 27100 2017 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 26400 2018 Design Year Trend 2018 N/A 25600 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted 80000 70000 > &0000 y N li0000 g0000 t000 a) F0000 10000 0 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' South of NE 36th Street =Observed Count Fitted Curve County: Station #: Highway: 2009 2014 2019 2024 2024 2031 2036 Year Trend R-squared: 29.3% Compounded Annual Historic Growth Rate: 3.80% Compounded Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): 3.33% Printed: 20-Aug-14 Exponential Growth Option Miami -Dade 143 SR5/USHwy 1 Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2009 31000 28700 2010 29000 29700 2011 28500 30800 2012 29500 31800 2013 36500 33000 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 36500 2 17 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 37800 2018 Design Year Trend 2018 N/A 39100 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted 50000 45000 0000 0 15000 -50000 g5000 13000 co g000 0000 5000 0 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' South of NE 36th Street County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 143 SR 5 / US Hwy 1 Observed Count Fitted Curve 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2031 2036 Year Trend R-squared: 23.2% Compounded Annual Historic Growth Rate: -2.34% Compounded Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): -2.12% Printed: 20-Aug-14 Exponential Growth Option Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2004 38000 36100 2005 43500 35300 2006 29500 34600 2007 33000 33800 2008 31500 33100 2009 31000 32300 2010 29000 31600 2011 28500 30900 2012 29500 30300 2013 36500 29600 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 27700 2 17 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 27100 20' 8 Design Yea Trend 2018 N/A 26500 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2013 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 87 - MIAMI-DADE SITE: 0143 - SR 5/US-1, 200' S NE 36 ST YEAR AADT 2013 36500 C 2012 29500 C 2011 28500 C 2010 29000 C 2009 31000 C 2008 31500 C 2007 33000 C 2006 29500 C 2005 43500 C 2004 38000 C 2003 43500 C 2002 46500 C 2001 39500 C 2000 47000 C 1999 40000 C 1998 47000 C DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 19000 S 17500 9.00 52.40 4.60 15000 S 14500 9.00 55.70 10.60 15500 S 13000 9.00 55.10 8.60 14000 S 15000 8.98 54.08 8.60 16000 S 15000 8.99 53.24 2.10 16500 S 15000 9.09 55.75 2.60 17500 S 15500 8.01 54.34 2.70 16000 S 13500 7.97 54.22 2.60 21000 S 22500 8.80 53.80 4.40 21500 S 16500 9.00 53.30 4.40 21500 S 22000 8.80 53.40 6.10 22500 S 24000 9.80 52.30 4.00 19500 S 20000 8.20 53.50 5.50 24000 S 23000 8.20 53.10 3.20 22500 S 17500 9.10 52.70 4.90 24000 S 23000 9.30 52.70 2.50 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; F = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES 120000 100000 5,- as 0 w -0000 .0000 c 0000 ai a < 0000 0 2009 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' North of NE 36th Street o Observed Count Fitted Curve 2014 2019 2024 Year 2021 2026 **Annual Trend Increase: 2,850 Trend R-squared: 75.6% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 8.31 % Trend Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): 6.26% Printed: 20-Aug-14 Straight Line Growth Option 2031 County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 5059 SR 5 / US Hwy 1 Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend 2009 35000 34300 2010 35500 37200 2011 39000 40000 2012 47000 42900 2013 43500 45700 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 54300 2017 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 57100 2018 Design Year Trend 2018 N/A 60000 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends `Axle -Adjusted 60000 50000 > l0000 t a) g0000 m H >' 20000 ai G) a0000 0 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' North of NE 36th Street County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 5059 SR 5 / US Hwy 1 oObserved Count -Fitted Curve 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2026 2031 Year Annual Trend Increase: 309 Trend R-squared: 2.3% Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 0.84% Trend Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): 0.75% Printed: 20-Aug-14 Straight Line Growth Option Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2004 49000 37200 2005 39500 37500 2006 30500 37800 2007 34500 38100 2008 32500 38400 2009 35000 38800 2010 35500 39100 2011 39000 39400 2012 47000 39700 2013 43500 40000 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 40900 2017 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 41200 20 8 Design Yea) Trend 2018 N/A 41500 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted 250000 20000 0 y d 1. 0000 �0000 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' North of NE 36th Street FObserved Count Fitted Curve 2014 2019 2024 Year 2024 2026 Trend R-squared: 78.1 % Compounded Annual Historic Growth Rate: 7.44% Compounded Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): 7.50% Printed: 20-Aug-1 4 Exponential Growth Option 2031 County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 5059 SR 5 / US Hwy 1 Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend** 2009 35000 34400 2010 35500 37000 2011 39000 39700 2012 47000 42700 2013 43500 45800 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 56800 2017 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 61000 2018 Design Yea Trend 2018 N/A 65600 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted 60000 50000 a 10000 g0000 F- 20000 d CS) s- L 0, 40000 0 L TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5 / US Hwy 1 -- 200' North of NE 36th Street Observed Count -Fitted Curve County: Station #: Highway: 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2026 2031 Year Trend R-squared: 32% Compounded Annual Historic Growth Rate: 0.81 % Compounded Growth Rate (2013 to Design Year): 0.84% Printed: 20-Aug-14 Exponential Growth Option Miami -Dade 5059 SR5/USHwy 1 Year Traffic (ADT/AADT) Count* Trend" 2004 49000 36600 2005 39500 36900 2006 30500 37300 2007 34500 37600 2008 32500 38000 2009 35000 38300 2010 35500 38700 2011 39000 39100 2012 47000 39400 2013 43500 39800 2016 Opening Year Trend 2016 N/A 40900 2017 Mid -Year Trend 2017 N/A 41300 20' 8 Design Year Trend 2018 N/A 41700 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2013 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 87 - MIAMI-DADE SITE: 5059 - SR 5/US-1, 200' N NE 36 ST YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 43500 C 47000 C 39000 C 35500 C 35000 C 32500 C 34500 C 30500 C 39500 C 49000 C 45000 C 48000 C 45000 C 48000 C 48000 C 47500 C zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 22000 S 21500 9.00 52.40 5.20 23500 S 23500 9.00 55.70 5.80 20500 S 18500 9.00 55.10 4.50 16500 S 19000 8.98 54.08 4.40 17500 S 17500 8.99 53.24 3.40 16000 S 16500 9.09 55.75 3.70 17500 S 17000 8.01 54.34 3.10 15500 S 15000 7.97 54.22 4.90 21000 S 18500 8.80 53.80 1.80 25000 S 24000 9.00 53.30 6.20 21500 S 23500 8.80 53.40 4.80 23500 S 24500 9.80 52.30 3.40 21000 S 24000 8.20 53.50 5.30 23500 S 24500 8.20 53.10 3.10 25500 S 22500 9.10 52.70 3.10 24000 S 23500 7.70 52.70 2.50 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; F = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES SERPM Model Plots Growth Rate Calculations from 2005 and 2035 SERPM Plots Location Model Volumes (AADT) Growth Rate (%) 2005 2035 Diff NE 2nd Avenue 12,853 30,429 17,576 4.56% 11,539 23,533 11,994 3.46% 9,344 17,718 8,374 2.99% 8,283 16,525 8,242 3.32% N Miami Avenue 22,883 30,918 8,035 1.17% 25,237 38,365 13,128 1.73% 18,643 29,614 10,971 1.96% 17,978 25,836 7,858 1.46% 15,089 25,594 10,505 2.32% NE 36th Street 10,533 16,635 6,102 1.93% 10,519 17,686 7,167 2.27% 17,950 19,679 1,729 0.32% 22,580 30,613 8,033 1.19% Biscayne Blvd 26,854 37,821 10,967 1.36% 32,122 37,817 5,695 0.59% Total 262,407 398,783 136,376 1.73% K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Growth\SERPM\Growth Rate Comparison.xls APPENDIX G: Vested Development Trip Information 35% IN/22 --t. 35% OUT/14 w 0 L m 0 0 0 7 0_ O cn W k 25%/8 1 (lip 30X/10 N • NE 33rd Street 0 w 10X/3 5X/2 15%/8--,ir NE 32nd Street EDGEWATER V O O x wo `-- 55%/18 t- —15X/5 5%/3 70X/38 —♦ 85X/46 — 4. 41-- 20X/7 4---10X/3 75%/41- 10%/5 -.-- 110. NE 31st Street 5%/2 ----♦► 0 0 QI >2 rn na NE 30th Street 0 N 44 U O � 30%/16 5x/3 -----� 0 O 10X/6� LEGEND XXX/70(<(X> NEW DISTRIBUTION/NEW ASSIGNMENT XXX IN/XX PERSONITRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT (MAXIMUM) NE 29th Street FIGURE 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT PrMI1 KiNey-HOm and Associates, Inc. 36TH STREET & 3RD AVE TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION As stated earlier, the NW 36`h Street at 3'1 Avenue Project will have 112 residential condominium units and 10,000 sf of retail. The retail uses will be specialty retail which are oriented toward serving the residential portion of the development plus nearly business and residential. There is frequent bus service on NW 36th Street in front of the project and there are bus bays in front of the new project which will be reconstructed as part of the NW 361h Street resurfacing and beautification project to be constructed by the Florida Department of Transportation. There is also convenient north/south bus service available within the area. For these reasons, it is assumed that transit use will result in a 10% reduction in vehicle trips to and from this project. The Institute of Transportation Engineers has data for estimating the level of pass -by traffic for shopping centers of this size although there is no specific data for specialty retail. A shopping center with 10,000 sf of leasable area would have approximately 75% pass -by trips during the PM peak hour, It has been conservatively assumed that 40% of the traffic to and from the retail component of this development will be pass -by traffic. Internal Capture, i.e. trips between the retail and residential uses on -site was estimated at 10% using the procedures found in the 1TE Trip Generation Manual. Details of these calculations can be found in Appendix F. However, no additional reduction for Internal Capture was made to the number of external trips, given that external trips were already reduced for transit and for pass -by. Land Use Table 3 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation ITE Land Enter Exit Total Size Use Code Trips Trips Trips Residential Condominium 112 D.U. 230 44 22 66 Specialty Retail 10,000 sf 814 20 25 45 Unadjusted Vehicle Trips 64 47 111 Transit Trip Reduction @ 10.0% -6 -5 -11 Total Driveway Trips 58 42 100 Retail Pass -By Trips @ 40% -8 -10 -18 Net External Trips 50 32 82 Net vehicle traffic to and from the NW 3611' Street at 3rd Avenue Project was assigned to the local roadway network using the Cardinal Distribution of Trips developed by the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Percentage distribution of project trips per the Cardinal Distribution can be found in Appendix F. The distribution of project vehicle trips during the PM peak hour is shown graphically in Figures 5 and 6 and is described in Appendix B, Table B-1. 9 jMa.,44TH sT JL NW •1:33.a.S.T___, NVV 42ND ST NVV 41$T ST NW 40TH ST NW 39TH ST C I II i I JI,.NaOL44Ibi-S-T--j, 11 I _ i It NVV 42ND ST „ L ( 1 1 () 1 1 cf: NW 32ND ST 30TH ST 757 % Z fl( 311 j , NW 38TH ST NW 37TH 37TH ST INVV 361-1 NW 31ST ST 1 1 I Co) a t\I NW 35TH S NW 34TH T NW 34TH S 11 % z LII NW 33RD S 11 CARDINAL DISTRIBUTION FOR TAZ #498 13.59 12.68 12.35 6.16 18.59 5.11 18.47 13,05 I ZIMP I RA N SPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS NW 36th Street at 3rd Avenue MUSP Figure 5 Traffic Impact Study Project Trip Distribution 1 0 1 11 ...Yaw Biscayne Blvd } 11 —31 NE 33rd Street TRAF ;G S GNAL 30 j--19 (-/' es --) TRAFFIC $ GNAL t SITE i-- 21 27 -J NE 32nd Street NE 29th Street Dead End --� Dead End —► N.T.S. TPA eBidW .S Park Lane Tower PM Peak Hour Site Only Traffic Figure 4 7 • • 1/511r t/3 It/3 4t7a_ 116 NE 2ND AVE NE 29TH STREET NE 28TH STREET NE 27TH STREET rMN. 001.11011. j WOMB WIMP Val NE 26TH TERRACE NE 26TH STREET NE 25TH STREET NE 24TH STREET 4/9/9 1316 420/9 PROJECT NE 23RD STREET NE 22ND STREET 3/13 ea ea r!i/I3 31:1-6-* f1/4 NE 21ST STREET 9/4 .4 2J9 BISCAYNE NE 20TH STREET NE 19TH STREET 4/21, 1/4 7/4 t 117 3/11 AM/PM PEAK HOUR NET ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC DUE TO PROJECT NORTH NTS BISCAYNE BAY FIGURE 6 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. SOHO CONDOMINIUM May 26, 2004 Page 23 • • The Boulevard 1111ISP Traffic Impact Study Table 1: Trip Generation Land Use (LU) High -Rise Residential Condo / Townhouse Specialty Retail Center Existing Apartments (Not used, Informational) Gross Vehicle Trips Units 127 DU 15 TGSF 6 DU ITE LU CODE 232 814 220 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL Trips 30 18 14 48 Trips 18 23 7 41 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian/Bicycle Trip Reduction @ Net Vehicle Trips 16.0% Of Gross Trips 14.9% Of Gross Trips 10.0% Of Gross Trips 8 7 5 29 6 6 4 TRIPS 48 41 2/ 89 14 13 9 24 53 Net Person Trips in Vehicles a Net Person Trips in Transit @ Net Person Trips (Vehicle and Transit Modes) 1.40 40 1.40 10 50 8 42 74 19 92 Net Person Trips (Walking/Bicycling) @ 1.40 7 n ,A RICHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6 5 12 • • • The Boulevard MVSP Traffic Impact Study 4.0 Traffic Distribution The Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for the subject development is TAZ 503 as assigned by the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO). The County's TAZ are included in the Corresponding tab. The corresponding traffic distribution being assigned to the following directions are outlined in Table 2, The Corresponding tab includes a TAZ Map and the corresponding Directional Distribution Summary for this zone utilizing the 2005 Cost Affordable Plan. Table 2: Cardinal Distribution DIRECTION DISTRIBUTION % NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 13.19 5.12 5.60 9.40 14.63 21.54 13.78 16.75 TOTAL 100.00 tCHARD GARCIA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6 • The Boulevard MUSP Traffic Impact Study 5.0 Traffic Assignment The PM peak hour trips from Table 1 have been distributed and assigned to the existing adjacent roads. As evident from trip generation calculations, the PM peak hour represents the worse case. Table 3 was developed to depict the PM Peak Hour Assignments. The Corresponding tab includes the ingress and egress traffic distribution with the corresponding assignments to the North, South, East and West for the PM peak hour and Daily Trips. Table 3 is the cardinal traffic assignments which are further grouped as indicated into the four primary quadrants. Table 3: PM Peak :flour Traffic Assignments PM. Peak Trips DIRECTION IN OUT Total NNE 4 3 7 ENE 1 1 2 ESE 2 1 3 SSE 3 3 6 SSW WSW 4 6 4 5 11 WNW 4 3 7 NNW 5 4 9 TOTAL, 29 24 53 DIRECTION North IN 4+5=9 OUT 3+4=7 TOTAL 16 East 1+2=3 1+1=2 5 South West 3+4=7 6+4=10 3+4=7 5+3=8 14 18 TOTAL 53 _1 tGHA+�D LGARC{.A ek ASSOCIATES, • NE 2nd Avenue t 49 URBANA TOWER f 5 NE 18th Street N Nrs 17 SITE 58-4 72 0 N (p r •41 L► �� NE 17th Terrace at 14" rnrn CD �9 st TAZ 494 0/0 11.33 15.14 12.35 6.57 20.45 8.77 7.31 18.09` 6 -� 7—t P. a) 0 m N PM Peak Hour 8 1N 48 OUT 130 TOTAL 178 Site Only Traffic ZA40 I WTI TRANSPORT ANALYSIS PROFESSIONALS FIGURE 5 9 R-4(4) Jib.40 ^oo j' .-0 9(9) r 0-. coo 0—y IIo i 4 NE 36th St (US 2 I 1 I 1 1 a 1 I I U I f gb H...- 1 1 I 1 m / 1 111 1 m I 1 1 I 1 1 Pr000se/S E t NE 34th tj x eion 1 1 1I I I 1 3 1 I 1 •!I f 1 1 7 1 1 I ,-' 1 04 1 1 i =. ,� ► N Proposed N432nd St ExtensR�n J l /ti��o`r,� yl T17(tdr4—_ i . 1 4(13), ... I f / I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 / I Proposed NE 31 st St Extension 4 ► f 1 1 a1 1 ml 3I a1 Z'f Si 1 1 I x6'61 k 0 j .--1 3(13) / If-7(24) �4(4) ,l 1 .-0 (6) t P 5(18)—► o c 0 N- M 9(30)__._P o—• 1 1 1 1 1 W z NE 29th St Legend 4 AM Peak Hour Volume (4) PM Peak Hour Volume -�---�- FEC Railroad Existing Roads - Proposed Roads Site Boundary ,R--o .-0 0--01 T 4(41-4 7/ Not to Scale Figure 14 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) Project Turning Movement Volumes September 14, 2005 0 1 r 0__.00 0 0) E m z 3(9) 3(9) —► 0—y R-- 12(13) 11(12) NE36thSt(US 2) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ail 1 1 I / 1 ProuoseINE 34th St Exte j i jt, 1 1 I 1 3 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 / / 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pro...s d Nt32-d SlExtenspn I / I / / 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 / / / / Proposed NE 31st St Extension J 7 1 1 1 al 1 m/ 4(13)--0 0—► 1 / 1 w z NE 29th St Legend I AM Peak Hour Volume (4) PM Peak Hour Volume 1 1— FEC Railroad Existing Roads • Proposed Roads Site Boundary w Not to Scale Figure 10 Buena Vista East Tract G (Parcel 3) Project Turning Movement Volumes September 7, 2005 NOT TO SCALE NE 42nd Street t= JJ4 r JJ4 re J14 r NE 41st Street NE 40th Street htr JJ4 r Or to ai. 55 J htr Garage Bi/03 JJ4 0.em JF eJ h t r o r _1.. i= a' t. JJ4 r aJ a, • ur k . S. a t4 r Jl NE 39th Street NE 3sth Street =J hir 1tr 7 7 Jit. r 24 '1tr aal � ]I dl4 r" NE 36th Street J hit y 5m 7 t. J14 r 1 C/ , KimleyHorn �/ and Associates, Inc. to • JJ4 r J htr NE 39th St 71 Wrage Garage 14®r e» BJ 41tr » 5' .t 7 411 t1 0 J II Dr Garage Jo16 J14 ra 411 n y a' .30 414 r • 414 I]7 err t r hir Figure 6 Project Traffic PM Peak Hour Miami Design District 2012 Page - 23 Nf12ntl Olst d .o Nr33,fStreet J1 ,,T lit 3«nMr. 1 4 KimlayHom pp-- IMF and Associates, Inc, �tr r it Jl • it r SluayR0a6* y 0 smyInNrs«ton o Pm«i Dm.wy J14 • 91 ml i 1 1 Figure 6 Project Traffic PM Peak Hour Miami Design District APPENDIX H: Trip Generation WEEKDAY PROPOSED AM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION GROSS PROJECT TRIPS INTERNAL CAPTURE EXTERNAL VOLUMES 10% MULTIMODAL REDUCTION FACTOR NET NEW PROJECT TRIPS Land the RE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units Percent In Out Total Percent IC Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total In Out G R 0 U P 1 1 Shopping Center 9 820 1089.83 ksf 62% 38% 415 254 669 26.0% 174 328 167 495 10.0% 49 304 142 446 2 General Office Building 9 710 181.146 ksf 88% 12% 271 37 308 9.7% 30 256 22 278 10.0% 28 242 8 250 3 Hotel 9 310 52 room 59% 41% 17 11 28 33.2% 9 13 6 19 10.0% 2 12 5 17 4 Residermal Condon:riumdrowra,ouse 9 230 561 du 17% 83% 35 170 205 33.2% 68 1 136 137 10.0% 13 0 124 124 5 High -Turnover (Sit own) Restaurant 9 932 32.267 ksf 55% 45% 192 157 349 42.4% 148 118 83 201 10.0% 20 108 73 181 6 apartment 9 220 82 du 20% 80% 9 35 44 33.2% 14 2 28 30 10.0% 4 0 26 26 7 Specialty Read Center 9 826 78.929 ksf 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation Sub -total: 16% VOF Reduction Total Previously Approved SAP Net New 939 664 1,603 27.6% 443 718 442 1,160 10.0% 116 666 378 1,044 820 710 310 230 LN(Y) = 0.61*LN(X)+2.24 LN(Y) = 0.8'LN(X)+1.57 Y=0.53(X) LN(Y) = 0.8*LN(X)+026 107 60 167 559 318 877 559 289 848 0 29 29 932 Y=10.81(X) 220 Y=0.49`(X)+3.73 826 Closed during AM Peak Hour WEEKDAY PROPOSED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION (PROPOSED) ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION GROSS PROJECT TRIPS INTERNAL CAPTURE EXTERNAL VOLUMES 10% MULTIMODAL REDUCTION FACTOR NET NEW PROJECT TRIPS Land the RE Edition RE Code Scale RE Units Percent In Out Total Percent IC Trips In Out Total Percent Trips in Out Total In Out G R 0 U P 2 1 Shop pinaceaer 9 820 1089.833 ksf 48% 52% 1,425 1,544 2,969 75% 223 1,313 1,433 2,746 10.0% 274 1,177 1,295 2,472 2 General Office Building 9 710 181.146 ksf 17% 83% 48 233 281 20.3% 57 20 204 224 10.0% 22 8 194 202 3 Hotel 9 310 52 room 51% 49% 16 15 31 49.3% 15 8 8 16 10.0% 2 7 7 14 4 Resrdential CondominiumRownhouse 9 230 561 du 67% 33% 165 82 247 49.3 % 122 104 21 125 10.0% 13 97 15 112 5 High -Turn er (S t-Down) Restaurant 9 932 32.267 ksf 60% 40% 191 127 318 32.4% 103 140 75 215 10.0% 22 128 65 193 6 ape 1, ant 9 220 82 du 65% 35% 41 22 63 49.3 % 32 25 6 31 10.0% 3 24 4 28 7 Specialty Retail Center 9 826 78.929 ksf 44% 56% 93 118 211 7.5% 16 85 110 195 10.0% 19 76 100 176 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ITE Land Use Code Rate or Equation Subtotal: 165' VOF Reduction Total Previously Approved SAP Net New 1,979 2.141 4,120 13.8% 568 1,695 1,857 3.552 10.0% 355 1,517 1,680 3,197 820 710 310 230 LN(Y) = 0.67'LN(X)+3.31 Y=1.12`(X)+78.45 Y=0.6(X) LN(Y) = 0.82'LN(X)+0.32 243 269 512 1,274 1,411 2,685 1,196 1,326 2,522 78 85 163 932 220 826 Y=9.85(X) Y=0.55'(X)+17.65 Y=2.4`(X)+21.48 K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Trip Gen\08 27 14 TRIP GEN.xlsx_ PRINT -PEAK HOUR 9/11/2014,2:41 PM ITE MULTI -USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (Source: Chapter 7, ITE Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004) Enter from External: Exit to External: Demand Balanced Demand Land Use B: Retail (High-Tumover Rest 23 162 38.0 % 17 I 9.0% ITE Land Use Code 932 Size: 32 I Total Internal External Enter 192 79 113 Exit 157 69 88 Total 349 148 201 % 100% 42% 58% Enter from External: Exit to External: ICv2.4 AM - Copy.xls 113 88 Demand 17 82 I 33.0% 17 Balanced Demand 11.0% 17 Demand I 30.0% 15.0% Enter from External: Exit to External: 20 I Balanced Demand 28.0% 47 47 258 20 116 I Balanced Demand Demand Balanced Land Use A: Residential (Hotel, Condos. Apartments) ITE Land Use Code 310, 230, 220 Size: 52, 561, 82 I Total Internal Extemai Enter 61 38 23 Exit 216 54 162 Total 277 92 185 % 100% 33% 67% Demand Demand Balanced Demand Demand I 0.0% 0 0 I 0.0% • Demand Balanced Demand 0 I 3.0% 2 1 I 2.0% Land Use C: Office (General Office) 1 Demand ITE Land Use Code 710 Size: 181.146 I Total Internal External Enter 271 13 258 Exit 37 17 20 Total 308 30 278 % 100% 10% 90% Project Number: Project Name: Scenario: Analysis Period: AM Peak Analyst: 33.0% 20 Balanced Demand 20 11.0% Demand Balanced Demand Demand 28.0% Demand Balanced 54 54 30.0% 3.0% 76 I 4.0% 8 I 22.0% NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT Land Use Category A B C D Total Enter 23 113 20 323 479 Exit 162 88 258 172 680 Total 185 201 278 495 1,159 Single Use Trip Gen Estimate 277 349 308 669 1,603 33.2% 42.4% 9.7% 26.0% Overall Internal Capture = 27.70% 8 Demand Balanced Demand 28 I Land Use D: Retail (Shopping Center) ITE Land Use Code 820 Size: 1089.83 I Total Internal Extemal Enter 415 92 323 Exit 254 82 172 Total 669 174 495 100% 26% 74% Enter from External: Exit to External: Demand Balanced Demand 17 I 323 172 9/11/2014 2:44PM ITE MULTI -USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (Source: Chapter 7, ITE Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004) Demand Land Use B: Retail (High-Tumover Rest Enter from External: Exit to External: Demand Balanced 134 39 53.0% 17 I 9.0 % ITE Land Use Code 932 Size: 32 I Total Internal External Enter 191 59 132 Exit 127 44 83 Total 318 103 215 % 100% 32% 68% Enter from Extemal: Exit to External: ICv2.4 PM - Copy.xis 132 83 17 63 I • 31.0% 15 I 12.0% Demand I 20.0% Enter from Extemal: Exit to Extemal: 15 Land Use A: Residential (Hotel, Condos. Apartments) ITE Land Use Code 310. 230, 220 Size: 52, 561, 82 I Total Internal External Enter 222 88 134 Exit 119 80 39 Total 341 168 173 % 100% 49% 51% Demand Demand Balanced Balanced Demand Demand 69 20.0% 25 25 29 195 304 I Balanced Demand I 0.0 % 0 0 I 0.0 % ♦ Demand Balanced Demand 0 I 2.0% 4 4 I 2.0% Land Use C: Office (General Office) 5 ITE Land Use Code 710 Size: 181.146 I Total Internal External Enter 48 19 29 Exit 233 38 195 Total 281 57 224 % 100% 20% 80% Demand Balanced Demand Project Number: Project Name: Scenario: Analysis Period: PM Peak Analyst: 31.0% 69 69 12.0% Demand I 20.0% Demand Balanced 31.0 % 38 38 20.0% 3.0% 332 I 2.0% 30 I 23.0 % NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT Land Use Category A B C D Total Enter 134 132 195 1,400 1,861 Exit 39 83 29 1,540 1,691 Total 173 215 224 2,940 3,552 Single Use Trip Gen Estimate 341 318 281 3,180 4,120 49.3010 32.4% 20.3% Overall internal Capture = 7.5% 13.79% 54 Demand Balanced Demand 199 I Land Use D: Retail (Shopping Center, Spe 1TE Land Use Code 820, 826 Size: 1089.83, 78.929 I Total Internal External Enter 1518 118 1400 Exit 1662 122 1540 Total 3180 240 2940 % 100% 8% 92% Enter from External: Exit to External: Demand Balanced Demand 30 I 1? 1,400 1,540 9/11/2014 2:45PM APPENDIX I: Cardinal Trip Distribution MIAMI-DADE 2035 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY PERCENT NNE 16.05 ENE 0.78 CARDINAL ESE 3.35 SSE 3,35 DIRECTIONS SSW 23.73 NNW 18.21 TOTAL ORIGIN ZONE WSW 20 WNW 14.53 375 3075 TRIPS 1220 78 163 293 911 638 467 549 4,319 PERCENT 28.25 1.81 3.77 6,78 21.09 14.77 10.81 12.71 376 3076 TRIPS 1096 95 248 284 1324 992 705 931 5,675 PERCENT 19.31 1,67 4.37 5 23.33 17.48 12.42 16.41 377 3077 TRIPS 800 155 138 193 931 753 560 545 4,075 PERCENT 19,63 3.8 3.39 4.74 22,85 18.48 13.74 13.37 378 3078 TRIPS 609 212 131 131 917 752 656 747 4,155 PERCENT 14,66 5.1 3.15 3.15 22.07 18.1 15,79 17.98 379 3079 TRIPS 1163 252 277 157 1478 1009 1264 1294 6,894 PERCENT 16.87 3.66 4.02 2.28 21,44 14.64 18.33 18.77 380 3080 TRIPS 674 170 201 85 973 927 848 884 4,762 PERCENT 14.15 3.57 4,22 1.78 20.43 19.47 17.81 18.56 381 3081 TRIPS 354 132 189 228 737 592 436 455 3,123 PERCENT 11.34 4.23 6.05 7.3 23.6 18.96 13.96 14.57 382 3082 TRIPS 1508 501 386 992 1731 1482 1171 1600 9,371 PERCENT 16.09 5.35 4.12 10.59 18.47 15.81 12.5 17.07 383 3083 TRIPS 2732 994 963 2708 2794 2224 1957 2908 17,280 PERCENT 15.81 5.75 5.57 15.67 16.17 12.87 11.33 16.83 384 3084 TRIPS 569 121 413 979 821 545 368 438 4,254 PERCENT 13.38 2.84 9,71 23.01 19.3 12.81 8.65 10.3 385 3085 TRIPS 9 5 7 21 22 29 23 15 131 PERCENT 6.87 3.82 5.34 16.03 16.79 22.14 17.56 11.45 386 3086 TRIPS 508 135 328 934 951 739 454 453 4,502 PERCENT 11.28 3 7.29 20,75 21.12 16.41 10.08 10.06 387 3087 TRIPS 1513 690 657 1083 935 758 653 695 6,984 PERCENT 21.66 9.88 9.41 15.51 13.39 10,85 9.35 9.95 388 3088 TRIPS 104 29 57 119 161 154 97 82 803 PERCENT 12.95 3.61 7.1 14.82 20.05 19.18 12.08 10.21 389 3089 TRIPS 244 85 100 292 345 305 227 237 1,835 PERCENT 13.3 4.63 5.45 15.91 18.8 16.62 12.37 12.92 390 3090 TRIPS 137 52 58 176 197 159 161 '137 1,077 PERCENT 12.72 4.83 5.39 16.34 18.29 14.76 14.95 12.72 391 3091 TRIPS 228 68 75 349 385 359 300 225 1,989 PERCENT 11.46 3.42 3.77 17.55 19.36 18.05 15.08 11.31 392 3092 TRIPS 382 63 132 206 590 502 370 529 2,774 PERCENT 13.77 2,27 4.76 7.43 21.27 18.1 13.34 19.07 393 3093 TRIPS 784 188 269 625 1652 1364 655 758 6,295 PERCENT 12.45 2.99 4.27 9.93 26.24 21.67 10.41 12.04 394 3094 TRIPS 350 96 65 110 629 491 341 349 2,431 PERCENT 14.4 3.95 2.67 4.52 25.87 20.2 14.03 14.36 395 3095 TRIPS 1170 335 349 1419 1593 1306 661 761 7,594 PERCENT 15,41 4.41 4.6 18.69 20.98 17.2 8.7 10.02 396 3096 TRIPS 943 276 270 735 1467 974 662 833 6,160 PERCENT 15.31 4.48 4.38 11.93 23.81 15.81 10.75 13.52 397 3097 TRIPS 1085 246 228 325 1464 1178 906 990 6,422 PERCENT 16.9 3.83 3.55 5.06 22.8 18.34 14.11 15.42 398 3098 TRIPS 436 102 201 285 675 466 288 298 2,751 PERCENT 15.85 3.71 7,31 10.36 24.54 16.94 10.47 10.83 399 3099 TRIPS 808 429 338 784 933 514 389 458 4,653 PERCENT 17.37 9.22 7.26 16.85 20.05 11.05 8.36 9.84 400 3100 TRIPS 176 174 94 294 241 158 129 121 1,387 PERCENT 12.69 12.55 6.78 21.2 17.38 11.39 9.3 8.72 401 3101 TRIPS 45 25 22 43 40 35 41 56 307 PERCENT 14.66 8.14 7.17 14.01 13.03 11.4 13.36 18.24 402 3102 TRIPS 52 9 13 25 43 28 25 37 232 PERCENT 22.41 3.88 5.6 10.78 18.53 12.07 10.78 15.95 403 3103 TRIPS 499 349 261 294 355 194 231 278 2,461 PERCENT 20.28 14.18 10.61 11.95 14.43 7.88 9.39 11.3 404 3104 TRIPS 514 173 342 815 710 501 333 375 3,763 PERCENT 13.66 4.6 9.09 21.66 18.87 13.31 8.85 9.97 405 3105 TRIPS 292 123 98 254 261 163 182 193 1,566 PERCENT 18.65 7.85 6.26 16.22 16.67 10.41 11,62 12.32 406 3106 TRIPS 473 183 255 755 617 657 275 352 3,567 PERCENT 13.26 5.13 7.15 21,17 17.3 18.42 7.71 9.87 407 3107 TRIPS 1569 507 564 1113 799 664 617 776 6,609 PERCENT 23.74 7.67 8.53 16.84 12.09 10.05 9.34 11.74 408 3108 TRIPS 398 536 318 734 505 498 257 331 3,577 B-12 Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 383 16.83% 17% 11.33% 11% 15.81% 16% Year 2035 Applied Percentages 5.75% 6% 12.87% 13% 16.17% 16% 15.67% 16% 5.57% 5% APPENDIX J: Volume Development Worksheets AM Peak Hour TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.839 "AM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Raw Turning Movements 1 1 7 0 3 2 7 153 0 1 369 3 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1,050 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 3 2 7 161 387 3 EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 4 The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1,7% 1 7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.75h 1.7% 1.7% 1.756 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH o 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 20 0 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 7 3 2 7 174 408 3 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering 19,0% Exiting 26.0% "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 8 AM TOTAL TRAFFIC 7 3 2 7 182 408 3 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.863 EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Raw Turning Movements 5 0 12 2 0 2 10 154 5 2 361 13 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1 050 1.050 1.050 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 13 2 2 11 162 2 379 14 EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 4 The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH o 0 1 0 0 0 1 _ 0 0 20 1 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 0 14 2 2 12 175 5 2 400 15 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Entering Exiting Net New Distribution Entering 25.0% 56.0% 19.0% Exiting 49.0% 25.0% 26.0% "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Pass - By Trips Net New 0 14 7 8 0 0 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC o 0 0 14 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM TOTAL TRAFFIC 5 14 16 7 10 12 175 5 2 400 15 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.852 "AM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Raw Turning Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 12 1.050 32 1.050 1.050 1.050 58 1.050 1.050 85 1.050 1.050 10 1.050 151 1.050 11 1.050 1.050 71 1.050 336 1.050 18 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS I 13 I 34 I 8 I I 61 I 9 I 89 I I 11 I 159 I 12 75 I 353 I 19 "AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 4 1 The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 17% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 17% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1 2 0 3 0 5 1 8 1 4 19 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 14 36 64 9 94 12 171 13 79 373 20 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering 4.0% 30.0% 22.0% Exiting "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE 7.0% 38.0% 4.0% EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 2 11 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 2 11 AM TOTAL TRAFFIC 14 36 8 64 9 94 12 171 13 81 384 21 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Federal Highway & NE 39th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.816 "AM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Raw Turning Movements 67 9 23 41 80 43 15 262 1 6 333 70 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1,050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS 70 24 43 84 45 16 275 6 350 74 "AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1,7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 4 0 1 2 4 2 1 15 0 0 18 4 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 74 9 25 45 88 47 17 290 1 6 368 78 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Entering Exiting Net New Distribution Entering 23.0% 7.0% Exiting "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" AND USE TYPE 7 0% EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Pass - By Trips Net New 2 0 0 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM TOTAL TRAFFIC 76 9 25 45 88 47 17 290 1 6 368 78 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) & NE 38th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.948 WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Raw Turning Movements 359 75 209 49 611 563 429 1,315 27 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1,050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS 377 I 79 219 51 842 591 450 1,381 28 EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 3 1 The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three 1 3 Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 20 4 12 3 34 31 24 73 1 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 397 83 231 54 880 622 474 1,458 29 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Exiting Entering Exiting "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE Project Trips Pass - By Net New 11.0% 5.0% 7.0% EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC AM TOTAL TRAFFIC 397 83 231 54 680 622 474 1,458 29 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway & NE 36th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.875 "AM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SET SBR SBR2 AM Raw Turning Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 24 1 050 109 1.050 387 1.050 161 1.050 1.050 210 1.050 42 1.050 69 1.050 50 1.050 100 1.050 130 1.050 32 1.050 3 1.050 49 1.050 205 1.050 03 1 050 46 1.050 216 1.050 73 1.050 4 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS 25 I 114 I 385 I 169 I I 221 I 44 I 72 I 81 I 105 I 137 I 34 I 3 I 51 I 215 I 98 48 1 227 I 77 4 BT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SBT SBR SBR2 Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three 2 Midtown Miami Five 2 4 Miami Design District SAP April 2012 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 TOTAL"VESTED"TRAFFIC o 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 17% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 17% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 17% 17% 1.7% 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1 6 20 9 12 2 4 3 a 7 2 0 3 11 5 3 12 4 0 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC I 26 I 120 405 I 182 I 233 1 48 76 I 88 I 111 144 I 36 I 3 I 54 228 103 51 238 I 81 4 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SBT SBR SBR2 Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering 2.0% 5.0% 15.0% Exiting 21.0% 15.0% 2.0% "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SBT SBR SBR2 Project Trips Pass - By Net New 6 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 4 AM TOTAL TRAFFIC I 26 120 I 405 I 182 I I 233 46 I 76 I 68 I 111 1 144 I 36 I 3 I 80 I 230 I 104 I 51 I 239 I 81 I 4 J TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Retail Project Driveway COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.92 "AM EXISTING TRAFFIC" AM Raw Turning Movements Peak Season Correction Factor EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR 1.050 1.050 7 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 4 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS I I 7 I I 4 nr" EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 iami Design District SAP Amendment May 20 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC o 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7°/ 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH o 0 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 7 4 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Entering Exiting Net New Distribution Entering Exiting 100.0% 100.0% "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 29 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 29 AM TOTAL TRAFFIC 7 33 Note: Turning volumes determined from traffic count at NE 2nd Avenue and NE 42nd Street TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Residential Project Driveway COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.92 "AM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Raw Turning Movements 7 4 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 AM EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 4 EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 iami Design District SAP Amendment May 20 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC o 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 17% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% AM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH o 0 AM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 7 4 "AM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Entering Exiting Net New Distribution Entering 100.0% Exiting "AM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE 100.0% EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New AM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 29 29 0 AM TOTAL TRAFFIC 29 7 4 Note: Turning volumes determined from traffic count at NE 2nd Avenue and NE 42nd Street PM Peak Hour TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.911 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Raw Tuming Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 10 1.050 3 1.050 10 1.050 1.050 7 1.050 1.050 6 1.050 1.050 8 1.050 375 1.050 3 1.050 1.050 3 1.050 244 1.050 8 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS 11 3 11 7 6 8 394 3 3 256 8 "PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St 1a NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 2 3 The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 20 22 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 19 7 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 32 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 14 0 PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 12 3 12 7 1 6 8 456 3 3 302 8 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering Exiting "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE 19.0? 26.0% EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 22 15 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 22 15 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC 12 3 12 7 6 478 3 3 317 8 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.905 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Raw Turning Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 11 1.050 1.050 9 1.050 1.050 13 1.050 3 1.050 1.050 1.050 19 1.050 390 1.050 11 1.050 1.050 7 1.050 243 1.050 10 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS 12 9 14 3 20 410 12 7 255 11 T EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 2 3 The Boulevard 4 5 Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 5 3 3 15 16 6 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 5 1 2 14 5 2 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC 10 0 4 0 0 0 5 35 0 0 29 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1 7% 1,7% 1.7% 1.736 1 7% 1.716 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1,7% 1.736 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 22 1 0 13 1 PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 23 13 15 3 26 467 13 7 297 20 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering 25.096 56.0% 19.0% Exiting 49.0% 25.036 26.0% "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 20 20 42 42 21 21 22 22 43 43 15 15 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC 23 20 13 57 24 23 26 467 56 22 297 20 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.979 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Raw Tuming Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1.050 28 1.050 17 1.050 1.050 54 1.050 103 1.050 141 1.050 1.050 1.050 262 1.050 18 1.050 1.050 33 1.050 246 1.050 22 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS 12 29 18 57 108 148 275 19 35 258 23 "PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 2 3 The Boulevard 4 5 Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 8 8 60 3 58 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 5 6 2 6 6 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC o 13 0 0 14 62 0 9 6 64 8 0 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1 7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1,7% 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1,7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1 2 1 3 6 8 0 15 1 2 14 PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 13 44 19 60 128 218 9 299 26 101 280 24 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering 4.0% 30.0% 22.0% Exiting "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE 7.0% 38.0% 4.0% EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 3 23 17 6 32 4 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 3 23 17 6 32 4 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC 16 44 19 60 128 241 9 316 26 107 312 28 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Federal Highway & NE 39th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.938 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Raw Tuming Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1 050 48 1.050 9 1.050 15 1.050 1.050 42 1.050 163 1.050 31 1.050 1.050 42 1.050 462 1.050 3 1.050 1.050 3 1.050 216 1.050 95 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS "PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" 50 9 16 44 171 33 44 485 3 3 227 100 EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 13 50 3 55 13 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 7 13 5 43 3 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC 20 63 3 0 60 0 0 0 43 0 0 16 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1 7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 1 7% 1 7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 3 0 1 2 9 2 2 26 0 0 12 5 PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 73 72 20 46 240 35 46 511 46 3 239 121 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Entering Exiting Net New Distribution Entering 23.0% 7.0% Exiting "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE 7.0% EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 6 18 5 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 6 18 5 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC 79 72 20 46 258 35 46 511 46 3 239 126 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Biscayne Boulevard (US 1) & NE 38th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.975 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Raw Tuming Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1,050 1.050 1.050 1.050 406 1.050 128 1.050 366 1.050 1.050 36 1.050 1,186 1.050 411 1.050 1.050 313 1.050 865 1.050 54 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS 426 134 384 38 1,245 432 329 908 57 EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums 2 The Boulevard 3 4 Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three 4 3 Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 30 17 27 23 8 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 9 3 25 33 2 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC 9 30 0 20 _ 0 52 64 10 Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.79'0 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 22 7 20 2 66 23 17 48 3 PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 457 171 404 60 1,320 455 398 1,020 70 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering 11.0% 5.0% 7.0% Exiting "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 4 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 9 4 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC 457 180 404 64 1,320 455 398 1,020 75 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: NE 2nd Avenue/Federal Highway R NE 36th Street COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.93 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" PM Raw Turning Movements Peak Season Correction Factor EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SBT SBR SBR2 1.050 123 1 050 514 1.050 86 1 050 408 1.050 30 1 050 34 1.050 157 1.050 101 1.050 304 1.050 00 1.050 1.050 80 1.050 128 1.050 108 1.050 48 1.050 123 1.050 01 1.050 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS 59 I 129 I 540 90 I 428 I 32 I 36 I 165 201 I 319 I 72 1 I 84 I 132 113 I 48 I 129 I 98 0 R2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SBT SBR SBR2 Edgewater NW 36th St 0 NW 3rd Ave 4 e Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard 4 5 Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three 5 2 Midtown Miami Five 9 4 Miami Design District SAP April 2012 5 9 21 6 17 20 20 3 Miami Design District SAP Amendment May 2013 5 2 7 2 2 5 7 18 18 TOTAL VESTED TRAFFIC o 0 14 14 11 34 2 14 26 0 0 0 27 43 0 21 0 0 0 Years To Bulldout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1.7% 3 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 23 1.7% 2 1.7% 2 1.7% 1.7% 1 7% 17 1.7% 4 1.7% 1.7% 4 1.7% 7 1.7% 1.7% 3 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC I 62 136 I 583 I 109 I I 462 I 68 40 I 188 I 238 I 338 76 1 115 182 I 119 72 136 I 101 0 1 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE Pass -By Distribution Entering EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SBT SBR SBR2 Exiting Net New Distribution Entering Exiting 2.0% 50% 15.0% 21.0% 150% 2.0% "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE Project Trips Pass - By Net New EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SEBL2 SEBL SEBR SEBR2 SBL SBT SBR SBR2 2 4 18 12 2 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 2 4 11 18 12 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC I 84 I 136 I 583 I 109 I 462 I 72 I 40 I 188 I 249 I 336 I 76 I 1 I 133 I 194 I 121 I 72 I 136 I 101 I 0 I TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Retail Project Driveway COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.92 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Raw Turning Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1.050 18 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 17 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS I I I 19 1 1 I I 18 I 1 I I I I I I I I "PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 iami Design District SAP Amendment May 20 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH 1.770 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 20 19 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Net New Distribution Entering Exiting Entering 29.0% 71.0% Exiting 94.0% 6.0% "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 23 55 80 5 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 23 55 80 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC 23 75 99 Note: Turning volumes determined from traffic count at NE 2nd Avenue and NE 42nd Street TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT STUDY INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTION: Residential Project Driveway COUNT DATE: August 13, 2014 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR: 0.92 "PM EXISTING TRAFFIC" EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Raw Turning Movements Peak Season Correction Factor 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 18 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.050 17 1.050 1.050 PM EXISTING CONDITIONS 19 18 nr„ R WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Edgewater NW 36th St @ NW 3rd Ave Park Lane Tower SoHo Condominiums The Boulevard Urbana Tower Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miami Five Miami Design District SAP April 2012 iami Design District SAP Amendment May 20 TOTAL "VESTED" TRAFFIC Years To Buildout 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Yearly Growth Rate 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% PM BACKGROUND TRAFFIC GROWTH PM NON -PROJECT TRAFFIC 20 19 "PM PROJECT DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass -By Distribution Entering Exiting Net New Distribution Entering 71.0% Exiting 94.0% "PM PROJECT TRAFFIC" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Project Trips Pass - By Net New 80 55 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRAFFIC 80 55 PM TOTAL TRAFFIC 80 55 20 19 Note: Turning volumes determined from traffic count at NE 2nd Avenue and NE 42nd Street APPENDIX K: Future Background Conditions Analysis AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 TWSC Future Background 1: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 1 7 0 3 2 7 174 0 1 408 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 2 2 0 5 2 0 7 7 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - None - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 8 0 4 2 8 207 0 1 486 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 727 724 500 729 726 219 494 0 0 212 0 0 Stage 1 495 495 229 229 - Stage 2 232 229 - 500 497 - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 339 352 571 338 351 821 1070 - - 1358 Stage1 556 546 774 715 - Stage 2 771 715 553 545 - Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 330 346 565 327 345 813 1064 - 1350 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 330 346 327 345 - - Stage1 549 543 765 706 - - Stage 2 754 706 540 542 - - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Minor Lane / Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) Notes EB 12.5 B WB 13.1 B NB 0.3 NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR SB 0 1064 - - 492 448 1350 0.008 - - 0.022 0.013 0.001 - 8.41 0 - 12.5 13.1 7.669 0 A A BB A A 0.024 - - 0.067 0.04 0.003 - : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Future Background 2: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street/NE 4th Avenue AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 5 0 14 2 0 2 12 175 5 2 400 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 2 2 0 1 3 0 3 3 0 3 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length - 150 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 0 16 2 0 2 14 203 6 2 465 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 717 719 479 725 725 211 485 0 0 211 0 0 Stage 1 480 480 - 236 236 Stage 2 237 239 - 489 489 - - - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 345 354 587 340 352 829 1078 - 1360 Stage 1 567 554 767 710 - - - Stage 2 766 708 561 549 - Time blocked -Platoon, % - - - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 339 348 585 325 346 826 1075 - - 1357 - Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 339 348 - 325 346 - Stage1 559 552 756 700 - Stage 2 752 698 543 547 - - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 12.7 B WB 12.8 B NB 0.5 Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1075 - 491 466 1357 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.045 0.01 0.002 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.393 - 12.7 12.8 7.657 0 HCM Lane LOS A BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.039 - 0.141 0.03 0.005 - Notes SB 0 : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn Timings Future Background 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street AM Peak Hour --► 40- 4\ t "' t Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 4 4 41 Volume (vph) 14 36 64 9 12 171 79 373 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.2 0.2 0,2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated •3: NE2ndAvenue&NE39thStreet I 1 p2 (R) �--- 04 45 s I 45 s 1 t 06 (R) -008 45s I 45s I K:\FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Future Background 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street AM Peak Hour 4. 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4► 4+ 4 41 Volume (veh/h) 14 36 8 64 9 94 12 171 13 79 373 20 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.97 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 247 373 66 330 75 247 180 587 42 328 1012 55 Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 189 1303 232 404 263 861 43 1632 117 343 2813 152 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 67 0 0 197 0 0 230 0 0 293 0 263 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1724 0 0 1528 0 0 1793 0 0 1644 0 1663 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 2.8 Prop In Lane 0.24 0.13 0.38 0.56 0.06 0.07 0.32 0.09 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 686 0 0 652 0 0 810 0 0 796 0 598 VIC Ratio(X) 0,10 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3083 0 0 2819 0 0 3245 0 0 2978 0 2939 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 5.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 8.0 Lane Grp LOS A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 67 197 230 556 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 6.8 6.3 7.4 Approach LOS A A A A Timer Assigned Phs 8 4 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 10.8 12.3 12.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.2 4.0 4,0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.8 40.8 41.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 4.3 4.1 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.7 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn Timings Future Background 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBR2 NBL NBT SBL2 SBT NWL2 NWL Lane Configurations r 4 +TT " ¥ Volume (vph) 9 25 17 290 6 368 45 88 Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 7 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 2 2 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.6 22.6 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.6 22.6 Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 25,6% 25.6% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 34.4% 34.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated fits and Phases: 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street ,1 02 (R) P8 36s I 1 IP '} I Q6 �J 35 s I 131 s I 23 s I K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street AM Peak Hour t r d 4\ Movement EBL2 EBL EBR2 NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR NWL2 NWL NWR Lane Configurations o" 41 'I 'V Volume (vph) 74 9 25 17 290 1 6 368 78 45 88 47 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 1594 1545 1857 3445 1750 1684 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 1594 1545 1786 3277 1750 1684 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 90 11 30 21 354 1 7 449 95 55 107 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 101 3 0 376 0 0 539 0 55 164 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 13 7 13 13 7 20 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 9.6 52.6 52.6 13.8 13.8 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 9.6 52.6 52.6 13.8 13.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.58 0.58 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 170 164 1043 1915 268 258 v/s Ratio Prot c0,10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.00 c0.21 0.16 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.02 0.36 0.28 0.21 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 38.3 36.0 9.8 9.3 33.3 35.7 Progression Factor 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.6 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.3 4.4 Delay (s) 35.9 36,0 10.8 9.7 33.6 40.2 Level of Service D D B A C D Approach Delay (s) 35.9 10.8 9.7 38.5 Approach LOS D B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn Timings Future Background 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street AM Peak Hour f 4 4\ t \. Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations ►j 4 r tr..T� Volume (vph) 397 83 231 54 680 474 1458 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 29.6 29.6 29.6 24.0 24.0 11.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 72.0 72.0 41.0 113.0 Total Split (%) 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% 45.0% 45.0% 25.6% 70.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 57 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street o2 (R, 113 \*135 1p6(R) 41s 1 172 s K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street AM Peak Hour -► ~`t #r 4-- k` t %� \4' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 4 r 'j ti+ "N f► Volume (vph) 0 0 0 397 83 231 54 680 622 474 1458 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1713 1542 1769 3227 1770 3528 Fit Permitted 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.06 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1713 1542 302 3227 105 3528 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 418 87 243 57 716 655 499 1535 31 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 104 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 251 254 48 57 1267 0 499 1565 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 1 4 4 1 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 31.6 31.6 31.6 64.9 64.9 115.8 115.8 Effective Green, g (s) 31.6 31.6 31.6 64.9 64.9 115.8 115.8 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.41 0.41 0.72 0.72 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3,5 3.5 1.0 1,0 2.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 331 338 304 122 1308 543 2553 vls Ratio Prot c0,15 0,15 c0.39 c0.26 0.44 vls Ratio Perm 0.03 0.19 0.41 vlc Ratio 0.76 0.75 0.16 0.47 0.97 0.92 0.61 Uniform Delay, d1 60.6 60.5 53.2 34.9 46.6 49.2 11.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.9 9.4 0.3 12.3 18.4 20.3 1.1 Delay (s) 70.5 69.9 53.5 47.2 65.0 69.5 12.1 Level of Service E E D D E E B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 64.7 64.3 26.0 Approach LOS A E E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 45.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn Timings Future Background 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations ' T1 T14 h 11T g N r ? Volume (vph) 26 120 405 233 111 144 51 239 81 54 226 103 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split NA Split NA Prot NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 7,0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20,0 35.5 35.5 31.2 31.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 30.8 30.8 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 68.0 53.0 36.0 36.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 9.4% 9.4% 42.5% 33.1% 22.5% 22.5% 19.4% 19.4% 19.4% 15.6% 15.6% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0,0 0.0 4.5 4.5 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min None None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 100 (63%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Hi.hwa K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway AM Peak Hour Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations 44. fro. i Volume (vph) 26 120 405 182 233 46 76 68 111 144 36 51 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0,95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1712 3320 3077 1770 1788 1770 Flt Permitted 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 632 3320 3077 1770 1788 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 30 136 460 207 265 52 86 77 126 164 41 58 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 35 0 17 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 166 632 0 386 0 0 0 203 199 0 58 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 28 49 11 28 49 21 28 22 22 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split Split NA Split Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 5 3 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 49.1 49.1 33.0 23.3 23.3 30.6 Effective Green, g (s) 49.1 49.1 33.0 23.3 23.3 30.6 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.21 0.15 0.15 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 1018 634 257 260 338 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.19 0.13 c0.11 0.11 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.62 0.61 0.79 0.77 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 43.1 47.5 57.6 66.0 65.7 54.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 2.8 4.3 14.4 12.1 0.2 Delay (s) 45.1 50.3 62.0 80.3 77.8 54.3 Level of Service D D E F E D Approach Delay (s) 49.3 62.0 79.1 Approach LOS D E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 63.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 30.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway AM Peak Hour Movement SBT SBR SBR2 SEL2 SEL SER SER2 Lanevionfigurations 1 g N rf r Volume (vph) 239 81 4 3 54 226 103 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 6,8 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0,88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0,88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 272 92 5 3 61 257 117 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 78 0 0 0 0 86 Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 19 0 0 64 257 31 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 28 49 22 11 21 Turn Type NA Prot Split NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 30.6 30.6 29.1 29.1 42.2 Effective Green, g (s) 30.6 30.6 29.1 29.1 42.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 302 321 287 417 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.01 0.04 c0.16 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.76 0.06 0.20 0.90 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 61,3 52.9 55.6 64.0 44.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.0 0.1 0.2 27.8 0.1 Delay (s) 70.3 53.0 55.8 91.7 44.3 Level of Service E D E F D Approach Delay (s) 64.2 73.8 Approach LOS E E Intersection Summary K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background AM.syn PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 TWSC Future Background 1: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 12 3 12 7 1 6 8 456 3 3 302 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 0 6 6 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 8 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 13 3 13 8 1 7 9 501 3 3 332 9 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 881 879 351 885 881 518 348 0 0 511 0 0 Stage 1 350 350 - 527 527 - Stage 2 531 529 - 358 354 - - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 267 286 692 266 285 558 1211 - 1054 Stage 1 666 633 535 528 - - Stage 2 532 527 660 630 - - - Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 257 279 683 253 278 551 1203 - 1047 - Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 257 279 - 253 278 - - - Stage 1 655 627 527 520 - - Stage 2 516 519 - 637 624 - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS 15.9 16.4 0.1 0.1 C C Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1203 - - 360 332 1047 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.082 0.046 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.015 0 - 15.9 16.4 8.449 0 HCM Lane LOS A A C C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.022 0.268 0.145 0.009 Notes : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC Future Background 2: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street/NE 4th Avenue PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 23 0 13 15 3 1 26 467 13 7 297 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 16 0 9 9 0 16 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - - None - - None Storage Length - 150 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 0 14 16 3 1 29 513 14 8 326 22 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 939 944 356 943 947 539 351 0 0 530 0 0 Stage 1 356 356 - 580 580 - Stage 2 583 588 - 363 367 - - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 244 262 688 243 261 542 1208 - 1037 - Stage 1 661 629 500 500 Stage 2 498 496 - 656 622 Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 231 252 677 228 251 533 1192 - 1023 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 231 252 228 251 Stage 1 643 621 487 487 Stage 2 475 483 627 614 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 18.7 21.5 0.4 0.2 C C Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1192 - - 303 239 1023 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - 0.131 0.087 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.094 - 18.7 21.5 8.546 0 HCM Lane LOS A CC A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.074 - 0.445 0.284 0.023 Notes : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:IFTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\SynchrolFuture Background PM.syn Timings Future Background 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street PM Peak Hour ` •- 4\ t Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 4 4 41 Volume (vph) 13 44 60 128 9 299 101 280 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 70 (78%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street 1 02 (R) 04 36 s I 54 s 1 to6 (R)-Sibs 36 s i 54 s K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Future Background 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street PM Peak Hour 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 4 +11* Volume (veh/h) 13 44 19 60 128 218 9 299 26 101 280 24 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 184 444 160 190 237 337 127 571 50 361 838 70 Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.'35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 118 1152 416 142 614 874 16 1655 144 540 2427 202 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 77 0 0 414 0 0 341 0 0 218 0 195 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1685 0 0 1630 0 0 1815 0 0 1523 0 1647 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 2.7 Prop In Lane 0,17 0.25 0.15 0.54 0.03 0.08 0.47 0.12 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 788 0 0 764 0 0 748 0 0 700 0 568 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0,00 0.31 0.00 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2751 0 0 2760 0 0 2014 0 0 1645 0 1732 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 7.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.0 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 6.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.0 9.0 Lane Grp LOS A A B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 77 414 341 413 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.0 7.9 10.0 8.8 Approach LOS A A B A Timer Assigned Phs 8 4 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.9 15.9 14.5 14.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.2 4,0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 49.8 49.8 32.0 '32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 8.2 6.6 4.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.0 3.0 1.6 1.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 8.7 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM.syn Timings Future Background 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street PM Peak Hour 4\ t 4 Lane Group EBL EBR2 NBL NBT SBL2 SBT NWL2 NWL Lane Configurations N r 4 41, '9 ¥ Volume (vph) 72 20 46 511 3 239 46 240 Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 7 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 2 2 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.6 22.6 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.6 22.6 Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 18.9% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0,6 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4,6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 78 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street • o2 (R) 4IN7 08 37s I 1 11 t 06 (R) 37s I 136s I 17s K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street PM Peak Hour 4\ t r LAY irN Movement EBL2 EBL EBR2 NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR NWL2 NWL NWR Lane Configurations r 4 41 I V" Volume (vph) 73 72 20 46 511 46 3 239 121 46 240 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1717 1559 1832 3360 1764 1743 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1717 1559 1735 3200 1764 1743 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 78 77 21 49 544 49 3 254 129 49 255 37 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 155 3 0 642 0 0 329 0 49 292 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 4 2 4 4 2 6 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.2 13.2 42.8 42.8 20.0 20.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 13.2 42.8 42.8 20.0 20.0 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.48 0.48 0.22 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 228 825 1521 392 387 vls Ratio Prot c0.17 vls Ratio Perm 0.09 0.00 c0.37 0.10 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.01 0.78 0.22 0.12 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 36.0 32.8 19.6 13.8 28.0 32.7 Progression Factor 0.92 1.00 1.09 1.00 0.94 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 3.8 0.0 4.6 0.3 0.1 6.2 Delay (s) 36.8 32.9 26.1 14.1 26.3 39.1 Level of Service D C C B C D Approach Delay (s) 36.3 26.1 14.1 37.2 Approach LOS D C B D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 26.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM.syn Timings Future Background 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street PM Peak Hour Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations II 4 r ' TI TI Volume (vph) 457 171 404 60 1320 398 1020 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 29.6 29.6 29.6 24.0 24.0 11.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 107.0 107.0 31.0 138.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 59.4% 59.4% 17.2% 76.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 146 (81%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street 1 p2 (R. ,, o4 138 s I 142 s 11 \"p 5 106 (R) 31s 107s I K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street PM Peak Hour f -. - c '- . 4\ t/\ 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations IS 4 rr ) t4 '`i 'P t Volume (vph) 0 0 0 457 171 404 60 1320 455 398 1020 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1730 1583 1770 3369 1770 3505 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.04 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1730 1583 477 3369 70 3505 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 466 174 412 61 1347 464 406 1041 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 201 0 19 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 317 323 211 61 1792 0 406 1109 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated gIC Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Prot vls Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 0.0 A Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA 4 4 6 5 2 4 6 2 35.4 35.4 35.4 101.0 101.0 132.0 132.0 35.4 35.4 35.4 101.0 101.0 132.0 132.0 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.56 0.56 0.73 0.73 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 3,5 3.5 3,5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 330 340 311 267 1890 287 2570 c0.19 0.19 0.53 c0.20 0.32 0.13 0.13 c0.84 0.96 0.95 0.68 0.23 0.95 1.41 0.43 71.6 71.4 67.0 19.9 37.0 67.5 9.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 39.1 35.7 6.0 2.0 11.6 206.0 0.5 110.7 107.1 73.0 21.9 48.7 273.4 9.9 F F E C D F A 94.9 47.8 80.4 F D F HCM 2000 Control Delay 70.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.34 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 180.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM.syn Timings Future Background Optimized 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway PM Peak Hour 3 4-- t 4 j 4/ \-. Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR SEL SER Lane Configurations 1 f t I + sr Volume (vph) 62 136 583 1 462 238 336 72 136 101 115 182 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm NA Split NA Split NA Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 Detector Phase 1 1 6 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 35.5 35.5 35.5 31.2 31.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 30.8 30.8 Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 66.0 46.0 46.0 58.0 58.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 11.1% 11.1% 36.7% 25.6% 25.6% 32.2% 32.2% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% 18.3% 18.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min None None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 26 (14%), Referenced to phase 2:WBTL and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway 01 20 s -11'b6 (R) ■ 66 s ItI/Po3 33s I 1123s s a5 K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM_opt.syn Timings Future Background Optimized 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway PM Peak Hour Lane Group SER2 Laneonfigurations Volume (vph) 119 Turn Type pt+ov Protected Phases 4 1 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Intersection Summary K:IFTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\SynchrolFuture Background PM_opt.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background Optimized 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway PM Peak Hour 3 f -a• ~*M { •- rt... il,, 4\ ) t P Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations +11, N Volume (vph) 62 136 583 109 1 462 68 40 188 238 336 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1758 3376 3294 1770 1798 Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 343 3376 3142 1770 1798 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 67 146 627 117 1 497 73 43 202 256 361 82 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 213 735 0 0 611 0 0 0 458 439 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 42 39 39 20 42 44 20 12 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA Perm NA Split Split NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 5 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 61.6 61.6 41.5 49.5 49.5 Effective Green, g (s) 61.6 61.6 41.5 49.5 49.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.23 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 1155 724 486 494 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 c0.26 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.64 0.84 0.94 0.89 Uniform Delay, d1 46.7 49.8 66.2 63.9 62.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.7 2.7 11.5 26.9 17.3 Delay (s) 68.4 52.5 77.7 90.7 79.9 Level of Service E D E F E Approach Delay (s) 56.0 77.7 85.4 Approach LOS E E F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 77.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 180.0 Sum of lost time (s) 30.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 127.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM_opt.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Background Optimized 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway PM Peak Hour Movement SBL SBT SBR SEL2 SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations / fi g r r Volume (vph) 72 136 101 1 115 182 119 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 77 146 109 1 124 196 128 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 Lane Group Flow (vph) 77 146 109 0 125 196 30 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 44 42 12 39 44 Turn Type Split NA Prot Split NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 16.3 16.3 16.3 24.7 24.7 41.8 Effective Green, g (s) 16.3 16.3 16.3 24.7 24.7 41.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 160 168 143 242 217 367 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.08 0.07 0.07 c0.12 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.48 0.87 0.76 0.52 0.90 0,08 Uniform Delay, d1 77.8 80.8 80.0 72.1 76.5 54.1 Progression Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 1.49 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 34.2 20.0 1.4 35.4 0.1 Delay (s) 76.9 112.5 97.3 70.3 108.9 80.4 Level of Service E F F E F F Approach Delay (s) 99.3 90.0 Approach LOS F F Intersection Summary K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Background PM_opt.syn APPENDIX L: Future Total Conditions Analysis AM Peak Hour HCM 2010 TWSC 1: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street Future Total AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 1 7 0 3 2 7 182 0 1 408 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 2 2 0 5 2 0 7 7 0 2 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 1 8 0 4 2 8 217 0 1 486 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow AD 736 733 500 738 735 229 494 0 0 222 0 0 Stage 1 495 495 238 238 - - Stage 2 241 238 - 500 497 - - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 335 348 571 334 347 810 1070 - - 1347 - Stage 1 556 546 765 708 - Stage 2 762 708 553 545 - - Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 326 342 565 322 341 802 1064 - 1339 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 326 342 322 341 - Stage 1 549 543 755 699 Stage 2 745 699 540 542 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 12.5 B WB 13.2 B NB 0.3 Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1064 - 490 443 1339 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - 0.022 0.013 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.41 0 - 12.5 13.2 7.691 0 HCM Lane LOS A A BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.024 0.067 0.041 0.003 Notes SB 0 : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 2: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street/NE 4th Avenue Future Total AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 5 0 14 16 7 10 12 175 5 2 400 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 2 2 0 1 3 0 3 3 0 3 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - None - None Storage Length - 150 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 6 0 16 19 8 12 14 203 6 2 465 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Minors Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 726 719 479 725 725 211 485 0 0 211 0 0 Stage 1 480 480 236 236 - Stage 2 246 239 - 489 489 - - - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 340 354 587 340 352 829 1078 - 1360 - Stage 1 567 554 767 710 Stage 2 758 708 561 549 Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 324 348 585 325 346 826 1075 - 1357 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 324 348 325 346 Stage 1 559 552 756 700 Stage 2 727 698 543 547 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 12.8 B WB 14.8 B NB 0.5 Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1075 - 483 405 1357 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.046 0.095 0,002 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.393 - 12.8 14.8 7.657 0 HCM Lane LOS A BB A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.039 - 0.143 0.312 0.005 Notes SB 0 : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn Timings 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street Future Total AM Peak Hour -► { s- 41 1 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 4 4 a. Volume (vph) 14 36 64 9 12 171 81 384 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street M 02 (R) 4--- 04 45 s I 45 s F to6 (R) "4.'08 45 s I 45 s I K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street Future Total AM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4r 4+ 4 41 Volume (veh/h) 14 36 8 64 9 94 12 171 13 81 384 21 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.97 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Cap,veh/h 247 373 66 330 75 247 180 587 42 328 1011 55 Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 189 1303 232 404 263 861 43 1631 117 343 2809 153 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 67 0 0 197 0 0 230 0 0 301 0 271 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1724 0 0 1528 0 0 1792 0 0 1644 0 1662 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.9 Prop In Lane 0.24 0.13 0.38 0.56 0.06 0.07 0.32 0.09 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 686 0 0 652 0 0 809 0 0 796 0 598 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3083 0 0 2819 0 0 3241 0 0 2980 0 2939 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 5.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1,1 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 6.2 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.0 6.3 0,0 0.0 7.0 0.0 8.1 Lane Grp LOS A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 67 197 230 572 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 6.8 6.3 7.6 Approach LOS A A A A Timer Assigned Phs 8 4 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 10.8 12.3 12.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 40.8 40.8 41.0 41.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.6 4.3 4.1 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1,4 1.4 1.8 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.1 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn Timings 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street Future Total AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBR2 NBL NBT SBL2 SBT NWL2 NWL Lane Configurations N rf 4 41+ ) ¥ Volume (vph) 9 25 17 290 6 368 45 88 Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 7 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 2 2 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.6 22.6 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.6 22.6 Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 25.6% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 34.4% 34.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 4: Federal Hiohwav & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street 7 - p3 36 s 1 1 to6 (R) 36 s I 131 s I 122 f, K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street Future Total AM Peak Hour Movement EBL2 EBL EBR2 NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR NWL2 NWL NWR Lane Configurations ° r 4 4t '11 Volume (vph) 76 9 25 17 290 1 6 368 78 45 88 47 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4,8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 1594 1545 1857 3445 1750 1684 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 1594 1545 1786 3277 1750 1684 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0,82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 11 30 21 354 1 7 449 95 55 107 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 104 3 0 376 0 0 539 0 55 164 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 13 7 13 13 7 20 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 9.7 52.5 52.5 13.8 13.8 Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 9.7 52.5 52.5 13.8 13.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.58 0.58 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4,6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 171 166 1041 1911 268 258 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0,07 0.00 c0.21 0.16 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.02 0.36 0.28 0.21 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 38.3 35.9 9.9 9.3 33.3 35.7 Progression Factor 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.3 4.4 Delay (s) 36,5 35.9 10.9 9.7 33.6 40.2 Level of Service D D B A C D Approach Delay (s) 36.4 10.9 9.7 38.5 Approach LOS D B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn Timings 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street Future Total AM Peak Hour Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations j 4 r +I 11 TT Volume (vph) 397 83 231 54 680 474 1458 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 29.6 29.6 29.6 24.0 24.0 11.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 47.0 47.0 47.0 72.0 72.0 41.0 113.0 Total Split (%) 29.4% 29.4% 29.4% 45.0% 45.0% 25.6% 70.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 57 (36%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street o 2 (R0 .41.04 113s 06 (R) 41s I 72sit \IPo5 47 s K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street Future Total AM Peak Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations IfS r '1 11, 1 +1+ Volume (vph) 0 0 0 397 83 231 54 680 622 474 1458 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1681 1713 1542 1769 3227 1770 3528 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.06 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1713 1542 302 3227 105 3528 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj, Flow (vph) 0 0 0 418 87 243 57 716 655 499 1535 31 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 195 0 104 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 251 254 48 57 1267 0 499 1565 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 1 4 4 1 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 31.6 31.6 31.6 64.9 64.9 115.8 115,8 Effective Green, g (s) 31.6 31.6 31.6 64.9 64.9 115.8 115.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.41 0.41 0.72 0.72 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 331 338 304 122 1308 543 2553 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.15 c0.39 c0.26 0.44 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.19 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.75 0.16 0.47 0.97 0.92 0.61 Uniform Delay, d1 60.6 60.5 53.2 34.9 46.6 49.2 11.0 Progression Factor 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.9 9.4 0.3 12.3 18.4 20.3 1.1 Delay (s) 70.5 69.9 53.5 47.2 65.0 69.5 12.1 Level of Service EEDD E E B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 64.7 64.3 26.0 Approach LOS A E E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 45.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn Timings 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Future Total AM Peak Hour J' --► "- Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations ti TT N i 'I + ga N r r Volume (vph) 26 120 405 233 111 144 51 239 81 60 230 104 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split NA Split NA Prot NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 35.5 35.5 31.2 31.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 30.8 30.8 Total Split (s) 15.0 15.0 68.0 53.0 36.0 36.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 9.4% 9.4% 42.5% 33.1% 22.5% 22.5% 19.4% 19.4% 19.4% 15.6% 15.6% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min None None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 160 Actuated Cycle Length: 160 Offset: 100 (63%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated •6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highwa 01 .L •'03 �25s 4 } `I o5 ! 02 (R) 15s I 53s 31s 36s '�06 (R)! 68 s I K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Future Total AM Peak Hour Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations 41) 1 'fir '1 Volume (vph) 26 120 405 182 233 46 76 68 111 144 36 51 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3320 3077 1770 1788 1770 Fit Permitted 0,32 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 573 3320 3077 1770 1788 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 30 136 460 207 265 52 86 77 126 164 41 58 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 37 0 17 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 166 630 0 386 0 0 0 203 199 0 58 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 28 49 11 28 49 21 28 22 22 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split Split NA Split Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 5 3 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 44.8 44.8 28.4 22.9 22.9 30.6 Effective Green, g (s) 44.8 44.8 28.4 22.9 22.9 30.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.14 0.14 0,19 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 256 929 546 253 255 338 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.19 0.13 c0.11 0.11 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.68 0.71 0.80 0.78 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 46.5 51.2 61.9 66.4 66.1 54.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 4.0 7.5 16.1 13.8 0.2 Delay (s) 50.7 55.2 69.4 82.5 79.9 54.3 Level of Service D E E F E D Approach Delay (s) 54.3 69.4 81.2 Approach LOS D E F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 63.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 30.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Future Total AM Peak Hour Movement SBT SBR SBR2 SEL2 SEL SER SER2 Lane'configurations it g A r Volume (vph) 239 81 4 3 60 230 104 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 272 92 5 3 68 261 118 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 78 0 0 0 0 83 Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 19 0 0 71 261 35 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 28 49 22 11 21 Turn Type NA Prot Split NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 30.6 30.6 33.8 33.8 47.2 Effective Green, g (s) 30.6 30.6 33.8 33.8 47.2 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 302 373 334 466 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.01 0.04 c0.16 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.76 0.06 0.19 0.78 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 61.3 52.9 51.9 59.6 40.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.0 0.1 0.2 10.9 0.0 Delay (s) 70.3 53.0 52.0 70.5 40.7 Level of Service E D D E D Approach Delay (s) 64.2 59.8 Approach LOS E E Intersection Summary K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 8: NE 4th Avenue & Retail Driveway Future Total AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 0 7 33 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 8 36 0 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 36 0 - 0 44 36 Stage 1 - 36 Stage 2 8 Follow-up Headway 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1575 967 1037 Stage 1 - 986 Stage 2 - 1015 Time blocked -Platoon, % - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1575 - 967 1037 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver - 967 Stage 1 - 986 Stage 2 - - 1015 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS 0 0 0 A Minor Lane / Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1575 0 HCM Lane V/C Ratio + HCM Control Delay (s) 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 + Notes : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 9: NE 4th Avenue & Residential Driveway Future Total AM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 29 0 7 4 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 32 0 8 4 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 12 4 4 0 0 Stage 1 4 - Stage 2 8 Follow-up Headway 3.518 3.318 2.218 - Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1008 1080 1618 Stage 1 1019 Stage 2 1015 - - Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1008 1080 1618 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 1008 - - - Stage 1 1019 - - Stage 2 1015 Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.4 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1618 - 1080 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 8.4 HCM Lane LOS A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.09 Notes _ : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total AM.syn PM Peak Hour HCM 2010 TWSC 1: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 43rd Street Future Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 12 3 12 7 1 6 8 478 3 3 317 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 7 0 6 6 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 8 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 13 3 13 8 1 7 9 5:25 3 3 348 9 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 921 919 368 927 923 542 364 0 0 536 0 0 Stage 1 366 366 552 552 Stage 2 555 553 - 375 371 - - Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 251 271 677 249 270 540 1195 - 1032 Stage 1 653 623 518 515 - - - Stage 2 516 514 646 620 - Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 241 264 669 236 263 533 1187 - 1025 - Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 241 264 - 236 263 - - Stage 1 642 617 - 509 506 - - - Stage 2 500 505 - 623 614 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 16.6 17.1 0.1 0.1 C C Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1187 - 341 313 1025 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - 0.087 0,049 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.055 0 - 16,6 17.1 8.524 0 HCM Lane LOS A A CC A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.022 0.284 0.154 0.01 Notes : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 2: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 42nd Street/NE 4th Avenue Future Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 5.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 23 20 13 57 24 23 26 467 56 22 297 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 3 3 0 2 16 0 9 9 0 16 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - - None - None Storage Length - 150 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 22 14 63 26 25 29 513 62 24 326 22 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1019 1024 356 1011 1004 563 351 0 0 578 0 0 Stage 1 389 389 - 604 604 - Stage 2 630 635 - 407 400 Follow-up Headway 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 215 235 688 218 242 526 1208 - 996 Stage 1 635 608 - 485 488 - Stage 2 470 472 - 621 602 - Time blocked -Platoon, % - Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 176 221 677 186 228 518 1192 983 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 176 221 186 228 - Stage 1 618 588 - 472 475 Stage 2 406 459 560 582 - Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB WB NB SB 25.9 35.7 0.4 0.6 D E Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1192 233 228 983 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.264 0.501 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.094 25.9 35.7 8.755 0 HCM Lane LOS A DE A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.074 1.027 2.556 0.076 Notes : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn Timings 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street II Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 4 4 41* Volume (vph) 16 44 60 128 9 316 107 312 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 4 6 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Detector Phase 8 8 4 4 6 6 2 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.2 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Intersection Summary Future Total PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 70 (78%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street p 2 (R) ill- 04 36 s I 54 s j I t p6 (R) -0138 36 s l 54 s l K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 3: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 39th Street Future Total PM Peak Hour 4L 4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, 4. 4-, 4 + Volume (veh/h) 16 44 19 60 128 241 9 316 26 107 312 28 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.95 0.98 0.95 Parking Bus Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Adj Sat Flow veh/h/In 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 190.0 186.3 190.0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Cap, veh/h 200 440 157 181 229 361 121 578 48 343 837 76 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 164 1112 397 133 579 913 15 1664 137 513 2414 218 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 80 0 0 438 0 0 358 0 0 237 0 219 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1673 0 0 1626 0 0 1817 0 0 1502 0 1643 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 0,0 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 3.2 Prop In Lane 0.20 0.24 0.14 0.56 0.03 0.08 0.46 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 798 0 0 772 0 0 746 0 0 686 0 570 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2578 0 0 2630 0 0 1923 0 0 1564 0 1649 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 7.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 1.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/In 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0,0 1.3 Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0,0 10.7 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 9.8 Lane Grp LOS A A B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 80 438 358 456 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.1 8.2 10.7 9.5 Approach LOS A A B A Timer Assigned Phs 8 4 6 2 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.8 16.8 15.1 15.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 49.8 49.8 32,0 32.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 8.9 7.1 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.2 3.2 1.8 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 9.2 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes K\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn Timings 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street Lane Group EBL EBR2 NBL NBT SBL2 SBT NWL2 NWL Lane Configurations N r 4 41 "i ¥ Volume (vph) 72 20 46 511 3 239 46 258 Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 7 Detector Phase 8 8 6 6 2 2 7 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.6 22.6 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.6 22.6 Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 18.9% 41.1 % 41.1% 41.1% 41.1 % 40.0% 40.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min None None Intersection Summary Future Total PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 78 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street I • 02(R) 08 37s I 1 t 06 �) 37s i (i367 � 17s I K:\FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Federal Highway & NE 38th Street & NE 39th Street Future Total PM Peak Hour Movement EBL2 EBL EBR2 NBL NBT NBR SBL2 SBT SBR NWL2 NWL NWR Lane Configurations et 44. 4., 'i Volume (vph) 79 72 20 46 511 46 3 239 126 46 258 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1717 1559 1832 3356 1764 1745 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1717 1559 1734 3196 1764 1745 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 77 21 49 544 49 3 254 134 49 274 37 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 161 3 0 642 0 0 329 0 49 311 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 4 2 4 4 2 6 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 8 6 2 7 Permitted Phases 8 8 6 2 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.2 13.2 41.8 41.8 21.0 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 13.2 41.8 41.8 21.0 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.46 0.46 0.23 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 228 805 1484 411 407 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.00 c0.37 0.10 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.01 0.80 0.22 0.12 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 36.2 32.8 20.5 14.4 27.2 32.2 Progression Factor 0.90 1.00 1.11 1.00 0.95 1.04 Incremental Delay, d2 4.8 0.0 5.1 0.3 0.1 6.3 Delay (s) 37.3 32.9 27.8 14.7 25.8 39.7 Level of Service D C C B C D Approach Delay (s) 36.8 27.8 14.7 37.8 Approach LOS D C B D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn Timings 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r +1 TI Volume (vph) 457 180 404 64 1320 398 1020 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Detector Phase 4 4 4 6 6 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 29.6 29.6 29.6 24.0 24.0 11.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 107.0 107.0 31.0 138.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 59.4% 59.4% 17.2% 76.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min None C-Min Intersection Summary Future Total PM Peak Hour Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 146 (81%), Referenced to phase 2:SBTL and 6:NBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street 1 02 (R) 9 7;4 138s I I42s I 1 �p5 t06 (R) 31s I 1o7s I K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Biscayne Boulevard & NE 38th Street Future Total PM Peak Hour -•- t p \. 1 4' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations li 4 r ' +T I f t Volume (vph) 0 0 0 457 180 404 64 1320 455 398 1020 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util, Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0,85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0,95 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 1732 1583 1770 3369 1770 3503 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.98 1.00 0,25 1.00 0.04 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 1732 1583 475 3369 70 3503 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 466 184 412 65 1347 464 406 1041 77 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 201 0 19 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 322 328 211 65 1792 0 406 1115 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type Split NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 35.4 35.4 35.4 101.0 101.0 132.0 132.0 Effective Green, g (s) 35.4 35.4 35.4 101.0 101.0 132.0 132.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0,20 0.20 0.56 0.56 0.73 0.73 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 330 340 311 266 1890 287 2568 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.19 0.53 c0.20 0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.14 c0,84 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.96 0.68 0.24 0.95 1.41 0.43 Uniform Delay, d1 71.9 71.7 67.0 20.1 37.0 67.5 9.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 42.8 39.3 6.0 2.2 11.6 206.0 0.5 Delay (s) 114.6 111.0 73.0 22.3 48.7 273.4 9.9 Level of Service F F ECD F A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 97.4 47.8 80.1 Approach LOS A F D F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 70.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.34 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 180.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.1% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:1FTL_TPTO1043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn Timings Future Total Optimized 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway PM Peak Hour 3 -. 1- Lane Group EBL2 EBL EBT WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations 11+ 44, A 1. ) T g N r j Volume (vph) 64 136 583 462 249 336 72 136 101 133 194 121 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split NA Split NA Prot NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 6 6 Detector Phase 1 1 6 2 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 35.5 35.5 31.2 31.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 30.8 30.8 Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 66.0 46.0 58.0 58.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 33.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 11.1% 11.1% 36.7% 25.6% 32.2% 32.2% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% 18.3% 18.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.8 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min None None None None None None None Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 26 (14%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Splits and Phases: 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Hi.hwa pl 20 s 1 02 (R) 46s -11'06 (R) V 66 s t4 33s ,03 23 s 4105 58 s K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM_opt.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway Future Total Optimized PM Peak Hour 3 t --I,. .* ,- - #- 4\ 1 t t . Movement EBL2 EBL EBT EBR WBT WBR WBR2 NBL2 NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations 4i*i i 'I Volume (vph) 64 136 583 109 462 72 40 188 249 336 76 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1759 3376 3287 1770 1798 1770 Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 318 3376 3287 1770 1798 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 69 146 627 117 497 77 43 202 268 361 82 77 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 215 735 0 614 0 0 0 470 439 0 77 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 42 39 20 42 44 20 12 12 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt NA NA Split Split NA Split Protected Phases 1 1 6 2 5 5 5 3 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 59.8 59.8 40.0 50.3 50.3 16.3 Effective Green, g (s) 59.8 59.8 40.0 50.3 50.3 16.3 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.22 0.28 0.28 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 3.0 8.5 8.5 6.2 6.2 6.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 240 1121 730 494 502 160 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.22 0.19 c0.27 0.24 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 vlc Ratio 0.90 0.66 0.84 0.95 0.87 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 48.2 51.3 67.0 63.7 61.8 77.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Incremental Delay, d2 31.1 3.0 11.3 28.5 15.4 1.6 Delay (s) 793 54.3 78.2 92.1 77.2 76.7 Level of Service E D E F E E Approach Delay (s) 59.9 78.2 84.9 Approach LOS E E F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 78.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 180.0 Sum of lost time (s) 30.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.2% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM_opt.syn HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Total Optimized 6: NE 2nd Avenue & NE 36th Avenue & Federal Highway PM Peak Hour Movement SBT SBR SEL2 SEL SER SER2 Lanevionfigurations t g r r Volume (vph) 136 101 1 133 194 121 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 1770 1583 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 Adj. Flow (vph) 146 109 1 143 209 130 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 99 Lane Group Flow (vph) 146 109 0 144 209 31 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 44 42 12 39 44 Turn Type NA Prot Split NA Prot pt+ov Protected Phases 3 3 4 4 4 4 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 16.3 16.3 25.7 25.7 42.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.3 16.3 25.7 25.7 42.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 6.4 6.4 6.8 6.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 168 143 252 226 373 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.07 0.08 c0.13 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.87 0.76 0.57 0.92 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 80.8 80.0 72.0 76.2 53.6 Progression Factor 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.95 1.45 Incremental Delay, d2 34.2 20.0 2.5 39.0 0.1 Delay (s) 112.4 97.2 70.2 111.3 77.8 Level of Service F F E F E Approach Delay (s) 99.1 90.1 Approach LOS F F Intersection Summary K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Futur Total PM_opt.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 8: NE 4th Avenue Future Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 23 75 99 0 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 82 108 0 0 5 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 108 0 0 240 Stage1 108 Stage 2 - 132 Follow-up Headway 2.218 - 3.518 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 1483 - 748 Stage 1 - 916 Stage 2 894 Time blocked -Platoon, % Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 1483 735 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 735 Stage 1 - 916 Stage 2 - 878 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane / Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1483 946 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.006 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.469 0 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.051 - - 0.017 Notes 108 3.318 946 946 : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:1FTL_TPT01043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #21Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn HCM 2010 TWSC 9: NE 4th Avenue Future Total PM Peak Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 80 55 20 19 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 87 60 22 21 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 162 21 21 0 0 Stage 1 21 Stage 2 141 - Follow-up Headway 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Capacity-1 Maneuver 829 1056 1595 Stage 1 1002 - Stage 2 886 Time blocked -Platoon, Mov Capacity-1 Maneuver 797 1056 1595 Mov Capacity-2 Maneuver 797 - Stage 1 1002 Stage 2 852 Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS EB 8.7 A NB 5.4 Minor Lane / Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1595 1056 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 - 0.082 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.345 0 8.7 - HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.117 - 0.269 Notes SB 0 : Volume Exceeds Capacity; $ : Delay Exceeds 300 Seconds; Error : Computation Not Defined K:\FTL_TPTO\043647000 - Design District SAP Amendment #2\Calcs\Synchro\Future Total PM.syn EXHIBIT C MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SAP 2 MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP 2.1 APPLICANTS SAP 2.2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SAP 2.3 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS ARTICLE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 3. GENERAL TO ZONES ARTICLE 4. STANDARDS & TABLES ARTICLE 5. SPECIFIC TO ZONES ARTICLE 6. SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS ARTICLE 7. PROCEDURES AND NONCONFORMITIES ARTICLE 9. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. SAP 2.4 CONCEPT BOOK F.1 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.2 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN AMENDMENTS TO MIAMI 21 ORDINANCE DATE APPROVED DESCRIPTION LEGISLATIVE ID 1334 7/26/2012 Special Area Plan for Miami Design District Retail Street 11-01196ap 13414 10/24/2013 Amendment to MDD Retail Street SAP to add additional properties 11-01196ap1 2nd Amendment to MDD Retail Street SAP to add an additional property 11-01196ap2 F.3 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.4 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN SAP 2 MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET The Miami Design District Retail Street is a mixed -use project in the heart of the Design District situated on certain parcels totaling approximately 21.06 22.86 acres. The site is generally bounded by Northeast 43rd Street and Northeast 42nd Street to the North, North Federal Highway and Biscayne Boulevard to the East, Northeast 38th Street to the South, and by NE Miami Court and North Miami Avenue to the West, Miami, Florida, and further described in Exhibit "A". SAP 2.1 APPLICANTS Applicant Entities: Ben Newton LLC Dacra Design 4141 LLC Dacra Design Moore (Del.), LLC FCAA, LLC Half -Circle Property (Del.) LLC Lovely Rita Acquisitions, LLC MDDA Morning Dew, LLC Monte Carlo Associates (Del.) LLC Norwegian Wood Acquisitions, LLC Oak Plaza Associates (Del.) LLC Penny Lane Acquisitions, LLC Sweet Virginia Acquisitions Tiny Dancer Acquisitions LLC Sun King, LLC Uptown Girl Development LLC Flagler Holding Group, Inc. 4201 NE 2nd Ave, LLC F.5 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.6 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN SAP 2.2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS SECTION PENDING FINAL REVIEW F,7 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN SAP 2.3 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1 DEFINITIONS OF BUILDING FUNCTION: USES (Article 4, Table 3) d. COMMERCIAL This category is intended to encompass land Use functions of retail, service, entertainment or recreational establishments and supporting office. The definitions listed herein shall only apply within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area. Entertainment Establishment: A place of business serving the amusement and recreational needs of the community. Such facilities may include, but are not limited to: cinemas, billiard parlors, teen clubs, dance halls, video arcades, or special event spaces and ballrooms. Uses not included: Entertainment Establishment, Adult. Open Air Retail: A retail sales establishment operated substantially in the open air including, but not limited to: farmers market, vending carts/kiosk�, kiosks, Retail Merchandising Units, and the like. Uses not included are: car sales, equipment sales, boat sales, and home and garden supplies, and Flea Markets. 1.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS This section provides for terms in the Code that are technical in nature or that might not be otherwise reflected in common usage of the word. If a term is not defined in this Article, then the Zoning Administrator shall determine the correct definition of the term. The definitions listed herein shall only apply within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area. Awning: A movable roof -like Structure, cantilevered or otherwise entirely supported from a Building, used to shade or screen windows or doors. Cantilever: A Frontage where the Facade includes a cantilevered section of a Building, including but not limited to, open balconies, bay windows, planters, and similar architectural features, that overlaps the Sidewalkmay project beyond the Frontage Line, with the Facade at Sidewalk level remaining at the Frontage Line. Frontage, Retail: A Principal Frontage facing a public space such as a Thoroughfare of higher pedestrian importance (i.e. traffic volume, number of lanes, etc.) requiring that Facades be detailed as storefronts in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sec. 5.4.5.b., 5.5.5.b., and 5.6.5.b of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Retail Frontages do not include the Secondary Frontages located on NE 42nd Street between NE 1st and 2nd Avenues, as well as those portions of a Pedestrian Passage Frontages located more than twenty-five (25') from the intersection of any Thoroughfare and the Pedestrian Passage. Loading Space: An area in which goods and products are moved on and off a vehicle, including the stall or berth. F.8 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN Retail Merchandising Unit: A freestanding structure open on one or more sides, fixed or portable, which may be connected to electricity and/or potable water, used as Open Air Retail for a commercial purpose or for the display or dissemination of information. Transit Corridor: A mass transit route with designated transit vehicle(s) operating at an average 25 minute or less headway Monday through Friday between the hours of 7 a.m. through 7 p.m. and includes designated transit stop locations within 1/4 mile of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area. Multiple transit routes or types of transit vehicles may not be added cumulatively under this definition for the purpose of parking reductions. 1.3 DEFINITIONS OF SIGNS Copy Area: The area computed by surrounding each Identification or Secondary Identification Sign with a square or rectangle shape to determine the area. Less those portions within the square or rectangle consisting of logo brand marks, framing elements, large scale featured artwork swashes, simple lines, back plates, or other decorative elements. Directional Sign: Vehicular or pedestrian -scale signage containing multiple messages that serve to identify the Miami Design District and guide or direct the public safely to destinations within the district. Directional signs may be located on private property or within the Public Right -of - Way, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works for all such signs within the Public Right -of -Way. Directional signs may be combined with address Signs but shall bear no advertising matter, and may be directed to guide area visitors to entrances, exits, retailer/tenants, or Parking Areas. The words "advertising matter" shall not be construed to include graphic logos, registered trade names, or elements of the district identity or "tag lines" that may be incorporated as part of the sign aesthetics. The size of a Directional Sign, and copy thereon, shall be scaled appropriately to the speed of the area traffic. Gateway Sign: A large-scale, mounted identity Sign of not greater than 5,000 square feet in size or 85% of a Building wall that serves to identify the district, mark a destination for visitors, and reinforce the district's character as a destination for art, culture, dining, and fashion. A Gateway Sign may include or be comprised solely of an art installation and recognition of the installation sponsor, which sponsor or donor recognition shall be limited to one (1) recognition comprising no more than 15% of the art installation forming all or a part of the Gateway Sign. Art installations forming part of a Gateway Sign shall not contain any point of sale signage or commercial product expression related to the donor or sponsor. Gateway Signs shall be oriented to face major traffic Thoroughfares, such as 1-195, Biscayne Boulevard and North Miami Avenue, and shall be limited to no more than five (5) such signs within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area. Notice and Warning Sign: Signs limited to providing notice concerning posting of property against trespass; directing deliveries; indicating the location of buried utilities; warning against hazardous conditions; prohibiting salesman; peddlers, or agents; and the like. Secondary Identification Sign: A Sign limited to the name or registered trade name of a Building, institution or person, whether natural or corporate person. SAP Signage Package: A comprehensive signage proposal consisting of Gateway Signs and/or Directional Signs for all or a Block(s) of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP requiring F.9 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN approval by SAP Permit for Signage that deviates from the requirements of Article 6 of Miami 21, as further amended by the Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan. Sign Area: Signs shall be comprised of individual letters, figures or elements on a wall or similar surface of the Building or Structure. The area and dimension of the Sign shall encompass a regular geometric shape or a combination of regular geometric shapes, which form, or approximate, the perimeter of all elements in the display, the frame, and any applied background that is not part of the architecture of the Building. When separate elements are organized to form a single Sign, and are separated by open space, the Sign area and dimensions shall be calculated by determining the geometric form or combination of forms, which comprise all of the Sign area, including the space between different elements, less the space attributed to any elements not comprising part of the Copy Area. F.10 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.11 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT 2.1.1 INTENT The intent of the Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan (SAP) is to guide the design, construction and management of a new retail pedestrian street and its surrounding city streets in the Design District to ensure a high quality, mixed use, pedestrian experience. The control of Building location, massing, and surface is intended to produce public space that is safe, comfortable and interesting for pedestrians and attractive to high -end retail tenants. Pedestrian mobility is to be improved by an enhanced Public Right -of -Way Streetscape and by the addition of a four block long Pedestrian Passage. The public space of the Pedestrian Passage is of a scale that is intimate and episodic. The quantity and materials of shared elements in the public spaces, such as pavement, signs and lighting are intended to be minimized and recessive, as the primary experience should be that of the highly individualistic retail stores. The Building Facade lines of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP are drawn to support the continuity of the existing Design District street wall, to form the sequential character of the pedestrian street experience, and to give store tenants appropriate space distribution and visibility. This document precedes the final development program, architectural design and detailing, and infrastructure engineering, and it is expected that adjustments to the development program, architectural design and detailing, infrastructure engineering may be necessary during implementation phases of design development and construction documents. Nothing in this Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, including the initial development program as set forth on Page A1.98 of the Concept Book, shall be construed to limit development in excess of the initial development program. Any future development in excess of the initial development program shall be subject at all times to the maximum density and intensity permitted by the underlying transect designation of any one Lot or parcel forming part of this SAP and the procedures set forth in Article 7 of this Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, including the approval of substantial modifications to the development program by process of Exception. The SAP is based on the Miami 21 Zoning Code, as amended through April 2012, and shall serve to supplement the code. Where standards set forth herein conflict with standards set forth in the code, the standards in this SAP shall govern. Where the standards in the SAP are silent, the underlying Miami 21 zoning code requirements shall govern. By virtue of the adoption of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, and any subsequent amendments thereto, all provisions of the Miami 21 Zoning Code requiring enactment or authorization by Special Area Plan pursuant to and identified in Section 3.9, unless modified in the SAP, shall be deemed duly enacted or authorized. The Miami Design District Retail Street SAP shall not constitute a precedent for the balance of the City of Miami. The alternate standards of this SAP should be considered unique with regard to the large aggregation of property under multiple ownership committed to an integrated development plan, as well as its unified design and management that will enable and ensure a coherent, high quality, and sustainable result. F.12 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.13 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 3. GENERAL TO ZONES 3.3 LOTS AND FRONTAGES 3.3.6 For new Buildings in Established Setbacks Areas, the Established Setback may be maintained for those Frontages identified on page A1.72.1 of the Concept Book. Where a new Building is Setback from the Established Setback Area consistent with Article 5, Illustrations 5.4, 5.5, and 5.6 of the Miami Design District SAP, such Setback shall govern the placement of all new Buildings to the nearest corner of the same Block Frontage, except for the Setback of plaza entries and as otherwise permitted in Sec. 5.4.5.d., 5.5.5.e., and 5.6.5.e. Galleries, Cantilevers and Arcades may be permitted within the First Layer in Established Setback Areas and may be permitted to encroach into the Public Right -of -Way by SAP Permit and upon a recommendation of approval or approval with conditions by UDRB and with the approval of the Director of Public Works. Habitable Space above the Public Right -Of -Way shall be included in the development capacity of the subject lot and included towards the overall development capacity approved within this SAP. Established Setback Areas include: c. Design District 1. Boundary: The Established Setback for the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP shall be as identified on page A1.72.1 of the Concept Book. 3.5 MEASUREMENT OF HEIGHT 3.5.3 Except as specifically provided herein, the Height limitations of this Code shall not apply to any roof Structures for housing elevators, bathrooms, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans, solar energy collectors, or similar equipment required to operate and maintain the Building (provided that such Structures shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%) of roof area for T4 and T5); nor to church spires, steeples, belfries, monuments, water towers, flagpoles, vents, or similar Structures, which may be allowed to exceed the maximum Height by Waiver; nor to fire or parapet walls, which shall not extend more than five (5) feet above the maximum Height in T4 and T5 and ten (10) feet in T6 and Districts. 3.6 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS 3.6.1 Off-street Parking Standards a. Off-street Parking requirements for the individual Transect Zones shall be as set forth in Article 4, Table 4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Where required off-street parking is based on square footage of Use, the calculation shall only include Habitable Rooms and Habitable Space occupied by such Use. With the exception of Block 5 East, Off- street parking requirements within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area may be calculated and provided for in aggregate for new Buildings. Existing properties as identified below shall not be required to provide parking if densities and intensities do not increase from existing uses from the adopted date of approved Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, as amended. If density and intensities change then applicable parking requirements shall apply. All new development shall be subject to parking requirements within Miami 21, as the same may be modified by the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. F.14 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 Existing Property Table REGULATING PLAN NUMBER NAME ADDRESS 1 Laverne (SAP Parcel #1) 90 NE 3991 ST 2 Buick Building (SAP Parcel #2) 3841 NE 2 AVE 3 Buena Vista Building (SAP Parcel #7) 180 NE 39 ST 4 Oak Plaza-KVA (SAP Parcel #17) 150 NE 40 ST 5 Oak Plaza-Twery (SAP Parcel #18) 154 and 160 NE 40 ST 6 Thomas Maier (SAP Parcel #19) 170 NE 40 ST 7 Melin (SAP Parcel #20) 3930 NE 2 AVE 8 Newton (SAP Parcel #21) 201 NE 39 ST 9 Rosen (SAP Parcel #24) 151 NE 40 ST 10 Mosaic/Chatham (SAP Parcel #25) 155 NE 40 ST 11 Moore -Garden Lounge (SAP Parcel #26) 175 NE 40 ST 12 Moore Building (SAP Parcel #27) 4040 NE 2 AVE 13 4100/Lee Building (SAP Parcel #45) 4100 NE 2 AVE 14 4141 Building (SAP Parcel #46) 4141 NE 2 AVE 15 Flagler Building (SAP Parcel #48) 4218 NE 2 AVE 16 4240 Building (SAP Parcel #49) 4240 NE 2 AVE 17 Spears (SAP Parcel #52) 3815 NE MIAMI CT 18 Always Flowers (SAP Parcel #53) 50 NE 39 ST 19 Lidia (SAP Parcel #54) 30 NE 39 ST 20 Lidia (SAP Parcel #55) 3840 NE MIAMI AVE 21 Lidia (SAP Parcel #56) 3825 N MIAMI AVE 22 Marcy (SAP Parcel #57) 3852 N MIAMI AVE 23 Marcy (SAP Parcel #58) 20 NW 39 ST 24 Marcy (SAP Parcel #59) 28 NW 39 ST 25 Madonna (SAP Parcel #60) 3900 N MIAMI AVE 26 Madonna (SAP Parcel #60) 21 NW 39 ST b. Off-street Parking dimensions and Shared Parking (mixed -use) reduction table shall be as set forth in Article 4, Table 5 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. c. Required Parking for Adaptive Reuses may be reduced or exempted by Waiver for properties located in a Community Redevelopment Area, or in areas where a Parking Trust Fund has been established, or for historic sites and contributing Structures within designated historic districts. d. Parking reductions shall not be cumulative except in T4, T5 and T6. Parking reductions shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the total Off-street Parking required, except for Residential components of projects within one thousand (1,000) feet of Metrorail or Metromover stations. 3.6.2 Off-street Parking Driveway Standards [RESERVED] 3.6.3 Additional Off-street Parking Regulations General performance standards for Off-street Parking facilities: F.15 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN a. Parking shall be implemented so as to provide safe and convenient access to and from public Thoroughfares which include movement lanes and Public Frontages. b. Vehicular access through Residential properties for nonresidential Uses shall be prohibited. c. Off-street Parking spaces shall be located with sufficient room for safe and convenient parking without infringing on any public Thoroughfare or sidewalk. d. Off-street Parking spaces whose locations require that cars back into movement lanes shall only be permissible in T3 and T4 zones. Backing into Alleys shall be permissible in all Transect Zones. e. Off-street Parking or loading area shall not be used for the sale, repair, or dismantling of any vehicle or equipment, or for storage of materials or supplies. f. Parking or storage of commercial trucks, buses, vans, sign trailers; trailers or semi -trailers for freight, cargo; or the like shall not be permitted in any T3, T4, T5-R or T6-R Zone. Inoperable vehicles shall be stored only in storage facilities or other approved places where they are completely concealed from public view. h. Except in connection with permitted active continuing construction on the premises, construction equipment such as earth moving machines, excavators, cranes, and the like shall only be allowed in D1, D2 and D3, as allowed by this Code. i. All Off-street Parking shall comply with applicable regulations related to lighting, paving, and drainage including the Miami -Dade County Code and the Florida Building Code. j. Specific areas may be set aside for Tandem Parking. Tandem Parking in all Transect Zones, except T3, may be used by both a valet parking operator or for residential self -parking. Each Tandem Parking space for residential self -parking shall serve a single residential unit. k. Parking facilities on adjoining Lots may share access points, driveways and parking subject to a recorded covenant running with the property on which the facilities are located. g. I. Where Lots are Abutting, underground parking may extend to Abutting blocks and Lots, including under Thoroughfares. 3.6.4 Calculation of Off-street Parking requirements related to number of seats. Where parking requirements relate to number of seats and seating is in the form of undivided pews, benches, or the like, twenty (20) lineal inches shall be construed to be equal to one (1) seat. Where Parking requirements relate to movable seating in auditoriums and other assembly rooms, ten (10) square feet of Floor Area shall be construed to be equal to one (1) seat except where otherwise specified. Net floor area shall be the actual area occupied by seating and related aisles, and shall not include accessory unoccupied areas or the thickness of walls. F.16 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 3.6.5 Valet Parking Off-street Parking facilities maintained with valet parking shall be allowed generally, provided that the minimum Off-street Parking requirements of this Code are satisfied and that an attendant shall remain on duty during business hours or as long as the Principal Building is occupied. Valet parking stations shall respond to demand within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area and multiple valet stations may be provided on each block when such stations are operated under a unified management scheme. Each valet station shall be permitted subject to review by the Miami Parking Authority (MPA) to ensure that the proposed locations will not adversely affect the flow of traffic on the adjoining Thoroughfare. 3.6.9 Loading Requirements Off-street vehicular loading shall be required in accordance with the standards set forth in Article 4, Table 5 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Service and loading vehicles servicing properties located within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area may gain access to such off-street loading area in order to service the property by utilizing no more than three (3) on - street maneuvers. a. Loading Standards. On -street loading shall be allowed in areas designated by signage and for limited intervals during specified hours. 1. Retail/Commercial Loading. On -street loading areas intended to service storefront retail and retail locations along the Pedestrian Passage shall be permitted within specifically designated zones. Loading within such designated zones shall not exceed 20 minutes. Such loading activity shall occur only between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. 2. Express Parcel Delivery. On -street loading for express parcel delivery shall be allowed in specifically designated zones. Loading within such designated zones shall not exceed 15 minutes and shall occur only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. 3.6.10 Bicycle Parking Requirements a. Bicycle parking shall be provided in aggregate for all new, Buildings in all T4, T5, and T6 zones, as shown in Article 4, Table 4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. The requirement set forth herein shall not apply to any existing and Adaptive Use Buildings. Existing, on -street bicycle racks located within the public Right —of-Way cannot be utilized to satisfy bicycle parking requirements set forth herein below. b. After the first fifty (50) required bicycle spaces are provided within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area identified within page A1.5 of the Concept Book, additional required spaces may be reduced by one-half. c. Required bicycle parking shall meet the following standards: 1. Required bicycle parking facilities may be located within the project site, adjacent to multiple Buildings, or in a shared bicycle parking facility located within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area and subject to all the conditions for shared bicycle parking facilities below: F.17 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN (a) Required bicycle parking for Buildings within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area may be satisfied by the same bicycle parking facility used jointly, provided that such right of joint use and maintenance is evidenced by covenant running with the land or equivalent legal document establishing the joint use. (b) Shared bicycle parking facilities may be located anywhere within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area. Any Building(s) seeking to utilize said shared facility in order to satisfy its bicycle parking requirements shall be located within 300 feet of any Building housing a shared bicycle parking facility which has sufficient capacity to provide the required bicycle parking spaces. The owner/developer of any Building seeking to use a shared parking facility to satisfy these requirements shall certify to the Zoning Administrator, on a form acceptable to the City Attorney, that the said shared bicycle parking facility has sufficient capacity to provide the required bicycle parking spaces. (c) The minimum number of required bicycle parking is satisfied by all Buildings using the shared facility. c. Within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area, bicycle parking requirements may be satisfied by providing bicycle racks within the Sidewalk or on -street bicycle corrals within an on -street parking space. Said racks or bicycle corrals shall be available for use by the public at no cost. Locations may be chosen to support Transit Oriented Development along Priority Corridors. d. Bicycle parking requirements shall be calculated in aggregate for the off-street parking requirements for the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area. 3.9 SPECIAL AREA PLANS 3.9.1 General g. Unless a Building is specifically approved as part of the Special Area Plan, any Building equal to or greater than 200,000 sq. ft. shall be reviewed by the Planning Director, after referral to and recommendation from the CRC for conformance to the Plan, prior to issuance of the Building Permit. 3.13 SUSTAINABILITY 3.13.1 General a. Landscape requirements are as required in Article 9 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, this code, and the City of Miami Tree Protection regulations of Chapter 17 of the City Code, as amended by the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Development Agreement. Where regulations of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP and thise Miami 21 code isare more restrictive than the Tree Protection regulations, the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP and thise Miami 21 code shall apply. NOTE: All new Buildings in excess of 50,000 sq. ft. within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP shall conform to the sustainability requirements set forth in Miami 21. F.18 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.19 MIAMI 21 AS ADOPTED - OCTOBER 2013 THE NATURAL ZONE consists of lands approximat- ing a wilderness condition, permanently set aside for conservation in an essentially natural state. THE RURALZONE consists of lands in open or cultivated state or sparsely settled. These include woodland, grassland and agricultural land. THE SUB -URBAN ZONE consists of low -Density areas, primarily comprised of Single -Family and Two Family residential units with relatively deep Setbacks, Streetscapes with swales, and with or without Side- walks. Blocks may be large and the roads may be of irregular geometry to accommodate natural and historic conditions. T6 THE GENERAL URBAN ZONE consists of a Mixed -Use but primarily residential urban fabric with a range of Building types including rowhouses, small apartment Buildings, and bungalow courts. Setbacks are short with an urban Streetscape of wide Sidewalks and trees in planters. Thoroughfares typically define medium- sized blocks. THE URBAN CENTER ZONE consists of higher Density Mixed -Use Building types that accommodate retail and office Uses, rowhouses and apartments. A network of small blocks has Thoroughfares with wide Sidewalks, steady street tree planting and Buildings set close to the Frontages with frequent doors and windows. THE URBAN CORE ZONE consists of the highest Density and greatest variety of Uses, including Civic Buildings of regional importance. A network of small blocks has Thoroughfares with wide Sidewalks, with steady tree planting and Buildings set close to the Frontage with frequent doors and windows. THE CIVIC ZONE consists of public use space and facilities that may contrast in use to their surroundings while reflecting adjacent Setbacks and landscape. THE DISTRICT ZONE consists of the least regulated Building and accommodates commercial and industrial Uses of a scale and with a Streetscape that facilitate vehicular access. APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP ARTICLE 4. TABLE 1 ZONE DESCRIPTIONS a- '':"• '''''6CDItil) - ''C) 0 ailki;aex - ',('' -i'9, U ' 1dX1 , '':, -. a - faX? V 111024PC. 01111. i . L.: ' '' aii Vall 4iif IS •-r, „..., ,0_,,i0 .0 ,..t• 00 ' ,g,,,,,,q n ) . ....„ ,..4 ,,,,,,; a No - ft ‘%.,,, loter ., .„. II _, , , -,,, „ ---,,,7 .0.-- •0. - . ,,,,,,,,,,:. ?.„:„.„.4. Q-a,i• - - -12 , Naaa aaaga, .„...,„ • ,"' - - 'Ka... • g tn iiie . Kt aaa . ,, aa ,- ,--* 't•.--, ''''F' 1 - , a' a • - ,. .(3,,Xx' 99 ',•1 ;J.. ..g; •, ig.. a ,.„„ -: a ,:,. VI _ teot a,--- - " • igamoso kiliiiii , .0"-- .iAr _a MN ' " Nivx gmav, ,....., r r. 4lIK 0-a ...... ,• ..,. 4, „,:, •-- .waVad, a If IS i , mappo gillesta >.?.. am '.,- '- .4f: -0 , ....; r„... • ; -,t:0-.---- 144 y il"4'k:A .l'e. 'fY - I. 6.''' e, c','' 4,r. bc3 t. (? Pi;,P ike:Pit ittgiriVa ,. ; v ,,, ,i, ..;\•.,,, --‘;:-.', ,,,,l 4,4fx. - ' '1,...f",i-rie,,r3 P- ,,,..24",,,,,,,,:ip < ..- 6, ,,,,, : , ,0R r a '', -.. , ,„.„, it: „...... kgt; 14-.A MOO. 0:. Nif , AM iliaa Di'lla--• ' 4, ',,, 5itii i o i a,•.•C., • a., ... )it YA Laa,i3 at. $-1, , ' - - PA* !AV. ralaaaNae ad a ' aft". aZai , ....„. '''''" '' ' '',-'.' '..•ca4:'• . ',-., a".,• r..a d'I ",d-Z, •",.-. d 4 •'. 0 p ,;, 0 c,,,d a, a SaaVaga. Fewrefh a: io ka- a 11 aaaaaaa MO* \ . ppi -',-- , , '..• 3.„— ,, f ,.. Amp gen .,.. ..',:-;.:', IV fil:› El E20 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 LOT OCCUPATION ARTICLE 4. TABLE 2 MIAMI 21 SUMMARY a. Lot Area 1,400 sf: 5,000 sf. min 1,200 s.f. min 5,000 ef. min 5,000 at min. b. tot Width 16ftmin/50 ft. min." 16ft min/50 ftmin.• 50ft min. 5011. min. c. Lot Coverage 93.5%for SAP 93.5%for SAP 93.5%fa SAP 93.5%ta SAP d. Floor Lot Rano (FLR) 5 / 25%additional Public Benefit'• 6 / 30%additional Public Benefit" e. Frontage at front Setback 50%min. 60%min. 60%min. 60%min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5% min.for SAP In aggregate_ 6.5% min.far SAP in aggregate= 6.5 %min.for SAP In aggregate= 6.5 %min.for SAP In aggregate_ g. Density 36 du/a^fe mar. 65 dWacre max. 150 du /acre 150 duloore BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front '",tea: ESA S910ft. mar SAP 10-kmmt'erE0Ae". ESAOT 10 ft max. via SAP 99-K-iree er ES.Aa loft mar.Na SAP 10 ft .,,m-,•, ESA sr 10 ft max. via SAP -via Permit. awl. Permit. Peal b. Secondary Front rn - 10-K-ma*, 5P ESAer loft max via SAP 40 ft ,.Ws," ✓F ESApr 10tt. mar. vie SAP 49,c-n..k," or ESA or 10 ft max. We SAP ESApr 10 ft max. via SAP Para • Emit Remit. Pertt.. c. Side Oft min.""* Oft min" Oft. min" 0ft min.* d. Reef 20ft min_ Oft min.* 0ft min.* Oft. min" 0 a. Common Lawn permitted prohibited prohibited proh8iled b. Porch & Fence prohibited prohibited prohibited prohibited c. Terrace or Light Court permitted prohibited prohibited prohlONed d. Forecourt pemttted permitted pemitted permitted e. Stoop permed permitted permitted permitted L Shopfront parmitted 1T4-L, 0) permitted (T54.,0) permitted (1613L0) permitted (16-12 L,O) g. Gallery permitted permitted" permitted " permitted• h. Arcade permitted permitted • permitted " permitted* BUILDING HEIGHT (STORIES a Principal Building 3 mac 2 min. 5 max.••'••• 2 min. B mea. 2 min. 12 mac. b. Outbuilding 2 max. c. Benefit Height Abul0ng T6, T5 & T4 only 4 max."/" B mea."/" * Note: Refer to Article 5 and Illustrations for Specific Transect Zone Regulations. Note: Bonus shall not be available for T6 properties abutting T3 (refer to Article 3). .** ****** T5 north of NE 41st Street shall be a maximum height of fifty (50' 0") feet. ***See Development Agreement for improvements or contributions required to meet this Open Space requirement, F.21 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP AS ADOPTED - OCTOBER 2013 DENSITY (UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE COMMUNITY RESIDENCE ANCILLARY UNIT TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE MULTI FAMILY HOUSING DORMITORY HOME OFFICE LIVE - WORK WORK- LIVE LODGING BED & BREAKFAST INN HOTEL OFFICE OFFICE COMMERCIAL AUTO -RELATED COMMERCIAL ESTAB. ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENT ENTERTAINMENT ESTAB. - ADULT FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SERVICE ESTAB. GENERAL COMMERCIAL MARINE RELATED COMMERCIAL ESTAB. OPEN AIR RETAIL PLACE OF ASSEMBLY RECREATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT CIVIC COMMUNITY FACILITY RECREATIONAL FACILITY RELIGIOUS FACILITY REGIONAL ACTIVITY COMPLEX CIVIL SUPPORT COMMUNITY SUPPORT FACILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES MAJOR FACILITY MARINA PUBLIC PARKING RESCUE MISSION TRANSIT FACILITIES EDUCATIONAL CHILDCARE COLLEGE / UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEARNING CENTER MIDDLE / HIGH SCHOOL PRE-SCHOOL RESEARCH FACILITY SPECIAL TRAINING / VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIAL AUTO -RELATED INDUSTRIAL ESTBL. MANUFACTURING AND PROCESSING MARINE RELATED INDUSTRIAL ESTBL. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES STORAGE/ DISTRIBUTION FACILITY R Allowed By Right WAllowed By Warrant: Administrative Process - CRC (Coordinated Review Committee) E Allowed By Exception: Public Hearing - granted by PZAB (Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board) Boxes with no designation signify Use prohibited. ARTICLE 4. TABLE 3 BUILDING FUNCTION: USES T4 T5 76 URBAN GENERAL URBAN CENTER URBAN CORE 0 0 0 36 65 150' R R R R R R R R R R R R R E R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R W W R R R R R R R*** R*** R R R R W W R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R W W W R R R W W W R R R W W W W W W E W W E W W E R R E W W E R R R R R E W W Uses may be further modified by Supplemental Regulations, State Regulations, or other provisions of this Code. See City Code Chapter 4 for regulations related to Alcohol Beverage Service Estab. * Additional densities in some T6 zones are illustrated in Diagram 9. ** AZ: Density of lowest Abutting Zone "'Allowed by warrant when facing T3 or when including outdoor use. F.22 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 4, TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING T4 - GENERAL URBAN ZONE DENSITY (UPA) 36 UNITS PER ACRE RESIDENTIAL Residential Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 1.5 spaces per principal Dwelling Unit. • Ancillary Dwelling — Minimum of 1 parking space per ancillary dwelling unit. • Live -Work — Work component shall provide parking as required by the non-residential Use in addition to parking required for the Dwelling Unit • Adult Family -Care Homes — Minimum 1 space per staff member and 1 space per 4 residents. • Community Residence — Minimum of 1 parking space per staff member in addition to the parking required for the principal Dwelling Unit(s). • Parking Requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Parking ratio may be reduced by thirty percent (30%) if the property is (i) within'/2 mile radius of a TOD or mile radius of a Transit Corridor, and (ii) within 650 feet from a Parking Garage or Parking Lot identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Article 3.6.10. LODGING Lodging Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3. • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 2 lodging units. • Minimum of 1 additional parking space for every 5 lodging units. • Parking Requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Parking ratio may be reduced by thirty percent (30%) if the property is (i) within'/2 mile radius of a TOD or mile radius of a Transit Corridor, and (ii) within 650 feet from a Parking Garage or Parking Lot identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Article 3.6.10. OFFICE Office Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3. • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 64: square feet of office use. • Parking Requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Parking ratio may be reduced by thirty percent (30%) if the property is (i) within'/2 mile radius of a TOD or' mile radius of a Transit Corridor, and (ii) within 650 feet from a Parking Garage or Parking Lot identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Article 3.6.10. COMMERCIAL Commercial Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • A maximum area of 40,000 square feet per establishment. • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of commercial use. • Parking Requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Parking ratio may be reduced by thirty percent (30%) if the property is (i) within' mile radius of a TOD or'% mile radius of a Transit Corridor, and (ii) within 650 feet from a Parking Garage or Parking Lot identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required (before any reductions). See also Article 3.6.10. CIVIC Civic Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 5 seats of Assembly Use. • Parking Requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Parking ratio may be reduced by thirty percent (30%) if the property is (i) within % mile radius of a TOD or' mile radius of a Transit Corridor, and (ii) within 650 feet from a Parking Garage or Parking Lot identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Parking for Civic Uses may be provided off -site within a distance of 1,000 feet. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Article 3.6.10. F.23 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN EDUCATIONAL Educational Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 feet of Educational Use. • Schools — Minimum of 1 parking space for each faculty or staff member, 1 visitor parking space per 100 students, 1 parking space per 5 students in grades 11 and 12 or College/University. • Childcare Facilities — Minimum of 1 space for the owner/operator and 1 space for each employee, and 1 drop-off space for every 10 clients cared for. • Parking Requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5 • Parking ratio may be reduced by thirty percent (30%) if the property is (i) within'h mile radius of a TOD or mile radius of a Transit Corridor, and (ii) within 650 feet from a Parkinq Garage or Parking Lot identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Article 3.6.10 F.24 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN T5 - URBAN CENTER ZONE DENSITY (UPA) 65 UNITS PER ACRE RESIDENTIAL Residential Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 1.5 spaces per Dwelling Unit • Minimum of 1 additional visitor parking space for every 10 Dwelling Units • Live -Work — Work component shall provide parking as required by the non-residential Use in addition to parking required for the Dwelling Unit(s). • Adult Family -Care Homes — Minimum 1 space per staff member and 1 space per 4 residents. • Community Residence — Minimum of 1 parking space per staff member in addition to the parking required for the principal Dwelling Unit(s). • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within 1/2 mile radius of TOD and within '/ mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept book. LODGING Lodging Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3. • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 2 lodging units. • Minimum of 1 additional parking space for every 10 lodging units. • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of commercial use, except for Public Storage Facilities, minimum 1 parking space for every 2,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet, and 1 parking space per 10,000 square feet thereafter. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within 'A mile radius of TOD and within' mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. OFFICE Office Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of Office use. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared Parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within % mile radius of TOD and within' mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offside within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. COMMERCIAL Commercial Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • A maximum area of 55,000 per establishment with one (1), 120,000 square foot establishment, maximum. For Block 5 East, one (1) additional establishment with a maximum size of 100,000 square may be permitted by Exception. • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of commercial use, except for Public Storage Facilities, minimum 1 parking space for every 2,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet, and 1 parking space per 10,000 square feet thereafter. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared Parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. F.25 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN EDUCATIONAL • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within'/2 mile radius of TOD and within Y4 mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offside within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Commercial Auto -related, Drive-Thru or Drive -In Facilities — See Article 6. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. Educational Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of Educational Use. • Schools — Minimum of 1 parking space for each faculty or staff member, 1 visitor parking space per 100 students, 1 parking space per 5 students in grades 11 and 12 or College/University. • Childcare Facilities — Minimum of 1 space for the owner/operator and 1 space for each employee, and 1 drop-off space for every 10 clients cared for. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared Parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within '/2 mile radius of TOD and within '/4 mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offside within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. F.26 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN T6 - URBAN CORE ZONE DENSITY (UPA) 150 UNITS PER ACRE RESIDENTIAL Residential Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 1.5 spaces per Dwelling Unit • Minimum of 1 additional visitor parking space for every 10 Dwelling Units • Live -Work — Work component shall provide parking as required by the non-residential Use in addition to parking required for the Dwelling Unit(s). • Adult Family -Care Homes — Minimum 1 space per staff member and 1 space per 4 residents. • Community Residence — Minimum of 1 parking space per staff member in addition to the parking required for the principal Dwelling Unit(s). • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within 1/2 mile radius of TOD and within % mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept book. LODGING Lodging Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3. • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 2 lodging units. • Minimum of 1 additional parking space for every 10 lodging units. • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of commercial use, except for Public Storage Facilities, minimum 1 parking space for every 2,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet, and 1 parking space per 10,000 square feet thereafter. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within'/2 mile radius of TOD and within'/4 mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. OFFICE Office Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of Office use. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared Parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within % mile radius of TOD and within Y4 mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offside within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. COMMERCIAL Commercial Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • A maximum area of 55,000 per establishment with one (1), 120,000 square foot establishment, maximum and one (1), 160,000 maximum square foot establishment will be allowed in T6-12 and above. • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of commercial use, except for Public Storage Facilities, minimum 1 parking space for every 2,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet, and 1 parking space per 10,000 square feet thereafter. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared Parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. F.27 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN • Parking ratio may be reduced within'/2 mile radius of TOD and within % mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offside within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. EDUCATIONAL Educational Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of Educational Use. • Schools — Minimum of 1 parking space for each faculty or staff member, 1 visitor parking space per 100 students, 1 parking space per 5 students in grades 11 and 12 or College/University. • Childcare Facilities — Minimum of 1 space for the owner/operator and 1 space for each employee, and 1 drop-off space for every 10 clients cared for. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared Parking standard, Art. 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. See also Art. 3.6.10. • Parking ratio may be reduced within' mile radius of TOD and within % mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%). • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offside within 1000 feet. • Loading — See Article 4, Table 5. • Parking may be provided off -site within Parking Structures or Parking Lots identified in the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Parking Management Program, as illustrated on pg. A2.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. F.28 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP MIAMI 21 AS ADOPTED - OCTOBER 2013 ARTICLE 4. TABLE 5 BUILDING FUNCTION: PARKING AND LOADING TARED PARKINGSTANDARDS SHARING FACTOR Function RESIDENTIAL LODGING OFFICE COMMERCIAL with Function RESIDENTIAL LODGING OFFICE COMMERCIAL The shared Parking Standards Table provides the method for calculating shared parking for buildingswith morethan one Use type. It refers to the parking requirementsthat appear in Table 4. The parking required for any two Functions on a Lot is calculated by dividing the number of spaces required by the lesser of the two uses by the appropriate factor from this Table and adding the result to the greater use parking requirement. For instance: for a building with a Residential Use requiring 100 spaces and a Commercial Use requiring 20 spaces, the 20 spaces divided by the sharing factor of 1.2 would reduce the total requirement to 100 plus 16 spaces. For uses not indicated in this chart on a mixed use lot, or within the mixed -use SAP area, a sharing factor of 1.1 shall be allowed. Additional sharing is allowed by Warrant. OFF•STREET PARKING STANDARDS ANGLE OF PARKING ACCESS AISLE WIDTH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SINGLE LOADED ONE WAY TRAFFIC DOUBLE LOADED TWO WAY TRAFFIC DOUBLE LOADED 90 23 ft 23 ft 23 ft 60 12.8 ft 11.8ft 19.3 ft 45 10.8 ft 9.5 ft 18.5 ft Parallel 10 ft 10 ft 20 ft Standard stall: 8.5 ft x 18 ft minimum • Driveways shall have a minimum of 10 feet of paved width of a one-way drive and 20 feet for a two-way drive for parking area providing 10 or more stalls, • Pedestrian entrances shall be at least 3 feet from stall, driveway or access aisle. • Allowable slopes, paving, and drainage as per Florida Building Code. • Off-street Parking facilities shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 7 feet. Where such a facility is to be used by trucks or loading Uses, the minimum clearance shall be 12 feet Residential and 15 feet Commercial and Industrial, • Ingress vehicular control devices shall be located so as to provide a minimum driveway of 20 feet in length between the Base Building Line and dispenser. • For landscaping requirements of parking lots, refer to Miami -Dade County Landscape Ordinance and the City of Miami Off-street Parking Guides and Standards. LOADING BERTH STANDARDS T4, T5, T6 RESIDENTIAL* Berth Size Loading Berths 420 sf 1 per first 100 units 240 sf 1 per each additional 100 units or fraction of 100. LODGING Berth Size Loading Berths 420 sf 1 per 300 240 sf rooms 1 per 100 rooms OFFICE COMMERCIAL** From 60,000 sf to 600,000 sf Berth Size Loading Area 420 sf Berths 50K sf - 120K sf 420 sf 1st 120K sf - 250K sf 2nd NOTES Berth Types Residential*: 240 sf = 10 ft x 20 ft x 12 ft Commercial**: 420 sf = 12 ft x 35 ft x 15 ft * Residential and Lodging loading berths shall be concealed within a building. ** 1 Commercial berth may be substituted by 2 Residential berths A required Commercial loading berth may be substituted be a lesser loading berth, if the size character, and operation of the Use is found to not require the dimensions specified and the required loading berth dimension could not otherwise be provided according to the regulations of this Code. Commercial berths may be shared by retail in same or abutting block. F.29 MIAMI 21 AS ADOPTED - OCTOBER 2013 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP ARTICLE 4. TABLE 6 FRONTAGES PLAN LO R.O.W. PRIVATE i PUBLIC Frontag Frontage a. Common Lawn: a Frontage wherein the Facade is set back sub- stantially from the Frontage Line. The front yard created remains unfenced and is visually continuous with adjacent yards, supporting a common landscape. The Setback can be densely landscaped to buffer from higher speed Thoroughfares. b. Porch & Fence: a Frontage wherein the Facade is set back from the Frontage Line with an attached Porch permitted to encroach. A fence at the Frontage Line maintains the demarcation of the yard while not blocking view into the front yard. c. Terrace or Light Court: a Frontage wherein the Facade is set back from the Frontage Line by an elevated terrace or a sunken light court. This type buffers residential use from urban sidewalks and removes the private yard from public encroachment. The raised terrace is suitable for outdoor cafes. d. Forecourt: a Frontage wherein a portion of the Facade is close to the Frontage Line with a portion set back. The forecourt with a large tree offers visual and environmental variety to the urban Streetscape. The Forecourt may accommodate a vehicular drop off. e. Stoop: a Frontage wherein the Facade is aligned close to the Frontage Line with the first Story elevated from the sidewalk sufficiently to secure privacy for the windows. The entrance is usually an exterior stair and landing. This type is recommended for ground -floor Residential Use. f. Shopfront: a Frontage wherein the Facade is aligned close to the Frontage Line with the Building entrance at sidewalk grade. This type is conventional for retail Use. It has substantial glazing at the sidewalk level and an Awning that may overhang the sidewalk. SECTION LOT R.O.W. PRIVATE PUBLIC Frontage Frontage F.30 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP AS ADOPTED - OCTOBER 2013 ARTICLE 4. TABLE 6 FRONTAGES g. Gallery: A Frontage wherein the Facade is aligned close to the Frontage Line with an attached cantilevered or a lightweight colonnade overlapping the sidewalk. This type is conventional for retail Use. Allowed by SAP Permit. See 5.4.2, 5.5.2 and 5.6.2 of this Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan for additional regulations. h. Arcade: a Frontage wherein the Facade includes a colonnade that overlaps the sidewalk, while the Facade at sidewalk level remains at the Frontage Line. This type is conventional for retail Use. Arcades may contain programmable space or arcades or balconies above them corresponding with the width of the covered area. Allowed by SAP Permit. See 5.4.2, 5.5.2 and 5.6.2 of this Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan for additional regulations. i. Cantilever: a Frontage wherein the Facade includes a cantilevered section of a Building overlaps the sidewalk, with the Facade at sidewalk level remains at the Frontage Line. Cantilevers may contain programmable space or arcades or balconies above them corresponding with the width of the covered area. Allowed by SAP Permit. See 5.4.2, 5.5.2 and 5.6.2 of this Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan for additional regulations. SECTION LOT R.O.W. PRIVATE 4 PUBLIC Frontage Frontage PLAN LOT R.O.W. PRIVATE . PUBLIC Frontage Frontage • F.3 1 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTNTIONALLY BLANK. F.32 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 5. SPECIFIC TO ZONES 5.1 GENERALLY 5.1.1 This Article sets forth the standards applicable to development within the each Transect Zone located within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area. Provisions of the Miami 21 Code modified herein shall apply only within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. 5.4 GENERAL URBAN TRANSECT ZONES (T4) 5.4.1 Building Disposition (T4) a. Newly platted Lots shall be dimensioned according to Illustration 5.4 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. Lot Coverage by any Building shall not exceed the percentage listed in Illustration 5.4 and Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, calculated in aggregate for new Buildings only. 1. Block 5 East. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lot Coverage for new Buildings on Block 5 East shall be calculated independently of the aggregate calculation for new Buildings on the balance of the Blocks comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Said Lot Coverage shall not exceed the percentage listed in Illustration 5.4 for Block 5 East of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. c. A Building shall be disposed in relation to the boundaries of its Lot according to Illustration 5.4 for each Block and-i-n Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. d. One Principal Building at the Frontage, and one Outbuilding to the rear of the Principal Building, may be built on each Lot as shown in Article 4, Table 8 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. The Outbuilding shall be separated from the Principal Building by a minimum of ten (10) feet. e. Setbacks for Principal Buildings shall be as set forth in Article 4, Table 2 and shown in Illustration 5.4 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. 1. Block 5 East. For the Secondary Frontage along NE 43rd Street of Block 5 East, any Building shall be Setback a minimum of twenty-five feet (25') from the Frontage Line for the initial one hundred and fifty feet (150') of said Secondary Frontage from NE 2nd Avenue and, thereafter, shall be Setback a minimum of fifty feet (50') from the Frontage Line for the balance of said Frontage to NE 41h Avenue. f. Facades shall be built parallel to a rectilinear Principal Frontage Line or parallel to the tangent of a curved Principal Frontage Line, for a minimum fifty percent (50%) of its length. g. The Setbacks for Outbuildings, pools, tennis courts or other similar recreational facilities shall be as shown for Outbuildings in Illustration 5.4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. F.33 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN h. Accessory Structures shall follow the setbacks for Principal Buildings as shown in Illustration 5.4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. One (1) Story, non -habitable Accessory Structures, of a maximum of two hundred (200) square feet or ten (10%) percent of the Floor Area of the Principal Building, whichever is greater, shall be located in the Second or Third layer of the property and shall be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from any side Property Line and ten (10) feet from any rear Property Line. 5.4.2 Building Configuration (T4) a. Development within Private Frontages shall comply with Article 4, Table 2 and Illustration 5.4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. Galleries, Arcades and Cantilevered Buildings shall be permitted to extend above the Public Right -of -Way of an entire Block Face. (See Section 3.3.6 and Article 4, Table 6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP). Galleries °yes alevers—Ited within —the Public Right of Way shall not count towards Open Space requirements. In T4, an Arcade, Gallery or Cantilever, and the addition of any Habitable Space above an Arcade or Cantilever, shall require an SAP Permit and: (i) upon a recommendation of approval or approval with conditions by UDRBi and (ii) with -the approval of the Director of Public Works. 1. An Arcade shall not reduce the active Sidewalk width from the connecting Sidewalk and shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen feet (15') above the average Sidewalk grade. The Arcade shall be a minimum of thirteen feet (13') deep and may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') feet of the curb. 2. A Cantilever extending into the Public Right -Of -Way, shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen (15') feet above the average Sidewalk grade. A Cantilever may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') feet of the curb. 3. A Gallery shall not reduce the active Sidewalk width from the connecting Sidewalk and shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen feet (15') above the average Sidewalk grade. The Gallery shall be a minimum of thirteen feet (13') deep and may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') feet of the curb. c. Encroachments shall be allowed as follows: 1. Pedestrian Passage. An Awning and/or Canopy within the Pedestrian Passage shall be permitted to encroach to a maximum depth of eight (8) feet or twenty five percent (25%) of the width of the Pedestrian Passage, whichever is less. Such Encroachment shall further be limited by objects in the Pedestrian Passage such as trees, streetlamps, etc. Bottom edges of Awnings or Canopies shall be no lower than eight (8) feet above the pavement/floor. Awnings of the quarter -sphere type shall not be permitted. 2. Sidewalk or Public Alleys. Awnings or Canopies abutting a Sidewalk or a public Alley or similar Public Right -Of -Way shall be designed in accordance with Section 54-186 of the City Code and: i. Shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of eight feet (8') above the Sidewalk and shall not extend into or occupy more than two-thirds (2/3) of the width of the Sidewalk F.34 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 measured from the building where said Awning or Canopy has a vertical clearance of less than fifteen feet (15') above the Sidewalk. ii. Stanchions or columns that support Awnings or Canopies shall be located not less than two (2') feet in from the curb line. iii. Shall not extend over any portion of the Sidewalk within two (2') feet of the curb where said Awning or Canopy has a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen (15') feet or greater above the Sidewalk. iv. Shall be further limited by objects located within the Public Right -of -Way such as trees, street lights, etc. 3. Open Balconies, bay windows, planters and other architectural features shall be permitted to encroach into the Pedestrian Passage up to three (3) feet beyond the Building Facade for up to twenty five percent (25%) of the width of the Building Facade when located not less than fourteen (14') feet above the surface of the Pedestrian Passage. d. Unroofed screen enclosures shall be located within the Second or Third Layer only and shall have a five (5) feet minimum side and rear Setback. e. All outdoor storage, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and communications equipment and appurtenant enclosures, shall be within the Second or Third Layer and concealed from view from any Frontage or sidewalk by liner buildings, walls, Streetscreens, or opaque gates. These shall not be allowed as Encroachments on any required Setback, except for Buildings existing as of the effective date of this Code, where mechanical equipment, such as air conditioning units, pumps, exhaust fans or other similar noise producing equipment may be allowed as Encroachments in the Setback by Waiver. f. Loading and service entries shall be accessed from Alleys when available. When a Lot has only Principal Frontages, vehicular entries, Loading Docks and service areas shall be permitted on Principal Frontages. Loading and service entries shall be screened from all Pedestrian Passage and Principal Frontage views by decorative walls or gates, commercial grade decorative wood or metal, tile, artistic or non -advertising signage (including way finding signage), Streetscreens or art or green walls. Building Heights shall be measured in Stories and shall conform to Article 4, Table 2 and as shown in Illustration 5.4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. The first -floor Elevation of a Principal Building shall be at average Sidewalk grade; a first -floor Residential Function should be at a minimum Height of two (2) feet and a maximum Height of three and a half (3.5) feet for privacy reasons or as regulated by FEMA, whichever is higher. The height of the building shall be up to three (3) Stories, and a maximum of forty (40) feet to the top of the roof slab. g. 1. Block 5 East. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any portion of a Building or Structure located within Zone B of Block 5 East shall not exceed one (1) Story with a maximum Height of twenty-five (25') feet. See also Illustration 5.4 for Block 5 East and Sec. A4.3 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. F.35 J• MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN h. Mechanical equipment on a roof shall be enclosed by parapets of the minimum Height necessary to conceal it, and a maximum Height of five (5) feet. Other ornamental Building features may extend up to five (5) feet above the maximum Building Height. Roof decks shall be permitted up to the maximum Height. Trellises may extend above the maximum Height up to eight (8) feet. Extensions up to ten (10) feet above the maximum Height for a stair, elevator or mechanical enclosure shall be limited to twenty (20%) percent of the roof area. i. Fences and walls may be located at the Frontage Line as shown in Article 4, Table 6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Fences and walls shall be a maximum Height of four (4) feet at the First Layer, except aluminum or iron picket and post Fences with or without masonry posts which shall not exceed a maximum of six (6) feet in Height. Within the Second and Third Layers, Fences and walls shall be a maximum Height of eight (8) feet. All ground floor and roof top utility infrastructure and mechanical equipment shall be concealed from public view. At the Building Frontage, all equipment such as backflow preventers, siamese connections, and the like shall be placed within the line of the Facade or behind the Streetscreen. Exhaust air fans and louvers may be allowed on the Facade only on Frontages located not less than fourteen (14') feet above the Sidewalk in a fashion that does not adversely impact the pedestrian experience. All service infrastructure and utility elements, including, but not limited to, electrical transformers, telephone boxes, cable and other utility boxes, utility wiring, meters, backflow preventers, condensers, dumpsters and loading docks, shall be screened from all Pedestrian Passage and street views by walls or gates. Loading and service entries shall be accessed from subterranean garages or designated service areas. k. Service, infrastructure and utility elements may be creatively concealed or emphasized. Rooftop elements, such as equipment, tanks, exits and elevator towers, shall be designed, housed or concealed as architectural elements worthy of public view as such elements shall be visible from the elevated highway and surrounding Buildings. 5.4.3 Building Function & Density (T4) a. Buildings in T4 shall conform to the Functions, Densities, and Intensities described in Article 4, Tables 3 and 4 and Illustration 5.4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Certain functions as shown in Article 4, Table 3 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP shall require approval by Warrant or Exception. Consult Article 6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP for any supplemental use regulations. 5.4.4 Parking Standards (T4) a. Vehicular parking shall be required as shown in Article 4, Tables 4 and 5 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. Parking may be accessed by an Alley when available. c. Surface parking lots, covered parking and garages shall be located within the Second and Third Layers as illustrated in Article 4, Table 8 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Surface parking lots, garages, Loading space and service areas shall be masked from the Frontage by a Streetscreen as specified in Illustration 5.4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. A maximum one hundred per cent (100%) of the width of the Facade may be F.36 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN surface parking, covered parking or garage, which shall align with or be set back from the Facade. Driveways and drop-offs, including parking, may be located within the Second Layer. d. Underground parking may extend into the First Layer. Ramps to underground parking shall be within the Second and Third Layers. Underground structures should be entered by pedestrians from a Building or the Pedestrian Passage. e. The maximum width at the Property Line of a driveway on a Frontage shall be twelve (12) feet. Shared driveway width combining ingress and egress shall be a maximum width of thirty-five (35) feet at the Property Line and may encroach into Setbacks. Two separate driveways on one Lot shall have a minimum separation of twenty (20) feet. Any vehicular drive greater than twenty (20) feet in width shall require a median of not less than three (3) feet in width between vehicular ingress and egress travel lanes to enhance pedestrian safety. 1. Block 5 East. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no driveways or curb cuts shall be permitted along the Frontage abutting NE 43rd Street east of NE 2nd Avenue. f. Tandem Parking on site should be encouraged. g. Shared Parking shall be calculated according to Article 4, Table 5 for the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. h. In T4-L and T4-O a minimum of one (1) bicycle rack space shall be provided for every twenty (20) vehicular parking spaces and may be in the Private Frontage or the Public Right -of -Way in a fashion consistent with the guidelines referenced in 3.6.10.d of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. i. Where Lots are Abutting, underground parking may extend to Abutting Blocks and Lots, including under Thoroughfares. Above -grade parking may extend into the Second Layer above a first floor Liner with decorative Facade treatment matching the Liner Facade below or an art or green wall. Underground Parking may extend above grade into a first floor Liner if the Building Facade is designed to meet the Sidewalk in such a manner that fully obscures the Parking Area. 5.4.5 Architectural Standards (T4) a. Only permanent structures shall be allowed. Temporary Structures, such as mobile homes, construction trailers, travel trailers, recreational vehicles and other temporary structures, shall not be allowed except as otherwise permitted by City Code. b: The Facades on Retail Frontages shall be detailed as storefronts with decorative Facade treatment or an art or green wall, and glazed no less than fifty per cent (50%) of the Sidewalk -level Story. A reduction to the above glazing standard to provide between forty- nine percent (49%) and thirty percent (30%) glazing may be granted by SAP Permit. Requests for reductions to provide between twenty-nine percent (29%) to a minimum of fifteen percent (15%) glazing may be granted by SAP Permit with review by the UDRB.-with the following exceptions: F.37 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN —Alen-g-N-E-1-st-Ave-Rue-a-n-cl-N-E-2-r}€1--Aven-ue-a-recl-ustion-between-farty-nine-per-Gant-(49%) and thirty percent (30%) may be granted by SAP Permit with review by the UDRB. Along NE 39th Street -NE 4nt-.oth Street -any' NE 4lst Stree+ a reduction bctwcen forty nine conditions by the UDRB. c. Roof materials should be light-colored, high-Albedo or a planted surface and shall comply with Article 3, Section 3.13.2 of this Code. d. Building walls shall reinforce the continuity of the Frontage Line and of the a Pedestrian Passage by their surfaces and by their establishment of the edge. Building walls may curve, angle, or deviate from the Setback, established pursuant to Sec. 3.3.6, by no more than ten feet (10') if approved by SAP Permit. 1 Block 5 East. Building walls for the Secondary Frontage abutting NE 43rd Street may depart from the above requirement in a manner consistent with the standards set forth in Sec. 5.4.1.e.1. e. Each Shopfront Facade may be an individual design. In the case of Abutting Shopfront Facades, their designs shall be coordinated. Party walls may extend beyond or above the walls of Abutting Buildings and shall be designed and finished as if they were intended to be permanent, as they may be seen from Thoroughfares, the Pedestrian Passage, and from surrounding Buildings. f. Entrance doors shall be at Sidewalk grade or the grade of the Pedestrian Passage, with the exception to entrance doors for existing Buildings and their additions. At the first Story, Facades along a Frontage Line shall have: (i) frequent doors and windows; (ii) pedestrian entrances at a maximum spacing of seventy-five (75') feet; and (iii) vehicular entries at a minimum spacing of sixty (60') feet, unless otherwise approved by SAP Permit. g. The visible exterior soffits of Balconies and roof overhangs and the ceilings of Arcades and Balconies shall be articulated with attention to materials and lighting given that the undersides of such elements are frequently more visible than the Facade. 5.4.6 Landscape Standards (T4) a. Open Space Calculation. Open Space shall be calculated on an aggregate basis for all of the new Building Lots included as part of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP and shall be a minimum of six and a half percent (6.5%) of the total new Building Lot Area. Should the Open Space provided at the completion of the development program set forth on page A1.98 of the Concept Book fall below ten percent (10%) of the total new Building Lot Area, the owner(s) of the multiple properties comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area shall off -set the difference between the desired ten percent (10%) Open Space and the required six and a half percent (6.5%) Open Space in accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement. Areas under permanent kiosks or Retail Merchandising Units shall not be calculated as Open Space. 1. Block 5 East. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Open Space for Block 5 East shall be calculated independently of the aggregate calculation for new Buildings on the balance of F.38 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN the Blocks comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Open Space for Block 5 East shall be a minimum of six and a half percent (6.5%) of the Block 5 East Lot Area. Should the Open Space provided on Block 5 East fall below ten percent (10%) of the Block 5 East Lot Area, the owner(s) of the tracts comprising Block 5 East shall off -set the difference desired ten percent (10%) Open Space and the required six and a half percent (6.5%) Open Space in accordance with the terms of the Block 5 East Development Agreement. b. Please see Article 9 for Additional Regulations. 5.4.7 Ambient Standards (T4) a. Noise regulation shall be as established by the City Code. b. Average lighting levels measured at the Building Frontage shall not exceed 2.0 foot-candles (fc). Average Horizontal illuminance, measured at the Building Frontage, where adjacent to T3 shall not exceed 1.0 fc. c. Lighting of Building and Open Space of First and Second Layers shall complement the street lighting of Abutting public spaces. d. The lighting fixtures of exposed rooftop parking shall be concealed by a parapet wall and shall not be seen from surrounding streets. e. Neither direct nor reflected light or glare shall extend or pollute beyond parapet walls. F.39 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 T4 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.4 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T4) BLOCK 1 WEST WE BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area - With rear vehicular access 5,000 s.f. min. 1,400 s.f. min. b. Lot Width - With rear vehicular access 50 ft. min. 16 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage 93.5% SAP aggregate d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) N/A e. Frontage at front Setback 50% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % ** SAP agg & Improvements g. Density 36 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit. b. Secondary Front Established setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit. c. Side 0 ft* d. Rear 20 ft min OUTBUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front 30 ft. min b. Secondary Front 10 ft. min c. Side 0 ft or 5 ft. min Abutting a Setback d. Rear 5ft min BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn permitted b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. permitted d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T4 L & T4 0 only) g. Gallery permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. i. Cantilever permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. BUILDING HEIGHT a. Principal Building 3 Stories max. and 40ft max. b. Outbuilding 2 Stories max. Comer Lot Interior Lot J. BLOCK 2 WEST WEST 1 BLOCK 4 WEST 1 BLOCK 5 BUILDING PLACEMENT _S_econdelyfrpoL ,,,-, 1.4 10' min. 10' min. I 0' j i i =i 5 min. ► ; 20' min. Pi r 1st 2nd PARKING PLACEMENT Comer Lot l' Interior Lot Comer Lot Interior Lot 3rd ►i j JI'min. 5' min. ►- i� ti r �V 5 min. i _._._.._. 5, min—_ — — -- 5'imin. ' ►4 ►a 1st 2nd Layer Layer BUILDING HEIGHT Max. Height i L 2 I 3rd Layer i ► i 2o'rn41, i 30%max. 5' min. 7. ------ - - - ------......._',1 1. 1__ ' I din. _ _. N 20'min ..�x•TF _. min. ►%i O'min. _.+.a I 1st 2nd 3rd Layer Layer Layer 1st Layer 2nd & 3rd Layer Lt ayer 2nd & 3rd Layer let Layer 2nd & 3rd Layer Max. Height Where an adjacent Building has a side setback, then new Building shall match said setback up to a maximum of five (5) feet Please see Section (1'S)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street DevelopmentAgreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.40 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area - With rear vehicular access 5,000 s.f. min. 1,400 s.f. min. b. Lot Width - With rear vehicular access 50 ft. min. 16 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage 93.5% d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) N/A e. Frontage at front Setback 50% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % ***** g. Density 36 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit. b. Secondary Front See Sec. 5.4.1.e. of the MDD Retail Street SAP c. Side N/A d. Rear N/A OUTBUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front N/A b. Secondary Front N/A c. Side N/A d. Rear N/A BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn permitted b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. permitted d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T4 L & T4 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted BUILDING HEIGHT a. Principal Building 1 Story max. b. Outbuilding N/A APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.4 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T4) BLOCK 5EAST ` BUILDING PLACEMENT r, BUILDING HEIGHT Max. Heigh' ***** Please see Section (12) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Block 5 East Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.41 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 5.5 URBAN CENTER TRANSECT ZONES (T5) 5.5.1 Building Disposition (T5) a. Newly platted Lots shall be dimensioned according to Illustration 5.5 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. Lot coverage by any Building shall not exceed the percentage listed in Illustration 5.5 for each Block and Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, calculated in aggregate for new Buildings only. 1. Block 5 East. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lot Coverage for new Buildings in Block 5 East shall be calculated independent of the aggregate calculation for new Buildings on the balance of the Blocks comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Said Lot Coverage shall not exceed the percentage listed in Illustration 5.5 for Block 5 East of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. c. Buildings shall be disposed in relation to the boundaries of their Lots according to Illustration 5.5 for each Block and Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. d. Buildings or Shopfronts shall have their principal pedestrian entrances on the Pedestrian Passage, a Principal Frontage Line or from a Courtyard at the Second Layer. Where a Building or Shopfront fronts both the Pedestrian Passage and a Principal Frontage and its length along the Principal Frontage is eighty (80') feet or less, its principal pedestrian entrance may be located on either the Pedestrian Passage or the Principal Frontage. Where a Building or Shopfront fronts both the Pedestrian Passage and a Principal Frontage and its length along the Principal Frontage is greater than eighty (80') feet on the ground floor fronts on both the Pedestrian Passage and a Principal Frontage, its principal pedestrian entrance shall be located on the Principal Frontage. e. For the minimum Height, Facades shall be built parallel to the Principal Frontage Line along a minimum of sixty percent (60%) of its length on the Setback line as shown in Illustration 5.5 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. In the absence of a Building along the remainder of the Frontage line, a Streetscreen shall be built co -planar with the Facade to conceal parking and service areas. f. At the first Story, Facades along a Principal Frontage should have frequent doors and windows. g. Setbacks for Buildings shall be as shown in Illustration 5.5 for each Block and set forth in Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. h. For ite with throe hundred and forty (3n0) feet Frontage length or more_.a A cross -Block passage shall be provided as follows: 1. Cross -Block Pedestrian Connection. If the Frontage Line of a site is at any point more than three hundred and forty (340) feet from a Thoroughfare intersection, the Building shall provide a cross -Block Pedestrian Passage, subject to the following exceptions:- F.42 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN a. Block 3 West. An above ground Parking Garage or above ground Parking Structure located in Block 3 West identified on page A1.14 of the Concept Book shall not be required to provide a cross -Block Pedestrian Passage. b. Block 4. A cross -Block Pedestrian Passage shall not be provided to exit onto NE 42nd Street. c. Block 5 East. In lieu of providing a cross -Block Pedestrian Passage for Block 5 East, any Building or Structure constructed thereon shall, at a minimum, incorporate a Cantilever, Arcade or Gallery along NE 2nd Avenue Frontage for Block 5 East, cantilevered Awnings and entry Canopies shall be liberally used as part of the Building design along said Frontage, subject to the limitations set forth in Section 5.5.2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, and in combination with street trees to ensure that pedestrians are adequately protected from the elements. 2. Cross -Block Vehicular Passage. If the Frontage Line of a site is at any point six hundred and fifty (650) feet from a Thoroughfare intersection, a vehicular cross -Block passage shall be provided. Street. 5.5.2 Building Configuration (T5) a. Development within Private Frontages shall comply with Article 4, Table 2 and Illustration 5.5 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. Galleries, Arcades and Cantilevered Buildings shall be permitted to extend above the Public Right -of -Way. (See Section 3.3.6 and Article 4, Table 6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP). Galleries, Arcades and Cantilevers located within the Public Right Of Way shall In T5, an Arcade, Gallery or Cantilever, and the addition of any Habitable Space above an Arcade or Cantilever, shall require an SAP Permit and: (i) upon a recommendation of approval or approval with conditions by UDRBi and gl with -the approval of the Director of Public Works. 1. An Arcade shall not reduce the active Sidewalk width from the connecting Sidewalk, and shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen feet (15') above the average Sidewalk grade. The Arcade shall be no less than thirteen (13') feet deep and may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') feet of the curb. 2. A Cantilever extending into the Public Right -Of -Way shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen (15') feet above the average Sidewalk grade. A Cantilever may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within not less than two (2') feet of the curb. 3. A Gallery shall not reduce the active Sidewalk width from the connecting Sidewalk and shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen (15') feet above the average Sidewalk grade. The Gallery shall be a minimum of thirteen (13') feet deep and may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') feet of the curb. c. Encroachments shall be allowed as follows: F.43 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 1. Pedestrian Passage. Awnings and/or Canopies within the Pedestrian Passage shall be permitted to encroach to a maximum depth of eight feet (8') or twenty five percent (25%) of the width of the Pedestrian Passage. Such encroachment shall be further limited by objects located within the Pedestrian Passage such as trees, street lights, etc. Bottom edges of Awnings or Canopies shall be no lower than eight feet (8') above the pavement/floor. Awnings of the quarter -sphere type shall not be permitted. 2. Sidewalk or Public Alleys. Awnings or Canopies abutting a Sidewalk or public Alley or similar Public Right -Of -Way shall be designed in accordance with the Section 54-186 of the City Code and: i. Shall maintain a minimum clearance of eight feet (8') above the Sidewalk and shall not extend into or occupy more than two-thirds (2/3) of the width of the Sidewalk measured from the building where said Awning or Canopy has a vertical clearance of less than fifteen (15') feet above the Sidewalk. ii. Stanchions or columns that support Awnings or Canopies shall be located not less than two (2') feet from within the curb line. iii. Shall not extend over any portion of the Sidewalk within two (2') feet of the curb where said Awning or Canopy has a minimum vertical clearance of less than fifteen (15') feet above the Sidewalk. 3. Other cantilevered portions of the Building shall maintain the required Setbacks. At the Second and Third Layers, bay windows, chimneys, roofs, and stairs may encroach up to fifty percent (50%) of the depth of the side or rear Setback. At the Second and Third Layers, Balconies may encroach up to fifty percent (50%) of the depth of the side or rear Setback. 4. Open Balconies, bay windows, planters and other architectural features shall be permitted to encroach into the Pedestrian Passage up to three (3) feet beyond the Building Facade for up to twenty five percent (25%) of the width of the Building facade when located not less than fourteen feet (14') above the surface of the Pedestrian Passage. d. Screen enclosures shall be located within the Second or Third Layer only and shall have a five (5) feet minimum side and rear Setback when Abutting T3 or T4. d. Loading and service entries shall be accessed from Alleys when available and otherwise from the Secondary Frontage. When Lots have only Principal Frontages, vehicular entries, Loading spaces and service areas shall be permitted on Principal Frontages. Loading and service entries shall be screened from all Pedestrian Passage and Primary Frontage views by decorative walls, gates or Streetscreens. e. All outdoor storage, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and communications equipment and appurtenant enclosures shall be located within the Second or Third Layer and concealed from view from any Frontage or Sidewalk by Liner Buildings, walls, Streetscreens, or opaque gates. These shall not be allowed as Encroachments. F.44 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN f. Building Heights shall be measured in Stories and shall conform to Article 4, Table 2 and be as shown in Illustration 5.5 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, except for the Parkin < 3 West whose maximum building height shall be eighty -one -feet {-81)-w th no aim ftation en -the number of Stories. The first floor elevation shall be at average Sidewalk grade. A first floor Residential Function should be raised a minimum of two (2) feet and a maximum of three and a half (3.5) feet above average Sidewalk grade. Existing one Story Structures shall be considered conforming and may be enlarged. Each of the following Blocks shall be subject to the additional standards set forth herein below: g. 1. Block 3 West. Parking Garages or Parking Structures located on Block 3 West shall have a maximum Building Height of eighty-one feet (81') with no limitation on the total number of Stories. 2. Block 4. Buildings and Structures, or portions thereof, located on Block 4 shall be limited to a maximum Height of fifty feet (50'). 3. Block 5 East. Buildings and Structures, or portions thereof, located on Block 5 East shall be developed in a manner consistent with the standards for each of the Block 5 East zones depicted in Section A4.3 of the Miami Design District SAP Concept Book. Said Building(s) and Structure(s) shall comply with the following maximum Heights for each zone: i. Zone C: 2 Stories ii. Zone D: 4 Stories iii. Zone D2: 5 Stories iv. Zone E: 5 Stories Within Zone E, the introduction of a mezzanine level within the 5th Story shall be permitted and shall not be counted as an additional Story so long as the Height of the improvements located within said zone do not exceed eight -one feet (81'). Mechanical equipment on a roof shall be enclosed by parapets of the minimum Height necessary to conceal it and a maximum Height of five (5) feet. Other ornamental Building features may extend up to ten (10) feet above the maximum Building Height. Roof decks shall be permitted up to the maximum Height. Trellises may extend above the maximum Height up to eight (8) feet. Extensions up to ten (10) feet above the maximum Height for stair, elevator or mechanical enclosures shall be limited to twenty (20%) percent of the roof area, unless approved by Waiver. h. All ground floor and roof top utility infrastructure and mechanical equipment shall be concealed from public view. At the Building Frontage, all equipment such as backflow preventers, siamese connections, and the like shall be screened from public view with landscaping or a similar aesthetic treatment placed within the line of the Facade or located behind the Streetscreen. Exhaust air fans and louvers may be allowed on the Facade only on Secondary Frontages when located not less than fourteen (14') feet above the average Sidewalk Elevation in a fashion that does not adversely impact the pedestrian experience. Service, infrastructure and utility elements may be creatively concealed or emphasized. Rooftop elements, such as equipment, tanks, exits and elevator towers, shall be designed, F,45 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN j. housed or concealed as architectural elements worthy of public view as such elements shall be visible from the elevated highway and surrounding Buildings. Streetscreens shall be a minimum of three and a half (3.5) feet in Height and constructed of a material matching the adjacent building Facade or of masonry, commercial grade decorative wood or metal, tile, artistic or non -advertising signage (including way finding), or art or a green wall. The Streetscreen may be replaced by a hedge or fence. Streetscreens shall have openings no larger than necessary to allow automobile and pedestrian access. Streetscreens shall be located co -planar with the Building Facade Line. Streetscreens more than three (3) feet high shall be fifty percent (50%) permeable or articulated to avoid blank walls. Within the Second and Third Layers, fences and walls shall not exceed a Height of eight (8) feet, with the exception of Streetscreens masking loading docks. 5.5.3 Building Function & Density (T5) a. Buildings in T5 shall conform to the Functions, Densities, and Intensities described in Article 4, Tables 3 and 4 and Illustration 5.5 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Certain Functions as shown in Article 4, Table 3 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP shall require approval by Warrant or Exception. Consult Article 6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP for any Supplemental Use regulations. 5.5.4 Parking Standards (T5) a. Vehicular parking and loading shall be required as shown in Article 4, Tables 4 and 5 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. On -street parking available along the Frontage Lines that correspond to each Lot shall be counted toward the parking requirement of the Building on the Lot. c. Parking should be accessed by an Alley. Parking shall, when available, be accessed from the Secondary Frontage. Where Lots have only Principal Frontages, parking may be accessed from the Principal Frontages. When a Lot has only Principal Frontages, Driveways, Loading Docks and service areas shall be at the Second Layer and permitted on Principal Frontages. d. All parking, open parking areas, covered parking, garages, Loading Spaces and service areas, shall be masked from the Frontage by a Streetscreen as illustrated in Article 4, Table 8 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Underground parking may extend into the Second Layer only if it is fully underground. Ramps to underground parking shall be only within the Second and Third Layers. Above ground parking may extend into the Second Layer with appropriate Facade treatment. For any above ground parking structures located at the intersection of two Thoroughfares, a retail liner shall be provided for a minimum of fifty (50) feet in order to complement the surrounding architecture. Surface parking may extend into the Second Layer a maximum of twenty five percent (25%) of the length of the Primary Frontage up to a maximum of fifty (50) feet, except Interim Parking which may be 100% of the length of the Primary Frontage and shall comply with all other applicable City Code regulations. F.46 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN e. The vehicular entrance of a parking lot or garage on a Frontage shall be no wider than forty- five (45) feet, except for a Parking Garage or Parking Structure in Block 3 West identified on fifty one (51') feet (exclusive of the width of the pedestrian refuge and any abutting alley} The minimum distance between vehicular entrances shall be twenty (20) feet at the Property Line and may encroach into Setbacks. Where the vehicular entrance exceeds thirty (30) feet in width, a median of not less than three (3) feet in width shall be provided between vehicular ingress and egress travel lanes to enhance pedestrian safety. 1. Block 3 West. For any Parking Garage or Parking Structure in Block 3 West identified on page A2.2 of the Concept Book, the vehicular entrance of said parking lot or garage shall be limited to total vehicular pavement not wider than fifty-one feet (51') (exclusive of the width of the pedestrian refuge and any abutting alley) upon approval by SAP Permit. f. Pedestrian entrances to all parking lots and parking structures shall be directly from a Frontage Line. Underground parking structures should be entered by pedestrians directly from a Principal Building or the Pedestrian Passage. g. Buildings mixing Uses shall provide parking for each Use. Shared Parking shall be calculated according to Article 4, Table 5 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. h. Underground parking may extend into the First Layer. Ramps to underground parking shall be within the Second and Third Layers. Where Lots are Abutting, underground parking may extend to Abutting Blocks and Lots, including under Thoroughfares. i. Above -grade parking may extend into the Second Layer above a first floor Liner with decorative Facade treatment matching the Liner Facade below or an art or green wall. For treatment or art or green wall shall be approved via SAP Permit. The Facade treatment shall ducts and all lighting. Underground Parking may extend above -grade into a first floor Liner if the Building Facade is designed to meet the Sidewalk in such a manner that fully obscures the Parking Area. 1. Block 3 West. For any Parking Garage or Parking Structure located on Block 3 West, a decorative Facade treatment or art or green wall shall be approved via SAP Permit. The Facade treatment shall conceal from view all internal elements including, but not limited to, vehicles, piping, fans, ducts and all lighting. 5.5.5 Architectural Standards (T5) a. Only permanent Structures shall be allowed. Temporary Structures such as mobile homes, construction trailers, travel trailers, recreational vehicles and other temporary Structures shall not be allowed, except as otherwise permitted by the City Code and this code. b. The Facades on Retail Frontages shall be detailed as storefronts with decorative Facade treatment or an art or green wall, and glazed no less than fifty per cent (50%) of the Sidewalk -level Story. A reduction to the above glazing standard to provide between forty- nine percent (49%) and thirty percent (30%) glazing may be granted by SAP Permit. F.47 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN Requests for reductions to provide between twenty-nine percent (29%) to a minimum of fifteen percent (15%) glazing may be granted by SAP Permit with review by the UDRB., with the following exceptions: ° and thirty perccnt (30%) may be granted by SAP Permit. percent (49%) and thirty percent (30%) may be granted by SAP Permit with review by r�nn r-i__..__i_ �. .. t..... ,... a,.,,... �.. ..7... .....-......F MC]0/_1 4., n minimum of fiftovn nori+o r� 0 conditions by UDRB. c. Roof materials should be light-colored, high Albedo or of a planted surface and shall comply with Article 3, Section 3.13.2 of this Code. d. The Facade of a Parking Garage that is not concealed behind a Habitable Liner shall be screened to conceal all internal elements such as plumbing pipes, fans, ducts and lighting. Ramping should be internalized wherever possible. Exposed spandrels shall be prohibited. The exposed top level of parking Structures shall be covered a maximum of sixty percent (60%) with a shade producing Structure such as, but not limited to, a vined pergola or retractable canvas shade Structure. In lieu of the use of the aforementioned shade producing Structure, an alternate treatment of the exposed top level of parking Structure may be approved by SAP Permit. e. Building walls shall reinforce the continuity of the Frontage Line and of the Pedestrian Passage by their surfaces and by their establishment of the edge. Building walls may curve, angle, or deviate from the established Setback, as established pursuant to Sec. 3.3.6., by no more than ten feet (10') if approved by SAP Permit. f. Each Shopfront Facade may be an individual design. In the case of Abutting Shopfront Facades, their designs shall be coordinated. Party walls may extend beyond or above the walls of Abutting Buildings and shall be designed and finished as if they were intended to be permanent, as they may be seen from Thoroughfares, the Pedestrian Passage, and from surrounding Buildings. g. Not less than one (1) entrance doors per Building or tenant space, as the case may be, shall be at Sidewalk grade or the grade of the Pedestrian Passage, with the exception to entrance doors for existing Buildings and their additions. h. The visible exterior soffits of Balconies and roof overhangs and the ceilings of Arcades and Balconies shall be articulated with attention to materials and lighting given that the undersides of such elements are frequently more visible than the Facade. 5.5.6 Landscape Standards (T5) a. Open Space shall be calculated on an aggregate basis for all of the new Building Lots included as part of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP and shall be a minimum of six and a half percent (6.5%) of the total new Building Lot Area. Should the Open Space provided at the completion of the development program set forth on page A1.98 of the Concept Book fall below ten percent (10%) of the total new Building Lot Area, the owner(s) of F.48 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN the multiple properties comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area shall off- set the difference between the desired ten percent (10%) Open Space and required six and a half percent (6.5%) Open Space in accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement. Areas under permanent kiosks shall not be calculated as Open Space. 1. Block 5 East. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Open Space for Block 5 East shall be calculated independent of the aggregate calculation for new Buildings on the balance of the Blocks comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Open Space for Block 5 East shall be a minimum of six and a half percent (6.5%) of the Block 5 East Lot Area. Should the Open Space provided on Block 5 East fall below ten percent (10%) of the Block 5 East Lot Area, the owner(s) of the tracts comprising Block 5 East shall off -set the difference desired ten percent (10%) Open Space and the required six and a half percent (6.5%) Open Space in accordance with the terms of the Block 5 East Development Agreement. 5.5.7 Ambient Standards (T5) a. Noise regulations shall be as established in the City Code. b. Average lighting levels measured at the Building Frontage shall not exceed 5.0 foot-candles (fc). Average horizontal illuminance, measured at the Building Frontage, where adjacent to T3 shall not exceed 1.0 fc. c. Lighting of Building and contingent Open Spaces shall be complementary with the street lighting of Abutting public spaces as illustrated in Article 8 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Interior garage lighting fixtures shall not be visible from streets. d. The lighting fixtures of exposed rooftop parking shall be concealed by a parapet wall and shall not be seen from surrounding streets. e. Neither direct nor reflected light or glare shall extend or pollute beyond parapet walls. F.49 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 T5 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a, Lot Area - With rear vehicular access 5,000 s.f. min. 1,200 s.f. min. b. Lot Width - With rear vehicular access 50 ft. min. 16 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage 93.5 % max. SAP Aggregate d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) N/A e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min. SAP Aggregate **** g. Density 65 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit c. Side 0 ft. min. d. Rear 0 ft. min. e. Abutting Side or Rear T4 6 ft. min. Abutting Side or Rear T3 10% of Lot depth min. 10, through 2"tl Story 26ft. min. above 2ntl Story** BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T5 L & T5 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. i. Cantilever Permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 5 Stories; See Art4 Table 2 for add'I limitations c. Max. Benefit Height 1 Story Abutting D1 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.5 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T5) it 0 _ • o BUILDING PLACEMENT 't Corner Lot Interior Lot Corner Lot Interior Lot /' iT Secondety,Pront - , ---1 iii r10'min za�- tP r-- 14 10' min. 0' min. plii 1 V a I 0' n € r .:..1 N ►4 ►t 1st 2nd 0 min. PARKING PLACEMENT 1 t 2nd Layer Layer BUILDING HEIGHT Max Benefit Height —0r--1 r0 Max —►�--I_ Height I , 5 3 Min. Height , 2 Max. Height Min. Height II ABUTTING SIDE & REAR D1 3rd 3rd layer 0 min. 1 0' min. ABUTTING SIDE & REAR ALL ZONES EXCEPTT4 &T3 7 I 2 @ min.H_.H 1 ABUTTING SIDE & REAR T4 1st Layer 2nd & 3rd Layer Layer 2nd & 3rd Layer -----, 25' min. I i 4 t 3 i a !T 2 10%of Load tt i 1 I( t.._ .a L______. i ABUTTING SIDE &REAR T3 **** Please see Section (15)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.50 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area - With rear vehicular access 5,000 s.f. min. 1,200 s.f. min. b. Lot Width - With rear vehicular access 50 ft. min. 16ft. min. c. Lot Coverage 93.5 % SAP Aggregate d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) N/A e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min.SAP agreggate **** g. Density 65 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit c. Side 0 ft. min. d. Rear e. Abutting Side or Rear T4 0 ft. min 6 ft. min. AbuttingSideorRearT3 10% of Lot depth min.1*' through 2nd Story 26 ft. min. above 2nd Story CROSS•BLOCK PASSAGE a. Pedestrian Passage Not required BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T5 L & T5 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. i. Cantilever permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 81 ft. See Sec. 5.5.2.f c. Max. Benefit Height 1 Story Abutting D1. APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.5 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T5) BLOCK 3 WEST BUILDING PLACEMENT �rcxv_;ar Cana Lot ...-- V 10 rn,n 1 fnler1of Let 0 m-n. x 1St 2nd L0o Law PARKING PLACEMENT Cow „ Lc' Inad Lc ¢ 1 110 rain 0 `1 X t5yar { 2a& 0 mn r4 Caner 3rd._.. _.. Layer •4 *4 _..►4 1st 2,4! Layc-r layer BUILDING HEIGHT Max BeaeF1 Hxxxpt Max Hugh! ldin. Hog„I A4�+ Her h1 n4o Rep ABUTTING DE&REAR DI 0mnc m:m, ;2 0 min ABUTTING SIDE &RE.AR Alt i0N0S EXCEPT 74 & 73 i I 2 B min. y. I ABUTDNG SIDE & REAR T4 3 2 10% ABUTTING SIDE & REAR T3 1st 2ed&Srd Laos **** Please see Section (15)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street DevelopmentAgreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.51 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area - With rear vehicular access 5,000 s.f. min. 1,200 s.f. min. b. Lot Width - With rear vehicular access 50 ft. min. 16 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage 93.5 % max. SAP Aggregate d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) N/A e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min. SAP Aggregate **** g. Density 65 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit b. Secondary Front 10 ft, min- 151 Story ; 15ft. min. - 2ntl Story* c. Side 0 ft. min. d. Rear 0 ft. min. e. Abutting Side or Rear T4 6 ft. min. Abutting Side or Rear T3 7'- 6" all Stories CROSS.BLOCK PASSAGE a. Pedestrian Passage Not required BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T5 L & T5 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. i. Cantilever Permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 5 Stories; 50 ft. max, See Sec. 5.5.2.f c. Max. Benefit Height 1 Story Abutting D1 REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.5 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T5) BLOCK 4 BUILDING PLACEMENT lwerK, Lot q'.n;ad:4ry F�Crq.. Si 2nd Lao' 1350! V. . 110 a1st G m n.:- 2n d 8 3,d 3,11 lay, PARKING PLACEMENT Cmr41 t.0! Ire:, bx to! 25n 1 2nd 3rd.. 1 ya, 4ay.ef i(y0. BUILDING HEIGHT Max.8eni¢(i ► ARM iNG BIDE & REAR DI 0(0!! ;WING SIDE & RFAq ALL (ONES EXCEPT T4 & 4 ,.._2 .._�&,n•.R.m ri tsl 2nd & AR,11(00 OOE & REAq rt 00jfING SIDE&BEAN 13 **** Please see Section (15)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.52 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT • NOVEMBER 2014 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area - With rear vehicular access 5,000 s.f. min. 1,200 s.f. min. b. Lot Width - With rear vehicular access 50 ft. min. 16 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage 93.5 % SAP Aggregate d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) N/A e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min. **** g. Density 65 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max. via SAP Permit c. Side 0 ft. min. d. Rear 0 ft. min. e. Abutting Side or Rear T4 0 ft. min. Abutting Side or RearT3 7'-6"all Stories CROSS -BLOCK PASSAGE a. Pedestrian Passage Not required BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a, Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T5 L & T5 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. i. Cantilever Permitted; with Habitable Space above via SAP Permit. BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 5 Stories; See Sec. 5.5.2.f c. Max. Benefit Height 1 Story Abutting D1 REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.5 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T5) 4;u BLOCK 5 EAST BUILDING PLACEMENT A Comm Lai Ir„enG Lol J...►+1......... i•4........ 1st 2nd Lrycr L C' PARKING PLACEMENT BUILDING HEIGHT min :1R rN 1s1 - -- TI La,'' s' 2nd LOU Lam o mn 0' O s • 3id taym 2m:&3r�1 v Lam 2nd& 3'0 taym ABUTTING SOL S FEAR ALL ZONES EXCEPT Ta & T3 ABUTTiN5 slog & PFAR Ta See Diagram **** Please see Section (12) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Block 5 East Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.53 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6) 5.6.1 Building Disposition (T6) a. Lot coverage by any Building shall not exceed the percentage listed in Illustration 5.6 for each Block and Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, calculated in aggregate for new Buildings only. 1. Block 5 East. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lot Coverage for new Buildings shall be calculated independent of the aggregate calculation for new Buildings on the balance of the Blocks comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Said Lot Coverage shall not exceed the percentage listed in Illustration 5.6 for Block 5 East of the Miami Design District SAP. b. Buildings shall be disposed in relation to the boundaries of their Lots according to Illustration 5.6 for each Block and the standards set forth in Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. c. Buildings or Shopfronts shall have their principal pedestrian entrances on the Pedestrian Passage, a Principal Frontage Line or from a courtyard at the Second Layer. Where a Building or Shopfront fronts both the Pedestrian Passage and a Principal Frontage and its length along the Principal Frontage is eighty (80') feet or less, its principal pedestrian entrance may be located on either the Pedestrian Passage or the Principal Frontage. Where a Building or Shopfront fronts both the Pedestrian Passage and a Principal Frontage and its length along the Principal Frontage is greater than eighty (80') feet, its principal pedestrian entrance shall be located on the Principal Frontage. d. For the minimum Height, Facades shall be built parallel to the Principal Frontage Line along a minimum of sixty percent (60%) of its length on the Setback line as shown in Illustration 5.6 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. In the absence of Building along the remainder of the Frontage line, a Streetscreen shall be built co -planar with the Facade to shield parking and service areas. In the case of two (2) or three (3) Principal Frontages meeting at Thoroughfare intersections, the Building corner may recede from the designated Setback up to twenty percent (20%) of the Lot length. e. Setbacks for Buildings shall be as shown in Illustration 5.6 for each Block and set forth in Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. For T6 8 and T6 12, r Lots having one (1) dimension measuring onc, For T6-12, T6-24, T6- 36, T6- 48, T6-60 and T6-80, the Frontage Setbacks above the eighth floor shall not be required for a Frontage facing a Civic Space or a Right -of -Way seventy (70) feet or greater in width. At property lines Abutting a lower Transect Zone the Setbacks shall reflect the transition as shown in Illustration 5.6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. 1. Block 2. For Lots zoned T6-12 having one (1) dimension measuring one hundred feet (100') or less, Frontage Setbacks above the eighth floor may be a minimum of zero feet (0'). 2. Block 2 West. For Lots zoned T6-12 having one (1) dimension measuring one hundred feet (100') or less, Frontage Setbacks above the eighth floor may be a minimum of zero feet (0') F.54 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 3. Block 3 West. For Lots zoned T6-8 having one (1) dimension measuring one hundred feet (100') or less, Frontage Setbacks above the eighth floor may be a minimum of zero feet (0'). f. Above the eighth floor, minimum building spacing is sixty (60) feet, except that where the Building abuts T5, the sixty (60) feet required spacing above the fifth floor shall be 20 feet. For T6 12, T6- 24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 Lots having one dimension one hundred (100) feet or less, side and rear Setbacks above the eighth floor may be reduced to a minimum of twenty (20) feet.. For T6 12, T6-24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 above the eighth floor in the Second Layer, at a setback of ten (10) feet, an additional two stories of habitable space may extend a maximum sixty percent (60%) of the length of the street Frontages. For T6-12, T6-24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6- 80 above the eighth floor an additional six feet of non -habitable space may be allowed without additional setback to accommodate depth of swimming pools, landscaping, transfer beams, and other structural and mechanical systems. g. twelve (12) Stories and the Building is adjacent to a T5 Lot, Building side Setbacks may be a minimum of ten (10) feet and no Building separation shall be required. to fourteen (14) Stories and the Building is adjacent to a T6 Lot, Building side Setbacks may be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet and the minimum Building separation may be reduced to thirty (30) feet. Closed stairs and open balconies may encroach up to five (5) feet into the Setback by SAP Permit. 1. Block 2 West. Lots zoned T6-12 may: i. Reduce to a minimum of twenty feet (20') Frontage Setbacks above the eighth floor when the Lot has one (1) dimension measuring one hundred feet (100') or less; ii. Reduce side Setbacks above the 5th floor to a minimum of ten feet (10') and no Building separation shall be required when adjacent to a T5 zoned Lot; iii. Reduce side Setbacks above the 8th floor to a minimum of fifteen feet (15') and building separation to thirty feet (30') when the Building is adjacent to a T6 Lot; and iv. Permit closed stairs and open balconies to encroach up to five feet (5') into the Setback via SAP Permit. For sites with three hundred and forty (3410) feet Frontage length or more, aA cross -Block passage shall be provided as follows: 1. Cross -Block Pedestrian Connection. If the Frontage Line of a site is at any point more than three hundred and forty (340) feet from a Thoroughfare intersection, the Building shall provide a cross -Block Pedestrian Passage, subject to the exception listed herein below. Such a cross -Block connection may be covered above the first floor by a maximum of twenty-five percent (25%) of its length with Structures connecting Buildings, such as a terrace, pedestrian bridge or vehicular bridge. In all T6 zones, a cross Block connection may be roofed. F.55 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN a. Block 1 West. A Parking Garage or Parking Structure located in Block 1 West shall not be required to provide a cross -Block Pedestrian Passage. Cross -Block Vehicular Connection. If the Frontage Line of a site is at any point six hundred and fifty (650) feet from a Thoroughfare intersection, a vehicular cross -Block connection shall be provided. 5.6.2 Building Configuration (T6) a. Development within Private Frontages shall comply with Article 4, Tables 2 and Illustration 5.6 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. Galleries, Arcades and Cantilevered Buildings shall be permitted to extend above the Public Right -of -Way of an entirc Block Face. (See Section 3.3.6 and Article 4, Table 6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP). Galleries, Arcades and Cantilevers located within the Public Right Of Way shall not count towards Open Space requirements. In T6, an Arcade, Gallery or Cantilever, and the addition of any Habitable Space above an Arcade or Cantilever shall require an SAP Permit and: (i) upon a recommendation of approval or approval with conditions by UDRBL and (ii) with the approval of the Director of Public Works. 1. An Arcade shall not reduce the active Sidewalk width from the connecting Sidewalk and shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen feet (15') above the average Sidewalk grade. The Arcade shall be no less than thirteen (13') feet deep and may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') feet of the curb. 2. A Cantilever extending into the Public Right -Of -Way, shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen (15') feet above the average Sidewalk grade. A Cantilever may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') feet of the curb. 3. A Gallery shall not reduce the active Sidewalk width from the connecting Sidewalk and shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen (15') feet above the average Sidewalk grade. The Gallery shall be a minimum of thirteen (13') feet deep and may overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2') of the curb. c. Above the eighth floor, the Building Floorplate dimensions shall be limited as follows: 1. 15,000 square feet maximum for Residential Uses in T6-8, T6-12 and T6-24 2. 18,000 square feet maximum for Residential Uses in T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 3. 30,000 square feet maximum for Commercial Uses and for parking 4. 180 feet maximum length for Residential Uses 5. 215 feet maximum length for Commercial Uses d. Encroachments shall be as follows: 1. Pedestrian Passage. Awnings or Canopies within the Pedestrian Passage shall be permitted to encroach to a maximum depth of eight (8') feet or twenty five percent (25%) of the width of the Pedestrian Passage, whichever is less. Such Encroachment shall be F.56 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN further limited by objects located within the Pedestrian Passage such as trees, street lights, etc. Bottom edges of Awning or Canopies shall be no lower than eight feet (8') above the pavement/floor. Awnings of the quarter -sphere type shall not be permitted. 2. Sidewalk or Public Alley. Awnings or Canopies abutting a Sidewalk or a public Alley or similar Public Right -of -Way shall be designed in accordance with Section 54-186 of the City Code and: i. Shall maintain a minimum vertical clearance of not less than eight feet (8') above the pavement/floor and shall not extend into or occupy more than two-thirds (2/3) of the width of the Sidewalk measured from the building where said Awning or Canopy has a vertical clearance of less than fifteen (15') feet above the Sidewalk. ii. Stanchions or columns that support Awnings or Canopies shall be located not less than two (2') feet from within the curb line. iii. Shall not extend over any portion of the Sidewalk within two (2') feet of the curb where said Awning or Canopy has a minimum vertical clearance of fifteen (15') feet above the Sidewalk. iv. Such Encroachment shall be further limited by the edge of the Sidewalk or by objects in the Public Right -of -Way such as trees, streetlamps, etc. 3. At the Second Layer, bay windows and roofs shall be at a maximum three (3) feet deep and may encroach up to thirty percent (30%) of the depth of the Sidewalk. Other cantilevered portions of the Building shall maintain the required Setbacks. At the Second and Third Layers, bay windows, chimneys, roofs, and stairs may encroach up to fifty percent (50%) of the depth of the side or rear Setback. At the Second and Third Layers, Balconies may encroach up to fifty percent (50%) of the depth of the side or rear Setback. 4. Open balconies, bay windows, planters and other architectural features shall be permitted to encroach into the Pedestrian Passage up to three (3) feet beyond the Building Facade for up to twenty five percent (25%) of the width of the Building facade when located not less than fourteen (14') feet above the surface of the Pedestrian Passage. e. All outdoor storage, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and communications equipment and appurtenant enclosures shall be located within the Second or Third Layer and concealed from view from any Frontage or Sidewalk by Liner Buildings, walls, Streetscreens, or opaque gates. These shall not be allowed as Encroachments. f. Loading and service entries shall be accessed from Alleys when available, and otherwise from the Secondary Frontage. Loading spaces and service areas shall be internal to the building, Where Lots have only Principal Frontages, vehicular entries, Loading Docks and service areas shall be permitted on Principal Frontages. Loading and service entries shall be screened from all Pedestrian Passage and Primary Frontage views by decorative walls or gates or Streetscreens. F.57 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN g. 1. Block 2 West. Unenclosed Loading Spaces and services areas on T6-12 zoned Lots within Block 2 West are permitted by SAP Permit and shall be buffered by a highly decorative wall or screen. Building Heights shall be measured in Stories and shall conform to Article 4, Table 2 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP and be allocated as required in Illustration 5.6 for each Block of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. First -floor elevation shall be at average Sidewalk grade. A first level Residential Function should be raised a minimum of two (2) feet and a maximum of three and a half (3.5) feet above average Sidewalk grade. Existing one Story Structures shall be considered conforming and may be enlarged. 1 Block 2 West. Buildinq(s) and Structure(s), or any portions thereof, located on Block 2 West shall have their maximum benefit Heights limited as follows: i. Parcel 11: 0 Stories ii. Parcel 12: 2 Stories 2. Block 3 West. Buildinq(s) and Structure(s), or any portions thereof, located on Parcels 22 and 23 of Block 3 West shall have a maximum benefit Height of two (2) Stories. h. Mechanical equipment on a roof shall be enclosed by parapets of the minimum Height necessary to conceal it. Other enclosures for housing stairs, bathrooms, elevators or mechanical equipment or for ornamental Building features may extend up to ten (10) feet above maximum height for T6-8 and T6-12. Roof decks shall be permitted up to the maximum Height. Trellises may extend above the maximum Height up to fourteen (14) feet. i. All ground floor and roof top utility infrastructure and mechanical equipment shall be concealed from public view. At the Building Frontage, all equipment such as backflow preventers, siamese connections, and the like shall be screened from public view with landscaping or a similar aesthetic treatment, placed within the line of the Facade or behind the Streetscreen. Exhaust air fans and louvers may be allowed on the Facade only on Frontages fourteen (14') feet above the Sidewalk in a fashion that does not adversely impact the pedestrian experience. Service, infrastructure and utility elements may be creatively concealed or emphasized. Rooftop elements, such as equipment, tanks, exits and elevator towers, shall be designed, housed or concealed as architectural elements worthy of public view, as such elements shall be visible from the elevated highway and surrounding tall Buildings. j. Streetscreens or fences shall be a minimum of three and a half (3.5) feet in Height and constructed of a material matching the adjacent Building Facade or of masonry, wrought iron or aluminum. The Streetscreen may be replaced by a hedge. Streetscreens shall have openings no larger than necessary to allow automobile and pedestrian access. Streetscreens shall be located co -planar with the Building Facade Line. Streetscreens over three (3) feet high shall be fifty percent (50%) permeable or articulated to avoid blank walls. k. Within the Second and Third Layers, fences and walls shall not exceed a Height of eight (8) feet, with the exception of Streetscreens masking loading docks. I. The ground floor along all Retail Frontages shall contain Habitable Space. F.58 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 5.6.3 Building Function & Density (T6) a. Buildings in T6 shall conform to the Functions, Densities, and Intensities described in Article 4, Tables 3 and 4 and Illustration 5.6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Certain Functions as shown in Article 4, Table 3 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP shall require approval by Warrant or Exception. Consult Article 6 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP for any supplemental regulations. b. The calculation of the FLR shall not apply to that portion of the building that is entirely below base flood elevation. 5.6.4 Parking Standards (T6) a. Vehicular parking and loading shall be required as shown in Article 4, Tables 4 and 5 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. b. On -street parking available along the Frontage Lines that correspond to each Lot shall be counted toward the parking requirement of the Building on the Lot. c. Parking should be accessed by an Alley. Parking shall be accessed from the Secondary Frontage when available. Where Lots have only Principal Frontages, parking may be accessed from the Principal Frontages. When a Lot has only Principal Frontages, Driveways, vehicular entries, Loading Docks and service areas shall be at the Second Layer and permitted on Principal Frontages. d. Primary Frontage. All parking, open parking areas, covered parking, garages, Loading Spaces and service areas, with the exception of drop-off drives and porte-cocheres, shall be located within the Third Layer and shall be masked from the Frontage by a Liner Building or Streetscreen as illustrated in Article 4, Table 8 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Parking, drop-off drives and porte-cocheres may extend into the Second Layer with appropriate Facade or Landscape treatment. For any above or below ground parking structures located at the intersection of two Thoroughfares, a retail Liner shall be provided for a minimum of fifty feet (50') in order to complement the surrounding architecture. Surface parking may extend into the Second Layer a maximum of twenty five percent (25%) of the length of the Primary Frontage up to a maximum of fifty (50) feet, except for Interim Parking which may be 100% of the length of the Primary Frontage and shall comply with all other applicable City Code regulations. e. Underground parking may extend into the First Layer. Ramps to underground parking shall be within the Second or Third Layers. f. The vehicular entrance of a parking Lot or garage on a Frontage shall be no wider than forty- five (45) feet, page A1.1'l. of the Concept Book whose vehicular entrancc(s) shall be no widcr than fifty one (51') feet. The minimum distance between vehicular entrances shall be twenty (20) feet at the Property Line and may encroach into Setbacks. Where the vehicular entrance exceeds thirty (30) feet in width, a median of not less than three (3) feet in width shall be provided between vehicular ingress and egress travel lanes to enhance pedestrian safety. 1. Block 3 West. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the vehicular entrance of a Parking Garage or Parking Structure on a Frontage on Block 3 West shall be no wider than fifty- one feet (51'). F.59 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN g. Pedestrian entrances to all parking lots and Parking Structures shall be directly from a Frontage Line. Underground Parking Structures should be entered by pedestrians directly from a Principal Building or the Pedestrian Passage. h. Buildings mixing uses shall provide parking for each Use. Shared Parking shall be calculated according to Article 4, Table 5 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. i. Where Lots are Abutting, underground parking may extend to Abutting Blocks and Lots, including under Thoroughfares. J• Above -grade parking may extend into the Second Layer above a first floor liner with decorative facade treatment matching the liner facade below or an art or green wall. Underground parking may extend above grade into a first floor Liner if the Building Facade is designed to meet the Sidewalk in such a manner that fully obscures the Parking Area. 5.6.5 Architectural Standards (T6) a. Only permanent Structures shall be allowed. Temporary Structures, such as mobile homes, construction trailers, travel trailers, recreational vehicles and other temporary Structures, shall not be allowed, except as otherwise permitted by the City Code and this code. b. The Facades on Retail Frontages shall be detailed as storefronts with decorative Facade treatment or an art or green wall, and glazed no less than fifty per cent (50%) of the Sidewalk -level Story. A reduction to the above glazing standard to provide between forty- nine percent (49%) and thirty percent (30%) glazing may be granted by SAP Permit. Requests for reductions to provide between twenty-nine percent (29%) to a minimum of fifteen percent (15%) glazing may be granted by SAP Permit with review by the UDRB., with ° and thirty percent (30%) may be granted by SAP Permit. ^g NE-, 38t 39th,'loth and NE ^lT,st Strects, a reduction between forty nine percent ° ° y be granted by SAP Permit with review by UDRB. require an SAP Permit and a recommendation of approval or approval with conditions by UDRB. • Notwithstanding the foregoing, only the first two hundred feet (200') of NE 38th Street east of NE lst Avenue shall be detailed as a storefront and glazed with clear glass for no less than 70% of the sidewalk -level Story. c. Roof materials should be light-colored, high Albedo or of a planted surface and shall comply with Article 3, Section 3.13.2 of this Code. d. The Facade of a parking garage that is not concealed behind a Habitable Liner and all Elevations shall be screened to conceal all internal elements such as plumbing pipes, fans, ducts and lighting. Ramping should be internalized wherever possible. Exposed spandrels shall be prohibited. The exposed top level of parking structures shall be covered a minimum of sixty percent (60%) with a shade producing structure such as, but not limited to, a vined pergola or retractable canvas shade structure. In lieu of the use of the aforementioned shade F.60 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN producing Structure, an alternate treatment of the exposed top level of parking Structure may be approved by SAP Permit. e. Building walls shall reinforce the continuity of the Frontage Line and of the Pedestrian Passage by their surfaces and by their establishment of the edge. Building walls may curve, angle, or deviate from the established Setback, as established pursuant to Sec. 3.3.6., by no more than ten feet (10') if approved by SAP Permit f. Each Shopfront Facade may be an individual design. In the case of Abutting Shopfront Facades, their designs shall be coordinated. Party walls may extend beyond or above the walls of Abutting buildings and shall be designed and finished as if they were intended to be permanent as they may be seen from Thoroughfares, the Pedestrian Passage, and from surrounding Buildings. g. Not less than one (1) entrance door per Building or tenant space, as the case may be, shall be at Sidewalk grade or the grade of the Pedestrian Passage, with the exception to entrance doors for existing Buildings and their additions. h. The visible exterior soffits of Balconies and roof overhangs and the ceilings of Arcades and Balconies shall be articulated with attention to materials and lighting given that the undersides of such elements are frequently more visible than the Facade. 5.6.6 Landscape Standards (T6) a. Open Space shall be calculated on an aggregate basis for all of the new Building Lots included as part of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP and shall be a minimum of six and a half percent (6.5%) of the total new Building Lot Area. Should the Open Space provided at the completion of the development program set forth on page A1.98 of the Concept Book fall below ten percent (10%) of the total new Building Lot Area, the owner(s) of the multiple properties comprising the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area shall off- set the difference between the desired ten percent (10%) Open Space and required six and a half percent (6.5%) Open Space in accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement. Areas under permanent kiosks shall not be calculated as Open Space. 5.6.7 Ambient Standards (T6) a. Noise regulations shall be as established in the City Code. b. Average lighting levels measured at the Building Frontage shall not exceed 20 fc (foot- candles). c. Average Lighting of Building and contingent Open Spaces shall complement the street lighting of Abutting public spaces as illustrated in Article 8 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. Interior garage lighting fixtures shall not be visible from Thoroughfares. d. The lighting fixtures of exposed rooftop parking shall be concealed by a parapet wall and shall not be seen from surrounding Thoroughfares. e. Neither direct nor reflected light or glare shall extend or pollute beyond parapet walls. F.6 1 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area 5,000 s.f. min. b. Lot Width 50 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage -1-8 Stories 93.5 % max. SAP aggregate - Above 8'h Story 15,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Residential & Lodging 30,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Office & Commercial d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) 5 / 25% additional Public Benefit e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min.SAP agreggate **** g. Density 150 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story c. Side 0 ft. min.; 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story d. Rear 0 ft. min.; 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 0 ft. min. 1st through 5th Story 10 ft. min. 6th through 8'h Story 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story AbuttingSideorRearT4 6 ft. min, 1st through 5'h Story 26 ft. min. above 5'h Story AbuttingSideorRearT3 10% of Lot depth min.1'' through 2nd Story 26 ft. min. 3rd through 5'h Story 46 ft. min. above 5'h Story BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T6-8 L & T6-8 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit. i. Cantilever permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit. BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 8 Stories c. Max. Benefit Height 2 Stories APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6-8) BLOCK 3;WEST } BUILDING PLACEMENT 1St 2, BUILDING HEIGHT T- r 10 9 6BUTT'.7'G SIDE 8 REM ALI.?ONES EXCEPT T5. TA 8 T3 10 ABUTTING SIDE & REAR 74 PARKING PLACEMENT 15! 1s01 Laii0< t;ryca 30 m10 ., rd 9 10 m;n..J __.. 6 '+BUTTs16G S6066REAR 15 8 7 .- 6� 5 2 10%aLo, N { A,M3477160 SIDE & PEAR 13 "10% of Lot depth for Lots more than 120' deep 6' min for Lots less than 120' deep **** Please see Section (15)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.62 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 T6 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area 5,000 s.f. min. b. Lot Width 50 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage -1-8 Stories 93.5 % max. SAP aggregate - Above 8'h Story 15,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Residential & Lodging 30,000 sq. ft. max. FloorplateforOffice & Commercial d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) 8 / 30% additional Public Benefit e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min.SAP agreggate **** g. Density 150 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 20 ft min above 81h Story b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 20 ft min above 8'h Story c. Side 0 ft. min.; 15 ft. min. above 8'h Story d. Rear 0 ft. min.; 30 ft. min. above 81h Story e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 Abutting Side or RearT4 0 ft. min.; 10 ft. min. 6'h through 8'h Story 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story 6 ft. min. 1" through 5th Story 26 ft. min. 61h through 8th Story 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story Abutting Side or Rear T3 10% of Lot depth min.1s' through 2"d Story 26 ft. min. 3rd through 5'h Story 46 ft. min. above 51h Story BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T6-12 L & T6-12 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit i. Cantilever permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 12 Stories c. Max. Benefit Height 8 Stories Abutting all Transect Zones except T3. wk3M APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6-12) BLOCK 1 1 BLOCK 1 EAST 1 `BLOCKI WEST WEST BUILDING PLACEMENT 1c1 %a Layer ta,^ 3rd Layer BUILDING HEIGHT Aletrtlp; SV,?E& REAR ALL ZDtXSexCrPI E. t t&T3 PARKING PLACEMENT 1e' 2nd ta,ee Layer AR{ ll 1131 S.utL&F.EAR 13 33311MGSi0E&REAR 13 *10% of Lot depth for Lots more than 120' deep 6' min for Lots less than 120' deep xai &:vd Laaae **** Please see Section (15)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.63 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area 5,000 s.f. min. b. Lot Width 50 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage -1-8 Stories 93.5 % max. SAP aggregate - Above 8'h Story 15,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Residential & Lodging 30,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Office & Commercial d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) 8 / 30% additional Public Benefit e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min.SAP agreggate **** g. Density 150 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story c. Side 0 ft. min.; 15 ft. min. above 8th Story d. Rear 0 ft. min.; 30 ft. min. above 8th Story e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 0 ft. min.; 10 ft. min. 6'h through 8'h Story 10 ft. min. above 8'h Story Abutting Side orRearT4 6 ft. min. 151 through 5th Story 26 ft. min. 61h through 8'h Story 30 ft. min, above 8th Story Abutting Side or Rear T3 10% of Lot depth min.1V' through 2"d Story 26 ft. min. 3'd through 5th Story 46 ft. min. above 5'h Story CROSS•BLOCK PASSAGE a. Pedestrian Passage Not required BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T6-12 L & T6-12 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit i. Cantilever permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 12 Stories c. Max. Benefit Height 8 Stories Abutting all Transect Zones except T3. APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6-12) BLOCK 1 WEST BUILDING PLACEMENT rr_PI _.1.4._. 1s1 2n3 Fail L...er Max. 314441 leegY lifitght 3ei Layer BUILDING HEIGHT ro hit11432G S'DE & AFAR AU L 7Ct12S EXCEPT T5, T4 & T3 N3U1iING SIDE &REAR T4 PARKING PLACEMENT 1 F..; 2re LSTer 1%yer AEUTTNG SIDE& REAR 15 2 31d fay Q tre119 11.41 A[3UlTN C%SIDE & REAR 13 "10% of lot depth for Lots more than 120' deep 6' min for Lots less than 120' deep 2-d & 3,d Lam **** Please see Section (15)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.64 MIAMI 21 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area 5,000 s.f. min. b. Lot Width 50 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage -1-8 Stories 93.5 % max. SAP aggregate - Above 8'h Story 15,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Residential & Lodging 30,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Office & Commercial d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) 8 / 30% additional Public Benefit e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min.SAP agreggate **** g. Density 150 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story c. Side 0 ft. min.; 15 ft. min. above 8'h Story d. Rear 0 ft. min.; 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 0 ft. min.; 10 ft. min. 6'h through 8'h Story 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story Abutting Side or Rear T4 6 ft. min. 151 through 51h Story 26 ft. min. 6'h through 8'h Story 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story Abutting Side or Rear T3 10% of Lot depth min.1a' through 2"d Story 26 ft. min. 3rd through 5'h Story 46 ft. min. above 5'h Story BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T6-12 L & T6-12 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit i. Cantilever permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 12 Stories c. Max. Benefit Height 8 Stories abutting all Transect zones except T3. APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6-12) BLOCK 2 BUILDING PLACEMENT SeSq_ndery.F9n<__..__._._ j 1st ..... C�min. 0 Layer 2nd & 3rd } ► Layer .a I ►r--' 10 min. N ►4 ►4 1st 2nd Layer Layer 30' m!n. 0' min. ►+t 30min. r BUILDING HEIGHT 3rd Layer PARKING PLACEMENT 15' m!n. 1 1�` ` 1 -Toyer __`-'--_- 2nd83rd 15' min. a min. 1st 2nd 3rd Layer Layer Layer Max. ! Benefit! 20 20 • I 13 \;' I Max_____ . ht 12 12 i I - --J _A� r \; 1 i 9 L I 8 i _.,_J 5 3 Min.i-_-.�__..__....__....._._ __..-..._ Height! 2 0' min. ►r 2 O'min. T -- L. ABUTTING SIDE & REAR ALL ZONES EXCEPT T5, T4&T3 ABUTTING SIDE & REAR T6 I-p 1 L.1. _................L. 13 \,.' I ! L \j I o30'm —N 46' min. i ~ _- i 1 I 4I L 3 S ! 2 ..�. 6 m 1.,., ►f--1.4 ,.._.i 2 10% of Lot depth ►- i.1 I 1 I I 1 II_ ABUTTING SIDE &REAR T4 ABUTTING SIDE & REAR T3 "10% of Lot depth for Lots more than 120' deep 6' min for Lots less than 120' deep Layer **** Please see Section (1!5)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.65 MIAMI 21 DRAFT • NOVEMBER 2014 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP REGULATING PLAN ILLUSTRATION 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6-12) BLOCK 2 WEST BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION a. Lot Area 5,000 s.f, min. b. Lot Wdth 50 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage -1-8 Stories 93.5 % max. SAP aggregate -Above 8th Story 15,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Residential & Lodging 30,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Office & Commercial d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) 8 / 30% additional Public Benefit e. Frontage at front Setback 60% min. f. Open Space Requirements 6.5 % min.SAP agreggate **** g. Density 150 du/acre max. BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story b. Secondary Front Established Setback or 10 ft. max via SAP Permit ; 0 ft above 8'h Story c. Side 0 ft. min.; 15 ft. min. above 8th Story d. Rear 0 ft. min.; 30 ft. min. above 8'h Story e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 0 ft, min.; 10 ft. min. 6th through 8th Story 10 ft. min. above 8th Story AbuttingSideorRearT4 6 ft. min. 1st through 5th Story 26 ft. min. 6th through 8'h Story 30 ft. min. above 8th Story Abutting Side orRearT3 10% of Lot depth min.1" through 2ntl Story 26 ft. min. 3ra through 5'h Story 46 ft. min. above 5th Story BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T6-12 L & T6-12 0 only) g. Gallery permitted h. Arcade permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit i. Cantilever permitted; with Habitable space above via SAP Permit BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 12 Stories c. Max. Benefit Height 0 Stories; 2 Stories South of Midblock of Block 2 West Mai &rlt ear H6ght BUILDING PLACEMENT ra...11,4 _►a 221 Lay& Lagm 23 BUILDING HEIGHT 1 13 12 ,3 la nr,n 2 Q nun oy AWING SIDE d REAR ALL ZONES EXCEPT T5, 2.; & T3 1 l2 9 8 2 26 mla 5 a 2 4 PARKING PLACEMENT .,., IS; 2no I.`yer Lary 4 mn y 3ro Lam ARMING SIRE R 8558 15 12 8 ABUTTING SIDE & EAR T7 A821141NG SIDE & REAR T3 "10% of Lot depth for Lots more than 120' deep 6' min for Lots less than 120' deep Please see Section (15)(b) of the Miami Design District Retail Street Development Agreement for further information regarding Open Space. F.66 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 ARTICLE 6. SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS 6.3 COMMERCIAL USES 6.3.1 Large Scale Retail REGULATING PLAN A single commercial establishment occupying more than 55,000 square feet of Floor Area Design District Retail Street S.A.P. shall be permitted subject to the following requirements: in the Miami LOCATION By Right in T6-12 or above for up to two (2) establishments with a maximum size of feet and 160,000 square feet. By Right in T5 for up to one (1) establishment with a maximum size of 120 000 square By Exception in T5 on Block 5 East for up to one (1) establishment with a maximum square feet. By Warrant in D1 By Right in D2. Section 6.3.1. "Additional Requirements" shall not apply. 120,000 square feet. size of 100,000 LOT SIZE As required by the Transect Zone. COMMERCIAL AREA LIMITATIONS Minimum of 55,000 square feet. REQUIREMENTS WHEN ABUTTING A MORE RESTRICTIVE TRANSECT • A minimum of one (1) shade tree with a minimum Height of twelve (12) feet shall be planted at twenty-five feet (25') on center along the perimeter of the wall. • Additional landscaping in the form of shrubs and Buffer plant material shall also be required. PARKING • All required Parking shall conform to the Transect Zone. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS • At ground level: Habitable Space, such as Liners , to conceal Parking Structures or Parking Areas must be provided for at least sixty-five percent (65%) of linear street Frontages. • Second floor level: Habitable Space, such as Liners to conceal Parking Structures, with a combination of architectural articulation for all linear street Frontages shall be required; however, in no case shall the Habitable Space Liners be less than forty percent (40%) of all Linear street Frontages. • Third floor level and above: Habitable Space, such as Liners, to conceal a Parking Structure with a combination of architectural articulation for all liner street Frontages shall be permitted; however, in no case will the Habitable Space Liners be less than twenty-five percent (25%) of all linear street Frontages. • A decorative facade, art wall or green wall may substitute for the Liner on a maximum of two (2) street Frontages. 6.3.2 Criteria for Certain Open Air Retail Uses a. Open Air Retail uses are permitted by Right. b. All exhibits, displays and sales of items from a Retail Merchandising Unit shall be subject to the following limitations: 1. Retail Merchandising Units, excluding any associated signage, as permitted below in b.5., shall be limited to a maximum size of one hundred and sixty (160) square feet in area and shall not exceed a maximum Height of fifteen (15) feet; F.67 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 2. There shall be no more than twenty (20) Retail Merchandising Units located in the SAP boundaries, and limited to Parcels 1-63, as identified on Sheet A1.5 of the Concept Book. 3. Retail Merchandising Units shall be setback from any adjacent public right-of-way by a minimum of ten (10) feet. 4. Retail Merchandising Unit openings and windows may be closed from time to time to secure the structure. 5. Individual exterior identity signs shall be limited to sixteen (16) square feet in area, with no dimension exceeding eight (8) linear feet in length. There shall be no more than two (2) identity signs per Retail Merchandising Unit. c. Open Air Retail uses shall not count towards gross buildable area and floor lot ratio calculations if the vending carts, kiosks, Retail Merchandising Units or other structure has wheels and is removable within 24 hours in case of emergency. d. Deviations from the standards set forth in Section 6.3.2.b may be approved by SAP Permit upon a finding by the Planning Director that the requested modifications are justified due to one or more of the following special conditions: 1. Established pedestrian flow patterns; 2. Existing landscape features; 3. Governmental action which creates a peculiar configuration on the subject property; 4. Deviations do not interfere with the pedestrian experience within the Pedestrian Passage. 6.5 SIGN STANDARDS 6.5.1.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The following general requirements and limitations shall apply with regard to Signs located within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, in addition to provisions appearing elsewhere in this code, with the exception of Signs located more than twenty-five feet (25') from the intersection of any Thoroughfare and the Pedestrian Passage. No Variance from these provisions is permitted unless other -wise provided herein. a. Any Sign allowed herein may contain, in lieu of any other message or copy, any lawful non - Commercial message, so long as said Sign complies with the size, Height, Area and other requirements of this code and the City Code. b. Limitations on false and misleading Signs. It shall be unlawful to post any Sign that is false or misleading. F.68 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN c. No Sign adjacent to a T3, T4-R, T5-R or T6-R zone shall be illuminated or Flashing unless such Signs are specifically authorized by the regulations for the Transect in which erected. Whether or not illuminated or Flashing Signs are authorized generally within a zone, no Flashing Sign shall be permitted within one hundred (100) feet of any portion of property in a Residential district located north of NE 42nd Street, as measured along the street Frontage on the same side of the street, or as measured in a straight line to property across the street, if the flashing element of such Sign is directly visible from the Residential property involved. d. Revolving or Whirling Signs and pennant or streamer Signs are hereby prohibited unless such Signs are specifically authorized by the regulations for the Zone in which erected. e. Signs of historic significance. Any Sign determined to be of historic significance by the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board, through resolution that makes findings according to the Chapter 23 of the City Code, may be exempted by Warrant from any Sign limitation imposed by this code. The placement of said Sign may be as approved according to the considerations and standards of Warrant approval, as the criteria in Chapter 23. f. Variances for Height on freestanding outdoor Advertising Signs may be granted by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, pursuant to the limitations set forth in this code and upon compliance with the following: 1. An application for a Height Variance for a freestanding outdoor Advertising Sign may only be submitted, and accepted by the City, if the Height Variance is necessary due to a government action which renders the Sign not visible from the roadway(s) which it was intended to be viewed from; said government action will only be considered a justification for the requested Variance if the action occurs after the Sign has been legally erected under the provisions of the zoning ordinance in effect at the time the Sign was built. A legally erected Sign that was legally constructed and not in compliance with the Height provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may not justify the noncompliant Height as hardship for a Variance request; only a subsequent government action, which physically impedes the visibility of a Sign, will be considered a valid justification; g. 2. Any application for a Height Variance for a freestanding outdoor Advertising Sign must be ac companied by line of sight studies from the roadway(s) which such Sign is intended to be viewed from; and 3. A finding must be made that the Variance be requested is the minimum Variance necessary to make such Sign visible from the roadway(s) which such Sign is intended to be viewed from. 4. In addition, this section shall not apply to any Sign with nonconforming status. All Temporary Signs shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 62 of the City Code. h. All Signs shall comply with the vision clearance standards of this code. i. A Warrant shall be required for establishment of community or Neighborhood bulletin boards, including kiosks in districts where permissible, but no Sign permits shall be required for posting of notices thereon. Size and location standards shall be as set forth in the districts where permissible. Subject to approval by the officer or agent designated by the City Manager, such bulletin boards or kiosks may be erected on public property. Conditions of the F.69 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN j. Warrant shall include assignment of responsibility for erection or maintenance, and provision for removal if not properly maintained. Freestanding Signs higher than seven (7) feet in height are prohibited in Transect Zones T6- 24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60, and T6-80. Free standing Signs above seven (7) feet in height are allowed By Right in District (D) Zones and may be permitted by Warrant in all other Zones, subject to any applicable Design Guidelines. These regulations do not apply to those signs regulated under Chapter 62, Article 13 of the City Code. k. Painted wall Signs are prohibited in Transect Zones T6-24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60, and T6-80. Painted wall Signs are allowed By Right in District (D) Zones and may be permitted by Warrant in all other Zones, subject to any applicable Design Guidelines. Painted wall Signs shall be limited to on -premises business identification signage as more specifically regulated in each transect zone per Section 6.5.2. These regulations do not apply to those signs regulated under Chapter 62, Article 13 of the City Code. 6.5.2 TRANSECT SPECIFIC STANDARDS 6.5.2.1 GENERALLY a. Criteria. In the review and approval of Signs, the City shall ensure compliance with all applicable sections of the Florida Building Code and ensure that the Signs comply with the zoning regulations of this code including: 1. The size and Area of the Signs comply with the specifications set forth for the type of Sign and the Zone in which the Sign is to be located; and 2. The Signs comply with location standards on the subject property or Structure as specified herein. 6.5.2.5 T4-O, T5-L, T5-O, T6-L, T6-O, CI -HD, D1, D2 AND D3 Except as otherwise provided, the following Signs are permitted and may be illuminated but shall not be Animated or flashing. a. For a single establishment within a Building: 1. Wall Signs. When a single establishment takes up an entire Building, wall Signs shall be limited to one and one half (1 1/2) square feet of Sign Area for each lineal foot of Building Facade area. • Each establishment is permitted one (1) Identification Sign and up to two (2) Secondary Identification Signs per Shopfront Facade, all of which shall be subject to the aggregate Sign Area. The Sign Area for each Shopfront Facade shall be calculated independently. • Wall signs shall be limited to registered trade names, logo brand marks, swashed, simple lines, back plates and other decorative touches. Tag lines, bylines, merchandise or service descriptions are not permitted. F.70 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN The Copy Area of each Identification Sign and Secondary Identification Sign shall be computed by surrounding each Sign with a square or rectangle shape in order to calculate the area. Elements such as logo brand marks, swashes, simple lines, back plates or other decorative touches shall not be included as part of the Copy Area. Letter height shall be determined by measuring the tallest letter of an Identification Sign or Secondary Identification Sign, inclusive of swashes, ascenders, and descenders. Identification Signs and Secondary Identification Signs shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the width of the Shopfront Facade. The combined area of all Identification Signs and Secondary Identification Signs shall not exceed thirty-five percent (35%) of the area of the Shopfront Facade. 2. Window Signs. Attached signs shall not exceed thirty-five (35%) of the glassed area of the window in which placed. Number of such Signs in not limited by these regulations, but the Window Sign areas shall be included as part of aggregate wall Sign Area, as limited above. Only trade names or graphic logos may be used. Store description, advertisements, or tag lines are not permitted. The entire graphic shall be mounted below 48" in height from finished floor and all applied graphics shall be adhered to the interior side of the glass. Painted Signs in the form of artistic murals may be allowed by SAP Permit. 3. Projecting Signs. Shall be limited to one (1) Sign structure with no more than two (2) Sign surfaces, neither of which shall exceed forty (40) square feet in Sign Area; however, such permissible Sign Area may be increased to eighty (80) square feet where maximum projection from the face of the Building is two (2) feet or less; sixty (60) square feet where projection is more than two (2) and less than three (3) feet; and forty (40) square feet where projection is at least three (3), but not more than four (4) feet. The aggregate Area of such Signs shall be included as part of aggregate wall Sign Area, as limited above. 4. Ground/Freestanding Signs. Shall be limited to one (1) Sign structure with no more than two (2) Sign surfaces, neither of which shall exceed forty (40) square feet in Sign Area for each establishment or for each one hundred (100) feet of street Frontage. Permitted Sign Area may be cumulative, but no Sign surface shall exceed one hundred (100) square feet. Maximum Height limitation shall be twenty (20) feet including embellishments, measured from the crown of the nearest adjacent local or arterial street, not including limited access highways or expressways, provided, however, that the Zoning Administrator may increase the measurement of the crown by up to five (5) feet to accommodate unusual or undulating site conditions. 5. Tenant Logo Treatment. Identification Signage (fascia wall signs, for example) can be inter -mixed with large expressions and artistic interpretations of the tenant brand logo marks. Tenant logos may be considered as larger scaled artistic expressions of the merchandising and can be used at a large urban Building scale, as Building patterns, or may be incorporated into the Building architecture itself, so as to be considered a part of the Building and Facade expression. Building wraps are not permitted. All Tenant Logo Treatment shall not be calculated as part of aggregate Facade Sign Area. Where a tenant logo or any letter, numeral, character, figure or emblem will cover more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of the Building Facade, such architectural or artistic treatment shall require approval by SAP Permit. 6. Building Address Signs. Building addresses will not be calculated as part of aggregate wall Sign Area, as limited above. MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 7. Wall Mounted Plaque. Not more than one (1) such Sign, not exceeding four (4) square feet in area, may be located adjacent to entry doors. No taglines, slogans, service or product descriptions are permitted in the text. A Wall Mounted Plaque shall be calculated as part of aggregate Facade Sign Area, as limited above. 8. Inlaid Entry Vestibule Floor Signs. Not more than one (1) such Sign not exceeding ten (10) square feet in area, may be recessed into the floor, located solely within tenant lease line at the entry vestibule of the store, and integrated flush into the surrounding flooring system. Such Signs must be fabricated out of durable, non -slip materials. Inlaid Entry Vestibule Floor Signs shall not be calculated as part of aggregate wall Sign Area, as limited above. 9. Interior Signs. Signage, mounted inside the store three (3) feet beyond the Shopfront Facade, viewed from the pedestrian walkway will not be calculated as part of aggregate Facade Sign Area, as limited above. Any Signage mounted inside the store within three (3) feet of the Shop -front Facade shall be considered a Window Sign and governed by the requirements of Sec. 6.5.2.5.a.2. 10. Video and animated architectural Facade treatments may be used as approved by Warrant. 11. Prohibited Sign Types. Following is a list of prohibited sign types: Suspended blade signs. Moving, rotating, or flashing signs, except video facade treatments permitted via SAP Permit. • Signs with exposed neon, vacuum -formed plastic, and internally illuminated plex- faced box signs. Parapet -mounted signs or signs which project above the parapet. Painted tenant identity signs, except artistic murals permitted via SAP Permit. Balloon or inflatable signs. • Signs which emit sound, odor, or any visible matter, except audio video permitted through the SAP Permit. • Simulated materials, i.e. plastic laminate, paper, cardboard, foam, Sentra. • Freestanding tenant identity signs and portable signs such as A -frame sandwich boards. • Signs advertising the availability of employment opportunities. • Signs with tag lines, slogans, phone numbers, or service description. • Signs attached, painted on, or otherwise affixed to trees and landscaping. F.72 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN b. For a single Building with more than one establishment opening up to the outdoors: 1. Wall Signs. The Building in which the establishments are located shall be allowed one (1) wall Sign, limited to a Building Identification Sign, not exceeding fifty (50) square feet in Area, for each face of the Building oriented toward the street, In addition, each individual establishment within a Building that has a separate entrance to the outdoors (available to the general public, whether on the ground floor or on an upper level), and a minimum Frontage of twenty (20) linear feet to the outdoors, shall be allowed the following Signs: • A wall Sign not to exceed one (1) square foot in Area for each linear foot of Frontage of the establishment. • Window Signs not to exceed twenty percent (20%) of the glass area of the window or glass door in which placed; such Window Signs may be painted or attached. The number of such Signs is not limited by these regulations, but aggregate Area shall be included as part of aggregate wall Sign Area, as limited above. • A hanging (as in under an Awning or similar Structure) Sign not to exceed three (3) square feet in Area. 2. Window Signs. Attached signs shall not exceed thirty-five (35%) of the glassed area of the window in which placed. The number of such Signs is not limited by these regulations, but the total areas shall be included as part of aggregate wall Sign Area, as limited above. Only trade names or graphic logos may be used. Store descriptions, advertisements, or tag lines are not permitted. The entire graphic shall be mounted below 48" in height from finished floor and all applied graphics shall be adhered to the interior side of the glass. Painted Signs in the form of artistic murals may be allowed by SAP Permit. 3. Projecting Signs. Shall be limited to one (1) Sign structure with no more than two (2) Sign surfaces, neither of which shall exceed forty (40) square feet in Sign Area; however, such permissible Sign Area may be increased to eighty (80) square feet where maximum projection from the face of the Building is two (2) feet or less; sixty (60) square feet where projection is more than two (2) and less than three (3) feet; and forty (40) square feet where projection is at least three (3), but not more than four (4) feet. The aggregate Area of such Signs shall be included as part of aggregate wall Sign Area, as limited above. 4. Ground or freestanding Signs. Shall be limited to one (1) Sign structure with no more than two (2) Sign surfaces, neither of which shall exceed forty (40) square feet in Sign Area for each establishment or for each one hundred (100) feet of street Frontage. Permitted Sign Area may be cumulative, but no Sign surface shall exceed one hundred (100) square feet. Maximum Height limitation shall be twenty (20) feet including embellishments, measured from the crown of the nearest adjacent local or arterial street, not including limited access highways or expressways, provided, however, that the Zoning Administrator may increase the measurement of the crown by up to five (5) feet to accommodate unusual or undulating site conditions. c. For outdoor advertising business Signs. Outdoor advertising business Signs shall be permitted as accessory Uses to principal Commercial Uses, and such Signs shall further be limited as follows: 1. Signs shall be wall mounted only on side walls of the existing principal Commercial Structure and shall not be freestanding; F.73 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 2. Signs shall be limited to one Sign per Structure only; 3. Sign Area shall be limited to no greater than thirty-two (32) square feet; 4. Permissible Sign Area may only be utilized on a Commercial Structure which has the allowable thirty-two (32) square feet of Sign Area unused from the total permissible wall Sign Area for the Structure in question (not counting the twenty (20) square feet of wall Signs allowable per establishment); and 5. Such Signs may either be painted or mounted onto the subject wall. 6.5.3 Limitations on Signs Above a Height of Fifty (50) Feet Above Grade Except as otherwise provided in a specific Transect Zone, the following regulations shall apply to all Signs above a Height of fifty (50) feet above grade: a. Signs shall be limited to the identification of the Building or the name of one (1) major tenant of the Building occupying more than five percent (5%) of the gross leasable Building Floor Area. Not more than two (2) Signs per Building on two (2) separate Building Facades shall be permitted. b. Signs shall consist of individual letters or a graphic logotype, including embellishments such as borders or backgrounds. c. The maximum height of a letter shall be as indicated in the table below. any portion of a Sign over fifty (50) feet but less than two hundred (200) feet above grade 4 FEET any portion of a Sign over two hundred (200) feet but less than three hundred (300) feet above grade 6 FEET any portion of a Sign over three hundred (300) feet but less than four hundred (400) feet above grade 8 FEET any portion of a Sign over four hundred (400) feet above grade 9 FEET d. The maximum height of a logo may exceed the maximum letter height by up to fifty percent (50%) if its width does not exceed its height. When text and a graphic logotype are combined in an integrated fashion to form a seal or emblem representative of an institution or corporation, and when this emblem is to serve as the principal means of Building identification, the following regulations shall apply. F.74 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN any portion of a Sign over fifty (50) feet but less than two hundred (200) feet above grade 200 SQ. FT any portion of a Sign over two hundred (200) feet but less than three hundred (300) feet above grade. 300 SQ. FT any portion of a Sign over three hundred (300) feet but less than four hundred (400) feet above grade 400 SQ. FT any portion of a Sign over four hundred (400) feet above grade 500 SQ. FT e. The maximum length of the Sign shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the width of the Building wall upon which it is placed, as measured at the height of the Sign. The Sign shall consist of not more than one (1) horizontal line or one (1) vertical of letters or symbols, unless it is determined that two (2) lines of lettering would be more compatible with the Building design. The total length of the two (2) lines of lettering, end -to -end, if permitted, shall not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the width of the Building wall. f. Deviations from the maximum size of letter, logotype, length of Sign or number of Signs may be granted by Waiver. g. All Signs higher than fifty (50) feet above grade may be permitted by Warrant and shall be reviewed based on the following guidelines: 1. Signs should respect the Architectural Features of the Facade and be sized and placed subordinate to those features. Overlapping of functional windows, extensions beyond parapet edges obscuring architectural ornamentation or disruption of dominant Facade lines are examples of Sign design problems considered unacceptable. 2. The Sign's color and value (shades of light and dark) should be harmonious with Building materials. 3. In the case of a lighted Sign, a reverse channel letter that silhouettes the Sign against a lighted Building face or the subtle application of illuminated letter returns is desirable. Lighting of a Sign should be accompanied by accent lighting of the Building's distinctive Architectural Features and especially the Facade area surrounding the Sign. Lighted Signs on unlit Buildings are un-acceptable. The objective is a visual lighting emphasis on the Building with the lighted Sign as subordinate. 4. Feature lighting of the Building, including exposed light elements that enhance Building lines, light sculpture or kinetic displays that meet the criteria of the Miami -Dade County art -in -public places ordinance, shall not be construed as Signage subject to these regulations. 6.5.4 Special Area Plan Signage Package The Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Signage Package shall serve to enhance the district's iden- tity, provide safe and clear directional devices for visitors into and through the district, deliver information about the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area, and preserve the character of the surrounding community as a unique destination for art, culture, design, and fashion in Miami. A SAP Signage Package F.75 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN shall allow greater flexibility in sign regulations when the flexibility results in a higher or specialized quality design. Approval of such a package may also authorize the placement of Directional Signs within the Public Right -of -Way or First Layer subject to the following conditions: (i) Directional Signs shall not be located within the First Layer or Public Right -of -Way so as to disrupt pedestrian activity; (ii) Directional Signs shall respect the vision clearance standards set forth in Sec. 3.8.4 of Miami 21; and (iii) the placement of a Directional Sign within the Public Right -of -Way shall require the approval of Public Works Department. Specific sign standards may be exceeded for various sign types with the exception that the total aggregate areas for Building Identification and Directional Signs are not exceeded. A SAP Signage Package submittal may be submitted for either the entirety of the SAP area or for the individual blocks comprising the SAP area. Such submittal, at a minimum, shall include the following: (i) a plan view of each Sign type indicating the typical condition for each Sign type and (ii) the specifications of each sign type. Where an SAP Signage Package is approved for an individual block, all subsequent submittals for future blocks shall incorporate an aesthetic consistent with the aesthetic of the previously approved Signage package. Upon approval of a SAP Signage Package, all signs which conform to the standards set forth therein shall not require an individual SAP Permit, and shall be permitted if in compliance with the Florida Building Code. F.76 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.77 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 7. PROCEDURES AND NONCONFORMITIES 7.1.2 Permits The permits that may be necessary to develop property within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area include the following: Warrant; Waiver; Exception; Variance; SAP Permit; and amendment to the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. The permits, with the exception of the SAP Permit, are illustrated in Article 7, Diagram 14. In addition, certain approvals may be necessary to confirm that uses are permitted under the Code, these include zoning approval (by right), certificate of use, planning determination, or zoning interpretation. Permits issued in error shall convey no rights to any party. The Zoning Administrator shall require corrections to be made unless construction has commenced on that portion of the construction that was permitted in error. 7.1.2.10 Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Permit a. SAP Permit. The SAP Permit authorizes the Development of Structures or Uses within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area following review of the proposed design or Use by the Planning Director. Design conditions or Uses requiring approval by SAP Permit are described in the various articles of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, and are referenced here only for convenience. The specific parameters of each SAP Permit are further described in the articles in which each SAP Permit appears in the Code. 1. Arcades, Galleries, and Cantilevers in T4, T5, and T6 (Article 5, Section 5.4.2.b, 5.5.2.b, and 5.6.2.b). 2. Encroachment of closed stair and open balconies above the 8th floor for T6-12 Lots west of NE 1st Avenue a maximum of five (5) feet into the required Setback (Article 5, Section 5.6.1.f). 3. Habitable stories above Arcade and Cantilevered Buildings in T4, T5, and T6 (Article 5, Section 5.4.2.b, 5.5.2.b, and 5.6.2.b). 4. Open, buffered Loading for T6-12 Lots located west of NE 1st Avenue (Article 5, Section 5.6.2.f). 5. Retail Frontage glazing reductions (Article 5, Section 5.4.5.b, 5.5.5.b, 5.6.5.b). 6. Single Establishment within a Building - painted Signs in the form of artistic murals (Article 6, Sec. 6.5.2.5.a.2). 7. Building with more than one establishment — painted Signs in the form of artistic murals (Article 6, Sec. 6.5.2.5.b.2). 8. Architectural or artistic signage treatment where tenant logo or any letter, numeral, character figure or emblem in excess of fifty percent (50%) of the area of the Building Facade (Article 6, Sec. 6.5.2.5.a.5). F.78 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 9. SAP Signage Package approval (Article 6, Section 6.5.4). 10. Decorative Facade treatment or art or green wall (Article 5, Section 5.5.4.i). 11. Building Setback modification from Established Setback (Article 5, Section 5.4.5.d., 5.5.5.e, and 5.6.5.e). 12. Vehicular pavement width for parking lot or Parking Garage entrance (Article 5, Section 5.5.4.e.i.1). b. SAP Permit review and approval process. All Development of Structures or authorization of Uses within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area identified as permitted by SAP Permit shall be reviewed and approved as set forth below. 1. Applications for SAP permits shall be made on forms provided by the city and, in addition, shall be accompanied by any information reasonably deemed necessary by the Planning Director to render a decision on the subject application. The Planning Director shall review each submitted application for a SAP Permit for completeness. Unless a Building was specifically approved as part of the Special Area Plan, all Buildings shall be reviewed by the Planning Director, after referral for recommendation to the Coordinated Review Committee (CRC) for conformance to the Plan, prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, consistent with the requirements of Sec. 3.9.1.g of this Code. All applications for Uses within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP authorized by the SAP Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director without need for referral to the CRC. 2. Where there is no referral to the CRC, the Planning Director shall issue a notice of an intended decision within twenty-one (21) calendar days of a determination that the SAP Permit application is complete. Where there is a referral to the CRC, the Planning Director shall issue a notice of an intended decision within fifteen (15) calendar days of the meeting date of the CRC. The applicant shall have seven (7) calendar days from receipt of the notice of the intended decision to request a conference with the Planning Director to discuss revisions or provide additional information regarding the application. Within ten (10) calendar days of the conference, or if no conference is requested within ten (10) days of the notice of the intended decision, the Planning Director shall issue his decision with written findings and determinations regarding the applicable criteria set forth in this section and any other applicable regulations as they relate to the application. The applicant and the Planning Director may mutually agree to an extension of time for the issuance of the final decision. The findings and determinations shall be used to approve, approve with condition, or deny the SAP Permit application. If a decision is not issued by the Planning Director within the above -specified timeframes, the SAP Permit application shall be deemed approved. 3. The Planning Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the SAP Permit application. Approvals shall be granted when the application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, and the terms of the accompanying Development Agreement. Conditional approvals shall be granted when the application requires the imposition of conditions in order to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, and the terms of the F.79 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN accompanying Development Agreement. Denials of applications shall be issued if, in the estimation of the Planning Director, conditions and safeguards have been considered and the application is still found to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, and the accompanying Development Agreement. The decision of the Planning Director shall include an explanation of the code requirements for an appeal of the decision. The Director shall include a citation of the legal authority supporting the denial of an SAP Permit application. c. SAP Permit Review Criteria. A SAP Permit shall be approved if the application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, and its accompanying Development Agreement. The Planning Director shall further consider the criteria set forth in Table 12 of Article IV where appropriate. d. SAP Permit Appeal to the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. The SAP Permit applicant may appeal the determination of the Planning Director within fifteen (15) calendar days of the issuance of a final decision. Appeal of the determination of the Planning Director shall be filed with the Office of Hearing Boards and shall be heard de novo by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. The Board shall determine whether to affirm or reverse the determination of the Planning Director. Should the Board choose to reverse the determination of the Planning Director, where the Planning Director previously denied the SAP Permit, the Board may approve the permit as requested by the applicant or approve with conditions and safeguards necessary to ensure the SAP permits consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the Miami Design District Special Area Plan, and the terms of the accompanying Development Agreement. The SAP Permit applicant may appeal the ruling of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board to the City Commission within fifteen (15) calendar days of the issuance of its ruling. Such appeals shall be filed with the Office of Hearing Boards and shall be considered de novo by the City Commission. The City Commission shall determine whether to affirm or reverse the ruling of the Board. The filing of all appeals shall state the specific reasons for such appeal and shall be made on forms designated by the Office of Hearing Boards together with the payment of any required fee(s). 7.1.2.11 Modifications to the Initial Development Program & Redevelopment Credits 1. Uses, and their respective Intensities or Densities, indicated on page A1.98 of the Concept Book are the Principal Uses currently envisioned for development on each specific parcel. However, the Densities and Intensities listed therein may be redistributed to any Lot or parcel within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area, subject always to the Density and Intensity limits of the underlying Transect. Notwithstanding the Densities and Intensities listed on page A1.98 of the Concept Book, future development within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP may exceed such specified Densities and Intensities in aggregate by 10% without need for further administrative review. Any proposed development within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP which exceeds the Densities and Intensities specified on page. A1.98 of the Concept Book by more than F.80 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 10% in aggregate may be approved by process of Exception, subject at all times to the maximum Densities and Intensities permitted by the underlying Transect designation of a particular Lot or parcel. 2. Where an existing Building identified on Page A2.3 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book is redeveloped, only the net additional Floor Area shall be counted against the Density and Intensity limits set forth on Page A1.8 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Concept Book. Such redevelopment, however, shall remain subject at all times to the maximum Densities and Intensities permitted by the underlying Transect designation of a particular Lot or parcel. F.81 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.82 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI'DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN ARTICLE 9. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS 9.5 MINIMUM STANDARDS The following standards shall be considered minimum requirements unless otherwise indicated: 9.5.3 TREES a. Tree Size All trees, except street trees, shall be a minimum of twelve (12) feet high and have a minimum caliper or diameter at breast height (DBH) of two (2) inches at time of planting, except that thirty (30) percent of the tree requirement may be met by native species with a minimum height of ten (10) feet and a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1 1/2) inches at time of planting. b. Street tree size and spacing Street trees shall be of a species typically grown in Miami -Dade County which normally mature to a height of fifteen (15) feet and a minimum caliper of three (3) inches at time of planting, and shall be provided along all roadways at a maximum average spacing of thirty (30) feet on center, except as otherwise provided in this Article. The thirty (30) foot average spacing requirement for multiple single family units and townhouse shall be based on the total lineal footage of roadway for the entire project and not based on individual Lot widths. Street trees shall be placed within the swale area or shall be placed on private property where demonstrated to be necessary due to right-of-way obstructions as determined by the Public Works Department. Street trees planted along private roadways shall be placed within seven (7) feet of the edge of roadway pavement and/or where present within seven (7) feet of the sidewalk. c. Power lines Where the height and location of overhead power -lines requires the planting of low growing trees, street trees shall have a minimum height of eight (8) feet, a minimum caliper of one and one-half (11/2) inches at time of planting, and shall meet the following requirements: 1. Single trunk trees clear of lateral branches to four (4) feet and/or multi trunk trees or tree/shrubs, as referenced in the Landscape Manual, cleared of foliage to a height of four (4) feet. 2. A maximum average spacing of twenty-five (25) feet on center. 3. Maturing to a height and spread not encroaching within five (5) feet of overhead power distribution lines. 4. Under high voltage (50kV and above) transmission lines installed independent of under built distribution lines, tree height and spread shall not exceed the minimum approach distances specified in the current ANSI (American National Standards Institute) Z133.1 Standards, as referenced in the Landscape Manual. F.83 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN 9.5.5 MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES The minimum number of required trees, in addition to street trees, is referenced in Table A. Within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP, where the trees provided exceed the minimum caliper or DBH requirements set forth in Sec 9.5.3.a and 9.5.3.b, the total number of required trees may be reduced, so long as, at the time of planting, the total minimum caliper or DBH provided is equal to or greater than the total minimum caliper or DBH for the number trees required in Table A and Sec. 9.5.3.b at the time of planting. TABLE A *Note: Chart to be inserted. *Requirements determined by most restrictive abutting Transect Zone Where a conflict exists, the requirement imposing the higher standard shall apply. a. Urban Center and Urban Core Transect Zones. In Urban Center or Urban Core Transect Zones, if the minimum number of trees required cannot be reasonably planted on the ground level of the subject property, the applicant may plant twenty-five percent (25%) of the required trees on upper levels such as open recreation areas or exposed decks. b. Off -site tree planting. If the minimum number of trees required cannot be reasonably planted within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Area, the applicant may enter into an agreement with the city, as approved by the department, to plant the excess number of required trees on public property in the following order of priority: (i) elsewhere within Design District; (ii) within one (1) mile of the Design District; or (iii) within any City park; or (iv) at any location within the City approved by the Planning Department. c. Tree trust fund. If the minimum number of trees required cannot be reasonably planted on the subject property, but as an alternative to the off -site tree planting option provided in subsection 9.5.5.b, the applicant shall contribute into the city's tree trust fund the sum of one thousand dollars ($1000.00) for each two (2) inch caliper tree required in accordance with Table A of Section 9.5.5. A city resident with current proof of residency and homestead status shall contribute five hundred ($500.00) for each two (2) inch caliper tree required in accordance with Table A of Section 9.5.5. d. Grassed areas that are to be used for organized sports such as football and soccer or other similar sports or playgrounds, that are clearly identified on a landscape plan shall not be counted toward calculating tree and maximum lawn area requirements. e. Trees shall be planted to provide shade to residential structures of a height of thirty-five (35) feet or less. At least two (2) required lot trees shall be positioned in the energy conservation zone as defined herein. All exterior air conditioning units, except for air conditioning units placed on the roof, shall be shaded by trees and/or shrubs as referenced in the Landscape Manual. F.84 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT — NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN f. Palms of a fourteen (14) foot minimum overall height and minimum caliper of three (3) inches at time of planting shall count as a required tree on the basis of two (2) palms -per tree, except as provided herein for palms used as of street trees. No more than thirty (30) percent of the minimum tree requirements shall be palms. g. Existing trees required by law to be preserved on site and that meet the requirements of Section 9.5.3, may be counted toward fulfilling the minimum tree requirements. h. Prohibited and controlled tree species shall not be counted toward fulfilling minimum tree requirements. Prohibited trees shall be removed from the site after obtaining approval of a tree removal permit. i. No less than thirty (30) percent of the required trees and/or palms shall be native species. j. No less than fifty (50) percent of the required trees shall be low maintenance and drought tolerant species. k. Eighty (80) percent of the trees shall be listed in the Miami -Dade Landscape Manual, the Miami -Dade Street Tree Master Plan and/or the University of Florida's Low -Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida list. I. In order to prevent adverse environmental impacts to existing native plant communities, cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto) that are harvested from the wild shall not be used to satisfy minimum landscaping requirements. Only existing cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto) which are rescued from government approved donor sites, transplanted within the site, or commercially grown from seed shall be counted towards the minimum tree and native plant requirements. m. When trees are planted within the right-of-way, the owners of land adjacent to the areas where street trees are planted must maintain those areas including the trees, plants and sod, using pruning methods specified in this Code. A covenant executed by those owners is required, or a special taxing district must be created to maintain these areas. Where the State, County or municipality determines that the planting of trees and other landscape material is not appropriate in the public right-of-way, they may require that said trees and landscape material be placed on private property. n. Consideration shall be given to the selection of trees, plants and planting site to avoid serious problems such as clogged sewers, cracked sidewalks, and power service interruptions. F.85 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. F.86 MIAMI 21 APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2014 REGULATING PLAN SAP 2.4 CONCEPT BOOK #3904694 v] F.87 EXHIBIT D MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SPECIAL AREA PLAN AMENDMENT 1iH,ac U7 ^.xs (i,'Nan a A N°4-s TAn0A2D ImCR�� COV&jpnir Neu-STS& aap mATEt.rk5 PRufoseD INSNha.ED w rflt .v n,E RlcaNv- 0 . WRT M A(e.G_ OEco R4nvE P "-"¢line' �at+i Osc.MtAvvo +-,�w,nnrv,3Er xa s 2. PARCH b¢(HEW)M�Sr 6-4 aE-Pwrten ry C ,.: ew 1 F?R-O�C��p— J tt: asraae-r C.v�WAQ� 4NcS. IHe 'gam. CRY OF P'fMI ^ -ARDS MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT ASSOCIATES / DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY, LLC This page has been intentionally left blank. CITY OF MIAMI HEARTH; BOARDS FLANS EVIEW •, 1112HL14 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Amendment The following pages are amended and dated 10/02013. A.0 A1.4 A1.5 A1.7 A1.9 A1.10 A2.2 A2.3 A3.5 A3.7 The remaining pages are dated 5/16/2013 c .I4.. . 412tr wr.+�aft. ...l. N S Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan PROJECT TEAM DRAWING INDEX Project Team List & Index of Drawings Applicant Team Leader: Landscape Consultant: Project Team List & Index of Drawings Miami Design District Associates Island Planning Corporation 3841 NE 2nd Avenue 248 Washington Ave #D Section A.1: Overall Site Information Miami, FI. 33137 Miami Beach, FL 33139 A1.1 Location in the Region A1.2 Surrounding Neighborhoods Signege: A1.3 Site Photos 4201 NE 2nd Avenue LLC RSM A1.4 Special Area Plan Properties 150 Broadway, Ste. 800 160 Avenida Cabrillo A1.5 Special Area Plan Properties New York, NY 10038 San Clemente, CA 92672 A1.6 Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Maps A1.7 Existing and Proposed Zoning Program Manager: Architect: A1.8 Illustrative Master Plan Coastal Construction Aranda\Lasch A1.9 Open Space/Civic Space Diagram 5959 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 212 Forsyth Street Miami, Florida 33126 New York, NY 10002 Section A.2 - Thoroughfares and Circulation Master Planner: Architect: Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company, LLC Keenen Riley 1023 SW 25th Avenue 3841 NE 2nd Avenue, Suite 400 Miami, FL 33135 Miami, FL 33137 Traffic Engineer: Architect: Kimley Horn and Associates SBA 5200 NW 33rd Avenue 2333 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Ste 1000 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Parking Consultant: Architect: Walker Parking Consultants Touzet Studio 6602 E 75th Street, Suite 210 65 NW 24th Street Suite 108 Indianopolis, IN 46250 Miami, FL 33127 Lighting Design: Parking: Speirs and Major Timothy Haas & Associates 11 - 15 Emerald Street 500 Township Line Rd, Ste 100 London WC1N 3QL Blue Bell, PA 19422 DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS A2.1 Proposed Frontages A2.2 Parking Management Program A2.3 Existing Buildings A2.4 Vehicular Circulation Diagram A2.5 Transit & Bicycle Routes A2.6 Thoroughfares A2.7 Thoroughfares A2.8 Sequence of Pedestrian Passage A2.9 Sequence of Pedestrian Passage A2.10 TOD and Proposed Streetcar Route Section A.3 - Landscape and Views A3.1 Conceptual Landscape Master Plan A3.2 Case Study: NE 40th Street - Facing North A3.3 Case Study: NE 40th Street - Facing South A3.4 Conceptual Studies for Central Streets A3.5 NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation Studies If 1-1 Section A.4: Block Diagrams A4.1 Block Key Plan A4.2 Block 5 East Proposed Zoning A4.3 Block 5 East Zone Specifications AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CITY OF rs MI HEA7FN1 BOARDS FLA:A it VIEW Hems Boer. _.pane, 11: A1.0 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Project Team List & Index of D PROJECT TEAM Applicant Team Leader Miami Design District Associates 3841 NE 2nd Avenue Miami. FI. 33137 Program Manager Coastal Construction 5959 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miarn . Florida 33126 Master Planner. Duany Rater-Zyberk & Company. LLG 1023 SW 25th Avenue Miami, FL 33135 Traftr_ Engineer: Kimley Horn and Associates 5200 NW 33rd Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Parkin° Consultant. Walker Parking Consurtants 6602 E 75th Street, Suite 210 Indianopolis. IN 46250 Lighting Design: Speirs and Major 11 - 15 Emerald Street London WC1N 3QL Landscape Consultant Island Planning Corporation 248 Washington Ave MD Miami Beach. FL 33139 Signage: RSM 160 Avenida Cabrillo San Clemente, CA 92672 Architect: Aranda\Lasch 212 Forsyth Street New York, NY 10002 Architect: Keenen Riley 3841 NE 2no Avenue, Suite 400 Miami. FL 33137 Architect: SBA 2333 Ponce - -on Blvd. Ste 1000 Coral G. ' FL 33134 ng. Timothy Haas & Associates 500 Township Line Rd, Ste 100 Blue Bell. PA 19422 DLA PLATER-ZvBERi: & COMPANY RLMI'ECTS ANO TOWN PLANNERS DRAWING INDEX Project Team List & Index of Drawings Section A.1: Overall Site Information A1.1 Location in the Region A1.2 Surrounding Neighborhoods A1.3 Site Photos Al A Special Area Plan Properties A1.5 Special Area Plan Properties A1.6 Existing and Proposed Future Land A1.7 Existing and Proposed Zoning A1.8 Existing Conditions A1.9 Illustrative Master R A1.10 Open Space/C A1.11 SAP Intilt pace Diagram d Uses by Floor A1.12 Pro.- -. Uses by Floor A1.1 .posed Uses by Floor 4 Block Key Plan Section A.2 - Thoroughfares and Circulation A2.1 Proposed Frontages A22 Parking Management Program A23 Existing Structures A2.4 Vehicular Circulation Diagram A2.5 Transit & Bicycle Routes A2.6 Thoroughfares A2.7 Thoroughfares A2.8 Sequence of Pedestrian Passage A2.9 Sequence of Pedestrian Passage A2.10 TOD and Proposed Streetcar Route Stita,trX91 riat41 Zr.�vttc Section A-3 pies and Illustrations A3.1 Pa' - .urt Conceptual Renoerings A32 tem Gateway r Pedestrian Passage Studies Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies 4NE 42nd Sreetscape Study A3.5 NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation Studies s A3.6 Recladding Studies tor Buena Vista Building A3.7 Cross Block Connection Conceptual Studies A3.8 Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% Glazing A3.9 High End Urban Retail Examples A3 10 NE 2nd Avenue and NE 41s1 Street Studies Section A 4 - Landscape and Views A4.1 Conceptual Landscape Master Plan A4.2 Sample at Tree Locations A4.3 Conceptual Streetscape Views A4.4 Case Study: NE 40th Street - Facing North A4.5 Case Study: NE 40th Street - Facing South A4.6 Conceptual Studies for Central Streets A4.7 Conceptual Birdeye View, indicating Green and Treed Rootscape A4.8 Green Walt and Root Examples A4.9 Ambient and Direct Lighting Examples A4.11 LEED ND Checklist AMENOMENT 10.04.13 A.0 • This page has been intentionally left blank. CITY OF M61MI HEARIN5 E^.ARDS PLANS R1":<::EW Bow„Gti Po1If El rr 11.54-[(4 11 24 W �: ens: Section A.1: Overall Site Information CITY OF MIAMI HEARIN BOARDS PLAN HEVi W P� r f it/a+/rti � nS. This page has been intentionally left blank. CITY OF MIAMI HEAPIND BOARDS PLANS REVIEW 4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Location in the Region 1. Miami Design District 2. Bal Harbor 3. Village of Merrick Park 4. Lincoln Road Mall HP 5. Miami International eFL- -ARDS av D.S, DUANY PLATER—ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan WPM; 0441111.14; IP Vail 141Of4.,a byte>., • Tit e DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS Iy _ sP r,> al:.i i , Fe$1 . 1f? 414+f14_ k4m!! rr 141, s.`ei Utileat;U-, ilacicA Surrounding Neighborhoods 1. Miami Design District 2. Biscayne Bay 3. U.S. 1-95 4. U.S. 1-195 15. Midtown CITY OF MIAMI 6. To Wynwood Art Distri EL Ts AMENDMENT 10.04.13 By -c By- D.S. Signature ,.,.ary not nm+ Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan DUANY PLATER—ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 Site Photos CITY OF MIAMI HEARING BOARDS �( PLANS,REVIEW I `/LI /t l Al Plan c; S: net Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Map Building Name Address Lot Area (Miami Dade property listing) LaVerne 90 NE 39th Street 13,438 2 Elektra 100 NE 39th Street 105 NE 38th Street 3801 NE 1st Avenue 3821 NE 1st Ave 3801 NE 1st Ave 28,006 3 Rothman 108 NE 39th Street 4,651 4 Palm Lot 140 NE 39th Street 45,722 5 Booth Booth 3821 NE 1st Court 3821 NE 1st Court 23,335 6 7 Buena Vista 180 NE 39th Street 45,906 8 Buick 3841 NE 2nd Avenue 26,928 9 Tuttle (South) 3725 Biscayne Blvd 76,831 io Tuttle (North) 299 NE 38th Street 25,008 Norwegian Wood 92 NE 40th Street 7,364 12 Casa/ Lady Jane 99 NE 39th Street 9,208 13 JBL 101 NE 39th Street 100 NE 40th Street 108 NE 40th Street 17,910 14 Hale Daniel 119 NE 39th Street 4,942 15 Oak Plaza Collins Oak Plaza -Loggia Oak Plaza-KVA Oak Plaza-Twery 139 NE 39th Street 163 NE 39th Street 150 NE 40th Street 160 NE 40th Street 154 NE 40th Street 28,621 is 17 i8 19 Thomas Maier 170 NE 40th Street 4,989 20 Melin 3930 NE 2nd Avenue 29,879 21 Newton 201 NE 39th Street 9,060 22 Asi-Museum Village 81 NE 40th Street 7,520 23 Suttin/ Lovely Rita 95 NE 40th Street 9,893 24 Rosen 151 NE 40th Street 5,005 25 Mosaic/ Chatham 155 NE 40th Street 12,512 26 Moore -Garden Lounge Moore Building 175 NE 40th Street 4040 NE 2nd Avenue 40,100 27 28 Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum Village 34 NE 41st Street 42 NE 41st Street 56 NE 41st Street see next page 29 30 DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS Special Area Plan Properties Map Building Name Address Lot Area 31 Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum Village 60 NE 41st Street 80 NE 41st Street 84 NE 41st Street 90 NE 41st Street 41,971 32 33 34 35 Moore 140 140 NE 41st Street 5,261 36 Mosaic (Lot) 144 NE 41st Street 5,251 37 Rosen (Lot) 150 NE 41st Street 5,261 38 Palmer Building 158 NE 41st Street 7,279 39 Asi 53 Asi 61 53 NE 41st Street 61 NE 41st Street 13,086 40 41 Moore 77 77 NE 41st Street 7,857 42 Moore 115 115 NE 41st Street 11,904 43 Scarlet Begonia 135 NE 41st Street 6,276 44 Church (FCAA) 150 NE 42nd Street 66,520 45 4100 / Lee 4100 NE 2nd Avenue 20,754 46 4141 4141 NE2ndAvenue 95,175 47 4200 4200 NE2ndAvenue 5,040 48 Flagler 4218 NE 2nd Avenue 15,701 49 4240 4240 NE 2nd Avenue 5,038 50 City Garage 3800 NE 1st Ave 31,291 51 Sebastian 35 NE 38th Street 9,524 52 Spear 3815 NE Miami Court 5,061 53 Always Flowers 50 NE 39th Street 6,121 54 Lidia Lidia Lidia 30 NE 39th Street 3840 NE Miami Court 3825 N Miami Avenue 25,074 55 56 57 Marcy Marcy Marcy 3852 N Miami Avenue 20 NW 39th Street 28 NW 39th Street 21,281 58 59 60 Madonna Madonna 3900 N Miami Avenue 21 NWO 39th Street 16,266 61 62 Uptown Girl 4100 NE 1st Avenue 5,739 63 Tiny Dancer 4039 NE 1st Avenue 5,133 e4 Helm 220 NE 43rd Street 80,976 Approved Lots New Lots Under Second Amendment 0UZ TUDI Approved Lot Area:* New Lot Area: Total SAP Lot Area: 914,692 sf or 20.99 acres CITY OF M.1LMI 80,976 sf or 01.86 acres:ro,canaos Prr.:;c ac,:11w 995,668 sf or 22.86-aoreRGt1- _oy, (I/LI /(r{ TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 A1.4- �S. Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Map Budding Name Address Lot Area (Miami Dade property iistn9) LaVeme 90 NE 39th Street 13.438 - Elektra 100 NE 39th Street 105 NE 38th Street 3801 NE 1st Avenue 3821 NE 1st Ave 3801 NE 1st Ave 28.006 RoOanan 108 NE 39th Street 4,651 Palm Lot 140 NE 39th Street 45.722 5 Boot* Booth 3821 NE 1st Court 3821 NE 1st Court 23,335 7 Buena Vista 180 NE 39th Street 45,906 5 Burk 3841 NE 2nd Avenue 26,928 t Turtle (Sotto) 3725 Biscayne. Blvd 76.831 Tuttle (North) 299 NE 38th Street 25.008 • Norweg,a Wood 92 NE 40th Street 7,364 '2 Casa/ Lady Jane 99 NE 39th Street 9.208 J8L 101 NE 39th Street 100 NE 40th Street 108 NE 40th Street 17.910 '4 Hale Darnel 119 NE 39th Street 4.942 5 Oak Plaza Collins Oak Plana -Logger Oak Plaza-KVA Oak Plaza-Twery 139 NE 391h Street 163 NE 39th Street 150 NE 49th Street 160 NE 40tn Street 154 NE 40th Street 28.621 s _ ' r Thomas Maier 170 NE 401h Street 4.989 2c Melon 3930 NE 2nd Avenue 29,879 _, Newton 201 NE 39th Street 9,060 .• Asi-Museum Village 81 NE 40th Street 7.520 23 SutlN/ Lovely Rita 95 NE 40th S 9,893 _ Rosen 151 NE 5.005 25 Mosaic/ Chatham 155 N Street 12512 _ Moore -Garen Lounge Moore Buidrng E 40th Street 4340 NE 2nd Avenue 40,100 2r Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum 41 Asi- Muse *doge 34 NE 41st Street 42 NE 4151 Street 56 NE 41st Street see next page 29 3c Dt+vt.'+ri:a-Ztarak 8 Coer+',t Special Area Plan Properti Map N Building Name .Address Lot Ar 1, Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum Village Asi- Museum V tage Asi- Museum Village 60 NE 41st Street 80 NE 4111 Street 84 NE 41st Street 90 NE 41et Street 41,971 12 33 3. 35 Moore 140 140 NE 41st Street 5,261 35 Mosaic (L00 144 NE41st 5,251 r Rosen (Lot) 150 NE 41 t 5,281 11 Palmer Building 158 N Street 7.279 as As, 53 Asi 51 41st Street 1 NE 41st Street 13.086 as • Moore 77 77 NE 41st Street 7.857 42 Moore 115 115 NE 41st Street 11,904 .3 Scarlet 135 NE 41st Street 6,276 4. Church ' ) 150 NE 42rd Street 66.520 45 / Lee 4100 NE 2nd Avenue 20.754 44 4141 4141 NE 2rk1 Avenue 95,175 4200 4200 NE 2nd Avenue 5,040 44 Flagler 4218 NE 2nd Avenue 15.701 .v 4240 424G NE 2nd Avenue 5,038 >0 City Garage 3800 NE 1st Ave 31,291 S'.^_,s,:ar 35 NE 381h Street 9.524 i 11 Always, Flowers 50 NE 39M Ssz.et ,,, -Al ether Vera 30 hE 3 E Sven; 38t2) NE Ware Court 825 N Morel Avenue "„ :`.'M I-- r_ _• Men litSecl Story 3652 N sAan tAre rue 20 NW 38¢+Street 23 NW 3BSh Street Weems Madonna S100 K Morn Jeerer 21 N1/44 39E- Straet. 1R Z61d v. __ Approved Lots { New Lots qthaAt.1.4, P1az/.1-7c1(4444c_ Approved Lot Arras' 830.017 sf or 19.05 acres New Lot Area- 84.675 sd or 01.94 acres Total SAP Lot Arse: 914,692 st or 21.00 acres - / nee.rlK+N.....krA sp..--.5. SAP r,tk 631232s:Y sa4545K, SW.wv,+"S0L e.Mnvn MI E, 0,74 AMENDMENT 10.04.13 Al 4 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan ElOriginal and First Amendment nNew Lot - Second Amendment STREET m 3Bth, STREET . EXPRESSWAY 1-195 N.G. 360 sr D U A N Y PLATER - Z Y B E R K & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS N E. 43N STREET 0 8 Special Area Plan Properties AMENDMENT 10.04.13 'eTOUZETSTUDIO SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CITY nF r ARDS l Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan • Approved Lots n New Lots -- w_, 16,, v so "sissy Dl ♦NY P TFR-ZvRER1: do CONrANI' ♦y t_�'� AY] ilnM PLANNF 45 • • • •j ttisaA ;.h Ple.ct4.4 • • •I u .. MRCS a Special Area Pia rti • r SS LOSSMs. AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A1.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing Future Land Use Map 1 Restricted Commercial Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Maps Proposed Future Land Use Map Duplex Residential Duplex Residential DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS Medium Density Restricted Commercial TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CITY OF MIAMI HEATT.1 CQARDS ROAM, osottoto w/ - • Viq Sgnature A1.6 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Maps Existing Future Land Use Map Proposed Future Land Use Map DDANY PLATER-ZYRERK & COMPANY ARCN,TC CT5 ANC TOWN ➢_ANNEtS U4i4At Matti-'1c.14ti,c _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing and Proposed Zoning IT3-O I T3-L T4-O NE 40th St • T6-8-O'I, ... •la T6-12:-0 T6-12-0 c T6-6-0 • T6-12-0• • T6-12-0 T6-12-0 T6-24-0 DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS no N IT3-O T3-L T4-O .I NE 40th St 1...1.' • • • • • T6-6-O• NE 40th St T6-12 O T642-0 • T4-L T5-0 COm) NE Sbth St co- �nz T6-12 O VC JUL, Jl > CI T6-8-O • T6-12-0: T6-12-0 T6-24-0 OUZE TUDI ESA for SAP properties TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CITY OF MIAMI HEARIN a BOARDS PLAH3CVIEW ®; eo n. G .oy,ll Pcl.zw-r ar A1.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing and Pr• .sed Zoning Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning T6-12-0 211 tip '1:ANY PLATER-Z1'- .RR & COMPANY •� -n::1 Ct•: aM J W M �.��MF 4., T6-24 - T6-12 T6-8 T5 - T4 T3 Choc-Insntubonal Established Setbacks ...�. ` Giza.S�T�t Plato-Zficput. T6-8-C T6-24 11111 T6-12 Aft T6-8 .... ,,,,,�,�� 75 - O .nG 74 T3 AMENDMENT 10.04.13 Civic -Institutional Established Setbad s �..,�. A1.7 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan SAP Property No. 1-63 New Bldg. Floor Area (S.F.) 2,699,095 64 350 000 Total(s): 3,049,095 Open Space (S.F.) 1-63 41,566 64 Total(s): 5,264 46,830 1-63 64 Total(s): Civic Space (S.F.) 31,974 4,049 36,023 NE 41st ST (City) NE 39t► Uc ity) ** New Building Floor Area (S.F.) used as GFA when applying FLR calculations. *The above -listed program represents the initial program envisioned for the Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan (the "SAP") area. Uses indicated on this page are Principal Uses currently envisioned for develop- ment on each specific parcel and are subject to future change consistent with the Use limitations set forth elsewhere in this SAP. The development program may be increased consistent with the requirements set forth in Art. 7 of the SAP Regulating plan. However, in no event shall any development in excess of the above -outlined program exceed the intensity and density limi- tations set forth in either the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan or the base transect designation, as modified by the SAP, for each parcel. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS OUZE TUDI t�'fir"+riri7iY2YC.' Illustrative Master Plan a;'� �.Ivs TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 FLAN,�Gifi��CVIEWll/u /lg. •P� Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Illustrative Mas an Existing and Proposed Development, by Principal Use' A 8 C C. (zA•13.C) SAP SAP SAP Proposed Adopted Adopted New 'Leveler, Deve0P- pro9e1 ProPelea 11001 nee ter new Capsoty for Cepeory Devaloo- Develop- Adopted and meet men, New CePsctr CaFeaatf Korea 1 Proposed 143,280 Department 143.280 (400.000 Store sf Wowed) Z 00.00.4031 RetardOtkei 318 342 305.499 117.472 741 213 Com:was 3. Peened e Reuse Orced 490.096 Commerce' 490. 0813 4. Proposed see below see belOw see below see belay Hotel 5 Preemel Reedertal Above Read 1 6 Proposed weh Rend 7 PlOpTeee Gay Gals. TOTAL sf 451.718 The below are calculated by unit and are not included rn the above tote_ 4. Proposed53.090 -1 key , Hole ' 5. Proposed Roseanne 72 ones 358 ores Abom Peer' 7. Proposed City Garage a. Ease% Lreashbrk j 24 tires -24 Urals 0 tants 0 Imes 3 tees 3 stets 0 ones 3 •The above-losted 33131001 ,e1a,ssants ntai =Vara lor the Wham. Devon Dena Retail Street Special Ares Plan ( area Uses ca au, pyge ore Po,00ffi USeS corroOt owned for deucop- rnera 00 each soec.fic oar01 ale are sub tore change consetent wen the Use 'an tabor.s set lone Menvhere s SAP The deserOPmere program may be rre..-eased consistent requeerneets set forth in Art 7 of the SAP 0e9clo6010 plan. Howe ro event shall any 40103001:33111 excess of the above -whorled r meted tre mersey and denstty en. teems set form tr. eche' the of More Ccrnreenen.ve Plan or the base barmen dessnatron. as rn by the SAP. Tor earn parcel_ 01 .s, AttR-ZYBERK & COMeANT 1TECTX ANO TOWN PLANNTA, POlia suutAtik mirk, — AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A1.9 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing Conditio. f 1 t 1 4 4 4 1 t t t 1 i t t t 1 t f t / DcAsLATER-ZYRERK & COMPANYMI,C lla 4 AMENDMENTO5.16.13 Al.8 NITECTI ANC :OWN PLANNERS '^''r��— 4 t • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd ST (City) NE 41 st ST (Clty) NE 401h ST (City) NE 38th ST (City) uifiit Open Space or Civic Spacc Ci,Jc Spue At, I- 195 Open & Civic Space - Diagram of Potential Locations Per Sec. 3.9.1 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Regulating Plan, Civic Space shall be not less than 5% of total new Building Lot Area. It may be concentrated at Plazas, as indicated, or included in the Pedestrian Passage, Courtyard or other areas within the SAP, as defined by the Code and designed into the master plan. Civic Space in excess of the minimum requirements may be utilized to satisfy the minimum Open Space requirements outlined in Secs. 5.4.6, 5.5.6, and 5.6.6 of the Miami District Retail Street SAP Regulating Plan. With the exception of Block 5 East, Open and Civic Space shall be calculated in aggregate. A companion spreadsheet is provided to help track aggregate quantities of Open and Civic Space as the project is realized. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS u"iw,1 AMENDMENT 10.04.13 TOUZET STUDIO SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CITY OF r513MI HEARING EOARDS PLANS E V 5W IN J /rH �z Pub. =dos Zonlr Br A1.9 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Open & Civic Space - Diagram of Potential L. «- ..ns Dr. Open & Civic Space rt Open Sp IM Civic ' ce shall be 5% of total new Building LotArea. It may be concentrated at Plazas as indicated or included in the Pedestrian e. Couryard or oner areas within the SAP. ac defined by the Ccdc and designed into the master plait. Civic Space in excess of minimum Gvtc Space requirements may count towards Open Space requirements. For minimum Open Space requirements. please refer to 15(b)(3) of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Development Agreement Open and Civic Span, shall be calculated in aggregate. Please see the Miami Design Distnet Retail Street SAP Code Language for speofic requirements. A companion spreadsheet is provided tc help track aggregate quaruties as Me project is realized. Pt..nTER-Z5stak & Cusre.i we Tows tauzArkiI iL.r AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A1.10 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Proposed Uses by F SAP Properties Underground Parking 447:44,514•- I= SAP Properties Exrsting (non - SAP) Properties D & COMP •)4s. Please see Parksng Mar.agentent Standards sr. Sectors A.2 for actrational parkmg locations. This diagram inds- Mies only the hkety locator* of sish-terranean parksng. Parking Department Stores RetailiCommercsal Restaurants 1 Lodging Residential iZh riCAZU AMENDMENT 05.1 6.1 3 A1.11 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Proposed Uses by Floo 4 4 4 4 pt.. Pi ATIER—Z111F.RK & COMI,AN% C. :cc•s 4wp 'OWN .LANNERS Floor 1 Roor 2 Maki -2c,f4444.— • • " Kin IF AMENDMENT 05.16.13 Parlang 1111 Department Stores Retail/Commercal Restaurants Lodging Residential Retail Frontage A1.12 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Proposed Uses by Floor 3 Ak �ml r 1, D ANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS ANC TOWN PLANNERS j - • lir it It . tti-uatrii Plazci -2ci' cc Floors 4 + -II Imo NEawn In I it. mu Tom r.i �F-yM• Gl roe^•u AMENDMENT 05.16.13 Parking - Department stores - Reta;l'Cammernal Restaurants - Lodgirg - Mixed Use A1.13 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Block Key P Block Key Plan Note: Th • - Key Plan is included in the SAP only to aid where any references in the Code or the Development Agreement refer to a icalty named clock. se refer to page Al 4-A1.5 of the Concept Book to ccr hty parcels vethm the Miami Design Distnct Retail Street SAP. DI'.s s L1Tr.R-Zyn,:It1: & COMPA\1 rr C'S ANC TCnn PLAnmC[S ftiia AD, Pkctr,+ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 Mr/ � 1 0.11pi A1.14 • Section A.2 - Thoroughfares and Circulation CITY OF MIAMI HEARIN i BOARDS FLAN EVOEW Beeng urns . ores This page has been intentionally left blank. CITY OF MIAMI HEAR!= BOARDS PIANREVIEW $ Paying .Lt ror pato a 2-rlK By n.5 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd ST (City) NE 41st ST (City) (,quno3) DAV IINVIW N NE 40th ST (City) I I 1 1 I NE 39th ST (City) I NE 38th ST (City) I L -- _ J z i" !'� z m N o. m 0 c ir DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS r r r Pf 1-195 -1 r ---- II Proposed Frontages OF PA H-A •.:.,.-...TARDS F pc.:_w Hexing e_. AT,3 t/7L sr -ta ry� �2H !'1 ers T1 �' Principal SAP & Retail Frontage - Secondary SAP Frontage - Pedestrian Passage Frontage - Dashed suggests Frontages for non -owned parcels, where the pattern may not already be clear. Cr zarr '/ A/ TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 A2.1 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Proposed F ges NE 42nd ET (Clty} liftw000rtto r - • .r." • 0•"^". 7-1 D PLATIPP-ZY BERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS ANS TOWN PLANNERS —47 t"•104: • A „„. Aftirfat-rol 04107 Pnnapal SAP Frontage Secondary SAP Frontage III Pedestrian Passage Frontage IIIII = 7. Dashed suggests Frontages for non -owned parcels. where the pattern may not already be clear. AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.1 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Parking Management Program *This sheet for informational purposes only. Look to Development Program Spreadsheet for specific parking requirements. Parking locations identified herein above are subject to future change and shall not be construed to preclude the future development/redevelopment of a site. DUANY PLATER—ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS Parking for Existing Buildings" Existing Under- ground Dacra- owned spaces Existing other Dacra-owned spaces FEC-owned spaces, leased by Applicant City -owned spaces, leased by Applicant Proposed Parking* TT New Structured Parking se /-ec Property with associated parking added as part of 4,7 A\ the First Amendment. Xtc Property with associated parking added as part of 4,,y • the Second Amendment. TUUZET Slum AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CITY OF MIAMI HEAPINO BOARDS PLANS REVIEW HOZAIO BOarda 411 113.10 x'(1. aAa.,az �z !_ e .. �m 11 2.0N s caw_ A2.2 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Parking Managemen ogram Prop, 1� assocated parking added as par, c. dment process. Dt17,1 .ITER-ZINFRA & COSIPAN1 tidal, .r Plca 4 -%ic C D= A•B+C pi- New Antic- Antrr Parking for Exist] • - ed SAP SAP dated paced Parking Parking Rede- Totals Buildings` , meat c Under- 168 168 and Dadra - owned spaces �-, Existing other 190 +164 -186 168 Dacraowned spaces _ EEGowned 23 23 spaces. leased _ bCAyAeosl owased ttt 85 85 Total Existing Parking 466 .,-164 -186 444 On -Street Parking -240 +240 Proposed Parking' New Stn;dured 2.105 +963 3.068 Parking .__._.. _._..__ _..... Summary` E Anticipated 2,571 -1,367 -186 3.752 Parking Pro- vided F Anticipated 1,054 +1,734 Parking Re- quired fL'9� TOTAL Anticipated =(E-F) Surplus 1.517 -367 -186 2,866" i -111 AJI numbers rray be subject to change and will be tacked with an ,nteraccve spreadsheet. debiting usage from the total parking pool ."Source: Timothy Haas & Acsrriates . AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A2.2 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing Buildings 0 0 STREET ESSN'AT Existing Buildings 0 N.E. RIM STREET 0 0 0 0 o CD 0 0 Note: Parking demand for Existing buildings has been accommodated in the anticipated parking totals. Please refer to Article 3.6.1 of the Appendix F of the Miami21 Code for further parking regulations. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS OUZE TUDI TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 C IT OF MIAMI N- - '1 BOARDS �:.:. RCdi�W R.,re .r R II'z/l`f 111,(L ..L2H/iH p.S. A2.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Existing B sings Fir �eioO • i®ilol o' ®j, 1ml Existing Buildmgx 101.1.414N,. COMSCRMAY Note' Parking demand for Ex.sts ildings has been accommodated in the anticipated parking totals. Please refer to Arude 3.6.1 of the Appendix F of the Miami2t Code for Curtner parking regulations. D u 1 s P ARC. i.R-T1Rk RK & COMP.\\1 CrANC ..WY .nNNG:S Utivatrti PTc -2t.(mut._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A2.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Vehicular Circulation Diagram Entering Traffic Exiting Traffic ii i NE �ds.� — Q I L T 'I/ 1_ T 1 1 / 1 1 r" 1 1 r" 4 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 / *41 1 1 1/ 1 1 1 / �-1 I / 1 a.1 1 / / 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / 1 — _1.0.J 1- J / 1 J. 1 .J =/ 1 1 I I / li 1g Is I E-I + 1 / I 1< O.�A 1< =/.ram^-�� 1 1 J. 1 / 1 1 1= 4 I= 1, 1 • 1110.7 11 r ^•1 ��«.F— 7 1 r / 1 1 1 ♦ 1 / ♦ 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / `— 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / r 1 E -+ ,�, 1 1 1 1 1 / ' i 1 / -, �; 1 / 1 I 1 / 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 ♦ / 1 I 1 ♦ / 1 1• . 1 1 w W i * W _ Entering Traffic (buildings) Entering Traffic (surface) Entering Traffic (Highway) Actual entries and exits may be adjusted as plans develop. The above drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS O.. Exiting Traffic (from buildings) _ Exiting Traffic (Surface) Exiting Traffic (Highway) r- =W x Gam 11/71,b y INFORMATION PROVIDED, Kimley-Hom ❑ IMF and Associates,lle 2. •'�TDUZETSTUDIO SECOND AMENDMENT I3 SECOND 07.21.14 A2.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Vehicular Cir :lion Diagram Entering Traffic Exiting Traffic I / 1 f mit - 1 1 i1•---- 1 r se WO 1 1 1 / 1 IL13 ii 0 ji 1 I it; 1 1 1; 1 S 1r /I '��^ 1—+1+ d III ;1 s ilLo1 ' 111 f 1 �1i. �1 �1 II �► - + 1 I 1 - —y 11 /1 1 Ir - 'E r---1 Il T i 1 1 1 t H-- . 1 ' 1 I ' / 1 1 l / / 1 1 l / 1 1 t / 1 ' t 1 ‘./ 1 1 11 L 1. y T 1 I / 1 �Y 'i W / W t♦ + Entering Traffic (buildings) •� Entering Traffic (solace) .-) Entering Traffic (Highway) 1 Acb:al enures and e - y bed as plans develop. DUAN 7' P TER-ZY BERK & CO NPA •.cu ECT; e.O Tow.4 a(Avx(vs O.. Exiting Traffic (from buildings) — 3. Exiting Traffic (Surface) Exiting Traffic (Highway) 1f«y�r INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan 16 10 62 Bus Routes J 36 1-195 93 - 202 —� City Trolley / Biscayne Route (41uno3) 3AY INVIW N *The bus routes, trolley routes and bicycle lanes identified hereinabove indicate the locations of such facilities as of the date of the adoption and may be modified by the City and County. Any future modifications to such transit facilities that may reduce the service levels within and around the Design District shall not preclude any future development project within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP area from availing itself of the Transit Corridor parking reductions provided for in Art. 4, Table 4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Regulating Plan. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS zeN/ ,/ z/ Transit & Bicycle Routes Bicycle Lanes 11 11 11 — 1I 11 MBA I 1j 11 11 E 1 1 111111 I 1>1 1"1 11 11 11 11 11 11 1, 11 11 11 Existing Bicycle Lane Future Bicycle Lane Existing Sharrows Df CITY C,Fr'. MI TAROS M�C+T • ^. a/ukrH D.S. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: 11Kimley-Horn and ASS0818teS, Inc. 'TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A2.5 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Transit & Bicycle Routes Bus Routes Bicycle Lanes 16 - 9 -.� 10 - 62 DI:ANY PL •RCM ▪ J 1-195 ER-ZYIERK & COMPANY CT6 ARO TOWN PL.RRLRY 93 202 Proposed City Trolley ILitaati1 P1-2444uk_ _ Existing Bicycle Lana Future Bicycle Lane ,, Existing ShanowS r-r.»wRa. "Raw INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:aniAlexiget con AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.5 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan All thoroughfares drawn looking east. j* 50' `0' 65 N.E. 38TH ST. N.E. 39TH ST. N.E. 40TH ST. Note: The above thoroughfare cross -sections are for illustrative purpose only and subject to change based on actual conditions and other requirements. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS Thoroughfares IL1 Li] N.E.41STST. OUZE TUDI 1 CITY CT f Th.MI C^.ARDS FLA.jy hiaf[DW Iloaim Boa. ar bS. + Public Works Condition note: Street sections shall conform to City of Miami Public Works Engi- neering Standards or as approved, in writing, by the Director of Public Works-4444++4.6/ TOUZETSTUDIO SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 A2.6 gy/ry Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan All thoroughfares drawn looking east. Th. ghfares P .' 11JuAKS CAI STOSr cL.6 zcrnu... w.,.. Co.....Te Lrr:r., LLN., Tyµ,L i t..,o..LY.4u4 5*..toy OL T> Atito.t.i, „y. ta'.n, ftY TM Dar.ct .. LC N ,L wLY,. 50 N.E. 38TH ST. N.E. 39TH ST. N.E. 40TH ST. Notes: All th. • ughfares drawn looking east. Proposed thoroughfare cross sections to be developed in civil detailing. Existing cu P sections intended to remain. Islands without interrupting existing drainage may be added. For additional illustrations, see ction A 4. DI.. PLATER-Z1 BERA & COMrAN e.T. nno Tern P_•nncns AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.6 a 1 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan N.E. 1ST AVE N.E.2ND AVE - EXISTING (typ. between NE 38th and 43rd Streets) +N.E.2ND AVE - OPTION 1 ALT TRANSIT LANE Thoroughfares N.E.2NDAVE - OPTION2 SHAR- ROW * Please note that all changes to NE 2nd Ave, including the possibility of introducing a central shared transit lane will need to be discussed with the County. Note: The above thoroughfare cross -sections are for illustrative purpose only and subject to change based on actual conditions and other requirements. DUANY PLATER—ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS + Public Works Condition note: Proposed cross section for NE 2nd Avenue subject to approval by the Miami -Dade County Public Works Department-0070M1p4,f,s}giery DUZ TUDI TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CRY OF M!G.MI HEARING F?ARDS PLAMTEVIEWJ Newt. Sairde ffr 'VI 'I auk wry .pye L4 �w- p.�Jl Jtl S. (}- B/vrpv svnatime ,a �,wr =,wow A2.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Thoroughfares I it., .111 N.E. 1ST AVE -s"-zar uia":cr s-ive s:Fc Yr --r7r4r—,a.e— m—i.r .er'ra• N.E.2 - EXISTING N.E.2ND AVE - OPTION 1 N.E.2ND AVE - OPTION2 SHAR- typ.. • - n NE 3&h and 41st Streets) ALT TRANSIT LANE ROW Please note that all changes to NE 2-d Ave. inducting the possibility of introducing -a ir.ntraMfared tramuit lane x'll need to be discussed with the County Notes: All thoroughfare -wn looking north. Proposed thoroughfare cross sections to be developed in civil detailing. Existing curb section ended to remain. Islands without interrupting existing drainage may be added. Fo1 addititan l illussrations, see Section'.:_ DtAs PL.TER- B!RK & Cuvr+v'i vtilsta4�.�l 1 lexzki 1 AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.7 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Sequence of Pedestrian Passage Southem Plaza All sections taken facing north. The above conceptual drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS Pedestrian Passage, Pedestrian Passage, south of 39th Street �L�i'ia) rIctV.i ro,) Pedestrian Passage north of 39th Street mid -block between 39th and 40th AMENDMENT 10.04.13 CITY OF MIAMI HEARING BOARDS F •ZW ommJ1/� Nn.p BmW A2.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Sequence of Pedestrian Passage Southern Plaza All sections taken Facing north. DEANE PLATER- BERK & COMPANY AkCulTE7.: kC TOWN PL&NNEPT Pedestrian Pedestrian Passage. south of 39th Street Passage. north of 39th Street Passage mid -dock between 39th and 4Oth AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage @ Oak Plaza Arcades Pedestnan Passage © Christian Louboutain Pedestrian Passage between 40th and 41 st The above conceptual drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS DEPARTMENT STORE Pedestrian Passage @ Entry to northern Plaza Block 5 East @ NE 4th Avenue Sequence of Pedestrian Passage Block 5 East @ NE 42nd Street AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CRY OF MIP.. I HEAP:..., DO.DRDS PLANS EV:=W1 iiaaing Board- `f A2.9 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Sequence of Pedesl - assage Passage @ Oak Plaza Arcades DU PLATER-ZVIERK & COMPANY RCMi'1: CTS AMD TOWN PLAMM.R5 Passage @ Christian Louboutatn Passage cetwee^. 40th anc 41st Passage @ entry to northern Plaza P1Zt t -2 iCkAz_ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.9 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan TOD and Proposed Streetcar Route I I 1 I I ] ,I I I I DUANY PLATER—ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS W iGiW 2'i Na A-7,(1(y Lt t_ i aims =mew CRY OF MIAMI HEAR1 ' A BOARDS FLAYS' REM: ar orc,cc' �, Il7 Y TOD Areas and the proposed Streetcar route are subject to future modification by the City. Any future modifications shall not preclude any future project within the SAP area from utilizing the TOD parking reduction provided for in Art. 4, Table 4 of the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP Regulating Plan. AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A2.10 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan TOD and Proposed Su' tcar Route DUANY AR AT[R-ZYRLRK & COMPANY i Cr3 ARO ',ORR RLAk kENS ttiza,Sth Pie to -24_ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A2.10 • Section A.3 - Landscape and Views Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Palm Court Conceptual nderings D NY PLATER-ZYBERfi & COMPANY ARCHITECTS ANC TOWN ALANNERC tiza ol*) Paul -2r. u_ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.1 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Eastem Gateway and Pedestrian Passage Concep I Studies Approach from 1.195 - Bamboo Pedestrian Passage at NE 41st Street with sew of Bock 4 department store and plaza. Du 1 PLATER-ZY.%Rx & COMPANY CMIT1GT5 AMC TOWK PtAMMLM3 A3.2 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan RedaddingStudies for 8uen' staBuilding o.." ,. `"'a,"^"" & ^^~. %7,aAt;r4, NOVA ~ ~ x ~~r ARaNDA\ LASC{ ~ xMENmwENTeum.10 A3.6 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Cross Block Connection Conceptual Studies hooves Srdeye study of westem Accessway, showing h pure urn - Posed department store at left of image. Right Study of western Access- way from NE 38th Street to the south plaza, stowing future propsed department store at left of Image. Di ANY PL R-Z% eERK & CometNv G'S AMC` TOWN a_s WNED, UTAZQiitrk f at,(4 Study of eastern Aacssway from NE 38th Street to the sore plaza 4•44,4 _ SB ARCHITECTS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan RedaddingStudies for 8uen' staBuilding o.." ,. `"'a,"^"" & ^^~. %7,aAt;r4, NOVA ~ ~ x ~~r ARaNDA\ LASC{ ~ xMENmwENTeum.10 A3.6 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Cross Block Connection Conceptual Studies hooves Srdeye study of westem Accessway, showing h pure urn - Posed department store at left of image. Right Study of western Access- way from NE 38th Street to the south plaza, stowing future propsed department store at left of Image. Di ANY PL R-Z% eERK & CometNv G'S AMC` TOWN a_s WNED, UTAZQiitrk f at,(4 Study of eastern Aacssway from NE 38th Street to the sore plaza 4•44,4 _ SB ARCHITECTS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan RedaddingStudies for 8uen' staBuilding o.." ,. `"'a,"^"" & ^^~. %7,aAt;r4, NOVA ~ ~ x ~~r ARaNDA\ LASC{ ~ xMENmwENTeum.10 A3.6 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Cross Block Connection Conceptual Studies hooves Srdeye study of westem Accessway, showing h pure urn - Posed department store at left of image. Right Study of western Access- way from NE 38th Street to the south plaza, stowing future propsed department store at left of Image. Di ANY PL R-Z% eERK & CometNv G'S AMC` TOWN a_s WNED, UTAZQiitrk f at,(4 Study of eastern Aacssway from NE 38th Street to the sore plaza 4•44,4 _ SB ARCHITECTS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan RedaddingStudies for 8uen' staBuilding o.." ,. `"'a,"^"" & ^^~. %7,aAt;r4, NOVA ~ ~ x ~~r ARaNDA\ LASC{ ~ xMENmwENTeum.10 A3.6 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Cross Block Connection Conceptual Studies hooves Srdeye study of westem Accessway, showing h pure urn - Posed department store at left of image. Right Study of western Access- way from NE 38th Street to the south plaza, stowing future propsed department store at left of Image. Di ANY PL R-Z% eERK & CometNv G'S AMC` TOWN a_s WNED, UTAZQiitrk f at,(4 Study of eastern Aacssway from NE 38th Street to the sore plaza 4•44,4 _ SB ARCHITECTS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Pedestrian Passage Conceptual Studies DOAN LATER-ZYBERK & Coo4rAN1 1.1f7ECTS AND TOWN PL&NNERS Green wall and waterwall facade on building partially removed to produce Pedestrian Passage. Two views. Vitai to flavA GG�4tntc A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 42nd Stree «- . - Study Th s streetscape illustration has been modified by discussions with the neighborhood. Additionally. large specimen tree plantings may occur in the deeper setback. D I: .IY ' LATER-ZYREAE. & COM?A!NI OITE GTS •NO TOWN VS•NN ENS �.Ciza itit�t P1ctzGi -7 _ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation S - es NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Dr.sv P 1ee-ZVIEtK & Co.Hrn.v AR, _cs awu raww rcAwe, These street elevator studies are conceptual and will subtr to City Staff review and Approval P7cctc c -Zr we._ AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan RedaddingStudies for 8uen' staBuilding o.." ,. `"'a,"^"" & ^^~. %7,aAt;r4, NOVA ~ ~ x ~~r ARaNDA\ LASC{ ~ xMENmwENTeum.10 A3.6 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Cross Block Connection Conceptual Studies hooves Srdeye study of westem Accessway, showing h pure urn - Posed department store at left of image. Right Study of western Access- way from NE 38th Street to the south plaza, stowing future propsed department store at left of Image. Di ANY PL R-Z% eERK & CometNv G'S AMC` TOWN a_s WNED, UTAZQiitrk f at,(4 Study of eastern Aacssway from NE 38th Street to the sore plaza 4•44,4 _ SB ARCHITECTS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Hypothetical Retail Streetscape at 30% G NyWmebcal Streetscape showing appro aly ago, cgata. rrage does not reflect actual retail tenants or proposed architecture Dr A''1 PLATER-Z1R1Rti & Cu'PA'\ AMENDMENT 05.16.13 05.16.13 A3.8 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan I 1 PL‘TER-ZfIlLRA C LEXIIS vUtTrON _ gmmi mom tit LIP, it t• IR 111 5itti StitztAta, rica-.AA -741.C44,44_ High End Urban Retail Ex AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.9 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 2nd Avenue and NE 41st Street ' dies PLATiB-ZIIILKA & COMPAV1 AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A3.10 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan PROMENADE PLAN LEGEND • MAHOGANY GUMBO LIMBO STRANGLER FIG SOUTHERN LIVE OAK • VERAWOOD O FLORIDA THATCH PALM t CYCAD/LOW BUSHES NEW CONSTRUCTION ▪ RENOVATIONS • EXISTING ■ OCCUPIABLE ROOF GARDEN UNOCCUPIABLE ROOF GARDEN •�� GREEN WALL WATER FEATURE EXISTING TREES EXISTING PALM • ART/FURNITURE GUIDELINES • Corners of promenade and e-w corridors to get specimen trees and/or clusters. • Blank walls facing promenade to be treated as monochromatic 'green walls". • Entrance to garage level to get clad was green surfaces. • Southern plaza to be planted with field of Florida thatch palms in clusters of 3 to 4. • Water Features shall have no water sprouts. All water features to use salt -chlorine generators. Water feature water surfaces shall be french gray or similar. L NE 42ND STREET NE 38TH STREET PROMENADE PLAN The above conceptual drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change based on actual conditions and other requirements. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS VA; a,4t l i I Icut 1-Zoicfrdc_ Conceptual Landscape Master Plan GREEN WALL AT GARAGE ACCESS DESTINATION WATER FEATURE GREEN WALL GREEN WALL CYCADS AND LOW PLANTS AT POCKETS" GREEN WALL AT BLANK FACADES WATER FEATURE SPECIMEN TREE AT CORNERS WATER FEATURE CYCADS AND LOW PLANTS AT "POCKETS" SPECIMEN TREE AT CORNERS Q® Z WATER FEATURE PALM PLAZA CT' OF MIAMI HEAT) 1 D^ARDS FLA." J n::::_�W��'�/, Y K er~ D,S. , l ��- ISLAND A N N I N G C O R P O R A T I O N 24:WA:HINGTONAVEMD MIAMIaEACH. FLORIDA 33139 1 P C AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.1 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Conceptual Landscape Master PROMENADE PLAN LEGEND • YANdJN Z.VSTECI Jl11 • SiHMy1EN Ew', • SOUTHERN ENE Own, • JETtANCRID • "Oatoo Ina lc. R\LU . t ISItS p NEW codsrBuc-lOI+ RENOSI CNS =(•STING • OCGU1'IACLE HOOF GAR nEN • =EPHSEE. NW CARDEN ..V--:FIiEN WALL WATER FEA1•.;RE ENSTaN;'RE[5 • TINTING TWA, ARTF4NR MERE GUIDEUNES Gxnwt p' pICnfn -- - one ens ssorrCors In int Vedonen newts and,tx NM., waits facet) pro nnna0I 9 tooted as ITONS.Ntall.1,C was" • Eneancr to garage I0i • .. run. was glean svtaces • Southern pYu ie Jad witr ,? ',soda to s.+dw«s N'. ua Nana 1' anal tare no wale' Rotor WINS* tr., aSe so T'c nonoratds. Water leoturn Nalarnn 0YN De Vona, Tao LT • aNsOSTIRE• •• • • • • • • • • - • • • —__ I, AA _O TSTRCL • • e • i vrn9tRECl , Note- LOc10IOn" SJeClmen and sore or tree may De adjusted to accommodate ox sxmq conditions. 1)1 ..r Pt" .a-7rne111: d CoetrA.Ni SUTA 414, 1 ZavA-_"I.-_ _ raCtli a:AL T <.ARAGEA:.rlss u€STNNIn,T *ATE EAT,R- FLEA *Au CcCIC, ANC.0A ALANr0A,ACi .1ts wEFA NNy, waTER HA•laR YI:GLt*TCET :CANER, WA1tn ;En,. cnC.tl'C:ANJLJW moat AT ,11CKER: ]RcWot MCC A* -o L — VonTEA • a • AMENDI1ENT 05.16.13 IPCI A4" 1 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan 0 a i 4 tr. 0 0 0 t. TREE DISTRIBUTION ON STREE lee Z TREE DISTRIBUTION L . MENADE DUANY ATER-Z\RENA & COMPANN c- :. A N: -, w 4 t_ t N N t sfha i , Pluzc.� -Zr .k Sample of Tr- ocations Rua 3. 'VERT. REE DISTRIBUTION 4. VER ICAL CIRCULATION AND LANDSCAPE AMENDMENT 05.16.13 IPCi A4.2 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Conceptual Streetscape NE 40th Street - Exisung Street View exxi. & COMP*, NE NE 40th Sreet - 2013 phologract VizaAtri.1 PlatAA AMENDMENT 05.16.13 4 ‚PC A4.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan 401,1 STREET- EXISTING N.PTX ELEVATION I I I Case Study: NE 40th Street - Facing North 'itrIgA11-.:r _ 111 I: - J D'ED- IC° @I'61 c)/ The above conceptual drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change based on actual conditions and other requirements. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS C(itiiaA4 PlcktrA CRY OF MIAMI HEAP`; i P.'ARDS PL AW er.v nW .l f 2:.r1 II-v¢-14 nannuv ey0.. 248 WASHINGTON AVE aD MIAMI BEACH. FLORIDA 331139' pC AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.2 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan �CD CD 0 U Case Study: NE 40th Street - Facing South NE STREET PROPOSED KAN 0 0 0000 I I I I`l NE 401, STREET - PLAN The above conceptual drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change based on actual conditions and other requirements. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS �Giza,4 NcctcA CITY OF MIAMI HEAR'!`! rOARDS FLf,.l,; 'VFW b. -/jI 'Slmatur, S/14— a _.>nolmwvan� G GORPORATION 24BWASHINOTONAVERD MIAMIIBEACH. FLORIDA 331199 I PC AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.3 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Case Study: NE 40th Street - Fa g North f 1 1 1 1 / f 1 1 � f f f 1 4 / f / 1 / J. j= / T... t I P C Ui t.� Pt ‘1 -"J.rxcx� & Co+�r..� G't:.nPtfi_ P�nt4._7..C.,44. AMENDMENT1:i A4.4 ( • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Case Study: NE 40th Street - Fa • • South DttNN PL LR-LIKf21. & CoMrs.N AMP v_n..i Ittattkrii ra,t4A Zc IS AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A4.5 • Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 41ST STREET NE 40TH STREET NE 39TH STREET The above conceptual drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change based on actual conditions and other requirements. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS 'ia,PoP1 t;t4 -2(141 Conceptual Studies for Central Streets 240 WAS HINOTO Hr. AVE, O MIAMI BEAC H. FL OR IRO T33139 I PC AMENDMENT 10.04.13 A3.4 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 41ST STREE NE 40 T -. STREET Ui; JLZ i No . Conceptu- tudies for Central Streets AMENDMENT 05.16.13 3AV ONZ ar IPC A4.6 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan NE 38th Street Elevation Study NE 42nd Street Elevation Study Note: The above drawings are for illustrative purposes only and subject to change. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS tza, Plc -7-r1 ,tc_ NE 38th and NE 42nd Street Elevation Studies AMENDMENT 10.04.13 CITY OF MIAMI HEAP' BOARDS PLFb.fREEVIEW Hos,. Boards A3.5 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Conceptual Birdeye View, indicating Green and Treed :. •fscape D1 s61 NI tlk-LN NI.kk & CON,••1 f &ittat h PIC! f7�1 -2 1 YvUc IPC' AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A4.7 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Green Wall and Roof Examples t ! 1 ! 1 1 ( ( 1 1 ( ( 1 1 ( 1 ( ( Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Ambient and Direct Lighting Examp D;.v. CoMr.N1 Stiza 414, P1cZ-u'CkAc-- AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A4.9 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan LEED ND Ch= ist eLELO 2004 for Nelgnlort uad 6rmlopmenl P10 ec[ Scorecard fagot &MAW. and Lin4lye ^, D014411/%XIV '. nap' .n.W..ncat.., neynt^a ..Ofl.O •/44 un and treM<.1 Cawnu,er. ..pars Prn,1 Wnaa,O..,d W.W. Over Cmle.wmon veexlr41 i..w.p, ,.,I1Wa 1m_...l.0 W..Kr4 f,Ox0,WnA I4%a ap Cal % t clans 14vnt44, 1„ _,a.2 ...r. a..,.,.....x�. nnus.4 .Mh ,.J..4..<o..dl. �...m'.. ..Ok) ROM, an• Fn.1wry LwOO S...e Sh+Rara,. G.aly 7 She Deuv, ra lank, +. Wnl d.nd Wale, 11pe• 1, Cm,..144 He[ k.ve.tb..a. t.r,Wmtw,_twareSo none-444•1.4 C,,4..4414 .twe.nnent nWxu> y.l..ny w.ln npar. 1,4441 WMW1,1e Stewt, Fet.p> Cm.rct 1,444.44.1 ..,wl[ 1 WY.O,e Wee, nl,.. CSIC� Y4'444.1., vwn, an -name W..,. Cc..anm.. _,.cx . 144.4e Park .e 1u41Prn C4046 Twee:1n.m.1 144411 1,4044 D...na.t...yerse. ...en •/ ...zonate Ct..- .ne l.,IWr+F.., Volt 10 44,110 aemrv. r.onu.. w41t vlvtarati.,.n1 U,,.y.... D..ir _.rnV Ce...,nuv.M1.I ...n 1.1tratroan Fect rrnn rrent.nrc.M Snow...att ..,.e..1.s u..,1. :teen IM.,0uc1Nl eadf .alnjc i9 Noma PT, 4m..N Fn..l: 1 444,41 1444441 .w1wN Wag [ratty[Rkray Repo, OWJY water Ulkwwty 14,4e1 f u0S.. M.14t4 N14.4p, Favoroo, Prose] DD.,,s P TER-ZYRERk & Co ,i ., Pr3RCt Na e,'. Deer: ■ MI■ ENE ■ MI ■ ■ NEE ■■E ■ A■ I■E Warm Despn Dlctncl 9/13/ID12 Groom Bdreitrucatn and lkokii gt. Ca ttnwd en renagn.a/IConun4-4en ..e'e,t ,Moen 1 a 4.4044.14. t 44.41.,w.n Da..,a 4•411I,...,: ca...t In.rV CNxtw.t, 1 4 Watte444,4•414,4.n, ..... , aexw.nNo•It Fwwr.R,.. rcot'e S811.1•44.. 44.144.n, ,,...:<,.....,. ..are', 1114 P44nnen .2.404 Intprwt on r10 DOW`nProceo E Porntt ■ MIEN MIEN ..Wwt.m.+, l.mpkn ewlOnomme Wan. :man •_, k.watm r.l t.,,..eWy n.rle•.wc� e. rear GakS 1. . a t Yxc...1a, .4 Laamplarr r..I0.w.S/ l.. ,ore KJ (me.. •_l . nw..eta..M [.en,Or.n iw,. lu..vn: ten. 4 w t0Oei Credo( 44W 20.atea vrd..,M.l Reponel ►rtor[ty Creal{ Stizast 1 rloz(,, -2 t1 . Cndn 1.1 kayos. »,..n, C.e0c flea. .:IeyaW Fester Creel, iht 1.1. .; ee.uul F,Wll, C,.en1 WOC14 V.dn I.1I1.114.a444.4o.a, • 4,11 .. 4 4,14 llle.,, ,C•Yr r rt; , fang. 11. 01 0101, Approved tor original SAP properties. Fall 2012 AMENDMENT 05.16.13 A4.11 Section A 4 - Block Diagrams C'T" 7 -ARDS Boer. - vror. .4Azazt. Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Block Key Plan —1'i' i 11 1 ' ' BOCK 2WEST J FL I L LJL' - ,T rT rr BLOCK I WEST r-1—r WE - .1 Mier earmassent Block Key Plan 171—ri -TTT-1-7-L I11111111 l lir 11: rue BLOCK3 7 h BLOCK I EAST 1 1 Note: This Block Key Plan is included in the SAP only to aid where any references in the Code or the DevelopmentAgreement refer to a specifically named block. Please refer to page A1.4-A1.5 of the Concept Book to identify parcels within the Miami Design District Retail Street SAP. DUANY PLATER-ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS AMENDMENT 10.04.13 ,'•' TOUZET STUDIO SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 CITY OF MI'.MI HEA'r"i COARDS FLA:,:3 Y:=W Far, -r II /z9 rH A4.1 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan Block 5 East Proposed Zoning 10'-0" T4-L 150'-0" .1 25._0" r I- t y 1 35.-0„ FRO/A CURB • 259.06' T3-L 386.99' T4-L T5-O ZONE E T5-O DUANY PLATER—ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS r oUz TUDI TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 T6-8 0 CITY OF IMAM! HD-..^.-: r.`ARos 009, ,k2A. _ u/z 1/iK A4.2 Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan 150'-0" 10'-d' 1 25'-0 rF FROM CURB Z z 2, 35'-0I I r RONE C I—P.L ZONE B ZONE DI o 1n L � r— y NE 43RD STREET ZONES 259.06' 6 LL V DUANY PLATER—ZYBERK & COMPANY ARCHITECTS AND TOWN PLANNERS 386.99' ZONE Al NE 42ND STREET ZONE D2 ZONE A ng Bcards a^Ymr This diagram was created speficically for Block 5 East for the MDD SAP Second Amendment and does not apply to any other block. TOUZET STUDIO AMENDMENT 10.04.13 SECOND AMENDMENT 07.21.14 A4.3 Block 5 East Zone Specifications T4 Y T5 ZONE A - 5% MINIMUM CIVIC SPACE - 6.5% MINIMUM GREEN OPEN SPACE - NO CURB CUTS ON 43"'STREET ZONE Al - LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE EXPANDS TO INCORPORATE SIDEWALK AREA ZONE B - 1 STORY MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONE C -ARCADE / CANTILEVER - HABITABLE SPACE ABOVE THE SIDEWALK / WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF- WAY TO WITHIN 2' OF THE CURB ON 2n0 AVE -2 STORIES MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONE D1 - 4 STORIES MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONE D2 - 5 STORIES MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONE E - ARCADE / CANTILEVER - HABITABLE SPACE ABOVE THE SIDEWALK / WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF- WAY TO WITHIN 2' OF THE CURB. - 5 STORIES. F MIAMI HEATir I D^ARDS PLAN., Hc'TSW h1/7//(t r� (//241t4 This page has been intentionally left blank. CITY OF e".9f.Ml HEAT .-1:, ; COAROS :2W Neatly Boa ,1‘24/111 Bodo • .11_ ��+ro11 2 W BB VI HEAr.!!.!1 E DARDS PLilig; REVIEW Hartng Boa. c-tt - 1 I/Z-0,4 EA, STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. July 21, 2014 Mr. Ayal Horovits, Manager 4201 NE 2ND AVE LC c/o Helm Equities 150 Broadway, Ste. 800 New York, NY 10038 Javier E. Fernandez 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, FL 33130 Direct: (305) 789-3501 Fax: (305) 789-2620 Email: jefernandez@stearnsweaver.com RE: Preliminary Fiscal & Economic Impact Analysis for Block 5 East of the Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area — Second Amendment Dear Mr. Horovits: Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. ("SWM") has performed this preliminary analysis to estimate the fiscal and economic benefits provided to the City of Miami ("City") and other jurisdictions as a result of the development of the mixed -use development concept proposed for Block 5 East as part of the second amendment ("Second Amendment") to the Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan ("SAP"). The other jurisdictions considered as part of this analysis include Miami -Dade County, the Miami -Dade County Public School District, and the Children's Trust. This letter provides the findings of our preliminary analysis. The analysis summarized herein is based on the tax and fee rates currently in effect (Fiscal Year 2014) in the various jurisdictions considered, which are likely to be adjusted prior to the development of the proposed improvements on Block 5 East of the SAP. Changes in the economic environment could also result in construction costs, sales prices, rent levels and hotel room rates that differ from those assumed below. These differences could result in fiscal and economic benefits actually being generated that vary significantly from the estimates set forth in this report. This analysis assumes that the proposed development will be constructed in a single phase, although such improvements may be developed in phases over a period of years. SAP AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION The proposed Second Amendment encompasses a land mass of approximately 1.9 acres +/- located within the Miami Design District, bounded by NE 43'd Street on the north, NE 42"d Street on the south, NE 4th Avenue on the east, and NE 2"d Avenue on the west, with a street address of 220 NE 43'd Street, Miami, FL 33137 ("Block 5 East" or "Property"). The development program for Block 5 East, at present, contemplates the development of approximately 100,000 leasable square feet of commercial (retail) space and 82 multi -family, residential units, with approximately 305 off-street parking spaces (210 below -grade and 95 above -grade) to support the aforementioned uses (the "Program"). The Program is further augmented by the creation of approximately 12,600 square feet +/- of combined Civic and Open Space along the northern boundary of the Property on NE 43'd Street, which will provide a passive park amenity for the abutting residential neighborhoods. For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the residential units will be developed as condominium units. The residential units are anticipated to average approximately 1,100 square feet in size and are expected MIAMI • FORT LAUDERDALE • TAMPA • TALLAHASSEE July 21, 2014 Page 2 to sell for an average price of $450 per square foot, producing gross sales proceeds of approximately $40.5 million. It is further anticipated that the additional commercial space will achieve sales productivity per square foot of approximately $700 per square foot and will rent at an average rate of $75 per square foot. Development of the aforementioned programmatic elements comprising the Second Amendment is estimated to exceed $37 million in hard costs. An additional $9.25 million will be expended for soft costs inclusive of architectural and engineering fees, marketing, leasing and sales commissions, and project overhead. Accordingly, the project will cost a total of $46.25 million to develop exclusive of land costs and developer fee/profit. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The materials that follow summarize the fiscal and economic benefits that the proposed Second Amendment and development of Block 5 East will generate. As noted above, we have assumed for purposes of this analysis that the project will be developed in its entirety, as opposed to in multiple phases. All monetary figures are expressed in 2014 Dollars. Fiscal Benefits The term "fiscal benefits" refers to the positive impact that the proposed project will have on the finances on the City of Miami and other jurisdictions in which it will be located. The benefits that it will provide will be both non -recurring and recurring in nature, with the former occurring during the construction period and the latter when construction is completed. The estimates shown are based on the FY 2014 millage and fee rates. City of Miami Recurring Benefits: $472,556 • $426,644 annually in City General Fund ad valorem taxes • $45,912 annually in City Debt Service ad valorem taxes Non -Recurring Benefits: $878,788 • $378,750 in City building permit fees • $68,790 in City police impact fees • $56,533 in City fire impact fees • $20,598 in City general services impact fees • $324,638 in City park impact fees • $25,479 in City impact fee administration surcharges Non -Quantifiable Benefits • Trade -related fees for roofing, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and other work performed during construction (non -recurring) • Increased City utility taxes and franchise fees (recurring) • Increased occupational license fees (recurring) • Increased revenue sharing funds (recurring) Other Jurisdictions Miami -Dade County: $2,163,884 STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, r.n. July 21, 2014 Page 3 • $263,713 annually in General Fund ad valorem taxes (recurring) • $23,628 annually in Debt Service Fund ad valorem taxes (recurring) • $9,658 annually in Library ad valorem taxes (recurring) • $700,000 annually in local option sales taxes (recurring) • $1,166,885 in road impact fees (non -recurring) • Increased water & sewer connection fees (non -recurring) • Increased Biscayne Basin sewer surcharge fees (non -recurring) • Increased revenue sharing funds (recurring) • Increased water & sewer service fees (recurring) Miami -Dade Public Schools: $513,169 • $50,184 in impact fees (non -recurring) • $443,658 annually in Operating Fund ad valorem taxes (recurring) • $19,327 annually in Debt Service Fund ad valorem taxes (recurring) Children's Trust: $27,995 • $27,995 annually in ad valorem taxes (recurring) Economic Benefits The term "economic benefits" relates to the positive impact that the proposed expansion of the SAP incorporating Block 5 East will have on the economy of the City rather than its finances. The economic benefits it will provide will also be non -recurring and recurring in nature. Non -Recurring • At least 80 percent of the $46.25 million that will be spent on hard and soft costs to develop the proposed improvements on Block 5 East will be spent within the City of Miami, producing an overall economic impact approximating $55.5 million when the multiplier effect is considered. • Expansion project expenditures will include an estimated $16.65 million for construction labor, an amount sufficient to pay for 299 man-years of construction work at the average annual pay of a Miami -Dade County construction worker, which approximates $55,600 per year. It is further anticipated that each direct construction jobs will result in the creation of at least 0.75 indirect or induced jobs. Indirect jobs will be in business related to construction such building supplies or equipment rental while induced jobs will be in businesses where those occupying the direct and indirect jobs will spend their earning such as the local supermarket or personal service establishment. A substantial portion of the jobs created by the development of the proposed project are likely to be filled by the City of Miami residents. Recurring • When the Program improvements are completed, approximately $1.18 million will be spent annually by condominium residents and workers at the project in retail and food and beverage establishments. It is anticipated that at least 85% of those expenditures will be within the City of Miami resulting in overall economic impact annually approximating $1.5 million when the multiplier effect is considered. STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. July 21, 2014 Page 4 • A total of approximately 216 people will be employed on Block 5 East inclusive of people involved in project operations, maintenance, and parking. Based on the information compiled by the Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation, it is expected that these workers will earn approximately $6 million annually. The direct jobs created by the proposed SAP expansion to include Block 5 East will stimulate the creation of approximately 140 indirect and direct jobs. Residents of the City of Miami are likely to occupy a significant number of the direct, indirect and induced jobs that result from the development of the project. CONCLUSION This preliminary analysis demonstrates that the proposed project will be highly beneficial to the City of Miami both fiscally and economically. Sincerely, avier E. Fernandez #3657783 vl STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEFF & SITTERSON, P.A. EXHIBIT E MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT SAP AGGREGATE SPREADSHEET Property Information Area Calculations Parking Requirements SAP Property Property Name Number(s) New Building Floor Area Open Space Civic Space Parking Provided Off- Street Parking Parking Provided On Required Street SAP DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS / REQUIREMENTS Parcel 1- 64 2,699,095 41,566 41,735 REMANING DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS / REQUIREMENTS Parcels 1 - 64 2,699,095 41,566 41,735 - - - SAP DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS / REQUIREMENTS Parcel 65 295,021 5,264 4,049 REMANING DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS / REQUIREMENTS Parcel 65 295,021 5,264 4,049 - - - TOTAL ALL DEVELOPMENT PARCELS 2,994,116 46,830 45,784 8/5/2014 Bike Parking Requirements Status Parking (Deficit) / Surplus Bike Parking Provided Off- Street Bike Parking Provided On Bike Parking Required Street Bike Parking (Deficit) / Surplus Approved/ Pending