HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-City Manager-Memo-Impact FeesSUBMITTED INTO THE
PUBLIC RECORD FOR
Cl'rYQRM1AMI,FL.oRIDA �TEM �j"� r�'��A� 9.9.* INTER-OFCE MEMORANDUML�^"1�"v
Honorable Mayor Tomas P. Regalado and
Honorable City Commissioners
Daniel J. Alf
City Manager
DATE: September 9, 2014
SUBJ :c
Impact Fees — Past and
Proposed Distribution
REVISION
REFERENCES:
ENCLOSURES:
REVISION: This memorandum is being reissued to reflect the current Capital Plan and to include an
additional table.
Past Distribution of Impact Fees
With the implementation of a new building permitting system (Ibuild) the City is able to accurately track
and analyze where impact fees are generated in the City. The attached tables and maps depict the amounts
and locations of impact fees collected in the City between October 1, 2011 through July 31, 2014, as
tracked through Ibuild.
The enclosed maps graphically depict the location of projects that have generated impact fees during this
period through the use of green circles. The maps also depict in red the location of projects that used
impact fees during this same period. The size of the circle depicts the magnitude of the impact fee collected
or used.
Each impact fee generating project (green) is bounded by a thin circle depicting a one mile radius around
the project. This one mile radius depicts a hypothetical area around each project where, if impact fees were
spent within the boundary, the residents of the project generating the impact fees could reasonably use or
benefit from the facility constructed with the impact fees. Given the timelines between when an impact fee
is generated and the time it takes to plan and develop a project, it is not reasonable to have a direct
relationship between a project generating the impact fee and a project built with impact fees in close
vicinity. However, when analyzing a range of time (several years) the relationship between the location of
projects generating and using funds should be apparent. The past three years of data depicted through these
maps and charts demonstrate that during this period, impact fees have been generally distributed in the
Commission district where they were generated and that there is a strong correlation between where the
impact fees are generated and where they have been spent.
Proposed Distribution of Impact Fees
The distribution of impact fees within the Capital Plan to be considered by the City Commission next week
has been developed with the same considerations described above. Similar to the approach used over the
past three years, the proposed Capital Plan generally distributes impact fees in the Commission district
where they were generated and there should be a strong correlation between where the impact fees are
generated and where they will be spent. The enclosed pie charts depict the distribution of unallocated
impact fees and the proposed appropriation for FY 2014-15. The blue pie chart depicts in which
Commission district unallocated impact fees were generated. The green pie chart depicts the proposed
appropriation of impact fees in the Capital Plan by district. Below is a summary of the data depicted in the
pie charts:
I�- ouTgit — Subm0-4l - [}\ knG()QY -Memo- RQs
September 9, 2014
Page 2
Table Depicting Proposed Distribution of Impact Fees by District (Capital Plan FY 14-15)
District
Impact Fees Generated per
District
Proposed Appropriation
of Impact Fees by District
1
1%
8%
2
61 %
47%
3
13%
13%
4
4%
8%
5
21%
10%
Multi -District Projects
14%
Taking the allocations over the past three years together with the proposed FY 2014-15 Capital Plan
allocations also depicts a balanced approach over a four year period:
Distribution of Impact Fees: Past and Proposed
10-1-2011 thru 9-30-2015
Total Collections
Total Allocations
District
Value
%
Value
%
1
$ 2,653,140
4%
$ 5,805,428
9%
2
$ 42,097,887
62%
$ 33,664,986
55%
3
$ 7,385,660
11%
$ 6,097,300
10%
4
$ 4,249,794
6%
$ 5,270,000
9%
5
$ 11,741,262
17%
$ 10,575,427
17%
Total*
$ 68,127,743
$ 61,413,141
* Totals do not include set aside for Citywide Land Acquisition
Based on the information presented herein, the Proposed Capital Plan provides a reasonable distribution of
funds amongst the five Commission Districts.
Attachments
N NrTgo
6.1, i•
JEUC flECORD
Impact Fees Distribution FY 2014-15
District 2
$16,500,000
47%
Cd'aviiTTED INTO THEDiStriCtl
S0
EUbLIC�(ECORDFa. 0s%
tTEMpONM2oi
District 3
$4,567,300
13%
District 4
$2,635,000
8%
District 5
$3,560,000
10%
Multi -District
$4,826,805
14%
Impact Fees Collection/Projection and Distribution FY 2014-15
• Parks - Antonio Maceo Community Building - D1
• Parks - Kinloch Park Building Addition - D1
• Parks - Curtis Park Playground
• Parks - Grapeland Park Picnic Shelter
• Parks - Curtis Park Turf
District Total
Parks - Museum Park
Parks - Regatta
Parks - Dorsey Park Community Center
Parks - Dinner Key Dredging Spoil Island C Dock Repair
Parks - Virrick Park New Pool Facility
Parks - Manatee Bend Park
Parks - Merrie Christmas Park Improvements
Parks - Virginia Key Rowing Center Park Building
Parks - Morningside Park Floating Dock
Parks - Morningside Park Tennis Center Building
Parks - Pallot Park Seawall
Parks - Douglas Park Community Center
Parks - Virginia Key Kayak Launch
Parks - Douglas Park Turf
Parks - Peacock Park Turf
District Total
Parks - Southside Park Field
Parks - Park Expansions and Land Acquisition - District 3
Parks - Domino Park Shade Structure
District Total
$125,000 Districts:
$125,000 Districts:
$200,000 Districts:
$850,000 Districts:
$1,500,000 Districts:
$2,800,000
$2,500,000 Districts:
$4,300,000 Districts:
$350,000 Districts:
$100,000 Districts:
$2,000,000 Districts:
$100,000 Districts:
$600,000 Districts:
$350,000 Districts:
$50,000 Districts:
$1,000,000 Districts:
$300,000 Districts:
$1,650,000 Districts:
$200,000 Districts:
$1,500,000 Districts:
$1,500,000 Districts:
$16,500,000
$1,500,000 Districts:
$3,037,300 Districts:
$30,000 Districts:
$4,567,300
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
Collection of Funds
$220,993
$21,360,240
$4,567,363
$1,477,653
$7,262,856
Allocation of Funds
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
Multiple Districts
$2,800,000 8%
$16,500,000 47%
$4,567,300 13%
$2,635,000 8%
$3,560,000 10%
$4,826,805 14%
fix, 7
6.04 4 e a
hJbuvim" iRECORD D FO B
flTEMQJc
Impact Fees Collection/Projection and Distribution FY 2014-15
• Parks - Coral Gate Park Access Control
• Parks - Coral Gate Park Baseball Field
• Parks - Bryan Park Community Building
• Parks - West End Park New Community Building
• Parks - Shenandoah Park Pool Renovation
District Total
• Parks - Spring Garden Point Park
• Parks- Eaton Park Daycare Improvements
• Parks - Eaton Park Improvements
• Parks - Lemon City Park Daycare Playground
• Parks - Little Haiti Soccer Park
• Parks- Legion Park Improvements
• Parks - Little Haiti Freedom Garden Park
• Parks - Little River Pocket Park Playground
• Parks - Lummus Park Playground
• Parks - Melrose Park Playground
• Parks - Bell Meade Park Improvements
• Parks - North Bay Vista Park Playground
• Parks - Spring Garden Point Park Historic Building
• Parks - Shedavia Jenkins Parks Lighting
• Parks - Oakland Grove Park Playground Equipment
District Total
• Parks - Park Expansions and Land Acquisition - Citywide
District Total
Grand Total
$20,000 Districts:
$30,000 Districts:
$150,000 Districts:
$235,000 Districts:
$2,200,000 Districts:
$2,635,000
$150,000 Districts:
$100,000 Districts:
$1,500,000 Districts:
$75,000 Districts:
$170,000 Districts:
$250,000 Districts:
$50,000 Districts:
$50,000 Districts:
$125,000 Districts:
$125,000 Districts:
$50,000 Districts:
$75,000 Districts:
$650,000 Districts:
$175,000 Districts:
$15,000 Districts:
$3,560,000
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
$4,826,805 Districts: 1,2,3,4,5
$4,826,805
$34,889,105
District
Distribution of Impact Fees: Past and Proposed
10-1-2011 thru 9-30-2015
Impact Fees Collections
Past Forecasted
Allocations
Past Proposed
Total Collections
% Total Allocations %
1 $ 2,432,147
$ 220,993 $ 3,005,428 $ 2,800,000
$ 2,653,140
4% $ 5,805,428 9%
2
3
4
5
Total
$ 20,737,650
$ 2,818,297
$ 2,772,141
$ 4,478,407
$ 33,238,642
$ 21,360,237
$ 4,567,363
$ 1,477,653
$ 7,262,855
$ 34,889,101
$ 17,164,986
$ 1,530,000
$ 2,635,000
$ 7,015,427
$ 31,350,841
$ 16,500,000
$ 4,567,300
$ 2,635,000
$ 3,560,000
$ 30,062,300
$ 42,097,887
$ 7,385,660
$ 4,249,794
$ 11,741,262
$ 68,127,743
62%
11%
6%
17%
$ 33,664,986
$ 6,097,300
$ 5,270,000
$ 10,575,427
$ 61,413,141
55%
10%
9%
17%