Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit A 2013/07/11VERSION A ..Title A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), DESIGNATING AS A BROWNFIELD AREA, THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 850 SOUTHWEST 2ND AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA ("PROPERTY"), FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISTA GRANDE APARTMENTS, A MULTI -LEVEL APARTMENT BUILDING WITH EIGHTY NINE (89), ONE AND TWO BEDROOM AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE 376.80 SECTION 2(B)(1-5); DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO NOTIFY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE MIAMI-DADE DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES OF THE EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING BROWNFIELD AREA, AND TO UNDERTAKE ANY OTHER NECESSARY RELATED PROCEDURES, NOTICES, AND REQUIREMENTS FOR SAID DESIGNATION. ..Body WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 376.79, of the Florida Brownfields Redevelopment Act, the State of Florida defines Brownfield Sites as real property on which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of the property may be complicated by actual or perceived environmental contamination; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said statute, Florida defines a Brownfield Area as a contiguous area of one or more sites, some of which may not be contaminated, and which have been designated by a local government by resolution, and such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other recognized economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency -designated brownfield pilot projects; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 98-242, adopted March 10, 1998, Resolution No. 99-197, adopted March 23, 1999, Resolution No. 05-0117, adopted February 24, 2005, and Resolution No. R-06-0561 adopted September 28, 2006, the City Commission designated. certain areas within the City of Miami ("City") to be Brownfield Areas, which were determined to have redevelopment potential that might be limited by actual or perceived environmental issues; and WHEREAS, 850 Southwest 2nd Avenue, Miami, Florida ("Property") is located outside of the current City Brownfield Area previously designated, and the Property owner is requesting that the Property be designated as a Brownfield area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 376.80(2)(a), of the Florida Brownfields Redevelopment Act, the local governing body shall evaluate the statute criteria as the basis for approving a designation, and notify the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the Miami -Dade Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources for amendments to the existing City Designated Brownfield Area; and WHEREAS, according to Florida Statute 376.80 Section 2(b)1-5, a local government shall designate a brownfield area under the provisions of the Statute provided that: (1) a person who owns or controls a potential brownfield site is requesting the designation and has agreed to rehabilitate and redevelop the site; (2) the rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site will create at least five (5) new permanent jobs, however the job creation requirement does not apply to a redevelopment that will provide affordable housing, creation of recreation areas, conservation areas, or parks; (3) the redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a permittable use under the applicable local land development regulations; (4) notice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has been provided to neighbors and nearby residents of the proposed area to be designated, and the person proposing the area for designation has afforded to those receiving notice the opportunity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation, and the notice is in a newspaper of general circulation in the area, at least 16 square inches in size, and the notice must be posted in the affected area (occurred on January 8, 2013); and (5) the person proposing the area for designation has provided reasonable assurance that he or she has sufficient financial resources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreement and redevelopment of the brownfield site; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that the Property to be also known as the "Vista Grande Apartments" development has met the criteria to be designated as a Brownfield Area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this section. Section 2. The Miami City Commission approves the designation of the Property to be also known as the "Vista Grande Apartments" development as a Brownfield Area. Section 3. In accordance with the Brownfields Redevelopment Act, Section 376.80(2)(a), Florida Statutes, for Brownfield program administration processes, the City Manager is directed to notify the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the Miami -Dade Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources of the expansion to the existing brownfield area, and to undertake any other necessary related procedures, notices, and requirements for said designation. Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.{1} APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: JULIE BRU CITY ATTORNEY .Footnote {1} If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten (10) calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. Brownfield Area Designation Request Vista Grande Apartments 850 SW 2nd Avenue THE GOLDSTEIN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FIRM, P.A. Transactions, Due Diligence, Development, Brown fields, Cleanups & Compliance One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 2120 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 777-1680 Facsimile: (305) 777-1681 www.goldsteinenvlaw.com Michael R. Goldstein, Esq. Direct Dial: (305) 777-1682 Email: mgoldstein©goldsteinenvlaw.com December 28, 2012 Via Email & U.S. Mail Ibtr. Johnny Martinez, City Manager City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33131 Re: Request for Designation of Vista Grande Apartments, 850 SW 2^d Avenue, Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida 33130, Folio No. 01-0205-080-1150 (the "Subject Property"), as a Brownfield Area Pursuant to Chapter 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes Dear Mr. Martinez: On behalf of Vista Grande Apartments, Ltd ("VGAL"), we arc pleased to submit this request for designation of the Subject Property as a brownfield area pursuant to Chapter 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes. When developed, the Subject Property will consist of 89 one- and two -bedroom units ranging in size from 551 - 987 square feet. This important project, which will offer critical housing on an affordable basis, is situated in a neighborhood desperately in need of redevelopment as evidenced by the fact that it is located in both an IRS Section 43(d)(5)(C) Qualified Census Tract and a Neighborhood Stabilization Program Target Area designated as having among the highest levels of poverty and unemployment. To that end, thc units at Vista Grande Apartments will be provided to households earning up to 60% of the County's median income, with an additional 10% of the units being restricted to households earning no more than 28% of thc County's median income. The National Association of Home Builders ("NAHB") issued a study in 2008 that analyzed the impact of affordable housing communities on the local economy. The NAHB study demonstrated that the first year economic impact of a 100 unit affordable housing community is $7.9 million in local income (wages for local workers and profits for proprietors and other small businesses in the area), $827,000 in taxes and other revenues for the local government, and 122 jobs. (000034-47.DOCX. 1 Mr. Johnny Martinez, City Manager December 28, 2012 Page 2 As noted above, Vista Grande Apartments is an 89-unit development. Accordingly, it is estimated that this project - with a S26.4 million capital cost - will therefore provide S736,030 in taxes and other revenues for the local government annually and over 108 jobs during construction of the project. On a long-term basis, the local economy will also benefit from new permanent jobs at the Subject Property. Additionally, local stnal.l businesses will also benefit annually, with carpet companies, landscapers, washer/dryer companies, painters and other vendors hired to maintain the Subject Property. VGAL is applying for a bro\vnficld area designation because environmental assessment activities to date have documented multiple discharges of petroleum contamination adjacent or in close proximity to the Subject Properry that impose a material level or regulatory, construction, health, and legal liability risk, severely complicate redevelopment efforts, and require significant time and money for technical and legal consultants to properIy investigate and address. i\ccordingly, the designation, if granted, will allow \'GAL to access a relatively modest but still important state -based economic incentive to help underwrite the unanticipated and unbudgercd costs associated with managing the perceived environmental risk as well as, generally, to put the project to more certain financial ground. In this sense, the designation will not only play a critical role in the successful redevelopment of the Subject Property but also in the larger revitalization effort for the community in which the Subject Property is located. In light of these Facts and circumstances, we respectfully request that the Office of the City Manager review the enclosed Statement of Eligibility and bring this application for a brownfield area designation before the Miami City Cointnission with a recommendation for approval. As you and your staff evaluate the materials v.,,e submit today, please feci free to contact us \vith any questions or should you require additional in formation. Thank you. Very truly v<.7urs, THE GOLD STEIN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FIRM, P.A. Michael R. Goldstein / mrg En cl. cc: Alice Bravo, Assistant City Manager Vista Grande Apartments, Ltd. {00003447.00CX. 1 Attachment A {00002394.DOCX. 1 } Brownfields Designation Eligibility Statement Vista Grande Apartments 850 SW 2" Avenue, Miami, FL 33130 Folio No. 01-0205-080-1150 The proposed development and construction by Vista Grande Apartments, Ltd. (the "Applicant"), of the Vista Grande Apartments (the "Project"), located at 850 SW 2ad Avenue, Miami, Miami - Dade County, Florida 33130, Folio No. 01-0205-080-1150 (the "Subject Property"), as more particularly described in Exhibit A, satisfies all five of the applicable Brownfields designation criteria set forth at Section 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes, as demonstrated herein. I. Analysis of Five Main Statutory Criteria for Designation 1. Agreement to Redevelop the Brownfield Site. As the first requirement for designation, Florida Statutes § 376.80(2)(b)(1) provides that "[a] person who owns or controls a potential brownfield site is requesting the designation and has ageed to rehabilitate and redevelop the brownfield site." The Applicant satisfies this first criterion in that it owns the Subject Property, is requesting that the Subject Property be designated a Brownfield, and has agreed to redevelop and, as necessary, rehabilitate the Subject Property. A copy of the Warranty Deed is enclosed as Exhibit B. 2. Economic Productivity. As the second requirement for designation, Florida Statutes § 376.80(2)(b)(2) provides that "[t]he rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site will result in economic productivity of the area, along with the creation of at least 5 new permanent jobs at the brownfield site that are full-time equivalent positions not associated with the implementation of the rehabilitation agreement or an agreement and that are not associated with redevelopment project demolition or construction activities pursuant to the redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site or area. However, the job creation requirement shall not apply to the rehabilitation and redevelopment of a brownfield site that will provide affordable housing as defined in s. 420.0004 or the creation of recreational areas, conservation areas, or parks." The Applicant satisfies this second criterion in that the total capital cost of the Project is estimated at approximately $26.4 million, with a material portion of that amount being spent on local labor, contractors, consultants, construction materials, and impact fees. Furthermore, it is estimated that the Project will generate approximately 5736, 030 in local real estate taxes and other fees and revenues. When fully developed, the Project will have supported over 108 temporary construction jobs, resulting in the payment of significant payroll taxes and salaries, which, in turn, will benefit the local economy and increase the productivity of the area. (Because rehabilitation and redevelopment of the Subject Property will provide affordable housing as defined in Florida Statutes § 420.0004, there is no permanent job creation requirement.) 3. Consistency with Local Comprehensive Plan and Permittable Use Under Local Land Development Regulations. As the third requirement for designation, Florida Statutes § 376.80(2)(b)(3) provides that "[t]he redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a permittable use under the applicable local land development regulations." The Applicant satisfies this third criterion in that redevelopment of the Subject Property is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a permittable use under the applicable local (00003442.DOC. 2 ) land development regulations. In fact, the Project has already received site plan approval and all related development approvals. Evidence of Site Plan approval can be found at Exhibit C. 4. Public Notice and Comment. Florida Statutes § 376.80(2)(b)(4) stipulates that "[n]otice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has been provided to neighbors and nearby residents of the proposed area to be designated, and the person proposing the area for designation has afforded to those receiving notice the opportunity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation. Notice pursuant to this subsection must be made in a newspaper of general circulation in the area, at least 16 square inches in size, and the notice must be posted in the affected area." The Applicant satisfies this fourth criterion in that it contracted to post the requisite notice at the Subject Property and publish the requisite statutory notice in the Miami Herald Notice by posting will occur on December 28, 2012, and by publication on December 30, 2012. In addition, the Applicant will hold a community meeting on January 8, 2012, at a publically accessible location in the vicinity of the Subject Property for the purpose of providing those receiving notice additional opportunity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation. For a copy of the notice to be posted and published as required by statute, please see Exhibit D. Evidence of actual posting and publication will be provided to the City once both forms of notice have been completed 5. Reasonable Financial Assurance. As the fifth requirement for designation, Florida Statutes § 376.80(2)(b)(5) provides that "[t]he person proposing the area for designation has provided reasonable assurance that he or she has sufficient financial resources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreement and redevelopment plan." The applicant satisfies this fifth criterion in that it has secured all of the capital necessary to fund the project, including but not limited to $24, 000, 000 in Low Income Housing Tax Credit Equity from Florida Housing Finance Corporation. II. Definition of `Brownfield Site" in Chapter 376.79(3), Florida Statutes Although the five criteria discussed above do not expressly reference contamination as a specific element that an applicant must demonstrate in order to be eligible for a designation, such a requirement is inferred by the multiple references to the term "brownfield site" throughout Chapter 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes. A "brownfield site" is defined by Chapter 376.79(3), Florida Statutes, to mean ". . . real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by actual or perceived environmental contamination." Accordingly, the key element of this final level of analysis is whether the Subject Property can be said to fall within the definition of a "brownfield site." That is, do the facts demonstrate that either actual or perceived contamination has complicated, is complicating, or will complicate expansion, redevelopment, or reuse? In this instance, the close proximity of two retail fueling stations with documented contamination in soil and groundwater and the significant and very real complications they pose for redevelopment and reuse answer the question in the affirmative. "Brownfield Site" Analysis The facts here clearly evidence that the Subject Property falls with the definition of the term "brownfield site" as set forth in Chapter 376.79(3), Florida Statutes. Specifically, a review of (00003442.DOC. 2 ) applicable environmental regulatory agency databases reflects a history of spills and contamination discharges in close proximity to the Subject Property. We discuss two such incidents in particular that have created acute regulatory, legal, construction and budget risk for the Applicant. First, as reflected by the records endosed at Exhibit E, in June of 1987 and April of 1993, significant discharges of petroleum related products occurred at a Citgo fueling station located with 75 feet of the Subject Property at 190 SW 8th Street. The Citgo was reported to contain three 10,000 gallon gasoline underground storage tanks ("USTs") and one 1,000 gallon waste oil UST. Due to the financial status of the responsible party and funding limitations at the state level, no adequate investigation of the extent of contamination or off - site migration has ever been performed and the commencement of cleanup is not anticipated to occur at any time in the foreseeable future. In the meantime, contamination in the subsurface continues to spread unabated. Although it is not clear whether the groundwater contamination has actually migrated onto the Subject Property, given its proximity to the source of the release, such a result appears at the very least plausible and has placed significant financial burdens on the Applicant to plan accordingly. Moreover, in the event that impacts from the petroleum discharges are, in fact, encountered by the Applicant during development, yet additional significant costs (and perhaps construction delays) will be incurred to properly manage contaminated media and construction effluent. This contingency planning adds to the expense, complication, and legal risk of the Project and goes to the heart of environmental perception risk that the Florida Brownfields Program was enacted to mitigate. Second, as reflected by the records enclosed at Exhibit F, . a release of petroleum contamination into the environment occurred in August of 2003 at an Exxon fueling station located within approximately 300 feet of the Subject Property at 720 SW 2nd Avenue. The Exxon facility reportedly contained three 10,000 gallon gasoline USTs at the time of the discharge. Specifically, on August 17, 2003, it was discovered that an estimated 2,000 gallons of gasoline was discharged from faulty product piping at the Exxon site. Site rehabilitation activities are ongoing but petroleum impacted soil and groundwater remain present. The close proximity of a second contaminated gas station creates yet additional complication and risks for development of the Subject Property, including risks associated with perceived human health exposure issues and market acceptability by the Applicant's targeted demographic. Ensuring protection of human health and contracting for assistance by qualified environmental professionals in order to provide clarification and reassurance to future residents regarding contamination and regulatory matters adds a layer of significant expense and complication that would not be incurred at a "greenfield" property. The Applicant has demonstrated that it meets the five statutory criteria for designation of the Subject Property as a brownfield area as set forth at Chapter 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes, including the threshold requirement at Chapter 376.79(3), Florida Statutes, incorporated by reference at Chapter 376.80(2)(6), Florida Statutes, that the property for which the designation is sought meet the definition of a "brownfield site." {00003442.DOC. 2 } applicable environmental regulatory agency databases reflects a history of spills and contamination discharges in close proximity to the Subject Property. We discuss two such incidents in particular that have created acute regulatory, legal, construction and budget risk for the Applicant. First, as reflected by the records enclosed at Exhibit E. in June of 1987 and April of 1993, significant discharges of petroleum related products occurred at a Citgo fueling station located within 75 feet of the Subject Property at 190 SW 8th Street. The Citgo was reported to contain three 10,000 gallon gasoline underground storage tanks ("USTs") and one 1,000 gallon waste oil UST. Due to the financial status of the responsible party and funding limitations at the state level, no adequate investigation of the extent of contamination or off - site migration has ever been performed and the commencement of cleanup is not anticipated to occur at any time in the foreseeable future. In the meantime, contamination in the subsurface continues to spread unabated. Although it is not dear whether the groundwater contamination has actually migrated onto the Subject Property, given its proximity to the source of the release, such a result appears at the very least plausible and has placed significant financial burdens on the Applicant to plan accordingly. Moreover, in the event that impacts from the petroleum discharges are, in fact, encountered by the Applicant during development, yet additional significant costs (and perhaps construction delays) will be incurred to properly manage contaminated media and construction effluent. This contingency planning adds to the expense, complication, and legal risk of the Project and goes to the heart of environmental perception risk that the Florida Brownfields Program was enacted to mitigate. Second, as reflected by the records enclosed at Exhibit F, a release of petroleum contamination into the environment occurred in August of 2003 at an Exxon fueling station located within approximately 300 feet of the Subject Property at 720 SW tad Avenue. The Exxon facility reportedly contained three 10,000 gallon gasoline USTs at the time of the discharge. Specifically, on August 17, 2003, it was discovered that an estimated 2,000 gallons of gasoline was discharged from faulty product piping at the Exxon site. Site rehabilitation activities are ongoing but petroleum impacted soil and groundwater remain present. The close proximity of a second contaminated gas station creates yet additional complication and risks for development of the Subject Property, induding risks associated with perceived human health exposure issues and market acceptability by the Applicant's targeted demographic. Ensuring protection of human health and contracting for assistance by qualified environmental professionals in order to provide clarification and reassurance to future residents regarding contamination and regulatory matters adds a layer of significant expense and complication that would not be incurred at a "greenfield" property. The Applicant has demonstrated that it meets the five statutory criteria for designation of the Subject Property as a brownfield area as set forth at Chapter 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes, including the threshold requirement at Chapter 376.79(3), Florida Statutes, incorporated by reference at Chapter 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes, that the property for which the designation is sought meet the definition of a "brownfield site." (00003442.DOC. 2 } Exhibit A C00001271,DOCX. 1 } Legal Description Vista Grande Apartments Lot 18, Less the West 10 feet thereof, and Lot 20, Less the East 10 feet thereof, and Lot 19, Block 58 South, CITY OF MIAMI, DADE CO. FLA., according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book "B", Page(s) 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT: A portion of Lot 20, Block 58 South, CITY OF MIAMI, DADE CO. FLA., according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book "B", Page(s) 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: The external area of a circular curve concave to the Northwest and having a radius of 25 feet and tangents which are 25 feet North of and parallel with the centerline of S.W. 9th Street and 35 feet Westerly of and parallel with the centerline of S.W. 2nd Avenue. All lying and being in Section 12, Township 54 South, Range 41 East, City of Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida. {00003448.DOC. I } Exhibit B (COQO1271.DOCX.1) Return to; DiANE KARST, ESQUIRE 777 Glades Road, Suite 300 Boca Raton, Florida 33434 This Instrument Prepared 8y: MARCO DE LA CAL, ESQUIRE 999 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 735 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Property Appraisers Parcel I.D. (Folio) No.: 01-0205-080-1160 1 IIIIIi I I 1 I I I I I I I IiI1I I I I I I IIII1111II1III I I I I CFN 2012R0639557 OR Bk 28263 Ps 4353f ilasl RECORDED 07/10/2012 12:05:52 DEED DOC TAX 21,000.00 SURTAX 151,750.00 HARVEY RUVIN► CLERK OF COURT tMIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA LAST PAGE WARRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED made the re day of September, 2012, by TAP HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation, of 782 NW LeJeune Road, Suite 437, Miami, Florida 33126, hereinafter called the Grantor, to VISTA GRANDE APARTMENTS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, whose post office address is 477 South Rosemary Avenue, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, herelnaftercalled the Grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include ail the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations.) WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NOf100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof Is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and. confirms untothe Grantee, all that certain land situate in MIAMi-DADE County, Florida, viz Lot 18, less tihe West 10 feet, thereof, and Lot 20, less the East 10 feet thereof, and Lot 19, Block 58 South, CITY OF MIAMI, DADE CO. FLA., according to the Plat thereof, as recorded In Plat Book "B", Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditarnents and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land In fee simple; that the grantor has good,right and lawful authority bo sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of ail persons whosoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2011. IN Wi ESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its corporate seal to be he 3 . ai d by Its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first above written. Signed, delivered In our presence: TAP L.DINGGS, I ., a Flo da corporation By. /c G' r', c t . Modesto Echeza ta, as President and Director S A +FFLIRIDA. ) ' ) S:S. COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this • • =y of September, 2012, by MODESTO ECHEZARRETA, as Prestflent and Director, and on behalf of TAP H J . 1 GS, INC., a Florida corporation, who is personally known to me , orWhO has prod iced his driver's license ( ) a'• ficaticn, and did not take an oath. MARCO DELADi. iYOMIl113 fIIyIIEm ExP8s 4Tbhar'i ra' 2�j'ivaerrLn NOTAR PU=LIC Book28263/Page4353 CFN#20120639557 Page 1 of 1 Exhibit C (00001271.Docx.1 } 2011 UNIVERSAL CYCLE - LOCAL GOVERNMENT VERIFICATION OF STATUS OF Sri E. PLAN APPROVAL FOR MULT.IFAaWLy DEVELOPMENTS NnnuofDcvetopmeat: Vista GrandaApartments gad MA I. atthe 2011 Udnru4Cyrk Atyliczthn) 850 SW 2nd Avenue, Miami Development Location: (At a rgeh• os„ provide the address assigned by the Linded States Pas W Service, including the address cumber. streetmmo sad city, exifthe address tau not yar ban bcedprovide (i) the erect aux. doust cf.:gaged tetersectionatel city if located Maid a city at (h) the street name, duel desIgnskri intersect ino and trusty if located to the uefaencporsfed sun of the county.) Zoning Designation: T6-24-O Mark the applicable statement: 1. 0 The above -referenced Development is new construction or reltabili ntion with uew cotutnlction and the final site phut, in the zoning designation stated above, was approved on or before the Application Deadline for the 2011 Universal Application Cycle (as stated on the FHFC Website lltip://npps.floiiclahousing.org/StnntlAloue/FHFC ECM/ContentPnge.aspePA4i..0138) by action of the (ttpsity authorised Body'). The above -referenced Development is new construction orrehnbilhtation with new construction and (i) this jurisdiction provides either prel ntimry site plan approval or conceptual site plan approval which has been issued, or (ii) site plan approval is required for the new constitution work; However, this jurisdiction provides neither preliminary site plan approval nor conceptual site plan approval, nor is any other similar process provided prior to Issuing final site plan approval. Altltougli there is no pre1i n nary or conceptunl site plan npproval process and the final site plan approval has not yet been issued, the site plan, in the zoning designation stated above, has been reviewed. The necessary approval/review was performed on or before the Application Deadline for the 2011 Universal Application Cycle (as stated on the FHFC Website Intp://apps.floridnhousing.org/StandAlone/FHFC ECM/ContentPage.aspx?PAGE=0238) by Office of Zoning (Legsfy Authorized Body') 3. 0 The above -referenced Development, in the zoning designation stated above, is rehabilitation without any new constmction and does not require additional site plan approval or similar process. * " egrliY Author bed Iiady' is not as iadividual. Applicant must 'Wage name of the City Conceit, County Commiaioo. )Board. Department Division, etc, with 2othadlyaver rare . •• 1 I cerii at the City/Co Bp os specified abo Ss otttyar the information stated above is txuc and correct. CERTIFICATION Etas vested in inc the authority to verify status of site plait Signahi Print or Type Name and Title This «draearon trust be alga. t p Uabk Cityr'e or Ccunty's Director of PlanningandZoning, chief appointed official (stein) responsible for determination of tunesnlateI . slapproval,CttyManage,aCaratyMGmger/AdmlaistratordCoordfwtar. Statuses acceptable, air ue Daher a. If thus coati&catioa Ls applicable to ibis Development sad is is impproprfatety signed, me Application calAi1 to meet eaeshotd It ills cocblas ccaectkcs cr'white-our, or lilt is sagaod, imaged, altered, er retyped, the them %AU at be toasidertd tad the Appllatioatsc7Ufail Qunbold. The arUdattmmay baphota vs:ded, UA t 016 67-4Loay 2-11) 67.1 cci(t)(1). EAC. Samaby Min, Zoning Admuustnitor Provide Deliind a Tab Labeled "Exhibit 26" Exhibit D {C0001271.DOCX. 1 } NOTICE OF PROPOSED BROWNFIELD AREA DESIGNATION REPRESENTATIVES OF VISTA GRANDE APARTMENTS, LTD., WILL HOLD A COMMUNITY MEETING ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 2013, FROM 5:00 P.M. TO 7:00 P.M. FOR THE PURPOSE OF AFFORDING INTERESTED PARTIES THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS ABOUT THE POTENTIAL DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 850 SW 2ND AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130, AS A BROWNFIELD AREA PURSUANT TO §376.80(2)(B), FLORIDA STATUTES, AND ABOUT DEVELOPMENT AND REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE POTENTIAL DESIGNATION. THE COMMUNITY MEETING WILL BE HELD AT THE HAMPTON INN BRICKELL, 50 SW 12TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130, AND IS FREE AND OPEN TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE COMMUNITY MEETING, INCLUDING DIRECTIONS, OR TO PROVIDE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS AT ANY TIME BEFORE OF AFTER THE MEETING DATE, PLEASE CONTACT MICHAEL R. GOLDSTEIN BY TELEPHONE AT (305) 777-1682, BY U.S. MAIL AT THE GOLDSTEIN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FIRM, P.A., 1 SE 3RD AVENUE, SUITE 2120, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131, AND/OR BY E-MAIL AT MGOLDSTEINO,GOLDSTEINENVLAW.COM. 100003454.DOC. t 1 Exhibit E (00001271.DOCX.1) I '-}.- ` Florida Departmt of Environmental Regulatt e ;{� `'J/J t.r' 1NvIn lr Orrice tilde2(. 0 0 Otur 5wnc Rost:,b 7YJIsh>.sxt. ftvndr 52399 24-00 Discharge Reporting Form rla • 1-7.)*110411 tr., r OeCry Rq.�.e,Z Arra 0.r-o•<ar IQ tM5 CC. 42oures sae Me •s'0.R Use this form to nobly tie Department d Ermronrnental Regulation d i Results d tank tightness testing that exceed attaraixe tolerances wilnin ten days of receipt ci test result. 2 Petroleum cksr ltarges eocooding 25 ga-trisen perwo s suite as desc iibed in Section 17.761460 FA C. r+'ti'ttn one rork:ng day et dtx,rnetty. 3 Hazardous substance {CERCLA regulated), discharges exceeding applicable reportable quantrues established in 17.761463(2) FAC.. within one varkrng day cd the discovery 4 Wrthin one working day d discovery ci suspected releases cordirmed by (a) released regulated substances or pollutants discovered in the surrounding area (b) unusual and unexplaned storage system operating conditions. (c) morutonng refit, frcrn a teak deteeuon method o from a tank closure a„ .sment that irk:kate a release may have occurred. or (d) manual tank gauging results for tanks ci 550 gauss or less. exceeding ten gallons per weekly test or fire gallon averaged over lour coruecutitie wee�Jy tens. Mail to the DER Dtstret Circe in your area listed on the reverse side d this tc;m PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE Complete as appt:cabre flanks L' 1 DER Factlty ID Number f 850 �1 2 Tank Number 3 Date 713°113 OL.q'' f � i Ct—A L ✓ SA ?ac t C� . Facdrry Address `- `Q 5 ) tg-tk. 4 Facility Name Facility Owner or Operator 5 Dale d recept d test results or discovery T�7ephcne Number ir3(:),5 }2 sea -Lt59.�Li Carniy. )D itar?inq Address: P. o , r1 Y ( Y� '�- -� 3030 Bo- cis m5n ridgy, yeat 6. Method of [mat dscavery (crrcte one only) A. Liquid detector (automatic or maracas) a Vapor detector (automatic or manual) E. Inventory contra C. Tightness test (underground tank only). rt 7. Estimated number d gallons discharged 3 0. Emptying and inspection. B. V'/hat part a storage sW.ern has leaked? (crde al that apcty) 9. Typed regulated su A. leaded gasoline c)unteaded gazciine gasohol bsiarice cscharged, (aide one) 0. veh,rtlar as L useti1H2s1e ea F. aviation gas M. duel G. let fuel Q ne.wltube oil A Dispenser 10_use ci leak (unclee that apply) A Unknown C. i.na,e connection a Spirt a Corrosion 11. Type el financial responsibfrty. (circle one) A. Third party insurance provided by line state insurarce contractor ®Sef.rrrsurance pursuant to Chapter 17d69500 F.A.C. 12. To the best of rrry knowledge and ballet all Information submitted on E. Puncture F. Installation laiiture Ks Printed Name d Owner, Operator or Acnhorizrd Representaavo t.,r.,, t O co..,... el Grow Mans. hr.. 11 y-t 171.. N.zerr n Nerd e7s tter..oas ter, $ 7n ,Y.een.MY'aM 1777 Coale old srS won be s . m O�r,nl.lrb L'ICM TO ®Vapor or w9 ute s7gns d a discharge an She vicrrsty G. Closure (earpiarn) H. Other � - i;V fir, .�tsz atiopu-vi . p 44241,E c� a Pipe C. Fciing O. Tank ()Unknown V haZatdsovs sutx farce rnctudes pesiades, arrassoria. chlorine and dent dies (wr20 in Mrr7e a ChenlaCZiAte,JaCt Servsce CAS mother) Z. other (write in name) G. Spl 1. Other (specify) H. Overfill C. Not applicable 0, None form Is true, accurate, and complete. Signature d Owner. Operator or Pt)+JSGrized Represerwative So.a..., 0.•62 4» ale Uw fvot=KS 71,7 so.. 77071 I. f y. YN gavot 1..,C17YM UAW,. a4.a 'XA Cni: M La .e M..My.a.-at 7XX 2nd AVENUE -1'T✓' r' ^ - 0 CRABS rail SW Dth STREET ASPHALT LfW-IS TW-o1 ( MW-14 CD RW-1 MW-i 4.05 ASP ILALT M,-I y t;t. 15JAC1On.1iu1 .lF'.: I AREA \(` )vif/ {AMA ��. LTe 21 W-3 4.82., ffi 1 /• 15.0$ ASPHALT LEGEND ® MONITOR WELL >( RECOVERY WELL au SURFACE DRAIN FUEL DISPENSER ISLAND —4.70 — WATER TABLE ELEVATION FLAW DIRECTION ( ) MW-20 REV 1 DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED SCALE Oft WATER TAI31 ELEVATIor WELL FEET ISW-1 M11-2 MW-3 MW' -4 MW-0 MW-0 Mw-7 Mx-Jl MR-0 Ulf -I0 MW- L 1 1(W-13 11W -14 11W-10 1(W-20 MW-21 4.02 4.82 4.81 4.83 4.05 4.82 4.00 NA 4.83 4.81 4.03 NA 4.08 NA 4.04 4.02 M14-22 NA FIGURE 2: GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MAP 00/01/04 PREPARED TOR CHEVRON ff 47071 100 S Dth STREET M I, FLORIDA CORPORATION SW 81h STREET ASPHALT 13 TW-0 X �! MW-14 R11-1 UW-1a0 Cam) 11 NW-12 IfVf 770 12.070 ND ASPHALT L(W-7 • 1t�1ck 1Wrt0t; fidW-?�i `• XRW-2,� ',FUEL REA UST)) � 1t1J-4 wit-0 .V it -21 CD MW-10 m 14W-20 t ASPHALT LEGEND P MONITOR WELL RECOVERY WELL SURFACE DRAIN FUEL DISPENSER ISLAND BENZENE: CONCENTRATION ( j LITRE COI CEITAL VOA I RATION liu{/LION r�� SCALE 1tPv DI."iCRWT1ON DATE APPRDV%a7 8fL FIGURE 3: TOTAL VOA CONCENTRATION 0a/01/04 PREPARED TOR CHEVRON #470714707 101 SWJAIiN',OFLhORIDAE7 CORPORALTOOt Exhibit F {00001271.DoCX.1 } Discharge Report Form PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE Instructions++arc on the reverse side. Please complete all applicable blanks i ,1. Facility ID Number (if registered): 0 t 093 2. Date of form completion: 3. General information Facility narne or responsible party (if applica`bl'e:):_ Facility Owner or Operator, or Discharger t n Contact Person:aN nil O r -e to 0 Facility or Discharger M. 'ling Address: 0 Location of Discharge (street address): 2. 0 5 DE'? Form 62-761 '1011 Ferns Tile Ihiychar- Rcn^rt Form Effective Date CQrpora-;oi3 y more N0 TeleEho e Number: ('5L5) $ let' County: ( „Q.c-. N vtir-ly 4 tom; a,�t: " — - 1 0 0 Latitude end Longitude of Discharge (if known) 4. Date of receipt of test results or discovery of confirmed discharge: O. 1�- f CG3 month/day/year 6. Discharge affected: { j Air ,Soil 7. Method of discovery (check all that apply) ( ] Liquid detector (automatic or manual) [ 1 Vapor detector (automatic or manual) ( j Tightness test ( j Pressure test >(Statistical inventory Reconciliation [ Groundwater 5. Estimated number of gallons discharged: � O t7 0 ( { Drinking water well(s) { ) Shoreline [ j Surface water (water body name) [ j Intcmal inspection [ 1 Inventory control Monitoring wells ( 1 Automatic tank gauging [ j Manual tank gauging [ 1 Closure/Closure Assessment ( } Groundwater analytical samples I 1 Soil analytical tests or samples ( I Visual observation (l Other S. Type of regulated substance discharged: (check one) 1 Unknown - 1 1 Used/waste oil [ 1 Jet fuel { I Heating oil { J New/lube oil Gasoline [ j Aviation gas ( I Diesel [ j Kerosene • [ I Mineral acid 1 Hazardous substance - includes CERCLA substances frum USTs above reportable quantities, pesticides, aaunonia, chlorine, and derivatives (write in name or Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number) [ IOt;er 9. Source of Discharge: (chec' all that apply) [ 1 Dispensing system I Pipe [ ) Barge 1 1 Tank I Fitting { I Tanker ship 1 1 Unknown I I Valve failure [ 1 Other Vessel [ 1 Other 1t}. Cause of the discharge: (check all that apply) j I Loose connection 1 1 Puncture [ I Firc/expl Sion [ I Overfill j<Other t', P� G e T r-14 r o„�-eclL 11.: erions taken'ln response to the discharge: it C 1 G (AL., . �� p p-e t 5 ezN a r /t} �,r z Si L�3 { I Spill [ I Human error [ I Pipeline [ 1 Railroad tankcar [ 1 Tank truck { 1 Collision [ j Vehicle Accident Jcr� jh IeX 'p-e [ j Vehicle [ I Airplane [ ] Dram [ 1 Corrosion [ I installation failure kJ{ �Ovl?•�`� l I2. Comments: 13. Agencies notified (as applicable): [ 1 State Warning Point 1 1 National Response Center [ [ Florida Marine Patrol [ I Fire Department. WEP (district/person) I -800 320-0519 1-800-:24-8802 (800) 342-5367 ounty Tanks Program 14. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information submitted on this form is true, accurate, and complete. Signature of Owner, Operator or Authorized Representative, or Discharger Printed Name of Owner, Operator or Authorized Representative, or Discharger Groundwater sample was taken from Monitoring Well #4. Note 2 %2 inches of free floating product (FFP). Monitoring wells #1,2,3, and 4 contained visible Layers of FFP. I observed no visible signs of contamination in MWs 5,6,7, and 8. INSPECTOR: Joelle O'Daniel SECTION: STS DATE: 08/25/03-08/26/03 SITE NAME: Five Group Corporation ADDRESS: 720 SW 2 AVE Poor Orignal Photo of westernmost sum lar grade UST, facing EAST taken 08/25/03. Product piping that failed has been removed and feeder rope remains in secondary. Poor Original' Florida Statute 376.80 Brownfield Program Administration Process 6/10/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine Select Year: 2012 ; j Go The 2012 Florida Statutes Title XXVIII NATURAL RESOURCES; CONSERVATION, RECLAMATION, AND USE Chapter 376 POLLUTANT DISCHARGE PREVENTION AND REMOVAL View Entire Chapter 376.80 Brownfield program administration process.— (1) A local government with jurisdiction over the brownfield area must notify the department of its decision to designate a brownfield area for rehabilitation for the purposes of ss. 376.77-376.86. The notification must include a resolution, by the local government body, to which is attached a map adequate to clearly delineate exactly which parcels are to be included in the brownfield area or alternatively a less -detailed map accompanied by a detailed legal description of the brownfield area. If a property owner within the area proposed for designation by the local government requests in writing to have his or her property removed from the proposed designation, the local government shall grant the request. For municipalities, the governing body shall adopt the resolution in accordance with the procedures outlined in s. 166.041, except that the notice for the public hearings on the proposed resolution must be in the form established in s. 166.041(3)(c)2. For counties, the governing body shall adopt the resolution in accordance with the procedures outlined in s. 125.66. except that the notice for the public hearings on the proposed resolution shall be in the form established in s. 125.66(4)(b)2. (2)(a) If a local government proposes to designate a brownfield area that is outside community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, closed military bases, or designated brownfield pilot project areas, the local government shall adopt the resolution and conduct the public hearings in accordance with the requirements of subsection (1), except at least one of the required public hearings shall be conducted as close as reasonably practicable to the area to be designated to provide an opportunity for public input on the size of the area, the objectives for rehabilitation, job opportunities and economic developments anticipated, neighborhood residents' considerations, and other relevant local concerns. Notice of the public hearing must be made in a newspaper of general circulation in the area and the notice must be at least 16 square inches in size, must be in ethnic newspapers or local community bulletins, must be posted in the affected area, and must be announced at a scheduled meeting of the local governing body before the actual public hearing. In determining the areas to be designated, the local government must consider: 1. Whether the brownfield area warrants economic development and has a reasonable potential for such activities; 2. Whether the proposed area to be designated represents a reasonably focused approach and is not overly large in geographic coverage; 3. Whether the area has potential to interest the private sector in participating in rehabilitation; and 4. Whether the area contains sites or parts of sites suitable for limited recreational open space, cultural, or historical preservation purposes. (b) A local government shall designate a brownfield area under the provisions of this act provided that: 1 A person who owns or controls a potential brownfield site is requesting the designation and has agreed wwv.lea.state.fl.us/Statutes/indexcfrn?Ann mnda=Disn1au StallitFRSearnh Strinn=RIIRI=(nfl(_n3p91r137RlR,tinndn.'27FRflhtml i /R 6/10/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine to rehabilitate and redevelop the brownfield site; 2. The rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site will result in economic productivity of the area, along with the creation of at least 5 new permanent jobs at the brownfield site that are full-time equivalent positions not associated with the implementation of the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement and that are not associated with redevelopment project demolition or construction activities pursuant to the redevelopment of the proposed4brownfield site or area. However, the job creation requirement shall not apply to the rehabilitation and redevelopment of a brownfield site that will provide affordable housing as defined in s. 420.0004 or the creation of recreational areas, conservation areas, or parks; 3. The redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a permittable use under the applicable local land development regulations; 4. Notice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has been provided to neighbors and nearby residents of the proposed area to be designated, and the person proposing the area for designation has afforded to those receiving notice the opportunity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation. Notice pursuant to this subparagraph must be made in a newspaper of general circulation in the area, at least 16 square inches in size, and the notice must be posted in the affected area; and 5. The person proposing the area for designation has provided reasonable assurance that he or she has sufficient financial resources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreement and redevelopment of - the brownfield site. (c) The designation of a brownfield area and the identification of a person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation simply entitles the identified person to negotiate a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement with the department or approved local pollution control program. (3) When there is a person responsble for brownfield site rehabilitation, the local government must notify the department of the identity of that person. If the agency or person who will be -responsible for the coordination changes during the approval process specified in subsections (4), (5), and (6), the department or the affected approved local pollution control program must notify the affected local government when the change occurs. (4) Local governments or persons responsible for rehabilitation and redevelopment of brownfield areas must establish an advisory committee or use an existing advisory committee that has formally expressed its intent to address redevelopment of the specific brownfield area for the purpose of improving public participation and receiving public comments on rehabilitation and redevelopment of the brownfield area, future land use, local employment opportunities, community safety, and environmental justice. Such advisory committee should include residents within or adjacent to the brownfield area, businesses operating within the brownfield area, and others deemed appropriate. The person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must notify the advisory committee of the intent to rehabilitate and redevelop the site before executing the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement, and provide the committee with a copy of the draft plan for site rehabilitation which addresses elements required by subsection (5). This includes disclosing potential reuse of the property as well as site rehabilitation activities, if any, to be performed. The advisory committee shall review any proposed redevelopment agreements prepared pursuant to paragraph (5)(i) and provide comments, if appropriate, to the board of the local government with jurisdiction over the brownfield area. The advisory committee must receive a copy of the executed brownfield site rehabilitation agreement. When the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation submits a site assessment report or the technical document containing the proposed course of action following site assessment to the department or the local pollution control program for review, the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must hold a meeting or attend a regularly scheduled meeting to inform the advisory committee of the findings and 6/10/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine recommendations in the site assessment report or the technical document containing the proposed course of action following site assessment. (5) The person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must enter into a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement with the department or an approved local pollution control program if actual contamination exists at the brownfield site. The brownfield site rehabilitation agreement must include: (a) A brownfield site rehabilitation schedule, including milestones for completion of site rehabilitation tasks and submittal of technical reports and rehabilitation plans as agreed upon by the parties to the agreement. (b) A commitment to conduct site rehabilitation activities under the observation of professional engineers or geologists who are registered in accordance with the requirements of chapter 471 or chapter 492, respectively. Submittals provided by the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must be signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered under chapter 471, or a professional geologist registered under chapter 492, certifying that the submittal and associated work comply with the law and rules of the department and those governing the profession. In addition, upon completion of the approved remedial action, the department shall require a professional engineer registered under chapter 471 or a professional geologist registered under chapter 492 to certify that the corrective action was, to the best of his or her knowledge, completed in substantial conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the department. (c) A commitment to conduct site rehabilitation in accordance with department quality assurance rules. (d) A commitment to conduct site rehabilitation consistent with state, federal, and local laws and consistent with the awnfieid sit-' contamination cleanup criteria in s. 376.81, including any applicable requirements for risk -based corrective action. (e) Timefrarnes for. the department's review of technical reports and plans submitted in accordance with the agreement. The department shall make every effort to adhere to established agency goals for reasonable timeframes for review of such r ocurnents. (f) A commitment to secure site access for the department or approved local pollution control program to all brownfield sites within the eligible brownfield area for activities associated with site rehabilitation. (g) Other provisions that the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation and the department agree upon, that are consistent with ss. 376.77-376.86, and that will improve or enhance the brownfield site rehabilitation process. (h) . A commitment to consider appropriate pollution prevention measures and to implement those that the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation determines are reasonable and cost-effective, taking into account the ultimate use or uses of the brownfield site. Such measures may include improved inventory or production controls and procedures for preventing loss, spills, and leaks of hazardous waste and materials, and include goals for the reduction of releases of toxic materials. (i) Certification that the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation has consulted with the local government with jurisdiction over the brownfield area about the proposed redevelopment of the brownfield site, that the local government is in agreement with or approves the proposed redevelopment, and that the proposed redevelopment complies with applicable laws and requirements for such redevelopment. Certification shall be accomplished by referencing or providing a legally recorded or officially approved land use or site plan, a development order or approval, a building permit, or a similar official document issued by the local government that reflects the local government's approval of proposed redevelopment of the brownfield site; providing a copy of the local government resolution designating the brownfield area that contains the proposed redevelopment of the brownfield site; or providing a letter from the local government that describes the proposed redevelopment of the brownfield site and expresses the local government's 6/10/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine agreement with or approval of the proposed redevelopment. (6) Any contractor performing site rehabilitation program tasks must demonstrate to the department that the contractor: (a) Meets all certification and license requirements imposed by law; and (b) Will conduct sample collection and analyses pursuant to department rules. (7) During the cleanup process, if the department or local program fails to complete review of a technical document within the timeframe specified in the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement, the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation may proceed to the next site rehabilitation task. However, the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation does so at its own risk and may be required by the department or local program to complete additional work on a previous task. Exceptions to this subsection include requests for "no further action," "monitoring only proposals," and feasibility studies, which must be approved prior to implementation. (8) If the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation fails to comply with .the brownfield site rehabilitation agreerent, the department shall allow 90 days for the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation to return to compliance with the provision at issue or to negotiate a modification to the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement with the department for good cause shown. If an imminent hazard exists, the 90-day grace period shall not apply. If the project is not returned to compliance with the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement and a modification cannot be negotiated, the immunity provisions of s. 376.82 are revoked. (9) The department is specifically authorized and encouraged to enter into delegation agreements with vocal pollution control programs approved under s. 403.182 to administer the brownfield program within their jurisdictions; thereby maximizing the integration of this process with the other local development processes needed to facilitate redevelopment of a brownfield area. When determining whether a delegation pursuant to this subsection of all or part of the brownfield program to a local pollution control program is appropriate, the department shall consider the following. The local pollution control program must: (a) Have and maintain the administrative organization, staff, and financial and other resources to effectively and efficiently implement and enforce the statutory requirements of the delegated brownfield program; and (b) Provide for the enforcement of the requirements of the delegated brownfield program, and for notice and a right to challenge governmental action, by appropriate administrative and judicial process, which shall be specified in the delegation. The local pollution control program shall not be delegated authority to take action on or to make decisions regarding any brownfield site on land owned by the local government. Any delegation agreement entered into pursuant to this subsection shall contain such terms and conditions necessary to ensure the effective and efficient administration and enforcement of the statutory requirements of the brownfield program as established by the act and the relevant rules and other criteria of the department, (10) Local governments are encouraged to use the full range of economic and tax incentives available to facilitate and promote the rehabilitation of brownfield areas, to help eliminate the public health and environmental hazards, and to promote the creation of jobs and economic development in these previously run-down, blighted, and underutilized areas. (11)(a) The Legislature finds and declares that: 1. Brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment can improve the overall health of a community and the quality of life for communities, including for individuals living in such communities. 2. The community health benefits of brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment should be better 6/10/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine measured in order to achieve the legislative intent as expressed in s. 376.78. 3. There is a need in this state to define and better measure the community health benefits of brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment. 4. Funding sources should be established to support efforts by the state and local governments, in collaboration with local health departments, community health providers, and nonprofit organizations, to evaluate the community health benefits of brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment. (b) Local governments may and are encouraged to evaluate the community health benefits and effects of brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment in connection with brownfield areas located within their jurisdictions. Factors that may be evaluated and monitored before and after brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment include, but are not limited to: 1. Health status, disease distribution, and quality of life measures regarding populations living in or around brownfield sites that have been rehabilitated and redeveloped. 2. Access to primary and other health care or health services for persons living in or around brownfield sites that have been rehabilitated and redeveloped. 3. Any new or increased access to open, green, park, or other recreational spaces that provide recreational opportunities for individuals living in or around brownfield sites that have been rehabilitated and redeveloped. 4. Other factors described in rules adopted by the Department of Environmental Protection or the Department of Health, as applicable. (c) The Department of Health may and is encouraged to assist local governments, in collaboration with local health departments, community health providers, and nonprofit organizations, in evaluating the community health benefits of brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment. History.—s. 4, ch. 97-277; s. 3, ch. 98-75; s. 11, ch. 2000-317; s. 2, ch. 2004-40; s. 44, ch. 2005-2; s. 7, ch. 2006-291; s. 5, ch. 2008-239. Copyright © 1995-2013 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us ‘AA ,.., n ,, ., a_.. _� Review of Brownfield Designation Request Review of Brownfield Designation Request This review serves the purpose to report the evaluation and responses to Brownfield Designation Request Applications submitted to the City of Miami in December 2012 by the Goldstein Environmental Law Firm for the following development projects: • West Brickell Tower - 1026 SW 2nd Avenue, Miami, FL 33130 • West Brickell View - 144-152 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33130 • Vista Grande Apartments - 850 SW 2nd Avenue, Miami, FL 33130 The Goldstein Environmental Law Firm has submitted the applications to the City of Miami for review and official authorization to designate the three (3) subject properties as Brownfield areas for the purpose of obtaining incentives associated with the redevelopment of Brownfield Sites. According to Florida Statute 376.80: "if a local government proposes to designate a brownfield area that is outside community redevelopment areas. enterprise zones, closed military bases, or designated brownfield pilot project areas, the local government shall adopt the resolution and conduct the public hearings in accordance w,vith the requirements of subsection (1), except at least one of the public hearings shall be conducted as close as reasonably practicable to the area to be designated to provide an opportunity for public input on the size of the area, the objectives for the rehabilitation, job opportunities and economic developments anticipated, neighborhood residents' consideration, and other relevant local concerns. Notice of the public hearing must be made in a newspaper ofgeneral circulation in the area and the notice must be posted in the affected area, and must be announced at a scheduled meeting of the local governing body before the actual hearing.." The City of Miami has a current Designated Brownfield Area which excludes the locations currently requested for designation. Furthermore, the request for designation was made from a non- . government source. Therefore, as part of the Brownfield Designation process and in accordance to Florida Statute 376.80, the City must evaluate the following factors for each site to determine if they meet the guidelines for being designated a Brownfield Area; 1.) Does a person who owns or controls a potential brownfield site, and is requesting the designation, agree to rehabilitate and redevelop the site. 2.) Does the rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site result in economic productivity of the area, along with the creation of at least 5 new permanent jobs at the brownfield site that are full-time equivalent positions not associated with the implementation of the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement and are not associated with the redevelopment project, demolition, or construction activities pursuant to the redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site and area. However, the job creation requirement shall not apply to the rehabilitation and redevelopment of a brownfield site that will provide affordable housing as defined in s.420.0004 or the creation of recreational areas, conservation areas, or parks. 3.) Does the redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site remain consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a permittable use under the applicable local land and development regulations. 4.) Notice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has been provided to neighbors and nearby residents of the proposed area to be designated and the person proposing the area for designation has afforded to those receiving notice the opportunity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation. 5.1 Does the person proposing the area for designation provide reasonable assurance that he or she has sufficient financial resources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreement and redevelopment of the brownfield site. Since the properties are outside the current Designated Brownfield Area, each site must also fit the definition of a "Brownfield" site. The EPA, defines a Brownfield property "as real property, in which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a • hc_zardous substance, pollutant or contaminant." The findings within the application review are a combination of evaluating whether each property • meets the criteria set forth in Florida Statute 376.80; whether each site meets the definition of a Brownfield Site, and if the designation is imperative for redevelopment to occur. The primary goals of the Brownfield. Redevelopment Act are to reduce public health and environmental hazards on existing commercial and industrial sites that are abandoned or underused due to these hazards; create financial and regulatory incentives to encourage voluntary cleanup and redevelopment of sites; derive cleanup target levels and a process for obtaining a "No Further Action" letter using Risk -Based Corrective Action principles; and provide the opportunity for Environm.entaI Equity and Justice. The Brownfield Process evaluations for each site have been made keeping these goals in mind and are attached for your review. Brownfield Designation Request Determination West Brickell Tower 1026 SW 2r1c; Avenue Miam, Fl 33130 FOO: 01-4138-051-0110 Property Summary: Current Site Condition: • Under Construction for 10-Story; 32 One and Two Bedroom Units; Affordable Housing Development Current Conditions of Surrounding Properties: • Exatinu OfficelRet:ailfromme,rciairResidential Busineses Farmer Site Usage (Type ,of Facility/ and or Busine.ss Name): 4 Resider-dal/Multifamily Housing Former or Current Documented Evidence of Contamination: • None documented at City a-f Miami cir Mie-mi-Dade Department of Rie-culetory and Economic Resources (RER) Proximity to Nearest Cantarninated Property and Description: • Oltgo Gas Station E7'1 190 SW 81' Street. Accordino to RER s,vebsite e Cita° as Station is :r.lqi.arninz=ted ditze to Pzirrner Leilkinc Underground Storage Tanks, A Sue Rehabilitation Completion Order has. not bean issued for this property which would indicate removaf of the coin temine,ion, and file records do not reveal migration of contamination onto 1026 SW 2.'1 Avenue. • Cheviot': Gas Station at 720 SW 2 Ave According to RER website, the Chevron Gas Station is contaminated due to Farmer Leaking Underiaround Storage Tanks. A Site Rehabilitation Completion Order has net been issued for this property which would indicate removal of the contamination, and file records do not reveal migration of contamination onto 1026 SW 2 Avenue Potential for development to be complicated by presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant; • Site is „already undier construction There are no environmental mitigation requirements documented at1026 SW 2" AVE-. Evkience of Contamination would have been notated by searrhina under the address or the folio of the following ritta,ildernImiamlOade.acidNetFncoilNetFYll:sapi DLL2METH3D=ViewSearch&Class=Permitte, d+facirities&LifeetiLl of' submitting a request to RER for File review vie VandtiTciltmiamidade.gov or visiting Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER)!Overtown Transit Village at 701 NW 1 st Court, 3rd Floor, Miami, Florida 33136 • According to the application review under RER File DW-20120050, the sites were checked as - not contaminatedas part of the pert review process (see attachment).. • Buildings prior to current cievelopment were not dilapidated and vacant far a lengthy amount of Urne. Evaluation of site to determine if it.meets criteria for Brownfield Designation. i- Site must meet all 5 factors for the Brownfield Designation process: Evaluation of Five Main.5totutor'v' Criteria iorOesic?nation_ 1.) "Does a person who owns or controls a potential brownf=ield site, and is requesting the designation, agree to rehabilitate and redevelop the site." • The owner has agreed to redevelop 1026 SW 27:� Avenue, and has provided 'evidence of the willingness to do so because construction has begun and is ongoing. 2.lt n:_ rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed arovinfieid a site will result in tCC.}lilfiiili productivity or the area, along with the creation of at l�at �gleast 5 new permanent jobs the GrGwnrielI d site that are iuii._tirne equivalent positions not associated with the implementation of the nrownfieid site rehabilitation agreement and that are not associated with the implementation of tine brow'n'ield site rehabilitation agreement and that are not associated withr vein e n CCi k' .�7i!l �.i t project demolition or construction activities pursuant to the redevelopment of the proposed Crawn'iield site and area. i-inweivier, the job creationrcau-re . ? n_ shall not apniy to the rehabilitation and redevelopment Q'," laro:;nt ,e.d site that .will provide a4fordable. housing as defined in s. 0.0004 or the creation of recreationai areas;conservation areas,or parks.'' ." • The p i a _ has submitted documentation in regards to the development c ei0)5 SW Zr.: Avenue as meeting the .-qu.ir erl nts of an afi rld.anle housing development. i0prcnt. • Eieyond the temporary Lobs that the project will create during construction; the neighborhood reta;E rs would benefit from increased pedestrian traffic.. 3.;E "-The redevelopment of the proposed bro:vnfield site is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a perrnittebie use under the ap tic le l? p t regulations." ap o�ct land and dC:�.e.G✓'T"ien�..e�ula,l.�ri:,." • Applicant has provided evidence _ that' has satisfiedrr- requirements, C, ueC) e'! ds�r';»c the development �rJe', rift : i.[ireriheri u, and Asher land use re ulatlons per Miami 21. The development also does not contrast w k ,., with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. u Notice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has been provided to neighbors and nearby residents of the proposed area to be designated, and the person proposing the. area for designation ioafforded h receiving noticef _ _ - lien has,Tv I.:CC to those reCeEV ` r'iu_iC__ the opportunity for comments and 5:!c,S7r'-SLi[7ns about rehebilftation. Notice pursuant to this subparagraph must be made in a newspaperof o. general circulation in the area, at tenet 16 square inches in size, and the notice must be posted ;n tine affected area"; * The applicant has provided the reviewer with documentation of a public notice announcement meeting regulatory requirement, and the reviewer verified in person that an opportunity; for public comment :'ias provided on lank.lary , 2013. The reviewer attended the meeting for 30 minutes and up until that time. no-one showed up to the meeting. 7 5. } The person proposing the area for designation has provided reasonable assurance that he or she hasuFficient financial resources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreernent and redevelopment of the brawnFieid site". r The applicant t has provided documentation of the ability to meet this criteria and construction has begun. Il- Site must meet definition of a "Brownfield": e Definition of a Brownfield is real property to wherethe 'fCfsioredevelopment, r ;:, y ex�U„_turf, n reuse :of which may be complicated by actual or perc>`ived environmental cant: mfn!atian"; Per RER, there are no environmental mitigation requirements documented at 1026 SW 2n'd Ave. According to RER File DW-2012005I0, the permitting processed indicated beforehand that the sites are not contaminated eliminating speculation. The .Applicant references the Citgc Gas Station190 SW t` Street and at $� tr�c� the Chervron Gat Station at 720 SW 2 d .Ave as big obstacles for development..A ffile review of .RER records doe's not reveal evidence of contamination associated with either gas station to be currently affecting the de.veiopment of 1026 SW': Avenue. applicant C the -proximity - n__ ..d �. i 1026 SW 2'£ The �, .1 i:a •". references Cz l7� tire Xii Ett"J Of contaminated ���,. gas station to c Avenue as creating the perception that the property could 7e contaminated; however @Vat r' The site is Already under construction and any perception has not complicated red'eveloprnenst. Furthermore., in order to obtain the proper permits prior to redevelopment, due diligence must be done to confirm whether or not 1026SW Avenue. Is contaminated. if a property is contaminated; ted; the developer would need to establish certain risk -based corrective measures to address the contamination prior to construction, There is no evidence of the requirement for risk -based correct action measures while West Brickell Tower is currently n . 1 d"` construction. Bricicell was not included in the original Designated Brownfield Area because economic and market study data did not support the need for incentives to attract development projects within that area, Although i ev lop... ` i t a development ,.�T€ n' in a i1 lliilig location outside of thecurrent designated Brownfield Area wound not automatically exclude consideration for a Brownfield Designation; the applicant must demonstrate that a property or properties have experienced long term vacancy due to actual or perceived contamination, the property Is a product of communty blight, and that availability of incentives is imperative for any 3 'lJw oppoki e t'J u00luljay au u lvvM ualS SuiDu! 3q P1ir:oert 20i=.% ay uAKTue e - „=i`== 'p,JOI dottig is u cl:j' o p.uaaiciod .,rp 'J c^iJ:. au% v is y` 'a, ° -``'! Y><ililf�.. :,SOI �i0`Ji:;? =afk� :(�. _,,...,..?dAa,."1 "1= Uj2Jai D? a..cJ0 �f3 se `S? i 3?.iy ) nits''9' . E U013Jas, p! quo aS p!J?`! t uo1.5,eu°fs o p al umoi9 cjgL-'Dli_dde 'acy, JO =R; lie 50g5 ;'2s 'H'IOiti_:� il! ,=^,3C(JJaJI? GjnJt _i?d "@ICLU S2 '! �A'Jctd 01,E 1J Cnc„ 31:1) OT O- SO-8L . —TQ ON Cij0 E T}E .1 uno--; ,p-cTlae'Iv w lj:,J 'a11Uv ' p-uL 11�1� Lu'L =a IY812DOI "i„7.v1wd;, t].) S UcLI.E. 2'dyilJp u ls2=M =41 JO `{„a.UeDlIddv„ 4Up) j3 i lvto l iii3)01J9 ps i1>> q ___ n suo;) put?. ]uelUd0ja/2p postdo d dt'yy :uOjsnpu0) ?U?U Jd0j2A !pBJ uE ;OU 5t#i jDU2'JO;??, 230U Si u01}PU:t_J?JUGa rise -37, Piallll;viw $ e ]OU 51 l-edOJG al;! �)ja�UA'0JCd !O UOI;iuu.ap alp. s]aatu PapU ,/4Jadojd e JauzaLM `uiuluJ,!apap u . aiap;suaD Ai r,eaij q Ppous `]u wdo;au-Aap;J J.O suejc9 ou .1:4'A,G'u 'Jai ;;':o M2u e Gp phis au!r^,q znotpv-A ADLTEDEA JO i.jlaUD pU2 pl 2gc-1 10 5J01 Ej r?U] `UGipeUThSap Ji;J pap.eu!tiie'puoJ aq 0' Oaau f ipes53JaU 1,.uszop kliadoJd e 1214 c3,i?pS «2p ]]EI1S +e'P;JOl 2JU15 hlj;'IJadsa 'Si,'? S not u!use uoJ. v:{p WOJ; ap.sv, ',.U2Wd0l.nep pasoduoid dU.pJo uo!pEJOj uup. +' .InDa0 Op.=uai-uciojaA•ap 6/21/13 Property Search - Report Property Information: Folio 01-0205-080-1150 Property Address 850 SW 2 AVE Owner Name(s) VISTA GRANDEAPARTMENTS LTD Mailing Address 477 S ROSEMARY AVE#301 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 Primary Zone 6402 AC< USE-BORDB2S CBD Use Code 0081 VACANT LAND Beds/Baths/Half 0/0/0 Floors 0 Living Units 0 Adj. Sq. Footage 0 Lot Size 19,500 SQ FT Year Built 0 Full Legal Description CfIY OF MIAMI SOUTH PB B-41 LOT 18 LESS W1OFT& ALL LOT 19 & LOT20 LESS El OFT FORSTBLK58 LOT SZE 130.000 X 150 OR 18348-0787 1198 1 COC 21827-0001 10 20031 IMPORTANT NOTICE The 2013 exemption and assessment values currently show n are preliminary and are subject to change until they are certified on July 1. Assessment Information: Current Previous Previous 2 Year 2013 2012 2011 Land Value $1,852,500 $438,750 $292,500 Building Value $0 $931,618 $861,746 Market Value $1,852,500 $1,370,368 $1,154,246 Assessed Value $1,852,500 $1,269,670 $1,154,246 Benefits Information: Current Previous Previous 2 Benefit Type 2013 2012 2011 Non -Homestead Caps Assessment Reduction $0 $100,698 $0 Note: not all benefits are applicable to all Taxable Values (ie County, School Board, City, Regional). Disclaimer: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER PROPERTY SEARCH SUMMARY REPORT Carlos Lopez -Camera Property Appraiser Penal Photography 2012 Taxable Value Information: Current Previous Previous 2 Year 2013 2012 2011 Exemption/ Taxable Exemption/ Taxable Exemption/ Taxable County $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,269,670 $0/$1,154,246 School Board $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,370,368 $0/$1,154,246 City $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,269,670 $0/$1,154,246 Regional $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,269,670 $0/$1,154,246 Sale Information: Date Amount OR Book -Page Qualification Code 9/2012 $3,500,000 28263-4353 Sales qualified as a result of exanination of the deed 10/2003 $2,500,000 21827-0001 Sales w hich are qualified 11/1998 $900,000 18348-0787 Sales w hich are qualified 7/1997 $0 17807-2881 Sales w hich are disqualified as a result of exarrination of the deed 6/1997 $0 17708-3779 Sales w hich are disqualified as a result of examination of the deed 7/1988 $0 13900-2891 Sales w hich are disqualified as a result of examination of the deed The Office of the Property Appraiser and Miami -Dade County are continually editing and updating the tax roll and GIS data to reflect the latest property information and GIS positional accuracy. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for data and the positional or thematic accuracy of the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Although this website is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file at Miami -Dade County's systems of record The Property Appraiser and Miami -Dade County assumes no liability either for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided regardless of the cause of such or for any decision made, action taken, or action not taken by the user in reliance upon any information provided herein. See Miami -Dade County full disclaimer and User Agreement at http://www.miarnidade.gov/info/disclaimer.asp. Property information inquiries, comments, and suggestions email: pawebmail@miamidade.gov g i sweb.miamidade.g a4Propert)6earchrpri ntM ap.htm 1/2 DERM, ERR Division, Water Control Section Date received: If Tracking # Drainage Weil # oaco 30-Day Deadline Reviewer: M Engineer Ati3e.710kv TeYP5-432---70/0 Site lora.: Project: ttkie. 15'et't kr-742/3 e. Folio: I.- to ti 0 Latitude 00 Logftde (E): Sae: Twn: -15E4 S Rge: (-1/1 E Lccatioir 1.9 Up 5AJ-7.4....k._• C C Coastal Wetland: ri.);(.1,W" Existing Contamination: (Y)/ Cotinty Flood Criteria: ft NGVD Oct_ Wafer Let : ft Mean High Tide: Lard tis-s: Total Site: 2- Fias Mncpaii1yt ftts-4. ; • I 7 ccastal Construction Line (Y) • D.; Pavement Outten tn Biscayne Bay (ORV) Pervious: Adjacerg to EEL£NFC Property: (Y) I Retention area: Weinfeld Frotecticri Area: (Y) Water Ot.zy: (Storrnwater discharge to Outstanding Fonda Water is 15G% of re4uired water quality trsatment) egi.fred: Ac-it WO Providact: Ac- it Percolation Rei 34-1\16- 5cfsiefitt Dri retention provided: Ac R-cvry Time: --Mr Infiltration flat; inihr Exliitration trench required: - a ft Exilltration trench provided: --- ft Volume SO set:ortds detentlorr W ci. Size of tio;c ) V/ `Z --t• Crer water quality traatireilt deviceisi: Water qua/Intl: 5 year design storm: g. / Jr.. Runoff, C: ^ Z. el's) Required number of drainage walls: 0 Drainage waifs provided: Size of well: {r Well capacity: gprnitt Salt Water rsity 1"" Avallable Head: 1,,t1 ft Other concerns: 1. Parking garagg:4 / Planters: MI 3. Special French drain required. SO lt 4. Plumbkig plans provided:. (N) 5.Manatee gralesrequited? (Y) /(N)/ NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: I. Piarrativn:r4 (N) 2. Site Fian: (N) Caristratic,aDetails: IS 4. C.,,..ttilatlons: Carnprettness Review: Date 1° Response: 2' Response: Completeness date: Roflution Rarnedia lion Approval: Wellands Approval: /Via. Coastal Approval:474 ERP Required (Y)/(N): Class limn Riqiifred (Y)/(): Legal: Warranty Deed:Opinion of Titte;rtY. 17(N) klaintenance Responsibility: (Y).(N) Co;ertant Requfrect (Y),(N) '2,471.1r./.,-, 2,2 A, '44.1.4122,2,4142,242244,2242,24,2424,244 ! • • if. I ••...•••••••••... • • • i • L! ()CH EP. • 4 31 V.L) :PP; 5' !!0!. . r .1 •;"11 . • . .• '!!! PLAN fr't gISQ1KRIMIkalIKIP dianZATiDairADIV.1=1"ZWZI1 . I iTgf; !!!,' • !;:-.:!;!;:i'' Nti3Utar.3 • .1::!'i„.1 ytaltatMlitegffiaN ;,::=7L:!.g.o.;,,,Pg • -- rigiip P3, iT.E.P..3 miTiPpny.1, PPM k.thig mgymagi4440— 11;,, :•:41.0a 4.322201 4‘,41242.3 I.33P5 3,3P 33.1, • PP," PPP,' X7174:1(4a.V.YrA s 424 ,24,21122,, , ID /MO, • • - • , . .r". P71337,3-Priipp;P .„ . , is, • 4 • 4,st s . 4 r A r!!! 6/21/13 Property Search - Report Property Information: Folio 01-0205-080-1150 Property Address 850 SW 2 AVE Owner Names) VISTA GRANDEAPARTMBJTS LTD Mailing Address 477 S ROSBVMRY AVE#301 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 Primary Zone 6402 MIX WE -BORDERS CBD Use Code 0081 VACANT LAND Beds/Baths/Half 0/0/0 Floors 0 Living Units 0 Adj. Sq. Footage 0 Lot Size 19,500 SQ FT Year Built 0 Full Legal Description CfrY OF MIAMI SOUTH PB B-41 LOT 18 LESS W 1 OFT &ALL LOT 19 & LOT 20 LESS El OFT FOR ST BLK 58 LOT SIZE 130.000 X 150 OR 18348-0787 1198 1 COC 21827-0001 10 20031 IMPORTANT NOTICE The 2013 exemption and assessment values currently show n are preliminary and are subject to change untl they are certified on July 1. Assessment Information: Current Previous Previous 2 Year 2013 2012 2011 Land Value $1,852,500 $438,750 $292,500 Building Value $0 $931,618 $861,746 Market Value $1,852,500 $1,370,368 $1,154,246 Assessed Value $1,852,500 $1,269,670 $1,154,246 Benefits Information: Current Previous Previous 2 Benefit Type 2013 2012 2011 Non -Homestead Caps Assessment Reduction $0 $100,698 $0 Note: not all benefits are applicable to all Taxable Values fie County, School Board, City, Regional). Disclaimer: MIANII-DADE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER PROPERTY SEARCH SUMMARY REPORT Carlos Lopez-Cantera Property Appraiser Penal Photography 2012 Taxable Value Information: Current Previous Previous 2 Year 2013 2012 2011 Exemption/ Taxable Exemption/ Taxable Exemption/ Taxable County $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,269,670 $0/$1,154,246 School Board $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,370,368 $0/$1,154,246 City $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,269,670 $0/$1,154,246 Regional $0/$1,852,500 $0/$1,269,670 $0/$1,154,246 Sale Information: Date Amount OR Book -Page Qualification Code 9/2012 $3,500,000 28263-4353 Sales qualified as a result of examination of the deed 10/2003 $2,500,000 21827-0001 Sales w hich are qualified 11/1998 $900,000 18348-0787 Sales w hich are qualified 7/1997 $0 17807-2881 Sales w hich are disqualified as a result of examination of the deed 6/1997 $0 17708-3779 Sales w hich are disqualified as a result of examination of the deed 7/1988 $0 13900-2891 Sales w hich are disqualified as a result of examination of the deed The Office of the Property Appraiser and Miami -Dade County are continually editing and updating the tax roll and GIS data to reflect the latest property information and GIS positional accuracy. No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided for data and the positional or thematic accuracy of the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. Although this website is periodically updated, this information may not reflect the data currently on file at Miami -Dade County's systems of record The Property Appraiser and Miami -Dade County assumes no liability either for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided regardless of the cause of such or for any decision made, action taken, or action not taken by the user in reliance upon any information provided herein. See Miami -Dade County full disclaimer and User Agreement at http://www.miamidade.gov/info/disclaimer.asp. Property information inquiries, comments, and suggestions email: pawebmail@miamidade.gov gisweb.miamidade.g omPropertySearchrprintMap.hlm 1/2 City of Miami Designated Brownfield Area and Enterprise Zone Maps ' IE-74�NST� +NE72140TER' --7—SW23 DST-- _�--SW 2SW257H Sr-`—± m' —SW ?6iH•S' - '7-SW26THST- 4TSW :287HST W 27:H if(,- SW-ITHST-y>y.2p{H I _%i 871 5W23 D-5T- ST—_m _ -SW.25T1S -SW26TH6T-- SW26TH•ST- STN ST-1 .o—...— ".iFb.on. _ B2ND -_- Ee0TH6T- '7 MIIIIIIIIIL Alwretne ggni . 6W24 H-TER-=--.!