The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutExhibit 6 - Version ACity's Brownfield Designation Request Determination and Supporting Documentation Review of B nfieldDesigna Designion Request This review serves the purpose to report the evaluation and responses to Brownfield Designation Request Applications submitted to the City of Miami in December 2012 by the Goldstein Environmental Law Firm for the following development projects: est Bricked Tower -1025 21d Avenue", Miami, FL 33130 o West Brickell View-144-152 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33 30 • Vista Grande Apartments - 850 SW 2rld Avenue, 1 The Goldstein Environmantal Law Firm has submitted the applications to the City of Miami for g review and official authorization to designate the three (3) subject properties as Brownfield areas for the purpose of obtaining incentives associated with the redevelopment of Brownfield Sites. According to Florida Stateite 376.80: "if a Iocal government proposes to designate e brownfiield area that is outside community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, closed military bases, or designated brownfield pilot project areas, the local government shall adopt the resolution and conduct the public hearings in accordance with the requirements of subsection (.t), except at least one of the public hearings shall be conducted as close as reasonably practicable to the area to be designated to provide an opportunity for public input on the size of the area, the objectives for the rehabilitation, job opportunities and economic developments anticipated neighborhood residents' consideration, and other relevant local concerns. Notice of the public hearing must be made in a newspaper of general in the area and the noticep affected area, and must be announced at a scheduled meetingo the local governing body before the circulation must be posted in f 9 .� the actual hearr,ng.: The City of Miami has a current Designated Brownfield Area which excludes the locations currently requested for designation. Furthermore, the request for designation was made from a non. government source. Therefore, as part of, the Brownfield Designation process and in accordance to Florida Statute 37.6.80, the City must evaluate the following factors for each site to determine if they meet the guidelines for being designated a Brownfield Area; 1.) Does a person who owns or controls a potential brownfield site, and is requesting the designation, agree to rehabilitate and redeveIop the site. 2.) Does the rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site result in economic productivity of the area, along with the creation of at least 5 new permanent)obs at the brownfield site that are full-time equivalent positions not associated with the. implementation of the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement and are not associated with the redevelopment project, demolition, or construction activities pursuant to the redevelopment of theproposed brownfield site and area. However, the job creation requirement shall not apply to the rehabilitation and redevelopment of a brownfield site that will provide affordable housing as defined in S.420,0004 or the creation of recreational areas, conservation areas, or parks. 1 Des the redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site remain consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a permittable use under the applicable local land and development regulations. 4.) Notice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has been provided to neighbors and nearby residents of the proposed area to be designated and the person proposing the area for designation has afforded to those receiving notice the opportunity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation, 5.) Does the person proposing the area for designation provide reasonable assurance that he or she has sufficient financial resources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreement and redevelopment of the brownfield site. Since the properties are outside the current Designated Brownfield. Area, each site must also fit the definition of a "Brownfield" site. The EPA, defines a Brownfield property "as real property, in which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse rnay be complicated by the presence or iotentia) presence ofa hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant' The findings within the applicationreview are a combination'of evaluating whether each property meets the criteria set forth in Florida Statute 376.80; whether each site meets the definition of a Brownfield Site, and if the designation is imperative for redevelopment to occur. The primary goals of the Brownfield Redevelopment Act are to reduce public health and environmental hazards on existing commercial and industrial sites that are abandoned or underused due to these hazards; create financial and regulatory incentives to encourage voluntary cleanup and redevelopment of sites; derive cleanup target levels and a process for obtaining a "No Further Action"' letter using Risk -Based Corrective Action principles; and provide the opportunity for Environmental Equity and Justice. The Brownfield Process evaluations for each site have been made keeping these goals in mind and are attached for your review. Brownfield Designation Request Determination West Brickell Tower 1026 SW 2nd Avenue Miami, Fi 33130 Folio: 01-4138-051-0110 Property Sum ma rV: Current Site Condition: • Under Construction for 10-Story; 32 One and Two Bedroom Units; Affordable Housin Development Current Conditions of Surrounding Properties: • Existing Office/Retail/Commercial/Residential Businesses Former Site Usage (Type of Facility/ and or Business Name): • Residenfial/Multifarnily Housing Former or Current Documented Evidence of Contamination: • None documented at City of Miami or Miami -Dade Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) Proximity to Nearest Contaminated Property and Description: • Citgo Gas Station at 190 SW 8"h Street. According to RER website, the Citgo Gas Station is contaminated due to Former Leaking Underground Storage Tanks, A Site Rehabilitation Completion Order has not been issued for this property which would indicate removal of the contamination, and file records do not reveal migration of contamination onto 1026 SW 2nd Avenue. • Chevron Gas Station at 720 SW 2 Ave; According to RER website, the Chevron Gas Station is contaminated due to Former Leaking Underground Storage Tanks, A Site Rehabilitation Completion Order has not been issued for this property which would indicate removal of the contamination, and file records do not reveal migration of contamination onto 1026 SW 2'd Avenue Potential for development to be complicated by presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant; • Site is already under construction. There are no environmental mitigation requirements documented at 1026 SW 2nd Ave. Evidence of Contamination would have been notated by searching under the address or the folio of the following link; httv/iderm.miamidade.qoviNetFYI/cgi/NetFYIlsapi DLL?METHOD=ViewSearch&Class=Permitte d+Facilities&Life=U; or submitting a request to RER for File review via VandyTAmiamidade,qov or visiting Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER)/Overtown Transit Village at 701 NW 1st Court, 3rd Floor, Miami, Florida 33136 • According to the application review under RER File DW-20120050, the sites were checked as ''not contaminated" as part of the permit review process (see attachment), • Buildings prior to current development were not dilapidated and vacant for a lengthy amount of time. Evaluation of site to determine if it meets criteria for Brownfield Designation. N- Site must meet all G factors for the Brownfield Designation process: l.)"Do�eoaperson who owns orcontrols apotential brnvvnfie|dsite, and isrequesting the designation, agree torehabilitate and redevelop the site." � The owner has agreed toredevelop 1O%6SVVZ"mAvenue , and has provided evidence ofthe willingness m �nUmess�dosobecauseconotruct|onhasbe8unand�songuing. Z.)"The mehab[Rtationand redevelopment ofthe proposed bnovxnfie|d site will result ineconomic productivity ufthe area, aUo�mgwith the creation ofatleast Snew permanent jobs atthe brmvvnfie/dsite that are full-time equivalent positions not associated with the implementation of the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement and that are not associated with the implementation ofthe brovvn#e!dsite rehabilitation agreement and that are not associated with redevelopment project demolition or construction activities pursuant to the redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site and area, However, the job creation requirement shall not apply to the rehabilitation and redevelopment of a brownfield site that will provide affordable housing as defined in s.420.0004 or the creation of recreational areas, conservation areas, mrparks." 9 The applicant has submitted documentation in regards to the development of 1026 SW 2 nd Avenue asmeeting the requirements ofanaffordable housing development. 0 Beyond the temporary jobs that the project will create during construction; the neighborhood retailers would benefit from increased pedestrian traffic. 3.\ "The redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a permittabl[e use under the applicable local land and development regulations." * Applicant has provided evidence that the development has satisfied permit requirements,and other land use regulations per Miami Zl. The development also does not contrast with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. 4`)"Notice ofthe proposed rehabilitation ofthe brownfie|d area has been provided toneighbors and nearby residents of the proposed area to be designated, and the person proposing the area for designation has afforded to those receiving notice the opportu!niity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation. Notice pursuant to this subparagraph must be made in a newspaper of general circulation [nthe area, atleast 16square inches insize, and the notice must beposted [nthe affected arem°; w The applicant has provided the reviewer with documentation, ofapublic notice announcement meeting regulatory requirement, and the reviewer verified in person that an opportunity for pubUixcomment was provided onJanuary 0,Z013. The reviewer attended the meeting for 3O minutes and upuntil that time, no-one showed uptmthe meeting, 2 5j "The person proposing the area for designation has provided reasonable assurance that he or she has sufficient finamcWresources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreement and redevelopment ofthe brovvn0e|dsbe". * The applicant has provided documentation of the ability to meet this criteria and construction has begun. N[~ Site must meet definition ofm^Browonfield~: Definition of a Brownfield is "real property to where the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which moybe, complicatedbvactual orperceived environmental contamination"; Per RER, there are no environmental mitigation requirements documented at 1O365VVZnd4ve�.According toRERFile DVY-201ZQO5O,the permitting processed indicated beforehand that the sites are not contaminated eliminating speculation, J� The Applicant references the Citgo Gas Station, at 1905VV O`u Street and the ChervoonGas Station at72O5VV2"«Ave asbeing obstacles for development. A file review of RER records does not reveal evidence of contamination associated with, eaf fecting 4venue. The applicant references the proximity ofcontaminated gas station k»1026SVV2"m Avenue ascreating the perception that the property could becontaminated; however )� The site is already under construction and any perception has not complicated redevelopment. Furthermore, inorder 10obtain the proper permits prior to redevelopment, due diligence must be done to confirm whether or not 1026 SW � 2 Avenue lscontaminated. If a property is contaminated; the developer would need to establish certain risk -based corrective measures toaddress the contamination prior tV comstrmction. There ismnevidence ofthe requirement for dsh-basedcorrective action measures while West 8ricke|iTower is currently under construction. 8hckeUwas not included inthe original Designated Brownfield Area because economic and market study data did not support the need for incentives to attract development projects within that area. AIthough a development in a thriving location outside of the current designated Brownfield Area weu|d not automatically exclude consideration fora Brownfield Designation; the applicant must demonstrate that aproperty orproperties have experienced long term vacancy due to actual or perceived contamination, the property is a product of community blight, and that availability of incentives is imperative for any development tuoccur atthe location ofthe proposed development, Aside from the contamination status, espec�iaNysince Florida Statutes state that a property doesn't necessarily need to be contaminated for designation, the factors of blight and length of vacancy without being sold to a new owner, and with no plans of redevelopment; should be heavily considered in determirift whether a property indeed meetsthe definition mfaBrownfield. The property is not a Brownfield Site becauise contarnination is not a factor, and was not an obstacle toward redevelopment Conclusion: The proposed development and construction by West Brickell Tower, Ltd. (the "Applicant"), of the West BrickeUTower Apartments (the "P 'ect"),|ocatedat1O26SVVZndAvenue,K8iamiK8iarn|-DadeComnty, Florida 33l3O,Folio No. 01'4138'OS1'011O(the "5u!NectProperty"iasmore particularly described in Exhibit A, satisfies all five of the ap�licable Brownfield designation criteria set forth at Section 376.80(2)(b), Florida Statutes, as demonstrated herein. The development of West Brickell Tower would be a beneficial redevelopment to the neighborhood; however the need to designate as a Brownfield Area would be incons,istent with the definition of a "brow/mfietdsite" and the Florida Redevelopment Act. 4 Prop° , 11:, F 4 o1:3ao5ioiio Property Mdress 1026 SW 2 AVE net Name(s) WEST BRICKELL TOWER LTD Ding Addmss 477 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVE #301, WEST PALM BEACH Fl. 33401 PrimaryPrJmanj ZonoC4 2 MIX USE -BORDERS CBD Use Code 0003 MULTWAMILY 3 OR MORE IT Beds/Baths/Half .70 Floors2 Living Units 4 Ad14, Sq. Footage 4.021 Lot Sza 8.540SO FT YoarSuflt 1938 Le9aI Description MLAMI HOTS A SUB PB 5-29 N4SFT LOT 19 & ALL LOT 22 LESS E 10FT FOR ST BLK 76 & S16FT OF LOTS 1 2 3 LESS El NT LOT 1 BLK 76 P8 B-41 LOT SIZE 61,000 X 140 Assessrnent ati : CurrentPrevious Year 2012 2'01 1 Land Value 3192.150 $ 28,100 Building Value 3167.064 $167,064 Marlwt 'Value $359,214 3295,164 Assessed Value 3324,680 3295,164 E*emption Information: Current Prey us Year 2012 2011 Homestead $0 30 2nd Homestead 30 Senior 30 3D Veteran Disabli Civilian Disability 30 30 Wk/owor) SO 30 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PR.OPERTY A.PPRAISER PROPERTY SEARCH SUMMARY REPORT Caries Lopez-Cantera Property Appraiser 1,4,0 del Al Pnvingraphy 2012 TaxaWe: We Info Current Prev' us 2012 2011 eTpuorraxabI0 Ex.ernplionfTaxable Count 0 3324,.680 .295,164 School CiIy Regional 9214 64 324,6'80 30 / $29 0 324,680 2 5, Sale Information: Da unt Rucordlng Book -Page 10/2012 $950,000 /2 1 3 5,000 7-2472 274024770 tlficatlon Code Sales qualified as a result of examination of Rho deed Sales qualified as a result o examination of the deed 24742-2704 12/1980 6/1974 Sales which are disqualified as a result of examination of the deed Other disqualified Sales which are 4isqualirrod a result of examination of the deed -1525 Sales which are qualified 0 Sales which are qualified alagRi4fuVkfti 'iV nr O; � v�Vi`1im I NVV� P4J dui(iiNiVfirt?1NNKCNaNNiN.im,'NiNN'NiNUNiWNi�ciw10 7 II DERM, ERR Divs an„ l' ter Controt Drainage Well 4. it. 0050 Reviewer: Site irstttaloa J . Iat a (N): Sec: 12 B: kl,: "` Coastal Wetland: County Rood Crier d Use: Total Site: �utlding: Pavement Pervious: Retention area: Long Date received: Tracking ## 3l -Day tr oadllne Fr71'Irtifl ^-1 Exleting Cont inatlon; tt NGVD Oct. Water Love : Municipality #� t Coastal Construction Line ('Y) W WWI to Biscayne Bay (OFW) Adjacent to EEl1NFC Property Weilfleid » t°ellen Ar (Y) ! Nuawtity: (Stormwater disclharg w to Outstanding Florida Water W O Requir WO Provl :;et:: rapt retention provided: Ac Recovery Exrll'atlon trench required Volume 90 secon *a detention: fah Tide: .44141, 150% of ro4uired water quality Percolation Rat ° 3"°7Y11 cis s �wr. Infiltration Ratio: . inr Other water quality treatment devlce(s): quantity: 5 year design storm: Required nu Il drafna Well Pr density 1* Availabtw Hea Othercon a: 1, Partdng gara ! (N) 2. Planters Runott, Drainage t Special Frencft drain rN ►ufr 4. Plumbing plans provi (N) 5.Manatee grates required? (Y) ►' (, NiPCE Sterm Water Pollution Rraven rt: Narrative: (N) 2. Site P'., (N) : Co 4. G'.tculatfons: I' (N) Co teterresa Review: Date 1 " Response: 2"/ R : = ,M a Completeness date: Pollution Rernedialion Approval: `+%41. Wetlands Approval: 4p.; Coastal Approvaf'4 ERP Required (Y)/(N):. Class 1ilil'Vt Required (WO): Warranty Deed:Opinion of Title ') "(N) Maintenance Responsibility: (V),(N) Covenant Nie ul. d: (Y Nt SITE PLAN A-1.O ) Review Results 26 SW 2 AV) Page 1 of I Intake GontraMor PlaoReviews Petmit inspections Certificate I Reports Admin Welcome FTWERSDDEWPons 10.1.20139 Review Results; BD12-006614-001 (1,026 SW 2 AV) General Plan Histoty ff Review Status If RosulfiRemarks Work Items D unaavvanreia-Favaraan3vnarana-aaanevonnur-annavaannng awutaanuanclataFoenenoes.................. AORrEOR I I Contacts Zoning ' Shop rins I s Notes MO Plait Number. BD12-006614-001 (Master Plan) Plan Status Active Malt Catiegory PHASED PERMIT -BUILDING Status Reason Plan Afrproved„ Master Permit Type- BUILDING Plan Ariteptance Dale Sep/05/2012 11:53:00 Number of Plan Sheets: 0 Threshold No Required Permits: Required DiserplinesB Required Certificate: N/A tog Address, Ratio NU mbec 0141380510110 Folio Violations Case # I Address EIVirtIation Ne violations 10 dibMay 1026 SW 2,31/ EitottntilUelipl 1111ertor Rernottehritt: No Etter ior Remodeling: No Shell Only: No Permit By Affidavit Ne Private Provider No Legatiza tiro Required: No Property Type: COMM erdal COPYRIGHT 201:3 CIIIY OF NIIAMI Privaq Policy oratact Us Fem QuIclo Oate Best kliSed with Internet Explorer 9 Doxitntnad ACCOIN)r. Rea ck,a. User 'Wm kring Orifiee v 1 2013,0211 hup://lmspro I ,and anagement/PlanRevie eviewResult/Review Zres Ilt/13D120066140... 7/23/2013 Global Inquiry Page 1 of 1 k1113nRe.,,,c2ws Perrarl , W2111::Tort2,2 Adritirl Global Inquiry Property Acidte5a 1026 SW 2 AV Folio NUM ber: 01-4136-061-0110 Process Plans Plan Number Plan Status laD 1 2..•01 32•001, Act, ve - Plan Approved Peru* Types Required Inspections 11y Ned Final PerrnaC Type Pend Number Permn SIlates BUILDING Ma Merl 1121(52V ,xi,1,,1,1,11(-,1 Final All Insperniens are finalized. PLUMBING I Final id Inspections are finaIGed Jab Category: DEMOLITION Work Items • DEMOLITION - TOTAL Issued Dale De011/2012 Dee/la/2012 rnsprod/LandiVianagement/Plani'eview/Clobalinquiry/Globallnquity/B1 2010632 7/24/2013 emPOWER Library Folder/Document List Page 1 of 1 71Tgclielt1 in a$ Anonymous User INIMayiesomplINKOLMsou„Liknu 04jact Cripboard There ore 0 ttern(s) on your clipboard HgliR 4 Nam, aged Flitla 6 - 9 items total' its Fi, 13. v?, C.4 Folder Vtew, ALL VIEWS • Document View. ALL VIEWS EEOS Ident!location Number Division Facility Name Workgroup Type Workgroup Number DEP Facility ID I VII .0 'hi VVATER MANAGEMENT VVEST ORICKELL TOWER DW 20120050 I Date Created Major Minor Facility Name Document Type Docur L'h, 4 il 2012-09-24 A 1 ENGINEERING DRAINING 20124 -41 4/1 2012-10-22 A 1 CORRESPONDANCE IN 20124 -AN i/I1 2012.10.22 A 1 WARRANTY DEED 2010-4 4 fl 2012.10.22 A 1 COMPLETENESS SUMMARY 20124 4 iil 2012-10-22 A 1 CORRESPONDANCE IN 2012.4 4 'fit 2012-10-22 A 1 CORRESPONDANCE IN 2012." in .k il 2012-10-22 A 1 PAYMENT RECEIPTS 2012-I 4 )ra 2012-10.22 A 1 APPLICATION REVIEW 2012-t r n is 11 2012-10-22 A 1 TECHNICAL REPORTS 20124 "_ In ..6 '61 2012.10-22 A 1 SITE PLAN 20114 in _o il 2012-10,22 A 1 APPLICATION FORM 2012-1 is 11 2012.10.22 A 1 ENGINEERING DRAVVING 2012= I Hisi, 4 ill 2012-10-22 A 1 ENGINEERING DRAWING 2012," 'El 4 ikl 2012-10-22 A 1 SITE PLAN 20124 ; n 4 iiI 2012-10-22 A 1 ENGINEERING DRAWNG 20124 In 4 /i/li 2013,01-14 A 1 ENGINEERING DRAWING 2012-° _ris iil 2013.01,14 A 1 CORRESPONDANCE IN 2012." In A il 2013-01-14 A 1 OTHER AGENCY DOCUMENTS,. NON.REFERENCE 2012-" : T 4 •Lil 2013.01-14 A 1 PAYMENT RECEIPTS 2012." 1091.200$ Coperigae Oat* 3$0 003 lag APPRigh9e Rafrafatt, °Moak aasurnenqs 3rE rnaleasuned ,atr,,,RS.I's Main else, 7019M a01 lal,foasS, gisWgp 33115 'Phis page was generated am Seplawaber 28 2013 at la a99 10 AM http://derm.miamidade.gov/NetFYI/cgiNetFYIlsapi.DLL? ETHOD=ViewFoldDoel„,ist&... 9/24/2013 !;01deltilk— DERIVI, ERR Division, Water Control Section ate received: (moo Tracking # Drainage Well * 0050 30-Day Deadline Reviewer: A • Engineer:jraevito kv,'i& Tel: 34-70i Site Info.: Project: A.k" 13,1 t k re274 A.-ec evet, t- . Folio: 1'. Lif PS? Latitude (N): Longitude (E Sec: 2- Twn: .A14 S Age: E Location: Io Uo 5 4%)`7 Ar-P Ba* aC Coastal Wetland: type-- Existing Contamination: (Y) / County Flood Criteria: 5 ft NGVD Oct. Water Level: eZ• ft Mean High Tide: I • !-lIo Land Use: Total Site: ' Phase Municipality: Pi- t it( Building: • 0c Pavement: Pervious: Retention area: Coastal Construction Line (Y) / Ptr Outfall to Biscayne Bay (OFW) (Y)i.(34)-* Adjacent to EEUNFC Property: (Y) /*Pir. Welifield Protection Area: (Y) Water Duality: (Stormwater discharge to Outstanding Florida Water is 150% of required water quality treatment) WO Required: Ac-ft WO Provided: Ac-ft Percolation Rate: t3'1cfs/sf/ft Dry retention provided: Ac Recovery Time: --hr. Infiltration Rate: in/hr Exfiltration trench required: ' ° ft Exfiltration trench provided: ft Volume 90 seconds detention: ka y cf. Size of well box: L I )4 II Other water quality treatment device(s): Wator quantfty: 5 year design storm: • in. Runoff, 0: ),• 12- (cfs) Required number of drainage wells: 0 Drainage wells provided: Size of well: 2Y in Well capacity: 440o pm/ft Salt Water density: 1 5 Available Head: Other concerns: 1. Parking garage: / (N) 2. Planters: (VN 3. Special French drain required: 4. Plumbingplans provided: (N) 5.Nianatee grates r uired? / (N) /pol NPDES Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: t. Narrative: N) 2. Site Plan: N 3: Construction Details; /vie 4. Calculations: Completeness Review: Date 11 Response: 2rd Response: Completeness date: Pollution Pemediation Approval; MA. Wetlands Approval: /VA. Coastal Approval:4/4 ERR Required (Y)/(N): Legal: Warranty Deed/Opinion al Title: iN Maintenance Responsibility: (Y),(N) Covenant Required: (Y),(N) I (N) Class WWI Required (Y)/(r): ,...rtrarafai 701 N.W. 1st Court, 6th Floor Miami, FL 33136 Re: West Dear Marie: rickell Tow Mark S. Johnson, P.S.M. Ronald A. Fritz, P.S.M. Jose L P.S.M. Michael J. Alley, P.S.M. August 20, 2012 E - Land Surveyors - Engineers - Land Planners 3240 Corporate Way • Miramar, Florida 33025 Phone: (954) 435-7010 Fax: (954) 438-3288 AUG 2 4 2012 Mrs. Marie Hall Miami -Dade County D br DERM Water Coriuo ErResources Regulaon Reslorotinn Water Control Section Dvisior, (.NRRT)) Alfonso C. Tello, P E, P.S.M. Hernando J. Navas, P.E, Luis F. Leon, P.E. Alberto A. Mora, P.E. John C. Tello, P.E. Attached please find the WellReview submittal package for the above -referenced subject site, including the following: 1. One (1) fully executed Well Form Review Application 2. Four (4) sets of signed and sealed Paving, Grading and Drainage Plans 3. One (1) set of signed and sealed Drainage Calculations 4. One (1) set of plumbing plans 5. One (1) copy of the boundary survey 6. One (1) check in the amount of $210.00 7. One (1) copy of proof of ownership 8. One (1) letter from the structural engineer certifying the use of French Drain within the garage. If you have any questions regarding the above or enclosed, pleaso do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, 48ag etiC Jose A. 1 ero, E.l. Project •ineer tdb K\12544 1\West Brickell Tower ocunnents\Outgoing Correspondance‘Mane Hali-DERM.doc 3 * 41 DEPART OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES REGULATION DIVISION WC, FOR. For Official Use Only Application Fee: $210 — Standard fee for Drainage Well Plan Review I. Checklist: 3 sets of signed and sealed paving and drainage plans (Required) 1-copy of signed and sealed drainage calculations or report (Required) 1-copy of topo aphic survey / boundary survey/Project location map 1-copy of proof of ownership 1-copy of plumbing plans NOTE: ALL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR OR Date Received: Assigned Reviewer: Water Control Section 33 SW 2ND Avenue, 21'd Floor Miami, Florida 33130-1540 Tel: (305) 372-6681 Fax: (305) 372-6489 AT1 Application Number: 2.01 AU3 2 4 OF 4M „Va,"„ Car „ See!. en Mier& kesas-r.,:„,5 n & Restoration EW SHALL BE FOLDED IN8.9M.P..§tit 2. Applicant Information: Name: Francisco Lagos Marmol Company: FLivl,1)26 2nd Avenue LLC Address: 1026 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 Contact person: Damon Kolb Tel: 561-832-1114 Fax: 561-832-1104 4. Project InforrAtion: Project Name: West Brickell Tower Is this part of a multi -phase project: Yes X No Total area of this application: 0.20 acres Total applicant -owned area contiguous to this project: 0.20 acres Sec: 12 Twn: 54 Rge: 41 Sec: Twn: Rge: Address: 1026 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33130 Folio No.: 01-4138-051-0110 3. Authorized Agent Information: Name: Alberto A. Mora, P.E. Company: Schwebke-Shiskin and Associates Address: 3240 Corporate Way Miramar, Florida 33025 Contact person: Alberto A. Mora, P.E. Tel: 305-652-7010 Fax: 305-652- 284 5. Proposed Use: X Residential Recreational Highway Institutional Other, Specify: Commercial Industrial Agricultural Landfill Does this permit application impact freshwater wetland, coastal wetland and/or surface waters? Yes / X No Date activity is proposed to be commenced: December 2012 Date activity is proposed to be completed: December 2013 AMP i„„„ DEPART T OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 1ANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES REGULATION DIVISION W.C. FORM 503 Water Control Application Form Page 2 of 3 6. Description of Project: X New Construction Modification or improvement of an existing drainage system or facility Length of exfiltration trench proposed (feet) 6 0 LF Length of existing exfiltration trench (feet) Unknown Total number of catch basins proposed 3 Number of existing catch basins: Unknown (To Be Removed) Number of drainage wells proposed: 1 Area of dry retention pond/ swale (acres) 0 Total number of outfall/s: Related Permits (List all permit numbers) 7. A idavit of Ownership or Control property on which the proposed project is to be undertaken. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE RECORD OWNER, LESSEE, OR RECORD EASEMENT HOLDER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW. NOTE: Lessees must provide a si tiled, notarized statement from the property owner indicating that the owner has reviewed the proposed project, including all proposed plans, and has agreed to allow the proposed project to occur on his or her lands. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SITUATED IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Use additional sheets if necessary) d subscribed before me at My commission expires on: 4a VIA A. WWII MY COMMISSION EE 037253 IRES: February 25, 2015- Na Hatay Public Undermillys 11111111111111111111111111111 DEPARTM T OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES REGULATION DIVISION W.C. FORM 503 Water Control Application Form Page 3 of 3 8. Application is made for a permit to authorize the activities described herein, A. I authorize the agent listed in item #3 to negotiate modifications or revisions, when necessa and accept or assent to any stipulations on my behalf. B. I agree to provide entry to the project site for inspectors with proper identification or documents from the Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) for the purpose of making preliminary analyses on the site. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such inspectors to monitor permitted work if a permit is granted. C. Further, I hereby acknowledge the obligation and responsibility for obtaining all the required state, federal or local permits before commencement of construction activities. I also understand that before commencement of this proposed project I must be granted separate permits or authorizations from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, as necessary. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. Signature of Applicant(s) Date, NOTE: THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED by the person(s) who desires to undertake the proposed activity or by an authorized agent. If an agent is applying on behalf of the applicant, attach proof of authority for the agent to sign and bind the applicant. NOTICE TO PERMIT APPLICANTS This is a drainage permit application. It is not a Class II, III, or VI permit. You must obtain all required local, state, and federal authorizations or permits BEFORE commencing work. For your information: Section 370.034, Florida Statutes, requires that all dredge and fill equipment owned, used, leased, rented, or operated in the state shall be registered with the Department of Natural Resources. Before selecting your contractor or equipment you may wish to determine if this requirement has been met. For further information contact the Chief of the Bureau of Licenses and Motorboat Registration, Tallahassee, Florida 32303. Telephone Number (904) 488-1195. Drainage Systern 1 DRAINAGE WELLS CALCULATIONS TABLE *numbers in red are variables subject to change; black numbers are calculated automatically Li fl 2000 N lfi 1.5 14.63 2 1'1.13 GPM) Water Quail_ 22260 726 1©.84229 32268.42 'lIUIIlillll S.W. r I TH STREET ASVIRMICIMIENt , jT 3131C1KL,itL TO E 1026 S ". 2ND AVENUE, CITY OF MIAM. CIVIL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS JULY 2012 47,1ry our, w pry LOCATION SKETC}-1 p r e p a y SCHWEBKE-S'HISK'IN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3240 CORPORATE IVA Y, MIRAMAR, FL. 33025 LAND PLANNERS — ENGINEERS -' LAND SURVEYORS (LB & CA ,'S7) TEL: (305)652-7010 FAX: (305)652-8284 AGi 1 kENT ID# 211 ME No. AJ-4 5, 0' 1 SFff,I'T PAVING AND. GR).4PVNG PiLAN: NAPAJAELL_LTill LA7771,475;EIgi:":174aV zarzn,,ti err x4ema,,kr.alw P. ztx,r57,a- REA0A5,14,01,10„ ryaa AVV% TOP MA --A ' , — rmavarzoomr . - CM110,1019,31,--011. At1,742 - ALIZAVAAALIL4RIAA APAtg ;40,;11e4te;-",,Hff-T:Ai TT \ 7-717 —1=^4 filidsz= ,SeLer.,64E. 0 C-6 9 , 'MS4,111 TIPS F" C UREA -EMU (410.0.4111.11140t CoUNDLIVAJ 10 .01, 4,,,,VPMY REIY1:10_41:113411ESUBB NIZNELI14.4k12LSOLliNri .4R/1440 '44.4 447' 4,4Q44;7414444'4441474 . 44,4_ 4 TYPE ID4 SUER fltli&L-24.404„CaVE11-81/1 4,4 Th 7,41Z,'" "PrVP, IFI4r41W411,1 CV' 31RN iNSTAILATIGN_DETAM LEENZIEELJESE SIDEWALK PEIAIMI DEIALLEIR. SW ND AVE 1, •77-7-7-1:1,':25F,h,"4-7"— '' 717"2,E7E:!...CIS,7a,72.S- , MEKTUNN, "A° Nrvo maw. 1tiG PAVEMENT ZESYER.Tz'',11:,:t TWO! .8.011 1:11) /`&7,11,,n7703. Flaarith- ,;z„ „z.tw.741" 12EVETZ, LTITSSEILIV,TVLANTLX,,M7% 47TSTL'7,4r,L ST,L=T4LET; .S.477.74117:-. THENgkorrAu littEELUZME-MAIL 171/LicT L, IRE SCHEDULE f1.1VES rawaLE naaaarn n,1 5C, /Ili, L'aa:',1:. faa aa.aa. aaa7,,asaal all,i4-74^44T4041-45042i 444,7471047.4440,4,UND STRUCTURE CONE STYLE ( , 1411 SEDUCER Qf.IPIIIIr I y "T;'77;7711'7 77/ R Cl'OSED 5,5".50:NTIAL. -„„ FIN. FLUD FLOOR OOR /, . SIT! PLAN --.ED " ,6001,4 f4T ":777.7741771774tretticrr, .„, WY,2W147 .1717,-41,15NNAII 1,14.ngry1,1.1( , r:71;'":RegiEr:F77", : nrntemon,,LI 1r0141444.1494,1.2.t.3.111.....-11.,1 LUMP. . . ' a4,11441:/,1,64,1110 , „ CORWILARCHTFCT.5 laM.,'..WV.F1551%1 wmuoc.A.at, z. 5 9 0 0 0 L-5 P.1.1,PAII" Lff40:41,:k; INSPE N REPORT ON CLASS V WELL (for Agency use only) THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF INSPECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, PERMITTING. EIRONEMENT AND REQTJLATORY AFFAIRS (PERA), WATER CONTRQL SECTION, Local Program/Water Management District West Brickell Tower This is to certify that I have this 13 day of December 2012, inves :,ated this approval pemiit, and recommend (a) Approval (b) Disapproval for the following reasons: X The construction of one (1) drainage well for the disposal of stormwat r runoff only and shall be tested each to a capacity of 500 GPM/ft. The wells shall be drilled to strata containing ground water with total dissolved solids greater than 10,000 mg/L and shall be cased. Pollution control structure preceding each drainage wells shall be built as per plans. Calculated holding time through this tank is 90 seconds or more. The drilling of one (1) well shall be at the sole risk of the driller if the above condition cannot be met. X This project qualifies for a No -Notice Surface Water Management Permit. 12/13/2012 Date Signature Mayra de Torres, Engineer I VanTer rotrulldnunage well I. word Iti_we.113 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Twin Towers Office Bldg., 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 DEP Form No: 62,528.90O3) Form Title: Eonatractiontclearance Permit Application for Class V Well Effective Date: DEP Application No.; (Filled in by DER) CONSTRUCTION/CLEARANCE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR CLASS V WELL (Depending on the nature of proposed injection well system, the Department may require the use of Form 62-528.900(1), F.A.C., in lieu of this form.) In compliance with Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, the undersigned water well contractor applies for a permit and approval from the Department of Environmental Protection for the installation of a Class V well on the following property owned by: West Brickell Tower, LTD. Corporation or Owners Name West Brickell Tower Facility Name 1026 SW 2m Avenue Facility Address Miami City Dade County SIC Code 2S42451,44:1447/4 801°1%1 SX)012.1.40 Storm Water and ground water from dewatering 1„../( Latitude/Longitude- Type of Discharge -2 2.5°4g)tict.V0)80°111 52,011LO. It is understood that the Department reserves the right, under the Statutes, to revoke the permit should this well at any time contaminate or otherwise affect other waters in the vicinity, or for other cause. 3313000000 Zip OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE*(circle one) William Todd Fabbri Name a Official Title City State Zip Owner Telephone No. horized Representative's* Signature Date *Attach letter of authorization. WATER WELL CONTRACTOR: Najib B Halwani President Dynamic Environemntal Drilling, Inc. Lic# 11138 Water Well Contractor's Name, Title and State License Number (printed or typed) 1825 Ponce De Leon Blvd #277 Coral Gables Fl Street City State 33139-0000 305-4 46-0737 Zip Telephone No. bill Water e11 Contractor' s Signature Date Page 1 of 4 DEP Form No: 62-528.90043) Enna Title: Constroction/Cloarance Permit: Application for Class V Well Effective 6ate: DEp Application flo: frilled in by DEP) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Type of Class V Injection Well: (Indicate number of each well type) Group Group 2 A/C Return Flow Wells Connector Wells Cooling Water Return Flow Wells, Recharge Wells Closed -looped System Group 3 Group 4 Wells Receiving Domestic Waste Laundry Waste Wells Group 6 Lake Level Control Wells Stormwater Drainage Wells 1 Other Non -hazardous Industrial or Commercial Disposal Wells (explain) Group 7 Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells Group 8 Swimming Pool Drainage Wells Other Wells (explain) 1 Temporary dewatering well to be abandoned upon completion Description and Use of Proposed Injection System: (If the proposed well is to receive stormwater, a drainageplan of the area draining to the well should be included. The drainage plan should illustrate any septic tanks, landfills, farm operations or other installations and/or landscape features which could contribute to. stormwater contamination.) Storm water from roof and site drainage and site ground water from dewatering activities see civil plan Nature and Volume of Injection Fluid: (The, Department may require an analysis, including bacteriological analysis, in accordance with Rule 62-528.635, F.A.C.) Strom water and ground Water 500 GPM/ Ft of available head Page 2 of 4 DEP Form No: 62-520.900(3) Form Title: constructi Permit Application for Class V Well Effective Date DEP Application N. (Filled in by CEP/ Proposed Pretreatment: Tank and Baffle Include a plot plan showing location of wel Well Design and Construction Details: (Complete for each well and for multi -casing configurations or unusual construction provisions. An elevation drawing of the proposed well should be included.) Proposed Total Depth: 100 feet Depth of Casing (s): 80 feet Diameter of Well: 24 inches Type of Casing: Cement: Type N/A Depth N/A Thickness N/A Water Supply Wells: PVC .375" Steel Other None When required by Rule 62-528.635, F.A.C., attach a map section showing the locations of all water supply wells within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed well. The well depths, and casing depths should be included. When required by Rule 62-528.635, F.A.C., results of bacteriological examinations of water from all water supply wells within one- half (1/2) mile and drilled to approximate depth of proposed well should be attached. Area of Review: (if required) Include the proposed radius of the area of review with justification for that radius. Provide a map showing the location of the proposed injection well or well field area for which a permit is sought and the applicable area of review. Within the area of review, the map must show the number or name, and location of all producing wells, injection wells, abandoned wells, dry holes, surface bodies of water, springs, public water systems, mines (surface and subsurface), quarries, water wells and other pertinent surface features including residences and roads. The map should also show faults, if known or suspected. Only information of public record and pertinent information known to the applicant is required to be included on this map. Attached Page 3 of 4 202 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL REPORT DOCUM ENT# A10000000598 Entity Name: WEST BRICKELL TOWER, LTD. Current Principal Place of Business: 580 VILLAGE BLVD., SUITE 360 THE BRANDYWINE CENTRE 1 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 Current Mailing Address: 580 VILLAGE BLVD., SUITE 360 THE BRANDYWINE CENTRE 1 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 FEI Number: 27-3620807 FEI Number Applied For ( Name and Address of Current Registered Agen THE RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA„ INC. 580 VILLAGE BLVD,, SUITE 360 THE BRANDYWINE CENTRE 1 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 US The above named entity submits this statement for in die State of Florida, SIGNATURE, FILED Apr 10, 2012 Secretary of State New Principal Place of Business: 477 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE SUITE 301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 New Mailing Address: 477 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE SUITE 301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 FEI Number Not Applicable ( ) Certificate of Status Desired ( ) t: Name and Address of New Registered Agent: THE RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC 477 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE SUITE 301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 US the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, 04/10/2012 Electronic Signature of Registered Agent GENERAL PARTNER INFORMATION: Document (0: Name: Address: City -St -Zip: WEST BRICKELL TOWER GP, LLC 580 VILLAGE BLVD., SUITE 3a0 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33408 Date ADDRESS CHANGES ONLY: Address: 477 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE, SUITE 301 City -St -Zip: WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that 1 am a General Partner of the limited partnership or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 620, Florida Statutes, SIGNATURE: KRISTIN M. MILLER PRES 04/10/2012 Electronic Signature of Signing General Partner Date Nair 46111— ' 1www.sunbiz.org - Department of Page 1 of 3 ' • IFL • F• •• •• •,•••••• •••••••••:::•:•: •,••• • '• • •• • • •••"„:: : . ••:•,••• .........••••:•••••••••••••••,..•:•.•• • •• ••••• ••••• .••••••••„.••••,,,,••••••:•:••••„....•....••••••..•.•,••••••••.,••••.„....•••• •••.•••,,..•••.....•.:•••••••••••:.,••,••••••••••,•,.••.„•,•••••••,...„.••...„. • : ••• Horne 101.1A111.1.WWW" Contact Us E-Filing Se es Document Searches Forms Help Previous on List Next on List Return To List No Events No Name History Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation THE RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC. Filing Information Document Number P93000082822 FEllEIN Number 061387606 Date Filed 12/03/1993 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 477 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE SUITE 301 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 US Changed 06/16/2011 Mailing Address 477 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE SUITE 301 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 US Changed 06/16/2011 Registered Agent Name & Address CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 1200 SOUTH PINE ISLAND ROAD PLANTATION FL 33324 US Name Changed: 02/20/2003 Address Changed: 02/20/2003 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title D RICHMAN, RICHARD P 340 PEMBERWICK ROAD GREENWICH CT 06831 Title EVAS SALZMAN, DAVID 340 PEMBERW1CK ROAD GREENVVICH CT 06831 Title P Entity Name Search Submit http://www.sunbiz.or scripts/cordet.exe?action-DETFIL&incLdoc_number=P930000828... 12/3/2012 www.sunbiz.org - Department of State Page 2 of 3 MILLER, KRISTIN M 340 PEMBERWICK ROAD GREENWICH CT 06830 Title EVP FABBRI, WILLIAM T 580 VILLAGE BLVD., SUITE 120 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33409 Title S DODGE, GINA K 340 PEMBERWICK ROAD GREENVVICH CT 06831 Title T COLE, DOREEN 340 PEMBERWCK ROAD GREENWICH CT 06831 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2010 01/19/2010 2011 01/24/2011 2012 03/05/2012 Document Images 03/05/2012 — ANNUAL REPORT 06/23/2911 —ADDRESS CHANGE 214/2011- ANNUAL REPORT 01/19/2010 ANNUAL REPORT 03/13/29 —ANNUAL REPORT /06/2008 LUAIL REPORT 04/03/2007 — ANNUAL REPORT 04104/2006 — ANNUAL REPORT 01/14/2005 — REINSTATEMENT 03/03/2004 ANNUAL REPORT 02/20/2003 — ANNUAL REPORT 03/12/2002 — ANNUAL REPORT 03/22/2OQ1 — ANNUAL REPORT 03/04/2000 — ANNUAL REPORT 03/12/1999 ANNUAL REPOBI .02/19/1998 —ANNUAL REPORT 03/13/19977ANNUAL REPORT 05/01/1996 —ANNUAL REPORT 001/1995 — ANNUAL REPORT [40,,,,mogYiplk (v.f.41-4MtexciEragojn ,f,j2Eatgrinqt,26yzj [4,„,,,ww,,MigwArlogtiriaQfthircarfsAttlf41 Rriort,"„" 1:424,12,,Ximimmojn-FIDEALromtataliva? Vjw gnat A nvg e, in,,,esifamag 44,1„, viewimne in } MEIgiTfAtiAtm4 4 "w2gistimimago„laiiQE ',144 [aauzialM10140CaieitgibinAtisalaiisi4 1„,,,,,„NiewArnag ,riabiELElpygmttprom:j .0AL iffle.0.0.Ale DFa i.tMattittsigg..). 9.0hzepfuti0T).$11.ras40,41 [az,kraviMAIN..10:li ?, I 0 4 Pe E E Triassakuji Note: This is not official record, See documents if question or conflict http:// .sunbiz.orgiseripts/cordet.exe?action-DETEL ing_doc_number=P 930000828... 12/3/2012 w.sunbiz.org - Department of State Page 3 of 3 Previous on List Next on List Return To List No Events No Name History Horne Contact us Document Searches E-Mling Services I Forms Help 8 Copyrioht(0 and Privacy Policies State of Ronda, Department of State Entity Name Search 1;45,11bMiL.7. http:/Jwww.sunbiz. orglscripts/cordet. exe?actionDETF1L&inqdoc_numbe P9 000082 12 /20 12 Miami -Dade County Wellfield Protection Areas old Protection Areas 10 Day 3D Day 100 Day 210 Day Average pay Maximum Day Municipalities Unincorporated M arnr•Dade Water Welts Major Roads METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA METHO July 6, 1993 Mr. Douglas S. Dunkelberger, P.E. Jammal & Associates, Inc. A Division of Professional Service Industries, Inc. 2540 Metrocentre Boulevard, Suite 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Re: SAC-0520 Ramirez 66 1245 SW 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida DER FAC ID 138841817 Dear M. Dunkelberger: • ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURES MANAGEMENT 33 S.W. 2nd AVENUE MIAMI. FLORIDA 33t30-1540 (05) 37247'88 The Tank Closure Report And Addendum submitted for the above -referenced facility have been reviewed by this Department and found to be complete. Therefore, the services of PSI/Jammal, Inc. have been completed and no additional work will be performed at the above -referenced facility unless authorized by DERM. If you have any questions concerning the above, please feel free to con (305) 372-6829. Sincerely, M. Paul Voight,' P.C. Project Supervisor State Administered Cleanup Pr Pollution Prevention Division MC: Attachment pc: Bert Conoly, FDER fax: Melanie M. Borkowski, PSI/Jammal ct ' 4 • „1§ , . 4 "*0 .1, L * NTERNATIONAL RY CORP0 PROFESS/ONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 2540 METROCENTRE BLVD. 7 0 SUITE 1 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 ATTN: JAMES W ANNEAR T MPANY ,t1.3 71.7 )11 P.2/2 INVOICE 58841 Stilling Road • Hollywood, FL 33021 Sward: MO ass.s000 Dade: (305) 947-0140. ARAMIREZ 66 11245 SW 2ND AVE!, M/AMI, FL PAGE i ZSCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED: 3MOYA1 and disposal of excessively contamin f throe (3) drums of hazardous sludge. DNTRACT NO: Removal and disposal BASE CONTRACT AMOUNT: Permit Fees (cost plus 20%) Hauling to Resource (33 Tons ' $14.50/ton) Soil Disposal (33 Tons G $35/ton) Env.Technician (Manifest) 4 hrs. 0 $50/hr. Vacuum Truck (9.5 hrs. 0 $90/hr.) Residual product dit aiaI B21 gallons .75 NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT LESS: Amount Previously Billed AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE: 771-24 ERVICE DATES: thru 01-25- DATE DESCRIPTION T1 EPFEssIoNAL_2EBYIPCg_________ 3TAL PR FESSIONAL IVO SUB -TOTAL 'IVOICE TOTAL ERVICES Acct. No. --0..;!•.t. • 0',7071 .t..totrt•z" NZ-----715671437— In - .PPROVED FOR AYMENT %.:7a115 r 504 .00 430 00' 478.50 1,155.00 200. 00 855.00 615.75 950. $28,191.25 -2150400 6,687.-23 4 BaTc MOVNI 6,687.25 - *:en, 4114.6.4.411.00 LA 60687.25 trootED AREMAPARTCFHscQM re..1344)61o1PPS • 4.' OPOLiTAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Date: Name: Company/Agency: Address: Subject: e DERM Ct'Rc MESSAGE: 3/T. Comm) TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION ENT 1310 11111 . 11t STREET L 1.00, '£RA :i31 W1971 Ti :me: : 6 p s Phone: City: e: Permit/File : State: Title: 4} TAN ©ACE COU Date: Name: ,fUeilktm Company/ Agency: Address: Subject: C.f TERM officiai. (Misc3IT. Comm) FLORIDA TELEPHONE COMMU Time: City: a METRO Oft/U. RESOURCES S11 I• MIAMI, FLOM Phone: Title:_ Permitii'iie: -State: Zip: Title : ___._OnabMAIMICIMMIMOM.YlbMINIMMOf'fl LLf'bfQf (1) KAYO 01L CO. ((2,) 17215 0 7 Ave, (3) 4? 1 , (6) {7) ('8) / () 10) / (12) 01/1'1/1111 (13) (14) TBI: 91 FY (15) w1Mibll/\7•J!<rf�f.Y;Nflflaa :�1'gY01Oq' Il*111A'11.4.1 (1) 00111N0'S AUTO SALES, INC.. (21 14831 K. Ox19 Hwy. (g' 1 r (4 a /22/1'991 (7) (/ (9) / (10) / (11) 12) 01/11./1111 13 ATRP Insp. done 14 TBI: 91 FY 15) All taroks resv.. DIRECT OIL SERVICE 1100 Al ibaba Ave. 02/28/1990 01/11/1111 : 91 l 1 (10) (12 01/11/1111 1 13 ATRP done 4/ 9;1, , 1 14 TBI: 91 FY 15 UST reamed 11/15/90 -A-CAR Ins Ave.. r 14[ 'lSOMMI .lO OMMIMuAp�fbfs'tf tafa'M**O (1) UT-17a ((S(2)) MACHO.: 138731931 (5) / (7 8 11' (12) 8 /3 r1b�ilWb>lbl0ii1@ffati,l0>bfpQy,l'pf�'iilil/W�11�1�lea.Ai�'ebb'isbb�lOFI1Y/1M{O0 (1) UNIOH 78 ((2)(3) 130 NE 167... St (5i (0 ((8' C9) (10'. (11 12) O1/1T/11 91 FY ac. was f'r Is address (1) UT-1801 (2) DERFAC40.:: 5) (9))) (I0) 7/3 (12) 9 / ®b ENVIRONIAENTAL RESOURCES MANAGE] AENT 33 S.W. Zri AVENUE MIAMI, FILOPIDA 33130-1540 (305) 372-678a April 21, 1993 Mr. Douglas S. Dunkelberger, P.E. Jammal & Associates; Inc. A Division of Professional Service Industries, Inc. 2540 Metrocentre Boulevard, Suite 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 SAC-0526 Ramirez 66 1245 SW 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida DER FAC ID 138841817 Dear Mr. Dunkelberger: The Tank Removal Report submitted for the above -referenced facility reviewed by this Department and found to be incomplete. Please submit a Tank Removal Report Addendum in letter form which items on the attached memo. All work shall be completed and submitted to this Office by May 24, If you have any questions concerning the above, please feel free to (305) 372-6829. MC: Attachment pc: Bert Conoly, FDER Melanie Borkowski, PSI/Jammal fax: James Annear, PSI/Jammal addresses the M. Paul Voight, P.G. Project Supervisor State Administered Cleanup Program Pollution Prevention Division ME °RANDOM : M. Paul Voight, Project Supe or DATE; April 21, 1 State Administered Cleanup «raxo PROM: Monica R. Castro, Hydrogeo ogist II State AdministeredAdsninistered Sleanup Program Ti SAC-0528 Review Comments for - Tank Removal Report Be advised that the following items were noted in the Tank Removal Report submitted for the following site: Ramirez 66 (SAC-0528) 1245 SW 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida DER #138841817 1) The copy of the Hazardous Waste Manifest in Appendix A was not signed by facility owner/operator. Also, the '1500" under Item 13 (total quantity) is unclear. 2) Laboratory results for TCLP waste oil sludge (RCRA) were not submitted. 3) The PSI/Jammal lab results have inconsistent units. For example, in SW846 8020 Purgeable Aromatics, mg/kg and .4/1 are used interchangeably for the same parameters. In the Total Metal Analysis, mg/kg and mg/1 are used interchangeably for the same parameters. Also, the reports do not specify which analyses were for TCLP and which were for Total Metals. 4) TRPH levels in soil stockpile exceeded incineration criteria. Therefore, the rationale for selecting incineration as a remedial method must be provided. 5) The procedure used for pling the stockpiled soils was not given. 6) No explanation is given for the laboratory results from VOC Analytical which are labeled as 'SAMPLE 06. 7) No explanation for differences in lab results from PSI/Jammal and VOC Analytical is given. For example, VOC Analytical VOAs exceed incineration criteria, while PSI/Jammal VOAs are BEL (7). MC: CAR APP-DIS SAC 0528 • • MEMORAND TO: M. Paul Voight, Project Supery or DATE: April 21, 1993 State Administered Cleanup FROM: Monica R. Castro, Hydrogeologist II SUBJECT: SAC-0528 Review Comments for State Administered leanup Program Tank Removal Report Be advised that the following items were noted in the Tank Removal Report submitted for the following site: Ramirez 66 (SAC-0528) 1245 SW 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida DER #138841817 1) The copy of the Hazardous Waste Manifest in Appendix A was not signed by facility owner/operator. Also, the '1500* under Item 13 (total quantity) is unclear. 2) Laboratory results for TCLP waste oil aludge (RCRA) were not submitted. 3) The PSI/Jammal lab results have inconsistent units. For example, in SW846 8020 Purgeable Aromatics, mg/kg and mg/1 are used interchangeably for the same parameters. In the Total Metal Analysis, mg/kg and mg/1 are used interchangeably for the same parameters. Also, the reports do not specify which analyses were for TCLP and which were for Total Metals. 4) TRPH levels in soil stockpile exceeded incineration criteria. Therefore, the rationale for selecting incineration as a remedial method must be provided. 5) The procedure used for sampling the stockpiled soils was not given. 6) No explanation is given for the laboratory results from VOC Analytical which are labeled as 'SAMPLE 06. 7) No explanation for differences in lab results from PSI/Jammal and VOC Analytical is given. For example, VOC Analytical VOAs exceed incineration criteria, while PSI/Jammal VOAs are BDL (7). MC: CAR APP-DIS/SAC 0528 lt"! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TO: SUBJECT: Gentlemen: ProfessonaI Service Industries, Inc. Jammal & Associates Division May 24, 1993 Project No. 784-34064 Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Storage Tank Section 33 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33.130-1540 c Ny D 841 Attention: Mr. M. Paul Voight Tank Closure Assessment Report Addendum, Underground Storage Tanks and Oil/Water Separator, Ramirez 66 (SAC - 0528), 1245 S.W. 2nd Avenue, Miami, Florida FDER #1388418I7. In response to your letter of April 2 , 1993, PSI/Jammal Divi- sion hereby submits this Tank Closure Assessment Report Addendum (TCARA). The following responses are referenced to the item numbers in the comment letter, Attachment 1. 1TEm I/1: A clear copy of the Hazardous Waste Manifest signed by the facility owner can be found au Attachment 2. 2: TCLP analysis of benzene and lead was not performed on the waste oil sludge and the hazardous waste determination was based on the Totals results (e.g. lead at 254 mg/kg) from VOC Analytical laboratory "Sample 06". Please see Attachment 3. DADE COUNTY, FL State - Ad inistered Cleanup Approved in.41A&4)._ Daten\ ec-c)..c_\\Qz U.)* (Nczics:Q.. s42y-N-st 2540 Met ntre , Suite West Palm 7 to Phone: 407659-3400 • Fax 407/680398 • •":.„ ""` ” 7 , ' 1 1 1 1 1 Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 784-34064 ITEM 04: rtrami i 2 -2- a. With regard to the apparent use of mg/kg and mg/L in an interchangeable fashion, this is due to differences in matrices tested. When testing a soil sample, the analytical labora- tory performs a soil to liquid matrix ex- change utilizing methanol in order to test the sample by Gas Chromotograph (GC). The results are then calculated for soil by using a formula based on the methanol's extraction properties, yielding a result in mg/kg. The analytical blanks are performed on the GC and are necessarily aqueous, yielding results that must be presented in mg/L because the matrix is not derived from a soil to liquid matrix exchange. Note that the parameters reported in mg/kg are for the soil samples tested and these reported in mg/L are for the analytical blanks. See Attachment 4 for a copy of the PSI laboratory report. h. With regard to the specification of TCLP or Total metals, the report refers only to Total metals as TCLP analysis was not performed, "Total metals" is indicated at the top of Page 2 of the Soil Stockpile PSI laboratory report (see Attachment 4). a. With regard to the TRPH levels in the %oil stockpile exceeding incineration criteria, the TRPH level reported was 252.0 mg/kg which, while exceeding the post incineration criterium for TRPH of 10 mg/kg, is lower than the pre -incineration maximum acceptable limit of 5,550 mg/kg for the incineration facility which treated the impacted soil (Resource Recovery of America, Inc.). Note that soils impacted to the pre -incineration limit must be blended prior to incineration. A copy of the post -incineration analytical report is as Attachment 5. I , V - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 784-34064 ITEM 85: rrEm 86: b. Given the above, the rationale for selecting incineration as a remedial method was that the TRPH level in the impacted soil did not exceed the pre -incineration limit for accept- ability at the incineration facility. The soil stockpile at the referenced site'was samples pursuant to Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and PSI protocol. The stockpile was divided into 12 sections using a grid pattern. Samples of the soils in each of the twelve sections were removed from the unexposed portions of the stockpile with a decontaminated stainless steel hand auger. The twelve sub -soil aliquots (of identical size) were placed in a decontam- inated stainless steel tray and thoroughly mixed with a decontaminated stainless steel spoon prior to filling'thesample contain- ers. 59i2,5hiCh_were_sampled-for AFDC: anair yses were placed into.sample-jars immIdiately after being_collected_to_prevent 1,essof volatiles. The headspace was limited in the VOC samples by tamping the soil samples with 'a glass rod. 'The laboratory resultsfrom VOC:Aalytiqal, labelled "SAMPLE 06", are fox-Ehe hazardous waste oil _slUdgg_removed from the waste oil tank, which was drummed and disposed at a permitted hazardous waste facility in Mich- igan as part of the tank closure. The dis- posal manifest can be found in Attachment 2. ITEM 7: The reason for the difference in analytical results in the VOC Analytical laboratory report and the PSI/Jammal Division laboratory report is that the sample sources are differ- ent. the sample source for the VOC Anal- ytical laboratory analysis was the waste oil sludge, while the sample source for the PSI/ Jammal Division laboratory analysis was the soil stockpile. The VOC Analytical report can be found in Attachment 3. Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 784-34064 ITEM #5: ITEM #6: 7: b. Given the above, the rationale for selecting incineration as a remedial method was that the TRPH level in the impacted soil did not exceed the pre -incineration limit for accept- ability at the incineration facility. The soil stockpile at the referenced site was samples pursuant to Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and PSI protocol. The stockpile was divided into 12 sections using a grid pattern. Samples of the soils in each of the twelve sections were removed from the unexposed portions of the stockpile with a decontaminated stainless steel hand auger. The twelve sub -soil aliquots (of identical size) were placed in a decontam- inated stainless steel tray and thoroughly mixed with a decontaminated stainless steel spoon prior to filling the sample contain- ers. Soils which were sampled for VOC anal- yses were placed into sample jars immediately after being collected to prevent loss of volatiles. The headspace was limited in the VOC samples by tamping the soil samples with a glass rod. The laboratory results from VOC Analytical, labelled "SAMPLE 06, are for the hazardous waste oil sludge removed from the waste oil tank, which was drummed and disposed at a permitted hazardous waste facility in Mich- igan as part of the tank closure. The dis- posal manifest can be found in Attachment 2. The reason for the difference in analytical results in the VOC Analytical laboratory report and the PSI/Jammal Division laboratory report is that the sample sources are differ- ent. The sample source for the VOC Anal- ytical laboratory analysis was the waste oil sludge, while the sample source for the PSI/ Jammal Division laboratory analysis was the soil stockpile. The VOC Analytical report can be found in Attachment 3. Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 784-34064 -4- Should any amplification or clarification of the report contents be required, please call the undersigned. Very truly yours. PSI/JAMMAL 'DIVISION James W. Annear Project iydrogeologist JWA/MMB : d l s 2654W Melanie M. Borkowski Department Manager - Environmental Management Group Attachments: 1. Metro Dade County DERM Coarwment Memorandum. 2. Hazardous Waste Manifest 3. VOC Analytical Report 4. PSI Laboratory Report "Soil Stockpile" 5. Post -Incineration Analytical Report e t• *f. HEMOR A NDUH 1 rrif 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TO: M. Paul Voight. Project Supery sor DATE: April 21, 1993 State Administered Cleanup am FROM: Monica R. Castro, Hydrogeologist II SDBJECT, SAC-0528 Review Comments for State Administered oanup Program Tank Removal Report Be advised that the following items were noted in the Tank Removal Report submitted for the following site: Ramirez 66 (SAC-0528) 1245 SW 2nd Avenue Miama, Florida DER NI38841817 1) The copy of the Hazardous Waste Manifest in Appendix A was not signed by facility owner/operator. Also, the '1500" under Item 13 (total quantity) is unclear. 2) Laboratory results for TCLP waste oil sludge (RCRA) were not submitted. 3) The PSI/Jammal lab results have inconsistent units. For example, in SW846 8020 Purgeable Aromatics, mg/kg and mg/1 are used interchangeably for the same parameters. In the Total Metal Analysis, mg/kg and mg/1 are used interchangeably for the same parameters. Also, the reports do not specify which analyses were for TCLP and which were for Total Metals, 4) TRPH levels in soil stockpile exceeded incineration criteria. Therefore, the rationale for selecting incineration as a remedial method must be provided. The procedure used for sampling the stockpiled soils was not given. 6) No explanation is given for the laboratory results om VOC Analytical which are labeled as 'SAMPLE 06. ) No explanation for differences in lab results from PSI/Jammal and VOC Analytical is given. For example, VOC Analytical VOAs exceed incineration criteria, while PSI/Jammal VOAs are BDL i?). MC: CAR APP-DIS/SAC 0S28 .* , • ." • -• * 3 w DNilt# ImICHIGAN DEPArITMENT OF NATUTIAL nssouncEs foal 01 1y04 UNIFOMVIFIAZAVIDOUS 1,11noof dire 3 US trA liT WASTE MANIFEST i 119_17hIPIri I/ 1,0I1-1 Y1013 G0,101610, 6 f 191119 *711171PTIOTiir Adc11-02,5, A !J. " ?" C. i • Z (,. ( /Z •'- .5 Iti z• d Gono.a1o, s Mono _5 • g—nrin,p0,1., ce iiii7-1.3potiof 2 Compaoirriaine ) , —6 IrgTITA in rkinbr, ,c rii1?).10 or_151/1/1 $ PA 10 iiurobor / IC (-ex 1/Y715? c?' sTi) 71? 1' 9 Deslynolea-Tectriije home fold Sire Krielross 10 US PA IT) Iiirnbw P,) /)Ier r 5 7r, 1/1. ; r".1 r ,( , :JO tri 2 y tr, upncolocop, 4010.0thog probe, StrIpproo finrrr(', 11.3741ei C1,135, arta 1114. JO /If/WED) r; //. %/e ‘,1 , • / 0 , f f -t"..• • / / its Adtllllonnt 0escdp0ons to; Malorlots LIsled Above 4,/ .7 17;42fil of ?eV pf--7)CTili 1iliritUI110 1,1611itc1i00s noll-Aerribonal Inforrodono t 7Y /' ,, re • e; r • .e F y iS'00 .-: V.,1 (.1 ' . ... c 1 . ,,* ** r 1.-1' V PI 1 ? i Y , 16 OESIEF1A1 11511S CE1I1iricA11014I Ivso•tor rl,c13.4 KM Ile coolools ol ells nvi•sloorocrd are toll, 4.61 acct./v.1R+) doscilt.0 aboyo by ompr, $1,1144110 were Anil ?no ri*4.$111.01, raticid matkro and Nboicd, arwl 0,0 k, W1,640401. 41 Nape, Cc6,1,114,44 for 1,64,411 try htot.wny r. to,,,p,a lc, eppi•ex•pc r,,.tfloab0.141 and halicnot Qt0pir61,6•11 of C;11IirmIS DO HOT WI1ITE Itl II415 SPACE A3 T. LJ UIS t nEJ. 1J Pri 104.0.944 urK14.• ,or sok .1 1-4 PA, 1973 64 A/ti.rtblIlucil AO 129 PA 1992 4Ih*,4 to 1411 tlryt.i.itotiit toclkm 791540 1.4C4 11161 ,1•41 t0 P a• /914 sfl001011 Na 2010 9 EA op 1 ;t oirirnisert3u sIUr1 lt 4. oe f ll l 01,e!:;i $ iaii of I vo A, SIfile Mearliosi Doo urnbo MI ? 4 8 0 8-9 State OFnefelmee ID — Sloth TranspolIara ID Trtinsporfers Phone E. Slats Tranaporler's F Transpodera Slain Facility's ID - IT Tvvi; 1 3 Polol 1)00 No Ous Moly -nArVor _ ilflI • • .4 I j I K, Ilandling Codas far Weilo3 1113kori Above 11 1 dot 11 tow, ouco,idy 00ml...ow 1 criety ttevepi pi/mem 4,111044a tn 1 ductII 1110111110 9111110*IcIlly 01 P*4$19 911Prtlaled 10 II1111 ile199P 1 Ion 11.11tai r�'li 11I1l 11 scbvs We nod 11101 I have eller procIscabloronIloti ot 1111•111,nopl 4Iu10ge or (looms! corrooily evadable 10 in islemb1111.11014/11‘ et...110.1M tittall h,34111111 410 Ole cl,tpr110lI. cm. di 1 fa,, a 01,11 ourrAirry timers inI 1 love made0 0004111011. alloit 44,1141k 6444 eleri Ihr tins' wa5in 011n010onanl mn114rti 11111 Ii firrtOrnilie In fl eatil Utak 1 cao pfloid Y.,. rg I nt Old rYPOri 1'14 rin ,! 17 lr !importer 1 Acknovdothjornen1 of flomp1 n fdeterisla . Printed/ Typo Insole /V' 5 -SIgno15ui 1 ---,- ," f•- -I .- Trinsporie, 2 Acknowtedgoroant or 110ao3pt of Motailols _ . Af-1,474M-il I S Pr intorf/lyp Sufwolorro ncy In is 11ori Spelt.* Oro 70 soltly Qw,lec ay Oyer/Um.' C0l$11,c0.l1cm ol rorolo lJ. Ilnivorilotte flielearde toyer y tl by 111s ni,rwiTes1 0*Ce01 ;In oin1ril uui hem 19 pylt I-I'll...11700 72 (1I'v tugnaillors I /_,?1,-ee/ tr Moor*, 4.16y Yoe* r.11Ptc.Vir' ell /41,,,,,h bar WA/ r • •• . el.C1 .11 A 0 11 R OUALII T # 4 CZ.Z F PO D0x V9RT PT, LA SAMPLE ©ESCRIPTZQ; Param¢t.gr C [i N STATION FZ 33316 BERRY INC. 0BERO1tBZ INC. R21 XZ66 5 SN 2ND AVE,HIAMI V A L I T Y A 9 $ U' R A rJ C t gA 8021 iri rail roc odiohIorbm thmnw_ BDL Brem©form Dromomethe►ne Dig, Carbon Tetraohioride 90L Chlaroatharse BDL Cis-1, 2-Di©hlarcaoth r ea DDL Chloroform DDL Chlcrcmatharlo BAD Dibxemoctiloremitha BDL 1,2-rlic:hlornhAinmAna tint. 1,3-D4chloro enne HAL 1,4-Dioh1or©besnzcoa BDL . Dichlororlu0romotha a BTJL chlerobonaane DDL Vinyl Chloride BDL 1, 1 Dichl oroattano BDL 1..2 Dichlorc t1 nc DDL 2., 2-tlichloreethc s MID °Trnr..:-1, 2-DLch1oroSDI, ',2-Dich1oroprapant n0L Csa,-1,3-Dich2oropr#pene BIZ Tronc-1, 3. Diahloropcopen ED'L Mcthylane Chloride • F117L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro than DAL TetrrIchtvroet1 ona 1 BIM 1,1 , 1-Triob1or©ethana BDI, 1,1, 2-.Triobloronthhrahe BDL Trichloroathona 'BDL Tr ich l ar0F l.uarmath n0 ELL 'Tanzania 68.0 Tcs°ruena r 790 t TBE 8DL Ethyl Den ma 294 Total Xylenoa 1500 750144,0e omits Ma he mg/kg 5030/803 ?a¢{kg 5030/602 Tag/kg 603O/802 mg/kg 5030/802 i /kq 5030/802 tag/kg 5030/8021 12.5 TA9/kg 5030/9O21 12.5 mg/kg 6030/8021 12.5 mg/kg 5030/8021 12.5 lag/kg 5O30/0021 12.3 mg/kg 5030/8021 12.5 gag/kg 5030/8021 12.S rig/kg 5030/8021 22.5 mg/kg 503O/5021 1.2.5 mg/kg 5020/$021 22.5 lag/kg 5030/8021 12.5 mar/kg 5O3O/8021 12.5 fig/kg 5130/8021 12.5 mq/kg 5030/002/ 12.5 tag/kg 5030/0022 22.S mg/kg 593O/8021 13.5 rig/kg 5O30/8021 12.5 rag/kg 8030/8021 12.5 i q/kg 6030/0021 12.5 mg/kg 503O/8021 12.5 mg/kg 5020/8021 12.5 lag/kg 5030/8021 12.5 g/k9 $030/8021 12.5 mg/kg 5030/0023. i2.5 mg/kg 5030/e021 12.5 mg/kg 6030/8021 12.s mg/kg 5630/0021 12.5 tag/kg 5030/8021 12.5 mg/kg 5030/8032. 12.6 191g/kg 5030/0021 12.5 LABEL: DATE SAMPLED: 3.1,E17 DATE RECEIVED: 3„2/02 COLLECTED BY: CLIENT -O7.1992 4-1 6 1ri1t Data T1 t1w alyst 12/02/92 12/03/ r2 6P 22.5 12.5 22/0202/92 129 12/02/92 CP 23.5 1.3 /02/92 12/03/92 GI' 12.5 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 12/02/92 22/03/92 GP 22/02/"92 12/03/92 GP 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 12/02/92 12/03/92 ,p 22/02/92 12/03/92 ' 22/02/92 12/03/92 Lfi' 12/02/92 12/03/92 fp 12/02/92 22/03/92 GIP 12/02/92 22/03/92 GP 22/02/92 1.2/03/92 'GP 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 22/02/92 32/03/92 GI' 12/02/92 22/O3/92 GP. 22/02/92 12/03/92 CP 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 32/02/92 12/03/5- GP 12/02/92 12/03/92 0p 12/Oa/s2 12/O3/92 CP 12/02/92 12/OA/92 GP' 12/02/92 12/O302 CP 12/02/D2 12/03/92 CP 12/02/93 12/O3/92 CP 12/02/92 12/03/92 6P 12/02/83 12/03/02 CL' 12/02/92 12/03/92 cp 12/O2/92 2.2/03/93 GP 12/02/02 22/03/02 cP e IICLIENT 0 4 ADDRESS: CLIPF BERRY INC. P4 BOX 13079 FORT EV72SLAD T TION FT. LAUDEP TALE, E"L 33316 SAm E DESCRIPTI©Ns CI,IF ' BAY INC. e NC. E 66 24 r 2ND AVE,KIRMI Paramctcr liDiluti n E"actor Total HaIogcns TR£'H Silver Arsenic Barium 11 Cadmium 111 Chromium Morrury Lead SnleniuM t 1 1 t 1 e * BDL .0 Below Dot All analyses were QAP 1 907-0376C HAS # r 62.40, 96356, SUB i1R9# 86122, 66149, ADM ID 4 40720 Result 10 D 745` 100.0 BDL BDL 3.8 BDL 2.4 B➢I. -254,0 BDL n Limits rmsd using 48 PACE: DATE: ..2-07-1992 LOG #: 3554-1 LABEL: SALE 05 DATE SAMPLED: 11 / 3.7,/; 2 A DATE RECEIVED: 12/02/92 COLLECTED EY;cLIE T Dctcctiran Extr. Anal.. Units Method Limit Date Date Analyst mg/kg 5030/8021 mg/kg 5050/9252 3.2 mg/kg 9073 2.7 mg/kg 3050/7760 1.0 mg/kg 3090/7061 1.0 mg/kg 3050/7080 1.0 mg/kg 3090/7130 1.0 mg/kg 3050/7190 1.0 mil/kg 3050/7471 0.1 mg/kg 3050/7420 1.0 fig/kg 3050/7741 1.0 12/02/92 12/03/92 GP 12/04/92 12/04/92 3V 12/02/92 12/03/92 v7V 12/02/92 12/03/92 Zit 12/02/92 12/03/92 JK 12/02/92 12/03/92 ..%TX 12/02/92 12/03/92 JK 12/02/92 12/03/92 ,TIC 12/02/92 1.2/03/92 3E 12/02/92 12/03/92 7K 12/02/92 12/03/92 JK D FOR; PSI, .Inc. Ge0t.echn1cal/Envlronemental Department 254.0 Metr6Centre Blvd - Suite 1 'Nest Palm Beach, FL 33407 951 REPORT 806-305-23836-0017-0 ATT'N: James Annear DATE8 December 2, 19,12. AA..MAAMMt Mt AAt.MMix MAMMMAAMA4 PRO.7ECT,. R'amiroz 66, 771-24028 DATE RECEIVED. November 24, 1992 SAMPLE MATRIX. Soil, Composite MF-TMODOLOGY EMPLOYED.. SW846 0020 and EPA 41.8,1 11009-01 5'011 Stockpile, '1500 Results Begin on Page Two ebbraro, DeparE'muent Manager' R.espeet0ully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 'EMS 842.18 SW046 8020 PURGEABLE AROMATICS RESULTS PP. Im7/1.g) Benzene BDI. 0.33 Toluene BDL 0.33 Ethylbenzene BDL 0.33. 7fy Ienes BD1. 0.33 Total VOA'S BDL 0.39 MTBE BDi. 0,33 Dilution Factor x1. Received: Analyzed. Sample ID P66 Lab e COMPOUND NAME Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Mylenes Total VOA'S MTBE 11/24/92 12/01/92/TB Analytical NA. Blank Matrix 1201. Spike RESU'LT5 DN. BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL Dilution Factor xi BDL - Belo. DOttrctie. STANDARD' DET'ECTION t RECOVERY LIMITS pPm (mg/1) 98 1.,.0 97 1.0 97 1.0 17 1.0 1..0 100 1.0 Received. NA NA. Analyzed. 12/01/92/78 12/01/92/TB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o 1 TED FOR: PSI, Inc. Geotechnical/Envronemental Department 2540 Metrocentre Blvd. Suite 1 West Palm Beach, FL. 33407 ATTN: James Annear ************** PROJECT: DATE RECEIVED: SAMPLE MATRIX: METHODOLOGY EMPLOYED: 11089-01 ndus PSI RE 06_385-23836--0017 DATE: December 2, Ramirez 66, 'T1-24028 November 24, 1992. Soil, Composite SW846 8020 and EPA 418.1 CLIE 1992 Soil Stockpile, 1500, 11/23/92 Results Begin on Page Two At Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FDHRS 84218 bbr arc Department Manager" INDU'ST"RIES, INC. 8 14 /Z-2- DATE e 1 e PSI/West Palm Beach 06-385-23.836-n )17-0 Page 2 of 3 SW846 8020 PDRD LB AR gATICS Sample ID 11 PSI Lab # e 1 1 e t 0 e s 1 t STANDARD DETECTION LIMITS Pam' (mg/kg) 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 STANDARD' DETECTION LIMITS PM frog/1) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Soil Stockpile 11089-01 RESULTS PPm Ifkg) BDL BDL BDL BDL EDL BDL xi 11/24/92 12/01/92/TB Analytical NA Blank Matrix 1201 Spike RESULTS PPm (mg/1 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL COMPOUND NAME Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Total VOA'S MTBE Dilution Factor BDL Below Detection Limits Received: Analyzed: Satnpi e ID PSI Lab # COMPOUND NAME Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Total VOA'S MTBE Dilution. Factor DL - Below Detection Limits Received: Analyzed: xi RECOVERY 98 97 97 97 100 NA NA 12,/0'1/92/TB 12/01/92/TB PSI/West Palm Se, 06.-38S-2.38 36-001 Page 3 of 3 Soil Stockpile 1.1.089-01 Analytical Blank 111.25 Secel^1 Est trac Ana/ye Vote `32L° a Below Detection Limit.. ,istribution of Report: NA. 11/25/92/KT 11/30/92/KT • • • • • -,, • 1 PSI/West Palm Beach 06-385-23836-0017-0 Page 3 of 3 TOTAL RECOVERABLE PETEOLEU11 HYDR' NS, EPA 418.1 Sample ID IPSI Lab # 1 1 1 1 Soil Stockpile 11089-01 COMPOUND NAME TRPH RESULTS ppm (mg/kg) 252.0 Received: Extracted: Analyzed: 11/24/92 11/25/92/KT 11/30/92/KT Sample ID PSI Lab # Analytical Blank 11.25 NA Quality Control D NAME TRPH RESULTS ppm (mg/kg) <10.0 t RECOVERY 112 Received: Extracted: Analyzed: NA 11/25/92/KT 11/30/92/KT NA 11/25/92/KT 11/30/92/KT • RA' .7 • 0 FGtq, L' r !l4i�1�r D,a�te ietribution of Reports Date of Rc its 11/30j92 C•of•C Data Cer ect d: / 3/9'3 t; sOD Collected Bys C9 Date Received, 21/21/92 114 30 Certification Nos f94254 FL -DER COO+pQAPz 9003543 Respectful Center Tor Reviewed Donald Leborator amine►+ e v 1 TESTED 1 io FOR: PSI, Inc.. Geotechnical/Environementa1 Department 2540 Metrocentre Blvd, Suite 1 West Palm Beach, FL 33407 ATTN: James Annear * * * * * * * * * *.* * *. * * * *. * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * PROJECT: DATE RECEIVED: SAMPLE MATRIX: LOGY EMPLOYED: PSI LAB 0 110'89-01 inc. PSI REPORT #06-385-23836-0017-I ***************** Ramirez 66, 771-24028 November 24, 1992 Soil, Composite SW846 3050/206.3, SW846 70 SW846 7190, SW846 7420, SW SW846 3050/270.3 and SW846 Antho Febbraro, December 2, 1992 0, SW846 7130, 46 7471, 7760 CLIENT PQL� _ID Soil Stockpile, 1500, 11/23/92 Results Begin on Page Two Department Manager Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.. FDHRS 84218 6056 thmertr,rt 9 taod Pto o:813/531,1448 /2 DATE g PSI/West Palm Beach 06-385-23836-0017-1 Page 2 of 4 Arsenic, mg/kg SW846 3050/206.3 Barium, mg/kg SW846 7080 Cadmium, mg/kg SW846 7130 Chromium, mg/kg SW846 7190 Lead, mg/kg SW846 7420 Mercury, mg/kg SW846 7471 Selenium, mg/kg SW846 3050/270.3 Silver, mg/kg SW846 7760 DATE ANALYZED/ ANALYST 12/01/92/CM 12/02/92/CM 12/02/92/GV 12/02/92/DP 12/01/92/CM 11/30/92/CM 12/01/92/CM 12/01/92/GV IPSX/West Palm Beach 06-385-23836-0017-1 Page 3 of 1 1 Sample ID IIPSI Lab PARAMETER IArsenic SW846 3050 Barium ISW846 7080 Cadmium SW846 7130 Chromium SW846 7190 Lead ISW846 7420 Selenium SW846 3050/270.3 Silver SW846 7760 Date Received: 12/01/92/CM 12/02/92/CM 12/02/92/GV 12/02/92/DP 12/01/92/CM 12/01/92/CM 12/01/92/GV IPSI/West Paid Beach 06 385-23836-001.7-1 A 1 e 1 t Page 4 of 4 PARAMETER Arsenic SW846 3050/206.3 Barium SW846 7080 Cadmium SW846 7130 Chromium SW846 7190 Lead SW846 7420 Mercury SW846 7471 Selenium SW846 3050/270.3 Silver SW846 7760 111 Date Received: i t e Matrix Blank DATE MPLE RESULTS ANALYZED/ ID (mg/1) ANALYST 1127 1127 1127 1127 1127 1127 1127 1201 <0.005 <0',100 <0.050 <0.020 <0.500 <0.001 <0.005 <0.050 12/01/'92/CM 12/02/92/CM 12/02/92/GV 12/02/92/DP 12/01/92/CM 11/30/92/CM 12/01/92/C4 12/01/9'2/GV CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD CM ME UM gin 2E2 MB 1193 PECT RC3,lNAME � E T TO INV' ICETQ LABORATORY (713) 6056 (813) rruie431en111.'7erYiceIn©U5U7ee,.Inc. SUSIAITTED TO: C) 4820 YV. iSth Street TX 77536 L$v erjce. KS 66049 -7901 Road L7 65© Poplar Street FL 34620 Pittsburgh, PA 15220 (412) 922 4€H%i itwy.225 Deer Park, 479-8307 Ulrnedon Clearwater, 531.1448 PROJECT NUMRER 77/.— tVo 40a PRLI.lECT ILtANA% _rt ADDRESS P.O. NUMBER ADDRESS r (l+t X �0 CITY / STATE a2tP a AEOUrnED DUE DATE ��i'� �il � CITY! ST iE 7 •€ 1'r ATTENTICSN 5AM ES TO VIA TELEP TELEPHONE NUA7DER COOLER$ REPURT VIA VERBAL Fn4 OVERNI ,. ti.• HY r v t A@QRATT?LtSB bNtEV t " .. -. � A--T TRAt t NUMBER REUNQUISIfED 23-' CATE' TIME ACCEPTED BY 1 1 •.L y'"1 DATE! TIME 5_ SEAL NUMBER • ^s:. LAABCr to CtliS11 DNi.Y sREP0RT DUe DAT ' ' L ' r '_ ,r r � re PSC-ACUE PARAMETER LIST Pt80fTAT€1RY USE DNLY >g �FE UB _ DATEITtIAE` SAA1I IDENTIPtCATt0N �q '" 7t4PC DATE i TtFAE sr-8 A Y11Sit e% Yi� tfllS�. ✓f ADDrn0NAL RE MKS SAMPLERS SIG NATU'R - `' 806 W. Beicon Road • Lakeland, Fiords 33803 Resource Recovery of America 2300 State Road 60 West Mulberry, Florida 33860 POSTBURN ANALYSIS CHAPTER 17-775 SAMPLE ID:4595K TOTAL VOA (5030/8020) TRPH (9073) TOTAL METALS Arsenic (3050/7060) Barium (3050/7080) II Cadmium (3050/7131) Chromium (3050/7191) Lead (3050/7421) IIIMercury (3050/7471) Selenium (3050/7740) Silver (3050/7760) 5.44 mg/kg 22.23 mg/kg 0.09 mg/kg 4.62 mg/kg 4.91 mg/kg <0.01 mg/kg 1.24 mg/kg 2.84 mg/kg Ramirez 66 1245 S.W. 2nd Avenue Miami, FL Sampled By: SH Sample Date: 12-28-92 Date Received: 12-29-92 Analysis Date: 12-29-92 Analyzed By: CJF/JMC r VIRONMENTNJ. RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AGEMENT 111 N.H. 1ST AVENUE MW4I, FLORIDA 33128-1971. Jammal & Associates, Inc. A Division of Professional Service Industries, Inc. DADE'..COUNTY, FL State Administered Cie aRt4aucOon Quality Control Services Geatecirnicai Engineering Rvaf En 1 ring Services 8 8 xi TO: SUBJECT: Professional Service Indushiess inc. Jammal & Associates Division March 25, 1993 Project No. 771-24028 Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Storage Tank Section 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 1310 Miami, Florida 33128-1971 Attention: Mr. M. Paul Voight Tank Closure Assessment, Underground Storage Tanks and Oil/Water Separator, Ramirez 66, 1245 S.W. 2nd Avenue, Miami, Florida. Gentlemen: PSI/Jammal Division hereby submits the Tank Closure Assessment Report (TCAR) for the underground fuel storage tank located a Southboro Elementary School in West Palm Beach, Florida. e Tank Closure activities were completed on November 24, 1992 and finalized in terms of contamination material disposal on Feb- ruary 5, 1992. Following is a summary of the activities of that date. • Six (6) underground storage tanks, which previously contained diesel fuel, gasoline, and waste oil, and associated piping were exhumed from a location on the south side of the referenced site. The soils from within the open tank pit were system- atically sampled and field screened using an organic vapor analyzer. 32.9 tons of soil from within the tank pit was found to be impacted by hydrocarbons and was removed from the site for incineration. 2540 Moth Suit West Palm 7 • Fat 407 111 Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 771-2402B The pit was backfilled with clean import fill. -2- An oil/water separator and its appurtenances were aban- doned in place at a location on the north side of the property. The closure assessment activities are discussed in detail within the attached Tank Closure Assessment Report. We trust that the information provided therein is clear and understandable. How- ever, should any clarification or amplification of the report contents be required, please call James Annear. Very truly yours, PSI/JAMMAL DIVISION X7 James W. Annear Project HydrogeologiSt JWARIMB:dls 2531W A ta hments 1 Melanie M. Borkowski Department Manager - Environmental Management Group 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 TANK CLOSURE 2.1 PRODUCT REMOVAL 2.2 TANK CLOSURE DESCRIPTION 2.3 SOIL SCREENING 2.4 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 3.0 DISPOSAL OF SOIL & WASTE OIL SLUDGE 4.0 SITE COMPLETION 5.0 CON'CLUSIONS 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS SITE MAP TABULATED OVA NET VOC READINGS MANIFESTS PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION LABORATORY REPORTS CLOSURE ASSESSMENT FORM PAGZ 1 1 1 2 4 4 4 5 5 SHEET 1 SHEET 2 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 771-24028 1.0 IN ' UCTIO This report addresses the Tank Closure Assessment at the Ramirez 66 Located at 1245 S.W. 2nd Avenue in Miami, Florida. The tank closure was conducted by PSI/Jammal Division from November 16 to November 24, 1992. Sheet 1 shows the site layout. 2 , 0 TANK___CIOSIME 2,1 PrQOct._Removal. On November 17, 1992, Cliff Ferry, Inc. of Fort Lauderriale, Florida removed 821 gallons of product/water mix from the on- site oil/water separator and from five existing on -site USTs, and 2drums of waste oil from one existing USt at the subject site'. The oil/water separator and appurtenances were further cleaned with a pressure washer. The pressure wash effluent was removed by the Cliff Berry vacuum truck. 2.2 Tank Closure Description During the week of November 16, 1992, Cherokee Groundwater Con- sultants, Inc. (Cherokee), of Hollywood, Florida, under contract to PSI, removed one (1) approximately 1,000-gallon underground storage tank which had contained waste oil, one approximately 1,000 gallon USTs which had contained kerosene, two approxima- tely 2,000 gallon and two approximately 4,000 gallon USTs which had all contained gasoline. Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 771-24028 The tanks were degassed prior to excavation using dry ice. Approximately 32.9 tons of soil from above and around the tanks were removed by Cherokee, stockpiled on visquene and transported to the Resource Recovery of America's incineration facility in. the nature of Mulberry, Florida (manifests are attached in Ap- pendix A) once hydrocarbon impact had been determined by labora- tory analysis. Photographs documenting the condition of the tanks after excavation and of the open tank pit are contained in Appendix S. As seen in the photographs, the tank appeared to be intact and to suffer no damage prior to the excavation and re- moval (except the waste oil tank which was opened in situ for removal of the waste oil sludge material). No liquid phase hydrocarbons were observed to have discharged from the tanks and. none were cbserved in the bottom of the tank pit after removal. Groundwater was not encountered at the base of the excavation (the base of the tank vault was about 7 1/2 feet below land surface). The product lines, which were connected to the dispensers, were excavated along with the tanks during the week of November 16, 1992. The lines were excavated to their terminus at the dis- pensers which were dismantled and removed. Please refer to Sheet 1, Site Map, for the location of the tanks and dispenser islands. L L_ CXee2iI g During the excavation of the tank an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) was used to scan the soil for hydrocarbon vapors, and all. soils were examined for the appearance and odor of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. Soil samples were collected from two (2) locations above each tank, two (2) locations below each tank. and one location from the lower 1/3 of each side wall within the excavation and from areas of apparent soil staining. 1 1 1 1 1 Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 771-24028 -3- The samples were field analyzed for volatile organic compound (VOC) content. This was accomplished using a flame ionization organic vapor analyzer (OVA) meter following standard procedures as outlined in Chapter 17-770.200(2) of the Florida Administra- tive Code (FAC). A Century OVA, manufactured by Foxboro, was used for field head space analysis. VOC readings for the sam- - pies were obtained from the OVA with a flame ionization detector (FID) in survey mode. The samples were placed in 16-ounce Mason jars leaving a minimum of 3 inches of head space for vapor col- lection. The jars were sealed and permitted to incubate for 5 minutes at a temperature between 15 and 32 degrees centigrade to allow possible volatile organic chemical vapors to collect in the head space. Following the incubation period, the FID probe was inserted through a sampling port in the lid of the jar to permit recording of the VOC reading. Initial readings were taken with an activated charcoal filter attachment which, ac- cording to the manufacturer, filters out organic vapors other than methane or ethane. A second set of readings, representing the total organic vapors, was taken without the charcoal filter assembly. The difference between the two (2) sets of readings represents a vapor analysis which excludes methane or ethane (which may be naturally present in the soils) and therefore yields a net VOC representative of foreign organic vapor such as petroleum hydrocarbons. According to the manufacturer, the instrument sensitivity is 1 ppm (part[s] per million) for this type of application. Maximum net VOC readings of greater than 1,000 parts per million (ppm) were indicated in samples from within the tank excava- tion. The OVA data for all samples collected from the tank excavation, and along the product line trench are tabulated on Sheet 2. FDER regulations state that, when dealing with diesel contaminated soil (note that one approximately 1,000 gallon tank previously contained kerosene), "excessively contaminated soils" are defined as having net VOC reading greater than 50 ppm, "con- taminated soils" as any reading greater than 10 ppm and "clean soils" as any reading less than 10 ppm. Please refer to Sheet 2 for tabulated OVA net VOC readings. a. rif‘2,11 , . Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 771-24028 2.4 Groundwater Sampling -4- No groundwater sample was collected from the site pursuant to the instructions of Mr. M. Paul Voight of the Metropolitan Dade. County Department of Environmental Resources Management. Site inspection reports completed by DERM personnel while the site was in operation indicate a strong petroleum odor in all of five existing monitor wells on site. Note that at least one monitor well, MW-4, was destroyed during the tank re oval activities. 3.0 IS AL OF SOIL & WASTE OIL SLUDGg Excavated soils exhibiting net VOC readings of greater than 10 ppm were stockpiled on bermed visquene on the southeastern por- tion of the site. A composite sample was collected from the soil stockpile and analyzed for pre -burn criteria which include total metals (7 RCRA), EPA Methods 8020, 418.1 and 9076. The soil was found to be acceptable for incineration and was trans- ported by Soil Tech, Inc. on December 22, 1992 to Resource Re- covery of America (RROA) in Mulberry, Florida where it was in- cinerated on December 31, 1992. Three drums of waste oil were analyzed and found to be hazardous based on above standard lead levels (5 m9_&_TCL?) and above standard benzene levels (0.5 mg?LTCLP). The drums were trans- ported on February 2, 19931bir CCM Berry, Inc. and Chemical Conservation Corporation to Chem -Met Services in Wyandotte, Michigan where it was received for final disposal on February 5, 1993. Manifests are contained in Appendix A. 4.0 SITE CQ15PIXQJ The oil/water separator and appurtenances (i.e. floor drains and associated piping) were abandoned with a neat cement grout. The tank pit excavation was backfilled with a clean import fill to 6 inches below grade and a concrete slab was poured over the en- tire backfilled area. .17 1 , • Metropolitan Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management Project No. 771-24028 5.0 CONCLUSIONS -5- The soils within the excavation were impacted by petroleum hy- drocarbons according to the results of the field screening meth- odology and laboratory analysis. All soils impacted to above 10 ppm net VOC per the OVA analysis were removed from the excava- tion and disposed at an incineration facility. According to historic DERM data reports, the groundwater at the site is like- ly impacted by dissolved hydrocarbons. RE At the discretion of the State Administered Cleanup Program director and DERN an initial chemical characterization of the groundwater in the existing monitor wells at the site should be pursued. However, the tank closure has sufficiently addressed the known sources of possible contamination. 2531W 4 1 , 4- MONITOR WELL Q UST FILL PORT SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION lif)/Il TANK A 1000 GALLON CONTAINING WASTE OIL TANK B — 1000 GALLON CONTAINING KEROSENE TANK C 4000 GALLON CONTAINING GASOLINE TANK 0 — 2000.GALLON CONTAINING GASOLINE TANK E 2000 GALLON CONTAINING GASOLINE TANK F — 4000 GALLON CONTAINING GASOLINE SITE MAP =TAi4'iZ4A7ION ASZESSI4Dii RAMIREZ 66 1!43 S.V. MO AVD4X H1M4 M. F1.ZRIZIA IDES FAG ID M3. 138641017 �1a61141ba1 Associates, Inc. A Divi$ On of pralesslonaI Serv'ce Undaslnes. Inc Nor' Kirnley-Horn IIIIII and Associates, Inc. Transmittal' Date: August 2, 2013 Project Name: Broadstone Brickell Lofts 5200 NW 33'4 Avenue Suitt 109 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 TEL 954-535-5100 DERM UTIQN REMED1ATI SECTION Job Number: 043531000 To: Gabriel Garcia Miami -Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources Department Overtown Transit V 'Ilse North 701 NW 1t Court, 4'1Floor Miami, FL 33136 U.S. Mail El Other We are sending you 10.11 El FedEx (Priority LE] Hand Delivery Overnight) Attached Shop drawings Other Cop/es Date 0 Under separate cover via the following items: Prints/Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Change Orders No. I)escriviion 8/2/13 1 Check 41405. S441.00 payable to Miami Dade County for Pollution Remediation Section Review 2 8/2/13 2 Signed/Sealed Drainage Plans 2 8/2/13 3 Environmental Report 2 8/2/13 4 Drainage Report These are transmitted as checked below: O For your use 0 Approved as submitted 0 As requested 0 Approved as noted O For review and comment 0 Returned for corrections Copy to: Resubmit Submit Return o Copies for approval E3 Copies for distribution El Corrected points Signed: Julia Focaracci TECHNICAL REPORT 1 GEOLOGICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,IN July 9, 2012 Mr. Richard Buck Morgan Group, Inc. 4553 S.W. Hammock Creek Drive Palm City, Florida 34990 AUG 0 2 2013 DERM UTION REMEDIATION SECTION TECHNICAL REPORT (../7-5-vs /F-- 70/ 3 RE: CRB Project No. IvIGI 1111-02; Summary of Phase 11 ESA Activities for the Apartment Properties, located at S.W. 2'd Avenue and S.W, 12th Street, in Miami, Florida Dear Mr. Buck: CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc. (CRB) is pleased to provide you with this summary of Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) activities at the above referenced properties (Site). This Phase II ESA was conducted to assess the moderate -risk Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) identified in the Phase I ESA prepared by CRB and dated June 8, 2012. These moderate -risk RECs included the on -site drainage structures, existing monitoring wells, and a neighboring property of environmental concern. On -site electrical equipment was identified as a low -risk REC. However, due to the low risk of environmental impairment presented by this REC, it was not assessed as part of this Phase II ESA. A Site Location Map and Site Map with Sampling Locations are included as Figures 1 and 2, respectively. As part of this Phase II ESA, two (2) monitoring wells were installed and four (4) groundwater samples were collected and analyzed (two samples were collected from the newly installed wells and two samples were collected from two existing wells). Groundwater impacts were identified at the Site. These impacts appear to be associated with the adjoining gasoline station that is in the Florida Early Detection Incentive (EDI) program. Under this program, the State of Florida is responsible for the assessment and rernediation of the impacts, including those at the Site. However, if the Site is to be redeveloped, construction activities, including dewatering and drainage, will have to be designed so as to prevent interaction with the plume and the spread of contamination. Monitoring Well Installations On June 19, 2012, CRB personnel were on -site to install two (2) monitoring wells at the Site. Monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-4 were installed using a truck mounted drill rig equipped with hollow stem augers. The monitoring wells were constructed of 2-inch diameter Schedule-40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe with ten (10) feet of 0.01-inch slotted screen followed by a solid riser to the surface. The monitoring wells were finished with a concrete pad; a manhole style cover; and a locking, watertight cap. The locations of monitoring wells 8744 SW 133RD STREET • MAMI, FLOR[DA 33176 • TEL.. (305} 447-9777 • FAX- (05) 567-2853 MW-3 and MW-4 are shown on Figure 2, and the monitoring well installation logs are included in Attachment A. Groundwater Sampling & Analysis Existing monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 were sampled on June 19, 2012, and newly installed monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-4 were sampled on June 22, 2012. Prior to sampling, a minimum of three (3) well volumes were purged from each monitoring well using a peristaltic pump. Groundwater sampling was conducted in accordance with DEP SOP-001/01, and the groundwater sampling logs are included in Attachment B. The groundwater samples were preserved on wet ice and transported to Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (Pace) in Pompano Beach, Florida, using proper chain of custody protocols. Pace analyzed the groundwater samples for EPA Method 8260 Full List compounds, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) by EPA Method 8270, Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPI-1) by Method FL PRO, l,2-Dibromomethane and 1,2- Dibromo-3-chloropropane by EPA Method 8011 and Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead by EPA Method 6010. Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Total Xylenes, 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, Isopropylbenzene, Naphthalene, 1-Methynaphthalene, 2-Methylnaphthalene and Lead were reported as 33.9 pg/L, 354 pg/L, 80.4 pg/L, 22.7 iig/L, 64.7 ug/L, 66.9 lig/L, 302 )41,, 31.9 pg/L, 73.9 pg/L and 74.9 pg/L in monitoring well MW-1, above the Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels (GCTLs) of I nil, 30 pg/L, 20 pg/L, 10 pg/L, 10 pg/L, 0.8 pgriL, 14 µg/L, 28 pg/L, 28 pg/L and 15 µg/L. Moreover, Ethylbenzene, lsopropylbenzene and Naphthalene were reported as above the Natural Attenuation Default Concentrations (NADCs) of 300 ,git, 8 µg/L and 140 jig/L. 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene and lsopropylbenzene were reported as 36.5 nit. and 36.5 pg/L in monitoring well MW-2, above the GCTL. Moreover, Isopropylbenzene was reported as above the NADC. Benzene and Isopropylbenzene were reported as 2.5 g/L and 5.1 µg/L in monitoring well MW-4, above the GC [ Ls but below the NADCs. A summary of the groundwater analytical results is included in Table 1, and the laboratory analytical results and chain of custody record are included in Attachment C. Discussion, Conclusions & Recommendations To assess the moderate -risk RECs identified in the Phase I ESA for the Site, CRB conducted a Phase II ESA, which included the installation of two (2) monitoring wells and the collection and analysis of four (4) groundwater samples. Results of this sampling revealed petroleum groundwater impacts in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-4. The lack of petroleum impacts in monitoring well MW-3 indicates that groundwater has not been impacted by the parking lot drainage system, and the low concentrations of the petroleum contaminants in monitoring well MW-4 suggest that the northern extent of the groundwater plume is limited on that portion of the Site. Based on the close proximity to the gasoline MCI 11 1 l-02 2 CRB Geological & EnvronmeniaI Services station and the known discharge at that location, the petroleum impacts at the Site are likely caused by this adjoining property. This gasoline station is in the Florida EDI Program. Under this program, the State of Florida is responsible for the assessment and remediation of the impacts, including those impacts on thc Site. However, development activities at the Site cannot cause the contamination to migrate into previously uncontaminated areas. If the development activities will require dewatering, or if drainage will be installed in the vicinity of the groundwater impacts, they must be designed so as to not interact with the groundwater plume, causing migration to occur. If you have any questions or comments concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact one of us at 305-447-9777. Sincerely, CRB Geological Victor Rossinsky, Ph.D., P.G. Senior Project Manager Attachments Environmental Services, Inc. Bradley L. Compton Project Manager MGI 1111-02 3 CRB Geological & Environmental Services, Inc. FLU tt.„14.„,,•0. GRAPH CALE • YHOspita 1Po ,0 CRB rod9a Light SITE TITLE, SITE LOCATIONS MAP RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES SW I2'th STREET & SW 2nd AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA Geollogical t Environmental Services, Inc, REVBATE, HAY 1.5, 2012 9744 SW Inrci Street FVorld© 33176 DRAWN DATE. KAY 7. 2012 Tel, (305) 447-9777 Fox' (305) 567-2853 DRAWN BY. LA PROJECT NO, NG1 1111,-02 FIGuRE SCALD AS NOTED APPROVED BY. BC 1 7401 111L,N52..1Report5NPRose CADV11— 5MR Locatkm Ramp Geological & Envkronnent©l Services, Inc, 8744 SV 133rd Street Mlonl, Florida 33176 Tel, <305) 447-9777 Fax, (305) 567-2853 HGI 1111.\8e�ar-taWFwss INCADV-Z= Site Hap .1t1. S.rrowedHp Psagrrt=_a SITE MAP WITH SAMPLING LOCATIONS RESI➢ENTIAL PROPERTIES SW l2th STREET & SW 2nd AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA Carlos A. Gimenez, Mayor August 8, 2013 CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7011 0470 0002 4387 3621 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Christopher Falce, P.E., LEED AP Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Suite 1019 5200 NW 33rd Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 7011 0470 0002 4387 3638 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Richard Buck Morgan Group, Inc, 4553 SW Hammock Creek Drive Palm City, FL 34990 Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources Environmental Resources Management 701 NW 1st Court, 4ih Floor Miami, Florida 33136-3912 T 305-372-6700 F 305-372-6982 miamidade.gov RE: Supplemental Site Assessment Report/Drainage Plans dated July 9, 2012 and August 2, 2013, respectively, and submitted by Kimley-Horn and Associates and prepared by CRB Geological and Environmental Services, Inc. (CRB), for the Broadstone Brickell Lofts Project Ilocated at 145 SW 13th Street and in the vicinity of the contaminated site, Ramirez 66 (UT-528/F-7243) located at, near, or in the vicinity of 1245 SW 2nd Avenue, Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida. Dear Messrs. Falce and Buck: The Pollution Remediation Section (PRS) of the Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources (RER) has reviewed the above referenced documents received August 2, 2013 and hereby has the following comments: 1. RER has no objection to the locations of the proposed drainage wells, DW-1, DW-3, and DW-4 or the proposed 25 LF of 24'1 exfiltration trench associated with S-1. 2, However, based on the sampling results provided for MW-1 (e.g., Naphthalenes 302 ppb, etc.), the location of the proposed DW-2 is not approved. Therefore, the following options are offered: a. MW-1 may be re -sampled for VOAs and PAHs; however, note that option 2b. or 2c. may be required if results still show contamination; or b. A properly constructed well (i.e., 30-35') shall be installed in the immediate vicinity of the proposed location for OW-2 and sampled for VOAs and PAHs, to demonstrate the absence of intermediate/deep contamination; or 1.) e lhAe-nn.c "Pcrettcve Jer' (_) Messrs. Falce and Buck UT-528/F-7243 August 8, 2013 Page 2 of 2 c. The proposed DW-2 may be relocated at least 100away from the proposed location with the exception of the area north/northeast of the gas station property boundary. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Tammy L. Welch of the Pollution Remediation Section at (305) 372-6700 or via email (welcht@miamidade.gov). Sincerely, ilbur ga, P.E., Chief Environmental Monitoring & Restoration Division, RER tw Enclosure ec: Christopher Falce, P.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. — chris.falce@kimley-hom.com Victor Rossinsky, Ph.D., P.G., CRB vrossinsky@crbgeo.net Bradley L. Compton, CRB - bcompton@crbgeo.net Michelle Schuyler — RER Maria Molina, P.E. - RER PROJECT LOCATION MIAMI.OADE COUNTY PROJECT TEAM 21A'21:4141v.' r7M LIST OF CONTACTS: ij ' • EE.:":,,Z„„„,,, n'w,,SET k'Az.444,4,4_ cqargsz- ,e.Eg SUBJECT PROPERTY ckefl Lo th STREET FL Ecs..7-1oN 1, TOWNSHIP 54S, RANGE 41E JULY, 2013 KAN mum,. Ato romwIt 13.1.4 5 .551.14,4555,10 '5 VIVO '40 UP OP 0.,,1,140CAN %,,IA4,1411,A4 _ ,,„ _ "- 1 '1V4 kr• "' , ore 1,or 11.1.,14,06,4',./%117VAY, LOCATION SKETCH PREPARED BY 11.1r" KadepHorap 1111111F_I anOMsociates,In 2 o 0 `Al 1— ▪ —1 < ▪ L ce • z 01 a: mar,/ C" 00 PROP, SROADETC}NE f iS,PbCKCk.6 LOTS'SUlU)IrNG EXISONG GAS STA-E NNOTA PART OF TFIi PROJECT 00.1 PROP'„ ERO DETorE'. E RI!CKEL.L LOFTS BILNLI'SING r.I', ELEV ATE OP' NOLO EXIOENG GAS STATION NOT PART OF' 'MIS PROJECT TPEET) &R. 4 r l .y�y;�. , ayv�yr�„�r • /".:;',Wrf • 0.6,61.7.7111.:;§1.9.y.,c,M.P...17M93:10,4,J,VTE.5.: Jo • ••••, , §REtigy , kr '-,L'..,,',.,''''''''-''':•i"j"...""' -,,,,„ ,,, i, ,. ,„.,, •,,, ,, ,., , „ ,, . „„„„ ,., . , : , , , , '..,,,,,",,,,'.,`,,,,;,:,,,,,,/,`1,,,,,','-;•',.,•,''.',:....,i".":1:',:!..';',•,,,':,,:':',‘'„'"'F'',,,!:: PREC STMM 00)(14AGEWIL „ DHAiNAU j- .114 ' Va'VecWrAT"' 1 11 • , • Suns! eggeom d MEL WELL.GRATEpETML. 4 Kirn and Associates, Inc, AUG 1 5 2013 DERM ROL UTION CONTROL DIVISION To: Wilbur Mayorga, P.E., Chief Department of Regulatory and Economic Resourc Environmental Resources Management 701 NW 1' Court, 4th floor Miami, Florida 33136-3912 (305)372-6700 From: Erik J. Wilczek, PE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: August 14, 2013 a 5200 NW 33' Avenue Sude109 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Subject: PRS comment response for Broadstone Brickell Lofts Project, located at 145 SW 13111 Street and in vicinity of the contaminated site, Ramirez 66 (UT-528/F-7243) located at, near, or in the vicinity of 1245 SW 2" Avenue, Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida. The following is an itemized response to the comments pertaining to the above listed ERP application: 1. RER has no objection to the locations of the proposed drainage wells, DW-1, DW-3, and DW-4 or the proposed 25 II of 24" exfiltration trench associated with S-1. 2. However, based on the sampling results provided for MW-1 Naphthalene's 302 ppb, etc.), the location of the proposed DW-2 is not approved. Therefore the following options are offered: a. MW-1 may be re -sampled for VOA's and PAI-I's; however, note that option 2b, or 2c. may be required if results still show contamination: or b. A properly constructed well (i.e. 30-35') shall be installed in the immediate vicinity of the proposed location for DW-2 and sampled for VOA's and PAH's, to demonstrate the absence of intermediate/deep contamination; or c. The proposed DW-2 may be relocated at least 100' away from the proposed location with the exception of the area north/northeast of the gas station property boundary. Drainage Well 2 (DW-2) has been removed from the proposed drainage design. Please see attached sheet C-201 for updated drainage system. TEL 954 535 5100 Please accept the revised plans and comments for approval and if you require any additional information or further clarification please do not hesitate to contact Sina Ebrahimi at 954-535-5134. -Fhank you for your assistance with this project. Very truly yours, KIMLEY-FIORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Erik J. Wilczek, PE