HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 1 FR/SReyEH6 it k
lrli I ILLLLIJ ❑1111J Wlldl It(Lalt_- "•.+ tug ,- nr,,.uuu
H•91111 I NI j.IL:111l f
w;µ'I} 'I U11111�S-
GITA&0E MIAMII'' 4,P,111111.II/ �
(Si177='tI1P ^'i'f'�*"�€ifTT.l- IIII 111 r. i"i114
:®M sARCATLhBOUNDARYl-
(jjjlitTTR� I�n-1 I41 !MI N.T1
111, ANDIRERMITS
®
IEII
II1111111111
1111111111C
I;s::<salT:' {9�11u1ll1J'=4nII�
IIIIIII8:�€I'IITf71;J1J'11=,.`�
111111I1®I1 t4„
-�1il�if f�r�H{fH�
11111111e
Itin111E
a111111111e
�i ry 1l l l 11«;,-61
111111118M
M11111122
-1
mat
wale 916.76
0 NI SW Ind kwn
1236 MY
Bunt
M11111n12
M111111111_
:1111111112
211511011_
=11111182
:1111101E
e11111111=
:®.IIII:
111111112511
®®mm
llllll
111111111=
IIII .imp II
IIIlIJI
16{I1 11811
1111111111E.
111111nnlli
CEBEETTIMPMEB
ffil3111
671
- "w�
' P�1VI11117,
1111111
1111111112
111111111
®4d
MINIM 111118
NO SW 200004n.
1021 NW � .!,; 11940
wm6..
1600 NW 1 [am
1111 NW IDERAwnw
a. E FI6 CNN
1103 ea,.
w.c WWRAwv..
erF M'np) . w.a-!,wvA.."
n frVrap, w•nVes0Nor WWI...
6t #.Nrnap.
�"-
wnnp) 6009,
111111118
=111111112
11111111112
81112188
1111111111111
®II11011,
600
NE
III
1111111 ;' 1
r&@66® 111/18m
en_ em -
nn= ;11W@I
86
1.020
650
400
6.400
365
1263
100
010
C-7
=1
1rIr�
T
w�
074114
1111I1111■
01111888
1111011111
=I1111111-
1111111111■
e®1111 11
M,I,IIIIIHC,
PM.
'Is luun■ni n I®�® III@@@S10®�®
IIIIIC 6yUnun11
e. lIIIIiI I1ililllll=
®Inn11n1
11011nnl1
11111111
111111
IIIIIIIIII
1nu11111
81111111111
2111111112
®11881111
mule ! , nn1! : . 1111n
Ig11111 n111N Oi%/Gi%/% s' 11-,
n11 �., •un1� m11011 .�//,,,,,re..,
i ■...
1I *. ®9 1 O6� IIII ` 1111111fI Gp '7�
LB11111� 1>,�ul � 1 amp Y�%.n111 nnlmm j�/was
-®®16I®11®BII,'. '/. III=/',. ,:�
6G,,,--;i mmmu
m 0 ,..IIII roam®. u.uny %Yr �/is 335� .11lllll
®o.m®nmlom i. /
uII lIuI ,6 ";:k4A////// -. 5: .. 1
®IICW° ter: °%WO
. ��� mmg - 11IIII6
1111
Inn■
nlllmn
1J IL
s usexw IC1
64 opu
70
r l77
N
I CI
/11/1112
11111111N
I l w I-1,11111
11111 1
N11111 rr''IIII,, rr11
111J R:M q ,�.I
2111111E
21111111E
N, vim
ITN
\111 I I.1.70167
III1111111. ;!`/psi%i%j ■Oi1°m a 1111110310
(1)TID
.116...11IIIII®
111119910931q
.' �';,sc e maim I;. .qi.1 ..1
W�/ It f ASV r..,
�i V 09.... Pam« 'moo
6561015166
III
Alit
11. or
w.rstiaonn.
mmI.alon District .n0 Cnmml_lon.Y. Nun
191993710
o • raorom era.
OFFICIAL FILE COPY
CLERK OF THE BOARD
OF coumnr COALUISSIONERs
MIAMI:-DADS COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
TO: Honorable Chairman Joe A. Martinez DATE: March 6, 2012
and Members, Board of County Commissioners
FROM: R. A. Cuevas, Jr.
County Attorney
Ordinance No. 12-09 •
SUBJECT: Ordinance pertaining to
Zoning regulations of signs;
amending Sec. 33-82 of the
Code; expanding the area
defined as the City of Miami
Urban Core where mural signs
may be permitted
This item was amended at the 2-15-12 Infrastructure and Land Use Committee by an
expansion of the northern part of the mural boundary.
The accompanying ordinance was prepared and placed on the agenda at the request of Prime
Sponsor Commissioner Bruno A. Barreiro.
R. A. Ct vas, Jr.
County Attorney
RAC/jls
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
MIAM1DADE
Memorandum
• March 6, 2012
Honorable Chairman Joe A. Martinez
and Members, Board of County Commissioners
Carlos A. Girne ez
Mayor
Ordinance pertaining toZoni g Regulation of Signs
The proposed ordinance expands the City of Miami Urban Core where mural signs are permitted. The
implementation •of this_ordinanoe will not have a fiscal impact to the County.
ayor —
Fis3412
MEMORANDUM
(Revised)
TO: Honorable Chairman Joe A. Martinez DATE: March 6, 2012
and Members, Board of County Commissioners
FROM: R. A. Cilevas, Jrl
County Attorney
SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. 7 (A )
Please note any items checked.
"3-Day Rule" for committees applicable if raised
v/ 6 weeks required between first reading and public hearing
L/
4 weeks notification to municipal officials required prior to public
hearing
Decreases revenues or increases expenditures without balancing budget
Budget required
Statement of fiscal impact required
Ordinance creating a new board requires detailed County Manager's
report for public hearing
No committee review
Applicable legislation requires more than a majority vote (i.e., 2/3's
3/5's _, unanimous ) to approve
Current information regarding funding source, index code and available
balance, and available capacity (if debt is contemplated) required
Approved Mayor
Veto
Override
ORDINANCE NO. 12-09
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
3-6-12
ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ZONING REGULATION OF
SIGNS; AMENDING SECTION 33-82 OF THE CODE OF
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA (CODE); EXPANDING
THE AREA DEFINED AS THE CITY OF MIAMI URBAN
CORE WHERE MURAL SIGNS MAY BE PERMIIThD;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, INCLUSION IN THE CODE
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, Chapter 33 of the Code of Miami -Dade County regulates the placement and
size of Class C signs within the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Miami -Dade County;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted Ordinance No.
07-61, as modified by Ordinance No. 07-91, authorizing the displayof mural signs within City of
Miami Urban Core; and
WHEREAS, the Board subsequently adopted Ordinance No. 10-71 expanding the
boundaries of the City of Miami Core and increased the number of mural signs; and
WHEREAS, the Board finds that the area proposed for expansion to the City of Miami
Urban Core is aesthetically similar to the current boundaries of the City of Miami Urban Core as
defined in the Code of Miami -Dade County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Miami would be aesthetically enhanced by the addition of mural
sign locations, within the City of Miami Urban Core as defined in the Code of Miami -Dade
County,
ORD/A733
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE .IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Section .33-84 of the Code of Miami -Dade County, Florida, is hereby
amended to read as follows: 1
Sec.33-84. Definitions.
For the purposes of this article the following words and phrases are
hereby defined as provided in this section, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise. Where there is a question as to the
correct classification or definition of a sign, the Director shall
place said sign in the strictest category and/or classification
(Y)
*
City of Miami Urban Core shall mean the geographic area
commencing at Biscayne Bay and the North side of NE
18th Street; thence West along the North side of NE 18th
Street to the East side of NE 2nd Avenue; thence North
along the East side of NE 2nd Avenue to the South side of
NE 36th Street; thence East along the South side of NE 36
Street to the West side of Biscayne Boulevard; thence
North along the west side `of Biscayne Boulevard to the
North side of I-195; thence West along the North side of I-
195 to the East side of N. Federal Highway; thence North
along the East side of N. Federal Highway to the North side
of NE 39th Street; thence West along the North side of NE
39th Street to East side of NE 2nd Avenue; thence North
along the East side of NE 2nd Avenue to North side of NE
40th Street; thence West along the North side of NE 40th
Street to West side of N. Miami Avenue; »to jts
}ntersection with the South limited access right-of-wav line
of the I-195 Eastbound exit ramp; thence West along said
,South limited access right-of-way line to its intersection
with the South side of NW 37th Street; thence West along
the South side of NW 37th Street to the East side of NW
Words stricken through and/or [[double bracketed]] shall be deleted. Words underscored
and/or »double arrowed« constitute the amendment proposed. Remaining provisions are now
in effect and remain unchanged.
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
Page 3
1st Avenue; thence South alone the East side of NW
Avenue to the North side of NW 36th Street; thence East
alnno the North side of NW 36th Street to the West side of
ami A
ue: thence
to
the
ide of N.
jjarni Avenue«1 to the North side of NW 25th Street;
thence West along the North side of NW 25th Street to the
East side of the theoretical extension thereto of NW 1st
Court; thence North along the East side of the theoretical
extension of NW 1st Court to the North side of NW 27th
Street; thence West along the North side of NW 27th Street
to the West side of NW 2nd Avenue; thence South along
the West side of NW 2nd Avenue to the South side of NW
19th Street; thence East along the South side of NW 19th
Street to the West side of NW 1st Avenue; thence South
along the West side of NW. 1st Avenue to the North side of
NW 16th Street; thence West along the North side of NW
16th Street to the West side of NW 3rd Avenue; thence
South along the West side of NW 3rd Avenue to the North
Side of the Dolphin Expressway; thence West along the
North side of the Dolphin Expressway to the East side of I-
95; thence North along the East side of I-95 to North side
of NW 20th Street; thence West along the North side of
NW 20th Street to the West side of NW 14th Avenue;
thence South along the West side of NW 14th Avenue to
the South side of the Dolphin Expressway; thence East
along the South side of the Dolphin Expressway to the East
bank of the Wagner Creek Canal; thence South 300 feet
along the East bank of the Wagner Creek Canal; thence
East running parallel 300 feet to the South of the Dolphin
Expressway to the West side of NW 7th Avenue; thence
North along the West side of NW 7th Avenue to the South
side of the Dolphin Expressway; thence East along the
South side of the Dolphin Expressway to the West side of
I-95; »thence South along the West side of I-95 to the
North side of NW 5th Street • thence West along the North
side of NW 5th Street to the West side of NW 6th Avenue;
thence South on the West side of NW 6th Avenue to the
West side of NW North River Drive: thence South along
2 Committee amendments are indicated as follows: words double stricken through and/or
[[double bracketed]] shall be deleted, words double underlined and/or »double arrowed«
constitute the amendment proposed.
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
Page 4
the West side of NW North River Drive to the North side of
West Flagler Street thence East along the North side of
West Flagler Street to the West side of I-95;« thence
South along the West side I-95 to the South side of SW 8th
Street; thence East along the South side of SW 8th Street to
the East side of S. Miami Avenue; thence North along the
East side of S. Miami Avenue to the South side of the
Miami River; thence East along 'the South side of the
Miami River to the Fast side of Brickell Avenue; thence
North along the Fast side of Brickell Avenue to the North
side of the Miami River; thence Fast along the North side
of the Miami River to Biscayne Bay; thence North along
the Biscayne Bay shoreline to the point of beginning, as
shown on the City of Miami Urban Core map shown
below.
[[mod]]
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
Page 5
city of Miami Urban. Clore
COUNTY
Dopartment.of Pfannirig•endZoning
0 Z000 4,00
SEALE'IN.FEET I
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
Page 6
»City of Miami. Urban Core«
4,
SustainabiGly, Planning and Eaammnia Enhancement
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
Page 7
Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or provision of this ordinance
is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity.
Section 3. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners, and it is hereby
ordained that the provisions of this ordinance, including any sunset provision, shall become and
bemade part of the Code of Miami -Dade County, Florida. The sections of this ordinance may
be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention and the word "ordinance" may be
changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word.
Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after the date of
enactment unless vetoed by the Mayor, and if vetoed, shall become effective only upon an
override by this Board.
PASSED AND ADOPTED: March 6, 2012
Approved by County Attorney as
to form and legal sufficiency:
Prepared by:
Craig H. Coller
Prime Sponsor:
Commissioner Bruno A. Barreiro
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSION AUDITOR
Legislative Notes
Agenda Item:
File Number:
✓atc of Analysis:
o� rac
7A
120314
„ 't112
Summary
This ordinance pertaining to Zoning regulations of signs, amends §33-82 of the Code of Miami -Dade County (Code),
expanding the area defined as the City of Miami Urban Core where mural signs ma„ be permitted.
This ordinance would add an additional 31 acres to the City of Miami Urban Core and includes property owned my
Miami -Dade County, Park Towers Associates (Park Towers), and the City of Miami's Lummus Park.
Currently, the Code allows 45 mural signs within the Miami Urban Core. According to the Department of
Sustainability, Planning, and Economic Enhancement (SPEE), there are 37 mural signs'. The City of Miami provides
the County with a list of mural signs, and provides enforcement of the County Code. The County is dependent on
the t ty to provide the numbers.
According to SPEE, the Park Towers in the proposed expanded area for the City of Miami Urban Core has been
rezoned as mixed use by Miami 21, the City of Miami's plan to manage and guide growth within the City.
Background and Relevant Legislation
Sign Code of Miami -Dade County
Chapter 33, Article VI of the Code is known as. the Sign Code of Miami -Dade County (Sign Code). The Sign Code
defines a sign as any display of characters, fetters, logos, illustrations or any omamentation designed or used as an
advertisement, announcement or to indicate direction. Use of merchandise products, vehicles, equipment,
inflated balloons, or the like as an attention attractor or advertising devise, with or without a printed or written
message or advertisement is also considered a sign.
Signs are further categorized into one of three categories — Class A (temporary signs), Class B (point of sale signs)
and Class C (commercial advertising signs). Murals fall under Class Cr signs, and are defined as any Class C wall sign
naintpd nn, nr affixpd nr sPrurpr1 flat to the facade of a huildinc
r he City of naiomi provided this information ro the Counry approximately Morcn 412.
2 Class Csigns constitute any sign which is used for any purpose other than that of advertising to the public the legal or exact
firm name of business or other activity carried an the premises, or for advertising any service or product or products actually and .
actively being offered for sale on the premises, or which is designed and displayed solely to offer for sale or rent the premises, or
to advertise special.events. Class C signs maybe in the form of a billboard, bulletin board, mural or poster board, and maybe
affixed flat or painted ono building.
I '
The Sign Code Is applicable In the unincorporated and incorporated areas of Miami -Dade County, Florida. When
applicable to a municipality, the municipality is responsible for enforcement. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 07-84, the
current Sign Code only allows municipalities to opt out from one of the•Code's divisions, Division 5 (Commercial
Signs on Expressway Right -of -Way). Municipalities are not allowed to opt out from the entire Sign Code. Five
municipalities - Cutler Bay, Dora!, Hialeah, Miami and North Miami - have opted out of Division 5 but the
remainder of the County Sign Code still remains in Effect as the minimum standard within thck municipalities:
iunicipalities.
•Approval Date and.'
Reso/Ord No:
. Summary of Miami -Dade County. Legislation,..'::._' ; '-..-::•.: ; :.;:•;::,:
The Sign Code and Murdl Signs 6:the City of Mier:
July 18, 1985
Ord. 85-59
This ordinance revised,the Sign Code. The primary purpose of this revision was twofold:
• First, to reorganize the Sign Code in a format for easier reference and interpretation.
Related sertinns warp vrnunpd together and the renrrirements for the different sign types
were•placed in•a chart format.
• Secondly, the Sign Code was modified to improve the standards and efficiency of the code,
and minor changes were made for purposed of clarification.
Nov. 12, 1996
Ord. 96-263
This ordinance amended §33-82(b) of the Code, prohibiting certain signage variances without
prior consent of the affected municipalities.
Mar. 16, 2004
R-370-04
This resoiution directed the County Manager to initiate discussion with the City Managers of
the municipalities within Miami -Dade County regarding improved compliance with the Sign
Code of Miami -Dade County in unincorporated and incorporated areas of the County and
directed too preparation of rspiiit.
Dec.14, 2004
Report
File No. 043439
Pursuant to Resolution No. 370-04, this report was on municipality compliance with the County
Sign Code.
• This was a preliminary report and did not include the findings from the survey taken.
• The County Manager directed the Planning and Inning .staff and the County Attnmev's
Office to discuss with the City of Miami the creation of a core downtown zone wherein
certain types of large signs and murals would be allowed. Staff was directed to draft
modifications to the County Code for the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to
consider.
Oct. 18, 2005
Ord. 05-187
This ordinance amended §33-332 and §33-107 of the Code, exempting from zoning regulations
Class C (Outdoor Advertising) Signs at Miami International Airport (Wilcox Field).
April 26, 2007
Ord. 07-61
This ordinance, pertaining to zoning regulation of signs, provided the following:
• Limited exemption for certain mural signs within the City of Miami Downtown Core (later
known as he sty of Miami Urban Core);
o Allowed 30 mural signs within the City of Miami Urban Core area.
• Authorization for signs with noncommercial messages where commercial messages are
permitted;
• Time limitation to issue sien permits:
• An appeals procedures;
• Restricted the application for murals under certain circumstances; and
• Two (2) year sunset provision.
The BCC expressed concern regarding the enforcement of illegal signs. Staff noted that there
were 20 murals in violation to the Code, six (6) had been issued citations and eight (8) had been
removed.
June 26, 2007
Ord. C,-,7.1
This ordinance amended §33-121.11 of the Code, providing municipalities with an option to opt
out cf the regulations restricting sign placement in proximity to expressways.
July 10, 2007
Ord. 07-91
This ordinance amended Ordinance No. 07-61, providing the following:
• Renamed the City of Miami Downtown Core to the City of Miami Urban Core;
• Increased the permitted mural signs in the City of Miami Urban Core from 30 to 45;
• Modified mural snaring requirements:
• Permitted mural signs to cover windows under specified circumstances; and
• Amended §33-107 of the Code to modify sign maintenance notice requirements.
pd../ 1, 2008
Ord. 08-80
This ordinance =meyc.le/l E33-1 n7 of the Code decreasing the number of mrir.l sioont allowed in
the City of Miami Urban Core to 35.
• This ordinance mirrored the City of Miami's ordinance, adopted on April 10, 2008, allowing
for 35 mural signs in the Urban Core.
April 7, 2009
Ord. 09-24
This ordinance deleted the sunset provision for the establishment of murals, repealing section 9
of Ordinance No. 07-61. •
The item was accompanied by a supplemental (Item No.090883), providing information
regarding mural signs in the City. of Miami (City) that are in violations and have not been the
subject or efiroicelttehtL by u1C Uly.
July 20, 2010
R-802-10
This resolution awarded a Non -Exclusive Concession Agreement to Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.,
d/b/a/Clear Channel Airports (Clear Channel) for an Advertising Display Program at Miami
International Airport (MIA).
The RFP for Advertising Display Program was advertised on November 6, 2007, for qualified
firms to propose for the opportunity to finance, design, develop, furnish, install manage and
operate an advertising display program at MIA for a term of ten (10) years and a Minimum
Annual Guarantee (MAG) of $4.5 million dollars.
Oct. 9, 2010
Ord. 10-71
This ordinance amended §33-82 and §33-107, expanding the area defined as the City of Miami
Urban Core where mural signs may be permitted and increased the number of mural signs
permitted from 35 to no more than 45.
April 4, 2011
1111/-3 ... ..t:....
.....� .y
File No. 110635
This ordinance pertains to zoning regulations of signs, allowing municipalities to opt out of
n Miami Dr:do -....linty n �.I.�;..nr . t,l.l,.l .t tl:^ ,.^,fr.:*,..,,:tur_ .....I Lone. 1 Ir...
..ter...... ., -,e. gib.. ......� , ...., u .... /
Committee meeting for lack of a second. r
Additional Information
South Florida Equitable Fund v. City of Miami
In April 2010, South Florida Equitable Fund (SFEF) filed a lawsuit against the City of Miami, challenging the
constitutionality of the City's regulation' of outdoor advertising signs (billboards) under City Ordinance, specifically
410.4.5, which prohibited all new freestanding outdoor advertising signs, except pursuant to a settlement
agreement authorized by Cfty•resolution which results in a net reduction of outdoor advertising sings in the City.
SFEF essentially argued that the City cannot limit how many billboards it builds'.
The Court found that the lawsuit lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute because the matter was not
only unripe, but moot as well. The Court found the matter unripe because, SFEF never obtained a final decision or
a conclusive response of the City Commission on Its settlement proposal. According to the City's Legistar, a special
meeting was scheduled for April 21, 2011, for the purpose of considering among other matters, a settlement
agreement with SFEF; however, the matter remains pending on the City's Legistar. The City's settlement
agreement would allow South Florida Equitable to build nine (9) biilboards3along I-95, and in exchange, the
company would have to take down at least two billboards in a neighborhood..
III addition, the Court founts' the matter .n c. t because the outdoor advertising Sign regulations In the Ordinance
were superseded by the June 2010 enactment of the amendments to Chapter 62, of the City's Code.
3 infrastructure and Land Use Committee •
Case No.10-21032-QV-U: South Florida Equitable Fund v. City of Miami, Florida
5City UfrIic,=1rUt :-. 100.32a: (coding te;Us anfa,-Sett; ,-eat:.yree,,.ar,twith .Covt`„aridcEquftrblarand
6 City if Miami Office of the City Attorney Executive Summary, July 1, 2010—June 30, 2011, pp. 13.
' The Miami Herald, Billboard Vote Could Mean Millions for Miami, April 19, 2011
6The Miami Herald, Miami Clears Billboard Hurdle, May 9, 2011.•
/3
Federal Highway Administration Concernst'-0
In a June 17, 2011 letter to the State of Florida, regarding certification of the City for local control of wall murals,
the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) stated that the City's ordinance standards for the proposed control of
outdoor advertising for size, spacing, and lighting of wall murals were not in conformance to the Highway
Beautification Act (HBA).
The FHA letter doesnot mean existing murals will come down soon. But it does appear to mean the City will have
to redraft its ordinance to incorporate stricter limits on banner size and placement that could bar at least some
existing murals. It would also likely require Miami -Dade County to redo an amendment to its Sign Code that
authorized the City's mural district.
American Planning, Association (AP.A)
•In a 1997 Policy Guide on Billboard Controls, the APA states that planners have identified sign control as one of the
most important yet troublesome problems facing local governments. Federal intervention intended to make
highway corridors more beautiful has been manipulated by special interests to make it more difficult for local
governments to use their own tools to accomplish the original purpose of the Highway Beautification Act.
Additional Information from the Public Hearing
During February 15, 2012, Infrastructure and Land Use Committee meeting, the former Director of Planning and
Zoning for Miami -Dade County stated that he conducted a study to determine if the area could be included in the
urban core before the Item was placed on the County's agenda. His study, he said, indicated that Lummus Park
and the area west of 1-95 was part of the urban core, as the cityscape was compatible with that to east and that
they are similar in character, architecture and aesthetics.
Prepared by: Elizabeth N. Owens
9 Miami Herald article, U.S. odals disallow Miami's Downtown Ad Murals, June 30, 2011.
"FHA letter regarding Certification of the City of Miami for Local Control of Wall Murols, June 17, 2011.
/y