The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAnalyses, Color Maps & School Brd ConcurrencyANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE OF SELECTED PROPERTIES CITY WIDE 12-01180zc Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8,b.(2) of Ordinance 13114, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami states that, the City may conduct a comprehensive review of the Miami 21 Atlas every two years to evaluate the development direction of the City's neighborhoods and determine if additional amendments are appropriate. The Planning and Zoning Department having conducted said biennial has found the following changes to be appropriate and consistent with the development direction of the city's neighborhoods. Recommended Changes: ZC # Parcels 1 lots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current Proposed 0141040150040 0141040150050 0141040150060 0141040150070 0141040150069 0141040150071 2970 SW 4 ST 2988 SW 4 ST 2996 SW 4 ST 445 SW 30 AVE 2981 SW 5 ST 2979 SW 5 ST T3-L -L T3-L T3-L T3-L T3- T3-0 T3-0 T3-0 T3-0 T3-0 T3-0 2 1 0141210250010 2701 DAY AVE T4-R T5-0 0141170031010 3899 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 2 0141170031011 3861 SW 40 ST T5- T5-0` 0141170030900 3855 5W 38'CT T5=L T5-0 0141170031170 3851 BIRD RD T5=L T5-0 0141170031180 3845 BIRD RD T5-L T5-0 6 0141170031190 3841 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 014 70031240 3811SW40ST T5-L T5-0 0141170031250 3801 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 0141170031400 3791 BIRD RD T5-L T5-0 0141170031410 3771 BIRD RD • T5-L T5-0 11 0141170031420 3775_BIRD AVE T5-L T5=0. 12 13 0141170031450 0141170031490 3755 SW 40 ST 3753 BIRD RD T5-L T5-L T5-0 T5-0 ZC # Parcels I lots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current Proposed 4 1 2 0132180380170 0132180380180 5808 NE 4 CT 454 NE 58 ST T5-R T5-R T5-0 T5-0 0141210161110 2765 S Bayshore DR T5-L T5-0'. File ID#: 12-01180zc 6 2 0141211990040 0141211990010 0141390012640 2850 Tigertail AV 3300 SW 27 AVE 2731 Brickell Ave 0141390012660 0101000000294 0101000000295 2901 Brickell Ave 195 NW 2nd Street 200 NW 1st Avenue T1 CI CS T6-8-0 T6-8-0 Review and analysis for each proposed zoning change has been conducted and findings and recommendations are as follow: Zoning Area / Parcel # 1 ZC # Parcels I lots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current Proposed 1 0141040150040 2970 SW 4 ST T3-L T3-0 2 0141040150050 2988 SW 4 ST T3-L T3-0 1 3 0141040150060 2996 SW 4 ST T3-L T3-0 4 0141040150070 445 SW 30 AVE T3-L T3-0 5 0141040150069 2981 SW 5 ST T3-L T3-0 6 0141040150071 2979 SW 5 ST T3-L T3-0 Review and analysis of this area / parcel finds that: • The Planning and Zoning Department detected an inconsistency between the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan — Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation and the current zoning designation on certain parcels within the study area. • As a result, the Planning and Zoning Department conducted a study covering a five (5) block area (twenty four (24) lots), analyzing the area based on: (a) visual analysis, (b) site visits, (c) aerial images, (d) land use and zoning designations, (e) building function: uses, (f) density, intensity and parking. • The subject properties comply with Article 7, Amendment to the Miami 21 Code, 7.1.2.8 (a) Successional Zoning from T3-L to T3-0. • Nine (9) parcels within the study area require Land Use changes in order to correct the inconsistencies found and realign the Zoning Atlas with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) FLUM. Land Use designation will change said properties from "Single Family Residential" to "Duplex Residential". Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the changes as presented. File I D#: 12-01180zc Analysis for ZONING CHANGE File ID: 12-01180zc #1 Yes No N/A. ® J a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. ® T1 b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. • n Li c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. ® fl d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. ® ❑ n e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ® ❑ (- f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. ® [ ❑ g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. ® ❑ ❑ h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. ® ❑ n i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. [ n j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. ® ❑ [ k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. Alk n n I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. ® n ❑ m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. ® ❑ ❑ n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. ® ❑ ❑ o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. (— ❑ ® p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. MIAMI 21 (EXISTING) �T5-L SW 2ND ST SW 3RD ST T -�O SW 29TH AVE SW 4TH ST SW 5TH ST T3-L SW 6TH ST ( SW 7TH ST 0 150 300 600 Feet T6-8-O T5- T4-R I I ADDRESS: 2970, 2988, 2996 SW 4 ST 2979 2981 SW 5 ST & 445 SW 30 AV L L MIAMI 21 (PROPOSED) SW 2ND ST SW 3 RD ST SW 29TH AVE T3-9 SW 4TH ST SW 5TH Si J T3-L SW 6TH ST ( 0 150 300 SW 7TH ST 600 Feet T6-8-O T5-L T4-R ADDRESS: 2970, 2988, 2996 SW 4 ST 2979 2981 SW 5 ST & 445 SW 30 AV 0 150 300 600 Feet ADDRESS: 2970, 2988, 2996 SW 4 ST 2979 2981 SW 5 ST & 445 SW 30 AV Zoning Area / Parcel #2 ZC # Parcels I lots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current Proposed 2 1 0141210250010 2701 DAY AVE T4-R T5-0 Review and analysis of this area / parcel finds that: • T5-0 Transect Zone Designation stretches from SW 28th Terrace south, excluding only to the subject property on the northwest corner of Day and SW 27fh Avenues. This strip is roughly five blocks long and includes both sides of SW 271h Avenue. • The subject property is the only parcel in this five block stretch that is zoned T4-R and is inconsistent with the continuation of the T5-0 designated to abutting properties to the north, south and east. T4-R is an intrusion into the established T5-0 corridor and should be rezoned to T5-0 in order to maintain consistency in the corridor. • The subject properties comply with Article 7, Amendment to the Miami 21 Code, 7.1.2.8 (a) Successional Zoning from T4-R to T5-0. • The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation of "Restricted Commercial" is consistent with the T5-0 zoning designation proposed. Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the changes as presented. File ID#: 12-01180zc Analysis for ZONING CHANGE Yes No N/A. File ID: 12-01180zc #2 a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. j� b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. �f c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. - d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. I -I e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ❑ f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. ❑ g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. n h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. C i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. E j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. ® n [ k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. ►1 C ❑ I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. ® ❑ ❑ m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. ® C n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. ® I I -I p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. MIAMI 21 MAP (EXISTING) N CY W w U 3- .I:. U OAK AV :::.::fir ......7: SHIPPING AVE 5 T4- DAY-AVE 7.. w .Q : ......:.•:.... a :.................. 121 ... ...:....... ....... . 0 150 300 600 Feet ADDRESS: 2701 DAY AVENUE MIAMI 21 MAP (PROPOSED) V) CY W w U OAK AV U SHIPPING AVE 0 150 300 600 Feet ADDRESS: 2701 DAY AVENUE 0 150 300 600 Feet ADDRESS: 2701 DAY AVENUE Superintendent of Schools Alberto M. Carvaiho November 5, 2012 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. Harold Ruck, Principal Planner City of Miami Planning Department 444 Southwest 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 hruck(a7miamigov.com Public Schools RE: PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI 12-01180zc LOCATED AT 2701 DAY AVENUE PH0112101500590 - FOLIO No. 0141210250010 Dear Applicant: Miami -Dade County School Board Perla Tabares Hantman, Chair Dr. Lawrence S. Feldman, Vice Chair Dr. Dorothy 8endross-Mindingall Carlos L. Curbelo Renier Diaz de la Portilla Dr. Wilbert `Tee" Holloway Dr. Martin Karp Dr. Marta Perez Raquel A. Regalado Pursuant to State Statutes and the Interlocal Agreements for Public School Facility Planning in Miami - Dade County, the above -referenced application was reviewed for compliance with Public School Concurrency. Accordingly, enclosed please find the School District's Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review). As noted in the Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review), the proposed development would yield a maximum residential density of 10 multi -family units, which generate 1 student at the elementary school level. At this time, the elementary school level has sufficient capacity available to serve the application. However, a final determination of Public School Concurrency and capacity reservation will only be made at the time of approval of final plat, site plan or functional equivalent. As such, this analysis does not constitute a Public School Concurrency approval. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 305-995-4501. Ivan M. Rodriguez, R.A Director I IMR:ir L-182 Enclosure cc: Ms. Ana Rijo-Conde, AICP Ms. Vivian G. Villaamil City of Miami School Concurrency Master File t Facilities Planning, Design and Sustainability Ana Rijo-Conde, AICP, Eco-Sustainability Officer. 1450 N.E. 2nd Ave. • Suite 525 • Miami, FL 33132 305-995-7285. 305-995-4760 (FAX) • arijo@dadeschools.net Canturrentyr Management System (CMS) Miami Dade County Public Schools Miami -Dade County Public Schools MDCPS Application Number: Date Application Received: Type of Application: Applicant's Name: Address/Location: Master Folio Number: Additional Folio Number(s): PROPOSED # OF UNITS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS: SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS: MULTIFAMILY UNITS: Concurrency Management System Preliminary Concurrency Analysis PH0112101500590 Local Government (LG): Miami 10/15/2012 11:10:51 AM LG Application Number: 12-01180zc Public Hearing Sub Type: Zoning City of Miami 2701 Day Avenue 0141210250010 10 0 0 10 CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS CSA Id Facility Name Net Available Capacity Seats Required Seats Taken LOS Met Source Type 841 COCONUT GROVE ELEMENTARY 841 COCONUT GROVE ELEMENTARY 6741 PONCE DE LEON MIDDLE - KEY BISCAYNE K-8 CTR - CORAL GABLES K-8 CTR (MID COMP) - 15 52 INO (Current CSA NO Current CSA Five Year Plan 1(:: YES (Current CSA 7071 CORAL GABLES SENIOR HIGH - 432 ADJACENT SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS YES (Current CSA 5561 FRANCES S TUCKER ELEMENTARY 90 1 11 YES (Adjacent CSA *An Impact reduction of 17.64% included for charter and magnet schools (Schools of Choice). MDCPS has conducted a preliminary public school concurrency review of this application; please see results above. A final determination of public school concurrency and capacity reservation will be made at the time of approval of plat, site plan or functional equivalent. THIS ANALYSIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY APPROVAL. 1450 NE 2 Avenue, Room 525, Miami, Florida 33132 / 305-995-7634 / 305-995-4760 fax / concurrency@dadeschools.net Zoning Change #3 Parcels 1 lots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current I Proposed 1 0141170031010 3899 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 2 0141170031011 3861 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 3 0141170030900 3855 SW 38 CT 75-L T5-0 4 0141170031170 3851 BIRD RD T5-L T5-0 5 0141170031180 3845 BIRD RD T5-L T5-0 6 0141170031190 3841 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 3 7 0141170031240 3811 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 8 0141170031250 3801 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 9 0141170031400 3791 BIRD RD T5-L T5-0 10 0141170031410 3771 BIRD RD T5-L T5-0 11 0141170031420 3775 BIRD AVE T5-L T5-0 12 0141170031450 3755 SW 40 ST T5-L T5-0 13 0141170031490 3753 BIRD RD T5-L T5-0 Review and analysis of this area / parcel finds that: • The subject properties front Bird Road located between SW 39th Avenue on the west and SW 37th Court to the east. • The proposed change of zoning designation from T5-L to T5-0 is consistent with the long-term, established uses for this section of Bird Road. T5-0 assigns the correct Transect classification for the existing commercial uses which provide services to the surrounding area. • The proposed T5-0 preserves the existing zoning transition between the subject properties and the T6-12-0 Transect Zone to the south and T3-0 Transect Zone to the north. • The proposed zoning change complies with Article 7, Amendment to the Miami 21 Code, 7.1.2.8 (a) Successional Zoning from T5-L to T5-0. • The proposed zoning designation is consistent with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) FLUM designation of "Restricted Commercial". Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the changes as presented. File I D#: 12-01180zc Analysis for ZONING CHANGE Yes No N/A. ® u u ® ® Li ® n n n n ® C r ® ❑ ❑ ® C C C ® ❑ C ® C ❑ ® C C C ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® n ❑ ® n 1- File ID: 12-01180zc #3 a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. SW 40TH ST 0 150 300 MIAMI 21 MAP (EXISTING) 600 Feet I SW 28TH ST LSW.29TH ST BIRD'RD PEACOCK AVE SHIPPING AVE_ ADDRESS :3899, 3861, 3841, 3811, 3801 & 3755 SW 40 ST 3851, 3845, 3791, 3771, 3775 & 3753 BIRD RD 3855 SW 38 CT MIAMI 21 MAP (PROPOSED) SW 40TH ST 0 150 300 600 Feet I SW 28TH ST LSW.29TH ST BIRD'RD PEACOCK AVE SHIPPING AVE_ ADDRESS :3899, 3861, 3841, 3811, 3801 & 3755 SW 40 ST 3851, 3845, 3791, 3771, 3775 & 3753 BIRD RD 3855 SW 38 CT 0 150 300 1 1 1 1 1 1 600 Feet 1 I ADDRESS :3899, 3861, 3841, 3811, 3801 & 3755 SW 40 ST 3851, 3845, 3791, 3771, 3775 & 3753 BIRD RD 3855 SW 38 CT Zoning Area / Parcel #4 ZC # 4 Parcels I lots 1 2 Folio # 0132180380170 0132180380180 Address 5808 NE 4 CT 454 NE 58 ST Zoning Designation Current I Proposed T5-R T5-R T5-0 T5-0 Review and analysis of this area / parcel finds that: • Originally designated C-1, during the Miami 21 Code adoption the subject properties were categorized T5-R "Urban Center Transect Zone — Restricted" a classification which does not allow the existing commercial uses. • The T5-0 "Urban Center Transect Zone — Open" classification facilitates the continuous operation of small neighborhood -service businesses functioning from the subject property. • The subject property has been designated Historic and cannot be altered or demolished. • The subject properties comply with Article 7, Amendment to the Miami 21 Code, 7.1.2.8 (a) Successional Zoning from T5-R to T5-0. • The current Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) FLUM designation is "Restricted Commercial", which is compatible with the zoning classification requested. Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the change as presented. File ID#: 12-01180zc Analysis for ZONING CHANGE ® ❑ C Yes No N/A. File ID: 12-01180zc #4 a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. n e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. Z f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. ❑ g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. ❑ h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. ❑ j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. C k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. ❑ I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. ❑ m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. ❑ n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. C o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. n p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. MIAMI 21 MAP (EXISTING) UNNAMED NE 59TH TER D1 T5-L NE 58TH TER L NE 58TH ST IOi NE 57,TH ST T5-L - NE 56TH ST —NE 59TH ST T5-R j Water Pump House Historic Resource r s u 0 150 300 600 Feet Y NE 56TH ST Morningside ADDRESS: 5808 NE 4 CT & 454 NE 58 ST MIAMI 21 MAP (PROPOSED) Cushman NE 59TH TER NE 58TH TER NE 58TH ST NE 57,TH ST —NE 59TH ST Palm Grove NE 58TH ST Water Pump House Historic Resource NE 56TH ST 0 - NE 56TH ST 150 300 600 Feet ADDRESS: 5808 NE 4 CT & 454 NE 58 ST 0 150 300 Water Pump House Historic Resource 600 Feet ADDRESS: 5808 NE 4 CT & 454 NE 58 ST Zoning Area 1 Parcel # 5 ZC # Parcels llots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current Proposed 5 1 0141210161110 2765 S Bayshore DR T5-L T5-0 2 0141211990040 2850 Tigertail AVE T5-L T5-0 3 0141211990010 3300 SW 27 AVE T5-L T5-0 Review and analysis of this area / parcel finds that: ® During the Miami 21 Code adoption, the northern portion of the properties were designated with T5-L "Urban Center Transect Zone — Limited" classification. • The proposed T5-0 maintains the same zoning designation on both sides along this portion of Tiger Tail Avenue and preserves the transition between T6-12 0 to the South • The subject properties comply with Article 7, Amendment to the Miami 21 Code, 7.1.2.8 (a) Successional Zoning from T5-R to T5-0. ® The current Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) FLUM designation is "Restricted Commercial", which is compatible with the zoning classification requested. Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the change as presented. File ID#: 12-01180zc Analysis for ZONING CHANGE Yes No N/A. Z Z Z L Z n Z r Z E. Z n I I File ID: 12-01180zc #5 a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. Li b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. U c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ❑ f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. it g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. Z ❑ E Z T. Z E Z E h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. C i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. ❑ j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. ❑ k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. Z n E. Z E Z n Z I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. ❑ m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. ❑ n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. n o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. Z ❑ I- p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 0 150 300 I MIAMI 21 MAP (EXISTING) 600 Feet 1 I ADDRESS: 2765 S BAYSHORE DR, 2850 TIGERTAIL AV & 3300 SW 27 AV 0 150 300 I MIAMI 21 MAP (PROPOSED) 600 Feet 1 I ADDRESS: 2765 S BAYSHORE DR, 2850 TIGERTAIL AV & 3300 SW 27 AV 0 150 300 1 1 1 1 1 1 600 Feet 1 I ADDRESS: 2765 S BAYSHORE DR, 2850 TIGERTAIL AV & 3300 SW 27 AV Zoning Area / Parcel # 6 ZC # Parcels I lots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current Proposed 6 1 0141390012640 2731 Brickell Ave. Ti CS 2 0141390012660 2901 Brickell Ave T1 CS Review and analysis of this area / parcel finds that: • This change consists of changing the zoning classification from T1 "Natural Transect Zones" to CS "Civic Space Zones" of the western portion of the Alice C. Wainwright Park. • The T1 Transect designation is intended for lands, permanently set aside for conservation in a natural state. The subject site has been modified with improvements related to its use. • The subject site has been and will continue to be used as a Park. This change assigns the proper zoning designation to the site and its use. • The proposed zoning designation is consistent with the existing Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) FLUM designation of "Public Parks and Recreation" for the subject site. Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the application as presented. File ID#: 12-01180zc Analysis for ZONING CHANGE Yes No N/A. ® n L File ID: 12-01180zc #6 a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. Z I I n b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. Z C C c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. F l d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. Z C n e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. Z ❑ ❑ f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Z n n g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. Z ❑ C Z C Z C Z C Z ❑ Z L. Z C Z ❑ Z ❑ h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. C i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. C j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. ❑ k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. P I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. C m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. C n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. n o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. n p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 0 150 300 I IIIII MIAMI 21 MAP (EXISTING) 600 Feet 1 I ADDRESS: 2731 & 2901 BRICKELL AV 0 150 300 I III I 1 MIAMI 21 MAP (PROPOSED) 600 Feet 1 I ADDRESS: 2731 & 2901 BRICKELL AV 0 150 300 1 1 1 1 1 1 600 Feet 1 I ADDRESS: 2731 & 2901 BRICKELL AV Zoning Area / Parcel # 7 ZC # Parcels I lots Folio # Address Zoning Designation Current Proposed 1 0101000000294 195 NW 2nd Street CI T6 80 0° 2 0101000000295 200 NW 1st Avenue CI T6-80-0,' Review and analysis of this area / parcel finds that: • The subject properties consist of two parcels. Parcel #1 represents the south lot that abuts an alleyway on the north, NW 1st Avenue on the east, NW 1st Street on the south, and the metro rail on the west. Parcel #2 represents the north lot that abuts NW 3rd Street on the north, NW 1st Street on the east, an alleyway on the south, and the metro rail on the west. • The designated parcels are currently zoned CI "Civic Institution" Transect Zone. • The parcels are privately owned and were inappropriately assigned split zoning during the adoption of Miami 21; CI to the west and T6-80-0 to the East. • The proposed change corrects this error and provides consistent zoning designation for the entire privately owned parcel. • The proposed zoning change requires a Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Future Land Use Map amendment for consistency. From "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation, & Utilities" to CBD "Central Business District". Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval of the change as presented. File I D#: 12-01180zc Analysis for ZONING CHANGE Yes No N/A. nEZ O El ® C C File ID: 12-01180zc #7 a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. NW 2ND AVE w V) 0 150 MIAMI 21 MAP (PROPOSED) NW 4TH_ST_ NW 1ST ST T6-36B-O 300 600 Feet PW;Com Pia \\ NW 3RD STyvvvvvvvvvvyyyyyyvv__ W NW 2 N D STvy\ \\v \\\\\\\\.\\\\ \\ v_ V) Downtown W FLAGLER ST ADDRESS: 195 NW 2 ST & 200 NW 1 AV NW 2ND AVE w V) 0 150 MIAMI 21 MAP (EXISTING) NW 4THST_ CI NW 1ST ST T6-36B-O 300 600 Feet PW;Com Pia NW 3RD STAvvv v`vyy_yyy�\��\ \w NW.2ND STvy\\\vvvy`vvvv\ v_ V) Downtown W FLAGLER ST ADDRESS: 195 NW 2 ST & 200 NW 1 AV 0 150 300 600 Feet ADDRESS: 195 NW 2 ST & 200 NW 1 AV