HomeMy WebLinkAboutLimited Review Of City0ict-C1-07 11:35aRm Fram-
T-156 PP.02 F-4a2
Audit Title: LIMITED REVIEW OF CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE
EMPOWERMENT ZONE INITIATIVE PROGRAM
AUDIT NUMBER 03-017
Date of Report: May 20, 2003.
BACKGROUND:
Miami -Dade County was designated an urban Empowerment Zone (EZ) effective January
1999. The objective of the EZ program is to rebuild communities in poverty stricken
inner cities and rural areas by developing and implementing strategic plans. The plans
are required to be based upon the following principles
Creating economic opportunities for EZ residents.
Creating sustainable community development
• Building broad participation among community -based partners
• Describing a strategic vision for change in the community.
This initiative provides tax incentives and performance grants, and also focuses on
supporting people in getting necessary job skills among other social needs. The Federal
government approved 8 neighborhood targeted areas and the EZ Board of directors
created a ninth (9th) targeted area, which is located in downtown Miami. The 9 targeted
areas are Florida City, Homestead, Model City/Liberty City, Overtown, East Little
Havana, Wynwood, Allapartah, Melrose, and downtown Miami. Six (6) of the 9 targeted
areas are located in the City of Miami and 76% of those who live within the EZ are City
of Miami residents.
The Trust was established under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
A Board of Directors and the Executive committee oversees the activities of the EZ Trust
and ensures that the strategic plans are implemented. The communities elect
44
4o-b W"'W4—WI l I .JJCam r16flIII
representatives organized in neighborhood assemblies to ensure that neighborhoods are
properly represented.
The federal government pledged $100 million of Social Services Block Grant (SSBG)
monies to be funded through the department of Health and Human Services and $130
million of tax-exempt bond financing. Private lenders pledged nearly $400 million over
two years, $1 billion over ten years, 5,000 specific job commitments from the private
sector with equivalent of $380 million in wage contributions. Additionally, the County
pledged $100 million and the State of Florida pledged between $50 million to $100
million to match the SSBG funding.
SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES:
The scope of the limited review/examination was to determine how funding was
allocated, the nature and extent of the economic benefits derived by the City, and also to
determine whether all legislation passed and adopted by the City Commission in
connection with the EZ initiative program was properly executed. The
examination/review covered the period October 1, 1999, through September 30, 2002.
The objectives of this limited review/examination engagement are as follows: .
• To determine whether City Commission Resolution number 98-636 was
transmitted to the Miami -Dade County Board of Commission by the City
Manager as directed.
• To determine how the empowerment zone resources are allocated among the
targeted areas within the EZ.
4`
ot..-11-07 11:35am Fran- T-155 P.04/10 F-4E2
• To determine the tangible public/community benefits derived from the
disbursements of approved allocations for the empowerment zone projects within
the City of Miami.
• To determine the benefits to the City of Miami businesses and residents from the
array of empowerment zone financial incentives.
• To perform other procedures as deemed necessary.
46
Oct-01-07 11:36am From- T-15$ P1E/10 F-452
SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS:
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS
RESOLUTION NUMBER 98-636 WAS NOT TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COI itlISSIOJV BY CITY MANAGER AS DIRECTED.
On June 23, 1998, the City Commission passed and adopted resolution number 98-636,
which authorized and directed the City Manager to participate in the preparation of the
Federal Empowerment Zone (EZ) Round II Application process, by assigning staff and
services of a professional consultant, subject to the Miami -Dade County's (County)
agreement with certain terms and conditions.
The City Manager was directed to forward a copy of this Resolution upon adoption
thereof and to request that the Miami -Dade Board of County Commission adopt a
resolution agreeing to the said terms and conditions. Pursuant to Resolution number 98-
636, $100,000 was appropriated from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
monies and was required to be used for consulting services. However, we noted that the
Community Development department did not procure the services of a professional
consultant that would have assisted the City, in preparing for the EZ Round II Application
process, as directed by the Commission. Upon audit inquiry and based upon our review
of the application/records submitted to the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development, it appears that Resolution number 98-636 was never transmitted to
the County, as directed by the City Commission. Therefore, the County never considered
nor agreed to the terms and conditions stipulated on the Resolution.
47
11:Ham Fror- 1.-156 PAC/10 F--g2
Recornrnendation
The Agenda Office has implemented a process for monitoring the implementation of all
Commission directions.
Response and Action plan
None_
48
QGt-61-0T 11:36arrm Fromm - T-153 P.07/10 F-452
MIAMI DADE EMPOWERMENT ZONE TRUST
EMPOWERMENT ZONE (EZ) RE$OVRCES ARE ALLOCATED EVENLY AMONG
THE AREAS WJJIIIN TIDE .?Z AND NOT ON THE BASIS OF POPULATION
SIZE.
Our review of pertinent records disclosed that resources were allocated evenly among the
targeted areas in the EZ during the review period. We noted that 6 of the 9 targeted areas
are located in the City of Miami and 76% of those who live within the EZ are City of
Miami residents. However, EZ records indicate that the targeted areas within the City of
Miami were allocated approximately $11 million (or 48%) of the S25 million received
during the audit period. The President of the EZ Trust stated that an additional $10
million of County surtax monies was allocated for projects in the Overtown area. Surtax
revenues are documentary stamp fees paid by developers. A more -equitable and fair
allocation process would have considered population density of the targeted areas within
the EZ.
Recornrz endati
We recommend that the Trust consider population density in its fixture allocation of
resources.
R soonse and Action Plan
The EZ Trust President stated that the (EZ) Round II Application was approved on the
basis of equal allocation of all resources among the targeted areas,
49
Oct-01 -07 11:Hwri Pram- 7-166 P.Ge/1O 1F-452
THE TANGIBILE PUBLIC/COMMUNITY BENEFITS DERIVED FROM THE
DISBURSEMENT OF APPROVED ALLOCATIONS FOR THE EMPOWERMENT ZONE
/.1ECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MIAMI.
The EZ Trust records reviewed indicated that the Trust received approximately $25 million of
federal and state funding during the period October I. 1999, through September 30, 2002. The
records reviewed also indicated the targeted areas within the City of Miami were allocated
approximately $11 million (or 48%) of the $25 million received. We were provided with a
listing, which disclosed specific resolutions that approved certain amounts to be allocated and/or
disbursed to various vendors/organizations for projects located in the targeted areas within the
City. The aggregate amount on this listing is approximately $6.4 million. The listing includes
approximately $1.7 million appropriated and/or disbursed for 5 projects that were described as
Northside/Poinciana developable sites. According to the excerpts, these projects would have
substantial impact on all EZ residents. The purpose (benefits) of the allocations and/or
disbursements includes but not limited to landscape beautification programs, business
counseling, summer youth program, land use planning, educational workshop, working capital,
marketing/public relations, surveys, and facades. Due to the limited nature of this review
engagement, we did not verify whether the amounts shown were actually received by the
vendors/organizations and used for the purposes stated. Additionally, the President of the EZ
Trust stated that an additional $10 million of County surtax monies has been allocated for
projects in Overtown. Surtax revenues are documentary stamp fees paid by developers. The
nature of the projects that benefited was not verified due to the limited nature of this review
engagement.
Recommendation
None.
Respgpse_ and Action. Plan
None.
Oct-01-07 11:37am From- T-158 P.00/10 F-452
THE BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MIAMI ,BUSIN 'SS�'S AND 'SIDENTS FROM THE
ARRAY OF E' lPOWERMENT ZONE FINANCIAL INCENTIVES:
The primary objective of the EZ program as noted on the EZ application was to rebuild the
poverty stricken inner cities and rural areas of Miami -Dade County by developing and
implementing strategic plans that would create economic opportunities, financial incentives, tax
incentives and attract performance grant monies.
TAX EXEMPT BOND FINANCING.
• We were informed that no Revenue bond funding had been closed as of April 17, 2003,
However, the President of the EZ Trust stated' in a written memorandum that industrial
revenue bond totaling $30 million has been approved for the Dupont Hotel and
preliminary approval of additional $25 million has been granted for the Everglade Hotel
both located in the City of Miarni,
SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT ,MONIES.
• The Trust has not received any social services block grant monies.
TAX DEDUCTIONS ALL O WED .
• Upon audit inquiry, we were informed that the EZ Trust does not generate and/or
maintain information/data pertaining to tax deductions that were allowed by the Internal
Revenue Services (IRS) in connection with environmental clean-ups made within the EZ
area. Additionally, no information/data was maintained for tax deductions that were
allowed by IRS for the hiring of EZ neighborhood residents, and for Section 179 business
tax deductions for qualified zone property. We made an attempt to obtain these
information/data from the IRS, however, we were informed that the information
requested were not tracked and/or maintained by EZ neighborhoods.
51
Oct-01-P7 11:37am From- T-15E P.1O/10 F-462
EMPOWERMENT ZONE'S PERFORMANCE REPORT .AND/OR COMPLIANCE
WITH TJiE IMPLEMENTATION OF OTHER MAJOR COMPONENTS OF TII
STR4 TEcIC PLANS.
• An annual report issued by the Empowerment Zone Trust (EZ) and the Enterprise
Community indicated that the EZ Trust remains committed to the goals and objectives of
HUD application. However, the report noted that its approach has been modified as a
result of limited funding and now leverages its initial capitalization as equity.
ANNUAL EXTERNAL AUDITS.
• The EZ's financial statements are included as part of the Miami -Dade County -wide
financial statements and audited by a major accounting firm. There is currently an. on-
going stand alone audit of the EZ Trust. However, we noted that the United States
department of Housing • and Urban Development perforrned a limited review of the
Empowerment Zone and the Enterprise Community programs during the period June 11
through June 14, 2002.
Recommendation
None.
Response and Action Plan
None.
52