The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAdditional Information Requested by the PABW ISS SEROTA HELFMAN FASTORIZA COLE & L3ONISKE P.A. [ITCHED- A. 61 ERMAN NiNA L. HOtVISKE MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN JAIUE ALAN COLE STEPHEN J. HELFMAN GILSERTO PASTORIZA M {CNAEL S. PQPOK JOSEPH H. SEROTA SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN C1-4ARO JAY WEISS DAVID M. WOLPIN LYNN M. DANNHEISSER IGNACIO G. DEL VALLE DOUJGLAS R. GONZALES MELiSSA P. ANDERSON' LILLIAN ARANGO CIE LA HOZ' JAMES E. BAKER JEFF P.H. CA2EAU RAQUEL ELEJABARRIETA CHAD FRIEDMAN ALAN L. GABRtEL* VIA HAND DELIVERY A T T CRNE.YS AT LAW MIAMI-BADE OFFICE 2525 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD SUITE 700 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TELEPHONE 30S-854-0800 FACSIM{LE 3054354-2323 WWW.WSF;-LAVe.COM S ROWARO OFFICE 20D EAST SROWARC3 Ea0LILEVARD e SIDITE E900 FORT L.AUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301 TELEPHONE 954-763-4242 m FACSIMILE 954-764-7770 Mr. Anel Rodriguez Hearing Boards City of Miami 444 S.W. 2nd Ave., 7th Floor Miami, FL 33130 *OF COUNSEL February 27, 2007 GR£G0Ru A. HAILE JOHN J. °KENDRECF I 1 KAREN L1ESERMAN* jOHANNA M. LUNDGREN ANDREW W. MAI MATTHEW H. MANDEL FAMi MAUGHAM ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAURi YtlNIOR P1NE1R0 -JOHN .1. QUtCK ANTHONY L. RECIO SCOTT A. ROSIN GALL D. SEROTA* JONATHAN C. SHAMRES ESTRELL1TA S. 51BILA EDUARDO M. SOTO MICHAEL L. STINES JOSE S. TALAVERA STEVEN E. TAYLOR LAURA K. WENDELL* JAMES E. WHITE CLINTON A. WRIGHT III" Re: Columbus Centre Planning Advisory Board Hearing Exhibits Dear Mr. Rodriguez Enclosed please find copies of the following three exhibits that were presented to the Planning Advisory Board for the Columbus Centre hearing in response to questions from board members: 1 Shadow study - Page A-008 depicting projected impact of shadows on December 21s1 normally the shortest day of each year 2. Shadow study --- Page A-009 depicting projected impact of shadows on June 21st, noiiiially the longest day of each year 3. Federal Aviation Administration Determination of No Hazard dated January 26, 2007 - deteinzines that a building with an overall height of 710 feet above mean sea level at the location of the subject property does not constitute a hazard to air navigation provided normal marking and lighting regulations are observed Please include these in the official hearing file. Mr. Anel Rodriguez February 27, 2007 Page 2 Thanks for your attention to this matter. Please feel free to call s sae if you have any questions. TRJms 1339001 Enclosure Very truly yours, Tony Recio WEISS SEI OTA HELFMAN PASTORIZA COLE & BONISKE, RA. .:x.10,4-$ASWAI"fif v0.6fAlt:ON40.41,05.1Werel... R E V E T A V EC A NJ P. A. >t0.4 7 polb COLUMBUS CENTRE 1492 SOUTH MAN AVENUE, MIAMI - FLORIDA f E V E L T A V E A L E P.A. COLUMBUS CENTRE 1492 SOUTH MIAMI AVENUE, MAK - PLORIDA i pi Federal A vt±on Administration Air Traffic Airspace 73ra c z, ASs>4-520 2601 Meacham Bl.nr d, Fort Worth, TX 76137-0520 Issued Date; 01/26/207 Nickel Goeseke 1450 South Miami LLC 1492 S. Miami Avenue 6202 Miami, FL 33130 Aeronaut cal Study 2006-AS0-5829-0E. ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION * The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning: Structure: Location: Latitude: Longitude: Heights: Building -SW Corner Miami, FL 25-45-32.74 N NAD 83 80-11-40.02 W 692 feet above ground level (AGL) 710 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities. Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met: As a condition to this Determination, the structure is marked and/or lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 AC 70/7460-1K Change 1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, red lights - Chapters 4,5(Red),&12 It is required that the enclosed FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be completed and returned to this office any time the project is abandoned or: At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part I) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest heigh (7460-2, Part II) See attachment for additional condition(s) or information. This determination expires on 01/26/2009 unless: (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office. (b) the construction_ is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION Page 1 MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OPEICE AT EXPIRATION DATE. DAYS 'r kI0R TO HE This determination is subject to review , f an interested party files apeW tin that is received by the FAA on or before February 25, 2007. In the event a petition for review is filed, it must contain a full statement of the basis upon which it is race and be submitted in triplicate to the Manager, Airspace and Rules Division - Room 423, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 independence Ave, Washington, D.C. 20591. This determination becomes fina1 on March 7, 2007 unless a petition_ is timely filed. In which case, this deterr:�ination will not become final pending disposition of the petition_ Interested parties will be notified of the grant of any review. For any questions regarding your petition, please contact Office of Airspace and Rules via telephone -- 202--267--8783 - or facsimile 202-267-9328. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, irequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be used during actual construction_ of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact on all existing and planned public -use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air navigation. An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any), and the basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s). A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (202)267-9219. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2006-ASO-S829-OE. Signature Control No: 485224-522919 Kevin P. Haggerty Manager, Obstruction_ Evaluation Service (DNH) Page 2 Attachment (S, Addizion=,1 rformat 7460-2 Attached use Page 3 Add.itioriai Information for AST 2006-AS0-5829-OE Proposalz To construct ri e ned c a i gh: of 692 feet above ground level, 710 feet above mean sea level. Location: The structure will be located 5.59 nau icaL miles east of MIA Airport reference point. Section 77.23 (a) (1) by 192 feet - a height more than 500 feet above around level. Section 77.23 (a) (2) by 233 feet - a height that exceeds 477 feet above mean sea level within 5.59 nautical miles of MIA. Section 77.25 (a) (5) a height that affects are Airport Surface by penetrating Section 77.25 (d) Approach Surface by 39 feet as applied to MIA. Details of the proposed structure were circularized for public comment. There were no letters of objection received during the comment period_ The proposed structure proximity to the airport was considered and found to be acceptable. The impact on arrival, departure and en route procedures for aircraft operating under VFR/aFR conditions at existing and planned public use and military airports, as well as aeronautical facilities, was considered during the analysis of this structure. The aeronautical study disclosed that the structure, at a height of 710 feet above mean sea level (AMSL), would have no adverse effect upon any terminal or en route instrument procedure or altitude. The cumulative impact (IFR/VFR) resulting for the structure, when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures was considered and found to be acceptable Therefore, it is determined that the proposed structure would not have a substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on any navigation facility and would not be a hazard to air navigation. ///////////END OF COMMENTS//////// SW corner of Building. Page 4