HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 4• •
Bibliography
Altshuler, Alan. A. and J.A. Gomez-lbanez. 1993. Regulation/or Revenue,. The PohticalEconomy of
Land 1/se EA:actions Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Baldassare, Mark. 1998. When GOYernn?en/Fails:• The Orange CounO'Bankrzptcy, Berkeley:
University of California Press and the Public Policy Institute of California.
California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. 1998a and 1998b• Debi Line. Vol. 17, Nos. 7
and 8. July and August.
. 1998. Calfornia Debt issuance Primer Sacramento, CA: California Debt and
Advisory Commission.
California State Controller. 1997, State of Ca/Aiwa COMM/MO Redevelop/nen/Agencies Annual
.Report, J995--96. Sacramento: California State Controller.
Chapman, Jeffrey 1. 1995. "California: The Enduring Crises," in Steven D. Gold (ed.) The Fiscal
Crises ofthe Siaier. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. pp. 104-140.
. 1996. "The Challenge of Entrepreneurship: An Orange County Case Study,"
Municipal Finance Journal. 17. pp. 16-3 2
. 1998, The Continuing Red/sirihuiion of Fiscal Siresr. • the Long Run Consequences
ofProposition Li (Working Paper) Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Citrin, Jack. 1979. "Do People Want Something for Nothing: Public Opinion on Taxes and
Government Spending" National Tor ✓Donna/, Vol. 32, No. 2 {supplement), June, pp. 113-130.
Dardia, Michael. 1998. Su6s•idiringRedeF'elgpmernt in California. San Francisco: Public Policy
Institute of California.
Dresch, Marla and Steven M. Sheffrin. 1997a. Who Pays for Exactions and Development Fees? San
Francisco: The Public Policy Institute of California.
. 1997b• "The Role of Development Fees and Exactions in Local Public Finance,"
Stale TaxA/o/er: December 1, 1411-1416.
Fox, William F. and Matthew N. Murray. 1998. "Incentives, firm location decisions and regional
economic performance." in Helen F. Ladd (ed.) Loco/ Government Tar and Land Ur•e Policies in the
United Sieves Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. pp. 168-181.
Frates, Steven B. 1998, "Proposition 13 Did Not Strangle Local Budgets," Cal -Tar Digest, Vol. 2, No.
5 (June), pp. 5-6.
Johnson, Craig L. and John L. Mikesell. 1994. "Certificates of Participation and Capital Markets:
Lessons from Brevard County and Richmond Unified School District," Pu61ic Budgeting and
Finance, Volume 14, No. 3, 41-54.
Johnson, Greg. 1998. "County Auditor's Association Changes Guidelines for Calculating Property
Tax Administration Costs," CSil FO4ni=Nerur•. (April).
Kesslar, Karen Coker. 1994. "Realignment Data Project Report #1" March 6.
Kirlin, John J., Jeffrey I. Chapman, and Peter Asmus. 1994• "California Policy Choices: the
Context," in John J. Kirlin and Jeffrey 1. Chapman, (eds.) California Policy Choices !%lame 9.
Sacramento and Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, pp. 1-23.
Kirlin, John J. , Jeffrey 1. Chapman, Peter Asmus, and Roy Thompson. 1994, "Fiscal Reform in
California," CalforniaFiScalReforni.. AP/an/or.9ctiom, "Oakland, CA: California Business —
Higher Education Forum.
- 29 -
•
Kirlin, John J. and Anne Kirlin. 1982. Pith/lc Choices--Prima/e Resources. Sacramento, CA:
California Tax Foundation.
Legislative Analyst's Office. 1992. The 1992--93 Budge/ Perspec/fives and Issues. Sacramento,
California.
. 1993. "Making Government Make Sense: A More Rational Structure for State and
Local Government" The 1993-99'Budge/. Penrpeciiies and Issues. Sacramento, CA.
1996a. "Reversing the Property Tax Shifts," April 2. Sacramento, California.
1996b, U;dersianding Proposi/ion 2l8 (December). Sacramento, California.
1997. Calfornra .ir Spending Plan, 19971999 (October), Sacramento, California.
Luce, Tom. 1998. Regional tax -base sharing: the Twin -Cities experience," in Helen F. Ladd (ed.)
Local goveinnnen/ Tar and land are Policies in /he Uni/edS/a/es. Northampton, MA: Edward
Elgar, pp. 168-181.
Man, Joyce Y. (1999). "Fiscal Pressure, Tax Competition, and the Adoption of Tax Increment
Financing," Urban S/iIdes. Vol. 37, No. 7.
Man, Joyce Y. and Mark Rosentraub. Forthcoming. "Tax Increment Financing: Municipal Adoption
and Effects on Property Value Growth," Pu61ic Finance Review.
McCarthy, Mike and Lynn Graebner. 1997. "County subsidy of industrial utility rates violates
Proposition 218," Sacrarnen/o Business Journal, Vol. 14, No. 8, May 12, pp. 1, 23.
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith, inc. 1979. Calfania s TaxAlloca/ian Bonds.. Ka/Nu of
Proposition 13. (October), New York: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith, Fixed Income
Research.
Misczynski, Dean. 1986. "The Fiscalization of Land Use, " in John J. Kirlin and Donald R. Winkler
(eds.), Calfornia Policy Choices: Yd. 3. Sacramento: University of Southern California.pp. 73-106.
Ross, Jean. 1997. "Proposition 13: Its Impact on California and Implications for State and Local
Finance," Siaie Tax Notes, Vol. 13, No. 10 (September 8), 635-644.
Shires, Michael A., John Ellwood, Mary Sprague. 1998, Has Proposition I3Deliverea'.2 The
Changing Tar Burden in C a/jornia. San Fi onc&co.• PA/h&c Polk), Ins/itine ojCalifornia.
Sokolow, Alvin D. and Peter Detwiler. Forthcoming. "State -Local Relations in California," in Platon
Rigos, Dale Krane, and Mel Hill (eds.). home Ru/e in America' A Fif/�, Slate Handbook.
Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Yinger, John. 1998. "The Incidence of Development Fees and Special Assessments," National Fax
Journal. Vol. LI, No. 1. (March), pp. 23-42.
- 30 -