HomeMy WebLinkAboutOLD ZB Reso (2005-1070)Miami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 2005-1070
Monday, October 17, 2005
Mr. Miguel Gabela offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED DENIAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CHANGE OF ZONING IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, PAGE 44, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, FROM 0 OFFICE TO C-1
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 2460
SOUTHWEST 16TH COURT AND A PORTION OF 2465 SOUTHWEST 17TH AVENUE,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED 0 OFFICE.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Juvenal A. Pina,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Away
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta No
Ms. Chloe Keidaish Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 7
NAY: 1
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 7-1
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Sec
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2005-0975
item Nbr:
6
o
e
•
Exhibit A
Lot 32, Block 1, Woodside A Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof, as
recorded in Plat Book 5, at Page 28, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade
County, Florida.
Property Address: 2460 Southwest 16 Court, and a portion of 2465 Southwest 17
Avenue, Miami, Florida 33145
Miami -Dade County Folio No.: 01-4140-006-0280 and a portion of 01-4140-006-
0010
Section 2210. Nature and
e of
Zoning Board
Report City Commission
on
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When menin to the rezoning of land under application made ander d has sArtitudied and the
repot and,
recommendation
g of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood
or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains t ' the same or similar population density pattern and t
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necess ry.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. to a
i Theproposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect publicsafety
p
greater extent than the existing classification.
d change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
j) The propose
k) The propo
sed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
1} The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
regulations.
accord with existing re g
to
n) The propo
sed change conveys the same treatment to the individualon of the public.
welfareowners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection
o) There
are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
hereby does not
on the property
a
p) It is difficult to find other
already permitting such us
Motion: After considering
request on agenda item #
adequate sites in
e.
t e factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No.
rova0Oden move that the
be recommended to the City Commission for (app )4��-�-ri
the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
Print Name
°