Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutsubmittal-11 February 24, 2005 City Commission Meeting on Zoning and Planning Public Hearing regarding Items PZ.8 First Reading and PZ.9 First Reading Biscayne 21 is the name of the home where we, a group of neighbors, have joined together to address our concerns about these two recommended variances in question. We are here to request that you DEFER on passing these variances. We strongly oppose the zoning variance that you have been asked to review today. We urge you to defer its First Reading until better communication about the project has taken place between the developers and the community. As you know, this variance is necessary to allow Royal Palm Communities to build their proposed project as submitted in their December 2004 MUSP application. We are concerned about the apparent lack of height limits. We are not in agreement with the size and scale of the project. Most of us never were from the start. And we are even more vehemently opposed now that the developers are cramming the same immense tower proposed in August into a property that is now 26% less net area. I argue that members of our community were not made adequately aware of the magnitude of this development. Those marketing the project created false impressions and encouraged misunderstandings. Significant civil opposition to this project as defined DOES exist, IS real, and will only grow if our issues are not addressed. These developers continuously overstate certain desirable aspects of the project while completely understating the drawbacks that will negatively impact the quality of life at Biscayne 21 and for other local residents. We have high hopes that democratic processes within our community, more specifically our City of Miami and our Edgewater district, will let our voices be heard. We are here because Edgewater residents, silent far too long, demand more active involvement in community and land development planning and zoning issues that impact us. SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM fz. ON 2L/-a‘ 2 We are here to contribute in positive ways and, like you our City Commissioners, are excited to see our neighborhood evolve and develop in some very positive ways. Many of us feel like we live in a place now where development is out of control. We have seen historic homes torn down in nearby streets and have developed a bad case of learned helplessness, or a belief that there is just nothing that we can do. And this seems to be exactly what developers, like Royal Palm want. Why did we just come to realize that the overwhelming majority of us share common concerns but yet failed to express those until right now? The answer is complex, but I will break it down into 4 answers that relate to poor public communication that has kept us quiet. First, as a community, Edgewater seems to be increasingly becoming more fractured. Residents of other areas in the Upper East Side have benefited from solid grassroots organizations. Morningside and Belle Meade are just two examples of neighborhoods with strong histories of mobilization to protect residential rights. Edgewater has lacked this same grassroots power structure, BUT we are NOT an urban wasteland devoid of community and history. Much to the contrary as you will learn today when you meet us. We intend to jump-start the momentum necessary to increase residential community participation in the planning of our community and home. Second, despite what these developers say, there simply has not been enough open three- way dialogue between all of our area's developers, the city and its original Edgewater residents. Third, whatever dialogue that has taken place has not trickled down to all those concerned. Believe it or not, many neighbors just didn't know about the enormous magnitude of the Paramount project. I first learned of it last fall from my mother who lives in New York and told me how she had heard about some fancy condo near where I live that would have elevators to each residential unit. Fourth, I argue that the dialogue and information that DID trickle down was mostly about misperceptions or half -of -the -story impressions about the development project in question. Let me give you some examples. The developers spread the good news around the community that Paramount was all about townhouses. But they understated the 46-story tower, and the fact that townhouse units would only make up less than 2% of the total units. The developers spread the good news that they preserved one historic home, Miami's famous Something About Mary house. Submitted Into the public record in connection with item ?z- ? on -2•sy-os Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk 3 But they understated the demolition of other historic homes that once belonged to "Mary's" next door neighbors. They spread the good news of their intentions to keep plenty of green spaces. But they understated the long shadows to be cast in all directions, including to our swimming pool each and every afternoon. They spread the good news of commercial enhancements, such as restaurants and shops, that many of us look forward to having next door. But they understated the failure to adequately address parking needs for future luxury condo residents, their visitors and those enjoying the new commercial establishments. They spread the good news of their willingness to help the city beautify North Bayshore Drive, its sidewalks and waterfront areas. But have they also understated what could be ulterior motives to incringe upon the waterfront that is to our immediate south at Biscayne 21? They spread the good news last fall to a few Biscayne 21 residents about their first MUSP designed for the entire city block. Most residents did not attend. Communication of their visit was a mere line item on a Board Meeting mail -room flier. There was never any direct communication from the developers straight to individual residents. But let me also add that they never formally presented the existing December 2004 MUSP to us at all. This would be the redesign that calls for only 3.8 fewer units on 26.5% less net area. They spread the good news about the "affordable housing" bonus that they would pay the city if you grant them the necessary FAR of 2.4, which represents a rather heavy 28.3% increase from the existing zoning of floor area ratio. But they understated that our former neighbors evicted from 340 and 348 Northeast 21st Street are now looking for alternative "affordable housing" somewhere else in the city. They spread the good news in Sunday's Herald implying that the project was a done -deal and announcing sales would commence in March. But they understated a key point made by Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta, the Zoning Board Chair, on January 10 when she reluctantly recommended the zoning variance to you today. I am talking about the necessary alley closure that must be granted by the city and to my best understanding has not yet been granted. The property has an east -west zoned alleyway. Isn't an alleyway public property that would in fact be real estate owned by the City, just like a street? Isn't an alley generally Submitted Into the public record in connection with item 72 - S' on . • os Priscilla A. Thompson City Clerk 4 not included into the net area of private property if an owner happens to have two bordering properties divided by an alleyway? On the Biscayne Blvd side, the alley is bordered to the north by Bacardi's property — making it a shared alleyway. I learned there are three types of alleys - "a public right of way", "an easement" and "part of an existing private property". This couldn't possibly be considered part of an existing private property if it shared with their immediate neighbors. So wouldn't that have to make it either a public right of way or an easement? If this alley is in fact city property and does not belong to the developers, and if the city has not yet granted permission to the developers to eliminate this east -west alley within the zoning, how or why have the developers gone ahead within the past week and built a sidewalk that stretches from in front of Mary's house about 50 feet south and ACROSS what it still zoned as a city alleyway? I would at this time like to submit photographs for the record to the City Clerk to show the Commissioners what I am talking about. I took them yesterday at 4:00 pm. We are here today to bring this wide range of concerns to your attention and kindly ask you to consider either denying or deferring the First Hearing of the zoning variance application that was submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Communities. We very much agree with the Planning Department's own Pre -Application Design Review Committee that concluded in late December that this revised MUSP is "unacceptable" and "out of scale within the context of the neighborhood." Our neighborhood. Let me conclude by opening the floor up to my neighbors at Biscayne 21 to share a little more insight into the vast array of details that I have brought to your attention just now. We ask you humbly to proceed today with caution and restraint and to hear us out. That is why I requested a time -specific meeting so that more of could attend. We thank you, Commissioner Winton, our District 2 commissioner, and Commissioner Sanchez, Chair of this meeting, for allowing us this special consideration. This matter is of utmost importance to the residents at Biscayne 21 and we appreciate your taking our concerns to heart. Chris Tingue Biscayne 21 Resident 2-24-2005 Submitted Into the public record in connection with item Pt- on .0-,-1/-os Priscilla A. Thompson -�-._ City Clerk Note: The following document was received by the City Clerk's Office on March 7, 2005. The document has been filed as correspondence relating to Items PZ.8 (File No. 04-01268a) and PZ.9 (File No. 04-01268b) listed on the February 24, 2005 Commission Meeting agenda. March 2, 2005 Commissioner Johnny L. Winton City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Dear Commissioner Winton: We, the group of Biscayne 21 residents, who went to City Hall last Thursday would like to thank you for hearing our concerns and deferring decisions about the land use and zoning variances applied for on behalf of Royal Palm Communities. Based on your statements, we think you would prefer to approve the land use variance allowing them "Restricted Commercial" and to make our community more dynamic in terms of more local businesses. This would be fine with us. You also expressed your concerns about allowing them to pay a bonus to increase FAR density and allow them the zoning variance necessary to build the project proposed to the City in December 2004. You did not seem to have time to address the issue of the alleyway that Ms. Hernandez -Acosta had expressed concern about on January 10, 2005 in the Zoning Board hearing. We would welcome an opportunity to speak with you or a representative of your staff in the near future at our home at Biscayne 21. We know that development and many new hi -rise condos are well on their way and as you said, "the horse is out of the barn." We are all for progress, but we are just concerned about negative impacts on our quality of life in Edgewater. We are grateful to the many positive developments that have taken place in recent years, such as renovations of Margaret Pace Park, opening of North Bayshore Dr from NE 20th Terr to NE 20th St, and of course the eventual grand opening of our Performing Arts Center. We are enclosing about 70 petitions that were signed by many residents in the 36 hours prior to the meeting. Most of these residents wanted to attend but could not due to work obligations. Many others did not yet sign the petition, but have now indicated willingness to do so. Our intention last Thursday was for one of us to conclude by reading this statement and give the copies to the City Clerk for the record, but we did not have time to do so. In conclusion, we thank you for all you have done for our community, and we support you and the Commission with all of these positive improvements to our area, and appreciate your hearing our voices last Thursday at City Hall. With kind regards Name D Low izG oKc Name c 0 E Name /9t9 resident since i9G% resident since reside i qqo resident since 990 resident since r, ;1?ce2 Name resident since Name resident since \,,.\,efee.(ze,00(z)(2,A Name resident since Name i91:1 resident since if79 owner since S owner since owner 9o2 owner since /9902 owner since /q%c7 owner since owner since Imo( owner since owner si ce ‘;le 199 r Name resident since owner since Signature/Date 4v�s Ot a,1 Signature/Date ignature/ ate Z Signatur- /Date Signa Signa re/Da Name resident since owner since Signature/Date Name resident since owner since Signature/Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey. „oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name u £ V1IAl S Sign)()AAAJ4) ature Owner of Unit 46f - -_( Date Yahoo! Mail - scotl:ofc@yahoo.com Page 1 of 2 I-100, MAIL Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:36:00 -0800 (PST) From: "Dennis Scott' <scottofc@yahoo.com> Subject: My note to Commissioners re: Paramount at Edgewater project. To: "Tingue, Christopher S." <ctingue@miami.edu>, cstingue@aol.com Dear Respected Commissioners: Print - Close Window My name is Dennis Scott and I am the owner of two apartments in the Biscayne 21 Condominium located at North Bayshore Drive & 21st Street. I regret that I cannot address you folks personally today; for the same reason I have not been able to voice my opinion in past hearing meetings, my work demands preclude me from appearing before you. Again, my apologies! In the past however, I have been able to attend several Edgewater neighborhood meetings, some headed by our own distinguished Commissioner Johnny Winton, where it appeared that sincere opinions and dialog was sought pertaining to our community in Edgewater. Time and time again we voiced our disdain for the encroachment of sky -scraper monoliths that you folks might call 'high - density' residential living, especially at the water's edge. Our building and many others in the immediate area are low to mid -rise buildings and are not in line with this type of proposed skyline. We are not Manhattan NY and we do not want to become one. The bottom line is that hundreds of families in our area could be negatively affected for many years by the decisions that you folks make here in these chambers. It is terribly unreasonable and downright insulting for you to allow a 46-story building to be erected less than 100 yards from our modest 14-story Condominium. The dramatic difference in height and mass will scar our tranquil area forever, not to mention the parking nightmares that have already begun to plague our area because of some recently finished projects nearby. And in less than a half mile to the south of us on Bayshore Drive you already have the massive projects of the Quantum & the 1800 Club underway. I am also not aware that any significant traffic -flow studies have been compiled or published to date. On top of that, I am also not aware of any guarantees by the City or anyone else that our provided utilities of Water & Sewer, Electric, and Emergency Fire Lines will not be negatively impacted by such an enormous project on our corner in addition to the Quantum & the 1800 Club. Please do not allow this project to continue as it currently stands and most certainly please do not permit any higher density zoning to change the dynamic of our immediate neighborhood and make us to suffer forever. The Cite project was a nice addition to our neighborhood because it blends in with the dynamics of it; the Paramount project will not! Please STOP, LOOK, & LISTEN to your Design Review and Planning Advisory Boards. After all, your own appointed Pre -Application Design Review Committee for Urban Design and Land Development was strongly against the current plans of the Paramount project as presented (and approved) this past December. Please keep the buildings in our neighborhood in perspective with one another and in line with the current surroundings and dynamics! Thank you for you valuable time and your kind consideration. Dennis Scott http://us. f408.mail.yahoo.comlymlShowLetter?box=Sent&MsgId=960_97 39170_ 107160_... 2/23/2005 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey, „oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name l 1,1 C (c' i' Owner of Unit Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few _ incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square" We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name . s "v \ ' Z6 Owner of Unit 40 44• 9e- Signa 6 /( a3 ( Date Please read and sign this gatement if you are in agreement. A fev. incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name J/�i4f�j/.�� , ?JJ A, Owner of Unit 4 /' -a"' 3 Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few „oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name N1 aIlCt 5o d �rvO irwit/A' Signature Owner of Unit 4 6Z--Z -�ooJ Date Please read and sign this Aatement if you are in agreement. A few Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bay bore Drive. Name ad fL i N £, Ke-leit3 Owner of Unit l l aciat4wu Signatur Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fev, .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name fawner -of of Unit 24 J I+ .2 23 05 Signature �� Date 7r. Copstpatiu 517204.1 To ruPctIA56- PPObrq Akik --Ra- pe L-5 C CON'CC %S Cr= 77 -is Poe CJ ,- -/ -. Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fel,-oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name /f,/ i'/ Owner of Unit Date 7i' Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey, .oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name M J 2 -A—p6 A-tL Signature Owner of Unit W/4 Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fel,...oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 214 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ��.. uf CI-e S Owner of Unit Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fev, .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. / Name Signature 02 -co- 3/ Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A feN. .oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne B levard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Baysh. - Drive. Name `/ j t 1/ti � Owner o nit 44). bieseil c›)- Signature Date Yi)t- greu'lop iLeAfr GoNaeas r-U-ti9j l6 4 47 7 ,41(4-mi Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%—oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21d St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bays re Drive. Name Signature Owner of Unit o?/4; Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A feN..oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Signature Date Owner of Unit 54 2 01 A /0 rNamn Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A feN..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Lre i4 Owner of Unit §ttiL.tdre Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A feN..oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. / f Name M4TC-e/ e5 5a eZOwner of Unit V / / .;,/,2,3 /61 \r- Date Please read and sign this aLatement if you are in agreement. A fev, Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Q/1 G r S tO G�ijE�G Owner of Unit Sv L7 /.z,3/0s- Signature Date Please read and sign this acatement if you are in agreement. A fev‘ incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Na L\ 13` G1t1(;0 Nam Signature Owner of Unit cJO Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey, .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21d St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Nam �,(�(� (5e{/(� Owner of Unit Signature 2--Z3 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fev..oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ttO/LET0-61) C Owner of Unit --19 Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey, ,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ti / # 6 gea / le Owner of Unit 20/ • Sig tur Name Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%, .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 214 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. E,e/ C /// S Signature Owner of Unit 70 CIL Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A few „oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 214 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Owner of Unit 76 / 2 (2yb , Date Please read and sign this ,Latement if you are in agreement. A fev‘ incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name e v e( e i Owner of Unit /3 Signature /©$ Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%. ancerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Nam 1 \'‘StrC)\\.e-sys‘e Owner of Unit l 9"AQQ,p Signature Date Please read and sign this catement if you are in agreement. A fey. incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20t' Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North B ore Drive. Name OAA Q ` LJ Owner of Unit 70 ,�1► as a.3 moo Signature Date Please read and sign this Jtat ement if you are in agreement. A fem. incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21gt St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name At 1‘, ' I") Z Owner of Unit - L g 15 \ 05 Si l ." ate Please read and sign this otatement if you are in agreement. A fev. Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21d St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. 5r /� / Imo' Name � l' !`'I i- 0 Owner of Unit g d 5- Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey. concerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North l ayshore Name N i Signature ve. V'y Owne of Unit Date Please read and sign this .catement if you are in agreement. A feIN incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive.\ Name /� l� Owner of Unit PO 7 Signature C) /23 /o 5 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. tt Name LuLe__ Owner of Unit l 1 Signature �a31c15 Date Please read and sign this ,Latement if you are in agreement. A fev1 .incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20t Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Owner of Unit ?o 9 6 /c 3/5 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fer..oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Na • e ail avLt WC -fI 1(4 S Owner of Unit q t 0 ignature 2/ 3%5 Date Please read and sign this ,Latement if you are in agreement. A few Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Bo J 'a 1 corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bays Name ^/is44 '4Owner of Unit 9c0 / Signature z/2 3 t/a, Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fev, .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21g` St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North B . shore Drive. Na y• 'eta... t S Si" Owner of Unit f r - Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fev..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. 1-6 Name > > '� ?Zt a vv.dj>earteroTrirt '/ 1 K� -7/3/.0 Si ' Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Ba hore D#rive Name`V ` 1,7 l Owner of Unit 05 Signature Date Please read and sign this .catement if you are in agreement. A few Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Dri1e. Name Q —c J Owner of Unit IC (2 ittA Signs 0-a( a3 (OES Date Please read and sign this .catement if you are in agreement. A fev, ancerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Signature Owner of Unit / C / 2 Date Please read and sign this Jtatement if you are in agreement. A fev..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square" We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ( t G� (A) k t 1/t Owner of Unit I 0 0( Signature 2 ' o Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey. zoncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name 4. Owner of Unit /3 / 7 -23/d Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey, .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Na Signature ti I- kid Avfg Owner of Unit / d % Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey..oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Baysh• e Drive. Name Owner of Unit a 0,7 ---- Sign a Date Please read and sign this .,tatement if you are in agreement. A fev. Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name m � � i � ‘f 141 it Signature Owner of U (6 07 02- .23 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe‘..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Rti-tAG-Z A. PA 3 Lt a31 Owner of Unit l O II Signature 02- Z3-o6- Date (---R;e. f s7/CIC4) Signature Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fev, _oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21d St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 No Baysho e Drive. Nam Owner of Unit (//Z 3/0J� Da e Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe\..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should \"consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name /1%. r10., 04 • 4, r3 Owner of Unit // O/ ignature 'fi 2cfa Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey doncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: TO: RE: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 City of Miami Commission Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21A St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name `.1 �`%L.L.. y L • i`i?i5 CHA4/ I/ ignature/ Owner of Unit At //o j 02/�73 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A feu .oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21g St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Owner of Unit ((03 "J/ Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe‘..,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21s` St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name EiLE ze. Signature Owner of Unit I Z—Z3-o6 Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fey, .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name g Owner of Unit /// 0 tgnatur/ % Date Please read and sign this ,Latement if you are in agreement. A few incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20t1' Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Namete4GC)C I.(.t Owner of Unit % 1'U Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%...oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Signature 0/A JtA5-)-n( of Unit 1 i' 1- 2P3/ Date Please read and sign this .,Latement if you are in agreement. A fev, Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North B . , or: Drive. Name Sign. re Owner of Unit 1 2-1 0 ZI‘2_1 OY Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A feh .,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21'1 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ,51-1 icyRo r4 1/410 S Owner of Unit ) Z ( S Signature ovLOA 04 2 ZI 20)5 Date Please read and sign this .catement if you are in agreement. A fev., Jncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 20 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore rive. Name Owner of Unit '/<,L Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%, �oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21a St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ,' 7 " 4, "1 _ _, A-0 a it. Owner of Unit / - D ature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fe%. ,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20t' Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name Owner of Unit / 4M - Signature Date Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A feN. ,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21g St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name L.Nolsto Owner of Unit 1 "l0c\ Signature Date 1(£b1S«,A -D Vci&(Z Please read and sign this statement if you are in agreement. A fel, ,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 20 St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive, Name J Owner of Unit 06ZSignatur• ' Date Please read and sign this .,Latement if you are in agreement. A few incerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name ' NV\ Owner of Unit 1 ('k �~ Signature Date Please read and sign this otatement if you are in agreement. A fe%. ,oncerned Biscayne 21 residents have confirmed that they will attend Thursday's City Commission meeting, but we really need as many owners possible to attend this public hearing to express their views or show their support of this statement. FOR: Zoning and Planning Meeting, February 24, 2005 TO: City of Miami Commission RE: Application for Zoning Variance Submitted on Behalf of Royal Palm Communities for Properties located at 340, 348 NE 21st St, 317, 341, 345, 363 NE 20th Terr, and 2040, 2066, 2072 N Bayshore Dr, Miami, FL With regard to the December 2004 MUSP (major use special permit) application submitted on behalf of Royal Palm Miami Holdings, we support the December 28, 2004 Planning Department's Pre -Application Design Review Committee, that concluded "that the tower height and massing is out of scale within the context of the neighborhood" and that the revised MUSP application is unacceptable. We agree that the developers should "consider building a program which addresses the new lot configuration and reduces the scale and height of the project, in order to create a project more in scale with the immediate context." Therefore, we suggest that our City Commission NOT approve the first reading of the zoning variance recommended with hesitation by our Zoning Board on January 10, 2005. We oppose this zoning variance and ultimate approval of the existing December 2004 MUSP application, which would authorize construction of the "Paramount at Edgewater Square". We oppose a 46-story tower adjacent to our property. We prefer a more modest development that is lower in height. We prefer a project that more adequately addresses its own residents' parking needs. We are concerned about future neighbors' intentions to manipulate sidewalk and waterfront restoration. We are concerned about general traffic flows, street parking, construction noise and pollution and sidewalk and street closures. We are worried about infrastructure for basic services such as sewage and waste removal, electricity and water supplies. We worry about negative impacts on our environment, and hurricane preparedness during construction. We are concerned for the loss of our own views of sunsets visible over Greater Miami and the subsequent shadow that would result from a 46-story skyscraper. We look forward to supporting a project at the property in question that we will welcome to our neighborhood without resentment and disdain and that will not negatively impact our quality of life as neighbors and residents of the City of Miami's Edgewater area along the Biscayne Boulevard corridor, and more specifically at Biscayne 21 located at 2121 North Bayshore Drive. Name .7'ih- Owner of Unit /lf 0 7" Signature Date