HomeMy WebLinkAboutproject updateJuly 8, 2004
prepared for:
Office of the City Manager
City of Miami, Florida
prepared by:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
15600 N.W. 67th Avenue, Suite 304
Miami Lakes, FL 33014-2176
Phone: 305.557.4770
Fax: 305.557.1617
Description:
The ' intent of the; Miami f St7reetcar Feasibility.! Study is to assess the
feasibility of a streetcar operation between downtown Miami and NE 79th
Street along a north -south corridor. The feasibility study will also cover
the redeveloping Buena. Vista Rail Yard area. The 6-month feasibility
study will cover alignment options, station location/planning, economic
development opportunities, traffic, parking, capital and operating costs,
ridership, connectivity to transit, and other important elements.
What is Streetcar Transit?
Miami is farther from an operating tight rail or modern streetcar system
than any other large U.S. city, so many of its residents are unfamiliar
with this transportation option. Streetcars were, however, an important
part of Miami's downtown vitality in earlier years. More importantly,
streetcars are an integral part of the city Miami is becoming, a dense,
lively, international city like so many others which now enjoy the
benefits of high -quality local transit.
Streetcar transit is a version of light rail (LRT), but has different key
characteristics:
CIIARACTERISTICS I.IGII1 RAII
Vehicles
Route Length
Peak..Usse
Main Users
• wt. 77,000-110,000lb. empty • Wt. 63,500Ib, empty
• Large, usuatlyin 2 or 3 car trains • Small, modem, one or two car consist.
• 180 - 270 feet • 65 -130 feet
• Typical max. speed 50 — 60 mph • Typical max: speed, 30 - 40 mph
• Usually > 10 miles
Less frequent regional stops/stations
for faster travel eQeed
• Mostly commuters
• Usually <.10 miles
• Frequent stops foreasy circulation
hTpap ad
atistieed
•
Some commuters
• :Tourlsts
• Shoppers
I D3
Purpose and Need of a Potential Streetcar :
As stated in Mayor Manny Diaz's State of the City
address for 2004, the City of Miami is undergoing
unprecedented redevelopment of its urban
neighborhoods, generation of private investment and is
embarking on a sound financial future.
"(Miami's) tax base grew by over 15% during 2003,
resulting in a $2.3 billion increase in real estate values."
"Currently, $2.3 billion in major projects are under
construction. An additional $5 billion in major projects have
been approved, and $5 2 billion are at various stages of the
planning process."
A Potential Problem: Miami Becoming a
Victim of Its Own Success
Accommodating this substantial level of growth and
development is a significant challenge for the City,
particularly with respect to transportation. Although
there is much to celebrate in Miami's resurgence and
the significant investments now being made in
redevelopment projects, this success carries a warning:
these population densities require a "mode
split" (travel mode choices) that relies more on transit
and walking and less on the automobile. Changing that
mode split will require aggressive action by public
agencies through both policy and investment.
Downtown Miami now faces, on a local scale, a version
of a problem evident in the growth of the region over
the past few decades. The regional Metrorail system,
while a substantial investment in transit capacity, was
left behind by the geographic expansion of the
metropolitan area.
Expanding this system is very invasive and expensive.
Thus, the system has become largely irrelevant to a
larger and larger share of new development. Likewise,
the Metromover circulator is convenient to a significant
portion of the current downtown. Expanding this
system, even if funding could be obtained, would also
be very invasive and expensive, and is therefore
unlikely. The transportation system thus does not
provide adequate service to the areas undergoing
redevelopment, and the potential streetcar can address
the twin concerns of enhancing mobility and
stimulating new development.
Potential Benefits of a Miami Streetcar:
In addition to shaping development into a more
sustainable pattern, streetcars have been shown to be
very efficient transit circulators, at approximately 1 /3
the total cost of a typical LRT system, and they do not
require dedicated right-of-way. That is, they operate
in mixed traffic with little or no impact to traffic flow
or on -street parking. Like LRT, streetcars are
relatively quiet, extremely reliable, and have low
maintenance costs compared to buses.
Most important is streetcars' value as a place -maker
and their value as a community circulator, the ability
to attract choice riders, residents and visitors who
would otherwise use automobiles for in -town trips.
Schedule:
Study completion September 2004
Study Scope:
To evaluate physical and financial feasibility of a
streetcar system, including alignment, station
locations, connectivity to other transit services,
economic development opportunities, costs and
financing, ridership, traffic and parking impacts,
environmental analysis, and implementation
requirements.
Study Process:
The Study is being carried out in two phases: Phase I.
Concept Development; and Phase II. Planning, Design,
and implementation Plan to support advancement of
the Streetcar Concept Plan.
The first phase of the Study is complete and has
accomplished the following:
• Evaluation of twelve major corridors for physical
and economic feasibility.
• Held initial meetings with some of the project's
stakeholders to ascertain the compatibility and
2
`ri CITY OF MIAMI STREETCAR CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY
PROJECT UPDATE
effectiveness of a streetcar project with respect to
district plans.
• Development of criteria for selection of a Phase I
segment.
• Application of criteria to the alternative corridors.
• Determination of which corridors (or corridor
segments) possess "fatal flaws" in the study area,
and corridors where streetcars would enhance and
reinforce the objectives of redevelopment and
revitalization efforts in the City.
• Developed a concept route with station locations
for a series of streetcar lines that could serve
major destinations and connect areas undergoing
redevelopment and provide access to other areas
to improve their viability for redevelopment.
• Recommend an initial streetcar project.
Findings:
As a result of this process, a Phase I segment of a Miami
Streetcar system, a bi-directional (Le., two-way)
circulator route is proposed.
The most favorable alignment for the initial project
phase would run from the heart of the Central Business
District to the Miami Design District, utilizing the
alignment shown at right. The route's downtown
section is designed to be shared with the Bay Link line
when it is constructed.
Projected Project Cost:
A cost estimate will be developed for the initial project
phase, but based on previous streetcar projects; an
order -of magnitude capital cost range for the
recommended initial phase is estimated to be $120 -
130 million (includes track and track bed, traction
power, vehicles, maintenance and operations facility,
some utility relocation and roadway reconstruction,
preliminary and final design, construction
management, inspection and system testing). Annual
operating costs, depending on frequency of service
should fall in a range of $4 - $5 million.
Miami;Design
District
d= r
` + �'
..
Avoollsomrt
**MAME
101116
mown
'— • I Study Aura
Miami Design District
Recommended
Alignment
Recommended Stop
Locations
Phase 2 Alignment
Phase 2 Stations /
Stop Locations
July 2004 \
Typical components:
• Track and Traction Power:
- Single Track: $9.5 million per mile*
- Double Track: $16.5 million per mile*
"includes utility relocation, roadway construction and construction
contingencies.
• Vehicles: $2.3 million per vehicle
• Maintenance facility: 2.5 - 3 acres, $5 - 7.5 million
5 - 10 acres (if joint Bay Link use), $10 - 17 million
• Vehicle life: 30 years +
• Vehicle reliability: 99.5%
Study Milestones:
• Phase I Corridor Analysis
• Stakeholder Meetings
• Agency Committee Meetings
• Public Workshops (3)
• impact Analyses
• Plan/Ordinance Evaluations
• Urban Design Concepts
• Cost Estimate
• Financial Analysis
• Construction Options
• Implementation Plan
• Final Report
Key Issues to be Resolved:
• Final alignment decisions
• City project coordination
• Streetcar/Bay Link Coordination
• FDOT Coordination
• FEC right-of-way negotiation
• Midtown infrastructure design and construction
• Project Financing
• Operating scenario
Potential funding sources:
Federal:
• FTA "Small Starts" program
• Flexible funds, CMAQ (if eligible), Enhancements
• Congressional earmarks
• EDA Public Works or Economic Adjustment
programs
Stale:
• Transit or Rail Service Development Programs
• Strategic Intermodal System funding
• Park and Ride Program
• Commuter Assistance Program
• Intermodal Development Program
• Public Transit Block Grant Program
• State Infrastructure Bank loans
Local:
• Parking meter and garage revenues (quasi -
independent Authority/Commission sets rates)
• People's Transportation Plan - 1 /2 Cent Transit Tax
• Local option gas tax
• DDA funds (dedicated mfllage rate)
• Tax increment financing (through CRA mechanism)
• Already -programmed street improvement/
reconstruction projects
• MDTA funding (in lieu)
• Community Development District (e.g. Midtown
Miami)
• Local improvement district
• Potential private sector participation
CONTACT:
Lilia Medina, AICP — Asst. Transportation Coordinator
City of Miami, Office of the City Manager
444 SW 2nd Ave, 3rd Fl., Miami, FL 33130
Tel. (305) 416 - 1429
limedinaeci.miami.fl.us