HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 4EXHIBIT 4
FLORIDA STATUTES
376.78
376.80
376.82
Chapter 376 Section 78 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate
Page 1 of 2
The Florida Senate
2012 Florida Statutes
Title XXVIII
NATURAL RESOURCES;
CONSERVATION,
RECLAMATION, AND USE
Chapter 376
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
PREVENTION AND REMOVAL
Entire Chapter
SECTION 78
Legislative intent.
376.78 Legislative intent. —The Legislature finds and declares the following:
(1) The reduction of public health and environmental hazards on existing conunercial and industrial sites is vital
to their use and reuse as sources of employment, housing, recreation, and open space areas. The reuse of industrial
land is an important component of sound land use policy for productive urban purposes which will help prevent the
premature development of farmland, open space areas, and natural areas, and reduce public costs for installing new
water, sewer, and highway infrastructure.
(2) The abandonment or underuse of brownfield sites also results in the inefficient use of public facilities and
services, as well as land and other natural resources, extends conditions of blight in local communities, and
contributes to concerns about environmental equity and the distribution of environmental risks across population
groups.
(3) Incentives should be put in place to encourage responsible persons to voluntarily develop and implement
cleanup plans without the use of taxpayer funds or the need for enforcement actions by state and local governments.
(4) Environmental and public health hazards cannot be eliminated without clear, predictable remediation
standards that provide for the protection of the environment and public health.
(5) Site rehabilitation should be based on the actual risk that contamination may pose to the environment and
public health, taking into account current and future land and water use and the degree to which contamination may
spread and place the public or the environment at risk.
(6) According to the statistical proximity study contained in the final report of the Environmental Equity and
Justice Commission, minority and low-income communities are disproportionately impacted by targeted
environmentally hazardous sites. The results indicate the need for the health and risk exposure assessments of
minority and poverty populations around environmentally hazardous sites in this state. Redevelopment of hazardous
sites should address questions relating to environmental and health consequences.
(7) Environmental justice considerations should be inherent in meaningful public participation elements of a
brownfields redevelopment program.
(8) The existence of brownfields within a community may contribute to, or may be a symptom of, overall
community decline, including issues of human disease and illness, crime, educational and employment opportunities,
and infrastructure decay. The environment is an important element of quality of life in any community, along with
economic opportunity, educational achievement, access to health care, housing quality and availability, provision of
governmental services, and other socioeconomic factors. Brownfields redevelopment, properly done, can be a
significant element in community revitalization.
(9) Cooperation among federal, state, and local agencies, local community development organizations, and current
owners and prospective purchasers of brownfield sites is required to accomplish timely deanup activities and the
redevelopment or reuse of brownfield sites.
History. —s. 2, ch. 97-277.
http://www.flsenate.vov/laws/statutes/2012/376.78 10/7/2014
Chapter 376 Section 80 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 1 of 5
The Florida Senate
2012 Florida Statutes
Title XXV ill
NATURAL RESOURCES;
CONSERVATION,
RECLAMATION, AND USE
Chapter 376
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
PREVENTION AND REMOVAL
Entire Chapter
SECTION 80
Brownfield program administration
process.
376.80 Brownfield program administration process.—
(1) A local government with jurisdiction over the brownfield area must notify the department of its decision to
designate a brownfield area for rehabilitation for the purposes of ss. 376.77-376.86. The notification must include a
resolution, by the local government body, to which is attached a map adequate to clearly delineate exactly which
parcels are to be included in the brownfield area or alternatively a less -detailed map accompanied by a detailed legal
description of the bxownfield area. If a property owner within the area proposed for designation by the local
government requests in writing to have his or her property removed from the proposed designation, the local
government shall grant the request. For municipalities, the governing body shall adopt the resolution in accordance
with the procedures outlined in s. 166.041, except that the notice for the public hearings on the proposed resolution
must be in the form established in s. 166.041(3)(c)2. For counties, the governing body shall adopt the resolution in
accordance with the procedures outlined in s.125.66, except that the notice for the public hearings on the proposed
resolution shall be in the form established in s. 125.66(4)(b)2.
(2)(a) If a local gavernmentproposes to designate a brownfield area that is outside community redevelopment
areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, dosed military bases, or designated brownfield pilot project areas, the
local government shall adopt the resolution and conduct the public hearings in accordance with the requirements of
subsection (1), except at least one of the required public hearings shall be conducted as close as reasonably practicable
to the area to be designated to provide an opportunity for public input on the size of the area, the objectives for
rehabilitation, job opportunities and economic developments antidpated, neighborhood residents' considerations, and
other relevant local concerns. Notice of the public hearing must be made in a newspaper of general circulation in the
area and the notice must be at least 16 square inches in size, must be in ethnic newspapers or local community
bulletins, must be posted in the affected area, and must be announced at a scheduled meeting of the local governing
body before the actual public hearing. In determining the areas to be designated, the local government must consider:
1. Whether the brownfield area warrants economic development and has a reasonable potential for such activities;
2. Whether the proposed area to be designated represents a reasonably focused approach and is not overly large in
geographic coverage;
3. Whether the area has potential to interest the private sector in participating in rehabilitation; and
4. Whether the area contains sites or parts of sites suitable for limited recreational open space, cultural, or
historical preservation purposes.
(b) A local government shall designate a brownfield area under the provisions of this act provided that;
1. A person who owns or controls a potential brownfield site is requesting the designation and has agreed to
rehabilitate and redevelop the brownfield site;
2. The rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site will result in economic productivity of
the area, along with the creation of at least 5 new permanent jobs at the brownfield site that are full-time equivalent
positions not associated with the implementation of the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement and that are not
associated with redevelopment project demolition or construction activities pursuant to the redevelopment of the
proposed brownfield site or area. However, the job creation requirement shall not apply to the rehabilitation and
redevelopment of a brownfield site that will provide affordable housing as defined in s. 420.0004 or the creation of
recreational areas, conservation areas, or parks;
Chapter 376 Section 80 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 2 of 5
3. The redevelopment of the proposed brownfield site is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and is a
pennittable use under the applicable local land development regulations;
4. Notice of the proposed rehabilitation of the brownfield area has been provided to neighbors and nearby
residents of the proposed area to be designated, and the person proposing the area for designation has afforded to
those receiving notice the opportunity for comments and suggestions about rehabilitation. Notice pursuant to this
subparagraph must be made in a newspaper of general circulation in the area, at least 16 square inches in size, and the
notice must be posted in the affected area; and
5. The person proposing the area for designation has provided reasonable assurance that he or she has sufficient
financial resources to implement and complete the rehabilitation agreement and redevelopment of the brownfield site.
(c) The designation of a brownfield area and the identification of a person responsible for brownfield site
rehabilitation simply entitles the identified person to negotiate a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement with the
department or approved local pollution control program.
(3) 'When there is a person responsible for Brownfield site rehabilitation, the local government must notify the
department of the identity of that person. If the agency or person who will be responsible for the coordination changes
during the approval process specified in subsections (4), (5), and (6), the department or the affected approved local
pollution control program must notify the affected local government when the change occurs.
(4) Local governments or persons responsible for rehabilitation and redevelopment of brownfield areas must
establish an advisory committee or use an existing advisory committee that has formally expressed its intent to
address redevelopment of the specific brownfield area for the purpose of improving public participation and receiving
public comments on rehabilitation and redevelopment of the brownfield area, future land use, local employment
opportunities, community safety, and environmental justice. Such advisory committee should include residents within
or adjacent to the brownfield area, businesses operating within the brownfield area, and others deemed appropriate.
The person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must notify the advisory committee of the intent to
rehabilitate and redevelop the site before executing the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement, and provide the
committee with a copy of the draft plan for site rehabilitation which addresses elements required by subsection (5).
This includes disclosing potential reuse of the property as well as site rehabilitation activities, if any, to be performed.
The advisory committee shall review any proposed redevelopment agreements prepared pursuant to paragraph (5)(i)
and provide comments, if appropriate, to the board of the local government with jurisdiction over the brownfield area.
The advisory committee must receive a copy of the .executed brownfield site rehabilitation agreement. When the
person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation submits a site assessment report or the technical document
containing the proposed course of action following site assessment to the department or the local pollution control
program for review, the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must hold a meeting or attend a
regularly scheduled meeting to inform the advisory committee of the findings and recommendations in the site
assessment report or the technical document containing the proposed course of action following site assessment.
(5) The person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must enter into a brownfield site rehabilitation
agreement with the department or an approved local pollution control program if actual contamination exists at the
brownfield site. The brownfield site rehabilitation agreement must include:
(a) A brownfield site rehabilitation schedule, including milestones for completion of site rehabilitation tasks and
submittal of technical reports and rehabilitation plans as agreed upon by the parties to the agreement.
(b) A commitment to conduct site rehabilitation activities under the observation of professional engineers or
geologists who are registered in accordance with the requirements of chapter 471 or chapter 492, respectively.
Submittals provided by the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation must be signed and sealed by a
professional engineer registered under chapter 471, or a professional geologist registered under chapter 492, certifying
that the submittal and associated work comply with the law and rules of the department and those governing the
profession. In addition, upon completion of the approved remedial action, the department shall require a professional
engineer registered under chapter 471 or a professional geologist registered under chapter 492 to certify that the
lion• thzin'i7 fl CPli A'FP rTr, illQTx7CIC-f-afilfPc/)n1'i/,74 9r1 4/1 /')O 1A
Chapter 376 Section 80 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 3 of 5
corrective action was, to the best of his or her lmowledge, completed in substantial conformance with the plans and
specification approved by the department.
(c) A commitment to conduct site rehabilitation in accordance with department quality assurance rules.
(d) A commitment to conduct site rehabilitation consistent with state, federal, and local laws and consistent with
the brownfield site contamination cleanup criteria in s. 376.81, including any applicable requirements for risk -based
corrective action.
(e) Timeframes for the department's review of technical reports and plans submitted in accordance with the
agreement. The department shall make every effort to adhere to established agency goals for reasonable timeframes
for review of such documents.
(f) A commitment to secure site access for the department or approved local pollution control program to all
brownfield sites within the eligible brownfield area for activities associated with site rehabilitation.
(g) Other provisions that the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation and the department agree upon,
that are consistent with ss. 376.77-376.86, and that will improve or enhance the brownfield site rehabilitation process.
(h) A commitment to consider appropriate pollution prevention measures and to implement those that the person
responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation determines are reasonable and cost-effective, taldng into account the
ultimate use or uses of the brownfield site. Such measures may include improved inventory or production controls
and procedures for preventing loss, spills, and leaks of hazardous waste and materials, and include goals for the
reduction of releases of toxic materials.
(i) Certification that the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation has consulted with the local
government withjurisdiction over the brovvnfield area about the proposed redevelopment of the brownfield site, that
the local government is in agreement with or approves the proposed redevelopment, and that the proposed
redevelopment complies with applicable laws and requirements for such redevelopment. Certification shall be
accomplished by referencing or providing a legally recorded or officially approved land use or site plan, a
development order or approval, a building permit, or a similar official document issued by the local government that
reflects the local government's approval of proposed redevelopment of the brownfield site; providing a. copy of the
local government resolutiondesignating the broirnfield area that contains the proposed redevelopment of the
brownfield site; or providing a letter from the local government that describes the proposed redevelopment of the
brownfield site and expresses the local government's agreement with or approval of the proposed redevelopment.
(6) .Any contractor performing site rehabilitation program tasks must demonstrate to the department that the
contractor:
(a) Meets all certification and license requirements imposed by law; and
(b) Will conduct sample collection and analyses pursuant to department rules.
(7) During the cleanup process, if the department or local program fails to complete review of a technical
document within the timeframe specified in thebrownfieldsite rehabilitation agreement, the person responsible for
brownfield site rehabilitation may proceed to the next site rehabilitation task. However, the person responsible for
brownfield site rehabilitation does so at its own risk and may be required by the department or local program to
complete additional work on a previous task, Exceptions to this subsection include requests for "no further action,"
"monitoring only proposals," and feasibility studies, which must be approved prior to implementation.
(8) If the person responsible for brownfield site rehabilitation fails to comply with the brownfield site
rehabilitation agreement, the department shall allow 90 days for the person responsible for brownfield site
rehabilitation to return to compliance with the provision at issue or to negotiate a modification to the brownfield site
rehabilitation agreement with the department for good cause shown. If an imminent hazard exists, the 90-day grace
period shall not apply. If the project is not returned to compliance with the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement
and a modification cannot be negotiated, the immunity provisions of s. 376.82 are revoked.
(9) The department is specifically authorized and encouraged to enter into delegation agreements with local
pollution control programs approved under s. 403.182 to administer the brownfield program within their jurisdictions,
thereby maximizing the integration of this process with the other local development processes needed to facilitate
httn_//vuww.fisenate. anv/lawes/sta1i tes/2012./176.Rli 6/2/7014
Chapter 376 Section 80 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 4 of 5
redevelopment of a brownfield area. When determining whether a delegation pursuant to this subsection of all or part
of the brownfield program to a local pollution control program is appropriate, the department shall consider the
following. The local pollution control program must:
(a) Have and maintain the administrative organization, staff, and financial and other resources to effectively and
efficiently implement and enforce the statutory requirements of the delegated brownfield program; and
(b) Provide for the enforcement of the requirements of the delegated brownfield program, and for notice and a
right to challenge governmental action, by appropriate administrative and judicial process, which shall be specified in
the delegation.
The local pollution control program shall not be delegated authority to take action on or to make decisions regarding
any brownfield site on land owned by the local government. Any delegation agreement entered into pursuant to this
subsection shall contain such terms and conditions necessary to ensure the effective and efficient administration and
enforcement of the statutory requirements of the brownfield program as established by the act and the relevant rules
and other criteria of the department.
(10) Local governments are encouraged to use the full range of economic and tax incentives available to facilitate
and promote the rehabilitation of brownfield areas, to help eliminate the public health and environmental hazards,
and to promotethe creation of jobs and economic development in these previously run-down, blighted, and
underuti li red areas.
(11)(a) The Legg slature finds and declares that:
1. Brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment can improve the' overall health of a community and the
quality of life for communities, including for individuals living in such communities.
2. The community health benefits of brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment should be better measured
in order to achieve the legislative intent as expressed in s. 376.78.
3. There is a need in thisstate to define and better measure the community health benefits of brownfield site
rehabilitation and redevelopment.
4. Funding sources should be established to support efforts by the state and local governments, in collaboration
with local health departments, community health providers, and nonprofit organizations, to evaluate the community
health benefits of brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment.
(b) Local governments may and are encouraged to evaluate the community health benefits and effects of
brownfield site rehabilitation and redevelopment in connection with brownfield areas located within their
jurisdictions. Factors that may be evaluated and monitored before and after brownfield site rehabilitation and
redevelopment include, but are not limited to:
1. Health status, disease distribution, and quality of life measures regarding populations living in or around
brownfield sites that have been rehabilitated and redeveloped.
2. Access to primary and other health care or health services for persons living in or around brownfield sites that
have been rehabilitated and redeveloped.
3. Any new or increased access to open, green, park, or other recreational spaces that provide recreational
opportunities for individuals living in or around brownfield sites that have been rehabilitated and redeveloped.
4. Other factors described in rules adopted by the Department of Environmental Protection or the Department of
Health, as applicable.
(c) The Department of Health may and is encouraged to assist local governments, in collaboration with local
health depailutents, community health providers, and nonprofit organizations, in evaluating the community health
benefits of brownield site rehabilitation and redevelopment.
History.—s.4, ch. 97-277; s. 3, ch. 95-75; s, 11, ch. 2000-317; s. 2, ch. 2004-40; s. 44, ch. 2005-2; s. 7, ch, 2006-291; s.5, ch. 2008-239,
http://www.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2012/376.80 6/2/7.014
Chapter 376 Section 82 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 1 of 4
The Florida Senate
2012 Florida Statutes
Title XXVlll
NATURAL RESOURCES;
CONSERVATION,
RECLAMATION, AND USE
Chapter 376
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
PREVENTION AND REMOVAL
Entire Chapter
SECTION 82
Eligibility criteria and liability
protection.
376.82 Eligibility criteria and liability protection.—
(1) ELIGIBILITY. --Any person who has not caused or contributed to the contamination of a brownfield site on or
after July 1, 1997, is eligible to participate in the brownfield program established in ss. 376.77-376.85 subject to the
following:
(a) Potential brownfield sites that are subject to an ongoing formal judicial or administrative enforcement action or
corrective action pursuant to federal authority, including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. ss. 9601 et seq., as amended; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42
U.S.C. ss. 300f-300i, as amended; the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. ss. 1251-1387, as amended; or under an order from the
United States Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to s. 3008(h) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
.Act, as amended (42 U.S.C.A. s. 6928(h)); or that have obtained or are required to obtain a permit for the operation of a
hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility; a postdosure permit; or a permit pursuant to the federal
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, are not eligible for participation unless specific exemptions are
secured by a memorandum of agreement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to
paragraph (2)(g). A brownfield site within an eligible brownfield area that subsequently becomes subject to formal
judicial or administrative enforcement action or corrective action under such federal authority shall have its eligibility
revoked unless specific exemptions are secured by a memorandum of agreement with the United States
Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to paragraph (2)(g).
(b) Persons who have not caused or contributed to the contamination of a brownfield site on or after July 1, 1997,
and who, prior to the department's approval of a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement, are subject to ongoing
corrective action or enforcement under state authority established in this chapter or chapter 403, including those
persons subject to a pending consent order with the state, are eligible for participation in a brownfield site
rehabilitation agreement if:
1. The proposed brownfield site is currently idle or underutilized as a result of the contamination, and
participation in the brownfield program will immediately, after cleanup or sooner, result in increased economic
productivity at the site, including at a minimum the creation of 10 new permanent jobs, whether full-time or part-time,
which are not associated with implementation of the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement; and
2. The person is complying in good faith with the terms of an existing consent order or department -approved
corrective action plan, or responding in good faith to an enforcement action, as evidenced by a determination issued
by the department or an approved local pollution control program.
(c) Potential brownfield sites owned by the state or a local government which contain contamination for which a
governmental entity is potentially responsible and which are already designated as federal brownfield pilot projects or
have filed an application for designation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency are eligible for
participation in a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement.
(d) After July 1, 1997, petroleum and drydeaning contamination sites shall not receive both restoration funding
assistance available for the discharge under this chapter and any state assistance available under s. 288.107. Nothing in
this act shall affect the cleanup criteria, priority ranking, and other rights and obligations inherent in petroleum
contamination and drydeaning contamination site rehabilitation under ss. 376.30-376.317, or the availability of
economic incentives otherwise provided for by law.
httn://vv-vv-w.f1senate..P-nv/Irsllcktstritec/7019./,76 R7. 6/7/7(114
Chapter 376 Section 82 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 2 of 4
(2) LIABILITY PROTECTION, —
(a) Any person, including his or her successors and assigns, who executes andd implements to successful
completion a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement, shall be relieved of further liability for remediation of the
contaminated site or sites to the state and to third parties and of liability in contribution to any other party who has or
may incur cleanup liability for the contaminated site or sites.
(b) This section shall not be construed as a limitation on the right of a third party other than the state to pursue an
action for damages to property or person; however, such an action may not compel site rehabilitation in excess of that
required in the approved brownfield site rehabilitation agreement or otherwise required by the department or
approved local pollution control program.
(c) This section shall not affect the ability or authority to seek contribution from any person who may have liability
with respect to the contaminated site and who did not receive deanup liability protection under this act.
(d) The liability protection provided under this section shall become effective upon execution of a brownfield site
rehabilitation agreement and shall remain effective, provided the person responsible for browwnfield site rehabilitation
complies with the terms of the site rehabilitation agreement. Any statute of limitations that would bar the department
from pursuing relief in accordance with its existing authority is tolled from the time the agreement is executed until
site rehabilitation is completed or immunity is revoked pursuant to s. 376.80(8).
(e) Completion of the performance of the remediation obligations at the brownfield site shall be evidenced by a
site rehabilitation completion letter or a "no further action" letter issued by the department or the approved local
pollution control program, which letter shall include the following statement: `Based upon the information provided
by (property -owner) concerning property located at (address), it is the opinion of (the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection or approved local pollution control program) that (party) has successfully and satisfactorily
implemented the approved brownfield site rehabilitation agreement schedule and, accordingly, no further action is
recjnred to assure that any land use identified in the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement is consistent with
existing and proposed uses."
(f) Compliance with s. 376.80(5)(i) must be evidenced as set forth in that paragraph.
(g) The Legislature recognizes its limitations in addressing deanup liability under federal pollution control
programs. In an effort to secure federal liability protection for persons willing to undertake remediation responsibility
at a brownfield site, the department shall attemptto negotiate a memorandum of agreement or similar .document with
the United States Environmental Protection Agency, whereby the United States Environmental Protection Agency
agrees to forego enforcement of federal corrective action authority at brownfield sites that have received a site
rehabilitation completion or "no further action" determination from the department or the approved local pollution
control program or that are in the process of implementing a brownfield site rehabilitation agreement in accordance
with this act.
(h) No unit of state or local government may be held liable for implementing corrective actions at a contaminated
site within an eligible brownfield area as a result of the involuntary ownership of the site through bankruptcy, tax
delinquency, abandonment, or other circumstances in which the state or local government involuntarily acquires title
by virtue of its function as a sovereign, or as a result of ownership from donation, gift, or foreclosure unless the state
or local government has otherwise caused or contributed to a release of a contaminant at the brow- nfield site.
(i) The Legislature finds and declares that certain brownfield sites may be redeveloped for open space, or limited
recreational, cultural, or historical preservation purposes, and that such facilities enhance the redeveloped
environment, attract visitors, and provide wholesome activities for employees and residents of the area. Further, the
Legislature finds that purchasers of contaminated sites who are nonprofit conservation organizations acting for the
public interest and who did not cause or contribute to the release of contamination on the site warrant protection from
liability.
(j) Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter, chapter 403, other laws, or ordinances of local governments, a
nonprofit, charitable, federal tax-exempt, s. 501(c)(3) national land conservation corporation which purchases title to
property in the state for the purpose of conveying such land to any governmental entity for conservation, historical
httn•//wvinv flcpnafp. anv/latuc/ctatiitPQ/9(119/;76 R9 F(9/9inA
Chapter 376 Section 82 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 3 of 4
preservation or cultural resource, park, greenway, or other similar uses shall not be liable to the state, local
government, or any third party for penalties or remediation costs in connection with environmental contamination
found in the soil or groundwater of such property, provided that such corporation did not cause the original deposit
or release of the environmental contaminants, and provided the department and local pollution control program and
responsible parties have access to the land for investigation, remediation, or monitoring purposes.
(k) A person whose property becomes contaminated due to geophysical or hydrologic reasons, including the
migration of contaminants onto their property from the operation of facilities and activities on a nearby designated
brownfield area, and whose property has never been occupied by a business that utilized or stored the contaminants
or similar constituents is not subject to administrative or judicial action brought by or on behalf of another to compel
the rehabilitation of or the payment of the costs for the rehabilitation of sites contaminated by materials that migrated.
onto the property from the designated brownfield area, if the person:
I. Does not own and has never held an ownership interest in, or shared in the profits of, activities in the
designated brownfield area operated at the source location;
2. Did not participate in the operation or management of the activities in the designated brownfield area operated
at the source location; and
3. Did not cause, contribute to, or exacerbate the release or threat of release of any hazardous substance through
any act or omission.
(1) When a property, including a brownfield site, escheats to a county, the county is not subject to any liability
imposed by this chapter or chapter 403 for preexisting soil or groundwater contamination due solely to its ownership.
However, this paragraph does not affect the rights or liabilities of any past or future owners of the escheated property
and does not affect the liability of any governmental entity for the results of its actions that create or exacerbate a
pollution source. The county and the Department of Environmental Protection may enter into a written agreement for
the performance, funding, and reimbursement of the investigative and remedial acts necessary for a property that
escheats to the county.
(3) REOPE_NERS.—Upon completion of site rehabilitation in compliance with ss. 376.77-376.85, no additional site
rehabilitation shall be required unless it is demonstrated:.
(a) That fraud was committed in demonstrating site conditions or completion of site rehabilitation;
(b) That new information confirms the existence of art area of previously unknown contamination which exceeds
the site-speri fi c rehabilitation levels established in accordance with s. 376.81, or which otherwise poses the threat of
real and substantial harm to public health, safety, or the environment in violation of the terms of ss. 376.77-376.85;
(c) That the remediation efforts failed to achieve the site rehabilitation criteria establishedunder s. 36.81;
(d) That the level of risk is increased beyond the acceptable risk established under s. 376.81 due to substantial
changes in exposure conditions, such as a change in land use from nonresidential to residential use. Any person who
changes the land use of the brownfield site thus causing the level of risk to increase beyond the acceptable risk level
may be required by the department to undertake additional remediation measures to assure that human health, public
safety, and the environment are protected to levels consistent with s. 376.81. or
(e) That a new release occurs at the brownfield site subsequent to a determination of eligibility for participation in
the brownfield program established under s. 376.80.
(4) ADDl•1'IONAL LIABILITY PROTECTION FOR LENDERS. —
(a) The Legislature declares that, in order to achieve the economic redevelopment and site rehabilitation of
brownfield sites in accordance with this act, it is imperative to encourage financing of real property transactions
involving brownfield site rehabilitation plans. Accordingly, lenders, including those serving as a trustee, personal
representative, or in any other fiduciary capacity, in connection with a loan, are entitled to the liability protection
established in subsection (2) if they have not caused or contributed to a release of a contaminant at the brownfield site.
(b) Lenders who hold indicia of ownership of a parcel within a brownfield area primarily to protect a security
interest or who own a parcel within a brownfield area as a result of foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure of a
security interest and who seek to sell, transfer, or otherwise divest the parcel via sale at the earliest practicable time are
httnn://www.f[senate.g.ov/laws/stafihtes/2C112/376.R2 6/9/7f114
Chapter 376 Section 82 - 2012 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate Page 4 of 4
not liable for the release or discharge of a contaminant from the parcel; for the failure of the person responsible for
brownfield site rehabilitation to comply with the brownfield site rehabilitation agreement; or for future site
rehabilitation activities required pursuant to a reopener provision established in subsection (3) where the lender has
not divested the borrower of, or otherwise engaged in, decisionmaldng control of the site rehabilitation or site
operations or undertaken management activities beyond those required to protect its finandal interest while making a
good faith effort to sell the site as soon as practicable and when an act or omission of the lender has not otherwise
caused or contributed to a release of a contaminant at the brownfield site.
(c) The economic incentives that were granted to a person responsible for site rehabilitation by state or local
governments shall not accrue to a lender who obtains ownership of the brownfield site by one of the methods
described in this subsection. The economic incentives are abated during the lender's ownership, but they may be
transferred and reinstated upon the sale of the brownfield site.
History.—s. 6, ch. 97-277; s. 5, ch. 98-75; s. 182, ch. 99-13; s.13, ch. 2000-317; s. 3, ch. 2004 40; s. 71, ch. 2007-5; s. 6, ch. 2008-239.
Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers
should be consulted for official purposes.
Copyright 0 2000- 2014 State of Florida.
11ttn://www.fl sen ate. anvnaws/statntesn.n 191;7F R9
Krmn1a