HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZAB & Zoning Adm. Appeal DocsWEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTORIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
MITCHELL BIERMAN, P.A.
NINA L. BONISKE, P.A.
MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN, P.A.
JAMIE ALAN COLE, P.A.
STEPHEN J. HELFMAN, P.A.
GILBERTO PASTORIZA, P.A.
MICHAEL S. POPOK, P.A.
JOSEPH H. SEROTA, P.A.
SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN, P.A.
RICHARD JAY WEISS, P.A.
DAVID M. WOLPIN, P.A.
DANIEL L. ABBOTT
GARY L. BROWN
JONATHAN M. COHEN
IGNACIO G. DEL VALLE
JEFFREY D. DECARLO
ALAN L. GABRIEL
DOUGLAS R. GONZALES
EDWARD G. GUEDES
JOSHUA D. KRUT
MATTHEW H. MANDEL
ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAURI
ANTHONY L. RECIO
BRETT J. SCHNEIDER
CLIFFORD A. SCHULMAN
LAURA K. WENDELL
JAMES E. WHITE
VIA HAND DELIVERY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
MIAM I-DADE OFFICE
2525 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD
SUITE 700
CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134
TELEPHONE 305-B54.0800
FACSIMILE 305-854-B3E3
WWW.WSH-LAW.COM
BROWARD OFFICE
800 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD • SUITE 1900.
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301
TELEPHONE 954-763-4242 • FACSIMILE 954-764-7770
Mr. Anel Rodriguez
Department of Hearing Boards
City of Miami
444 SW 2 Avenue, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33130
'OF COUNSEL
April 19, 2012
Re: Appeal of Zoning Interpretation 12-001
ADRIAN J. ALVAREZ
LILLIAN M. ARANGO
SARA E. AULISIO
ROBERT H. DE FLESCO
BROOKE P. DOLARA
RAQUEL ELEJABARRIETA
CHAD S. FRIEDMAN
ERIC P. HOCKMAN
HARLENE SILVERN KENNEDY*
KAREN LIEBERMAN*
JOHANNA M. LUNDGREN
ALEIDA MARTINEZ MOLINA•
KATHRYN M. MEHAFFEY
RODERT A. MEYERS•
MATTHEW PEARL
TIMOTHY M. RAVICH•
AMY J. SANTIAGO
GAIL D. SEROTA*
JONATHAN C. SHAMRES
ESTRELLITA S. SIBILA
ALISON F. SMITH
ANTHONY C. SOROKA
EDUARDO M. SOTO
JOANNA G. THOMSON
MICHELLE D. VOS
PETER D. WALDMAN*
SAMUEL I. ZESKIND
On behalf of Barlington Group, LLC (the "Applicant"), this letter shall serve as our
request to appeal the action taken by the Planning & Zoning Appeals Board ("PZAB") in
connection with Zoning Interpretation 12-001 (the "Interpretation"). The Interpretation was
issued by Mr. Barnaby Min, Zoning Administrator, on February 16, 2012 in response to our
zoning interpretation request dated January 31, 2012, copy enclosed. Pursuant to Sec. 7.1.1.1(6)
of the Miami 21 Code, the Zoning Administrator has the duty and power to decide questions of
zoning interpretation in accordance with the provisions of Section 7.1.2.3.
The Applicant is an aggrieved party and hereby submits this appeal within the 15 day
appeal period set forth in Sec. 7.1.2.3(b). The basis of the appeal is the failure of the Zoning
Administrator to properly analyze the issues presented in the request for interpretation as well as
legal error in the statutory construction of the Miami 21 Code. Notwithstanding the PZAB's
denial of the appeal, the PZAB agreed with the argument and legal theory presented on appeal by
Applicant and passed a companion resolution urging the City to modify the Miami 21 language
to more explicitly state that accessory parking is permitted in T4 properties, independent of
whether the principal use is permitted in the T4 transect zone. In accordance with Ch. 62-157(a)
of the City of Miami Code of Ordinances, enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500 for
Mr. Anel Rodriguez
April 19, 2012
Pagel2
the processing of this request. Accordingly, please schedule this appeal on the next available
Planning & Zoning Appeals Board agenda.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us
directly.
Very truly yours,
Estrellita Sibila
ESS/
Enclosure
2254001
cc: Martin Pinilla
Bill Fuller
/24;e-
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTORIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
Miami Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
File ID 12-00252za
Resolution: PZAB-R-12-012
April 04, 2012 Item PZAB.4
Mr. Patrick Goggins offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
13114, THE PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD DENIED THE APPEAL BY
GILBERTO PASTORIZA, THEREBY UPHOLDING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S
INTERPRETATION 12-0001, DATED FEBRUARY 16, 2012, REGARDING
ACCESSORY PARKING.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Sergio Cruz, the motion passed and was adopted by a
vote of 5-3:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE
Mr. Sergio Cruz
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia
Mr. Patrick Goggins
Ms. Maria Beatriz Gutierrez
Mr. Lazaro Lopez
Mr. Ernest Martin
Mr. Daniel Milian
Mr. Juvenal Pina
Mr. Oscar Rodriguez
Ms. Janice Tarbert
Mr. David H. Young
Yes
Absent
Yes
Absent
No
Yes
Yes
No
Absent
Yes
No
Francis o "Garcia, Director
Planning a d Zoning Department
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority, Anel Rodriguez, Clerk of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board of the
City of Miami, Florida, and acknowledges that he executed the foregoing Resolution.
SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS,'DAY OF n , 2012.
vraMBSsa ' ji jft)
Print Notary Name
Personally know or Produced I.D.
Type_ and number of I.D. produced
Did take an oath or Did not take an oath
Notary Public State of Florida
My Commission Expires:
. 1'1%- VANESSATRUJILLOfor:
' - MY COMMISSION it EE 105250
4' EXPIRES: July 11, 2015
�'�yBonded Thru NotaryPublic Underwriters
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTORIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
MITCHELL BIERMAN, P.A.
NINA L. BONISKE, P.A.
MITCHELL J. BURNSTEIN, P.A.
JAMIE ALAN COLE, P.A.
STEPHEN J. HELFMAN, P.A.
GILBERTO PASTORIZA, P.A.
MICHAEL S. POPOK, P.A.
JOSEPH H. SEROTA, P.A.
SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN, P.A.
RICHARD JAY WEISS, P.A.
DAVID M. WOLPIN, P.A.
DANIEL L. ABBOTT
GARY L. BROWN
JONATHAN M. COHEN
IGNACIO G. DEL VALLE
JEFFREY D. DECARLO
ALAN L. GABRIEL
DOUGLAS R. GONZALES
EDWARD G. GUEDES
JOSHUA D. KRUT
MATTHEW H. MANDEL
ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA—MAURI
ANTHONY L. RECIO
BRETT J. SCHNEIDER
CLIFFORD A. SCHULMAN
LAURA K. WENDELL
VIA HAND DELIVERY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
MIAMI—DADE OFFICE
2525 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD
SUITE 700
CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134
TELEPHONE 305-854-0800
FACSIMILE 305-854-2323
WWW.WSH—LAW.COM
BROWARD OFFICE
200 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD • SUITE 1900
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301
TELEPHONE 954-763-4242 • FACSIMILE 954-764-7770
Mr. Anel Rodriguez
Department of Hearing Boards
City of Miami
444 SW 2 Avenue, 7th Floor
Miami, Florida 33130
*OF COUNSEL
RE: Appeal of Zoning Interpretation 12-001
February 24, 2012
ADRIAN J. ALVAREZ
LILLIAN M. ARANGO
SARA E. AULISIO
JOANNE C. CHARLES
BROOKE P. DOLARA
RAQUEL ELEJABARRIETA
CHAD S. FRIEDMAN
OLIVER GILBERT*
ERIC P. HOCKMAN
HARLENE SILVERN KENNEDY^:)
KAREN LIEBERMAN*
JOHANNA M. LUNDGREN
!:
ALEIDA MARTINEZ MOLINA* I f
KATHRYN M. MEHAFFEY ttx.i
ROBERT A. MEYERS*s,;'
MATTHEW PEARL
TIMOTHY M. RAVICH*
AMY J. SANTIAGO
DANIEL A. SEIGEL
GAIL D. SEROTA*
JONATHAN C. SHAMRES
ESTRELLITA S. SIBILA
ALISON F. SMITH
ANTHONY C. SOROKA
EDUARDO M. SOTO
JOANNA G. THOMSON
MICHELLE D. VOS
PETER D. WALDMAN*
JAMES E. WHITE
SAMUEL I. ZESKI ND
On behalf of Barlington Group, LLC (the "Applicant"), this letter shall serve as our
request to appeal Zoning Interpretation 12-001 (the "Interpretation"). The Interpretation was
issued by Mr. Barnaby Min, Zoning Administrator, on February 16, 2012 in response to our
zoning interpretation request dated January 31, 2012, copy enclosed. Pursuant to Sec..7.1.1.1(6)
of the Miami 21 Code, the Zoning Administrator has the duty and power to decide questions of
zoning interpretation in accordance with the provisions of Section 7. .2.3.
The Applicant. is an aggrieved party and hereby submits this appeal within the 15 day
appeal period set forth in Sec. 7.1.2.3(b). The basis of the appeal is the failure of the Zoning
Administrator to properly analyze the issues presented in the request for interpretation and
applying the incorrect section of the Miami 21 Code. In accordance with Ch. 62-157(a) of the
City of Miami Code of Ordinances, enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500 for the
processing of this request. Accordingly, please schedule this appeal on the next available
Planning & Zoning Appeals Board agenda.
Mr. Anel Rodriguez
February 24, 2012
Page 12
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us
directly.
Very
rrl
Gilberto Pastoriza
GP/ms
Enclosure
2254001
cc: Martin Pinilla
Bill Fuller
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTORIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
CITY OF MIAMI
OFFICE OF ZONING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gilberto P4 tori3a, Attorney at Law
FROM: Barnaby"L. MK, Zoning Administrator
DATE: February 1012
RE: Zoning Interpretation
12-0001
This Zoning Interpretation is issued to clarify the procedures for accessory or incidental
parking.' There are properties throughout the City of Miami ("City") that have dual zoning.
Many of these properties have the principal use in one Transect Zone and the associated
accessory parking in a second Transect Zone. The issue presented for this Zoning
Interpretation is what requirements must a property comply with when its principal use is in
one Transect Zone and its accessory parking is in a separate Transect Zone.
Section 3.3.1 of Miami21 states that lots "assembled into one ownership that encompass more
than one Transect Zone shall be developed according to the corresponding Transect regulation
for each Lot." Accordingly, pursuant to Section 3.3.1, both Transect Zone requirements must
be complied. When accessory parking is located in a Transect Zone, it is only authorized if it
complies with the requirements of that particular Transect Zone. Because accessory parking is
incidental and subordinate to the principal use, the principal use must also comply with the
requirements of the particular Transect Zone.
To illustrate the issue, consider a property that has dual zoning of both a T6-8-O Transect Zone
and a T4-R Transect Zone. Article 4, Table 3 of Miami21 indicates that general commercial
uses .are allowed. by right in a.T6-8-0 Transect Zone but strictly prohibited in a T4-R Transect
Zone. As Section 3.3.1 of Miami21 indicates, both Transect Zone requirements must be
complied with in order to allow the principal use of a general commercial use. Because the
T4-R Transect Zone strictly prohibits general commercial uses, the accessory parking is
likewise prohibited.
There is a provision of Section 3.3.1 of Miami21 that arguably presents conflicting authority
on this issue. Specifically, Section 3.3.1 of Miami21 also states that "T4 Lots adjacent to T5 or
T6 Lots may provide parking for adjacent Lot uses, and shall follow all other T4 requirements
including Liner requirements. Access for such parking shall be provided only through the T4-
0, T5 or T6 Lot." An inference can be made that because this section refers to parking in a T4
Lot for the adjacent lot, parking is thus allowed regardless of whether the principal use is
allowed. This section, however, must be read in conjunction with the remaining portions of
Miami21, including the above -cited portion of Section 3.3.1. Accordingly, if the actual use is
not allowed in the specific Transect Zone, the corresponding accessory parking is likewise not
1 Accessory parking is parking that is customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use. The terms
accessory_and-incidental_are_interchangeable_and_for_the-purposes-of--this-Zoning Interpretation, -the -term -accessory
parking shall be used.
Doc. No.: Docl (2) (2) (2) (5) (2)
allowed. The language concerning T4 lots is meant to solely address uses that are allowed in a
T4 Transect Zone.
In addition to the statutory construction analysis above, deference must also be paid to the
intent of Miami21 and the zoning atlas. Article 4, Table 1. of Miami21 indicates that T4
Transect Zones are "primarily residential urban fabric with a range of building types including
rowhouses, small apartment buildings, and bungalow courts." T6 Transect Zones, on the other
hand, "consists of the highest density and greatest variety of Uses." (Emphasis addled).
Accordingly, the intent of Miami21 is to have lower impact commercial uses in a T4 Transect
Zone and keep it primarily residential. Parking for an associated use in a T6 Transect Zone
which is of a higher density and more variety does not comply with this intent.
In conclusion, accessory parking is only authorized in a Transect Zone if the principal use in
which the panting is associated is also allowed in the specific Transect Zone.2
This interpretation shall be final unless appealed to the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board
within 15 days of the date of its issuance.
cc: Francisco Garcia, Director of Planning
Victoria Mendez, Assistant City Attorney
Office of Zoning
Office of NET
2 This Zoning Interpretation is limited to the applicability of Article 4, Table 3 to accessory parking. Assuming
the accessory parking is authorized, it must also comply with the remaining provisions of Miami21 including, but
not limited -to, —Article 3 with -respect -to -heat island -effects, —Article 5-with-respect to--design-and-location criteria,
and Article 9 with respect to landscaping requirements.
Doc. No.: Docl (2) (2) (2) (5) (2)
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTORIZA COLE & EONISKE, P.L.
MITCHELL BIERMAN. P.A.
NINA L. BONISKE, P.A.
MITCHELL J. BURNSTE1N, P.A.
JAMIE ALAN COLE, P.A.
STEPHEN J. HELFMAN, P.A.
GILBERTO PASTORIZA, P.A.
MICHAEL S. POPOK, P.A.
JOSEPH H. SEROTA, P.A.
SUSAN L. TREVARTHEN, P.A.
RICHARD JAY WEISS, P.A.
DAVID M. WOLPIN, P.A.
DANIEL L. ABBOTT
GARY L. BROWN
JONATHAN M. COHEN
IGNACIO G DEL VALLE
-JEFFREY D. OECARLO
ALAN L. GABRIEL
DOUGLAS R. GONZALES
EDWARD G. GUEDES
JOSHUA D. KRUT
MATTHEW H. MANDEL
ALEXANDER L. PALENZUELA-MAURI
ANTHONY L. RECIO
BRETT J. SCHNEIDER
CLIFFORD A. SCHULMAN
LAURA K. WENDELL
VIA HAND DELIVERY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
MIAMI-DADE OFFICE
2525 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD
SUITE 700
CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134
TELEPHONE 305-854-0800
FACSIMILE 305-854-2323
WWW,WSH-LAW.COM
BROWARD OFFICE
200 EAST BROWARO BOULEVARD • SUITE 1900
FORT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA 33301
TELEPHONE 954-763-4242 • FACSIMILE 954-764-7770
Mr, Barnaby Min
Zoning Administrator
City of Miami
444 S.W. 2"d Avenue, 4`1' Floor
Miami, Florida 33130
'OF COUNSEL
January 31, 2012
Re: 968 SW 8 Street and 824 SW 9 Court, Miami, Florida
Dear Mr. Min:
ADRIAN J. ALVAREZ
LILLIAN M, ARANGO
SARA E. AULISIO
BROOKE P. DOLARA
RAOUEL EL£JABARRIETA
CHAD S. FRIEDMAN
OLIVER GILBERT'
ERIC P, HOCKMAN
HARLENE SILVERN KENNEDY'
KAREN LIEBERMAN'
JOHANNA M. LUNDGREN
ALEIDA MARTINEZ MOLINA•
KATHRYN M. MEHAFF£Y
MATTHEW PEARL
TIMOTHY M. RAVICH'
AMY J. SANTIAGO
DANIEL A. SEIGEL
GAIL D. SEROTA'
JONATHAN C. SHAMRES
ESTRELLITA S. SIBILA
ALISON F. SMITH
ANTHONY C. SOROKA
EDUARDO M. SOTO
JOANNA G. THOMSON
MICHELLE D. VOS
PETER D. WALDMAN•
JAMES E. WHITE
SAMUEL I. ZESKIND
Our firm represents Barlington Group, LLC who is contemplating the purchase of the
properties located at 968 SW 8 Street and 824 SW 9 Court for the purpose of expanding the
Goodwill Retail Center immediately to the west. The property located at 968 SW 8 Street is
designated Restricted Commercial in the City's Future Land Use Map and is zoned T6-8 0 under
Miami 21 (the "8`h Street Parcel"). The property located at 824 SW 9 Court is designated
Duplex Residential in the City's Future Land Use Map and is zoned T4 R under Miami 21 (the
"9"' Court Parcel"). See enclosed property maps.
Prior to the implementation of Miami 21, the 911' Court Parcel was zoned SD-12 Special
Buffer Overlay Districts which allowed the parcel to be used for surface parking in connection
with an abutting commercial use. The 9`I' Court Parcel has been used on and off again by the
user of the 8 Street Parcel for parking purposes. Notwithstanding the prior zoning, Sec. 3.3.1 of
the Miami 21 Code provides:
Mr. Barnaby Min
January 31, 2012
Page 2
T4 Lots adjacent to T5 or T6 Lots may provide parking for adjacent Lot uses, and
shall follow all other T4 requirements including Liner requirements. Access for
such parking shall be provided only through the T4O, T5 or T6 Lot.
The purpose of this letter is to request your determination pertaining to the parking use on
the 9th Court Property. Specifically, we are requesting a determination as to whether the 9`h
Court Parcel can be used for the purpose of providing accessory parking for the 8`h Street Parcel.
The 8th Street Parcel has a one -lane access point for ingress and egress to SW 8 Street. The 9th
Court Parcel would provide a more efficient point of ingress and egress having two lanes for
entry/exit. Additionally, please confirm that the 9th Street Parcel can be used as a point of
ingress/egress. For your ease of review and analysis, enclosed please find the proposed site plan
showing the proposed Goodwill Retail Center Expansion plan. Kindly provide your written
determination at your earliest convenience.
Thanks in advance and we look forward to your response.
ES Sims
2254001
Enclosures
cc: Martin Pinilla
Bill Fuller
Very t T , yours,
stra lita Sibila
WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN
PASTORIZA COLE & BONISKE, P.L.
.011
sri•1Q
{pp''' Miami Zoning Details for Address: 824 SW 9 CT
:....
-
_
_
•
-
Single Family - Residential
- 2` Duplex Residential
Medium Density Multifamily
Residential
tt Low Density Restricted
Commercial
_ Medium Density Restricted
Commercial
Restricted Commercial
BEM
•
II
Wil
s
1WillF'
I
1
i�
I
t
•
-
:I
ltii
Duties Res. a
,
•
Zone
T4-R
Description
General Urban Zone
Enactment
13114
Section
Area
Sub Area
Description
ID
Description
Enactment
ID
Description
Enactment
Former Zone
R-2
Description
Two -Family Residential
Enactment
SD
Description
Enactment
SD-12
Buffer Overlay District
Owner
Physical Address
Billing Address
01413E0110090
3621 SW 113 CT MIAMi FL 331653423
FRANCISCA CAPO TRS
Legal Description
RENNO SUB PE) 13-1 NSOFT LOTS 10 11 &
12 BLK 1 LOT SIZE 50,000 X 150 73R-74477 COC 25010-2124125371-1630 1006 5
, Miami Zoning Details for Address: 968 SW 8 ST
uar,+ I.
.r rr t
4. O 11
1 _
I I -- 1
- I ?—: i
- --.--, 'I,! r_
1 j T4-L
TA-R I l 1- _
- . 1.-1�1-4-`7'
TS-L
r
• • Established Setbacks
M T3 SUB -URBAN
a T4 GENERAL URBAN
T5 URBAN CENTER
W 7TH 5t _ _ - "- SLt--=-
I_
�T6-8 URBAN CENTER
s 11 •4-G 4 are ♦ ra -4 4 -a 4 _
4: „ t -- e C s• -p 7- a - 4-
TI --B-C]
a ,4-4-4- .+ a s- 4 . a
0
__ __:„_,
___ , L_
I I T 6
r L
--
I
-"s 7 \e- ?\ \ \
Zone
T6r8-o
Description
Urban Cora Zone
Enactment
13114
Section
3.3-6
Area
Sub Area
Description
ath Street
ID
Description
Enactment
ID
Description
Enactment
Former Zone
C-1
Description
Restricted Commercial
Enactment
SD
Description
Enactment
SD-25
SW ath St.Special Overlay District
Owner
Physical Address
Billing Address
0141380110060
3621 SW 113 CT MIAMI FL 33185
RENE CAPO TRS
Legal Description
RENNO SUB PB 13-1 LOTS 7 & 8 BLK 1 LOT SIZE 100.000 X 1$8 73R-74477 COC 25010-2124/25371-1630 11306 5
MIAMI 21 ARTICLE 3. GENERAL TO ZONES
AS ADOPTED - MAY 2011
ARTICLE 3. GENERAL TO ZONES
3.1 TRANSECT ZONES
3.1.1 The Miami 21 Code Transect Zones are described in Article 4, Table 1 and include
the standards summarized in Article 4, Table 2 and further described in Article 5.
They range in Function and Density from low -Density, primarily residential areas to
high Density Mixed -Use areas, across the Transect, with zones identified as T1, T2,
T3, T4, T5, T6, CS, CI, CI -HD, D1, D2 and D3 and all R, L, 0 and T6 subcategories.
3.2 PHASING
All development shall conform to this Code regardless of phasing. Each phase of a
development project shall conform to this Code in its entirety.
3.3 LOTS AND FRONTAGES
3.3.1 Lots assembled into one ownership within one Transect Zone may be developed as
a single Lot. Lots assembled into one ownership that encompass more than one
Transect Zone shall be developed according to the corresponding Transect
regulation for each Lot. In such cases, there shall be no transfer of Density or
Intensity of Development Capacity between Transect Zones. Where Lots are
assembled into one ownership, the side or rear Setbacks sharing the Property Line
may be eliminated. Lot assembly shall require a Unity -of -Title acceptable to the City
Attorney. Contiguous Lots in one ownership, as of the effective date of this Code,
may be developed as one Lot in excess of the maximum Lot size. T4 Lots adjacent
to T5 or T6 Lots may provide parking for adjacent Lot uses, and shall follow all other
T4 requirements including Liner requirements. Access for such parking shall be
provided only through the T40, T5 or T6 Lot.
3.3.2 In Transect Zones T5, T6, CI, CS, D1, D2, and D3, buildable sites shall Enfront a
vehicular Thoroughfare or a Pedestrian Passage, with at least one Principal
Frontage.
3.3.3 Lots facing Thoroughfares on more than one (1) side shall have designated Principal
Frontage(s) and may have Secondary Frontage(s). Unless otherwise designated by
a Special Area Plan, a Principal Frontage shall be that facing the Thoroughfare of
higher pedestrian importance or intensity (i.e., traffic volume, number of lanes, etc.),
as determined by the Planning Department upon request by the Zoning
Administrator.
a. If two Thoroughfares are of equal importance each Frontage shall be considered
a Principal Frontage. Lots with two or more Frontages may consider other non -
fronting Property Lines as sides.
111.3
968.976 SW 8th STREET, MIAMI, FL
824 SW 9th COURT, MIAMI, FL
PROPOSED PROJECT FOR
GOODWILL RETAIL CENTER EXPANSION
OPROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
sine 1/16- - Pd.
INTERIOR RENOVATION FOR:
GOODWILL CENTER EXPANSION
SOORTMAVA 33139
824 W 91N COURT, MA FL IIg
FORM
FORM GROUP, INC