Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRA-R-14-0031 Submittal-Avenue G Marketplace-Letters of SupportAvenue G Marketplace Senator Dwight Bullard 39th District- Representing Overtown Letter of support for Avenue G Marketplace Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board SUBMTTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR STEM J i ON 3-1-aa 1 Lk 11-f -o01 I - SUM i -F170-- A-venu Cr Idol kjplr. - Lae/5 G- up por t THE FLORIDA SENATE Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1100 SENATOR DWIGHT BULLARD 39th District January 2, 2014 The Honorable Thomas Regalado, Mayor -City of Miami Members of the City of Miami Commission Overtown/ Parkwest CRA Greetings, COMMITTEES: Agriculture, Vice Chair Appropriations Subcommittee on Education Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government Education Environmental Preservation and Conservation Military Affairs, Space, and Domestic Security JOINT COMMITTEE: Joint Administrative Procedures Committee As the representative for the Overtown community in the Florida Senate, and Vice -Chair of the Senate's Agriculture Committee, I strongly support the Avenue G. Marketplace Proposal before the Overtown/ Parkwest CRA. This proposal responds to the community's need for a major grocer anchored retail, providing much needed basic services for its Residents and 160 Jobs for them as well. Overtown, like other places within the urban core, are becoming food deserts. It has been well documented by Miami Dade's Health Department and the City of Miami's Neighborhood Drill Down Report that Overtown has an enormous deficit in access to quality fresh foods. This community needs several new grocers to supply the demand as other communities have. It is for these reasons that I've introduced Senate Bill 426. This bill would provide tax credits for certain businesses that sell nutrient -dense food items in areas designated as food deserts by the federal government. I humbly ask for your official support of this critical legislation to improve communities like Overtown by incentivizing grocers to enter markets they may not otherwise without government intervention and assistance. For the aforementioned reasons, Avenue G Project has such great support from the community. The residents, homeowners and stakeholders in The Historic Overtown overwhelmingly support the Avenue G Marketplace Project proposed by BDB Miami, LLC on NW 3rd Ave and 6th Street (Block 55 next door to Poinciana Village). The following groups have provided their official signed support of Avenue G: • The Poinciana Home Owners Association Board of Directors (Representing 64 Units) • The Town Park North Home Owners Advisory Board (Representing 170 Homeowners) • Overtown Youth Center Parent Support Group (50 Parents) • Omni/Park West Redevelopment Association & Grand Central (Local Business) - Ownership of Jackson's Soul Food In addition, Avenue G Marketplace would become the largest private employer in Overtown, providing much needed jobs to local residents. The proposal's binding first source hiring agreement to the CRA provides concrete oral promises with a signed binding agreement. The project will produce 160 permanent jobs for local residents that will spur economic activity. I encourage you to stand with the residents, businesses, and the homeowners in support of Avenue G-bringing quality basic services to communities that need it the most. Sincerely, noi9itt. ecteeand State Senator, District 39 REPLY TO: Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board O 10720 Caribbean Boulevard, #435, Cutler Bay, Florida 33189 0 218 Senate Office Building, 404 South Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1100 (850) 487-5039 Senate's Website: www.flsenafe.gov DON GAETZ GARRETT RICHTER President of the Senate President Pro Tempore GT GreenbergTraurig November 15, 2013 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Michelle Spence -Jones, Chairwoman Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency and Honorable Members of the SEOPW CRA 1490 NW 3rd Avenue Miami, Florida 33136 Lucia A. Doughcrty Tel. 305-579-0603 doughertyl@gtlaw.com QED INTO RECORD I ON3-3I-,+ Re: SEOPW CRA / Request for Proposals No. 13-003 (the "RFP") for the Development of Block 55 / 249 NW 6 Street, Miami / BDB Miami, LLC / Avenue G Marketplace / Objections to RFP Process and Potential Award of Contract to Overtown Gateway Dear Chairwoman. Spence -Jones and Members of the Board: This firm represents BDB Miami, LLC, ("BDB"), the second -ranked proposer in the procurement process referred to above (the "RFP Process"). As you know, the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency (the "SEOPW" or "CRA") issued the RFP in order to obtain proposals from well -qualified, highly experienced companies to develop the CRA-owned property located at 249 NW 6 Street ("Block 55"). The CRA issued the RFP pursuant to Section 163.380 of the Florida Statutes as well as the requirements and conditions specified in the RFP itself and its addendum dated July 11, 2013 (the "Addendum"). For ease of reference, copies of the RFP, the Addendum, and Section 163.380 are attached as Exhibits "A", "B" and "C", respectively. I am writing to bring to your attention that Florida Procurement Law has not been observed during the RFP Process. The CRA's Selection Committee acted arbitrarily and capriciously in disregarding rules governing the RFP Process that are imposed by the Florida Statutes, Florida Procurement Law, and which were specified in the CRA's own communications with the participants in the RFP. Additionally, BDB contends that the first -ranked proposer, "Overtown Gateway", should be disqualified because it (1) failed to include information that the RFP required all proposers to include in their bids; and (2) it has included the City of Miami's Department of Off -Street Parking (a.k.a. the "Miami Parking Authority") as a member of its proposal team. To the extent that the CRA proceeds to award a contract to Overtown Gateway, I hereby formally object on behalf of BDB. L PROCUREMENT LAW Section 163.380 of the Florida Statutes provides that community redevelopment agencies, like the SEOPW, can sell or lease CRA-owned real property only if the transaction is subject to a GREENBERG TRAURIG. PA. • AT rORNEYS AT LAW v WWW.GiLANN..OM 333 S.F. 2nd Avenue 2 Suite 4400 ® Miami. R_ 33131-3238 • Tel 305.579.0500 • Fax 305.S/9.0717 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board The Honorable Chair & Members of the SEOPW CRA Re: Objections to RFP (13-003) Process & Potential Award of Contract to Overtown Gateway November 15, 2013 competitive procurement process.' It is a bedrock principle of Florida Procurement Law that, although generally granted "wide discretion" in the award of contracts, government agencies cannot act arbitrarily or capriciously in exercising that discretion.2 This principle means that, where a government agency establishes a particular rule or criteria governing the procurement process, that agency cannot then disregard or unreasonably apply that rule or criteria.3 Put another way, governments must stick to and fairly apply the procurement rules they establish. A. THE RFP's RULES The CRA, consistent with the requirements of Section 163.380, established only a few basic but important rules governing the RFP Process but CRA Staff and the Selection Committee seem unwilling to stick to those rules or to fairly apply them. The few rules created by the CRA (collectively, the "RFP's Rules") include the following: Rule #1 A requirement that all proposals demonstrate proposer's financial ability by providing a balance sheet (See Exhibit B); Rule #2 A requirement that all proposals demonstrate the proposer's ability and willingness to indemnify the CRA (See Exhibit B); Rule #3 A requirement that the Selection Committee evaluate proposals based, in large part, upon each proposer's balance sheet and ability to indemnify the CRA; and Rule #4 A rule that CRA Staff negotiate final development agreements "with the top -two ranked proposers, and present negotiated development See § 163.380(3Xa), Fla. Stat. ("Prior to disposition of any real property or interest therein...[the CRA] shall give public notice of such disposition..., invite proposals from, and make all pertinent information available to, private redevelopers or any person interested in understating to redevelop or rehabilitate" the property.); § 163.80(2) (Requiring the CRA to "take into account and give consideration to the Tong -term benefits" of the proposed transaction.); see also State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency, 392 So. 2d 875, 881 (Fla. 1980) (Interpreting a substantially identical version of today's section 163.380 and confirming that the law requires public bidding). 2 Marriot Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 383 So. 2d 662, 667-68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (Even where "the law imposes no mandatory obligation upon public agency in respect to letting of competitive contracts that will require agency in every case to consider lowest dollars and cents bid to exclusion of all other pertinent factors...the law does require that...discretion may not be exercised arbitrarily or capriciously but must be based upon facts reasonably tending to support conclusions reached by such agency) quoting City of Pensacola v. Kirby, 47 So. 2d 533, 535-36 (Fla. 1950); Miami -Dade County School Bd v. J. Ruiz School Bus Service, Inc., 874 So. 2d 59, 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) ("Under the system created by the competitive bid statutes, a public authority may not arbitrarily or capriciously discriminate between bidders, or make the bid based upon personal preference."); Wood -Hopkins Contracting Co. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc., 354 So. 2d 446, 449-50 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (Action of electric authority in taking bids...are, as with all other discretionary functions of public entities, subject to requirement that r exercise be not arbitrary, unreasonable or capricious"). �S' a 3 See Marriot Corp., supra at 667-68; Accela Inc. v. Sarasota County, 993 So. 2d 1035, 1038-39 (Fla. 2d °. c N c i DCA 2008) ("[A] public entity must follow its own laws for a contract with the entity to be valid.") See generally, s 444 ° City of Sweetwater v. Solo Const. Corp., 823 So.2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (While a public authority has wide 2 m c, discretion in award of contracts for public works on competitive bids, such discretion must be exercised based upon c o c = clearly defined criteria, and may not be exercised arbitrarily or capriciously.") " c m 2 of 5 The Honorable Chair & Members of the SEOPW CRA Re: Objections to RFP (13-003) Process & Potential Award of Contract to Overtown Gateway November 15, 2013 agreements to the CRA's Board" (See Email from the CRA's Executive Director attached as Exhibit "D"). The RFP's Rules —which are commonly found in public RFPs—are designed to ensure (1) that all proposals submitted include the CRA's essential terms (i.e., that each proposal is "responsive"); and (2) that proposals are made only by entities that will be able to satisfy the terms of final negotiated contract (i.e., that each proposer is "responsible"). "Regardless of the procurement method, an agency may only award a contract to responsible [and responsive] bidders." Joseph Goldstein, 1 Florida State Procurement Handbook §§ 2:6 and 2:11 (2010) (and sources cited therein).4 II. DISCUSSION CRA Staff failed to apply Rules #1 and #2 after if first received Overtown Gateway's response to the RFP. Overtown Gateway's proposal did not include a balance sheet and failed to make any mention of Overtown Gateway's ability or willingness to indemnify the CRA. In contrast, BDB's proposal included a copy of BDB's current balance sheet, an executed draft indemnification agreement, and all other information required by the RFP and Addendum. We submit that the deficiencies in Overtown Gateway's proposal are material and warrant its disqualification as nonresponsive to the RFP.5 Because the CRA cannot confirm Overtown Gateway's responsibility without the benefit of its balance sheet or proof of its ability to indemnify the CRA, we further submit that the CRA lacks any basis to determine that Overtown Gateway is a responsible proposer. The CRA Selection Committee similarly disregarded Rules #1 through #3. The RFP required that all proposals "must demonstrate the [proposer's] financial and legal ability to carry out the project, including information on the financial status of the developer" (emphasis added). The Addendum then specified the criteria to be used by the CRA's Selection Committee in evaluating each proposal. The Addendum specified that the proposer's "Organization Structure and Financial Strength" would be the single most important criterion considered by the Selection Committee. According to the Addendum, the Selection Committee must evaluate this criterion by looking to each proposer's: (i) Financing Capabilities; (ii) Demonstration of Additional Funding Sources; (iii) Balance Sheet; and (iv) Ability to Indemnify. Despite the fact that Overtown Gateway failed to supply a copy of its balance sheet or to demonstrate in that it was able and willing to indemnify the CRA, two of the Selection Committee members gave Overtown Gateway's proposal perfect scores with respect to the Organization Structure and Financial Strength criterion. The third member of the Selection Committee gave Overtown 4 "Responsibility is a general consideration of whether a bidder has the capability in all respects to fully perform the contract requirements and the integrity and reliability that will assure good faith performance." Goldstein, 1 Procurement Handbook § 2:6. "A responsive vendor is one who submits a bid, proposal, or reply that conforms in all material respects to the solicitation." Id at § 2:11. S Publicis Sanchez & Levitan, LLC, v. Department of Lottery, DOAH Case No. 02-2659BID, 2002 WL 31440748 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hrgs., Oct. 18, 2002) (Bid disqualified as nonresponsive where bidder failed to submit financial statement as required in the RFP); Rattler Construction Contractors, Inc. v. Department of Corrections, DOAH Case No. 98-5623131D, 1999 WL 1486436 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hrgs., Mar. 4, 1999) (Same). 3 of 5 U .0 3 C a ° o Y N it) y0,, C • C 0 i -0 u C CG CU C O .8 c Eu The Honorable Chair & Members of the SEOPW CRA Re: Objections to RFP (13-003) Process & Potential Award of Contract to Overtown Gateway November 15, 2013 Gateway and BDB's proposals equal scores with respect to the criterion (22 points). The Selection Committee's issuance of high scores to Overtown Gateway's incomplete proposal represents the height of capriciousness. Most recently, it has come to our attention that the CRA's Staff intends to change Rule #4 above. Rather than negotiate final development agreements with both BDB and the first - ranked proposer, the CRA's Staff has informed us that it will only negotiate with the first -ranked prosper. CRA Staffs new approach, as articulated by the Executive Director for the first time on October 8, 2013, will violate BDB's rights under Florida Procurement Law and deprive you of an opportunity to make the best determination for the future of Overtown. If CRA Staff fails to negotiate with BDB in good faith, the RFP Process will be irreparably flawed and may be subject to judicial review.6 We believe that the violation of Rules #1 through #4 represent material deviations from the RFP and the Addendum that disqualify Overtown Gateway. Some Florida Courts opinions suggest that minor deviations from the requirements of an RFP can sometimes be waived after review by the contracting agency. However, even if you believe that the CRA can waive the irregularity of not submitting a balance sheet or indemnity, fundamental fairness requires CRA Staff to negotiate a Final Development Agreement with BDB and to present that agreement to you for your review. III. DISQUALIFICATION OF OVERTOWN GATEWAY'S TEAM Overtown Gateway's listing of the Miami Parking Authority as one of its team members presents further reasons why Overtown Gateway should be disqualified from the RFP Process. At best, listing the Miami Parking Authority as a team member is further evidence of the Overtown Gateway's non -responsibility. As you know, the Parking Authority is a department of the City of Miami. Pursuant to Section 23(c) of the City's Charter, "all acts of the department...shall be subject to the approval of the [off-street parking] board." The off-street parking board has not authorized the Authority's participation the RFP Process in any resolution of the off-street parking board that we have identified. It thus appears that Overtown Gateway non -responsibly listed the Miami Parking Authority as one of its team members despite the fact that the Authority is not authorized to so participate in the RFP Process. In other words, Overtown Gateway would have the CRA accept its proposal despite the possibility one of its essential team members may not be authorized to implement the proposal. While Overtown Gateway's listing of the Miami Parking Authority at best demonstrates the team's non -responsibility, at worst, it suggests an effort to unduly sway the CRA Board's approval that will potentially create an appearance of impropriety for the average observer. Section 23(j) of the City Charter requires that all excess revenues collected by the Miami Parking Authority must be "paid into the general funds of the City." In recent years, the Miami Parking Authority has regularly provided millions of dollars in revenue to the City. In fact, the City's 6 City of Port Orange v. Leechase Corp., 430 So. 2d 534, 535-36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (Government has wide discretion in determining establishing procurement standards but it is "one of the duties of the judicial branch to protect the public from the unreasonable and arbitrary exercise of the power of the executive branch of government.") 4 of 5 u c 7 3 a c ' 0 ✓ °, v u m c c y 113 t c o = .0 8 C Di v C ° v i+ E v o 0, in v °� The Honorable Chair & Members of the SEOPW CRA Re: Objections to RFP (13-003) Process & Potential Award of Contract to Overtown Gateway November 15, 2013 2013-2014 budget projects special revenue funds of more than $7 million. A copy of the pages of the City of Miami's 2013-14 budget illustrating budgeted transferred from the CRA to the City of Miami is attached as Exhibit "E". W. CONCLUSION Florida Procurement Law is all about fairness —both to proposers and to the public. To date, the procurement process for RFP 13-003 has been woefully unfair to both prospers and to Overtown. BDB was honored to have been ranked second by the CRA's Selection Committee and eagerly looked forward to negotiating a final development agreement that would be more favorable to the CRA than Overtown Gateway's proposal. At the same time, I know that you and by extension the residents of Overtown anticipated receiving negotiated development agreements from the most responsible, responsive, and capable proposers. If CRA Staff unfairly proceeds to negotiate a final development agreement with BDB, the CRA will be leaving on the table an offer to invest at least $20 million in available private equity without the need for public or private financing, and to make an annual guaranteed payments totaling $2.4 million over twenty years. Instead of BDB's proposal, the CRA will be left with a development agreement based on a proposal by Overtown Gateway that does not offer a payment amount or purchase price for the acquisition of Block 55 and would require 70% financing of construction costs. Florida Law and basic fairness to BDB and Overtown compel the CRA Staff to negotiate a final development agreement with BDB and to present the negotiated agreement to the CRA Board for your consideration. Accordingly, I respectfully request on behalf of BDB Miami, LLC that the CRA conduct such negotiations with BDB. BDB thanks you for your kind attention to this matter and for the opportunity to serve the residents of Overtown and the City of Miami. Enclosures cc: Clarence E. Woods, III Jessica N. Pacheco, Esq. William R. Bloom, Esq. MIA 183528006v14 5 of 5 Sincerely, Lucia Dougherty, Esq. u s 3 3 c a,1 s O c 13 01 E 3 O u c 0 u c_ 13 O u d 4-1 M M O c O c f0 S Clerk of the Board Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Exhibit A SUBM1TTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM II C..3-31-1ciF SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP #13-003) BLOCK 55 Plat Book "B" Page 41 249 NW 6`h Street Miami. Florida PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Total Property Size: 149,856 square feet more or less Zoning: T6-12-0-Urban Core Folio: 01-0105-050-1120 Improvements: The property is unimproved and is offered in its "AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS" condition. Utilities: Utilities are available adjacent to the property including potable water, sanitary sewer, electric power, telephone and cable television. Neighborhood: The Property is centrally located in Miami within an older neighborhood, which is over 90% developed. The general boundaries of the neighborhood extend north from NW 5th Street to NW 28th Street, and west from North Miami Avenue to NW 7th Avenue. The neighborhood is further intersected by the I-95 and I-395 elevated expressways. NW 3rd and NW 2"d Avenues are major north - south traffic arteries through the neighborhood, with local retail shops mixed with residential uses. NW 7`h Street ("Sawyer's Walk") and NW 9th Street ("9th Street Pedestrian Mall") serve as pedestrian -oriented corridors. General Information Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 163.380(3)(a), the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency ("CRA") is declaring its intent to dispose of its interest in the referenced property and is seeking proposals from private developers or any persons interested in undertaking to develop the property. All proposals must be consistent with the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan dated November 2004 by Dover Kohl & Partners as updated by the Final Update of May 2009 by the City of Miami Planning Department (ver. 2.0) which is available at http://www.miamicra.com/seopwcra/docs/2009 SEOPW Redevelpment Plan.pdf All proposals must include a detailed description of the project, site plan and renderings, project schedule, background information on the developer's proposed development team and development expertise, a list of all persons with an interest in the development, and recommendations from the developer's recent clients. Proposals must demonstrate the financial and legal ability to carry out the project, including SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI 1490 Northwest 3rd Avenue, Suite 105 Miami, FL 33136 Tel (305) 679-6800 Fax (305) 679-6835 http://www.miamicra.com/seopwcra U 3 O` o r u C y c mm C C O 2 p V C Ca N c O -O 7-1 C E £ CU 1A ` Y information on the financial status of the developer, a project budget consisting of a detailed pro forma demonstrating sources and uses of funds, and a detailed statement of all financial assistance needed from any source. Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board All proposals shall incorporate the following: a. Elements preserving the history of the Overtown area, while incorporating the theme of "Live, Work and Play," including entertainment venues and restaurants with outdoor dining to the fullest extent practicable. b. Information regarding job opportunities for local area residents and businesses to allow them to participate in the construction of the development, including at least two (2) local job fairs prior to the commencement of each development phase. c. Information as to job opportunities for local residents and local businesses post -construction, including newly generated trade and service related jobs, including at least one (1) local job fair upon the completion of each development phase. d. Phasing of construction, with a preference on the completion of the Retail Component, prior to the Residential Component. e. The requirement that twenty percent (20%) of the subcontractors for the project are companies that have their principal place of business within the County, giving first priority to subcontractors whose principal place of business is in the CRA Redevelopment Area, second priority to subcontractors whose principal place of business is in Overtown, third priority to subcontractors whose principal place of business is within District 5 of the City, fourth priority to subcontractors whose principal place of business is in the City and last priority to subcontractors whose principal place of business is in Miami -Dade County. f. The requirement that the general contractor and all subcontractors hire forty percent (40%) of the unskilled labor for the construction of the project from workers residing in the County giving first priority to workers residing in the CRA Redevelopment Area, second priority to workers residing in Overtown, third priority to workers residing in District 5 of the City, fourth priority to workers residing in the City with last priority to workers residing in the County. g. To the extent required by the City of Miami Zoning Code, the Developer shall plat each development site. h. Evidence of available financial resources acceptable to the CRA. Respondents should be aware that the CRA will also be requesting proposals for Block 45 and 56 to the east of Block 55. Proposers may bid on one or both properties. All available information on the referenced Property may be obtained from the CRA at 1490 NW 3''d Avenue, Suite 105, Miami, Florida 33136. For further information, please contact Brian Zeltsman at (305) 679-6827. All interested parties are encouraged to inspect the property. A pre -submission conference will be held on July l0th, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. at the CRA offices. The "cone of silence" does not apply to this RFP, and thus, communication with the staff of the CRA and the City of Miami is permissible. Respondents must submit ten (10) copies of their proposal to the City Clerk of the City of Miami, at Miami City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida 33133, by 3:00pm on Tuesday, July 23rd, 2013. Late proposals and/or proposals submitted at any other location will not be accepted. 3 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board The CRA reserves the right to accept any proposal deemed to be in the public interest and in furtherance of the purposes of Florida's Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, to waive any irregularities in any proposal, to cancel this Request for Proposals, to reject any or all proposals, and/or to re -advertise for proposals. Clarence E. Woods, III Executive Director 4 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Exhibit B SUBMITTED INTO PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM I I nr\a 3-31-aol+ MICHELLE SPENCE-JONES Board Chair CLARENCE E. WOODS. Ill ENecutite Director SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP #13-003) BLOCK 55 Plat Book "B" Page 41 249 NW 6th Street Miami, Florida ADDENDUM #1 - July 11, 2013 This addendum should be considered a supplement to the original RFP that shall provide clarifications to the questions and/or comments posed during the additional information and clarification period. 1. EVALUATION CRITERIA Responses shall be evaluated according to the following criteria and respective weight: Rating Factor Maximum Points • Proposer's Experience and Qualifications. overall capability of the development team, specifically as it pertains to the proposed development • Proposer's Team Experience (incl. Project Manager) • Proposer's organization structure and financial strength including: o Financing Capabilities o Demonstration of additional funding sources o Balance Sheet o Ability to Indemnify • Development Concept including: o Overall Compatibility with Redevelopment Plan o Live/Work/Play concept SOUTHEAST OVERTO WN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI 1490 N.W. 3rd Avenue, Ste. 105. Miami, FL 33166 Tel (305-679-6800. (305)-679-6835 10 10 25 20 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board • Economic viability of the project and evaluation of market and cash flow analyses, pro forma, including evaluation of market and financial assumptions and their reasonableness based on current market conditions • Economic return to the CRA to be measured in terms of tease payments, property taxes, CRA's tax increment, and any other financial returns benefiting the CRA • Project schedule and timelines 2. AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 20 10 5 The selected proposer shall be required to provide audited financial statements supporting the proposer's representations in the response SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI 1490 N.W. 3rd Avenue, Ste. 105. Miami, FL 33166 Tel (305-679-6800. (305)-679-6835 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Exhibit C SU3MITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEM II C. 10/11/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine Online Sunshine The 2013 Florida Statutes Submitted into the public record in connection with Select Year: 2013 Go) Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Title XI COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Chapter 163 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS View Entire Chapter 163.380 Disposal of property in community redevelopment area. —The disposal of property in a community redevelopment area which is acquired by eminent domain is subject to the limitations set forth in s. 73.013. (1) Any county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may sell, lease, dispose of, or otherwise transfer real property or any interest therein acquired by it for community redevelopment in a community redevelopment area to any private person, or may retain such property for public use, and may enter into contracts with respect thereto for residential, recreational, commercial, industrial, educational, or other uses, in accordance with the community redevelopment plan, subject to such covenants, conditions, and restrictions, including covenants running with the land, as it deems necessary or desirable to assist in preventing the development or spread of future slums or blighted areas or to otherwise carry out the purposes of this part. However, such sale, lease, other transfer, or retention, and any agreement relating thereto, may be made only after the approval of the community redevelopment plan by the governing body. The purchasers or lessees and their successors and assigns shall be obligated to devote such real property only to the uses specified in the community redevelopment plan and may be obligated to comply with such other requirements as the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may determine to be in the public interest, including the obligation to begin any improvements on such real property required by the community redevelopment plan within a reasonable time. (2) Such real property or interest shall be sold, leased, otherwise transferred, or retained at a value determined to be in the public interest for uses in accordance with the community redevelopment plan and in accordance with such reasonable disposal procedures as any county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may prescribe. In determining the value of real property as being in the public interest for uses in accordance with the community redevelopment plan, the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency shall take into account and give consideration to the long-term benefits to be achieved by the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency resulting from incurring short-term losses or costs in the disposal of such real property; the uses provided in such plan; the restrictions upon, and the covenants, conditions, and obligations assumed by, the purchaser or lessee or by the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency retaining the property; and the objectives of such plan for the prevention of the recurrence of slum or blighted areas. In the event the value of such real property being disposed of is for less than the fair value, such disposition shall require the approval of the governing body, which approval may only he given following a duly noticed public hearing. The county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may provide in any instrument of conveyance to a private purchaser or lessee that such purchaser or lessee is without power to sell, lease, or otherwise transfer the real property without the prior written consent of the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency until the purchaser or lessee has completed the construction of any or all improvements which he or she has obligated himself or herself to leg .state.fl.us/statutes/indexcfm?mode=View Statutes&SubM enu=1 &App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String= 163.380&URL=0100.0199/0163/Sectiors/0163... 1/3 10/11/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine construct thereon. Real property acquired by the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency which, in accordance with the provisions of the community redevelopment plan, is to be transferred shall be transferred as rapidly as feasible in the public interest, consistent with the carrying out of the provisions of the community redevelopment plan. Any contract for such transfer and the community redevelopment plan, or such part or parts of such contract or plan as the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may determine, may be recorded in the land records of the clerk of the circuit court in such manner as to afford actual or constructive notice thereof. (3)(a) Prior to disposition of any real property or interest therein in a community redevelopment area, any county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency shall give public notice of such disposition by publication in a newspaper having a general circulation in the community, at least 30 days prior to the execution of any contract to sell, lease, or otherwise transfer real property and, prior to the delivery of any instrument of conveyance with respect thereto under the provisions of this section, invite proposals from, and make all pertinent information available to, private redevelopers or any persons interested in undertaking to redevelop or rehabilitate a community redevelopment area or any part thereof. Such notice shall identify the area or portion thereof and shall state that proposals must be made by those interested within 30 days after the date of publication of the notice and that such further information as is available may be obtained at such office as is designated in the notice. The county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency shall consider all such redevelopment or rehabilitation proposals and the financial and legal ability of the persons making such proposals to carry them out; and the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may negotiate with any persons for proposals for the purchase, lease, or other transfer of any real property acquired by it in the community redevelopment area. The county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may accept such proposal as it deems to be in the public interest and in furtherance of the purposes of this part. Except in the case of a governing body acting as the agency, as provided in s. 163.357, a notification of intention to accept such proposal must be filed with the governing body not less than 30 days prior to any such acceptance. Thereafter, the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may execute such contract in accordance with the provisions of subsection (1) and deliver deeds, leases, and other instruments and take all steps necessary to effectuate such contract. (b) Any county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency that, pursuant to the provisions of this section, has disposed of a real property project with a land area in excess of 20 acres may acquire an expanded area that is immediately adjacent to the original project and less than 35 percent of the land area of the original project, by purchase as provided in this chapter, and negotiate a disposition of such expanded area directly with the person who acquired the original project without complying with the disposition procedures established in paragraph (a), provided the county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency adopts a resolution making the following findings: 1. It is in the public interest to expand such real property project to an immediately adjacent area. 2. The expanded area is less than 35 percent of the land area of the original project. 3. The expanded area is entirety within the boundary of the community redevelopment area. (4) Any county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency may temporarily operate and maintain real property acquired by it in a community redevelopment area for or in connection with a community redevelopment plan pending the disposition of the property as authorized in this part, without regard to the 3 3 provisions of subsection (1), for such uses and purposes as may be deemed desirable, even though not in a ai.o� conformity with the community redevelopment plan. o v rn (5) If any conflict exists between the provisions of this section and s. 159.61, the provisions of this c o c section govern and supersede those of s. 159.61. v c (6) Notwithstanding any provision of this section, if a community redevelopment area is established by E c N leg.state.fl.us/statuteshndexcfm?mode=View Statutes&SubMenu=1 &Appmode=Display_Statute&Search_String=163.380&U RL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163... 2/3 Item 11 on Todd B. Hannon 10/11/13 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Orlin Sunshine the governing body for the redevelopment of property located on a closed military base within the governing body's boundaries, the procedures for disposition of real property within that community redevelopment area shall be prescribed by the governing body, and compliance with the other provisions of this section shall not be required prior to the disposal of real property. History.—s. 11, ch. 69-305; s. 9, ch. 77-391; s. 13, ch. 84-356; s. 1, ch. 92-162; s. 906, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 96-254; s. 9, ch. 98-314; s. 12, ch. 2006-11. Copyright ,0 1995-2013 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board I eg .state.fl.us/statutes/i ndex cfm?r r ude=View Statutes&SubM enu=1 &App_rrnde=D i s play_Statute&Search_Stri ng=163.380&U R L=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163... 3/3 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Exhibit D SUBMITTE!J INTO rH' PUBLIC RECORD FOR ?tM n ON 3-3I-±:h Martos, Edward O. (Assoc-Mia-LDZ-ENV) From: Lago, Carlos R. (Assoc-Mia-LDZ-RE) Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:28 AM To: Martos, Edward O. (Assoc-Mia-LDZ-ENV) Subject FW: Block 55 Ed, please see the email below Carlos R. Lago Associate Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1333 S.E. 2nd Avenue I Miami, FL 33131 Tel 305.579.0578 lagoc@gtlaw.com I www.gttaw.com ®GreenbergTraurig From: Woods III, Clarence E. [mailto:CWoods@miamigov.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 12:40 PM To: douq.maver@gdi2100.com; BARRON CHANNER - BachRE (barron.channer@bachre.com); Lago, Carlos R. (Assoc-Mia- LDZ-RE) Cc: william.bloom@hklaw.com; Jessica Pacheco (jessica@jpachecolaw.com); Shiver, Cornelius Subject: Block 55 To all, On June 18, 2013, the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency ("CRA") issued Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 13-003 for the development of Block 55. On July 23, 2013, the CRA received three (3) proposals in response to RFP No. 13-003. On August 2, 2013, a selection committee consisting of: Greg Gay, City Planner, City of Miami, Brian Zeltsman, Director of Architecture and Development for the CRA, and Patricia Braynon, Director of the Housing Finance Authority of Miami -Dade County, met to evaluate the aforementioned proposals, and has ranked the proposals in the following order: 1. The Peebles Corporation/BACH Real Estate ("Overtown Gateway") 2. BDB Miami, LLC 3. Stone Soup Development, Inc. ("Sawyer's Landing") Based upon the selection committee's rankings, the CRA staff intends to negotiate with the top -two ranked proposers, and present negotiated development agreements to the CRA's Board of Commissioners at a date to be determined. Clarence E. Woods, III Executive Director Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency 1490 NW 3rd Avenue, Suite 105 Miami, Florida 33136 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board • Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board City of Miami Fiscal Year 2013-14 PROPOSED BUDGET CITY OF MIAMI TABLE OF ORGANIZATION City Commission Chairman: M. Sarnoff Vice -Chairman: W. Gort Commissioner: F. Carollo Commissioner: M. Spence -Jones Commissioner: F. Suarez { { { City Attorney Julie O. Bru Auditor General Theodore Guba City Clerk Todd Hannon Other Agencies Bayfront Park Management Trust Civil Service Board Civilian Investigative Panel Community Redevelopment Agency Residents of Miami i Tomas P. Regalado Executive Mayor Office of International Business Development Johnny Martinez Chief Administrator / City Manager Assistant City Manager / Chief Financial Officer Finance Procurement -{ Risk Management Management and Budget' Downtown Development Authority Fire Fighter's & Police Officer's Retirement Trust General Employees & Sanitation Employees' RetirementTrust Liberty CityTrust Assistant City Manager / Chief of Infrastructure Building CIP &Transportation Information Technology iPlanning & Zoning - Public Facilities Public Works Miami Parking Authority Miami Sports & Exhibition Authority Virginia Key Beach Park Trust Management and Budget is an Office within the City Manager's Office 46 Assistant City Manager / Chief of Operations - Code Enforcement Community Development Grants Administration GSA NET iParks & Recreation { Solid Waste Fire -Rescue Police Communications 1— EODP Human Resources j— Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Five -Year Financial Forecast Intergovernmental Revenues: 'Intergovernmental Revenues' include revenues from the State of Florida, such as the Half -Cent Sales Tax, as well as revenues from other local units, such as the Miami Parking Authority and the Village of Key Biscayne. Intergovernmental revenues are projected to grow by 2.0 percent annually through FY 2018. Thousands 58,000 56,000 54,000 52,000 50,000 48,000 46,000 44,000 42,000 3.0% 2.0% o 2.0% 0 2.0% 2.0% 5.0% -0.9% 0.0% -5.0% III ■ III III, -10.0% -15.4% -15.0% 56,177 47,537 47,112 48,054 49,016 49,996 50,996 "'�." ,��, �■ ram... -20.0% 2012 Actual 2013 YE 2014 Proposed 2015 Forecast 2016 Forecast 2017 Forecast 2018 Forecast Projection seam Intergovernmental Revenues Growth Licenses and Permits: The 'Licenses and Permits' revenue category includes revenue from building permits, mural permits, occupational licenses, and other licenses and permits. The City of Miami continues to experience growth in licenses and permits issued, and the five-year forecast projects that revenue from these sources will grow by 2.5 percent annually. The forecast also includes increased building permit revenue associated with new construction planned for the downtown area in the coming years. Thousands 44,000 42,000 40,000 38,000 36,000 34,000 32,000 6.7% 8.0% 5.0% - - 7.0%% - 6.0%MN °`\ 2.7% 2.6% 2.5% 2.5% 4.0% 'e (: 3.0% 2.0% t.1-1 1.0% 0.0% 35,656 38,032 37,744 38,760 39,767 40,761 41,780 -1.0% -2.0% 2012 Actual 2013 YE 2014 Proposed 2015 Forecast 2016 Forecast 2017 Forecast 2018 Forecast Projection -0.8%,,-- sou Licenses & Permits ----Growth Fines and Forfeitures: 'Fines and Forfeitures' are revenues derived from penalties for violation of statutory offenses and administrative rules. This category also includes revenue generated through court fees, as well as 237 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Fiscal 2012-13 $866,650,700 Fiscal 2013-14 $895,143,200 Inflow Category Revenues (Inflows) - All Funds Licenses and Permits 4.7% Other Revenues (Inflows) 20.4% Intergovernmental Revenues 17.6% Fines and Forfeitures <1% Transfers -IN 5.1% Interest <1% Franchise Fees and Other Taxes 11.4% Licenses and Permits 4.2% Intergovernmental Revenues 15.4% Fines and Forfeitures <1% Transfers -IN 5.5% Interest <1% Franchise Fees and Other Taxes 11.1% Property Taxes Franchise Fees and Other Taxes Interest Transfers -IN Fines and Forfeitures Intergovernmental Revenues Licenses and Permits Other Revenues (Inflows) Charges for Services Charges for Services 12.0% Property Taxes 28.2% Other Revenues (Inflows) 22.2% Property Taxes 28.1% FY 2012-13 Adopted FY 2013-14 Proposed $244,420,400 $251,116,200 $98,570,700 $99,191,900 $800,000 $1,000,000 $44,627,900 $49,640,800 $4,760,200 $4,885,100 $152,403,500 $138,224,800 $40,582,500 $37,807,100 $176,421,800 $199,092,900 $104,063,700 $114,184,400 $866,650,700 $895,143,200 281 Charges for Services 12.8% Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Consolidated Schedule Revenues (Inflows) by Category All Funds FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 Special Revenue Debt Service Internal Service Proposed Adopted General Fund Funds Funds Funds All Funds All Funds Property Taxes Ad Valorem Taxes -Real $205,012,800 $25,382,800 $230,395,600 $224,707,000 Ad Valorem Taxes -Real- $5,100,000 $5,100,000 $7,100,000 Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes -Penalty $1,000 $1,000 $50,000 & Interest Ad Valorem Taxes -Personal $14,969,600 $14,969,600 $12,491,600 Ad Valorem Taxes -Personal- $650,000 $650,000 $71,800 Delinquent Total -Property Taxes $225,733,400 $25,382,800 $251,116,200 $244,420,400 Franchise Fees and Other Taxes S,U&F Taxes -Local Option $6,382,300 Fuel Tax $6,382,300 $6,465,400 Franc Fee -Electricity $26,000,000 $26,000,000 $26,000,000 Franc Fee -Gas $400,000 $400,000 $435,000 Utility Ser Fee -Electricity $27,500,000 $27,500,000 $24,544,400 Utility Ser Fee -Water $3,900,000 $3,900,000 $3,695,300 Utility Ser Fee -Gas $1,330,000 $1,330,000 $1,149,200 Utility Ser Fee -Fuel Oil $13,600 $13,600 $13,100 Public Service Taxes $22,316,000 $22,316,000 $25,218,300 Other Taxes $11,350,000 $11,350,000 $11,050,000 Total -Franchise Fees and $99,191,900 $99,191,900 $98,570,700 Other Taxes Interest Interest & Penalty - $1,000,000 Investment $1,000,000 $800,000 Total -Interest $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 Transfers -IN Other-Interfund Transfer $10,709,600 $38,331,200 $600,000 $49,640,800 $44,627,900 282 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Total -Transfers-IN Fines and Forfeitures Consolidated Schedule Revenues (Inflows) by Category All Funds FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 Special Revenue Debt Service Internal Service Proposed Adopted General Fund Funds Funds Funds All Funds All Funds $10,709,600 $38,331,200 $600,000 $49,640,800 $44,627,900 Fines -Judgments And Fines $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,134,600 Fines -Violation of Local $1,300 $1,300 $40,000 Ordinances Fines -Other Fines And/Or $517,900 $1,365,900 $1,883,800 $1,585,600 Forfeits Total -Fines and Forfeitures $3,519,200 $1,365,900 $4,885,100 $4,760,200 Intergovernmental Revenues Federal Grants $98,400 $68,151,700 $68,250,100 $81,197,000 State Grants $992,800 $992,800 $2,106,900 State Shared Revenues $555,000 $555,000 $865,000 Municipal Rev Sharing $11,685,800 $11,685,800 $11,211,200 Half Cent Sales Tax $26,993,800 $26,993,800 $26,121,200 Grants From Other Local $16,685,000 $3,000,000 $19,685,000 $21,265,000 Units Shared Revenues From $7,779,200 $2,283,100 $10,062,300 $9,637,200 Other Local Units Total -Intergovernmental $47,112,200 $88,112,600 $3,000,000 $138,224,800 $152,403,500 Revenues Licenses and Permits Occupational Licenses- $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Business Occupational Licenses- $200,000 $200,000 $250,000 Business -Penalty Occupational Licenses- $575,000 $575,000 $575,000 Metro Building Permits $7,310,000 $7,310,000 $8,444,800 Other Licenses, Fees and $22,658,500 $63,600 $22,722,100 $24,312,700 Permits 283 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Consolidated Schedule Revenues (Inflows) by Category All Funds Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 Special Revenue Debt Service Internal Service Proposed Adopted General Fund Funds Funds Funds All Funds All Funds Total -Licenses and Permits $37,743,500 $63,600 $37,807,100 $40,582,500 Other Revenues (Inflows) Misc-Red Light Camera $6,850,000 $6,850,000 $5,800,000 Fines Misc-Disposition Of Fixed $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Assets Misc. Sales of Surplus $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 Material and Scrap Misc-Contributions And $150,000 Donations From Private Sources Misc-Other Miscellaneous $2,255,800 $4,172,000 $140,001,200 $146,429,000 $125,147,000 Revenues Misc. Settlements $250,000 $1,500,000 $1,750,000 $1,750,000 Contra Revenue for Bad $70,000 $70,000 $250,000 Debt Other -Debt Proceeds $3,166,500 Other -Other $1,420,000 $1,420,000 $983,200 NonOperating Sources Other -Other Nonoperating $137,800 $41,332,500 $1,099,100 $42,569,400 $39,170,600 Sources/Carryover Total -Other Revenues (Inflows) Charges for Services $10,738,100 $45,754,500 $1,099,100 $141,501,200 $199,092,900 $176,421,800 CFS-GG-Internal Service $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 Fund Fees And Charges CFS-GG-Other General $686,100 $60,000 $746,100 $690,300 Government Charges And Fees CFS-PS-Police Services $3,408,900 $761,000 $4,169,900 $4,539,300 Fire Protection Services $9,000 CFS-PS-Emergency Service $7,650,000 $7,650,000 $7,000,000 Fees CFS-PS-Protective $289,000 $289,000 $75,900 Inspection Fees 284 Consolidated Schedule Revenues (Inflows) by Category All Funds Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 Special Revenue Debt Service Internal Service Proposed Adopted General Fund Funds Funds Funds All Funds All Funds CFS-PS-Ambulance/False $530,000 $530,000 $350,000 Alarm CFS-PS-Other Public Safety $504,400 $300,000 $804,400 $703,500 Charges And Fees CFS-PE-Garbage/Solid $25,636,100 $25,636,100 $25,598,500 Waste Revenue CFS-PE-Cemetery Fees $1,500 $1,500 $600 CFS-PE-Other Physical $145,000 $145,000 $235,500 Environment Revenue CFS-Trans-Parking Facilities $7,415,100 $7,415,100 $7,343,800 CFS-Trans-Tolls $289,100 $289,100 $190,000 Transportation Tools $739,000 $739,000 $689,000 CFS-C&R-Special $1,203,500 $1,596,600 $2,800,100 $2,217,400 Recreation Facilities CFS-C&R-Other $12,475,000 $241,500 $12,716,500 $12,406,100 Culture/Recreation CFS -Rents and Royalties $6,867,500 $2,710,100 $9,577,600 $8,977,100 CFS-Other Charges for $38,516,200 $1,808,800 $40,325,000 $32,687,700 Services Total -Charges for Services $98,552,300 $15,632,100 $114,184,400 $104,063,700 Total Revenues $523,590,600 $161,638,300 $67,813,100 $142,101,200 $895,143,200 $866,650,700 285 Miami Parking Authority (D ep artment of Off -Street Parking) Proposed Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2013-14 (Submitted to the City of Miami Commission For Approval) (Approved by the Off -Street Board of Directors July 10, 2013) vex (3-17,+► Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board MIAMI PARKING AUTHORITY Schedule of Revenue and Expenses Proposed FY 2014 Operating Budget Operating Revenue Off -Street Facilities Parking Lots On -Street Management Fees Other Total Operating Revenue Operating Expenses Salaries, Wages & Fringe Benefits Repairs, Maintcnance, Cleaning & Landscape Security Utilities Insurance Assessment Expenses Rental - Building/Land Revenue Sharing Parking Meter Parts & Installation Legal and Professional Bank Charges Supplies & Miscellaneous Other Expenses Advertising & Promotion Total Operating Expenses Operating Results Before Depr & Anrort Depreciation & Amortization Operating Results Non -Operating Revenues (Expenses): Interest Income Gain (Loss) on Disposal Property Interest Expenses Total Non -Operating Net Revenue In Excess of Expenses Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Actual $ Approved Budget Proposed Budget 3,956,386 7,804,016 13,649,453 919,904 183,821 4,064,930 7,871,246 14,061,000 304,286 200,000 4,365,044 8,027,024 14,764,500 308,236 220,000 26,513,580 26,501,462 27,684,804 5,942,992 1,269,764 756,810 680,615 464,168 496,330 683,755 1,643,866 137,266 1,166,151 858,472 139,925 270,005 234,612 5,912,259 1,284,629 831,971 670,285 554,519 432,022 678,455 1,631,600 151,632 1,113,024 865,000 148,950 329,615 241,500 6,256,872 1,289,663 878,610 709,244 499,207 437,868 678,456 1,911,094 188,430 1,248,610 890,000 198,497 325,925 346,000 14,744,731 14,845,461 15,858,476 11,768,849 (3,570,486) 11,656,001 11,826,328 (3,727,209) (3,513,860) 8,198,363 7,928,792 8,312,468 79,389 2,479,520 (3,653,961) 20,000 10,000 (3,606,145) (3,553,382) (1,095,052) (3,586,145) (3,543,382) 7,103,311 4,342,647 4,769,086 Requested Budget 2014 vs. FY 2012 Actual Budget 2013 Increase/(Decrease) 408,658 223,008 1,115,047 (611,668) 36,179 300,114 155,778 703,500 3,950 20,000 1,171,224 1,183,342 313,880 19,899 121,800 28,629 35,039 (58,462) (5,299) 267,228 51,164 82,459 31,528 58,572 55,920 111,388 344,613 5,034 46,639 38,959 (55,312) 5,846 1 279,494 36,798 135,586 25,000 49,547 (3,690) 104,500 1,113,745 1,013,015 57,479 170,327 56,626 213,349 114,105 383,676 (69,389) (2,479,520) 100,579 (10,000) 52,763 (2,448,330) 42,763 (2,334,225) 426,439 Requested Budget 2014 vs. FY 2012 Actual Budget 2013 Increase/(Decrease) 10.33 7.38 2.86 8.17 (66.49) 19.68 1.98 5.00 1.30 10.00 4.42 4.47 5.28 5.83 1.57 0.39 16.09 5.61 4.21 5.81 7.55 (9.97) (11.78) 1.35 (0.77) 0.00 16.26 17.13 37.27 24.27 7.07 12.18 3.67 2.89 41.86 33.26 20.71 (1.12) 47.48 43.27 7.55 6.82 0.49 (1.59) 1.39 1.46 (5.72) 4.84 (87.40) (50.00) (2.75) (1.46) 223.58 (1.19) (32.86) 9.82 MIAMI PARKING AUTHORITY Schedule of Revenue and Expenses Proposed FY 2014 Operating Budget FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Requested Budget 2014 Requested Budget 2014 Approved Proposed vs. vs. Actual Budget • Budget FY 2012 Actual Budget 2013 FY 2012 Actual Budget 2013 8 S S Increase/(Decrease) Incru &(Dessau) Operating Raceme ON -Street Facilities 3956,386 4,064,930 4,365,044 408,658 300,114 10.33 738 Parking Lots 7,804,016 7,871,246 8,027,024 223,008 155,778 2.86 1.98 On -Street 13,649,453 14,061,000 14,764,500 1,115,047 703,500 8.17 5.00 Management Fen 919,904 304,286 308,236 (611,668) 3,950 (66.49) 130 Other 183,821 200,000 220,000 36,179 20,000 19.68 10.00 Total Operating Revenge 26.513,580 26,501,462 27,614,104 1,171,224 1,183,342 4.42 4.47 Operating Equines 5nlnries, Wares & Frinee Benefits Salaries • Regular 4,444,506 4,270,362 4,532,871 88,365 262,509 1.99 6.15 Salaries - Overtime 126,412 158,274 158,274 31,862 2520 Saiaries- Sick&Vacation 373,676 265,103 274,510 (99,166) 9,407 (26.54) 3.55 Social Security 317,033 323,393 334,954 17,921 11,561 5.65 3.57 Health Insurance 27,843 390,911 391,118 363,275 207 1,304.73 0.05 Retirement 489,183 401,963 459,566 (29,617) 57,603 (6.05) 14.33 Benefits - (Auto, LTD, STD) 139,932 102,253 105,579 (34,353) 3,326 (24.55) 325 Tuition 9,219 - - (9,219) . - (100.00) Miscellaneous Pay • 15,189 (15,189) (100.00) 5,942,993 5,912,259 6,256,872 313,879 344,613 5.28 5.83 Rennin. Mninlena net. Chains & Landscape Maintenance - Properly 229,838 201,730 160,900 (611,938) (40,130) (29.99) (2024) Maintenance •Landscaping 133,519 120,773 123,800 (9,719) 3,027 (7.28) 2.51 Maintenance • Elevators 68,838 52,200 70,940 2,102 18,740 3.05 35.90 Maintenance - MC 24,579 8,500 12,500 (12,079) 4,000 (49.14) 47.06 Maintenance -Computers 70,176 67,250 64,050 (6,126) (3,200) (8.73) (4.76) Maintenance -Garage Equipment 144,871 144,052 178,164 33,293 34,112 22.91 23.68 Maintenance - Alarms 3,993 12,820 8,500 4,507 (4,320) 112.87 (33.70) Maintenance - TV Surveillance 4,500 4,411 17,600 13,100 13,189 291.11 299.00 Repairs -Equipment 21,558 24,500 19,400 (2,158) (5,100) (10.0I) (20.82) Motor Pod 163,960 210,630 210,870 46,910 240 28.61 0.11 Cleaning & Housekeeping Supplies 272,436 272,638 250,239 (22,197) (22,399) (8.15) (8.22) Expendable Tools 5,826 - 2,000 (3,826) 2,000 (65.67) Clothing 24,901 34,900 40,700 15,799 5,800 63.45 16.62 Signs 57,167 75,500 74,000 16,833 (1,500) 29.45 (1.99) Small Equipment 19,749 48,500 52,200 32,451 3,700 16432 7.63 Maintenance - Other 4,597 6,225 3,800 (797) (2,425) (1734) (38.96) Cleaning 18,638 - - (18,638) - (100.00) - 1,269,146 1,284,629 1,289,663 20,517 5,034 1.62 0.39 $ cnrity Security Armored Car Services 737,174 810,671 876,310 139,136 65,639 18.87 8.10 19,637 21,300 2300 (17,337) (19,000) (81.29) (8920) 756,811 831,971 878,610 121,799 46,639 16.09 5.61 Utili101 Telephone 286,247 • 252,215 308,756 22,509 56,541 7.86 22.42 Light& Power 367,030 390,644 367,150 120 (23,494) 0.03 (6.01) Water 27,338 27,426 33,338 6,000 5,912 21.95 21.56 680,615 670,285 709,244 28,629 38,959 4.21 5.81 Jnsurnnro Properly & Gen [lability Insurance 437,661 487,610 437,717 56 (49,893) 0.01 (10.23) Worken Compensuian Inmrance 26,507 66,909 61,490 34,983 (5,419) 131.98 (8.10) 464,168 554,519 499,207 35,039 (55,312) 7.55 (9.97) Rental - Buildlnn/Land Rental -Buildmg/Land 683,755 678,455 678,456 (5,299) I ' (0.77) 0.00 Assessment Exnenen Assessment Expnses- Repairs & Maintenance .163,050 98,266 99,372 (63,678) 1,106 (39.05) 1.13 Assesuoent Expenses - Utilities 13,881 5,778 45,600 31,719 39,822 228.51 689.20 Assessment Expenses - Office Supplies 3,624 3,696 3,720 96 24 2.65 0.65 Assessment Expenses -Management Fee 41,566 42,815 38,988 (2.578) (3,127) (6.20) (8.94) Assessment Expenses -Insurance 197,030 204,635 177,564 (19,466) (27,071) (9.88) (1323) Assessment Expenses - Security 77,179 76,832 72,624 (4,555) (4,208) (3.90) (5.48) 496,330 432,022 437,868 (58,462) 5,846 (11.78) 135 Bevenne Sharim Revenue Sharing 1,643,866 1,631,600 1,911,094 267,221 279,494 1626 17.13 pnr dne Meter Pans & IrutOOatiol Equipment Rental 38,153 40,633 34,550 (3,603) (6,082) (9.44) (14.97) Puking Meter Parts &Installation 99,113 111,000 153,880 54,767 42,880 5526 38.63 137,266 151,632 188,430 51,164 36,798 37.27 24.27 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board MIAMI PARKING AUTHORITY Schedule of Revenue and Expenses • Proposed FY 2014 Operaring Budget FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Requested Budges 2014 Requested Budget 2014 Approved Proposed vs. vs. Actual Budget Budget FY 2012 Actual Budget 2013 FY 2012 Actual Budge 2013 S S 3 Increase/(Decrease) Increasei(Decreaue) Lees' and Professional Property Surveys, Planing 5,305 5,000 5,000 (305) (5.75) Legal Services 117,000 117,624 117,624 624 0.53 Trustee Fen 15,000 30,000 25,000 10,000 (5,000) 6667 (16.67) Audit Fen 150,000 163,000 135000 (15,000) (28,000) (1000) (17 18) Oche Consultants 878,846 797,400 965,966 87,140 168,586 9.92 21.14 1,166,151 1,113,024 1,248,610 62459 135,586 7.07 12.18 Bank Charges Bank Charges 858,472 665000 890,000 31,528 25,000 3.67 289 4mnlies & Miscellaneous Postage ,t Courier Services 7,954 13,900 13400 5,446 (500) 6647 (3.60) Printing 70,002 81,350 109,147 39,145 27,797 55.92 34.17 Office Supplies 20,279 23,200 22,600 2,321 (600) 11.45 (2.59) Office Equipment 23,631 7,100 6,050 (17,581) (1,050) (74 40) (14.79) Compute Supplies 1,7.64 11,900 9,500 6236 (2,400) 651.58 (20.17) Computer Software 16,795 11,500 37,800 21,005 26,300 125.07 228.70 139,925 • 148,950 198,497 , 58,572 49,547 41.86 33 26 Other Ferreira Property Taxes 145,146 153,420 153,430 8,204 10 5.71 0.01 Licenses &Permits 2,454 1,900 950 (1,504) (950) (61.29) (50.00) Miscellaneous 14.805 12,550 12,550 (2,235) (15.23) Entertainment - - - - Travel 11,496 12,000 12,000 504 4.38 Training 4,541 38,600 38,600 34,059 - 75003 MeetingsandConventions 50,205 87,150 84,350 34.145 (2,600) 68.01 (3.21) Cashier -Ovenge/(Shortage) (164) - 50 214 50 (130.49) Publications 1,241 1,425 1,325 84 (100) 6.77 (7.02) Membership Dues 14,530 22,570 22,670 8,140 100 5602 0.44 Claims Settlement 25,500 (25,500) (100.00) Bad Debt Expense - - Penalties & Interest 252 (252) (100.00) 270,006 329,615 325,925 55,919 (3,690) 20.71 (1.12) advrrtuine 4`Promotio0 Promotional 8,327 15,000 15,000 6,673 80.14 - Public Relations 197,519 150,000 230,000 32,481 80,000 16.44 53.33 Advertising 28,767 76,500 101,000 72,233 24,500 251.10 32.03 234,613 241,500 346,000 111,387 104,500 4748 4327 Total 6pernr6rg Expenses 14,744,117 14,845,461 15,158.476 1,114,359 1,013,015 7.56 6.82 Operating Results Before Depr d Amor 11,769,463 11,656,001 11,626,321 56,865 170,327 0.48 1.46 Depreciation R Amoniution (3,570,486) (3,727,209) (3,513.860) 56,626 213,349 (159) (5.72) Operating Resullr 8,198,977 7,928,792 1,312,468 113,491 383,676 1.38 4.84 Non -Operating Revenues (Expenses) Interest Income 79,389 20,000 10,000 (69,389) (10,000) (87.40) (50.00) Gain (Loss) on Disposal Property 2,479,520 (2,479,520) (100.00) Interest Expenses (3,653,961) (3,606,145) (3,553,382) 100,579 52,763 (2.75) (1.46) Total Non -Operating (1095,052) (3,586,145) (3,543,382) (2,448,330) 42,763 223.58 (1.19) Net Rexene In Excess of Expenses 7,103,925 4,342,647 4,769,086 (I,334,839) 426,439 (32.87) 9.82 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board MIAMI PARKING AUTHORITY Schedule of Revenues and Expenses Proposed FY 2013 Operating Budget — Line Item Descriptions Description of Line Items: Operating Revenue Off -Street Facilities - Revenue collected at parking garages, including daily customer revenue, monthly cardholder revenue and revenue derived from special events Parking Lots — Revenue collected at parking lots, including daily customer revenue, monthly decal -holder revenue and revenue derived from special events / rental of lots On -Street — Revenue collected from single space and Pay and Display meters located on -street as well as revenue derived from rental of metered spaces (production events, valet, etc) Management Fees — Fees charged to third parties (i.e. Miami -Dade County, Florida FDOT and City of Miami) for the administration of various parking / non -parking facilities Other — Majority of line item represents fees remitted by towing companies that assist in towing illegally parked vehicles from parking facilities / on -street spaces Operating Expenses Salaries, Wages & Fringe Benefits Salaries — Regular - Base salaries for all full time / part-time Authority personnel Salaries — Overtime — Overtime funds paid to hourly personnel Salaries — Sick & Vacation — Sick and vacation time for full-time Authority personnel Social Security — Social security taxes paid to the federal government for Authority personnel Health Insurance — Insurance premiums paid by MPA for full-time Authority personnel Retirement = Employer portion of annual pension obligation paid to the MPA's pension plan for full-time Authority personnel Other Benefits — Insurance premiums paid by MPA on behalf of full-time administrative and operations personnel for auto, short-term disability and long term disability Page 1 of 5 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Tuition — MPA provides educational assistance for regular full-time employees who have completed 365 calendar days of service in an eligible employment classification. The amount of assistance paid by the Agency is 100% of tuition costs up to a maximum of $3,000 in a calendar year providing the employee earns grade of "C" or better Miscellaneous Pay — Payment for the use of temporary labor for special events and special employee assignments Repairs, Maintenance, Cleaning & Landscape Maintenance — Property — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of parking facility structural components, excluding items detailed below Maintenance — Landscaping — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of parking facility landscaping Maintenance — Elevators — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of parking facility elevators Maintenance — A/C — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of parking facility, operations and administrative office air conditioning units Maintenance — Computers — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of parking facility / administrative office computer equipment Maintenance — Garage Equipment — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of parking facility revenue control equipment Maintenance — Alarms — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of parking facility revenue alarm / security systems Maintenance — TV Surveillance — Contractual expenses incurred in connection with the maintenance of TV surveillance cameras located in garage facilities Repairs — Equipment — Non -contractual repairs associated with parking facilities Motor Pool — Expenditures associated with Agency vehicles including gas, repairs and lease payments for leased Agency vehicles Cleaning / Cleaning & Housekeeping Supplies — Contractual expenses and cleaning supplies purchases for the maintenance of parking facilities / administrative offices Expendable Tools / Small Equipment - Maintenance tools and maintenance / office equipment purchases that do not exceed $1,000 and therefore are not considered a capital asset Page 2 of 5 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Clothing — Uniforms for operations personnel Signs — Maintenance and purchase of signage for both off-street and on -street parking facilities Maintenance — Other — Annual contractual maintenance fee incurred for Authority telephone system Security Security — Contractual expenses incurred for security personnel who perform surveillance of parking facilities Armored Car Services — Brinks services for the pickup of cash at specified locations Utilities Telephone — Expenses paid to telephone carriers for the usage of telephone lines and cellular phone lines (i.e. AT&T, Sprint) Light & Power — Electricity expense for all parking facilities / administrative offices (FPL) Water - Water expense for all parking facilities / administrative offices (Miami -Dade Water and Sewer) Insurance Property and General Liability Insurance — Insurance premiums related to property, general liability, and directors and officers liability coverage Workers Compensation Insurance — Workers compensation premiums for Authority personnel Rental — Building /Land Rental Building/Land — Fixed, contractual lease payments paid for the rental of parking lots managed and not owned by the Authority Assessment Expenses Assessment Expenses — The expenses for the Courthouse Center Garage condos that are accumulated and paid to the condo association. The items in this category include but are not limited to: repairs and maintenance, utilities, office supplies, management fees, property insurance and security Page 3 of 5 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Revenue Sharing Revenue Sharing — Payments made to lessors of parking lots that are managed by the Authority. These payments are based on a % of either gross or net revenue derived by the parking lot Parking Meter Parts & Installation Equipment Rental — Rental of golf carts for security personnel to roam facilities, rental of office copiers Parking Meter Parts & Installation — Purchases of parking meter supplies / parts to replace defective parking meter equipment Legal and Professional Property Surveys, Platting — Expenditures incurred related to property surveys and platting of prospective parking facility acquisitions Legal Services — Legal fees paid to City of Miami for City Attorney services Trustee Fees - Fees paid to Trustee of Authority bonds Audit Fees — Fees paid in connection with the annual audit of the Authority's financial records Pay and Display Fees — Service contract fees paid to parking meter vendors, parking consultants, payroll processing fees, website redesign fees, rating agency fees in connection with the Authority's bonds Bank Charges Bank Charges — Bank fees and credit card processing charges associated with the Authority's parking facilities Supplies and Miscellaneous Postage & Courier Services — Postage expense for Authority's mailings Printing — Printing of tickets and decals for parking facilities and customer service pamphlets Office Supplies — Desk supplies (i.e. paper) for all Authority facilities / administrative offices Office Equipment — Office equipment purchases that do not meet threshold for capitalization Page 4 of 5 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Computer Supplies — Computer supply purchases for all Authority facilities / administrative offices Computer Software — Computer software purchases for all Authority facilities / administrative offices Other Expenses Licenses & Permits - Miscellaneous licenses and fees Miscellaneous — Payment for medical exams and back ground check for employees (new hire and worker comp cases) and mystery shopper program Travel - Business travel expenses incurred for parking related conferences Training -Training expenses for all employees Meetings and Conventions - Business meeting expenses for all employees Publications — Miscellaneous business publication subscriptions Membership dues - Membership dues for various parking related organizations and professional associations Advertising & Promotion Promotional — Promotional materials distributed to customers at special events / customer appreciation week Public Relations — Contractual expenditures related to public relations consultant services and sponsorships of various charities and non-profit organizations Advertising — Media advertising expenses (i.e. radio, television, and printed media) Non -Operating Revenues / (Expenses) Depreciation & Amortization — Depreciation related to parking facilities, including building and structures, leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures, and parking equipment Interest Income — Interest and gain/losses on Authority investments Interest Expenses — Interest expenses and amortization of bond issuance costs incurred in connection with the Authority's bond issue. Page 5 of 5 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Avenue G Marketplace Poinciana Homeowners Association Advisory Board of Directors Petition Supporting Avenue G Marketplace Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board SUBMITTED INTO THE 'U3LIC RECORD FOR I(Eii4 �� ON 3-3i aoi4 Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) Name of Homeowner Association ?2© Address of Property ILt( I3(e Cri # of Units C D. e We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6`h Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community, we need cafes stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3rd Ave and 6th Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Respectfully, I-oir-12-6 q1 /C,e S` -i�-Jc� n P per, 2 a %% �� 'tie, Name, Signature and Address Vim' ( 330 2DiA)w. 7>,/ s9 3 I_B woivcrog&/ s7 A✓JeYc �>l sLI✓,0 rrl(i2 / p 32)3-6 itle, Name, Signature and Address jtkit! 11/(0VV) (1) (4 J Wir )6 ( N iii) s, 4 ' M,io4 3 3 / 3� /Title, Name, Signature and Address dLeli7P, lL/iCiie4 VPI,) 5°1--O, Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board • Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board nc�c2r� , \A I Name of Homeowners -Association # of Units ZLI ac9 kk 14b SFFC..33/3 Address of Property Da We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3`o Ave and 6th Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community. We need cafes and stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3`d Ave and 6th Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Ref gectfully, / Rokti o,) 2Gq kJ. 7P1.5; . ite7 5'/q M'tm: L33ts Title, Name, Signature and Address / r. 2o-do, n ci f i 7 c .G> 2,6 9 /v. ✓ Wi 3 9 M,' ecw1; 'F [— 3 ! ? 6 Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and i ddress Title, ame, Sign- ure and Address Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) Pam; oC2 if )l(re CmC& ntit_t Z Name of Homeowners Association 2 9(20) AL/ 71/)c1.,, 3313(, Address of Property Date # of Units We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3`d Ave and 6`h Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community, we need cafes stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3' Ave and 6th Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Respectfully, Title, ame, ignature Title, Name, Signature nd Address nd Addr Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) n ev. e ; niit�(' Name of Homeowners Pessociation # of Units 2(04 > 2ni I '7% �� j 33I3Co Address of Property We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6111 Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community, we need cafes stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled Tabor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3`d Ave and 6'h Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Respectfully, se/kr-L Title, Nam Al Ut 11/10"et (Awl./ 02q 0,01 SI' !No? e, Name, Signature and Address Ait C�0/01� 3/7 t -,- dss dress '1` ,g‘074/44 Tit le,,Paam , Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Avenue G Marketplace Poinciana Homeowners Petition Supporting Avenue G Marketplace Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR. 1 EM 1 1 ON-3'-.-o'. Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) c c, VIIIcy Name of Homeowners sociation :a,q 12nI 7 , , J rcnt(, CC. 33 341 Address of Property Date #of Units We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6th Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also.a welcome addition to our community. We need cafes and stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3rd Ave and 6th Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Respectfully Title, ame, Signature arfd Address Title, N grim- i• nature and Address a3 Title Na e, Signature and Address lol Title, Name, Signature and Address I oloor Z. fraaler Aim--c4U ne)I kt2;4,9 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Title, Name, Signature nd Address \\ 4zA Title,"ame, Signature and Address PVns‘ e_t; Nl • %l o toles 2. l Title, Name, Signature and Address e5D 1,k( e Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, N e, Signature and Address Titl , Name, Signatur and Address 4Df( jel9<n Title, NaAe, Signature anAress eTa- 11).4A6 W (b °l Title, Name, Signature and Addres Jai Title, Name, Signature and Add Name, Signature and A • ress RL ALLAc� Title, Name, Signa ure and Address /JeZ 4 d� /O6 Title, Name, Signature and Address a 42.2A-RA CoQNAQckiA Title, Name, Signature and Address Tipe, Name Signature and Address r(777 r2 Title, l�m Signature and Address 4 Title, Name, Signature and Address let/r-frn Lt)4.(12/ jat'gzkiLl evhini2J1 463 446.3 ( AI- UL#LfQo CuZfiL 406 9 3Oz Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board (A). i Ji cr,2{; 1444W Un.4- 3®.;- Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature d Address 62/ Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, amp Siggy�'ture and Address �D/A/w 7 ��..e2o7 GJ/cCEz/ &- L— ,2 o' / 4 c,J A E (a? Vc,A.tvct'..c Title, Name, nature and Address alay.,144 1 2 b f N w 7 4.[ 0? R A0As d M Aarkr - (Hi , )3(c=' 2©1 of 7 6 Usk163 rcd-L �3)30 )r1 �� 42 Asp% ��:v>•!. ` ,�1��,,iYr// 3 3 Title, I me, Signature and Addre Title, Name, Signature and Address QrtLLto Title, Name(Signature and Address Ile fits Title, Name, Sign and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Pometv 2Gq 1t s - 12 I ro '// '3113 6 Title, Name, Signature and Address / e o Avo o W 7111 K- - e'l c� (F( Title, Name, ignature and Address \ b n t< O Z 61 Nw 7'-4e/ 2,20 H r`(nt, F13P Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Avenue G Marketplace Town Park North Advisory Board Petition Supporting Avenue G Marketplace Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board FEU re`IT TCL INTO THE ' U3L IO RECORD FOR y'%.oa-M IION3—a—.wj'.. Homeowners Association Letter of Support 1 for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) Name of Homeowners Association 1E1,45 PV_ Address of Property l 70 # of Units 9//q/i 3 Date We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3`d Ave and 6'h Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community, we need cafes stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3`d Ave and 6`h Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. FZ spectfully, \ Ail (1_,( Ci C\j/k}r 1 cis (pq itulo. q 1 "Ni.c,{ . � Title, Name, Signature and Adddrt `�h .a b dIn r� n e, vs 17�4 /U . ,J cl L k -# SJ / 111; a f,c 3 i l Title, Name, Signature and Address , l inA- .V-1) CL2ti% L'() r: � / C ' / 72, (' , 6 ,d 7;c ep Title, Name, Signatur and Address � ik_t t, �`� 11 e-0'\ 11'> ri7 t;`7(1- 1 ((v c /1_,^(4,a ow P(-A-z Title, Name, Signature arid Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) l V \i To, h(c),(CL>y Q Name of Homeowners Association 014 54't^ PL 17 Address of Property Date We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6'h Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community, we need cafes stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3`d Ave and 6`h Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Respectfully, WO i U), \'‘Il q d?5 N)VN) M;Ci,n‘ 3t3 Titl Name, ignature and Addreteack Lt4,-c Ce,,6 ()fa 702_,5 F7I ,P 4S WV/ 046 (3-,e Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) T.wAi-Parr,-406 (one' )5ac-- /i9 c i q Name of Homeowners Association # of Units 1gLf5 NW Ern Pt_. Address of Property Date AA1 ( i 13 We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3`d Ave and 6th Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community, we need cafes stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3fd Ave and 6' Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. R peC/-t o Ai &OM 1 It Name, Sig ( n'innrl*'e /'1i0 ,e, ture and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address /9,0 s,'v L Fp/ice Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board 5�. Arc A4sis Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board SUBVUTTED INTO THE PUBLC RECORD FOR 1TE' ITE1 / 1 ! 3-3 ! -col 4- Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) Name of Homeowners Association Address of Property #ofUnis Date We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6`h Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community. We need cafes and stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3rd Ave and 6`h Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Respectfully, VP Gon>e, kcv Title, Name, Signature and Address J I ySa AJO (3 % 33/ Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Homeowners Association Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) 0e 3 Name of Hoeowners Association Address of Property # of Units We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6'h Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community. We need cafes and stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3rd Ave and 6th Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of homeowners. Respectfully, Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Title, Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Avenue G Marketplace Overtown Youth Center Parent Support Group Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board SUBMITTED ENTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR ITEMJ L ON 3-3:—alto 0,4 .e,,_ktA0‘03 t-kcs,y)-(c21-1,ki °N; Overtown Youth Center Parent Group Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) 10/9/2013 We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3'd Ave and 6th Street. The project team has met with the Overtown Youth Center Parents. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for our children , our neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community. We need cafes and stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3'd Ave and 6th Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of Overtowns Youth and Parents. Respectfully, kakl)� � AC 1O0.\ \1%'V,) rl�k mica -)t-\ . '7)'))1�AD Name, Signature and Address 1g1)11-n i 1��(r't C Ingi1 rvt�-7'r��-`'''o5 �I,/rn ri_. Name, Signature and Address , z J ? _ /4°rnA-' LLB. 3/' fin- #3 Iy);cfn, ovuda 33/ 3i Name Signature and Address a'tc1.4's Ili t ) /7f, "54 ic /0,723,6 Name, %, Signatpr7 and Address 4 I6Lw 19d tow o 3)) L Name, Signat re and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Da)-61 ame, ignaturs Overtown Youth Center Parent Group Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) I L 70 IJ 0'A - 1 Kam,/ Fl.. 3/340 and Address Name, Signature and Ad: ress ad -ha A.00 182i au), Ski Pi MiarA.lif(331310 Name, Signature and Address jiviov n Name, Signatu e and A Signature and Actdres iu� ���f/U 307 Name, Signature an6Addres e � Sc - (C - I a-3 1,6 �P !- Name, Signature and Addre cfi 1p00 Ii& 406-frft1 (o At a„,„ N w y /41 sf/1/t/A/ 7/A O iwrevi 1 `6 5 H. to 2, fie; Signature a Mess I mar Name, Signature and Address ///frilP, /(/ ///7 4 4a/wf,f3t1;/' Name, Signature and A dress 3.2 Name Signatur am 0.40O 00--(N 3 i-1&J71l1f?. 33L3 b allv 33 i d Addr7ffi Or, 14,xvi �es 1 6>a• dd ss Sign ure and Address Sr �(, 3/36 Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Overtown Youth Center Parent Group Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) (ki-C71 / Signature - n • Addre s Nme, Signat and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board 'SUENvIri-IED 11%1TC F SL1C RECORD F ,. 1; I 0 3-3i-.2J1-1- " 0 4o..u3 Ni u,4.1, pZ- - so , -( Overtown VIMENIMParent Group Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) 10/9/2013 We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6th Street. The project team has met with the Overtown C,titititCwaraimParents. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for our children , our neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community. We need cafes and stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3rd Ave and 61h Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of Overtowns Youth and Parents. Respectfully, Name, Signature a nd Address Name, Signature and Address G(7/4 (ic,/vdd Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature Name, Signature and Address and Address 9/7/GC)7 ,//7/--74;_ /‹—e) 3 )G `1(0 55 qy1 A/c,, «1' kd vt, ttie ct«/ v. 07it, rti yc-a Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Overtown liatitkOntraILParent Group Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) Name, Signature nAddrr ss ozg, 1 7V >n 4/ S" L+ 3 /7 Name, Signature and Address _ /77 e 6 et- / s 0 - vv . `/ /4Je 3 (5 Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address I 0 I 3716S/ .ram.tI` Name, Sign: ure and d: ress Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public - record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board OvertownlUntratastaV Parent Group Letter of Support for Avenue G Market Place and BDB Miami (Developer) 71 SO p-e_S /96/„Ait. / Narj Signature and Address / / n C /7// /7:f 5 Name,nature and Address Name, Signature and Acdress Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Name, Signature and Address Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board ip-Troz Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board Su ,p� ,,L SUBMITTED INTO THE PUBLIC RECORD FOR GRANDCENTRAL 697 North Miami Ave. I Miami FL 33136 PH. 305.377.2277 www.grandcentralmiarni.com October 18, 2013 BY EMAIL SEOPW CRA Board 1490 NW 3rd Avenue Miami, FL 33136 305-679-6800 RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE AVENUE G MARKETPLACE Dear SEOPW CRA Board Members: Grand Central is downtown Miami's most versatile contemporary event space and, as you know, located within the SEOPW CRA boundaries. We are one of the largest private employers within the SEOPW CRA and have attracted well over 100,000 visitors to the neighborhood each year since opening in 2010. As a stakeholder in the SEOPW CRA we believe that development projects that generate main street activity benefit small businesses because busy sidewalks make safe places to live and work. We strongly support the proposed development of Avenue G Marketplace on 3rd Ave and 6th Street. The project team has met with our leadership. They took the time to engage the community on their own initiative. This shows their respect for homeowners, our association, neighborhood and the Overtown community. The Developers have over 100 years experience developing, owning, leasing and/or managing all types of retail properties including Bayside Market Place. This project will be anchored by a Major Grocer selling "Fresh" foods to our community. This is a much needed basic service in our community, as we've become accustomed to secondary markets and corner stores for food. The retail shops are also a welcome addition to our community. We need cafes and stores to generate economic activity. Avenue G will provide 163 permanent jobs, the developer is also committed to providing at least 40% of the retail lease space to Minority and Women Owned Businesses. In addition the Developer has included within its proposal to the City a binding First Source Hiring Agreement, that includes 40% of the unskilled labor for local residents and 20% Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board of the subcontractors as Minority and Women Owned Businesses. Again, a binding agreement and not promises. Avenue G and BDB Miami have been forthright and transparent in their financial abilities to complete this development project. As homeowners and voters we appreciate this attribute above all things within their proposal. Accountability and Transparency is the universal foundation of good governance and it should be no different in Overtown. We strongly support the Avenue G proposed Development project on 3rd Ave and 6th Street. We encourage our elected officials to do the same and support the interests of local businesses and homeowners. Aramis Lorie President CC: Commissioner Michelle Spence -Jones Commissioner Marc Samoff Commissioner Willy Gort Commissioner Francis Suarez Commissioner Frank Carollo Submitted into the public record in connection with Item 11 on 03/31/14 Todd B. Hannon Clerk of the Board