HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRA-R-13-0054 BackupSUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
CITY OF MIAM|
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: Clarence E.Woods, U|
Executive Director, SEOpVVCRA
From:
City Planner, City of MiaTWf'
Doba August 7.2O13 File:
Subject: Blocks45/5G
References:
On June 17 2013. the Southeast VVaa issued
Request for Proposals ("RMqNo. 13-002 for the development of Blocks 45and 56. On July 22'203,the CRA
received three (3) proposals in response to RFP No. 13-002 from the following proposers:
1. Stone Soup Development, Inc. ("Gavvyer'aLandinQ^)
2. Ali Aboard F|oddo—Stadkzno' LLC
3. The Peebles Corporation/BACH Real Estate ('OvedznwnGehawmy")
On August 2, 2013. e selection committee consisting of: Gregory Gay, City Planner, City of Miami; Brian
Zeltenaan, Director of Architecture and Development, CRA; and Patricia Bneynon' Director of the Housing
Finance Authority of Miami -Dade County, met hoevaluate the aforementioned pnopnea|e, and has ranked the
proposals as follows:
1. The Peebles CorpoxaUon/BACHReal Estate ("OvertownGatewoy]
2. All Aboard Florida — Stations, LLC
OVERTOWN GATEWAY PARTNERS LLC
RFP RESPONSE
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
CRA REQUIREMENT DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL DURING
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CRA
Project Description
Phase I
Comply with the County
Phase I
Settlement Agreement minimum
230 residential apartments, hotel with
150 rooms, 50,000 square feet of
commercial office space and 30,000
square feet of entertainment and
restaurant retail space with sufficient
parking for compliance with code and
cultural plaza between Blocks 45 and 56.
development requirements
270 residential apartments, same hotel,
commercial office, entertainment,
retail and parking (an increase of 40
units)
No Sawyer's Walk Cultural Plaza until
Phase II is constructed (objected to by
Phase II
Executive Director) (Phase I complies
with the County Settlement minimum
development requirements)
408 apartment units, 50,000 square feet
of commercial office space and 30,000
Phase II
square feet of retail space and sufficient
parking for compliance with code
Approximately 410 apartments, same
commercial office, retail and parking.
Includes Sawyer's Walk Plaza Cultural
Plaza (Sawyer's Walk Culture Plaza
was included in Phase I design of RFP
Response)
Deposit
Not requested in RFP
Deposit of $1,000,000; $500,000
upon Effective Date and
additional deposit of $500,000 at
end of Inspection Period
Developer proposes Deposit of
$250,000
RFP RESPONSE
CRA REQUIREMENT DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL DURING
NEGOTIATIONS WITH TILE CRA
Project Schedule
Phase I:
Developer comply with time
frames included in RFP response
Developer will comply with the time
frame of the County Settlement
Preconstruction
and comply with time frame
requirements of the County
Agreement with respect to Phase I
except will require 36 months to
Design Development: by March 2014
Construction Drawings: by June 2014
Permitting/Filing: by October 2014
Construction
Settlement Agreement
complete Phase I due to the size and
complexity of Phase I instead of
completing construction within 24
months as required by the County
Settlement Agreement but proposes
substantial extended time frames from
that reflected in RFP response with
respect to Phase II (i.e.,
commencement of construction moves
from anticipated date of July 2015 to
an outside date of May 15, 2019)
Commencement construction of Phase I
by October 2014 with completion of
Phase I by March 2017
Phase II:
Preconstruction
(other than the time to complete Phase
Design Development by January 2015
I the Developer will comply with the
time requirements of the County
Construction Drawings by April 2015
Settlement Agreement)
Permitting/Filing: by July 2015
Construction
Commencement by July 2015
Completion by January 2018
Project Payments
Developer request reduction in Project
Full Payment of 2.5% of Gross
Developer will comply with the stated
Payments required by County Settlement
Revenues to County and 2.5% of
rent requirements of the County
from 5% of Gross Revenue to 2.5% of
Gross Revenue (variance requested)
Gross Revenues to CRA as
required by the County
Settlement Agreement
Settlement Agreement
2
#25655374_v1
RFP RESPONSE
CRA REQUIREMENT DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL DURING
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CRA
Affordable Housing
Agreed to provide 60 Affordable
Apartments per County Settlement
Agreement with slight modification
(variance requested)
Developer comply with the
Affordable Housing
requirements of the County
Settlement Agreement
Developer has agreed to comply with
the Affordable Housing requirements
of the County Settlement Agreement
Parking Accommodations
with Lyric and
Longshoremen's Union
Developer indicates that it will provide
required parking
Developer document agreement
with Lyric Theatre and
Longshoremen's Union
Developer has provided no evidence
of parking agreement but represents to
have an agreement with Lyric Theatre.
Still working with Longshoremen's
Union
Indemnity Agreement
Developer indicates willing to provide
Indemnity Agreement
Requested Indemnity Agreement
Proposes Indemnity Agreement be
signed by Developer only and not
from any significant entities
from significant entities in
addition to Developer
Guaranty of Completion in
addition to payment and
performance bond
Not requested in RFP
Requested Guaranty of
Completion from significant
entities
Developer not willing to provide
Guaranty of Completion - Developer's
position is that a payment and
performance bond should be sufficient
Demonstrated Financial
Ability to Perform to the
CRA
Background information provided in RFP
response
Executive Director requested
financial information from
Developer to demonstrate ability
to perform
Developer has not provided any
financial information
Requested Variance
Developer requested variances as part of
RFP response. Most significant
variances are 36 months to complete
Phase I and reduction of Project
Payments by 50%
Developer request as few
variances as possible
Developer is only requesting variance
of 36 months to complete Phase I
instead of 24 months
3
#25655374_v1
RFP RESPONSE
CRA REQUIREMENT
DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL DURING
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE CRA
Status of Development
Agreement
CRA requested Developer
negotiate a Development
Agreement with Developer
incorporating deal terms prior to
submission to CRA Board for
consideration
Development Agreement not finalized.
Key points have been discussed.
Waiting for redraft from Developer.
4
#25655374_v1
RFP RESPONSE
ALL ABOARD FLORIDA
CRA REQUIREMENT
�CU M�EM�'AT ONI
DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL DURING
NEGOTIATIONS WITH CRA
Project Description
Approximately 258 residential
apartments, approximately 97,200
square feet of commercial office
space and approximately 55,100
square feet of restaurant and retail
space and approximately 2,000
parking spaces
Comply with the County
Settlement Agreement minimum
development requirements
Not less than 250 and not more than
360 residential apartments,
approximately 95,000 - 100,000 square
feet of commercial office space with
approximately 50,000 - 56,000 square
feet of restaurant and retail space, same
parking (Project complies with the
County Settlement Agreement
minimum development requirements)
Deposit
Not requested in RFP
Deposit of $1,000,000; $500,000
upon Effective Date and additional
deposit of $500,000 at end of the
Inspection Period
Developer has agreed to make Deposits
totaling $1,000,000
Project Schedule
Pre -Construction
Developer comply with the time
frame included in RFP response
and comply with the time frame
requirements of the County
Settlement Agreement
Developer will comply with time frame
of County Settlement Agreement
except will require 30 months to
complete construction due to the size
and complexity of the Project
Design and zoning approvals: by
mid 2014
Construction
Commencement: by August 2014
Completion: by October 2016
#25655393_v1
RFP RESPONSE
CRA REQUIREMENT
DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL DURING
NEGOTIATIONS WITH CRA
Project Payments
Upfront payment of $5,500,000 in
lieu of Project Payments and
Indemnity Agreement (variance
request)
Developer increase its payments
Developer proposes payment of
$5,500,000 in lieu of Project Payments
plus community benefits payments
totaling $2,500,000 and separate
payment in lieu of Indemnity
Agreement
Affordable Housing
None proposed - (request variance)
Developer comply with Affordable
Housing Requirement of the
County Settlement Agreement
Developer has agreed to comply with
Affordable Housing Requirements of
the County Settlement Agreement
Parking Accommodations
with Lyric and
Longshoremen's Union
Developer indicates that it will
provide required parking
Developer document agreement
with Lyric Theatre and
Longshoremen's Union
Developer represents that it has
documented parking agreements with
the Lyric Theatre and the
Longshoremen's Union
Indemnity Agreement
Developer proposed cash payment in
lieu of Indemnity (request variance)
Request Indemnity Agreement
Developer has agreed to pay a
significant amount in lieu of Indemnity
Agreement
from Developer and significant
entity or provide cash payment in
lieu thereof
Guaranty of Completion in
addition to payment and
performance bond
Not request in RFP
Requested Guaranty of
Completion from significant
entities
Developer agreed to provide a
Guaranty of Completion from an entity
having a minimum net worth of at least
$50,000,000
Demonstrated Financial
Ability to Perform to the CRA
Background information provided in
RFP response
Executive Director requested
financial information from
Developer to demonstrate ability
to perform
Financial information provided by the
Developer and reviewed and approved
by Executive Director and Chief
Financial Officer of CRA
2
#25655393_v1
RFP RESPONSE
CRA REQUIREMENT
DEVELOPER'S PROPOSAL DURING
NEGOTIATIONS WITH CRA
Requested Variance
Waiver of the Affordable Housing
Developer request as few
Proposed variances approved by
Requirement; payment of
variances as possible
Executive Director and are listed on
$5,500,000 in lieu of Project
Exhibit A attached hereto
Payments and waiver Indemnity
Agreement and 30 month time frame
for completion of Project instead of
24 months (still ahead of schedule)
Status of Development
CRA requested Developer to
Development Agreement fully
Agreement
negotiate a Development
negotiated and Developer and
Agreement with Developer
incorporating deal terms prior to
submission to the CRA Board for
consideration
Executive Director have agreed to final
terms, subject to Board approval
3
#25655393_v1
EXHIBIT A
Proposed Variances
The Developer proposes the following variances to the Declaration:
1. Project Payments. In lieu of making the Project Payments as defined in the Declaration, which requires payment over time, the
Developer shall pay on the Closing Date, Five Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($5,500,000.00) to be shared
equally by the County and the CRA.
2. Completion Date. Substantial completion of the Project is anticipated to occur approximately nineteen (19) months in advance
of the completion date permitted by the Declaration. However, since the Retail Component and the Residential Component
(collectively, the "Project") are integrated, in lieu of substantially completing construction of each the Retail Component and
Residential Component separately within twenty four (24) months after commencement of Vertical Construction of the Project as
required in Section 7 of the Declaration, the Developer proposes to substantially complete construction of the entire Project within
thirty (30) months of the commencement of Vertical Construction of the same.
3. Estoppel. Developer proposes the addition of a provision to the Declaration authorizing the County Mayor or its designee, on
behalf of the County, and the Executive Director, on behalf of the CRA, to execute an estoppel certificate or similar instrument, upon
the request of the Developer and in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the County or the CRA, as appropriate, affirming
compliance with the conditions set forth in the Declaration and the termination of the possibility of reverter.
4. Residential Restrictions. Developer proposes providing 60 residential units in compliance with the provisions of Section 3 of
the Declaration with all residential units in excess of 60 residential units being market rate units.
5. Indemnification Agreement. In lieu of providing the Indemnification Agreement the Developer is proposing an alternative risk
management solution in the form of a payment of One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) (the "Indemnity Payment") for the
benefit of the City, the County and the CRA. Within one (1) business day following the end of the Inspection Period if the Developer
does not elect to terminate this Agreement, Developer shall deposit the Indemnity Payment with the Escrow Agent, which shall be
disbursed (i) at Closing pursuant to disbursement instructions signed by the City, County and the CRA or (ii) disbursed to the
Developer if this Agreement is terminated prior to Closing.
6. Clarification on Reversion Rights. Section 9(E) of the Declaration provides as follows: "In the event a Default Notice is
issued pursuant to Section 9(A)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this Declaration, and is not cured in the Default Cure Period, as same may be
extended, in accordance with the last sentence of Section 9(A), title to any portion(s) of the Property which have not been improved
with buildings shall automatically revert to the CRA, subject to the right of the County set forth in the Declaration and in the
Settlement Agreement ..." It is the Developer's understanding that the foregoing reversion shall not apply if improvements to the
Property have been commenced, even if such improvements have not been substantially completed. If that is not the correct
4
#25655393_v1
interpretation of the foregoing provision, Developer has agreed to pay the following in lieu of any such possible reversion rights:
payment to each of the County and the CRA, as liquidated damages, Two Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($2,500.00) per
day for each day between the Outside Date until substantial completion of the Project. The Outside Date shall mean the later of the
date (i) the Developer should have achieved substantial completion of the Project, as may be extended as provided in the Declaration,
or (ii) May 15, 2018. The Project shall have the meaning set forth in the Development Agreement_
CRA Requested Variance
Termination based upon Inspection. If the Development Agreement is executed between the Developer and the CRA and the
Developer terminates the Development Agreement during the Inspection Period, the CRA shall be required to issue another
Development Opportunity within thirty (30) days of the date of termination.
5
#25655393_v1
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
tt itttttttttt ttttt t'ttttttftltttltttttte Y e,e. -ee♦
€ VFI t , P S LA1FWAY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
For its entire history, Overtown has been an iconic neighborhood influenced by Black culture that is
celebrated by residents and visitor alike. In the prime of Overtown's "Little Broadway" era, Avenue G (now
known as "Second Avenue") was the nerve center. Blocks 45 and 56 housed some of the most significant
places of the day. The Blocks 45 and 56 are critically important to modern Overtown's intent to establish
a Folk life Village as well as foster a thriving entertainment and commerce district. Their development
must be placed in the hands of a team with genuine intent, provide ability and demonstrable resources for
getting the job done right.
We propose the "Overtown Gateway" projects a bold and thoughtful development designed to transform
parking lots at the heart of Overtown into a vibrant district offering a wide range of options to live, work
and play in the neighborhood. Our proposal is influenced by thoughtful consideration of the various plans
and studies that have been developed for the neighborhood over the last twenty years. The Redevelopment
Plan and HOFDIA standards were central to our consideration and can be seen in the design. The Project
concept can be seen in Tab 3 with images of the design located in Appendix A and B.
The Overtown Gateway team is comprised of highly accomplished firms with collective experience
developing and managing large-scale and complex projects. Detailed information about each individual
team member is located in Appendix C.
Our Development Partners, The Peebles Corporation ("Peebles") and BACH Real Estate ("BACH"),-have direct
experience with all the components of the project - hotel, residential, office and retail. Over the last decade,
Peebles has developed projects totaling approximately $300 million in South ylorida alone. Recently Forbes:
Magazine named Donahue Peebles, the company's founder, as one of the "ten wealthiestBlack americans"`
BACH is a local -based, African -American owned development firm led by Barron Charmer Mr ,Charmer is'.
an emerging developer with over ten years of real estate development and acquisitions experience He is
a 30-year native of Miami -Dade with an MBA from The Wharton School. Overtown Gateway represents a
joint -venture between BACH and Peebles. Mr. Peebles and Mr, Ch`aner have worked together for a decade _:
The Project team includes Munilla Construction Management ("`MCM"), D. Stephenson..
("Stephenson"), Revuelta Architecture ("Revuelta"), Miami ParkingAuthority ("MPAj an
and Fernandez ("BRF").
MCM is a Miami -based construction management firm�and one of the `largest- Hispanic -owned
construction firms in the US. The firm has the bondingfcapacity to undertake single projects ranging up
to $300 million in construction costs and collective projects -totaling $t billion.
• Stephenson is the largest African -American ovrned construction management^ firm in South Florida.
They have current experience working in Overtown as manage rs of the :kirk- and Shoppes
project (Eight Street, NW Third Avenue).
• Revuelta is one of the most prolific architects in the design' of Miami hi -rise structures. His portfolio
of projects designed features nearly ten buildings m Greater Downtown Miami.
• MPA is the single largest manager of parkinThey currently manage several lots within
Overtown. Their parking portfolio includes 14 garage's and nearly 90 surface lots along with over 11,000
on -street spaces.
• BRF is the premier law firm specializing in land'use matters throughout Miami. They also have significant
4
CVIEUTIMS lAIFWi Y
experience with current land use issues in Overtown. BRF and the Development Partners have worked
together for over ten years.
We have deliberately sought to address the key objectives of this solicitation with a Project that includes
several facets. The key elements and project benefits are detailed in tabs 3 and 5 respectively.
• Overtown Gateway would generate roughly 750 jobs with the development of Blocks 45 and 56. Our
team has direct experience, deliberate intent and commitment from the top down to exceed the targeted
levels of jobs for local residents and contract opportunities for local companies.
• Significant post -construction jobs will result from the retail, hotel and office components. We plan to put
in place a dedicated jobs and contracts coordinator who would remain active even after construction
to ensure that local residents and companies have every opportunity to work with Overtown Gateway.
• Respect for the cultural heritage of Overtown is embedded within our design. Elements of HOFDIA and
the Redevelopment Plan are incorporated. The visual direction of the project is in synch with Overtown's
history
• The Project would generate significant economic returns for SEOPW CRA. This would amount to millions
each year. A summary of the highlights is provided in Tab 5.
• Beyond creating jobs, Overtown Gateway will engage Overtown youth by providing educational
experiences exposing them to the real estate industry and entrepreneurship. In doing so, we are
deliberately seeking to sow the seeds for growing the investors of the future whom will build-up
Overtown with compassion and commitment to its cultural heritage_ Our "Overtown Scholars" program
is discussed in Tab 5, Project Benefits - item (e).
• Parking considerations for ILA and Lyric Theater are accounted for in ouryplans forTirst hale
• The construction timeline is set up for a two phased project Th(e first phase would be poised to procee
immediately with consistent speed. The pace is in line with'the deadlines established in the Declaration
of Restrictions. The scale and approach necessary for the Project creates the desire, to discuss a few
variances to the Declaration. These are detailed in Tab 3.
We are confident about the financial viability of the Project Peeblesand BACH hake significant"experience
with the South Florida markets and with hotel, office, residential and retail properties. Collectively- we
Y
have significant financial resource with access to much more fdr undertaking Overtown Gateway Letters
evidencing interest from a sample of potential financial patties are provided in Appendix D.
• The demand for residential in Miami is significant andgrowing Vile will cater to the wide cross section of
people seeking workforce housing, desirous of downtown living and attracted by Overtown's character.
This sector is routinely overlooked despite counting for a large percentage .of those who work in
Downtown currently and care to live there in thb�uture
• The hotel is planned as an extended-staypromri
no branded -hotels that compete, for this 4clie :m
that the hotel will be an operational success:
• The retail is positioned to tap into the enetainnient district being formed in Overtown. Downtown's
retail activity is booming per numerous stiidiesYby the Downtown Development Authority. We plan to
compete for this business while also benef tt ng front -those who will live, work and play at Overtown
Gateway.
at caters to business travelers. Currently, there are
wntoWn Miami. With 150 rooms, we anticipated
••(e• ♦9(•4•• s. • •es• •• sa s et • ••eeeV•ee et`
CVIE1?ItW 43 1FFW4 '
J
J
As you review our submission, we hope you agree that Overtown Gateway addresses your objections for
Block 45 and 56. We appreciate the unique opportunity to be considered for such a special opportunity.
Mr. Peebles and Mr. Channer lead our team and are personally excited by the opportunity This represents
a rare opportunity to develop a transformative project that sits both amidst a cultural heritage they claim
and within a geographic market they have a high degree of interest in. Their passion drives the team and
we hope that the results exceed your expectations. We look forward to the opportunity to discuss Overtown
Gateway further with your team.
SOURCES u
ConstructIordrairt
Investor Equity
Total
USES::
Construction Costs
Soft Cost$
Finance Costs
Total
SOUlIcES::
•Construction Loan
TIP Proceeds (*1) $
PerkingGrant. CFA C*2.) $
Barking Grant County (*2) $
Investor Equity $
BLOCK 4.5,
Total
IISEs
Construction Costs
Soft COAS
Finance Costs
Total
84,78041 $
36,336,780 , $
121,122,630 $
94,862,688
16,406,653
7,853,289
121,122,630
BLOCK 48
84,7E1'4841 $
12,589,067 $
3,000,000 $
3,000,000 $
17,746,902 $
tiCid16
89,936,362.7
34544,156.1.7
120110,517
10t324;777
1.43,05Atig
12 17
awfx sfr
0,036,362,07
084,69a
25,189,464.70
$ 128,480,517
121,122,630
•$ 101,324,777
$ 18,825,385
$ .8,330,356
121,122,638 120486$11
94,862,688
18,406.653
7,853,289
NOTES
1: Capitalize TIP proceeds with 00% return of tuel'elOntthrough 2030
2: Grants provided for publicptrking
uM.•b1170W
li9 99 601888'
'e18.)$81088rewe. 001$18118
thilsestigs
r" U'0 .',W tcNt t+3alnxa'iiO' :fes:.
'2, 1
.Year 4
I:::'TrA11u200
,.415,264 S 6,299,551> 8.600,879 '1 6,798,905 ,3 .7,01t38737.212,959
530,250 $ 624,180 -3 ' 603,087 S 744,967 S 267316 ! ' 740,319 S-
.1,173075 '3 5,975,026 S 6°926425 5 7.272051 3 77191437 .3 1715468 3.
.3 975,000 4 1458750 S 1274080 $ 1,393,227 °5 ° 0,435A24 3 1420074=
`s 154954 4 163,785. 5 167,493 $ 171,312 3175,246' 0 078,289 s 187411
506,651 $ 650,907 S 670,434 $ 890,547 $ 711,1,83 • ' 137,4 '
18,087697, 18,670,133 ::. 49 4741
029,388
•t-.. 12,27.9,731 s 14105,743 $ '15.301.971 S 4.7051,696 $ 11562442 !3
•,0118,283
,014,529
4/84465
186,738 •
17%,216 '$ 800,533
338,493• 3: 369;894 S 407,049 $ 406,292 $ 409055 5 1452 142 4,•455,728 0 ` 479670-..5
ddY84btre 1,0Y0p7.531 1A74.450 2,043,505 :2,135,000 �2,'10%109' 7„261727 '2845,020 '2,42,7a'164
(ib940pir.9 7„ 1,091 4,231123 4,810,742 0091,407 5,136,743 4393;040 61555,661.. 4712431,
In4urance: 314008 132.299 140,833 146,603 251,065- ,155,179 140228 • 365A11
170110985 256,205 304.697 512844 :342,260 352,485 353,1118 373,868 •885,040
Repairs &18911lle,6ou6e` 2444,234. 352,797 3700• 391,154 402,840: 414077' 437.275: 440,04.5.:
04min&rpeases 904,234 352,797 145,018 191,254 402,840 ,414,877 422,27$ <440,045
' 0&1,,,,I7,8r008426v 557017 176,390 387509 395„577 201,420 727,438. 213,628 220,838
i$rC911 225,170 764,598 781,245 ...'293,365 302,130' 3114150 320,4.56 430,034
,',, 4 104434,' 352,797 375,039_ 142154 402,040 4 8'27 . . + 427,275' 440,045
111.09spMyai ?� 'T,541,544 8.' 8,517,849 4 5,24A#5 4• 5 r84126 ,S i0,080.524 5 14393,590 4 ;' 4716,431 S 11049,353: $
A) ,0 4189167 79 027094 5 017428 € 2,14,4,70 3 7,401,518 $: 7,994,408 ;,4,:: .7414492 'S 8.137,45r #'
Ft89 $ 5299M83 $ SAZS'9* 0:- 466,744 .9
s346%2 $
'628330 4- 650,374 .3'
19,761,189 S 29,352819.
494,030 .S 508400'
742141102 0,69804
094Ad1., 8.a70.0;t1
'#69,949: I75048
,45044$ 16b,707
473,190 A65,746:
226,499 235,373
ii+9.Rst9:. 954.794
453'191rr:.
0,6g6,'t40
69$640...
090:131= 5.348B13`ri
9:.
8
9,7✓14f81 'I:+4,%7,45'7Sa5032;5,: R69123761'.- 4.. 7.904A24f
50, Rent Revere; yAVCS-
k2i .R.r ROVePt19�, 1610,
Bti.80tReven68-'i0PFNS•.
0n. Rent 8eventat a VARK1NO
0ifia9 Revenue,
1'OeeWve 07KRx8bvelnit9
N 8 L51u1=
Rent SMir*-C8.601au01y.
Real [alateUre4
Insurance
Willett%
Rep,'19 &M41Net,onc4..
eamin wpnlses
c,ncrzt Prn8,D04tls.
Payroll
.c08Mgikp,.
LW
',LP8R.4Nc06/8
410Oil R
3,e42 4e 146'i
VA5Na2m :C
Year 6
10,877960 $ 14385299 '5 ,1.0,690708 $ 11,012,459 "$ 11342,833 $ 11,653,,21$ 3
593007 -4 :744,967 3 7671114 S 730 814,044 ;S 1 9.46E".3
vassal $ i,314327 S 140,024 1 1478,07s S 1S5$4;34 ;S Lwow -•S
$0,140 S. 54540 1 ' ,16o 54140 3 58,Y&6 4 56.140... 3
912,7:41 1313,11311006. 613,911 514,1619, 114,759
12,589,145: "'+5 1t,965,695 13 19,52 4920 4:. 74,751,%eS 3 34445972 S
?h4,650, $
.2,033.621, 0 12394,620
621 'S 089,529.
3,615,3,52 13 1003,586
5040 3' 58.140
stslas 115,657
tis8' se5 S 56, 53z-
"2451A2 2057 302,622 314,144 324,142 1004,09 943,794 354,064- , 104.043 378.398
?,,023568 '3094,943e 1,7.61497 1,143565- 2324091.' .. 2,403364 087,452 4024,546 3.6603 257,916
144221- 172,772 0,81471` . 189,846 194A05:- 5607244 ,306,276 . 212699- .2113386 228328
445.112, 404801 414578 3,40441 453,799, '457352 461,312 495,590 Sim*7,,53.77,54
.*423 458,05s �484,100`.- 0 51862e`. 5114417 560,071 566,503. 583(128 - 1'
385423 458,099. 404.200 0 _ 510,629 534,117 050,071 566,503. 603,429 0 461
104,461 229,030 242,160 251,795 259214 267,058 275,,010 .283,251 191714 390431
4;4311;544 S' 4459,059 . 464,200 301590.. 518,625 a,f7M1631 .3 5,8",al,664 �'S 6,564,37d� 5 e628&IS 450,64E
3R 3,54E 563,150 877Yie2' 368,771 iQ0 fi08 412,553' 424,87E i87i57
8 { � 0*861
0$101 $. '0,13%421 4'. 8,318,054. $ 5,405,606 $ 1 '6,431401,'
I 1 6,975.576 .5 7,261,691, 4, 7467,507, $ 7r678119e 5:• 7,895,099 `3 0,112.190 $ 0347,554 ,1 093,341:
403,570 '414,695 432.314 447,445- 463,11)6 `479,314- -496,090 413,454 531,425-
'066040406611128t5VC ,'+$"6.2494429§;'-Y 0.148,,9X0+' $-,'.8,3d.3,802.3r-::=,6.8249 y1'v7i119,563*SS:.6`f,3i4984*5.t/;41k788c•,5.
293442
7022107 -4 ',7,034,101; +rs.8,0.41,916'.
. 5"i" + i
EtACH
FEE B . S
revuelta
ant+xrte.
w
Overtown Gateway = 45T56
CM
.:
REALESTt'ATE PITAL PARTNERS
me r,�,,_:,,
Ac6rlty40
Ac5 5yNaa e-
0r ial `Start
l k6I1
;•201S'
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Durelcn
1 Sia 1 t3+4 '
`Q1) 02 J 0e C14
tit Q«2 >� a3 Q4
01`. j t�2 j Q3 il4
01 02 103 1a4
01 1 a2 j 03 1 04
2)1 412 QS .Q#
r f52 'Q?.�
Overtown Gateway
G�k
A1000
-Block 45/56 1679j 10-Jun-13 22•Jan 18
IRFP ��..-.- 11519-Jun-13 02-Dec13
t
RFP1
r
iz;
•
€ i A1010 1 Development Agreernen1 �03-Dec-l33^ I31-Dec1133
f
S S
a' ':s...:. .., 'n4.
PRECONSTRUCTION 285 13-Oct 14
A1020 Design Development(8 ock 45) { 60 02-Jan-14 ;28-Mer14
_
.7 £
3 i 1 1 Y
�'�..'�1,,..����[[} t
1
L 3.L._
;
A1030 fCorsiructorl Drawings (Block 45) t 60(27-Mar 14 )19-Jun-14
—7'
;
i7 ENgW1g4t R
A1040 1 Pernut6n9 F9mg (Block 45) )0120-Jur 14 1
f
1
s t
,.. s BO{ 20-Jun-14 { 13.Oci 14
1 A1050 [Permitting (Block 45)
CONSTRUCTION 873414-Oct 14 89-Mar
. r
P
_ } erlT�Be (BkiCR
t
A1060 ! Notice to Proceed NTP Block 45 - r 0! 14-Oct-14 .
4 >
`
S '
A1070 I Construction (Bbck 45)- 29 Months 61014-get-14
lMar 17
r
t•
S
i -
s } �l si t
t
A1080 jTemporaryCersrcateor06cUpancy(TCO). 89*46 1 0- s09-Mar17
{
{ y
1
t t t
S Pora•1( �UYfe6t6Qett y b -B
•
t
r70 5`
t ."..- SAC k 4 wu +f. 4xt"t ,•, yw} _3 ro- tcW
•, r ""' � s. s"^(' "^'..
..i'a.
7 4.4 -'-5S-.C;
T•r •, ^-'�•.� i
I -
. t
4•,.�-.x}C 4'3 t-1 4 :{ �:"i
•"'"3-'
:`.i .5 .: .te)w1.
t4. _t t i,
PRECONSTRUCTION —_-- 28. J �09-J
i A1090 1' esgn Development (Bbck56) } 60, 14-00-14 (09-Jan-15
a s
C
r }
1 i r%Cv
S 19-�''v'
i I1
al�:r On I
# I ir.{.}r•ii.-
t
>
8
I
{ t.
A1100 {ConsWcaon.Drawngs (Block 56) .. _. 60. 12-Jan-15 `- 03-Apr 15
t t, '}C 1 D �, k t
1
t t # 1 S
I_ f
1 E
A1110 l Pen tf g Fa5n9 (Block 56) ) 0, 06-Apr15
.,.--__.._.,.,�.._._., - -r28-Ju115
�
;'
r
Penriitirl9 ; q `
t
1 3 ` i
1 i
z
1 }
1 1
80I06- r 15
A1120 'Permitting (Block 56) ) M -
CONSTRUCTION _ -.. 300j24-11115 '22.Jan 18
A1130 ; Noticeto.Proceed NTP- (Block56) 0'29-Ju1-15 -
k ;
1
I•
t
t
t
S
(.
L1 - � } t
7>zFP�'(�BDR�J6f
,..,1;.'(, 1 f ,y..
I C'r
t � 1
1 3.1 I
-
S,y
rr }
A1140 I. Construction (Black 56)-30 Months 630129-Jul-15 , 22-Jan-18
S
40/1 ,y,'
"i""`•' Mo
q
ij
A1150 ITemporary Ceif8Bcate of Occupancy (TCO)-Bbck56- t 01 I22-Jae-18
-
•
' -
)
a
.
Cidal6 (i'Ccr}tbCk 56
1 `d00
Si' �
Data Late: Anne 19, Fii '
Milestone Schedule
Jury 24 2014. __
Paget art '•
..
ELINYWN GATEWAY
N ewBoston
Real Estate Iinvcastment Funds I Urban Strategy America Fund
July 1, 2013
Mr. Clarence E. Woods, III
Executive Director
Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency
1490 NW 3rd Ave. Suite 105
Miami, Florida 33136
Re: Equity Letter of Interest for Overtown Gateway project
Dear Mr. Woods:
The Urban Strategy America Fund is an institutional real estate private equity firm focused on investing
in real estate projects and properties across the country. Our team has undertaken $1.5 billion in
transactions over the last 10 years. Currently, we are managing a fund with $190 million of investor
equity, specifically for investing in real estate.
Mr. Barron Channer (BACH Real Estate) and Don Peebles (The Peebles Corporation) are well known to us
given their proven abilities at identifying and organizing attractive investments. We have previously
reviewed opportunities presented by them.
In recent conversations, Mr. Channer has presented conceptual plans for the Overtown Gateway
project. The large-scale, mixed -use and transit -oriented nature of the project makes it attractive to us.
Further, our process emphasizes investing with seasoned professionals, like Mr. Channer and Mr.
Peebles, at the helm of each project.
In light of our understanding of the project and regard for capacity of Mr. Channer and Peebles, we
would be pleased to give serious consideration to an investment in Overtown Gateway.
1 am available to discuss further, if you desire. Please feel free to contact me at 617-878-7909.
Sincerel
rkSykes, P -sident
130Foor•1 \'!.'•SHiNCTOtI o : ,
75 STATE STREET 12TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02109 T: 617.723.7760 F: 617.227.4727
CVELIFIYWN GATEWAY
:own, agOtrOgrifif4?
CAPRI CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
37s North Michi ,u Avenue, Suite 3430 Chicago, Illinois 6o6et
3r3•573.3366 s' 311.5734:70 W capricapital.com
t gprimor capricapitoLcotn
QUINIIN E. PRIMO III
Chairman 8 ChiefEvantina Officer
July 17, 2013
Mr. Clarence E. Woods, III
Executive Director
Southeast Overtown - Park West Community Redevelopment Agency
1490 NW 3rd Avenue
Suite 105
Miami, Florida 33136
Re: Equity Interest for Overtown Gateway Project
Dear Mr. Woods:
Capri Capital Partners
Please be advised that Messrs. Channer and Peebles have introduced us to their plans for the
Overtown Gateway Project proposed for the Overtown neighborhood of Miami. We have
maintained a working relationship with both gentlemen for more than five years and, previously,
consummated a very profitable investment with The Peebles Corporation in downtown San
Francisco. Our regard for their collective experience, capability and professionalism is very high
and we maintain a strong interest in doing additional business with them.
By way of background, Capri Capital Partners, LLC is a real estate investment management firm
that focuses on top tier assets in major property markets throughout the United States. We have
been recognized for our investments in urban commercial and residential properties, such as
Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Shopping Plaza, a 900,000 square foot regional mall in urban Los
Angeles, and North Bethesda Marketplace, a transit -oriented residential and commercial mixed -
use development in Bethesda, Maryland, outside of Washington, DC. The firm was founded in
1992 and currently has approximately $3.4 billion in assets under management, representing
some of the largest institutional investors in the US. In 2012, Black Enterprise Magazine
recognized Capri as its Financial Services Company of the Year.
We have had the opportunity to tour Overtown and review the Project proposed. Given our
interest in the Miami market and desire to invest in urban areas, we would give strong
consideration to providing equity investment capital to the Project if the opportunity presents
itself. This interest would, of course, be subject to the then current investment mandates of our
clients, as well as a formal investment process, including approval by our internal investment
committee.
Mr. Clarence E. Woods, III
July 17, 2013
Page Two
In conclusion, we applaud your and the city's efforts to continue to revitalize the Overton
neighborhood, an area we believe is critical to the economic vitality of the city of Miami. Should
you have any questions or needs for additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me at
312-573-5266.
Yours v tgdly,
uintin E. Primo III
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN / PARK EST COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION
L ice' aw A FL i
RESPONSE TO EE{t T POP PRO
t
45
ABOARD FLORIDA
z
All Aboard Florida
Southeast Overtown / Park VV'est Community Redevelopment. Agency
Response to Request for Proposals (RFP) #13-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
July 2013
All Aboard Florida - Stations LLC ("AAF"), a wholly -owned subsidiary of Florida East
Coast Industries, Inc. ("FECI"), is pleased to present this response to the Request for
Proposals #13-002 ("RFP") issued by the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community
Redevelopment Agency (the "CRA") for Blocks 45 and 56 (the "Site"). We appreciate
the CRA's consideration of this proposal, which introduces All Aboard Florida in its
larger context and describes the key relationship of the Site to the regional opportunity
that exists. We will describe the framework under which we propose to develop the
Site in a manner that fully achieves the aspirations expressed for the Historic Overtown
neighborhood while simultaneously weaving it into the broader vision for the future of
Downtown Miami.
2
All Aboard- Florida
Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency
Response to Request for Proposals (RFP) #13-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
July 2013
We have created a development proposal guided by the 2009 Southeast
Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan, including the 6 Redevelopment
Goals and 14 Guiding Principles for Historic Overtown. Central to our proposal is a
live/work/play concept that emphasizes the creation of active and vibrant streetfronts
along NW 20d Avenue and NW 6th and 8th Streets and continues Sawyer's Walk along
the NW 7th Street axis towards the Overtown Metrorail Station. A carefully assembled
mix of uses further supports this objective. The resulting development creates an
anchor that stimulates the Historic Overtown arts district concept and links the
neighborhood to the newly emerging multi -modal transportation hub that we are
developing adjacent to the Site. The project as proposed creates jobs, expands the tax
base, improves the quality of life for residents, increases visitation to the area, respects
and preserves the cultural heritage of Historic Overtown, and introduces a new,
appropriate housing option for the community,
KEY Y ZETSC . =_E IC.
L INKAI. .'i'# EATHER
TO WATERFRONT AND
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENTS
PEDESTRIAN LINKS TO WATERFRONT
AND DOWNTOWN CULTURAL AMENITIES
We are committed to working with the residents of the Historic Overtown
community. Our proposal for the Site is reflective not only of the requirements in
the RFP and the goals in the Redevelopment Plan, but also the feedback gathered
from community leaders during the planning stages of our concept. if selected, we
anticipate an interactive process with neighborhood residents and community
groups to help craft the final details of the project's design elements in order to
achieve our goal of comfortably integrating the project into the current and future
visions for Historic Overtown.
3
Ail Aboard Florida
Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency
Response to Request for Proposals (REP) #13-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
July 2013
Our proposed development offers the immediate opportunity to realize many
critical objectives for the Site while also supporting a number of broader initiatives
for the greater Historic Overtown neighborhood. The Site is uniquely situated as a
"hinge" between neighborhoods that can be greatly enhanced through connectivity
and integration.
£ tiiN to CM;e r r ;%
ABOARD'FLORIDA'
BLOCK
OVERTOWN'METROR
STATION
RSNT6RlMENT
Specifically, the Site is between the historic neighborhood of Southeast Overtown
and the emerging All Aboard Florida downtown transportation hub that will be
established in conjunction with the project, The Site can serve as the threshold into
the emerging entertainment and arts district that draws upon the cultural heritage
of the Historic Overtown community and our proposal will link this district to the
transportation hub. In addition, a newly enhanced NW 8th Street pedestrian realm
will serve to connect the neighborhood to the planned developments on the former
site of the Miami Arena and beyond through the proposed Miami World Center
project and, ultimately to the downtown waterfront.
By carefully locating the various uses across the Site and giving thoughtful
consideration to the flows of pedestrian activity and the mass and scale of the
buildings as they address the streetfront, this project will serve as a stimulus for the
realization of the CRA's vision for the community and will inspire momentum and
growth for the Historic Overtown neighborhood.
4
Ail Aboard Florida
Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency
Response to Request for Proposals (R-P) #13-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
July 2013
IN RODUCING
ALL ABOARD
FLORIDA,
We are singularly positioned to deliver against the many opportunities presented by
this Site for several key reasons.
ALL ABOARD FLORIDA
,AN EXPRESS.INTE O
PASSENGER RAIL SYSTEM
OFFERING 3-HOUR TRIP
BETWEEN MIAMI AND{{o L_ANDO WITH H S TO II -
IN FORT LAUDERDALE
AND WEST PALM BEACH.
All Aboard Florida is being developed as the first
privately owned and operated intercity express
passenger rail system in the United States. This
ground -breaking project will create an important
transportation alternative along Florida's east
coast, connecting Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West
Palm Beach and Orlando with new, custom -
designed trains and stations.
Over 42% of the Florida population lives and works adjacent to this rail corridor. The
Miami terminus for this rail service is planned on nine acres adjacent to the Site
where the downtown transportation hub will
be located. Our new facilities will connect
directly to two Metrorail stations,
Metromover and the Miami -Dade County bus
system to create a true multi -modal
transportation system. The ability to
integrate the uses and facilities of this project
with the larger transit -oriented context of the
transportation hub is a reality that only we
can fully deliver.
We have the financial resources and
capabilities to execute the proposed
development as a single phase project with
an immediate start date and are poised to
initiate immediately - resulting in a completion
in the RFP,
date that is earlier than anticipated
Our team has a proven track record of delivering
projects of this scale, complexity and type locally,
as well as locations around the world. As such, we
offer the expertise necessary to understand and
manage the urban planning, development, social,
and financial challenges presented by a project of
this nature.
5
Ali Aboard Florida
Southeast Overtown / Park West Commun ty Redevelopment Agency
Response to Request for Proposals (RFP) #13-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
'T'HE POPQAL
July 2013
The project as proposed represents a transformation of the neighborhood, built upon
connectivity and a vibrant streetscape. This realization will be achieved through a focus
on walkability, and through the introduction of a mix
of uses that foster interaction and round-the-clock
life. In addition to the physical benefits of the project,
the tangible economic benefits are equally
transformative. To determine the scope of those
benefits, we commissioned a thorough economic
and fiscal analysis of the proposed development. A
summary of the study is provided in Section 6 of this
proposal, with a copy of the full study attached as
Exhibit "A" in the Appendix. Among other benefits,
the study determined that this approximately $110 million
ALA. ABOARD FLORIDA
WILL CONNECT FLORIDA'S
KEY CITIES IN A NEW WAY
TO SPARK SOCIAL AND
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES.
capital
project will generate:
Over 800 worker -years of construction labor
Over $40 million in construction wages
Over $1.9 million in fees to the City of Miami related to the development
3111 Over $1 million in annual tax increment revenues to the Redevelopment District's Trust Fund
3' Over 1,000 new permanent, full-time and part-time direct, indirect, and induced jobs
KEY COMPONENTS OF PROPOSAL:
A Live/Work/Play concept, which is in accordance with the 6 Redevelopment
Goals and 14 Guiding Principles outlined in the Redevelopment Plan.
A total of 153,200 sf of commercial space including:
55,000 sf of retail, food and beverage outlets, and commercial space that
will activate a newly created pedestrian streetscape connecting Historic
Overtown to the downtown transportation hub and beyond. Lively shops
and restaurants with a plaza on the northwest corner of the Site will
promote the Lyric Theater as the centerpiece of the emerging
entertainment and arts district.
97,200 sf of office space that will allow companies to relocate to Overtown
and provide job opportunities and daytime commerce to the
neighborhood.
o at least 250 new residences, specifically designed as an appropriate
residential product priced and targeted to a customer seeking to live, work
and play within Historic Overtown and the downtown Miami community.
O approximately 2,000 parking spaces serving the needs of the project, the
neighborhood, the downtown transportation hub, the Lyric Theater and
the International Longshoremen's Association.
A;i Aboard Florida
Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency
Response to Request for Proposals (RFP) #13-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
July 2013
Over the past few weeks, our team has made a concerted effort to meet with
members of the Historic Overtown community in preparation of submitting this
response. We met with representatives from the Black Archives, St. Johns CDC,
Greater Bethel AME, International Longshoremen's Association - Local 1416, Urgent,
Inc„ the Historic Overtown Folklife District Association and various residents.
In these meetings, we presented our preliminary plans for the Site and the downtown
transportation hub for All Aboard Florida. The stakeholders were encouraged to share
concerns, ask questions and provide suggestions for the development. Overall, the
stakeholders were supportive of our efforts to bring new development and
opportunities to the area while maintaining a sense of the neighborhood's culture and
architectural style.
Establishing and maintaining relationships in Historic Overtown is essential to moving
this project forward and securing support for the proposed development. Our team
is committed to working with all of the groups in the community as the project
progresses. We anticipate there will be opportunities for partnerships and
collaboration once the development program and scheduled are further defined.
In an early effort to engage veteran -owned and minority, disadvantaged and women -
owned enterprise businesses (MBE/DBE/WBE), we hosted two outreach forums in
June to provide firms with more information on the project and an opportunity to
network with potential prime contractors. These events were held in Central and
South Florida and attended by more than 300 firms. Attendees learned about the
project and the procurement schedule, and the afternoon session consisted of vendor
exhibitions. Attendees networked and discussed teaming opportunities with 20
potential prime contracting firms that have expressed an interest in bidding on design
and construction work.
The introduction of new real estate uses, the creation of job opportunities, the
addition of transportation alternatives, and the collective economic and social
benefits to be realized from our concept make this a compelling proposal. On top of
our ability to create a well -executed, large-scale development, we are also in a unique
position to link Historic Overtown into our multi modal transit hub. As a result, we are
confident that we are in the best position to effect positive change for the Historic
Overtown neighborhood.
8
All Aboard F orida
Scutt •east Ova•tnwn / Park West Community Redeye opment Agency
Response to Refit lest f?r Pr000sals (RPP) 11t3-002 • Blocks 45 are 56
July 201
CONCEPTUAL PROJECT DELIVERY SCHEDULE
PROJECT START
DESIGN & ENTITLEMENTS
PERMITTING & PROCUREMENT
CONSTRUCTION START
PARKING
RETAIL
OFFICE
RESIDENTIAL
2013 2014
01 u2 Q3 01 C2 31?
A AUG
i !
AUG fYWV !
'r i c @-a'D''2L`CCE S4 2e1:... _ _e'1-. CONTEMPLA
AC cemsraYC11D START, , MAY2016
2016
ED DATE
OCT
CONTEMPLATED DATE
MAY 2016
ACCELERATED DELIVERY `'"
35
Al: Aboard Florida
Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency
Response to Request ror Uroposa;s (RFP) 1313-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
July 20133
EVENUE ASUMPTtONS
Woe K.^,r..mrlx 1
2
3-
4
5
6
w
2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Grca Revenue'
-"'Read - Pent/LP $3800 $38.00 $39.14 $40.31 $41.52 $42./7 y14.05 $4537 S45.74 548.14
Office - Rea/!Sr 35.00 35.00 36.05 37.14 38.25 39.39 40.57 41.79 43.05 44.34
Res:82,81N - Una 4o91/Mon1h 1,328.13 1,328.13 1,367.97 1.409.01 1.451.28 1.49482 1,539.66 1.585.85 1,63.3.43 1,68243
Parking - Avg. Space/Month 125.00 125.00 128./5 132.61 136.59 140.69 144.91 14926 153.73 158.35
'StaGbzauon Achraved m the ..Tad Quarter of 2018
KEY OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS
Stabilized Occupancy Rates
Retail
Office
Residential
Parking
85%
90%
85%
90%
Operating Expense Ratios
Retail
Office
Residential
Parking
30%
35%
42%
25%
37
Ail Aboard r"ior±da
Southeast Overlown / Park West •::ommunity Redevelopment Agency
Response to Request rot Pruposais (RFP) 7r13-002 - Blocks 45 and 56
..1uy 2013
SECTION 6 - BUSINESS PLAN AND TERMS
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (S
Residential
Units 258
Gross Square Feet 193,500
Gross Square Feet/Unit 750
Net Leaseable Square Feet 164,475
Net Leaseable Square Feet/Unit 637.50
Retail
Gross Square Feet 55,100
Net Leaseable Square Feet 49,590
Office
Gross Square Feet
Net Leaseable Square Feet
97,200
82,620
Parking
Gross Square Feet
Spaces
Area/Space
TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET
770,640
2,028
380
1,115,440
Retail Office Residential "Parking Total
Land
Hard Costs
Protessional Pees
Development & Project Management
Legal. Finance & Administration
Construction. Interost Ex ,nse
Tst4i:Project Costs'
$597,993 51.023,872 $2.100.030 51,778,105 $5,500,000
9,367,000 16,038.000 32.895,000 27.852,361 86.152,361
843,030 1,443.420 2960,550 2506.712 7,753,712
515,185 882,090 1.809.225 1,531,880 4./38.380
187.340 320.760 65/.900 55/.04/ 1,723,04/
607.511 1,040,168 2,133,454 1.806,406 5,587..539
a41189339 ."'$20493f4_ $42,556,1 "+ o1v,U 2,511.: ' $111,3SK,t7Y8,,..
A
Sources
Uses
Initial Equity
Debt
Total Sources:.
$33.436,512
78.018,527
Land
Development Costs - Retail
Development Costs - Office
Development Costs - Residential
Development Costs - Parking
Construction Inters& E. )9ns6
$111,455,039 Total Oses:
$5,500,000
10,912.555
18,584,270
38.322575
32.448,000
5,567.39
15;l ,039
35
BankofAmerica
Merrill Lynch
July 18, 2013
Clarence E. Woods, III
Southeast Overtown/Park West Executive Director
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Miami
1490 NW 3rd Ave, Suite 105
Miami, FL 33136
Dear Mr. Woods:
I understand that you are working with Florida East Coast Industries and its
related All Aboard subsidiary regarding the C.R.A. Request For Proposal. Bank of
America and its predecessor banks have shared a 25+ year valued relationship with
Florida East Coast Industries and its related subsidiaries. Please accept this letter
as confirmation that Florida East Coast Industries and its related subsidiaries
maintain sufficient liquidity in the high 8-figures at Bank of America. Please note
that we have also financed three construction loans for Florida East Coast
Industries in the past twelve months and look forward to additional financing
opportunities offered by Florida East Coast Industries and its related subsidiaries.
Should you have any questions or if I can be of any help in your review of their
qualifications, please do not hesitate to let me know. I can be reached at 305-468-
4378 or kim.abreu@baml.com.
Sincerely,
.6k<ti.A1V1.„ (1bLeA.,1
Kim Abreu
Senior Vice President
Commercial Real Estate Banking Group
#1784721