Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRA-R-09-0035 EXHIBIT A - 2009 SEOPW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Version 2.1 with corrected maps and text post CC of 5-28-09SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 2004 by Dover Kohl & Partners FINAL UPDATE MAY 2009 by the City of Miami Planning Department (Ver. 2.1) Table of Contents for the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan November 2004 Final Updated May 2009 Section ONE Introduction Page 2 • This Document 2 • Topics Frequently Asked from Neighborhood Stakeholders 2 • Historical Context Page 3 • 21st Century Context Page 5 • The Potential: A Livable City 5 • History of the CRA Page 6 • Revised Boundaries 6 • Revisions from the Original CRA Redevelopment Plan Page 7 • Findings of Necessity Page 9 • New Legal Description Section TWO Goals and Guiding Principles Page 11 • Redevelopment Goals #1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles #3 Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability #4 Creating Jobs within the Community #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Page 13 • Guiding Principles 1. The community as a whole has to be livable. Land uses and transportation systems must be coordinated with each other. 2. The neighborhood has to retain access to affordable housing even as the neighborhood becomes more desirable to households with greater means. 3. There must be variety in housing options. ii Section TWO (continued) 4. There must be variety in job options. 5. Walking within the neighborhood must be accessible, safe, and pleasant. 6. Local cultural events, institutions, and businesses are to be promoted. 7. The City and County must provide access to small parks and green spaces of an urban character. 8. Older buildings that embody the area's cultural past should be restored. 9. Newer buildings must respond to our climate and reflect the community's cultural heritage 10. Streets and buildings must be attractive. 11. Twenty -four-hour environments are to be encouraged. 12. Identifiable neighborhood centers are to be established in a distributed pattern within Overtown and Park West. 13. The zoning and other development regulations must be reworked to yield the results envisioned in this Redevelopment Plan. 14. Restore a sense of community and unify the area culturally. Section THREE The Build -out Plan Page 19 • Conceptual Plan Diagram o Land Uses & Residential Units Page 21 • Hypothetical Build -out Plan Page 22 o Publicly Owned Land for Public Improvements Page 23 o Open Spaces: Parks, Plazas, and Green Spaces Page 25 o Transportation System: Mobility and Access • Reestablishing the Traditional Urban Network of Streets • Pedestrian Friendly Street Improvements • Promoting the Return of Two-way Streets • Rail and Transit Routes • Key Ideas from the Miami at Midnight Report Page 27 o Parking • Providing and Retaining On -street Parking • Off-street Parking Page 39 o Land Development Regulations Adherence to Local Land Development Regulations Revisions to the City's Zoning and Land Development Regulations Page 40 o Physical Plan ■ Possible Changes to I-395 Section FOUR Projects and Programs Page 44 • Projects and Project Areas, Overview 44 • Criteria for Physical Improvements 44 • Project Areas 44 o Stakeholders Roles Page 46 o Project Area A. NW 1st Avenue Page 54 o Project Area B. Overtown (including Little Broadway and Lyric Plaza) Page 62 o Project Area C. NW 3th Avenue Neighborhood Center Page 66 o Project Area D. Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor Page 69 o Project Area E. West Overtown Page 74 o Project Area F. Properties facing Biscayne Boulevard Page 77 o Project Area G. The Promenade — Park West Entertainment District Page 86 o Project Area H. NE 8th Street- Miami WorldCenter Page 88 o Project Area I. New Camillus House/UM Research Center 88 o Project Area J. Townpark Homeownership District Page 89 • Projects and Programs 89 o Community Heritage and Historic Preservation Page 94 o Promotion and Enhancement of Overtown and Park West as a Business Location Page 97 o Planning, Development, Technical Assistance and Program Compliance Page 99 o Street Improvements, Utility Infrastructure and Transportation Page 101 o Home Ownership Pre -qualification and Counseling 101 o Grants to Existing Businesses 101 o Laredo/Re-use Plan (CLUC 90 Properties) • Summary Chart of Projects and Goals iv Section FIVE Capital Improvement Costs and Timeline Page 108 • Introduction 108 • Capital Improvement Goals 108 • Prioritizing Capital Improvements Page 109 • Potential Funding Sources 109 • Capital Improvement Costs by Project Area Page 117 • Capital Improvement Costs — Not Project Area Specific Page 119 • Timeline and Capital Improvement Costs — Summary Section SIX Residential Uses and Neighborhood Impact of Redevelopment Page 121 • Neighborhood Overview Page 122 • Housing Policy 122 • Relocation Policy Page 123 • Traffic Circulation 123 • Environmental Quality Page 124 • Effect on School Population Page 125 • Community Facilities and Services Page 126 • Physical and Social Quality Section SEVEN Plan Management Page 128 • Powers of the SEOPW CRA Page 129 • Powers Not Given to the SEOPW CRA 129 • Authority to Undertake Redevelopment Page 130 • Future Amendments to this Redevelopment Plan Page 131 • State of Florida Statutory Requirements 131 • Safeguards and Assurances 131 • Land Acquisition Section EIGHT Definitions Section NINE Directory of Local Organizations Section TEN Appendices Page 142 A. Previous Planning Work for the Area Page 145 B. Acknowledgements Page 146 C. School Impact Analysis for the SEOPW CRA Redevelopment Plan Page 156 D. 1982 Resolution adopting the SEOPW CRA Page 170 E. Resolution Adopting New Boundaries Page 180 F. Advertisements Of Public Notice Page 190 G. Findings of Slum and Blight vi cirss have aiways heat radiated out into • This Document • Topics Frequently Asked from Neighborhood Stakeholder.: • Historical Context • 21st Century Context • The Potential: A Livable Cinr • CR History • Revised BoniiA rigs • Revisions from the Original CRA Redevel; 'y nent Plan • Findings of Necessity • Legal Description Introduction This Document This is a 2009 update to the 2004 Amendment of the 1982 Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan (referred to as "Redevelopment Redevelopment commissioned Overtown/Park Plan" or "Community Plan"), and was by the Southeast West Community Redevelopment Agency ("CRA" or "SEOPW CRA"), and the CRA's governing bodies, the City of Miami ("City") and Miami -Dade County ("County") to provide an updated planning document for the redevelopment of the Park West and Overtown neighborhoods in accordance with the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 ("Act"). The 1982 Redevelopment Plan has not been effective in the redevelopment area, due to the lack of financing ability by the CRA and private enterprises. The need to update the 1982 Plan and provide a financing strategy for the implementation of the CRA's activities in the redevelopment area became imminent as land throughout South Florida became scarce and the last portions of undeveloped land lie within the redevelopment area boundaries. It is the intent of this extensive amendment of the 1982 Redevelopment Plan to address ways in which the CRA can maximize opportunities 2 presented by current initiatives and trends, and transform Southeast Overtown/Park West into a thriving mixed -use neighborhood and commercial hub in the heart of downtown, as provided for by this revised Community Redevelopment Plan. This update reflects the expansion of the Redevelopment Area's boundaries to include the southwest section and part of the northeast section of the Overtown area. Topics Frequently Asked About From Neighborhood Stakeholders Every redevelopment area has certain urgent concerns and problems that the community wants addressed. While a number of these issues can be resolved through local government, some of these issues need to be remedied by members of the community. Adopting redevelopment plans and creating community redevelopment agencies are not solutions in themselves, but only vehicles to get to solutions. There needs to be grass -root efforts to further stimulate interest in, education of, and visions for the revitalization of the redevelopment neighborhoods. Overtown and Park West stakeholders frequently ask questions about: • Affordable housing for existing residents. • Support for small businesses and the creation of new jobs for current residents in Overtown and Park West. Historical Context The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area encompasses one of the oldest residential and commercial areas of the City of Miami, although few structures of historic or cultural significance remain. Overtown and Park West each have their own historic past, but for practical reasons and proximity, their futures are linked together. OVERTOWN "Overtown" is one of the oldest neighborhoods in Miami settled by African Americans about the time that Miami was founded in the 1890s. African Americans were not allowed to live in the other developing areas of Miami Jobs available to Overtown residents were mostly associated with Henry Flagler's Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad Company, the burgeoning tourist service industry, and agriculture. Like in many southern American towns, the African American community lived on the other side of the railroad tracks from most white families, closer to the citrus and pineapple farms. The name "Overtown" came from people saying that they were going "over town" to this neighborhood. It was also referred to in the past as "Colored Town." The area grew and developed into a vibrant community. African Americans became business owners and established a viable economic community by constructing schools, homes, churches, hotels, apartments, theaters, night clubs and small neighborhood markets. In the 1920's and 1930's, N.W. 2nd Avenue was known as "Avenue G," and was a major corridor for entertainment, retail stores, and hotels. Dr. W.B. Sawyer built the first African American hotel in the area in 1921. The population continued to grow until the early 1960's. Desegregation, urban renewal, the Neighborhood Development Program, and construction of the SR-836/I-395 and I- 95 expressways significantly changed the character of the neighborhood. and tragically, residents from Overtown were scattered and relocated. Economic, physical and social decay became pronounced and has progressively contributed to the decline in the area. Various planning efforts have taken place over the last few decades. For a list of these planning studies, see Appendix A, entitled 3 "Previous Plan Studies." PARK WEST Most of the area currently referred to as Park West was part of the original "Miami" Subdivision platted in 1896 by the principal developers of the early City of Miami, Mary and William Brickell, Julia Tuttle, Henry Flagler, and the Fort Dallas Land Company. While the initial development of Park West focused on residential projects, it soon established a commercial character, in the form of warehouses, associated with its downtown location and proximity to the Port of Miami, when formerly located at the site of present day Bicentennial Park. The name "Park West" derives from this area being located "west" of the "park." Before 1964, this area was basically a warehouse and wholesale district related to the old port. When the port moved, so did the wholesale businesses and storage facilities. Few of the remaining businesses have any functional relation to the port now located on Dodge Island in Biscayne Bay. New warehouses and container storage areas are provided on Dodge Island and areas west of the Miami International Airport. 21 st Century Context The 1982 Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area encompassed approximately 279 acres of land generally bounded by Biscayne Boulevard on the east; I-95 on the west; I-395 on the north; and NW 5th Street on the south. In 1986, the boundaries were expanded to include the areas bounded by NW 1st Street on the south, Metrorail right-of-way on the west, NW 5th Street on the north, and North Miami Avenue on the east. This Plan expands the SEOPW CRA boundary to include area bounded by NW 22nd Street on the north, NW 1" Place on the east, NW 5th Street on the south, and NW 7th Avenue on the west (referred to as "expanded area"). The expanded areas have a direct effect on the existing Redevelopment Area and present excellent redevelopment opportunities. It is an area of hard edges, heavily traveled highways to the west and north, and the less imposing but still disruptive boundary created by the Metromover and Metrorail tracks to the east and south. Moreover, the Florida East Coast railroad tracks serve as a psychological and physical barrier dividing the area into Southeast Overtown to the west and Park West to the east. In preparation of this planning effort, an evaluation of the existing slum and blight conditions was conducted in the expanded CRA areas. This evaluation revealed that slum and blight conditions persist throughout, providing further justification for expanding the SEOPW CRA boundaries. Addressing and improving these conditions is a key purpose of this plan. A summary of the evaluation of slum and blight conditions are set forth in Appendix G, entitled "Findings of Slum and Blight." Despite its challenges, Southeast Overtown/Park West is advantageously situated between downtown Miami and the Omni area, Motion Picture/Media ("Media") District, and the Entertainment District, and is in close proximity to Miami Beach, Miami International Airport, and the regional transportation system. What happens in the larger context will therefore shape and be shaped by what happens in Southeast Overtown/Park West. Located directly north of Overtown and Park West, the Omni Media and Entertainment Districts are currently undergoing a rapid transformation into a regional epicenter of the cultural and performing arts. Big Time Productions, Inc., a studio/production company, moved its headquarters from Miami Beach to the Omni area creating a movie production hub along 4 NE 14t' Street. Just east of Big Time Productions studio buildings is the new [Adrienne Arsht] Center for the Performing Arts of Miami -Dade County. The center includes a 2,200-seat symphony hall, a 2,480- seat ballet/opera house, a 200-seat black box theater, and ancillary support and educational services. The completion of this exciting complex has served as a strong catalyst for redevelopment, a phenomenon that has been further enhanced by a concerted effort to attract media, arts, and entertainment related businesses and facilities to the neighborhood. South of Overtown and Park West, downtown Miami's central business district is a flourishing center of international business, finance, telecommunications, government and trade. With over 131,000 workers, 4,000+ hotel rooms, and attractions, such as the Bayside Marketplace, the American Airlines Arena, and the Miami -Dade Cultural Center, downtown Miami is a dynamic destination that has the potential to positively impact adjacent neighborhoods such as Southeast Overtown/Park West. Despite its dynamism, downtown Miami once lacked the residential component that was necessary to transform it into a true 24-hour city center. With the latest development boom of 2003-2007, several new residential and mixed -use development projects have been planned and/or constructed along [Biscayne Boulevard]. Most of these developments are viewed as market rate and luxury rate properties with limited accommodation for the middle class or working class citizens desiring an urban residence. With its advantageous location and untapped redevelopment potential, Southeast Overtown/Park West presents perhaps the best opportunity to develop a livable downtown core. The City of Miami is proactively planning for the future of its neighborhoods, and there are a number of current initiatives that will have a direct impact on the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area, including the expanded area. Planning efforts, such as the "Baylink Draft Environmental Impact Statement" (DEIS), "The Park West Entertainment District Promenade Special Area Plan," "Biscayne Boulevard Special Area Plan," `Bicentennial Park Master Plan," "Downtown Transportation Master Plan," and "Overtown Greenprint Plan" are integral to the redevelopment of the area, and coordination between these efforts is key. Some of the more specific planning projects include: the Flagler Marketplace development in downtown Miami; redevelopment of the Omni Mall into a retail, entertainment and office complex; the newly redeveloped Margaret Pace Park in the Omni area; redevelopment of the historic Lyric Theater as the cornerstone of the planned Folklife Village in Southeast Overtown; and the planned extension of the 9th Street Pedestrian Mall in Park West. This Plan presents the best opportunity to integrate these initiatives into a cohesive vision for the area as a whole. The Potential: A Livable City Well -located at the confluence of the Americas, Miami has emerged as the Western Hemisphere's international trading center and one of the world's most vibrant and dynamic metropolises. Founded in 1896, Miami quickly established itself as one of the nation's premier tourist destinations with its world-renowned climate and natural beauty. Tourism defined the economy for much of the last century and remains a major industry. Nonetheless, the last thirty years have seen an unprecedented diversification of Miami's economy, as its strategic location, excellent transportation linkages, and culturally diverse population have led to its ascent as the "gateway to Latin America" and one of the nation's true international business centers. Greater Miami today is a cosmopolitan metropolis of over two million people, and a leading center of finance, trade, tourism and telecommunications. 5 Despite these advantages, Miami has lacked one of the most important characteristics of great world cities — a walkable, mixed -use center that is a desirable place to work, play and live. Bathed in decorative neon light, the downtown Miami skyline beckons at night, which belies the fact that its streets are virtually deserted. Few of the approximately 131,000 people who work in downtown actually live there. At the close of each business day, they disperse to points north, east, south and west of Miami While in the recent past, it is true that many would choose a suburban location regardless, it is also true that downtown Miami has a shortage of affordable housing and neighborhood services that would make it a viable alternative for those who would otherwise find it a desirable place to both live and work. In the past few decades, Miami has made a concerted effort to take advantage of the new economic realities of globalization and the rise of information technology. Its location provides a competitive advantage, as does a relatively well -developed privately initiated and funded technology infrastructure. While that may not have been enough, recent studies indicate that the businesses and workers of the new economy seek out and thrive in mixed - use environments that foster accessibility, social interaction, and the exchange of ideas. This has resulted in a reversal of trends of the 1970's and 1980's, which saw economic activity centers move from city centers to suburban office parks and "edge cities" that sprang up overnight. In contrast, the economic activity centers of the new economy are increasingly located in central city neighborhoods like San Francisco's Multimedia Gulch, the Digital Harbor in Baltimore, and downtown San Jose. With its strategic location and untapped redevelopment potential, the Southeast Overtown/Park West neighborhood presents the best opportunity for the development of a thriving, mixed -use economic and activity center in Miami's downtown. This plan charts a course to fully realizing Southeast Overtown/Park West's possibilities. History of the CRA On July 29, 1982, the Miami City Commission, by Resolution No. 82-755, approved the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan. On December 7, 1982, the Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County, by Resolution No. R-1677-82, approved the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan. On March 31, 1983, the City and the County executed an Interlocal Agreement which provided for the delegation of redevelopment powers to the City and the establishment of the redevelopment trust fund to receive tax increment revenues. In 1985 the Park West area was included in the CRA's then -existing boundaries. During the summer of 2002, the SEOPW CRA Board proposed to expand the boundaries to include some of the areas of Overtown west of Interstate 95 and areas surrounding NW 3rd Avenue north of Interstate 395. This boundary expansion was later adopted by the Miami City Commission on July 28, 2002, pursuant to Ordinance No. 12247. Notwithstanding, no action was taken by the Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County on this boundary expansion. On December 31, 2007, the City, the County, the SEOPW CRA, and the Omni Redevelopment District Community Redevelopment Agency entered into an Interlocal Agreement to provide for, among other things, the expansion of the Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area and the extension of its life. Pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement, the parties agreed that the CRA would cause a Finding of Necessity report to be prepared in which the conditions of slum and blight within the expanded area would be documented, and to cause an update to the 2004 Amendment to the 6 Redevelopment Plan to be prepared. Revised Boundaries Section 163.361, Florida Statutes, provides that the CRA may recommend a change in the boundaries when it becomes necessary or desirable to amend or modify the redevelopment plan. Since 2001, the SEOPW CRA Board has been evaluating the need to extend the existing boundaries to include more of Overtown. Advantages to the enlarged boundary include being able to use the SEOPW CRA's resources to facilitate redevelopment in more disadvantaged neighborhoods of Miami, and to improve the appearance and usefulness of the expressways that have caused so much damage and fragmentation to the community environment. Revisions from the Original CRA Redevelopment Plan The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan, Revised December 1982 (sometimes referred to as "the '82 Plan") was prepared for two primary reasons: 1) To establish the need for a CRA; and 2) To guide the SEOPW CRA's redevelopment activities. This document is the extensive 2009 amendment to the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Plan. This document replaces the previous "82 Plan" and is hereafter referred to as the "Community Redevelopment Plan" or "Redevelopment Plan." Revisions from the 1982 Plan: • Chapter I, "Introduction," has been significantly revised to identify the purpose for the SEOPW CRA, its potential, and to update the context with the 20 years that have passed since the original plan was prepared and adopted. • Parts of Chapter II, "Setting," were brought into Section 1, Introduction, of the Community Redevelopment Plan. For example, "Historic Evolution" was re-edited into a heading called "Historical Context." • Chapter III, "Redevelopment Proposal," contained a description of the need for redevelopment. The objectives stated in Chapter III have been re-evaluated and can be found in Section 2, "Goals and Guiding Principles." • Chapter IV, "Redevelopment Plan," contained projects and strategies. These have been re-evaluated and some have been restated in Sections 2 through 6. These components are separated into different Sections in the updated Community Redevelopment Plan to group them by similar topics so that they can be more easily found in the document. • All maps and graphics from the 1982 Plan have been replaced, including the Boundary Map. • The Land Use Plan, Zoning Plan, and Traffic & Transportation Plan have been completely overhauled. • The Park West Conceptual Redevelopment Plan and Acquisition strategy has been abandoned for an incremental approach. Findings of Necessity Section 163.355, state that "[n]o county or municipality shall exercise the community redevelopment authority . . ., until after the governing body has adopted a resolution, supported by data and analysis, which makes a legislative finding that the conditions in the area meet the statutory definition of "slum" and "blight." In 1969, the Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County, by Resolution No. R-1117-69 approved the Central Miami Renewal Plan ("CMRP"). The CMRP examined the area south of NW 20t1' Street; west of the FEC Railroad, with an extension to N.E. 2nd Avenue; east of I-95; and north of the Miami River. It was amended 7 on January 20, 1981, to include the areas bounded on the west and south by the FEC tracks; on the east by Biscayne Boulevard; and on the north by I-395, as well as the area bounded on the south by I-395; on the east by Biscayne Boulevard; on the north by NW 17th Street in part, and the City of Miami Cemetery in part; and on the west by the FEC tracks. While the aforementioned areas were found to meet the definition of "slum" and "blight," only a portion of this area was included in the original SEOPW CRA Redevelopment Area. Most of the conditions described in the 1982 Plan are still prevalent today in the existing Redevelopment Area, in that, there is still a decline in population, marginal retail facilities, and an excessive amount of vacant and underdevelopment properties. The majority of multi -family buildings, single family houses, and duplexes suffer from structural deterioration. The majority of retail buildings are vacant, making the vacancy rate of commercial uses greater than fifty percent. In February 2009, in accordance with Section 163.355, and as required by the Interlocal Agreement dated December 31, 2007, the SEOPW CRA caused a Finding of Necessity report ("2009 FON") to be prepared in which the expanded area was examined to determine whether conditions of slum and blight were present. The 2009 FON provided evidence of the following: • Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, parking facilities, roadways, and public transportation; • Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness: • Unsanitary or unsafe conditions due to environmental contamination; • Site and structural deterioration; • Aggregate assessed values of real property in the expanded are for ad valorem tax purposes failing to show any appreciable increase over the five (5) year prior to the finding of such conditions; • Existence of crime; and • Physical and economic conditions conducive to disease, infant mortality, poverty. and crime because of the predominance of dilapidated, deteriorating, antiquated and obsolescent buildings and the existence of conditions that endanger life and property by fire and other causes. The 2009 FON concluded that the existence of slum and blight conditions within the expanded area, if left unattended, would persist and undoubtedly extend to and beyond the boundaries of the existing Redevelopment Area. These conditions will lead to an economic and social liability to the City of Miami and could consume additional County and municipal resources to address the myriad of issues outlined above, while reducing the local tax base. 8 Proposed Southeast Overtown/Park West Expansion Area rrars NM: T161. RI mr«sr xw,v«NW AT,fLII wn zay«1Vn my isr«ar I{154, nnrars .33ee„,wrMr. w.'er«ar rrxyensr Legend V� Southeast OvertownIPark West Southeast OvertownfPark West Expansion Area NW en, Kr TN mr«sa Hw r_FTNEr erg, _ M mv. r -eotFaiiw£ Je xr 1171.1 TVA. was NE an. Er Legal Boundary Description for the SEOPW CRA The Southeast Overtown/Park West Redevelopment Area, including the expanded area, is hereafter described as follows: The legal description of the Study Area is physically defined as beginning near the southeast corner of Lummus Park; at the southwest corner of the intersection of NW 2nd Street and NW 3th Court; continue north to the north side of NW 5th Street; then west along the north side of NW 5th Street to the east side of NW 7th Avenue; then north along the east side of NW 7th Avenue to the north side of NW 22nd Street; then east along the north side of NW 22nd Street to the east side of NW 5th Avenue; then south on the east side of NW 5th Avenue to the North Side of NW 22nd Street; then east on the north side of NW 22nd Street to the west side of NW 2nd Avenue; then north on the west side of NW 2nd Avenue to the north side of NW 22nd Street: then east on the north side of NW 22nd Street to the east side of NW 1st Place: then south on the east side of NW 1st Place to the southern edge of the I-395 ROW; then 9 east along the southern edge of the I-395 ROW to the western side of Biscayne Boulevard; then south along the west side of Biscayne Boulevard to the north side of NE 5th Street; then west along the north side of NE 5th Street to the west side of North Miami Avenue; then south along the west side of North Miami Avenue to the north side of NW 1st Street; then west along the north side of NW 1st Street past NW 1st Avenue, to include properties abutting the west side of NW 1st Avenue; then north along the western edge of said properties to the north side of NW 5th Street; then west along the north side of NW 5th Street to the east side of NW 3th Avenue; then south along the east side of NW 3rd Avenue to the south side of NW 2nd Street; then west along the south side of NW 2nd street to the southwest corner of the intersection of NW 2nd Street and NW 3th Court. Created by the City of Miami Planning Department D:IREOUESTSISEOPW CRAISEOPW.mxd 4 - 28- 2009 SW 1ST--ST F F F j : i-7-.°_-. _ F � SEOPW CRA Boundaries • Keaevelopment Goals • iiid ng Principles 10 Never underestimate he power of city fa regenerate_ -Jane Jacobs Goals and Guiding Principles Redevelopment Goals The redevelopment goals set forth in this 2009 updated Redevelopment Plan serve as parameters for the SEOPW CRA Board and staff members when making decisions, taking actions, and strategizing projects and programs for the Redevelopment Area. They guide the Agency's public policy, appropriation of funds, and priorities in eliminating the conditions of slum and blight within the Redevelopment Area. The goals are: 1) Preserving historic buildings and community heritage; 2) Expanding the tax base through the use of Smart Growth planning principles; 3) Creating infill housing, diversity in housing types, and retaining affordable housing; 4) Creating jobs within the community; 5) Promotion and marketing of the community; and 6) Improving the quality of life for residents of the Redevelopment Area. This Redevelopment Plan identifies fourteen (14) guiding principles aimed to 11 facilitate the achievement of the aforementioned Redevelopment Goals. The numbering of goals and principles in this plan is not intended to imply a prioritization of importance. All goals and principles are of equal importance to the revitalization of the Redevelopment Area. The matrix on the following page shows that all of the Guiding Principles work toward more than one goal. Following the Matrix, each of the Guiding Principles is further explained. Goals and Supporting Principles Note: The names of the Guiding Principles below have been reduced to a few key words for purposes of brevity. Goal #1: Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage Goal #2: Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles Goal #3: Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability Goal #4: Creating Jobs within the Community Goal #5: Promotion & Marketing of the Community Goal #6: Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Principle 1: Livable Community * * * * * Principle 2: Affordable Housing * * Principle 3: Housing Variety Principle 4: Job Variety * * * * Principle 5: Walkable Streets * * * Principle 6: Promotion * * * * * Principle 7: Green / Open Space * * Principle 8: Historic Preservation * * * * Principle 9: Appropriate Architecture * * * * Principle 10: Attractive Streets * * * Principle 11: 24-Hour Environment * * * * Principle 12: Neighborhood Centers * * * Principle 13: Revise Zoning Regs. * * Principle Restore community * * * 12 Guiding Principles All actions affecting the Redevelopment Area by a government entity, agency, service provider, or private property owner are to be judged according to the Guiding Principles and the Hypothetical Build -out Plan described in Section 3. If any new projects or efforts are being proposed that are not identified in Section 4, then their relevance should be judged by the Goals and these Principles. Principle 1: The community as a whole has to be livable. Land uses and transportation systems must be coordinated with each other. The most important combination to make a community livable is to have land uses and transportation systems working together in concert. Ideally, a successful neighborhood will offer the opportunity to reside, work, and carry out the other activities of daily life (i.e., shopping, recreation, entertainment, religious and cultural events, education, etc) all within an area of comfortable walking distance. To achieve this, a thoughtful mix of residential, employment, commercial and community - serving uses should be promoted by the City and CRA in a densely developed and well - designed urban fabric. Neighborhood -serving commercial uses, such as pharmacies, grocery 13 stores, bank branches, dry cleaners, restaurants, day care facilities, and entertainment establishments (i.e. bowling alleys, cinemas, video stores, etc) should be incorporated into the neighborhood fabric to serve the population and reduce automobile dependency. Also, civic buildings and community -serving uses such as schools, libraries, police stations, fire stations, and parks should be provided and located in such a manner as to create community focal points and strengthen neighborhood identity. Great cities are built up from groups of such neighborhoods. Transportation modes have to be balanced and varied too, so that one can choose to walk, drive, take a taxi, or ride a bike, a bus, or community transit in the form of Metrorail or Metromover. Overtown and Park West can be thought of as a group of neighborhoods. In order to reposition Southeast Overtown/Park West as a livable area, a mixture of housing types, service establishments, and employment centers must be provided within each of these neighborhoods. Though no two neighborhoods are exactly alike, neighborhoods are traditionally about one -quarter mile from center to edge, for several reasons. This is thought by scholars to be a dimension within which residents can come to know many of their neighbors well, and form a detailed "mental map" of their daily territory. This helps explain why the ten-minute walk diameter can be observed in historical settlements from many time periods, and in cultures all around the world. Perhaps more importantly today, most people are willing to walk distances approximately ten minutes away before choosing another mode of transportation, provided they are presented with a pedestrian - friendly, safe environment. To reduce unnecessary car trips and dependence on the automobile, the most livable neighborhoods in modern cities include an array of residential, business, retail, and neighborhood -serving uses within that ten-minute area. While today's technology offers multiple means of transportation, "walkability" remains a key component of the vibrant and healthy neighborhood and an important determinant of neighborhood boundaries. Superimposing a ten-minute walking diameter on Southeast Overtown/Park West, and a review of historic development patterns, reveals that the area is actually comprised of five distinct neighborhoods: Park West, Southeast Overtown, North Overtown, West Overtown, and The Government District. Determining how to improve infrastructure, services and the provision of uses in each of these smaller neighborhoods is the most effective strategy for improving the area as a whole. The vision of this Redevelopment Plan is, therefore, to improve the Redevelopment Area by transforming it into a group of healthy mixed -use neighborhoods, and connecting those neighborhoods with a variety of transportation options. Principle 2: The neighborhood has to retain access to affordable housing even as the neighborhood becomes more desirable to households with greater means. Based on comments and discussions made at various community meetings in Overtown and Park West, it is quite clear that there is general consensus among existing residents, former residents, CRA and City staff, and elected officials that Overtown has to retain affordable housing, and first priority to affordable housing and job opportunities must be given to existing and former residents of Overtown. The SEOPW CRA's Housing Policy is stated in this Redevelopment Plan and can be found in Section 6. 14 Principle 3: There must be variety in housing options. The housing stock in Downtown Miami and the neighborhoods of Southeast Overtown/Park West is extremely limited. The existing inventory consists mostly of lower -priced and substandard houses and apartments. This lack of residential alternatives inhibits efforts to foster a 24-hour downtown and limits options for those who would otherwise choose to reside in a center city location. A mix of market rate and affordable housing units and types, including rental units, ownership units, multi -family units, workforce and supportive housing, single-family units, and accessory apartments, is necessary to accommodate the diversity and lifestyles of existing and future residents. The Overtown and Park West of the future will take advantage of their urban character and infrastructure and provide an attractive array of residential choices for current and new residents. The neighborhoods have to ensure the integration of different economic sectors to stimulate a positive shaping of the urban space. Principle 4: There must be variety in employment opportunities. Employment centers should be located within the neighborhoods to accommodate those who wish to live in proximity to their work and reduce dependence on the automobile and long commutes. As with access to affordable housing, there appears to be general consensus in the community that employment opportunities be made available to existing residents of Overtown has a high priority. Principle 5: Walking within the neighborhood must be accessible, safe, and pleasant. Streets have many responsibilities. They act as a system for movement, providing mobility and ways to move around the City. Even more importantly, their right-of-way serves as the "front door" to private properties. The character and design of the street, and thus the resulting "curb appeal," have a direct correlation to the type and quality of development projects, real estate values, and economic potential. Providing a range of choices for moving safely and comfortably throughout the neighborhood is an integral function of the city street network. Neighborhood streets should therefore be designed to accommodate a number of transportation choices, including walking, bicycles, mopeds, automobiles, and mass transit. The provision of a continuous, two-way street grid in Southeast Overtown/Park West will increase accessibility and reduce congestion, while the provision of wide shaded sidewalks, walkable block sizes, on -street parking, bicycle paths, and transit services increases the range of choices for moving to, from, and within the Redevelopment Area. Creating pedestrian - friendly streets encourages the development of street -level businesses and natural surveillance. Principle 6: Local cultural events, institutions, and businesses are to be promoted. In order for Southeast Overtown/Park West to achieve its full potential, it is necessary to address and improve the neighborhood economy and expand the economic opportunities of present and future residents and businesses. This entails both the support and enhancement of existing businesses and local entrepreneurs and the attraction of new businesses that provide needed services and economic opportunities. New economy business centers are characterized by concentrations of competing but complementary firms that are driven by the advantages of co -location. Redevelopment efforts should actively identify opportunities for Southeast Overtown/Park West to capitalize on this trend. 15 Principle 7: The City and County must provide access to small parks and green spaces of an urban character. Access to public parks and green spaces is a key element of quality of life in urban neighborhoods, as natural environments provide essential respite in an urban environment. Therefore, it is vital that a series of green spaces and parks, preferably linked by greenways, be developed within each neighborhood and that existing green spaces and parks be enhanced to provide a genuine amenity to the quality of life for existing and future residents. These green spaces, parks, and greenways will be an important element in developing and maintaining community aesthetics and identity, providing recreational and social opportunities for residents and visitors, and attracting new residents and businesses. Principle 8: Older buildings that embody the area's cultural past should be restored. These older buildings are physical reminders of the community's heritage and enhance the experience of the place, giving it a richness that cannot easily be obtained once the buildings are lost. Unfortunately far too many of the historic buildings identified in the 1982 Plan have been demolished despite the efforts of The Black Archives History and Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. and other local initiatives. Principle 9: New and rehabilitated buildings must respond to our climate and reflect the community's cultural heritage. Established neighborhoods are distinguished by architecture that is indicative of their history, climate, and function. Successful redevelopment efforts capitalize on these elements rather than imposing development that is disconnected from what has come before. South Beach provides an excellent example of this concept in action; its redevelopment was predicated on its rich architectural heritage and history, and as a result, has been wildly successful. The five (5) neighborhoods that comprise Southeast Redevelopment Area boast unique features and architecture that reflect their history and function. For example, Park West's architecture still reflects its former function as a warehouse district for the Port of Miami, while the story of Overtown's heyday as a thriving center for black -owned businesses and culture is told in its remaining buildings of note. The redevelopment of these neighborhoods should occur within the context of these histories and new development should acknowledge the past traditions and further their future. Whenever possible, buildings of architectural merit should be adapted to new needs and creatively reused. Principle 10: Streets and buildings must be attractive. Neighborhoods are defined by their public realm, the spaces between buildings. The streets, sidewalks, parks, greenways, and civic uses bring the community together and link it to the outside world. A vibrant and engaging public realm serves as the neighborhood's canvas and lifeblood, a means for inspiring and captivating residents and visitors. Sound urban design, attractive buildings, and streetscapes are essential to having streets that are both functional and visually attractive. Looks are important to current residents who will feel community pride when receiving pleasant comments about where they live. Looks are important to attracting investors to make other improvements to the neighborhood. To have attractive, pedestrian -friendly urban streets, buildings must be set close together, and building heights and road widths must be compatible. Building walls with their 16 windows and doors, that open to the street, should come together to form a continuous facade. Maintenance of public streets and spaces has to occur in a consistent manner to show that the community is cared for. Private property owners have to do their part too, painting buildings when they start to peel or fade badly, and clean up yards or vacant properties if garbage collects there. If the owners are not inspired to make improvements or repairs when the need becomes visually obvious, then it is Code Enforcement's job to deliver a citation to them. Principle 11: 24-hour environments should be encouraged. A common feature of prosperous metropolitan cores is a "24-hour environment": a broad and diverse offering of cultural, entertainment, and recreational options that attract and engage residents and visitors on weekends and after the workday ends. This environment encourages social interaction and is a catalyst for economic vitality and attracting businesses and residents. Southeast Overtown and Park West provide an excellent opportunity to create the 24-hour environment that downtown Miami lacks. Principle 12: Identifiable neighborhood centers are to be established in a distributed pattern within Overtown and Park West. Cohesive neighborhoods have strong centers, identifiable from their concentration of higher density residential, commercial, and civic uses, and/or a signature public open space such as a park, square or plaza. The neighborhood center helps ensure the provision of various uses within a walkable area and is essential to the establishment of neighborhood identity. Neighborhood centers should be developed in each of the five neighborhoods that Redevelopment Area. comprise the Principle 13: The zoning and other development regulations must be reworked to yield the results envisioned in this Community Redevelopment Plan. Both the SEOPW CRA and the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department agree that the zoning requirements within the CRA boundaries must be improved to further redevelopment of the desired type. Principle 14: Restore a sense of community and unify the area culturally. The SEOPW CRA needs to do what ever is in its power to bring back the vitality that once gave Overtown its character, sense of place, and cultural distinctiveness. 17 • Conceptual Plan Diagram • Land Uses & Residential Units • Hypothetical Build -out Plan • Publicly Owned Land, for Public Improvements • Open Spaces: Paris, PiA7ac, and Green Spaces • Transportation System: Mobility and Access Re-establishing the Traditional Urban Nervork of Streets Pedestrian Friendly Street Improvements Promoting the Return of Two -Way Streets Rail and: Transit Routes Key Ideas from the Miami at Midnight Report • Paigkin Providing and Retaining On -Street Parking Off-street Parking • Land Development Regulations Adherence to Local Land Development Regulations Revisions to the City's Zoning and Land Development Regulations • Physical Plan Possible Changes to 1-395 Make no tithe plarhs,- abry Themselves will n and work, hemembenr never the, but lung ail with ever-growrng insl ey have no magic ,ire stir men"s blood and ;Jab- ot be realized- Make big plans; aim high in hope g that a noble, krlcai dragrarn once recorded will er we are gone wilt a livvrg thing, asserting rtself ncy. - Daniel Burnham,1910 Hypothetical Build -out Plan Conceptual Plan Diagram The Conceptual Plan Diagram to the right shows the basic framework used to shape the Hypothetical Build -out Plan, which is very detailed and has many layers. A number of public and private groups have studied the same areas either prior to or in parallel with this Redevelopment Plan. Many concepts set forth in these plans have been incorporated or consolidated into the diagrams, and have contributed to shape this Community Redevelopment Plan. These plans include the following: • The Overtown Greenway Plan • The Overtown Greenprint Plan • Miami Downtown Transportation Master Plan • Miami- The Downtown Master Plan • Miami at Midnight Report • The Historic Overtown Folklife Village Plan • Overtown Civic Partnership "Ray Gindroz" Plan • Bicentennial Park Plan • Biscayne Blvd Special Area Plan • Grand Promenade Special Area Plan • FEC Corridor Study • Performing Arts Center Site Plan A summary of the many ideas raised by various planning efforts over the last few decades is provided in Appendix A, entitled 19 "Previous Planning Work for the Area." 04110 AI�JJ=1111IE�IfT�L III —T III SEDPW 6ouidarf - ue-,crap — rtervna er rarenatle •*•Greerxays: Pedestrian Sate Cnr1,:'3 Parts! Grsen Spam Project Areas ANVi 15'A1enLe 9. DV9Yvnr JrltlualnQ _rile Broadway - Lyric c Plaza: C. M.A. 3rd M rue Nenorborllood Cert. -� - 0 D. Huh c erhsm Priority Bushes CoCorridoror E.'A6G O42nuer F. Popedes acnga } eEau learn nl_= - G. TIIE-'rcmePla le- Part[ WE€[ Enea'izirnHll. rDIsYIcl Han - H'ANYd -.ante' 1.11wrni Part lomeo'nnersnp o51rIG' 1.11 rtw Cam Ilus -loosEkIM 30:ear91 Gut. L= ,12 ,brAipirst 1. IL. —I, T is `— 8. ce7ennial Aides Alma .IrEll*1L� I I IEK ` LLI -1_ ,_' Mr.1. W OMmkNeo+ V' r« J PT R' P1FiAAa P. NW 20T MY, 1,1T T TR tl� fF'?P.11`7r�IP jT79Tj vl' it 7.7! ?OTT! TT, B Ew ifP.T4 6fi 3#T11 ST Me 11RO it* en Ma 3311D rr* .iE &MI TEk ]Stti 9[Tr] pi 2T :tip aeii :37 Eng J i' 1Ili' ® re 2M11 Tern M1.1=V i TEU f 176 iI''o Imo' Gf [M 211110 tn% i'fhLi x3! [a] axs] Tim CD S.rr"m CI7 S.TTr .1. .T MU Ylti lT L131;3.1i 3r F. 4 .LE 1411,1ET LU Land Uses & Residential Units As described throughout this Redevelopment Plan, the intent is to mix land uses within the Redevelopment Area as much as possible. The exceptions will be where there are large areas of government offices and facilities or where there are concentrations of single-family detached houses. A wide range of residential types is sought with this Redevelopment Plan. Measures must be put in place to retain affordability while encouraging market rate housing in the area. Hypothetical Build -out Plan The Hypothetical Build -out Plan portrays one possible built -out future for the Redevelopment Area in a very advanced state of redevelopment and infill development. It is useful to show possible configurations for public and private building placement, streets and access ways, parking areas, and public spaces and street patterns. Think of the Hypothetical Build -out Plan as a series of layered ideas that have all been "flattened" into one drawing. These layers include: • Publicly -Owned Land, available for public improvements • Open Spaces: parks, plazas, and green spaces, and greenways • Transportation System • Parking Policy • Land Development Regulations • Physical Plan, showing physical conditions of public and private buildings, parking locations, sidewalks, and yards Each of these layers is described in further detail in the pages that follow in this section. 21 Publicly -Owned Land Each of the properties shown on the map to the left, either owned by the CRA, City of Miami, County or State agencies, are considered suitable for public improvements or public -private redevelopment initiatives. This map shows a "snapshot" of the current ownership and should not be viewed as an end result in itself. (To obtain a copy of the most updated property ownership map, contact the City of Miami's Planning Department). Additional properties may need to be purchased and some currently owned may need to be sold to reach the goals of this Redevelopment Plan. Properties that would be ideal for the CRA to purchase are purposefully not identified in the plan, to avoid costly problems in time and money associated with land speculation. These problems have already hindered the CRA's performance over the past twenty years. Required CRA Actions: 1) Continue to evaluate and negotiate future land purchases to meet the goals of the Redevelopment Plan. 2) Evaluate and advertise public -private development opportunities, utilizing the land owned by the CRA in furtherance of the goals set forth herein. 22 3) Coordinate with other private and public entities for the development of surplus real property within the Redevelopment Area that will further the goals set forth herein. SEOPW CHA 1• City or Miami EN Miami DadE Caurly r ILin pill PA r "I�Nl.mll 9 311 lilt = - urtrl-11—!��1-Ti [ J Lill NAFJPNE ithli � � -KIT — MILLI u-.1 L1L [ra¢rB I 1 [t� i+.� tLi Er I i i113 0 EN 1 fl Ell .P-,---::±iffE6201 o 7 i� OiNil-tiPtrVinOprai. 11;Qie dlla Open Spaces: parks, plazas, and green spaces, and greenways. Urban dwellers do not have the luxury of large amounts of private open space in their rear gardens and back yards. Instead, urban living highlights the enjoyment of pedestrian - friendly streets and public spaces (parks, squares, greens, greenways, and plazas). Creating and maintaining high -quality public spaces is necessary for the Redevelopment Area to achieve its potential. Of the five neighborhoods that have been identified, only Overtown, west of the Interstate, has adequate open space. The acquisition of land to create these public spaces and the necessary construction and maintenance is possible through a variety of means. Required CRA Actions: 1) Acquire more land for publicly accessible green space for active and passive recreational use. 2) Coordinate with the City of Miami's Planning & Zoning Departments to improve public safety with natural surveillance; requiring that neighboring buildings front all public spaces with doors and windows. 3) Coordinate with the City of Miami's Parks Department on the installation and maintenance of public spaces. 23 4) Require development projects within the Redevelopment Area to maintain green spaces within project scope. 2161' al sr VIA Nit hi. a IT NW 2(TI- ST Nes IS, IVit 'JAW. pee 1.1 - 1 ,1MI } _ ,.a,.. • nle di DENIM. ,4111.1 gale ,11 ..r_w.,.a.•r E FLP.GLE v ST t , 1 Ways to acquire more land: 1. Land Swaps The City and CRA can directly exchange properties with property owners. For example, if property that is in a good location for a park is privately owned, and the CRA owns land that is a suitable development site, then the CRA could swap land with the private property owner. The community gets a park where it makes sense and the original owner gets a good development opportunity. 2. Revolving fund for public lands The County, City, and CRA can create a revolving fund for public lands. For example, suppose the CRA needed to consolidate several properties to make an adequately large green space. It already owns or recently purchased a few of the parcels, but one or two remaining owners hold out and refuse to sell. To avoid the need to use eminent domain, the CRA could give up and decide to sell the land recently purchased. The revenue from the sale could be put into a fund, and used later in another location for the purpose of acquiring land for green space. This may require specific transaction controls. 3. Purchase the land outright. The CRA Board can, as it has in the past, purchase the land outright for a fair market value. Assistance can be sought from the County, City, State, and the Trust for Public 24 Land to expedite the purchase of land. Matching grants can be pursued. 4. Land Pooling Land pooling is the consolidation of small landholdings for their unified planning, servicing, subdivision and redistribution. This method for land assemblage provides many opportunities including the shared cost and returns of land subdivision between the landowners in an equitable way at no cost to the CRA and the orderly design of the subdivision layout for the planned urban land use. This process would counter excessive land speculation and ensure an adequate supply of land for development purpose. 5. Ask for donations. The CRA can ask property owners to donate their land for public use. The old expression still holds true, "It doesn't hurt to ask." Proper maintenance of public spaces New public spaces are best maintained through taxing districts applied to the neighborhood and adjacent properties. These plazas and green spaces will be relatively small in comparison to other City of Miami parks. Maintenance, including grass, tree, and shrub planting, landscape mowing and clipping, emptying of garbage cans, litter cleanup, and pressure cleaning paved surfaces should be provided by the City of Miami.. These services can also be provided by locally owned businesses through an incentive program. Recreational facilities and functions should also be provided as part of City or County programs. The CRA can also coordinate with local churches, civic groups, or organizations that are willing to donate the time and resources to maintain public spaces. Successful Small Urban Parks & Squares: The following are qualities that make small parks and squares safe and useable: 1) Design matters more than acreage or uses or luxury. 2) Natural surveillance is essential. 3) Enliven the place with regular activity. 4) Shape the public space with carefully placed trees and buildings surrounding its edges. 5) Open and frame the views into and from within the space. 6) Pedestrian access is all-important. 7) Calm the traffic, beautifully. 8) Provide shade. 9) Provide flexible open space for diverse functions; do not fill up the park with excess equipment. 10) Reserve places for symbols of civic pride and uniqueness. 11) Plan for sustained care and maintenance. Transportation System: Mobility and Access Successful urban environments are supported by a variety of mobility choices, thereby affording residents the freedom to move about comfortably, whether on foot, bicycle, via transit or automobile. In contrast, areas designed primarily around the automobile do not provide the level of mobility and access necessary to create vibrant places with an active street life. Part of the challenge of redeveloping Park West and Overtown is poor mobility and access. Mobility is the ability to travel over distances. Access is the ability to get to a destination —to actually get to the door. This condition has been created through a combination of barriers such as the Interstate Highways and the elevated Metrorail, and further compounded by the system of one- way streets. The one-way streets discourage motorists from comfortably circulating within the area. These streets also create "straight- aways" that encourage motorists to speed and make it unsafe for pedestrians to cross streets. Although rail cargo and the elevated transit facilities of Metrorail and the Metromover, are seen as positive features in the neighborhood, there are some specific negative effects that these have on adjacent properties and streets. The physical plan 25 attempts to suggest ways to diminish these negative effects and maximize the positive ones through the location of buildings and public spaces. Required CRA Actions: Restoring the urban fabric and mitigating some of the negative impacts of previous transportation improvements are possible through a set of changes carried out in concert. These include: 1) Advocate, fund, and/or facilitate the re- establishment of the traditional urban network of streets and restoration of missing links in the street grid. 2) Advocate, fund, and/or build pedestrian - friendly street improvements. 3) Promote the return of two-way streets. 4) Advocate, facilitate, and construct on - street parking 5) Assist with solutions to any noise, access, and privacy problems associated with properties along the rail and transit routes. 6) Develop pedestrian compatible community transit system to link all Southeast Overtown, Park West, and the nearby Central Business District and Omni area, as described in the Miami at Midnight report. 7) Explore the possibility of a pedestrian zone adjacent to the Overtown Metrorail Station to enhance intermodal transfers, as described in the Miami at Midnight report. Re-establishing the traditional urban network of streets. Throughout the Redevelopment Area, the traditional urban block structure has been altered. In several locations, streets have been eliminated, and the network compromised. This has created super -blocks, some of which are 1,100 feet long or even longer. These blocks are unusually large and do not fit with the established grain and size of the original street system and blocks, making navigation needlessly difficult. Super -blocks limit both vehicular and pedestrian access, causing an unnecessary waste of time and fuel for motorists and longer distances to travel for pedestrians. Newly created or connected streets should generally do the following: • Be designed as two-way streets with on - street parking; • Be of a similar right-of-way width to the segments of existing streets with which connections are being re-established; and, • Provide pedestrian -friendly street improvements. in this section. There are some locations within the Redevelopment Area where streets are fenced off or blocked by highways, rail lines, and the Metrorail. If for some reason vehicular access cannot be achieved in these locations, then every effort needs to be made to at least open them up for safe pedestrian access. In contrast to the large super -blocks, there are several locations where existing blocks are extremely small. On a very limited basis it may be advisable to close some of the intermediate streets to form blocks of a size more conducive to infill development. This should be evaluated on a case -by -case basis and not adopted as an overall policy. The merits of enlarging a block include: • Selling the rights -of -way and using the proceeds toward the purchase of public green space or for rights -of -way needed elsewhere. • Increasing the legibility of the major streets. • Directing and organizing routes of travel without diminishing the primary street system. • Providing a larger development site for contemporary buildings that may need more room for midblock parking. «< Map showing locations where the street grid should be opened. Existing Street Grid Showing Two-way Streets (No Arrows) and One -Way Street (With Arrows) I♦rwo-OM STREETS A -wIW PREEN. 27 I ,.I"_:"I}Ik r II 1 1 I I1 1.1YY:v NI(TSi FAS..riR,UL.- ' I — n'i--HsvYl Pi I I 1 w w.x. .ryeaSi _ I — 11 :IA 11H: ` as; `. _ VA 1101, an — i.. 1 I r I 1_ .— L I , I+I{ ' t. 7 L ti _ 1de _ 4t f r It �� ne . I _ rw.vx,ar.ex ;JIn ex -I fI_—fq = - - II II �l�l IIDJ111 _ 1.1 i -' T •G I .iceennial 'ti•F Lm §i I I nw+aynL r (Orel 11 P — 1 ill i 1 I I II III II ._ I _ I I I I,II 1' L 1 1W 1 a II— IIIMI nl II _ —J III xw: I 1 C "snrn- r . I I' . I II _ - _. . ..P• . I 1aa1 Fq I ,I L 1 I i' 1I =-1 I I I Suggested Changes to the Street Grid A ▪ TWO-W%Y STREETS • #+E-WAY STREETS PROPOSED TWO-WAY STREETS 28 L I MY 1ST _I I �I I I I L —1 - I i 1 - u5mee — LF r I —1 1I- I_L nx-J-I tip".FM2V,l,trLSinv I= if Y I - f F ■ I __.__ � �� e� pihr IL- ill MIi — 1 — I . _ 4 I f1 k \ 111111:...1 I I nighnre _ e I ' r W• �� !_ hx ry, a ,t" ,,1 c.. , IL zeal RI !., _r Perform ifirm— :11. leilM II I�I?lIl1J�l I r" l mal I y I T f +reno u • .1e . u V �'�' u.I 11 ' I II III II ` l I I I',, - 11 1-: cap A4;rnes I I I lrIII I,II 11 I 1 I -- 1 �I i� IIan MOM pl itT« ' -F t 1 , I,I L I 11=J I IC I Pedestrian Friendly Street Improvements In an urban setting, street level businesses need a comfortable pedestrian environment, as they are reliant on a walk-in customer base. Strategies to make streets pedestrian friendly include: • Create a two-way street system. Two-way streets have calmer traffic than one-way streets, because drivers are more cautious when adjacent to oncoming traffic. • Provide on -street parking to create a safety buffer between pedestrians on the sidewalk and moving vehicles, and assist ground level retail, restaurants, and businesses. • Create narrow travel lanes to discourage speeding, and conserve the much -needed space for on -street parking and wider sidewalks. • Maintain and create small curb radii, which will require motorists to slow down when turning at intersections. • At neighborhood centers and intermodal pedestrian zones, provide a rough road surface (bricks or cobble stones, etc) that discourage speeds beyond 20 mph) Creating continuity on the streets is also a top priority. Sidewalks should be designed to encourage ground level businesses and pedestrian activity from block to block. In 29 particular: • Create wide sidewalks that allow pedestrians to walk side -by -side as well as pass each other, and also allow outdoor dining to be part of the street scene. • Shade pedestrian paths. This is an absolute necessity in the South Florida climate While shade trees should be installed wherever practical, in general shade trees are not as effective in providing shade as projecting elements on buildings such as awnings and colonnades. Therefore these features should be facilitated by zoning and mandated as part of CRA-funded projects. • Minimize crosswalk distance to limit the amount of time when pedestrians are walking in the travel lanes. Promoting the Return of Two -Way Streets The existing street system within the Redevelopment Area contains a multitude of one-way streets. These are unfavorable to the future success of the area for several reasons. One-way streets increase the speed of traffic, thereby reducing pedestrian activity. Retail has great difficulty thriving on one-way streets — not only is their drive -by volume cut in half, but each street is traversed primarily by either the morning or the evening commuters, and therefore, hours of high visibility are limited Creating a two-way street system will alleviate these problems and also help to orient those traveling within the street system. Conversion to two-way streets must be treated as a priority. All three scenarios in the Downtown Transportation Master Plan include improving the streets into a two-way street system. The Downtown Transportation Master Plan's study area is east of I-95. Areas of Overtown west of I-95 are currently set up as one-way streets. To extend and complete the system of two-way streets, the following streets should be converted as well: 10th Street, 11thStreet, 5th Street, and 6th Street between I-95 and NW 7th Avenue. 5th and 6th Streets east of I-95 should remain one-way to accommodate Port of Miami related traffic only if the FDOT improvements take place. Rail and Transit Routes Rail: The FEC rail line that runs along NW 1st Avenue carries cargo to the Port of Miami This serves a useful purpose, but the tracks themselves form a barrier down the middle of Overtown. Fortunately for the neighborhood, the train moves slowly though this area because it is nearing the end of the line at the port. To diminish the physical separation between Overtown and Park West, more crossings are needed at 9th, 10th, and 12th Streets. Preferably these crossings will be for both pedestrians and vehicles; however priority should be given to pedestrian crossings. Transit Routes In November 2002, the People's Transportation Plan ("PTP") was approved by the voters of Miami -Dade County. The new transportation Plan added numerous rapid transit corridors to the existing Metrorail system, which currently serves only a limited area, linking the remainder of the greater metropolitan region. Having the convenience of Metrorail in Overtown is advantageous for the residents; however, the physical structure of the elevated rail has a negative impact on the neighborhood with the following problems: • The elevated tracks further break up the neighborhood into little separating neighbors and streets. • The space underneath the rail lines is generally unlit and unsupervised, making it unsafe, especially at night • The noise from the trains makes the 30 pieces by commercial adjacent properties less desirable as places to live. • Although the appearance isn't unsightly, it isn't beautiful either. Miami -Dade County and the City of Miami have been studying the location for a new Metrorail route in the East/West direction, linking the Miami International Airport to the Port of Miami. Many of the possible paths for the link between Government Center and the Port pass through Park West, but underground. An underground Metrorail will be an improvement compared to the elevated tracks. The route once preferred by the County and City planning departments may have been ruined. The preferred route passes under the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse on NW 1" Avenue. The Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County chose not to pay for the special foundation required to accommodate the subway train under the federal courthouse, and instead has a foundation that cannot accommodate a future subway underneath it. In light of that problem, and since Park West is well served by transit already, the best subway routes for Park West may be those that spare the inhabitants of Park West the inconvenience of building a new line. The subway does not have to go through Park West. It could travel east on NW 2nd or 3rd Streets and turn to the port under Bayfront Park or under Biscayne Bay. Another suggestion comes from the Miami at Midnight report. Just as Metrorail will be connected to the Miami International Airport (MIA) with the ongoing development of the Miami Intermodal Center ("MIC"), the Port of Miami could be connected to Metrorail with the creation of the "Overtown- Park West Community Intermodal System." As described in the report, these intermodal improvements would be structurally very different than the MIC, but would serve the same intermodal purposes. It is basically calling for passenger and freight intermodal access improvements to integrate all modes of intercity and local transportation as well as connections with the private automobile in the context of the existing historic Overtown and Park West communities. Key Ideas in the Miami at Midnight Report The Miami at Midnight Report explores the opportunities and options for narrow gauge rail transportation modality and shared parking strategies to link the proposed Promenade improvements to the Bicentennial Park, the Miami Beach Baylink project and other destinations within the redevelopment area. It includes a description of the strategies to create a pedestrian -oriented intermodal access plan and a case for using cost efficient narrow gauge rail and small community transit vehicles for short distance intermodal movements of passenger and goods. The Report includes a description and recommended locations for shared parking structures and mixed -use buildings that are placed on their perimeter (liner buildings) and concludes with a description of the opportunities to secure federal and state funding, a scale of magnitude cost estimate and recommended actions to be undertaken. The value to the CRA in the Miami at Midnight Report is that it describes a unique mechanism to meet many of the redevelopment objectives with a real funding source. Key ideas from the Report include: 1) Rail Vehicles: The rail vehicles are intended to be small, seven feet wide, and nine feet tall. The floor height should be 5 inches from the street grade making it easy to get in and out. Some cars can be open air and some air-conditioned. Seating can be positioned to accommodate bicycles, baby carriages, wheelchairs, luggage, grocery shopping bags and other goods typical for pedestrian, bicycle or automotive 31 transport. 2) Narrow gage rail: Since narrow gage rail is designed for shorter slower trips, the costs of installation and maintenance are lower. 3) Pedestrian Intermodal Access: Traffic calming and pedestrian amenities will need to be provided along the streets and mixed mode corridors where the transit routes will occur. 4) Freight Intermodal Access: The Miami at Midnight Report assumes that 5th and 6th streets become the primary truck route for the Port. Recently the MPO has rejected primary truck route due to opposition from the Overtown community and Miami -Dade Community College. This portion of the Report, therefore, may no longer be valid. However, continued community discussions should be undertaken to find a beneficial design that provides port access but minimizes truck traffic adverse to the community. 5) Liner buildings and Parking Structures: The transit system is not simply tracks and vehicles, but also parking garages. The slower speed community transit and narrow gauge rail vehicles also serve as shuttles from parking to the various attractions and transportation services in this intermodal system. To make the garages meet the objectives of a pedestrian -oriented downtown neighbor- hood, the garages must be lined with useable habitable space that is accessible from the street for commercial and residential uses. 6) Community Intermodal System: The various components of the Redevelopment Plan will function as elements of a community based intermodal system (e.g., passenger and freight intermodal facilities and connectors). While the redevelopment of the existing Metrorail and Metromover station sites into a series of connected liner buildings and parking structures (with properly designed interior and exterior spaces to better relate the pedestrian activities at the street level with the transit station floors twenty to thirty feet above grade) can obviously be proposed as an intermodal transportation project that would qualify for transportation trust funds, to a greater or lesser degree, every improvement within the Redevelopment Area should be seen as an opportunity to improve the 32 intermodal movements within the Redevelopment Area. The Overtown/Park West Community Intermodal System, therefore, consists of specific pedestrian -oriented transportation projects to enhance intermodal connections and significantly increase modal splits. 7) Funding Opportunities: In order to understand the magnitude of these funding opportunities, we only have to look at the Florida Department of Transportation's ("FDOT") annual budget (approximately $4 billion) and the significance of their ongoing efforts to identify and focus funding towards the critical elements of Florida's Strategic Intermodal System. When combined with the congressional schedule for TEA 21 Reauthorization and the United States Department of Transportation ("USDOT") SAFETEA legislation provisions, there is a clear opportunity to define elements of the Redevelopment Plan in fundable transportation project terms. This illustration shows how a narrow gauge rail vehicle can be small enough to fit within narrow right-of-way. 1 I to i !' 8) Recommended Actions: The CRA needs to immediately consider and approve these transportation projects as intermodal projects and seek the support for these projects from the Miami City Commission, the Board of County Commissioners of Miami -Dade County, the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization ("MPO"), the USDOT, the FDOT, the Florida House and Senate legislative delegation, the U.S. Congressional delegation and both U.S. Senators from the State of Florida. Immediate discussions with members of the FI C and SITAC would be very important as well. The proposals need to be presented as consistent with USDOT and FDOT intermodal initiatives and well -established transportation law and policy. While historically large-scale pedestrian -oriented transportation improvements difficult to conceptualize transportation expenditures, federal and state interest in have been as valid with the intermodal projects (virtually all passenger intermodal movements involve pedestrian trips), there would seem to be a better opportunity to undertake such an initiative at this time. 33 To be seriously considered for state and federal funding, the proposed intermodal projects need to be identified in the MPO's long-range plan and should be scheduled within the FDOT's five-year work program. Further, such intermodal improvements need to also be identified as an element of the Strategic Intermodal Systems (SIS) (intermodal connectors or otherwise) and addressed in the TEA 21 Reauthorization and related federal appropriations decisions. In undertaking these efforts, the CRA must recognize that they will need to be a funding participant with the City of Miami and the Miami -Dade County as to any state and federal originated transportation funds. With the incorporation of pedestrian -oriented mixed -mode streets and corridors, parking shuttles and community transit, parking structures and liner buildings into this Redevelopment Plan, the CRA, along with the Omni Redevelopment District Redevelopment Agency implement initial components Community should of the intermodal improvements plan in partnership with the Miami Parking Authority (also known as the "Department of Offstreet Parking"), or other public and private partners, to demonstrate how such a system will work and why their transportation funding partners (USDOT, FDOT, County and City) should participate in such community redevelopment related transportation intermodal improvements. Three maps have been included in this Redevelopment Plan for reference. Obviously the details of the routes, systems, and parking garage locations may change as the system is closer to implementation. Promenade Area Map #1 Narrow Gauge Rail A. Promenade to 1-395 Parking Loop B. Promenade to 14th Street Loop C. 10th and 11th Street Loop D. NW 3rd Avenue Loop E. 8th and 10th Street Loop F. Miami Avenue Area Loop G. Central Loop H. Port of Miami Loop 1. Jackson Memorial Hospital Loop (a) via NW 3rd Avenue (b) via N. Miami Avenue J. Omni East Loop K. Omni West Loop Metromover / Station 0 Metrorail / Station Intermodal Areas (Passenger, Freight, and Connectors) Interregional Destinations & Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Hubs Port of Miami (POM) Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) Miami International Airport (MIA) Jackson Memorial Hospital (JMH) Downtown Bus Terminal (DBT) Miami Beach Convention Center (Miami Beach) Orange Bowl Greyhound Intercity Bus Facility (GIB) Miami River (and to MIA / MIC / POM and other waterfront destinations via waterborne transit service 34 Promenade Area Map 2 Regional Rail Connectors 1. Baylink Connector to Port of Miami 2. Port of Miami Connector via Metrorail Extension 3. East - West Corridor via 5th and 6th Streets to Port of Miami 4. Baylink Metromover / Station Metrorail / Station Intermodal Areas (Passenger, Freight, and Connectors) Interregional Destinations & Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Hubs Port of Miami (POM) Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) Miami International Airport (MIA) Jackson Memorial Hospital (JMH) Downtown Bus Terminal (DBT) Miami Beach Convention Center (Miami Beach) Orange Bowl Greyhound Intercity Bus Facility (GIB) Miami River (and to MIA / MIC / POM and other waterfront destinations via waterborne transit service 35 Xw x51H yr Nw 11 ,LI_JII in 1II I_I,; `I Lr rI I II I I ' II —I r1• nw ]STX�ii J I 1 I 111� I I —I I I � NW 11Tn :- 1 1 ri xAR'o5'TI I — nw-}e.eu-sr I ��� nw xxno Ln ¶y11 n nwr{nu,cR • f l _ 0.MLi 3r I I .' •" 1 1 oI I III ,T1 1-* ``.. it -III=�T_I_ I II I #q �p�I I ! �� 117 r Xellif 1im 1 111 X`irr r r r r C �T NIX Y I I T; 1� "I I I I� I I- I L • I 7 I n1 TR xIAYCi a ,uar'T ICI I I lu .12 if: 9eo�J J l I r,e I � �T ; XC 2W a I I �I _ 1 ��u '"eR1 t•.i"I k 1 �' �5 � sit L M1X'1}�Yr RM •li� r-4 ,y,�lnsra ai XI I n ''__'1 n - sIne 11gr XS,i1113,IIh,,1• —1 6 C3`5TC11.1 I t. u grrIlrh:MR/ p� 1 I I1I1 r. ;III 1,1711c111.L:---:�ry 1 , • i — NC 1. „ I ti = I'w }xrrl Xr-sxsr —m I r___' Ae1'alna I iWlnelki/5 �L TIIr1 .1_1 uu 1 I11 1 I 11 =1 e sR 11 1'17 I 1 os 71 Tr — I 4 Promenade Area Map #3 Proposed Community Intermodal System Improvements Passenger Intermodal Facility Improvements Area Freight Intermodal Facility Improvements Area and Freight Intermodal Connectors Pedestrian -Oriented Intermodal Connectors Recommended Liner Building / Parking Structure Area Metromover / Station Metrorail / Station Interregional Destinations & Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Hubs Port of Miami (POM) Miami Intermodal Center (MIC) Miami International Airport (MIA) Jackson Memorial Hospital (JMH) Downtown Bus Terminal (DBT) Miami Beach Convention Center (Miami Beach) Orange Bowl Greyhound Intercity Bus Facility (GIB) Miami River (and to MIA / MIC / POM and other waterfront destinations via waterborne transit service 36 '114T M, 7 IT1I lI 1 1 .- r t19TI I r l 1 - T1 1 III —II I m 3r— ,w n m IIN.Z I , - . ' 1 i TjI I�V I 4— NW #2nm3N I _ ... *I I I I I 1 M N° Teel _ 1 1 i .I i [ 112 • IIIY-YIITnT[ i xe ln�f l 1 L� TII I I I•nwBFTMYT1� 1 e L I, II �m5 � Ne T } 1 M. .1 VNNAMP 4Wire — II • •� i ,' .111, N� -9 NW'n ] 9l1 4..v I • JJ nllq�T14.. P . `—I N See,T • ylt3lefS • zF n%,rno ▪ `+u I s.r I le rpls:srey�s. �+e ;aver — 1 L e▪ "• 1 I • _ ▪ l I [Tnt —Peeew- I R 1 I _ Iti ,I. rw T I I — • flT� rl II▪ I American A dines'} Arena r+ anT, l�w3S.-_al_ I e9rrCat .1—I I- ' 1 Ig l' NW. 19tN 5Y 'Y � I • 1J-YJ _ I G 3 IIII nearer' T ' �II._I, II I�I I I 1 — I1�I II�le=') II ! rt t I "'lorry"'lor IWcentenn Pa,.NQ tTH Sr ..yL l_ Pell 14T — 1Ne 1u i MIT I • .� f * 1 'VT . I!J Pew TLI•I III=�leT I LL _ Nr rewrhaet}}l� .. ?'+IrutG:lele sr'� _ t ��r— LEI IL1 I I 1 I -hI ea 1111x11 Parking Having more than enough spaces in surface parking lots can fragment the urban environment and looks unsightly, while having too few spaces can frustrate residents and patrons. However, if individual property owners maximize the amount of parking that can be created on each private lot, and meet 1970s-style parking ratio expectations, the result would be at best a blighted, unsuccessful aspiring suburb rather than a pleasant, walkable urban environment. More commonly, high parking requirements make small -scaled infill developments too difficult. Therefore the CRA should promote a balanced strategy that seeks to use space efficiently and facilitate a system -wide approach. Parking should be treated among matters of public infrastructure rather than just as a private endeavor on private properties. The CRA should not enter the business of parking, but can help implement projects that can be managed privately or by the Miami Parking Authority. Required CRA Actions: 1) Advocate, fund, and/or build on -street parking spaces in any future redevelopment efforts within public rights -of -way. 2) Support a reform of off-street parking 37 regulations to be adopted by the City of Miami to reduce the unnecessary burden on private developers. To jumpstart redevelopment, new businesses in existing buildings should be exempt from parking requirements to reduce their startup costs and therefore their financial risks. Providing & Retaining On -Street Parking On -street parking provides motorists with access to street level businesses. These businesses can capture the attention of both pedestrians and drive -by motorists. On -street parking also creates a comfortable pedestrian environment by buffering pedestrians from vehicles in the travel lanes. Sidewalks automatically become active with pedestrians because of people getting in and out of their cars parked in the on -street spaces. Existing on -street parking throughout the Redevelopment Area should be maintained. The potential for adding on -street parking to streets where it is not currently provided should be explored when roadway improvements occur over time. All new and improved streets within the Redevelopment Area should be designed to include on -street parking. Off-street Parking In overly car -dependent regions such as South Florida, each development will commonly attempt to provide for their own parking on -site with a parking structure or parking lot. In urban areas, some of the negative effects of storing large quantities of cars on each site are: • Experiencing gaps between buildings, from parking lots, when walking down a sidewalk is disruptive for retail environments. Shoppers are easily turned off by these gaps and will often stop shopping or pause and turn around if it looks like there are not any worthwhile destinations down the street. • Parking structures greatly increase the costs to develop a building. This makes market rate and workforce housing, for example, more difficult to find in central urban areas, where such housing is primarily needed. Luxury apartment dwellers more easily absorb the cost of the parking garages. • Development that includes parking structures requires larger parcels to create functional structures and financially viable projects. This generally requires the projects to be large in scale, and therefore harder to finance and harder to fit within the fabric of the neighborhood. • Parking structures associated with one building do not necessarily create a "shared" situation, which can reduce the overall needed parking spaces. The concept of shared parking means that at night an apartment resident can use the same parking space used by an office employee during the day. In the suburban model, office buildings and residential buildings are not typically designed to share parking; nor is the building management company in the business of managing parking. Without shared parking, the inefficient end result is that more money is spent and more land is utilized for parking than is really necessary. Making shared parking work As shared parking facilities are built and the area becomes more developed, livable, interesting, and walkable, with daily needs and services present, some households may opt to do without an automobile or share fewer cars among family members. Developers of new buildings will not have to provide as much of their own parking as they did in the past. The CRA can do its part by participating in public - private ventures to build shared parking 38 facilities. This will take the burden off local property owners interested in redeveloping or improving their properties and buildings. Reducing the Impact of Parking Garages: To diminish the visual and negative impact of parking garages, these guidelines should be followed: • No blank walls of parking garages or walls with openings to the parking garage should directly face public streets. • A "liner" of habitable space with a minimum depth of twenty feet should be constructed between the street and the garage portion of the building. Ground floors of garages may contain lobby entrances, entrances to parking, and should also contain retail space. Recommended liner building depths are thirty to forty feet for residential and office, fifty to sixty feet for retail. First floor residential uses should be raised a minimum of two feet above the average sidewalk grade. • Gates or payment kiosks should be at least forty feet from the sidewalk if the entrance is on a street. • Wherever possible, entrances to the parking garage should be from an alley or side street. • For safety reasons, garages should be well lit during all hours of operation and patrolled by security officers. Land Development Regulations Adherence to, and revisions of, the City's Zoning and Land Development Regulations. All CRA Redevelopment activities shall adhere to the City of Miami's Comprehensive Plan and all zoning and regulatory requirements, as revised from time to time. The existing zoning regulations do not necessarily encourage or ensure the development of street -oriented, urban buildings. This situation is not unique to the Redevelopment Area. A fine-tuning of the citywide land development regulations will eventually occur. However, to assist projects that are entering the development stage in a timely manner, a new set of Urban Design Standards for Redevelopment Area, plus accompanying incentives, can offer an intermediate solution. The proposed Urban Design Standards would reflect adjusted zoning mechanisms in certain zones within the Redevelopment Area. In the past, the low Maximum Building footprint (the percentage of the property which can be covered with a building), and the Floor Area Ratio (the amount of square footage that is habitable based on size of the lot) required land assembly to form large parcels, sometimes encompassing an entire 39 city block. To reduce this need to assemble several parcels into one, the Maximum Building footprint should be increased, minimum parking requirements reduced, and Floor Area Ratio either de-emphasized or eliminated. Then buildings will be allowed to vary in size and scale, and an orderly mixture of buildings can occur within any given city block. Specific reforms that should be reflected in the new Design Standards, for at least some areas within the Redevelopment Area include: • Increased maximum building footprints • Revised floor area ratios, in certain zones • Decreased parking requirements • Decreased open space requirements • Building envelope requirements (i.e., step - backs and tower orientation rules) to maintain access to sunlight and prevailing breezes. This will have the added benefit of optimizing east -west view corridors. The new Urban Design Standards shall describe the following: • The Building -To -Street Relationship: how buildings should face the street at the ground level. This includes elements such as distance between operable doors, percentage of window glazing, and the use of projecting elements to provide shade, such as colonnades and awnings, balconies, or overhangs. • Building Envelope: how the mass of the building is expressed to maintain quality street spaces, while optimizing development potential. • Architectural Elements: the basic architectural features to create fit with the climate and visual interest in buildings and to provide harmony among diverse designs by many architects. • A Mixture of Uses: Reducing or eliminating off-street parking requirements for storefront businesses located at the street level will be attractive to small business, provided there is enough pedestrian traffic on the adjacent street. This may also be an incentive for a developer to build retail square footage at the base of an office or residential building, furthering the initiative of mixing uses. The overall benefit will be to create flexibility within a framework of reasonable certainty, allowing the development community to deliver a variety of building types to provide a range of housing options and services needed to accommodate individuals of numerous lifestyles and economic positions. T'1 tro Physical Plan The Physical Plan shows the physical and geographic conditions of public and private buildings. The plan identifies civic buildings, private buildings, streets, highways, and mass transit lines. Various colors for areas between buildings identify parks and open spaces, parking locations, sidewalks, street trees, and yards. 40 Fork t. 1:16 * — i 0 Nrar Prangs) hreas that we primarily hau d wrlE For parldng. gage% or pia= ({,ream) Gnus (G n) E'}xi.Stilg Buikditg ys rstratat Putking Stbacitusc Public Building +SFcdJ i�+lrrcutail Txkor Pktricing Stnvture l,iath) FBC ERA 5trecrTrzcs T wo-Elnest el i Muttonnver Possible Changes to I-395 The MPO has been discussing modifications to I-395 between I-95 and the Macarthur Causeway. Various scenarios have been presented by the Florida Department of Transportation, the apparent favored alternative being the one with trenched through -lanes with at -grade frontage roads. Park West and the Omni area would be reconnected with bridges for city streets spanning the travel lanes below. This alternative suggests moving the alignment of I- 395 northward along NE -NW 13th Street, and therefore creating a re -developable swath of land at its current location. The plans on the right compare this alternative with the Redevelopment Plan as drawn and show that it is compatible. 41 Current I-395 configuration. I- . !3 °,.5°i`h ,.trenched through -lanes along NE 13th Street. 42 43 ▪ Projects rid Project Areas, Ovenriew Criteria fox Physical Improvements ■ Project Areas ▪ Stakeholder's Roles Project Area A_ IL' ' 1st : T-et ue ▪ Project Area B. O ettov._a (including Little Broadway - Lyric Plaza) ▪ Project Area C. NW 3rd Avenue Neighborhood Center ▪ Project Area D. Historic Overtown Priority- Business Corridor ▪ Project Area E. West Overtown ▪ Project Area F. Properties facing Biscayne Boulevard ▪ Project Area G. The Promenade - Park West EntettaitirinPnt District • Project Area Fi NE 8th Street 'Spine' Project! and Programs This sets the chief rrm visible regime and r dais deeper serif and nature end lave. Community Heritage. and .Historic Pseseavation Promotion and Enhancement of Overtown and Par* West as a Business Location PL.nning; Development, Technical Assistance and Piograr Compliance a reet Improvements, Utilit-; Irtsastructure and "Transportation Honie Ownership Pre -qualification and Corinseiirfg Grants to Ems- ting Businesses T. , edo Re-u a Plan LL:0 90 Propertiea) Comparison Chart: Goals and Supporthag Projects Projects and Programs 44 Projects and Project Areas: An Overview This section is organized into two primary subsections, "Project Areas," and "Projects and Strategies." The Project Areas are numbered "A" through "J" and as a group do not encompass the entire Redevelopment Area. They should be thought of as various "starting points" for projects within the Redevelopment Area. The impetus of focusing efforts into these Project Areas is a direct response to the unfair accusations by some members of the public that the CRA has spent large sums of money and has little to show for it. When money is spent evenly throughout the Redevelopment Area, it is difficult to see where the money has gone, because you can not stand in one location and see a 100% transformation. The purpose of having the Project Areas is to focus expenditures and efforts in small areas to totally transform them, creating as dramatic and visible an impact as possible. By concentrating the efforts, people will experience what the larger area will look, feel, smell, and sound like as revitalization spreads, inspiring additional private reinvestment. The boundaries for Project Areas are not intended to be treated as finite boundaries. If a redevelopment proposal is adjacent to the area and it meets the urban design solutions of 45 the project, then it should be considered part of the Project Area. The current projects and programs to be facilitated by the CRA are listed and described in the second half of this section, following the description and intent of the Project Areas. These projects may need to be updated from time to time as the projects evolve and components are implemented. Some may need to be removed from the plan when they are sufficiently completed. New projects may need to be added. This section can be supplemented by another document or documents revising the list of projects or describing them in greater detail. Criteria for Physical Improvements The following are criteria for any physical improvement project to be endorsed by the CRA: • It produces a total, outdoor environment of exceptional beauty, which exudes safety and optimism, and which stands out in marked contrast to blight. • It involves a combination of adaptive re -use of existing (or better, historic) structures with new buildings and improved public spaces. • It involves a completion of the public space; for example, both sides of the street, all corners of an intersection, or all sides of a park or green space should be built out or renovated. • It includes a significant residential component, preferably owner -occupied; one desire is to repopulate the area and to correct an imbalance of renters versus owners. • It lures residents of moderate incomes or varied incomes; these are "colonists" who will demonstrate the viability of close -in convenient neighborhoods and whose discretionary income will help support businesses. • It suggests what the larger neighborhood will be like as revitalization spreads, and it inspires private reinvestment. • Its purpose meets the principles and goals described in Section 2 of this redevelopment plan Project Areas Stakeholders' Roles. Specific roles for each of the stakeholders appear below and with the Project Area descriptions. In the spirit of teamwork, the stakeholders can each do their part to revitalize the area. The roles for stakeholders other than the CRA should be considered as suggestions. Approval of this plan should in no way require agencies or individuals outside of the CRA to perform the suggested actions. Stakeholders include: CRA: Perform actions as sanctioned under the Redevelopment Act of 1969 and identified in this Community Redevelopment Plan. City of Miami: Continue support for the CRA and make changes to the zoning and other land development regulations for properties in this part of the City. The City should maintain and improve its properties in Overtown, and use its resources to provide a safe and attractive community. Overtown Civic Partnership: Focus efforts in partnership with the City of Miami and the CRA. The Overtown Civic Partnership's goals mirror those of the CRA. These include goals regarding housing and physical development, economic development, community buildings, and leadership development. For Profit Developers, Community Development Corporations, and Investors: Continue redeveloping properties, adding more jobs and housing options within the community. 46 Residents in the Community:: As most are aware, revitalization takes a long time. Spend the effort and money to improve the appearance of homes and yards. Sometimes little tasks that do not cost too much can make a big difference, such as repainting, adding a tree or shrubs, and picking up litter that might be on your street or in your or your neighbor's yard. Rental or Commercial Property Owners and Business Operators: Maintain or improve the appearance of your buildings. Grants and low -interest loan programs are available to accelerate improvements. Property owners who do not intend to make improvements should consider selling their properties or partnering with others who have greater resources. Overtown Community Oversight Board: Continue monitoring and guiding the various activities within Overtown, including implementation strategies and creating new affiances. The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.: Continue the efforts to promote and preserve the cultural heritage of the community. Community Churches: Stay involved and stay aware of the revitalization activities in the Help the CRA distribute community. information as needed from time to time. Sponsor activities to improve the visual appearance of the neighborhoods and continue to promote the area as a proud community that cares. Project Area A: NW 1st Avenue General Boundaries: North: South: East: West: I-395 Overpass NW 1st Street properties that face NW 1" Avenue properties that face NW 1" Avenue Challenges • There is an awkward traffic pattern for vehicles proceeding north along NW 1" Avenue. • Pedestrians are crossing the railroad tracks under unsafe condition, simply because they are walking the shortest route between two points. • The railroad tracks, buildings, and vacant properties lining NW 1" Avenue are unsightly. • There is a general lack of sense of place resulting from low building heights in proportion to the street width. This takes away from the potential of NW 1" Avenue becoming an important signature location. New Opportunities There are a number of opportunities that an enhanced NW 1" Avenue will afford the neighborhood. One of these is the improvement of the pedestrian connection between the newly proposed Promenade in Park West and the Overtown neighborhood. 47 Better pedestrian routes and improved walking conditions will allow residents and visitors alike to circulate between the two areas. Another opportunity is that the railroad right- of-way can accommodate a new light rail system, the Baylink. A station along this section of the avenue will bring people to the Promenade and serve as a link to downtown Miami and Miami Beach for neighborhood residents. NW 1st Avenue does not need to be a strong retail oriented street. A mixture of office and residential buildings are the best choice for the extra -wide roadway. Retail efforts should be focused on the core area of Overtown and the key east -west streets such as 9th, 11th, and 14th. Urban Design Solutions 1) With the current traffic pattern, northbound vehicles need to stop, turn left and cross the railroad tracks and then stop and turn right to continue north. To resolve this odd driving route, the main travel lanes of NW 1st Avenue will curve across to the western side of the railroad tracks and continue to the north. The roadway on the eastern side of the tracks should remain a two-way street. 2) Legitimize parking on the east side of NW 1st Avenue by marking on -street spaces and installing parking meters. 3) A number of changes and improvements are proposed in the Physical Plan to create a more pedestrian -friendly environment along NW 1st Avenue. Several new at - grade crossings of the railroad tracks are proposed. This will allow for safer pedestrian movement across the tracks as well as establish missing connections in the street grid. Improvements to sidewalks and the addition of street lights and shade trees along the median will provide a more enjoyable walking environment at all times of the day. 4) Taller building heights, when combined with the landscape improvements, will increase the definition of the public space on both sides of the tracks and will contribute to creating a sense of place. The natural surveillance that occurs when people can watch the Avenue through the windows of their homes or offices will make NW 1st Avenue a much safer place. 5) A parking structure in some location along NW 1st Avenue, perhaps in Overtown, will service the parking need generated by the influx of visitors and daily inhabitants to the area. Any proposed parking structures must be lined with habitable spaces (such as offices, apartments, or hotel rooms) facing the streets or avenues. NW t Avenue E. 4 .._ _E • r•f M • • #_ems • •- ti. pr 4 ei .e e�+a. ii e.i`Mfe'�4P4as`'a•• r • • F ry �._ hilt. , :E:1 parillece by the FULure bngs butt[ C 7 tr'Mr properey lip On -se reet parking through r�ut- Grade crossings at railroad right-of-way Mid-b Loc k parking gg rages recom nee Possible L1Jcar ion for plaza Proposed P rorr etude i Nr4C'' ] be between NW 7th Sr 8z 1-395 48 2 south bound and 1 non h bound travel lanes d.iuereed ro west side of tracks. Ove mown Mee rc ra d Station. Governnie or +Cente r Merrora iL .Sca Ei Frs4ry-°� • OtirthOU St 'IL fi ra a lAr • 115C rOet. v rthe�use II , Center } "' :it A �; 1 '' 1st A s e be Lweeo lst Sr .2z NW BLh. Sr i st Avenue, Iooko ng .1,JU.I.R i s E isti Hy Cor 6[ loans. The I" 11 rc 4U LI C14,... NZ. die I I d i i Y J i telAr west streets cross them_ The lack of shade, empty lots, and blank walls contribute to a hostile environment 49 i • "." -11,1 4.4411 IL , :1-14r id 1 1 11. k •111;1 11 L !silt 61 n i-71:•11: lar - Mg :,- tr . e .I. 1.,...._ ..:- ,.tr..-,, -. .-_-.: .. .. . . -. ,. • , —.1a" 6. 4 ‘ _ . 'N'N ;1st Avenuelooking south_ The right-of-wav is to be reconfiaured to accommodate liciht rail. n-street , _ .. _ _ parking, and double alleys of shade trees_ Properties fronting the street are illustrated as mixed -use buildings with housing on upper floors_ 50 lst Avenue, booking north_ hxistrng conditions_ 51 rqviii lst Avenue, looming north The ngrit-or-way can accorrrnociale on -sip -eel parking, 'gm" ran; and wider sidewalks. 52 NAN i st Avenue Section_ 53 Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • Make sure there are Credit Counseling Services available for existing Overtown residents, to help them qualify for homeownership. • Make sure there is an organization set up that can offer basic financial literacy training, job training, education and other supportive services for people with extremely low incomes that can not qualify for home ownership. • Begin talks with FEC and Miami -Dade County Public Works to change the configuration of NW 1st Avenue. This Avenue has historically been the divider between Overtown and Park West, and the redesign is needed to make it the unifier. • Support the City with the effort of revising the land development regulations, by funding the effort and/or promoting it with the community. City of Miami: The Planning Department should prepare new development regulations for properties along Biscayne Boulevard in Park West to create rules that will provide an attractive and safe pedestrian environment facing Biscayne Boulevard. 54 Overtown Civic Partnership: Continue efforts to implement public —private joint development projects. Residents in the Community. Residents should participate in programs to better prepare them to take advantage of home ownership and opportunities that arise from redevelopment. Developers: Provide residential units along NW 1" Avenue that meet the goals and principles of this redevelopment plan. Commercial Property Owners: Look for opportunities condominiums for apartments or to increase the number of patrons for the local businesses. Overtown Community Oversight Board: Continue to monitor and offer recommendations on activities. The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.: Continue the efforts to promote and preserve community's cultural heritage. Project Area B: Overtown General Boundaries: North: South: East: West: NW 14th Street NW 5th Street NW 1st Avenue NW 3rd Avenue Challenges • The historic entertainment cultural life of arts and and expression of heritage in this area needs to be regenerated. Many of the historic buildings have been demolished. • There is a need for a safe public gathering space associated with the restored and expanded Lyric Theater. • Insuring the economic viability of the Lyric Theater as the cultural anchor of Historic Overtown • Once the Lyric Theater and surrounding businesses become successful, there will be a perceived shortage of parking spaces, and new parking spaces will be needed for infill redevelopment. • Residential population has decreased in year 2000 from year 1990 according to the Federal Census, explaining the decrease in viable businesses that offer services to the residents. New Opportunities 55 The Project Area called "Overtown" is intended to be the central core of Overtown. Groups like the Overtown Civic Partnership are proactively planning to revive Overtown, creating a "destination of choice." The Lyric Plaza will be the focal public open space for cultural and entertainment activities. The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. has restored the Lyric Theater and rents it out for activities and events. The Lyric Theater will also attract business to the area from performances associated with the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami -Dade County. The CRA, the County, and the South Florida Land Trust already control significant land parcels in this vicinity, and have been assembling them for the purpose of redevelopment. The May 2002 Economic Programming Study prepared by ZHA, Inc. for all of Overtown recommends that an enticement program be created by an Action Team for Procurement. The Action Team is to be made up of commercial realtors, bankers, commercial developers, and a senior CRA staff member. Their job is to attract a tenant mix that supports the jazz, blues, and gospel entertainment venues and the supporting businesses in retail and services. The Lyric Theater serves as the cultural anchor of "Historic Overtown," and can serve to significantly enhance efforts to create a tourist destination. The long-term viability of the Lyric Theater as the cultural anchor, and future commercial retail and residential developments is critical. Keeping the theater open and active may require additional public - private partnerships. Urban Design Solutions 1) The Lyric Plaza should be surrounded on three sides by mixed -use buildings, with the fourth side being the planned addition to the theater. The ground level of these buildings should contain restaurants, bars, clubs, and shops offering unique merchandise with cultural appeal. These establishments will complement the theater -going experience and will encourage people to come early and linger after performances at the Lyric Theater and other future clubs in the area. 2) Offices and/or apartments should occupy the upper floors around the Lyric Plaza. 3) Vehicular access should be provided on the west and north sides of the Lyric Plaza, providing a drop-off location for patrons and providing access to midblock parking facilities. 4) The city blocks between NW 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue should follow the Folk Life Village Plan in character, with two to four story buildings. 5) Taller buildings should be built facing NW Pt Avenue and the Metrorail tracks. Integrated into these buildings should be garages that provide shared parking spaces to theatergoers, the businesses, residents, and visitors on NW 2nd Avenue and in the Folk Life Village area. Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • Offer land as part of public —private joint development projects, and coordinate County efforts to do the same. • Support the City with the effort of revising the land development regulations, by funding the effort and/or promoting it with the community. • Make sure there are Credit Counseling Services available for existing Overtown residents, to help them qualify for homeownership. • Make sure there is an organization set up that can offer basic financial literacy training, job training, education and other supportive services for people with extremely low incomes that can not qualify for home ownership. • Help existing and future commercial property owners attract quality tenants, 56 Action Team as described in ZHA, Inc.'s 2002 Economic Programming Study. City of Miami: Change the Land Development Regulations for Overtown, to meet the vision for this area, and examine the extension or inclusion of the area around the Lyric Theater into the City's Entertainment District, so new businesses in Overtown can receive the same incentives that businesses in parts of Park West receive. Overtown Civic Partnership: Continue efforts to implement public —private joint development projects, and help existing business owners improve the appearance of their storefronts by offering design suggestions for the facades and windows. Residents in the Community. Residents should participate in programs to better prepare them to take advantage of home ownership and opportunities that arise from redevelopment. Developers: Provide residential units in Overtown that meet the goals and principles of this Redevelopment Plan. Overtown Community Oversight Board: and national retailers, by starting the Continue to monitor and offer recommendations on activities. The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.: • Carry out the plan to expand the Lyric Theater and manage the Lyric Plaza. • Continue to maintain the Lyric Theater and rent it for events. • Continue with art and heritage exhibits showcasing African American cultural contributions at the Lyric Theater to provide a destination in Overtown. • Continue the efforts to promote the Folklife Village. • Assist in the development of complementary uses along the NW 2nd Avenue corridor. Ov e rtown 97. lin 1: tq, striet; MP- r 1.- • 7 & 31v 35 .%Q.Q.t. P. r Plk r ▪ ' • Greater Beihel • • A M.E. Church • • r ,. • • • • • * t a •- •/ r 4 4 57 e P e r —x r rt ft 0 ft IP * • * • 1117#1. oR VI Ily#41repar ✓ ▪ IF P r et f P P • elk 0 e • •• Pr ors - - 0 • P' " I I " r 05. go-V 11 ,Pr're It 0 0 it 4. -4 -*es- :LyPc Theater P rh • 0 • 0 0 0 0 -.-- • -0 - V -I 4, M Li -block parking garages recommended On -greet parking throughout ['Liza surrounded on all sideg by mixed -use buildings liStreer Pedestrian Mail opened to vehicular access Mid -black parking garage rucommended Histqfie OVtrLDwn. Folklefe (Redevelop-nen' hc-re should follow the- 1997 Master Plan prepared. for the Black Archives 1-listory & Rewarch Foundation by DPZ & Company, 1,1pclated front an earlier plan by Ron Frazier oc Associates) 99ih Street Pedestrian Mall NM. 2nd Avenue, existing conditions. The street that was once the center of Overtown's nightlife is now characterized by empty lots,veiy little activity, and commerce. The Lyric Theater stands isolated; most of the dense urban fabric that once stood along this street was demolished_ Because no buildings face the Ninth Street Pedestrian Mall along its western half, it lacks natural surveillance and feels desolate and unsafe_ 58 Historic: Lyric Theater A resurrected "Little Broadway' Entertainment District is to take shape around the Lyric Theater Plaza_ Ninth Street could once again he opened to slow -moving vehicular traffic_ Mixed -use buildings will define Ninth Street, facing the public realm with 'eyes on the street.' 59 Q S ",� f�` _ _ , _. ; •, err . �• ,��.. 1,� -- �� Overtown: This drawing b U DA illustrates intense h igh ri se development along NW1st Avenue and l etrorai t; stepping dawn to the smaller scaled buildings of vertown's Folklifie Village. 60 r - Overtown The Lyric Theater and NM 2nd Avenue. 61 to 3 411 The Folklife Village: NW 9th Street. Project Area C: NW 3rd Avenue Neighborhood Center General Boundaries: North: South: East: West: NW 22nd Street I-395 Overpass NW 1" Place NW 4th Avenue Challenges • Buildings that once opened toward the street with doors and windows have been closed up, presumably due to crime or the perception of vulnerability to crime • Neighborhood -serving retail has been reduced to a handful of bars, small markets, hair salons and barber shops, and laundromats. • The Culmer Center building is far from the street, fenced off, poorly lit at night, and the property is significantly underutilized. • Existing apartment buildings in the area are at best plain and, in many cases, aging and unattractive. New Opportunities NW 3rd Avenue could become a thriving mixed -use commercial street with businesses that better support the daily needs of both longtime residents and newcomers. New residential development, such as Village of St. Agnes, Carrie Meek Tower, and St. John 63 Village will increase the variety of housing choices and diversify the household types and incomes, and return the customers needed for the businesses. The Culmer Center could be rebuilt and expanded as an impressive street - oriented building, with a courtyard for certain outdoor activities. The corner at NW 17th Street and NW 3rd Avenue has large trees that will enhance what could be turned into a public green square. Vehicular traffic around the new green square will make it safer than the property currently appears. ZHA's 2003 Economic Programming Report supports the need for additional retail in North Overtown, especially with the 102 new units that are soon to come on the market. Urban Design Solutions 1) Use the Culmer Center property as a redevelopment site. a) The existing facility should be replaced with a new structure built at the corner of NW 17th Street and NW 4th Avenue. The new building should be oriented to the street, with an open air courtyard. b) An unfenced public green or park should be built at the corner of NW 17th Street and NW 3rd Avenue where currently there are large trees. The front entrance of the new Culmer Center should face the new green square. c) The remaining portion of the Culmer Center property along NW 3rd Avenue should be redeveloped as 2- to 4-story flexible -use buildings, oriented toward the street like those on the east side of NW 3rd Avenue. d) The remaining portion of the Culmer Center Property along NE 4th Avenue should be redeveloped for residential or office uses. Live/work combinations should be encouraged. 2) Properties on the eastern side of NW 3rd Avenue should be refurbished or redeveloped into 2- to 4-story mixed -use buildings. Windows and doors must face NW 3rd Avenue to make walking along the sidewalk safe and worthwhile. 3) Implement the Trust for Public Land's Overtown Greenway Plan (the portions for North Overtown, in particular). NE/NW 14th Street is the main pedestrian connection into the Omni Area. 4) Sidewalks should be repaired where broken and trees planted where there are gaps. This segment of NW 3rd Avenue currently has a nice mature street tree canopy that should be retained during any future streetscape project. Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • Make sure there are Credit Counseling Services available for existing Overtown residents, to help them qualify for homeownership. • Make sure there is an organization set up that can offer basic financial literacy training, job training, education and other supportive services for people with extremely low incomes that can not qualify for home ownership. • Initiate a streetscape improvement project for North Overtown. • Help attract new businesses to NW 3rd Avenue in anticipation of new residents moving into Village of St. Agnes, Carrie Meek Tower, and St. John Village, making those businesses more viable than with the current population. • Provide assistance perhaps through a facade improvement program or rehabilitation grant or loan program for existing commercial building/business owners to upgrade the existing stores on NW 3rd Avenue. • Request the County to redevelop the Culmer Center, or seek a third party to enter into a joint venture with the County. 64 City of Miami: Assist with streetscape improvements for North Overtown, and request the County to redevelop the Culmer Center. Overtown Civic Partnership: • Request the County to redevelop the Culmer, or seek a third party to enter into a joint venture with the County. • Focus efforts on West Overtown in a similar manner to that of the core of Overtown. Residents in the Community. Residents should participate in programs to better prepare them to take advantage of home ownership and opportunities that arise from redevelopment. Developers: Continue to provide more residential units in North Overtown that meet the goals and principles of this redevelopment plan. Commercial Property Owners: Make improvements to buildings, and look for opportunities for apartments or condominiums to increase the number of patrons for the local businesses. Overtown Community Oversight Board: Continue to monitor and offer recommendations to activities in North Overtown. The Black Archives, History &Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.: Continue the efforts to promote and preserve the cultural heritage of the community. Community Churches: • Evaluate your building and grounds to see if changes can be made to the appearance to help beautify NW 3rd Avenue. • Study the possibility of developing excess church property for housing or commercial uses. • Host or sponsor community events to attract tourists or visitors to Overtown. NW 3rd Avenue Neighborhood Center r l'itt ▪ • • r • - , • t 4. • et St kin& ; • . . . . law ........ Build . Ei:Ksc.c.pandrcnings built [o fronc property [toe fp.. I ..-----r- r...„.0 ; P f Nam " Par P.' ta, • e 1441 4117Ical rFa4.°1 IA it Pr -11ILle:4„ Nevi' -- ▪ Noffel • 01 C c„hmec CnteT•• p park. is NW' if* P• P. PP,* th f f .r. • gm&•if 4, • 3 ;:rcni i5S, CAA apt,-..1 ondre. a e 4 L 41*— ro. VIN 1 qtrt 104.0 t P-: • !••,' ,r- 65 Affrattiar " 10 • • Palk IP , I- 39 5 , Redeveloped Cuirtier Center property Mixed -use buildings located along avenue Rear lanes provide access m parking behind buildings NyThird Avenue; Culver bquare. uuirner Square is TO be reconfigured as a public green space surrounded by resi- dences, commercial enterprises, and civic institutions. 66 Project Area D: Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor General Boundaries: North: South: East: West: I-395 Overpass NW 8th Street properties that face NW 3rd Avenue properties that face NW 3rd Avenue On June 9th, 1998, the Miami City Commission, by Resolution No. R-98-592, designated NW 3rd Avenue from approximately NW 8th Street to approximately NW 14th Street, and NW 8th Street from NW 2nd Avenue to NW 3rd Avenue, as the Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor. This general designation gave the CRA the ability to start planning activities, to assist the overall commercial revitalization of Overtown. Challenges • More buildings require renovation. • The community has criticized the construction of parking lots, because they appear to remain empty and decrease the sense of a built-up neighborhood. • The street has many churches, each needing additional parking during church events and funerals that occur on days other than Sundays. These events further reduce the parking availability for business patrons. 67 • There is a lack of shade for pedestrians. • Sidewalks are narrower than those for typical main streets, making it less comfortable for shoppers and other pedestrians. New Opportunities The potential for a thriving NW 3rd Avenue has not been lost. The segment near NW 8th Street is quite visible for people getting on I-95, and it is somewhat visible for northbound motorists on I-95. More noticeable improvements between NW 8th and NW 10th Streets will attract people to stop there who might otherwise pass by, or who might be interested enough by a passing glance to want to return when they have more time. Urban Design Solutions 1) Do not build any more parking lots until the demand for the area increases to the point where there is a real parking problem. The project entitled Planning and Development of Parking Facilities for the Historic Priority Business Corridor, should be considered complete until more parking is needed in the Priority Business Corridor. The surface parking lots constructed by the CRA were intended to be an interim use. The CRA is interested in development proposals for those properties, provided parking is included that is also accessible for existing neighborhing buildings. 2) Shade for pedestrians is urgently needed. This can be accomplished by planting trees between the on -street parking spaces, or with awnings, canopies, roof overhangs, balconies, colonnades, or arcades attached to the buildings. 3) Vehicular travel lanes should be narrowed so that the extra space can be added to the sidewalk width. On -street parking must remain in any future streetscape project, to help the businesses along the street, and to add a safety barrier between the moving cars and the pedestrians. 4) Landscaping along the embankments of the Interstate Highways and the Metrorail should be continued. 5) Improve the appearance of Church - owned parking lots. These are mostly empty except during Sunday services and other events and they could be landscaped better. Better yet, develop new buildings to house church programs, community outreach services, subsidized housing or for generating revenue through renting and leasing. Any new buildings will likely have to include parking structures, and minimize the view to parking from NW 3rd Avenue. Implementation Strategies The 1998 Study for the Historic Overtown NW 3rd Avenue Priority Business Corridor recommended that an economic study was needed, that a business capacity and identification program be created, and a "theme" be adopted. The May 2002 Economic Programming Study, prepared by ZHA, Inc. for all of Overtown, estimates the magnitude of commercial and residential development that Overtown can sustain. It recommends that an enticement program be created by an Action Team for Procurement. The Action Team is to be made up of commercial realtors, bankers, commercial developers, and a senior CRA staff member. Their job is to attract a tenant mix that supports the jazz, blues, and gospel entertainment venues and the supporting businesses in retail and services. The study suggests that the success of future residential development is dependant upon the success of the commercial uses. This action team will have to work on the Priority Commercial Corridor in a coordinated manner with entertainment district intended for Overtown. A "theme" is not so important, but positioning the Overtown neighborhood properly in an advertising and marketing campaign will be important to its success. 68 Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • Continue to plan and coordinate improvements for this Project Area. • Coordinate efforts with the Overtown Civic Partnership. • Help existing and new commercial property owners attract quality tenants, and national retailers, by starting the Action Team as described in ZHA's 2003 Economic Programming Study. • Make sure there is an organization set up that can offer basic financial literacy training, job training, education and other supportive services for people with extremely low incomes that can not qualify for home ownership. City of Miami: Examine current land development regulations for the possibility of revisions, and upgrade the appearance and facilities at Athalie Range #1 Mini Park. Overtown Civic Partnership: Continue development efforts for this area. Residents in the Community. • Patronize the businesses on NW 3rd Avenue. • Residents should participate in programs to better prepare them to take advantage of home ownership and opportunities that arise from redevelopment. • Appeal to FDOT and the City of Miami to renovate Athalie Range #1 Mini Park consistent with the goals to revitalize Overtown. Commercial Property Owners and Developers: Continue making improvements, and look for opportunities for apartments or condominiums to increase the number of patrons for the local businesses. Overtown Community Oversight Board: Pay close attention to NW 3rd Avenue while focusing on the Overtown efforts. Look for actions that can benefit NW 3rd Avenue. The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.: • Continue the efforts to promote the Folklife Village. • Continue efforts to secure funding and organize businesses consistent with the Main Street Program that the Foundation currently oversees. • Continue to work jointly with the Overtown Civic Partnership towards improvements in the neighborhood. Community Churches: • Evaluate your building and grounds to see if changes can be made to the appearance to help beautify NW 3rd Avenue. • Study the possibility of developing excess church property and surface parking lots for housing or commercial uses. • Host or sponsor community events to attract tourists or visitors to Overtown. 69 Project Area E: West Overtown General Boundaries: North: South: East: West: NW 11th Street NW 7th Street I-95 NW 7th Avenue Challenges • Streets were closed off near Reeves Park, and in turn, create large blocks, referred to as "superblocks." These sometimes are difficult for pedestrians to cross, and make motorists drive farther, consuming time and expensive fuel. • Boarded up buildings greet motorists entering Downtown from the I-95 ramp that becomes NW 3rd Court. • The two blocks of neighborhood serving retail blocks on NW 5th Avenue might be difficult to revive in the near term. New Opportunities The location of this area between downtown and the Miami River will become desirable as a neighborhood in which to live once the amenities functional. apartments and neighborhood become more attractive and ZHA's 2003 Economic Programming Report supports the need for residential units in West Overtown. The one-way streets in this neighborhood could be returned to two-way, shortening car 70 trips and removing confusion for motorists. Apartments could be quite desirable facing all four sides of Reeves Park. Opening up the superblock so that streets will surround all four sides of Reeves Park will make the park appear to be safer. West Overtown does have industrial uses along NW 7th Avenue. Those that are compatible to the neighborhood should not be discouraged. Special attention will need to be given to the transition from industrial to residential uses. These businesses provide jobs for local residents at wage levels higher than retail jobs and likely high enough to support a family. Urban Design Solutions 1) To break up the superblocks, former streets will need to be restored, especially the superblock bordered by NW 8th Street and NW 10th Street between NW 5th Avenue and NW 7th Avenue. 2) Apartment buildings must vary in form and color to enhance the visual appearance of the neighborhood. 3) The fronts of new apartment buildings facing Reeves Park shall have their front doors facing the Park. 4) Neighborhood serving commercial land uses shall be encouraged on NW 5th Avenue between NW 7th Street and NW 10th Street, except on the Reeves Park property. 5) Provide on -street parking, especially near neighborhood serving commercial buildings and around Reeves Park. 6) Implement the Trust for Public Land's Overtown Greenway from the Miami River to Overtown. Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • Help the Trust for Public Land implement their Overtown Greenway. • Make sure there are Credit Counseling Services available for existing Overtown residents, to help them qualify for homeownership. • Make sure there is an organization set up that can offer basic financial literacy training, job training, education and other supportive services for people with extremely low incomes that can not qualify for home ownership. • Help promote neighborhood serving retail for West Overtown in a similar manner to Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor. • Encourage the City to change the one-way streets in West Overtown back to two- way streets. • Assist residential developers to provide additional quality housing in West Overtown. • Help existing and future commercial property owners attract quality tenants, and national retailers, by starting the Action Team as described in ZHA's 2003 Economic Programming Study City of Miami: • The Public Works Department should turn the one-way streets to two-way streets which is recommended for Overtown and Park West in the Downtown Transportation Master Plan. • Contribute to changes to Reeves Park as new development opportunities arise on surrounding properties. • Upgrade the appearance and facilities at Athalie Range #1 Mini Park. • Encourage buildings that face Reeves Park and Athalie Range #1 Mini Park to provide natural surveillance of the parks and provide incentives for creative architectural designs that blend residential buildings with the culture of the neighborhood. Overtown Civic Partnership: Focus efforts on West Overtown in a similar manner to that of the core of Overtown. Developers: Continue to provide more residential units in West Overtown that meet 71 the goals and principles of this Redevelopment Plan. Residents in the Community. • Residents should participate in programs to better prepare them to take advantage of home ownership and opportunities that arise from redevelopment. • Appeal to FDOT and the City of Miami to renovate Athalie Range #1 Mini Park in accordance with the goals to revitalize Overtown. Commercial Property Owners: Make improvements to buildings as necessary, and paint or clean building facades on a frequent basis. Overtown Community Oversight Board: Continue to recommendations to activities in West Overtown. monitor and offer The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.: Continue the efforts to promote and preserve the cultural heritage of the community. West 0 v rtown Streets added to divide "superb lock" 104 Rear lanes provide access to parking behind buildings 72 M1m . r PRP :, wry .Nyl,Yn Si[ect• eff Residences facing onto the park 1J W0 8 11L StM i I a Q r * I I I 3E7- f tlltr cct I—f¢`' { On -street pa( LLing throughout — I•sf. r � • *� a y k L e L a Restored 5thAvensue Buildings built to Neighborhood Main .Streee front property line Reeves Park, existing conditions: Apartment buildings are set back far from the street. There are few win- dows and doors facing the park, depriving it of natural surveillance_ 73 Reeves ram, inn the future_ Apartment buildings are rebuilt closer to the street with doors end windows facing the park. Low -slung buildings are to be replaced with apartments of more vertical proportions. 74 Project Area F: Properties Facing Biscayne Boulevard General Boundaries: North: I-395 South: NE 5th Street East: Biscayne Boulevard West: NE 2nd Avenue Challenges • Most properties facing Bicentennial Park remain vacant and only used for parking for events at the American Airlines Arena. However, ownership has changed, which may signal that change is not too far off. • Zoning regulations for buildings fronting Bicentennial Park do not necessarily promote street -oriented buildings. • Biscayne Boulevard is difficult to cross with the fast-moving traffic and the large number of travel lanes. There are very few marked crosswalks. New Opportunities Requiring buildings to be sited on the front property line or a designated "build -to" line will allow Biscayne Boulevard to develop into an urban street befitting its location and history. Building envelope controls should prevent new buildings from blocking air flow and light from existing buildings behind them, to optimize air quality. Awnings, colonnades, and balconies must 75 provide needed protection from the elements for passing pedestrians. These sheltered locations will also provide opportunities for outdoor dining along Biscayne Boulevard, contributing to Miami's warm -weather lifestyle. Parking garages lined with habitable spaces facing the streets will help satisfy the parking needs of the new Biscayne Boulevard buildings. The habitable space lining the garages will give these utilitarian structures an urban face toward the public spaces of the streets and Park. Urban Design Solutions 1) The primary solutions to the challenges faced by Biscayne Boulevard buildings will be found in changes to the zoning code. These code changes must address such issues as building placement, awnings, and colonnades, among others. The Biscayne Boulevard Special Area Plan details these recommended changes. 2) More control is to be exercised over the building envelope, allowing buildings to interact more sensitively with prevailing breezes and improve air quality. A twelve story building base requirement should be instituted to create a more unified "street wall" and improve the spatial enclosure along Biscayne Boulevard and Bicentennial Park. 3) Additional pedestrian crossings are to be located along Biscayne Boulevard to increase pedestrian safety and mobility. 4) With the two new museums planned for Bicentennial Park, their parking demands should be met offsite, on the west side of Biscayne Boulevard. By making the motorists park west of Biscayne and walk down the streets and across the Boulevard, merchants gain better visibility, and the pedestrian traffic makes the streets safer, just by their presence. Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • Support the City with the effort of revising the land development regulations, by funding the effort and/or promoting it with the community. • Until such time as the new land development regulations are in place, facilitate meetings with property owners prior to the completion of their construction documents and approvals to show them the intentions of the new regulations. City of Miami: • Help the CRA implement a shared parking garage to serve the Museums and Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami -Dade County on the west side of Biscayne Boulevard. • The Planning and Zoning Departments should prepare new development regulations for properties along Biscayne Boulevard in Park West to create rules that will provide an attractive, comfortable, and safe pedestrian environment facing Biscayne Boulevard. Commercial Property Owners and Developers: • Every floor facing Biscayne Boulevard should have habitable and useable space. Parking garages on lower floors should have "liners" of habitable space. Drop- offs may occur in the on -street parking lane, should FDOT create a parking lane in its new design for the roadway. • Primary entrances should face Biscayne Boulevard. • Vehicular entrances to garages and delivery bays should occur on NE 2nd Avenue, but not on Biscayne Boulevard. 76 Biscayne Boulevard 132 libwripe4 ricra j,395 _ dam_ til Promenade • .�*:.... �u..M1 P trier 1 le] Museum patrons roust park west of Biscayne Boulevard Pedestrian crossings added to Biscayne Boulevard - Towers rise up from the "'base Parking garage in "base" - (within dashed recffirrgle) Buildings 'built to property lines as a "base" of fi W 8 slurics American Airlines Arena Fr Tower SC4JTiEAST crERTOW N !PARK WEST MASTEN SRAM • ,•••• ••• 1-• Properties facing Biscayne Boulevard are to be developed with nixed -use buildings. Residences and offices are locat- ed above shops and restaurants. A redesigned Biscayne Boulevard incorporates light rail, trees: and wide sidewalks 77 Project Area G: The Promenade General Boundaries: North: South: East: West: NE/NW 11th Street NE/NW 10th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 1" Avenue Challenges • Unused railroad right-of-way that has become an unsightly alley. • Nondescript, windowless buildings lining the right-of-way, contributing to a bleak atmosphere. • The current physical conditions provide hiding locations for wrong -doers and the homeless. • Rapid success of the Entertainment District has resulted in peak times for parking and traffic congestion. • Businesses open during daylight hours are few, causing the area to look empty and abandoned during the day. New Opportunities The Promenade holds the promise of a great location for a vibrant entertainment district and setting for an urban lifestyle in Miami It will be a pedestrian link between Overtown, Biscayne Boulevard, and the new museums in Bicentennial Park, activated by nightclubs and restaurants at night and locally serving businesses during the day. New residents will 78 be some of the patrons supporting the local economy. The parking needs of these patrons will be accommodated in a lined parking structure adjacent to NW 1st Avenue. New mid -block plazas that will be created along the Promenade will function as public gathering spaces for the clubs that have recently been relocating to the Promenade. Most successful commercial districts have anchors to draw patrons. The Promenade will have on its eastern edge a renovated Bicentennial Park (future Museum Park), with two new museums, the Miami Art Museum (MAM), and the Miami Museum of Science. At the western end of the Promenade, along NW 1" Avenue, a significant anchor has not yet been identified. . This anchor should attract people to the neighborhood during daylight hours, as well as at night. Terraces, whether part of new buildings or added to the existing buildings, will provide space for outdoor dining at ground level and above, improving the "outdoor" lifestyle that Miami's weather allows. Urban Design Solutions 1) Examine and modify, if necessary, zoning regulations to encourage new multi -story mixed -use buildings and parking garages. The requirement of windows, doors, and terraces to the existing buildings along the Promenade will contribute to the natural surveillance of the space making the environment safer. New regulations could add incentives additional parking for civic buildings such as the Center for the Performing Arts, the two arenas, and the future museums in Bicentennial Park. 2) Design a construction plan that will detail the approach to lighting, signage, and new pavement in an effort to encourage business activity and make the area safer. This could be implemented on a block by block basis as funds permit. 3) Modify the boundaries of the City's Entertainment District to include just the properties that face NE/NW 11th Street and NE/NW 10th Street from Biscayne Blvd on the east to NW 1st Avenue on the west (including both sides of NW 1th Avenue). 4) Review the Promenade Special Area Plan for more design concepts and strategies. Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • Fund and implement improvements to the former railroad now known as the Promenade. These improvements should include, but not be limited to, re -surfacing pavement, landscaping, increased lighting, and painting. Acquiring the services of engineers or landscape architects may be required. • Coordinate and help facilitate in some manner, an air conditioned garbage location accessible by all the businesses along the Promenade. This could be constructed as part of a new building or by renovating an existing one. Management of this facility should be taken on by one of the building managers for collecting fees, for example. • Support the City with the effort of revising the land development regulations, by funding the effort and/or promoting it with the community. City of Miami: • Work with the CRA if necessary to implement the shared garbage facility. The City should not be responsible for the management of this facility. • The Planning Department should prepare new development regulations for properties with C-1 zoning in Park West, to allow an increase in development opportunity. • Support the creation of a zoning ordinance that allows outdoor dining for the Promenade. • Examine the modification of the boundaries for the City's Entertainment District. Interest appears to be focused on the 11th Street area. The southern 79 portion of the boundaries should be removed. The boundaries can be extended to the west to include portions of Overtown. The area around the Lyric Theater should be included. • Continue to provide police support for the Redevelopment Area. • Solve the homeless situation in the area and assist Charities Unlimited in the relocation and/or upgrade of its Camillus House facility. • Assist in the infrastructure installation for the area, particularly the wiring of fiber optics. Overtown Civic Partnership: Seek opportunities for the positive effects of the Entertainment District to "spill" over into Overtown Commercial Property Owners and Developers: • When renovating existing structures or building new ones orient patio entrances, outdoor dining, or entertainment spaces to the Promenade. • Enclose unsightly rear building items, such as electrical meters, back flow, preventers, etc. • Place mechanical equipment on roofs to keep the Promenade free of the noise and unsightliness. • Work with the CRA or City to create a shared garbage facility. Promenade Possible location for plaza Example location for Media Tower 80 On -street parking throughout Par* Pace B Possible location for lined parking garage Possible location for Buildings have entrances and Pedestrian passages should. occur where possible Porter railroad right-of-way re -open ed for pedestrian access CO Bicentennial Park Alley between 10th and 11th Stree: ,: Existing conditions_ 81 The Promenade: The first round of improvements include uniform paving material; lighting, and initial facade treatments. The Promenade, over time: New buildings will be added and addition- al properties transformed_ Signs can be changed frequently_ The Promenade: Mid -black paseos will provide alternative routes for pedestrians, increase retail frontage, and become community gathering spots_ .A small piazza is envisioned with outdoor dining, kiosks, and a fountain. 84 The Promenade: Canopies and arcades will shade those who are dining and walking along the Promenade: extending the potential hours of operation to include daytime_ 85 The upper floors of buildings may project over the storefronts. 86 Project Area H: NE 8t'' Street/ Miami WorldCenter General Boundaries: North: NE 10th Street South: NE 6th Street East: Biscayne Boulevard West: N Miami Avenue Challenges: Despite the location, properties are somewhat separated from the neighboring downtown. Barriers include the elevated Metromover tracks on 5th Street and the FEC railroad Streets. because right-of-way between 6th and 7th 7th Street is not a through -street, it is blocked by the former Miami Arena site. New Opportunities Recently various property owners in this area have organized a collective effort to coordinate future development across multiple City blocks. They can do this with flexibility if the City designates a zoning district that would allow transferring certain zoning requirements and entitlements from one block to another within the district. This flexibility will allow opportunities for a grocery store, additional commercial anchor stores, and better configurations for parking structures since some of the blocks are very small for garage. ZHA, Inc. identified in its 2003 report to the CRA that there is potential in setting up 87 and attracting a new business market in preventative medical care to Park West, generally supported by people with greater means, spending more than 19 billion dollars nationally each year. These medical related uses are not necessarily required for the 8th Street Spine but are offered here as a unique market potential for the area. Preventative medical care includes health maintenance tests and scans to make sure that customers are healthy and for early diagnosis of possible health problems. Tests may include EKG (resting and treadmill), visual acuity testing, audiogram, chest x-ray, spirometry, non-invasive colonoscopy, blood workup, body composition, and nutrition counseling. Customers will have access to over 100 specialists and may receive additional diagnostic tests such as calcium -score heart scan, CT lung scans, total body scan of the heart, lungs and abdomen/pelvis, ultrasound for carotid arteries, dental examination, skin exams, and cosmetic surgery consultations. Mingled with the medical services are holistic services that include traditional therapeutic massages, facials and body treatments, and energy healing (Tai Chi, Yoga and meditation classes, hands-on healing). Urban Design Solutions The success of this project depends on the creation of a district of various buildings and businesses catering to the preventative medical market and to typical residential and commercial markets. The physical form of this district will not vary from the urban form for Park West described elsewhere in this plan. Current property owners should be interested in this idea, because if successful, it will provide demands for leaseable space or land/building purchases in a unique market for South Florida. If this is slow to implement, conventional market demands can provide tenants. As in the Promenade Area and elsewhere, the zoning regulations need to be examined and modified, if necessary, throughout Park West to encourage new multi -story mixed -use buildings and parking garages. The requirement of windows, doors, and terraces to the existing buildings along streets will contribute to the natural surveillance making the environment safer. New regulations could: • increase the FAR and density limits, or eliminating them all together. • have separate FAR requirements for each use as an incentive to get mixed used buildings. • allow for transfer of development potential from one property or block to another. • add flexibility to setbacks and increased greenway setbacks on certain streets connecting major public facilities; • swapping public and privately owned land to move public rights -of -way from their existing locations to new ones. For example, 7th Street could be swapped for land next to 8t' Street to make a larger right-of-way that could include a significant green way between the two arenas. • include a streamlined the regulatory process and increase MUSP thresholds. Stakeholders' Roles for Redevelopment CRA: • The CRA must first approach the hospitals and confirm ZHA's solicitation of the hospital's interest and the understanding this is a hospital -related real estate venture as part of the regionalization of medical/health services. • Set up a long range planning committee devoted to finding a workable manner to construct and recruit tenancy for the complex. See ZHA's 2003 report for more details regarding this committee. • Support the City with the effort of revising the land development regulations, by funding the effort and/or promoting it with the community. 88 City of Miami: • Economic Development Initiatives: validate the economic viability of preventative medical uses and make recommendations to the CRA board whether to pursue this project. • Planning Department prepare new development regulations for properties in Park West, to allow an increase in development opportunity. Commercial Property Owners and Developers: • Collaborate with the CRA to get this project started. Volunteer to participate on the planning committee devoted to designing a coordinated effort and for recruiting and setting up the potential preventative medical care market. • Leasing agents may want to assist with meeting with the hospitals and doctors. Miami WorldCenter Envisioned as "a dynamic urban core of diversity and excitement," Miami WorldCenter proposed to be a "blend of exceptional retail, restaurant, entertainment, hotel, residential, and commercial offerings in one unique location with up to 20 million square feet of buildable area across nearly 30 acres of prime real estate." Project Area I: Camillus House/UM Research District General Boundaries: North: South: East: West: NW 20th Street NW 15th Street I-95 NW 7th Avenue Camillus House's new home on a 3.1-acre lot adjacent to the intersection of US95 and 836. The seven -building center will provide a "safe - haven" and services for up to 4,500 persons each year who are homeless and in need of food, shelter, medical attention and job training. The new center will be built following the latest "green" construction guidelines, which will provide Camillus House with a significant reduction in operational costs. The center, which is located in Miami's health district, an area surrounded by other well - established medical, research and community service buildings, includes a central courtyard and a total of 340 beds including emergency shelter beds, rehabilitation and treatment beds, 80 permanent housing units and 64 beds for individuals in job training programs. 89 Project Area J: Townpark Ownership District General Boundaries: North: South: East: NE 20th Street NW 16th Street NW 4th Avenue West: I-95 Townpark Village is a cooperative housing development by HUD for low income families. Built in 1972, these 2 and 3-story homes consist of 2, 3, and 4 bedroom units. Homeownership has been a major theme to encourage redevelopment in the Overtown community and these residents have decided to transition from co -ownership with HUD to private homeowners. Projects and Strategies: The Projects and Programs for the CRA are organized into the following headings: I. Community Heritage and Historic Preservation II. Promotion and Enhancement of Overtown and Park West as a Business and Investment Location III. Planning, Development, Technical Assistance and Program Compliance IV. Street Improvements, Utility Infrastructure and Transportation V. Home Ownership Pre -Qualification and Counseling Program VI. Grants to Existing Business Program VII.Laredo/Re-Use Plan (CLUC 90 Properties) Program The ordering and numbering of these projects are not intended to reflect a prioritization. The programs and programs identified here should change over time as projects are completed and new projects become important. Each of the projects and programs has underneath them check marks that illustrate which of the goals set forth in Section 2 above they are supporting. I. Community Heritage and Historic Preservation 90 1. Renovation of Historically Significant Buildings ✓ # 1-#6 supports all of the goals Overtown The CRA proposes to build on the historic character of the area by preserving and revitalizing historically significant structures in the Redevelopment Area. Projects will be implemented following the completion of the designation of the significant historic structures for rehabilitation. The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.'s Master Plan identifies the following objectives as a guide in the redevelopment process: • Effectively communicate information and develop broad based awareness and appreciation of historic achievements of the African -American community through exhibits, special events, tours, and the media. • Develop a magnet area within the target community for the purposes of: (1) re- establishing a special identity for Culmer- Overtown by focusing one era in its history, the "Little Broadway" jazz era; (2) to establish interest in the Afro -Caribbean heritage by encouraging tourism, trade and cultural exchanges. Develop these themes to attract night clubs and restaurants; programming special cultural events, designing signs, street furniture and public plaza spaces; and creating promotional literature for tourism and local marketing. • Preserve, where feasible, surviving buildings which represent important links to persons, activities or events of major significance in the past. • Encourage new development to incorporate uses which would contribute to the vitality of the district such as stores, nightclubs, restaurants, theaters. • Encourage new buildings to incorporate selected design elements from the past which reflect special cultural or thematic feelings which are relevant today and should be re-established. Consideration will be given to the preservation of all of the identified historic buildings, wherever structural conditions and cost of rehabilitation might be favorable. However, recognizing that overall economic revitalization plans for Overtown require extensive new development, emphasis should be placed on preservation of the following historic structures, which are considered to be of major importance, located within the Redevelopment Area: Churches • Greater Bethel A.M.E. Church, 245 NW 8th Street • Mt. Zion Baptist Church, 301 NW 9th Street • Building which was formerly the Lyric Church, NW 2nd Avenue and 8th Street, and the adjacent building • Ebenezer Methodist Church, 1042 NW 3rd Avenue • St. John's Baptist Church, 1328 NW 3rd Avenue • St. Agnes Episcopal Church, 1750 NW 3rd Avenue Businesses • X-Ray Clinic, 171 NW 9th Street • Stirrup Building, the corner of NW 8th Street and 3rd Avenue • Longshoreman's Hall, NW 2nd Avenue and NW 8th Street • Stewart -Scott Building, NW 2nd Avenue and NW 10th Street • Dr. Davis' Office Building, NW 2nd Avenue and NW 10th Street • Judge L. E. Thomas' Office NW 2nd Avenue and NW 10th Street • Ward Rooming House, NW 9th Street and NW 2nd Court • Clyde Killens' residence & business, corner, NW 2nd Avenue and NW 11th 91 Street • Lyric Theatre, 819 NW 2nd Avenue • Clyde Killens' Recreation Hall, NW 2nd Avenue and NW 10th Street Public Buildings • Black Police Precinct and Courthouse, 1009 NW 5th Avenue • Dorsey Library, 100 NW 17th Street Residences • Dorsey House, 250 NW 9th Street • Killens House, corner, NW 2nd Avenue and NW 11th Street The City of Miami, in conjunction with the Black Police Benevolent Association, completely rehabilitated the former Police Precinct located at 5th Avenue and 11th Street in Overtown. The building hard been vacant since 1990's and was renovated to be used as a Black Police Museum. In addition, the facility was designed and equipped to promote cultural activities for and within the Overtown community Possible preservation strategies must be studied for each of the above buildings individually. Among the factors to be considered are: ownership, need for repairs, economic productivity, potential for new uses, eligibility for federal tax benefits, location and relationship to planned redevelopment sites, potential for moving to a new site, potential sources of funding. Buildings to be of first priority concern because of imminent threats of demolition, deterioration or vandalism include: • Stirrup Building • Stewart -Scott Building • Thomas Building • Ward Rooming House (only front remains with temporary structural support) • X-Ray Clinic Buildings that should be considered for reconstruction (due to previous demolition or neglect) include: • Ward Rooming House • Cola Nip Building, formerly at 233-5 NW 9th Street • Divine Mission Building • Brown House Park West Older structures located in Park West that have historic and cultural significance to the overall Miami Community should be preserved when economically feasible. Special attention will be given to the Freedom Tower. Properties of major architectural, historical and/or contextual significance include: • 500 NE 1st Avenue, Central Baptist Church • 505 NE 2nd Avenue • 521 NE 2nd Avenue • 545 NE 2nd Avenue, Valencia (Gibson) Hotel • 135 NE 5th Street • 49 NE 5th Street, Salvation Army Citadel • 600 Biscayne Blvd., Freedom Tower These buildings reflect the wide variety of architectural styles common to Miami, particularly Mediterranean Revival and frame and masonry vernacular structures. Two of the buildings, however, are examples of styles unusual to Miami- Venetian Gothic (Salvation Army Citadel) and Neo-Palladian (Central Baptist Church). The preservation of these structures should be included in any redevelopment project. 2. Historic Designation • # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage The City of Miami's Planning and Zoning Departments have evaluated Overtown and Park West as a possible historic district and have determined that it is not eligible. However, significant buildings have been 92 designated Historic or listed in the National Register for Historic Places, or both, through the efforts of the Planning and Zoning Departments. The following properties have been designated by the City of Miami as historic sites: • Dorsey House, 250 NW 9th Street • X-Ray Clinic, 171 NW 9th Street • Chapman House, 526 NW 13th Street • Cola Nip Building, 233-5 NW 9th Street, building demolished • Lyric Theatre, 819 NW 2nd Avenue • St. John's Baptist Church, 1328 NW 3rd Avenue • Ebenezer Methodist Church, 1042 NW 3rd Avenue • Mt. Zion Baptist Church, 301 NW 9th Street • Greater Bethel A.M.E. Church, 245 NW 8th Street • St. Agnes Episcopal Church, 1750 NW 3rd Avenue • Black Police Precinct and Courthouse, 1009 NW 5th Avenue • Dorsey Library, 100 NW 17th Street The properties listed above as historic sites may utilize the Historic Preservation "HP" Zoning Overlay District permits, that provide certain modification to zoning and building code regulations where necessary to make preservation architecturally feasible. economically or The following properties have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places: • Dorsey House, 250 NW 9th Street • X-Ray Clinic, 171 NW 9th Street • Cola Nip Building, 233-5 NW 9th Street, building demolished • St. John's Baptist Church, 1328 NW 3rd Avenue • Mt. Zion Baptist Church, 301 NW 9th Street • Greater Bethel A.M.E. Church, 245 NW 8th Street There may come a time when more structures will become eliigible. Should that occur, the CRA will work with The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. and the City of Miami to further designate properties of historic value in the community. 3. Promote and/or Organize Activities and Events That Recreate the Former Vitality and Atmosphere of the Community ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community An African-American/Caribbean theme is recommended to recreate the feeling and atmosphere of "Historic Overtown". The establishment of an annual Historic Overtown Cultural Arts Festival reminiscent of the jazz era will provide the setting for jazz concerts to be held within the proposed district. The establishment of an international cultural complex featuring activities reminiscent of the nineteen thirties, forties, and fifties will provide artists with the opportunity to receive training as well as to perform in concert. Events that would aid in attracting people into the community include a national oratorical competition, hair styling contests, tennis tournaments and other sporting events, culinary contests specializing in soul food from the Caribbean and Southern States, and the establishment of a hall of fame with annual recognition of national figures. Families from all over the world will be encouraged to hold annual family reunions in Miami -Dade County, particularly in the Historic Overtown district. The establishment of specialty shops which feature products of Africa, the Caribbean and the Southern States including restaurants, caterers, photographer's studios specializing in passports, bookstores and art galleries would help attract visitors to the area. 93 A "Saturday Marketplace" where vendors are allowed to set up in a designated street block or public plaza, featuring ethnic foods, crafts, fresh produce, artwork, a VIP Convention Center for local organizations with national and international chapters, and a permanent center to exhibit ongoing collections unique to the black experience would also increase the number of visitors to the area throughout the year. 4. Provide Incentives for Revitalization in "Historic Overtown" ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #3 Housing: Infall, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability ✓ #4 Job Creation ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Incentives or requirements may be provided to attract retail stores at the ground level on selected commercial blocks, and to attract jazz clubs, permit -controlled street vendors, and outdoor markets. Special zoning incentives in the HP Overlay Ordinance may be used for the preservation of existing historic structures. Design guidelines for new construction that would encourage selected elements of historic building forms to be incorporated into the design of new buildings should be considered. 5. Establish a First -Class Residential Village Containing a Cluster of Restored Buildings — The Folklife Vill ✓ # 1-#6age. supports all of the goals The placement of distinctive street furniture wherever redevelopment plans call for new improvements to sidewalks and plaza spaces such as paving, benches, signs, trash cans, landscaping, etc., and the development of landscaping standards utilizing historical and thematic plant materials can aid in achieving this goal. Public plaza, street, sidewalk and park improvements should be designed to accommodate the special cultural events the area will attract. As a complement to the Historic Folk Life Village Master Pan, the CRA shall promote public private partnerships including partnerships with non-profit organization and/or development entities located and operating within "Historic Overtown" to develop the first-class residential village in a manner consistent with "Historic Overtown". 5a. Provide Planning, Coordination, and Technical Assistance to the Historic Folklife Village Development The Historic Folklife Village is Dade County's proposed African American heritage tourist destination. Plans were proposed in 1997 and 1998 to guide the redevelopment of the tourist site by emphasizing reestablishment of mixed uses. The CRA will assist The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. in providing a detailed survey, a complete economic and functional evaluation of all the land uses and proposed development within the Historic Folklife Village, and initiate any environmental assessments in order to assist in the efforts of developing the area. 5b. Technical Assistance to Historic Lyric Theater Redevelopment The Lyric Theater is a performing arts theater that was the center of local nightlife in its heyday. Located at NW 2nd Ave. and NW 8th St., it is currently under renovation by The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. Their primary objective is to 94 use the theater as a venue for cultural programming, community meeting facilities and an anchor for the Historic Overtown Folklife Village. The CRA will assist in The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc.'s on -going efforts to rehabilitate the theater and make available related support facilities. Assistance will include a right of way for access to back of house related activities and potential parking. 5c. Planning, Design and, Development of Infrastructure Improvements in the Historic Folklife Village As a complement to the Historic Folklife Village Master Plan, the CRA will assist in providing technical assistance for the provision of infrastructure improvements, such as streetscape improvements and landscaping. 5d. Planning, Design and Development of Parking Facilities to Support the Lyric Theater and the Folklife Village The CRA proposes to assist with the development of parking facilities to support the increasing use of the Lyric Theater and the eventual development of the Folklife Village. 6. Promotion of "Historic Overtown" as a Tourist Destination ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The establishment of a Tourist information center which would direct tourists to attractions, restaurants, hotel accommodations, and historical sites throughout Miami -Dade County would serve to mark "Historic Overtown" as a tourist destination. The placement of historic markers delineating historic sites (including sites now vacant or redeveloped) and the establishment of tours of local historical sites including bus tours to visit sites county -wide and mini -tours for sites within the district are among several strategies that can be used to generate interest. "Historic Overtown," especially those areas along the historic NW 2nd Avenue corridor, should be developed in a manner to create a tourist destination in suitable sites for commercial/tourist/cultural uses. As suitable sites for commercial/tourist/cultural uses continue to diminish within "Historic Overtown," the need to insure the economic vitality of existing uses becomes more critical. Therefore, economic conflicts between existing land uses must also be viewed from a perspective of improving and redeveloping existing commercial/tourist/cultural uses, where appropriate. The strategic objectives for the promotion of "Historic Overtown" as a tourist destination are: (1) increase the number of commercial and cultural attractions, restaurant, hotel accommodations and historical sites offering information and memorabilia about "Historic Overtown's" rich heritage to visitors; (2) increase public visitation to historical resources within "Historic Overtown;" provide public accessibility to cultural events within "Historic Overtown;" (4) increase the number of Overtown residents and visitors benefiting from cultural activities each year; and coordinate with the Miami -Dade County African -American Tourist Site Task Force Board, and similar board, entities and organizations to locate and develop business opportunities for tourist attractions within "Historic Overtown," especially along the NW 2nd Avenue (3) (5) 95 corridor. 7. Establishment of Artists' District by Legislation ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #4 Job Creation ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will petition for the designation of an Artists' District for Overtown. The Overtown area possesses a fascinating history as a center of black culture and the focal point of area entertainment. This legacy is still seen in its buildings, plazas and theaters. The establishment of an Arts District -would capitalize on these resources by directing future growth in a manner compatible with its history. The establishment of legitimate theater, writers, and artists' workshops; and first class night clubs and restaurants should be encouraged based on the guidelines of the Historic district. The establishment of manufacturing as well as other related businesses for the arts, i.e. manufacturing and distributing equipment and supplies for dancing, music, art, etc. should also be encouraged. 8. Update Housing Policy, Periodically ✓ #3 Housing: Infall, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability The Housing Policy should be reviewed at least every two years. Changes will be made to to the policy that increase, support, or maintain affordablity in the CRA as new outcomes are discovered by the current policy or as issues arrise from new development in the neighborhood. II. Promotion and Enhancement of Overtown and Park West as a Business and Investment Location 1. Seeking Public/Private Development Opportunities ✓ # 1-#6 supports all of the goals The CRA will search for, evaluate, and advertise public -private development opportunities that will utilize the land owned by the CRA in an effort to further the goals of the Redevelopment Plan. This may include tasks associated with: • coordinating with other private and public entities for the development of surplus real property within the CRA. • offering land as part of public —private 2. joint development projects. • coordinating efforts with Miami -Dade County to do the same. • Request the County to redevelop the Culmer Center to improve the facility and help improve NW 3rd Avenue, or seek a third party to joint venture with the County. • coordinating, and help facilitate in some manner, an air conditioned garbage location accessible by all the businesses along the Promenade. This could be constructed as part of a new building or by renovating an existing one. Management of this facility should be taken on by one of the building managers for collecting fees, for example Investigation into Hospital -related Real Estate Ventures #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles #4 Job Creation #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents ZHA, Inc. has identified in its 2003 report to the CRA that there is potential in setting up and attracting a new business market in preventative medical care to Park West, generally supported by people with greater 96 means, spending more than 19 billion dollars nationally each year. This is identified in Project Area H, of this section. The CRA will approach the hospitals and confirm ZHA's solicitation of the hospital's interest as a hospital -related real estate venture, part of the regionalization of medical/health services. If there is interest on behalf of the City and the hospitals to pursue this idea, the CRA will also establish long range planning committee devoted to finding a workable manner to construct and recruit tenancy for the complex. See ZHA's 2003 report for more details regarding this committee. The location for this grouping of medical related uses may occur elsewhere than along NE 7th or 8th Streets, provided it remains within the CRA. 3. Establish an "Action Team for Procurement" to enlarge the Business Community ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #4 Job Creation ✓ #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents ZHA, Inc., the CRA's economic feasibility consultants, has identified in its 2003 report to the CRA an approach to attracting new businesses to Overtown, with incentives and organization. The CRA will review the strategy and establish an Action Team for the purpose of attracting new businesses to Overtown. The CRA may elect to call the committee by a name different from "Action Team." To start, the Action Team will focus on NW 3rd Avenue from the Culmer Center south to NW 8th Street, the area identified in this plan as the core of Overtown, and along NW 1st Avenue from I-395 south to NW 5th Street, and along 11th Street and the Promenade. The CRA will keep the Action Team informed of new residential projects as they are being proposed to help in the effort to attract new businesses. 4. Enhancement of Property Assessments and Options to Improve Values in the Vicinity of Camillus House ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles Camillus House is a unique facility serving special needs and indigent populations. This area of the CRA is in need of special attention. In order to promote growth along this segment of the Biscayne Boulevard entrance into the City of Miami, the CRA is proposing to research and implement specific options for spurring growth in this key segment of Park West. Potential courses of action include improving deterrent uses, planning enhancements and alternatives, and stabilizing neighborhoods. 5. Property Assessment Reevaluation ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles The property values in the CRA continue to appear under assessed. In 1998, the City of Miami requested that the Governor of Florida undertake a review of the Dade County Property Appraisal methodology and practice of assessing property values in the City of Miami. The practice of undervalued assessments particularly related to commercial property negatively impacts the incentives for a developer to invest in the area. The CRA proposes to continue efforts to follow up on this request. 6. Identification, Marketing and Negotiation of a National Franchiser as a Pioneer Project for the Historic Priority Business Corridor ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart 97 Growth Principles ✓ #4 Job Creation ✓ #5 Promotion & Marketing ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The creation of strategic partnerships between franchisers and minority urban based businesses represents a market of untapped consumers, investors, and entrepreneurs. Location of these businesses along the corridor and impact area will give impetus for the expansion and location of other businesses. The CRA will continue its efforts to identify, negotiate, and market the Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor to potential franchisers by offering favorable direct or indirect development incentives. 7. Planning, Design, and Development of a Job Creation Plaza ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #4 Job Creation In order to help create critical mass along the Historic Priority Business Corridor, the CRA is making plans to develop a job creation plaza that will serve the local community and other users. The plaza will be a pedestrian friendly environment incorporating open space, landscaping, a much needed plaza or meeting area suited for passive gathering and socializing, retail restaurants and other businesses uses and services. 8. Development of a Professional Business Office ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #4 Job Creation The CRA proposes to develop a professional office building within the Historic Priority Business Corridor or its impact area. If the building is constructed within the Historic Overtown Folklife Village, it should follow the design guidelines of the Historic Overtown Folklife Village Master Plan. 9. Development and relocation of new Businesses to Overtown and Park West ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ tt'l Job Creation ✓ #5 Promotion & Marketing ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will provide marketing and assistance for new and compatible businesses to relocate to Overtown and Park West. III. Planning, Development, Technical Assistance and Program Compliance 1. Facilitation of the improvements identified in each of the Project Areas ✓ # 1-#6 supports all of the goals Efforts regarding the Project Areas, as described elsewhere in this section, will take precedence over other efforts being undertaken by the CRA. The Project Areas are: • NW 1st Avenue • Overtown (including Little Broadway - Lyric Plaza) • NW 3rd Avenue Neighborhood Center • Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor • West Overtown • Properties facing Biscayne Boulevard • The Promenade — Park West Entertainment District • NE 8th Street/Miami WorldCenter • Camillus House/UM Research Center • Townpark Homeownership District 2. Changes to Land Development Regulations ✓ # 1-#6 supports all of the goals 98 The CRA will initiate the re -zoning of all properties within the Redevelopment Area, for reasons described in Section 3 of this Redevelopment Plan. Tasks will include: • Funding this initiative and promoting it within the community • Hold workshops and meetings with the community and the City of Miami Planning Department to prepare the first draft of an ordinance for a new zoning district or districts for properties within the CRA. • Revise a subsequent draft of the ordinance. • Provide guidance and support for the re -zoning effort during the re -zoning process. 3. Increase Parking Supply ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will examine ways to increase the supply of parking within its boundaries. Tasks may include: • Advocating, funding, and/or building on -street parking spaces in any future streetscape or redevelopment efforts within public rights -of -way. • Funding, and/or building off-street parking spaces in any future redevelopment efforts within the CRA boundaries. • Coordinating and facilitating efforts with the City of Miami that support the reform of off-street parking regulations to reduce the unnecessary burden on private developers. For example, to jump-start redevelopment, new businesses in existing buildings should be exempt from parking requirements to reduce their startup costs and therefore their financial risks 4. Miscellaneous Land Acquisition ✓ # 1-#6 supports all of the goals The CRA proposes to acquire land, as necessary, to support the implementation of the projects described in this Redevelopment Plan within the Redevelopment Area. Acquiring more land for publicly accessible green space for active and passive recreational use will also be a priority. 5. Support for Greenways ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will assist, where possible, the Trust for Public Land with implementation of their Overtown Greenprint Plan and Greenway Plan within the Redevelopment Area. 6. Monitor Conditions At Public Schools Serving Students in the Redevelopment Area ✓ #3 Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will send an individual or small committee to each of the public schools that serve students that live within the Redevelopment Area. Since the quality of schools is often the number one factor for chosing where to buy a house, the intention of this project is for the CRA to help improve the neighborhood schools where possible. The purpose of the school visits is to look for: • Physical improvements that can better the appearance of the schools • Review the performance of the students as compared to other local, state and national public schools • Overcrowding or under utilization of the facilites The CRA will record observations and make recommendations and requests to the School Board. The CRA may ask the City 99 Commission to make requests to the School Board as well. Since many of the schools serving the CRA area are outside of the Redevelopment Area, the CRA can only fund, if possible, improvements to those schools inside the boundaries. 7. Create and Design an Overlay of Special Fencing for all CRA-owned properties and others governmental and non-profit institution owned properties within its jurisdiction in Overtown ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Historically, public agencies that own land maintain the properties vacant while redevelopment occurs or is proposed and this does not give redeveloping communities a look that is pleasing and does not do much for the image of the area. The CRA proposes to create and design an overlay of special fencing in the Bahamian, Caribbean style for all CRA owned properties and for other properties within its jurisdiction to transform an otherwise challenging situation into an opportunity to provide the Historic Business Corridor and its impact areas with a linking element that will provide character within a historic framework. The fencing should be compatible with the design parameters specified in the Historic Overtown Folklife Village Master Plan. 8. Technical Assistance/Liaison to Optimist Club Activities ✓ #4 Promotion & Marketing ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA proposes to continue to provide assistance and support to the Optimist Clubs in terms of policy guidance, assistance with local governmental organizations, and other technical assistance. 9. Plan Improvements of the Overtown Parks: Gibson Park, Williams Park, Reeves Park, Dorsey Park and Athalie Range #1 Mini -Park ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents According to a report by the Trust for Public Land, parks and recreational opportunities are important to all communities. The lack of adequate recreational space has been an element of contention in the studies of urban violence. Inadequate parks ranked above unemployment and difficulties with police amongst the most significant problems within the inner city neighborhoods. This realization was behind the creation and support of the Safe Neighborhoods Parks Bond Program. Unfortunately, neighborhoods such as Overtown have the least park land and the fewest facilities with the most difficulty in improving and maintaining the existing areas. The CRA will coordinate efforts with the City of Miami's Parks and Planning Departments to provide for incentives to allow for the creation of additional park/green space and for the maintenance of such recreational areas. The CRA may produce schematic designs for facility improvements and public safety measures within the parks. 10. Development of a "Gateway" Project into the Omni and the Overtown/Park West Areas ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community The CRA proposes to study and evaluate the potential of entry features for the entrances into the Omni Area at the I-395 exit, 11th Street and Biscayne Boulevard and into the Southeast Overtown Area at NW 14th St. and connections with I-395, I-95, and NW 3rd Ave., at NW 3rd Ave and NW 8th StSt. and at NW 4th Ave. and NW 8th St. Specific entry features for the Park West Area will also be determined. Entry features for Overtown 100 should be in accordance with the Historic Overtown Folklife Village Master Plan. Efforts to be coordinated with the Trust for Public Land in implementing their Greenway/Greenprint Plan, and with The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc., Overtown Civic Partnership and the City of Miami in implementing these gateways and preserving the historic context of the area. 11. Update the Housing Policy ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #3 Housing: Infill Diversity, & Retaining Affordability The CRA will adopt a new housing policy and will update it periodically as changes occur in the market places and as property values shift from time to time. 12. Promote Affordable Developers ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #3 Housing: Infill Diversity, & Retaining Affordability Housing to The CRA will meet with developers of projects within the Redevelopment Area prior to their permit application submissions to the City. The purpose of the meeting is for the CRA to encourage and negotiate for as much affordable housing as possible in each new developemnt. The CRA will not offer assistance of any kind to developers unless the developers comply with the CRA's Housing Policy. IV. Street Improvements, Utility Infrastructure, and Transportation 1. Streetscape Projects # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage #5 Promotion & Marketing of the Community #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA has begun or completed streetscape design and construction in a few of the Project Areas. The CRA will continue the efforts to conclude those projects that have not begun or been completed. The streetscape projects include: 1. 9th Street Pedestrian Mall 2. The Promenade (between 10th and 11th Streets) 3. NW 3rd Avenue (south of I-395) for the Historic Priority Business Corridor 4. NW3rd Avenue (north of I-395) 5. NE/NW 11th Street (Entertainment District) 6. NW 1st Avenue Additional streetscape projects may be included in the future. Related tasks may include • regular maintenance of lighting, street furniture, landscaping, and paving materials. • acquiring the services of engineers or landscape architects. • Discussions FEC and Miami -Dade County Public Works to change the configuration of NW 1st Avenue. This Avenue has historically been the divider between Overtown and Park West, and the redesign is needed to make it the unifier. 2. Coordination of Infrastructure Improvements with City of Miami and Miami Public Works Departments, Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department, FDOT, Miami Parking Authority and Other Relevant Agencies ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents 101 CRA efforts are concentrated on planning infrastructure improvements in the Redevelopment Area, such as street improvements, landscaping, lighting, parking and pedestrian amenities, and enhancements. Coordination with local and state agencies responsible for implementing these infrastructure improvements, as well as private developers and community members, becomes paramount to set priorities, coordinate and avoid duplication of efforts, and find new avenues to pursue resources. Tasks may include: • Upgrades to water mains and sewer mains, by implementing actual reconstruction or by subsidizing the upgrades performing others. • Collaborating with the MPO to return one-way streets back into two-way streets. • Improving pedestrian features such as crosswalks that are more visible to motorists or securing easements or access for pedestrian routes separated from the roadways. • Influencing the decision to subdivide larger blocks into smaller ones with the creation of new streets. • Increasing public on -street parking in rights -of -way. • Assisting with solutions to any noise, access, and privacy problems associated with properties along the rail and transit routes • Assisting in the decision making process of possible changes to I-395 and I-95 as the MPO continues its study and discussion regarding the removal or reconfiguration of those two federal highways. 3. Pedestrian Compatible Community Transit System ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will review, and act accordingly towards the work of Thomas Gustafson and Nova Southeastern University related to the development of a pedestrian compatible community transit system to link all Southeast Overtown, Park West, and the nearby Central Business District and Omni areas, as described in the Miami at Midnight report. The Report also describes the possibility of a large pedestrian zone adjacent to the Overtown/Arena Metrorail Station to enhance intermodal transfers. 4. Pilot Infrastructure Improvement and Maintenance Program ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #4 Job Creation ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will establish for Overtown and Park West a pilot street cleaning, sweeping program and a grass cutting program, primarily for security reasons, for the areas of the CRA and maintain a closer coordination with existing property owners and the Downtown Development Authority, and the City of Miami 5. Plan, Coordinate, and Design Special Lighting; Security District (Pedestrian Enhancements) ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Security is an important issue in the area. The CRA proposes to provide pedestrian enhancements, special lighting, and create a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere in the Redevelopment Area by developing and implementing a Security and Lighting District and a Police Enhancement Program, including the Entertainment District, the 9th Street Pedestrian Mall, and Sawyers Walk. Within the Historic Overtown Folklife Village, lighting should be consistant with the character identified in the Historic Folklife 102 Village Master Plan. V. Home Ownership Pre - Qualification and Counseling Program ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #3 Housing: Infall, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA will coordinate efforts with the City of Miami, local real estate organizations, mortgage lenders and community bankers, community development corporations, faith - based institutions, consumer advocates, and residents to implement a home ownership pre - qualification and counseling program which will provide homeownership training sessions, market public sector assistance programs, and assist in pre -qualifying home buyers. Services will be accessible to existing Overtown residents. The program is intended to provide basic financial literacy training, job training, education and other supportive services for people with extremely low incomes that can not qualify for home ownership. VI. Grants to Existing Businesses ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #2 Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles ✓ tt4 Job Creation ✓ #6 Improving the Quality of Life for Residents The CRA proposes to assist in creating jobs by providing technical assistance with Section 108 loan applications and administering a revolving loan pool, which will make low interest, low downpayment, long terms loans in the amount of $25,000 to $1 million for business improvement projects to area businesses. Tasks may include: • facilitating grants, • technical assistance to business owners, • architectural and design services for building or facade renovation or new construction VII. Laredo/Re-Use Plan (CLUC 90 Properties) Program ✓ # 1 Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage ✓ #3 Housing: Infall, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability The CRA will continue to support development proposals that utilize current vacant government owned and County Land Use Code (CLUC) 90 properties located within the Redevelopment Area. The CRA will liaise with Miami -Dade County in clearing title and promoting scattered site housing on these properties. Comparison Chart: Goals and Supporting Projects The charts on the next four pages list each of the projects and programs and identify which of the goals they primarily support. 103 Comparison Chart: Goals and Supporting Projects Project Names Goal #1: Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage Goal #2: Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles Goal #3: Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability Goal #4: Creating Jobs within the Community Goal #5: Promotion & Marketing of the Community Goal #6: Improving the Quality of Life for Residents I. Community Heritage and Historic Preservation 1. Renovation of Historically Significant Buildings * * * * * * 2. Historic Designation * 3. Promote and/or Organize Activities and Events That Recreate the Former Vitality and Atmosphere of the Community 4. Provide Incentives for Revitalization in "Historic Overtown" * * * * * 5. Establish a First -Class Residential Village Containing a Cluster of Restored Buildings, The Folklife Village. * * * * * * 5a. Provide Planning, Coordination, and Technical * * * * * Assistance to the Black Archives Historic Folklife Village Development 5b. Technical Assistance to Historic Lyric Theater Redevelopment * * * * * 5c. Planning Design and Development of Infrastructure Improvements in the Historic Folklife Village * * * * * 5d. Planning, Design and Development of Parking Facilities to Support the Lyric Theater and the Folklife Village Historic Preservation * * * * 6. Promotion of "Historic Overtown" as a Tourist Destination 7. Establishment of Artists District by Legislation * * * 8. Update Housing Policy, Periodically 103 Comparison Chart: Goals and Supporting Projects (Continued) Project Names Goal #1: Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage Goal #2: Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles Goal #3: Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability Goal #4: Creating Jobs within the Community Goal #5: Promotion & Marketing of the Community Goal #6: Improving the Quality of Life for Residents II. Promotion and Enhancement of Overtown and Park West as a Business and Investment Location 1. Seeking Public/Private Development Opportunities * * * * * 2. Investigation into Hospital -related Real Estate Ventures * * * 3. Establish an "Action Team for Procurement" to enlarge the Business Community * * * -I- 4. Enhancement of Property Assessments and Options to Improve Values in the Vicinity of Camillus House * 5. Property Assessment Reevaluation 6. Identification, Marketing and Negotiation of a National Franchiser as a Pioneer Project for the Historic Priority Business Corridor * * 4- 7 Planning, Design and Development of a Job Creation * * Plaza 8. Development of a Professional Business Office * * 9. Development and relocation of new Businesses to Overtown and Park West 104 Comparison Chart: Goals and Supporting Projects (Continued) Project Names Goal #1: Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage Goal #2: Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles Goal #3: Housing: Goal #4: Creating Jobs within the Community Goal #5: Promotion & Marketing of the Community Goal #6: Improving the Quality of Life for Residents Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability III. Planning, Development, Technical Assistance and Program Compliance 1. Facilitation of the improvements identified in each of the Project Areas * * * * 4- 2. Changes to Land Development Regulations * * * * * * 3. Increase Parking Supply * * 4. Miscelaneous Land Acquisition * * * * * * 5. Support for Greenways * 6. Monitor Conditions At Public Schools Serving Students in the SEOPW CRA * 4- 7. Create and Design an Overlay of Special Fencing for all CRA owned properties and others governmental and non- profit institution owned properties within its jurisdiction in Overtown 8. Technical Assistance/Liaison to Optimist Club Activities * -1- 9. Plan the Improvements of the Overtown Parks: Gibson Park, Williams Park, Reeves Park, Dorsey Park and Athalie Range #1 Mini -Park 10. Development of a "Gateways" Project into the Omni and the Southeast Overtown Park West Areas * 11. Update the Housing Policy 12. Promote Affordable Housing to Developers * * 105 Comparison Chart: Goals and Supporting Projects (Continued) Project Names Goal #1: Preserving Historic Buildings & Community Heritage Goal #2: Expanding the Tax Base using Smart Growth Principles Goal #3: Housing: Infill, Diversity, & Retaining Affordability Goal #4: Creating Jobs within the Community Goal #5: Promotion & Marketing of the Community Goal #6: Improving the Quality of Life for Residents IV. Street Improvements, Utility Infrastructure, and Transportation 1. Streetscape Projects 2. Coordination of Infrastructure Improvements with City of Miami and Miami Public Works Departments, Miami * Dade Water and Sewer Department, FDOT, Miami Parking Authority and Other Relevant Agencies 3. Pedestrian Compatible Community Transit System 4. Pilot Infrastructure Improvement and Maintenance Program 5. Plan/Coordinate/Design Special Lighting, Security District (Pedestrian Enhancements) * 4- V. Home Ownership Pre -Qualification and Counseling Program * * * VI. Grants to Existing Businesses Program * * * * VII. Laredo/Re-Use Plan (CLUC 90 Properties) Program * * 106 Streets and squares s pedeslriaan. Profaerfy nergJabors to know ea • introduction on • Capital Improvement Goals • Prioritizing Capital Improvements Potential Funding Sources • Capital Improvement Costs 'Iry Project Area • Capital Improvement Costs - Not Protect Area Specific • Capital Improvement Casts - Summary Quad be safe, cornfortafafe, .and interesting to the corniured, they encourage walking and enable oh other and protect their corramunr8{es- - Charter of the New Urbanism. 7-996 Capital Improvement Costs and Timeline This section identifies the primary capital improvements, their costs, and timeframe for implementation. It is not the intent of this section to serve as an implementation plan or as an operations budget. The CRA has an independent operation strategy and budget that will identify capital improvements among its other projects and expenses. The known and desired capital projects listed in this plan are prioritized. It should be expected that this section will become obsolete over time as projects get completed and new ones become important to the community, which is the reason for a separate budget strategy. Capital Improvement Goals The goals for making capital improvements within the Redevelopment Area are: 1) Eradicate the visual blight seen from streets and public places within the CRA to upgrade the appearance to attract new development. investors and 2) Protect the health and safety of the residents by improving the performance of the City's infrastructure systems. 3) Remove or diminish negative impacts 108 Introduction caused by existing or inadequate infrastructure. Prioritizing Capital Improvements The approach to prioritizing improvement projects focuses on key Project Areas described in Section 4. These Project Areas are characteristically unique and show the greatest potential for immediate positive change. Place Corridors The Project Areas set forth in Section 4 do not encompass the entire Redevelopment Area, but when started, should attract interest in the community and spark additional private investment within the Redevelopment Area. The idea behind concentrating efforts in small areas is to totally transform them, creating as dramatic and visible an impact as possible. When money is spent evenly throughout the entire CRA, it is difficult to see where the money has gone. By focusing the efforts, people will see what the larger area will be like as revitalization spreads, inspiring additional private reinvestment. First Priority should go towards efforts within the Project Areas. The CRA Board will decide if certain projects rank higher than others, as they will with their 5-year improvement plan. Areas outside of the Project Areas may need improvements too, such as water and sewer upgrades, parking structures and parking shuttles. These will be evaluated as to their impact on furthering the efforts in the specific Project Areas. Potential Funding Sources It is important for the CRA staff to coordinate with the City and County staff to leverage or match tax increment funds with Federal, State, and locally available funds. Sources include but should not be limited to: • Capital programs for the City, County or other local governmental entities. • Community Development Block Grants. • Federal, State, and local Transportation Trust Funds • People's Transportation Plan funded through the local option half -penny sales tax and overseen by the Citizens Independent Transportation Trust. • Federal, State, and Local Park Funds. • Partnerships with educational institutions. • New Market Tax Credits 109 Capital Improvement Costs by Project Area Each Project Area has improvements itemized as: 1. Streetscape Improvements Streetscape improvement estimates include costs associated with pavement, curbs, sidewalks, concrete pavers, drainage, landscaping, utilities, signage, and pavement markings. The construction costs were prepared from information in the Draft Report for the Southeast Overtown / Park West Redevelopment Plan dated September 2003. The costs exclude structures and any right of way acquisition. 2. Water Main Water Main estimates include costs for upgrading underground mains that provide water service to the properties. Hookup fees are not included. 3. Sewer Sewer estimates include costs for upgrading underground sewer pipes that provide solid waste disposal from adjacent properties. Hookup fees are not included. 4. Projects budgeted for FY 2003-2004 Projects budgeted for the Fiscal Year 2003 — 2004 have been added to the Project Area they serve. Some currently budgeted projects affect multiple project areas and are listed under the category of "Other Capital Improvements." Capital Improvements by Project Area Project A - NW 1" Avenue Overall Priority: Medium The visual nature of the street needs improvement since the railroad right-of-way is rather unsightly. This avenue can become a linear park (with transit & rail) with similar buildings and uses on both sides of the track, so that the two areas become more unified in character. First Steps — High Priority Discussion should begin immediately with FEC to find out their intentions for the right- of-way and to find the possibility of modifying the roadways on both sides as described in this plan, which will require acquisition of portions of the right-of-way. Project F - Biscayne Boulevard No items are listed for Biscayne Boulevard because improvements within the right-of-way are part of current projects in the planning stage by the Florida Department of Transportation. 110 Project A - NW lst Avenue OVERALL EST. COST: $5,297,400 Future Items: LINEAR FT COST / Lin. Ft. COST ITEM NW 1st Avenue Streetscape 3,600 $1,120 $4,032,000 Water Main $306,000 Sanitary Sewer Main $76,500 TOTAL: $4,414,500 20% Contingency $882,900 TOTAL: $5,297,400 Capital Improvements by Project Area Project B - Overtown - Little Broadway Overall Priority: High Overtown is the heart of the African - American community. The CRA will reinforce its previous investments in the neighborhood by focusing its present efforts and resources here to get results. Current Improvements identified in the budget for FY 2004: • Grant to Lyric Theater expansion • Grant to Renovation of Ward Rooming House • Land Acquisitions (including appraisals, environmental, etc.) • Grant for Historic Folk Life Village Food Franchise 111 Project B - Overtown OVERALL EST. COST: $10,340,887 Future Items: LINEAR FT COST / Lin. Ft. COST ITEM NW 11th. St. 1,500 $750 $1,125,000 NW 10th. St. 1,500 $750 $1,125,000 NW 9th. St. 1,500 $750 $1,125,000 NW 1st. Ct. 450 $750 $337,500 NW 2nd. Ave. 1,400 $750 $1,050,000 NW 3rd. Ave. 1,400 $750 $1,050,000 Water Main $281,925 Sanitary Sewer Main $70,481 Land Acquisitions (after FY04) $1,500,000 Historic Folk Life Village Tech. Assistance (after FY04); Type: Grant 100,000 SUBTOTAL: $7,764,906 20% Contingency $1,552,981 TOTAL: $9,317,887 Items currently listed in the budget forFY2004:: Lyric Theater expansion Type: Grant To be determined Ward Rooming house renovation Type: Grant 8,000 Land Acquisitions (including appraisals, environmental, etc.) 1,000,000 Historic Folk Life Village Food Franchise Type: Grant 15,000 TOTAL: $1,023,000 Capital Improvements by Project Area Project C - NW 3rd Avenue Neighborhood Center Overall Priority: Medium This project provides attention to the northern portion of Historic Overtown's Business Corridor (NW 3rd Avenue) that was sliced in two by the creation of I-395. First Steps — High Priority Provide streetscape improvements similar to Project D — Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor. 112 Project C - NW 3rd Avenue Neighborhood Center OVERALL EST. COST: $6,111,750 Future Items: ITEM LINEAR FT COST / Lin. Ft. COST NW 3rd Ave. 1,500 $750 $1,125,000 NW 7th. St. 1,000 $750 $750,000 NW 4th Ave. 1,250 $750 $937,500 NW 14th. St. 340 $750 $255,000 NW 15th.St 340 $750 $255,000 NW 16th. St. 340 $750 $255,000 NW 16th. Terr. 780 $750 $585,000 I-395 Frontage Road 550 $850 $467,500 Water Main $370,500 Sanitary Sewer Main $92,625 SUBTOTAL: $5,093,125 20% Contingency $1,018,625 TOTAL: $6,111,750 Capital Improvements by Project Area Project D - Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor Overall Priority: High This corridor is the historic main street along NW 3rd Avenue. Portions of this area also fall within the Folk Life Village. The CRA will reinforce its previous investments in the neighborhood by focusing its present efforts and resources here to get results. Current Improvements identified in the budget for FY2004: • Facade Program on NW 3rd Avenue between 8th Street and 14th Street. 113 Project D - Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor OVERALL EST. COST: $12,711,250 Future Items: LINEAR FT COST / Lin. Ft. COST ITEM NW 11th. St. 1,400 $750 $1,050,000 NW 10th. St. 1,400 $750 $1,050,000 NW 9th. St. 1,600 $750 $1,200,000 NW 8th. St. 1,800 $750 $1,350,000 NW 7th. St. 1,800 $750 $1,350,000 NW 3rd. Ave./I-95 Exit 450 $750 $337,500 NW 4th. Ave. 700 $750 $525,000 NW 5th. Ave. 1,200 $750 $900,000 NW 6th. Ave. 1,200 $750 $900,000 NW 7th. Ave. 1,200 $750 $900,000 Water Main $157,500 Sanitary Sewer Main $39,375 SUBTOTAL: $9,759,375 20% Contingency $1,951,875 TOTAL: $11,711,250 Items currently listed in the budget for FY2004: Facade Program on NW 3rd Avenue between 8th Street and 14th Street 1,000,000 TOTAL: 1,000,000 Capital Improvements by Project Area Project E — West Overtown Overall Priority: Medium West Overtown is the core of the area added to the Redevelopment Area west of I- 95, but east of NW 7th Avenue. First Steps — High Priority See Section 4, Projects and Programs (Project E) for actions that do not require capital improvements. 114 Project E — West Overtown OVERALL EST. COST: $4,101,750 Future Items: ITEM LINEAR FT COST / Lin. Ft. COST NW 3rd Ave. 1,500 $750 $1,125,000 NW 14th. St. 400 $750 $300,000 NW 13th St. 400 $750 $300,000 NW 12th. St. 400 $750 $300,000 NW 11th.St 400 $750 $300,000 NW 10th. St. 400 $750 $300,000 Water Main $634,500 Sanitary Sewer Main $158,625 SUBTOTAL: $3,418,125 20% Contingency $683,625 TOTAL: $4,101,750 Capital Improvements by Project Area Project G - The Promenade Overall Priority: High The Promenade occupies the former municipal railroad right-of-way owned by the CRA in the burgeoning Entertainment District. The CRA will reinforce its previous investments in the neighborhood by focusing its attention here to get results. Additional parking, shuttles to distant parking locations, and changes to the land development regulations are urgently needed to support the recently renovated businesses on NE 11th Street. Current Improvements identified in the budget for FY 2004: • Security Cameras for the Entertainment District, however there is no cost identified. • Interim Promenade construction: to clean up, pave a center lane, and add landscaping has been approved for $500,000. 115 Project G - The Promenade OVERALL EST. COST: $6,993,000 Future Items: LINEAR FT COST / Lin. Ft. COST ITEM Miami Ave. 700 $750 $525,000 Grand Promenade 1,800 $750 $1,350,000 N 11th. St. 1,800 $750 $1,350,000 N 10th. St. 1,800 $750 $1,350,000 NE 1st. Ave. 700 $750 $525,000 NE 2nd. Ave. 700 $850 $525,000 Water Main $162,000 Sanitary Sewer Main $40,500 SUBTOTAL: $5,827,500 20% Contingency $1,165,500 TOTAL: $6,993,000 Capital Improvements by Project Area Project H - NE 8th Street/ Miami WorldCenter Overall Priority: Low Priority should be raised if property owners or elected officials show stronger interest in the concept as described in Section 4, Projects and Programs, and further described in the market analysis performed for the CRA by ZHA, Inc. 116 Project H - NE 8t1, Street / Miami WorldCenter OVERALL EST. COST: $3,315,938 Future Items: LINEAR FT COST / Lin. Ft. COST ITEM Miami Ave. 500 $750 $375,000 NE 6th. St. 700 $750 $525,000 NE 7th. St. 700 $750 $525,000 NE 8th. St. 700 $750 $525,000 NE 1st. Ave. 500 $750 $375,000 NE 2nd. Ave. 500 $850 $375,000 Water Main $50,625 Sanitary Sewer Main $12,656 SUBTOTAL: $2,763,281 20% Contingency $552,656 TOTAL: $3,315,938 Capital Improvement Costs - Not Project Area Specific There are capital improvement projects within the Redevelopment Area that are needed outside of the specific project areas and some that address problems that face all areas within the Redevelopment Area. These typically connect or "link" the city infrastructure and mobility of people living, working, shopping, and visiting the Redevelopment Area. Other Capital Improvements Overall Priority: High The items in this category are listed in the FY 2004 Budget, except for the Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Main items shown at the very bottom of the list. 117 Other Capital Improvements OVERALL EST. COST: $19,431,119 Future Items: 11EM COST Property Maintenance $146,000 WASD — Infrastructure Improvements — Major entertainment commercial corridors (first effort to include: 3rd Avenue, 14th Street, 11th Street, 2nd Avenue) $2,000,000 WASD — Impact Fee Reduction Subsidized Loan Program $300,000 Entertainment Grants $200,000 Developer Construction Loans (leveraged) via Grow Miami Fund $2,000,000 Grants to private property owners for existing structures $1,905,000 11th Street Expansion PD&E in FY2004 $150,000 11th Street Expansion PD&E beyond 2004 $5,850,000 9th Street Streetscape Phase 3 $1,400,000 Water Main $4,360,443 Sanitary Sewer Main $1,119,676 TOTAL: $19,431,119 Capital Improvement Costs -Not Project Area Specific Community Intermodal System Projects in this category include various Intermodal system improvements in the context of the redevelopment of the CRA and are subject to intermodal designations and the availability of grants and appropriations of Federal and State transportation trust funds. Overall Priority: High Time is of the essence to attract Federal funding for these improvements. Breakdown of the item: Intermodal Connectors for Freight, Goods, and Passengers, (shown in chart, right) Intermodal Connectors: $6.0 Million • Passenger zone Intermodal improvements • Freight Intermodal Facility Improvements • Additional Intermodal Improvements would be scheduled for implementation after 2012 costing approximately $76Million Breakdown of the item: Parking Structures and Parking Shuttles (shown in chart, right) Vehicles and infrastructure: $ 8.4 Million • Promenade to I-395 Parking Loop (Demonstration Proj ect) • Central Loop (connecting Cultural Buildings) • NW 3rd Avenue Loop • Miami Avenue Area Loop (Breakdown is continued on next page) 118 Community Intermodal System, 2004 - 2012 OVERALL EST. COST: $30,900,000 Future Items: 11EMS: COST Intermodal Connectors for Freight, Goods, and Passengers These pedestrian and vehicular access improvements include substantial street, mixed -mode corridor and greenway improvements as described in the Miami at Midnight report. Additionally the SEOPW CRA should use these improvements to enhance future Amtrak -Florida East Coast (FEC) service options for Overtown and Park West $6,000,000 Parking Structures and Parking Shuttles The pedestrian -oriented parking structures and associated parking line buildings will help establish the urban form of the walking environment. The parking shuttle vehicles will help extend the travel distance of the pedestrian trip and thereby improving the Intermodal access between Port of Miami, , Metrorail, Metromover, I-95, and Miami International Airport. (and Amtrak when FEC service is established) $23,400,000 Contingencies and Incentive Fees Every large capital project needs to reserve funds incentive fees to better manage project costs and for contingencies and to meet the completion and incentive fees for $1,500,000 schedule (remainder 3.3 million for contingencies work scheduled after 2012). TOTAL: $30,900,000 Community Intermodal System, After year 2012 OVERALL EST. COST: $110,300,000 ***** Note: The costs referenced in the charts above are further described in the Miami at Midnight report, Section H, Order of Magnitude Cost, on pages 19 through 24. Breakdown of the item: Parking Structures and Parking Shuttles (continued from prey. page) • Additional Routes (per Miami at Midnight Report) would be scheduled for implementation after 2012 costing approximately $10 million. Parking Structures: $ 12 Million • For 800 Spaces x 15K per space • Structures associated with additional Routes (per Miami at Midnight Report) would be scheduled for implementation after 2012 costing approximately $18 million. Transit Barn $ 3 million • With Shared Freight Loading Facilities and Maintenance Facilities (5K sq. ft.) • Expansion associated with additional Routes (per Miami at Midnight Report) would be scheduled for implementation after 2012 costing additional $3 million. Timeline for Improvements Everyone familiar with the area will express the concern that time is of the essence. Every project is important. Projects in the 2004 Budget should be completed by the year end of 2006. Substantial accomplishments to the projects deserving the highest priority should be completed by 2008. These are: • Overtown, • NW 3rd Avenue, and 119 • The Promenade Revisions to the development regulations should be completed and adopted by year end 2004. All the remaining projects, provided efforts to obtain additional funding are successful, should be completed by 2012. Capital Improvement Costs -Summary Capital Improvements Summary OVERALL EST. COST: $99,203,094 BY PROJECT AREA: COST Project A - NW 1st Avenue $5,297,400 Project B - Overtown $10 340 887 Project C - NW 3rd Avenue Neighborhood Center $6,111,750 Project D - Historic Overtown Priority Business Corridor $12,711,250 Project E — West Overtown $4,101,750 Project F — Biscayne Boulevard ***Funded by FDOT*** $ 0 Project G - The Promenade $6,993,000 Project H - NE 8th Street Spine $3,315,938 SUBTOTAL: $48,871,975 NOT PROJECT AREA SPECIFIC: Other Capital Improvements $19,431,119 Community Intermodal System $30,900,000 SUBTOTAL: $50,331,119 The house Itself is of the thing that reeky co with other houses for • Neighborhood Overview • Housing Policy • Relocation Policy • Traffic Circulation • Environmental Quality • Effect on School Population • •—ozuniunity Facilities and Services • Physical and Social Quality wee_ its reiatravr to the community is Ms. A sanwtthorse must depend on its ou_ is beauty Residential Uses and the Neighborhood Impact of Redevelopment elopment Neighborhood Overview The Redevelopment Area has a wide range of land uses because of its proximity to the Central Business District. Park West, the eastern part of the Redevelopment Area, predominantly has old warehouses that once contained businesses that relied on the proximity of the Port of Miami, when it was located at what is now Bicentennial Park. Park West is now home to one sports stadiums - American Airlines Arena (Miami Arena — demolished in September 2008), the Network Access Point (NAP) facility that provides computer data storage related services, three large residential towers, an expansion of the Wolfson Campus of Miami -Dade Community College, and several new nightclubs catering to the "after hours" market. The majority of the existing residents in Park West resides in the three towers located on NW 1st Avenue near the former Miami Arena site, while four new luxury mixed -use residential towers were development during the recent real estate boom from 2003-2007. This represents a potential increase in new middle to upper income residents to the Park West area but the recent recession, occupancy of these edifices will proves to be a challenge for the next 2-5 years. The Southeast 121 Overtown residents reside in largely low-rise, older rental development scattered throughout the community. There is a large homeless population and an outdated homeless feeding facility in Park West that the City of Miami is in the process of providing assistance in relocating. The existing population in Southeast Overtown is considerably younger and poorer than the City of Miami and Miami - Dade County as a whole, and reflects a slightly higher median household size. The existing households in Southeast Overtown are more likely to be headed by single head of household than the City of Miami as a whole. Unemployment rates in the community are also higher than the rates for the City and County. Overtown is comprised of small neighborhood businesses, churches, single family homes and apartment buildings, with the latter being the most dominant. According to ZHA's 2003 Economic Programming Study, a review of the 1990 and 2000 US Census and Claritas market research service data shows that homeownership is very low in Overtown, about 10%. This low homeownership rate is a reflection of the low household incomes in the community and the lack of affordable homeownership development in the community. For comparison, the City of Miami as a whole has about 35% of its residential units owner occupied. In 2002, almost 50 percent of Overtown's households earned less than $15,000 per year. The population of the CRA area has increased by 2.9% between 1990 (6,599) and 2000 (6,792). The following are residential characteristics in surrounding areas: • Northeast of the Redevelopment Area is the Omni Redevelopment Area. The Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami -Dade County ("PAC") was completed in 2006 and serves as a catalyst to draw new people, businesses and residents into that area. North of the PAC between Biscayne Boulevard and Biscayne Bay are several new multi -family residential towers under construction and/or recently completed. • North of the Redevelopment Area, the conditions are similar to Overtown. Redevelopment efforts within the Redevelopment Area can only have a positive effect on its northern neighbors. • Southwest and West of the Redevelopment Area is the Miami River and the Spring Garden neighborhood. The river has mostly industrial uses, but future loft style apartments and mixed use developments have been advertised on signs posted at various properties. Spring Garden is a stable residential neighborhood primarily of single family homes, separated from western Overtown by the Seybold canal. • To the south is the Central Business District with mostly government related buildings on the southern edge of the Redevelopment Area. • Northwest of the Redevelopment Area is the hospital area comprised of several hospitals, doctors' offices, and related businesses and research facilities. • To the East are properties facing Biscayne Bay, including Bicentennial Park and the American Airlines Arena. Two museums are anticipated for Bicentennial Park, (to be renamed "Museum Park"). Housing Policy The following items constitute the CRA's Policy toward Housing, both market rate and affordable: 1) The CRA will only endorse, support, encourage, assist or initiate housing initiatives that will do their part to: a) Improve living conditions for all residents of the neighborhoods b) Incorporate a variety of housing options and serve a range of incomes 122 c) Includes design features and considerations that contribute to the livability of the community d) Furthers the development of "workforce" housing through partnerships with employers located in and surrounding the community, including the use of Employer Assisted Housing models 2) A goal for the level of affordable housing that should be made available in the Redevelopment Area of, at least, 20% of any new development or rehabilitation of existing housing stock, to be periodically reviewed for results. 3) Affordability can be achieved by: a) Working with both non-profit and for -profit developers to help them find redevelopment opportunities and to assist with overcoming obstacles they may encounter. b) Developing and supporting programs that will assist in the development of housing that is affordable to lower - income families by providing developer incentives such as density bonuses, parking concessions and project subsidies. c) Establish inclusionary zoning [proposed Miami21] policies that will require a percentage of the units in all new rental and homeownership developments to be affordable to low and very low-income families, with best efforts being made to serve existing Overtown residents. d) Assisting developers, who provide rental housing serving families, including seniors, earning below 50% of the area median income, to secure project based assistance for those units. e) Ensuring that existing supportive housing is better integrated into the community, and expanding supportive housing models to address the unmet needs of existing residents. f) Ensuring adequate funding of and access to mortgage subsidy programs for existing families who seek homeownership opportunities in the community. Relocation Policy As stated in this Redevelopment Plan's Housing Policy, it is the CRA's goal and intent to retain, improve and increase the housing stock in the Redevelopment Area and not to replace it with a non-residential use. In the future, if any unforeseen redevelopment project involving the CRA requires the involuntarily displacement of anyone from either a rented or owned housing unit, the project proposal must contain a Project Relocation Plan which adheres to all applicable laws and regulations. The Project Relocation Plan must be approved by the CRA Board in a publicly noticed CRA Board meeting prior to any final approval of the project. If any future projects were to require relocation and CRA funding were to be "partnered" with Federal funds, the CRA shall make it a condition of its participation that all provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act are met. This strategy adheres to the requirements of Chapters 163 and 421, Florida Statues. Through the Housing Policy and Relocation Policy described in this Redevelopment Plan, the existing residents within the Redevelopment Area who may be temporarily or permanently displaced as a result of redevelopment activities directly supported by the CRA will have access to safe, sanitary and decent replacement housing. Traffic Circulation The network of streets within the Redevelopment Area is the typical Miami "grid." The older portions of Overtown have smaller blocks. The I-95 and I-395 Highways 123 have created some real and psychological barriers; however there are several locations where the city streets pass under or over the highway. The FEC Railroad, which runs along NW 1st Avenue, interrupts circulation for both pedestrians and motorists in several locations. For this Redevelopment Plan's proposed traffic changes, see Section 3, Hypothetical Build -out Plan: "Transportation System: Mobility and Access." The primary change proposed is returning many of the streets from a one-way configuration back to two-way streets. The current conditions appear to make it easy for visitors to enter Overtown, but confusing to leave. The current roadways should handle the projected increase in residential units, since the same city streets accommodated a former population of 40,000 in 1960. The population in 2000 was 6,792, an increase from 6,599 in 1990. Also, public transit serves Overtown rather well, which did not exist in 1960. Further community transit and transit access improvements will be explored related to Airport to Sea Port Metrorail linkages through the Overtown/Arena Station and other possible livable community intermodal system improvements. FDOT is proposing changes for the Port of Miami traffic, which will include modifications to NE/NW 5th and 6th Streets to have three travel lanes in each direction, and additional ramps on to I-95 for northbound traffic, and traffic westbound on SR836, The Dolphin Expressway. This project was recently rejected by the MPO so efforts to determine new alternatives should be undertaken. Transportation capacity is controlled by the downtown's DRI agreement (Development of Regional Impact). The local circulation is addressed on a project by project basis in the Major Use Special Permits (MUSP). Environmental Quality Redevelopment will environmental quality due provisions in the City's building improve to existing permit process. Miami -Dade County's Department of Environmental Resource Management reviews all new construction permits to insure health standards are followed. Asbestos testing is required for existing buildings that are to undergo renovation. The County's Health Department must also approve any water and sewer changes, restaurants, hospitals, clinics, and schools. Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department ("M-DWASD") provides water and sewage services and runoff drainage for the Redevelopment Area. M-DWASD has upgraded their standards which means that nearly all new construction and renovations within the Redevelopment Area will require upgrades to the water service lines, given the age and smaller diameter of the existing water lines. Locations of concern within the Redevelopment Area are those locations that once had industrial uses and gas stations, which are primarily in Park West, along the FEC railroad tracks, and along NW 7th Avenue. Effect on School Population In 2000, the population of the Redevelopment Area was 3,904. The average household size in the 2000 Census for Miami - Dade County was 2.90, which means there are approximately 1,347 households. Using Miami -Dade County Public School's five -step School Impact Review Analysis Process, this suggests that there are currently approximately: • 238 school children enrolled in elementary school; • 130 school children enrolled in middle school; and • 151 school children enrolled in high school. • 519 total students (estimated) 124 Since the projected population growth for the Redevelopment Area is difficult to estimate given the large development potential, two scenarios were calculated using the School Impact Review Analysis Process (see Section 10, Appendix C). Based on this analysis, substantial numbers of new residents will require the construction of new schools or major additions to existing ones. If every property in the Redevelopment Area was built out to its maximum potential, with current zoning, Miami -Dade Public Schools will need to double the size of Booker T. Washington High School and add multiple middle and elementary schools Currently with the low utilization of the one high school serving the neighborhood, 2000 to 3000 more residential units can be added to the school district and stay within capacity limits. That is not true for the middle and elementary schools. The two middle schools serving the area are both currently overcrowded. The elementary schools are currently underutilized but new development generates more students at the elementary level. The analysis only took into account the public schools, not charter schools. The student population in the charter schools can come from outside the Redevelopment Area and Miami -Dade County Public Schools does not factor them into their formulas. Factors that can affect the projections of the school impact analysis: 1) Increases in zoning causing additional residential units beyond existing zoning. 2) A lowering of the student drop -out rate, primarily affecting the high school level. 3) A large percentage of new residents sending their children to charter or private schools. Miami -Dade County Public Schools is assessing their facilities and the number of students since Florida voters passed a referendum in 2002 requiring a mandatory classroom size reduction in public schools. The deadline for this is the 2008-9 school year. In 2008, Miami Dade County Public Schools implemented a school concurrency system which allows them to receive information from the all local municipalities to determine the amount of future growth a community can anticipated based on new/proposed development or redevelopment.. This will also impact the students living in the Redevelopment Area. Current Schools serving Redevelopment Area include: Elementary Schools: Frederick Douglass Elementary Paul Laurence Dunbar Elementary Phillis Wheatley Elementary Riverside Elementary the Elementary Charter Schools: Mater Academy East Charter School Rosa Parks Charter School Overtown Magnet / Elementary Alternative Schools: Ada Merritt Elementary A commuter school within close proximity to the Redevelopment Area, providing a dual language education: English plus Spanish or Portuguese. Secondary Schools: Jose de Diego, Middle School Booker T. Washington Senior High Secondary Charter Schools: Downtown Miami Charter School Mater Academy East Charter School Magnet /Alternative Secondary Schools: Corporate Academy North Accommodates students who, for various 125 reasons, have been unsuccessful in a traditional high school. Facilities accommodate approximately 160 young adults. Instructional program is tailored to the needs of the individual student. Through a partnership with Communities In Schools of Miami, Inc., students participate in mentoring programs that include opportunities to explore careers in many of Miami's larger companies. Jobs for Miami Training Academy Provides vocational and educational training for adults, young adults, out of school youth, dislocated workers, welfare recipients and refugees. Miami Skills Center Provides basic education, and technical and career development skills New World School of the Arts A state -supported school cooperatively administered by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, Miami -Dade Community College, and the University of Florida. The grades 9-12 program provides a comprehensive educational sequence of artistic training, academic and creative development and preparation for professional careers in the arts. School for Advanced Studies, Wolfson Campus Provides an accelerated, full-time dual enrollment program (high school & college) at Miami -Dade Community College. Young Men's Preparatory Academy Provides a rigorous curriculum along with positive role model using intensive study of Sean Covey's "The Seven habits for Highly Effective Teens." Community Facilities and Services Community Facilities and Services in and near the Redevelopment Area: • Parks / Public Spaces o Bicentennial Park [to be renamed "Museum Park"] o Gibson Park o Athalie Range Park o Lyric Plaza o Culmer Center's grounds o Williams Park o Rainbow Village Park o Henry Reeves Park o Lummis Park • Service, Meeting, & Recreational Centers o Culmer/Overtown Neighborhood Center, o The Overtown Youth Center o Freedom Tower o Action Community Action Agency Service Center (CAA), 858 West Flagler Street, (305) 547-4892 o Wynwood Neighborhood Center (DHS), 2902 NW 2nd Avenue, (305) 547-7661 • Churches o Central Baptist Church o Greater Bethel A.M.E. Church o Mount Zion Baptist Church o St. Johns Baptist Church o St. Agnes Episcopal Church o St. Peter's Catholic Church • Educational o University of Miami Medical Campus (Jackson Hospital) o Miami -Dade Community College, Wolfson Campus, o The Culmer/Overtown Branch Library, Miami -Dade County Library System o Main Library, Miami -Dade County 126 • Entertainment Venues o Historic Lyric Theater o Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami -Dade County o Bicentennial Park [to be renamed "Museum Park"] o American Airlines Arena o Bayfront Park and Amphitheater o Gusman Center • Public Transit o Metrorail (two stations) o Metromover (five stations) o Metrobus, (many routes) Physical and Social Quality Until recently, Park West and Overtown have been overlooked as a desirable place to live and work. With the attraction of the Park West Entertainment District during evening and early morning hours, and with the anticipated spill -over effect of the Performing Arts Center, expansion of the Historic Lyric Theater, and new proposed market rate and affordable housing, the physical character of the Redevelopment Area is about to change. Recent projects from the CRA have been geared toward beautification of the public rights -of -way with sidewalk improvements and tree planting. The CRA has identified that new zoning regulations are needed with design guidelines. The intention of the design guidelines is to ensure that both publicly and privately constructed buildings are attractive and support the need for pedestrian access, comfort, and safety. Proposed new developments at the time of writing this amendment all provide a mix of uses including residential, making it possible to live and work within walking distance or transit. The greatest asset of this community is its location. The Central Business District is within walking distance, it is served by public transit, and it is centrally located in Miami - Dade County. Power, of the SEOP ' OR -A. • Powers Not Assigned to the SEOPW CRA Authority to Undertake Redevelopment + Future Amendments to this Kecie-,-eiopnent Plan • State of Florida Statut-oiv Requirenients • Safeguards and Assurances • Land Acquisition To the lover of cities. _. drarliviidaratity is a very res? garadiy. - Ra U.rpwarr Log - Plan Management The Redevelopment Plan shall be managed through the items specified in this section. The CRA shall conform to all requirements and standards as designated by the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969. The CRA is entitled to undertake all activities under the Act, as it may be modified from time to time. Powers of the CRA The CRA shall be empowered to engage in the activities set forth in Section 163.370, Florida Statutes, which include the following 1) To write and execute contacts and other implementation means that may be necessary or timely to exercise its powers under the Community Redevelopment Act. 2) To distribute information regarding community redevelopment to the community's residents, property owners, elected officials, and activists. 3) To commence with community redevelopment and related activities within the Redevelopment Area, which may include: a. Acquisition of property by purchase, lease, option, gift, grant, bequest, devise, or other voluntary method of acquisition. b. Disposition of property at its fair 128 market value in accordance with Section 163.380, Florida Statute; c. Demolishing and removing existing structures, landscaping, or previous improvements to real property or facilities; and d. Installing, constructing, or rebuilding streets, sidewalks, utilities, parks, playgrounds, and public spaces. 4) Within the Redevelopment Area: a. To make inspections, surveys, appraisals, soundings, or test borings on private property; b. To conduct environmental tests and surveys on private property; c. To purchase, lease, option, gift, grant, or bequest, any real property together or without any other improvements; d. To hold, improve, clear or prepare for redevelopment any acquired real property; e. To mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise encumber or dispose of any property; f. To enter into contracts that are necessary for any redevelopment activities, projects or programs; To solicit requests for proposals, requests for qualification, and bid solicitation for redevelopment activities; g. h. To apply for financing and to borrow money from the Federal Government, the State, the County, the City or other public body or from any public or private sources in the form of loans, bonds, grants, contributions, and any other form of financial assistance to be used for redevelopment activities; i. To acquire air rights which shall be used for implementing redevelopment projects; To appropriate funds and pay expenditures as necessary to perform the actions identified in this plan; k. To organize, coordinate, and direct the administration of redevelopment activities, projects, and programs the City of Miami and/or Miami -Dade County; 1. To establish community parking projects; m. To fund pilot programs to market activities within the Redevelopment Area; and, n. To establish a community development entity under the U.S. Treasury New Market Tax Credit Program; o. To establish, implement and fund community policing innovations. j. 5) The CRA shall be permitted to issue redevelopment revenue bonds and other financial instruments in accordance with Section 163.385, Florida Statutes. Bonds issued under this section do not constitute indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restrictions as they apply to the City of Miami or Miami -Dade County. 6) The CRA may exercise all or any part in combination of redevelopment powers as prescribed in the Community Redevelopment Act. Powers not assigned to the SEOPW CRA The following activities may not be paid for or financed by increment revenues, but may be purchased through alternative funding sources: 1) Construction or expansion of administrative buildings for public bodies or operational police and fire buildings, unless each taxing authority agrees to such method of financing for the construction or expansion, or unless the construction or expansion is contemplated as part of a community policing innovation. 2) Installation, construction, reconstruction, repair, or alteration of any publicly owned 129 capital improvements or projects which are not an integral part of or necessary for carrying out the community redevelopment plan if such projects or improvements are normally financed by the governing body with user fees or if such projects or improvements would be installed, constructed, reconstructed, repaired, or altered within 3 years of the approval of the community redevelopment plan by the governing body pursuant to a previously approved public capital improvement or project schedule or plan of the governing body which approved the community redevelopment plan, 3) General government operating expenses unrelated to the planning and carrying out of a community redevelopment plan. Regarding zoning and land development regulations, the CRA shall not have the power to: a. Independently zone or rezone property; however the CRA can recommend and advocate zoning changes to the City of Miami; b. Grant variances or exceptions from zoning, building regulations, or life - safety codes.; however the CRA can request such variances and exceptions to the City on behalf of an applicant; or c. Independently close or vacate public rights -of -way. The CRA Board shall not have the power to grant final approval of this Redevelopment Plan and future revisions. Authority to Undertake Redevelopment This Redevelopment Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Florida Community Redevelopment Act, Chapter 163, Part III of the Florida Statutes. The adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and any later modifications or amendments shall follow the procedures set forth in Chapter 163, Part III. By adopting this Redevelopment Plan, the CRA is authorized to perform "community redevelopment" as defined in Section 163.340(9), Florida Statutes. The CRA is the government agency that oversees and monitors development within the Redevelopment Area, and as such, all development projects proposed within its environs must be presented before the CRA Board prior to the City of Miami granting approval of the project. Future Amendments to this Redevelopment Plan This Redevelopment Plan is an amendment and update to the original 1982 Plan. In the future, this Redevelopment Plan may need to be amended as new, innovative projects eligible for tax increment revenues are proposed for the area. Amendments to the Plan shall be in accordance with Section 163.361, Florida Statutes. The CRA Board will initiate any amendment action by adopting a resolution recommending that the Miami City Commission adopt the proposed amendment to the Plan, and requesting transmittal to Miami -Dade County for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The original "Findings of Necessity" should be reaffirmed with regard to the proposed modification or amendment. Should any provision of the Community Redevelopment Plan, including later revisions, be found to be invalid, unconstitutional or illegal, such provision shall not affect the remaining portions of the Plan. 130 State of Florida Statutory Requirements The Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 requires that specific elements be included in every redevelopment Plan. The chart to the right identifies the location for each of those elements within this Master Plan Report. 131 Technical Item Section Legal Description 1 Diagram Showing Open Space 2 J Diagram Showing Street Layout 3 Limitations On Massing, Intensity And Density 2 3 Properties For Parks And Other Public Use 3 Neighborhood Impact 6 Publicly Funded Capital Improvements 5 Safeguards And Assurances 7 Retention Of Controls And Restrictions With Land Sales 7 / Residential Use- Affordability 2 CX 4 _ 6 Costs 5 Timeline 5 Safeguards & Assurances Safeguards to Ensure Redevelopment Activities Follow the Redevelopment Plan 1) The CRA shall file an annual financial report by March 31 of each year with Miami -Dade County, and the City of Miami This annual report shall contain a programmatic overview of the public and/or private funded activities of the CRA as allowed by the Redevelopment Plan. 2) The CRA shall file a Five Year Capital Program budget with the City of Miami, for inclusion in the City's Five Year Comprehensive Plan, and update this budgeting document annually. 3) The CRA Board shall be fully subject to the Florida Sunshine Law and meet at least on a monthly basis in a public forum. 4) The CRA shall provide adequate safeguards to ensure that all leases, deeds, contracts, agreements and declarations of restrictions relative to any real property conveyed shall contain restrictions and covenants running with the land and its uses, or other such provisions necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. The CRA shall further ensure that such conveyance comply with the requirements of Section 163.380, Florida Statutes. 5) The CRA shall continue to acquire property and to convey such interest to developers and investors for redevelopment. 6) The CRA shall promote the use of land pooling to provide existing property owners with an opportunity to participate in the redevelopment as an equity partners in return for the use of the private owners land for such development. 7) The CRA shall present a Regulatory Plan to the City of Miami for adoption and continue to recommend zoning changes consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. 8) The CRA shall request to the City that all proposals for new development, once reviewed by the City administration, shall be forwarded to the CRA for review and consistency with the Redevelopment Plan. 9) The CRA shall request specific goals and objectives from developers that utilize Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds. 10) The CRA shall require a Local Participation Agreement for all development projects occurring within the Redevelopment Area. 11) The CRA shall, or will require the developer to provide existing business 132 owners and business tenants within the Redevelopment Area preference for re- entry into business, provided the business is compatible with the uses, theme and quality of development in the Redevelopment Area and that the business owner or tenant has the financial ability to operate the business consistent with the overall integrity of the redevelopment district. Safeguards to Ensure Financial Accountability 1) The CRA shall maintain adequate records to provide for an annual external audit which shall be conducted by a knowledgeable Certified Public Accountant. The findings of the audit shall be presented at a public meeting of the CRA Board and such findings shall be forwarded to the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County by March 31 of each year for the preceding fiscal year which shall run from October 1 through September 30. The annual Audit Report shall be accompanied by the CRA's Annual Financial Report and shall be provided to the City of Miami, and Miami -Dade County and shall be made available for public review. Legal notice in newspapers of general circulation shall be provided to inform the public of the availability for review of the Annual Audit and Annual Financial Report. 2) All CRA tax increment financing (TIF) funds shall be held in a Redevelopment Trust Fund separately from other funds as required by Florida Statutes. 3) The SEOPW CRA shall request specific goals and objectives from developers that utilize Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds. Safeguards to Ensure Proper Implementation and Project/Program Accountability 1) The CRA shall establish measurable goals and objectives for each activity it administers and/or funds. 2) The CRA shall coordinate with related agencies, entities, community based organizations and stakeholders, specifically including the Water and Sewer Authority (WASA), the City and County Public Works, Capital Improvement Projects, and Planning departments to ensure the proper planning, budgeting and implementation of projects. 3) The CRA shall hold public hearings on the following at its monthly Board Meetings: a. Report and status on its programs and projects (the "Activities"). b. Gather input from property owners, citizens and interested parties regarding redevelopment activities; and c. Discuss strategies to resolve local redevelopment issues Providing for a Time -Certain and Sever ability The term of the CRA shall be through the year 2030, or through the end of the fiscal year in which any outstanding bonds are retired, whichever is later. Land Acquisition Section 163.370, Florida Statutes, provides that the CRA may acquire land. In Section 4 of this Redevelopment Plan, under District Wide Program #9, Miscellaneous Land Acquisition, the CRA objective states that "[t]he CRA proposes to acquire land, as necessary, to support the implementation of the projects described in this Redevelopment Plan within the Redevelopment Area." The CRA cannot acquire property through eminent domain proceedings. The City of Miami has the sole authority to commence eminent domain proceedings on 133 behalf of the CRA. The CRA shall recommend that the City resist resorting to such proceedings, because of its costly nature which is further typically perceived as a non - collaborative action by property owners in the Redevelopment Area. In the event that property owners are unwilling to participate in the redevelopment, despite the provision of financial and technical assistance, the CRA shall recommend to the City of Miami that eminent domain proceedings commence. Definitions Definitions The following terms, wherever used or referred to in this part, have the following meanings: Blighted Area An area in which there are a substantial number of deteriorated, or deteriorating structures, in which conditions, as indicated by government -maintained statistics or other studies, are leading to economic distress or endanger life or property, and in which two or more of the following factors are present: (a) Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, parking facilities, roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities; Aggregate assessed values of real property in the area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the 5 years prior to the finding of such conditions; (c) Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; Deterioration of site or other improvements; Inadequate and outdated building density patterns; Falling lease rates per square foot of office, commercial, or industrial space (b) (d) (e) (f) (g 135 compared to the remainder of the county or municipality; Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; Residential and commercial vacancy rates higher in the area than in the remainder of the county or municipality; Incidence of crime in the area higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality; Fire and emergency medical service calls to the area proportionately higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality; (1) A greater number of violations of the Florida Building Code in the area than the number of violations recorded in the remainder of the county or municipality; Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or (n) Governmentally owned property with adverse environmental conditions caused by a public or private entity. (m) However, the term "blighted area" also means any area in which at least one of the factors identified in paragraphs (a) through (n) are present and all taxing authorities subject to s. 163.387(2)(a) agree, either by interlocal agreement or agreements with the agency or by resolution, that the area is blighted. Such agreement or resolution shall only determine that the area is blighted. For purposes of qualifying for the tax credits authorized in chapter 220, "blighted area" means an area as defined in this subsection. Board or Commission A board, commission, department, division, office, body or other unit of the county or municipality. Community Policing Innovation A policing technique or strategy designed to reduce crime by reducing opportunities for, and increasing the perceived risks of engaging in, criminal activity through visible presence of police in the community, including, but not limited to, community mobilization, neighborhood block watch, citizen patrol, citizen contact patrol, foot patrol, neighborhood storefront police stations, field interrogation, or intensified motorized patrol. Community Redevelopment Agency A public agency created by, or designated pursuant to Section 163.356, Florida Statutes. Community Redevelopment Area A slum area, a blighted area, or an area in which there is a shortage of housing that is affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly, or a coastal and tourist area that is deteriorating and economically distressed due to outdated building density patterns, inadequate transportation and parking facilities, faulty lot layout or inadequate street layout, or a combination thereof which the governing body designates as appropriate for community redevelopment. Community Redevelopment Plan A plan, as it exists from time to time, for a community redevelopment area. Federal Government The United States Government or any agency or instrumentality, corporate or otherwise, of the United States. Housing authority A housing authority created by and established pursuant to Chapter 421, Florida Statutes. Increment Revenue The amount calculated pursuant to Section 163.387, Florida Statutes. 136 Mixed -Mode Corridor A street limited to pedestrian, bicycle and transit movements for all or part of the day and night. Public officer Any officer who is in charge of any department or branch of the government of the county or municipality relating to health, fire, building regulations, or other activities concerning dwellings in the county or municipality. Real Property All lands, including improvements and fixtures thereon, and property of any nature appurtenant thereto or used in connection therewith and every estate, interest, right, and use, legal or equitable, therein, including but not limited to terms for years and liens by way of judgment, mortgage, or otherwise. Redevelopment or Community Redevelopment Undertakings, activities, or projects of a county, municipality, or community redevelopment agency in a community redevelopment Oarea for the elimination and prevention of the development or spread of slums and blight, or for the reduction or prevention of crime, or for the provision of affordable housing, whether for rent or for sale, to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly, and may include slum clearance and redevelopment in a community redevelopment area or rehabilitation and revitalization of coastal resort and tourist areas that are deteriorating and economically distressed, or rehabilitation or conservation in a community redevelopment area, or any combination or part thereof, in accordance with a community redevelopment plan and may include the preparation of such a plan. Related Activities Either: 1) Planning work for the preparation of a general neighborhood redevelopment plan or for the preparation or completion of a communitywide plan or program pursuant to Section 163.365, Florida Statutes. 2) The functions related to the acquisition and disposal of real property pursuant to Section 163.370, Florida Statutes. 3) The development of affordable housing for residents of the area. 4) The development of community policing innovations. Slum Area An area having physical or economic conditions conducive to disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, poverty, or crime because there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which are impaired by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence, and exhibiting one or more of the following factors: (a) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces; (b) High density of population, compared to the population density of adjacent areas within the county or municipality; and overcrowding, as indicated by government -maintained statistics or other studies and the requirements of the Florida Building Code; or (c) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes. 137 Directory of Local Organizations Directory Updating this directory from time to time does not constitute a revision to this redevelopment plan. Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency James Villacorta, Executive Director E-mail: jhvillacorta@ miamigov com 49 NW 5 Street, Suite 100 Miami, Fl 33128 Telephone: (305) 679-6800 Miami Dade County Board of County Commissioners Audrey Edmonson, District 3 Stephen P. Clark Center 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 220 Miami, Florida 33128 Telephone (305) 375-5393 Email: district3@miamidade.gov Dennis C. Moss, District 9 Chairperson, Board of County Commissioners 111 N.W. 1st Street, Suite 320 Miami, Florida 33128 Telephone (305) 375-4832 Email: district9@miamidade.gov CRA Board of Commissioners Commissioner Michelle Spence Jones, 139 Chairperson, Telephone: (305)250-5390 E-mail: mspence-jones@miamigov.com Commissioner Marc Sarnoff Vice -Chairperson Telephone: (305)250-5333 E-mail: jwinton@ci.miami.fl.us Commissioner Angel Gonzalez, Board Member Telephone: (305)250-5430 E-mail• agonzalez@ci.miami.fl.us Commissioner Joe M. Sanchez, Board Member E-mail: jsanchez@ci.miami.fl.us Telephone: (305)250-5380 Commissioner Tomas P. Regalado, Board Member E-mail- tregalado@ci.miami.fl.us Telephone: (305)250-5420 City of Miami Pedro G. Hernandez, City Manager 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, FL 33133 Telephone: (305)250-5400 E-mail: phernandez@miamigov.com Julie O. Bru, City Attorney 444 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 945 Miami, Florida 33130 Telephone: (305)416-1800 E-mail- law@ci.miami.fl.us Department of Community Development Main Number (305) 416-2080 George Mensah, Director Telephone: (305) 416-2099 Planning Department Main Number: (305) 416-400 Fax: (305) 416-1435 Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director Telephone: (305) 416-1435 Economic Initiatives Division City Manager's Office Main Number (305) 416-1400 Fax: (305) 416-2156 Lisa Mazique, Director Telephone: (305) 416-1411 Public Works Department Main Number (305) 416-1200 Stephanie Grindell, Director E-mail: sgrindell@ci.miami.fl.us Building Department Main Number (305) 416-1100 Hector Lima, Director E-mail: hlima@ci.miami.fl.us Overtown Community Oversight Board Saliha Nelson, Chairperson 1600 NW 3 Ave, Bldg C Miami, FL 33128 Telephone: (305) 573-8217 Overtown Civic Partnership & Design Center Philip Bacon, Executive Director Dorsey House 250 NW Ninth Street Miami, FL 33136 Phone: 305-416-3301 Fax: 305-416-3302 www.overtown.org The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. 819 NW 2 Avenue, Miami, FL 33136 Telephone: 305-636-2390 Fax: (305) 636-2391 The Trust for Public Land 7900 Red Road, Suite 25 South Miami, FL 33143 Telephone: (305) 667-0409 www.tpl.or. BAME Development Corporation of South Florida 245 NW 8th Street, Miami, Florida 33136 Telephone: (305) 373-7233 Fax: (305) 373-8915 140 Collins Center for Public Policy 150 SE 2nd Avenue Suite 703, Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 377-4484 www.collinscenter.org St. Johns CDC David Alexander, President/CEO 1324 NW 3 Avenue, Miami FL 33136 Telephone: (305) 372-0682 St. Agnes CDC 2031 NW 4th Court Miami FL 33136 Telephone: (305) 573-6885 Mt. Zion CDC Don Patterson, Director 301 NW 9 St, Miami, FL 33136 Telephone: (305) 379-4147 The Overtown Youth Center Carla Penn, Executive Director 450 NW 14th Street, Miami FL 33136 Telephone: (305) 349-1204 Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) 150 S. E. 2nd Ave., Suite 911 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 381-7967 Fax (305) 372-1890 www.liscnet.org Beacon Council Inc. 80 SW 8 Street, Suite 2400, Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 579-1300 www.beaconcouncil.com Habitat for Humanity Anne Manning, Director 9350 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 200 Miami, Florida Telephone: (305) 670-2224 www.miamihabitat.org Florida Department of Transportation District VI Secretary 1000 NW 111th Avenue Miami, FL 33172 Telephone: (305) 470-5197 Fax (305) 470-5610 General Information: (305) 470-5349 www.dot.state.fl.us • A. Previous Planning Work for the Area • B,_ Acknowledgements + C. School Impact Analysis for the SEOPW CRA Redevelopment Plan • D. 1982 Resolution adopting the SEOPW CRA • E. Resolution Adopting New Boundaries ■ F. Advertisements of Public Notice • G. Findings of Slumand Blight • II. Oyertowrr Empowerment Trust's Goals 7 ,,] lol! IA ' _ ' � , l i l l 1, 1 l' 4i_+m 1 i•f�i ,.7.,. 1r■ R 4 �FAI a 1.14,6 7 0, I a 1 Gl ;ird }+ y .�R•1I pp � • • r ,I, is 11 . I . III' II »' I, 1,;. , r • , !II ,. 111,1,0i1 . lelrE, ' 7• , v:ICJ...11 ,',I Bill I '. tii Appendices Appendix A Previous Planning Work for the area 1973 Urban Development and Zoning Plan. This report recommended redevelopment of the area north of the port access road to I-395 between N.W. 1" Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, later designated as Park West. This recommendation was incorporated within the MCNP in 1976. 1976 Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 4MCNP) A Comprehensive Plan is required by the State of Florida for every municipality. Miami's Comprehensive Plan provides the framework for the overall development of the City of Miami. This plan is periodically updated and continues to guide the City's decisions. In 1976 Development opportunities were identified for the CRA area within this document including the establishment of an in -town residential community and redevelopment opportunities made possible by the expanded transit system. 142 1979 -1980 Overtown Redevelopment Plan Prepared by the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department with extensive citizen review, this plan was for the larger Overtown community, not just the CRA boundaries. This plan was adopted by both the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County. Portions of this plan that referred to Southeast Overtown were incorporated into the original SEOPW Community Redevelopment Plan. 1979-1981 Miami Park West, A Redevelopment Program for Downtown Miami Prepared by Wallace, Roberts and Todd (WRT), American Cities Corporation, and Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, this plan called for land purchase of a 16-block area, extensive clearance and redevelopment of the industrial area into a residential and commercial community. The focal point of the plan was a large linear green space linking Overtown to Bicentennial Park. This plan was incorporated into the 1982 SEOPW Community Redevelopment Plan. 1981-82 SEOPW Community Redevelopment Plan Prepared by the City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, this plan stated to the State of Florida the need for a Community Redevelopment Agency, and specified projects and operations for the CRA. Although the plan was modified over the following few years, it is now out of date, which has led to the Community Redevelopment Plan to which this appendix is attached. The 1982 redevelopment plan was reviewed and modified over a six-month period by the Southeast Overtown/Park West Ad Hoc Committee that included representatives of the Overtown and Park West communities and provided a forum for community concerns. 1986-87 Omni Area Redevelopment Plan, September 1986 Prepared by the City of Miami Planning Department, this is the Community Redevelopment Plan for the Omni Area CRA. August 1984 Design Standards and Guidelines for the Southeast Overtown / Park West Redevelopment Project This document was prepared by the Downtown Development Authority for the SEOPW CRA. These standards contain many common sense practices for treating pavement and landscaping on public streets. The guidelines however reinforce a plan that is heavily dependent upon a wide landscaped pedestrian mall, an idea since widely discredited nationally. The small segment of the pedestrian mall that was constructed on NW 9th Street in the late 1980's has already been re -opened to traffic. February 1989 The Historic Overtown Folklife Village, Master Plan / Urban Design Guidelines. This plan and accompanying guidelines were prepared for the Black Archives, History and Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. by Ronald E. Frazier & Associates. The plan surveys a three block area of historic buildings and offers architectural guidelines for buildings. 1989 Downtown Miami Master Plan 1989 This document was prepared by the City of Miami Department of Planning, Building, & Zoning and the Downtown Development Authority. This plan was officially adopted by the City Commission in 1989 and continues to guide decision making for the downtown. May 1997 143 Master Plan for Historic Overtown Folklife Village, May 1997. This plan was prepared by Duany, Plater- Zyberk & Company as an update to the 1989 plan for the Black Archives. It offers new implementation strategies for the previous plan. 1998 NW 3rd Avenue Priority Business Corridor. This document prepared by Bermello-Ajamil & Partners, Inc for the SEOPW CRA examines the physical existing conditions along this historic commercial corridor. Recommendations are also included to stimulate business. September 1999 City of Miami Community Redevelopment Agency, Fiscal Year 2000 and 5-Year Plan 2000-2004, Budgeted Projects and Programs Prepared by the SEOPW CRA, this document lays out the current five-year plan of programs and expenditures. Projects and programs from this document have been included in the SEOPW Community Redevelopment Plan. March 2000 Overtown, Redevelopment Area Design Charrette Report This document was prepared by Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and produced through a grant from the Florida Department of Community Affairs to the South Florida Regional Planning Council for Eastward Ho initiatives. SFRPC brought in the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to provide a community design charrette workshop and produce a detailed plan for all of Overtown. Many local architects and planners participated along with local property owners and residents. The plan showed how the community can redevelop over time with small incremental improvements and reinvestment, unlike typical grand schemes. Unfortunately the plan failed to capture the excitement needed in the investment community and official circles, and is perceived by some members of the community as the latest in a string of broken promises. March 2000 Housing Needs and Potential of the Overtown / Park West Area This document was prepared by Reinhold P. Wolff Economic Research, Inc. for South Florida Partnership Office Fannie Mae. It is a market housing study. Spring 2000 History of the City of Miami a brief summary of its past in pictures, maps and writings This was prepared by students at the University of Miami School of Architecture under the directions of professors Allan Shulman and Adolfo Albaisa. This is not a planning document but rather a summary showing how Downtown Miami has changed over the years. 2002 Miami River Corridor Urban Infill and Redevelopment Plan This document was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc for the Miami River Commission, City of Miami and Miami -Dade County. 2002 Park West Club District Streetscape Master Plan. This plan was prepared by Wallace Roberts & Todd for the CRA. It identifies parking areas and streetscape improvements along Eleventh Street. August 2002 Overtown Greenway Plan This document was prepared by Trust for Public Land and Wallace Roberts & Todd. This document identifies the various planning efforts taking place in the area and offers greenway alignments and landscaping and 144 streetscape guidelines. transportation trust funds and to develop such improvements as a community intermodal October 2002 system. Overtown Greenprint Plan Prepared by the Trust for Public Land, The Greenprint Steering Committee, and Glatting Jackson Kerscher Anglin Lopez Rinehart Inc. The Greenprint Plan is a strategic plan to design and build an interconnected system of urban open spaces, including parks, greens, gardens, plazas, bikeways and sidewalks. December 2002 Overtown: A Look Back, Connections to the Future This plan was prepared by Urban Design Associates on behalf of the Collins Center for Public Policy, Inc and the Overtown Civic Partnership. The document analyzes the existing conditions and shows design alternatives for "Downtown Overtown," the core area of Overtown. November 2003 Miami at Midnight This report was prepared by Thomas F. Gustafson, P.A. to examine the use of narrow gauge rail modality in the SEOPW and OMNI CRA areas and to suggest locations for liner buildings and related parking structures. The report provides a basis for requesting Appendix B Acknowledgements The Southeast Overtown — Park West Community Redevelopment Plan, Update 2004 was prepared initially by Dover -Kohl & Partners, Town Planners, with the 2009 Update modified by City of Miami Planning Department. Incredible support, ideas and information for the entire plan was received from: • City of Miami Commissioners and CRA Board Members: o Commissioner Angel Gonzalez, District 1 o Commissioner Marc Sarnoff, District 2 o Commissioner Joe M. Sanchez, District 3 o Commissioner Tomas P. Regalado, District 4 o Commissioner Michelle Spence Jones, District 5 • County Commissioner, Audrey Edmonson, District 3 • City Manager, Pedro Hernandez • CRA Executive Director, James H. Villacorta 145 • CRA consultants: o TY Lin International/HJ Ross o ZHA, economists o Thomas Gustafson • City of Miami's Planning and Zoning Departments • Many residents, property owners, and business owners within and near the Redevelopment Area. • Overtown Community Oversight Board • Overtown Civic Partnership • The Black Archives, History & Research Foundation of South Florida, Inc. • The Trust for Public Land • LISC of Greater Miami • The Overtown Youth Center • Several Community Development Corporations, including: o BAME CDC o St. Agnes CDC o St. John's CDC • Park West Civic Association • Florida Department of Transportation • Several Community Churches, including: o St Agnes o Mt Zion • FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation) • Thomas F. Gustafson and Nova Southeastern University's Center for Public Policy and Leadership Appendix C School Impact Analysis for the CRA Redevelopment Plan This Impact Analysis has been performed to examine the impact of the CRA Community Redevelopment Plan on the public school system in Miami -Dade County. This analysis is projecting a total redevelopment of all properties within the Redevelopment Area as if almost all of the area were to be built out today using the current zoning code. This scenario is not likely to occur because the eventual redevelopment will happen gradually over a long time, and many of the existing structures will remain. However, this is the best approach to examine possible problems that can be avoided over the next few years as properties do get redeveloped. Approach: Each City block within the Redevelopment Area was numbered. (See attached map) The zoning for each block was cross-referenced. A spreadsheet was generated that lists each block, corresponding 146 gross square footages, and the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for each zoning district. The spreadsheet generates the approximate number of dwelling units with the assumption that the average apartment size is 1,250 square feet of space. This dwelling unit size is from a recent analysis by a developer for a project in Overtown. The columns on the right of the spreadsheet separate out the number of possible dwelling units that occur in each of the school districts provided by Miami -Dade County Public Schools ("M-DCPS"). There is one high school that serves the Redevelopment Area, two middle schools, and three elementary schools. A second scenario: While examining the FAR, it became apparent that a developer could build smaller units and stay within the maximum density allowed in each zoning district. Therefore a second spreadsheet was prepared that removes the FAR limitations and estimates the possible number of units using the maximum density allowed. The SD-6, and SD-16 zones do not specify a maximum density, so for those areas we used the first scenario (with FAR) to estimate the number of units on those blocks. This second scenario suggests that more dwelling units are possible if the controlling factor becomes the maximum density instead of the FAR. There was no analysis prepared to determine if a developer could maximize the density within the FAR limitations. Findings: Using M-DCPS's equations to estimate the number of students for each school, the new capacity is compared with the existing capacity as reported in M-DCPS's Region IV FISH Design Capacity (Permanent + Relocatable). The comparison suggests the following: Booker T. Washington High School: Scenario 1 reveals 3,060 new high school students would be added to the neighborhood, putting the high school at 202% of its current capacity. This reveals that another high school of a similar size would need to be added, or the school would need to double its current student capacity, by renovation or additions to the existing school. Scenario 2 reveals 6,278 new high school students, requiring much more capacity. Booker T. Washington HS is presently under utilized. It can accommodate approximately 1,000 additional students before exceeding M-DCPS's acceptable threshold of 115%. Citrus Grove Middle School: Only a small portion of the Redevelopment Area lies within the Citrus Grove Middle School district. Scenario 1 (by FAR) reveals 35 new middle school students could be added to the school. Scenario 2 (by maximum density) reveals 150 new middle school students. Without any new students, Citrus Grove currently has a capacity problem at 151% utilization. More capacity is currently needed at Citrus Grove Middle School. The utilization becomes a concern to the School Board when it increases above 115%. Jose de Diego Middle School: The majority of the Redevelopment Area lies within the Jose de Diego Middle School district. Scenario 1 reveals 2,603 new middle school students could be added to the neighborhood. Scenario 2 reveals 5,318 new middle school students. This is a significant number of new students. Without any new students, Jose de Diego currently has a slight capacity problem at 119% utilization. Scenario 1 creates a capacity utilization of 342% and Scenario 2 creates it at 575%. Jose de Diego Middle School needs to be increased in size immediately for more capacity. Another middle school should be planned now if it isn't already. 147 Paul Dunbar Elementary School: Only a small portion of the Redevelopment Area lies within the Paul Dunbar Elementary School district. Scenario 1 reveals 129 new elementary school students could be added to the school. Scenario 2 reveals 451 new elementary school students. It appears that new development within the Redevelopment Area will cause minimal capacity problems at Paul Dunbar Elementary School. With 451 new students from the unlikely Scenario 2, the capacity is at 119% utilization. Phillis Wheatley Elementary School: Scenario 1 reveals 925 new elementary school students could be added to the school. Scenario 2 reveals 1,768 new elementary school students. There appears to be no capacity problems at Phillis Wheatley Elementary School. Scenario 1 reveals 925 new elementary school students would be added to the Phillis Wheatley Elementary school district, putting the school at 209% of its current capacity of 655 students. This reveals that another elementary school of a similar size would need to be added, or the school would need to more than double its current student capacity. Scenario 2 reveals 1,768 new elementary school students. If this much redevelopment were to occur, an additional Elementary School will be needed for the neighborhood. Phillis Wheatley Elementary is presently under utilized. It can accommodate approximately 310 additional students before exceeding M- DCPS's acceptable threshold of 115%. Frederick Douglass Elementary School: A greater portion of the Redevelopment Area lies within the Frederick Douglass Elementary School district. Scenario 1 reveals 3,800 new elementary school students could be added to the school. Scenario 2 reveals 7,841 new elementary school students. Most of these new students would be living in Park West, where the development potential is very large. If Park West develops in a manner similar to Brickell Avenue, many of the households will then be part-time residents, professionals without children, or parents who send their children to charter schools or private schools. If this is the case, then the actual number of students for public schools will be reduced from the projected amount in this study. With both scenario projections, additional elementary schools will be needed in the neighborhood. Frederick Douglass Elementary can accommodate approximately 414 additional students before exceeding M- DCPS's acceptable threshold of 115%. This Redevelopment Plan was prepared by Dover, Kohl & Partners in, October 2003, and updated by the City of Miami's Planning Department in May 2009. 148 SEOPW CRA BLOCK NUMBERS FOR DWELLING UNIT PROJECTIONS 149 TN ST • dm ME MEV J G: BF 1 ' En ME IM El S7 El EM CI ST kat Inn1 MI ae 27 El Mil Ell la Mil 111111111111 0 4•_ N'i> { E s'PVV C.R:A R r.•;ievelapirriont Plgn Sch:a:al Imp Kr Anal;'M1i 51 ��11 dL Potential Buildout U .in i EKElting Zoning FAR& -Scenario 1 fP l.W11n.1 h:i .�•Y. +k S A✓'• a-uA A. • u.1 S uY a.'Sa+5.1 r f• YE., .AJ T CLL 1.0 LI . 't} IS .4 4P PJ' 14.4140,10, •1 U w PAP 1,4.411 ,IL+1a1 - e+11+ - r1R rl(f-rdf,le'f R'F.9 gle Np r{++JM rn rni n + P+rr nl ▪ xr ■ 1 LIE[[ 41d { AY' AL! :A. 119E 11' x4, +g xrr G5?I,L4 CC 11:6L 4144? e I41 1¢ erf 1■ •' 'e.u1'P., I .14 l+••, IP'1 r •l I. IF •l ?]4 JJL 9■ ISLE 1. ■ I PILL S J II x; AR Jw IT TJ Her ID fi Her 1: 111 JA •J R AMI] X I...1 + l• ,R Y. 111555, I v. Ye IT. :11 Y554 YJ : Jee x VI LLL ▪ 1444L4 114 151 4 .1a A::55 :15 24 1a Rr 9' freer { U 9 11 Iv 144 LLL 14' 444L4 LA 14 191 4 f I t• 1- P;; 1- IC 4AS, IC 1'4 INCH IIW5, ;4RJ ^CP .4•14 1 J'r 114' TI{! 1rl pH++J'• R x UAx151L r.1 ^ +r'e rr Yeee if 5• err. ry d11 :L IIf .5. 54{ lit J'e rpm 75 955T 141_ .4! 2 9N 1■ 1Cr 11u x'1 ,91 11 1' ;4 11 1 1 11 14 de 41 II 41 de 4' {S di IL 11 r; 11 w 1155 :31 gel :91 .IR ?'4 ?1 IL { Al ALA l-0.1r r.1 4,9 r.: e J *1 Rd e i :0•11 0.1r WA I !A14; .11 4I ✓ 1 +11: 514+ err. 91: W I • n 1e; Al 11 441 r. 14 Rd ✓ 14 PH r. 1 N J uJ 41 xJ RJ GI xd F1i441 111 E. IL NJ ✓ 14 PH 41 RI 4*I hl r. 1 RJ 5.1 n ' I 1±: xd RJ e: K n. KJ RJ *1 Rd eJ m •.I 5. 1 AI A{ 4.14 t}1 11.d U . Id K{ r.1 RJ 4I r.1 xJ KJ AI r: 1 pJ 11( 471 Ig I1; 111 1C IS tlR Pe {3 :9L P[I L1 411 IA 14 LE IC :X IY IA ,4 dPl Ia dY JJJ JJJ d4 Pe J1 .1411' 1'9 Re id 11 R ?sus {L :44 Ne 114 ulee 9S E 155 IL ' 115 1¢ 19 a{ 1■ IA 1.] .4. S:4 411 .44 :15 1 Rx5 17 ;11 ae Ji 14.1 VL iA 91 ¢4 11 IN 11e 30 AI IR111 ;u Il;rd 1.14 C RL 1u?J[ :K a4e 141 e]" :-1 -R x5 JH 191 r x' NRe 1C 111 •Ii Ji 1P J'+r 44 111 91 9¢ t? R].5 1Y IY'Y, 444 I C5 LL Sx5 1C 14. PA X 44144E .41S.I 14a ILL 3L 144 {I 1.5 a Ye 11 41 EL x 5•1 1111 J1 Ye IT T3: 4105 a: ▪ J'P R'S 4N+ IY MR ? Ye S R5 e Y, 11 IC S{ I R R. 114 11'Rr 1C4.5 I44 1¢ 1{'Tr 1141'1 L' N A T{ 41114 ix 4 ;1'a• n. xuw. R 4.5 N ;IR4 IR 7er N, 4 le PP M :11 111 MI :Y RNr JJs IS R, JH 9N Y4 9 &rr I¢ 1.1 94 17.04 17 111 91 91 10411 CIx11111+ 1014II51>14 1114eJf1 CP 4:1111 4 LI .1Kl.ni'.x 1.141 + J': 114rfr'?rh1J 1 Ill1. I.[ r[a1[E Mr 71 ..156 41.44R4 4:4.14 I [ LL'CEPP RIPP 110.1 'S11 5 •1 110.1f44 L441 r. 71.904 x'Ir 4L O 10445 J.• 1,61 Hie RPr LL 91'SLLL ML95 1144111. 1114 SH Yr Yrrr rJ++ LL i{115L6 JSJ" LA 5:•5. 7AdS 14 Pe r:.{+r 11112 RR 1711 II A 415-1 45 X554 'N MP woe 1.S PI4:111 11d4 J'I 914.E JE11' 1.11,4!;e HMI R: MIL ■J'I AL SILL 11911 + 1re'Y 1;00 1.1 Y1LL 11.1 l'ti'I 1119 14JLL5 5.A1 111.0111 .P!1 57 11 HILL 1'. I:I7555 51.5 [C Ile 0-4r e•l p,.ul us... very 1,11R I!' A L eiii4ttrr• rce S'1111 ql 11] k11"ee 19 710'.'. x4:4 1 4 11 •.{55 1 •:S I' 11 e+T',f ,J'I I9 11x.11 1:1 5- 5S455.! 1441 IT, +1 Yrrr ,r{+ rT 1'. r'e1Pr Pi lr •1xA5 :M rr1 ,2 JJy 111 WM? 5 : l_2_:5 1551 +14e:2 r4.2 P T 11 WILL TJPJ sS Li'JSLL C111 I � Ile wJrr Yrir PT LC 9P e111 11111. 5L LAM 010 r ET yedd Y 411 • II: P":1 16 FI s65 YJLL 1LA 51 L7 S_3{L5 4,1 91 11.51.5 'IL{ 51 .14 :I:.: 111.1 P T Ile Veer 11.11 LC all xs:l 11111 e+ RI R555 X411 J'e4i:, 1111 15. '.11*•5'. CIA .A:4'555 R5.1 IS Y+H!'J V.I IT P. 51 r� S{!1 S_x 555 555: '1 were I'•r 115505 •Jt1 02, •r RPPP J•r{ II{Yrrr 00• COW 4114141 IN%Ni F%IFEF,KN •54 s ^ LA ^.LLL C151 r+ Kr Yrrr xrtr L9 1.1 El X!Y 11HE:L 1110 Fr11^•JN suiI1N.?Lamsrnernrldel 6 T xJ nurr P:{1 L1 SJ CALL R:11 5k a:N555 R_I' 1s Jo :u IC J`d 1?d IA 1{LL IJN I{+ f' RI A Y 5: 4 IC 1+ ]R YNe Y1Yf S I. Ja1. 1 1.41ri la.. 11 ..++++++.d+wry 1, TAN XR xR 111 PL49.9 thd'ilh R CKIY4IR KY %sH i SlfI1sr41-IR n'.V.1*+41:J.rt4H ra P+n414+[}44Ast 4r114 p h'11,1 .4 P.4. +F^I.{+1.4A 4..4,4.E +E AFa.Fi...F}l119 F,o. .v' J,LLJ le 1 41 .14 41 171 110 11 SF 13 11. 1 It 44. 13 11 1-41 1 4.1 CL 1411 MI 1155 lid Pd NJ .111 N d 4.1 11 PP 1 If 1 CI 511 .11 311 111 141 LH 11 11 44 44 14 41 13 44 44 41 PP .71 13 RI Mao 61001.10) fAl•Ce .111, 11. lal 4.1 di 13 le 1 44 71 id RI HT- • 55 41 95 Flw 11 ./' W. A▪ L 11 N I 511 He TO HI .11 If 4 71 151 411 411 1511 Capacity Analysis -Using SEOP'ti1`' CPA's Existing Zoning FAR High Schoo-Is There Isar y 3ne h 21- S_1331 cer- rq tre ern re BECP'd. CiR. . Booker T.'h BhIn Ikon hlph School R.gj.cl.d c.*.11np UnIl. corn, Now R® hIn I. ea.ai. 1-yS 2r 110 1Rna.rrl 'F.l C Nunh.rcl Sludart. v' Ihn Rlr.. _rj.1 4wnicau-4 c " SluNrtr!u-L ly'S_S rl_1r-h -Ass. ivmSe9u-wafiu Par Funk Yee.. r..-}165{c.:.4@iLr.•9.Y a.l...l Number cl Se ITC.I Siudrllr In 1h..1... 14S=S 1S1.11S SC,!V bath S.ia:Ll SL e-r —Ac.luaY..Yu..coLa 4..r.Aay....o-...0 u.ua.. mem. rerWl•sc.dd x.u..4c C.Fac/.v And M r. SLh:Ll Ys,x Nvinrli.at.l u1 •A7I C4ruly %LALalxl _alsc re I'..Trarr1 _.awl r .4.sIyIn Y.IxaISIN. c.onxu.s Ltii li cavrr Ich.l FL: IRL,% L1ILc.L6sn C.F..E" Cul.-1 ea.c..-, T. Wax hl-;lul s- Ny1 1,7CE 2,334 7.La a: C+ 2,353 -mot 3c % al 11cw.41 LI.y.L.a,r.l eycy, 7. Win h1-04n s- Nj1 ia,7EE 2,334 2C2.19 CI 2,353 23:2.1E1 Cunm.rT. S rl..ula: 111.a_IE IW.a .au.rl Sr wel*I,,m adS DI' 115%L.I.c re i•. Irxleirrlr riri-r ual.r11.11x .e,v,nr1h1.] ti:alal"dl.rh l,yL.. 1.J!- ..y Is du_Li. it atc• .r.S. ,.a.FUT...1 Milli. l x.I 1, ph a11x..1.'.I Lra xi 151 t nc.nrn 1 Middle Schools Te"e are lac riddle s_hco s sev r. 1're enllx aEC}P.V CRA, allh kite. de Cle®c cer.Ic nO aimcsl the erdre 3.E7P'.4 Crci a -ea CIPorkie Grove Middle Sclhool r.cl.sl.d 13.011ny Units. els Or How 5... 19xFa 1 -Pa Xi mr. c..• .a. nee hur.t.n ar Slutl.nl. In Ih1a Pr.. 'JS✓A 2n.IIy- -lidr. JI.S — SI_y.rl.: LrI I1C aLo ntr {rw.icias`icaclrrx.P.-u Pw Glade ""-" u,. Y{ imy cr44cr irrscemed. hum.. Mtltlle Ynad Siud.ria n trim .r... 1in 3'lS —" ]! N.0 1.4Idtl1. School Slutl.nl. — Raoa MSCr. i..xr knoera.n.. w'a+r ar:a.r...r... c. n«.cp'?.vc,a...,.G+„u u aCi. dinkormee ru.,,.01, Chr. 110 Salualrhn. Slul.htI'aF_rlan L}..yr IL..Ir..M %LII Is.IN- C.In:E., rrn.Ix,L L.... I_v lsa li in h.W.hllr eh.naun. LArV- L.'alu-III 1,1.1 "C.Idl- il. Jyc.Scll CrF.sP.y •u..t bi-_r. ..]cr. 1.11,J. ' 447 395 1ES.-E.A 93 9e5 '.EC SbiS ✓. III 1...pc.w u.e.kixrrra bi-_r. L]cre Mild• €i... 395 170.CEca 93 9e5 '.E4524i'. Conm.nl. aRawllr. 1`r wl.ca142...xw4 Sw IMaw Ihr..lntl.r I'S%CrIr.:11, Its now Fc1.Irt.1.1u1riac.n-ATI S...u_knn.rd.IW6.. Jose de Diego Mldd le School t Itwo I lined naa: .liver Rr.:uns' Badly I -la lrears hune.. of Sluchnl. In Ihh al 11 :4, I n .: a. LM — SI_].ri.: ul1 ' 3A 12 alul..S .. • .• r vaxs w.?a- F.r o- vc L.mu ,.,: Yd imas c,d4a i.rr:i aa. hu b.l ct Mtltlh ICA I' • • ! 3'lS —" :,10] 2..x IIHIS School Slutl.nl. ... ..um +0+. Pw.0 Jw1.d Li w..TI+.a..,./e r. •ya,u l.a.::. c'.Yr+rsu r.:.ay , Cow.cur Anaxl. h. SalrsalN.rr. S] ul..il',F_YIx1 L..VL Lbvrc re %IJIIs.11u- Cah.:E,, Fbn.Ix.E L3..IIr1 L3.Iaa Id In 1L.1..ah11. LLr.launr Ls.Y- L..paa1. 1,1.1 "01AL W -III. .Scll CEF.si:y wri Jay. Jrr LU..w wwr .47 1,133 119.EE% ] 1,1E5 11E1_95% • 1.•1a1E Jana gm LY.w wwr _ 55] 1,133 342.2'Li ] 1,1E5 34221% Cnrm.nl. aRam11.. II L' 4a... c..G L. I raver. I h r.nnu 4° I' S% C.1s: EJ. I In now FCIn9rl .iul.r4 cu.-al .l S...etcnnlJ.l W t papa ltt 1D Capacity Analysis -Using SEOPW CRA's Existing Zoning FAR Elementary Schools There are Irene- eiemer'e-i :crccla aerNng Ire C91 re BE :P'1Y C FA, aril Freaeyri Douglas ;er- r r{ purtlan W Lhe aEopea C12R. area Paul Q-'unbar Elementary School DSOS ng aril. .m. New Res Urals CkJ=1a 1-45 r2-' K :sus 'reap iavY Nu-itar cI Slu'4n4. in Ihn Alra. _! :wa•IlJ..I a Nu-ltcr cl Ll.nsnlsly 9_Iex19':rrCmrd niN. weed. veD ra.e.ns u ae -.-xv y{spyis r.,u..ml Analr... • . v. . .n I_ t x Iud.n1. J.woww:tiar..11. 9tTcr Mrr4. ta,.l.rt 1°'ualal u1 C4.Jd:r .. 49 Lail en _al.c re I'na.r.-1 _.11 i4avY.y In ,eras'YK {!acorn L. w.. aa: re 1c111 1L:1AL,II. VI Isa9n1 CaPa' cut. -I lti_11..,6 nisei trr. ray 2atYcr. EE•, 5sv 71_23% 0 929 71_23% yaw, 1 Ycraus nl 1../.tiwlva-Ia11 1•._ILAJ line tYrr.riri 91..15au 75C 52% 8.5.11% 0 929 85.114 Conm.rll.4 !Issues. l II..=1a.c1 JJn'r11err..1IJ. r.bw 1•I...IMaar IIe1LL`w l.rc re 1•a11rw1.JY1sr . J -Is 'um l'..==anrrMyaae. PhIIIOa'Wheatley Elam enlary T .a=too. LYwal Ins Ural. y .and Man Rom. Ct6=1.1-515 4.2.26 - 'c: 4.1 ' ior...ld l9o.d Muntcr cl YIu o rt... !hen Aiwa. ins., x.s.,.r • •.la• Mu-ltcr cl Ll.rronlsre S:F cl Sludrrks netas wend. •-A•s-a L{: Ys Scam/UAM.1c nrr.Aa4a A.m.. deans. C acac Anal I, 1 14 . e .. •... :16Jan1. ',.hcn Moons ::L+J.rf. 11ab1 u1 '..y iu':1 I =1' , i d1 '• cn.vul.. • '111 �.1 r1s,AL,ML C.Jacp- ..u1.-1 I' II 1 r...salErr tnrr.-1a1Y 9L11c u i42 ESE, 67.53% C. 5E5 57.53% wes, i YCIJua.al a„siva-1.11 I=111s o••.al sly tl.lr.-tall 9atrcr 1,3E2 ESS .W9.92% 0 .955 7t3d.92% Conmanl.4 R/nut.. I II. acl.alllJn .a.wwla Fs rrrrw IiI.wa•WJ ar 1 It.. LLaa re I•E in,.s2sr• :.14-da ncl.IIaa a,irrtsIntia 152 ar.n.r.1 FrederickDoug'aaa Elernerta•y vohoo II•r..tattStl tr wllwy Unto. aLacfr M.w 11n.. nn*. 14.•ih9 1 - i!5 21..7 nuro1 1,4 a1Md.nl. In IhII Are• 21 dai awa1•1• _1sd 7. c.JhS - 51_y.Il.. u11 5,A51 yl l.ltr - 6u 0.aac Su'--- w,+i.6, irw4 4J11v 51.rLia'J.w1 R•Jnt.l cd e1.m.nlry 9 chool alud.nl. In Ih1. ono. 2135. El- y.-d i tH -- - -,IO1 Nn!chard .a1 el..ntary !chd 'JSud.nle ews i+.°Y�vRSrwss.4rJal:...:.�,xrpu Pewia.. trru a.. war ...swine, ass ,w..r ,6... . Cs II r a,ry.Is. s=116a1N.n. nul.lt l•>F-YIwn tl..11ln tayacly 51.41 I..1W- C`.In:tl, IY.n.Iwrt LDa.111 L 1mc I1 In Iatualala. ns..Icnn. L1.V- L:ia.=I, 121.I -.141- t- -Ili ..I.11 C4a..a:y .u-wri r-I.earla._ter.. t wr.raarrn lmrl 715 779 94.5E% 2.04 9E2 72_'1% W III I.1j.n..J LDrr.lc lust F1.G.rlca::cwY.. t all.riary 911rcal 4 >5 773 953.24% 2.04 9E2. 455..78% Cnnm.nl. 21.lt..uII.. 1.e nIIcc1 Jan .aces{ 9Y. 1.vww I1.61r1611 of I • 5% C.lra:15, I lw now pcl.1R.1 .11.Nrd con-DL.1 .. aucxnnuJ.lwJ t 0.641a 11 SECI'Ai e ieveleprnent I'Ian Svfr:IL:4 Iu p. ::•k1+nail'. Iy .7174, 717.1 Potential Buildout Using Eaistnq Maxinum Albxvable Density-Scenario2 _'._ 4• _NL^1 •L J.• r.1 . ur4. 1t }L're5e L1'.i1 dk #'714441'I1 b4'4++A4fwdg4r'4M*•?+Y Ise Pnq YP II 1! 1:1II.J{149 91 e aP1 rm 1a1 GI GI A E L'1 era, 4 •TJ a1 li X eI 1L1 ■ 9 + d ia} Y 11 r1 a ji J1 KJ N n1 • X1 K{ P 111 R • .4: P ri 5•I i '•J. Y ' 4.1 1 X •J 9' SLl. r err. {1 .J q• 41 41 ✓ 2d.r 31 I C ! IanJ 11 {IaX4 11 5 .1 4154 E1 r! xA En KJ 111 f1 141 9Y1 K1 !I X1 I•'. 11: f! 14 KJ 1,1 N nl A •;J S• N n1 L •;1 II N1 Y. KJ re, 11114 a: Sr J19 c! 1' 75, e 4.- ar 'I I 515 Nr N r 11 Ka RI Yr 91P 1.5 1== n 1 .1 S: 11 4.5 .11 :=9 L 5 1;r 111 715 4tl k! S14 115 =!r !1. 111 11 :i. Pi ! 1 X'. !9{ !1{ 11 111 111 4I5 n r nA 1 Na RI •114.11k area4/ 41 11R' -IY.dr .4.1 71r J: 111 1 ai V M1= 1'S ▪ • L5 sr lL Se 11 111 96 41 ;I) X5 K{ k{ ;1r gl 1d rr .14 414 51 ae a= R5 •r• Ri ✓ r Rl a1 I=P I" !I+ AID 41 11• yu Tr e9 }1 LI nl ✓ r LL 15 {Ih 411 ,.r RP Le{ 41 iS y1 R{ Ei J1{ N r yJ e A1Q 1111E 111,419 1111E 13UL 111.1. 1,11 i111 R554y -9:Q .L.LLL _5S4L, K{rN X{L¢ W IT .111 he 11515 'Iran 1 •5U KrJT MT ♦ 11 5a+a + 51+A _1S IC Y ran 111=f Ja+Y uaN 1111 Jaarc WON 1:{3 + ran X=PF 4.4111. x'{51 P!P4 R:.L 41.55 1i14 4111 555: JUN 15._ {ISx 1:4 NJ T. 'x {rrr 11ArR MSC {:rc =PT 5514. 1.11,1 .117 X:11N ur 1a: wow 111{LL 41, X=•R 4441 " 4•T{3 Phwniy !rn! 1i•IraaaLN unr p11P 4,511 4411' a1' la ar Ij1f d.1. lad. h1.111,4 rh Iql Ne• diJ 4 keRI 4.1 9=9 1. 1,. ,,41,lf iL Ltle Pen. rilpY MI 111 Nan did44JI 9=1 life did k 1911 1q▪ ' INS A1111P 411 K lr1411111.11NIe is I It IL P'r IL Q 'I= !L¢ 1154 Jai M N JJ1 ¢ ¢ IS 4:LL J11 lRer 11.1 I¢LL •+SR 11V. IYN u= !ILL {" xV Ja1 IrN N S ••1 14 11.' L'L1•!1 IrJl l •! 44. ¢RH'{ J'J IYN r44 Id4 91. 14111 K 41. Ii 14-1;.24L1•IXL Le111 Je: fr 1.la M1r'Jr1.TV11 YnY P1! l41r 191 Y LA aa1 N N 2:1 it id 214 44LL Jai N r'r N 511 1 LL IRlr{#¢K Ill• 1.12 • 1 i111 NK 1J6 41e24J1.IRK 11551 .::SL TIE 1 i111 NN III nee idJkl!1: { 1,1 IN 4J .11 11111 54 RT r; :XE .4•: rN {1 ',I le S5• +a: J: hL h1 •1: 51_ J ale 4 1411.111 P1: ; .nx =N N .111 111 n ar {R 1 1hl 11 . F55L VIC I C.: 11 IN {d JX It1 I r=4 1L n 1.11 11 IN n !E r 1J1Y e$ L :111 ree Nr •1 i{ a 41,414 IRI sn4I R11 Nr 11.1 5 r{1rV'•Q1.Cil 411911• 111 J al! 141.. rrr 41. XL_ N.. hl 1=. -r•L ICI Nt 4r x'- 1•h 141rI3 xfPrj4;1-0r9 ] 1414 aAl 4. !{:541 Hi] 5•.5 114. Nn 12511 11.11 1R uu 1414 21= hi 11 55l x4. NN I LJI 11.1. 4:5 u4 N f1 1 11 ;el uu le• NN co, N 1 Id! NN Jde R rr JJ{ ■ ¢ 4 1T I IIR ■¢ Nrr ▪ d Nrr 1 :,l1 1 1x u 1r' ;rr I 111 rill. :la 1155 aI IRn 1 411 6LL 115 1154 rrr I4 de 4h YLL 1 uu dAJ I41 N 1 N11. -15 u V. 4'a N1r =ra la'54J. P11PI1a 1.1P 555 u55 .Yyy1111'' rrr 111 'AI IT • T{ Jf5 SSU. R rrr ! i 1 . rrr M1nr 211 rf'r.r 1 45I NN I 1=P 141 11 44 111. 1:LJ ▪ , !4 4' 111 a nl 14.1] 1ru r4 11r ::. ! ] L. •N 'ya !r1 fid Jr: I •4=1 a•1] :5.5•al x:] {JG 4{ i5.4 4.• .4 .1 , 55 jl R,•J {{ r {{ 4111 C5' RL 01 In t 115.4 R'] 1.1 f{ L i NJ r{Iar11 r! r.115ArT I•15444111 114 N11.111Y 1•1161,1.1Y 41..14 T.I•-4•114 a]4.•n i 1111•• µAN Lila IL .41 all a 411.4 ILI Is a!u!{Id6Y Is Rib 4.11144 lam 4¢a414 aXri. l4,, a JN • ■ J4 Pr ■ • ■ Y !tl 111 ■ aa IR 151 ✓ 1c 11 11 R 1 11 11 a A NwigogowiSigoNglipbilMog MAIL Mil WAN ON nrmENtll LI N n T 1449d,. n•,In illl IrlaNY {q A 211 3■ dig .11 Y%dl RR 1E =X "11 • !! .y :1= IN 14 • • 4■ 15' h Nr1.1 FYe an h J•j4 PYe I 1I:II5b.� 4.1 4.5 nr .5 • !! a. • 4■ 411 r! 59 • 41 !A In 15, 41 :51 1y Alf 10 311 Jlr IPI -45 1555 V. r 1dedd 141 ILLLLL 751 JRR{11VK1•1• al; Nara ram/414M1 PIP •,.1411114K R+ 17.1.5 l IT 'r= 14 N Ix V. Ira IYN •Ad elre 211 .4 LL IrJ IIYN 114 R 91: Y LL d INN 2211 N re 12. r.dLlna,,t1{Iu1111,1 14iN Y�wl l 414 AIM, Y:IM ■1.4 yi•g4,Ir NI LLi1 b1e -0+.uln e+I• .. 21. ea i. P.,•rtlarllr{xan n araL .Pce+Yr4 L.,.e•l.14t rreV. 'r rr PI. I. • Ir+!••1111 In 4111411A11.11La1 11.1 •4 9 1 .1-+1+111e •1+• 44 .4.5 1••.4.... •111 1• IPA .41.• I a 1.1 Tel •. 44I r r Le • 1 11l a 1•••• a am a r_...• da•r+•1. A.r 1;XT k1a•aw ra. i s ea Yrs r„+L-alu J{n IE9 m 531 :Pi. 111 {{39 N.4I rinlaiiawL,.I+L1J1Je(W' L1Jk1.1.1Nriae1••1s14L14•i'q LImmra'■{ pa am M 4 ' FIFE L31Er{rdrl!'..((f>�1 Fneuncl.tl Coemlinp Uri1. tl IJc a Capacity Analysis -Using .L_:EC PW CIA's Existing Maximum Allowable Density High Schools There Is y one high s i sering the ern!, EEOF./.. CRC.. Euo r T. WeerilnAlon Hlob Schaal N. Ran . LJr.l.f 134.=1. 1-2} L-02}2 22untlmrc2 51uri R.. on Ihn Alma. 51 2!_ o,}ae" "-'J..-C 2' efp ;am me -in.. Paw..ci ar'i.Yc Seaiak X.2S &+.W`.r Yam Muses. Ai.. Nun.. c. M1epM1 xM1e..l 21.Mnla en lean.e.a. ' I .2 Yf,e.r,'a 11 Cl _•_ ROMS F1t1. w �J'i.1C.-r --Rm. LL.Y. Yrra.'atfu:.ira..Aa.Tm am.0 cawm iW.i darer. r - ,. C.e.aM Pn.M.. .1.a1A 4.r. Va.J.rf. l'uala I can A, a4.•yr 14.J'J ua.1 an _.I.cIV I'n.w.ai-I .. Ca.., in YMxYS. . cv.svm Dimon _ I rr:lRL,R UI14.11un c.p.s9- Cu..-1 tl.,C1.• 1......111-2tlas N• 1121 1.7C6 2.25.5. 7 .i-t4 D 3,355 -: 4.. ....114v-1v. W U.rra m. Maa1.• 1. 7/4...111-2en N• 11 gel 7.524 2.2S5. 553.3a4 0 2.355 _55 _-=r cn.n.rrl. s Hama.. 111. ._1.Jc1 War me.. El o• 111.1n•.ta .1. 91114E CAP.. 91M f.Yip Wiiffa a' J au-r u ma 1.11. mum nnrt.dilid t 11Cmh.rlri ] Middle Schools . -. o the soh.. s sez' rg 1-ie entire BEOPW CR.k mrtth Jose le C eia L•tr-12 rg c. most the erllre SEOP4N COLA. aree2 CIUus Grove Michele Schaal F'rolre:_.1 _:rvllYep tllc is Maur Pia.. Unrf' B ai.a 1 - Ptl 21.22am. Madan. In MN Pf... .555 _.Pr x i 2tl3 - 51- .1P.! w1 5u. M.el4 .. �Sror,'-"-°CcxsrJnah. ^--'--Gs.12. u.2 Yi[aam mama a•wvY X.vnWrcf Mtltlr SC ix. 51W.Ma niM1. are.. JW .1_y.-r i'C, -- 1. N... Mltl rlr 9rM1..1 51uW111. Aim an1P2.4 drums imm c. r arr mannr-o or..yy.u. r,. AM2• CMiasma/ r.om.. C. c+clly Ainal tl alr.al N.rr. rhu,r,f1°aF_rl an LM.11.. Lrp.c if N. U11..1N- C.Wafy° Vann.. u.. y1 Lamm, 1i.11 Nal.e. rue ur...aun. 1....- L'.en. li 1 a1.1 -.1,51-% _lid 2.9cn C•F...`L _u•rri IL11._. 7.2... 211. a • 4.! • 335 166.-5n S3 925 'SC %y5 .4 I11 P.m...J L1... Lam., 1_51•_r •uc.r 11.11.• ' f_' 335 1972.£54e SD 905 -56 1S% oonm.nl. arSawu.: 1 •r .cl.c al Nan .cc m.e Sm ..Nmw Ihnm1.11lt 1' }% C•enmi.1 I I. now .1.1fJ41 rl..1..Pa cm-26.1 S. .wcnn W.l..J .lase do Diego Mldd le School r 1'1ci.rimtl 0..1l1115 UnR.. els uP. Now R... pntr' Pllaka 1 _ iJ 15.1351 -c ni en • •r. .,e. fame tlunG.al`�I•,W nl. l n lM1r W!. 52_25 2..11.1;..lib X CAM - 5 I_as MI A earn 21.213 bs.SI -' Meer a.m. Cs..cal..r.JM.. Ps. amaimam 1412,0 C Wf dimeSeraa..r tl'. mb.l cl'Mtltlr Y_hx15i.1 Yl lh. car..: 21.222 El -as -km }'.'S -- 2.212 ram, Mk... ,o.:: 3luy.nl. w...a P.r.o.1a "a. ao maamiaoam •...a a u'.:Y'_. Yrr: s:v. i '2 1,1..11r kn. }s M. aar.vl Ha.. .....i l'ap_WI an 1]..1.. Lnena 1r R U1 IBM.- Caen_/n_ P.n... Loam. ..ma li In F1.t..bt.LP. Mammal. 1-..V- Live.. li 1 a1.1 -AS1 zL k Jil s.i511 Cam.t( '^• .. JaLA,.a. LMc VIcur • 557 1.155 11e.555h 7 ,.. aff ••0 Si 111 .......1 Juno J. Lri. 11c u ..Jr f 7C-5 1.155 575.134.96 D ,'.ff _ . C4t., n.n In .1 Mw11.. a ails al 4ar..m.m.G 'Jr. imam. l l.nrlutl Le 1' }% C.In_ la. 11. new pe1.. f 41 rl uN rla 20. .eucn nul.l.J r Capacity Analysis -Using SEOPW CPA's Existing hr'laximum Allowable Density Elementary 5-ohools rYere are --1-ee a elver 3 t:chccl5 cer-. r9 7e .-11 re 3EC:= ... CR..... Alin Fr,79r tc="3u2das .er- =r{ -z, 2rer-,-rcrlkn Y the CEC:u=:r..C•RA area Paul Dunbar Elementary School Ploaselsc.DvonlInci Urals 9 L,c'a Ncw. Rs. L- CALLAN "I 2,34r ivr Lamm °:rwl�I.0 ya..Y Plumbercl Slu_airya IM1.�AIra. 2 Si.' ._*.c `_1ulanta1 L 95° al_llrb sun: Lazv+w Far tar.3c.cScwu ...:}4°ltisy4 4 i4.srSrws.iy.s Number cI Llarrsntary S:Iwal 5:uerrA,t n iN®asws. 5131 YLean•m 4♦C • 451 WEN rJmnenhl'. 5a-us =IUJe1111. -A.:rr{s-rL irace•+rWusL.rA%aTrr.'rrau Limo aoa��'oorv.Lir'do »lrrwi#L1atirrloyww Ycs�y C w.cM AnaNN.. `aheri'a.n. ULadrrr PYlafI en -dil c4fldty 1. U5. Lal:n Z.lc re I•.nmrm-1 C4.aT.y In .:r471.fn.54. eam.clarm Dos 01 lapsu ly lcl.l I C IAL_ 1. UI Lc.LNn Csi.Liv. Clair -I IaL_IL..ranl t.nlartry saalcu SE' Es"e 71.:3z C- 325 71 .7:3 Y1.11.1 PyclanrJ uewwu:r,.11 I'1._II..n rl trnartry Sallcu 1."'2 SZE. 113.3tz C. 9.25 113.3.4 ConnerrN i Randle.. rh.,r_Pucl llu.r .uaeJ Rm ••••y Wr Fr ..n`r.d cr 115R LSlmc ly l`E. lsx remit. aL.-N.1n.cl me ln araunncrrl.y P1111115 YYneS11WY El5nlentarr Sanoci t INN&eb.m t naPlr,a uiidt. N. Row Ur1LS" eaa:.. 1- Sly say. car. •ru111..r Cade. Nunherd 5ludart. n I11m Arta 1 4 k Number d tlanmm.ry Schec! S c 1. 2 b4. flt .ri .. - C.�eb An.Nm. `aheW'ammo ]4LJere IU.+citel en ',magi. Cap•uly 1 i .411 e1, _ly .•ulealm-1 _ .. . .1 eu3 • 1 I Jl aly Ida! rr:lA, 'a.L UI e:.Wn C.pLEi Curve-1 I III• ✓!`r.ivy tI.irr-I.i• Sal.cel 4-03 E S 67.S31 C S__ .S34 kWh Pitpnsel a51tL 9m.l I11Ir ea`ralryel.Ir.-Illy `e I.c1A 2.2.11 ES; 337E3% 0 555 337. 31i Cunnnrrla fitaa:Ia.cl rider .aaa ml Rs my..' Fierce N 11514, Lm lnc ly 1`r, w IAPar+r fl -S lvra.el .l us aarrpscddiad 155 rlcinere, 2 FreclerloK Douglass Elementary School rscler:ad yw.I11ns Un4. e tcl•N 4IPW Ilse. 6a:Ri I - L•9 44,+ r l 11 d.nl. In Ihli Pra. K.nle . _sid 4 0.1.11 " 9I_].sde .' Lill •.' i+= SI,k, . sam'iao¢l.m14w ia•J"'-Ltau w.:�. L iaWi,. id.a i.r.+l...r h _r :5• }. L e-nenluy School 9luelarrl. In IhI. •rsc I: C.5 el_9e-d J+tl -- .'.14 4.e tiv Lars-•a.ry S4hee1 Y._41 11. . norr.l2Wis iarayvcrr y..saon-.rl arru.. v,,.I �. -.�� .ova•w . -• _ nay .rra �.enagq _n�acll Pnil 5:1uc1 Nary. 4u11.1I•c4_Sl an L1.ay1 .c h. L1Vm % UI L:.IN- CaIr.:.y" r1 Pi.4a1Y Lne4.1 L'aia, Ir. .10. hs.,alaLie Lhlael:•J,I. L.i.w Lain: l- '!vial - {:I ZL. 1. J1. c.3.:11 -.1F4.1'r +.K I•Ir_er.1c•.-:yuttl.• t mrmriary `aI.cvl 715 775 51.SC% _C- 3E= = E 1' 10 111 I•IvyrcetJ L,ryalc1remnL rl.e.rkc ylsdl as tmrennl ry9rIuc1 8,55E 779 1399.7'5n _C- 3E: £7' Se.v. Conmenla S. araa•JII.. 9`d irccl 4ama .Icc..r49r. lent... I11.n.3uld rP 1• W. C.1n:e;. 1t•new. p I.. I.lralanke cur-44.1 5. macnnuJ.l.•J r :aye Id 14 Appendix D 1982 Resolution adopting the SEOPW CRA Please see next few pages for: City of Miami Resolution 82-755, adopted July 29, 1982 156 triroN,ila. $Z7 "" i►kr4240TIGP APPROVING, I. PRINCIPLE, TIIE ITIVI11TONWIPARIF. WNST IJ 1'i Y ▪ CLOPIfIT FUN, WtTI1 •kMENURP71 LhTED ▪ 1 h Y 4142,g341144,1Y WI IIQC1ihr: ,u' EIV OH .TJIE Od THE WEST, I-3$$ OH 7111: IoI'AL AND MCATE 1rH SWIRR1 3N TKf TO.U1n, A LOFT or Vilna I P•r••.'StliLD 1 IX•t{?, AND HARI x PUT H EP?DP ; ISJ;RT10. MIME L"it _1- IMdJI Or FACT AND c...',ral'.Lirsrof I iAti 1 HARM 31=. ' 19Kr 1...V I L".Jk i'.1}F9OV.},L AY 1 dr. ROM Of OJlNTY t•{•HNIE ICr"9t; AD.! .111P . _..,_ =i]G A MIN: R.F?.'. •' DY 'EIIli LILY ANA Cr)01471 IN 1f4gh1<= I^_ . 1DN. MUMS, under thm prQVLt.•.t:fd of Chapter 1$4 Pazt iiY a' R L ar 1da a t.at ated amer_ a a the cut~rioeaity. Rmdrw,F l pi+lFnt Act of Haig, a.o amalle04, the :ity DI w shf ray dssLgna,r.a a gum, or d 4Itlrked ar:aa or a opr1 Lr3atlon the loorr 11 appropriate for Jr Gbnhun ity redgyminprieht pra joot, mod j WRERBKg o the d aau C Lty commission Adopted the opmnowr avelaplent Plan PaVO:utiorti Ka, 79420 wthioh cecammebdeld t11* radavaloprrent of .he aoµ:hea star n po tLtm [1kf artri?f[tk O•3nnunit4 too; e*nnor9l*1 Ilia etaident iid deVelOPMentr imd }alSanl r the Lil ems Inky Commission *L'?rove! ,in p i- p L A h e Sauthaaat mn f P rirk 140,0 Orrnriu na L1r PlelardelOpment 3 alLOldtioa i l-?PDF and biop nhl Iy TMldi#tcaxiens te thiP Flan wire requested by thah4.ant. r:.-yertpwilliplik past c eirRn1ey asdavalgreolOnt a.E. Bloc=:ra.air•.Ty ,;.-i.ch laf appolatird by F he City tc caniew the p:-.n . WREI+EI4 , under tha JroviaLana el Chapter i$ r Frtrt ITI of rLurLda .1tJYtu_as knavery as U■ ClautaaFty 1lajavaloparewa# Act DI L 969, as amended, Mark4opOlitia bwilm County,. FlveLda tbarc tra -called Dada CcisntyF is rrtqui red to 00pEdive All anTmnIty radOWlapment piAltri ana fr"15.171EA5 p the 'Hoard of County conTI E as onm lill f lima, 'County PLOgida, is Lbe duly 1fo v cf Dame IRO;,CNIt red and aathcriled g'tn- for puvrotqcs or ni}rout ng v:Ins crrw Corpriusgra • 1I Q2 train MailM • • . W H-.HEA4, tha On..11. Mart oc 1.1.LA aeiee vn low 4etezloca-..p.i or.d)cr b21chted, ILI k Are* 0)11. 7Part.ili.NAL al C.-411A0' t j% Pt-Jc,:t],4iadmLAreal and • " HIZECh2. the plan le in f'irnt w1ti tIiu Man!, ' Cunimidonoeive H.:1.4hb.:wlvood flan. ▪ 7HEREfORE, BE IT REECIVED ST TH7 COMIESIOM 07 :Ht CTTY OF IIMMI0 TORIP.L Seotiom •rhe Censimatma approver In primiple ehe lonLbeedt DrortOWnitlark Neat eareecrity Redermlopsea,a Plea dotal JUR. 1M2 ago anondod. a Grey of WIWI is aEtaehad hereto .. Bade a park herOot, for on 'lima bounded gooare4iy 1:1F Biecarkia RomlOvird Oh the Cart, K-9M en the Malt, L-315 on the NorthHaxth 5th StPaak 00 the' 340ith, aubotantlaliy la the forM Of 'Chi attaCted Keret.10. amid Flan Laeludem dequialtion and clearanoL, relcdotion, rehabilitation, et -root izipraver.ents ilia bikini' l• I: , Section COalc:141i4m 4.51FrOmsr4 in IrLaciple the d hardnehl,a a0 atm plan •copy of each is ottsOlad hazato arid hada & port hemeof by reface:me, SIICELOri The Conmisokon f1jii,divmernines and d a411&rve that the natter oak, oluE St.tliwftrineym rocitaLs e44 trge iad correct and they aro hvii.d!y inrciporatad as portion of the terOlution. it • 4, The CC1D1S110n tO the Board of County COM16110MOrt :.1a: the S'oOtheart atertoemiFerk 6art area bir ITPrnpriAtel5 letclared A 15kAllAUMiti Redevelop= e tiint Arra snd that Linen.. Milk actions. Will briglOwarned by COnnLnity ROIroxelopmrat PLan. ction 5. The COMMiltiaa awkeindu itej suppoZt to Fle 30Lot Cit5q4-venty rodewolCpment effort* Li Ft* Southeast CVareNWPark WEAE Arise and lirocts the Adainistrakioa to. kiprX ,101PtlY 'with Hqtr.0pOlitan ewe Colinty ikpliment bho 2 82-755- "‘• •-• :•••••.' ViaN, 0 • No . ' • ' • •• 51'13RRE 1:2•• •.• IA' T.••• EPhl Ack%ng COMM VW APPEUIr.: BVI 1: . hi. I r• =Huy APrigkOVED 10: ''_i : '.I. 1 o rICIN.iii-, I' I': •••. OS; . . . . '-- _ i • :-... j l' ...';• k.i. • 1.1••••r•.: -17 1 A ?1E4Rhld FLI HAT1OiiL fRESE[dVATIo IN THE FL'PUAE CEv TOPHENT Or OER'L'4LN bale aeri. Objectives ;4 tiv The goal of tars Riatariv OVertawn program in tO 4rithlitn tho rkgh history and elaturs aE Overturn, thereby creating a same of' 4 fn- tity and uoM04mttY pri.de that will uunaribate to the euor,cni C and phyalval revitalt;at:Qn of the overtawn eaweNnity. By alamantng tha past, It is inta_dad 1,4entify those dame 9ti that npre sada E va r town the thriving, exciting focus for the a ar.k etm,abit V in eg ti Flori , and to p i_ to and prod uctiw■ itq= agsto of that part era into the future rudevaiapaeat plan. Object=_vea of Om POT include; ▪ effectiVely cormanigstg In/Omar/on dpi rieval-}c brofsd bevel awareruem7 and ap rec i.kt ivo of historfc aChilWements pf Ik;e Bleak co unity throdgh tours, And the nedia. a.=.hibi =s, ap eie l elell J" , • Re-e sta:oli s11 E v=tvia1 idCLt.ity Ear OVerturn by taclisiiq on one lafa in its hi seciyr, the 'Little Broadway" jazz 9 a. Ltievslop this es x theme far era•"Wotlfhq pew might- CL bt and rustabraMta; programming s:44.iel tultasal, iti'4nta dedi,nsnr skins. Utreet furnilare dfla public piaxa sipac$a; are treating pr=Typt ivasl Li tinrature :ox tdtlri sa: and local rrksting. • Pteear,ra, sere faasiblao 00ZWIVIEV huildiiqgs uhJ.eh repre- Tnt 14Ortant links kQ persona, ac tiat ie a Or events ct =jor sigaifiuz-nee in the past. o 5.0440 oftiglai raca,nitien and protection far the area b•r 00tobLiz yif7 am historic dietrIct. • ErtcWram new t0v0I0pfreht to inrmrpm4,ita uf3Oa which vau1i contribute to 111.0 Vitality of the &s rict such ad stores, ni�r.t lubt. zustaLLCantz, t leatwee. ■ 57, 1f3TO now bf:iidinqu ihegrpOrmto 10Loet•S OssLi?a alcicnt.s. Ertel thz past vlich ro f lean •pale 1 cultural err t ema tier fee 1 sr,:4 Wh1,th are rolevatt trremN and slxul2 tpg • or Idiatorical lisoun by alivezaL names, including Avenue " ', Colorer¢ Tnitil,° 4+ B iiogtcn Xeigh Ira, Ovarturffi. Cu 11he r, Central Negro District M' t'nue ' S' a the adia ' Y -Imo. a oeueto n ikland Is one Of this oldest mightiortiood2 la the City of MAC.. Pecalarly referred to today as aecrtcaaa, thifl coo a nity de "Z €wed it 1 B9d as a result of the need ea human Kock workers who mare brouirht to the M1Lmai area tram Weft Palm Beach during t.he tine Sheri Henry A. tiaz le r eN tendea the Florida. ems;; Est Ttadarim t' ai�h3, By 1904, teverat oe the Fttomi Dge eoIia. cropfrunner era the Miami ]flaws] repot tied an ae tier$ lit0C401, ' T iP in ' C!41 vid TOW BOO r`dini to the 1907 DftioiaL dl:racr ry of the City Of Mend, thb bt 7ck 1111,. II r F Cultural Club held re uiar lei at' ly 5;.t.i!gq, sr.cBch through Me POuitda.ti'n dlso reveals that as Early am 19lRr hrx dt.. Agnes Corotet Yard held repular activities, attracting reaidiflta and tourist &like. T'uriets were keowm to also frees q JeJLt the &ree t4a .Enjoy the fins grad# t1onsl rotes [qra cord' ] n the nr :sus black rn ine& and np. rs kill =alataur nte, AS the area binckia de-we74 rd rent' mcnnoule ve,ntui4s. *unri as 'hotels,. spertigent O . lexes. theatres, rightCletm and small hei+lhhorho-ail MAWS. In effect Overtnum 'became a st_cng ppisatirdi c L�li.ty, In the 1 20's end 1910' a. TM 2nd Avenue 'gas known ma Avenue 'V . It wzi tra ca r.t oe o ` *r3 black en.teYta ° 77en t, retail s _ores earl pi-nouer Lott -Lime reveal that by the 14t4' a 4ivertcacn was a ea? tur4L oom is ubcru 4 rt s to `r8n. ell 15v r the i 1d crime to per: arra and to practice fort m1_1q engbpem=s_ ETarn11y oxeitang lS ehq fact that for mow War& touriUtl Iiaitfra+. Miami teach came across wom k2 01., OVWC,OPAI aeoa to listen to the popular Negro Spirituals song ilntAt ranters chux'_rrte. Once kLow® me 'titian 3roadi ay-' Overlawn h L 7 21.:4121 a w°a lunble ocaltabotum to kha7 City of Miami, thm Cuunt5` E 154dt, sad um f}44rail United "5444S+ Eo.r'hwest SiargmB'ANedue vas ale place tO be der._nq the exa era The syncopated sound* or }aa3 and Muse 153404 iii4htly from tht night;�1 ub and date hails. its tith entertainment acoounte:d for R Qre?' irt9 natidnal repetition. In Oil 150G"1 aril S94o's ' Its t:Ltibs presented ouch stars se Marian mairion, 9eesie smith, Ilaael snort, t+t ! "hfat sio9m Cole. Porter resident sosehuld Silas rseolle such po: formAru as Billie eltrlidagp Erskine dawkins, and Jii'i Luneef ird, at the P iekLand PaLaip r cunt 3as ie and Cab C# 1lowey brought tbi4 r hill • bends. Roland 4Giyetl 'MA Etta Kotteno a aingeit wha di.eplayad hfrieen artifacts were presented La rho agittssilaoa at 1Ooker 7, Ka:ehinlirtOn senior High Schttl. Mesa afternoon perfoeminces which ottmn included ata Richardson from Atlanta reading eogery, oast 54 p" reaaent. Singer l'atbl Pi beaCte Seiie pa'ris jr, and his trio, "Barbara Olai: r Lana Eorner Dnahl Buddy ,Tohtisom, arm: Nina H [:.Kinney appeared annually. Darr Caripiity ,des a_sa n tavurritt. the Katherina pt.,.pari 82-755 • PIL21TRVATIOK. OP The historic Sitaz Lao iflantified hn.,:ridtg c11.::.-..Lic.ancia to the: 0:.....?ftriva of the -se blillaing 3Ltaclieiib tiii Fftiort A. nu crtuario fa; soluctim.:1 tht,se hizturiz QmnaiacTselcm shOULd he givart tu prI3 1In 07 kuiLdanss whereuut OF LL:Zatinet 5'd.thE be raVVrMb14...a !..aat over- all econ5mLCtt.11tthn.jrpls fcE Otieertn*, meW leVelaepant, u::9!usit; should he plaectE an prencr71r1'.n In! tnE hiscoziq a.t.-4okure.s wtr_oh mte CXL.71L.6uf 0:1 be 7.1jOr il,p2ttamaa: 1, ChurchQs a- riu..6.!LeL A.H,C. Cmvieah, Nore=nr a th S:r iIiO -' 2-1 C'hurch, 3r4 ?Nun= oth ,a6n. [41.emaxl.f±i Lyric. ChUttA. Noft71.4:_ :Lua And Uth r3, C.X.; n2:1 oh titi cbT..nl.t.rtr ChLrah. BusInt,5.e.:Le. a. CD0.z. Nin I 7.L r. . 1 a. 3i2o!IL boiLEing Tr' cur° 1. Ei otcr Lyti1cLuir 3. 111:.7 '2•L''',1cr.‘7n ha • r °. • !: 1:11.2 : • • trA:....75 5 • • pelozit! =0•11CC'rr. ". : :•• • ;.-1.1. •"1Ltionr diedwri•orf:t1C1. Or van:LI- tor vri.°_:.!: : r•-••„, ritak i ourrvn"! I.. • rlou31 u:paka: T. 0,41.hic1.-chaa E. .71 L'l•r• !:taLC•15;;ent emci% •Orrist,E1;;ITYG:1 ConTyr.1"4"..1t,. •: • •:'. ' i• nal.C1•1 PI7,°0V.:-..1.,2•15 1.! k• opml.:.-•ft cif •' ';!1;' 13•:,i',:itaq,7. or oil - L3C I : • • : 0'7 pru'.. I .7 kry reqU'Lrc1t 1 ‘r.-1Lti.c.in, 31 tcj.r r r ho appEc,:p„;•_1 by a sp:l PrLoz IT" •••prrsild c•ral••• . C.C1 pr£ :! • r • -.7!-.L7Lo g-,d1 buiLOLnu PiaC.21SISAr."." r r• ui ;LI '.•L 1. ° - ahunid the :e.. ° L . 7, r• 1:r.at IdEre• Lite; kiL• th .1113 L;°•• • I. L: •.: • • • WL311:.•i FLI;; .T•••• :• ••••••7. F.' ; . - " •;11.2. . • 5. , : .•• : • • • • C. Cur. • 7, AttChCr'-' ' iLi31- ; .7.13:1LtIco.7.1 :415,2:r=e; arJ:' Pr- t3s,r. •'• aug Er-7•7 any ro.ri,V.7-. • : I tor enfertkyrrn, WID1.1 La rr. Vi 7_14 IEN bid ta.L3:-13C .1.11JtnVr-t•:-."-"LnY L'•r- • .• .• Tzr.:E1Aqg).17:nal e:i3•1,5:•-3.7Lele 1/47•Nr• koz r.np=•telt, .." 1•52-7.1-0:5 and ptivatt ipvestor& ) a G] the Uati `nsi kegittaT Makss LovDEE- pr dueira4 propertiel ei .gable for f# ral IOW= tax teratfit 4f ;rLa Kational Re9ittat has WAG atziescnt standards ror secapt- in. hlttvrig molding! wad distrLCt.a imam av#laiego bar eligible forreocimitiee eeder the 'KC' ordiniAtGP quilikfy+ Pat. the National negiItqr3a d3 Ehe NatiChAl valLe.ke wail$ bit tabuld fF4L flaglster hat no effect oh ovninq' and puliairm d$ requiatlahir a] Natifnlsl Rewiiter rcgbites the sonment or lac pr Ina tp ovomer uld the "H'' vrdiftAhce wot1ia not_ +Osidttrinq Who above. ad ^attayas and liAirtatiaasr li 191.4Ctid Lint bf : L in qs phauld be nominated for Listing on the etatienal R2ut - 41 71,F,. ILLLLallyr riN;a va•ald, '_neleae hooker T. Washirg= ggb .?.s fi .and the l O:S$y? }louse. This lilt thhuid he ttgPardad baeit4 witeo thm stet Pai4 vi prsserrat an etr*•Eallas for indivieial bui18- intl Y$ ar_end.ed above- pertioatae conlieratiaa should be 4moem to o rarciaL buildings eFefeted eye Profit -making entities that could well=re the LAX impAnte. Betlule thil timing plot will Lars011y shape t]10 yhysical €t~ga O fiLlare develapetnt in Oweet8 4 canssdifrL_an ehbuld Oa given te. ietgrporatihq a lefooers that woad be1v to Cecrea to the ,$e=inq ydA 0.4010s{1Ffre of ■hiottario Qytetowai adthh ,ens providaa Lrcantive4 or roe ,quiremelas for retAll et,orea at the grotmd lAtIst Gel ttli4todel eons- . wink blaCto 2, PCov.da inbeeeivem for '#Tis clubs 1: Permit eoatt411q street vendors and outdoor mtikakm 1. Utilise the *eelal eaninl inoenttt'ei 41. the lit crdirafot for praPerwation.O: Axiitinq historic etrv0 to ras 5, Drvtlap LaM1d+caFing stanaardt iLULzini htatorieel and thembkie plant MOterinls i. (Dr iaar possible deign guidelines !or mew eon- riruction that would enedurage Oeleeted elements of hiaeario bailalrvg forge to be inGOVPatated nsoa Lbe deeiV4 at mew buildings, as tar awmitli _te fccI!cwirm lOw 0.02 honeienace2t4 by tita `_voilb1L of st.usenth fOr Vac qv *et Naval ststivn, 41771 -4n A C e Tr -krRi g fit TO .AWAF STIES pk ac SPA Aaid,e Er[m preserving selected biatoric buildings, the greatest opPotrtvnity for heueLbpilug Physi4ca], evidence 00 Historic ovarriwrr in the public Kates - sidewalks, plague end peas': 1, c P+arkA rl - should be a top priority short . tOject. /hu Mack Archives trill assemble a short wri ttmm text and appropriathe ttl _ mph or lilvstraticm fir each major h.LEWric si!:a in O VeMonEn anclmiinq sites nnw yam/ or te4evelovad) Pwiriim4 will then by requeated from the redevelop- ment =r. act, CH and private *cares to reprcduirs tr i s cn anodized aluminum [vr new • r rri stemMaterial) plaqums, to be wisely myar,._ed it appropriate locations. This will ptr- ui=_ a vital eldOmtleatione trto1 for otimulatimq a+.ereoere amongst large number! ;aF °veetin re'gi.- r dente i 4 v1nir ea. 2. Street Furniture - wherevea raBevelcpmeat plains tall fox neW-riPioneente tt ■ldevalkd and plaza Spaces EU* aR paving, benches, signs, Craw Cans, 1*nr1- BC6I'Lib" ate, an opportunity exists t 908i'n each inprOlenents with +n hi IitOrir• theme - particularly the iLittme !Loral:Way jazz era_ peciaZvmnts - pabliC plelsr streetr aidewali and park _74Tove+arts +should be desigw d to accomod.a th�5 t Yecial cultural evRnta envisioned in. 'Lne "pragram- mile section 8C this }Api et, Foo=raneir Kett of whit IS eighLEiea:at in the hi.Stor of auartrlra involved. the people Misselve and MO Retisitg 1014Y generetedr came than physi- cal tlhings Rath ■S bUi lei r.r Therefore, an esaent ial elemg at of the Hittvxic Eimeh,zai t nceur in to program aeti'itiAs and oyunts that Will reenatt thi former vitality and akdsspheri Of the cars4nity. Aveh prt wife rill be Critibgi t2 attracting Williats and viaitorat iron. errand Dade Eoanty_ 1• Mold nett totcarts within: the propoded di,ttlick I, play for C1ia astabl.ishruant GF an annual Matlack OvettOlga Cikltarxa_ . rt$ Festival ramiTiLacense aE j418t era ln.t ]iah an kn:ternikicnel cultural rewlex Featur- ing Activities tm:riaiatent or the nineteen thirties'. for oat and fkEtirs uhet0 artists can receive training an i] at perform in cencert. 4. DICIjreas Caoit/oz from all r. lr th* world to hold ann'al Eami3y raunio;t2 in blade county. particularly in Uhe ?liitario DoIrterwo &twin.. a. "Establish D'rits'-loan ri tioaal rempetiticm h. 'CUibnor*' etnteets apecializinn iia 100. fcad gran WA Coribbair, end Snpwren States. C•. Asir st4ii mg tinteete d. Eatith1101 a hell Of fano, nt.nuLL roca^jtian OF r_aci on, 1 t iqures it, ,nabLish a tcr.gl! F+Crsrnr5r,rnt oe sapC r'Cncr Arta event • S. Encourage the ertablidhdenE of 1rgiti,rlalee thr,otird eritara r and artists +a rkehapa aod gins t' claa,s night Clubs and rimtaPraxta basgd en tho quidtkli7lta d .dittnridi district,. 5 Ent -corms klli Oat b1ishrrerrt of menufseti b as wolf aR other related heo.' riossea for the ors, i.a. :lmryU- factvrinar ant OiStributimil sqUARAONt and sup iaa" fdflThi in4, auld,c, art, ,e'te. 7. 6maurave Eha natibl idrhQent at tom o f kraal hle- tbrstai 2ik00 %ltd Landmarks, i. BUM tours rQ Visit aitn4 CGUrt -wLdi b. xiaf-#tiara for sites vitbin the Aiatsict B. f"naaurago CIO OStablishrient 4A 'tourist iL5forna- ti4n Cidter which uou1l dIrset tour step t0 a.trmy,- W.0711, reataurs:rp , harts]. acopn7priatices, and Itin- torical Cl'-ei thrueghewt Rada 4,1buntyF_ 9 tro:100ga the establishMerit bf specialty 13190ps u#tieh roatUltf prnducts of Afrleao tt,q Caribbean and the Snother4 States. a. O. e. Pagiaok'Aalt9, eatorara, etc, LttgraphIT'a atudiQ iF iiIizkng in paxzp ! f gtorea artd art gxlltries 10 Establish a 'SetorLayr Rarkotelace whore v0a4OrM are a1-d, ed tar sot up in a de ignett.4 street black or publ.c plaza - fes:uring SUMO fends, erafEar tro9 produce, artwork, att. AYCbives Ths 0114vin9 litua of Chu sleek Riihives Research an0 ili,stary man. &Lim should ratrral'v* inrrcas 4 'date and private :support, ne pro j'Ct inn Wei eatablisbinmg 9 re eareh col lankicin docuncr jrgg issaelld aC` ikeiti0m, ■vaM.k9 arrd sites 0 hiatoricel eigairlaanoe v'_tiri;l the diatt ct tab�.iah! PerrrOMEnt lath Archsu■s all s ideweik 'g Eoi Aau ar�p l#stiar�at psair1 related 10 this process ROOM!' reCoads, p1''ea;►7raiihs an4 minuteript.s whi' i do t the district Th ti the ergad u Hanel papery elf the Black U- niv. ad His1i r and DezoaiCh ioundatiUn p[ South F$Or-da, Inc. 17 tatabligh utl Fan-PAPg pliblicition program Eatabli#Itl an (international rebasrch iaearnshfp progTe with collegial' and urrivorritios arownd the vok1ct Contia4t 0-9akno research programr: ltr rL the benefit of the LLoalm il*ti`'Sh-largs. Serve 44O the inLo lSatigrri1 c1,ueri7L9hrause end di meninx= 'rlar. seater Zvi the euiture aE black 114001, i.t. dran- gOlvge, lravd, :lrcza, Vi#lkG1 and, perforrmJ n9 artsr hair stylae music, etc, t2M (1) 8'2— 755 i MUKWA 115e fieriMsde melfalust- AY TAR 1ML3, T4 mut !fir dhrtimi/rma 'F! U IT T C4111111 ELM c !ram 11.1 PUP Tit &F1k NOM BY no . HCAT►iEa5TJlfddf MEV mom, megitempOW 95 INTEROTA7E J5E, ▪ 7 eP 4nF, is i Y ititeAmM t to iiim LF.■ land Lame m14 i#pd acquiIEtiai elptenta of the 1,B2 DOULtri.t 7' eEtl ,f Irk itst Csamua ity kmiev4100mOkt ?tan 1M OC %a 066446 to hhr apptrawod pito,1 Wtve'_eF/arr,e Vrograa (City caltiLtsian Itsmulutid >MF. 13- 'F'2 add Comekt4 eweemi eion kiDolottom No. Yrte0G 4 aAh W ARM. nib of the pew**a Oberlie 4i4 Wend cL4-Earman:r ,riC]F tI Mini Cipipithpettivi 1041.9 Leartgitd Davelempsefic NJaJttaiZ#o Ifftw ] 19441 nftd OFLUSAS4 all Sht pcopostd changes art congiettrit with tht y4++1f ybilm iver at Or 688lhQh8t Orettarn/Park *#! L CeimuritY Iltde*419nt Wltad an4 THERM the Pcb¢4ard 04,464 06 66160 kb Kr6066461 dirrelOpiftek of a tort' arinalcoliaaah, arNiopent of pokatrian ills, temorti 4f ¢pkee4er blci k pe+t a tnnhlrt • 11- sa lifi aClary , ds4 Witati tfid NienW441. tke Pitt el Ana! ii1X hivietiy 6540. 0 ill .11661161 of l fgrAhgr a, 11 , Ito 10. 30 fdild+ria'g advartieed Iap+rleg. a4spaad lopnikatacta No. WO 51-95. by am h t# 9 vote, • vamiendieq peal or asslidin9 the 5013{beast OVFITVOVVylatk fo#[tcommamity tsiomitepeo4t 146606v 66k fbrEhr Ana pisizns, tht city caomation, altar eonetdtratlao D Chia ailt*f, dtam *Maga, grid to the bet ulterior of tht wiz* vtV re et th4 #ty a~r ]liaa to NNW this ledehwtit Ov#rtr 'Pat% Nast moss i hr tpdstrtimpaivit !1 ah .1L: t t Adt h trgis! /Niro 111111'061, et IT ItROWTO ut COINCIISma OP THE CTrc Of KM, PLOAIOAq cirr uoithassrnff Wan CV C IS Se iglIK4wca lirtif#41247 . . inwelagicirb Nara 4itlid Netiber, i&i acl ,A4Led.411th COMpissl= Vid hilahltiBM i, 3-g72 Jr10 zy 00,1310dc ,qammiation via 1.01.eautim Va. -L'»'- )„eby apenj4 incorpolbtio9 Olo '64100 .itipJlArpd tht a0.10F4.0t, awectimennz111 aft liAliveloPiach Plan re/14ton* WO July 7th, Mk and inoorportolit helNin Cdfirtipftee4 . , • • 140144 AND ROM thts ieleliraty, of j>toksa..r • y I • Pia AP111011110. 4- • 85-120 • -ii-4 . • . • 31.1 Appendix E Resolution Adopting New Boundaries Please see next few pages for: SEOPW CRA Resolution 0293, adopted May 30, 2002 and City of Miami Ordinance 12247, adopted July 9, 2002 170 aoLLrioF No. sEowL R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOADD OF Dt CTOR5 OF lilt SOUTHEAST ovarowmirAF.K WE "1 OVUM REDENTLOPMENTAGENCY ("c A"), im ATTACH DIT I, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COMMISSION OF T.Frp ciTYF MIAME ("CITY COMMISSION"), AS GOVERNING BODY OF THE CRA, AMEND AND MODIFY TSE CRA REDEVELQPME 'T PLAN TO EXTEND TEE BOUNDARIES OF THE REDEVVEI.f]PPM N1 AREA AS SET FORTA IN THE ATTACHED MAP; REQUESTING THAT TIME CITY COMMISSION SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEAlC TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND MODIFICATION Or THE PLAN AT THE EARLIEST DATE. PERMITTED BY LAIXr; FEQUESTIN!J THAT 'ME CITY COMMISSION 1)I1 .CT IRE CITY MANAGER TO PROVIDE ALL NOTICES REQUIRED BY LAW; AND ALL'THQR ENCi THE ACTING EXECUTIVE 171R,FLTOR OF THE CR.A TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECIMA.RY TO Accomp LSH AppRova OF pRoposED Aly E➢N"DMENT AND MOOT/CATION OF THE PLAN TO EXTEND BOUNDARIES OF TEE PIDEMO?IVIENT AREA BEFORE WILEREAS, A$, the. Sit vertownfPartc West Community Redevelopment Agency (the "CAN) ii9 rcTrionsibils for earryios iornmunity redevelopment activitieg in the redevelopment area purn t t, Sullitlegat CfreCTIOWERZt Wart COonmurditY a t flan (*Pistil; lid 14141EEREAS, as provided for by the Community Redevelopment .Aetof 1 9, the CPA Endo it6 pommy and desirable to amend rind dify the exiling PNan to each the bow -An -la of tbo community rodcybkinnout arcs to Tome fully and effectively carry cat 116 cOrnm.0 iry redevelopment activities, and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors oldie CkA (iho "Bound") desires to rid to the City 6siOn Of the City of Miami the "C9ty Commission"). im its ry as the governing body of the CRA, that the Plan be amended and modifwd ext&ud the boondaries of tine re t area as set forth in the attached gip, S4 that the cRA`B fS clegigr ra may immediately plan for redevelopment ofbot the current redevelopment and the areas within the proposed kkoundely exteosions; SCA swpwi 0_ WHEREAS, the Board ii aware that the city Commission may modify the proposed boundary extet puns to thrtijcvelgrpratrit area van the City C anmi lion c+ons.ide . final approvat of the eraeidcd Tedevelopmcnt plan at the public hearing required by Corr ] 153.361, Florida Statutes (2001). NOW, THEREFORE, , BE [1' RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DI.RECTORS,OF TUE SOIUTHF,4ST OVERL'OWN/PARK WEST COr ltieitrt ury. REDEvELoprfoorr AGENCY OF THE CITY OF E'rIIAM1, FLORIDA; Section. 1, The teeitals and fwding5 contained in the preamble CO this re olutaorL are inCorporated herein as if fully set forth in this section. Scction 2, The Board hereby recommends to the City Commission that it adopt the proposed amcndrnent and modcifiegioo of the Plan extending the buuwd Aries of the redenlopment area as sot fib ill the attached map. Section }. The. Bowl rrxpuesta WI the City COrnnitssian alithimaZe a public hir.,pnitzaS regusreld by Section 163361, Florida S (2004 to cOn5iciert the proposed ametadment and Jodi icznon o 'the Purr at Eke earliest date perm ttad by law - Section 4, The Board err revestE that nct City Commirai n dirt the City Manager to provide an not requited by Jaw, including rintioe to the appropriate ‘axing authorities and paablicatk of notice of hearing prim to the City Camunissioo holding a public hearing to, +ornsider approval of the amendment and modification of the Plan. Section 5. The aosrd i9 swam that the City COmmiakcrrb may at its discretigr,F reduce Olt roconunerided hemadary aclartsietta wh t the amended redevelopment Wan iR submitted to the City Corrunission for final approval at aloe public heariea- 5ectian 6, 'Ma CPA's Acting Executive Director is dieted so take al! aetiuns accessary to accomplish approval of the proposed amendment and moditeai;un of She Plan to Extend the boundaries ofthe redevelopment arca before ly 1, 20p2, Section 7, This reRolution ill be effective upon it a rptin ,- PASSED AND ADOPTED this 30ei day or :vial.... 2002. ATTEST Arthur E. Tu. le, Jr,, Chaini1851 PFiaci]]a A. Thompson Oak oft a Scant Pap 2 43 SEOPWICRA 0` APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS. A]ejMndro Vi1ar Jl a C1tA GeatTal Counst] ATTA MENTS Yaac3 of3 SEO1W /. - 3 �u'a. P 41 7 mi it— — 1.01Pro1414 I ilia lil j-11 IN Ele 4' I iU PIE O 4E10111 ri 174 71:1" r I I I M II 11.41 r '.1., r-l•-•P CiEa.1 ih. __ th- -.1--ry-,1,- ----- - --''..' --1-71-,,----- .•J • 1,,,. , L ' A di' hif c7A-, -1 .._4 lil CIL_ 11 _.i ) d. 1.-Pt. T7 . li;1 : Lill 1 iinF-1 10E-1 i - al -,t... .iin- .1,7-I- ) r. Miarni CRA Boundary Study Options EKI&'' rig Ststmess!! Ctvertmtn PFIrkWasi CRA Boundary Denri CRA Faurida East Coast Rail -Dad 5 Map 3 MCI RIM r--g2-.A eel C]Tcr ATTOPIErCFF CE 3kt 416 1604 P.m 6/13RE2 ORDINANCE NO, 12247 AT O DINANC@ OF TR8 MIAMI CITY COmmI S $ ION , WTTH ATTACHMENTS, AMENDINC AND MODIFYING THE i:OTY HEA5T OVERT/PARK ZEST commUNITY w auEvELOPM3NT PLAN TO EXTEND THE BOUNDOIR$ OF THE CITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA AS DESCRIBED IN X IE IT AR AND TN2ORFC}RATl .] • HEREIN, AMENDING CHAPTER 14, ARTI LE V , DrvisiON 1, OP THE CODE OF Tt1E CITY OF MIAM ' , FLORIDA, AS 2LM. D D ENTITLED 'DOWNTOWN DEVE? EMINT, SOUTHEAST RTOWN/PARK 1 C$T REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND COMMU ITf RE EvELOPMEIT .A 1 GENFRALLY7 , TO RIME= • ArENMENT AND MODIFICATION OF TEE SOFT OV R O P RA' 41E3T cOMILTNi1`Y REDEVE1OPMENT FLAN, MORE PANTI c iLAFZLY 8Y AMENDTNG SECTION 34-252 OF SAID L : CONTAMING A REFEALER ?F OvlS oN AND A SEVERAEIL TY ULAVsEr AND PROvicanG POE AN LKK DIATE EFFECT/ : DAT'Z - WHEREAS, the Southeast Overt owwn/park west COmmunity Redevelopment Agency (the *CA" io reepioag5ik 1 ► Lox carrying out comrrua ,.ity redevelopmant activities in the community redeve1opment.. area pursdant to Soutbe4eL overt wnfPark West Community Redevelopment Plan f "T1 anR ; and WEUREAS, as prcvIded for by the Ccimm snity Redevelopment kct of 1959, the CRA finds ita necessary and desirable sO amen and modify the exiatittg Pl.n tO extend the boandar .es of trfie 6 12247 "Chapter DOWNTOWN N D v Z.opMENs' ARTICLE V. SOUTHEAsr O1 RT'DW<ti/PA1 X WEST REDEVELOPMENT Ili gT TCT ANTI rnMM N:. TY REDUVELOPKENT 4GENC'Y DIVISION 1. GERALLy f Sec. 14 - 52 . acunda r : en ass ipxiated The $outhess QvertownJPark wlet. r, Redevelopment Area Diampei-ot {''district"] shalt encompass the area described an the MA cn file with the city rlexk igetmeeie-4 6 -mot. The diatriut shall be under r.hm j urisdictivn and control of the agency. t Section 4 Ali Ordinances or parts ordinances that +ire inconai.Stenu or in txtlict with the provigiona Of this Ordinance are reps&led Section 5 If any section,, part of election, paragraph, cieuse, phrase or word of t:aia Ord lance is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Ordinance eha11 Mgt be affected. Section 6 This Ordinance ahail become effective IN1'2 TATEIA upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor. If elle Mayor dois ant $ n this lad£hai,.c[5, it ®hall became nt fective at '054 end of ten calendar daya from the date It wax passed and adopted. If Mc Mayor vetosa Ship Ordinance, is 'shall hecaec affective itomadiately upon override of Lha veto by the Citi ceio _ Page 3 of 4 12247 II'r W!I�. r tIIjL.L PAS$1ED ON P R&'' READINO BY TITLIE of Ly this nth {lay of June 2.00.2 PkSSf3D AND PtDOPTED ON SEA AND F7NAL R NG BY TITLE ONLY this 27th day of J•ape ATTEST r 02 MANUEL h, D!.AZ, MAYOR In ac ocedarce wllh Miami Crad. Src 2-16, *ince the mayor ccl not Inc to ppM.* ciF this. le elation by signing in the detivadizri Oa$e pmpled, 8e10 hsgwralion r►nw cornef re ti-e dame c4 len (10) dctym from the die d# mimnuaion scum regandt AVM, %litho id ihift IA MIX coirc;91ing,a F]U CILLa A , THOMP9ON CiT'f CLERK APPRQ °ED A9 TO IOFWL., z ALE C W129ASS:J}i:r,FLIP -ECTNES5 Page i of i•F CIJi i Th.-rnrinn, Citw alrk 12247 Boundary Description 08.08.02 (Dees Rot i! luck Drrrtroaiuf Pori w WWt; tin ,fsianal) The extended Southeast overtowniPark Vint community rectev'elopCu:nt area is Willy bounded as follows; Beginning nay the southeast tner of Lunidnits Park; it th,e sauthwcst co-rner of thc intresection of NW 2°0 Street and NW 3 Court; caravan nun north to the north side of NW 54' Street; then west along the north side of NW 5Th Street to tltie east side of NW £°' Avenue., then north along :he cal side of NW 5Th Avenue to the hOrth side of NW 7111 Suet; then nett alb the north side oft tiV 7'''sweet to Site east side of N'1W !'" Avenue: then north along the east side of NW 74' Avenue to the southern edge of the Meft r it right ofway ("RDWI. Ten ease plug the southern edge. of the urai1 ROW to the western edge of the 1-95 ?OW; then north *mg the western edge of the 1-95 ROW to the north side of NW led' Shiest; the east along the north slik of NW 10' Street to the w#6t side of NW 441 Avenue.; then north alcmg the west side of NW 4'h Amor to the south side or ''W 17`' Street; then West alone the south side of NW 17th Street to the west side of NW 5111 Avenue; then north along the west We of 1 Avenue to the nemlr side of NW 19th Street; then east along the north aide of NW 19th Street to the west aide of NW 4ds Court; then north along the• west side of NW 41' Court to the south side of Nw 2011' Stresi then west along the south side of NW 2pto 9l point is ling with the western boundary of the properly abutting the continuation of NVk' 4Th icon north of NW 20'h Street; then north to the north side of NW 2O Street and eomnruin[ mirth tic the south side of NW 22'd Seem; then east Along the south sidle of NW 2?°d Shoot to a point 2Qt3 feet cast of the ezet side of the NW Ague ROW; then south along a line Vie feet tit of the east side of the NW Y Avenue ROW to the MA side of NW 20° Street; then east along the north side of NW 2O' Street to the east See of ;l1W 2i Court; then youth Along the east side ofNW 21.111 Court to the north aide of NW I711' Street; Sher, vast elrnsg the ograh side of NW 171" Street to the east aide ofNW 2" Avenue; then SiVigh along the ea-v side of NW ' Avenue to the nutria aide of NW 14d' Street. Thee east along the north side of Mit 141h Street to the east side of NW I" Avenue; then south along the east aide of NW I" Avenue to the northern edge of the 1- '95 ROW; than east along thc norther edge of the I-395 ROW to the, Biscay= Bay hullthead; then south dons the hullthead to the _southern edge of the I-395 ROW; then west along the southern edge of the 1=395 ROW to the western side of Biscayne Eoulevard. That south along the west side of Biscayne Boulevard to the north side of NE 3th Street; then west ajUlt. the ouTth side of NE. 5'h street to the west side of North Miami Avenue; then muth along the west side of North hfarm AMMO to the north side of 1" Street; then west aking the north side of NW l Street past NW 1' Avenue, to include properties abutting the west side of NW t"' Avenue, then north along the western edge of sl�•arai F"F' nlarr Lk v:•i1 a34149. re•NotGr dvyi'r A:lrr cad .oK 12247 said proimfie% rr, €he north side of NW Sw Street then wcsi along #etc north si.de of NW 56' Stmct io the emit side of NW Y'' A to then math along the cast aide of NW 3'4 Avenue to the south side 0.f NW 2a41 Strut; then west along the &mei side of NW 2 st vet to the southlrregi carnet of the inienection. of NW 2 ° Sheet and NW Yd Com, e1P5ED 'Rey Uup,r`P 01-01.9A Feudal kr •Ivrrr aAsr hxad Qui 12247 TO -It a _ 05 Appendix F Advertisements Of Public Notice Please see the next few pages. 180 SEDPW Redevelopment Plan Public Meetings 2002-2004 Pubic Meet 1g IJ:Aicre Pc.steii Type Discussion Location Time Conrnenta `.1on:l_vr. , .i _`6: 2004 Miami Times, Miami Today, Daily Business Review CRA Board Meeting SEDPW Plan resubn --erl tc. tl-. =:R.- Board for approval h.'i 3 3' y 'era = 20-7pm See City Clerk for minutes 305-250-5360 :1urn:Ia . l•,'arch 29, 2004 Miami Tines_ M`ami Today, Daily Business Review CRA. Board Meeting SEDPW Plan submitted for approva . I:c.m deferred to 4-26-04 Board Meeting h/ia 3~ - •ena = 20 -7pm See City Clerk for minutes 305-250-5360 Thursday, February 19, 2444 Miami T cores Community Briering CRA Housing Consultant, Greater Miami Neighborhoods_ Inc. regarding housing policy for the SEOFW Redevelopment Area.. Presentation by Crosswinds Communities Inc. Calmer Center 0-8pm Contact City Clerk for Overtown Advisory Board Minutes for 2-19-04, contact 32E-250-5360 Thursday, October 02, 2003 Miami Times, Miami Da ly Bus ness Review Workshop SEDPW Draft Flan Miami Arena 4-6:30 pm See City Clerk for minutes 305-250-5360 a=_irday: March 0.. 2022 Miami Times, Miami Da ly Business Review Fla i P .-,°ie:k. Plan availab e for distributon. Creston of the SEOP'o^: Review Panel for review of DRAFT SECP:^1 Plan Plans could be picked up at CRA {Dupont Off'ce7, Overtown NET and Downtown FIET March 8-Comments March 22, 20:13 available, contact CRA Office at 325 679-6800 Saturday: January 25, 2003 Miami Times T.�.+.• 1 -_31 1%.!e. ti.ng CRA Economic Consultant_ ZI-A to d scuss economic analysis of SEDPW Redevelopment Area Lyric Theater 1D-12 noun See City Clerk for minutes 305-250-5360 37.irday: November 09, 2222 Miami Today: Mian- -i 3 .e._ T.:,. i Hall re&ti i.j SECPW Draft Plan Lyric Theater 1D-12 neon See City Clerk for minutes 305-250-5360 181 9._Aileasll Iti r t4 wRn Park West QggrurrivrIItyRedeveIOpfnetmom NOTICE -OF CQFt11UNITY BRIEFING The SE(]F'1N CRA'S housing cansutlant, Greeter Miami rtie hbclrhtx3ds Inc. MJJ J"), will brier the onrnr•&rnihi ®rr5 seek NW, O1 in work to devalop The houswig component of ti vpdatc ' the 196.2 SEOPlisf R tde+telopfnent Plan. She housing c+arnponent will include, ,prr analyalrt of current givd future musing deeds and Mende, arid establish housing goals end parades far Iha SEOF'1' reda4eloprnent area. GLIN'e fkral work Pr4duu will resell Ina housing poi+cy rcr the SECredervaltapmerrl area twit *III be 0 COmpenion dacwrneM to ins updated SECP1k RedevOlOOMent Flan. This housing POW will he r3reeenled 14 the CFtA Board and OW city' of Miami fbr adoption and imple6rerria- 1kN motion based developer, cyourwiros Communities, In , is in negutiatlore with Ltie flycfM Miami grid SEOPWGRAtosetts the Onvoing Poinciana iVillageaswi ere Wjk IJti IliOn and will brief the COrEenunaly. on its pro - Posed 10130 res+dentiat mod, nixed -use dove, opmer►1 PraJect en 5 1f2 brads th Overtown. Both briefings will hike Race during the #r#rnrrwn Advisory Board miteNsg O0 Thursday, February 19. 2004, et 5:00 pm, art 1ha Carpel Center lamp et 1 tJO 3" A+renue. Miami, Florida. Interested individluala and keF k eI! ere tre.tureged to attend this neeling. Conleci Choler Aracatt et 30!-6F9-hUoo If 2ddltcnal irrftentketion is required. F .eI ,,rdwmk.iy N.rrl 6.da t.n,wrr,ihna.i COUNTY OF C+OE R,Rr 1- ' wd.o.n Ft ay.,W Il +Yd .rhq aw %.LL. vp dr< U. i d. wJ M. elr Clot al na FE..141 mars i. scyppc I '4G1 . N®i., 6.6i coug...FY:nm. Lin IT nud>m ai ,.wd .-o vaa,y.el r +i ntd ioarf ti wm,ary I4,» . Arse r ..r y.r TJIY I4IA1•6 `nrr<s u . t..,p.m nay,+ n,,....... oMr T .r, werisNl *MIX loa omespnircr t..—..l... a-. tyre ` rails a x, ..14 0.• F .Ilia . zd la Iwo omd as or" od w-Ja .0 4 I.L.T. 7.1 6m.. LI4ir1, .` •. re„rF: R•nme,r .sows ar .ow i.a r rIw aw.l paw 41•1, p.ao.am =Alai achy +r~arms* mist aaL.i ..yq Merl ae e aW.rI w M >R as 1ccraii .J •.ice +a e.61yg,,. c ®,firCIA �aar�,Imtrar.. tee, v. 1 a. or n txx MY v. .'0e f._ f •rztt NOME ATM' OF pt.al.E �YT a.ArrGr;. Ih co. tp, op! * tom tit r /MIA 4iai'M caA13331i MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Irilr r Ind AHERN . - WII Manly. STATE 4F FLORIDA COUNTY ' FJIAIAA1--04OE: 13g1a•rr 9•ae 4VKlera1 wed Lanni peekrlely VD -Oared 0.1l. FERBEYFIE, SaRraon+0111*I 3eys 141 haarshe 1 ; SUPEFV1SOR 01361 hlah2e8Fortho r.Lernl 13eaiy k3ualness Sri'' I iB Werra Maitre, a daily Iexcapl 5etulraa•' Sinlay "4 "10 f44 4) r EPeF'er, pig,11: J'r&r at Warr, , 10 Menii.r da � , FkRl %atlne e3lamedGaily rJr$'JverserinnI. De^g P LBW Advertisement GI Rave. ei thrr wiener rst f F lhaa 1 ITN NOTICE OF Cr1l1NITYWOFIKUOP SQLiTIfEASTOVERTO•WN PART{ WEST aim* XX XX C ur4 'kW Mibli3h d in geld newspaper in the mugs et Meantlur*ler sayi. Nu the sad Milli Da* Busir iN. Review a $ adompaFar Washed at Mtiali Fn seed l.Slelrii•Dade 00111'Rj- Ficricle errd than Ira veil heimpep,pr hS8 heirOckfie bean coraiains 1p plltJleliad is sold MiaR'iUewe oxrdy. Flnlde 68Gh CISIF I SBhJFEI , OVIday errd Legal' Ffallr am aidrres tac n ergjitred os c4104 rrrli rlrrdlter etei.g poet Moo in Miami In Said Mgm1-D.deCal,rrry. Florida, kir POW or mg Year raem pritrellrib *le hrs1 p tiltalita d the ra�IaOwl cap1 delNerlsemmard; grid Omni hatnra Says tJW Ilea 5Jl4llag Pe/ran paid nor piterrewlarts parson, hrri mretrporedert rok nunL I@[t l ;.cr,n-. rahrr1 Ior Ir.- r�oloo! &arming II' u±�.e �t rc' i ; IKa4a7 cl u na•�! ."C.415p®tiel. d mail IG t5n"J }• IirxJ ceviu 22 i'dadirivr EisiE F In rz {MALI' a FER@I'Agpar L•:_trL1T C! p _ Sr`xTK FLDIUDA is *Itte f9a coin . OC DIM CM. jt�Flf 23 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN PARK WEST ISEOPlivi COMMUNITY RED VE LOPMEtrIT AGENCY NOTICE OF COMMUNITY WORKSHDP PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE LIFIAFT 5EPTEMBER 20635EVPW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE The SE .YITh wlllyeeIan itsmod comr r* verriskr.f.1Kfi.nio l� SE01=517CFIAPIanrengCana.Jl.ti Dareri4d' &Padncrs, Iodlicuas 110, CRAFT 13ep1omta:.• sixsl s1 OPYY iledeveloprnerx Ran Llpeole 3413 nrwli w* lake platy an Th , QC1 &r 2. 211d3, Irom 4:DG Fel0 pT. the Mane Perna OAP Rd.BmI 1.1.40:ml el jrrg Aref Bal . RCA, Florida. Pwble COMMerls received suer uaa N. .h. s''UG€r C.ammunI u' hra4 Cre as rrverp_rlled mot the Jlid Flat 4b, neni j a. Transsrierrs Imm ear prowom rM:1 9uyy mpf ng3 (r r,Nemt3er 3, 2032 end March if, 211131oanbootlai7pd !Tom ulmCily Clerks iamplrir firs ial damnanhs :erpaps. dr2;lirgs, onrlalioroteo nl rrIcmNykim .11 be evadahle far piola revlaee lolorejrir, 5.FpInriitR , 2022 tlyout h Itue dey. Onnbar 1,Dia.tremtrllm 105.000111,411 eCopyre hh. R0111.6 p-enI hpircy ahem. Ail NW $Ih. 9inKt Sails 144 , rune. Fbnela_ rl dress documrras ail also ++reilnble al ins varnrtnla! w �illglv�, Inlarrrslad ndirdru rah9lders utpa reukteeCd arc.1 ci;rr+awfigA ce, the rInx drefl Surd. no ct the redetelepreer0 plan updai did c.-cmJIalJrrl1Sr 111Ie11d E414 rreAtirrp. Far mato Iricrrr lion, ply pollen RI>htlrah Lq.r u13R5437 .3g!S. 1i11 D€+h awe Fascist A. Thettipson marker hut ac4i- 03 .35164716M 671:7G l7Pr FC'r1r1'•di dB OIX1Jr r OF WOG witfolinirk F.tl.lyd WW..L1rr W LlniE .r4urJy flxala PANE. Fb111 F,`..TICW [a: tars 1r Nollm!T Or .Ilse Fd 1'e11lc (iek d THE W]al(I T1NIE'd w.ilr:v.y°.pr pa I.°.i u ?Jun_ ark £baff. Lid k .s pi§hKvr Li laid r. a LW= arts iiFl.si 9r: 1.1a..i.•r i1.:cm :rJhiri Pi n flea 1.40 ?F# MI+IWI I110.1 a 1 rraRilpr Anleml u MIME, air ▪ F1ew.®dlid ali i mai1m ldrnUMrlraah Attatalnmall L7Ydc L'.ertj. F1rak 1ndY =iih 6.1 ha, "'- fl.ar ri unal star roil liana lI ail 4.3 tor. WI1rr 01♦'.s>_ Drt Conk, FIR14 rr aarm .1 eIw d® su ran rm �.mda� eta aI i k,un rr 11k .irrMrd t.mr ilrral .E.rw aaa. r W aba ki midp.5 pea airprnrlrvd err fm Mau. c- -°a! ✓ oom for i1R prapa{r d #*. a.rar a Y. dsa a: r air 1m%+rFn. 4 71r�1,7 Al ribs £fiat and u1.... a lailm c. Lira IM J;~Jy, 3� or fir} IIaW 14.G-1Jl145" PuDLC &TAIL 4F 14.0 15... L0.r1r.!. Np=rrr•rr li%r *41641. abb. .11h J75 r L, I rlrrLr, buelriclld ,nuLrbm.iting. bual ato 'Mhlia1lanrrtsl:uiir e lenw Indli RIRR1r .11141 LIIc ' ....1414; Crr Lilt tdlWorai wm.6.11 Ent•l►.Ira ill Yr-:? 84Fd Wan arr. ci.hrT rs:tRFu ESr .L91 Inrludt iru;:75ra a f*rrm Ir.,iraFlrl' nrid 061.m.p.--nrxil user. a k/Ci L ua !malt.15 a1 Malta Tsy Ju I1hr moil b U:1udr c{JTnn'a11 iiILy_ Mother u yrrtjl OWN& as dim cur*, FAR Nela11Ji air 110%1011rl ail flue 5• -.614dea Aur.iIrrrrrery 15.71 GU Fray,` 4'h+rt L 1Ft c?' .11 tio.nod NIrINUlrlly. hR4.ii ia5,"ukarniu: a1,n1 OA Eland 'with the help at £Bh- buck,4 1rii firing. 5111 . me Warner I +►011-� Turner 6r dk.rnrun r droiIai1. vlai{t, tome the iriirrr. F mrr Tr4 Yrorl4lb FT I.1 » lri April jl w i b Mali v:141 Lae 71 ura° 1 hot P F11YL i y1.711 Thu' here. anarrg :MI 'q aJaiarlln� r1Ehle 14 P#rllipa .1,,r.n-F. Fine rwin4141FaWr ilrrlal Ind 14Wi Ill a.r tepee eel. en lhuy DaLIJ■Tid'1 double le r ul ail 4YFiiy Rt%E.t►y: lire 51 e,RDL1111001. a.ra {eook 1ird LX aemni. • I. 1. Ire iihr Prl'YIHpS a`Jrt15a one. r1116. u1cr Lim liaa'L. 3t5 • fire. rA i"NEItral. I 61F7+Gu liar arm.. lam belli N O* plzvcr3psumL-L-IrrL.e buJtiJ., town■ J3r+Jadte<tlg put l4 tuft .rnllu.n;l I UP b ■ 1trr41 oI KV mum a,r. Io JP tin taisiph ay drlFnrl.F{l £t} yin •1nn 1:+ •• 511.4 11r !111E iI tart 7U IJ1_ AO1. Lint 111 Id WO pet Iaw& raged RE Lbe pairs by elf ]79.411'• E4A.Ifxx1 aokarlt6 fa, nrid C.C.iu rei I ivbfininrri unnyfrri. WE5t (SEOF1 j Cornrpuniiy RedAvlclO meni Agency frlOTICS OF COMMW1fl WORKSHOP Pubic Comtp>nts cry the: LDRAF September 2001SEOPW Red I t Filar Linda'. T*w SEcIF!h d:RAWIe br F tlk4 its rift! urmv°Jtr 493rl ho,.D0hi- +Y' 2,2 GRA.clnpailr1 Cexni:Wm UP•!r! EDT 6 Fairdini. ki CIS[usr F�i I71iAfT1Srp1.nalrr ;.sHanfa Ftdeviiyrnrrl Rt#n voch,k, awl rrt'nlnp wef iakt: plrrx Oh Tmaad■r, 65r1.6.6er Z, lrcrr #1:1D pm l0 S:3 4015. Lt ir.1 llama arma cplp Room) l•calid ri 01 Arena feaal•Tati t,Iu u Far1dis FLAW- ru+mrrri r. iyliJ Onre. lrrt 1AiiOFr b, .D.253 Comm WO, VtiMYa kV hire beer, FrrralµW iird. 1111:1 .- rnrled i569:16'selap7rrt+H lea Teinietos irum !,e 1HI!L1 IJ! ti oavArinP'r ,.Mdkirwlo t1,141 Her I',INO&. 20113J On Li 41.141.iiiae Irian l'a, COI (14r`4 v%ce by amddrp 30545a'S b 7 nil vF. P.11 ct'a m0✓dL Lama, LiSrarrryr and nirEr 1r.rin6rr "-dolma. l03n1 LU'1t,[ trrrirela 1 r rr+tre+.r+rt+, L17r1da}.skip/rpm., 2D "l :d 11rci411 YSidrrr,rdirt I!I AMPI 1. 2003from E ID i . 5. See 1.m rr IJrr o*+narlrlk' Fl errio-peum AljirrCe rdrr:r xi) we 51- EilafFrt{10.1diau Flwnlu urrrLr9EwJ/Fs(ati„FllL" id I. manna. F rmlierr I PI Dreg lvd+Fd rr J1 rJ VIC ilrrtrie>Ylce W .. sonot ed arld z.prnrrler ed err lrrr 61.a. rS■il {klaa L # ;I11.6Di dr IJFL. 166:1.6414oprrll1i11 plan Jpa1l& fir■ *ram In,&lend mid 4reelrc. Fat +rier'i dYL.rsrelia, FL. .- wraltrd • atbeker• Lose a±. 5-fin stir i• SM;1{t4e:i F4aelw as 11,rrnl,6rn LJTak SI the 6:Lar1 MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW FutIanna Ds•, wwsp Sam a rid Lori' Fa ELI .. Isluri., Mini.L ii, ICLPui/h'. f'IGi1da STATE OF i=LORIOA+. QDIJhiTY OF k1II'tiI.6�5bE: Cletare the Lnderseped elhanty personally° appaere.'d Q Y. FERIBEYRE, sift an tail says Vat Fie' or ol'e II 55I.IPFH 9yCR, LOQal MOWN VI IJtib MiJYYri [] iI 91151-nss Flario4m hkto Morro oplly "o I Wiunlay, munaa y and Lot* 14rdrdaysl measpapar. pi-ished at Marni n Miami-0ede Ctearty, Ronda; liB1 the attuctuei capy al ac vewserrtfii, bairn Level Adwex1earrrart al ',Joke in OW mailer irl P4 411IX6 6ouTHE'I5i GIVEIFFOYIN 13A19KVrE.STO Att.'.Jr1iTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY • PLMLICi oric[Y2fiM In IYatrXxxK Court was prffahud In said haespepertlG isouesdf CIS•17P2Dall A t iI further says tzeI the sod Morro D j BOOM Review it a riiiweptitier Inii slredatLilian! in mid klwm!.tIlle► 4D4lth•. Fvpkle eel flied the mill rim•Iipapifitras Nrcrlartr tilen r:,ardnij i. I p i `col n said Mieiii-DadliCeurAr. Fiona, eochclay ':exenpt5alarday. Sunday and Le• Holidays) acid has team erlaned es second `:lest (Nil MAW eft fire p *1 on,* in M$roi $PiJ Ii$,rifpitchip rtr.' Flenda, tar ponod of o no year rain vacating the 1rs1 pt.1:11kAliale Cf Ore alletht'd uttivuI ad erlie9nnemi; Wee eli3nl AXING' goy; Ilia lag rN 2r!9 INK nei hoe pakl nor fNCinfood asap 174/1eln, firm or aopc alion 1, v:xafu L :Loam SICrn {e' ralurb cz soeun . This tforpublicaraarr r) 1eir'r yfi �'8 5w4w1 I>e and subecrt'iird telvre me trey '7 lam Liam 0.v FEREE Iwawa*vidoltiat halm Millar at sop Southoest &vartown Parkwe at Community RabdosreIapltsent Agane:Y Pub!io Notice On E.Surdely,tLiret,S,MO, ihafEOV. Lerman IV 9c4e..aky:meid axgeL,• iu did [ha 4110 Arrwndmcrd to d7e 1.892 Ro-iva°ci p x P. i Cleo:WMRAdrnaalepmenlF1an')far ra, wBradcommon!h}thegenral . p.tYc Imaddriart the CRAcraelocI*.a SECPYJ Par+el, •ot'r.#*a a oceentrgio mach up al value! ears ..iac• oornmdad gwrrachies to rooting prp apQ Foli lignvei Plan aM pravi ci.rtllon oarnnaaals.. To Cbl61n f off dorop PIW',. piano come+1he E-Ro..ol J 579`3224, elree by We GRA Olga at 3DD EhEarartnil Wingt,1 way, Sing sog Meaanl+aeol1he Dirpo•rl Plea Hook ¢' 11 c *sign 1,9 ellNal of Lh i • Overtm a NET oFlkca{td00 NW a Avenue', CI Me Etelveveven HET draw CIS NW Srneej. Cornmenta on 1he rada+ael"prner4 pier` &Wet k+> avra5at'rtd lay itrar CM noInerihenilAw r a20nrx$•ekiOM.Ma$I inEaribrirekel info the Plan Pi4411i.4 Thompson Ger1' rhe@corgi �1114D61I 3117 . G34-33164N31 M FrriTEIX r 0DINTY OF Nog _ CIF'View ifttltit! • PINIXOP Of muciiiiimpi �....,.d.,.'..d,.rr, F.. •.rtr.l, .i l,unl scut �air,.. .4,s Oyu riv rr i w. 5r�n i'rL Ei T111 u t 11 T!!S cr.i -... ° 044.4kaiu Rr 1264 T*. 1 ITW.. II.' Fi i .itr t-'r slri,ir n r...,1 iY s.,:w 41111 WW1 imil. Pr44 MI WON 11141111 ... rr• Limkpi pillars W FY,RU, Ti.. 1;.ryt: nal&.'r rave IFr ...r.naior 47 k4k.irrs Ism' i •lr 1.0u t.1.4s barn 1 Frei Fair . tn. la 6 rns u ...,.rt rite snl ii.r' r i .... Pm. re.. . 'Awl WI 1%m rIesJR1..p-.1alpm., tmi A.+..gr. nte.., . d.• .a r}Irea. ri iY M•Yd 4.1*..f °eMcr•rmkbl Purim dram r.r• .`F a. a.r •rdc, r..i 'RT. rin®d irr Cm. FM...► FWIMEMIlilii iMTI, Hera "14. iaa: w® wttu i. 'Fr MP,. •s v..I1T 6.1 +wM.wae7 hi rJ.Irar® u Is ...,rani aI .fir 1 . i c�.il'�.�k, l+-&..11v- '.•sari dd.r.&.r4tod Islam air Um, i. MUM Pl. JG rum.' of Flom, T u.11rYi, YYrwrrltrlan�rr Mink AD.14eil BLIC HEARING ha City C emission of tlh,3 City or at 9.00 -sun at City Hdl. larrarred at Florae, for the purpnw cJf authoti2- Perpe1t Bloc-Excive,es Easement %were teat oI City-aarnard swetirty 118FM. FlLrtdo. TNT. prnrrgrty i9 rteed- rsloc:illnp and malr`fe.nlr rt isiina to Fppe. i And anise be Mud cin- lusan REF ID appeal prlydocivon ict to Orly metier considered at His That a vel'eurn r r rd of 1Fb Ixo- Asiimen& and eeI iehe8 llpxin array PrlscIlleA. Thompson Cih. Clerk. Adl;nayt T'h'tr al Wirch 2 i 71} • TILE fi, CH (WI 05999-38 dS. �• Scliitheast Over Qwn Parkwest jnmunfty RedRvelopment Atuirwy Public. Natio On $#lurdiyr .each #. 2003, this RECIPW Communil•' Redevelopment Agent issued the &aft Ainerfarnant to the 1082 Re.1.9welCfprnent Plan Cihe Redevelopment II Or review end comment 4. thv general pr,t,llc. In alddilir, n, 4he CRA created the St OPVkr Review Panel, whictl Is a Committee made up Oi ',reIunteers wtyo ccoanottod tihemEeIvee 110 reading the 2003 Redevelopnieril Plan end providing Frilled corm - Merits. • To obtain a copy of the Plan, please contact the CRA et (30t 576-3324, drop try Its CRA cake al 300 Biscayne Boulevard Wey, Sult•a 09 dMeazenine of the Dupr)erl PI020 Wvletl, or fill do a sign up Eiheetl at itl r 0.4.r1,0wn NET office (1400 4 3 Avenue`) or the DowntOven MET afire (3 HAI 9 Street) Comments on the redeye loprnan1 plan must b1I received by the CFtA no later dirt March 28r 2003 for revlearr and pos- sible incorporation Info the Plan. {411 6j Prispillp. A- Thornpsoi Ciark of the Board MIAMI-Dnoe MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTICE TO PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT SOUTH DISTRICT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DEEP INJECTION WELL DESIGN CICC PROJECT NO. EO3-WA D-V2 1,1111e=ilerp.1.:61: ' ia-rni Tim 114111 151211CA ral Co on 17.7.11. d my. 1 F XL v p.t.4 an dim 1116 141.4 nig* wmpip, " 1+.11.r. 44+11.! ki 4 kla. 4.1.6 Irrk h." .11146,0440 OWE lidia Link Coral!. I. I "-LIE IA I ff., 46 44 i14.44140.41 S.:47 Aftiotii ay Mx. Fr*Fai carp INN rrimma 431 441,rianacc J balm cac. Or- 15,411c .9.rir.1 hi 4i...F111.111.311 rn..4 4114 in4r4 yir sca ;muddy a .74 dm dm Ku. amalahlaa civil' DF WW1 COMMWII7Y FIEDEYELDPMENT AGF141.1" SouthILM CIvertown Parkw.g5t fSEOPW) Commury Redevelopment Agepgy NOTICE OE puBLic MEETING The $COFW CRA will be conducting a 'own boll I -mating host- ed by CRA Economic Consultants, 7.1-1A, to discuss the eco- nomv . analysis fir 1h SEOPW Redawalopment Area Said meeting will take pace on Saturday. Anuery 25, 2005, begin- niry 10-00 a.m., et the LynTpealer Iii=trisid at NW 2rid Avenue, 1.1iarrw, FLortla 11110T-SteG =ndividuals are encouraged to sure Said meeting Priscilla A Thompson (P10964} CRA Clark di' the Board }lLiaga Elm r frat.101W 1 star,. rs.•11.. C,fer.$. ERN Of MIAMI 17010141U7YA attr. CITY OF MIAMI Southeast Overtowri Park West Community Redevelopment Agency (SE FW /GRA,) NOTICE OF TOWN HALL MEETING Trte SEOPW CR,A. will be ekoduchng a town ha . 13.uolrig to Obtain. cornmuniry input to the exisillag 16452 SEOPW Redevelopment Plan. Residents, Church .Members. BLiamess and Property Owners are Inr'1 o to provide inPol. on Lilo vision for the Ove+town and Park West community. Seicr meeting will lake place on Sh141r y. November hegimning 10:00 e_m.. al the Lyric Thealeer locales at 1319. f+iiW ?i id Avenue, hisernl, Florida. The meeting Is open to tha public and intere led individuals are encouraged to Mend said. meet- ing_ 410636 Prmciaa A. Thompson Clerk of the Board srAre or nO.1a Cr hulisrtin6H rx,A,xr: cr FAME brlw. 41.e ° "+'iR"� r6vlry Im�k rsr• r N.r. . hrha, who, ®os]t ,. 4 i•r ,k a er d i bek C14I 9d n11- aIIAMI 11.41 .r.Yl.b , Nor LYdc :ad$•. F1 ..r.. FM =riot rf . r ■.a Ri o ud' o tz=UMrl lizalinkar 61. 34.] iF: rr.■n Ihnkr ra r 4N11 TWE Wr•K TIMES L. a fa *If raniMbn i. F111E.., G Ccaari. Maxim al I . uc w.1 wr. In nnenc 6r!r. �+'-.-:�f P.M.*" D.. Case, rlwa� arch �+* r.l 'us hrs.=sml.m wsw7 • 61,: par. [mot r hl,aa. UKt writ., to , !marl otsarc na, rra�dw d a. el ryYYIrrY¢m t••I,c .4.I*2 e. a r LiNirdzsri. 16.11w Or....1 e.r, Loka ..ice woam ■.oc4 !.r, rn .lava..! o, ds.....rewt ra�ao. m 2Ln- ti, 8c pr W,1:.,.wµpue� w cj. WO obuTiad him It NI MR di. lit NirTAMI' puiiic BME Of FgW+m6 AT L. NGE, lily : P. up5fAky.H 9 I T,d iI. It L.h7lnhrr•^al.- ad ire chairrnen of #rsil+y SerwitnIrrc. k Nem pf 5k1I nl awl Jae Boutiark Ccrumcil. 7LRti1Et, tairatairraf * rand! rim pr..iidrol of n i Chilrim'a ll nF l o n. ✓ RcaLltix, chain:ma- G 1E Gr4 iMlidmd Cl im- I xerum ity loprrerdl of Prat Union 1Nonnrlii] Elocitla oArnmiloViliambl,chair- I. 14Iith's Council aFl- I l}i aLPJprraLdrILU.PJ ' beil'aihjNBrnnFrnn� 11_ p. forms C#71 k 4040aI?ri Lanai Today by Deihl'g N-2663tsrbli faK431(MI5). 1, 1 TODAY'S INTEWS iftk SrOtttszOdrlrrinanJrari1 ELM 119110E OF PAL MOO Thi SEON CRInril to dark ln1 3 Item h:jl rrorkg In r1r n rt nleu1I rlpin 1s Gar a hp IEEE & IPW Hedrotlaprrml I" d. lh5di1r, W000lrK ~if! 41.1 PAPplery VI m Willi MU Gr raver l r Gw barrow and Part 1 12:11imerrtp 5a.d rrredlak Y1{M I& pUq a.1 Sitlrr4al. 1104mbie P. trim. trimoil 1pA0 I u iw Lnrlc nett Iced at 1.191MW Fad t are. Fbd . !I ✓ earm is son Id irrt Wit t iic I I1rit ed ine•Ml#11it 11.4 i i M141d IP aim • r4 Ira IIQ W I , ' M uia t Tlmrlpsan LildM ne %Board mac1F =rm. morn au lam mor 60Man 1,110. W 1 1+7-Va '� • • halm d pinripals rr [to im. • E•arrola rdiN niooarl wirh. Lis dl Ir131951 awl #e reasvad no ham 'Gfarl 5:rl1 pm, [Ramat 1i1 "Wrier* In Chain Small Oa14aLas• Pry+14y aid Prooli+'I Nrootorgeg kiririilrWAp al rtrr (inn IleibAOtoir R 1),Inci {ar+n4111}' Prorralopcns 911:C ON,-.4piv D med.d Wasp Suns as'J Irhrranrx IIr r lion FlanBz r11- 1t s rr-arrirenced lhalof irir'esled ps-Ij plci it a gm Pk 19EE arm Cloc wdaprrerd Pal im uraideS n 1r157I 151 rwiw,. Fled egplq # itoWaim' ittleollpprriarl planuar.aiaht.1ri raki,ala pro trii4NCh,Fi luclrr Illrrnal,rn•, pliasa Ctrrtar irtda Lc.' al pal PS ].9?f Tna-arrn.PttlaralalrriatDid rid icran ur°ry cotegnavntri dpeirr IGJroti1t rim In OKUP1 irral Lefts% 1111rp5 dorrw ,s rf 11 4Ii braEr rulr6ff «ld Nero. rA F1R+U ecr r41(16111W %o Ni! IpEO('T . I;+ I7Ak1 rr7 d U d I ''Imre* In mot Gib mutt at rip Lrn. ar.d'ar l9 Irradat Fi La7n-I or Inrs-ssl. gown.ems ktrig Elmore Ciinctu Appendix G Findings of Slum and Blight Please See Next Page 190 GUILLERMO 0 LMEDILLO TO: MINE= =11: DIRECTOR C.FLA_ CITY OF 3.1L20.11 E 0 VAZQUEZ rE KOHL & PARTNERS FROM: GULLER25 10 0L2'JEDLLLO ar_rAFECT: SLUM ANTI BLIGHT REPORT DATE: 5,023,0°21K2 CC: EIT:LGIO VAZQUEZ, =MR E001-• & FARTS SLUM AND BLIGHT CONDITION'S PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA _el: iDfS .7 Board during it5 delibero.tc 7he ........ 7-: 711e existing redevelopment dis BACKGROUND :n 1969. the Board of Count.: ::::.ners approved. by Resolution 11--69 the Central yj R 1ev.i=.1.7.n.. This plan included the area Eouth. of NW Twent-Yirti.'i:et, west of the FEC Railroad, wIth an extension to N.E. Second Avenue: east of 1-95; aid north of the fiaca ?dyer. It was amended or January 20, 1981 to include the areas bounded on the west and south by the FEC tranks on the east by Biscayne Boulevard.; and on the north by I-395. In addition, the area bounded on the south by I-3 on the east bY Biscayne Bouleyard; on the north by NW Seyenteen. Street in part, and. the City of Difianii. Ceirieteiy in part; and on the west by the FEC tracks_ At those public hearings, evidence IEVIE Fu:esented to find this area meeting the ,definition of "slum and blight:'. Th importance of that decision is that the plopose-d expan.sion area located north of I-395 and fronting on NW Third Stre-et, extending north to NW Twent w Second. Street was declared through resolution of the County Commission as "shun.) and blight". r. area F� 1 _ Additionally, Areas B and C of the proposed expansion, were part of the Central Piaflii Urban P' itea a1 Area graphic provided for illustration purposes at the hearing of January 20, 1981,.. when the expansion was approved. PROPOSED AREA A. These properties ace located within the rights of a.3r of 1-393 and 1-93. They were not included in the description of either of the eMis ting cede-elkprl-_ent districts. These properties are presently .in a state of disrepair, and to leave them out of the districts simply creates a ribbon of neglected properties separating them. These properties meet the eriteila to be classified as "shun a:ld PROPOSED AREAA-1. The general 'boundaries of this area are: on the south and west: the I-395 Right of Way; on the :forth NW 1411'_ Street Loin 1- 3 9'5 to North Mianai. Avenue, and NW 136'. Street_ from North fiarri; t3-ei�xtie to North East 3dia>t Court; and on the east North East Miami Court. This area is party in the existing Oinni Rede7. elopLeiit Dist ict: therefore there is no need to make a 'slum and blight" finding. The portion that is not in the Criuii Redevelopment District is in state of disrepair, and it c o:1ra :1s a iv,miber of vacancies that present serious limitations for redevelopment. It is important to consider this area in connection with the SE013\17 Redevelopment District 'because of its list al relationship and continuity under the ex rresxwar. PROPOSED AREA A 2, This 3Lrea is bounded general.- on the north and east b the I-95 Fight of Way; on the west by NW Fifth_ sirerlr-e: and of the south by N77 Tenth Street. Two of the three properties are owned brc the City. and the other one is a decrepit structure, .which Heeds major work or demolition. The percentage of vacant land and dilapidated structures qualifies the area as "shim s.ntl PROPOSED AREA A-3, Bicentennial park is presently vacant. There is no permanent use e _ablished. The only meaningful structure e is the seawall and it is damaged to a great degree. It is important to consider this area as expansion to the Redevelopment District because its planned use will serfs as a support activity to the residential dere.opment that will emerge in the ;mill efiL:iate neighborhoods. PROPOSED AREA A 4. Watson Island has some uses projected: but presently its major poison is vacant. Again, the percentage of existing vacant land qualifies this area as "shim and blight". PROPOSED AREA B This area is defused on the north by NT Tenth a nte; on the east by I-5; on the so•.tt1: b-NW Fourth. Street; and on the '.ve3t 1b7 Furth Avenue. :t :s evi .ent that the identity of the existing SOTP ' area is changing, Loin a orimaril; residential neighborhood to a more dynamic mixed -use district, defused bT attractions and recreational activities. 'ts these it take up sonle of the properties that were originally considered for reside:ilia: ri aq oses, Aces. B emerges 3s a natual expansion to the west. These is a i:eigbooihood it7 frasti.t€:t,.ue, which maintains a very close visual relationship and great connectivit; t'_uo,tgh the street network that crosses under the expiessws.y. The building code ieq,1res a /50 year certification for structures built before 1 6Ci. Eight; percent ofthe properties were built before 1960. .Ap1 rosiinace:v Eft; percent of the properties are vacant. The number of vacancies, lack of maintenance and updating q, .3].i r fain area as "slum and blight" under the criteria of 'deterioration of s:te and otter improvements': "diversity of ownership rich prevents the Lee ;lie:ta.o lip of ]and -ithiia the deteriorated area"; and "inadequate and outdated b tilL:ig density patterns". AREA B-1. This corridor i•u;s along k-"Third Avenue, fro_Y_ _-�.95 to W Twenty Second Street_ It includes all properties fontntg ' a s_:t e_{ zt }:de of the right of wa-. On the west side: it includes a n,-.7lber of properties owned br public agencies, which have contriID1 ed to the character c_•: the strip_ It is important to expand the Disttict to inc tde tls s t.ori:cloy a ts:..t the tax it•.ciement inav be used to improve a s:g:xi_cart ssgairacant structures its distep2i. 771•._-7 � -:- si•.:_= _:?fore 1950. 3 Number of vacancies and the age of the buildings meet the criteria of "slum. and blight". PROPOSED AREA E. Tbi5 area is defined by NW Eleven Street on the noith; on the east by NW Fifth Avenue; On the south by NW Sixth Street; and on the rest by NW Seventh Avenue- �ilttilost s;xt7 percent of the propel -TT.- in this area is vacant, a± d the remainder coatasas a axis of ad-1 strial. coarleicial and residential uses. Diversityof owiteis_hip and vacancy rates gi l;fIes this area as __slum. and blight" - Attached please Lad 3 list of properties according to the proposed area, including -vacancies and concLtion of the existing structu ues_ 'This. will assist the Board d.ii ag its doirs_deration for expansion. S um Bligh1 F ndings Expanced SEOPW CRA Bound,nes My2, 2002 AREA Consultant: FOLIO NUMBER Guillermo LOT SIZE Olmed BUILDING SIZE lo BLDG_ CONDITION OWNERSHIP AREA Al 01-3135-0DD-OL:: 12 ' .=L7 2 ; 2c 01-3137-032-D07: 2 322 01-3138-000-08C: 1 KL i ' a- -Siae-coD-002,: 2.5H : 0- -S138-01:10-0810 1.658 I:- -si3e-: 1 3-oo 1.: C ' -S138-0D0-057: 1.722 : 0" -S13e-:.:Q-05E: " _ 2 .3L = AIR _ _ 0- -S ne-: NI-0430 7,180 7,7:' 1:1 =AIR 0" -S13e-:N-04: 10.DI:10 14,6 :f T =007 - ,L:: 0-S13e-CN-0 1C.DCG : V.',::::.,:'.1- : C7 -S1.315-:D-0: 1C.DCC : V..::::.,:'.1- = 11' -S138-000-0540 C' -S138:D-1120 C' -si3e-::,;,-127: a .76C ::,5C: =AIR : VACANT 01-3138-000-12 i: :f,308 : VAC.ANT = D =....21 -E 01,3138-00P-12; : 8,750 C• VA :::.t..NT 0 -3138-CDP-11;: 1.77 : VACANT 0' -S138-0D5-11f: 10,000 ; : ! = AIR I:- -S13e.-:.:15-11.5: 2,000 : '...°A:::..:'.1— C- -S138-005-114.: 4,000 C" -S138-01:15-1130 4,000 0" -S13E1-01:15-10g0 8,01:10 : ....°.a:::A117 = 0' -S138-005-1080 0,000 1 .i...L a' -S138-005-1 le: :5 ,400 32'. 0' -S138-01:15-107Ci g,900 8,0C: = :::::.-7,' 0' -S13e:05-11 TO 8,000 : VACANT c- -si3e-::6-11.51 ,EICG ..f..52:] =AIR a- -si3e-::,5-118o 3,000 : VACANT = D. VATE AREA A2 0' -S130:5-002C 71,002 ',A GOOD : —Y 0- -S137-DC ' : 3.332 0 VACANT = R 'ATE C- -sne--_:... -D07: 21'. E7': .] 15,5 POOR CITY AREA B 0 t-11107:1,:-1C7_ c 3ee 2.408 GOOD = D. VATE. 01-0107-:-1eK L,OCC : Sg4 GOOD = D. VATE 01-0107-::1.:-1 ':: 7,500 2C i .':C° 2 : OD = D. VATE 01-D107-ZD-1":. 7,500 = ...!.L:::.,a`.1— = D. VA—E 01-1:1107-03D-1 ':: 7.500 : '..:.':::..L'.1- = 01-0107-CSD-1 I .'!.: 7 .5CC : ...!..::::.,:—.1- = C1-0107-C SD-114: 7.:5CC C G141107-C SD -I 1,5: 7.500 : '...°.a:::!:'.1- = 0141107-010-1 / '..: 7,500 C ',.:.•I- = 0{-0107-00-1 ' :: 7.500 : C -D107-030-1: i: :cc = e -D107-030-1,:: .' .3eC 2,125 ,3:::. C '-'3107-031:1-1e:: f.00C 3.437 GOOD C ' -D107-020-1e i: L.00C 1,8E19 GOOD Expan_=:1 __-: =..I7:13• rye.: 2'.nn�iill .r, ice. il,.*rir'-".Irr.orl Lr, AREA FOLJO NUMBER 0"-D107-030-104: LOT SIZE ' BUILDING SIB Q BLDG. CONDITION OWHERSH/1 0'-D107-03D-10.`: 1C.5CC 0 VACANT PRIVA—E 0`-D1o7-03D-1C5: 11.550 0 VACANT PRIV. -_ 0"-7.11O7-0311-1C7: 11.550 ': VACANT PRP#-= 0"-7)107-04D-1 C : 0.000 13,107 GOOD P'RIVA - 0'-:.107-C4:1-1C4.: 32,356 2E.,395. GOOD PP '.•:. -_ 0"-:'1o7-:4:-11CO 4 0 0" -:' 100-C SD-2020 112,740 32,121 GOOD HUD 0'-S137-o30-00- _ 2,498 ' VACANT HUD 0 "-5137-C 30-00 : 2,512 1.04 G CtiO D HUD 0"-5137-:sD-0C2.: 10,012 = VACANT HUD 07 -51.57-: S3-0040 2,512 5.432 GOOD HUD 01-3137-03D-fl0 c 2,370 1,427 GOOD HUD 01-3137 D-00 } 4,103 4,345 GOOD HUD 01-3137 -00g0 3,750 0 VACANT OO:.IN-- 0 i-3137-02'B-D 1 0 3.750 0 VACANT C..:: - Nl -' 01-3137-02D-0'' •: 2 750 : VACANT CC::.r,-,• C'-5137-02D-1 • .: 2,750 :..'AC.A.NT GO ... r.,-°• C--D1013-070-2°::: 3,000 :..:y.w.r•JT CO'...I.,,-• 0'-D106-07D-2C •: 32,000 27.4L- ._• :_:- Y....r.,..: 0'-:'106-07D-205: 2,000 : VACANT CC:. r,-°• C - -S 137-L B-D0; C 2,000 : VA.CA.NT 3 RYA - _ C--S137-O20-0020 2,000 : VACANT =_: ':•A -_ 0'-S137-028-0040 2,000 : VACANT :__: ..'.� -_ 0" -S 137-)2D-00FO 2,000 :..0.A.r•JT PR`w'r - _ 0'-}137-:20-00D z.00C :.. O.A.NT P1IrV' -_ 0'-5137-:.2<'-007: e.000 :.:.v.ANT PP''tir,� -_ 0" -S 137-:::'-3N: 0.000 :...O.A.NT 3 R. ' - _ 0'-:�10K-::: 2C'.: S.000 . _ _ C--..)10,=•: 2C-: 5,000 : r.vAr•J— _ _. ,•.� -_ a- -:.1 ,_•:.: 2C_•) 5,000 :..A.C..r•J— - r, ,. 0--:,13_.::: 2:-; 5,000 : VACANT C C: r .-- 0' -7..10K-::-2 •:: S.000 = 0.'. • GOOD _:... -_ 0'-:,1OL-:i:2 : 5.000 .-. 30OD 0--:,13=•:. :2':) 15.oaa 2.4 • ,:•)01:1 ... 0"-S1 }_•::s . •:. 3,007 1,22` 3.0.3 . :.,•.� _ 0 i-.3137.: SS-002o 2,550 1,22e C OR PR VA. -= o1-5137-:SS-o0'°: 2.550 1,22C.3COR PR 't='r`-_ 0'-5137-:SS-O04: 2.550 1,444 a.0OR P' ' •.� -_ 01-S 137-::SS-OC `: 2.550 1,4L4 a c o 17.--S137-:;SS-0C:: 2.550 1,22'- aCOR PP VA.-_ C•-S137-:SS-OC'?: 3.60a 1,22'_ aCOR PP kr`-_ C - -S 137-.:55-01=: 1.220 - VACANT P? ',',� - _ C--:110-°:5:1-1C-: 3,000 2,632'COR 0--3137-:2S-0C'.: 2,000 422 3COi __:..•.�-_ 03-3137-:2S.OI,=: 4.00C 3.302 aVOR =J' -= 01-3137- 26-004D 2.00C :- VACANT C _:: - r,-" 01-3137-02B-0030 3,000 0 VACANT CC:.r,-•• 0 i-3137-0PB-002C 5.000 0 VACANT CC:. r, - • • 0'1-3137-0213-00-: S.00C 0 VA AN— .::: - r,-°• 0 i-0104-0-BD-10' : 5.000 3.404 'v V =. =' ':.. - _ Slam Blight Findings Expanded BEOFV/ CRA Bounda-ies May 23, 2002. AREA Consultant: FOLIO PRIMER (.. ' -S137-:SS-3CK Guillermo LOT SIZE 2,9E14 Olmed BUILDING SIZE 1,220 ID BLDG. CONDITION POOR OWNERSHIP C ' -S137-:SS-0C ; : 2.50 1,226 POOR :-D •:;,-: .... _ C- -S137-033-01:: 2,550 1,444 POOR =D •:;,-: . ... - C- -S137:33-01 • : 2,550 1,220 POOR PR ',....A -E C- -S137-033-0 r:: 3,100 1,226 POOR . ....- _ C- -3137-03S-0 I :_. 3,075 1,226 POOR =D •:,...-: .... _ C- -S137-03S-0 L-_ 2,550 1,144 POOR =D •:,...-: C--}137-:}}-0r7: 0 PKG. . ....- _ 3,750 0 VACANT ==!...:1-• -E C' -D1CK-07D-1 I :: 2,500 1,004 POOR U-D1CK-07D-11-: 1,250 0 VACANT PR VAT E C' -DICK-CID-10E.: 2.5CC 1,237 POOR C' -D1IY-C7D-1C,i: 2.5CC 1.0.5? ROOR . ....- _ C- -D11:14-07D-1 i : 2.5CC : '..'ACANT C- -D11:14-07D-1 IL: 11,500 : ....°..:CANT =a ...:1-• -E 7,500 7 ' • = CO . ....- _ C -D1CK-07D-1 I !: 7,500 2.22' OR 7,500 0 VACANT P1RIVATE 01-01EK-:7D-1C!: 17,523 3„954 GOOD PR VA-E C'-0102-:4D-1 i ' : 15.000 22,782 POOR piD ..-•-: C- -D103-:4D-1 I :: 0,825 0,00.5 3aOR :,D •:;,-: C--:111:13-C4D-1.:;: 4.935 I: VACANT 3C.0CC 23,29c, a Co C.-:1102-:}:1-1CK 1.5.0CC 13,900 a coR ==........-: . ... _ C' -D102-:3D-1C7: 1.5.0CC 13,900 POOR D ,...: =-•:- . ... - C.-:1102.--i}:-11::: 3C.0CC C VACANT P R VA - C' -D102-:SD-1C!: e.oco 0,592 aCOR .... _ C•-.D102-:SD-1C5: 4:55 0 VACANT = a. ...:1-• -E C -311:13-:SD-1C2: .2.8.75 0 VACANT 01-0102-GBD-11:4: 7,500 3,204 POOR :D •.',1-: .... - 0 T-E111:12-CK-11::4 i 5,000 0 VACANT 01-D102-05D-1C2: 2,500 aa5 '.::C:17e. 01-011:12-05D-1C- 2.5CC 0 VACANT PRIVATE 01-0102-0SD-1C : 21 7fC 14,140 PCOR PR VATE 01-D102-CSD-1C ': 22.2.50 0 VACANT 'a a. VAT E 01-D102-0K-11:K 52.500 43,407 POOR =-D. '..:ATE 01-D102-CSD-1C:7: 7.500 4,017 POOR =D ....'.: ._ 0!-D1132.7.5D-1C:: 7,500 1,094 POOR :D •.',1-: .... - C'-:111:12:5D-11:!: 10,000 C '..TACANT = a •.:: - = C - -D102-05D-1C: 5,000 : .. - :-FIT C- -D101-0 'D-2C2: 594.800 I.! LL = = ::::. r.- . c--Dioi-:-..)-2c.:: 1.-L.84e . .. .. _ _ _ _ _ _. AREA B1 01-3130-021-007C 7&=, _ ... - C1-3130-021-0770 111710 1.!.3.• ; =A F. . ....- _ -3130-021-078C .5.1CC 1.627 =AIR :D •.',1-: .... - C. -313es121-072.0 .5.61C .17-.. =COR :D •.',1-: .... _ C- -S13e-021-1.1@': 1.92 1..S.: =COR C- -S13e-:21-0Ii• ' 3.53e 2.5: =COR C • -S136-021-0E: .5.3.5.5 : ...?..: CANT = a Expan ed . ncla • _{ May 22, 2002 AREA Consultant: FOLIO NUMBER C'-3130-021-D P•: Guillermo LOT SIZE 5,355 Olmed BUILDING SIZE t} 10 BLDG. CONDITION VACANT OWNERSHIP PR VATE C ' - S 130-064-DC ' : 03,000 33,455 GOOD CITY C'-3130- O64-DC:: 302,850 NA NA CO,_ I.- ' C'-3130-064-D •': 1,024 1.302 =AIR ,P :'-_: C '-3130-064-D .. 2.521 2.5D2 =AIR = _.. - _ !:' 3130-21 1?.:' 2.6c'2 3.215 =AIR -_.. C'-3130-021-17:: 1,872 1,864 =AIR = _.. - _ C3130-72112': 10350 4,01 =AIR =_..- _ C'-3136-021-12'. 2.8eC c VACANT =_•....ATE C--313C-:21-122°: : o:s: C VACANT =_...°ATE 01-313F. .:::.-3: -: 7.1_2 : VACANT = _...'AT_ e'-3130-C20-02".: 0,0 8 6,087 GOOD := .. --_ e'-3130-020-03 C 0,401 C VACANT =_.:'=-_ e '-3130-020-0340 0,764 4,802 GOOD = _.. -_ e '-3130-O20-033C 7.106 6,751 GOOD = _.. _ :"-3130-020-0321Cr ? .22? 0 VACANT = _.. - _ C.' _3136-020-022: 12.220 11,744 GOOD = _..:'AT_ e'-3136-020-D22': 6.055 1,703 FAIR =_. ..'AT_ p:'-3130- 20-02:: 14.018 3,104 FAIR =_...'AT= C ' -313?' •:::•-2::: 7.008 D VACANT = _...'AT_ C' 31 i1•__: �_=: 2.1E 0,507 FAIR =_• ;'.�-_ B:'-313''.•.- -:2_:: 0,050 1,224 FAIR :=. _ _ :' -' 13.! •:: -3::: 0,050 1,224 FAIR :=. . 01-313': •:. _8-D2 ' : 0 ,050 1,451 FAIR = _ 0' 231:3.'. •:_8-D2:: 0,050 1,224 FAIR 0--S131:•:25-D1:: 0,950 1,45' =AIR =_..°, T C--a130,:25-01=: 7,100 1,224 =AIR ==.'.'AT= 01-3135-02B-DC:: 5,8E0 1,224 =AIR =_...'AT= 01-3136-:25-DC=: 5,850 1,451 FAIR = _...'ATE 01-3138-C 25-0C -: 0,850 1,451 FAIR = _...'AT _ 01-3130 2E-OCe: 0,850 1,224 FAIR =_...'AT_ 01-313e-:25-D04C 6,850 1 ,798 FAIR = _. .....ATE 01-3130-C25-O02•: 12,285 1,229 FAIR := ...`-: 01-3136-025-02_: 8,215 0,567 FAIR = _.. - _ 01-' 136- 25-0::: 0,060 1,224 FAIR := .. - _ C--31:Si'. •::5-0=-. 0,05C 1,224 FAIR = _.. - _ 0--B131:.:::-2:': 0.060 1,451 FAIR =_..- _ C--B131'.•.-=-�_:: E.95C 1,224 FAIR =_.:7,7= 0'-51 .!•.-=-•_':: i'...fC 1,451 FAIR ==.'.'A.T_ 01-31; .'. •::: -5' :: 7.100 1,224 FAIR = _. ..'ATE 01-313.! •::' -5::: ?.8E0 1,224 FAIR = _..'L.-_ 01-313.'. •:.:-O.:: e.8E0 1,451 FAIR 01-31 .! •:.=5-DC-: 6.8EC 1,451 FAIR = _...- _ 0'-31.S.! •::8-DC=: C.8E0 1,224 FAIR := ... _ C' -: 1'_ :.:::-'•:=: 6.8E0 1,7D8 FAIR . . -_ C'-1••1�'.•::=-:•::: 12.22E 1,22gFAIR =_..- _ C' -312E •:4:-3::: 397.362 NA FAIR ::. I - ' C' -312E-:42-D f :: 2E.220 0 VACANT = =. ... - _ C'-3125-:42-D1': 1.005 1.5,773 FAIR =_.. - _ C'-3125-:BB-D3,±: 12.601 15,130 FAIR =_.. - _ C'-3125-:30-D2?C " 5.000 2,05e FAIR = _.. - _ 4 3 F ndings Expanced ECPW CRA Boundaries May 22. 2002 AREA Cc,nsultan:: FOLIO HUMBER .3 -ille-ric• LOT SIZE Clrred BUILDING SIZE lo BLDG. CONDJTK3N OWNERSHF AREA :: C' -2101-02'3-10'C 2.6.000 2.0E: 2!-.)0D FPL 1: 23137-C221-1.12.H 256,000 2 31:: -2 :.(_11 PRVATE C'-21[11-.:DD-104: 16,300 : ...'.1- COUNTY' C'-:1101-=-102,: 10.000 : ...°1LO.z'.1- CO _ NTY 0-1-0101-C33-1020 10.000 : ....'AO.''.1- D'I-D101-00:1-1011 11.060 7 21:: :AR 01-0101-01:11:1-1011 11.201 1 .00!4 =AIR :•:,,,-= . ... , _ 0" -3137-031-D2: 3'6,000 : VACANT ::::_r,—/ 0" -S137-031-011_ 11,002 : VACANT RR_ C' -3130-00:1-02:: 4,000 : VACANT RR C" -7.1105-0K-1C 10,643 : 3E.G.. 33 VAT E C,-.01:16,01[1-1C7: 31,881 0 VACANT 3R VA- E C' -Dim-cm-lei: 7.500 0 PKG. 3R VAT= .".. -7.0 06-C,DD-1C;: 52,500 62,218 FAIR PR -VA-E C' -D106-CK-1C ' : 30,000 31,000 FAIR PR VA-E 11:16-aiD-1C=.: 46,000 23,806 FAIR PR '..:A -E ' : 6,000 0 VACA!'.1- PR ......L. -E C'-:DiCK-:;:-1": E.00C : VAC'.1- PR VATE C'-211D-:;.:-1':: 6.000 : VAC..:'.1- PR VA7E 0I-011:K-:?:-1: 6.0CC 0 VAC.A'.1- PR VATE 01-01[K-::ID-114: 10.0CC 6.387 GOOD PRVATE 01-4137-:41-DC2: 37.4.i: 0 VACA.NT PR VATE 01-4137-CK-1CK 7.5CC 0,874 FAIR PRVATE 014131-:?:-1:: 7,500 6,487 FAIR PRVATE 014137-C41-00: 22,407 2,204 FAIR :'R VATE 01-D1D41-NID-12': 3,760 1,625 FAIR :VATE 01-0104ZD0-124: 7.500 0,431 FAIR :RVATE 01-0104-00-122: 11.2E0 3,236 FAIR 01-0104-0EID-10.5: 11.2EC 3,000 FAIR :VA: 01-2104-00D-102: 2.7E0 VACA.11- = VAT= 01-3104-00D-102: 4.12E 3,002 GOOD 01-0104-00-104- 3.37E 014111:15-01D-11:: 0.770 0 VACAN7 CC' _ N 7Y 0141105-01D-1Ci: 28,260 : .-I_ITY CO . NTT 011-010E-:"D-11.2: 11,1500 F.'2'. .-I_ITY CO_ rITY 04-010E-:'-7.1-1Cf: 16,000 i ! .3 : . -1_IPf CO . NTT 0" -'310E-: *-7.i-11!: 10,000 : VACANT CO_ rITY C -D10E-: D-1140 6,000 : VACANT PR C' -,:i10E-: D-1020 3.760 : VACANT PRVATE C-.7,1 0E-:'D-1C': 11.250 : VACANT PRIVATE C'-:110E-:':.-1C4: 1E.000 2.202 GOOD PR 0E-:':-1Cr.: 1a,001:1 6 213 ., GOOD C'-:00E-:::-1C: 30.000 26,1387 GOOD C'4137-:4H3C": 14.870 0 VACANT PR ......4 -E 7 500 7,340 GOOD PR .......-E C' -DID:E.:4' -3C:: iaa 0 VACANT 33 ......A-E C'-31[16-:2:1-1Cf: 22 100 26,316 GOOD 3D •:,°-: . 5 ii -042.131er 1' km 11111111i lila II' E-i: ._.-' II 1.11.1. Innirik. : In Ull 4 -.5- tillo S II It zl'Er. — _ SOWN !Mir m i. IN - ,° , 4111111111 INIIIM -1•11110 !rat :EP III rat; IA ',." Ill 1. 11 i :, °.° ill ill:" 1•1111111.01 !lin V!RtiIii1l AL IAN IMP jIIIIIIIii 11111; on .1 EINTrUla 200 (-7 r Omni CRA IZ ilair ME 'zit , IOW =I I t =1"1.1 remora .....7rEFIR "Ma • 0 g 1 El..1.111111 mok glop 1111111 17 .e1== B1111' 0 Miami CRA Boundary Study Optiong V, L.., _t`c) ChitartOwn Parl. Was1 CRA.111)undaqr OrpniCRA . Rana Nvii LIMA xxima 00011 Opdon Dpacm DiXitAi At Urrion upa.n, lox Map 3 fUlErfSI f49.z.22 2491 201