Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRA-R-04-0002 PAC Parking Study BackupUL1 Southeast Florida/Caribbean Lilt Southeast florida/Canribbean District Council 327 S.W. 12th Court Fort Lauderdale, 1L 33315 954-522-0570 Fax 954-524-3341 coordinator®SEFtorida.uliorg wwtw.SEFtorida.utlorq Lk: -the Urban Land ;'stitute 1025 Thomas Jefferson; Street, N.W. Suite 500 West Wastrington, D.C. 20007-5201 800-321-5011 ri�rH. ufi.org Urban Land Institute Southeast Florida/Caribbean District Council Technical Assistance Program Panel For Miami -Dade County Public Schools And Miami Performing Arts Center May 3&4, 2004 Doubletree Grand Hotel Miami, Florida Executive Summary The cooperative effort being undertaken by the School Board and the Performing Arts Center provides an excellent opportunity to advance several public objectives in the area. A well -conceived project, or. projects, can solve the parking needs of the two Sponsor groups while also stimulating redevelopment in the area with housing and street level retail and restaurants. Such redevelopment also could strengthen the educational objectives of Miami -Dade Community College and Miami International University. Arts and educational facilities can be strong attractors of new residential, retail, and restaurant uses in a neighborhood. The subject Arts/Education neighborhood is also attractive for such development with its proximity to Biscayne Bay, I-95, the Metro Bus/Metromover Station, Bicentennial Park, and the Miami International Airport. The challenge is to devise development opportunities which will attract the private capital necessary to build the required parking for the Sponsor groups at no cost to them. To achieve that result, the development opportunities need to allow private sector developers to invest the funds necessary for the Sponsors' parking structures while achieving enough other profit -making development to realize a reasonable rate of return on that investment as compared to other investment opportunities. In addition to making land available, other incentives need to be devised by the various public entities to make the proposed development opportunities competitive with other opportunities. The current School Board RFP focuses only on one site. While that site could satisfy physically the School Board's need for 750 spaces, it could not support enough additional development to attract private capital to build those spaces. Also, the site cannot provide, in an acceptable manner, the 1,500 to 1,800 spaces needed by the Arts Center. The TAP Panel believes that seeking proposals on multiple sites would produce better results for the Sponsors and for the neighborhood. In addition, the Arts Center would be better served by dispersed parking facilities in light of the locations of the main entrances to the two performance halls at the northeast and southwest quadrants of the Arts Center complex. The TAP Panel identified seven potential sites for parking/mixed use projects within a block of the Arts Center. The Panel performed preliminary site analyses to test physical feasibility. Those analyses are set forth in this report. In addition, the Panel made strategy recommendations, general observations and suggestions, and recommendations on revisions to some of the terms of the RFP, all of which are included in this report. The TAP Panel believes that it is essential that a multi-agency/stakeholder task force be established immediately to ensure the best collaboration for a timely and appropriate solution to the School Board and Arts Center's objectives. A substantial amount of time will be needed to select and conclude a contract with a developer, or developers, to obtain project approvals, to develop construction documents, to let construction contracts, and to complete construction. Since the Arts Center needs parking by May of 2006, the TAP Panel recommends that the Arts Center immediately develop an interim parking plan. 4