Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTurkey Point Units 6 & 7 Transmission LinesRoute selection process for Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 transmission lines Define Project and Study Area rar ram_ c a tvpiaa hshe Regional Screening ap oppo,raw oft �.Aco tramitai4f 4 Alternative Route Identification ua Of a ,E aiS tt ©fit opftons rim 0 1* ► Quantitative Route Evaluation olele tqua'y measafrabtargrgaii 4 ► Selection of Candidate Routes ere ua° , tit tVe r; au a ,' 0; he anal �5'ISo a + b akimau rl .1te- wr Qualitative Route Evaluation Public input A Local government and agency input Open Houses Ta, len ice"' Ca Id$t„�OUtes �itt�l�f Selection of Preferred Corridor Agency Workshop 4 � ypf�fe �uteoi :e_firoe,ATMEn D�fGS a �( tPCil,ld�o 0 0 0 ,r • hies Application rr aration H iotti e brevieW a i h `ens�liigi- r. .xayAstz `ia ;4 - . �3t,� u,t ,,,••Rw g:* , Meetings and presentations to interested stakeholders t'd smSSUn Transmission Improvements • In November 2008, FPL proposed potential routes for new transmission lines that must be integrated into the existing transmission grid. The new lines would continue to improve the strength, reliability and security of the electric grid. • One of the lines would deliver electricity to the downtown Miami area through the eastem region of Miami -Dade County. • The other three would deliver electricity to western substations through routes in western Miami -Dade County. • Two new 230kV transmission lines, one each in the east and west regions, and two new 500kV transmission lines, both In the west region, are proposed. Meeting Florida's Electricity Needs • FPL must plan and Invest now in new generation facilities and transmission lines to meet the future electricity demand of our customers. • FPL Is proposing two new nuclear units at our existing Turkey Point site as well as the supporting transmission line improvements. • The Turkey Point 6 & 7 project provides clean generation with zero greenhouse gas emissions and reduces our reliance on any single source of fuel. • The transmission improvements would support new generation and help improve the overall reliability of the electrical infrastructure that delivers electricity to Miami -Dade County. Route Selection ■ 0n June 30, 2009, FPL filed a Site Certification Application with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for new transmission lines proposed for Miami -Dade County. • The four new transmission lines were submitted as part of the Site Certification Application for the proposed Turkey Point 6&7 project that will bring two new nuclear units to our existing generation site at Turkey Point • The transmission corridors we submitted in our application are based on input from our neighbors and area residents as well as balancing land use, environmental, safety and engineering/cost issues. A Collaborative Approach • As part of FPL's community outreach process, nine open houses were held in the Miami -Dade area where customers were able to review maps, use interactive displays and provide feedback directly to the project team. • As a result of customer's input, FPL was able to select corridors that meet the infrastructure needs of the community while minimizing the impact on local areas. Next Steps • Now that thls application has been filed, FPL will engage In an extensive multi -agency review process at the local and state level. There are multiple opportunities for Individuals and groups to leam more and participate in the process. • Construction of the power lines could occur as early as the 2014-2016 timeframe. NOTE: FDA AMOREDETAILEO MAP, .VISIT Ent PROJECTWEE BITE At:. tiwN.PPLesinnellahlvtmmmlulen FPL TURKEY POINT UNITS R S 7 TRANSMISSION LINES Upfd FT..49•11.11Nomems Cont. Dam. Ammo Rel. O • 14222_0906 COMMUNITY INPUT TO FPL's ROUTE SELECTION • Outreach for route selection — Letters to community to invite public input • Nov 2008 — 260,000 letters inviting to open houses • April 2009 — 93,000 letters announcing preferred route • All letters contained project web site, toll free number and project email to communicate with FPL — Individual meetings with government agencies Nine open houses to collect public input on route selection — Two local government and state/regional agency staff workshops • July 2008 • Jan 2009 E-survey sent to 64,000 customers for input on route selection criteria — Project website Project email — Toll free number • Ongoing dialogue during certification — Opportunity for additional communication through letters, website, email, toll free number Individual meetings with neighborhoods, individuals, government staff and elected officials — Public meetings held by local governments - Public testimony during the Certification Hearing 602/09 FPL'S PREFERRED CORRIDORS BROWARD COUNTY . . MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INGRAHAKHY NOTE: FOR A MORE DETAILED MAP, VISIT FPL'S PROJECT WEB SITE AT: www.FPL.com/reliabletransmission / I,. .s. ,' ..c.". -.5)- TAMIAMI TR HOMES7EAD FLORiDA CITY • ,.. FifFAtf GAROENS Pen SINOP - WrilF Imo' Ira imiromm 4414411 ,g, - .041111111111111111111011110_ -aim _ .. „, killegillislEMNIVIVIRO ' , /2 2 'L.--112 v--. OPIIONgitrate:14Pligg :.:-.4 naliplifellir aid min- Ai, •-wrii liggiii ilium 1 0.11111 BIZ CLIZLER,90Y NIV4..N2LNAStlifIl ST I rcTh • ; s'• 11:1111111111 illg I I ,B,,pj_limmu. -111111111kir al 111105.4 . tnifiliell5Lla , faoh`q1i.V idereiti MirliffliiiiffOrti II ismanlimonliff...e.riainamots!_i Zr4 MENEM • E ("1>( IRPGARL • cII'4-0" oulii 111111111111 , EINE11111111111 taw W111011111/111 .-Atri,A4s-r2 sigrawor.4finir wgiowl:E.TioAcrer Nr411•1111 r. CORAL REEF.DR WEST MIAMI ALMETT EIA'a 6e, fl f?' fir TurkeyPoint TURKEY POINT PLANT PROPERTY ATLANTIC OCEAN FRE. T R KEY( PONT e r TRANSMIS4ION Legend FPL Substation Open FPL Right -of -Way Available for Use East Preferred Corridor West Preferred Corridor r:77. I West Secondary Corridor Access Corridors Limited Access Roads Major Road , Canals Mun icipalities t2r=3 County Boundary Turkey Point Plant Property A 0 2 4 I Mfles FPL Posting Routes Public Works Dept. Date: Nov. 13, 2008 US 1 Segments were selected based on site specific opportunities and the ability to address segment constraints After extensive qualitative review, the US 1 segments showed on balance, considering engineering, land use and environmental issues, to be better than the other segments ® Considerations included: Collocation with two existing major infrastructure facilities (US 1 and Busway/Metrorail) Ability to locate at a further distance from private property Collocation with existing FPL facilities for much of the route Ability to accommodate future plans for MDX and local governments by expanding corridor to provide flexibility around Metrorail stations Limited private easements likely to be required Metrorail easement compatibility preliminarily confirmed Ability to avoid or otherwise address existing vegetation Space flexibility to avoid underground conflicts Space flexibility along Busway to coexist with bikeways and pedestrian ways Flexibility to address MPO expansion plans 24 FPL. Cfl Preferred Route Selected based on Site Specific Opportunities and Constraints ® During and after the substantial qualitative review was completed, many segments were dropped from further consideration • The preferred route was selected based on site specific opportunities and the ability to address segment constraints • Corridors* were studied after the route was determined • Corridor boundaries were delineated to submit in the licensing application „r Corridor can be up to one mile wide for flexibility — Narrower right-of-way** to be chosen within corridor after licensing approval — Corridor will disappear when right-of-way is established • Corridor boundaries were widened where flexibility is needed to address engineering constraints and existing infrastructure conflicts in such areas as: — Dadeland Area (minimal building setbacks) — Metrorail stations *Term "corridor" used for an area that can be up to one mile wide connecting the terminal points and used in the certification or licensing phase of the transmission project. The boundary of the corridor disappears after the right-of-way is obtained. ** Term "right-of-way" used for the physical land area where FPL obtains land rights to build the transmission lines. It is used during the construction phase of the transmission project and remains through the life of the transmission line. 25 FPL. .),- ;5 U.S. 1 in South Miami as it is today • .1 1:.� A7{ }9 Looking south near 6242 US 1, South Miami U.S. 1 in South Miami with simulated transmission line (80' height with 300' spans .. _f teR r... i..,r'.1..,.�ahi...W..w.' sk*r: ....."-' Proposed transmission line Traffic camera Looking south near 6242 US 1, South Miami This photo simulation is intended to provide an illustration of new transmission facilities based on current engineering practices. For example, typical pole height and span length is superimposed as it might be installed in this area. This photo simulation is not intended to illustrate actual locations of poles, or actual landscaping or aesthetic issues within the transmission line right-of-way. Such details will not be finalized until the final design of the transmission line. Z'L Beginning in the 1970s, scientists began to ask questions about whether EMF has the potential to cause health effects such as cancer. A lot of research has been performed since then to answer those -questions. This handout describes what is currently known about the research related to EMF and health. Who is involved in this research? Scientists Scientific Agencies Organize panels of experts Panels of Peview of all Experts the research and recommend actions (e.g., research, guidelines) What is EMF? EMF stands for electric and magnetic fields. These fields surround anything that is generating, transmitting, or using electricity. The highest levels of EMF are measured directly near the source and levels decrease with increasing distance. Electric fields are the result of the voltage applied to an electrical object, while magnetic fields are the result of the current (i.e., the electricity) flowing through these objects. If you are standing next to an electrical source (such as an appliance), .you cannot see or hear these fields, but you can measure them with the right meter. More recently, magnetic fields have been the focus of health research and will, therefore, be the focus of this handout. What are common sources of magnetic fields and associated exposure levels? Magnetic fields can be found everywhere because we use electricity in so many ways. Electricity is transmitted over considerable distances from generation sources to substations, through distribution systems, and finally into the wiring, appliances and machinery in our homes and workplaces. The transport and constant use of ele.ctrir_ity in our neighborhoods and towns makes magnetic fields common in homes, schools, and commercial establishments. Magnetic fields are measured in units of milligauss (mG). In our homes, magnetic fields are generated from 1) appliances. 2) the vwiring that powers those appliances, 3) the distribution lines that deliver electricity to the home, and 4) any currents flowing on water pipes. Nearby transmission lines can also contribute to the magnetic field measured inside a home. Appliances produce the highest levels of magnetic fields in homes, but the levels drop off quickly with distance. For example, a vacuum cleaner may produce a field of 300 mG at 6 inches from the appliance, but at 1 foot the level will drop to 60 mG and at 2 feet to 10 mG. Are magnetic fields a hazard to our health? Because we encounter these fields everywhere, scientists have done research to answer this question. Thousands of studies related to magnetic fields and health have been con- ; ducted since the 1970s. The following sections describe the findings of this research. How have scientists reached conclusions about magnetic fields and health? Standard scientific methods are followed which are designed to reach objective conclusions (see inset box to the left). • First, scientists conduct studies at universities and organizations around the world and publish these studies in journals for other scientists to read. Their research includes human epidemiology studies, experimental studies of animals, and experimental studies of cells and tissues (see inset box below, What types of studies are conducted?). As the research literature grows, health and scientific agencies review and evaluate research in what is called a weight -of -evidence review. A weight -of -evidence review considers the entire body of research together; individual studies provide very little infor- mation about a possible health risk when considered alone. A ,.•veight-of-evidence review is not a simple or straightforward process and is, therefore, conducted by a collaborative panel of scientists with expertise in the relevant fields. Scientific agencies in the United States and abroad have organized expert panels to conduct weight -of -evidence reviews. These panels review all of the research and provide conclusions to the public about the possible risks related to magnetic fields. If a health risk is established, standards or guidelines are recommended to protect against that risk. Precautionary measures can also he recommended if uncertainty about a health risk exists, but the measures should be proportional to the strength of the research. If the evidence related to a risk is weak, for example, only low-cost precautionary measures are recommended. 13 What types of studies are conducted? Epidemiology Research • Observe ordinary people • Evaluate whether people with disease have higher estimates of past magnetic field exposure In Vivo Research • Experiments of rats and mice in the laboratory • Evaluate whether animals with high magnetic field exposures have higher incidence rates of cancer or other diseases esmust be considere. In Vitro Research • Experiments of cells and tissues in the laboratory • Evaluate whether cells and tissues exposed to high magnetic field levels exhibit changes that Indicate a disease process What have scientific agencies concluded? Health and scientific agencies that have organized expert panels include: • The World Health Organization (WHO), 2007 • The Health Protection Agency (HPA), 2004 • The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2002 • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), 1999 The conclusions of these agencies have been consistent, overall. They did not conclude that electric or magnetic fields are the known or likely cause of any disease, including cancer. When the epidemiology studies were reviewed, all of the scientific agencies noted a statistical association between higher average exposure to magnetic fields and childhood leukemia, but the studies presented more questions than answers. The organizations noted that there are many uncertainties associated with these studies, including the difficulty of estimating past exposure to magnetic fields and concerns about selection bias. Furthermore, epidemiology studies measure the statistical association between two variables in one population and cannot, in most circumstances, establish a causal relationship alone. No consistent evidence of a cancer risk or a disease mechanism has been observed in experimental studies. For these reasons, the scientific organizations did not conclude that magnetic fields cause child- hood leukemia or that they are a likely cause. Many different exposures are being studied as possible risk factors for childhood leukemia and are described in detail by the National Cancer Institute (NCI): httpl/wv,-wnci.nih.00v/cancertopics/factsheet/Sites-Types/childhood. Does Florida have any standards for EMF? Florida is one of six states that have electric or magnetic field standards for the right- of-way (RCIW) of transmission lines. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (`FDEP") has established stan- dards for electric and magnetic fields from transmission lines and substations. Based on its review of the scientific data, it stated that there is no conclusive evidence of any danger or hazard to public health. This conclusion applies to the levels of EIviF that people commonly encounter, including those associated with transmission lines • and substations in Florida. cE...r�.r 69--:37::; i-v j: [Vim 2 1:'r'irn 150 rn 2 . 2 0 5! i) kV i 00 kb/m 2 ir:Um :. K) rr O 507 kV on Cerlair ' e>:isiinq ROVE' 250 in(, >500 r:V 15 kv!m ,.j kV/m 2S() m(:: Cr!) ,asnr.d in units of kilos•nirn pFr n,-Ter (1'V!n)). Should any precautions be taken to reduce exposure to ETAF? The NIEHS and the WHO have only recom- mended precautionary measures that are not costly. For example, moving appliances away from sleeping areas is one easy way to reduce exposure. \'pith regard to the utility industry, the WHO recommended that very low cost measures be utilized to reduce magnetic field levels when constructing new facilities. Where can I find more information on what independent scientists are saying? National Cancerinstitute httpl/www.ncionifi.gov/cancertopicsi factsheet/ Riskimagnetic-fields World Health Organization httpl%ww-vv.who.intipeh-emf/aboutien/ This brochure was created by epidemiolooists and biological scientists in the Health Sciences Practice of Exponent. a leading firm in scientific and engineering disciplines. Exponent July 2009 /7) FPL. Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Project Upcoming Key Project Transmission Milestones For Municipal Governments Note: Deadlines shown below are based on the Eighth Revised Scheduled approved by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) on March 8, 2011. Deadline for parties to propose altemate corridor(s) for a transmission line May 2, 2011 Agencies headed by non -collegial bodies submit to DEP final reports on FPL's transmission line corridors as to matters within their respective jurisdiction May 17, 2011 Proponent of accepted altemate corridor submits data on alternate corridor needed for preparation of agency supplemental reports on proposed alternate corridor (and pays appropriate application fee) May 31, 2011 Agencies headed by collegial bodies submit to DEP final reports on FPL's transmission line corridors as to matters within their respective jurisdiction June 1, 2011 Reviewing agencies file with DEP any issues conceming the completeness of the altemate corridor data June 15, 2011 DEP issues its Project Analysis on FPL's proposed transmission line corridors DEP issues 1 s` determination of completeness of alternate corridor (schedule assumes incomplete) .. Proponent of alternate corridor submits corrective data in response to DEP's determination of incompleteness (if no data is submitted, alternate corridor is deemed withdrawn) Reviewing agencies file with DEP any remaining issues conceming completeness of alternate corridor data DEP issues 2nd determination of completeness of alternate corridor (schedule assumes complete — if incomplete, altemate corridor is deemed withdrawn) Agencies headed by non -collegial bodies file with DEP supplementary reports on alternate corridor(s) for which submitted data has been determined complete Agencies headed by collegial bodies file with DEP supplementary reports on alternate corridor(s) for which submitted data has been determined complete June 20, 2011 .. June 22, 2011 July 6, 2011 July 18, 2011 July 22, 2011 August 15, 2011 August 22, 2011 DEP issues its Project Analysis on alternate corridor(s) September 7, 2011 Deadline for agencies to file notices of intent to be a party to the Certification Hearing February 1 2012 Hearing on Site Certification before the ALJ (commencement date) May 1, 2012 Hearing on Site Certification before the Siting Board (anticipated date) September 25, 2012 If you are interested in seeing the most recent comprehensive schedule, please refer to information on the Florida Department of Administrative Hearings, Docket Sheet 09-003575 at website at htto://www.doah.state.fl.us For more on the Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Project, please refer to the FPL website at www.FPL.com/cleansafenuclear d'5) EXHIBIT A EIGHTH REVISED SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF SITE CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FOR FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S TURKEY POINT UNITS 6 887 POWER PLANT SITING APP. PA03-45A3; DEP OGC CASE No. 09-3107 DOAH Case No. 09-3575-EPP Day/ Date Requirement! Deadline Statute Applies to: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 DEP issues 4th Completeness Determination on the plant and non- transmission portion of the SCA. 403.5066(4) [1j Wednesday, September 22, 2010 FPL files position statement in response to DEP's 4th determination that the plant and non -transmission portion of the SCA is incomplete. 403.5066(2) [1] Wednesday, September 29, 2010 FPL files additional information in response to DEP's 6th determination that the transmission portion of the SCA is incomplete. 403.5252(4) [2] Wednesday, November 17, 2010 AGENCIES submit recommendations regarding the completeness of the transmission portion of the SCA to DEP in response to FPL's additional information submitted on September 29, 2010. If an agency recommends the application is complete, the agency must also submit its preliminary statement of issues on transmission to DEP and all parties. 403.5252(4) [2] Friday, December 03, 2010 DEP issues 7th Completeness Determination and its preliminary statement of issues on the transmission portion of the SCA. 403.5252(4) 403.526(1) [2] Monday, February 28, 2011 FPL files additional information in response to DEP's 4th determination that the plant and non -transmission portion of the SCA is incomplete. 403.5066(2)(b) [1] Tuesday, April 12, 2011 Deadline for DEP to publish Florida Administrative Weekly notice of the revised deadline for filing alternate corridors. 403.5115(4)(g) [2] ma Aftete Corridor Tuesday, April 12, 2011 FPL publishes newspaper notice of the revised deadline for filing alternate corridors. 403.5115(1)(f) Alte2] mate Corridor Monday, May 02, 2011 Deadline for PARTY to file notice of proposed alternate corridor(s) for a transmission line (NOTE: Alternate corridors must include the same terminal and Intermediate substations or substation expansions as FPL's proposed corridor(s). The schedule assumes an alternate corridor is proposed on the deadline date for doing so. If an altemate corridor is proposed earlier than the deadline date, subsequent dates on this schedule associated with alternate corridors may change.) 403.5064(4) [2] Alternate Corridor [1] Applies only to Main Site and Associated Facifities [2] Applies only to specified Transmission Line Corridors I1], [2] Applies to both Monday, May 09, 2011 FPL and DEP file notices of acceptance or rejection of attemate corridor. (If FPL and DEP accept, altemate proponent must submit data in support of altemate corridor. If FPL or DEP reject, alternate corridor is not proper for certification - schedule assumes FPL and DEP accept attemate condor.) 403.5271(1)(b)1 [2] Attemate Comdor Monday, May 16. 2011 AGENCIES submit recommendations regarding the completeness of the plant and non -transmission portion of the SCA to DEP in response to FPL's additional information submitted on February 28, 2011. 403.5066(4) (1) Tuesday, May 17, 2011 AGENCIES issue reports on FPL s proposed transmission line comdors as to matters within t e r junsd Iron - 403 526(2)(a) [2) Monday, May23, 2011 DEP issues 5th Completeness Determination on the plant and non - transmission portion of the SCA 403.5066(4) [7) Tuesday, May 31, 201 i PROPONENT OF ALTERNATE CORRIDOR submits data on alternate comdor needed for preparat on of agency supplementary reports on proposed attemate comdor and pays the appropnate application fee 403.5271(1)(d) 403.518(6) I21 Alternate Condor Wednesday, June 01, 2011 PROPONENT OF ALTERNATE CORRIDOR makes good faith effort to notify all local landowners whose property or residences are within 1/4-mile of the proposed transmission line condor boundaries. • [2] Alternate Corridor Corridor Wednesday, June 01. 2011 AGENCIES HEADED BY A COL EGIAL BODY issue reports on FPL s proposed tra smiss on t e comdors as to matters within their junsdict on. 403.526(2)(d) [2] Tuesday, June 07, 2011 FPL files position statement in response to DEP's 5th determination that the plant and non -transmission portion of the SCA is incomplete (if necessary). 403.5066(2) 111 Monday, June 13, 2011 SFWMD issues its report on FPL's proposed transmission line corridors as to matters within its junsdiction. 403.526(2)(dj [2] Wednesday, June 15, 2011 AGENCIES file with DEP any issues concerning completeness of alternate comdor data 403.5271(1)(e)1 Alternatez Corridor Thursday, June 16, 2011 PROPONENT OF ALTERNATE CORRIDOR files with DEP a list of the landowners and residences notifed of the altemate comdor 403 5115(7)(b) 121 Alternate Corridor Monday, June 20, 2011 DEP issues Project Analysis on FP 's proposed transmission line comdors. 403.526(3) [2J Wednesday, June 22, 2011 DEP issues 1st determination of completeness of alternate condor (schedule assumes incomplete). 403 5271(1)(e)1 Alte2mate Comdor [1] Applies only to Main Site and Associated Facilities [2] Applies only to specified Transmission Line Corridors [1], [2] Applies to both (i) Wednesday, June 22, 2011 FPL files additional information in response to DEP's 5th determination that the plant and non -transmission portion of the SCA is incomplete (if necessary). 403.5066(2)(b) [1] Wednesday, July 06, 2011 PROPONENT OF ALTERNATE CORR DOR submits corrective data in response to DEP's determination of incompleteness. If no data is submitted altemate corridor is deemed withdrawn. 403.5271(1)(e)2 [2] Alternate Corridor Monday, July 18, 2011 AGENCIES file with DEP any issues conceming completeness of altemate corridor data. 403.5271(1)(e)3 Alternate[2] Corridor Friday, July 22, 2011 AGENCIES submit recommendations regarding the completeness of the plant and non -transmission portion of the SCA to DEP in response to FPL's additional information submitted on June 22, 2011 (if any). 403.5066(4) [1] Friday, July 22, 2011 DEP issues 2nd determination of completeness of alternate comdor (schedule assumes complete - if incomplete altemate comdor is deemed withdrawn). 403.5271(1)(e)3 [2] Alternate Corridor Friday, July 29, 2011 DEP issues 6th Completeness Determination on the plant and non- transmission portion of the SCA (if necessary). 403.5066(4) [1] Monday, August 15, 2011 AGENCIES file with DEP supplementary reports on alternate comdor that has been determined complete 403.5271(1)(f) [2 Alternate Corridor Monday, August 22, 2011 AGENCIES HEADED BY A COLLEGIAL BODY file with DEP supplementary reports on alternate corridor that has been determined complete. 403.5271(1)(h) [2] Alternate Corridor Monday, August 22, 2011 PROPONENT OF ALTERNATE CORRIDOR publishes newspaper notice of alternate corridor. If not timely published, altemate corridor is deemed withdrawn. 403.5271(1)(c) 403.5363(2)(d) [2] Attemate Corridor Wednesday, September 07, 2011 DEP files Project Analysis on altemate corridor(s) 403.5271(1)(i) [2] Alternate Corridor Friday, September 30, 2011 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY issues its determination of land use/zoning consistency for power plant site and associated facilities that are not exempt from the definition of "development. 403.50665(2)(a) and (b) (1] Land Use Friday, October 21, 2011 Deadline for DEP to publish Florida Administrative Weekly notice of Miami -Dade County's determination of land use and zoning consistency. 403.50665(2)(c) 403 5115(4)(c) [1] Land Use Friday, October 21, 2011 Deadline for FPL to publish newspaper notice of Miami -Dade County's determination of land use and zoning consistency. 403.50665(2)(c) 403.5115(1)(c) [1] Land Use Monday, October 31, 2011 AGENCIES file preliminary statement of issues for the power plant and non -transmission associated facilities. 403.507(1) [1] 11] Applies only to Main Site and Associated Facilities [2] Applies only to specified Transmission Line Corridors [1], [2] Applies to both Monday, November 14, 2011 Deadline for SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECTED PERSON to file petition for hearing on a focal govemment's land use determination. 'Deadline may be earlier if notice is published prior to deadline for publication. . 40350665(4) [1] Land Use Monday, November 21, 2011 ALJ sc redules hearing on land use (if a petition for hearing was filed by a substantially affected person). 403.506(1)(a) [1] Land Use Tuesday, November 29, 2011 Deadline for DEP to publish Florida Administrative Weekly notice of land use hearing before the ALJ (if a petition for hearing was filed by a substantially affected person). 403.508(1)(b) 403.5115(4)(d) [1] Land Use Tuesday, November 29, 2011 Deadline for FPL to publish newspaper notice of land use hearing before the AU (if a petition for hearing was filed by a substantially affected person on deadline date). 403 508(1)(b) 403.5115(1 j(d) (1] Land Use Wednesday, December 14, 2011 Friday, December 16, 2011 ALJ conducts hearing on the challenge to the determination of land use consistency (schedule assumes a 3-day hearing). 403.508(1)(a) [1] Land Use Thursday, December 29, 2011 AGENCIES issue reports on the power plant and non -transmission associated facilities as to matters within their jurisdiction. 4Q3.507(2)(a) [1] Tuesday, January 17, 2012 AU issues Recommended Order from hearing on land use consistency 403.508(1)(d) [1] Land Use Wednesday, February 01, 2012 Deadline for LISTED AGENCIES to file notices of intent to be a party to the Certification Hearing. 403.508(3Xb) (1], [2] Friday, February 24, 2012 FPL publishes newspaper notice of Certification Hearing and notice of the deadline for filing notice of intent to be a party. 403.508(2)(b) 403.5115(1)(e) (1] [2] Tuesday, February 28, 2012 Deadline for DEP to publish Florida Administrative Weekly notice of Siting Board Hearing on land use consistency. 403.5115(4)(e) [1] Land Use Tuesday, March 13, 2012 SITING BOARD hearing on land use consistency. (NOTE: The Siting Board typically meets on Tuesdays. The deadline reflected in the schedule is for the last Tuesday within the deadline for the hearing established by the PPSA. The actual hearing date is subject to change based on the Siting Board's 2012 meeting calendar.) 403.508(1)(d) [1] Land Use Friday, March 16, 2012 DEP files Project Analysis on the power plant and non transmission associated facilities 403 507(5) (1) Friday, March 16, 2012 Deadline for DEP to publish Florida Administrative Weekly notice of Certification Heanng. 403.508(2)(b) 403.5115(4)(f) [1] 12) Friday, March 30, 2012 Deadline for INTERVENORS to file motions to intervene in the Certification Hearing 403.508(3)(e) [1]. [2] [1] Applies only to Main Site and Associated Facilities [2] Applies only to specified Transmission Une Corridors [1]. [2] Applies to both Monday, April OZ 2012 Earliest date to request that ALJ cancel the Certification Hearing and relinquish jurisdiction to DEP if all parties stipulate. 403.508(6)(a) (1), (21 Monday, April 09, 2012 Deadline for ALJ to issue order granting or denying the request to relinquish jurisdiction (based on earliest request date to cancel Certification Hearing). 403.508(6)(b) IV, (2) Thursday, April 19, 2012 Deadline for PARTIES to submit Proposed Recommended Orders to DEP if ALJ has relinquished jurisdiction (based on earliest relinquish date). 403.508(6)(d)2 I1J, (2) Thursday, April 26, 2012 FPL to have published newspaper notice of cancellation of Certification Hearing HAW has relinquished jurisdiction. 403.508(6)(c) 403.5115(1)(g) I11 1.2] Thursday, April 26, 2012 Deadline for DEP to have published Florida Administrative Weekly notice of cancellation of Certification Hearing if ALJ has relinquished jurisdiction. 403.508(6)(c) 403.5115(4)(h) I11' (2) Tuesday, May 01, 2012 Monday, June 04, 2012 AU conducts hearing on Site Cerbficatto chedule assumes a 24 workday hearing) 403.508(2)(a) [1), [2) Monday, May 21, 2012 Deadline for DEP Secretary to issue Final Order on Certification if ALJ has relinquished jurisdiction. 403.508(6)(d)1 403.509(1)(a) I11. (2) Monday, July 30, 2012 ALJ issues Recommended Order on Site Certification (schedule assumes hearing transcripts are filed 10 working days after the hearing concludes). 403.508(5) [1), [2) Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Deadline for DEP to publish Florida Administrative Weekly notice of Siting Board Hearing on Site Certification. 403.5115(4Xi) [1J, [2) Tuesday, September 25, 2012 SITING BOARD hearing on Site Certification. (NOTE. The Siting Board typically meets on Tuesdays. The deadline reflected in the schedule is for the last Tuesday within the deadline for the hearing established by the PPSA. The actual hearing date is subject to change based on the Siting Board's 2012 meeting calendar.) 403.509(1)(b) [1], [2] [1] Applies only to Main Site and Associated Facilities [2] Applies only to specified Transmission Line Corridors [1], [2] Applies to both