HomeMy WebLinkAboutBackup Documentation 1City of Miami Police Department
Solicitation:
Paul Coverdell Forensic science
Improvement Grants :Program
C F DA No.. 16.742
May 17th, 2010
- ibaciup Socurricntatan
City of Miami Police Department
PROPOSAL ABSTRACT
The City of Miami Police Department (MPD) requests funding under the Paul
Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants Program to reduce the current backlog
of latent palm print evidence as well as prevent backlogs in the future. This funding
request in the amount of $150,049.70 will be used in the following manner and with the
following expected results:
= A total of $68,278.08 would be allocated for man hours for the reduction of
laboratory backlog in the latent print function of the Crime Scene
investigations Unit. These man hours will be utilized for the latent print
examiner and staff to enter backlogged latent palm print cases that in turn
will be searched using the Automated Fingerprint Identification System
(AFIS). Additionally, there will be $5,223.27 allocated to cover fringe
benefits, for a total of $73, 501.35.
• A -total of $20,167.47 would be aliocated for an archival management
system in which to properly file, search and protect the latent
palm/fingerprint evidence for examination and court dissemination,
• A total of $42, 740.00 would be used to put into place two AFJS review
stations to augment our current AFIS system, These two stations would
multiply the value of the two current AFIS systems by allowing more than
two people the ability to perform the critical work flow of latent
Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants
Program, FY 2010
Page 1 of2
City o fiamiPolice Department
palm/fingerprint comparison. This amount includes a $2,740.00
maintenance fee.
An allowable amount of $13,640.88 for administrative cost is also being
requested.
MPD is requesting $1-50,049.70 to implement the following activlties:
1. $73,501.35 to cover overtime expenses and -fringes;
2, 120,16747 for an archival management system;
3, $42,740,00 to install 'two ARS review stations with the required
maintenance fee; and
4, $13,640,8E3 which is the percentage allowed to cover the cost to
administer this grant.
The investment made in allocating overtime hours -for personnel, providing an
archival management system, and installing -two AFlS review stations will allow the
MPD to improve the quality and timeliness of forensic science over current operations
by 70%. Once implemented, this project will be able to substantially expedite the
processing of evidence.
Paul Caverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants
Program, FY 2010
Page 2 012
Table of Contents
Main Body
it; External Invetigations Attachment to the Program Narrative
Budget Detail VVorksheet and Budget Narrative
IV Ran for Coliecting the Data Required for Performance Measures
V. CoverdeR Statutory Curtfications
Vli Other Standard Forms
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
As of 2003, Miami was the fifth poorest City in the nation (US Census Bureau,
American Community Sun/ay), Currently the City of lviiami has an unemployment rate of
11,5%, compared to 9.9% nationwide (Bureau of Labor tistics). Equally as
disturbind, the City of Miami is the 3rd most dangerous City in the nation (Forbes 2009).
in 2009, Miami had 59 homicides, 91 victims of sexual battery, 2,094 robberies, 2,739
aggravated assaults, 4,856 burglaries, 13,385 larcenies and 2,536 motor vehicle thefts.
As of May of this year, Miami had 30 homicides (16 unsolved), representing an ncrease
of 30% over .2009.
The 'City oi Miami Police Department is requesting funds in the amount of
$150,049.70 in orderto eduoe the current backlog of latent print evidence as well as
prevent backlogs in the future, -This funding would be used in the following manner and
with the following expected results:.
A 'total of $68,278.08 will be allocated 'for overtime to reduce laboratory
backlog in the latent print function ofthe Crime Scene investigations Unit
These overtime hours will be used 'for the latent print examiner and staff to
enter backlogged latent. palm print cases that will be searched in the
Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS).
A total of $20,167,47 will be aliiocat cl for an archival management system
in which to properly file, search and protect the atent palm/fingerprint
evidence for examination and court dissemination.
• A total of $42,740.00 will be used to implement two AFIS review stations
to augment our current APIS system. These two stations would intensify
the value of the two current APIS systems by allowing more than two
people the ability to perform the critical work flow of latent palmifingerprint
comparison.
A total of $13392.55 or 10% will he used to cover the costs to administer
this grant.
The latent print function is a component of the Crime Scene Investigations Unit and
is housed in the Criminal Investigations Division, This function is a support service to
the Department's investigative units and augments their efforts by identifying suspects
in -criminal cases through latent finger/paim print discovery at crime scenes.
The Crime Scene Unit handles a wide range of criminal cases, from quality of hfe
crimes such as larceny and motor vehicles thefts to capital crimes such as homicides
and sexual batteries,The Crime. Scene Unit investigates approximately 10,000 -12,000
criminal cases on 5 yeady basis and an estimated 1,500 oases yield latent
fingerprintipalm print evidence. Of these cases, there are approximately '700 cases
which yield identifications to suspects which assist investigators in -their efforts to solve
Latent palm print evidence is not new to the forensic or law enforcement community;
however before 2005 there was no automated method to search latent print databases
throughout the State of Florida and the United States as a whole. It has been widely
recognized that in a majority of crimes such as burglaries, occupied burglaries,
residential rapes. robberies and homicides, it is routine that palm prints are left and
subsequently developed at the scene of these crimes, Unfortunately, before automation
and databases, palm prints riad..to .be manually compared to .a known suspect for
positive identification.
Since the inception of new techn logical advancement in palm print identification by
vvay of automation, the palm print databases have been steadily growing throughout the
country. This has provided the law enforcement community through the efforts of
trained and seasoned crime scene investigators and latent print examlners great
advances in the field of forensics.
Unfortunately, the influx of approximately 12,00D cases annually does not permit
backlog management and follow-up. 416 cases, primarily homicide, sexual batteries
and aggravated assaults, have bean identified to be of ARS palm print value which
could result in the identification of a suspect and a timelier turnaround response for the
investigator. Tnese 416 cases would require an average ofthree ) man hours for full
examination in order to possibly result in identification of a suspect and a subsequent
report -to the investigator. Therefore, the 416 cases would require 1,24B man hours
divided among the four examiners identified to eliminate the backlog.
The cases are not n a digital or manageable format. The evidence requires on -site
storage and certain archival maintenance practices in order to be readily searched,
examined and retained tor future prosecutions. Currently, the storage of these, c
outdated and unsecured.
The backiog also slows down the workflow of the operation on current cases. At this
time only two examiners can sit at the AFiS terminals in order to enter and then verify
unknown latent palm prints. Adding two supplementary ARS review stations will allow
staff to double the productivity of the operation by having two examiners enter unknown
latent palm p nts and at the same time have two examiners verify the results as they
are being reported. The investment made in allocating overtime hours for its personnel,
providing an archival management system, and implementing two ARS review stations
will allow time MPD to improve the quality and timeliness of forensic, science over current
operations. Once implemented, this system will be able to expedite the processing of
evidence.
Despite the efforts to reduce the backlog with the current manpower, the Unit still
faces an overwhelming number of cases for examination creating a major bottleneck
with regard to productivity. The shortage of personnel and the amount of calls for
service add to the backlog of cases. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics
(2006), 55% of violent offenders were repeat offenders. It is vftal that Police Officers on
the front line have the tools necessary to arrest, detain and prosecute offenders.
Without this funding, the ability to reduce the number of crimnas free to commit more
crimes is seriously hampered.
PROJECT/PROGRAM DESIGN AND YMPLEMENTATION
The project consists of examining palm prints which have been in backlog since
early 2005. Palm prints are one of the most prevalent latent prints discovered at crirne
scenes. They are routinely developed at points of entry as well as vehicles and objects
handled by offenders such as bottles and weapons. Technology to search this
evidence did not become .utomated until approximately 2005 and as a result unknown
iatent palm prints became impossible to search wlthouf a known suspect to be
compared to. Therefore many palm prints, in approximately 416 cases, went
unexamined due to a lack of suspects.
With itoday's technology and the funding from this grant, MPD will examine those
415 cases containing balm prints and enter thern to be searched in the database that
has widely grown since its inception in 2005. Our staff of Latent Print Examiner's (LPE)
will manually re --examine and evaluate the palm: prints in order.to enter them into the
database to be searched, They will then examine the results of the search in order to
effect identification to a known suspect in the criminal database.
The funding will cover overtime for the manual tasks associated with the request
of examining, entering and reviewing the entered palm prints in the database. A portion
of the funds will be used to purchase two verification stations which will increase the
capacity of 1,APD's existing AFilS system, The current APIS system performs double
duty in that it performs entry and verification functions. Therefore when the AFIS is
used to enter prints, it cannot verify or vice -a -versa. The addition of -two verification
stations will dedicate AF1S to entry and the verification stations will be free to perform
the verification of results returning from the database from the earlier submissions, in
essence we would double our capacity in the workload process.
• MPD will also irroement the filing of current and future cases into the archival
management system. The systemwould allow for proper thing, archiving, quick retrieval
and the security of latent prints. The system, once in place w become a fast and
readily accessible system to retrieve cases being stored L The need for off -site secure
storage will be lessened as well as the man hours spent searching through boxes and
drawers for cases in various locations throughout the buildino. This savings in speed
and timeliness wili also overlap into the speed of the LPE's perform ng their work with
cos quickly at hand and reducing time while increasing response time to investigator
requests.
Quality and timely examination of evidence is extremely important for Police.,
Departments. Due to the advances in science and technology, the use of physical
evidence has become more critical to the prosecution of criminal cases. Law
enforcement agencies are expected to be morc thorough, efficient and swift in gathering
and processing evidence and investigations of crime. "Juries prefer and '-lave come to
rely on the use of physical evidence, such as fingerprints or DNA evidence, which ties
the suspect to the crime scene. A properly conducted investigation gives credibility to
the evidence collected making arrest possible and prosecution imminent.
CAPABELITfESICOMPETENCIES
Miguel A. Exposito, the City of Miami Poce Department's Chief of Polic..,e, s a
graduate of the prestigious FBI National Academy, the Police Executive Research
Forum's Senior Management Institute for Police (SMIP/PERF), the Harvard University
JFK School of Government, and Florida International University's institUte. of
Government. He holds a Bachelor's Degree from Barry University, and has completed
coursework at the University of Virginia toward a Master's Degree. In 1994, at the.
request of the U.S. State Department and as a representative of the United States,
Chief Exposit° lectured 255 high-ranking government officials at the international
Consultation Conference on Community Policing, Police Corruption, and
Professionalism in Buenos Aires, Argentina. As Chief, he commands over 1100 police
officers and 400 civilians.
Assistan Chief Roy Brown is responsible for the Criminal Investigations Division,
supervising and managing a multitude of investigative units ranging from persona! and
property crimes to narcotics investigations and money laundering, The Division is
comprised of the Criminal Investigations Section and the SpecI investigations Section,
He is responsible for the deployment of approximately 200 detectives and civilian
personnel, equipment and resources required to investigate major and capitafelony
c,rimes.
Mr, Lazaro Fernandez has -been with the Miami Police Department since 1984,
Mr. Fernandez is responsible for the Crime Scene investigations Unit which is
responsible for processing crime scenes, photographs, lifting and identifying
fingerprints, recovering DNA evidence and .collecting and preserving other items of
evidentiary value.. He has extensive training in the various discipiines of blood spatter,-
shootina reconstruction, crime s
ne investigations -and.photography,
The CSis are field units which respond to -crime scenes and identify,
document and collect evidence. Some f this evidence requires submission to the lab
for further analysis. The CSIs are responsible for examining the evidence and assuring
that the most compelling of evidence is submitted. Their immediate supervisors (CSI
lis) are responsible for assisting them as well as assuring the quality control of their
submissions. The evidence, once packaged properly for preservation, is then paced
into the.property unit and appropriate paperwork completed for submission to the lab for
analysis.
The 2005-05 Coverdell Grant (# 2005-DN-BX-0-i23) was awarded on September
1, 2005. In 1979 the Miami Police Department became the first police department in the
country to acquire an Automated Fingerprint identification System (.AFIS). It became
apparent that there was a need to process even more evidence therefore MPD
requested and was awarded $95000 to purchase a second AFiS machine. From July
2006 to December 2006, there were an additional 1,236 entries which resuted in 116
suspects identified. From January 2007 to March 2007, AFIS system handled 823
additional entries resulting in 90 identifications, The 2006-07 Coverdell Grant (# 2006-
DN-BX-002.9) -was awarded on September of 2006, The $95,000 awarded was used to
hire additional contractors to evaluate evidence and enter results in the AFIS, to pay
overtime for technicians .to work on current cases and/or re -open closed cases and to
facilitate more than 1,5,00 hours of training to MPD personnel. This grant resulted in a
two -fold accomplishment in that not only were the backlogged cases examined; they
were examined using today's technology. A total of 464 backlogged cases were entered
and they yielded 162 identifications, Additionally, fourteen individuals attended training
in Basic Fingerprint Classification, Digital Photography, Fingerprint Evidence Processing
and Recovery. Just last year, the MPD was awarded $42,450 for overtime expenses
that will enable Crime Scene Investigators to analyze the evidence collected daily and
forward to the laboratory directly, $57,532 to facilitate approximately 2300 hours of
training in different topics to MPD personnel and $23,713 to cover the cost of
registering for the aforementioned training, for a total of $123,695.00,
Currently the Crime Scene Investigation Unit is comprised of three shifts of
approximately four CSis each, two Public Service Aides (PSAs) and one CSI
supervisor. The CSIs and PSAs are the field investigators which respond to the scenes
and collect, package and submt evdence to the lab for analysis, Their work is
managed by the Unit's Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and theirimmediate CSI
li supervisor manages their time and directs theft activities. There are also four
contractual Latent Print Examiners (LPEs), one Latent Print Examiner Trainee and one
Latent Print Examiner Supervisor which comprise the Latent Print Function of the Crime
Scene Unit. These individuals are responsible for receiving the latent palm and
fingerprint evidence in order to examine, enter into the AFIS for searching the criminal
databases, effecting both AFIS and manual comparisons for identification of suspects.
They then forward the said identification results to the investigators for further criminal
investigation which leads to prosecution. They are also responsible for the archiving
and preservation of said latent palm /fingerprint evidence for future presentation .to the
courts, The Forensic Investigations Supervisor is responsible for assuring compliance
with the SOPs and common forensic practices
BUDGET
The total project budget is $150,049.70, A total of $68,278.08 will be allocated
for overtime dedicated .to the reduction of laboratory backlog in the latent print function
of the Crime Scene Investigations Unit: These man hours will provide the latent print
examiner and staff to enter backlogged latent palm print cases that will be searched in
the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS). $5,223.27 will cover fringe
benefits expenses. Another $20,167.47 will be allocated for an archival management
system in which to properly file, search and protect the latent palm/fingerprint evidence
for examination and court dissemination. An additional $42,740.00 will be used to
implement two AFIS review stations to augment the current AFIS system. These two
stations would increase the value of the two current AFIS systems by allowing more
than two people the ability to perform .the critical work flow of latent palm/fingerprint
comparison. Ten percent or $13,640.58 will he used to cover the costs to administer
the grant. The supplies and expendables associated with gathering and submitting
evidence to the lab is already budgeted for by the Police Department.
On a fiscal level, grant expenditures are reviewed by the City's Budget Office for
compliance and fund eligibility. Expenditures are reviewed by Certified Public
Accountants with experience in government finances. The Finance Department is
responsible for grants nitoring; they manage the City's accounts payable, general
ledger, and prepare the Ctty's annual financial .statement. The City will serve as fiscal
agent and manages millions of dollars in federal, state, and local grants. Expenses will
be handled by the Finance Department, awarded the Certificate of Achievement for
Excellence in Financial Reporting.
IMPACT/OUTCOMES AND PLAN FOR COLLECTNG DATA FOR PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
1 Improvement in quality and timeliness.
a. The bacHog vvili be reduced by approximately 70%.
b, The archival management system wiJ make the search and protection of
evidence, more effective and efficient by providing a method that makes
evidence more readily accessible.
c. The two AFIS review stations will double the capacity of the current AFlS
systems by afouvng mare than two people to perform the critical work flow of
latent palMffingerprint comparison; the input of latent palm/fingerprints and
their ensuing verification.
in March of 2009, The Miami Police Department received re -accreditation from the
•
Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) reinforcing
MPD's commitment to quality law enforcement and excellent policies and procedures.
2. Anticipated Impact of Eligible Projects Activities'
a. The overtime for the personnel would result in the adding of man hours to the
current staffing in order to reduce the backlog of latent palm/fingerprint cases.
b. Equipment purchased will double the Crime Scenes Investigation Units
capacity to perform the workflow necessary .for latent palm/fingerprint
comparison.
c. N/A- MPDs Crime Scene Investigations Unit is computerized.
d. NIA- Funds are not being requested forfacilities.
The Forensics Investigation Supervisor will be responsible for the review of -all
data collected weekly by all .members of the CS! team. Data will •be reviewed for
consistency, quality, and performance outcomes. • If data is inconsistent, and/or
demonstrates that performance measures are not being met, the Supervisor will .lead
staff trainings to ensure improvement.
MPD has a data collection system to comply with current U.S. Department of
Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice reporting standards,
progress towards objectives and implementation of recommendations. The plan uses an
evaluation approach to address the program systemically and provide feedback on the
outcomes and program design changes. Team members will meet monthly to review
data and determine changes needed to assure program success. All reports will
comply with USDOJ requirements far deadlines and content.
Appendix 3. Template for "External Investigations"
Attachment
(frIstructions: Scn -the completed document and submit mace file electronically as part
of your application package,)
OP AE3 N. 1121-0329
Appinval Ezpims 0212612013.
30
FY 2010 Coverdell Forensic Science
improvements Grants Program
Attachment: External investigations
The 'Certification as to Extern& investigations" that is submUed on behalf of the applicant agency
as part of this application certifies that —
A goVernment entity exists and an appropriate process is in place to conduct independent
external invesligations into allegations of serious negligence or misconduct substantially
affecting tne integrity of the forensic results committed by employees oi contractors of any
forensic laboratory system, medical examiner's office, coroner's office, law enforcement
storage facility, Of medical facility that will receive a portion of the grant amount.
Prior to receiving funds, the applicant agency (that is, the agency applying, directing to the National Institute
of i.tustc..e) must Provide —tor each forensic laboratory system, meoical examiner's office, coroner's office,
law enforcement storage facility, or medical facility that will receive a portion of the granf amount — the
name of the "government entity" (or entities) that forms the basis for the certification. Please use the
template below to provide this lnformation (Applicants may adapt this templateif necessary, bul should
ensure that the adapted ciparnent provides all required information.)
INIPORTANT NOTE ff necessary for accuracy, list more than one entity with respect to each intended
rieb.lpient of a portion ofthe grant amount. For example, if no single entity has an appropriate process in
place with respect to allegations of serious negligence as well as serious misconduct, it will be necessary to
fist more than one entity. Similarly, if no single entity has an appropriate process in place with respect to
allegations concerning contractors as well as employees, il will be necessary to list more than one entity.
Additional guidance recording the "Ciartlfication as to External InveSfi3atiOne appears in the "E-14bility''
section of the program announcement for the FY 2010 Coverdell program,
Name of Applicant Agency (including Name of State or Unit of Local Government):
City of Miami
5/17/2010
Date:
Name of any forensic laboratory systsm, medical
examiner's office, coroner's office, law
enforcement storage facility, or medical facility
that will receive a portion of the ()rant amount
1. N/A
2.
OMB No 1121-DZ29
Approval Expoes o2aw2o3
EXisting government entity (entities) with an
appropriateprocess in pace to conduct
independent external investigations
Miami Police Department
Internal Affairs Unit
3].
P( 2010 External Investigations Attachment (continued)
City of Miami
Name of Applicant Adencv:
3. N/A N/A
6,
OMB NU,, 1121-0324
Approval Expirts 02J2Elt2013
32
DATA COLLECTiON PLAN
The CSIs and their supervisors utilize internal forms to record their activities.
The work is translated into monthly statistical data. The Forensic Investigations
Supervisor currently manages the evert Tie reports and statistical reports. As required,
all data
,Ilected will be available for 3 years after award.
iData Collected lHow Collected
'Reduction of 416
,inhoklogge,d cases
Arc
!Management
:I:System,
KT'S review stations
idally case
xart-iinationlveritic
L.
men logs
IHoW Processfor
Accessed/Analyzed Reportir2g
lOutcom.es
These caws have beenC—mparson to Submisslon of
identified and are in the!previous morith/year, ipreoress reports
care, custody and control
lof the Latent Print
iFunction.
The latent/palm print
ievidence wir migrate to
lthe new management
system and will be
Icataloged according to
prime, NEJ Areas, and
pollee case number.
•IResponses of previously
ackieggee latent
searches will be
!examined daily and
!logged
• ion a weekly basis
Ito the Unit
iSuperviser,
The evidence will be There will be a
rnigrated into the newh OD% migration of
system) and readily ;latent finger/palm
accessible by the iprint evidence into
LPEs performing, 'pe new system,
searches for the The cases will be
requested cases.. ilogged as they are
!entered.
Comparison to
previous monthlyear
The amount of
examinations and
verifications will be
'egged and reviewed
eekly and
compared on a
month to month basis;
Subrnissien of
progress reports
iwUl be as per the
frequirement of the
iGRANIT
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Ob'ective
To reduce the 416
back/ogged cases in the
Latent Print Function.
Archival management
system implementation
and migration of current
evidence,
Implementation of two
APIS review stations.'
Performance
Outcome Measure
Percent reduction 70%.
-iii903/0 of the current arm;,,l
future evidence wiU be
stored, and logged,
Output Measure
70% of the cases wil? be
searched, verified and
disseminated to
inve.stigator,s.
ata Grantee Provides
We have identified 416
palm print cases and win
provide documentation o
their entry and related
search results.
Logs indicating migration
and storage lo-ic said
evidence.
Logs, entries and
p
rts.
Qt,16 APPROVAt.tiCi,142S-01AB
EXD;Ft ES 5-98 (Ra.. 1/97)
Budget DetaL Worksheet
Pttrpose: The Budget Detail 'Worksheet may be used as a guide to assist you in the. preparation of
the budget ad budget narrative, -1'01.1 may st.dmit the budget and budget narrative using this form or in
the format of your cboicc (plain sheets, your own fOIM, Di a variation of this form). However, all
required information (including the budget narrative) must be provided. Any category of expense not
applicable to your budget may be deleted.
A. Personnel - List each position by title and name of employee, if available. Stiov,' the annual
salary rate and the percentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation paid for employees
gaged in grant activities must be consistent with that paid for similar work within the applicant
organization,
Nam eiPosi ti on
Computation Cost
Sr investi9diors al IvIPD
PoEtTlor. 2
1
Fstilior) 5
IPosation
Pc.$1i115n 5
Pc)51.fton 6
416 uses X a hr. ea. = 1,246 hra, 554 71 avg. oft
$68,278.08
7 r
SUB -TOTAL $68,278O8
B. Fringe Benefits - Fringe benefits should be based on actual known costs or au established
formula. Fringe benefits are for the peisonne-i listed in budget category (A) and only for the
percentage of time devoted to the project. Fringe bone -fits on overtime hours are limited to FICA,
Workman's Compensation, and Unemployment Compensation
Nam /P osition cornputntion Cost
ripe benta akwed under ovartiMa pay
,Vrinner here111 2
r -----
Frw Itenefi(
1Yenetti 4
!Fringe benelit 5
$08,278.08 x 7,65% =
$5,2 .27
SUB -TOTAL $5,223.27
ToW Personnel & Fringe Benefits S7:3'5°1'35
OriP FORM 715111 (5-95)
)tern
C. Travel - 'Itemize tavel expenses of project personnel by purpose (e, g., staff to training, field
interviews, advisory group meeting, etc.). Sbow the basis of computat;.on (e.g., six people to 3-day
traiiig at SX airfare, SX lodging, SX subsistence), In training p;-ojeas, tyavel and meals for trainees
should be listed sc,pa.-ately. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the
location of tavei, if Icnown. Indicate sohre of Travel Policies apphed, Applicant or Federal Tavel
Regulations.
Purpose of Travel Location
LTray60 entry 1, two lines Der I Pm-
ei511"/ - NIA
rri entry 2
Travel enrry 3
i revel entry 4
'Travel entry 5
firayei entry 7
Computation Cost
$0 00
TOTAL
D. Equipment - List Eon-ox.pendable JLm hat a:-e to be purchased. Non -expendable equipment
is arigib le property having a useful life of more than two years and an acqi6sition cost of ,S.5.,,900 or
rnore per unit. (Note: Oisanization's OWE capitalization policy may be used for items costing less than
S5,000). Expendable items should be included either in the "supplies -category or in the "Other"
categ,ory. Applicants should analyze the cost Oentitts ofpurchasing versus leasing equipment, es7oe-
cially nigh cost items and those subject to rapid technical advances, Rented or leased equipment costs
should be listed in the 'Contractual" category, xplain how the equipment is necessary for the success
of the project. Attach a narrative describing the procurement method to be used,
Item
Computation.
TWD
K (2) Arts Review Slairo'ns 2 =
one (1) Archival Mariagment System
Annual Maintenance ree
equipmenl entry 4
equipment entry 5
$40,000.00
$20,1157 47 X 1 = 420,187.47
X 1 = 1S2740,00
$2,740.00
TOTAL 382.907 47
E. Supplies - List items by type (office supplies, postage, training materials, copying paper, and
expendable equipment items costing less that $5,000, such as books, hand held tape recorders) and
show the basis for computation. (Note: Organization's own capitalization policy may be used for
items costing less than $5,000). Generally, supplies include any materials that are expendable or
consumed during the course of the project.
Supply Items
Computation
Cost
Supply item 1, one line per entry - NIA
supply Item 2
supply item 3
isupply item 4
isupply item 5
Lupply Item 6
supply item 7
supply llem 8
supply Ilem 9
1
$0.0D
TOTAL $0.00
F. Construction - As a rule, construction costs arc not allowable. In some cases, minor repairs or
renovations may be allowable. Check with the program office before budgeting funds in this
category,
Purpose
lour Imes per entry, use boxes below or an additional
page for more spare it required - N/A
Description of Work
Cost
a
so.ao
TOTAL $0.00
G. ConSultants/Contracts - Indicate whether applicant's formal, written Procurement Policy or
the Federal Acquisition Regulations are followed,
Consultant Fees: For each consultant enter the name, if known, service to be provided, hourly or daily
fee (8-hoilr day), and estimated tine on the project. Consultant fees in excess of $450 per day require
additional justification and prior approval from OJP.
Name of Consultant
Supply item 1, one line per entry
Supply item 1, one line per entry
Supply Item 1, one line per entry
Supply item 1, one line per entry
Service Provided
Computation Cost
maximum of Three lines - N/A
$0.00
Subtotal $0.00
Consultant Expenses: List all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultants in
addition to their fees (i,e., travel, meals, lodging, etc.)
Item
Consultant expense entry 1, one line pee(
L
Consultant expense entry 1, one line peal
Location
Computation
maximum of three fires- NM
maximum of three lines
maximum of three lines
Cost
Subtotal $0.00
Co/1lracis: Provide a description of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate
of the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding contracts.
A separate justification must be provided for sole source contracts in excess of S100,000.
Item
Cost
maximum of tour lines, additional information should be attached on a separate sheel(s)- N!A
$0.00
maximum of four fines
Subtotal $0,00
TOTAL $0.00
H. Other Costs - List items (e.g., rent, reproduction, teiephone, janitorial or sec .r'ity sere c• s,
and investigative o}° confidential funds) by m=jor type and the basis of the computation. Foa- example,
provide'. the square footage and the cost pet- square foot for i ent, cr provide a monthly rental cost and
how many months to rent.
Description
Computation Cost
es per miry, use bug@s love or an additional
ar more Space tt required - tWA
TOTA
$0.00
J
Z. Indirect Costs - Indirect costs are allowed only if the appuicant has a Federally approved in
cost rato, A cony of the rate approval, (a fully executed, negotiated agrec lcut), rrmst be attached. If
the applicant does not Lave an approved rate, one can be requested by oont ct eg the applicant's
cognizant Federal agency, w aich will review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant
oai zauon, or if the applicant's accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the dire ;t costs
afeg;rats.
Deseript o
Computation Cost
10 'o r - c1a1-amaunt of grant
�738.4p8,IIZX 10%=
trA of[cialamountof9rani
$136,408.62 X 30%
13,640.88.
TOTAL $13,€40.38
Budget Summary- When you have completed the budge worksheet, transfer the totals for each
category to the spaces below. Compute the total dixect costs and the total project costs. Indicate the
amount of Federal requested and the, amount of non-Fe...de:-al funds that will support the project.
Budget Categ
Amount
A. Personnel
E. Fringe Benefits
C. Travel
D. Equipment
E. Suppiie..s
F. Construction
G. Consultants/Contracts
H. Other
Total Direct Costs
I. Indirect Costs
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
Federal Request
Non -Federal Amount
$150,049.70
$9 00
$68,278 08
$5,223.27
$0,00
$62907 47
$D.00
$0.0C
$0.00
$0.0C
$136,408,82
$13,640 88
$150,049:70
C;ty of Miami PocicE Departmenl
BUDGET NARRATIVE
A. Personnel $68,278.08
This budget item will cover man hours for the reduction of laboratorybacklog in
the Latent Print Function of the .,;rinne SCene investigations Unit, These man
hours will allow the,Latent Print Examiner and his staff to enter backlogged latent
pal print cases to be searched in the AFlS system.
Fringe Benefits .$ 5,22.3.27
Fringe benefits on overtime hours are limited to F-ICA, VVorkman's Compensation
and Unemployment Compensation.
C.:Equipment .$62,9.07.47
A total of 20,167.47 iwiU cover the ost of an archival management 'system in
which to properly -file, search and protect the latent palm/fingerprint evidence. -for
examination and court dissemination. A $40,000,00 total will be used to
implement two AHS review stations to augrnerit our current AFIS system. Thee
two stations will multiply the value of the two current AFlS systems by allowing
more than two people the ability to perform the c.ritical work -flow of latent
palmffingericrint comparison. An annual maintenance fee of $2,740.00 is also
in-cluded.
Paul Coverclell Foronsi: Science. Improvement Grunts Program, FY 20)0
Page 1 of 2
Ctyof Miami Police DepartrnEm'..
D. Administrative Cost $13,640.88
The solicitation states that not more than 10 percent of .the total amount of a
Coverdell grant may be used for dract or indirect administrative expenses,
II. BUDGET SUMMARY
A. Personnel $ 68,278,08
B. Fringe Benefits $ 5,223.27
C. Travel N/A
Equipr ent $ 62,9,07.47
Supplies N/A
F.-- Construction N/A
G, Consuitanticontract NIA
- Other N/A
indirect Cost $ 13,540 88
Total Cost: $150,04,9.70
Federal Requests $150,049.70
Pan) Coverdell Forensic Sdence improvement Grants Program, Fy 2p1p
Pe 2,712
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
NATIONAL iNisiruTE: OF JUSTICE_
FY 2010 Coverdell Forensic Science improvement
Grants Program
Certification as to Plan for Forensic Science Laboratories
Application from a Unit of Local Government
On behalf of the applicant agency named below, i certify the following to the National Institute of
Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice:
This unit of local government has developed a plan for forensic science
laboratories under a program intended to improve the quality and timeliness of
forensic science or rnedicai examiner services provided by the laboratories
operated by the applicant unit of local government and any other governrrient-
operated laboratories within the State that will receive a portion of the grant
amount.
I acknowleage that a false statement in this certification or in the grant appiication that it supports
may be subject to criminal prosecution, incluciing under 13 U.S.C. §1001 and 42 U.S.C, § 3705a.
also acknowledge Ina: Office of Justice Programs grants, inciuciing certifications provided
connection with such grants, are subject to review by the Office of Justice Programs and/or by the
Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General.
I have authority to make thistertffication on behalf of the applicant agency (that is, the agency
applying directly to the Nationa! Institute of J ustioe),
4416-6 —Cige° ,(P/6tpF VLC,S 1
TItte of Certifying Official
to--"oire.t7/-
Narle of Applicant Agency
(Including Name of Unit of Local Government)
/411, i?"
Date
E3 N. 1121.0729
Approval Expires 02128/2013
/ 0
26
US, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE
PY 2010 Coverdell Forensic Science improvement
Grants Program
Certification as to Plan for Forensic Science Laboratories -
Application from a State
On 5ehahf of the e.pp.licant actency 113Med beiovi, ce-fify the following te the National Institute. of
Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U,S. Department of Justice:
The State has developed a plan for forensic science laboratories under a program
intended to improve the quality and timeliness of forensic science or medical
examiner services in the State, including such services provided by the
laboratories operated by the State and those operated by units of !coal government
within the State,
ackhowtedge that a false statement in this certification or in the grant application that it supports
may be subject to oriminaprosecution, including under 18 US § 1001 and .4:2 USC, § 3795.
also acknowledge that Office of Justice Programs grants, including certifications provided
connection with such grants, are subject to review by the Office of Justice Programs and/or by the
Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General.
I have authority to make this certification on behalf of the applicant agency 0.hat is, the agency
applying directly to the National Institute of Justice),
Si e ofCertryng Of!
.4 :5 1572:41,_?-T 644 /Fr
Printed Narne. of C'ertilying Official
EF /01,1C4S77 0 C
Titleof Certifying Official
/Li or- mt,A4-fl
Name of Applicant Agency (Including Name of State)
$- !LI -ez°1°
Date
OMB No, 11z1.326
A.pprovai Expires amar2o1
25
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
NATiONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE
FY 2010 Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement
Grants Program
Certification as to Generally Accepted Laboratory
Practices and Procedures
-^µ
On behalf of the applicant agency named below, I certify the following to the National institute of
Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice:
Any forensic science laboratey system, medical examiner's office, or coroner's
office in the State., including any laboratory operated by a unit of local government
within the. State, that wit; receive any portion fthe grant amount uses generally
accepted laboratory practices and procedures, established by accrediting
orcanizations or appropriate certifying bodies
I acknowledge inat a false statement in this certification or in the grant application thafit supports
may be subject to criminal prosecution, including under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 42 U.S,C. § 3795a.
I also acknowledge that Office of justice Programs grants, including certifications provided in
connection with such grants; are subject to review by the OffiC5 of Justice Programs and/or- by the
Department of Justioe's Office of the Inspector General,
I have authority to make this certification on behalf of the applicant agency (that is, the agency
applying directly to the National Institute of Justice),
of eutyinp Official
Printed Name of Certifying Official
,‘C'T/S-72ijr V6
Title of Certifying Official
7-17"
Name of.Applicant Agency
(Including Name of State or Unit of Local Government)
MI/VV
Date
OM a W.1121=0329
pmvul Exfirra 02129?201.S
27
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE
FY 2010 Coverbeil Forensic Science improvement
Grants Program
Certification as to Use of Funds for New Facilities
Dn behalf of the applicant agency named beiow, I certify the following to the National institute of
Justice, Office of Justice Progcams, U.S, Department of Justice.:
The amouni of the grant (if any) used for the costs of any new facility or facilities to
be constructed as part of a program to improve the quality and timeliness of
forensic science and medical examiner services will not exceed the limitations set
-forth at 42 U.S.C. § 3797m(c) and summarized in the FY 20'10 Coverdell Forensic
Science Improvement Grants Program Announcement.
I acknowledge that a false statement ir; this certification or in the grant application that it supports
may be subject to criminal prosecution, including under 1t3 U.S.C. § 1001 and 42 U.S.C. § 3795a.
; also acknowledge that Office of Justice Programs grants, including oeifications provided in
connection with such grants, are subject to review by the Office of Justice FI'rograms and/or by the
Department of Justice's Office of the inspector General.
I have autnorlty to make this certification on behalf of the applicant agenq (that is, the agency
applying directly to the National Institute of Justice),
tfyng Official
Frinted Names ofCerifying Officia;
Ass iir L47,I
Title of Certifying Officia71
7.2
Name of Applicant Agency
(Including Name of State or Unit of Local Government)
pl/feai
Date
OMB No 11 21-03.
Approval gxp'rres. 021213/203
28
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE
FY 2010 Coverdeil Forensic Science Improvement
Grants Program
Certification as to External Investigations
On behalf of the applicantagency nemeiz.i below, certify the following to the National institute of
Justibe, Office of Justine Programs, U,S, Department of Juste
A government entity exists and an appropriate process is in place to :conduct
independent external investigations into allegations of serious negligence or
misconduct substantially affecting the integrity of the forensic results committed by
employees or contractors of any forensic laboratory system, medical examiners
office, coroners office, law enforcement storage facillty, or medical faiflty n the
State that will receive a portion of the grant amount,
personally reap and reviewed the section entitled "Eligibilityin the Fiscal Year 2010
program ahrouncement far the Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grants Program,
adknoWledge that a false statement in this certification or in the grant application that It
: :supports may be subject to criminal prosecution, includlrig under 18 US.C. § 1001 and 42
US 0 3725rA. I also acknowledge that Office of Justice Programs grants, including
certifications provided in connection with such grants, are subject to review by the Office
of justice Programs andior by the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General,
I have authority to make this certification on behalf of the applicant apency (that is, the ageny
applying directly to the National institute of Jus-tice),
e 5f Certifying Official
tinted Name of Certifying Official
Title of C2ertifying Official -
Applican Agency
(including Name af State or Unit of Local Government)
Date
CAA No. t1,2-,o3a
Approval Expre4 C212e42013
29
Other - PART ] VIOLENT CRIMES
2005 ,
2 00.r•
,2l?06;
!, 2005
•
.2,d04.
•2003•
.:2002)
2001.
' ;2000 ,
4_995;'
Crimes
Arrest
Crimes
ArreS is
Crimes
Arrests
Crimes
Arrests
Crimes
Arrests
Crimes
Jrrc. ,
Cnmee
Arres-t
Crimes
Arrests
65
47
66
38
63
Crime Statistics
10-year comparison of Part r Crimes and ,-(rests
80 2,415 3,151 4,941
30 52 386 1,474 636
a?.'�s^t"""'F,=<Ak'��=`r4-i.4 R:':r;}° zilr4t` v_iWe% �.aqg
13,591 3,666 27,907
1,934 227 4,741
78 77 2,537 3,427 4,829 12,478 3.876 27,302
40 38 358 1,433 568 1,916 284 4,635
77 333 2,111 1510 4,442 11,967 3,679 26,219
30 70 336 1.273 542 1,838 270 4,359
54 112 2,019 3,949 5,377 13,930 4,01.4 29,455
54 82 562 1,594 750 2,238 468 5,728
69 155 2,367 3;570 5,556 14,652 4,297 30,966
26 93 720 1,598 1,071 2,818 . 398 6,662
74 164 2.928 3,991 5,876 15,404 5.088 33,527
33: 1.536 _ .10= =,8C3 7,73 r 5,722:
351 2.706 4,306 5,962 15,886 4,876 33,952
55 949 2,150 1,352 3,397 418 6,368
161 2,719
120 925
•
4,284 6,218 16,635 5,228 35,291
2,062 1,306 3,869
492 8,812
Crimes 66 176 3,077 4.5558 7.303 1,8.254 5,722
Arrests 23 85 771 1,947 1,106 3,251 338 7,521
Crimes 63 164, 3,076 4,558 7,329 13,335 . 5,72.3 40,048 42,1.98
Arrests 22 44 863 1,950 1,461 3,374 , 606 8,320
31,211
32.738
Rir
33,408 if
33,335
26.786
31,077
41,039
38,457
+rv:
- .Derte.tekerrrram ISORropurts_submhna dPiertaalkipertmerin#iew.Errfarss
31 a Iw" war _ 7rr s w r
3�r> F +p' lv`.,eS
�J' 7S '�, •i'K--�'!a"f4F. `riYa: Y>r .,.
. ;�3RLa� TemrtolpgV Si�orR jag
39,759
42.236 si*f',
OMB APPROVAL NUMBER
l 121-0340
EXPIRES 12/31/2012
STANDARD ASSURANCES
he Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines, and
?quirements, including OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-102, A-110, A-122, A-133; Ex. Order 12372 (intergovernmental review of
:deral programs); and 28 C.F.R. pis. 66 or 70 (administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements). The applicant
Iso specifically assures and certifies that:
1. It has the legal authority to apply for federal assistance and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability
(including funds sufficient to pay any required non-federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning,
management, and completion of the project described in this application.
2. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents
the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain.
3. It will give the awarding agency or the General Accounting Office, through any authorized representative, access to
and the right to examine ail paper or electronic records related to the financial assistance.
'4. It will comply with all lawful requirements imposed by the awarding agency, specifically including any applicable
regulations, such as 28 C.F.R. pts. 18, 22, 23, 30, 35, 38, 42, 61, and 63, and the award term in 2 C.F.R. § 175.15(b),
5, it will assist the awarding agency (if necessary) in assuring compliance with section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. § 470), Ex. Order 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), the
Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. § 469 a-1 et seq.), and the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C, § 4321).
6. It will comply (and will require any subgrantees or contractors to comply) with any applicable statutorily -imposed
nondiscrimination requirements, which may include the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42
U.S.C. § 3789d); the Victims of Crime Act (42 U.S.C. § 10604(e)); The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
of 2002 (42 U.S.C. § 5672(b)); the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29
U.S.C. § 7 94); the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12131-34); the Education Amendments of 1972
(20 U.S.C. §§1681, 1683, 1685-86); and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-07), see Ex. Order
13279 (equal protection of the laws for faith -based and community organizations).
7. If a governmental entity:
a. it will comply with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of
1970 (42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq.), which govern the treatment of persons displaced as a result of federal and
federally -assisted programs; and
b. it will comply with requirements of 5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-08 and §§ 7324-28, which limit certain political activities of
State or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in
whole or in part by federal assistance.
Close1Windovii...
;://grants.ojp.usdoj_gov/gmsexternal/displayAssurancesTextAction. st?method=assure&status=Y&ith-- 1 9/15/2010
ill>U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND
DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
4pplicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification io which they are required to attest. Applicants
>houid also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Acceptance of this form
provides for compliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying," 2 CFR Part 2867,
'DOJ Implementation of OMB Guidance of Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension," and 28 CFR Part 83, "Government -wide
Debarment and Suspension," and Government -wide Requirements for Drug -Free Workplace (Grants)." The certifications shalt be
:reeked as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award
:he covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.
1. LOBBYING As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 69, for persons entering into
a grant or cooperative agreement over $100,000, as defined at 28 CFR Part 69, the applicant certifies that:
;a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Ivientoer of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal grant or cooperative agreement;
:b) if any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
nfluence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit
Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in accordance with its instructions;
:c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all
+ers (Including subgrants, contracts under grants and cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) and that all sub -recipients shall
:ertify and disclose accordingly,
?. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (DIRECT RECIPIENT)
ks required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented al 2 CFR Part 2867, for prospective
)articipants in primary covered transactions, as defined at 2 CFR Section 2867.20(a):
k, The applicant certifies that it and its principals:
a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal benefits by
State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for
:ommission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, Stale, or
peal) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of
:mbezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
:) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with
ommission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
J) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local)
. rminated for cause or default.
Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this
pplication.
. DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS)
s required by the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 83, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 28
-FR Sections 83.620 and 83.650:
tips://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/ginsexternal/dispiayAssurancesTextAction.st?method=certify&status=Y&id=2 9/15/2010
a. I he applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by:
a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a
;ontrolled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for
'iolation of such prohibition;
b) Establishing an on -going drug -free awareness program to inform employees about
1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
?) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace;
3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
1) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace;
:) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement
squired by paragraph (a);
I) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the
nployee will
Abide by the terms of the statement; and
) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later
an five calendar days after such conviction;
Notifying the agency, in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or
7erwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees muss provide notice, including position Title,
Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, B10 7th Street, N.W., Washington, G.C. 20531. Notice
all include the identification number(s) of each affected grant;
Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any
tployee who is so convicted
Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements
:he Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or
Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such
poses by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d),
and (f),
:he duly authorized representative of the applicant, ! hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications.
Close Window,
;://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/ginsexternai/disptayAssurancesTextActiOn.st?method --ceItify&status~Y&id= 2 9/1 5/201 0
FY-2010 Paul CoverdelI Forensic Science improvement Grants Program 2010-93752-
FL-CD
Application
Application Handbook
Overview
Applicant
Information
Prorect Information
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Application
Help/Frequently Asked
Ouestions
..,MS Home
_oo Off
Correspondence iSwitch to ...
Assurances and Certifications
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application/preapplication is true and
correct, the document has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the
applicant will comply with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarded.
Your typed name, in lieu of your signature represents your legal binding acceptance of the terms of
this application and your statement or the veracity of the representations made in this application.
The document has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant
will comply with the following:
1. Assurances
2. Ceri.iircdiionRegdrelilil Lobbying. i'jiaiiers;
and Drug -Free Workplace reou,irements.
If you are an applicant for any Violence Against Women grants, this includes the Certification of
Compliance with the Statutory Eligibility Requirements of the Violence Against Women Act,
*Prefix
Mr.
Name Prefix:(Other)
*First Name
Carlos
Middle Initial (if any)
*Last Name
Migoya
Suffix
Name Suffix:(Other)
*Title
City Manager
=Address Line 1
400 NW 2nd Avenue
Address Line 2
Budget Unit
*City
Miami
County
Miami -Dade
*State
Florida
Zip Code
33128-
s=Phone
305-250-5400 Ext :
Fax
305-250-5410
*E-mail
cmi.oya Wrniamigov.com
F I have examined the information provided here regarding the signing
authority and certify it is accurate, I am the signing authority, or have been
delegated or designated formally as the signing authority by the appropriate
authority of official, to provide the information requested throughout this
application system on behalf of this jurisdiction, Information regarding the
signing authority, or the delegation of such authority, has been placed in a file
and is available on -site for immediate review.
.. pntinue jj
ttps://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmsexternal/applicationAssurance. do
9/15/201 0
rre
FY201D Paul Coverdeti Forensic Science improvement Grants Progra
2010-97752-FL-CO
Application
2.evietry 5F-424 Pript Copv
Application Handbook
Overview
Aoplicant
nforrnation
.triformation
Budinetanct
fa
Attachrrigrits
Assurances an
Certifications
Re‘±i±ew SF 424
Submit Application
2tbiTrecutintiv Aske
JeStiOnS
Horne
f.:orresocindence
APPLICATION FOR
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
PE OF SUF3MISSION
Application Nor-Cortstuction
5.APPLICANT INFORMATION
r4arne
i PoUc
4 0 NW end Avenue
Miami, Florida
8-176
e
fs
. DATE SUBMITTED
y 17, 2010
. DATE RECEIVED
tb
Applicant Identifier
Y STATE State Application Identifier
4, DATE RECEIVED BY
FEDERAL AGENCY
PLOVER IDENTIFICATION NUMB
960937
TYPE OF APPLICATION
(EIN)
, CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASS/STANCE
MBER: 16.742
CFDA
TITLE:
PauCoverdeli Forensic Sciences Improvement Grant
Program
12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT
at' of Marnl, Florida
FederaJ Identifier
Organizationai Unit
City o
am Police Department
Name and telephone number of t
person to be contacted on matters
involving this application
onzalez., Maria
OS) 603-6201
TYPE OF ARP ICANT
ip
NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY
ional institute of JuStice
11.. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF
APPLICANT'S PROJECT
Reduction of current backlog, of atent
paVnlfingerprint evidence and curt.(( future
tack;og of said evidence.
L. PROPOSED PROJECT
Star,: Date October 01, 2010
nj Date: September 30, 2011.
. ESTIMATED FUNDING
Federal
Appkant
State
'-oca;
[)ther
ProgramnCO
T
14. CONGRESS NAL DISTRICTS OF
-1$150,050
$0
a.
Appitcanl
b. Pro)ect FL17 FLI8 FL20 FL21
16, IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO
—1 REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER.
12372 PROCESS?
Program has not been selected by state or
revievi.
17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT
ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?
://grantS.0jp.usctoj.govigrnsextemaita .phcat' nReview.do
9/1512010
TOTAL
$ 150,050
N
1B. TO THE BEST OF TRY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION PREAPPLICATION
ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNING BODY OF
THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE
ASSISTANCE IS REQUIRED.