Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR LAND USE CHANGE REQUEST Approximately 3667 NW FLAGLER TER, 61 NW 37 AV & 58 NW 36 CT Application No. 09-08 File ID 07-010241u1 REQUEST The proposal is for a change to the 2020 Future Land Use Map of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan from "Duplex Residential" to "Restricted Commercial". (A complete legal description is on file at the Hearing Boards Office). FUTURE LAND USE Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) Policy LU-I.6.1 established future land use categories according to the 2020 Future Land Use Plan Map and the "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map." Duplex Residential: Areas designated as "Duplex Residential" allow residential structures of up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, subject to the de- tailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency manage- ment requirements. Community based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correc- tional rehabilitation facilities) also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within duplex residential areas. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable locations within dup- lex residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s). Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Resi- dential" subject to the same limiting conditions and a finding by the Planning Director that the proposed site's proximity to other residentially zoned property makes it a logical extension or continuation of existing residential development and that adequate services and amenities exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents; any activity included in the "Office" designation as well as commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or en- tertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are simi- lar in nature to those uses described above, places of worship, and primary and secondary 1 schools. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as per- missible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.72 times the gross lot area of the subject property; such FAR may be increased upon compliance with the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed a total FAR of 3.0 times the gross lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in the Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center allows a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 10 times the gross lot area of the subject property. All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and ser- vices included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. DISCUSSION The subject area consists of three parcels comprising approximately 0.325 acres. The parcels are located within the block bounded by NW Nagler Terrace to the south, NW 37 Avenue to the west, NW 1st Street to the north and NW 36 Court to the east. The site is currently designated "Duplex Residential". Surrounding the subject site is also "Duplex Residential" land use to the north, south and east. To the west the designation is "Restricted Commercial". The subject site is in the West Flagler NET area. ANALYSIS The Planning Department is recommending DENIAL of the application as presented based on the following findings: • The parcels are part of a duplex residential designated area. • There is an existing grand fathered structure at 61 NW 37 Avenue that include the most western of the subject lots designated "Duplex -Residential" that should be changed. • The requested change will represent an intrusion of commercial uses into a duplex residential neighborhood. • A land use change at this location may set a negative precedent and create a "domino effect" in regards to future land use change applications. • The "Duplex Residential" land use category allows residential structures to a maximum den- sity of 18 dwelling units per acre respectively. The requested "Restricted Commercial " de- signation allows to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" or to 150 dwelling units per acre. This potential increase in residential density will be out of scale with the established neighborhood. • MCNP Land Use Goal LU- I (1) encourages a land use pattern that protects and enhances the quality of life in the city's residential neighborhoods, and (5) promotes the efficient use of land and minimizes land use conflicts. A change to Restricted Commercial is not a logical extension of that category. 2 • MCNP Land Use Policy LU-1.1.3 (1) provides for the protection of all areas of the city from the encroachment of incompatible land uses; and (2) the adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public health and safety. • MCNP Housing Policy HO-1.1.7, states the City will continue to control, through restrictions in the City's development regulations, large scale and/or intense commercial and industrial land development which may negatively impact any residential neighborhood. • MCNP Housing Policy HO-1.1.8 states that through land development regulations, the City will protect and enhance existing viable neighborhoods in those areas suitable for housing. • MCNP Land Use Policy 1.1.1 provides that new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards adopted in the Capital Improvement Element. These findings support the position that the Future Land Use Map at this location should not be changed. 3 Proposal No 09-08 Date: 9/2/2009 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LAND USE MAP WITHIN A TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AMENDMENT INFORMATION CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Applicant Javier Avillo, Esquire on behalf of Hasred Inc„ a Florida Corporation Address: 3667 NW FLAGLER TER, 58 NW 36 CT & 61 NW 37 AV Boundary Streets: North: NW 1 ST East: South: NW FLAGLER TER West: Proposed Change: From: Duplex Residential To: Restricted Commercial Existing Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 0.3250 acres @ 18 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Other sq.ft. @ FAR Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Other Proposed Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 0.3250 acres @ 150 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Other sq,ft. @ FAR Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Other Net Increment With Proposed Change: Population Dwelling Units Peak Hour Person -Trips NW 36 CT NW 37 AV 6 DU's 5 0 sq.ft. 49 DU's 26 0 sq.ft, 0 110 43 21 Planning District WEST FLAGLER County Wastewater Collection Zone 315 Drainage Subcatchment Basin N1 Solid Waste Collection Route 120 Transportation Corridor Name NW 37 AV RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Population Increment, Residents 110 Space Requirement, acres 0.14 Excess Capacity Before Change 182.80 Excess Capacity After Change 182.66 Concurrency Checkoff OK POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents Transmission Requirement, gpd Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 110 24,697 >2% above demand >2% above demand OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents 110 Transmission Requirement, gpd 20,397 Excess Capacity Before Change See Note 1. Excess Capacity After Change See Note 1. Concurrency Checkoff WASA Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration System Before Change Exfiltration System After Change Concurrency Checkoff On -site On -site OK RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Land Use Goal LU-1 Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Land Use Policy 1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 a - g (See attachment 1) SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Population Increment, Residents Solid Waste Generation, tons/year Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 110 141 800 659 OK TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Population Increment, Residents Peak -Hour Person -Trip Generation LOS Before Change LOS After Change Concurrency Checkoff 110 21 B B OK NOTES: 1. Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Metro Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department (WASA). Excess capacity, If any, Is currently not known. Restricted Commercial Allow residential uses feuded rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to 'High Density Multifamily Residential' subject to the same limiting conditions and a finding by the Planning Director that the proposed site's proximity to other residentially zoned property makes it a logical extension or continuation desisting residential development and the adenualed services and amenities exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents:transito y residential facilities such as hotel and motels; general office use; dint* and laboratories; as well as commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, and often located along arterial or collector roadway, which Include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment fncllilies, private clubas and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature of those uses described above, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places or workship, and primary and secondary. schools, This category also Includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. Allow a maximum lot floor ratio FLRI of 7.n times the net lot area of the su ject Property: such FLR m Jy be Incre ased upon compliance With the detail Provisions of the applicable land development regulations:however. FLR may not exceed a total FLR of 11 D times the net lot area of the sublect propeity. Properties designated as Restricted Commercial in the Urban Central Business District and Buenavlsta Morris regional Activity Center allow a maximum floor area lot ratio (FLRI of 37.0 times the net lot area of (he sublect Properly CM_1 IN 03/13/90 ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMENTS Population increment Is assumed to be all new residents. Peak -period trip generation is based on ITE Trip Generation, 5th Edition at 1.4 ppv average occupancy for private passenger vehicles. Transportation Corridor capacities and LOS are from Table PT-2(R1), Transportation Corridors report. Potable water and wastewater transmission capacities are in accordance with Metro -Dade County stated capacities and are assumed correct. Service connections to water and sewer mains are assumed to be of adequate size; if not, new connections are to be installed at owners expense. Recreation/Open Space acreage requirements are assumed with proposed change made,