HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 07-0002
Monday, January 08, 2007
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE VARIANCE AS
LISTED IN ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, TO ALLOW AN INCREASED IN
HEIGHT ELEVATION, PROPOSED 33'0", ALLOWED 25'0", WAIVED 8°0", FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1260 SOUTH VENETIAN WAY,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS
OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
THIS VARIANCE WAS GRANTED PER PLANS ON FILE WITH A TIME LIMITATION
OF TWELVE MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Miguel Gabela,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Ron Cordon No
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr, Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta No
Ms. Chloe Keidaish Away
Mr, Juvenal A. Pina No
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 4
NAY: 3
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms, Fernandez: Motion carries 4-3
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-01844v Z.4
Exhibit "A„
Legal Description
Survey of Lots 5 and 6, of Block 4, of "SAN IARCD", according to the Plat thereof as
recorded in .'Plat Book 9, at Page 21, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County,
Florida.
Motion:
Zoning Board Action on Petition for Variance
at the request on agenda item # be denied)
in that the requirements of Section 1903.1 were) were
fied by relevant evidence in the record public
hearing.
gas stated in the City's finds or fact, or
b) -as demonstrated by the petitioner, -or
on the basis of the following:
The Zoning Board shall make findings that all of the requirements and standards
of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been) demonstrated.
Circle appropriate condition(s):
a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do not exist),
which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and
which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in
the same zoning district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
b) The special conditions and circumstances (do) (do not) result
from the actions of the petitioner
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of zoning ordinance
(would) (would not) deprive the applicant of rights commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the
terms of the zoning ordinance and work unnecessary and undue
hardships on the petitioner
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
d) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same
treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other -lands,
buildings or structures in the same zoning district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
e) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same
treatment, any special privilege that is denied by the zoning
ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning
district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
f) If granted, the variance (will be) (will not be) in harmony with the
general intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance and will not be
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public
welfare
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
Date