HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Resoami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 07-01O4
Monday, November 19, 2007
Mr, Miguel A, Gabela offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO,
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED DENIAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION
TO AMEND PAGE NO. 33, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO C-1
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 58-64-66-70 NORTHWEST 36TH COURT, 3665-69-71-73
NORTHWEST FLAGLER TERRACE AND 3670-72 NORTHWEST 1ST STREET,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS
OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Angel Urquiola,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin Yes
Mr. Ron Cordon Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Away
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Away
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez Away
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Away
Mr. Cornelius Shiver Away
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 5
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 5
Ms, Fernandez: Motion carries 5-0
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive,retary
Hearing Boards
File 1D##: 07-01024zc
Z.1
Exhibit A
Legal E)escription
Lots 9 through 20. Bock 9 of "-Nielfth Street Manors" according to The Pat
thereof as recorded n pat Book 5, Page 59 of the Pub!ic Records of Miarni-Da
County, Honda.
Circe i,ppropri
When pertaining ic the IC2 Orlilig Oi land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation ol the -Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not,
a) The proposed change conforms wth the adopted fvliami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change isri harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
0 Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
0 The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing c(assification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification_
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No, 11000,
request on agenda item Ai I be recommended to the City Commission for (approval)
move that the
ignaure/
Print Name
Agenda Item Dale