Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAR Presentation 2-28Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan EAR -Based Amendments Presented by: The City of Miami Planning Department Presentation Overview ci; Jlllpief TI J\I P] in PViment; AFH. H err — 200 Trl�rlCi rnent P!JbiJ�� DLitr1ci/inpLit Introduction Comprehensive Planning What do you envision for your City's future Economic Prosperity Compatible Land -Use Adapt to Change Strong Communities Sufficient Public Benefh Introduction Comprehensive Planning..... Comprehensive planning assembles Goals, Objectives and Policies to address the constant change and evolution of a community. Comprehensive plans are prepared to address compatibility issues between various: uses of land management and preservation of natural resources identification and preservation of historically significant areas adequate planning for infrastructure needs. Introduction Population Growth and Demographics 2,400,000 2,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 900,000 600,000 300,000 n City of M iam i • Miami -Dade County Source: U.S. Census Bureau & Miami -Dade County Planning and Zoning Department 334,859 1,267,792 346,865 1,625,781 2,400,000 2,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 900,000 600,000 300,000 11 City of Miam i • Miami -Dade County 362,470 2,253,485 358,548 1,967,000 364,001 2,283,319 362,470 2,253,485 366,496 2,313,047 372,920 2,342,739 f . : f et I. 1 County vs. City of Miami Growth •Land use density and intensity •Provision of Public Services •Planning for infrastructure needs 379,550 2,372,418 386,882 2,402,105 11111 Rate of Growth Miami-DadePM' Miami City of Countydi Miami 11970-1980 1 28.24%4, 3.59% 11980-1990 , 19.15% 1 3.37% 11990-2000 I 16.33% I 1.09% 2000-2006 IP 7.66% 1111 11.01% 404,048 2,431,819 1 2000-2001 1.32% 12001-2002 ,30% 12002-2003 .28% 12003-2004 I 1.27% 12004-2005 I 1.25% 12005-2006 / 1.24% 0.42% 0.69% 1.75% 1.78% 1.93% 4.44% Introduction rojected Population Growth Rate of Growth U Miami-Dad/I City of County Miami 2007-2010 3.64°/Thn 3.52% 2010-2015 5.95M 5.67° 2015-2020 5.74= 5.94' 2020-2025 5.65 5.61 Source: U.S. Census Bureau & Miami -Dade County Planning and Zoning Department 3,000,000 2,700,000 2,400,000 2,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 900,000 600,000 300,000 • City of Miami • Miami -Dade County 404,266 2,461,577 418,508 2,551,284 442,246 2,703,114 468,507 2,858,185 How shall we grow? /' . fiF Lek 494,769 3,019,785 Introduction Introduction Vacant Land Map 1.68 % Vacant • to Introduction Recent Infill Activity w uddinga CompIalad from 2002 Onward Approximately 1,018 buildings have been completed since 200 Y • INF rk • N r A IMP Introduction Future Land Use Map E rwow611.101 U114 Tvporli smrtio FM64 - Fahrledmii Ouckit - fbroarimat Illt4488 Nowrry glagitrpdy Pq401106061 RIO Donirir kturotkinity emu' Ylitra Itliantre1WW01, Public 1..115ewirwirriatc.reeed0n. god 'Mill IROWIrKbP4 Mi Conrail Eteplotis etiarki ▪ Oilftatia CaffAINitlit Intiwwetha ▪ eirgetrimrwallm ROCId&11611i 1134.111118 0,LS Yaldl Rwdiasal VW*/ amply Whim Csritea auwInrrim Milre InLicamile pap MUM* IHANNIO Talkitt Arta • MI UnlWac Maul - 568 trfe.,ai =Casa - 668 Utah.. law gahatIrara • Mc uwt!.....c foulbtau C JkV.r.t • )86 Imo., • : r ' 4 1 • J , t • J Introduction Percentage of Future Land Use designations Fixed Guideway, Rapid Transit, and Expressways 3% Industrial General Commercial 3% 5% Restricted Commercial 12% Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation, and Utilities 9% Office 2% High Density Multifamily Residential 2% Central Business District 1% Medium Density Multifamily Residential 11% Single Family Residential 27% Conservation Recreation 5% Duplex Residential 18% Introduction Commo the Comprehe • Is the Plan is made up of Land Development Regulations, Building Code, Code Enforcement, etc? • Can the plan only change/updated once every 7-years? • Is the MCNP is a sub -plan to other municipal documents? • Does the MCNP incorporate detailed housing development needs and guide federal grant programs? Introduction Outside comprehensive plan issues may be addressed in: Land Development Regulations -Zoning Ordinance - Proposed Miami 21 Design Standards, Development and Preservation Strategies - Master Plans (Parks and Public Space, Coconut Grove Waterfront, Virginia Key, etc.) Detailed Housing Plans and Implementation Programs - Consolidated Plan (Department of Community Development, HUD & State funding) Building Code - Official Florida State Code and National Building Standards Historic Preservation Regulations - Miami City Code Chapter 23 eting Appropriations - Capital Improvements Program (funding appropriated by City Commission) Code Enforcement - Miami Code of Ordinances Transportation Improvements - MPO Transportation Improvement Program (includes funded five year projects for FDOT, Turnpike, County, MDT, MDX, Tri-Rail and Municipalities) - MPO Long Range Transportation Plan to the Year 2030 (includes planned transportation projects prioritized by need for FDOT, Turnpike, County, MDT, MDX, Tri-Rail and Municipalities) Introduction for M +1 ,1[11, i-I�ria �d �1 ;i'4 Comprehensive Plan Organization Diagram: Planning Documents within the City of Miami EAR -Based Amendments Detailed Housing Program Budgeting Appropriation DCA Chapter163 Growth Management Act City Framework: Goals, Objectives, EAR and Policies Implementation of Framework Design Standards Land Development Regulations Historic Preservation Transportation Improvements Code Enforcement Presentation Overview r�r M` '-a ,�. fiF Lek • i n ro ! 1 itiori • EAF. P ` I Jrr — 00FJ • Ei-\F�-13-1J,w-r rnen� Tll �Tl r • Public; DLitr1ci/inpLit Miami's Comprehensive Plan Background Required by state law that guides the City's existing and future development. By Florida Statute 163, each city and county in Florida must adopt a comprehensive plan. Adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989 and contains amendments by the City Commission through March, 2006. • The state of Florida allows the plan to be amended twice - a -year, separate from statutory amendments, emergency situations, and minor land use changes. Miami's Comprehensive Plan What does the plan do? • Indicates how the City will meet the needs of existing and future: — Residents — Visitors — Businesses • Preserve the character and quality of its communities. How does the plan impact You? • As population grows, density and public services will increase to support existing and future communities. • The plan creates a policy framework that has the effect of law, to guide all public and private development decisions in the City. Presentation Overview Miami -Dade County PubIit; Scrirsrfls i ntrrjd uition • 1���l�llni ciornpreherrive KKari ]ffln.jr • EAF. Report — 2 0 J J i r rn erld rn en • Public; DLitr1ci/inpLit r3J. • _ 04, Elements Goals, Objectives and Policies Each element contains goals, objectives and policies to address how the city will meet existing and future needs for the residential and business communities. The elements in the MCNP are: Future Land Use Housing Sanitary and Storm Sewers Natural Ground Water Potable Water Solid Waste Collection Transportation Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities Parks, Recreation and Open Space Coastal Management Natural Resource Conservation Capital Improvements Intergovernmental Coordination Educational Elements Public School Facilities Element M;9m -Dace. Count'? st;rL:;s ` • In 2005, the State Legislature mandated school concurrency to be implemented through the comprehensive master plan (Chapter 163, F.S.). • School Concurrency assures that adequate public school facilities will be available concurrent with the impact of new development. • Local governments must adopt a Public School Facilities Element and an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) between the County, City and School Board as part of the comprehensive development master plan. • The City of Miami adopted its School Concurrency Element and ILA on January 24, 2008. Presentation Overview 2005 EVALUAI I(.»J AYPRAi)AI klUUH'I M1AMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN • j ntrrjd L 1itIJn i\ik-11111' Girnpreh nEJv Mar) riernefit Ei-\F jed• PAR-3-1E;erl r 111eT1d rnentr _; • Public; DLitr1ci/inpLit EAR Report - 2006 What is the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)? • The Report will evaluate how successful the MCNP is in addressing major community land use planning issues • State law requires that every 7-years, each city and county complete a report for their comprehensive plans 2005 EVALUATION- --APPRAISAL REPORT " MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN tilt iod 4" a. EAR Report - 2006 4 Major issues identified • The need for, and Impacts of, Equitable Redevelopment and Development • Preservation and Enhancement of Natural, Historic, Archeological and Recreational Resources • Neighborhood Integrity • Transportation Recommendations that address the 4 major issues are: • Gathered through public outreach. • Applied to the MCNP through the EAR -Based Amendment Process. Presentation Overview • j ntrrjd L ]itiJn 1\iil�lrnl' c�irnpr�h n iv PJ�in • EAF. 00e3 • Public; DLitr1ci/inpLi EAR -Based Amendments What are the EAR -Based Amendments? • Each city and county must amend its comprehensive plan to address the issues identified in its EAR report. — Review original recommendations and modify the goals, objectives, and polices. • The city must seek more public outreach — Identify that changes will be made based on the recommendations and include additional modifications to the MCNP. • State Mandated Amendments — New State statutory requirements that will impact the MCNP will be included along with the recommended amendments. • State law requires this process to be completed by August 2008 Amended Elements of the MCNP • Future Land Use • Housing • Sanitary and Storm Sewer • Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge • Potable Water • Solid Waste Collection • Transportation • Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities • Parks, Recreation, and Open Space • Coastal Management • Natural Resource Conservation • Capital Improvements • Intergovernmental Coordination Future Land Use Element • Create well -designed, mixed -use neighborhoods — Consistent with neighborhood character, function and history — Opportunity for multi -modal tran — Implemented through land deve (Miami 21) • Enhance existing strategies — Prevent unacceptable infrastruc — Prevent encroachment of incom — Create appropriate height and — Prevent degradation of open sp: ecology portation opment regulations ure levels of service patible uses ass transitions ce, environment and Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element Miami Parks Completely reworked based on the Miami Parks and Public Spaces Plan adopted May 2007 by the City Commission Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element • More urban • More natural • More connected Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element • New access -based and funding -based Level of Service measures: — Park within '/2 mile of every resident with future 1/4 mile goal — $100 per capita funding i!f Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element i- Highlights No net loss of park land Enhancement of existing parks, facilities and programs Park land acquisition according to community priorities Increased public access by pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled persons Increased visual and physical access to waterfront areas Expansion of greenways and trails Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element Highlights Shared resources with other agencies, groups Improved efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability Additional funding, including impact fees, developer contributions, public benefits for density bonuses, grants, volunteer contributions, philanthropy Enhanced community participation in park and recreation policy and planning Annual reports on implementation of the parks master plan Housing • Clarify that the Comprehensive Policies address the needs of the very -low and low-income groups • Require that the progress being made toward meeting the goals of the Consolidated Plan be publicly reviewed on a periodic basis • Consider an economic element that would among other issues address the issue of economic disparity that underlies the need for affordable housing • Transportation Element • Further clarification of the Adopted LOS Standards • Enforcement of the Transportation Control Measures Ordinance • Coordination with MDT on the expansion of the bus transit system • Coordination with MDT to improve connections between transit modes • Coordination with FDOT to ensure that transportation improvements minimize the intrusion of commuter traffic on residential streets • Provision of design guidelines for development in existing and planned transit corridors to promote pedestrianism and transit usage through improved connectivity and transit infrastructure 400 • t Capital Improvements Element • Specifies that development orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon the availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards for sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, parks and recreation and transportation facilities • Specifies that land use map changes must maintain the financial feasibility of the MCNP • ror Presentation Overview I r Y F M C_ A M I NETrir U ENENT TEAM j ntrrjd L 1itIJn 1���l�lllll' Griffipre'rlerlE;17e P]EiTn ri ell] Tlr rEJL\H, FH �;� J r r 2Jr J Ei-\F-13-l�-r Tll �Tl� Tll �Tlr Public Outreach Appointed Committee Group • The City's public participation process was "kicked -off' with a committee group established by community representatives identified by our City Commissioners who are aware of current neighborhood issues. • Each member was given the opportunity to: — Provide review and comment on proposed outreach program. — Provide review and comment on proposed DRAFT MCNP amendments. — Identify effective methods for public outreach in their communities. Public Outreach Committee Meeting HigIUts Meeting 1 — November 1, 2007 • Introduction • Indicate tasks by City/consultants • EAR process/background • Committee role identified Meeting 2 — January 8, 2008 • Statute Issues -New State Statute updates -DCA August 2008 Deadline • Response to MNU suggestions to MCNP • Outreach Timeline / NET Meetings Meeting 3 — February 1, 2008 • Specific changes to DRAFT discussion • Current Capital Improvement Plan • City Public Hearing schedule Public Outreach • January 2008 — Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) Meetings January 29, 2008 District 1 (Flagami) January 30, 2008 District 4 (Flagami) January 31, 2008 District 2 (Upper Eastside) • February 2008 — Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) Meetings February 4, 2008 District 3 (Coral Way) February 5, 2008 District 4 (West Flagler) February 6, 2008 District 2 (S/W Coconut Grove) February 7, 2008 District 3 (Little Havana) February 11, 2008 District 5 (Overtown) February 12, 2008 District 5 (Model City) February 13, 2008 District 1 (Allapattah) • March 2008 — Planning Advisory Board (PAB) March 5, 2008 PAB Workshop March 19, 2008 PAB Meeting • April 2008 — City Commission April 24, 2008 DCA Transmittal Hearing • July 2008 (Tentative) — City Commission July 24, 2008 (Tentative) EAR -Based Amendments Adoption Hearing Public Input Policy LU-1.1.11: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia Key, Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay, that have a land use and zoning classification of Conservation, as shown on "Attachment A," as an Urban Infill Area pursuant to Miami -Dade County's designation of an Urban Infill Area Tying generally east of the Palmetto Expressway and including all of the City of Miami. Areas designated Single -Family — Residential on the MCNP Future Land Use Map within the Urban Infill Area shall be protected from changes that permit higher density residential uses and from commercial, office and industrial uses within those areas, in order to preserve the Tow density residential character of these areas. Redevelopment of corridors adjacent to these areas shall be encouraged to be located primarily at major intersections of commercial corridors. Within this area, Outside of these residential areas, the concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity shall be emphasized with the goals of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and the viability of commercial areas. Priority► will be given to infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and structures, and the redevelopment of substandard sites. Maintenance of transportation levels of service within this designated Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency Exception Area shall be in accordance with the adopted Transportation Corridors level of service standards and the City of Miami Person -Trip Methodology as set forth in Policies TR-1.1.2 and 1.1.3 of the Transportation Element of the MCNP. Public Input f of re r • 41111. ' .� fiF Nk. Policy TR-1.1.1: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia Key, Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay that have a land use and zoning classification of Conservation, as an Urban Infill Area pursuant to Miami - Dade County's designation of an Urban Infill Area Tying generally east of the Palmetto Expressway and including all of the City of Miami. Areas designated Single -Family — Residential on the MCNP Future Land Use Map within the Urban Infill Area shall be protected from changes that permit higher density residential uses and from commercial, office and industrial uses within those areas, in order to preserve the low density residential character of these areas. Redevelopment of corridors adjacent to these areas shall be encouraged to be located primarily at major intersections of commercial corridors. Within this area, Outside of these residential areas, the concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity shall be emphasized with the goals of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and the viability of commercial areas. Priority will be given to infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and structures, and the redevelopment of substandard sites. Maintenance of transportation levels of service within this designated Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency Exception Area shall be in accordance with the adopted Transportation Corridors level of service standards and the City of Miami Person -Trip Methodology as set forth in Policies TR-1.1.2 and TR- 1.1.3 of the Trans * ortation Element of the MCNP. See Land Use Polic LU-1.1.11 Public Input Parks and Environment • General need for more parks and green space • Promote green buildings • Provide incentives for hybrid vehicles • Need improved tree canopy • Existing parks are not accessible to residents • Create buffers around parks • Need more youth -oriented facilities • Public Input ,Lransportation Poor public transportation system Reemphasize need for a transit hub in Liberty City Funding increased for transportation, but never applied Traffic lights at entrances to 1-95 on NW 7th Ave. will cause queuing Water taxis — include cross-reference between ports and transportation Public Input Land Use • Need better historic and neighborhood preservation • Need height restrictions next to single-family residential • Single-family neighborhoods need to have a buffer around them • All of the city should not be a TCEA/Urban Infill area • Cumulative impacts of development of 72 acres not accounted for • Create low-rise office category • Restricted Commercial category can be translated into high-rises { Public Input Housing and Economics • Need more emphasis on affordable housing • Need more job creation and workforce training Public Input Intergovernmental Coordination Poor communication with residents and lack of citizen outreach MCNP has good ideas that are not being implemented Goals, objectives, and policies must be measurable and implemented Public Input O..... '-a �.... fetLV4. Other Concerns • Language needs to be much more specific • Incorporate a homelessness strategy into the MCNP and a time frame to develop it • Schools are overcrowded — where will new schools go? • Need walkway honoring African American heritage on NW 12th Ave. between NW 62nd St. and NW 67th St. • FEC corridor and sidings should be put to better use Web site Links • Miami Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan: htto://www.miamioarksolan.com • Miami 21: http://www.miami2l .org • Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) and EAR -Based Amendments DRAFT document: htto://www. miamiaov.com/Plannina The End