HomeMy WebLinkAboutEAR Presentation 2-28Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
EAR -Based Amendments
Presented by:
The City of Miami
Planning Department
Presentation Overview
ci; Jlllpief TI J\I P] in
PViment;
AFH. H err — 200
Trl�rlCi rnent
P!JbiJ�� DLitr1ci/inpLit
Introduction
Comprehensive Planning
What do you envision for your City's future
Economic Prosperity
Compatible Land -Use
Adapt to Change
Strong Communities
Sufficient Public Benefh
Introduction
Comprehensive Planning.....
Comprehensive planning assembles Goals, Objectives and
Policies to address the constant change and evolution of a
community.
Comprehensive plans are prepared to address compatibility
issues between various:
uses of land
management and preservation of natural resources
identification and preservation of historically significant areas
adequate planning for infrastructure needs.
Introduction
Population Growth and Demographics
2,400,000
2,100,000
1,800,000
1,500,000
1,200,000
900,000
600,000
300,000
n City of M iam i
• Miami -Dade County
Source: U.S. Census Bureau &
Miami -Dade County
Planning and Zoning Department
334,859
1,267,792
346,865
1,625,781
2,400,000
2,100,000
1,800,000
1,500,000
1,200,000
900,000
600,000
300,000
11 City of Miam i
• Miami -Dade County
362,470
2,253,485
358,548
1,967,000
364,001
2,283,319
362,470
2,253,485
366,496
2,313,047
372,920
2,342,739
f
. :
f et I. 1
County vs. City of Miami Growth
•Land use density and intensity
•Provision of Public Services
•Planning for infrastructure needs
379,550
2,372,418
386,882
2,402,105
11111 Rate of Growth
Miami-DadePM' Miami City of
Countydi Miami
11970-1980 1 28.24%4, 3.59%
11980-1990 , 19.15% 1 3.37%
11990-2000 I 16.33% I 1.09%
2000-2006 IP 7.66% 1111 11.01%
404,048
2,431,819
1 2000-2001 1.32%
12001-2002 ,30%
12002-2003 .28%
12003-2004 I 1.27%
12004-2005 I 1.25%
12005-2006 / 1.24%
0.42%
0.69%
1.75%
1.78%
1.93%
4.44%
Introduction
rojected Population Growth
Rate of Growth
U
Miami-Dad/I City of
County Miami
2007-2010 3.64°/Thn 3.52%
2010-2015 5.95M 5.67°
2015-2020 5.74= 5.94'
2020-2025 5.65 5.61
Source: U.S. Census Bureau &
Miami -Dade County Planning and Zoning Department
3,000,000
2,700,000
2,400,000
2,100,000
1,800,000
1,500,000
1,200,000
900,000
600,000
300,000
• City of Miami
• Miami -Dade County
404,266
2,461,577
418,508
2,551,284
442,246
2,703,114
468,507
2,858,185
How shall we grow?
/' .
fiF Lek
494,769
3,019,785
Introduction
Introduction
Vacant Land Map
1.68 % Vacant
•
to
Introduction
Recent Infill Activity
w
uddinga CompIalad from 2002 Onward
Approximately 1,018 buildings
have been completed since 200
Y
•
INF
rk
• N
r
A
IMP
Introduction
Future Land Use Map
E
rwow611.101 U114 Tvporli
smrtio FM64 - Fahrledmii
Ouckit - fbroarimat
Illt4488 Nowrry glagitrpdy Pq401106061
RIO Donirir kturotkinity
emu'
Ylitra Itliantre1WW01, Public 1..115ewirwirriatc.reeed0n. god 'Mill
IROWIrKbP4
Mi Conrail Eteplotis etiarki
▪ Oilftatia CaffAINitlit
Intiwwetha
▪ eirgetrimrwallm
ROCId&11611i
1134.111118 0,LS Yaldl Rwdiasal VW*/ amply
Whim Csritea auwInrrim Milre
InLicamile pap
MUM* IHANNIO Talkitt Arta • MI UnlWac
Maul - 568 trfe.,ai
=Casa - 668 Utah..
law gahatIrara • Mc uwt!.....c
foulbtau C JkV.r.t • )86 Imo.,
•
:
r
'
4
1 •
J
, t
•
J
Introduction
Percentage of Future Land Use designations
Fixed Guideway,
Rapid Transit, and
Expressways
3%
Industrial
General Commercial 3%
5%
Restricted
Commercial
12%
Major Institutional,
Public Facilities,
Transportation, and
Utilities
9%
Office
2%
High Density
Multifamily Residential
2%
Central Business
District
1%
Medium Density
Multifamily Residential
11%
Single Family
Residential
27%
Conservation
Recreation
5%
Duplex Residential
18%
Introduction
Commo
the Comprehe
• Is the Plan is made up of Land Development Regulations,
Building Code, Code Enforcement, etc?
• Can the plan only change/updated once every 7-years?
• Is the MCNP is a sub -plan to other municipal documents?
• Does the MCNP incorporate detailed housing development
needs and guide federal grant programs?
Introduction
Outside comprehensive plan issues may be addressed in:
Land Development Regulations
-Zoning Ordinance
- Proposed Miami 21
Design Standards, Development and Preservation Strategies
- Master Plans (Parks and Public Space, Coconut Grove Waterfront, Virginia Key, etc.)
Detailed Housing Plans and Implementation Programs
- Consolidated Plan (Department of Community Development, HUD & State funding)
Building Code
- Official Florida State Code and National Building Standards
Historic Preservation Regulations
- Miami City Code Chapter 23
eting Appropriations
- Capital Improvements Program (funding appropriated by City Commission)
Code Enforcement
- Miami Code of Ordinances
Transportation Improvements
- MPO Transportation Improvement Program (includes funded five year projects for
FDOT, Turnpike, County, MDT, MDX, Tri-Rail and Municipalities)
- MPO Long Range Transportation Plan to the Year 2030 (includes planned
transportation projects prioritized by need for FDOT, Turnpike, County, MDT,
MDX, Tri-Rail and Municipalities)
Introduction
for
M +1
,1[11, i-I�ria
�d �1
;i'4
Comprehensive Plan
Organization Diagram:
Planning Documents
within the City of Miami
EAR -Based
Amendments
Detailed Housing
Program
Budgeting Appropriation
DCA
Chapter163
Growth Management Act
City Framework:
Goals, Objectives, EAR
and Policies
Implementation
of
Framework
Design Standards
Land Development
Regulations
Historic Preservation
Transportation Improvements Code Enforcement
Presentation Overview
r�r
M`
'-a ,�.
fiF Lek
• i n ro ! 1 itiori
• EAF. P ` I Jrr — 00FJ
• Ei-\F�-13-1J,w-r rnen� Tll �Tl r
• Public; DLitr1ci/inpLit
Miami's Comprehensive Plan
Background
Required by state law that guides the City's existing and
future development.
By Florida Statute 163, each city and county in Florida
must adopt a comprehensive plan.
Adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989 and
contains amendments by the City Commission through
March, 2006.
• The state of Florida allows the plan to be amended twice -
a -year, separate from statutory amendments, emergency
situations, and minor land use changes.
Miami's Comprehensive Plan
What does the plan do?
• Indicates how the City will meet the needs of existing
and future:
— Residents
— Visitors
— Businesses
• Preserve the character and quality of its communities.
How does the plan impact You?
• As population grows, density and public services will
increase to support existing and future communities.
• The plan creates a policy framework that has the effect
of law, to guide all public and private development
decisions in the City.
Presentation Overview
Miami -Dade County
PubIit; Scrirsrfls
i ntrrjd uition
• 1���l�llni ciornpreherrive KKari
]ffln.jr
• EAF. Report — 2 0 J J
i
r rn erld rn en
• Public; DLitr1ci/inpLit
r3J.
• _ 04,
Elements
Goals, Objectives and Policies
Each element contains goals, objectives and policies to address how the city will
meet existing and future needs for the residential and business communities.
The elements in the MCNP are:
Future Land Use Housing Sanitary and Storm Sewers
Natural Ground Water Potable Water Solid Waste Collection
Transportation Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Coastal Management Natural Resource Conservation Capital Improvements
Intergovernmental Coordination Educational
Elements
Public School Facilities Element
M;9m -Dace. Count'?
st;rL:;s `
• In 2005, the State Legislature mandated school concurrency to be implemented
through the comprehensive master plan (Chapter 163, F.S.).
• School Concurrency assures that adequate public school facilities will be available
concurrent with the impact of new development.
• Local governments must adopt a Public School Facilities Element and an Interlocal
Agreement (ILA) between the County, City and School Board as part of the
comprehensive development master plan.
• The City of Miami adopted its School Concurrency Element and ILA on January 24,
2008.
Presentation Overview
2005 EVALUAI I(.»J AYPRAi)AI klUUH'I
M1AMI COMPREHENSIVE
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
• j ntrrjd L 1itIJn
i\ik-11111' Girnpreh nEJv Mar)
riernefit
Ei-\F jed• PAR-3-1E;erl r 111eT1d rnentr
_;
• Public; DLitr1ci/inpLit
EAR Report - 2006
What is the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)?
• The Report will evaluate how successful the MCNP is in addressing
major community land use planning issues
• State law requires that every 7-years, each city and county complete
a report for their comprehensive plans
2005 EVALUATION- --APPRAISAL REPORT
" MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
tilt iod
4"
a.
EAR Report - 2006
4 Major issues identified
• The need for, and Impacts of, Equitable Redevelopment and
Development
• Preservation and Enhancement of Natural, Historic,
Archeological and Recreational Resources
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Transportation
Recommendations that address the 4 major issues are:
• Gathered through public outreach.
• Applied to the MCNP through the EAR -Based Amendment Process.
Presentation Overview
• j ntrrjd L ]itiJn
1\iil�lrnl' c�irnpr�h n iv PJ�in
• EAF. 00e3
• Public; DLitr1ci/inpLi
EAR -Based Amendments
What are the EAR -Based Amendments?
• Each city and county must amend its comprehensive plan to
address the issues identified in its EAR report.
— Review original recommendations and modify the goals, objectives, and
polices.
• The city must seek more public outreach
— Identify that changes will be made based on the recommendations and
include additional modifications to the MCNP.
• State Mandated Amendments
— New State statutory requirements that will impact the MCNP will be
included along with the recommended amendments.
• State law requires this process to be completed by August 2008
Amended Elements of the MCNP
• Future Land Use
• Housing
• Sanitary and Storm
Sewer
• Natural Groundwater
Aquifer Recharge
• Potable Water
• Solid Waste
Collection
• Transportation
• Ports, Aviation, and
Related Facilities
• Parks, Recreation,
and Open Space
• Coastal Management
• Natural Resource
Conservation
• Capital Improvements
• Intergovernmental
Coordination
Future Land Use Element
• Create well -designed, mixed -use neighborhoods
— Consistent with neighborhood character, function and
history
— Opportunity for multi -modal tran
— Implemented through land deve
(Miami 21)
• Enhance existing strategies
— Prevent unacceptable infrastruc
— Prevent encroachment of incom
— Create appropriate height and
— Prevent degradation of open sp:
ecology
portation
opment regulations
ure levels of service
patible uses
ass transitions
ce, environment and
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element
Miami Parks
Completely reworked
based on the Miami
Parks and Public
Spaces Plan adopted
May 2007 by the City
Commission
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element
• More urban
• More natural
• More connected
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element
• New access -based
and funding -based
Level of Service
measures:
— Park within '/2 mile of
every resident with
future 1/4 mile goal
— $100 per capita
funding
i!f
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element
i-
Highlights
No net loss of park land
Enhancement of existing parks,
facilities and programs
Park land acquisition according to
community priorities
Increased public access by
pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled
persons
Increased visual and physical
access to waterfront areas
Expansion of greenways and trails
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element
Highlights
Shared resources with other
agencies, groups
Improved efficiency, effectiveness
and sustainability
Additional funding, including
impact fees, developer
contributions, public benefits for
density bonuses, grants, volunteer
contributions, philanthropy
Enhanced community participation
in park and recreation policy and
planning
Annual reports on implementation
of the parks master plan
Housing
• Clarify that the Comprehensive Policies address the
needs of the very -low and low-income groups
• Require that the progress being made toward meeting
the goals of the Consolidated Plan be publicly reviewed
on a periodic basis
• Consider an economic element that would among other
issues address the issue of economic disparity that
underlies the need for affordable housing
•
Transportation Element
• Further clarification of the Adopted LOS Standards
• Enforcement of the Transportation Control Measures Ordinance
• Coordination with MDT on the expansion of the bus transit system
• Coordination with MDT to improve connections between transit modes
• Coordination with FDOT to ensure that transportation improvements
minimize the intrusion of commuter traffic on residential streets
• Provision of design guidelines for development in existing and planned
transit corridors to promote pedestrianism and transit usage through
improved connectivity and transit infrastructure
400
•
t
Capital Improvements Element
• Specifies that development orders authorizing new
development or redevelopment that results in an increase
in the density or intensity of land use shall be contingent
upon the availability of public facilities and services that
meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards for sanitary
sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, parks and
recreation and transportation facilities
• Specifies that land use map changes must maintain the
financial feasibility of the MCNP
•
ror
Presentation Overview
I r Y F M C_ A M I
NETrir
U ENENT TEAM
j ntrrjd L 1itIJn
1���l�lllll' Griffipre'rlerlE;17e P]EiTn
ri ell] Tlr
rEJL\H, FH �;� J r r
2Jr J
Ei-\F-13-l�-r Tll �Tl� Tll �Tlr
Public Outreach
Appointed Committee Group
• The City's public participation process was "kicked -off' with a committee
group established by community representatives identified by our City
Commissioners who are aware of current neighborhood issues.
• Each member was given the opportunity to:
— Provide review and comment on proposed outreach program.
— Provide review and comment on proposed DRAFT MCNP amendments.
— Identify effective methods for public outreach in their communities.
Public Outreach
Committee Meeting HigIUts
Meeting 1 — November 1, 2007
• Introduction
• Indicate tasks by City/consultants
• EAR process/background
• Committee role identified
Meeting 2 — January 8, 2008
• Statute Issues
-New State Statute updates
-DCA August 2008 Deadline
• Response to MNU suggestions to MCNP
• Outreach Timeline / NET Meetings
Meeting 3 — February 1, 2008
• Specific changes to DRAFT discussion
• Current Capital Improvement Plan
• City Public Hearing schedule
Public Outreach
• January 2008 — Neighborhood
Enforcement Team (NET) Meetings
January 29, 2008
District 1
(Flagami)
January 30, 2008
District 4
(Flagami)
January 31, 2008
District 2
(Upper Eastside)
• February 2008 — Neighborhood
Enforcement Team (NET) Meetings
February 4, 2008
District 3
(Coral Way)
February 5, 2008
District 4
(West Flagler)
February 6, 2008
District 2
(S/W Coconut Grove)
February 7, 2008
District 3
(Little Havana)
February 11, 2008
District 5
(Overtown)
February 12, 2008
District 5
(Model City)
February 13, 2008
District 1
(Allapattah)
• March 2008 — Planning Advisory Board
(PAB)
March 5, 2008
PAB Workshop
March 19, 2008
PAB Meeting
• April 2008 — City Commission
April 24, 2008
DCA Transmittal Hearing
• July 2008 (Tentative) — City Commission
July 24, 2008 (Tentative)
EAR -Based Amendments
Adoption Hearing
Public Input
Policy LU-1.1.11: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia
Key, Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay, that have a land use
and zoning classification of Conservation, as shown on "Attachment A," as an Urban
Infill Area pursuant to Miami -Dade County's designation of an Urban Infill Area Tying
generally east of the Palmetto Expressway and including all of the City of Miami.
Areas designated Single -Family — Residential on the MCNP Future Land Use Map
within the Urban Infill Area shall be protected from changes that permit higher density
residential uses and from commercial, office and industrial uses within those areas, in
order to preserve the Tow density residential character of these areas.
Redevelopment of corridors adjacent to these areas shall be encouraged to be
located primarily at major intersections of commercial corridors. Within this area,
Outside of these residential areas, the concentration and intensification of
development around centers of activity shall be emphasized with the goals of
enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and the viability of commercial
areas. Priority► will be given to infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of
underutilized land and structures, and the redevelopment of substandard sites.
Maintenance of transportation levels of service within this designated Urban Infill
Transportation Concurrency Exception Area shall be in accordance with the adopted
Transportation Corridors level of service standards and the City of Miami Person -Trip
Methodology as set forth in Policies TR-1.1.2 and 1.1.3 of the Transportation Element
of the MCNP.
Public Input
f of
re r
•
41111.
' .�
fiF Nk.
Policy TR-1.1.1: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia
Key, Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay that have a land use
and zoning classification of Conservation, as an Urban Infill Area pursuant to Miami -
Dade County's designation of an Urban Infill Area Tying generally east of the Palmetto
Expressway and including all of the City of Miami. Areas designated Single -Family —
Residential on the MCNP Future Land Use Map within the Urban Infill Area shall be
protected from changes that permit higher density residential uses and from
commercial, office and industrial uses within those areas, in order to preserve the low
density residential character of these areas. Redevelopment of corridors adjacent to
these areas shall be encouraged to be located primarily at major intersections of
commercial corridors. Within this area, Outside of these residential areas, the
concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity shall be
emphasized with the goals of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and
the viability of commercial areas. Priority will be given to infill development on vacant
parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and structures, and the redevelopment of
substandard sites. Maintenance of transportation levels of service within this
designated Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency Exception Area shall be in
accordance with the adopted Transportation Corridors level of service standards and
the City of Miami Person -Trip Methodology as set forth in Policies TR-1.1.2 and TR-
1.1.3 of the Trans * ortation Element of the MCNP. See Land Use Polic LU-1.1.11
Public Input
Parks and Environment
• General need for more parks and green space
• Promote green buildings
• Provide incentives for hybrid vehicles
• Need improved tree canopy
• Existing parks are not accessible to residents
• Create buffers around parks
• Need more youth -oriented facilities
•
Public Input
,Lransportation
Poor public transportation system
Reemphasize need for a transit hub in Liberty City
Funding increased for transportation, but never applied
Traffic lights at entrances to 1-95 on NW 7th Ave. will cause
queuing
Water taxis — include cross-reference between ports and
transportation
Public Input
Land Use
• Need better historic and neighborhood preservation
• Need height restrictions next to single-family residential
• Single-family neighborhoods need to have a buffer around them
• All of the city should not be a TCEA/Urban Infill area
• Cumulative impacts of development of 72 acres not accounted for
• Create low-rise office category
• Restricted Commercial category can be translated into high-rises
{
Public Input
Housing and Economics
• Need more emphasis on affordable housing
• Need more job creation and workforce training
Public Input
Intergovernmental Coordination
Poor communication with residents and lack of citizen outreach
MCNP has good ideas that are not being implemented
Goals, objectives, and policies must be measurable and
implemented
Public Input
O.....
'-a �....
fetLV4.
Other Concerns
• Language needs to be much more specific
• Incorporate a homelessness strategy into the MCNP and a time
frame to develop it
• Schools are overcrowded — where will new schools go?
• Need walkway honoring African American heritage on NW 12th
Ave. between NW 62nd St. and NW 67th St.
• FEC corridor and sidings should be put to better use
Web site Links
• Miami Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan:
htto://www.miamioarksolan.com
• Miami 21: http://www.miami2l .org
• Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
(MCNP) and EAR -Based Amendments DRAFT
document:
htto://www. miamiaov.com/Plannina
The End