HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Resoa onin oar
eso ution o.: 08-068
Monday, September 8, 2008
Mr, Angel Urqu o a offered the folic ing resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1305 FROM
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO
THE CITY COMMISSION TO AMEND PAGE NO. 35, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF
ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
WITH AN SD-19 DESIGNATED F.A.R. OVERLAY DISTRICT, F.A.R. OF 1.04, FOR
THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1007, 1019, 1027, 1033
SOUTHWEST 6TH STREET AND 1028 SOUTHWEST 5TH STREET, LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED).
Upon being seconded by Ms. lieana Hernandez -Acosta,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin Yes
Mr. Ron Cordon Away
Mr, Miguel A. Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Away
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Cornelius Shiver Away
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 6
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 3
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 6-0
Teresita . Fernandez, Executive eefetary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 08-00699zc
Z.5
EXMBIT A
bject Property Add7e5s) Leg& Descripton
1007 3.W I3 Street
Komi., Ft. 33130
1019503 37Stuerr
Miami, FL 3:3130
1027 SAN. 6 Street
Miami, FL 33130
1033 SM. 6th Street
nami, FL 33130
1028 S 03 5t1Street
Miami, FL 33130
Rev. 9C407
South 100 feet of I ot 17, Block .2F af"LAWRFNCE
FSTATF. LAND CO'S SUBDNISON" acoordinq •V.-,; the
Mat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Paso 45 ,df the
Public Necorio of Miami -Dade County, Florida
Lot 16, Bloc*. 25 of "LAvvRENcE ESTATE JND
$UBONISiON'l accordnd to the Plat Cnereof
as recored n Plat Boo0 2 at Page 46 of the
Putiic Records of fiiiavni-Dade County, Florida
Lot 16, Block 25 of -LAWRENCE ESTATE LAND
' : SU5DVlS0N according to the at there -of
as recorded t Piat Boos 2 at Page 46 of the
Public Records of Miami -Dade Courty, Horida
Lot 14, Block 25 of "LAWRENCE ESTATE LAND
CO'S SUBDIVISION" according to the Plat thereof
as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 46 of the
Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida
Lot 4, Block 25 of "LAWRENCE ESTATE LAND
CO'S SUBDIVISION" according to the Rat thereof
as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 46 of the
Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
p roprnateconditon(s).i
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered;
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) it is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, I move that the
request on a da item # recommendedyto the City/omission fo( (approval)' denial).
'�
f
Signature
Print Name
Agenda item
Date