Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSummary FormAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY FORM FILE ID: SP.1 Date: 5/15/2008 Requesting Department: City Manager's Office Commission Meeting Date:June 5 , 2 0 0 8 District Impacted: II Type: ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Emergency Ordinance Discussion Item ❑ Other Subject: Authorization to execute Second Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement among the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County, Midtown Miami Community Development District and the Midtown Miami Community Redevelopment Agency. Purpose of Item: A Resolution of the Miami City Commission, with attachment(s), authorizing the City Manager to execute a Second Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement, in substantially the attached form, between the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County, Midtown Miami Community Development District, and Midtown Miami Community Redevelopment Agency to amend section 3.3.1 of the Interlocal agreement. Background Information: Supplemental Page Attached Budget Impact Analysis Is this item related to revenue? Is this item an expenditure? If so, please identify funding source below. General Account No: Special Revenue Account No: CIP Project No: Is this item funded by Homeland Defense/Neighborhood Improvement Bonds? Start Up Capital Cost: Maintenance Cost: Total Fiscal Impact: CIP If using or receiving capital funds Grants Final Approvals (SIGN AND DATE) Budget Purchasing Risk Management Dept. Director Chief City Manage 51:7,„-ii-a Supplemental Page Background Information: The City of Miami ("City"), Miami -Dade County ("County") and Midtown Miami Community Development District ("District") entered into an Interlocal Agreement dated May 28, 2004. The Interlocal Agreement established among other things the obligations of the District in providing infrastructure improvements including but not limited to the Parking Garage Project ("Garage") and the intent to finance the Garage with proceeds from one or more series of Bonds. It also established conditions under which the City and County were required to make Economic Incentive Payments to the District and conditions under which the City and the County would cause a Community Redevelopment Agency to pay Tax Increment Revenues to the District. The revenues from both the Economic Incentive Payments and the Tax Increment Revenue were committed for making debt payments on the Bonds. These Economic Incentive Payments and/or Tax Increment Revenues were to be paid to the District based on development benchmarks (i.e. completion of mixed use and residential components by specified timeframes.) On June 30, 2005 the parties executed a first amendment to the Interlocal Agreement, which added the Midtown Miami Community Redevelopment Agency ("Agency") as a party to the Interlocal Agreement, released the City and County's obligation to contribute Economic Incentive Payments to the District as well as amended certain related provisions of the Interlocal Agreement Pursuant to Section 2 of the First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement, the Agency has collected Tax Increment Revenues and has not contributed that Tax Increment Revenue to the District. The City, the County, the District and the Agency now desire to amend the Interlocal Agreement and certain related provisions, so that the Tax Increment Revenues already generated can be released to the District.