HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoN a onin Naar
esolution o: 08=017
Monday, March 10, 2008
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION TO AMEND PAGE NO. 18, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE
NO, 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL TO
C-2 LIBERAL COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-19 DESIGNATED F.A.R. OVERLAY
DISTRICT, F.A.R. OF 2,1, FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY
3528, 3530 AND 3586 NORTHWEST 36TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Miguel Gabela,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin Away
Mr. Ron Cordon No
Mr. Miguel A. Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavagiia Yes
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta No
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pima No
Mr. Cornelius Shiver Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola No
AYE 5
NAY: 4
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 5-4
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File I D#: 08-00164zc Z.1
Exhibit
Ltgal Oescription
LoLs 0 through 20, Block 61 of MELROSE rriCIS 5 SEC [TON, according to the Plot
thercof $.s recorded u 11Book i 7 ai P.Ev,,w. 12, of the PLthlic Recocis of Miarni-Dadt
Count. Florida
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered;
where applicable; whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment,
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinan0e-Wo71-1-000.: I move that the
re,que-Ston agenda tern # be recommended to they Commission for (approva),1 (denial),
,..iignatU re
Agenda item
Date