HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANAL MS FOR ZONING CHANGE
3528, 3530, and 3586 NW 36th Street
CASE NO. 08-00164ze
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an
amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
The subject properties are located at 3528, 3530, and 3586 NW 36th Street (complete
legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office), from C-2 ".Liberal
Commercial" to C-2 "Liberal Commercial" with an SD-19 "Designated F.A.R.
Overlay District" with a 2.L
The following findings have been made:
• it is found that the SD-19 "Designated F.A.R. Overlay District" is a district that was
created as an instrument to modify (increase or decrease) the F.A.R. on specific
properties within the City.
• It is found the change of zoning to C-2 "Liberal Commercial" with an SD-19
"Designated F.A.R. Overlay District" with a 2.1 will set a negative precedent creating
a domino effect in regards to future zoning change applications in the area.
• It is found that the additional F.A.R. requested is not necessary to accommodate
reasonable development.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending denial of the
application as presented.
nalysis for
File ID: O8-00164zc
Yes No N/A.
[ a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment.
E 0 b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
Z (1 C d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood
or the city.
L
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density
pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities
such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.
�j f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
• g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change
necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the
neighborhood.
• i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not
affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the
existing classification.
I1 k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to
adjacent areas as the existing classification.
l) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the
adjacent area as the existing classification.
P m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accord with existing regulations.
P1
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as
to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the
protection of the public welfare.
7 o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited
under existing zoning.
j� p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.