HomeMy WebLinkAboutOverView Form1. DATE:
NAME
INITIATING
INITIATING
C.I.P.
RESOLUTION
DEPARTMENT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ciN un^. PROJECT OVERVIEW FORM
Ii P�
�.ya%)/
4/22/08 DISTRICT: 2
OF PROJECT: Barnyard Playground Area Resurfacing
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks & Recreation
CONTACT PERSON/CONTACT NUMBER: Ed Blanco (305) 416-1253
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Ola O. Aluko (305) 416-1280
NUMBER: CIP/PROJECT NUMBER: B-39910E
2. BUDGETARY
TOTAL
SOURCE
If grant
AMOUNT:
Are
Estimated
INFORMATION: Are funds budgeted? EYES ONO If yes,
DOLLAR AMOUNT: $60,000
OF FUNDS: District 2 Neighborhood Quality of Life Improvements
funded, is there a City match requirement? • YES • NO
EXPIRATION DATE:
matching funds budgeted? III YES II NO Account Code(s):
Operations and Maintenance Budget
3. SCOPE
Individuals
DESCRIPTION
OF PROJECT:
/ Departments who provided input:
OF PROJECT: Resurfacing of playground area.
ADA
Compliant? • YES • NO • N/A
Approved
Approved
Approved
Revisions
Time
by Audit Committee? '1 YES • NO • N/A DATE APPROVED:
4/15/08
by Bond Oversight Board? • YES ■ NO II N/A DATE APPROVED:
4/22/08
by Commission? • YES ■ NO ■ N/A DATE APPROVED:
to Original Scope? II YES ■ NO (If YES see Item 5 below)
Approval II 6 months • 12 months Date for next Oversight Board Update:
4. CONCEPTUAL
Has
DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
Is conceptual
If not,
Source(s)
COST ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN
a conceptual cost estimate been developed based upon the initial established scope? N YES
■ NO If yes,
COST:
COST:
estimate within project budget? • YES • NO
have additional funds been identified? ■ YES I NO
of additional funds:
Approved
Approved
by Commission? ■ YES 0 NO ❑ N/A DATE APPROVED:
by Bond Oversight Board? ■ YES ■ NO ■ N/A DATE APPROVED:
5. REVISIONS
Individuals
TO ORIGINAL SCOPE
/ Departments who provided input:
Justifications
for change:
Description
of change:
Fiscal
Have
Source(s)
Impact • YES ■ NO HOW MUCH?
additional funds been identified? • YES ■ NO
of additional funds:
Time
Approved
Approved
impact
by Commission? ■ YES ■ NO ■ N/A DATE APPROVED:
by Bond Oversight Board? • YES • NO II N/A DATE APPROVED:
6. COMMENTS:
APPROVAL:
BOND
DATE: 4/22/08
OVER GHT BOAR
Enclosures: Back -Up Materials j j YES LJ NO
1.
NAME
INITIATING
INITIATING
C.I.P.
RESOLUTION
DEPARTMENT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
xai '",, PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 ORM
=ja� b\.
r
ox�i-
DATE: 4/22/08 DISTRICT: 2
OF PROJECT: Armbrister Park Tennis Court Conversion
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks & Recreation
CONTACT PERSON/CONTACT NUMBER: Ed Blanco (305) 416-1253
DEPARTMENT CONTACT: Ola O. Aluko (305) 416-1280
NUMBER: CIP/PROJECT NUMBER: B-39910E
2.
TOTAL
SOURCE
If
AMOUNT:
Are
Estimated
BUDGETARY INFORMATION: Are funds budgeted? I, YES NINO If yes,
DOLLAR AMOUNT: $15 000
OF FUNDS: District 2 Neighborhood Quality of Life Improvements
grant funded, is there a City match requirement? • YES • NO
EXPIRATION DATE:
matching funds budgeted? • YES II NO Account Code(s):
Operations and Maintenance Budget
3.
Individuals
DESCRIPTION
SCOPE OF PROJECT:
/ Departments who provided input:
OF PROJECT: This project consists of reconverting the hockey courts in to tennis courts
ADA
Compliant? • YES II NO 1 N/A
Approved
Approved
Approved
Revisions
Time
by Audit Committee? III YES • NO • N/A DATE APPROVED:
by Bond Oversight Board? ■ YES • NO • N/A DATE APPROVED: 4/22/08
by Commission? • YES ■ NO 0 N/A DATE APPROVED:
to Original Scope? • YES • NO (If YES see Item 5 below)
Approval • 6 months • 12 months Date for next Oversight Board Update:
4.
Has
DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
Is
If
Source(s)
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE BREAKDOWN
a conceptual cost estimate been developed based upon the initial established scope? ■ YES ■ NO If yes,
COST:
COST:
conceptual estimate within project budget? • YES • NO
not, have additional funds been identified? ■ YES • NO
of additional funds:
Approved
Approved
by Commission? ■ YES ■ NO ■ N/A DATE APPROVED:
by Bond Oversight Board? ■ YES ■ NO • N/A DATE APPROVED:
5.
Individuals
REVISIONS TO ORIGINAL SCOPE
/ Departments who provided input:
Justifications
for change:
Description
of change:
Fiscal
Have
Source(s)
Impact • YES • NO HOW MUCH?
additional funds been identified? • YES • NO
of additional funds:
Time
Approved
Approved
impact
by Commission? ■ YES ■ NO • N/A DATE APPROVED:
by Bond Oversight Board? EYES • NO • N/A DATE APPROVED:
6.
COMMENTS:
1 1
APPROV
BOND
��
r ✓ - 4/22/08
' __. A I NA
O RSIGHT BOA ' D
Enclosures: Back -Up Materials PQ YES �„J NO