Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
III. Tab 2. Traffic Impact Analysis
7 . Medina, AICP `firer rclira Coordinator arni, /he City Manager/Transportation r4 A'JeSn1 D Floor; osida 33 — Phase Pt y r—Review # 187 Sub M -;went to our September le, 2007 review comments for the subject project, we have reoeNod forrreai responses from David Rummer and Associates inn• (DPA) dated October 15, December 12, and December 13, 2€307. The format response Includes revised paws to the traffic impact study and the vehicle maneuvering paths through the project Este, Noe the response indicates th delivery services for this .site will n.ct be using tractor trailers {MB) or single Lw t (SU) trucks, The developer has been granter an exception and will be using small vary for deliveries. Photocopy of CPA's responses ere attached herewith. At this ttrne, we conclude that the revised traffic report adeaquetAty addrosscas the traffic requirements and the report is found to be Sufficient. The traffic impeert study held Identified Transportation Control Meatuses (TCM) to reduce the auto trips generated by this development. The TCM plan recommends ioelowing strategies to reduce peek hour traffic: 1, Promote carpooling and ridesharing through South Florida Commuter Services Program; 2. Provide transit information at prominent public area tor the use of residents and patrons, when necessary the information will be updated at no less than six month intervals; 3. Promote transit use by encouraging employers/landlords to purchase transit passes and make them available to employees and residents at discounted prices or at no charge, or in lieu of subsidized parking; and 4. Encourage employers to implement staggered work schedules. Further, the developer is anticipating a minimum peak hour trip reduction of 10% and have oornmtttead to a performance monitor to track the trip reduction associated will the TCM program. The development approval or this site should be conditioned upon the Implementation of proposed TCMs and the motvtoring prograrn, Should you have any questions, please call me at 954.739, uthorn Sal Shan P.E, Se <r T . a neaer or. utitolinorV G4rnplsx 5100 NW 33rd Maws. Suitt 160 Fist D.udsrd00, FL 35ar}9.63T"h Tad: 4. 739.18aj, !L 064.?3etA749 Anacrura.nr Mr. Antonio S..1erwz Friannsir ri G?ry c War) Planning (Fax • 305.41& i 449; Mr.. ,PArl mnpinasa. P.E., PFA. (ln • 3Cif,444,4473e ) Revised W DPA Projec r • • 14101 • TA E F C TE T Pate Listof Exhibits...............................:..................................................................._...,.....,.....__......... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1,0 INTRODUCTION 11 1.2 Study Area 2 Study Objective 4 2m0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2.1 Data Collection 5 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics 5 2.1.2 Traffic Counts 6 2.1.3 Intersection Data 6 2.2 Corridor Capacity Analysis 9 2.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis 11 3.0 PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 13 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 14 4.1 Background Traffic 14 4.7 Committed Developments 14 4.3 Project Traffic 14 4.3.1 Project Trip Generation 14 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment 17 Future Corridor Capacity Analysis ? 1 4.4 4.5 4.6 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Site Access 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: 75 Approved Transportation Methodology & Site Plan Traffic Counts & Signal Timing FDOT's Quality/LOS Handbook — Generalized Tables Downtown Miami DRI Increment 11 Transit Ridership Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets Committed Development Information Traffic Control Measures Plan Page exhibit Location Map ......................... TSFEX ITS Page 2007 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.................................................................................7 3 Existing Lane Configurations .. ......... ......... ...o..........,........... ................... ................ n.,..........8 4 Existing Corridor and Transit Conditions,„_ .... „.,. ........... ........... ......... ..... ....... 10 Person -trip Volume and Capacity — Existing Conditions Matrix 12 6 2007 Intersection Capacity Analysis Results ....... .............. .......................... ,..... 1 i 7 Future Lane Configuration 15 8 Future PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes without Project 16 9 PM Peak Hour Project Trip Generation 18 10 Cardinal Distribution 19 11 PM Peak Hour Project Vehicular Trips Assignment 20 12 Person -trip Volume and Capacity -- Future Conditions Matrix 22 13 Project PM Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes 14 Future with project PM Peak Hour Vehicular Volumes ?el 15 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis 21 Page �. 87.5,70.1.'r P A:f f...%S'f' 1:Mraf! EXECUTIVE SU A Y The Biscay ae .bark Office project is a proposed mix6ed-use development located on the west side of Biscayne .Boulevard between !V 24 Street and NE 25 Street in Miami, Florida. The project consists of approximately 214 rental apartments, 16,795 SF of retail space, and 134,484 SF of office space, Access to the site will be facilitated by two, two-way driveways on NE 23 Street and two, two-way driveways on NE 24 Street. Build out of the project is anticipated by the year 2009. The subject site is located just outside the boundaries of the Downtown Miami Area -wide. DRL Existing and future traffic conditions for the project area corridors were established using the person -trip based corridor capacity method. This method, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, promotes improved transportation efficiency through increased private vehicle occupancies and makes mass transit a full partner in the urban transportation system. Analysis results show that the project area corridors are projected to operate within the established corridor threshold. The intersection capacity analysis was performed at the intersections under study using vehicular volumes and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Results of the future intersection analysis show that all intersections operate within the standard adopted by the city. zee f 111 0 1 ! ! ! 1.1 Study Area iti ns. For traffic analysis purposes, the study was performed for PM peak corAcl y zp o p area has been 10 T 0 UCTIO : e Biscayne .Park Office project is a proposed nixed -use development located on the w st side of Biscayne Boulevard between NE 24 Street and NE 23 Street in Miami, Florida. The project consists of approximately 214 rental apartments, 16,795 SF of retail space, and the additional 134,484 SF of office space. Access to the site will be facilitated by two, two-way driveways on NE 25 Street and two, two-way driveways on NE 24 Street. A Major Use Special Permit (MCS.P) traffic study thr the residential and retail portions of the project was already performed and approved in September 2004. Currently, the residential and retail portions are being constructed. A copy of the site plan is included in Appendix A. Budd out of the project is anticipated by the year 2009. The subject site is located .just outside the boundaries of the Downtown Miami Area -wide D.I. Consistent with the approved methodology for this project (see Appendix A) the traffic study defined as NE 36 Street to the north, NE 20 Street to the south, North Miami Avenue to the west, and Biscayne Boulevard to the east. Corridor capacity analysis was performed for Biscayne Boulevard and NE 20 Street, Intersection capacity analysis was performed for the following intersections: • NE 24 Street / Biscayne Boulevard • NE 25 Street / Biscayne Boulevard • NE 26 Street / Biscayne Boulevard ® NE 24 Street / NE 2 Avenue (North Side) 6 NE 24 Street / NE 2 Avenue {South Side) • NE 25 Street / NE 2 Avenue • NE 24 Street / NE 2 Court Page 2 ' ; L 1 kr IIiiT ! r r—TTF-1-7— PROJECt - SITE fi / 111 I 1 : ! € I T'ttt tt- r ,.. -. , v• • . ..... , , < ; < , ! I 1 -...-----.-.. L. , ; 1 ! ,. € --1-11--71 -r--- 1 , ' I . I 1 I ' , , ,.„, , i 7 :- i 1 : =.-.. It ':-: : 1.--711:- IHT1-i 1 _ri I - . : L--ill :j„,L L_,, t_L I ---,,: '''' I 1 li : ! : i 1 ! 1 i_ -1,Lt ET ! ' ! 1 ! -- '-' Z'----- N < < S ,‹ I ' ! - € rfl N 2 T I I I PTJ1T. BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TITLE: LOCATION MAP Page EXHIBIT N. 3Ci4-720 Park 6.,/fice AIuSp Tr e.41,11jc rnpai: Study' 1.2 Study Objective '[he objective of this traffic study is to assess possible PM peak hour impacts on the project area corridors using the person -trip corridor capacity method. This method is designed to meet the challenges posed by Florida's growth management laws: to promote compact urban development, discourage suburban sprawl and improve urban mobility. The method is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and promotes improved transportation efficiency through increased private vehicle occupancies, thus making mass transit a full partner in the urban transportation system. Page. 4 k ;!' 0 2.1 Data Collection EXI Ti G T F. c 0 D T 111 Data collection for this study included roadway 'sties, intersection data, interse volumes, and signal tuning. The data collection e sections. 2.1 a1 Roadway Characteristics s described in detai the fo.11owin Biscayne Boulevard Biscayne Boulevard (LS-1) is a major arterial that provides north/south access throughout the City of Miami from downtown (the CBD) north to the Broward County line. Between NE 20 Street and NE 36 Street, Biscayne Boulevard is a two-way, four -lane divided roadway. .xclusive left turn lanes are provided at major intersections. On -street parking is prohibited, The posted speed limit is 30 mph. DIP NE 20 Street NE 20 Street between North Miami Avenue and NE 2 Avenue is a two-way, two-lane undivided roadway. On -street parking is prohibited. There are no posted speed limit signs within the study 1110 111 area. NE 24 Street NE 24 Street is a local roadway that provides east/west access within the study area. It is a two- ! way, two-lane undivided roadway. On -street parking is prohibited and there are no posted speed limit signs within the study area. 1110 NE 25 Street NE 25 Street is a local roadway that provides east/vest access within the study area. 1t is a two- way, two-lane undivided roadway. On -street parking is not permitted and there are no posted speed limit signs within the study area. Page 1 isar arterial that prA ids s north'souih access witiw the study area. NI Avenue is a two-way, four ndivided r Midway within the project li fts. On -street parking is prohibited_ There are no posted speed unlit signs within the study area. NE / i Court 2 Court is a two-way. two-lane undivided roadway within the project limits "There are no posted speed limit signs within the study area. 2.1.2 Traffic Counts Consistent with the methodology submitted to and approved by the City, peak period vehicle turning movement counts and 24-hour directional counts were collected at the intersections and segments under study. Seasonal adjustment factors were obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Traffic counts are included in .Appendix B. Exhibit 2 shows the adjusted 2007 PM peak season, peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. 2,1.3 intersection Data A field survey was conducted to detearwiine the lane configurations for the roadways and intersections under study. Existing signal timing data was obtained from Miami -Dade County for the analyzed intersection. Signal information is included in Appendix B. This information provided the signal phasing and timing used in the intersection capacity analysis. Exhibit 3 shows the existing lane configurations for the intersections and roadways studied. Page 6 NE 26 ST NE 25 ST NE 24 ST PROJECT: BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY T rFLE: 27 EXISTING PM PEAK TRAFFIC VOLUMES NE 24 ST T S, EXHIBIT No. Page 7 NE 26 ST NE 25 ST NE 24 ST EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY NE 24 ST 1 EXHIBrr No. 3 } E Page 8 i. A.R/ ?Ft .?-f)(:- I .5. 2,2 Corridor Capacity Analysis Existing traffic conditions for the prc.)ject area corridors have been established using the person - trip based corridor capacity method. The methodology for this analysis is outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The existint traffic conditions analysis identifies the person -trip volumes and person -trip capacities of the corridors, establishes existing person -trip usage and identifies whether or .not person -trip deficiencies exist. An adopted standard of ..LOS E applies to the transportation corridors as measured by the persontrip method. The existing conditions analysis establishes the multi -modal corridor conditions within the project area. The person -trip capacities and volumes for the study corridors have been developed consistent with the approved methodology for this project as described below: Person -Trip Volumes Lin..k volumes collected were adjusted to peak season traffic conditions using seasonal adjustment factors provided by FDOT. Peak hour maximum service volumes were obtained from FDO-f's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Transit (bus and fixed rail) ridership and capacity were obtained from Increment II of the .Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. An analysis of existing vehicle roadway and transit conditions is shown in Exhibit 4, supporting information included in Appendix C. Person -Trip Capacity Vehicle occupancy for the person -trip capacity calculations is based upon a comprehensive study performed for the City of Miami. The vehicle occupancy factor of 1.6 persons per vehicle is approved for use as the practical capacity of a private passenger vehicle to determine the person - trip capacity of the vehicular traffic system. Bus and fixed rail capacity for each corridor was determined based ,on the number of transit ychicles per hour and the person -trip capacity of each transit vehicle. This information was obtained directly from Increment II of the Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. Pctge 9 WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWir ®®MW i W®®worm® wiorwirmrmr ti • Exhibit 4 Existing Corridor and Transit Conditions Corridor From BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 36 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 2 AVENUE Roadway Conditions (vehicles) Transit Conditions (persons) Dir NB 59 NB SD N.MIAMIAVENUE ER WB Total Count Raw PM Peak PM Dir Max Bus Bus Existing Source! Peak Hour Season Peak Hour Service Ridership Capacity Lanes Perod Volume Factor Volume Volume 1 2 2 Total Metrorail Ridership 2 2LD DPA - PM 1209 0.97 1173 1660 523 1472 0 2LD DPA - PM 1330 0.97 1290 1660 416 2252 0 2170 DPA - PM 1115 0-97 1081 1660 523 1472 0 2LD DPA - PM 1036 0.97 1004 1660 416 2252 0 1LU DPA - PM 277 0.97 268 850 27 195 0 1LU DPA - PM 361 0.97 350 850 16 105 0 Melrerail Capacity 2 6 0 0 6 0 0 Total Meiromover Ridership 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notes: 111 Peak 1-tour Directional Maximum Service Volumes are obtained from FDOT's Goal lyll..evet of Service Handbook 12) Transit and roadway information obtained from the Downtown Miami DPI Increment 11 Metrorover Capacity i2l 0 0 0 0 0 U Total Transit Ridership i21_._ 523 416 523 416 27 16 ransil Gapacily 4472 2252 1472 2252 195 195 verso n--Ti The available person -trip capacit followin.g_ Person -trip capacity - - each corridor is shown in Exhibit 5 based on the on -trip volume = Availablc Person -trip capacity. A general level of service designation is provided for each study corridor based on the calculated available person --trip capacity. A person -trip eve of service look -up table was developed based on the ratios derived from the EDOT's 2002 Oual tt:. Lcv=el o, Service Handbook (see Appendix C). Based upon the person -trip evaluation for existing traffic conditions, no study corridor operates below the acceptable `person -trip" level of service standards, 2.3 Intersection Capacity Analysis The intersection capacity analysis was performed using vehicular volumes and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), based on the procedures of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. It should be noted that the intersection of NE 24 Street and NE 2 Avenue is offset and was analyzed separately from the north side and south side. Exhibit 6 shows the resulting LOS for existing conditions at the intersections under study, analysis worksheets are included in Appendix U. All six intersections operate within the standard adopted by the city. Exhibit 6 2007 Intersection Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection S/U Existing LOS1 NE 24 Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 25 Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 26 Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 24 Street / NE 2 Avenue (North) NE 24 Street / NE 2 Avenue (South) U B U S U B A A A NE. 25 Street / NE 2 Avenue A NE 24 Street / NE 2 Court U A Notes : ` LOS is for the Major Street for unsianalized inters ctions_ unsignalized s= signalized Source: 11)PA Page 1 I w v w w w w w w w w w• w w w ®w v w w w# ®w W• v ®w w w ®w w 0 Corridor From To BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NE 36 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 2 AVENUE N. WAIVE AVENUE Dir NB SB NB SO EB w8 (a) Roadway Vehicular Capacity 1660 1660 1660 1660 850 850 Exhibit 5 Person -Trip Volume and Capacity Existing Conditions Matrix Roadway Mode (b) (c) Pers-Trip Roadway Capacity Vehicular @PPV=1.6 Volume (a`1,.6 [21 2656 2656 2656 2656 1360 1360 [31 1173 1290 1081 1004 268 350 td) Pers-Top Volume @PPV=1.4 (c) 1.4 [41 1642 1805 1513 1406 375 490 (e) Excess Pers-Trip Capacity {b) - (d) 1014 851 1143 1250 985 870 T (f) Total Pers-Trip Capacity [1] 1472 2252 1472 2252 195 195 ransit Mod (.9) Total Pers-Trip Volume i51 523 416 523 416 27 18 Notes: j1) The Roadway Vehicular Capacity is obtained from Exhibit 4. ]2] Person -Trip capacity is derived by applying a 1.6 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. [3]) The Roadway Vehicular Volume is obtained from Exhibit 4_ 14) Person -Trip Volume is derived by applying a 1.4 vehicle occupancy to the vehicular capacity. (5] The Total Transit Person -Trip Capacity is obtained by adding bus, metrorail and metrornover capacities (see Exhibit 4). [6] The Total Transit Person -Trip Volume is obtained by adding bus and metromover volumes (see Exhibit 4). [7] The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix C). e (h) Pers-Top Excess Capacity 949 1836 949 1836 168 177 9 ti) t)) Segment Segment Pers-Top Pers-Trip Capacity Volume (b t d}4"(q) rnent Total 4128 4908 4128 4908 2165 2221 203E 1822 1555 402 '1555 505 (k) (I) Pers-Trip Segment Excess Person Trip Capacity vlc LOS -_-.r ' f i 1963 0.52 t} 2687 0.45 0 2092 0.49 C 3086 0.37 C 1153 0.26 C 1047 0.33 0 .;; r /SP I r_ ,e5 c•, 3M P A EDA DP i he 2007 Miami -Dade C r Dade ` r r2. ort atio k p AD AY VE E T Pro rerm (TIP) and the 203( etro- jcrr .�r L;?em nt. were reviewed to identify any programmed or <rn.rled projectswithin the limits of the study area established.- These documents show no o(t e iall� programmed or planned capacity improvement projects within the study area prior to completion of the proposed project. Page 13 • • • • • 10 1 1 1 1 I • 4 FUTU 4.1 Background Traffic ET AFFHC CO DST Cons siste nt with other traffic studies performed in the area, a one percent growth :factor was applied to existing traffic volumes, This growth rate is intended to account for future. gro ,rt: due to additional developments that have not been identified at this time but occur within the sturdy, period, 4.2 Committed Developments A list of projects was obtained from City of Miami websites planning department. These projects are approved and are either under construction or about to break ground. Other projects are approved by City Commission but with no building perrnits, or in the application stage. The projects in the vicinity of Biscayne Park Office are shown in Exhibit 7. The project size and trip generation are included in Appendix E. Traffic generated by these developments was distributed using the Cardinal Distribution from the appropriate TAZ. For estimating trip distribution from committed development, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway network, roadway available to travel in the desired direction and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. This information and a matrix showing volumes from the committed developments are also included in Appendix E. Future traffic volumes were projected for the build -out year 2009. Exhibit 8 shows the projected turning movement volumes without the project. 4.3 Project Traffic 4.3.1 Project Trip Generation Project trip generation is based on the calculation of person -trips consistent with the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan. Person -trips generated by the project were established using the Page 4 1 1 1 1 10 DO 11 1 1 NW36_ NE 25 ST NE 24 ST PRG.ECT: NE26ST 13 NW 29 ST LEGEND 1 - TIZ1ANO II 2 - ROSABELLA LOFTS 3-SOHO 4 - STAR LOFTS 5-ONYX ON THE BAY 6 - AJA ON THE BAY 7 - ONYX Ik 8 - VISTA BISCAYNE 9 - PARK LANE TOWER 10 - THE BOULEVARD 11 - MIDTOWN PARK 12 - 2121 BISCAYNE 13 - PLATINUM ON THE BAY 14 - LIMA 15 - SKY RESIDENCES 16 - MONDRIAN MIAMI 17 - DISTRICT LOFTS 18 - SOLEIL 19 - PARAMONT BAY BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE j COMMITTED DEVELOPMENTS MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MAP EXHIBIT No. Page 15 PROJECT: BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK TRAFFIC VOLUMES 0 0 Rac Lime Park Offic? fttipoci Stade following procedures consistent with he City's -:ornprchensive Plan and the approved methodokygy: The gross vehicular trip generation lor each land use was determined using the institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 'Frip Generation 7'1' Edition rates or formulas. 111 Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 16% based upon the use of the ITE trip rates (City of 1111 Miami's 1,4 vs. ITE's 1.2 persiveh), Gross vehicular trips were reduced by 14.9% to reflect transit usage based on projected modal splits using data from Increment 11 of the Downtown DRI. • Gross vehicular trips were also reduced by 10% for pedestrian/bicycle based on estimates from Increment li of the Downtown DRI since project is within such close proximity. • The net external vehicle trips were converted to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. • The vehicular trips assigned to transit were converted back to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City standards. ▪ The net external person -trips were obtained by adding together the project net external person -trips for the vehicle and transit modes. 10 A trip generation summary for the project is provided in Exhibit 9. 110 4.3.2 Project Trip Assignment Project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study area using the Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 503, shown in Exhibit 10. The Cardinal Distribution gives a generalized distribution of trips from a TAZ to other parts of Miami -Dade County. For estimating the trip distribution for the project location, consideration was given to conditions such as the roadway .network accessed by the project, roadways available to travel in the desired 10 direction, and attractiveness of traveling on a specific roadway. Exhibit 11 shows the project vehicular trip assignment to the impacted roadway segments and intersections. I 411 10 Page 17 mir ler lor Nur II 4111 W WWW WW W W 11111 1111, NW Ili NW 111, MI IF NV IF W mr w ger • Exhibit 9 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES High -Rise Apartments Specialty Retail General Office GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS UNITS 214 DU 16,795 SQ. FT. 34,484 SQ. FT ITE Land Use Code 222 814 710 IN PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS Trips 61% 49 39% 44% 20 56% 17% 34 83% 31% 10 69% OUT Trips 32 26 167 TOTAL Trips E31 46 201 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment © Transit Trip Reduction Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction (a, NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 16.00% 14.90% 10.00°/© of Gross External Trips (1) of Gross External Trips (2) of Gross External Trips (3) 31% 31% 31% 1% 16 15 10 61 69% 69% 69% 225 36 34 23 328 52 49 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 31% Net External Person Trips using Transit @ 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 31% Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit rnodesj 31% 107 85 21 69% 69% 69°/0 186 47 2 271 68 340 Net External Person usingbicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle 4 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DR! Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DR I Increment II 32_ j_ 46 1 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 • 1 Bi5coyne G& z s Exhibit !0 Cardinal Distribution o T rips TAZ 503 Carding Dir coon Distribution TAZ 503 NNE ENE ESE SSE SS W WS-W WNW NNW 13.58% % 53 5.30% 9.67% !y 94% 2 E 33% 15.29% I7.36 y Total ; 100. 00% age g 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NE 26 ST NE 25 ST NE 24 ST (30%) --a --- (20%) — (5%) ;—(100%) 15% PROJECT DRIVEWAYS L --10% 10% v E (15%) _�-- (15%) 10% 10% w w z JEc1; BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (15%) Sal PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT NE 24 ST LEGEND XX - ENTER (XX) - EXIT EXHIBIT No. Page 20 4e4 Future Corridor Capacity Analysis -The existingperson-trip volumes were combined with the committed development and background growthperson-trips to obtain the total year 2009 person-trip.volume without -probe t. The net external project person -trips were then added to het the future person trip volumes with projeet. These volumes were compared to the future persor -trip capacities to determine future level of service, The .future person -trip volume and capacity matrix is shown in Exhih.it 12. All corridors analyzed are projected to operate within the established LOS E threshold. 4a5 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Background growth and committed development trips were combined with the adjusted 2007 existing traffic to get the total year 2009 vehicular traffic without project on the study intersections. The project trips were then added to obtain the future with traffic volumes. Exhibit 13 shows the project PM peak hour vehicular volumes and Exhibit 14 shows the total (with project) PM peak hour vehicular volumes at the intersections under study. Results of the future intersection analysis show that all intersections will operate within the LOS E standard adopted by the city. Exhibit 15 shows the resulting LOS at the intersections under study. intersection capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix I). Exhibit 15 Future Intersection Capacity Analysis Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Intersection S NE 24 Street / Biscayne Boulevard Future Without Pro°ect NE 25 Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 26 Street / Biscayne Boulevard NE 24 Street / NE 2 Avenue (North) NE 24 Street / NE 2 Avenue (South) NE 25 Street / NE 2 Avenue S B C A Future With Project B C B A A A B A A NE 24 Street / NE 2 Court Not Lj —OS is for the Major Street for tinsign;ized intersections, unsignalized S- signalized A A Source: L )PA Page'1 • • Exhibit 12 Person -Trip Volume and Capacity Future Conditions Matrix rridor From To Without Project With Project Dir (a) Existing Pers-Trip Volumes (b) Future Bkg. Pers-Trip 1.0% 2 (c) Committed Development Pers-Trip (d) Future Pers-Trip Volumes (b * c) (e) Projected Transit Capacity (f) Future Pers-Trip Capacity (9) Future w/out Proj Pers-Trip (h) Project Pers-Trip Volume (!) Total Pers-Trip Volumes d .r h (I) Future Pers-Trip Capacity (k) Future with Proj Pers-Trip vic d)!(fj LOS vtc 3-OS *rn cozuz mW wLOCOCO ill 12! PI t4l Isl f5l i41 iCAYNE BOULEVARD 36 STREET NE 29 STREET 2165 2208 402 2610 78 4206 0.62 D 70 2680 4206 0.64 0 2221 2266 336 2602 1530 6438 0.40 D 32 2634 6438 0.41 D 29 STREET NE 20 STREET 2036 2077 394 2472 78 4206 0.59 0 91 2563 4206 0_6 1 0 1822 1859 368 2227 1530 6438 0.35 C 79 2306 6438 0.36 C 20 STREET 2 AVENUE N. MIAMI AVENUE 402 411 76 487 -9 1546 0.31 C 5 492 1546 0.32 C 508 518 89 608 -9 1546 0.39 C 12 619 1546 0.40 C Notes: (11 The Existing Person Trip Volume is obtained from Exhibit 5, column (j) (2-) Year 2006 Background Person Trip Volume is derived by applying a 2% growth factor to the existing person -trip volume (3} Projected Transit Capacity was obtained from the Downtown Miami DRI Increment it (Table 21.D10 column (4) - Table 21.A7 column (15)) j4j The Total Future Peak Hour Person Trip Capacity is obtained by adding all modes of transportation (Exhibit 5, column (i)) and the projected transit capacity (Exhibit 12, column e) (51 The Person Trip LOS is provided consistent with the FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook (see Appendix C) j61 Project Person Trip Volumes are derived from Trip Generation Analysis (Net External Person Trips (Vehicles + Transit)) r rip 1 4 NE25ST NE24ST 26 0 as 40 7 27 20 w rNJ w 6 6 0 — 27 6 Ev 6 9 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS 6 20 BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 7 7 — 4 9 PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS NE 24 ST EXHIBIT No. Page 23 PROJECT: BISCAYNE PARK OFFICE MUSP TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FUTURE WITH PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHS T No. 14 Page 24 4 6 Access Access to `. s t will be facilitated by two. Iwo way driveways on NE 25 Stree and way driveways on NE 24 Street. No conflicts will occur with proposed driveways. The project trips were assigned to the driveways and analyzed. [ insignalized FICS analysis results show adequate operations. The analysis worksheets are included in Appendix D. Bm'a3.'ne PaA. P,111ST-' IPy.iffic impoct Snedy 5.0 C C U An assessment of the PM peak hour traffic associated with the development of Biscxy'ne Park Office was performed in accordance with the approved methodoloy submitted to the city. Analysis of future (2009) traffic conditions with the project during the .PM peak hour shows that the City of Miami's adopted Level of Service standards will not he exceeded_ Adequate capacity during the PM peak hour is available to accc.)ramodate the proposed project trips within the study area at the intersections and on the transportation corridor segments analyzed. A traffic control measures plan has been developed for this project. The plan is included in Appendix F. nousp apri 2007.doc P g2 2 .6 oved Transportatio ethodology Site Plan AVM PLU S OC ATES, INC. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• TRANSPORTAT=ON a CIVIL a STRUCTURAL e ENVIRONMENTAL To: Affilia ti From: RE: cc: IFacsimile Transmission Mr. Raj Shannzugam, PE UURS Corporation Rita Carbonell Biscayne Park - 407136 Lilia Medina, Carlos Melo, file Fax #: Phone #: Date: Pages: (954) 739- I a 89 (954) 739-1881 April 17, 2007 6 page(s), including cover 25 Plaza Corp is pursuing City of Miami approvals for a multi -use project located on the west side of Biscayne between NE 24 Street and NE 25 Street in Miami, Florida. Phase 1 is currently under construction and consists of apartments, 6,843 SF of retail space, and 12,384 SF of office space. Phase Il is proposing 9,952 SF of retail space, at SF of office space. Therefore the traffic analysis will be performed for the buildout which includes 214 rental apartme SF of retail space, and 134,484 SF of office space. Phase I has two, two-way driveways on the east end of the site, one on NE 25 Street and the other on NE 24 Stree proposes another two, two-way driveways on the west end of the site. The driveway on NE 25 Street will serve the ret while the NE 24 Street driveway will provide access to the office garage. The subject site is located just outside the l Downtown Miami Area -wide DRI. A traffic impact study was perfoiiiied for Phase I on September 2004 and sufficiency was received on October 4, methodology for this study will be consistent with the methodology for Phase I. The proposed site plan is attached the previous methodology. This will serve as our methodology for the subject MUSP traffic impact study. X The study limits are NE 36 Street to the North, NE 20 Street to the South, Biscayne Bay to the East, and North Mia to the west. X Turning movement traffic counts are to be collected during the PM (4:00-6:00) peak period at six major intersect immediate project vicinity, 1. NE 24 Street / Biscayne Boulevard 2. NE 25 Street / Biscayne Boulevard 3. NE 26 Street / Biscayne Boulevard (Signalized) 4. NE 24 Street / NE 2 Court 5. NE 24 Street / NE 2 Avenue 6. NE 25 Street / NE 2 Avenue in addition to these intersections, we will analyze the project driveways. X Segment traffic volumes will be collected as 24-hour machine counts at the following locations: 1. Biscayne Boulevard between NE 36 Street and NE 29 Street 2, Biscayne Boulevard between NE 29 Street and NE. 20 Street 1750 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD CORRAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TELEPHONE'. 305 447-0900, FAX: 305 444-4986 E-MAIL: dpa@dpiurnmer.corr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 NEStreet between NI: ¢ and NortA Miami Avenue X AN -unable Florida Department of Transportation (:DDT) counts will be consulted were appropriate X Raw traffic counts will be adjusted to peak season (for the peak hour period). X The signal timing and phasing at the study signalized intersections will be obtained from Miami -Dade County, X Existing and future traffic conditions for the project area corridors (Biscayne Boulevard and NE 20 Street) will be R using the person -trip method. The methodology for this method is outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Arei Plan. Rubber tire and fixed rail transit capacity of the study corridors will be established based on available inforrr Increment 11 of the Downtown DRI. X Corridor capacity will be estimated using generalized vehicular capacities (converted to person -trips) from the l DRI, FDOT LOS Manual, or other acceptable equivalent. X Project Traffic — project trip generation will be based on the calculation of person -trips consistent with the city Comprehensive Plan. Person -trips generated by the project will be established using the following procedure con; Increment IT of the Downtown DRI. I , Determine the gross vehicular trip generation for each land use using the Institute of Transportation (1TE) Trip Generation, 7t Edition rates or formulas. ?. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a vehicle occupancy adjustment based upon the use of the ITE trip ral Miami's 1.4 vs, ITE's 1.2 pers/veh). 3. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a transit reduction based on projected modal splits from Incremer Downtown DRI. (Project is just one block north of the Downtown DRI boundary. Additionally analyzd included in the DRI analysis. ) 4. Reduce gross vehicular trips by a pedestrian/bicycle reduction based on estimates from Incremer Downtown DRI. (Project is just one block north of the Downtown DRI boundary. Additionally analyze included in the DRI analysis.) 5. Establish the net external vehicle trips, 6. Convert the net external vehicle trips to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursuant to City 7. Convert the vehicular trips assigned to transit back to person -trips using 1.4 persons per vehicle pursu standards. 8. Add together the project net external person -trips for the vehicle and transit modes. X Background Traffic. A growth factor consistent with historical annual growth in the area will be applied to the exi volumes. X Committed Developments. Will be based on the list of relevant projects included in the City's web based a Committed development trips will also be converted to person -trips based on the methodology described a committed developments are shown in the attached exhibit. X Highway Capacity Software (HCS) based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) will be used for existing intersection capacity analysis. Project and committed development net external vehicle trips (adjusted for transit, and occupancy as described above) will be used for the intersection capacity analysis. Intersection capacity analy performed at the four study intersections and the proposed project driveways. X Trip Assignment. Net new external project traffic will be assigned to the adjacent street network using the a cardinal distribution from the Metro -Dade Long Range Transportation Plan Update, published by the Metropolita. Organization. Normal traffic patterns will also be considered when assigning project trips, off you have any questions you can contact me at (305) 447-0900. 1750 PONCE DE LEON BOULEVARD CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 TELEPHONE, 305 447-090C, FAX 305 444-4986 dpa@dplurnmer.con 1raffsc_n WI w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w WNW w w w w w w w w w • RS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r Traffic Counts Signal Timings 1 1 1� 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 . 1 r r r r r r r r r r r Tbru 1iTrn Left Ea Right ALL VEHICLES Site w3d4 09022115 Slam. 01t4: 15/03/07 File , _0 245a ' S1 93100 80U1EVARL/US f, j 141E 24T€i STREET !iron South {From Went Thru UTurn Loft 1 Riuh0 Thra UTurn Left { Right T ru LJTorz Left 1 Total Fa' 24n4 `:-T: 'T 1 9k.SCRYN£ iJLEV. a 7/US i I MI: FLORIDA cool 95c, £-Y: r3BE TWOMA.9 NOT 71GNF-'..,? 390 9 FF LC SURVEY SPEC1A01STS, WC_ 534 ;xx ; 3N TERRACE DELL Y BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (563) 272-3355 FAX ;561i 272-4381 OXSCAYN5 BOULEVARD/US 2 1NE 24334 STRZET From :north Right Date 05/01I0t 16; 00 0 190 2 6[ s 9 1 0 6 I 3 229 1 4 i 3 4 0 1 469 16:15 1 157 1 5: 14 1 0 5 E 6 337 G 3 j 2 1 0 2 j 535 16;30 2 173 2 5 5 0 0 2 2 320 0 8 j 3 0 0 2 f 524 16:45 1 Sri: 0 1` i G 0 i€ 4 302 0 5 3 fl 0 1 1 506 Hr Total 4 731 5 17 [ 45 2 0 14 ; 15 118$ 1 20 11 5 0 5 ( 2034 17e00 17,15 17,30 17.45 fir Total 4 166 1 5 1 7 5 211 0 6 f 7 5 165 0 12 ' 11 6 206 1 5 't 6 20 768 2 28 { 31 ra 0T5L 24 1469 00 r• 0 0 2 5 286 1 2 j 2 0 0 1 0 1 4 299 0 3 2 2 0 0 4! 1 283 0 7 i 0 0 0 0 4 i 6 265 0 2 j 4 0 0 2 0 zl € 16 1133 1 14 i 12 2 0 4 505 S j 546 5 j 458 2 507 16 I 2056 45 1 76 4 0 25 1 31 2321 2 34 ; 23 7 0 22 I 4090 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STRL`'T m E1507Y E OULEW,P..r.'/;'S 1 MI I, 77.3R FDA COUNTED BY: A. E THOMAS Tru%yi1T 871 'iRA7 F1C SURVEY 02E0 ALIS7S. i'7 624 C;AR ENIA TERRACE DECiRAY DERCH, FLORIDA 33446 (561) 772-3255 FAX <561i ALL VEHICLES BISCAYNE aomwARD/us ARD/TJs 1 From ?7or11 2$E 24TH STREET Frei+ East [ BISSCThE BOULEvA Djs s .- From South 1!ZE 24TE STREET ;From West 5_12 wore va 70115 Bra-t Late, 05/01y 7 File 1_L. : 2407 U51 2 Eight Thrt; CT'aro Left j szes:1 TTian U-ixo Left . Right T:Te 717uro Left i Rzcgrt Thru UTurn Left ; Total pat, 25/01/07___m,e___....-._-__..----- _________------------- .--------------- .-___________--------- Peak Haul- Analyeia 14y Entire intersection for the Period; 16,00 to 18;00 an 05/01/07 Peace etar1 16,31 1 16,30 26:30 166.30 volume 12 751 3 17 I 26 1 0 6 f 15 1207 a f 30 2 7 12 Pezcent 27 964 0% 2% I 79% 37 et, 197 ( 37 37 57 i i 427 77 07 303 Pk eotal 783 ; 33 € 32s1 ° I 34 7;00 j 17:"a5 ?iiohest 17;1.5 i ? 16: Volume 5 211 9 6{ 7 0 7 2 1 2 321 0 7 2 2 0 5 Hi coral. 222 9 i 330 9 PH? .E.& ? .92 1 .93 •P7 0 0 NE 24TH STREET 411 19 a 32 1 I • 12 I 12 I I 2 2 24 BISCAYNE BO EVARD/US 1 12 75 2 12 1,207 26 121 751J 20 I 1,245 34 2,028 • ALL VEHICLES 10 10 0 J 783 56 Intersection Total 2,081 2,008 70 0 26 26 33 1 1,241 6 19 • 1,207 751 10 767Aj 19 ! 1,207 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 i 6 6 37 NE 24TH STREET 20 2 15 r i r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 i!. il I 1 1 1 mi.m..i) F-40,..iotA, M *y. Z, 2.007 a_ta a If : dick° It 31)to e klD* iput li zec 1 E 24TN STREET 4, NE 2 QUAT FLOC 1 11 COUNTED, > z : AWE 711036tAS NOT SIGUAL>'03 ?3AI IC S'EVEY S?ECIALIF S, INC. 624 ,aE7IA T,' CM =ELRAY SEACH, FLORIDA 333444 (561) 2?4-3255 FAX (561( 212-43?1 ALL V ES NE 24TE 5TRER 1NZ 2117) 3:Ra �/1re° 24CH &?'.0E'T From East JErom Sout0 ;From, weer. Thro, 3Turn Lett 1 7,i5ht ::iurn L00' ; Right Thru Date 05/02/07 Total S'te Code . O0070119 Cast 3ar,e= C5/02/077 File 7.0, 2407 2CT Pace .. 16.00 6 0 1 0 0 3( 2 5 1 17 16.15 3 0 i 3 G 0 1 2 10 16:30 7 1 3 0 3[ 1 10 25 1 16,45 3 0 3( 1 0 0€ 2 2 11 1 Ar sotal 19 0 6 , 0 6; 6 19 63 17;00 7 0 1( 5 0 5! 2 9 f 29 17,15 6 0 4 j 1 0 1; 7 4 23 0 10330 7 0 3 3 0 1, 6 3 f 28 17:45 7 0 4 1 3 0 3 p 5 6 28 ■ Fir Total 27 0 12 i 12 0 10 I 20 27 308 1 0 *i'37'33 46 0 1$ j 19 15 j 26 46 171 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 °Date 05/02/D7 peek Your AhaiysiS By Entire Interse7Cior for Peak start 17;00 17 00 Volume 27 9 12 j 12 0 Percent 694 04 314 1 S5� 04 ',Percent totals 39 j 22 "Highest 17,45 1 17,00 Volume 7 0 4 [ 5 0 1H1 total 11 1 10 PHF -69 -55 STREET & a 2; o COURT ;.:_: FLORIDA II: ;:. . '.:=r2 EY; ABE TWOVIS CNALI ZED ------- Kt 24TH STREET !NE 2RD COURT From East 1 From South Thru `Trurra Lett 1 Right UT'arn TRAFFIC SURVEYSPECi1il,ISs'S, INC 024 CAF'E2 3, L R3tCF DELRAY b&ACA, FLORIDA 23444 .557.`t 212-3255 FAX {`,61) 272-4361 ALL VEHICLES iNt 24T,: SMET Frog? West .eft Right Thru Ta2al r the Period, 16,00 co 16:00 on 05/02; 7 17,00 20 20 27 i $ 3 } 434 57% 1 47 17:30 5 j 6 S j 14 .64 Site Cod - 2 ii 71723 ._.art Data: 27/02/07 File 1,12, 24Sf :X,,` 2 0 0 ON1m,24TH STREET 01, 10 1 27 0 37 r 1 r 1 0 27 27 47 20 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 r 1 r r 0 20 0 84 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 108 54 27 39 27 78 12 12 39 NE 24TH STREET 0 27 12 • r• • • • • r i0 • • • i0 r r r 4 rti a A P-t4j Z3 Zoc7 zawA) y•Ai titbit ct5ototid 11, NZ 26TH STREET 4. 815C?752 9o' LEVARD%1'6 1 IF MIAMI, FLORTDA RD r 1 1 1 10 10 1 1 1 TRAFFIC SURVEY sPEC1A°L257S, TNC- 624 GARDENIA IERRACE Dz„ RAY .957 0 i, FLOR 1OA 33444 561) 272-3255 FAX i561) 272-t311 £1S 523'R EuiL`eVARD/US 1 !Nc 2E79 S RER FT1,1 toOrti Fran East Right Thru Date 05(01/0e 16v00 5 200 16:15 a 169 16:30 1 172 6: 2 206 Hr Total 13 753 ALL VEHICLES E «e Co-3e : 00070/19 Start Date: 05l01/D7 File 25S^ USI Page ! Wi SCAYNU EVARD/Us 1 !From SDU h West 3 ISTU STREET 11T rh Let ( Right Tyra u8Tarh Left [ Right Thru L'iUarn weft { Right Worn Left j Total 17,00 3 202 17;15 2 217 17;30 2 204 17,49 5 210 Hr Total 12 833 1 0 0 4 0 3 5 3 j a 2 3 2 12 { 4 4 6 4 5 19 2 0 6 ! 3 252 2 0 9 5 151 1 0 6 1 7 315 2 01 2 28 7 0 22 € 17 1204 3 1 1 5 0 0 2 0 2 7 9 7 10 33 5 4 0 3 12 313 311 311 248 1183 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 4 2 3 6 15 3 3 3 4 9 5 21 3 1 3 6 5 5 19 O 1 O 1 13 2 0 6 O 6 • 3 O 3 O 18 { 493 555 519 5155 2082 555 572 554 503 2134 *TOTR..* 25 1586 1 21 35 12 55 29 2387 0 33 j 28 23 0 23 4266 • 1 26T72 2?33E 6 EISCAii SOUL3VP2 ,,Ja 1 MI 1, a 2RTr.A `:OUTIT6 .9 : 6O`aALP 6V AGE L„„E 1 / RISCAYNE l IU6 1 ?rum Ng th 11 /Right. hru 1l� urft Qate 0 /C1/07 1 Pak start VOIUTe /Percent Pk total / Highest Volume / Hi total PHA 1 1 1 1 1 1 4246,t31c SURVEY 55 EcIALITS6S, INC. 624 G14RDE Zia `ERN_A E DSLER49 HE.6 e. FLORIDA 33444 (591' 272-3255 FAX '.563.` 272-4381 1 a 266r6 STREET ALL VRRUCIRSS Site Code _ 00070119 Start Date: 5;1fOE File _.E. 26 Sage jEISCStaNE BOULEVARD/US 6 !NE 26T1; STREET S- 'ta 6 Right That« 'Tor Left 3 Thru 11Tutt2 Left I Right Thu : u n Left Peak Hour Analysis ry Entire Znteraeco5on for teas Period; 16;00 to 18;20 ao 05?01/07 16;45 I 1€=45 ; 16;49 ( 16,45 9 529 0 11 j 17 6 2 24 ! 11 1222 0 16 15 1, 0 16 ,6 98t 04 14 1 354 226 44 49T 14 984 18 14 338 356 e* 3334 249 I 49 j 1245 49 17;15 17t15 I 17.00 f 17:30 2 217 C 2 1 6 3 © 9 i 5 313 '3 4 9 5 0 3€ 221 1 12 322 17 .96 ,68 .97 .72 0 / ii 2 6TH STREET 11/ 16 1 6 9 16 / 1 1� 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 / 0 31 16 17 BISCAYNE BOU 829 829 849 80 VARD/US 1 2,104 ALL VEHICLES 16 1,222 17 1,255 17 49 Intersection Total 2,196 16 16 0 26 829 16 871 2,120 BISCAYNE BOULEVAR 88 1,249 • 1,222 1,222 JS 1 0 Total c 17 17 6 49 6 26 26 39 NE 26TH STREET r • • • • • r. ir IP 1 1 II 1 1 II OD II • tam i, F7ofzibL it(A; 2,Zbb7 D ta)4 1. AltCh e Ai Ai 1 1 1 E 25'7 0 STREET S NE 2)00 AVENUE' 1 , 2 MI, 9,L 5a2A 1 COUNTED E`": MONA:.:: Vti�i sl z&ALIZDC 1 1 NE 23417 AVENGE From North TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, 1NC_ 624GARDENIA TERRACE 17512aAY BEACH, FLORIDA 32444 5[&"r 272-3295 FAX (561) 272-.341 3.i•s.. VE 42 C.$S [N13 2 5TH 3 25597 'Prom £s95 1NE 2ND AVENUE sczrz!ar Thru uN7o Left f Right Thru Y urra Left i pia nt 1 Date CS-;02/77--__..__._.. .. .. ... Sits Code Start 5Da e, o5<<C,Y707 File I - , 250T_2AV Page ': v 35Ta1 STREET [From West 471ur7 Left i Aight TY:ru t,'urn heft j Total 16:00 2 104 0 0 5 _ 0 2; 2 167 0 3 2 1 16:15 3 39 5 3 2 2 5 3 j 179 0 5 3 1 16;30- 7 102 0 S j 5 1 0 6 1 1 22C 0 3; 6 2 i 10 2 2 174 e 3[ 3 1 Hr Total 3 414 0 10 i 14 4 0 11 I 6 740 1 14 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:00 3 113 0 3 1 0 1 1 5 191 0 1 1 1 17; 1 5 2 119 0 3 j 1 0 0 0 f 0 194 0 0 I 1 1 17:30 _ 109 0 21 3 _ 0 1 j 2 179 C 0 1 C 1 17745 '29 2 0 3 i 3 0 0 2 1 1 161 2 1 5 Sr Total 6 433 0 11 j 8 2 C 4; 6 726 1 3 j 7 1 1 .TOTAL. 11 .547 0 23 I 22 6 0 15 1 14 1469 1 1 1 1 0411110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lb 1 1 2 21 250 301 352 29'; 1240 O 0 5 j 329 O 0 4 1324 C 0 2 1 350 0 0 3 1 275 0 15 i 1228 O 24 j 2466 Pt 1E- T F 24E 2?F6 AVEVUE ?SINK, FLOR4DR O0.`27TFX fin . pi63 AL1 E FFACS NOT ✓ 5T .%�. 3.1.T 1$P. TRAFFIC 1E211C4ZY SPECIALISTS, 1NC _ 624 CARD3k2A TERRACE DEI.LRAY HEJACH, FLORIPA 33444 i581) 72-3255 FAX 6561t 272-4341 ALL VEHICLES a L 2512 f ✓r^fJE 1 NG 257H STREET ; 925 2512 AVriNUE 01E 25734 ST'REFT Fro North 18romBast ro uth Fr0o+ Vest Right Thru LTux1t Date 05/02/02 -- Site Code J 00020119 Stars .0461: 05/02/07 File 1_;7_ 255`P-_2A`a Fags . 2 I Left f Right Thru lrVurn Left j Right Thru UTurn Left ( Rag5» Thru tTTurn Left 1 Total Peak Hour Analyeis By Entire Intersection for the Period: 16;00 to 18:C0 on 05/02/0: Peak start 15:30 j 16:30 Volume 5 443 0 13 9 2 Percent 11 96% 0* 30 451 10a 03 Pk total 461 1 20 Highest 17,15 16:3C Vu:.ume 2 129 0 3 6 1 0 Hi total 124 13 PEP .93 I .38 NE 2i 0 0 ▪ NE 25TH STREET DO 8 2 • 5 ▪ • 12 ✓ �• 0 - • • • 11 ▪ ° 0 • - - • • • • jik • • • • 15 12 11 0 i1 443 6 15:30 6 732 2 14 981 01 738 16:38 220 0 224 -89 AVENUE 3 12 782 9 443 131 803 461 1,264 ALL VEHICLES 38 23 Intersection Total 1,302 9 443 11 463 NE 2 1,261 AVENUE 3 41 798 • 782 782 16;30 13 0 0 12 aat 2* 0% 52* 23 16:30 6 C 0 1 7 .82 0 9 9 20 2 1 8 8 2 9 9 21 NE 25TH STREET 13 0 8 0 0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { ' 225 24Tr3 STREET 6 ?SE 2472 fivENLIE 1 MIAMI, FLORIDA CQUid'S'EL` HY , CST/5 65 T SIGNALIZED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 aARPE 5IA T559905 DELRAY REACH, 5L:T4109 33444 4561) 272-3255 FAX t661) 272--4381 rALL VEHICLES 0 NE 2651 AVENUE 6 24724 STREET Pram Aorth 1 F17om East [NE 2592 AVENUE 1From South Thru J' urn i,7f5 Fug?1t Warp, Left j Reght. Thou j Total I3ste 05/02/ 47 Fc� Csde /0070119 sLazTl. Dote, 05/C2/17 F3 7 . 24S2AV_C Page 15:0+0 100 0 4 j 7 0 6 2 175 ! 294 16:15 97 9 2 j 6 0 4 1 183 j 253 .16,30 113 0 6 E 9 9 2 4 214 i 348 16:45 106 0 3( 0 C 2 173 J 291 0 Hr Total 416 0 15 } 22 0 14 } 8 751 } 1226 0 17:00 112 0 9[ 5 0 1 S 188 i 317 17:15 100 0 9€ 4 0 5 I S 155 289 1 17: 30 86 0 9 E 7 0 3 k 4 161 270 17,45 92 0 6 j 6 0 1 4 146 i 245 Hs Total 379 0 30 [ 22 0 1C i 20 660 E 1121 i ' 'TOTAL* 795 0 45 i 44 G 24 28 1411 i 2347 r 1 1 ism 04TA STREET 4. NE 2300 AV OI3 36I, FLORIDA 1111 COUNTED FY C3i6,35 r"iiLOMI; J TRA.FFIC S, E 1t+C. 624 GAHDENIA TERRACE DELRRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561} 272-3155 FAX (561) 272-4151 ALL VEHICLES iNE 2ND A EN13`3 taR 24TH STREET I NE 2ND AVENVE 0 From North ;From East Strotr South ■ Thom i,5 rn Left , R ght UTuro Left. € 3igh1 Thru Total i Date 05/21/07 ._ rPeak Hour Anal'aia 9y Entire Intersect., or for the Period: 16.00 to 13;5Q on 05/02/07 •Peak atart 1.515 16;15 [ 16;15 VoI.,,./mt 427 E 17 20 0 9 12 764 Percent 96% 06 4% 69,k Ot 31t ( 25 936 Pk total 444 23 776 1 Highest, 3630 16:30 16,30 Volume 113 0 6 9 0 2 j 4 214 wSi total 119 11 21$ .93 ? .39 .66 NE 2ND AVENUE 427 17 4271 17 444 0 764 20 784 • ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 1,249 r IV • 58 Site c 42 00073 10 SI:ar._ Cate, 05=°07/57 File I.e. ; 24322AV C7 2 20 20 29 0 9 9 29 NE 24TH STREET 0 0 17 0 12 1 z F lorziett Ai4y1)Zoo7 (By 4;cJke` Dwe4 dot blAs.1$1rea 43 243 rH STREET 8 30E 2300) AVENUE coo) TEJ 3Y; J31cQv E1,i30E Ca31.EON .1NAT.Z2ED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC, 624 CARVENIR 72553CE DELRAY 823C30 30)05103 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX C561) 272-4351 ALL VEh CLES NE 2N ' 5755)35 I NE 23'0 AVENUE 55 2 4TH STRSET From North c Frcr South !From neat R.; a50 hr—c 1 Ti r trrurn Left j Right 033u30 Lett j iota] Date 05/02/07 16;00 5 106 189 `� 1 ! 1 0 I ! 303 16:15 2 2C3 ( 157 1 2 1 1 0 3 299 15:30 3 112 z 214 0 2 j 3 0 2 336 15:45 0 114 183 1 1 1 2 0 0 I 301 H3 Total 10 435 I 773 0 6 7 1 6 j 123E 17:c,o 0 112 189 0 17;15 1 111 1 198 1 17:30 a 108 j 177 0 17:45 2 92 .t60 Hr Total 4 423 1 714 4 2 j 7 0 5 315 4 3 0 2 ! 309 2 3 0 2 I 293 1 1 0 4 263 9 1 14 ...k.. 0 r... 13 1 1177 &T0TAT.� 14 856 1487 1 15 j 21 r r r 19 ! 2415 Site 1.10de COD7D119 Start Date ; 15/02/07 File 1,1J, 2402A J Page 1 4aE 2 UTh STREET 6 NE 2RD 74:SE4 S r MIAMI, FLORIDA ' co',?TEJACQUE11NE `"'i 4F=xC SURVEY 5P3CI4i,ISTE, INC, 624 GARDEONT..6 a2RR)CB SE.:ACH, FI R;DA 23444 (50.) ,l72-3255 IEX 56I.° Zr2-43E1 ALL VEFIC06S NE 2ND AVENUE iNE 2ND AVENUE From North IF,rom South 1 FrO7. West Right Trru j Thru UOoro Left 1Right JTurn Lett j Total Date 05/02/07----- __________________'---.„ "---'-- _""__------- -.__---,__.._- peak Koh: Analyso4 9y Entire Sntermection for the Period, I6:02 to 18:0G on 05;02/07 Peak Star: 16:30 I 16,34 16:34 Volume 4 449 i 774 1 5; 15 0 9 j PercefC 1% 99% 99% of 12 { 622 s% 'silt Pk total 453 754 j 24 Higheat 16:30 E /5,30 17:0G Volume 3 112 214 0 7 7 0 6€ Hi total 115 j 216 ; 12 PHF .98 1 .91 i .53 1' 24TH STREET 0411P 10 r 0 14 n 1 0 0 9 9 0 r ° 15 15 0 r 0 r VP 1 NE 2ND AVENUEli 449 4 449 453 38 1,236 9 774 0 783 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 1,261 1,248 784 0 449 9] 10 774 1 464 10$ 774 3g89 fi NE 2ND AVENUE 0 start L787 ; v5l02f0z File 7.D_ : 24 2A7 7 s 2 0 0 r r r r r I) r r r r r r r r r r r r r 1 1410 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1 1 1 0 1 N 1 t4;04“1; 1:10rAik M4c z) ZOb7 RAw4 'by: gto.leolit ouJe.4 Ao4 ►Ai.at11 23 9TREET EXSC3' Y. DULEVA11Df95 MIAMI, R 3 33 cat : 17 R3 ANOW, 7 rz 'I9APFIC 6URV9Y SeECIA.LISTS, : (- 624 CARDE2 266 TERRACE DELRAa 5EA, FLORIDA 33444 5�1) 272-3265 FAX (661) 272-4331 ALL VEHICLES S to Code : O0079339 5curl (Lt. 05/0'a107 Fire X.D. a 25ST_US3 Page 1 BISCAYNE 2CULEVA1D/U9 1 j36 35370 STREET CAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 1?d99 25171 STREET From Eat. From 'Eolith 1 From Wes ; ,Right 5121ru UTurn Legg j Right TPtrt 11T'irn _,eft 1 Right Thru Jw r Lest j Right Thru 1Trurn Left j Total Cate 05/01/07 From North 16-0 7 205 0 9 E , I 4 7 i 10 237 0 4( 6 0 0 1 1 494 16;15 0 185 I 22 12 2 0 6 11 339 0 5 E 9 0 0 1 i 574 166:30 0 191 0 6 i 9 9 0 6 3 6 324 0 4 1 0 0 3 i 545 :45 2 185 12 13 ?. 9 305 0 C 0 =' 0 1 5 Fir Total 9 765 1 39 j 41 3 0 31 1 36 1206 C 13 ? 7 0 0 6 7 2158 17:000 .. 220 0 9 I 5 0 0 2 6 379 9 0 1 0 2 0 9% 624 17;15 3 232 0 9 j 12 2 0 6[ 7 319 0 2 j 3 0 0 1 590 17;30 3 214 0 5 j 7 0 6 12 309 0 4 f 0 9 0 1 564 17,45 2 237 0 5 i 5 0 0 6 9 279 0 3 I2 0 0 0€ 540 Ho Total 9 903 9 28 29 3 0 24 € 34 1286 0 9 [ 5 2 6 2 [ 2334 *TOTAL 18 1669 1 1� r r 0 67 j 70 6 0 55 1 70 2492 9 22 12 2 0 8 1 4492 i 195 25 15 STREET A BIS B EV1RT2 ,, 5 iOIX594, FLORIDA 41/11 i 1 Peak Mart iVolume iTeZCe :t iP3c total Ihighest Volume 111 45 total PHF i i i 1 i i 624 GARGE54I2 TERRACE D 61.RAY 9D.Cd, FLORIDA 5344E 565 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4331 ALL VER/CLES 97SCA*tE ROULEVFRRD/US k Prom North. Right Thu Date 95/95/C7 Site Lode , 00039115 Start Date_ 05/O /02 File _,D. : 25S US1 Page 2 No 25TH STREET IB1SCAYN5 £sOU126VA.RQ/[;S 1 (145 25 B SaR5979 'From 5a*t. .F.rom South j Froes West Lett ! Right Thru L1Turn Left { Right T`hu UTu= I Right ahro 7Prrn Lett 1 Total Peak Hour Analysis By Entire Srteraecfor the Period; 16;90 to 16:00 on 39/61507 57,00 I 12;00 ( 17:09 ? 17;90 9 993 0 28 1 29 3 9 29 j 34 1286 0 a 5 2 0 .2 d 14 964 04 34 j 524 54 to 434 34 974 94 z4 564 224 Ca 224 9.0 1 56 1379 17,15 17,15 97:00 17115 3 232 0 9 1 12 2 0 9 j 5 379 9 0 I 3 9 8 1 244 1 22 I 355 i 4 .96 i .64 .86 3 .56 i NE 25TH STREET i� 9 i 9 i 1 i 0 21 2 2 2 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 2 9 0 i 5 5 0 30 90 903 940 28 2 1,286 29 28 1,317 2 57 • ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 2,334 24 903 5 932 2,261 B I S CAYNE BOULEVARD! US 1 120 29 29 3 56 3 24 24 64 NE 25TH STREET 0 0 28 2 34 1%)-d ► ►'o ► ► t 1 M 10�1�t { ) fl pie; CL& 1 t Za 2007 ► 1 \Diea 473f,4Wok ble4 1 i Traffic Survey Specialist Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 **********************************************************************w**** Data File ' Station ' Identification Start date Stop date 1City/Town Location D0503001.PRN 000000050203 : 000058410088 May 3, 07 May 3, 07 Miami, Florida : NE 20 St Between NE Interval ; 15 minutes Start time ; 00:00 Stop time 24:00 County : Dade 2 Ave & N Miami Ct 0******************************************************************************* Westbound Volume for Lane 1 • May 3 'End Time 00 01 / 15 12 11 , 30 10 7 45 8 2 00 5 8 -------- ---- 1Hr Total 35 28 02 7 12 03 04 4 4 6 3 6 3 5 5 1 3 30 14 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ---- 0 18 32 62 60 53 60 8 20 SO 52 63 46 50 12 24 51 54 45 47 62 9 39 61 54 52 51 44 ---- ---- -- ---- 15 29 101 194 222 220 197 216 0 End Time 12 13 1 15 66 70 1 30 66 63 45 67 50 1 00 48 48 0411Total 247 231 14 15 16 58 56 67 39 94 80 73 89 94 86 102 75 17 18 84 81 107 93 101 60 41 37 19 20 31 28 24 27 30 30 20 21 21 22 23 30 17 9 30 29 6 19 18 16 23 19 10 220 336 357 365 239 105 106 102 83 41 238 Peak 382 Peak 11******************************************************************************* Eastbound Volume for Lane 2 Hour Total : 3733 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak hour factor : 0.89 PM peak hour begins : 17:15 PM peak hour factor : 0.89 May 3 volume : volume : End Time 00 01 15 30 45 00 11 11 6 12 10 10 3 11 Hr Total 30 44 02 03 04 05 ---- 4 4 5 7 5 4 5 2 8 2 3 19 0 4 2 16 06 28 32 50 65 07 08 09 10 11 63 83 65 53 64 69 70 78 45 62 60 62 54 47 65 71 72 58 64 74 17 14 15 44 175 263 287 255 209 265 End Time 12 13 15 30 45 00 51 69 59 87 56 53 65 64 Hr Total 266 238 14 15 77 58 57 57 249 16 17 54 75 63 67 272 294 259 55 61 87 69 76 73 63 82 18 63 50 49 49 19 44 45 50 40 20 21 22 23 55 31 22 16 44 30 26 23 33 25 23. 13 35 31 15 15 21/ 179 157 117 86 67 024 Hour Total : 4023 w'AM peak hour begins : 08:00 AM peak volume : 287 Peak hour factor : 0.86 PM peak hour begins : 15:30 PM peak volume : 305 Peak hour factor : 0,88 ******************************************************************************* 04110 0 1 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 1 Data File : D0503001 . PRN Station 4 000000050203 p Identificatman : 000058410088 Intery : 15 minutes ' Start date : May 3, 07 Start time a 00:00 Stop date : May 3, 07 Stop time : 24:00 i City/Town: Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : NE 20 St Between NE 2 Ave & N Miami Ct Total Volume for All Lanes M May 3 r End Time 00 01 02 03 04 T�t _Grp 07 _OB _ 09 10 11 _ ' 15 23 22 11 8 9 7 46 95 145 125 106 124 30 16 19 17 10 8 10 52 119 122 141 91 112 45 18 12 14 5 8 31 74 111 116 99 94 127 __ 00___ va8 19 5 5 ___5 __25 _104 132 _126 110 m115 118 1 Hr Total 65 72 47 28 30 73 276 457 509 475 406 481 ' End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0 15 117 126 135 149 170 138 164 30 135 116 114 141 159 156 110 45 126 115 124 160 165 170 90 r 00 135 112 96 158 157 160 86 0 Total 513 469 469 608 651 624 450 • • 19 20 21 75 83 61 69 71 60 80 63 44 60 56 54 284 273 219 22 23 39 25 55 29 41 29 34 25 169 108 Hour Total : 7756 AM peak hour begins : 07:45 AM peak volume : 515 Peak hour factor : 0.89 PM peak hour begins : 15:45 PM peak volume : 652 Peak hour factor : 0.96 ********************-********************************************************-*** Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace 0 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 0 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File : D0503002,PRN Station : 000000050201 Identification : 000058410124 • Start date : May 3, 07 Stop date ; May 3, 07 0 City/Town : Miami, Florida Location : Biscayne Boulevard North of NE 31 Street 0 ******************************************************************************* May 3 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 / ______________ --------------------------------------- 0 End Time 00 01 02 03 ---- ---- 04 05 06 07 08 Interval : 15 minutes Start time : 00:00 Stop time ; 24;00 County : Dade 09 10 0 15 110 55 24 22 18 27 71 137 188 167 190 30 87 54 30 17 25 28 65 123 178 169 172 0 45 79 40 18 18 16 39 101 164 161 162 202 00 68 29 26 23 ,.....11 45 106 170 216 219 198 ---- ---- 0 Er Total 344 178 98 80 70 139 344 594 743 717 762 927 0 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 277 249 251 309 312 286 322 183 220 167 211 184 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 30 ---- 0 259 224 227 342 296 301 301 169 187 250 234 215 45 276 268 232 318 298 324 215 177 209 204 177 125 / 00 282 252 243 294 302 299 165 172 185 204 155 101 ---- ---- ---- ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- 1 4 1 Total 1094 993 953 1263 1208 1210 1003 701 801 825 777 625 11 221 212 217 277 Hour Total ; 16449 k AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 1030 Peak hour factor : 0.93 F PM peak hour begins : 15:15 PM peak volume : 1266 Peak hour factor : 0.93 1 ******************************************************************************* May 3 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 / 15 30 102 47 34 37 37 28 24 34 152 216 374 354 297 265 74 44 15 59 209 281 312 309 266 232 0 45 85 47 22 19 26 95 229 302 377 286 269 261 00 56 36 30 21 28 98 249 341 403 315 259 294 ill Hr Total 317 174 123 92 106 286 839 1140 1466 1264 1091 1052 0 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 15 294 295 240 329 330 304 311 256 207 30 304 311 269 369 341 342 316 243 206 0 45 343 286 278 314 297 362 270 245 234 0 00 336 270 259 353 344 339 242 220 196 0 Hr Total 1277 1162 1046 1365 1312 1347 1139 964 843 20 21 165 205 184 181 736 22 186 201 175 134 23 130 194 125 106 696 555 0 24 Hour Total : 20392 •AM peak hour begins : 08:00 AM peak volume : 1466 Peak hour factor : 0.91 PM peak hour begins : 15:15 PM peak volume ; 1366 Peak hour factor : 0.93 ******************************************************************************* Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 L7 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 ®hone (5 Volume Report with 24 Hour To ************************* Y******************* i Data File : D05030G2 . PRN Station : 000000050201 • )Identification : 000058410124 0 Start date ; May 3, 07 Stop date : May 3, 07 I City/Town : Miami, Florida ` Locat ion : Biscayne Boulevard N **a********************************** 1 May 3 Interval Start time Stop time County of NE 31 Street *********** ********************** lenia Terrace 1) 272-3255 is Page 2 ********************** Total Volume for All Lanes 15 minis 00:00 2 4 : 0 z0 : Dade 1 End Time 15 30 45 00 00 212 161 164 124 01 02 102 98 87 65 58 67 40 56 03 04 59 46 32 49 37 42 44 39 1 Hr Total 661 352 221 172 176 1 05 61 87 134 143 425 06 07 08 223 353 562 275 404 490 330 466 538 355 511 619 1183 1734 2209 09 521 478 448 534 1981 10 1 1 487 486 438 444 471 478 457 571 1853 1979 End Time 15 30 45 00 12 571 563 619 618 13 544 535 554 522 14 491 496 510 502 15 638 711 632 647 16 642 637 595 646 2520 17 590 643 686 638 18 633 617 485 407 19 20 21 439 427 333 412 393 455 422 443 388 392 381 385 22 23 397 314 435 409 352 250 289 207 Total 2371 2155 1999 2628 2557 2142 1665 1644 1561 1473 1180 Hour Total 0 36841 0 AM peak hour begins : 08:00 AM peak volume : 2209 Peak hour factor : 0.89 • PM peak hour begins : 15:15 PM peak volume : 2632 Peak hour factor : 0.93 0 I Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 0 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ***************************************************************** 0 Data File : D0503003.PRN k Station z 000000050202 , Identifloati n ! 000411638008 Interval : 15 minutes Start date ; May 3, 07 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : May 3, 07 Stop time ; 24:00 0 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location ; Biscayne Boulevard North of 23 Street p******************************************************************************* •May 3 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 ---------- 'End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ........_ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0 15 95 49 19 24 12 23 58 121 176 155 166 205 30 65 47 28 12 27 18 69 119 160 187 165 235 0 45 76 48 19 16 18 35 79 145 153 172 189 2,7 / 00 63 29 24 19 13 ---- ---- ---- 45 104 150 211 202 167 239 ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 299 173 90 71 70 121 320 535 700 716 687 896 10 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0 --1-.-5---- 263 232 218 273 300 263 258 140 191 162 205 175 1 30 238 238 217 281 290 254 234 143 171 232 211 184 45 239 268 186 299 281 267 187 158 186 185 173 119 / 00 259 255 267 282 301 273 148 155 162 194 129 89 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0411kTotal 999 993 888 1135 1172 1057 827 596 710 773 718 567 1111,Hour Total : 15113 1AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 957 Peak hour factor : 0.91 'PM peak hour begins : 16:00 PM peak volume : 1172 Peak hour factor : 0.97 1******************************************************************************* May 3 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 • End Time 00 1 15 72 30 51 0 45 52 00 50 Hr Total 225 136 01 41 29 41 25 02 03 04 27 23 18 19 25 14 17 15 19 19 27 24 05 25 48 83 83 06 123 165 199 214 07 08 09 10 11 185 218 258 288 284 302 219 265 256 199 287 252 198 354 236 176 87 71 89 239 701 949 1190 1046 792 176 189 187 183 735 11 End Time 12 0 15 1 30 45 0 00 13 196 263 207 223 245 219 242 214 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 196 199 208 232 241 183 126 103 107 68 197 200 218 281 242 164 134 125 100 117 190 215 215 354 185 159 153 106 115 78 192 221 228 335 179 155 126 126 95 72 OHr Total 890 929 775 835 869 1202 847 661 539 460 417 335 /24 Hour Total : 15009 hAM peak hour begins : 08:15 AM peak volume 1208 Peak hour factor : 0.85 FPM peak hour begins 17!15 PM peak volume : 1211 Peak hour factor : 0.86 1******************************************************************************* 11111 1 0 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc, 624 Gardenia Terrace 0 Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ************************************************************** 111 Data File 1 D0503003,PRN lik Station : 000000050202 P Identification : 000411638008 Interval : 15 minutes I Start date : May 3, 07 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : May 3, 07 Stop time 24:00 'City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade ' Location : Biscayne Boulevard North of 23 Street Total Volume for All Lanes , May 3 P 1 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 0 15 167 90 46 49 31 48 191 306 460 457 385 381 30 116 76 51 26 46 66 234 337 425 443 364 424 0 45 128 89 37 33 45 118 278 403 440 424 387 404 / -------- ---- 00 113 54 43 34 37 128 318 438 565 438 343 422 1 Hr Total 524 309 177 142 159 360 1021 1484 1890 1762 1479 1631 ------- IT- li End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 0 15 459 495 414 472 508 495 499 323 317 265 312 243 1 30 445 461 414 481 508 535 476 307 305 357 311 301 45 484 487 376 514 496 621 372 317 339 291 288 197 0 00 501 469 459 503 529 608 327 310 288 320 224 161 --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 10 , Total 1889 1912 1663 1970 2041 2259 1674 1257 1249 1233 1135 902 410 Hour Total : 30122 AM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak volume : 1905 Peak hour factor : 0.84 PM peak hour begins : 17:15 PM peak volume : 2263 Peak hour factor : 0.91 • ******************************************************************************* fi 141.lir mor 4w lor w 1111, w 1111, 1111, 4111, w w MI II 1111, • DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC Project Name: Location: Observer: INTERVA 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05: 5 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05-45 PM 06:00 P TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park Office Biscayne Boulevard! NE 24 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Bisca ne Boulevard mom= tA.L1=iiimi IILIIIIIIAIIIIL311S A 11111111BAIIIILAII 229 3 237 337 6 346 Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: NE 24 Street AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDIT1ONS-PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON 07136 51112007, Tuesday isca ne Boulevard NE 24 Street TIME INTERVAL NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND ESTBOUND GRAND TOTAL T R TOTAL T R TOTA T R TOTALT R TOTA 04:00 P 06:00 PM 17 1126 16 1158 25 713 12 750 11 4 12 PEAK HOUR FAC TOR 0.86 0.87 0.72 0.5 0,95 Note: 2003 FOOT Peak SeasonalWeekly Volume Factor = 0.97 Biscayne Blvd_NE 24 Styls IF IP w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w wNW ml. IOW • DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. TI INTERVAL TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: Biscayne Park Office Project Number: 07136 Location: Biscayne Boulevard 1 NE 25 Street Count Date: 5/1/2007 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Day of Week: Tuesday 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 P 05:30 P 05:45 P 04:15PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM NE 25 Street Bisca ne Boulevard EASTBOUND 4 237 10 251 5 339 11 355 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON Biscayne Boulevard ---------- NE 25 Street TIME INTERVAL NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND an T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL IllIl R TOTAL TOTAL 04:00 PM 6 00 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1209 En 1111111111111111111111 1253 0,84 810 9 852 0.90 6 11 1 0.39 27 4 64 0.6 1 Note: 2003 FOOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor 0 97 AN TOTAL 598 564 548 GRAND TOTAL 2180 0 94 Biscayne BlvdNE 25 Stxts w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w • • "VWw DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, [NC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park Office Biscayne Boulevard 1 NE 26 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: 07136 51112007 Tuesday Bisca ne Boulevard NE 26 Street N • :.; • • I _. � T . . 1 i A . II I 1 7- .,. Z ii ' TOTAL T R l CI'fAL L T IZ TOTAL ' L T R I TOTAL j L T jiiiiiiii 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 3 ®® 258 4 206 mu 7 8 2 5 13 493 04 15 PM 04:30 PM 350 360 3 169 177 I 3 9 2 4 15 555 04:;�0 PM 04:45 PM 3 MN 175 3 8 6 1 4 1 1 519 04:45 PM 05:00 PM ® 287 296 206Mil 209 0 4 1 2 3 6 515 05.00 PM 05:15 PM 4 ®® 322 202 min 210 6 3 3 12 7 0 4 1 1 555 00, 15 PM 0s:30 PM 2 4 317 221 6 6 4 16 9 3 6 18 572 05 30 PM 05:45 PM 3 0 314 204 209 3 9 �® 17 9 1 4 14 5r4 05:45 PM 00:00 PM 6 248 257 210 217 3 13 10 1 5 16 5f}3 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS•PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON Biscayne Boulevard NE 26 Street TIME INTERVAL... NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND G ND TOTAL AL L T R TOTAL 1 L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T v i T'OTA 16 1158 15 1 880 85 11 769 13 12 15 14 0.59 28 . 6 17 5 70 .__295 P�� HOUR FACTO 0 9Z .. 0 Note: 2003 FOOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 0,97 Bisc.oyne Blvdq_NE 25 St.xls 410 DAVFO PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park Office NE 2 Avenue 1 NE 24 Street {North Side) Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: Wednesday 07136 512/2007 NE 2 Avenue NE 24 Street --x -__.. INTERVAL OUTHBOUND EASTBOUND _�IV t��Tl — 'RAN TOTAL L L L L Rrami 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 0 175 2 177 4 100 0 104 0 0 0 0 4 2 6 10 91 r 294 20 3 348 04:30 PM 0 183 1 184 2 97 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 0 214 4 218 6 113 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 9 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 0 179 1 180 3 106 0 109 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 291 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 0 188 6 194 6 111 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 1 mm a 0 0 07 5___ 4 6 6 9 7 0 31 289 270 245 ___ 05 15 PM 05:30 PM 0 165 161 6 4 171 165 9 9 100 86 0 109 0 0 0 05,30 PM 05:45 PM 0 0 95 0 0 0 ® 0 05:45 PM 06:00 PM 0 146 4 150 6 82 0 88 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON NE 24 Street TIME INTERVAL NORTHBOUND SOIJTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEST B UND GRAND TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L. T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL 04:00 PM 06:00 PM 0 685 14 698 0.83 22 386 0 407 0 0 0 0 12 0 21 33 0.65 1139 PEAK f-iQUR FACTOR 0.88 N/A 0.90 Note: 2003 FDOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 0.97 NE 2 Ave iE 24 St Oortll).xts Mr lir lor ler er w VP I/ 111, 1111, W w VP Vir w 111, w w Mr 111, N. NV "V gur wwwwwwwww Ng" my lir Now III -WISF IRV 'Mr • ft °AVID PLUMMER & ASSOCEALES. INC. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: Biscayne Park Office Location: NE 2 Avenue 1 NE 24 Street (South Side) Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. TIME INTERVAL 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM TIME INTERVAL Project Number: 07136 Count Date: 5/2/2007 Day of Week: Wednesday NOFtTHBD Ft 1 189 0 2 187 0 2 214 0 2 183 0 2 189 4 188 177 60 0 0 0 0 NE 2 Avenue NE 24 St TOTAL L 190 0 189 0 216 0 185 0 191 0 192 0 179 0 161 0 OUTHBOUND T Ft TOTAL 106 5 103 2 112 3 114 0 112 111 108 92 0 2 111 105 115 114 112 112 109 94 1 3 2 0 5 2 2 4 0 7 0 3 0 3 0 1 TOTAL 2 4 5 12 5 5 5 0 0 0 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON NORTHBOUND NE 24 Street SOUTHBOUND TOTAL Note: 2003 FOOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 0.97 19 0 42 E OUND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRAND TOTAL 303 298 336 301 315 309 293 260 EST8OUND GRAND R TOTAL TOTAL 0 0 0 1172 N/A 0.94 NE 2 Ave NE 24 St (south),xls w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ws w w w w w w w w w w w w w war w w • • ❑AVIE) PLUMMER ASSOCIATES, INC TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Project Name: Biscayne Park Office Location: NE 2 Avenue / NE 25 Street Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. TIME INTERVAL 04:00 P 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04',30 PM 04.45 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 0530P 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 06:00 PM NE 2 Avenue Project Number: 07136 Count Date: 5/212007W Day of Week: Wednesday NE 25 Street e• ■:.1 t •i `B•1 0 ;•1 0 - - WE 1 N GRANIT: TOTAL IIIMIIRJIII fI I IILIIIIMUIIIIIILIII TOTAL • WI 167 2 172 0 104 106 0 4 1 8 290 1 179 1 185 © 99 103 0 8 2 2 5 301 220 1 224 103 0 108 6 0 i,.. 6_ 13 352 174 2 180 108 0 110 3 0 4 0 1 3 297 194 © 200 119 1 0 6 1 1 1 3 329 194 0 194 3 119 � 124 1 0 4 0 0 1 I 1 324 179 181 © 109 112 0 0 2 1 3 5 300 161 165 c� 92 �' 5 0 8 ........ 5 ... 275.... 97 AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON NE 2 Avenue NE 25 Street TIMENORTHBOUND INTERVAL©1011 SOUTHBOUN_ D EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAND TOTAL. TOTAL ( L T R TOTAL EEll T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL. 04:00 PM 06 00 PM 10 712 728 �� 6 NMI= 0 j® 8 3 11 21 119.9 PEAK HOUR FACTOR � 0.$411111.111110,89 0,72 0.42 0.92 Note: 2003 FOOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 0.97 NE 2 Ave NE 25 St.xls • • DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Name: Location: Observer: TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS Biscayne Park Office NE 2 Court / NE 24 Street Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc, Project Number: Count Date: Day of Week: Wednesday AVERAGE PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS -PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON 07136 5/2/2007_ TOTA 17 10 25 11 29 23 NE 2 Court NE 24 Street TIME INTERVAL NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND GRAN[ TOTAL 83 [ L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL 1 T R 0 TOTAL 31 04:[OOPM08OCPM0 8 0 10 17 4 0 _ 0 0 0 i 22 13 35 22 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.45 NIA 0.64 0.73 _ 0 93 Note: 2003 FOOT Peak Seasonal Weekly Volume Factor = 0.97 NE 2 CI_NE 24 St_xls NL'-Mf,1P, $ ASSOCATES. iaz3C,-. 24-HOUR COUNTS S Project Name: Biscayne Park Office Projec€ No,: Location: NE 20 Street between NE 2 Avenue and North Miami Avenue Count Date: Observer; Traffic Surrey Specialists, Inc, i3EGIN TIME EASTBOUND 1gt 114 2r:d 1/4 3rd 114 4th 114iTOTAL 12:00 AM , 11 6 10 3 30 01:0O AM 11 12 10 11 44 02:00AM 4 5 8 0 17 03:00 AN ` 4 4 2 4 14 04:0G AM 5 5 3 2 15 05.00 AM 7 2 19 16 44 06.00 AM 28 32 50 65 175 07.00AM 63 69 60 71 263 0800414 83 70 62 72 287 09.00 AM 65 78 54 58 255 10.00424 53 45 47 64 »S 209 1100424 64 62 65 74 265 12.00PM 51 69 59 87 266 01_00PM 56 53 65 64 238 02:00 PM 77 58 57 57 249 03:00 PM 55 61 87 69 272 04:00P14 76 73 63 82 ' 294 05:00 PM 54 75 63 67 259 06:00 PM 63 50 49 49 211 07:00 PM 44 45 50 40 179 08:00 PM 55 44 33 35 167 09:00 PM 31 30 25 31 117 10:00 PM 22 26 23 15 86 11 00 PM 16 23 13 15 67 1[24-HOUR TOTAL 47023 AM Peak Hour. PM Peak Hcur-. EASTBOUND BEGfN TIME WEST6OL`ND 1st 114 2nd 1/413rd 114 4th 1/4 TOTAL 12:00 AM 12 10 8 5 35 01,00AM 11 7 2 8 28 02:00 AM 7 12 6 5 30 03.06' ia�r jj 4 6 3 1 14 04:00 AM E 4 3 5 3 15 05:00 AM EE `0 8 12 9 29 06:00 AM 18 20 24 39 101 07:00 AM 32 50 51 61 194 08:0C AM 62 52 54 54 222 09:00 AM 60 63 45 52 220 10:00 AM 53 46 47 51 197 11:00414 60 50 62 44 216 12:00 PM 66 66 67 48 247 01:00 PM 70 63 50 48 231 02:00 PM 58 56 67 39 220 03:00 PM 94 80 73 89 336 04 00 PM 94 86 102 75 357 05:00 PM 84 81 107 93 365 06.00 PM 101 60 41 37 239 I' 07.00 PM 31 24 30 20 105 08:00 PM 28 27 30 21 106 09:00 PM 30 30 19 23 102 10:00 PM 17 29 18 19 83 11:0OPM 9 6 16 10 41 24-HOUR TOTAL 3733 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY Time: 08:00 AM Volume. 287 Time-- 03-30 PM Volume. 305 AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: 07136 513/2007 T fl1C7 "IAY TOTAL 6 72 47 2 3 73 276 457 509 475 4 48 469 469 608 65 624 450 284 2 219 169 108 7,756 AM Peak Hour_ Time, 11:45 AM Volume: 243 PM Peak Hour_ Time, 05.15 PM Volume: 382 EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND Time', K-factor: D-factor: Time: K-factor_ 0-factor: 07,45 AM 6.6% 55.5% EB 03:45 PM 8.4°A 56.9% VVB Volume: 515 PHF: 0.89 Volume: 652 PHF: 0.96 NE 20 St - NE 2 Ave_N Miami Ave xis V+D PLUMMj:R A5 v;,: 24-HOUR COUNTS Project Name: Biscayne Office Park Project No.: 07136 Location: Biscayne Boulevard between NE 36 Street and NE 29 Street Count Date: 6/3/2007 Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. SEGIN TIME NO THBOUND f 1st 114 2nd 114 3rd 1i4 4+h 1/4ITOTAL 12 ©O A 1 10 s 87 79 68 344 01:00 AM ( 55 54 40 29 176 2:00AM 24 30 18 26 98 03:00 AM 22 17 18 23 80 40GA.M 18 25 16 11 70 5 07 AM 27 28 39 45 139 06 00 AM 71 66 101 106 344 07:00 AM 1_137 164 170 594 09.00AM 168 178 161 216 743 Os OO At 167 169 162 219 717 000AM 190 172 202 198 762 111 00 AM 221 2' 2 217 277 927 12'00PM 277 259 276 282 1094 01:II0PM 249 224 268 252 993 02:00PM 251 227 232 243 953 03:00 PM 309 342 318 294 1263 04:00 PM 312 296 298 302 1,208 05:00 PM E 286 301 324 299 1,210 06:00't'M 322 301 215 165 1,003 07:OO PM 183 169 177 172 7t11 08 00 PM 220 187 209 185 801 09:00 PM 167 250 204 204 825 1 0:00 PM 211 1 234 177 155 777 1:0Ci Pd 184 215 125 101 625 24-HOUR TOTAL 16,449 A.N. Peak Hour. PM Peak Hour: NORTHBOUND . BEGIN5OUTHBOUND 'NOE1 st 114 TOTAL 102 74 35 6 317 01:00 AM 47 i 44 47 36 02:DOAM 34 22 34 123 03.00AM 37 15 19 2i92 04_00 AM 28 24 28 28106 05:00 AM I 34 58 9S 98286 0.00 AM 152 2D9 229 249839 07.00 AM ' 216 281 302 1 3411,140 38.00AM 374 312 377 4031,466 0900 AM E 354 309 236 3151,264 1000AM ' 297 266 269 2591,091 3C AM 265 232 2©1 i 2941,052 12:00 PM 294 304 343 3361,277 01 00 PM 295 311 286 27€1,162 02.00PM 24fl 269 278 2591,046 03•GO PM 329 369 314 3531,365 O4.00 PM 330 341 297 344,312 1 05.00 PM 304 342 362 3381,347 l 06:00 PM 311 316 270 2421,139 07:00 PM 256 243 245 220964 08:00 PM 207 206 234 196843 09:00 PM 166 205 984 181736 10:00 PM 166 201 175 134696 11:6O PM 130 194 125 106555 r24-HOUR TOTAL j 20,392 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY Time. 11:45 AM Volume. 1,089 Time: 03:15 PM Vatume. 1.266 AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: NORTHBOUND AND SORTHBOUND Time: K-factor: D-factor: Time: K-factor: D-factor, . 11:45 AM 6.314 53.1% GB 03:15 PM 7.1% 51.5% SE3 36.84 Time: 08.00 AM Volume, 1,466 Tme. 03:15 PM Volume 1,366 Volume: 2,324 PHF0.94 Volume: 2,632 PHF: 0.93 Biscayne Bivd - NE 36 St _ NE 29 St xis f • ;AV':ATE- 3NC. 24-HOUR COUNTS S Project Name: Biscayne Park Office Project No.: Location: B sca ; ne Boulevard between NE 29 Street and NE 20 Street Count Date: Observer: Traffic Survey Specialists, inc, BEGIN j TIME NORTHBOUND lot 1/4 2nd 1/4 3rd 1/414th 114 TOTAL 12:00AM 95 65 76 63 299 01:OOAM 49 47 48 29 173 02:00AM 19 28 19 24 90 03:00 AM 24 12 16 19 71 04:00 AM 12 27 18 13 70 05.00AM 23 18 35 45 121 06,00AM 68 69 79 104 320 07.00 AM 121 119 145 150 08 00 RM 176 160 153 211 09:00 AM 155 187 172 1 202 716 10.00 AM ^ 168 165 189 167 687 11:00 AM 205 235 217 239 896 12:00 PM 263 238 239 259 999 01:00 PM 232 238 268 255 02.00 PM 218 217 186 267 03:00 PM 273 281 299 282 1.135 0..:00 PM 300 290 281 301 1,172 05:00 PM f. 263 254 ~ 267 273 06:00 PM 258 234 187 148 827 07.00 PM ' 140 143 158 155 596 08:00PM 191 171 186 162 710 09,00 PM 162 232 185 194 773 10,00 PM 205 211 173 129 718 11.00 PM 175 184 119 89 567 24-HOUR TOTAL [ 15,113 AM Peak Hour. PM Peak Hour. NORTHBOUND EGA SOUTHBOUND st 114 2nd 114 3rd 114 41i 1/4 TOTAL 2:OOAM 72 51 52 50 225 01:00 AM 41 29 41 25 136 02:00AM 27 23 18 19 87 03:00AM 25 14 17 15 71 u4:DO AM 19 19 27 24 89 05:00AM 25 45 53 83 239 08:00AM 123 165 199 214 701 07:OOAM 185 218 258 288 949 08:00AM 284 265 287 354 1,190 09:00 AM 302 256 252 I 236 1,046 10:00AM 219 199 198 176 792 11 00 AM 176 189 187 183 735 12,00 PM 196 207 245 242 890 01 00 PM 263 223 219 214 919 10200PM 196 197 190 192 775 03 00 PM 199 200 215 221 835 0400PM 208 218 215 228 869 05.00 PM 232 281 354 335 1,202 06.00 PM 241 242 185 179 847 07:00 PM 183 164 159 155 661 08:00PM 126 134 153 126 539 09:00PM 103 125 106 126 460 10:00PM 107 100 115 95 417 11:00 PM 68 117 78 72 335 I24-HOUR TOTAL 115,009 1 DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY Time: 11:45 AM Volume'. 979 Time: 04:00 PM Volume. 1:172 AM Peak Hour, PM Peak Hour: AM Peak Hour: PM Peak Hour: NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND Time: K-factor: D-factor_ Time: K-factor, D-;actor, 08:30 AM 6.3% 629 % SB 0515PM 7.5% 53,5% SB 07136 513/2007 VVO-WAY TOTAL 24 30 77 42 36 1,021 1.484 1, 890 762 1.479 631 1.88 912 1.663 1.97 2,04 2.259 1,674 1.257 1.24 1,233 1.13 902 0,122 Time: 08.15 AM Volume: 1,208 Time: 05:15 PM Volume: 1,211 Volume: 1,905 PHF: 0.84 Volume: 2,263 PHF: 0.91 Biscayne Blvd - NE 29 St NE 20 St.xls 1 • • r • • •ab • • • • • • • • • • • igna T n s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 Signal Timing PATTERN SCHEDULE FOR 3597 3S 1 & E 26 ST FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) TIME PT OFF NSG G v EWP Y S Y M CYC MIN: 20 12 0 11 70 66 4 15 4 90RARL-Y NT 15 21 0 30 1 4 12 4 6 51 N T TE M2 115 23 0 30 1 4 12 4 6 51DATE NTG 500 19 0 30 1 4 12 4 6 51 DAWN Ms_2 545 1 58 66 1 4 15 4 90AVG M2 0 615 2 16 55 1 4 26 4 9GPRE AM 1S 745 12 23 61 1 4 20 4 90AM PEAK 845 16 103 88 1 4 13 4 110M1➢ MORN 1200 17 102 88 1 4 13 4 11ONOON M2 1345 10 102 88 1 4 13 4 110AFT M1 0 1545 9 102 93 1 4 13 4 115PRE PM P .1630. 18 1.02 93 1 . 4 13 4 i 1.5 PM PEAK 1800 3 77 63 1 4 18 4 90POST PM 1900 1 58 66 1 4 15 4 90AVG M2 0 2130 11 70 66 3 4 15 4 90E.ARLY NI 1 1 Appendix C FDOT's Quality/LOS Handbook Generalized Tables Downtown Miami DRI Increment II Transit Ridership • • CLASSIFICATION CLASS 2 ARTERIAL CLASS 4 ARTERIAL TYPE 1L.U. 2LD 3LD 4LD 1LU 2LD. 3LD 4LD LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE FDOTS 2002 QUALITY 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE (Peak Hour Directional Volumes) A B 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 220 340 440 0 0 0 c 90 1,360 2,110 2,790 270 650 1,000 1,350 D 810 1,710 2,570 3,330 720 1,586 2,390 3,130 E 850 1,800 2,710 _ 3,500 780 1,660 2,490 3,250 til PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE (Threshold volume to capacity ratio A B C L D I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.12 0.°i2 0.13 0.13 0 0 069. 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.35 0,3 0,40 .........._. 0.42 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0, 0.96 0.96 1,00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Source: FDOT's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook NOTES: [1 ] THE PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE IS DERIVED BY DIVIDING THE FDOT'S 2002 LEVEL OF SERVICE BY THE LOS E FOR EACH TYPE OF ROADWAY, wIMP wwwwwMP' wwIMF wrwrwwrVP' wwwwwIMF wrwwwwwwwwNW' w®www w w w Mr 'ssir Not.19t4 .„k 00 2EN9v92991 CAOWAY ...,.688091 BISCAYNE /2L NE 64 STREE.T NE 46 STRET NE 46 STREET E-195 1-195 NE 36 STREET NE 36 51REEY NE 29 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 20 STREET FIE 20 STREET 60 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 13 STREET NE 13 STREET I-395 9-398 NE 6 STREET NE 9 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 4 STREET SE I STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET 5E 2 STREET SE 4 STREET N6 2 AVENUEIBRICKELL, AVENUE NE 20 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE t3 STREET NE 13 STREET 1.399 1-395 NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 1 STREET NE. 1 STREET FLADLER. STREET FIAGLER STREET 512 1 STREET SE 1 000601 SE 2 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 4 STREET 5E 4 STREET SE 6 STREET SE 8 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 95 ROAD SW 15 ROAD RIGKENBACKER CSYW NE AY8NUE NE 17 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET F.395 1-395 NE 6 STREET NE 6 STREET FLAGLER STREET TLTI3LER STREET 3E 9 STREET SE 1 SPREE? 5E 7 STREET FACILITY TYPE EXIMIPIG IN R LANES NB SB NB 5B NB 8B NB SB NB 58 NB 5B NB 58 M8 88 NB 98 NB 58 NB 58 N8 58 NB 5B NB SB NB S8 NB NB 98 NB S8 NB SB 58 58 58 5B 58 9999 SB NEI 58 NB SB NB SB NB 85 NB 58 NB NB NB NB NB 410 4L0 3 3 410 3 3 410 3 3 4L0 3 3 4110 3 3 4L17 3 3 41.0 3 3 OLD 3 3 SLO 3 3 4L 3 31 3 BLn 3 8L0 610 BL0 3 3 48 5 2LOW 9$ 4L1J 9 411.3 9 4LU 9 31 3L 31. 9 31 K 3L 3L 24 4L 24 2L 24 3L 24 4LO 24 24 4LO 46 46 4L0 48 46 2LU 6 33. 6 3L 6 33 3L 31 6 16 62 16 82 16 62 16 62 16 62 16 62 16 36 16 38 16 36 16 16 18 32 36 36 48 62 46 62 46 49 4e 4e 16 4e to 48 16 46 16 48 96 46 16 48 11 1e 93 95 95 95 95 10 10 €0 10 10 10 10 T B 48 48 4e 49 40 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 6 6 s 32 32 10 61 8 95 5 9 B 93 93 93 93 93 93 62 93 82 93 92 93 62 83 62 03 62 83 62 93 62 93 93 T 93 95 51 93 51 93 51 93 51 93 51 93 51 93 61 93 51 93 51 93 93 95 46 77 T T 14 95 95 7 95 T 95 T 95 T 95 95 C 95 95 C 95 C 95 95 95 51 8 95 95 95 95 95 5 95 95 S 95 5 95 96 95 93 TABLE 21443 13439914rtoBi i LA1p4®11551-0JYK1A7R 2D2191211143 PIS 99,12 99211619994112 AND PERSON -TRIP 1APAC1TY AESRINMENT8 PUS ROUTES 96RVIN6 OAOWAYSEGEEIENT9 95 T 95 T 95 T 85 T 95 95 95 95 95 0 95 10 10 K T 10 K T 7 8 9 10 K T 7 9 9 1O K 7 B 5 5 0 $ 96 C —7271 3 11 46 9% 96 T9 99 66 69 111 99 86 59 999 99 66 69 911 99 66 69 111 99 66 69 911 99 66 69 111 18 54 18 111 45 191 99 45 42 111 99 4$ 42 111 88 45 42 84 75 45 42 84 75 30 84 240 75 9 10 192 46 72 20 86 19 68 19 68 16 66 18 46 12 69 40 6 4 2 2 24 32 18 27 fSi 28/48Li 76 76 S 92 6 65 3 96 9 92 3 8 2 6 6 7 9 9 132 132 138 78 48 Tiff 33 66 Be 68 44 0 0 6 0 34 52 S 5 2 5 4 149 187 90 K 48 48 159 48 112 46 76 48 76 190912999 4891 ROW 0ER 8df:ti694 93 21 13 21 13 21 13 21 21 13 21 s3 21 3 21 8 12 12 80 24 144 24 146 24 192 16 T 129 132 724 76 7T 42 K 94 f 64 94 93 17i8 100 199 106 €00 109 100 109 100 110 160 100 100 104 76 104 1OO 86 199 69 09 66 OO 60 60 80 T 8 0 18 1e 1e 1e 16 19 10 167 487 167 00 72 96 72 06 72 99 83 76 63 P5 l i 1999 200 796 203 290 260 290 295 216/ 200 295 170 275 T 152 946 i 152 946 152 14s 152 148 152 132 TOTAL �^ 94U8 IRx9 Aneerffos5' 1 340A3970 339 .246 334 '748 339 246( 573[ 418I 1.z3I 495 523, 496I 442, 063 87/1 46$1 75,21 W19 7411 484 749 4981 4127 459 627 5134 I, ICE 69 1671 020 P.2P0 920 0.565 9203 6.2711 0.369 1 0.2319 97 355 0.1 11.3 2292 19 1 1,796 2,4881 ,r06 2,484 1.706 0. :2,456< 8.2174 1,7961 0.307 2,4116I 0197 2,486I 0 584 2,226 8..177 3.494I 19.321 81351 0.190 76t1'.. 912411 1879 7519 022411 k 39A 1191 04 3061 206 : I 31541 1492 3 51 9,6701 025E 9,97p '� 9.2E8 1,330j 0.22fl. 552i 5.34t 536 04'I 9!6 365 996 2ma 119 196 xe 1,99A 22 104 456 430 276 409 69 191 4 0 i92e 1.344 4,271 $66, P.424 ,5960,210 30611696 y 308 0.ik1$ 306 T,©7I 874 1,229 1.226 2,164 2,114 534 06.7 0.3612 1 5 354 0_212!I- 192� 1.12T SOURCE', KEITII AND SCYINARS, P.A. N1TRANPLAVAT220JE9TS1324311197 9911TA&LE.SI91SAATC1C.1964 • .. Pmp,14,4 6 • ROADWAY i1071A-8811113-6''-- - NW 20 STREET Nvv 17 STREET NW 17 STREET NW In STREET N29 14 STREET NW 6 SITtEET NW 9 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 5 STREET SW 1 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 2 AVEPJUE N. MIAMI AVENUE EE3 WB N. MIAMI AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE E8 WEI NW 3 AVENUE 155 ER 568 FACILITY TYPE smarm LANEs 9115 2LU 58 NB 2211 2 21 58 2 21 NB 2LU 21 SB 21 NB 3L NB NE 15 STABEINEKTIAK CSWY BiSCAYNE ISLAND 6676640916 DRIVE 6E1 WS DAYstiORE DRWE BrSCAvNE BLVD ES 988 BISCAYNE 131.20 N. MIAMI AVENUE EH 568 NE 14 STREET SAYSHDRE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLVD BISCAYNE BLVD NE 1 AVENUE NE 1 AVERAJE N MIAMI AVENUE 01 PRAM AVENUE vwv 2 AVENUE mht ? AVENUE MA/ 3 AVENUE Ewa 3 AVENuE 125 NE 11 STREET NW 3 AVENUE 145 NEE 10 STREET NVY 3 AVENUE 1-25 STREET/PORT 490ULE5280 E. OF PORT BRIDGE BISCAYNE BLVD BISCAYNE BLVD NE 1 AVENUE NE 1 AVENUE 94 MIAMI AVENUE hi MIAMI AVENUE NW 1 AVENUE NW 1 AVENUE NW I ci rfw I CT Nvi ?AVENUE 94985 AvEAAJE NrAt 3 AvENUE mw 3 AVENUE 1415 es 468 E11 Wa ES EB We EB WA ELI 9893 WB EH EB W13 W8 we WB WB W8 988 988 2L 2411 32 32 4LU 32 32 4599 32 32 2LD A A ?X 32 32 2LU 4LU 3 IL K 21 Ai M 2LU m 69 2LU 2 2 2LU 3L 21 2L 21 61.0 3L 2L 29. 21. 2L 21. 7 31. 7 40 48 16 51 16 61 T M T 14 14 79 7 21 21 A 55 62 C 62 C 91 49 69 69 TABLE 21,AS Roviwrowit 18.4.4* orti UPDATE MOM PM BUB RAWASHIP ABB KABOB -TRW CAPACITY ABAKOSMENT3 BUB ROUTES SARVING ROADWAY eta 86947. 5 32 93 128 56 14 22 46 56 15 27 18 27 10 27 155 32 36 42 18 32 61 3 16 012 45 48 69 128 21 16 21 54 2 7 6 75 86 411 75 66 75 76 78 A 24 16 24 94 32 18 21 Si 5 243 62 13 21 23 76 61 72 ROOMS AM SECIEMEMT 12 14 112 62 66 14 112 46 20 14 46 14 40 14 466 10 8 275 298 152 132 126 126 Una. 85)8 tsaa 162 55.91; 2.415.4 1 645 15 5501 kl. 754 58 114 1 taMm I'M' D.164 1 i 1 ! V 15T1, .$ 10 %.1 0-092. 271 MI 1.135 10 iss I *.o4m 271 161 195 61:3'n I NI 45, 0.533 161 AS5.465 7.0 5490.136 ! 1 VD! 0.M' 71 I 11 1 ! 7946 i ZOO 0.551 778 i 2.7% 61,20i zac! 69150.419 238 ets 0.149 45139 11.34,1 i 1 0-106 4 ' 1251 +66 3511 0.3552 I 4 4 , 13£7 0.1443 114 [[ 445 111509 p 50! 446 C.1.TE, ,.. 14 11,6 0.140 ..: ,.., 54 l' 114 ACM ''. 7555 teM WS 5213 14't 1155 0274 Oil E13 7.338 11627JE% 13.0e la?! WOI 6427 sOuRCE: AFJTH AND 911111491919.PS. NATRANPLAMPROJECTS1.20011167182TADLES1111MATROLEP1.4 P437'107 269N0v-2001 ROADWAY FROM TO BISCAYNE BLVO NE 54 STREET NE 46 STRET NE 46 STREET I.195 1-195 NE 36 STREET NE 36 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 29 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 20 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 15 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 13 STREET NE 13 STREET 1.395 1395 NE 6 STREET NE 6 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 4 STREET NE 2 AVENUEIBRICKELL AVENUE NE 20 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 19 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 14 STREET NE 13 STREET NE 13 STREET 1-395 i-395 NE 3 STREET NE 3 STREET NE 1 STREET NE 1 STREET FLAGLER STREET FLAGLER STREET SE 1 STREET SE 1 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 2 STREET SE 4 STREET SE 4 STREET SE 8 STREET . SE 8 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 15 ROAD SW 15 ROAD RICKENBACKER CSWY TABLE 2EA8 DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI UPDATE EXISTING AM AND PM METRORAIL AND METROMOVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON -TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT OIR NB SB NB 58 NB SB NB SB NB SE NB SB NB 5B NB 58 NB SB NB 58 NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SE NB 5E NB NB 59 NB SB NB 56 SB SB SB SB SB 5B SB NB 58 NB SB NB Si; NB SB FACILITY TYPE EXISTING ^LANES 4L0 4LO 4L13 4L1:X 4L0 4L13 4L13 4L0 6L17 81.0 4L 31 ELD SLIX OLD 8LO 2LOW 4LU 4LU 4LU 3L 3L 3L 3L 3L 3L 4L 2L 3L 4L0 4LC1 4L0 METRO - RAIL MR4 MR4 [2j PM PEAK 7TJTAL [1] CAPACITY RIDERSHIP % _PERSONS PER ONS1 25% 25% 25% 25% 1,463 1,463 1,463 1,463 276 692 276 692 AM PEAK TOTAL �............ RIDERSHIP AM REeTRO- YIC BOWL_ w1C PMS3yER 0.189 0.473 0.189 0.473 813 256 813 256 0.556 0.175 0.556 0.175 MM2 MM2 MM2 MM2 MM2 MMI MM1 MM1 MM1 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% BOX 50% 50% 50% 501E 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% MMY 25% 25% MM2 25% 25% MM2 50% MM2 50% MM1 50% MM1 50% MM1 50% MM1 5013. 11,4541 100% MM2 50% 100% MM2 50% 100% MM2 56% 50% MANS P1 PEAK CAPACITY LPERSONA, 960 960 960 950 960 960 960 960 960 960 960 960 1,440 1,440 1,440 i,440 1,440 1,449 2,0130 480 480 480 480 960 980 1.440 1,440 1,440 1,44 2,F 7 960 1,920 860 1,980 920 0 3 P41 PEAK TALv 1380FIP 44 0.046 53 0.055 44 0.046 53 0.055 44 0.046 53 0.055 44 0046 53 0.655 47 0.049 B9 0.093 91 0.095 79 0.073 83 0.058 56 6.039 74 0.051 800.656 1061 0.074 73,1 0.051 2111 0,073 221 0.046 26' 0.054 22 0.046 ,28 0,054 53 0.055 70 0.073 55 0.039 80 0.056 BO 9.956 73 0.051 1461 0.051 164 0.1'71 360 0.1.3E 1641 0.171 360( 0.191 es 1 6.00 07 0.101 AM PEA aLeetterep A TEllAoetsi 0.059 0.052 57 0.059 50 0.09'2 57 0.059 50 0.052 37 0.059 50 0.052 0.064 0.053 0.092 0.071 81 0.056 59 0.039 00 0.056 57' 0.040 102 0.071 76� 0.0531E 2031 2.07id 1 61 i 11 II 1131 0235 Ir1 1001 0.206� 1131 0.235 100; 0.205 1091 0,104 `!`! 1351 0.143k 1 151 1511 316j 3441 3161 344 1931 11Z i! 0,329 0.173, 0.329i 0-179j1. 0,170 0,193 SOURCE: KEITFI AND SCHNAMS, N:1TRANPI.NJWft0JECTS1200111671VT39LES31IM3T43)433 43 20-N0v-2001 ROADWAY FRC)M TO WW2 -AVENUE- .._ NW It STREET NW 8 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 6 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 3 STREET NW 3 STREET . NW 1 STREET NW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 1 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 2 STREET SW 7 STREET SW 7 STREET SW 8 STREET SW 8 STREET SW 11 STREET SW 11 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 13 STREET SW 15 ROAD NW 3 AVENUE NW 20 STREET NW 17 STREET NW 17 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 14 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 9 STREET NW 5 STREET NW 5 STREET SW 1 STREET CIE 20 STREET NE 2 AVENUE N, MIAM! AVENUE N. MIAMI AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE NW 3 AVENUE 1-95 NE 15 STREETNENETIAN CSWY BISCAYNE ISLAND BAYSHORE DRIVE BAYSHORE DRIVE BISCAYNE BLW BISCAYNE BLVD N. MIAMI AVENUE TABLE 21.A6 DOWNTOWN WAIN Dill UPDATE EXISTING AM AND PM METRORAIL AND METROMOVER RIDERSHIP AND PERSON -TRIP CAPACITY ASSIGNMENT FACILITY TYPE EXISTING AIR LANES.. NB 2LU SB NB 2LU SB NB 2L0 SB NB 210 S8 NB 2L SB 1L NB 2L SB 1L NO 4LU S8 N8 2LU S8 N8 4LU SB N8 21.11 58 NB 2LU S8 NB 4LU SB NB SB NB S8 NB SB NB NB E8 WB EB WB E8 WB ES WB ES WB ES WB 2LU 2LU 2LU 3L 2L 2LU 4LU 4L0 2LD 210 2LU METRO - RAIL MR1 MR1 MR2 MR2 Ill 76 50% 25% 50% 25% 50% 25% 50% 25% I2I PM PEAK AM PEAK PEAK TOTAL�.� _. __..._TOTAL���._-.� CAPACITY RIDERSHIP PM RIDERSHIP AM IPERSONs 1PERSON8I WC - PER50NS WC 2,925 1,463 2,925 1,463 2,925 1,463 2,925 1,463 684 692 684 692 686 692 686 692 0.234 0.473 0.234 0.473 0.235 0.473 0235 0.473 MR3 25% 1,463 281 0.192 25% 1,463 692 0.473 MR3 25% 1,453 281 0.192 25% 1.463 692 0,473 MR4 25% 1.463 27s 0.189 25% 1.463 692 0,473 M0.4 25% 1,463 276 0.109 25% 1.463 692 0.473 1,266 256 ,266 256 1.258 256 1,258 256 0.433 0.175 0.433 0.175 0.430 0.175 0.430 0.175 776 0.530 256 0.175 776 0,530 256 0,175 813 0.556 256 0.175 013 0,556 256 0.175 PEAK _PM PEAK MOVER % IPRS[NV5.1 _.{PERSUN__ �_ METRO- + T CAAPACITY RIDERSHIP A 5 Yfc SOURCE: KEITH AND SCHNARS, PA i:'i'i5120014167164TABLESt11MATikkl'Nti4 A endix Intersection Capacity Analysis Worksheets r • • r i• xisting ondi i c)1 n Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time- Period T Qtt AY TOP CONTROL SUNWARY DPA -Existing PM Peak Hour Project Description Biscayne Park Office - #07136 East/West Street: NE 24 Street o mation North/South Street: Biscayne Boulevard ersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street Northbound vernent 1 ume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (vehlh) Percent Heavy Vehicles edian Type RT Channeiized Lanes onfiguration Upstream Signal nor Street Movement 2 T 16 1092 0.86 0.86 18 1269 3 R 16 0.86 18 4 L 24 0.87 27 2 Southbound 692 0.87 795 6 R 12 0.87 13 plume (vehlh) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration 7 11 0.72 15 2 0 2 T 0 Eastbound Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Movement 1 Lane Configuration L (veh/h) 18 (m) (veh/h) 813 4 0.72 5 2 0 0 1 LTR Southbound 4 L 27 535 7 0 0 TR 9 12 0.72 16 2 0 0 Undivided Westbound 8 LTR 98 122 1 L 1€0 L 13 0.51 25 2 0 9 2 T 0 Westbound 11 T 2 0,51 3 2 0 0 1 LTR 10 Eastbound 11 LTR 36 92 0 0 TR 12 R 36 0.51 70 2 0 0 12 lc 0.02 % queue length ontror Delay (stveh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) 0.07 9.5 0.05 0.16 12.1 0.80 4.74 102.6 F 102.6 0.39 1.57 67.3 F 67.3 pproach LOS F F Copyright 0 2005 University of Ffonds, Ail Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5110/2007 6:2 PM file:/ C:\Docu. ents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Temp\u2kFB 3.tr p 5/10/2007 ttio- vs, ottyi) - 4.4 4 AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral Information ite information naiL PA ency/Co. ate Performed iysis Time Period 4st1ng PM Peak Hour ntersection Jurisdiction \nalsis Ye 2 -sca e B/vd am' F Project Description Biscayne Park Office - #07136 EastNVest Street: NE 25 S ntersection Orientation: North -South tudy Period (h elide Volumes and Adjustments No South Street: Bisca ne Boulevard or Street Movement 3 ume (vent) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lanes 1 L 11 0 84 13 2 1 Northbound 2 T 1173 0.84 1395 2 33 0.84 39 0 0 Undivided 4 32 0.90 35 2 1 Sou hbound 5 6 T R 786 9 0.90 0.90 873 10 2 0 0 onfiguration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration 7 L 4 0.39 10 2 0 T 0 Eastbound Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach ovement ane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) /c Northbound 1 L 13 762 0.02 8 1 0.39 2 2 0 0 1 LTF? Southbound 4 35 469 0.07 7 TR 9 6 0.39 15 2 0 0 Westbound 8 LTR 97 64 1.52 10 L 26 0.63 41 2 0 9 T 0 TR Westbound 12 R 3 33 0.63 11 T 0.63 4 52 2 2 0 N 0 1 LTR 10 Eastbound 11 LTR 27 85 0.32 0 0 12 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) 0.05 9.8 A LOS pproach Delay (siven) pproach LOS Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida, Ail Rights Reserved 0.24 13.3 8.44 404.9 F 404.9 F JiCS+TM Version 5.21 1.20 65.9 {19515151501111109 65.9 Generated: 5/10/2007 823 PM file://C:\.Docurnents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Temp\u2kFB7Amp 5/10/2007 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ersec t Release 5.21 Analyst: DPA inter.: NE 26 St / Biscayne Blvd Agency: Area Type: All other areas Date: >Turisd: Miami, FL asicd; Esis_ ; a ; Peak our Year ct ID. Biscayne Pas Office 507136 St: NE 26 Street N/S Sr; P ca'ne Boulevard SIGNALIZED ZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound Westbound i Northbound 1 L T R. 1 L No. . Lanes jt LGCon1..TT ig Volume 112 Lane Width I RTOR Vol 1 1 0 LTR 15 14 12.0 0 LTR 127 6 1 12 , 0 0 So i Inbound T R L TR 111 46 112.0 12.0 0 Duration .25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 11 2 1 L TR 116 1123 112.0 12,0 2 3 4 i 5 i NB Left A Thru A Right A Peds 1 SB Left A Thru A Right A Peds EB Right 1 WB Right 13.0 94,0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1 Cycle Length: 115.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary / Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 1 Lane Group Flow Rate 1 Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Eastbound 1 LTR 183 1622 0.38 0.11 48.6 D 48.6 D Phase Combinat on 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WE Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right 0 Right en low A11 Red 1 1 Westbound 1 LTR 164 1452 0.41 0.11 49.1 D 49.1 D 1 Northbound 1 L 505 618 0.04 0.82 2.0 A 1 TR 2894 3540 0.46 0.82 3.2 A 3,2 A 1 Southbound 1 L 280 343 0.04 0,82 2.1 A TR 2892 3538 0.29 0.82 2.6 A 2.5 A 1 , 410 Intersection Delay 5.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -,-StA111 4.1ULU1 rill.Ze 1 01. .1 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY enerat no al Site Information DPA ncy C ate e alysis Time Period .,vsting PM Peak Hot; Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NE 24 St / NE 2 Ave N Miami. FL Project Description Biscayne Park Office #07 EastMJest Street: NE 24 Street North S u Street: NE 2 Avenue tNo1h Side' ntersection Orientation: North-Soth Study Period hrs : 0.25 Jehce Volumes and Adjustments Stree Northbound Southbound Movement 2 .oume veh h T R 664 4 2 :Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.63 0. 3 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h PercentHeavy Vehicles 0 800 16 23 2 T 374 0.88 425 0.90 0 edian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 0 onfiguration R LT Upstream Signal inor Stree 0 Eastbound 0 Westbound Moverrient 8 0 11 12 R olu veh/h) 12 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.65 0.63 0 65 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 18 0 30 PercentHeavy V hicles Percent Grade (%) 2 0 2 2 0 2 Flared Approach N Storage 'T Channelized Lanes 0 onfi•uration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Movement Lane Configuration Northbound Southbound 4 LT 7 Westbound 8 LR 10 Eastbound 11 12 v (vehfh) 23 48 C (m) (veh/h) 807 353 vlc 0.03 0.14 95% queue length Control Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (slveh) Approach LOS 1 ilk Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, AS Rights Reserved 111. 1 1 1 1 0.09 9.6 A 0.47 16.8 c 16.8 .HCS-1-114 Version 5.21 Generated 5110/2087 324 PM file://C:\Docunients and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Ternplu2kFCD.tmp 5/10/2007 wo- Way stop Liontroi General Information 'Analyst A enc /Co Analysis TimenPeriod 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY nPA existing PM Peak Hour Project Description Biscayne Park Office - #07136 East/West Street: NE 24 Street ISite Information Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year ,NE 24 S /NE 2 Ave (South) Miami. FL North/South Street: NE 2 Avenue (South Side) intersection Orientation: North -South -Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movement Volume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles — 2 Median Type RT Channelized Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal inor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 9 0 LT 7 L 10 0.42 23 2 Northbound 2 T 700 0.87 804 2 T 0 Eastbound 8 0.39 0 2 0 0 Study Period (nrs): 0.25 3 0 83 0 0 0 9 11 0.42 26 2 0 Undivided AA, 4 0.88 0 2 0 10 0.65 0 2 Southbound 5 404 0.95 425 2 T 0 Westbound 11 0.63 0 2 0 0 6 R 0.95 7 0 TR 12 0.65 0 2 0 anes onfiguration 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Lane Configuration Northbound 1 LT 0 LR Southbound 4 7 0 Westbound 8 0 9 10 0 Eastbound 11 LR 0 12 (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) 9 1124 49 445 lc 0.01 0.11 0.02 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 8.2 A HCS+TM Version 5,21 0.37 14.1 8 14.1 Generated: 5/10/2007 8:24 PM file ://(C: \Documents and Settings \ Christopher13 \Local Settings\ Templu2kFD 1 Amp 5/10/2007 wo- way ,'5top (-oritrol rage 0.1 A 1 1 0 1 • 1 1' 1 0 • 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 eneral information 0-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information n I St 9 Y ate Performed PA ersect c E 25 S /NE2 Av urisdcton Analysis Yea nal sis Time Period xisting PM Peak Hour Project Description Biscayne Park Office -#07136 East/West Street: NE 25 Street ntersection Orientation: North -South ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street .ovement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized onfiguration Upstream Signal Minor Street overlent olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration L 10 0.84 11 2 0 LT 7 11 0.72 15 2 0 i,Nlorth/South Street NE 2 Avenue —tudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Northbound 2 T R 691 7 0.84 0.84 822 8 2 0 Eastbound 8 1 0.72 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 TR 9 12 0.72 16 2 0 0 Southbound 4 5 6 L T R 11 399 6 0.89 0.89 0.89 12 448 6 2 Undivided 0 LT 10 8 0.42 19 2 0 2 0 Westbound 11 T 3 0.42 7 2 0 0 1 0 0 TR 12 R 11 0.42 26 2 0 0 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) /c LT 11 1103 0.01 5% queue length 0.03 ntrol Delay (s/veh) 8.3 LOS A pproach Delay (slveh) pproach LOS Copyright (1) 2005 University of Florida, Al Rights Reserved 4 LT 12 798 0.02 0.05 9.6 A 7 Westbound 8 LTR 52 249 0.21 0.77 23.2 23.2 c HCS-i-TM Version 5,21 9 LTR 10 Eastbound 11 LTR 32 321 0.10 0.33 17.5 17.5 12 Generated: 5/10/2007 8:24 PM \Documents and Settinas\ChristopherB \Local Settings\Temp\su2kFD5 Amp 5/10/2007 wo- w ay :!.)top nera 0 T 0-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY e hiformaton Analyst A Date Perforrned Anal)/ s Time Period DPA Existing PM Peak Hour p 'ec f pton Biscayne Park 0 East/West Street: NE 24 Street n e_section Orien ation: East-West 07 36 Intersection NE 24 S E 2 urisdiction ys.rs Year N hiS u Street: NE 2 Co dy Perod hrs 0.2 ehic e Voumes and Adu tmen Major Street Movement Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR •veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lane onfiguration U stream Si nal Minor Street Movement o ume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Hared Approach Storage RT Channelized 0 7 8 0.45 17 2 Eastbound 2 T 2 64 32 Northbound 8 0.84 0 0 0 N 0 WO, 13 0 64 20 0 0 9 R 10 0.45 22 2 0 Undivided 12 2 0 LT 10 0 89 0 2 estbound 2 28 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 0 0 0 0.42 0 12 0.89 0 0 0 Lanes onfiguration Delay, Queue pproach Movement Lane Configuration veh/h) (m) (veh/h) Ic 0 ength, and Level of Service Eastbound 1 0 LR Westbound 4 LT 12 1554 0.01 7 0 Northbound LR 39 968 0.04 0 9 10 0 Southbound 11 0 12 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS 0.02 7.3 A 0.13 8.9 A 8.9 A cpyright 0 2005 University of Floi-ide, AS Rights Reserved /-tG3-Tm Verson 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 824 PM file://C:\Documents and SettingsThristopherBlocal Settings\Temp\u2kFD9,tnip 5/10/2007 Future h u roject I wo- Way -,$top Control .£16k., “A. RV 0WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY enerai nformaton ite hiformaton An y t PA Aienc /Co. te Perforrned Analysis Time Period Pro' PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NE 24 StlBiscayne Blvd 'Pi4iami, FL :sroject D t n ;sea ,ne Park 0 - 07 6 Street: NE 24 StreetN h South Street: Biscayne t3oulevard intersection Or e on: North -South Study Period (11 ): 0.25 ehic e Volumes and Adjustments 4 a`or Str Northbound outhbound veryent ume (veh/h L 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 19 ven/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 edian Type RT Channelized 2 334 0.86 1551 32 0.85 37 4 0.87 Undivided 47 2 5 5 0.87 R 2 87 1017 13 0 Lanes 0 onfiguratio Upstream Signal inor St ee Movement o ume (veh/h Peak -Hour Factor PHF 11 0.72 0 Eastbound 8 4 0.72 TR 12 0.72 10 21 0.51 0 Westbound 11 T 2 0.5 TR 12 R 58 0.51 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade %) 15 2 5 2 0 16 2 41 2 3 2 0 113 2 Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized anes 1 1 onfigurat on Delay, Queue Length, and Levelof Service pproach LTR Northbound Sou hbound Westbound TR Eastbound ovemen 1 4 0 11 2 ane Conflguration L vehth) L LTR LTR 19 47 157 36 m) (veh/h) lc 670 410 51 33 0.03 0.11 3.08 1.09 *5% queuelength 0.09 0.39 16.76 3.87 ntro Delay (s/veh) 105 14.9 1106 LOS pproach Delay s veh) pproach LOS B F 366.9 F 06 366.9 F F Copyright Cy 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5 21 Generatedi 5/10/2007 8:24 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Senings\Terripiu2kFDD.trnp 5/10/2007 wo- w a i.op.. Lonuoi 0 • • • 0 ne al Informatkni 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY e nforma n Analyst PA Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period o Prof PM Peak Hour intersection urisdiotion NE 25 StlBiscaynri 8lvd Miami, FL na ss Year Project Description Biscayne Park Office -#07136 East/West Street: NE 25 Stree In ersection Oren ;on: North -Sou North South Street: Bisca ne Boulevard tud Period hrs : 0.25 vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street ovement olume (vehth) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement °fume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized L 11 0.84 13 2 1 7 4 0.39 10 2 Northbound 2 T 1421 0.84 1691 2 T 0 Eastbound 8 0.39 2 2 0 0 3 R 50 0.84 59 TR 9 6 0.39 15 2 Undivided Southbound 4 5 49 0.90 54 2 1 10 L 27 0.63 42 2 T 975 0.90 1083 2 T 0 Westbound 11 T 3 0.63 4 2 0 N 0 9 0 90 10 0 0 TR 12 R 55 0 63 - 87 2 0 0 Lanes onfiguration 0 1 0 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Northbound Movement Lane Configuration veh/h) (m) (veh/h) 1 LTR Southbound 4 7 LTR Westbound 1 Eastbound 8 9 10 11 12 L L LTR LTR 13 634 54 354 133 34 27 30 0.0 0.15 3.91 0.90 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS Copyright © 2005 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved 0.06 10.8 0.53 17.0 15 58 1551 1551 F HCS+TM Version 5.21 3.00 324.1 F 324.1 F Generated: 5110/2007 8:24 PM file://C:Tocuments and Senin2s\Christephera\Local Settings\Tenip\u2kFELtrnp 5/10/2007 A CS+e Signali trite sec'eiease 5.21 Analyst: inter,: NE 26 S= / Birca •? A ency: Area Type. All other areas Date: Jerisd: Miami, EL rio : F_ wo Pr< i PM Peak "Four Year ect TD; Biscayne Park Office - 807136 NE 26 Street N/S St, Biscayne Boa'evard No. Lanes LGCcnf ig 'Volume Lane ' idth RLOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound k Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound L R I L `l' _R k L T u 1 1 0} `.2 R 0 12 15 14 12.0 G 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 LTR L TR 1 L TR 128 6 17 I16 1392 15 111 951 13 1 12:0 [12.0 12.0 112 0 12.0 0 0 I 0 Duration ,25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A .Right A Peds i Peds WB Left A I SE Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds k Peds NB Right 1 EB Right Right WE Right Olken 13.0 94.0 flow 4,0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary 6 7 8 Length: 115,0 secs Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity ($) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 184 Westbound LTR 163 1626 0.38 0.11 48.5 D 48,5 D 1439 0.44 0.11 49.4 D 49.4 D Northbound L 394 482 0.05 0.82 2.0 A TR 2894 3541 0.57 0.82 3.9 A 3.9 A Southbound L 188 230 0.06 0.82 2.2 A TR 2894 3540 0.36 0.82 2.8 A 2.8 A • Intersection Delay = 5,7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS - A Iwo -Way Stop L:oraroi ragc n I In ma ion 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY e Information Intersection Proect Desrition Bisca ne Park 0 c 07 East/West Street: NE 24 Street Intersection Orientation: North -South eh` le Volumes and Ad'ustments :211.611 Movement 'Jurisdiction Analysis Year 24 StINE 2 A ve ;North Miami, F NorthlSouth S eet: N 2 nu No h ide tud Period hrs : 0.25 Northbound 1111111111•1111111111111111 111111=1111111111111111111 —— 1111111.11.1111111111 )/olume veh/ti' Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Row Rate, HFR veh/h Percent Hea Vehicles Median T e RT Channelized 11111111111111M111111111 0 111111111111111111111111110111 IIIIEallili 0 0 1.10.1111 11111111.1111111MMI TR 11.111111111111111M1111111111111 EMEMEIMMEMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0111.1111111111111111111111111 0 11111111.111111 0.84 0.83 883 14 0.83 16 Southbound simiatim 431 0.88 0.88 489 6 0.90 0 wif211111111ammumimmigaiiiammammi Undivided 0 0 onfi. uration inor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles ercent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration 7 0.39 0 2 Eastbound 8 0.39 0 2 0 N 0 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) Northbound 1 Southbound 4 LT 25 751 7 9 0.39 0 2 0 0 Westbound 8 LR 50 313 10 12 0.65 18 2 0 9 Westbound 11 0.63 0 2 0 0 0 LR 10 Eastbound 11 12 R 21 0.65 32 2 0 0 12 0.03 0.16 • 5% queue length ontrot Delay (s/veh) OS 0.10 10.0 A 0.56 18.7 pproach Delay (siveh) pproach LOS 18.7 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, Ali Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 8:25 PM file://C:\Doeurnents and SettingsThristopherB\Local Settings\Temp\u2kFF7.tmp 5/10/2007 WU YV L.,0k1Li neral nforrnaflon T 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Sfte Information Analyst Agency/Co Date Performed PA _nalysis Time Period Fut wo ProiPM Peak Hour in ersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year !NE 24 St/NE 2 Ave (South) Miami, FL ect Descrpton Biscayne Park ce -#07135 Eas Street: NE 24 Stree tersecton Orien a North -Sou h ehicie VolumesVoumes and Adjustments North/South Street: NE 2 Avenbe (South Si t dy Period (hrs): 025 or S ovemen Northbound 2 So hb 5 oume (veh/h 8 769 46 7 Fe -Hour Factor, PHF .87 .87 0.83 0.88 0,95 0 95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 9 883 0 0 485 7 Pe cent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 anes 0 0 nfiguraton LT TR pstream Signe inor Street ovement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage T Channelized Lanes onfiguration 7 L 10 0.42 23 2 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) Northbound LT 9 1068 Eastbound 8 0,39 0 2 0 N 0 0 LR Southbound 4 7 9 11 0.42 26 2 0 0 Westbound 8 10 L 0.65 0 2 0 9 0 Westbound 11 0.63 0 2 0 N 10 0 0 Eastbound 11 LR 49 395 12 0.650 2 0 0 12 lc 0.01 0.12 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LDS Approach Delay (siveh), pproach LOS 4 0.03 8.4 A 0.42 15.4 15.4 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5_71 Generate& 5/10/2007 B'25 PM file://C:\Docurnents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Temp\u2kiTatnip 5/1012007 WO- w ay 7,Lop k—orirroi 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Genera n o ation -Site Information alyst .DPA ency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period Fut vvo Proj PM Peak Hour Project Description Biscayne Park Office -#07136 East/West Street: NE 25 Street intersection urisdiction nal sis Year NE 25 St/NE 2 Ave Miami, FL North/South Street: NE 2 Avenue atersection Orientation: North -Sou ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Movement • olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement • olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration L 10 0.84 11 2 0 LT 11 0.72 15 2 0 2 T 759 0.84 903 2 0 Eastbound Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Northbound 1 8 1 0.72 1 2 0 0 1 LTR Southbound 4 Study Period (hrs): 0.25 7 7 0.84 8 0 Southbound 4 5 L 11 456 0.89 0.89 Undivided 12 512 2 0 0 TR LT 9 12 0.72 16 2 0 0 Westbound 8 10 8 0 42 19 2 0 9 2 0 Westbound 11 T 3 0.42 7 2 0 0 1 LTR 10 6 6 0.89 Eastbound 11 6 0 0 TR 12 R 11 0.42 26 2 0 0 12 Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) LT 11 1044 LT 12 743 LTR 52 210 LTR 32 272 /c 0.01 0.02 0.25 0.12 5% queue length • ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS 0.03 8.5 A 0.05 9.9 A 0.94 27.7 D 27.7 0.39 20.0 c 20.0 Copyright 0 2005 University of Florida, Ali Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 625 PM file://C:\Doeu eats and Settings\ChristopherB\Local SettingsA"emp\u2kFIT.imp 5/10/2007 0-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY enerat inor ation Site Information rsalyst 1gency/Co. Date Perforrned Analysis Time r eriod PA Fut wo Proj PM Peak Hour ntersection NE 24 St f 'E 2 Ct urtsdiction iatni. F naiysis Year Project Description Biscayne Park Office - #07136 EastlWest Street: NE 24 Street North/South Street: NE 2 Court Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 2 L 0.72 0 2 T 22 0.64 34 3 4 R L 13 9 0.64 0.73 20 12 2 5 6 T R 22 0.73 30 0.42 0 Median Type RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration 0 7 L 8 0.45 17 2 0 0 Northbound 8 T 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 LR 0 0 TR 9 10 0.45 22 2 0 0 Undivided 0 LT 10 0.89 0 2 0 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0.89 0 0 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach ovement Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) Ic 12 1551 0.01 39 964 0.04 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS Copyright J 2005 University of Florida, AO Rights R 0.02 7.3 A 0.13 8.9 A 8.9 A iij-. TM Version 5.21 Generated_ 5/10/2007 8:25 PM file:/ C:'Documents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Templu2k1003_tmp 5/10/2007 Future i jest i wo- way ,-_,u)p ritgc1 ()I 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral Information 'Site Information -Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed A,nalysls Time Penod DPA ut w Prof PM Peak Hour ntersecton E 24 St a e sdiction 1. F Analysis Year Pro'ect Descri.tion Bisca ne Park Office -#07136 East/West Street: NE 24 Street Intersection Orientation: North -South North/South Street: B/sca ne Boulevard tudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movement L Northbound 2 3 R Southbound 4 5 L T v'olume vehlh Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (ven/h) 26 1337 32 0.86 IO86 0.86 30 1554 37 Percent Heavy Vehicles edian Type RT Channelized Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Lveh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 2 1 L 7 L 18 0.72 24 2 2 T 0 Eastbound 8 4 0.72 5 2 0 41 892 18 0.87 0.87 0.87 47 1025 20 2 Undivided 0 0 TR 9 32 0.72 44 2 10 L 2/ 0.51 41 2 2 T 0 Westbound 11 T 2 0.51 3 2 0 0 TR 12 R 58 0 51 113 2 Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 0 0 0 0 Lanes onfiguration 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement 1 1 L TR Southbound 4 7 0 Westbound 8 0 9 1 L TR 10 Eastbound 11 0 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR LTR (vehlh) (m) (vehlh) /c 30 661 0.05 47 408 0.12 157 45 3.49 73 42 1.74 '5% queue length Control Delay (s/veh) LOS ipproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS 0.14 10.7 8 0 39 15.0 Copynght Cl 2005 University of Florida; Ail Rights Reserved 17.39 1308 F 1308 F HOS+Tm Version 5.21 7.52 564.4 F 564.4 F Generated: 5/10/2007 8:25 PM Northbound file://C:\Docurnents and Settings\ChristopherB\Locai Settings\Temp\u2k1007.tmp 5/10/2007 WO- *I' U irip k„oriu ruge 01 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY neral n o tion Site Information Analyst 1PA 'Agency/Co Date Performed Analysis Time Period ut w Pro] PM Peak Hour Project Description Biscayne Park Office - #07136 Intersection Jurisdiction AnalysisYear NE 25 St/Biscayne Blvd (Miami, FL. ast/Vs/est Street: NE 25 Street North/South Street: Biscayne Boulevard ntersection Orientation: North -South ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound ovement olume (vehih) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF ourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage T Channelized Lanes onfiguration 14 a 84 16 2 1 7 11 0.39 2 T 1428 0.84 1700 2 T 0 Eastbound 1 0.39 Study Period (hrs): 0.25 50 0.84 59 0 0 TR 9 13 0.39 Undivided 4 49 0.90 54 2 L 10 L 27 0.63 Southbound 5 982 0.90 1091 2 0 Westbound 11 T 3 0.63 R 21 0.90 23 0 0 TR 12 R 55 0.63 28 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 33 2 0 0 42 2 0 4 2 0 N 0 1 87 2 0 0 LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement 1 Southbound 4 7 Westbound 8 9 10 Eastbound 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) /c 16 623 0.03 54 351 0.15 133 32 4.16 63 28 2.25 5% queue length Control Delay (slveh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS 0.08 10.9 0.54 17.1 15.78 1673 F 1673 F 7.52 872.3 F 872.3 F Copyright 0.2005 University of Fiorida, Aii Rights Reserved ficsi-Im Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 5:25 PM Northbound file://C:\Documents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local SettingsNTernp\u2k1 0013.trnp 5/10/2007 1VOW ay zi top t-011L101 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY eneral n matkn ite Information Analyst Agency/Co, Date Performed PA Analysis Time Period ut w Proi PM Peak Hour Project Descri•ti n Bisca ne Park Office - #07136 intersection Orientatio : North -South ntersection urisdiction E 24 StINE 2 Ave Analysis Year North/South Street: NE 2 Avenue North Side' t dy Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street Movement o urne (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type T Channelized Lanes onfiguration L 0.84 0 2 0 Northbound 2 T 736 0.83 886 2 T 23 0.83 27 0 0 TR Undivided 31 0.88 35 2 0 LT Southbound 438 0.88 497 2 T 0 90 0 0 Upstream Signal !nor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage T Channelized Lanes onfiguration 7 0.39 0 2 0 Eastbound 8 0.39 0 2 0 N 0 9 0.39 0 2 0 10 L 32 0.65 49 2 0 Westbound 11 0.63 0 2 0 N 0 12 R 47 0.65 72 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) Northbound Southbound 4 LT 35 742 7 Westbound Eastbound 8 LR 121 283 9 10 11 12 0.05 0.43 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) 0.15 10.1 2.04 26.9 LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS Copyriaht C 2005 University of Florida, All Rghts Reserved 26.9 0 HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/1012007 8:26 PM fiie://C: \Docurnents and Settings \ChristopherB \Local S ettings\Temp\u2k 1 02 1 Amp 5/10/2007 'f'wo- Way Stop Control 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY nera Inforrnation .Ste nformaton iAna y Ag y/C e Pm d DPA , alysis Trne Perod FutwProjPMPeakHo Project Descrip ton Biscay,ie Park Office- 071 6 EastANest Street E 24 Sfree tersecon Orientation: NorthSouth ehicie Volumes and Adjustments Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NE 24 St / NE 2 AvejSou h Miami, FL North/South Street: NE 2 Avon e (South Side Study Period (h s): 0.25 a or Stree Northbound South Movement 2 5 T ourne (veh/h) 8 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0. 7 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles edian Type 9 781 897 0 48 513 7 0.95 7 Undivided RT Channe ized nes 0 onT'grjraoon 0 LT 0 Upstream Signe nor Street Movement o ume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (vehfh) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration 7 L 10 0.42 23 2 0 Eastbound 0.39 0 2 0 N 0 0 9 0.42 26 2 0 0 TR Westbound 10 11 L T 0.65 0.63 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 12 0.65 0 2 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) m) (veh/h) Northbound LT LR Southbound 4 Westbound Eastbound 7 8 9 10 11 LR 12 9 1042 49 379 /c 5% queue length trol Delay (s/veh) 0.01 0.13 0 03 8.5 0.44 15.9 OSA pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, „A.f Rights Reserved .0" HCS+TM Version 6.21 15.9 Generated: 5110/2007 5:26 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Templu2k I 025,trnp 5/10/2007 • . 1 Copyright ©. 2,305 University of Florida. Ali Rights Reserved 5 111101111 Ell 1111111111 E I Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Median Type RT Channelized 10 0.84 786 0 84 935 20 0.89 465 0.89 1111111111111= 1111 ER NM I Mill IIEMMMI 6 0.89 6 Undivided I I I I I I NI I I I I MI I NU 11111111111 E ME I NE I I I I I I I II NW= NMI= 11111 NI E111111111111111 MEE . .i1t1iTE II I E onft u ration 1 WO' Way J&Ut} 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Cite In orrnatio General Information Pro e t Descr.ton Bi a e P k 0 ce - #07136 intersection Orientation: North -South n e rsdcton naly is Year E 25 S F asci North/South Street: NE 2 Avenue Stud Period (hrs•: 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Ma'or Street Movement Northbound Southbound III= 11E1111= 1111 E WI I I I I I I MI I I I M I I I 1111111111111111 E I II 1111 ME II III MEN I MI Minor Street Movement 0 0 0 0 OM 1111111 II 1111111111111111N 1111111 11111111111111 0 0 TR TR Eastbound 8 9 0 Westbound 10 E E 111E1111 I I I I I ZINO 1111111111110111111 1111111111M11111111111CM MI I NM MI El II I I I I EMI olume veh/h Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h Percent Heay. Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 0.72 15 0.72 1 0.72 16 L 0.42 3 0.42 7 :1111M 111111EMIL 1111181111111 0 11 III 1 III MIMI III II IMM11111111111111111111 0 0 51 0.42 121 2 0 11111111111111111111121111111 111111=1111 0 III I I I I I I I I I I 111111118111111110 0111111E111111 LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound 11111111111111111 =11111111111111 Westbound LTR 0 0 Eastbound Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v (vehlh) 11 22 163 32 C (rn) (veh/h) 1035 721 279 215 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.58 0 15 95% queue length Control Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (slveh) Approach LOS 0.03 8.5 A 0.09 10.2 3.41 34.6 D 34.6 D 0.51 24.7 24.7 • Ha..8-t-rm Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 8:25 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1029.tmp 5/10/2007 Fw Way Stop ontroi 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ever I hiformation Site information Analyst gency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period DPA Fut w Proj PM Peak Hour Project Deser E 1 ion Biwa ne Park Office -# 71 6 0051/070 Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NE 24 St / NE 2 Miami, FL s st Street: NE 24 Street North/South Street: NE 2 Court ersection Orientation: East-West ehicle Volumes and Aclustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration Upstream Signal Minor Street Movement • olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles -ercent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 0 72 0 2 0 8 0 45 17 2 .00 41 0.64 64 1 Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Northbound 8 0 84 0 0 0 0 3 4 R 13 L 0.64 0.73 20 0 0 TR 10 0.45 22 2 0 12 2 Undivided 0 LT 10 L 0.89 0 2 Westbound 48 0.73 65 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 0 0 0 6 0.42 0 0 0 12 0.89 0 0 0 Lanes onfiguration 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Eastbound 1 0 LR Westbound 4 7 0 Northbound 8 0 9 10 0 Southbound 11 0 12 Lane Configuration LT LR .0, (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) 12 1513 39 908 /c •5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) 'pproach LOS Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, Ail Rights Reserved 0.01 0.02 7 4 A 0.04 0.13 9.1 A 9.1 A HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10)2007 8:26 PM fite://C:\Docurnents and Settings\CliristopherB\Local SettingsiTemp\u2k102D.tny 5/10/2007 t p Control .rra e_toi.x o r 10 10 T 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ne aI info ti Site In or ation Analyst ylCo. Date Performed nalysis Time Period DPA 1Fut vv Prof PM Peak Hour 1 ntersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NE 24 S iami. FL. East Project Proj Description Biscayne: Park C ice _ # 07136 E stPWest Street: NE 24 NcrrtntSouth Street: East Project 0 ntersection Orientation: Eas est � elide Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T oiume (vehl3 6 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.72 0.64 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration Upstream Signal inor Street Movement olurne (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfiguration 8 0 LT 7 0.45 0 2 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (vehih) /c •5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS Eastbound 1 LT 8 1526 0.01 0.02 7.4 A 62 0 8 0.84 0 0 0 0 Westbound Copyright © 2005 University of F pride, Al Rights Reserved 4 udy Period (hrs): 0.25 7 3 0.64 0 0 0 9 0.45 0 2 0 0 4 0.73 0 2 Undivided 0 10 L 13 0.89 14 2 0 Northbound 8 HCS+TM Vernon 5-21 9 Westbound 39 0.73 53 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 0 0 N 0 0 LR 10 6 R 0.42 21 0 0 TR 12 R 20 0.89 22 2 0 0 Southbound 11 LR 36 934 0.04 0.12 9.0 A 9.0 A 12 Generated: 5110/2007 626 PM 1 fele://C:;Documents and Settings\ChristopherB\Zocal Settings\Terr p\u2k1035.tmp 5/10/2007 yv ay .?"1.0r," 1,...13111101 av,.. mr, • • • • OEWAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ne al nformaton ency/Co. Date Performed aiysis TimePeriod IDPA Fut w Proj PM Peak Hour Site Information Intersection .NE 24 St /West Proj Jurisdiction Miami, FL Analysis Year P o'ect Descr.tion Bisca ne Park Office #07136 s est Street: NE 24 Street ersection Orientation: East-West ehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments jor Street Eastbound overnent 2 T olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly How Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized anes onfigu ration Upstream Signal inor Street avement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 0.72 16 33 0.64 51 North/South Street: West Project Driveway Study Period (hrs): 0.25 0.73 0 2 2 0 LT 7 0.45 0 0 Northbound 8 0 84 0 0 0 9 0.45 0 Undivided 0 10 13 0.89 14 -1 Westbound 5 53 0.73 6 0 42 72 14 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 0 0 TR 12 R 27 0.89 30 2 0 2 2 0 2 Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes onfiguration 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Eastbound 1 Westbound 4 7 Northbound 8 9 LR 10 Southbound 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) (rn) (veh/h) 16 1510 0.01 44 923 0.05 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS 0.03 7.4 A 0.15 9.1 A 9.1 A Copyright C 2005 University of Florida, Al! Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 8:26 PM file://C: \Documents and Settings\ChristopherB \Local Sertings\Templu2k1 03 1 Amp 5/10/2007 wows. Stop Control .r [�L .1 i,31 E 1 1 1 ©- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY en al Infer Analyst PA Agency/Co. Date Performed t4naiysis Time Period a t Iry Proj Pal Peak Hou Project D:scription Biscayne Pa East Street: NE 25 Sfree Intersection Orientation: Eest tomes ce # 07136 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ;or atree Movemen Volume (veh/h Site Information ntersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year North/South Street: East PDrtvewa Study Period (bus): 0.25 Easthound estbound Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.72 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized 0 6 9 0.64 0,7 28 0.73 0.42 9 12 0 Undivided 2 38 0 anes 0 Configuration Upstream Signa nor Street Movement olume (veh/h2 eak-Hour Factor, PHF ourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage T Channelized Lanes onfiguration 7 L 27 0.45 60 2 0 0 Northbound 8 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 TR 9 7 0.45 15 2 0 0 10 0.89 0 2 0 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 0 0 0 0 12 0.89 0 2 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Movement 1 ane Configuration (vehfh) (m) (vehih) /c LR Westbound 4 LT 7 Northbound 8 LR 9 10 Southbound 11 12 12 1574 0.01 75 924 0.08 7% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) OS 0.02 7.3 A 0.26 9.2 A pproach Delay (s/veh pproach LOS -- Copyright .8/ 2005 University of Florida, Ali Rights Reserved 9.2 A vS+T Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 8',26 PM r file:!1C:1Dacur eats and SettingslChristapherB\Local SettingsiTernp\u2k1039.tnp 5/10/2007 wo- W ay ,:ptop nemnformat T AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ntormauon Analyst Agency/Coy Date Performed Analysis Time Period oect Descr.tion PA Fut w Pro- PM Peak Hour sca ne Park 0 .EastiWest Street: NE 25 S n ersec ion Orentation East es e - 07 3 hic e Volumes andAuf ustments 'or Stree Eastbound •r/V. est aiysis Year `orth So th Street: West ProjectDriveway Study Perod hrs ,25 stb overlent 2 T ohime v hh Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.72 7 0.64 6 6 0.64 0.73 48 0 73 0 42 urly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 26 9 8 2 65 0 Median Type RT Channelized 0 Undivided 0 Lanes 0 0 0 uration TR LT Upstream Signal I'Nlinor Street Movernent Volume (vehlh) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 7 20 0.45 44 Northbound 8 0.84 0 9 7 0.45 15 10 L 0.89 0 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 12 0.89 0 2 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Movement Lane Configuration Eastbound 1 LR Westbound 4 LT 7 Northbound 8 LR 9 10 Southbound 11 12 v (veh/h) 8 59 C (rn) (veh/h) 1576 918 vie 0.01 0.06 95% queue length -Control Delay (s/veh) LOS Approach Delay (s/veh) Approach LOS 0.02 7.3 A 0.21 9.2 A 9.2 A ••• Chpyrighl© 2005 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved HCS 4541 Version 5.21 Generated 5/10/2007 8:26 PM file://C:\Docurnents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Ternp\u2k103D.trnp 5/10/2007 Projec ' rive ays 100 • • • • • • • • • •1 • • • • • on skaayst ,Agency/Co 'Date Performed DPA TWO- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analysis Time Period ,Fut w Proj PM Peak Hour roject Description Biscayne Park Office - #07136 stlWest Street: NE 24 Street ersection Orientation: East-West Site Informati n lntersection -NE 24 St /East Project Dw:1 Jurisdiction Miami, FL Analysis Year --torth/South Street: East Project Driveway tudy Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajar Street Eastbound ovement 1 2 T 3 4 Westbound 5 R lume (veh/h) eak-Hour Factor, PHF ourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) ercent Heavy Vehicles edian Type RT Channelized anes 0 onfiguration LT pstream Signal 5 0.72 8 2 40 0.64 62 1 0 0.64 0 0 0 Undivided 0.73 0 2 0 39 0.73 53 1 0 0.42 21 0 0 TR inor Street ovement olume (veh/h) eak-Hour Factor, PHF ourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) ercent Heavy Vehicles ercent Grade (%) lared Approach Storage T Channelized 7 L 0.45 0 Northbound 8 0.84 0 9 0.45 0 10 L 13 0.89 14 Southbound 11 0.89 0 12 R 20 0.89 22 2 0 0 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 anes onfiguration 0 0 0 0 0 0 LR lay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach ovement ane Configuration (veh/h) m) (veh/h) Eastbound 1 LT Westbound 4 7 Northbound 8 9 10 Southbound 11 LR 12 8 1526 36 934 lc 0.01 0.04 5% queue length ontroi Delay (s/veh) OS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS 0.02 0.12 7.4 A 9.0 A 9,0 A Copyright C2005 University of Florida. Ali Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 8:26 PM file ://C:\Documents and Settings\Christopher13 \Local Settings\Ternp\u2k1035.tmp 5/10/2007 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 enerai Information 0® AY STOP C NTR SU ARY Information Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year NE 24 St West Orojec.t Dwy Miami, FL Proect De i ion Bisca ne Park Office -#07136 Intersection Orientation: East-West ehicle Volu a'or Street olurne veh/h es and Ad'ust Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vehlh Percent Hea Vehicles Median T e RT Channelized onfi • uration inor Street Movement North/South Street: West Protect Driveway tud Period hrs): 0.25 n s Eastbound 12 2 0.64 0 0.73 MI 111111111111•1111111M1121111111111111=1111111 Westbound 0.73 6 0.42 Undivided 1111111111111111111111111111 0 1 0 0 Northbound 0 1 0 TR 111111111111111111 Southbound 10 1111.11.1111111111111111111111111111111.1 plume veh/h Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized Lanes onfi • uration 0.45 0 0.84 0 0 0.45 0 2 0.89 0.89 0 0 27 0.89 30 2 0 111111111=111=111111111•11•111111111•1311111111111111111 MIME MINN 0 0 0 111111•11=11111111111111111111M11111111111111 0 0 LR 0 0 Dela Queue Len .th, and Level of Service Movement ane Configuration 22121111111111111 31171321111111111111 VLJ e5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) Westbound Northbound 111111131111111111111 111118111111111111MIIIMINIMI 11111111111111111111111 11111111101111111 111111111111111111111111 1111M111111111111 11111111•11111111111111111111111 MUM 111•1111111111 1111•11111111111111111111111 16 1510 0.01 0.03 8 9 Southbound 10 LOS pproach LOS A Copyright (t) 2005 University of Florida, Ali Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 44 923 0.05 0.15 MOE 9. / Generated: 5/10/2007 8:26 PM file ://C:\Documents and Settings\ ChristopherB \Local Settings\ Ternplu2k 1 03 I Amp 5/10/2007 lAnalyst Awn y/e6. - Date Performed Analysis Tirne Period PA T 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Pro j PM Peak Hour roiect DescriptionBiscayne Park Office - #07136 2 ast/West Street: NE 25 Street ntersection Orientation: East-West hide Volumes and Adjustments jor Street ovement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type RT Channelized anes nfiguration Upstream Signal r Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach 0.72 0 2 7 L 27 0.45 60 2 Eastbound 2 T 18 0.64 28 0 Northbound 0.84 0 0 0 N rorth/South Street: East Project Driveway tudy Period (hrs): 0.25 3 0.64 0 TR 9 7 0.45 15 2 Undivided Westbound 4 5 L T R 9 28 0.73 0.73 12 2 0 LT 10 0.89 0 2 38 0 1 0 Southbound 11 0.89 0 0 0 N 0 0 12 0.89 0 2 Storage RT Channelized anes onfiguration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service LR pproach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) Eastbound Westbound 4 LT 7 Northbound 8 LR 9 10 Southbound 11 12 12 1574 75 924 Ic 5% queue length onto! Delay (slveh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 0.01 0.02 7.3 A 0.08 0.26 9.2 A 9.2 A HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 8.26 PM ADocurnents and Settings\ChristopherB\Locat Settings\Temp\u2k1039.tnip 5/10/2007 0- AY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY neral Informaton i-ite information aiyst PA gency/Co ate Performed nayss Time Period t w Prof PM Peak Hour Prolect Descrption Biscayne Park 0 re - 07 3 Intersection Jurisdiction ithaiysis Year NE 25 St/ Wett Project Dwy itiliarnt, FL EastEast,West Street: NE 25 S North/South : West Froject Driveway nte sect on ntaEast-West tudy Period hr : 0.25 Vehicle Vo u es and Adjustments r S ree Eastbound ovemen 2 Volume (veh h' Pea -Hour Factor PHF 0 72 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 7 0.64 26 0.64 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type tbound 6 0.73 8 46 0.73 65 0.42 0 Undivided RT Channeized 0 Lanes 0 0 Configuralion TR LT ;Upstream Signe nor Street Movement olume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF ourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach Storage RT Channelized 7 20 0.45 44 2 Northbound 8 0.84 0 0 0 N 0 9 7 0.45 15 2 0 10 0.89 0 2 0 Southbound 11 T 0.89 0 0 0 N 0 12 0.89 0 2 0 Lanes onfiguration 0 LR 0 0 0 0 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pproach Movement Lane Configuration (veh/h) (m) (veh/h) Eastbound 1 Westbound 4 LT 8 1576 7 Northbound 8 LR 59 918 9 10 Southbound 11 12 Ic 0.01 0.06 5% queue length ontrol Delay (s/veh) LOS pproach Delay (s/veh) pproach LOS 0.02 7.3 A 0.21 9.2 A 9.2 A Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/10/2007 8:25 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\ChristopherB\Local Settings\Ternp\u2k103atny 5/10/2007 e i ed evelopment Info a Biscayne Park Office • .• 94 Ezi 7939. .h_ NE Z5 Stnocit 9iasapna 901evara R Ea>. • _ SS R E8 E:R 4E 29 Street 7 Rio-coy/to souiovard NEr NB NES 70- SBT 53.,a E9 997 £6 BT NE 2 Avenue I NE 24 Street ?4orth Sitie; NB, N9 T NLR SBL Se- SER S5 EE7 EE R 657 WE 7 V9R NE 2 Avenue t NE 54 Street fSouth S1de1 NE L NE? vb F9 SBL SE` ES L ES 7 BaB WBL 21B 7 WRR NE 2 Avenue! NE 25 Street NS 3 NB? NB R c6 L SBT 59R 9B L EE .ER NE Court /NE24 Stre44 NB, NB' t3B 56 R E9 n WE 3R 2' 34 18 1158 15 789 13 .s 1g 045 '4 22 388 12 21 a 722 418 10 0 15 712 11 431 12 3 87 097 77 DS 0 97 0 9? 57 037 9'r 397 C. 97 97 0 37 39.77 G57 O 07 0 97 9 97 19 97 0 97 C 37 G57 n 37 O 97 0 97 5a7 0 97 0 97 0 97 0 97 P 97 0.97 0 97 097 VsiumeB 13 36 'oah<0, 17 .3 37 31 1179 `1335 a+ s4 32 33 760 901 9 9 E 26 33 ,5 1123 15 11 745 3 15 14 27 9 16 664 2' 374 27 34 16 1140 15 11 751 12 15 255 17 0 978 14 22 392 0 0 n 57 0 0.97 G 0 37 ,. 0 97 0 47 057 3 97 0 97 0 97 0 97 0 97 0 97 0.97 097 9.97 797 097 0B7 0 07 097 007 0 97 0 97 0 97 0.07 C 57 0.97 12 0 25 760 404 10 0 10 691 7 11 399 12 21 714 0 412 1a 11 10 725 11 407 S 6 11 12 8 0 97 8 5.97 3 i n97 11 13 12 8 057 8 9 057 a P ,., 097 10 10 G 397 C 0 O 0 97 G 7 O 897 0 22 2 9 9' 097 097 0.97 0 97 2' 13 21 22 13 22 -. ' 905 ,AZ 574 777Z 503 22 Z2 0 124 a 302 39 39 38 38 3E 0 38 0 7 0 77 59 0 7 0 9 7 a 42 42 2i 0 G a O P O 0 9 0 0 D 0 0 G G 0 G O 0 0 0 • 0 O 0 0 G 0 O G 0 C O a G 0 7 • G O 0 0 TAZ 2 0 4 7 4 a a P.,eata _ 7fa77, 'ols,BB0 301:BB0 58 0 20 0 4 11 3 1421 50 40 0 975 6 3 12 4 7 0 6 7 27 0 3 0 55 ❑ 10 1382 15 P 13 2' 05 14 1428 43 90Z 71 13 27 55 36 1408 11 351 18 959 13 ❑ 13 12 27 3e 15 a 15 14 0 14 29 0 25 5 3 B 1? 0 17 0 733 14 22 az, 0 12 0 n 3 a 20 736 23 31 438 ❑ 32 n 21 27 47 768 0 481 10 c 1 O 15 4 759 O 7 2 0 31 458 5 11 12 C 0 O 3 O i9 12 27 488 O 7 0 n 3 C 11 a 27 3 9 9 ❑ 0 40 791 0 75 716 10 20 455 0 12 .15 51 8 0 5 0 0 C a 0 10 2 13 22 29 48 w w i w t w t i NW III w w w w l w w w w! w! Mr w w w w IF A!! M w I w Biscayne Park Commited Developments - TAZ 505 Name ocation Information nits Sq Pt Type of Permit Address Description Net Area Res ! Co id Hotel i Office Retail Tiziano II MUSP 2307 NE 4th Avenue Mixed -use: residential, retail, and office Wynwood/ Edgewater 54 Rosabella Lofts Soho 421,425,447 NE 22 St.; MUSP 418,442 446 NE 22 Ter.; 2221 Residential & 4,200 sq. ft. Place of NE 4 Ave Worship with 11 parking spaces MUSP 601-615 NE 23 Street Residential project Star Lofts Onyx on the Bay Wynwood/ Edgewater Wynwood/ Edgewater 258 95 MUSP 704-712 NE 25th Street 19 story residential complex Wynwood/ Edgewater MUSP 665 N.E. 25th Street Residential project w1 accessory recreational uses 55 Wynwood/ Edgewater 118 0 Aja on the Bay MUSP 700 NE 26th Terrace Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 129 Onyx II MUSP 421-455 NE 28 Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 117 0 2121 Biscayne MUSP 2121 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Wynwood/ Edgewater Mondrian Miami MUSP 333 NE 24 Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater District Lofts MUSP 2751 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: Residential, Retail, & Office Wynwood/ Edgewater 147 46,400 164 89 Pararnont Bay MUSP 2020 North Bayshore Drive Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Wynwood/ Edgewater Tots 364 1,590 0 0 8,90'7 427, 6,682 2,339 211,465 49,351 #07136 - TAZ 505 Committed Oevelapments.xis wwwwwwwwwwwwwwmmwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww • TAZ 505 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES Residential Condominium / Townhouse General Office Building Retail / Service UNITS 1,590 DU 427,170 SF 49,351 SF ITE Land Use Code 230 710 814 PM PEAK HOUR TRIP IN Trips 67a/0 ' 389 17% 95 44% 59 33% 83% 56% OUT Trips TOTAL Trips 192 581 463 558 75 134 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 43% 543 57% 730 1273 Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 16.00% 14.90% 10.00°/© of Gross External Trips (1) of Gross External Trips (2) of Gross External Trips (3) 43% 43% 43% 43% 87 81 54 321 57% 57% 57% 57% 117 109 73 431 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net External Person Trips using Transit @ Net External Person'Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 1.40 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Persons/ Vehicle 43% 43% 43% 411 113 525 57% 57% 57% 553 152 705 204 190 191 689 123;1 964 266 Net External Person trips waking using bicycle 1,40 Persons/ Vehicle 43% 114 I 57% 267 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) TAZ 505 includes Tiziano II, Rosabella Lofts, Soho, Star Lofts, Onyx on the Bay, Aja on the Bay, Onyx 11, 2121 Biscayne, Mondrian Miami, District Lofts, and Paramont Bay #07136 TAZ 505 T-Gerods • #04121 - TAZ 505 TAZ 505 2010 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 505 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 10.06% 3.67% 4.79% 3.75% 20.88% 22,71% 17.12% 17.02% TOTAL 1 00.00`)/0 34,14% 13,73% 43.59% 8.54% T.AZ.XiS w w I w! w M I l! w w w w w w w w_ NV M w® ® w M M Mr w w w 'w w ' MEW 'Mgr 'Mr • 410 Narne Biscayne Park Commited Developments - TAZ 504 Location Informatio Units So E Type of Permit Address Description Net Area Res 1 Cond Hotel LT c.. ..._.___,... Retei{ Park Lane Power MUSP 45 NE 32 Street Mixed Use: Residential, Retail & Office Platinum on the Bay MUSP 486 700 NE 29 Terrace; 555, 575 + 711 NE 29 Street; 2955 Residential project NE 7 Avenue Sky Residences MUSP 2955 Biscayne Boulevard MUSP 640 NE 34 Street Total Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Wynwood/ Edgewater 143 19,839 Wynwood/ Edgewater 320 Wynwoodl Edgewater i 206 Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater ;36 0 0 0 705 0 16,310 0 45,105 © 0 19,839 61,415 #07136 - TAZ 504 cattlr tjtt d Developments.xfs IMF ger w mar lip, 1.1 II yr w mor w vir mor • VI w w w Mir w w NI NIP' w w w ................ Residential Condominium 1 Townhouse General Office Building Retail / Service GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS TAZ 504 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net External Person Trips usin. Transit • Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) UNITS 746 DU 19,839 SF 61,415 SF Net External Person trips walking 1 using bicycle 1.40 ITE Land Use Code 230 710 814 of Gross External Trips (1) of Gross External Trips (2) of Gross External Trips (3) Persons/ Vehicle Persons/ Vehicle 17% 44% 56% 56% 56°/0 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS OUT TOTAL Trips Trips Trips 87 0 46 44`)/0 35 81 43 44% 33 76 29 44% 22 76 56% 170 44% 131 275 56% 56% 56% Persons/ Vehicle 56% 60 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 persiveh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRHncrement II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DR! Increment II (4) TAZ 504 includes Park Lane Tower, Vista Biscayne, Platinum on the Bay, Lima, and Sky Residences #07136 - TAZ 504 44% TGen.xis • TAZ 504 2010 Cardina Direction TAZ 504 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 10.64% 4.17% 5.05% 4.63% 21.64% 23.55% 13.42% 16.90% TOTAL 100.00% stribution #04121 - TAZ 504 TAZ.xls as is mr mor w w lor mir 'iv ger ler mr gor w ler WWWWWWWWWWWWW 111, W 1115! mir Air gir • The Boulevard Soleil Name Type of Permit MUSP Biscayne Park Commited Developments - TAZ 503 Location Information Units Address Description f Net Area Res Condo 234-272 NE 34 Street Mixed Use: residential & commercial MUSP 3100 Biscayne Boulevard Total Mixed Use: Residential, Retail, Restaurant & Office Wynwood/ Edgewater Wynwood/ Edgewater 127 288 415 0 el Office 0 13,2'33 0 12,095 5,328 #07136 - TAZ 503 Committed DeveiopmentsAis • • Residential Condominium / Townhouse Retail / Service GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net External Person Trips usinu Transit Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) TAZ 503 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 415 DU 25,328 SF 16.00% 14.90% 10.00% 1.40 1.40 ITE Land Use Code of Gross ExternalTrips (1) of Gross External Trips (2) of Gross External Trips (3) Persons/ Vehicle Persons/ Vehicle Persons/ Vehicle 61% 61% 61% 61% 61% Trips PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS OUT TOTAL % Trips Trips 129 33% 64 193 30 56% 38 68 159 102 261 25 24 16 94 120 33 154 39% 39% 39% 39% 39% 33 I 39% Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITE's 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II (4) TAZ 503 includes The Boulevard and Soleil #07136 - TAZ 503 16 15 10 60 42 39 39 141 TGerl.xls 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 • 0 1 #04121•TAZ 503 1 1 scayne Park 2010 Cardinal IIstribution Direction TAZ 503 L NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 13.58% 4.53% 5.30% 9.67% 12.94% 21.33% 15.29% 17.36% TOTAL 100.00% TAZ.xis w w w NOV w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w NWw w w le,' w salgr MINr Niffr 'VW Name Type of Permit Midtown Padi. #07136 - TAZ 500 Biscayne Park Commited Developments * TAZ 500 Location Information Address 3468 North Miami Avenue Total escription Net Area Mixed Use: Residential, Retail & Restaurant Wynwoodt Edgewater Res ndo 155 55 7,245 Committed Developments,xis TAZ 500 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Analysis USES Residential Condominium / Townhouse Retail / Service UNITS 155 DU 7,245 SF ITE Land Use Code 230 814 P PEAK HOUR TRIPS • N OUT 67% 45% Trips 58 9 33% 55% Trips 28 11 TOTAL Trips 88 20 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 63% Vehicle Occupancy Adjustment @ Transit Trip Reduction @ Pedestrian / Bicycle Trip Reduction @ NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 16.00% 14.90% 10.00`)/0 of Gross External Trips (1) of Gross External Trips (2) of Gross External Trips (3) 63% 63% 63% 63% 67 11 10 7 40 7°/Q 37% 37% 37% 37% 106 6 6 4 23 17 16 16 57 Net External Person Trips in Vehicles @ Net External Person Trips using Transit @ Net External Person Trips (vehicles and transit modes) 1.40 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle Persons/ Vehicle 63% 63% 63% 51 14 65 7% 37% 37`)/o 30 8 38 80 22 102 Net External Person trips walking / using bicycle 1.40 Persons/ Vehicle I 63% 14 11 37% 22 Notes (1) A 16% reduction to adjust for the difference between ITE auto occupancy and local data (Miami's 1.4 vs. ITEs 1.2 pers/veh) (2) Transit trip reduction based on projected modal splits used in the Downtown Miami DR' Increment 11 (3) Pedestrian and bicycle trip reductions based on Downtown characteristics used in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment fl (4) TAZ 500 includes Midtown Park #07136 - TAZ 500 T-Gen.xis • • • • • • • • #04121 - TAZ 500 TAZ 500 2010 Cardinal Distribution Direction TAZ 500 NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 14.09% 3.45% 5.42% 14.79(3/0 15.56% 19.61% 12.64% 14.44% TOTAL 100.00% 27,08% 35.17% 20.21% TAZ.xls Appen�� ix r Traffic Control Measures Plan 10 • • • r • i i 0 • 1 1 • The prc follows: iscayne Park TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES PLAN 's design and location will reduce the project vehicular traffic volumes as X The project is a proposed residential development which includes some retail and office space. This type of development will result in a portion of the trips being captured within the development, or internal to the site, X The project will also provide residential units with accessibility to mass transit. This feature will allow residents to use mass transit for their trip to work. The development will also do the following to further reduce peak hour vehicle trips: X Will encourage employers/landlords to participate in ridesharing programs through South Florida Commuter Services. Available information will be obtained and distributed to all employers/landlords in the development. X Miami -Dade County Transportation Agency current local and regional mass transit route and schedule information will be provided to potential transit users in a prominent public area of the development. The infoniiation provided and maintained on the premises will be updated, when necessary, at no less than six month intervals. X Promote mass transit use by encouraging employers/landlords to purchase transit passes and make them available to employees and residents at discounted prices or no charge, or in lieu of subsidized parking. X Encourage employers to implement staggered work hours. Implementation of these items will result in a minimum of ten percent (I0%) reduction of peak hour vehicle trips. The performance of the plan will be monitored by measuring actual afternoon peak hour volumes at the project driveways and comparing the counts against total project trips based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates. TRAP FICCONTROL. ooc