Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutIII. Tab 2.Traffic Impact AnalysisVia Fax and juiv 11, 2007 Ms. Li3 I_ Medina, AICP Assistant Transportation Coordinator City of Miami, Office of the City Martager,rrransportation 444 SW 2Avenue (10h Floor) Miami, Florida 33130 Re® Empire World Thwers 1 330 Biscayne aculevard Sufficiency Letter -wo 41 181 Dear Ms. Medina: Subsequent to our May 8, 2007 review comments for the subject project, we lave received a response letter from KHSA dated June 29, 2007_ The response letter also includes vehicle maneuverability details, Photocopies of the response letter and the attachments are included herewith. Please note that in reference to the issue of committing to a Transportation Control Measure Plan, the response indicates that the applicant will provide the following specific Transportation Control Measures: 1. Providing transit subsidies for the employees; 2. Placernent of transit information - schedule, maps, etc., at convenient locations of the site; 3_ Providing convenient and secure spaces for bicycles; and 4. Providing transit oriented amenities. The dovelapmerit approval should be conditioned upon applicant fulfilling above commitments. Further, the site plan should identify the location of the designated bicycle storage area. At this time, we conclude that the traffic impact report along with the subsequent submittal meets all the traffic requirements and the study is found to be sufficient with the aforementioned conditions. Should you have any questions, please call me at 954.739.1861. Siric U Raj hannt Seni r Traffi ham Attachment Cc: Mr. Antonia E Perez, Planner 11, City of Miami Planning Fax - 305.416.1443) Mr Jchn J. McWilliams, P.E. Ki-i&A. Fax - 954,739.2247) JR Corptratlon l.akeshere Cernp16.: 5100 NW 3,Srd Avenue, Sur,,E 150 Frn't Lauderdale, FL .75309-6375 Q54,791861. Fax: 654,7t.1789 a u to 29, 2007 Mr- Raj Shanuwgani, E.E. ugs Southern Corporation 5100 NW 3r Avenue; Suite 150 Fort Lauderdale, € 33309 Re: 330 Biscayne Boulevard. MUSE Traffic Impact Analysis Response to Continents Deu Mr. Shmiroug?m: We received your cQmrnents dated May 8, 2007, regarding the traffic study subtriittcd for the above referenced prcjec,_ We after the l wig responses_ The site plan indicates a total of 1,557 Residential Condominium units, 24,741. s.f. Retail{Commercial, and 3317 s.f. Office Space, whereas the traffic study is based on 1,565 Residential Condominium units, and 35,000 s.f_ RetaiiIConamercia1. The traffic study deeds to accurately reflect the proposed land uses and the analysis should be revised. New trip generation calculations were completed ba:oed on the site plan figures. The net new vehicular trips were reduced to adjust for the City's vehicle occupancy assumption. The results were then reduced to account for irawit and pedestrian trips consistent with the Downrowri Miami DRl — Incrt'rnent IIfor the Centrist Business District_ The result was 2' Less net exri:rna techicie trips than in the original an.atysis. This is n 6 0 reduction and wilt not have a signii..canr'impact in th.e results. 7`h;,, arnaty°si.$ is arra.ched as /Attachment A. 2: The site plan does not include the maneuvering (turning path) of delivery trucks to and from the loading -bays, nor the maneuvering of passenger vehicles though the parking garage. The site plan must include the turning path of design vehicles, using "AutoTurn" or any other approved method, This analysis is ar:opn.ed as Aaachmen.r B. 3. The northbound lvolurne at the Biscayne Bccule.vard!NE 3rd Street intersection is significantly lower than the northbound volcano at the F$.4 5'a5 570Cr FAX 2&4 73.9 2247 TAL. Raj ShaTmagarn, RE., Aunt:. 5.s, 2 arid AssodateS, adjacent intersection — Biscayne Boulevard/ NE 4th Street intersection.. Tbe traffic counts should be checked for accuracy and tile data/analysis should be revised accordingly. To provide )743"1 a conservaqye anaiy3is, tarift-1g rnave.Tne-nr counts frorn the peak hour of each individual intersecTion were used in this analysis, This E suited ina volu.nte discrepancy of 304 vehicles between. the two inf.erseclions, 26% difference in voitane. After farther review, the 4:45 peak hour turrtiatt rnovvrtent voiwne counts were used. This resulted in a voluin.e discrepancy of 196 vehicles, or a 16 % difference in vohone. The revised analysis is wzached at Attachment C. In. addition, the turning rnovernent counts for the two intersect were collected on different days. The C.. o lint s for the Biscayne Boulevard/NE 4th Street intersection were collected on February 21, 2007 and the cnitnf.s for the Biscayne BouZevard/NE 3rd Street intersection were collected on February 27, 2007, Thv eastbound right turning movement at the Biscayne Boulevard/NE 4' Street intersection Is shown to function at LOS F with the project traffic. Potential signal timing arid/or phasing modifications, within the limits of the system coordination should be explored to improve the LOS. Signal phasing, splits were optimized utilizing the existing cycle lengths. The eastbound right turning movement operates at LOS D with the. splits optimization. These results are attached ac Attachment De We trust these responses should address your cotement. Should ycu hve any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very iroly yours, KlivILE RN AND ASSOCIATES, INC, J , PE, Attaiiuments G:',0431DDIDO 330 304Lnynt COrtsponctenz.,e06 2F Cr URS Ittdoc Truffle Impact Analysis for Submittal to the City, of Miami 330 Biscayne Boulevard Project Miami, Florida Prepared for: Empire World Towers, LLC Miami, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc® Fort Lauderdale, Florida 200i Kim;ey-Hom and Associates, 3 c, March 2007 043100000 nley Hoi n and Associates • • Traffic Impact Analysis for Submittal to the City of Miami 330 Biscayne Boulevard Project Miami, Florida Prepared for: Empire World Towers, LLC Miami, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, Florida ©2007 Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. March 2007 043100000 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY................................................................................7 Level of Service Standard ............................................................................... Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology.....................................................7 Intersection Level of Service Methodology.........................................................................7 EXISTING CONDITIONS (2007) CAPACITY ANALYSIS 9 Transportation Corridors 9 Intersections 18 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 19 Background Area Growth 19 Committed Developments 20 PROJECT TRAFFIC �2 Existing and Proposed Land Uses 22 Project Access 22 Trip Generation 22 Trip Distribution and Assignment 26 FUTURE CONDITIONS (2010) CAPACITY ANALYSIS 31 Future (2010) Background Traffic Conditions 31 Future (2010) Total Traffic Conditions 33 TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PLAN 36 FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 37 CONCLUSIONS 38 G:1043100000 -330 BiscayrelReport\TIA.dac Page - i March 2007 Inc, ro fic?fl!)av ,?na1ysis ... 3Bouivard LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Methodology Correspondence Appendix B: Traffic Count Data Appendix C: Miarni-Dade Transit Data Appendix D: Existing Conditions {2007) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Appendix E: Growth Trend Analyses Appendix F: Volume Development Worksheets Appendix G: P.M. Trip Generation Table Appendix H: Cardinal Distribution Appendix 1: Future Conditions (2010 Without Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Appendix: Future Conditions (2010 With Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location Map 2 Figure 2: Intersection Lane Configurations 4 Figure 3: 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic 'Volumes 6 Figure 4: 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic 21 Figure 5: Project Trip Distribution 28 Figure 6: P.M Peak Hour Detailed Project Trip Assignment 29 Figure 7: 2010 P.M Peak Hour Total Traffic 30 G:\043100000 - 330 Biscayne \Report\TIA.doe Page - ii March 2007 i mley-Horn and Associates, inc. LIST OF TABLES € dar,acl:ir i s s-330 ai.ser n B ul: r Table 1: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds.......................................................8 Table 2: 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes...a...................................................................9 Table 3: P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions — Biscayne Boulevard 13 Table 4: P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions North Miami Avenue.., Table 5: P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions -- Flagler Street............, ...... Table 6: P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions -- SE 1'` Street 16 Table 7: 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Conditions ......... ............... .......o.-17 Table 8: 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 18 Table 9. P.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Generation 24 Table 10: P.M. Peak Trip Generation Comparison 76 Table 11: Cardinal Trip Distribution 27 Table 12: Future (2010) Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Conditions 32 Table 13: Future (2010) Background P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 33 Table 14: Future (2010) Total P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Conditions 34 Table 15: Future (2010) Total P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 35 G:\043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report1TiA.doc Page - [0 March 2007 srey4-1 A? INTRODUCTION 330 t5'caine ^'4= Empire World Towers, L.LC is proposing a mixed -use development (330 Biscayne Boulevard) in Miami, Florida. The proposed development is bounded by Biscayne Boulevard to the east, Metromover to the west, NE 3rd Street to the south, and NE 4tr, Street to the north. A project location map is provided as Figure 1. The project proposes to develop the site with 1,559 residential units, 34,700 square feet of retail space, and 2,375 square feet of office space. Construction is expected to be completed and fully occupied by the year 2010. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has completed this revised traffic impact analysis for submittal to the City of Miami as part of the Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) application. The purpose of the study is to assess the project's impact on the surrounding transportation network and determine if adequate capacity is available to support future demand. The study's methodology is consistent with the requirements outlined by the City of Miami for traffic studies. A methodology meeting was conducted with the City of Miami's traffic consultant on February 20Th, 2007. Methodology correspondence is included in Appendix A. This report summarizes the data collection, project trip generation and distribution, and capacity analyses. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TIA.doc Page - 1 March 2007 venue • iffiley-Horn nd Associates, Inc, Traffic thpacE AnalySiS - 330 Biscayne Be,,mie-mrd DATA COLLECTION A study area was examined for this traffic impact analysis commensurate with the anticipated increase in traffic associated with the project. The study area for this project is defined as: • 1-395 (north) • Flagler Street/South 1'4 Street (south) • 1-95 (west) • Biscayne Bay Additionally, the following intersections within the study area were examined: • NE 4th Street at NE 2nd Avenue • NE 3rd Street at NE 2nd Avenue • NE 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) • NE 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) • NTE 3rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) • NE 3rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) The following corridors were identified for analysis: • Biscayne Boulevard • North Miami Avenue • Flagler Street/South 1 Street Lane configurations for each of the examined intersections within the study area are provided in Figure 2. G:\043100000 - 330 BiscaynelReport TIA.doc Page - 3 March 2007 NE 2nd Avenue NE 3rd Street LEGEND LANE CONEIGt7RAT1ON NE 4th Street FIGURE2 LAN[: CONFftURA TONS rit Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, ..,..,) • • Kimley-Harry and Ass'oclates. inc. Boulev P.M. peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 P.M.) turning movement counts were collected in the study area on February 21, 2007 (Wednesday), and February 27, 2007 (Tuesday). The study area P.M, peak hour was determined to occur from 5:00 to 6:00 P.M. The traffic count data is included in Appendix B. The FDOT peak season conversion factor was applied to the traffic counts to adjust the traffic to peak season volumes. The appropriate peak season conversion factor for when the traffic counts were collected is 0.99. The peak season conversion factor table is also provided in Appendix B. Figure 3 presents the peak season turning movement volumes at the study intersections. G:\043100.00 - 330 Biscayne.Report1a;A.doe Page - 5 March 2007 NE 4th Street 104 NE 2nd Avenue NE 3rd Street 4 222 LEGEND XX VEHICLES PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ;56 -- 129 119 FIGURE 3 2007 P.M PEAK HOUR —PEAK so o;UN RAf-FK-; rKimsey -Horn --___ and Associates, Inca Pri'llag K1m#ey-Ion and Associates, inc. Traffic impact Analysis -- 33 ✓ .5 !cayne ou1evaril CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Level of Service Standard Level of service (LOS) is the traffic performance measure generally used in traffic impact analysis. Levels of service range from LOS A (free flow with negligible delays) to LOS F (heavily congested with long delays). The City of Miami has adopted LOS E as its minimum level of service standard. Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology Transportation corridor traffic conditions were examined applying the methodology outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. This methodology considers the person -trip capacity (including transit) for transportation corridors rather than evaluating only the vehicular roadway capacity. Level of service analyses were performed to assess the capacity of the transportation corridors evaluated in this study based on a comparison between person -trip volume and person -trip capacity within the corridors. The analyses of person -trip volumes and person -trip capacities account for both passenger vehicle and transit service within the corridors. Table 1 illustrates the level of service thresholds for each study corridor. The corridor level of service thresholds, measured in volume (v) to capacity (c) ratios, were developed from the 2002 version of FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Intersection Level of Service Methodology Level of service analyses were perfoiined for study intersections using Traffrcware's S.YNCHRO 6.0 Software, which applies methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Edition. G:104310000©- 330 Biscayne \Report\TIA.doc Page - 7 Match 2007 • • Kimley-Horn F_1 and Associates, Inc, 'Traffic impact Analysis 330 i isca n .73cqrlevard Table 1: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds LOS Biscayne Boulevard N Miami Avenue Flagler Street SE 1" Street Peak ]lour Directional Volume Thresholds V/C Ratio Peak Hour Directional Volume Thresholds (1) V/C Ratio Peak Hour Directional Volume Thresholds V/C Ratio Peak Hour Directional Volume Thresholds (1) V/C Ratio A (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) B (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) C 1,350 0.42 1,344 0.65 480 0.59 1,200 0.40 1) 3,130 0.96 1,944 0.94 760 0.94 2,868 0.96 E 3,250 1.00 2,064 1.00 810 1.00 2,988 1.00 F _ >1.00 - >1.00 >1.00 >1.00 (1) Peak hour directional volumes for Class IV State two-way arterials increased by 20% for one-way operation. (2) Cannot be achieved per "Table 4-7" from FDOT's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscaync\ReportVl IA.doc Page - 8 March 2007 • y om fates, Inc. rn f c bnpGrt An lysis - 330 dais€aynnn Bou.1eVard EXISTING CONDITIONS (2007) CAPACITY ANALYSIS Transportation Corridors Vehicular roadway conditions and transit ridership were examined to determine the current level of service for the transportation corridors examined in this study. Table 2 presents the unadjusted 2007 P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes, peak season conversion factors, and the 2007 peak season P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes for the study corridors. Table 2: 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes Roadway Segments Direction P.M. Peak Hour Volumes FDOT Peak Season Conversion Factor P.M. Peak Hour Volume Biscayne Boulevard (North of NE3rd Street) NB 1,614 0.99 1598 SB 967 0.99 957 Biscayne Boulevard (South of NE 3rd Street) NB 2,063 0.99 2,042 SB 1,009 0.99 999 North Miami Avenue SB 355 0.99 351 Flagler Street EB 131 0.99 130 WB 394 0.99 390 SE 15` Street EB 594 1.00 594 Existing transit conditions were examined considering the ridership and capacity of the Miami - Dade Transit (MDT) service operating in the corridors. MDT staff was contacted to obtain the P.M. peak hour ridership and capacities. The only information readily available was the ridership by route on a typical weekday. Therefore, additional research was conducted to determine the transit ridership and capacities in the study corridors, Nine (9) Miami -Dade Metrobus routes presently serve the Biscayne Boulevard corridor adjacent to the project site during the P.M. peak hour. x Route 3 operates with 18 minute headways in both directions. gi Route 11 operates with 8 minute headways in both directions. G A043100000 - 330 Biscayne.Report\T`iA.doc Page - 9 March 2907 K rn ey-!Hi and Assoddat , fr Traffic tarts er Analysis — 330 Bisca}tne Boulevard Route 16 operates with 18 minute headways in both directions. Route 51 operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. Route 77 operates with 8 minute headways in both directions. Route 93/Biseayne Max operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. Route 95 During the P.M. peak hour, Route 95 operates with variable headways in the northbound direction. There is no P.M. operation in the southbound direction within the study area. Route l 03/C operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. Route 1191S operates with 12 minute headways in both directions. It should be noted that the Biscayne Boulevard corridor is also currently served by Route 236 and Route Midnight Owl. However, these routes run after midnight. Therefore, Route 236 and Route Midnight Owl were not included in the transportation corridor analysis In addition, the Biscayne Boulevard corridor is served by the Metromover which operates with 1.5 minute headways. The following Metromover routes run along Biscayne Boulevard within the study area: ® Brickell Loop runs northbound along Biscayne Boulevard. • Inner Loop runs southbound along Biscayne Boulevard. • Omni Loop runs northbound along Biscayne Boulevard. Two (2) Miami -Dade Metrobus routes presently serve the North Miami Avenue corridor in the study area during the P.M. peak hour. ■ Route 6 operates with 30 minute headways in the southbound direction. ■ Route 8 operates with 10 minute headways in the southbound direction. In addition, the North Miami Avenue corridor is served by the Metromover which operates with 1.5 minute headways. The Metromover route runs along SE lst Street within the study area: Inner Loop runs along SE 1st Street with a stop at North Miami Avenue G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TlA.doc Page - 10 March 2807 Kirn cy Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis — 330 B scayne Boulevard Five (5) Miarni-Dade Metrobus routes presently serve the Flagler Street corrk c area during the P.M. peak hour. Route 11 operates with 8 minute headways in both directions. ■ Route 51 operates with 15 minute headways both directions. ■ Route 77 operates with 8 minute headways in both directions, ■ Route 95 operates with variable headways during the P.M. peak hour only. ■ Route 119/S operates with 12 minute headways in both directions. the study It should be noted that the Flagler Street corridor is also currently served by Route Midnight Owl. However, this route runs after midnight. Therefore, Route Midnight Owl was not included in the transportation corridor analysis. In addition, the Flagler Street corridor is served by the Metromover which operates with 1.5 minute headways. The Metromover route that runs one block south of Flagler Street within the study area is: ■ Inner Loop runs along SE 15t Street one block south of Flagler Street Twelve (12) Miami -Dade Metrobus routes presently serve the SE 1st Street corridor near the project site during the P.M. peak hour. ■ Route 10 operates with 30 minute headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 11 operates with 8 minute headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 16 operates with 18 minute headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 48 operates with 30 minute headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 51 operates with 15 minute headways in the eastbound direction, ■ Route 77 operates with 8 minute headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 93/Biscayne Max operates with 15 minute headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 95 operates with variable headways during the P.M. peak hour only. ■ Route 102/B operates with variable headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 103/C operates with 15 minute headways in the eastbound direction. ■ Route 111/K operates with 15 minute headways in the eastbound direction. Route 1191S operates with 12 minute headways in the eastbound direction. G:\043100000 - 330 Biscayne',rRepoa tt\TIA.doc Page - 11 March 2007 • y-Horn Associat Traffic Impact Analysis -- 330 ?Biscayne BoaleverrI It should be noted that the SE 1s` Street corridor is also currently served by Route Midnight Owl, However, this route runs after midnight. Therefore, Route Midnight Owl was not included in the transportation corridor analysis. In addition. the SE i.st Street corridor is served by the Metromover which operates with 1.5 minute headways, The Metromover route that runs along SE 1st Street within the study area is: inner Loop runs along SE ist Street MDT staff indicated that the Metrobus routes on the studied corridors sometimes use different bus types on the same route with variable capacities. For purposes of this analysis, an average capacity for each route was determined using data obtained from Miami -Dade Transit. The ridership capacities for the bus routes were calculated for the P.M. peak hour using the appropriate headways and capacities. Metrobus route maps are included in Appendix C. Tables 3 through 6 summarize the transit capacity provided by the routes. Data were obtained to determine the existing P.M. peak hour ridership for the identified transit routes. The data reflects typical ridership on the routes using the most recent ridership infolulation. The P.M peak hour ridership data is summarized in Tables 3 through 6. This ridership data is also included in Appendix C. G:i043100000 . 330 Biscayne \Report\TLA.doc Page - March 2007 fQm ey Horn _ Associates, x aff c Jrzpacl 30 Biscayne Boulevard Table 3: P.M. Peak Hour Miami. -Dade Transit Conditions — Biscayne Boulevard Transit Route Information Direction of Travel P.M. Peak Hour Headways Vehicles per Hour P.M. Peak Average Hour Vehicle Directional Capacity (riders) Person -Trip ! ! P.M. Peak Hour Average ctional s RouteRidershipCapacity Biscayne Boulevard Route 3 Northbound 18 minutes 3 53 I 159 15 {5� riders per Southbound 18 minutes , 3 53 1 159 6 (2 riders per bus) Route 11 Northbound 8 minutes 7.5 53 397.5 150 (20 riders per bus) Southboun.d 8 minutes 7.5 60 450 353 (47 riders per bus) Route 16 Northbound 18 minutes 3 53 159 24 (8 riders per bus) Southbound 18 minutes 3 53 159 9 (3 riders per bus) Route 51 Northbound 15 minutes 4 53 212 72 (? 8 riders per bus) Southbound 15 minutes 4 53 212 64 {16 riders per bus) Route 77 Northbound 8 minutes ...... 7.5 54 405 . 180 (24 riders per bus) Southbound 8 minutes 7.5 58 435 53 (7 riders per bus) Route 93/Biscayne Max Northbound 15 minutes 4 60 240 32 (8 riders per bus) Southbound 15 minutes 4 0 0 0 (0 riders per bus) Route 95 Northbound Variable 8.5 0 0 0 (0 riders per bus) Southbound Variable 8.5 No P.M. operation within the study area Route 103/C Northbound 15 rninutes 4 53 212 68 (17 riders per bus) Southbound 15 minutes 4 53 212 0 {0 riders per bus) Route 119/S Northbound 12 minutes 5 66 330 70 (14 riders per bus) Southbound 12 minutes 5 94 470 30 {6 riders per bus) Metromover Mickel' Loop Northbound 1.5 minutes 40 75 3,000 48©(12 riders per train) Metromover Inner Loop Southbound 1.5 minutes 40 75 3,000 200 {5 riders per train) Metromover Omni Loop Northbound 1.5 minutes 40 75 3,000 800 (20 riders per train) Total Northbound i - 126.5 - 8,115 1,891 (15 riders per vehicle) Southbound - 86,5 - 5,097 715 (8 riders per vehicle ) G:\043100000 - 330 Bisca;ue\Report1T1A.doc Page - 13 March 2007 KIrniey-Horn and Associates, inc, T eafc impact Analysis — 330 Biscayne Bouiev ra Table 4: P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions — North Miami Avenue Transit Route Information z Direction o Travel PM. Peak Hour Headways Vehicles Vehicle per j Capacity Hour (riders) Average P.M. Peak Hour Directional Person - Trip Capacity Route 6 Southbound 30 minutes F 2 ; 0 0 Route 8 Southbound i 10 minutes 6 56 336 PM. Peak Hour Average Directional Route Ridership (0 riders per bus) 90 (15 riders per bus) Metromover Inner Loop Southbound 1.5 minutes 40 75 3,000 200 (5 riders per tram) Total 1 Soutbound 48 3,336 290 (6 riders per vehicle) 0:\043I00000 - 33013iscayne\Report 1TIA.doc Page - 14 March 2007 Kimley Ho n ;fic act Ana/3)s Table 5; PiNt Peak Hour Miarni-Dade Transit Conditions Hagler Street Transit Route Information Direction of Travel P.M. Peak Hour Headways Vehicles per Hour Average Vehicle Capacity (riders) P.M. Peak Hour Directional Person -Trip Capacity P.M. Peak Hour Average Directional Route Ridership L.Westbd m a Route 11 Eastbound 8 minutes 7.5 53 398 150 (20 riders per bus) Westbound 8 minutes 7.5 60 450 352.5 (47 riders per bus) Route 51 Eastbound 15 minutes 212 72 (18 riders per bus) Westbound 15 minutes 4 53 64 (16 riders ter bus) Route 77 Eastbound 8 minutes 7.5 54 405 180 (24 riders per bus) oun 8 minutes.er 52.5 l)ers bus) Route 95 Eastbound Variable 0 0 0 0 (0 riders s er bus) Westbound Variable 0 0 0 0 (0 riders •er bus Route 119/S Eastbound 12 minutes 5 66 330 70 (14 riders per bus) Westbound 12 minutes 5 94 470 30 (6 riders .er bus) Metromover Inner Loop Westbound 1.5 minutes 40 75 3,000 200 (5 riders per train) Total Eastbound - 24 - 1,345 472 (2d riders per vehicle) Total Westbound - 64 m 4,567 699 (11 riders per vehicle) G:1043100000 - 330 Disc a;ne\Report TLA.doc Page - 15 March 2007 miey-1 torn a d Associates, irte, Traffcimpad rctyss-330Biscayne Boulevard Table 6: P.M. Peak Hon g° Miami -Davie Transit Conditions — SE Street Transit Information Route i Direction of Travel P.3.1. Peak Hour Headways Vehicles per Hour Average Vehicle Capacity (riders) P.M. Peak Hour Directional Person Trip Capacity P.M. Peak Hour Average Directional Route Ridership SE P' Street Route 10 Eastbound 30 minutes 2 53 106 10 (5 riders per bus) Route 11 Eastbound 8 minutes 7.5 53 398 150 (20 riders per bus) Route 16 Eastbound 18 minutes 3 53 159 24 (8 riders per bus) Route 48 Eastbound 30 minutes 2 41 82 6 (3 riders per bus) Route 51 Eastbound 15 minutes 4 53 212 72 (18 riders per bus) Route 77 ' Eastbound 8 minutes 7.5 54 405 180 (24 riders per bus) Route 93/Biscayne Max Eastbound 15 minutes 4 60 ' 240 32 (8 riders per bus) Route 95 Eastbound Variable 8.5 0 0 0 (0 riders per bus) Route 102/B Eastbound Variable 14.5 53 768.5 43.5 (3 riders per bus) Route 103/C Eastbound 15 minutes 4 53 212 68 (17 riders per bus) Route 111/K Eastbound 15 minutes 4 53 212 20 (5 ders per bus) Route 119/S Eastbound 12 minutes 5 66 330 70 (14 riders per bus) Metromover Inner LoopEastbound 1.5 minutes 40 75 3,000 200 (5 riders per train) Total Eastbound - 106 _ 6,125 876 (8 riders per vehicle) In order to determine person -trip level of service for the study area's transportation corridors, total person -trip volumes (vehicular and transit) were compared to the total person -trip capacities. The person -trip volume to capacity (v/c) ratios were compared to the person -trip v/c level of service designations outlined in Table 1, Table 7 presents the existing transportation corridor level of service for the P.M. peak hour. As indicated in Table 7, the transportation corridors have excess person -trip capacity during the P.M. peak hour and operate at acceptable levels of service. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Renart\TJA.doc Paige -16 March 2007 • • Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact n alyst - 330 Table 7: 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Conditions Principal Roadways Peak Season P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes P.M. Peak Hour Transit Ridership P.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) Directional Peak Hour Vehicular Capacity P.M. Peak Hour Transit Capacity P.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) P.M. PeakP.M. .Hour Excess Capacity .Peak Hour Level of Service Vehicles Person- Trips ttl Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicles Person- Trips (1) Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio 1,[�5 Biscayne Boulevard (North of NE are Street) NB 1,598 2,237 1,891 4,128 3,250 4,550 8,115 12,665 8,537 0.33 f; SB 957 1,340 715 2,055 4,550 5,097 9,835 7,780... 0.21 C Biscayne Boulevard (South of NE 3`4 Street) NB 2,042 2,859 1,891 4,750 3,250 4,550 8,115 12,665 7,915 0.38 C S13 999 1,399 715 2,114 3,250 4,550 5,097 9,835 7,721 0.21 C C w SB 351 491 290 781 2,064 2,890 6,226 5,445 0.13 on w m a EB 130 182 472 654 810 1,134 1,345 2,479 1,825 0.26 WB 394 699 1,251 810 1,134 4,567 5,701 4,450 0.22 " w Lin V) EB 594 832 876 1,708 2,988 4,183 6,125 10,308 8,600 0.17 C: (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2002 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook and the Miami -Downtown DRI. G:1043100000 - 330 13iscaynelReport\TJA..doc Page -17 March 2007 } iomm Mates, IIic, draffc.mp€. iysis-3a0Biscay nc ou?e a Intersections P.M. peak hour capacity analyses were also performed for the study intersections. Table 8 presents the results of the analyses, As indicated; the study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service. Detailed SYNCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix D, along with existing intersection traffic signal timing plans. Table 8: 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Overall Level of Service LOS Delay (s) P.M. Peak Hour NE 4th Street at NE 2nd Avenue B 10.4 NE 3`d Street at NE 2°d Avenue A 9.0 NE 4 Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) B NE 4` Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) A 6.5 NE 3 "Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) ©® A 9.9 NE 3" Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) G:10,13100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TLA.doc Page - 18 Mareh 2007 ley -Horn Associates, Inc. Traffic impact Analysis — 330 I3isce BACKGROUND T :FFIC Background traffic conditions are defined as the expected traffic conditions on the prevailing roadway network in the year 2010 (corresponding to the total build out of 330 Biscayne Boulevard) without the development of the proposed project. The background traffic volumes are the sum of the existing traffic and additional "background" traffic to account for expected traffic growth in the study area. Background Area Growth Future traffic growth on the area roadway network was determined through review of historic growth trends at nearby FDOT traffic count stations. The following FDOT count stations were referenced for this analysis: • Count station 5045 is located on SR 5/ US 1/Biscayne Boulevard • Count station 5046 is located on SR 5/ US 1/Biscayne Boulevard • Count station 5047 is located on SR 5/ US 1/Biscayne Boulevard • Count station 0101 is located on SR 968/ Flagler Street • Count station 0100 is located on SR 968/EB SE lst Street The review of historic growth trends resulted in an annual growth rate of -2.62 percent (-2.62%) for count station 5045, -7.92 percent (-7.92%) for count station 5046, 4.41 percent (4.41%) for count station 5047, 4.17 percent (4.17%) for count station 0101, and -1.18 percent (-1.18%) for count station 0100. To be conservative in the traffic analysis, an annual growth rate of 0.5 percent (0.5%) was applied annually to traffic counts to attain future (2010) background conditions. Historical traffic count data and growth trend calculations are included in Appendix E. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TIA.doc Page - 19 March 2007 KIdey-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis — 330 Biscayne Boulevard Committed Developments The City of Miami staff was contacted to determine if any projects that have been approved but not yet completed in the vicinity of the project site should be accounted for in this analysis. The Real Estate Development Database from the City of Miami was reviewed on March 12, 2007, and three (3) major use special permits (MUSP) projects were identified. These three (3) projects are listed below. 1. Everglades on the Bay 2. Park Suites at 50 Biscayne 3. The Loft Downtown (The Loft 2) The projected traffic from these committed projects was added to the background traffic. Please refer to Appendix F for committed project trip assignments to the 330 Biscayne Boulevard project study intersections. Figure 4 presents the 2010 background traffic for the study area. G:1043I00000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TLA.doe Page - 20 March 2007 NE 2nd Avenue NE 3r0 Street LEGEND 97 4- 276 113 XX VEHICLES PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES NE 4th Street 4 105 37 —® P.M. PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS ONLY, PER CITY Of MIAMI TRAFFIC CONSULTANT 4— 225 131 121 FIGURE 4 G FUTURE (2010) NON --PROJECT P.N,I PEAK HOUR rRAFEIU /'t Kimley Horn L . and Associates, Inca f. fey -Horn Traffic Impact naiys's — 310 Biscayne Boulevard PROJECT T FFIC Project traffic is defined as the vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project (330 Bicayne :Boulevard) and the distribution and assignment of this traffic over the roadway network. Existing and Proposed Land Uses The project proposes to develop the site (330 South Biscayne Boulevard) with 1,559 residential units; 34,700 square feet of retail space, and 2,375 square feet of office space. Construction is expected to be completed and fully occupied by the year 2010. Project Access The site can be entered via one (1) main driveway that leads to the parking area. The site's main entrance driveway is proposed along NE 3rd Street and a service driveway is also proposed along NE 3rd Street west of the site's main driveway. The site can be exited by (2) main driveways from the parking area. One (1) main exit is proposed along NE 3rd Street west of the site's main entrance driveway. One (1) main exit is also proposed along NE 4th Street. The service driveway west of the main exit driveway on NE 3rd Street can also serve as an exit for vehicles entering this driveway. Trip Generation Trip generation characteristics were quantified through use of data available from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) report Trip Generation, 7th Edition. These documents provide trip generation data for a variety of development types and indicate the percentage split between entering and exiting trips. Table 9 summarizes trip generation characteristics for the proposed development. Site traffic volumes shown in these tables were derived using rates provided in land use categories `High Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse' (Land Use Code 232) and `Shopping Center' (Land Use Code 820). As Table 9 shows, the proposed land uses are expected to generate 645 net new external trips during the P.M. peak hour. Internal capture calculations were performed in accordance with the methodology outlined in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. A pass -by capture trip reduction was also applied to the G:1043100000 - 330 BiscaynelRevort\T!A.doc Page - 22 March 2007 miey-Horn Associates, Inc. Traffic hnprctAnalysis —330Bi, ...w:eBo.uievard commercial retail land use consistent with the ITE Trip Generation Handbook methodology. As Table 9 shows, it was determined that an 18.7 percent pass -by capture was appropriate for the project, G:1043 ! ©000O. 330 Biscayne\Report\TIA.doc Page - 23 March 2007 • • ©_r1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Land Use High -Rise Residential Condorriinium/Townhouse Shopping Center Developinerit Totals Table 9. P.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Generation Gross Project Trips Total Infernal Capture Trips Traffic Impact An<alyszs— 330 Biscayne? Boulevard Pass -By Driveway Volumes Capture Trips Trips Enter Exit Total % Trips Enter P.M. Peak Hour Project Trip Generation 1,565 d.u. 35 k.s.f - 514 0.0% 52.8% 183% G:1043100000 - 330 BiscaynelReportVTlA.doc Page - 24 Net New External Trips Exit I10 ta 320 194 514 62 69 131 382 263 645 March 2007 • Kiratey-Horn and Associates, Inc. Trace Irnactna[psrs s3 3iscayne Boulevard As Tables 9 and 10 show, the proposed development (330 Biscayne Boulevard) will generate 645 additional net new external trips during the P.M. peak hour prior to wodaliv-ehicle occupancy adjustments. Please note that ITE trip generation assumes a vehicle occupancy rate of 1.2 persons per vehicle; however, the City of Miami has determined that 1A persons per vehicle are more appropriate for the focal area. Therefore, net new vehicular trips shown in Table 10 were reduced by 16 percent to adjust for these vehicle occupancy assumptions. Additionally, the net new vehicular trips were reduced to account for transit and pedestrian trips consistent with the Downtown Miami DRI — Increment II for the Central Business District. P.M peak hour trip generation tables are included in Appendix G. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TIA.doc Page - 25 March 2007 #Qmleydliorn and Associates, Inc, Traffic Impact Analysis— 330 Bascabne Eauiev Table 10: P.M. Peak Trip Generation Comparison Proposed Peak Hour Trip Generation Land Use ITE Code Scale I PIV Peak Hoar Enter Exit Total High -Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse 232 1,565 ' d.u. 320 194 514 Shopping Center 820 35, k s.. 62 69 131 Development Totals 382 263 645 Transit Trip Reduction (22.6 % Reduction) 86 59 145 Pedestrian Trip Reduction (10% Reduction) 38 26 64 Adjusted Vehicle Trips After Mode Split Reduction 258 178 436 .. ITE/Miami vehicular occupancy adjustment (16% reduction) 41 28 69 Net External Vehicle Trips 217 150 367 Person -Trips in Vehicles (1.4 persons per vehicle) 304 210 514 Person -Trips Using Transit 120 83 203 Net External Person Trips (Vehicle+Transit) 424 293 717 Trip Distribution and Assignment The likely distribution of project traffic was forecast for the trips expected to be generated by the project. The trip distribution was based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2005 Cost Affordable Plan for the project site's traffic analysis zone (TAZ 523). The cardinal trip distribution for TAZ 523 is provided in Table 11. The detailed cardinal distribution is included in Appendix H. G:1043100000 - 330 BiscayneA.epartiTIA.doc Page - 26 March 2007 K miey4Noam ard Asso dates, inc. `Traffic impact. Analysis — 330 Biscayne Basle Table 11: Cardinal Trip Distribution Cardinal Direction North -Northeast East -Northeast East -Southeast South -Southeast 4.3 9% South -Southwest 13.53 % West -Southwest 23.7$13/0 West -Northwest 20,94% North -Northwest 17.74% Total 100.00% Figures 5 and 6 show the project trip distribution and assignment respectively at the project driveways and adjacent intersections. 0:1043100000 - 330 Biscarne\Report\TLS.doc Page - 27 March 2007 % OUT 10% ®®� 00 15% ♦-55% 4-1D% NE 3rd Street LEGEND XX% NEW DISTRIBUTION PASS --BY TRAFFIC> NE 4th Street ---10%<-100%> Flagler Street SE 1st Street 10% IN±10% OUT k---90%<100%> 111--10%<-100%> 15% 5% 15% — FIGURE 5 TRIP DISTRIBUT)ON Kmley-Horn cs4 NE 3rd Street LEGEND XX NEW ASSIGNMENT PM<XX> PASS —BY TRAFFIC NE 4th Street w z tr.) 37 83 15 4) 1E 22—* 22 4-83 22<-74> FIGURt TRIP ASSIGNMENT Ho c �V N 1zJ z NE 3rd Street 134 1-359 4 --128 LEGEND XX VEHICLES PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES NE 4th Street 4J 22 ♦--308 411-- 10 r1 4j 4-173 4-173 13t i21 FIGURE 7 2010 P3A. PEAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC, Kirntey Horn __ and Associates, Inc. Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. i a,; c 1.mpa z Analysis -- 330 Biscayne Boulevard FUTURE CONDITIONS (2010) CAPACITY ANALYSIS Two separate future conditions peak hour capacity analyses were performed. A transportation corridor capacity analysis was performed examining person -trip volumes and capacity. Intersection capacity analysis was performed at the study intersections. The future conditions analysis were performed for the 2010 background traffic conditions and the 2010 total traffic conditions, which included the 2010 background traffic and the new trips expected to be generated by the project. Future (2010) Background Traffic Conditions Table 12 presents the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2010 P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. As indicated in Table 12, the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS C). Table 13 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2010 P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. During the P.M. peak hour, all the intersections operate at LOS B or better during the P.M. peak hour. Detailed SYNCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix I. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TJA.doc Page - 31 arch 2007 • • ©_ r1 Kimsey -Horn and Associates, Inc, Ti.affic Impact Analysis' 730 f3OYayn.e flo,aievatrl Table 12: Future (2010) Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Conditions Principal Roadway 2010 Y.M. Peak Hour Volume Background Committed Peak Hour Volume t2f 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Volume (3) 2010 P.M. Peak Hour "Total Capacity (C) (4) 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Excess Capacity 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Total Leve of Serv►cei Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- 'Trips V/C Ratio LOS s 0 o 'XI as z NB 4,190 10 4,200 12,665 8,465 0.33 SB 2,086 66 2,152 9,835 7,683 0.22 Biscayne Boulevard (South of 3`d Street) NB 4,822 102 4,924 12,665 7,741 0.39 SB 2,146 - 2,146 9,835 7,689 0.22 v 4 .g. 5 ZQ SB 793 793 6,226 5,433 0.13 C FlagIer Street 3 EB 664 - 664 2,479 1,815 0.27 WB 1,270 1,270 5,701 4,431 0.22 C Y EB 1,734 - 1,734 10,308 8,574 0.17 (1) An annual growth rate (0.5 percent) was applied to the 2007 P.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2010 background volume. (2) Total traffic generated along the corridors by committed developments (3) The summation of 2010 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. (4) Total capacity determined in Table 7. Ga043100000 - 33013iscaynelReport1T1A.doe Page - 32 March 2007 ION Kim ey Hom Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis -_. 330 Biscayne. Boulevard Table 13: Future (2010) Background P.. Peak .Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection F 2010 P.M. Overall Level E Peak Hour of Service LOS Delay {s) P.M. Peak Hour NE 4th Street and NE 2" Avenue B 10.5 NE 3rd Street and NE 2" Avenue B 15.8 NE 4 Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) ( B 13.2 NE 4 Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) A 6.6 NE 3" Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) NE 3" Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) 9.7 Future (2010) Total Traffic Conditions Table 14 presents the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2010 P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. As indicated in Table 14, the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS C). Table 15 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2010 P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. During the P.M. peak hour, all signalized intersections will operate at LOS B or better. The stop -controlled approaches of the project driveways will operate at LOS A. Detailed SYNCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix J. G:\043300O0O - 330 BiscaynelReport\T1A.doc Page - 33 March 2007 • • ryKimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis - 330 Biscayne Bon v Table 14: Future (2010) Total P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Conditions Principal 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Background Volume Committed peak Hour Volume (2) 2010 P.M. Background Peak Hour Total Volume (3) Project P.M. Peak Hour Distribution (Maximum) Project P.M. Peak Hour Assignment 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) ts) 2010 P.M. Peak Hoar Excess Capacity 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Total LevelRoadway of Service Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person -Trips Person- Trips Person- "Trips Person- Trips VIC patio 1 ,,OS Biscayne .1 Boulevard (North of 3a° Street) NB 4,190 10 4,200 - 4,200 12,665 8,465 0,33 SB 2,086 66 2,152 50% 10% OUT 124 2,276 9,835 7,559 0.23 Biscayne Boulevard (South of 3`d Street) NB 4,822 102 4,924 50% IN 108 5,032 .12,66.5 7,633 If040' SB 2,146 2,146 10% OUT 15 2,161 9,835 7,674 0.22 ; 4 SB 793 793 20% OuT 1N + 59 852 6,226 5,374 0.14 C.", w cl 7...Wl3 P13 664 664 15% IN 33 697 2,479 1,782 0.28 1,270.1. 1,270 1,270 5,701 4,431 0.22 V) ,--1" EB 1,734 1,734 5% IN 11 1,745 10,308 F8563 0.17 C (1) An annual growth rate (0.5 percent) was applied to the 2007 P.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2010 background volume. (2) Total traffic generated along the corridors by committed developments (3) The summation of 2010 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. (4) 2010 P.M. peak hour total volume (V) is defined as the sum of the project P.M. peak hour assignment and the background volume. (5) Total capacity determined in Table 7. (11043100000 - 330 Biscayne1Reportl'1°1A.doc Page - 34 arch 20( Kimsey -Horn As, Inc, sic apcca Analysis ysis 330 Biscayne Boulevard Table 15: Future (2010) Total P.11b Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection 2010 P.M. Peak Hour Overall Level of Service LOS ` Delay (s) P.M. Peak Hour NE 4`' Street and NE 2nd Avenue B 12 3 NE 3rd Street and NE 2d Avenue B 18.1 NE 4th Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) B 13'6 NE 4 Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) B 15.0 NE 3 Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) A 4 4 NE 3 Street and Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) B 12.5 NE 4th Street and Project Driveway A (1) 9.5 NE 3rd Street and Project Service Driveway A (1) 9.4 NE 3rd Street and Project Exit Driveway A (1) 9.2 NE 3r1 Street and Project Entrance Driveway (2) (2) * Phasing splits were optimized (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop controlled intersections. The LOS stop controlled approach is shown (2) LOS can not be calculated for right -in only driveway G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\ReportlTLA.doc Page - 35 March 2007 K;miky-Horn and Associates, Inc, i - rgje . %nv sc Araa(,sas — 330 Biscayne 'Boulevard TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PEAK A Transportation Control Measures Plan is required for this site to demonstrate how the developer plans to alleviate traffic from the proposed site on the surrounding roadway network. Miami -Dade County provides public transit in close proximity to the project site. In addition, other measures of transportation control can be used by the developer to encourage people to use public transportation, promote bicycling and walking, encourage car/vanpooling and offer alternatives to the typical workday hours. Examples of these incentives include, but are not limited to: gi Provide transit subsidies for employees of the site • Provide transit information within the site including route schedules and maps • Provide convenient and secure areas for bicycles • Provide other transit -oriented amenities The applicant intends to make the site pedestrian- and transit -friendly and will consider these features for incorporation into the site. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TIA.aoe Page - 36 March 2007 ley -Horn Associates. Inc. FUTU Traffic Imlys's 330 Bt.5•cayr2 8aulavwr d NSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS As part of this traffic impact analysis, future transportation improvements (programmed and punned) were identified within the corridors adjacent to the project site. The following projects were identified: Premium Transit — According to Miami -Dade County Long Range Transportation Plan (2030 LRTP), there is a project that will provide premium transit service between Downtown Miami and the Broward County line along the USA./ FEC Rail corridor. This project is a Priority N project scheduled for implementation between 2021-2030. G:\043I00000 - 330 BiscayneReport\TIA.doc Page - 37 March 2007 �y-:crn t s, inc. Traffic ImpactAraaxys6' 330 3iseczyne Boulevard CONCLUSIONS This traffic irnpact study assessed the impacts of the 330 Biscayne Boulevard project on the surrounding transportation network. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the City of Miami requirements and included data collection; project trip generation, distribution, and assignment; transportation corridor segment capacity analysis; and intersection capacity analysis. This report is being submitted as part of a MUSP application. Transportation cola idor capacity analyses and intersection capacity analyses were performed for the existing 2007 P.M. peak season conditions. Results of the analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and intersections in the vicinity of the project site currently have sufficient capacity and operate at acceptable levels of service. Trip generation calculations indicate that the project is expected to generate 367 new vehicular trips and 717 person -trips during the P.M. peak hour. These trips were assigned to the roadway network based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2005 Cost Feasible Plan. Intersection capacity analyses were conducted for 2010 non -project conditions and future (2010) total conditions. The future traffic condition analysis indicates that the majority of the intersections are expected to operate under conditions similar to future (2010) non -project traffic. The overall delays at the majority of the intersections do not change significantly as a result of the proposed project. The stop -controlled approaches of the project driveways connecting with NE 3rd and 4fh Streets will operate at LOS A. Results of these analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and major intersections will continue to have sufficient capacity and operate at acceptable levels of service. G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Report\TI.A.doc Page - 38 March 2007 • • • APPENDIX A: Methodology Correspondence • • itirffiey-Hom and A550eiates, Memorandum To: URS Southern Corporation From: John J. McWilliams, P.E. Date: February 20, 2007 Subject: 330 Biscayne Blvd. Mixed -Use Development MUSP Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Mr. Rajendran Shanmugam, P.E. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the MUSP traffic impact analysis methodology as agreed to during the February 201 meeting. The proposed development is bounded by NE 4t Street on the north, NE 3'a Street on the:. south, Biscayne Boulevard on the east, and Metromover on the west. The proposed development includes approximately 1,559 residential units, 34,600 sq. ft. of retail spaee, and 2,375 sq. ft. of office space. The following items were discussed: Trip Generation Tripgenerationcalculations will be performed using 1TE Trip Generation, 7th Edition; ITE:Trip Generation Handbook, and the Downtown Miami DRI- Increment IT. Trip Distribution Trip distributionwill be determined using the cardinal distribution from the appropriate Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). According to Miami -Dade County"s TAZ Map, the project is located in TAZ 523.. Committed Development The City of.Mitaroi will becontacted to obtain the most recent editionof the Large Scale Development Report. Projects currently under construction or approved will be included. Projects in the application stage who have submitted a traffic study will also be included. TEL 954 535 5103 FAX 954 739 2247 S&lite 130 5200'NA.33d Avenue t 7u5erdaie. Fsafiia 33309 • • Kirrley-Horn and Associates, #ri M;. Rajendran Shanmugam. fi.3., Ft©raary 20, 2CP07. Pg. 2 Study Ara The study area for this project is bounded by 1-195 on the west, Biscayne Bay on the east, I-39. 5 on the north, and Flagier Street/South l.'S` Street on the south. Within this study area, four (4) intersections were identified for analysis:. • NE 4th Street at Biscayne Boulevard (signalized) • NE 3rd Street at Biscayne Boulevard (signalized) * NE 4'1` Street at NE 2" 'a Avenue (signalized) a NE ,3 Street at NE 2Pd Avenue (signalized) The .following corridors were identified for analysis: • Biscayne Boulevard. • Miami Avenue • Elagler/ South lst Street Data Collection PM peak hour turning movement counts will be conducted at all identified study intersections. 24-hour machine counts will be conducted en all study corridors. All traffic counts will be adjustedto reflect peak season conditions using the appropriate FDOT adjustment factors_ Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses will be conducted for the PM peak hour at all identified intersections and corridors. Intersection analyses will be performed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HMI) methodology_ Corridor. analyses will be conducted using information from the Miami UKI-Il (..e. person -trip capacity) and the FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook. In addition, all project driveways will be addressed in this analysis with respect to access (controlled/uncontrolled) and queuing.. Site parking information will also be provided in the report. Loading area maneuverability will also be addressed. Documentation The results of the analysis will be summarized in a report. The report shall include all necessary supporting documents including signal timings, lane geometry, and software output sheets. Cs:\043100000 - Empire ToweriCorrespondence\02 20 07 URS Mema.doe • • • 330 Biscayne Boulevard MUSP Location Map 0 yds 100 200 300 4 Copyright © f98e-2005 Microsoft Corp. andlor tts suppliers. All rights reserved. hilp:flvnvw.microsoft.comtstreelsi 2004 NAVTEQ. All rights reserved. This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, t) Copyright 2004 by TeleAtias North America, Inc. All rights reserved. • • APPENDIX B: Traffic Count Data • • Intersection Turning Movement Counts • NE 2ND AVENUE . NE 4 bH STREET !'MIASI, FLORIDA 1111, tIPII= BY: ABS THOMAS GNALI ZED ,TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (581) 272-3255 FAX ;561i 272-4281 ALL VENICLES Site Code 00070064 Start Date: 02/21/07 File Sea, 4ST_2AVE Page 1 NS 2ND AVENUE From North 24S 4701 STREET 1From East Scut; Thru UTern Left I Right "JTurn Left I Right Thr Gate 02/21/07 Total 16:00 100 0 5 j 0 0 15 j 0 0 120 16:15 118 0 4 F 0 0 12 0 0 f 134 16,30 112 0 9 0 0 22 0 0 t 143 16:45 130 0 5 0 0 19 0 0 154 Hr Total 460 0 23 0 0 68 [ 0 0 1 551 17:00 153 0 7 f 0 0 28 0 0] 188 17:15 144 0 7 0 0 28 i 0 0 179 17:30 190 0 3 0 0 22 0 0 215, 17:45 160 0 9 0 0 19 0 0 188 HT Total 647 0 26 0 0 97 [ 0 0 I 770 *TOTAL '0 1107 0 49 j 0 0 165 f 0 0 1321 • • NE 2ND AV"ENuE a Nµ' 3TR FTREE,i T6IANI, FL3RIPA 11111 L"NTEt7 BY; ADE T 1MAS ONAL125D TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALIETS, 3N. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BFACW, FLORIDA 33444 ;561) 272-3255 FAX ;561) 272-4353 ALL VEHICLES Site Code - 00070064 Start Dace: 02/21/01 File I.L. : 4ST_2AVE Page 2 NE 2902 AVENUE NE 4TR STREET I Nn 2ND AVENUE From North !From East iSrom South Thru UTUrn Left [ Right UTurn left. 1 Right Thru Total Dat 02/21 0n______ _____ _____________________________ ___ _________ ......_._..__.,_....______..___________ ______ _____ ._....,..„____ _ _______ ____- Peak Nor Analysis Sy Entire lntersert_on for the Period: 16:00 to 18:00 on 02/21/07 Peak start 17:00 ; 17:50 ( 17:03 Volume 647 0 26 0 0 97 0 0 Percent 96% 04 41 { 01 01 1003 1 D1 01 Pk total 573 97 [ 0 Highest 17:30 [ 17:00 16,00 Volume 190 0 3 0 5 2a { 0 0 Hi total 193 28 0 PRP .87 ; .87 .0 f 0 0 • • NE 2ND AVENUE 647 26 647 26 673 J 673 0 0 0 0 ° ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 770 97 647 0 744 NE 2ND 744 123 0 0 0 97 0 97 97 26 NE 4TH STREET 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE 3RD STREET 4 NE 2ND AVENUE M1AMI, FLCRIDA IS+ NTED BY: CHRIS PALOMINO GNALIEEO TRA€F3C STRVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY EEAC13, FLORIDA 33444 561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 Site Code : 00070054 E Date: 3 Stall--z34. 0=22b.s7 - Pile 1 17. 3STR 2AV Page NE 2ND AVENUE 3 YSE 3RD STREET IRE 2ND AVENGE 1 NE 3RD STREET From North From East 1Froe South From West Right Thru UTurn Left ] Right Thru 6Turn Left Right Thru UTurn Left j Right Thru UTurn Left [ Total Bate 02/21/07 16:00 52 67 0 0 0 36 0 9 1 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 j 164 15:15 43 79 0 0 0 25 0 7 j 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0! 154 15:30 55 81 0 0 0 34 0 6{ 0 0 0 0[ 0 0 0 0 176 16:45 53 85 0 0 0 28 0 6 E 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 172 Ar Total 203 312 0 0 0 123 0 28 I 0 0 0 0€ 0 0 0 0? 656 17:09 76 86 0 0 1 0 43 0 8 i 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 213 17:15 63 90 0 0 I 0 47 0 6 1 0 0 0 O j 0 0 0 0 1 206 17:30 96 121 0 0 0 59 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 283 17:45 65 99 0 0! 0 46 0 8 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 01 218 Er Total 300 396 0 0 1 0 195 0 29 i 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 920 •TOTAL° 503 708 0 0 j 0 318 0 57 j 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 1584 or • NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND mTNIT MIAMI, FLORIDA 11111 VNTED EY. 250828 PALCMINO GNALI ZED TRAYFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC, 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DFLRAY SEACA, riORILA 33444 [561) 272-3255 FAA 661) 272-4301 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00070064 Start Date: 02/21/07 File I,D. 3STR2AV Page 2 NE 2051 AVEND4 [52.3 3P.D STREET I528 2522) AVENUE !NE 3RD STREET rrom North !From East [From South IFrom West I I Right Thru uTurn Left [ Right Thru liTurn Left I Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru BTurn Left Total Date 02/21/07 Peak Rour Analysis By Entire Intersection for the Period.: 16.00 to 15.00 on 02/21/07 Peak start 17.00 1 17.00 I 17,00 1700 Volume 300 395 0 0 0 195 0 29 I 0 0 0 oi 0 0 D 0 Percent 434 57% 0% 04 0% 87% 04 13% I . 05 Pt ON 04 04 05 05 05 Pk total 696 224 0 0 Highest 1730 1730 1500 i 1500 Volume 96 121 2 0 0 59 0 7 i . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hi total 2/7 65 I 0 0 PHP .80 85 I .0 .0 NE 2 AVENUE 0 300 396 0 0 0 0 0 300 OE 3RD STREET 0 195 495 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 396 696 495 0 1 696 0 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 920 29 396 0 425 425 NE 2ND AVENUE 224 0 0 0 0 224 195 0 195 29 29 0 NE 3RD STREET 0 0 0 0 0 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 -,NH & NE 4777 213&6ET, MIAM , FLORIDA TINTED BY; MAURICE 0OMEZ .z. 212E0 TRAFFIC SURVEY 9PECIA-LIS09, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLGR1DA 33444 561) 272-3255 FAX `;561) 272-4381 ALL VE9010LEE SLOB Code : 00070064 Start Date: 42/21/47 File I.D. : 5STU51_1 Page H8CAYNE HOPT,EVA8.D/06 1 56 4134 5TRE6T BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 !NE 4074 STREET From North !From East !From South !From West I Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru 7100 n Left I Right Thru UTuro Left Right e.0ru ern Left Total Date 02/21/07 -_ 46:00 0 0 0 4 26 17 0 0 0 238 0 17 0 0 0 0 'I 298 1615 0 0 0 0 j 23 15 0 0 0 320 0 15 0 0 0 0 373 16:30 0 0 0 0 j 19 13 0 0 0 220 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 1 267 16:45 0 0 0 j 27 24 0 0 3 0 261 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 329 Hr Total 0 0 0 0 9 95 69 0 0 1 0 1039 0 64 ; 0 0 6 0 1267 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 44 53 0 0 I 0 333 0 15 l 0 0 0 0( 445 17:15 0 0 0 0 3 34 23 0 0 I 0 358 0 20 i 0 0 0 0 i 435 17:30 0 0 0 0 1 34 22 0 0 1 0 361 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 1 431 17:45 0 0 0 018 22 0 0 1 0 364 0 22 ( 0 0 0 0 L 426 Br Total 0 0 0 0' 130 126 0 0 0 1416 0 71 { 0 0 0 0 1 2.77 *TOTAL, 0 • • 0 0( 225 189 0 0 0 2455 0 135 j 0 0 0 0 1 3004 5:SCAY: E 8o_ EEVA.?.L;tvS ; NB & :.a 4773. STREET, MIPMI, V1ORI00. UNTED BY: MAURICE G134 Z GNAL I Z5D BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 From Worth TRA F1C SVRVSY SPECIALISTS, INC, 624 GARDEN3A TERRACE ,'7ELR.TAY BEACH_ FLORIDA 333454 (561) 272-3255 rAX 561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES 1 NE 4376 STREET ;Fiore, East 'BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 From South i N � 4773 STREET I Prom Nest Site Code . 00070064 Start Date; 02/21/07 File Y.D. s 4STUS1 M Page 2 Right Thru turn Left i Right Thz-u UTurn Left i Right Thru UTurn Left ? Right Thru =Turn Left 1 Total Date 02/21/U7 Peak Hour A.naiysie By Entire intersection for the Period: 18;00 to 18:00 on 02/21/07 Peak start 17:00 17:00 17:00 17:06 Volume 0 0 0 0 130 120 0 0 1 0 1416 0 71 0 0 0 0 Percent OA 0% 0% 9T 1 524 48* 0% 0% j 0% 95% 0% 5s i 01 01 05 05 Pk total 0 [ 250 1 1487 € 0 Highest 16:00 [ 17:00 f 17:45 i 16:03 Vo1um0 0 0 0 0 1 44 53 0 0 1 0 364 22 i 0 0 0 0 Hi total 0 i 97 j 386 I 0 PILE .0 i .64 .96 1 .0 0 0 IIIMMONIMMEMEMIN:MMINM t ilIVE 4TH STREET 71 120 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 411 0 0 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 0 1,416 130 0i 1,546 0 191 1,546 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 1,737 0 0 0 1,487 250 0 0 130 130 250 120 1,487 71 • 1,416 71 1,416 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 120 0 0 NE 4TH STREET 0 0 0 0 0 FSSCAAYNE HQGLAYARD/US1 SD E ATE 4TII STREET, MI MI , FLORIDA .U31T50 W SeAEIA4T3i& PALOMINO GNALIZED TRAFFIC S'JRVE? SPECIALISTS, INC: 624 GARDENIA EFRALO DELFAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561i 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-1361 ALL VEHICLES Site Code : 00070064 Start bete02/21/07 File A.4. 4STU61_5 Pace 1 2I5CAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 From North hE 4TH STREET 'From East IRISCAYriE BOULEVARD/US 1 !NE 4 04 STREET From South jFrom West Right Thru !Burn Left j Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru UTorn Left ( Right Thru i;Turn Left ! Total Date02/21/07____________.._..----- _______„__.,„,.________--------- ___--------------------- 16.00 8 202 0 0 1 0 6 0 25 i 0 0 0 0 f 5 0 0 0 l 247 16;15 5 200 0 3 i 0 6 0 20 ; 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0[ 227 16:35 14 191 0 0 0 9 0 17 0 0 0 0 10 0 Q 0 j 241 16;45 6 201 0 0 j 0 13 0 24 j 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 j 251 iir Total 33 794 0 0 1 0 34 0 85 1 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 976 17:00 7 191 0 0 I 0 14 0 47 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 263 17:15 16 224 0 0 I 0 15 0 31 j 0 0 0 01 9 0 0 0; 295 17:30 12 225 0 0 0 18 0 22 1 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 j 290 17:45 8 234 0 0 j 0 15 0 23 1 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 j 290 Hr Total 43 674 0 0 1 0 62 0 123 ( 0 0 0 0 1 36 0 0 0 1138 *TOTAL. 76 1668 0 0 1 0 96 0 209 1 0 0 0 0 3 65 0 0 0 1 2114 • • HISCA:'06E BOCJLEVARD US1 sS & N2 4TH STREET, MIAMI , fii.annA SUNT E I EX: S ..MRN7TNA PALOMINO GNALI2ED TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 524 GARDENIA TERRACE DEFRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-43e1 Site :,can = 00070064 Star: Date: 02/27/07 File 1.,D. 4ST7S3 S Page 2 SPS0AYN9 BOULEVARD/US 1 106E 437? STREET 081SCAYNE EOCSL0VARD/i1S 1 jNNiE 4TE STREET From North 1From East 1Prom South 1RroM West I 1 1 Right Thru DTurn Left 1 Right- Thru ''Tura Lett 1 Right Thru UTurr Left ; Right Thru Date 02/21/07 UTurn Lett I Total Peak Hour Analysis Ey Entire Inter9e0tion for the Period: 16:00 to 12:00 on 02/21/07 Peak start 17:00 1 17:00 1 17:50 17:00 Volume 43 874 0 t j 0 62 G 123 ; 0 0 0 4 36 0 0 G Percent 5% 55* 0% 0! 1 0* 34% G% 668 E 0% 0* 08 08 1 100% 08 0% 08 Pk total 917 185 0 36 Highest 17:45 i 17:00 1 15:00 17:30 Volume 8 234 0 0 i 0 14 0 47 1 G 0 0 0 1 13 3 0 €0 Hi total 242 61 0 I 13 PEP .95 E .76 .5 j .69 0 0 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 43 874 OE 4TH STREET 0 62 105 43 0 0 0 43 874 917 141 917 0 0 0 0 • ALL VEHICLES 0 36 Intersection Total 1,138 36 36 0 • 0 1 123 874 36 1,033 BISCAYNE BO 1,033 185 VARD/US 1 0 0 185 62 t 0 62 123 123 0 NE 4TH STREET 0 0 0 0 NE 1RL STREET & NB SISCAYNE BOULEVARD' 39 1, MIAMI, FLOR10E IVJNTTED SY: ANGEI FERF.I,TA GNALI 26k TRAFFIC SNRVEx SPECTAL:ST INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33454 (561) 2'72-3255 FAX (561) 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code ; 00077064 Start Dace: 02/27/07 F67e I,D_ : 3576 1391 Page . BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/BSI NE 3R:D STREET 3NISCAYNE BOJLEVARC/US1 `116 3RD STREET From North i From East ]From South E'roia West Right anra 03Turr Left Right Thrr Le3srl Left 1 Right Tbru UTUrzi Left ! Right Thru uTurn Left { Total Date 02/27/07 16;00 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 0 0 1 37 240 0 26 , 0 0 C: 0 I, 303 15: 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 42 237 0 23 0 0 0 0 301 15:30 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 0 0 1 39 259 0 36 j 0 0 0 01 334 16:45 0 0 0 0 '1 0 0 0 0 43 293 0 26 i 0 0 0 0{ 364 Er Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 150 1029 0 113 j 0 0 0 0 j 1302 17:00 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 f 46 264 0 40 € 0 0 3 4 f 350 17:15 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 f 44 311 0 42 1 0 0 0 0; 397 17:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 f 32 319 0 32 [ 0 0 0 0 1 379 17:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 39 275 0 31 E 0 0 0 0 1 345 fir Total 0 0 0 0 f - 0 0 0 0 1 161 1165 0 145 j 0 0 0 0 l1471 "T0TAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0! 321 2194 0 258 f 0 0 0 0 1 2773 • • 360 3R➢ 33T220T £ NB BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/ US 1. E41AMI, FLORID I, USNTED BY: ANGEL P£RADTA GNALI ZED TRAfrFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 GARDENIA TERRACE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 (5611 272-3255 FAX C5611 272-4381 ALL VEHICLES Site Code . D0070064 Start Date: 02/27/07 File T.D. 3STR_US1 Page 2 BISCFYNE HGCLEVARD/US1 iNB 3RD STREET f «SSCAkiE BOULE ARD/U51 NE 3RD STREET From North. j 36o m Bast ( From South f From Neat i Right Thou 6Turn Left ! Right Thru umrn Left ( Right Thru UTurn 3686t ( .Ri3Tt Thru 3'Turn Left Total Date 02/27/07 Peak Hour A,-ialysie By Entire Intersection for the Period.: 16:00 t® 18:03 on 02/27/07 Peak start 15:45 16:45 [ 16:45 I 16:45 Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0[ 165 1183 0 142 € 0 0 0 0 Percent 0* Ok 09 0* j 05 0t Ok 0% Ilk 795 05 10% 05 65 0% 05 Pk total 0 0 1490 0 Highest 16:00 g 16:00 I 17:15 ( 16:00 Volume 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 44 311 0 42 ( 0 0 Bi total 0 0 i 397 0 PHF .0 1 e0 [ .94 6 ,0 41IVE 3RD STREET 142 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 411 0 BISCAYNE 1 0 142 OULEVARD/US1 1,183 0 1,183 0 1,183 ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 1,490 [ 0 0 0 1,490 • 142 142 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 165 1,490 1,183 1,183 US1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 NE 3RD STREET 0 0 165 165 165 0 0 NE 3RD STREET 6 SD BISCRYNE BOULEVARD/ US 1, MI99 3 , F;17RIDA 11111 UNTED BY: NICIOLE DOWN GS+ ALI555 TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, INC. 624 G9 N8R TESBAC`E DELRPY ZRACW, FLORIDA 33444 (551) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4351 ALL VEN2CLES 51L'e Code ; 00070064 Start Date: 02/27/07 Fie I.D. 1STCSI Page : 1 SISCAYN-8 BOULEVARD/US 1 (NE 3RD STREET €BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 805 3RD STREET From North !From east From South 1Frcm Wes 1 Right Thru UTurn Left Right Thru 11Turn Left Right Thru JTurn Left i Right Thru UTurn Left , Total Date 02/27/07 16:00 6 195 0 8 j 0 12 0 13 1 0 0 0 2( 0 0 0 0{ 231 16.15 12 184 8 0€ 0 14 0 9 E 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 0 1 219 16:30 9 222 0 0 0 15 0 7 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0; 256 16745 11 178 0 0 0 16 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 223 Hr Total 38 782 0 0 1 0 57 0 52 1 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 1 929 17:00 13 220 0 0 0 30 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0? 268 17:15 20 246 0 0 i 0 34 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 i 303 17:30 16 181 0 0 1 0 30 0 12 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0; 239 17:45 14 196 0 0 0 23 0 10 j 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 j 243 Dr Total 63 843 0 0 j 3 117 0 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1053 *T0T9L* 101 1625 0 0 i 0 174 0 62 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1082 • • NE 3RD STREET .9 913 'BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/ US 1, 4IA_M3, FLORIDA 4111 CUNTND BY: 5IC+30LE ➢0W;'5 GNALI 980 TRAFFIC SURVEY SPECIALISTS, 35C, 924 1'ARDENIA TERRACE DEDRAY 8i.A'li4, FLORIDA 33444 `561) 272-3255 FAX (561) 272-4391 ALL VEHICLES Site Code 0007006% Start Date: 01/27/== File Z.D. 3ST US' Page : 2 EZSC_AY`SE BOULEVARD/US 1 INE 3RD STREET j8ISCAYNE BOULEVAP.D/,IS ± INE 3RD STREET From ,*iprth I From East j From south {From West Right Thru UTurn Left 1 Right Thru UTurn Left I Right Thru Li Turn Lefc j Richt Thru UTurn Left 'I, Total Date 02/27/07 Peak hour Analysis 9y Entire Intersection for the Period: 15:00 to 15:00 or: 02/27/07 Peak start 17:00 17:00 17:30 17:00 Volume 63 643 0 0 j 0 117 0 30 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent 7% 93% 0% 0% 1 0% 804 0* 20% I 0% OE 04 04 ] 0% 04 0% 63 Pk total 906 j 147 i 0 j 0 Highest 17:15 1 17:30 15:00 j 16:00 j Volume 20 245 0 0 10 30 0 12 P 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 Hi total 266 ' 42 0 f 0 P8F .85 ! .88 .0 t .0 411VE 3RD STREET 0 117 180 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 180 • ALL VEHICLES Intersection Total 1,053 30 843 0 873 873 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 0 0 0 0 117 117 30 30 0 NE 3RD STREET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • Intersections Diagrams • .-evt,.a 423,2007 • cc/ 1,C.,okkecjA., Co'R.tSeR • Ni out4 t , rLo12.-;6A re-bZ3, ?Ab7 • tore • • 1 I 1 1 Te.b1 CCP 23, 20b't r� iee t kt��etl 1 1 I \it it • • -BATH • • 24-Hour Machine Counts • Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ***************°********************************************************rat******* Data File Station Identification Start date Stop date City/Town Interval : 15 minutes Start time : 00:00 Stop time : 24:00 County : Dade Location : Biscayne Blvd Between NE 4 St & NE 5 St ***************************************************************************-**** Feb 22 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 D0222005.PRN : 000000022104 000210521057 : Feb 22, 07 : Feb 22, 07 : Miami, Florida End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 15 87 51 29 18 10 20 1T84 166 30 77 49 30 18 14 30 120 154 45 108 23 23 17 20 48 177 216 00 54 39 21 16 38 73 167 191 Hr Total 326 162 103 69 82 171 548 727 08 226 194 205 224 10 273 260 202 305 849 873 1040 09 211 214 226 222 11 242 240 314 301 1097 End Time 12 13 15 30 45 00 341 309 273 363 254 323 319 316 Total 1286 1212 327 225 341 302 1195 14 15 292 211 390 307 16 363 415 345 416 1200 1539 18 19 424 353 281 426 341 246 374 294 233 390 251 314 1614 1239 1074 17 20 21 22 23 274 181 182 159 221 153 195 88 195 172 168 226 193 163 160 174 883 669 705 647 24 Hour Total : 19310 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 1265 Peak hour factor : 0.93 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 1640 Peak hour factor : 0.96 ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 15 30 45 00 52 38 50 20 28 27 22 13 13 16 12 18 03 12 14 19 16 Hr Total 160 90 59 61 04 05 06 07 08 8 17 57 119 226 18 14 72 142 251 12 34 99 158 294 17 54 139 213 330 55 119 367 632 1101 09 316 262 237 261 1076 10 249 218 210 220 897 11 202 217 220 216 855 End Time 12 13 14 15 205 208 222 30 198 213 219 45 226 222 183 00 212 199 221 Hr Total 841 842 845 15 221 185 224 201 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 - 213 257 210 180 156 97 116 91 239 226 168 147 116 97 105 120 247 240 210 170 131 130 132 143 216 244 148 141 129 116 105 114 v0JVM 831 915 967 736 638 532 440 458 468 24 Hour Total : 13985 AM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak volume : 1202 Peak hour factor : 0.91 PM peak hour begins : 17:00 PM peak volume : 967 Peak hour factor : 0.94 ******************************************************************************* • Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc, 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ******************************************************************************** Data File Station Identification Start date Stop date City/Town Interval Start time Stop time County Location : Biscayne Blvd Between NE 4 St & NE 5 ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 D0222005.PRN 000000022104 000210521057 Feb 22, 07 : Feb 22, 07 : Miami, Florida Total Volume for All Lanes St 15 minutes 00:00 24:00 Dade End Time 00 15 30 45 00 139 115 158 74 Hr Total 486 01 79 76 45 52 252 02 42 46 35 39 162 03 30 32 36 32 130 04 18 32 32 55 05 37 44 82 127 137 290 06 141 192 276 306 915 07 285 296 374 404 1359 08 452 445 499 554 1950 09 527 476 463 483 1949 10 522 478 412 525 1937 11 444 457 534 517 1952 End Time 12 15 30 45 00 546 507 499 575 r 24 Hour Total : 33295 Total 2127 13 462 536 541 515 2054 14 549 444 524 523 2040 15 513 396 614 508 2031 576 654 592 632 16 17 681 652 614 634 2454 2581 18 563 509 504 399 1975 19 461 393 403 455 1712 20 430 337 326 322 1415 21 278 250 302 279 1109 22 298 300 300 265 1163 23 250 208 369 288 1115 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 2104 Peak hour factor : 0.96 PM peak hour begins 17:00 PM peak volume : 2581 Peak hour factor : 0.95 ******************************************************************************* • Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page ****************************************************************4*************** Data File ; D0222004.PRN Station : 000000022102 Identification : 000058410082 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Feb 22, 07 Start time : 0000 Stop date : Feb 22, 07 Stop time ; 24:00 City/Town 1 Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : Biscayne Blvd Between NE 2 St & NE 3 St ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 91 53 31 19 11 18 105 220 261 252 328 346 30 77 46 26 16 19 33 134 178 255 294 315 332 45 156 26 25 15 25 56 207 254 254 285 282 390 00 57 34 24 18 19 82 201 237 264 314 359 393 Hr Total 381 159 106 68 74 189 647 889 1034 1145 1284 1461 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 15 399 312 373 335 425 536 481 356 254 225 196 192 30 374 278 274 269 468 517 438 427 247 197 226 214 45 364 363 403 446 419 498 429 346 234 215 180 218 00 375 383 325 343 520 512 415 482 227 200 196 164 4111r Total 1512 1336 1375 1393 1832 2063 1763 1611 962 837 798 788 24 Hour Total : 23707 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 1556 Peak hour factor : 0.97 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 2071 Peak hour factor : 0.97 ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 21 22 23 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 70 36 20 10 10 16 56 116 205 336 240 228 30 46 32 15 15 15 14 60 115 238 273 228 238 45 66 22 18 17 13 29 95 143 271 250 244 269 00 39 14 19 12 16 56 114 204 304 250 223 245 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 221 104 72 54 54 115 325 578 1018 1109 935 980 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 238 246 233 232 240 276 245 174 184 134 142 99 30 238 217 237 217 256 229 184 182 153 123 142 290 45 278 255 205 240 251 258 204 190 162 147 140 248 00 221 236 235 221 219 246 173 186 141 140 127 176 Hr Total 975 954 910 910 966 1009 806 732 640 544 551 813 24 Hour Total : 15375 AM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak volume : 1184 Peak hour factor : 0.88 PM peak hour begins ; 17:00 PM peak volume : 1009 Peak hour factor : 0.91 ******************************************************************************* • * Traffic Survey Specialists, linc 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ******************************************************************************** Data File Station Identification Start date Stop date City/Town Interval Start time Stop time County Location : Biscayne Blvd Between NE 2 St & NE 3 D0222004.PRN 000000022102 : 000058410082 : Feb 22, 07 Feb 22, 07 : Miami, Florida St 15 minutes O0!00 24:00 Dade ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Total. Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 ------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 161 89 51 29 21 34 161 336 466 30 123 78 41 31 34 47 194 293 493 45 222 48 43 32 38 85 302 397 525 OD 96 48 43 30 35 138 315 441 568 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Hr Total 602 263 178 122 128 304 972 1467 2052 09 588 567 535 564 2254 10 568 543 526 582 2219 11 574 570 659 638 2441 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 637 558 606 567 665 812 30 612 495 511 486 724 746 45 642 618 608 686 670 756 00 596 619 560 564 739 758 Total 2487 2290 2285 2303 2798 3072 or 18 19 20 21 22 23 726 530 438 359 338 291 622 609 400 320 368 504 633 536 396 362 320 466 588 668 368 340 323 340 2559 2343 1602 1381 1349 1601 24 Hour Total : 39082 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 2546 Peak hour factor : 0.97 PM peak hour begins : 1700 PM peak volume : 3072 Peak hour factor : 0.95 ******************************************************************************* • • ***********************************************************************A-******** Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc, 524 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File D0222003.PRN Station ; 000000022106 Identification 000411692131 Feb 22, 07 : Feb 22, 07 : Miami, Florida N Miami. Ave Between NW 3 Start date Stop date City/Town Location ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Interval Start time Stop time County St & NW 4 St Seuthbound Volume 15 minutes 00:00 24:00 Dade End Time 00 15 30 45 00 14 4 7 6 Hr Total 31 01 02 6 6 3 4 19 6 5 1 3 15 03 04 3 5 5 4 4 2 3 7 15 18 05 4 6 5 17 06 07 21 40 43 58 32 162 55 88 88 127 358 08 09 158 223 150 223 190 153 242 129 740 728 10 11 115 92 67 73 347 61 77 71 86 29S End Time 12 13 14 15 30 45 00 95 97 90 86 Hr Total 368 70 67 76 77 317 290 68 84 88 77 15 16 17 18 64 75 99 68 74 79 93 51 78 87 83 43 100 84 80 45 ---- ---- 316 325 355 207 19 20 21 33 34 24 31 24 33 17 16 13 14 12 20 22 23 16 22 13 57 20 27 16 15 122 90 59 65 121 41114 Hour Total : 5395 AM peak hour begins : 08:30 AM peak volume : 878 Peak hour factor : 091 PM peak hour begins : 12:00 PM peak volume : 368 Peak hour factor : 0.95 ******************************************************************************* 0 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 ******************************************************************************** Data File 1 D0222008,PRN Station : 000000022105 identification : 009601150098 Interval : 15 minutes Start date : Feb 22, 07 Start time : 0000 Stop date : Feb 22, 07 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : Flagler St between E 2 Ave & E 1 Ave ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 15 0 3 30 2 0 45 0 8 00 1 3 Hr Total 3 14 11 02 4 3 1 3 03 04 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 4 3 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 0 1 4 2 4 5 12 9 10 25 35 41 24 8 36 43 33 34 23 28 38 28 40 16 42 30 32 42 7 30 57 131 146 134 140 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 41 34 42 40 27 34 30 13 7 7 30 46 38 40 37 35 31 26 14 11 7 45 38 29 34 33 20 33 18 15 9 8 00 31 35 38 44 33 33 24 7 10 10 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Ilikr Total 156 136 154 154 115 131 98 49 37 22 23 2 8 4 8 9 7 6 8 32 21 31 24 Hour Total : 1794 AM peak hour begins : 1130 AM peak volume : 169 Peak hour factor : 0.92 PM peak hour begins : 12:00 PM peak volume : 156 Peak hour factor : 0.85 ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Westbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 12 4 4 0 1 4 10 18 46 78 74 103 30 20 6 1 1 1 3 14 24 46 76 67 118 45 11 6 2 0 1 8 21 35 53 77 93 105 00 13 5 2 0 2 3 26 28 56 53 85 123 Hr Total 56 21 9 1 5 18 71 105 201 284 319 449 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 15 88 122 102 78 103 98 88 75 30 105 84 124 88 84 112 105 61 45 90 91 105 94 97 80 97 55 00 107 103 76 80 75 104 98 36 Hr Total 390 400 407 340 359 394 388 227 20 21 25 22 21 14 82 21 21 16 10 68 22 23 21 27 16 55 18 51 17 28 72 161 24 Hour Total : 4827 AM peak hour begins : 11:00 AM peak volume : 449 Peak hour factor : 0.91 PM peak hour begins : 13:45 PM peak volume 434 Peak hour factor : 0.88 ******************************************************************************* • • Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ******************************************************************************** Data File m D0222008,PRN Station : 000000022105 Identification ; 009601150098 Interval : 15 minutes Start date ; Feb 22, 07 Start time : 00:00 Stop date a Feb 22, 07 Stop time a 24:00 City/Town : Miami, Florida County e Dade Location s Flagler St between E 2 Ave & E 1 Ave ******************************************************************************* Feb 22 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 12 7 8 1 1 4 14 28 71 113 115 127 30 22 6 4 1 2 4 19 32 82 119 100 152 45 11 14 3 3 3 12 33 58 81 115 121 145 00 14 8 5 0 2 5 35 44 98 83 117 165 Hr Total 59 35 20 5 8 25 101 162 332 430 453 589 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 129 156 144 118 130 132 118 88 32 28 23 35 30 151 122 164 125 119 143 131 75 33 28 20 63 45 128 120 139 127 117 113 115 70 30 24 27 58 00 138 138 114 124 108 137 122 43 24 20 23 36 r Total 546 536 561 494 474 525 486 276 119 100 93 192 24 Hour Total : 6621 AM peak hour begins : 11:15 AM peak volume : 591 Peak hour factor : 0.90 PM peak hour begins : 13:45 PM peak volume : 585 Peak hour factor : 0.89 ******************************************************************************* • Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour TotalsPage 1 ******************************************************************************** Data File : D0307001.PRN Station : 000000030601 Identification : 009600270007 Interval ; 15 minutes Start date : Mar 7, 07 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Mar 7, 07 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : SE 1 Street bet SE 1 Avenue & SE 2 Ave ******************************************************************************* Mar 7 Eastbound Volume End. Time 00 01 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 8 7 , 3 8 3 9 56 121 243 275 172 157 30 10 5 4 4 4 24 77 205 272 267 207 185 45 14 2 2 5 14 28 114 160 274 243 177 194 00 11 11 6 2 8 43 168 219 269 222 186 151 Hr Total 43 25 15 19 29 104 415 705 1058 1007 742 687 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ____ ____ --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 15 118 164 130 121 118 122 165 128 48 48 57 27 30 198 153 194 146 128 144 143 101 61 37 41 18 45 174 163 174 123 118 164 191 97 44 45 35 14 00 167 115 139 127 139 164 179 76 34 43 39 13 Hr Total 657 595 637 517 503 III/4 Hour Total : 10036 AM peak hour begins : 08:15 AM peak volume : 1090 Peak hour factor : 0.99 PM peak hour begins : 12:15 PM peak volume : 703 Peak hour factor : 0.89 ******************************************************************************* 594 678 402 187 173 172 72 • • • FDOT Peak Season Conversion Factor Report 2005 Peak Season ,- acr ez, C Pt oryReoo7 - [e7^..Type: . ALL: Category: 8700 `.' ..13 1 OAT_ 3 2 ieek -Dates S5 _00Y 2 01/01/2005 ... :01/0} 20''5 0,99 .« . 0 2: 2 0 0 5 .. _ 1/ 0 8/ 2 0 05 0.99 01/09/200S -- 1/15/2005 1.00 4 1.16/2005 _. 01/22/2005 0.99 01/23/2005 01/229/2005 0.98 6 01/ 0/2005 - 02/05/2005 0.9/ * 7 02/06/200 02/12/2005 0.96 x 5 02 33/2005 02/19/2005 0.95 * 9 02/20/2005 - 02/26/2005 0,95 *10 02/27/2005 -- 03/05/2005 0.95 • 1 3./06/2005 03/12/2005 D.96 *12 03/13/2005 - 03/19/2005 0.96 * 13 03/20/2005 -- 03/26/2095 0.96 `14 03/27/2005 -- 04/02/2005 0.96 * 15 04/03/2005 -- 04/09/2005 0.95 * 16 04/10/2005 - 04/16/2005 0.96 *17 04/17/2005 D4/23/2005 0.96 *18 04/24/2005 04/30/2005 3.97 *19 05/01/2005 05/07/2005 0.97 20 05/08/2005 - 05/14/2005 0.98 21 05/15/2005 -- 05/21/2005 0.98 22 05/22/2005 -- 05/28/2005 0.99 23 05/29/2005 - 05/04/2005 1.00 24 06/05/2005 06/11/2005 1.00 25 06/12/2005 06/18/2005 1.01 26 06/19/2005 - 06/25/2005 1.01 27 06/26/2005 07/02/2005 1.01 28 07/03/2005 -- 07/09/2005 1.01 29 07/10/2005 07/16/2005 1.01 30 07/17/2005 07/23/2005 1.01 31 07/24/2005 07/30/2005 1.02 32 07/31/2005 - 08/06/2005 1.02 II"33 08/07/2005 - 08/13/2005 1.03 34 08/14/2005 - 08/20/2005 1.03 35 08/21/2005 - 08/27/2005 1.03 36 08/28/2005 - 09/03/2005 1.03 37 09/04/2005 - 09/10/2005 1.03 38 09/11/2005 - 09/17/2005 1.03 39 09/18/2005 - 09/24/2005 1.04 40 09/25/2005 10/01/2005 1.06 41 10/02/2005 - 10/08/2005 1.07 42 10/09/2005 - 10/15/2005 1.08 43 10/16/2005 - 10/22/2005 1.07 44 10/23/2005 - 10/29/2005 1.06 45 10/30/2005 11/05/2005 1.06 46 11/06/2005 - 11/12/2005 1.05 47 11/13/2005 - 11/19/2005 1.05 48 11/20/2005 - 11/26/2005 1.03 49 11/27/2005 -- 12/03/2005 1.02 50 12/04/2005 - 12/10/2005 1.00 1 12/11/2005 12/17/2005 0.99 52 12/18/2005 12/24/2305 0.99 53 12/25/2005 - 12/31/2005 1.00 * Peak Season 2O0X',0.96 1.03 _.03 -.04 1.03 1.02 1.01 1.0D 0,99 r G 0 0.99 LzLi 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 .01 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.06 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.08 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.11 1.09 1.09 1.07 1.06 1.04 1.03 1.03 1.04 15-reb-2006 13:26:03 830UPD i1,0,0.W] 6 8700_2KSEASDN.tx7 Page 1 of 8 • • • • APPENDIX C: Miami -Dade Transit Data • • Route Maps ou e WHEELCHAIR .ACCESSIBLE NE 199 St NE172St Z NE 171 St NE167St 1111 rLio. NE 163 St 163 St Mall Government Center Metrorail Station Flagler St SW/SE 1 St DOWNTOWN BUS TERMINAL DIPLOMAT MALL 111 J Hallandale Beach Blvd 192 St Cswy E E E E i E ES29 �.► Aventura BIvd .MACYS AVENTURA MALL Ea OMNI BUS TERMINAL N Country Club TURNBERRY ISLE COUNTRY U CLUB o 192 St MMMMMM 1111811111 North Map not to scale 91f2 • Ntizt6 Stki NW 4 St 11 St SW 8 St SW 32 Ave SW 27 St NW 26 Ave Ticivana NW 30 St ri Aii„„patta, NW 24 Ave Coconut Grove Metrorail Station NW 29 S NW 18 Ave Flagler St mmormirioe".111 SW 1 St •<''› SW 11 St yi iv, (A:id NE 17 St cu a Mi ou e Miami Dade College Downtown Campus SW 1 SC a II 0 LW Til W 7 Si: a Brickell Metrorail Station North Map not to scale • • oute South Campus e...._._ SW 8 St t--,..- `AAViAtt&.rf Rfra -ktIMCgi SS7YtaragtLt]tMJP1,Z?ts'i'. SW 16 St SW 17 St SW 24 St FIU Bus Terminal < r- c� l<:irtait:3[ia LIi i North ru ,Dral Coral Way rq cip WESTCHESTER SHOPPING CENTER SW 7 St ► SW8St hY,1:5?aa:YS?':#+.b5i4' iSi91$S vSn;'?is')nt°s.��sg:'i?gnr.ra.,iitt, r.ti}L��t51`t g5i?a''.!i @2 ;:,:kA Legend Route 8 FIU Bus Terminal (Via Coral Way) MDC Downtown Campus Route 8A UNZ� 12=Nitg HU Bus Terminal (Via SW 8 St) MDC Downtown Campus SW 8 St North Map not to scale a • 4.7 NE 6 St MDC Downtown Campus SE 4 St mw Brickell Metrarail Station out • N. Miami Ave fl Government Center m Metrorail Station SW/NW 1 Ave Downtown Bus Terminal m w z NE z NE12sSt 163 St Mali 7St assima NE 119 St NORTH MIAMI NE 17 St W z NW/NE1 St Downtown Miami SW/SE1 St NORTH MIAMI BEACH North Map not to scale • • FIU SOUTH CAMPUS FIU Bus Terminal EFFECTIVE: March 16, 2003 REISSUED: Short Turn W Flagler St N. 0 SW 16 St SW 17 St Mall of the Americas W Flagler St ONLY SHORT TRIPS ENTER MALL OF THE AMERICAS WHEELCHAIRS Stop the bus at any location near the stop to allow wheelchairs on or off the bus. DESTINATION SIGN EAST DOWNTOWN MIAMI - 0040 WEST MALL OF AMERICAS - 0042 WEST FIU SOUTH - 0046 NOT IN SERVICE - 02D6 oute All.13USrS Rai£ WHEB.L{nAm ACCESSIBLE Government Cente Metrorai[ Station St c„) SW/SE 1 S Little Havana North Map riot to scale 2103. • oute WHEELCHAIR ACCESSl LE North Miami Miami Shores El Portal 0 T Gay 1 a) Lt./ z Biscayne Park 2,2 NE 17 Tarr o 15Strn >, OMNI f m Bus "g Terminal m a r—► Government ? m I NE 14 St Center Metrorail ¢ v Station m Downtown Bus Terminal SW/SE St 63 Street Mail NE 15 Ave NE 123 St North Miami Beach North Map not to scale • • Route 48 ALL BUSES ARE WHEELCHAIR AC CIESS [B LE a} 121 SW 66 St cn cn Lr� SW 70 St South Miami Metrorail Station Douglas Road Metrorail Station de e 000 Peacock T €f `zr� sb 1izt.SN - . Mercy Way Q a Hardee a) University Metrorail Station a.) Grand Ave SW/SE 2 St SE 4 St Mercy Hospital C.) Downtown (4 Miami St 6U crt North Map not to scale 1i165 Fla ler MAX LIMITED STOPS a) (N SW 8 St u) a\sV\ 5\\Id Coral Way Government Center Metrorail Station Flagler St a) co Omni International Mall Omni Bus Terminal NE 14 S a) w z NW/NE 1 St Downtown Bus Terminal SW/SE 1 St 0 0 cJJ 19 St 17 St 114Q0412, 0 0 0 'fry 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington 5 St North Map not to scae. ou e WHEELCHAIR ACCESStBLE • • Golden Glades MI Park & Ride LIBERTY CITY Culmer Metrorail Station North Map not to scale NORTH MIAMI Government Center Metrorail Station Biscayne Blvd SW/SE 1 St Downtown Bus Terminal • I Route 93 € IKE AI3 BUSE=' ARE ACCESSIBLE WHEELCMR ACC ES St8 LE ICI Limited Stop Ojus MAKES ALL LOCAL STOPS NORTH OF 163 ST North miami Miami Shore El Portal 71 St (Southbound) Little Haiti Wynwood MAKES ALL LOCAL STOPS SOUTH OF 19 ST Government Center Metrorail Station Downtown --Bus Terminal Hagler St 36 St 29 St 9 St c) SW/SE 1 St 9 Aventura Aventura Mali 163 St North miami 151 St Beach 46 St 35 St 23 St ,67> :�; Sans Souci Blvd 96 St 91 St 79 St 70 St (Northbound) 62 St 54 St 107 St OMNI Bus Terminal Downtown Miami NE 17 Terr North Map not to scale 7/06 • • NVO 199 St NORWOOD Golden Glades Park & Ride North Map not to scale AM z Exit I�— NW 8 St SW/NW 2Av NW 5 St Downtown Miami SW/SE 1 St to 8 St Brickell f SE 13 St 0 NE 18 NE 36 St to rickel! Norwood PM NW 6 St M [ Downtown Miami Flagler SE4St m 8 St �� �; Brickell ®SE13St • • Government Center Metrorail Station Brickell Metrorail Station North Map not to scale 2fl)6 DOWNTOWN Rickenbacker Causeway SW/SE 2 St SE4St Seaquariumn Ocr KEY BISCAYNE (f) Crandon ■ Park 4, tSZ Cape Florida State Park oute Route 02 ALL BUSES ARE WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE • Route C Government Center Metrorail Station IOmni NE Terminal Downtown Bus Terminal NE14S1 r SW/SE 1 St 440 4r Mt. Sinai Hospital ER Flagler St e way 4 CC MIAMI BEACH 17 S SOUTH BEACH incoln Rd 4 North Map not to scale * * ou e WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIRLF, Government Center Metrorail Station North Map not to scale /02 BROVVARD COUNTY z• Atlantic Shores Blvd • Diplomat Mali 1.) Ha andale Beach Elvd Causeway -9C Acb WINSTON 1. TOWERS BUS ZONE TOLL BOOTH HAULOVER MARINA 178 St 74 St a) 0 85 St ▪ • 77 St - 63 St 0 0 10 tip .t7 1-4 MIAMI BEACH • " c.) tic „cv SOUTH 5 St BEACH oute WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE Downtown Bus Terminal Omni Bus Terminal NE 14 St 13 St Flagler St SW/SE 1 St Ave Aventura Mall Cad. `?-k NW 5 St to Biv 7 St 0 2D C 0 Washington Ave Gaflahad Dade Blvd causeway z D 96St 14 4 S t U Lincoln Rd North Map not to Scale • ARK WEST TATION TENTH STREET s441 PR ENADE Z� BRIC((ELL ST TION STAt ION B CKEL °�: r t F b"� FINAN 'r••. STRICT• CAUSEWAY LEGEND Omni Loop Brickell Loop Er-5:71 Downtown Loop Metrorail Last Transfer Station to Omni Loop Last Transfer Station to Bricketl Loop Transfer Station (between Omni, Downtown, and Briekell Loops Transfer Station to Metrorail • • Ridership Data PSI Peak Period Route 3 Day Number of • Date Time Passengers Wednesday 5/10/2006 1600 5 Monday 5/1/2006 1750 2 Direction Seats NB 38 SB 1 38 Standees Capacity 15 1 53 15 1 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB SB 5 53 53 • • PM Peak Period Route 6 Day Date 7/24/2006 7/24/2006 2/1/2006 2/1/2006 5/2/2006 5/2/2006 Time PM 1716 1719 1613 1623 1654 1658 Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees 8 NB 26 15 8 NB 26 15 N 30 15 6 NB 30 15 2 NB 26 15 6 NB 26 15 Capacity 41 41 45 45 41 41 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 6 42 SB #D[V/01 #Drv/0! • • • • PM Peak Period Route 8 Day Date Time 7/26/2007 1705 Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity SB/WB 43 20 1 63 Wednesdays 7/26/2007 1710 25 SB/WB 43 20 63 Monday 6/19/2006 1601 10 SB/WB 38 15 1 53 6/19/2006 1604 25 SB/WB 38 15 1 53 Friday 4/28/2006 1755 2 SB/WB 38 15 53 4/28/2006 1800 10 1 SB/WB 38 15 53 4/3/2006 1752 8 EB 38 15 1 53 4/3/2006 1755 0 I EB 38 15 53 Monday Wednesday 4/3/2006 1756 8/3/2005 1603 13 I SB/WB 38 15 1 53 38 1 SB/WB 38 15 1 53 7/13/2005 1607 2 EB 38 15 53 Wednesday Tuesday 7/13/2005 1608 6/21/2005 1757 6/15/2005 r 1620 0 5 EB 38 15 EB 38 15 53 53 4 1 SB/WB 38 15 53 Wednesday 6/15/2005 1632 26 SB/WB 38 15 53 Friday 6/10/2005 1619 12 1 EB 43 20 63 6/10/2005 1623 5 EB 43 20 63 6/10/2005 1626 3 1 SB/WB 43 20 63 6/10/2005 1631 3 I SB/WB 43 20 63 3/30/2005 1739 3 1 EB 38 15 53 Wednesday 3/30/2005 1744 0 EB 38 15 53 Monday 3/28/2005 1644 18 I EB 38 15 53 3/28/2005 1648 0 EB 38 15 53 3/28/2005 1648 17 1 SB/WB 38 15 53 3/28/2005 1648 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity EB 5 55 SB/WB 15 56 27 1 SB/WB 38 15 53 PM_ Peak Period Route 10 Day Date Tuesday 3/21/2006 Tuesday 3/21/2006 Monday 3/20/2006 Tuesday 6/21/2005 Time 1709 1715 1745 1611 Number of Passengers 0 2 Direction Seats SB NB/EB SB NB/EB 38 38 38 38 Standees 15 15 15 15 Capacity 53 53 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/EB 5 53 SB 4 53 • • PM Peak Period Route Day Date 'ednesday 8/9/2006 Time 718 Number Passengers Directsan Seats Standees Capacity SB/WB 38 15 Wednesday 4/19/2006 Wednesday 7/20/2005 Wednesday 7/20/2005 1701 1630 1630 0 40 40 NB/EB 38 15 53 NB/EB 38 15 53 SB/WB 38 1 53 hl;.rsdav 2/17/2005 1745 79 B/WB 38 15 53 day 6/31;/2005 1711 I 37 SBIW B 62 20 i 82 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/.EB 20 53 SB/WB 47 60 • 411 f PM Peak PeriodRoute 16 Day, Date Wednesday 3/29/2006 Time 1607 Number of Passengers Direction NB/EB Seats Standees Capacity 38 15 53 Friday 12/9/2005 17I0 15 NB/EB 38 15 53 Friday 10/21/2005 1606 6 SB/WB 38 15 53 Monday 7/25/2005 1650 fl SBIW B 38 15 53 Tuesday 5/31/2005 1637 6 NB/EB 38 15 i 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity ; NB/EB 8 53 SBIWB 3 53 • • PM Peak Period Route 48 Day Friday Date Time 6/17/2005 1717 Number of Passengers Direction Seats , Standees Capacity NB/EB 26 15 41 Friday 6/17/2005 1741 SB 26 15 41 Thursday 6/16/2005 1600 0 NB/EB 26 15 41 • Thursday 6/16/2005 1650 0 SB 26 15 41 Wednesday - Friday 6/15/2005 1759 4/15/2005 1609 0 NB/EB 26 15 41 SB 26 15 41 Thursday 2/24/2005 1743 6 NB/EB 26 15 41 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity ?vB/EB 3 41 SB 0 41 • • PM Peak Period Route 51 Day Date _ Time Friday 7/7/2006 1421 Wednesday 4/12/2006 1728 Thursday 6/23/2005 1748 Friday 4/14/2006 1700 Thursday 4/14/2005 1752 Wednesday 3/30/2005 1739 Monday 4/11/2005 1603 Monday 4/11/2005 1658 Number of Passengers 21 18 16 11 17 12 29 14 Direction [ Seats NB/EB 38 NB/EB 38 NB/EB 38 NB/EB 1 38 SB/WB 1 38 NB/EB 1 38 NB/EB 1 38 SB/WB 1 38 Standees Capacity 15 53 15 1 53 15 1 53 15 53 15 1 53 15 1 53 15 1 53 15 1 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/EB 18 53 SB/WB 16 53 • • PM Peak Period Route 77 Day Date Number of Time Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Tuesday 1/10/2006 1751 0 SB/WB 38 15 53 Thursday 12/29/2005 1640 1 26 NB/EB 38 15 53 Friday 12/9/2005 1736 1 19 NBIEB 38 15 53 Friday 12/9/2005 1620 27 NB/EB 38 15 53 Monday 11/7/2005 1617 1 19 NB/EB 43 20 63 Thursday 10/13/2005 Tuesday 7/19/2005 1638 1 14 1615 I 12 SB/WB 42 20 NB/EB 38 15 62 53 Monday 7/18/2005 1614 1 17 NB/EB 38 15 53 Wednesday 6/1/2005 1714 46 NB/EB 36 15 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/EB 24 54 SB/WB 7 58 • • • • • PM Peak Period Biscayne Max 93 Day Friday Tuesday Tuesday Friday Bate 7/1/20 5 7/12/2005 2/1L/2005 7/ 1 /2005 Number of Time Passengers 1626 1414 1732 1405 10 6 12 4 Direction Seats Standees NB/EB 42 NB/EB 43 NB/EB 43 NB/EB 38 20 70 20 15 Capacity 62 63 63 53 Average Per Direction s Ridership Capacity NB/EB 8 60 SB/WB 0 0 PM Peak Period Route 95//Carol City Number of Day Date Time Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 0 0 SB d 0 0 • No data available • • • PM Peak Period Route 8 Day Wednesday Wednesday Monday Date 9/27/2006 9/27/2006 6/27/2005 Number of Time Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity : 1424 2 SB/WB 38 15 53 1536 6 NB/EB 38 15 53 1625 7 SB/WB 38 15 53 Monday 6/27/2005 1735 1 SB/WB 38 15 1 53 Monday 5/2/2005 1442 0 IB/EB 38 15 53 Monday 5/2/2005 1641 5 SB/WB 38 15 I 53 Monday 5/2/2005 1758 7 SB/WB 38 15 53 Tuesday 4/26/2005 1625 2 SB/WB 38 15 I 53 Tuesday 4/26/2005 1755 SB/WB 2 15 [ 17 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/EB 3 53 SB/WB 4 48 PM Peak Period Route C Day Friday Date 6/16/2006 Time 1421 Number of Passengers Directions 16 M3/EB Seats 38 Standees ' Capacity 15 53 Wednesday 12/28/2005 1438 0 SBIWB 38 15 53 Friday 12/16/2005 1422 28 1\TB/EB 38 15 53 Friday 9/16/2005 1544 6 NB/EB 38 15 1 53 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/EB 17 53 SB/WB 0 53 • • PM Peak Period Route K Day Date Time Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Wednesday 2/15/2006 1602 9 NB/EB 38 15 53 Tuesday 2/7/2006 1628 NB/EB 38 15 Wednesday Thursday 7/27r, 05 5/18/2006 1409 4 10 0 SB/WB 38 SB/WB 2,8 15 15 53 Average Per Direction Ridership ' Capacity NB/EB 5 53 SB/WB 5 53 • PM Peak Period Route S Day Date Time Number of Passengers Direction Seats Standees Capacity Monday 2/27/2006 1622 27 NB/EB 42 20 62 Friday 11 i 18/2005 1649 9 NB/EB 63 20 83 Monday Wednesday 11 / 14/2005 7/6/2005 1614 6 1748 NB/EB 6 1 SB/WB 38 15 74 2fl 94 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/EB 14 66 SB/WB 6 94 • • PM Peak Period Brickell Loop (Metromover) Day Date Number of Time Passengers Direction Capacity Friday 9/15/2006 Friday 9/15/2006 Thursday 9/15/2005 Tuesday 9/26/2006 Wednesday 4/5/2006 Tuesday 2/7/2006 Friday 4/7/2006 1723 11 1653 12 1622 2 1710 2 1612 16 1603 11 1646 9 NB NB NB NB NB NB NB Friday 4/7/2006 Tuesday 12/20/2005 1716 8 1734 16 NB NB 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Average Per Direction Ridership L Capacity NB 12 75 SB 0 0 • • PM Peak Period Inner rop (Metromover) Number of Day Date Time Passengers Direction < Capacity dnesday 9/6/2006 1654 SB/WB 75 dnesday 9/6/2Ci06 1708 7 SB/WB 75 ednesday 8/9/2006 1608 SB/WB 75 ?c.dnesday 8/9/2006 1620 0 SB/WB 75 Friday 5/5/2006 1628 2 SB/WB 75 Friday 5/5/2006 1644 SB/WB ? 75 Thursday 6/29/2006 1600 3 SB/WB 75 Thursday 6/ 15/2006 1726 0 SB/WB 75 Thursday 6/15/2006 1738 5 SB/WB 75 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB/EB 0 0 SB/WB 5 75 • • PM Peak Period Omni Loop (Metro Day Date Wednesday 3/22/2006 Wednesday 3/22/2006 Thursday 12/15/2005 Monday 1/16/2006 - Tuesday 10/11/2005 Tuesday 6/20/2006 Wednesday 11/23/2005 Tuesday 4/11/2006 Tuesday 7/11/2006 Time 1648 1716 1619 1558 1708 1720 1734 1644 1724 Number of Passengers 21 17 12 25 18 16 14 29 24 Direction Capacity NB 75 NB 75 NB 75 NB 75 NB 75 NB 75 NB 75 NB 75 NB 75 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB 20 75 SB 0 0 • • Rout PM Peak Summary NBIEBI CLOCK''ISE SB/ W 1i/COUNTER CLOCKWISE Average Ridership Average Capacity Average Ridership Average Capacity Route 3 Route 6 6 Route 8 5 Route 10 Route 11 5 20 53 2 42 0 55 15 53 4 53 0 56 53 53 47 60 Route 16 8 43 3 53 Route 48 3 41 0 41 Route 51 18 53 16 53 Route 77 24 54 58 Route Biscayne Max 93 8 60 0 Route 95 0 0 0 0 Route 277 6 53 2 53 Route B 3 53 4 48 Route C 17 53 0 53 Route K 53 53 53 Route S 14 66 6 94 Brickell Loop Metromover 12 75 0 0 Omni Loop Metromover 20 75 0 0 Inner Loop Metromover 0 0 5 75 Total Ridership 179 164 • • • • • APPENDIX D: Existing Conditions (2007) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Miami -Dade County Public Works Department Existing Timings Signal Timing.txt 2312 JS 1 & NE 4 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION TIME PT OFF NSW F Y Y EW F G Y MIN: 7 4 6 9 0 20 10 55 4 4 4 6 9 4 4 30 23 10 55 4 4 4 6 9 4 4 530 22 /0 55 4 4 4 6 9 4 4 600 5 4 54 4 4 4 17 9 4 4 720 8 14 55 4 4 4 16 9 4 4 930 9 14 45 4 4 4 16 9 4 4 545 11 _ ZO 61. 4 4 ._10- _9 ---4-- =4 1800 12 2 55 4 4 4 6 9 4 4 2100 18 8 55 4 4 4 6 9 4 4 2300 20 10 55 4 4 4 6 9 4 4 ENTER NEXT PAGE # (1 DIGIT), DAY # (2 DIGIT,99=HELP) OR 2) PAGE 4 S Y M CYC NEARLY NI 90LATE NIT 90NITE 6/0 IOOMID-DAY 100AM PEAK 90AVERAGE _.1 9PM PEAK 90POST PM 90BAYSIDE 90EARLY NI ASSET # (4 DIGIT) 2313 NE 2 AVE & 4 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION 25) PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF SW F Y WW F Y MIN: 7 6 7 6 0 23 28 26 6 4 14 6 4 6 60LATE NIG 600 13 28 20 6 4 20 6 4 60NITE 0/1 630 7 20 24 6 4 16 6 4 60PRE AM M 720 8 24 48 6 4 22 6 4 90AM PEAK 930 9 62 46 6 4 24 6 4 90M10-DAY 1345 10 28 46 6 4 24 6 4 90M10-DAY 1545 11 38...35 6 4 6 4 .. 100PM PEAK 1800 12 22 36 6 4 34 6 4 90POST PM 1900 13 28 20 6 4 20 6 4 60NITE 0/1 2300 23 28 26 6 4 14 6 4 6 60LATE NIG ENTER NEXT PAGE # (1 DIGIT), DAY # (2 DIGIT,99=HELP) OR ASSET # (4 DIGIT) 2309 NE 2 AVE & TIME PT OFF SW MIN: 7 0 23 34 32 600 13 36 21 630 7 29 32 720 8 31 49 930 9 69 38 1345 10 39 38 1545 11 47 35 1800 12-28 56 1900 13 36 21 2300 23 34 32 ENTER NEXT PAGE 3 ST F Y WW 5 7 5 4 9 5 4 20 5 4 9 5 4 22 F 6 6 6 6 6 5 4 33 6 5 4 33 6 5_4 46_ 5 4 15 6 4 5 4 20 6 4 # (1 DIGIT),4DAY # (2 TIMING Y 4 4 4 4 4 4 S Y M CYC FOR DAY # 5 (SECTION 25) PAGE 4 5 Y M CYC 6 60LATE NIG 60NITE 0/1 60PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 90MID-DAY 90MID-DAY 100 PM..::PEAK 90POST PM 60NITE 0/1 6 60LATE NIG DIGIT,99=HELP) OR ASSET # (4 DIGIT) 2308 US 1 & NE 3 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 5 TIME PT OFF NSW F Y WW F Y MIN: 21 4 7 9 0 20 48 62 4 4 7 9 4 30 23 48 62 4 4 7 9 4 530 22 48 62 4 4 7 9 4 600 5 40 62 4 4 17 9 4 720 8 34 62 4 4 17 9 4 930 9 40 62 4 4 7 9 4 1545 11`74_ 72 4 4 7 9 4 (SECTION 2) PAGE 4 S Y M CYC 1800 12 38 62 4 4 7 9.. 4__� ___._ 2100 18 40 62 4 4 7 9 4 2300 20 48 62 4 4 7 9 4 ENTER NEXT PAGE # (1 DIGIT), DAY # (2 DIGIT,99=HELP) Page 1 90EARLY NI 6 90LAT'E NIT 6 90NITE 6/0 100MID-DAY 100AM PEAK 90AVERAGE 90POST PM 90QAYSIDE 90EARLY NI OR ASSET # (4 DIGIT) 2007 P.M. Peak Hour Existing Signal Timings Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 0 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE 4th Street & NE 2nd Avenue C t \*. 2007 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) 4. ' Frt 1.00 F1 Protecied0 95- - Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 Said. Flow (perm) 1770 4++ 4.0 091 1.00 5075 5075 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.92 0.87 0 30 737 0 0 767 0.87 Protected Phases 8 P00#404_if);r40:0*A:, Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green,,tw Actuated g/C Ratio j00:000,,„To:§ftop,,?.1: Vehicle Extension (s) 10.4 81.6 0.10 0.82 3.0 3.0 00:•.!#50:000.*: v/s Ratio Prot vlc Ratio UniForrn Delay, di Progression Factor Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS c0.06 0.15 0.60 0.1 9 1 .44 1:06 68.5 2.1 68.5 0.0 2.1 HCM Average VolumeDelay10.4 HCM Level to Capacity ratio'' HCM 0.23 intersection Capacity Utilization 24.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (mn) 15 c Critical Lane Group GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs1SYNCHR012007 PM Existing Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE 3rd Street & NE 2nd Avenue .;o Lane Configurations 14.00kift0WW0t0K,,F!,::;,',.::,1,999..5:1:;91Y),:,...,..::, Total Lost time (s) !;:0,4ortj: f.(..„4.',F...,4„:„---',',:::-..,:f..,..i,i..,:-,;,,,,:,,,......s..,„:,.,,,,,,,,.,,::::i...:,.:,.,7,,..,,,!,::„.:,,,i„,,':,,,::::;.,:,:i,,..„,.„,,..,,,:,,,,,.,„:::.:,.,,,,.,::,:.,:.,..,..,,,,:.,,,,,..::::,..,:....,.,..,.„,.,.,,.::„.,, Frt 1.00 P11t.R(Ofie4e4:420.,.%.g,",'„,pii.,::::',-ii:•::, '..:::1•,:,::'::::,g'*::,;:,::,::,,i,::,@,.: — Satd. Flow (prot) 3516 Ftt;;?004(.0459 Satd. Flow (perm) 3516 V014*00011113ii5tRAENNA3:10ki;30MlilYY:::0:::i;':1-E's,'.? ..,4:41::!::::".....q.:gli;i:ii,;V ;:,',.541,0fig,1'1.ik:015';'..;:ii;,::9 392.,..,,,,.,..,0:. Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.35 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.80 0.80 0.80 ...Adj._....,.-1....:*(00)11#47,.04§-15455;41, ti?R5ii.934'Vg.4., OA:I "''''':':'A''-0,',,''.';.'-',iA';t.Q'::f:e.',-kj:.;:''ff,Y:;'i'.4''',';'":d,'::,,x'',''''g.',''OW24906'V437f RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 .124001„. ,:: i.")§ilkSPIR:i:,Pkig:::.. '''' ''':"..:.*Ar ::i;iiii:;;;;:, Yit.".' 239-g.;',AE:2001.051.09.,VagfiE0i;14,':!.i;g914:eiq.0RE816F:t.:F.-ki!(), Turn Type Perrn .,„it40014-,•••,....... 400#§0..1::::31PagOAR5P:3,,.,'',1,Jir:R:Ek.:•.;:tgffk,R:'/,,i'i:.•.siV:',Vs','.ti:•;•:'8.gid;:"0:#%4j:e.1,0.;:,#‘,.,„„.,..,,g;,!:41,e.3',.jqrV:if.Af.,42„':i.l.R.,,,1:8;ifil..i..4..,.;',F..., Permitted Phases 8 • Tsototopf:::::::,,.,,, '''*,,,nsgzg,f(0:..-Iittlfoi.§:,-,kRgc.,:t:0::-,::::,ig.,7:,,,:,„.:;,,..0,1:...,:fii.:::::-,:::,!,5-,E4,3i',:.:,,g,,:::..,&,..j,:o...::,Qi'::80.9 Effective Green, g (s) 11.1 80.9 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 yoii.0,0,:,410000www:g.i:,:.6:,,,p3,),,:4,.'.,.;,,itit,,.t.:;:;,,,,,,v,,,,s,,,,,ini,,.?„::::::.:.;:,„.,:lagag::-p,,..3.0 32,03:,,v..,;:::::::,,,,, Lane Grp Cap (vph) 390 3848 —...........,,,—.—.,...„......,....?..-4,:.-...,,,..,*,..,.:-.. ci/'6,4RatWPieit*-sfv;'.%;'''va::,,-' 18 v/sRatio Perm 0:07_.._. .. .. _ ii.#1,'afh:'1.:;;-t'.-'z'31,'SIL'I.kt,ikaS:::.:54:';''::::,:-,,;':,;:'V;R,'.t;jiiJ,',;'A,''f''.:P,'k:...!;r-8.1.,, ''::':'t'll','A-',.c...4.t:Iiiifil:t,:'Oi:":".:•.i;,'iM.,:-..:•.;". 'F".;I:i4a:s.1.....,i;01,0:01',0gt:::'...:;0:::ii;E:.,:;., Uniform belay, di 42.4 :::(00**00:APtqf,:.ri-4,:i!'0:,SgiVg:ilg.,,:::;4q.,0,::,,,.:,,it::::„,;i:i.i,:ititi.:.:!,,::::0:-. .1.4:Eits.,,,,.:A.,,e,,,,,,,,:., .:ii.,,,,,Q,gi6g.lAtio:,Agig:Aaiii.g..,0.83 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 0.1 e14t(.tSV:f:g4;:f2t.tp.;'i:,',j'A..-!%:Ifgn:Vi.:.lkgiWi,.,:::::.2;'.;:::E4:;:.,:,.5,iiii',..:..iiii:!::;F,:,'-',i3ig&t.,.,32.2 242:::.':i;,.'F.,..; Level of Service C A '.1070f40011'P;4),..0' ,...r...".;.,,t!•ggigel.Iii?4ia.:..... Tt:?!Ii':i'„•'gfs:,q;4'g::.:l:'ig'i'Z!i:2J2;E.iiE;f;,N?:;t':'.:k:.V4'.ig:.4„.„.:.0.0•'..:0•.:-.;:Sttikig...Mis'iftlit:i::E•'::4'2.0'-':'t.::•.,::::::',.g Approach LOS A C A 2007 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions 095 , -,,•;-6X-VAZO.IMV.Z4K5W• ;:,..,4"..WYW,,,W,W40,41.7".ak-4•Ve"ArOMTPXWAPT44:"WW14•5 • 44.- HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to apadty railo Actuated Cycle Length (s) Analysis Period (min) cCritical Lane Group 9.0 HCM Level of Service 0.28 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 15 tft, 4.0 091 0.94 4757 4757 2.2 GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2007 PM Existing Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kirniey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE 4th Street iscavne Boulevard (Northbound • 2007 PM Peak Hour i ting Traffic Conditions ane C€ nfigurations l p1.) Total Lost time (s Lane Uti acts Frt (t. ; ote atd. Flow Satd. Flow a! Turn Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Actuate Clearance Time (s) Otik144et on (. 4 4\ 4.0 e95 0.92 263 4Itt 1900 1900 4.0 639 4/ 00 .92 0_64 0.64 0.64 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.92 Perm Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 F a ressio [ncremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay iC:M \tole 1 C pacll r; i Actuated Cycle Length (s) lnt.~erseetlo =Cap i Ut Watt, Analysis Period (min) c C ical L ne G'raui 100.0 15 620 .0 Sum of lost time (s) pYgto 4667 0.24 0.2 8.0 G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2007 PM Existing Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 4th Street & Biscavne Boulevard (Scut bo nd) 2007 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations lde tific ROO Total Lost time o_ne t 4:Fact Frt ..... _..... . FleProteCte Satd. Flow (pro Fit;'P rm itt Satd. Row Peak -hour fact RTOR Reduction (vph) Turn Type €>teetedtase Permitted Phases Effective Green, g A�fi:�aieE Clearance Time (s) V011. 0 te) s o'r 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 <:;p.g >: ( .91: 0.86 1.00 1.00 3221 1695 1611 3221 1695 custom Perm 4.0 4.0 4.0 i 4.0 .99 6363 6363 4.0 0.95 Lane Grp Cap (vph) *Rotas,Prat vis Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 P:ro re sio Factor i Incremental Delay, d2 Del€ Level of Service Appro c Delay Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay HC c!u e o p ty ratio: Actuated Cycle Length (s) I.ntersectio.n apacEty Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Leine Group 306 612 322 0.03 0.05 33.0 33. 0.0 0.0 34.4 0.4 6.5 HCM Level of Service 100.0 0 15 Sum of lost time (s) ICU Lev00tSercE 8.0 4645 4.3 0.1 G:\043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2007 PM Existing Totai.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysjs 5: NE 3rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard (Northb Lane Confguratons .101009::.§W(Y ,. )".';?':,::::::t'si'sj.,:',2.:19Q0.0::19,09:'',:lPP(1 1900900::':,::190()gi'':I000:g1900,"::::.4..1p.0(G.-j; Total Lost tirne (s) 4.0 0;.;86-,,,';: 0.98 und 2007 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions p Frt Satd. Fow (prat' ifPerniitte Satd. Flow (perm) 6272 +TIM Peak -hour factor, PHF 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4„1;ifj:0::*1;040figiRdt,e4E$N6ati:SiDEVNIS.04W,R:0:g RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 Turn Type RON:CAPAP407.00ViENSg; Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) V4151054060:0*VORZg Lane Grp Cap (vph) 6272 6.92 0.92 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 '.." -"" Perm 2 76.0 0.76 4.0 3.0 4767 vis Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay,, dl Progresson Factor Incremental Delay, d2 0§t'(0).iteliattk.:MtgtSotit:.„,„,,,r,, . „ Level of Service Approach Deay Approach LOS 1900 1900 0.89 0.89 0.89 6.92 0.92 4 A A 0.26 0.34 3.9 1.00 0.2 HCM Average Control Delay , 4.1 HCM Lev& of Service A HCM Adtuate6d14C:rt):y°:clleqLengtn (s) 66:0 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Vat Service„ Analysis Period (min) 15 c Criticat Lane Group GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2007 PM Existing Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 3rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard (Southbo nd 2007 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Conditions • Lane Configuratbns Total Lost time (s) Lan UtJ Factor F rt Satd. Flow (prot) 4\ P \a tttt 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1610 3390 Satd. Flow (perni) 1610 3390 ..„„16 0 0 0 igi§fik„. Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 :"ZFOWN01)11R0Stgi:g60.g,%..gt:00:9"-Z: RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 16.0 76.0 4,0 0.99 6341 Clearance Time (s) 4:6 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 258 542 vis Ratio Perm 0.02 6341 760 vlc Ratio0.02 0.24 Uniform Delay, di 65.4 36.7 incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.2 Level of Service Approach Delay (s) 0 Approach LOS HCM,Average Control Delaottim6td:.C:00acity,e6y I '' 9, .9 HCM Eevel of Service Actuatee,11,CnY,ccle6pLe6n.9!(i (s) ! l';''.,,......:: , ,,, ,., 1 ti:. U LI , , ost time (s) Sum of i % i010t007::0. , „!igOtiOri::, i::''''-'"' ' . Analysis Period (min) 15 ,ii,,i.--‘,,„ICUi4OYSOr.Ot Service 0i',0,,,0.014aK044:0.fooi*a.,;4,:,,,:„ii,i„,?.nR,i.","ANAE§'Eisi::i;::KtS',;5;i5F:',i':::, GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2007 PM Existing Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 0.0 A 8.0 4819 3.4 091 0.1 3/26/2007 • • APPENDIX E: Growth Trend Analyses FDOT Historical Count Information . ..._ida. Depari_".,,nt. o_ Transport __on Transportation Statistics Office 2005Historical. AADT Repot C u_.ty: NA,. E 5045 -- SE. 5/US-2/NB, E SE 2 AV ON SE 4 1ST Yea,-821131 Directi= I Dir c iv_. 2 3 Factor D Factor T ,actor F2005 C 15000 N 0 19000 0.08 1.00 3.50 004 9 23500 N 23500 0 .0.0 0.67 6.20 2003 9 21000 N 21000 3 0.08 0.72 4_50 2002 C 2230E 1:0 22500 0 3.09 0.68 3.40 001 a 220 N 22530 0.08 0.54 5.30 200E ^ 21000 N 21000 0 0.08 0.53 3.10 1999 8 2250E N 22500 _ 0.09 3.53 3.10 ..0 0 1997 C 19000 N 19000 0 0,09 0.65 2.30 1996 C 2300E N 23000 0 0.09 1.0D 2.90 1995 C 21000 1 0 21000 0.08 0.63 6.70 1994 C 13503 N 0 0 0.09 0.60 5.50 1993 r 21500 N 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1992 C 24000 N 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 21114 N 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 22632 N 3 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 44105 N 23803 20302 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 39238 13 18260 20978 0.00 0.00 0.00 1287 31048 N 12937 18111 0.00 0.00 0"00 1986 39562 tI 19106 20456 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 56681 N 28687 27994 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 28174 Dr 14826 13343 0.00 0.00 0.00 AA D`=' ;lags: C W Computed; E = Manual Estimate; 5 = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T = Third Year Estimate; X = Unknown Flor Department of Trans, ion 200'_., Historical AADT Report Site 5046 a. �,,,wm\:o/ Direction 2 K. Factor cFao..ors .7.a.ctor }a:c wwnv 17500 0 «n: 1.00 :an §g&c :meow 0 20000 005 1.00 6.2 \w:c wane 0 222E 002 100 «c §9:c 23wuw 0 23500 03; 1.00 3.40 2001c ware : 26000 0.08 13: :20 900c ww,w 0 2500 03E «J 3.10 wgc 250e9w , 25000 0.09 :3: 3.10 19280 w3„w....2 0.......2...08...1. ...0 QJc wa:w 0 go, 0.09\y 2.30 wSc 22:0r9 0 2290 939 1.00 2.90 aac on&w o:& 0 03e 0.63 5.40 ayc waaw 0 0 029 «m 4.40 1993 c 24500 5 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1992 = 24002 w 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 as 21883 w 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 wa<w 0 0 0.00 0.00 030 AADT Flags: := Computed; s= Manual Estimate; e=First Year Estma S=Second Year Estimate; == ThirdYar Estimate; X = Unknown -rides --_tme..._ v_ ._..;spor atlon 7_a_1Maion, Statist:L.c. 2005 Historical Ar L_ Report Site 5047 SR JS 100 .5 _ .:fi�r'zLER ST Year AADT 5irection. 1 Direction 2 K .actor v Fact_ T Fac or F-2005 F 42000 5 25500 5 16500 0.08 0.66 3.50 2004 C 36300 N 22300 S 14000 0.08 0.6. 6.20 2003 C 3.300 2 24000 S 500 0.08 0.72 4.80 2002 C 34000 ti 21500 12�1500 0.09 0.68 3.40 001 0 35500 N2300.0 0 '2506 0.08 0.54 5.30 2000 C 42000 5 27500 5 _4530 0.08 0.53 3.1_0 1999 0 3.000 Irk 23000 5 13000 0.09 0.53 3..0 1998 0 34590 id 215J0 S 3-9.00 0.0-8- 0..53 2.50 1997 0 33500 ICI 21000 9 12530 0.09 0.65 2.30 1996 C 32500 2 20500 S 12000 0.09 0.53 2.90 1995 C 29500 N 18500 5 11000 0.08 3.63 6.70 1994 c 30000 ri 18500 5 11500 3.09 0.60 5.50 1993 C 35500 N 22000 S 13500 0.00 0.00 3.00 1991 36661 N 23174 S ..3487 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 31278 2 19623 8 11455 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 32400 N 22937 S 9463 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 30862 Si 18684 S 12178 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 29717 N 18081 S 11636 0.00 0.00 3.00 1985 31430 N 20210 S 11220 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 306698 N 19353 S 11335 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT F1aas: C = Computed; F = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; T -� Third Year Estimate; X - Unknown Transocrtation Sta. Office C my Site: 00 SR a 8 FLAGLER ST(WD,>n« W 7.2,S-1/BISCAYNE BLVD Yer M.,DT Directi n 1 Directior., :« mmsFactor « Factor 2:005z 5400 0.08 13: 4.30 4600 9 0 . 4600 0. a 1, 9,70 �(«3^ ,o;: , 3800 ,\: 1.00 `a2\ 00 , 4300 ,a, 4\\ 2,» c - „ 4700 ,2, 1.00.0 :w:c 4500 9 ,\ Sr: 0.08 1.00 4x0 Q d z 4800 s 08 3800 0.09 330 220 agc ows 09 ao »» 1.00 2.70 age Jws wyw 0 0.09 1.00 5.2 aa: awz ,w 4900 0.09 1.00 5.40 awc ywz ,v 0 «a 0.63 10.30 ay: aws 08 0 0.09 0.60 2.40 awe g«s 08 0 «o 0.00 0.00 :2:c gees 08 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 5542 s 08 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 5713 s 0 w 0 0.00 0.00 0.,9 AADT Flags; 0 Coptema= manlaalGt ate; 9 Firat Year Est. First Year Estimate := Second YearDt ate; T = Third 89±rd Year Estimate;ate; X Unknown Florida vL:ar_me,__ of Transoortation Transportation Statistics Office 2005 'Historical AADT __,?_.port 513 923...E SE _ ,6 200 SR _ US -a. 1SCA913E BLVO Year. ?se:-_ )5rc__6. 2 Direction 2 Y. Factor 19 Fator 3 Factor 2005 F 11000 0.,C8 1.00 4.30 2004 2 9300 ._ 9300 W 0.08 1.00 9.70 2003 9 _ 000 E 1_0000 L^ 3 0.08 1.00 5.00 2002 1 10500 E '0500 9 0 0_09 1.00 4.60 wti2001 C 11000 0 11200 ., 0 G.08 1.00 5.30 _OC_ C 13000 „ 13000 W 0 0.08 1.00 4.40 °99 c 00 10000 r: 0 0.09 1.00 3-90 1998 C 11000 23 11000 v 0 0.10 1.00 2.70 1997 1 10000 E 0 W 10000 0.09 1.00 5.20 1996 C 12500 E 12500 14 0 0.09 1.00 5.40 1995 1 17500 E 17500 33 0 0.08 0.63 5.40 1994 19 11500 E 0 1 0 0.09 0.60 4.40 1993 C 11000 C 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1992 C 1.500 E 0 6 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 12300 E 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 11659 F 0 W 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 14168 1 10582 W 3486 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 14977 9 9916 9 5061 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 15663 E 3409 sd 7254 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 16479 F 10201 1 6278 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 16755 E 10482 W 6273 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; F = Manual Estimate; 19 = First Year Estimate S = Second Year Estimate; 19 = Third Year Estimate; X = unknown Growth Trend Analyses 25000 20000 G1 a) m 0 :c j 15000 Average Daily Traffic 10000 5000 0 2001 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5/US-1 -- 200' E of SE 2 AVE on SE 4 ST Observed Count Fitted Curve 1 1 1 -1---4 ---1+ -F 1 1 1 1 1 -- 1 -1 1 4 -1-- 2006 2011 Year 2016 " Annual Trend Increase: Trend R•squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2006 to Design Year): Printed: -600 29.3% -2.62 % -2.93% 26-Mar-07 Straight Line Growth Option 2021 Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Miami -Dade 87-5045 SR 5/US-1 Traffic (ADTIAADT) Count* 22500 22500 21000 23500 19000 Trend** 22900 22300 21700 21100 20500 2006 Opening Year Trend 2006 200 N/A 1990 2009 Mid -Year Trend NIA 18100 2012 Design Year Trend 2012 NIA 16300 TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends Axle -Adjusted Average Daily Traffic (Vehicles/t3ay 30000 20000 10000 0 -10000 -20000 -30000 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5/US-1 200' E of SE 2 AVE on SE 2 ST 001 2006 2011 Year County: Station #: Highway: 016 2021 **Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2005 to Design Year): Printed: -2,050 99.3% -7.92% -11.54% 26-Mar-07 Straight Line Growth Option iami-Dade 87-5046 SR 5/US-1 Traffic (ADT/ DT) Year Count* Trend** 2001 26000 25900 2002 23500 23900 2003 22000 21800 2004 20000 19800 2005 17500 17700 2006 Opening Year Trend 2006 N/A 15700 2009 Mid -Year Trend 2009 N/A 9500 2012 Design Year Trend 2012 N/A 3400 TRANPLAN ForecaAs/Trends *Axle -Adjusted TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5/US-1 --100' S of FLAGLER ST 80000 ,.w. .--- 70000 60000 0 m 50000 40000 co 30000 m cn 20000 10000 2001 MO Observed Count Fitted Curve 2006 County: Station #: Highway: I i { I I +--4- F I I--- I I I l I -I--- 4 2011 2016 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2005 to Design Year): Printed: 1,500 60.0% 4.41 % 3.75% 26-Mar-07 Straight Line Growth Option 2021 Miami -Dads 87-5047 SR 5/US-1 Traffic (A!TIAADT) Year Count* Trend* 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 35500 34000 37500 36000 42000 aargliPiti 34000 35500 37000 38500 40000 2006 Opening Year Trend 2006 N/A 41500 2009 Mid -Year Trend 2009 N/A 46000 2012 Design Year Trend 2012 N/A 50500 TRANPLAN Forecas+ts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 968/FLAGLER ST -- 200W of US 1/BISCAYNE BLVD 9000 8000 7000 .T .2 6000 41) (.) 5000 4000 ca 3000 2000 1000 0 2001 [Laza Observed Count Fitted Curve 2006 2011 Year 2016 2021 ** Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2005 to Design Year): Printed: 170 21.1% 4.17% 3.50% 26-Mar-07 Straight Line Growth Option County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 87-0101 SR 968/FLAGLER ST Traffic ADT/ DT) Year Count* 1 Trend 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 4700 4300 3800 4600 5400 et: in• - 4200 4400 4600 4700 4900 Tr- • • 2006 N/A 5100 I I • 2009 N/A 5600 11111PAGIUDNinv - 2012 N/A 6100 TRANIFLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted 12000 — 10000 w 8000 Average Daily Traffic 6000 4000 - 2000 0 2001 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 968/EB SE 1 ST -- 200° W of SR 5/11S-1 a m Observed Count Fitted Curve 2006 2011 2016 Year ** Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2005 to Design Year): Printed: -120 6.9% -1.18% -1.13% 26-Mar-07 Straight Line Growth Option 2021 County: Station #: Highway: Miami -Dade 87-0100 SR 968/EB SE 1 ST Traffic (ADT/AADT) Year Count* Trend* • `IS 2001 11000 10600 2002 10500 10500 2003 10000 10400 2004 9300 10200 2005 11000 10100 2003 Opening Year Trend 2006 N/A 10000 2009 Mid -Year Trend 2009 N/A 9600 2012 Design Yeav Trend 2012 N/A 9300 TRANIPLAN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted • 0 APPENDIX F: Volume Development Worksheets 11 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 2nd Avenue & NE 4th Street PM PEAK HOUR. ]lescriptiora Lefl NE 2nd Avenue Southbound Right Left NE 4th Street Westbound Right Left NE 2nd Avenue Northbound Right NE Lea 4th Street Eastbound Ri ht. Through Through Through '1'hrou8h 2007 Existing Traffic 26 647 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Season Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 2007 Volume Conversion 26 64.1 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 Annual Growth Rate 0.555 0,5% 0.5'% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5'% Backgrot.md Growth 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed Projects Everglades on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Suites at 50 Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 the Loft Downtown (The Loft 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Background Traffic 26 651 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Traffic 22 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 'total Traffic 48 651 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Description 2007 Existing Traffic Peak Season Factor 2007 Volume Conversion Aanual Growth. Rate 1.3acklround Growth Committed Projects Everglades on the 13ay Park Suites at 50 Biscayne 'the Loft Downtown (The Loft 2) 2013 Background Traffic Project 'Traffic Pass -By 'iraf0c 2013 Total Trani) VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 2nd Avenue & NE 3rd Street PM PEAK HOUR Left NE 2nd Avenue Southbound lei ht Left NE 3rd Street Westbound Ri 1st Left NE 2,nd Avenue Northbound Ri,ht NE Left 3rd Street Eastbound Ri wt Throe h Throe it Throe lw Throt311 0 0.99 396 0.99 300 0.99 29 0.99 195 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 392 297 29 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,5% 0.5% 6 0 0 0 0.5% 4 0 0 10 0.5% 0 84 0 0 0.5% 3 63 0 17 0.5% 0.5% 0.5°A 0.5% 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0,5% 0 0 0 0 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 398 311 37 0 113 276 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 398 348 128 359 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) & NE 4th Street PM PEAK HOUR • Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) KID h Street Description Left. Soulbbound Left Westbound Through Righl Left Northbound Right Lett Eastbound Right Through Right Through • Through 2007 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 120 130 71 1416 0 0 0 0 Peak Season Factor 0.99 099 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 t7.99 2007 Volume Conversion 0 0 0 0 119 129 70 1402 0 0 0 0 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5"/ 0.5% 0.5 % 0.5% 0.5"/o 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 2 2 I 21 0 0 0 0 Committed Projects Everglades on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Suites at 50 Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Loft Downtown (The Loll 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro 0 2013 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 121 131 71 1423 0 0 O 0 Project'fraftic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-Hy't'rafl5e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 `total Traffic 0 0 0 0 121 131 71 1423 #i 4 � 0 .. 0 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) & NE 4th Street PM PEAK HOUR 17esc .iptiou 2007 Existing '17 af1k Peak Season Factor 2007 Volume Conversion Annual Growth wth Rate Background Growth Committed Projects Everglades on the Bay Palk Suites at 50 Biscayne The Lott Downtown (The Loft 2) 2013 Background ']'raffle Project Traffic Pass -By Traffic 2013 Total Traffic liscayne Boulevard Left (Southbound) Southbound Ri ht Left NE 4th Street Westbound Ri ht Biscayne Boulevard Left (Southbound) Northbound Ri ht Left NE 4th Street Eastbound Right Throu h T'hrou h Throu h 1 Through 0 0.99 874 0.99 43 0.99 123 0.99 62 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 0 0.99 36 0.99 0 865 43 122 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0,5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 878 44 124 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 ® 0 965 44 124 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET" Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) & NE 3rd Street PM PEAK HOUR NE 3rd Street 13iscaytae oulevard (Northbound �.L 3rd Street Descri)tiou Left Southbound Left Westbound Left Northbound Right Left Eastbound I Through Right Through Right Through Right Through 2007 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 1183 165 0 0 0 Peak Season factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 11.99 0.99 2007 Volume Conversion 0 0 0 0 U 0 141 1171 163 0 0 0 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0 5°% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 R 2 0 0 0 Contatitted Projects I verglades on the 13ay 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 10 0 0 0 0 Park Stites at 50 Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Loft Downtown (The Lois 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Background Traffic 4 0 Q U 0 0 235 1199 165 Q U Si Project Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -By 'Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Total Traffic 0 0 U 0_ 0 0 343 1199 165 0 0 0 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) & NE 3rd Street PM PEAK HOUR Rise wne Boulevard (Southhound) Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) NE3rc eet Description Left Southbound Westboninil Left Northbound Right I „nnstbonrnd 1 Through Right Through Righteft Through Right Through 2007Existinng Traffic 0 843 63 30 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak .Season Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 2007 Volume Conversion 0 835 62 30 116 0 0 .... 0...,. U 0 0 0 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 13 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corntitted Projects Everglades on the Bay 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Suites at 50 Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 the Loft Downtown (The Loft 2) 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Background 'Traffic 0 848 129 30 118 0 0 0 (1 0 fl 0 Project Traffic 0 15 109 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Total Traffic 0 _ 863 238 30 226 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Project Driveway & NE 4th Street PM. PEAK HOUR Description Project Left Driveway Southbound Right NE 4th Street Westbound Right Project Driveway Northbound Right Leff, NE 4th S L' astbot '1'hrou Through Lett Through 1..elt Through _ 2007 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Season Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99_ 0.99 0.99 099 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 2007 Volume Conversion 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 36 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5"/c Background f3rowth 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 Committed Projects Everglades on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Suites at 50 Biscayne. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'he Loft Downtown (I'he Loft 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?013 Background Traffic ® 0 0 0... 106 0 0 0 0 0 37 Project'1'raffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 15 0 22 Pass -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Total Traffic 0 0 0 0 106 0 37 0 15 0 59 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Project Service Driveway & NE 3rd Street PM PEAK HOUR Description Project Left Service Driveway Southbound Right Loll NE 3rd Street Westbound Right Project Left Service Driveway Northbound Right Left NE 3rd Stree Eastbound Through Through Through 1 Through 2007 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Season Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0,99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 2007 Volume Conversion 0 0 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5"/ 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5"1 Background Growth 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 C'ontu fitted Projects Everglades on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E'ark Suites at 50Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Loft Downtown (The Loft 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Traffic 0 0 15 0 83 22 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Total "Traffic 0 0 i 5 0 308 22 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Project Exit Driveway & NE 3rd Street PM PEAK HOUR 1)escrptiocr Project Left Exit Driveway Southbound fti_ht Left NE 3rd Street Wcstbound Ri•,ht Project Exit Driveway Northbound Left Throu_h Ri•ht NE 3rd Street raxtt,onnd Leti 1 through RI Itt Throu_h Throuh 2007 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Season Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 2007 Volume Conversion 0 0 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anneal Growth [tate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5°% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed .Projects Everglades on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Park Suites at 50 13iseayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tl The Loet Downtown {The Loll 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Traffic 0 0 83 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-13y Traffic 0 0 74 0 -74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Total Traffic 11 fl ...... 157 0 173 0 0 (t 0 0 W 0 o VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Project Entrance Driveway & NE 3rd Street PM PEAK IIOUR 13escri rtsoaa Left NE 3rd Westbound est ou dt Right IP� ProjectEntrance eway hDiv3trbht Left _... Eastb bnd Street I...<, _ -tight 2007 Existing Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Season Factor 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 ? 0.99 0.99 2007 Volume Conversion 0 0 0 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 0.5% 0.5"/u 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% Background Growth 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Committed Projects Everglades on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 Park Suites at 50 Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Loft Downtown (The Loft 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 Background Traffic 0 0 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project. Traffic 0 0 0 0 22 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -By Traffic 0 0 0 0 -74 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 2013 "dotal Traffic 0 6 0 0 173 269 0 0 0 fl....... • 0 0 PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION STUDY AREA INTERSECTION TOTALS ## PM Peak Hour Description 16:00 1605 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 •NP. ^_ud h veeee & NE 4th Street • NE 2nd Avenue & NE 3rd Street •Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) &NE 4th Street Biscay :e Boulevard (Southbound) & NE 4th Street Biscayne 13ou1es and (5Ior`hbound) & NE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound; & NE 3rd Street g1043100400 - 330 40scaynekcale,gtmexlsl peak hour (pm) 3/2R%_^007 2:33 Tolais 120 134 143 154 188 179 215 184 164 154 176 172 213 206 283 218 298 373 267 329 445 435 431 426 247 237 241 251 263 295 290 290 303 301 334 364 350 397 379 345 231 219 256 223 268 .303 239 243 1363 1418 1493 1167 1727 1815 1837 1710 5441 5805 6202 6546 7089 Peak Hour Kimiey-Horn ► and Associates, Inc. Copyright 2004,Kimley-Horn and Assaciales. Ths. • • • APPENDIX G: P.M. Trip Generation Tables 2 3 4 5 lE 6 E1 7 U 8 P 9 10 1 11 12 13 14 15 PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON PROPOSED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION tTE TRW (ENEf2ATION CHARAGTER1STIC,• Land Use Hiph.Ri.e R.identiai Condwniniurn f Townhouse Shopping cantor FIE Edition 7 rrE ode 232 820 rrE 151ttEt TtL)IV4:,:'> Er ISTR1BLFrICii�l ----..- •Percent . .. cal e Units ki Ou GROSS 0LUAMEB Out 1565 DU 62% 38% 340 208 35 KSF 48% 52% 150 163 A}'illCa`E. EXTERNAL TRIP$ IC Total Percent Trips In Out Tot 48 8 2% 34 320 313 10.9% 34 136 194 514 143 279 erce Q4/e 2-8 % PO Trips 0 148 EX 13 F1 lAi Taff 0 r fatal 320 194 514 62 65 131 Total: 490 371 G:1043100000 - 330 BiscaynelCalcsltllpgen7.xls: PRINT -PEAK HOUR 3/2612007,5:26 PM 861 7-9 % 68 456 337 793 18-7% 148 382 263 645 • • 0 APPENDIX II: Cardinal Trip Distribution Miami-t. ainterim 2005 Cost Feasib Plan CONE DIRECTIONAL I5L'`TICN SUMMARY CARDINAL DIRECTIONS TOTAL NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW NW NNW 511. 53193 60 29 17 45 134 81 133 506 PERCENT 11.36 5.73 3.36 1.38 8.89 26.48 16.01 26.28 512 TRIPS 114 52 37 67 122 210 180 157 939 PERCENT 12.14 5.54 3.94 7.14 12.99 22.36 19.17 16.72 513 TRIPS 589 289 216 507 559 989 912 795 4856 PERCENT 12.13 5.95 4.45 10.44 11.51 20.37 18.78 16.37 514 TRIPS 198 91 233 312 186 485 385 244 2134 PERCENT 9.28 4.26 10.92 14.62 8.72 22.73 18.04 11.43 515 TRIPS 341 105 110 231 215 481 433 406 2322 PERCENT 14.69 4.52 4.74 9.95 9.26 20.71 18.65 17.48 516 TRIPS 142 53 37 99 101 225 197 183 1037 PERCENT 13.69 5.11 3.57 9,55 9.74 21.70 19.00 17.65 517 TRIPS 563 269 199 632 498 991 1087 792 5031 PERCENT 11.19 5.35 3.96 12.56 9.90 19.70 21.61 15.74 518 TRIPS 150 41 40 111 101 204 188 164 999 PERCENT 15.02 4.10 4.00 11.11 10.11 20.42 18.82 16.42 519 TRIPS 132 50 34 79 96 248 191 202 1032 PERCENT 12.79 4.84 3.29 7.66 9.30 24.03 18.51 19.57 520 TRIPS 747 514 144 98 660 1718 1259 1872 7012 PERCENT 10.65 7.33 2.05 1.40 9.41 24.50 17.95 26.70 521 TRIPS 872 399 38 32 157 3415 3923 2740 11576 PERCENT 7.53 3.45 0.33 0.28 1.36 29.50 33.89 23.67 522 TRIPS 473 362 175 90 717 1455 1153 1180 5605 PERCENT 8.44 6.46 3.12 1.61 12.79 25.96 20.57 21.05 ___.523 TRIPS 227 142 60 96 296 520 458 388 2187 PERCENT 10.38 6.49 2.74 4.39 13.53 23.78 20.94 17.74 524 TRIPS 1574 552 112 523 885 2928 1910 2504 10988 PERCENT 14.32 5.02 1.02 4.76 8.05 26.65 17.38 22.79 525 TRIPS 409 191 80 331 300 834 657 610 3422 PERCENT 11.95 5,58 2.34 9.67 8.77 24.37 19.49 17.83 - 35 - 1/18 05 • • • APPENDIX I: Future Conditions (2010 Without Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE 4th Street & NE 2nd Avenue 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Background Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations 'deaf FOW:::00144)(:,: 1900 e - • Total Lost time (s) 4.0 00:„ Frt 1.00 ' 4t4 :749001900 4.0 091 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5076 FtP:000*tit0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5076 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.92 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 111 0 0 0 30 748 RTOR ::;0kyvh3NoyizvvgRrCC-Ntq-ArttPAN*3:PV:SRTSP::Ei**,K-Ri,.l;N5':VV,4*'-aaNO.ki.% Lane Group Flow (vph) 111 0 0 0 0 778 C:747117P*Miliggfilaeiatil4a.NAING,3,,igq..,t40664.0410-Mtniikt.V,90-OhtinAgettligi?StZtti. Protected Phases 8 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 81.6 Effectve Green, g (s) 10.4 81.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.82 Ctearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 40*ACCONtOtiegpitolicsm,,fidimpo2tolost:4142 \as Ratio Prot c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 \tic Kati° 0.60 0.19 Progression Factor 1.49 1.00 Delay (s) -66.0 2.1 400-01.40*FpfitESZNI:t:-..,,,a0IMS141ta#V.V:VANICARAtteMar::::g:- Approach Delay (s) 69.0 0.0 2.1 M Average Control Delay 10.5 HCM Leve of...,:eiVi"lif*VVIEggairSmzempaim- HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.23 -01:404PTYIPt*:40104101PAAraniPWsi'5:4i1*-1,00gt001:00Wigligt:',..8.0 Intersection CapacityUtilization 25.1°/0 ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHR012010 PM Future Background.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE 3rd Street & NE 2nd Avenue Futur 2010 PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Conditions Lane.Configurations .,. . ...4.t... 1001:,"90*:::(VffpfY5::':Z:.,:190C4ii;1 i'.i.:i:I0();•::::190::::E1900:;:f:1, Total Lost time (s)4.0 tao*:..." - 7.1.00mr.-"'::"• :E,:.::;*..:;;!::',,.:i:::',''!,:n - - ..'.9p.k.N.:,.::::;:... rt 1.00 Ftvgioto#0.16:r.,:-c.-p:]'!:,;,'v:i.„,0.99 said. Flow (prot 3489 Fit ,...,Ifylk*itiging':,.:.:,' ::" 0.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3489 4751 i;Of4*Wh3fttRigg.lg:Eg%f.§Y: .:14i43L0 C.',:0,',):,.., ..... ....,.276: :ait,;:::: 15::,;e1:91;'::::::Pt8,j.;:,11,0..isg.-g-4 ::!..,15:::.;7:::311 Peak -hour factor, Pl.-' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.80 0.80 0.80 Adj.''Flow vph V'''.'1.<4:',Vi."-0-1;2.:1):,i;',,V,':IIViA:432.6.;:s'::an',"0,Yl'i*T.(gl'':i'r0n0i5,.'ji,..0.:::',5l"..i4:',±-Ri',:iWOAi'M''..4.9184'0,3-,.'' 9 RTCR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 52 tj:771.irV"r04:03i-Nit,..taingidOgVitiq;Vi';it.'. ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4.0 0.93 1.00 4751 0 Turn Type Perm Protected 1:ith:ACOC' Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G 14.0 Effective Green, 6 (s) 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 ClearanceTime Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 488 vis Ratio Perm 0.13 Uniform Delay, di 41.5 gt40.0t41440404.0T04i.g6gfittlEPX:I!,.P.f.,:1;:atF:44-igtit.0;140,4eifiRogeog: Incremental Delay, d2 ,‘• Level of Service, Approach Delay Approach LOS A "k4 7.6 78.0 78.0 4.0 3.0 3706 0.23 2.9 01 A 3.0 HCM Average Control Delay 15.8 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume :fkp;*000(ttratio 0.35 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) ServiceIntersec:ion Capacity Utilization 32.2% ICU Leve of Analysis Period (min) 15 8.0 G:\043100000 = 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2010 PM Future Background.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26i2007 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE 4th Street & Biscayne Boulevard 1,Northbound) Lane Configurations 1000!:',flOK-14044:?•6(.1.F'*:19Q Total Lost time (s) 2010 PM Peak Hour Future a ground Traffic Conditions p 4tt1 --t1900-- K.- 1900 1000 ‘:1990::-;1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 Lane UtL Factor 0.95 Frt 0.92 Ft Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3263 6393 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3263 6393 'M-Pjfi§41140itIterM.-?Attg104:000:2M73-44t Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.66 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 N!--A$0,,ISM-40*trt0::O.Q2:01 Turn Type Perm 1:13.4eigiMili1"Xlif-P140.4P Permitted Phases 2 Effective Green, g (s) 19.1 72.9 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 623 4660 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 Uniform Delay, di 36.6 4.8 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.2 At.qfiKghtiagatftaatMft,RiVfgrta34.g2;W.R'c5fit§a-oge-okz7mgogiii,r,?,iw:ygz.-t,:,„.5:q:i,-.Y Level of Service D A Approach Delay Approach LOS A D A A HCM Average Control Delay I 3.2 HCM ,,-1016:*01103;90410*§:tWSP:Kq44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 if:40r04,000.000,-(rOattOKU-Zie,P44Yck::::::: Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4-aulf.:24104-41411-ffi HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 ICU Level of 5ervce A GA043100000 - 330 BiscaynelCalcs\SYNCHRO\2010 PM Future Background.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 4th Street & BscayneBoulevard outhb un • 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Background Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations 004:PR*00-44C: Total Lost time (s) Fit tOt0-0„0Olp,b,,, Seta: ESard7new (perrn) re 11%1 4.0 4.0 4.0 tilt 4.0 0.99 6362 6362 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0,95 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 44 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 144(31#-MOOkrfOikk-9. 1-Aenanasfagnoeuiveataa, Tum Type custom Perm Protected PhasesKDB:iflERtggq:10:,14':',:g-REIN8NAMPEPREWFostRogigitigeNN!,i5::;.,,,:, Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G 19.1 19.1 19.1 72.9 Effective Green, 6 (s) 19.1 19.1 19.1 72.9 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 „40:1**0:0040004418$00,54:VVS,!4:%'4:1$9ggi.$;9(5MigAANP*-;, Lane Grp Cap (vph) 308 615 324 v/s Ratia Prot 0.05 vis Ratio Perrn 0.03 0.05 0.86 1.00 ,0 1611 3221 1695 1611 3221 1695 Uniform belay,d1 32.9 33.0 34.4 Progression- Factor Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.4 Level of Service C A B Approach LOS 6 A A A 4.0 HCM Average Control Delay 6.6 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to 0apacity ratio 022 • •• Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8 0 Level af Service A" - Analysis Period (min) 15 4638 0.21 4.3 1.00 0.1 A G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHR012010 PM Future Sackground.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kirniey-Horn and Associates, inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE 3rd Street s ayne Boulevard (Northbou id c 4- k- 4\ 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Background Traffic Conditions p Lane Configurations Total Lost time (s) Frt Fft Protected Satd. Flow (prot) tt tri 4.0 • 0.98 6263 • ,,,,,,, „..".0?-euniitt • Satd. Flow (perm) 6263 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 t4400040.1E1W]toirig,-,!,zonsiOnif0:;Oitsig10;:agiii.:4:NtigtARFX.. Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 2 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green G (s) 76.0 Effective Green, g (s) 76.0 Clearance time (s) '.,ottrowigmofioott:(0:)5::;c„, Lane Grp Cap (vph) vis Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, al Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay(s) 4.2 Level of Service ::---;:toottporof --1;?!5s5x..s:ossialmq 4.0 4760 0.29 0-37 4,0 A A A riMf4M.4,,,,i,n1r-1824,-V-042-Mf.41:15144iggs40.4--11,42M1.4.1W!**5-0 HCM Average Control Delay 4.2 HCM evel of Service 9100001PopAoojtopcoiti:.;:::51,-ig...: Actuated Cycle Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost tirne (s) 24.0 10.000000g0000wpor:zotiow:6„,., iE;.::::::::.gi:."ICU :::::::or'-§t0011:740:80,4,-t0:::g.gt::.-..A „ Analysis Period (min) ...................... ... 15 Pl':'::;',:;c:fIttOatxa0.1:4Pr4.-00:-.•;;iFi,,it:::.:-.4*.:14'.;K:I;'.::iM.•':!:,.:4::::: GA043100000 - 330 Biscare\Calcs\SYNCHR012010 PM Future Background.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signa ; ed intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 3rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) Lane Configurations Total t F Satd_ Row Said. Flo RTOR Reduction (vph) 610 3390 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Background Traffic Conditions I .98 628 .92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 Turn Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Clearance Time (s) Per 16.0 16.0 76.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) Progress o F €)r Incremental Delay, d2 l evel of Service p ac #el Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay HC lI 't C pacity ; t Actuated Cycle Length (s) Iter;ecriCapacity t[iat[ Analysis Period ca 9.7 4 100.0 k4:8°lq 15 258 542 0,0 0.2 HCM Level of Service Su of lost time (s) G:\043100000 K 330 BiscaynelCalcs\SY NCHRO1201 O PM Future Background.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley®Horn and Associates, Inc. 8.0 4774 0.1 3/26/2007 • • APPENDIX J: Future Conditions (2010 With Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs HCfv1 Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE 4th StreetStreat& NE 2nd Avenu Lane Configurations 41+ ido01flOw(v1:00) 1900--, ,.1900-: : 1900 ' 1.900::' :1990 1900::,,,:, "- Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lan.0,1.4f.ji..FOOt0.' '; - ''':.,:i::::&1-.0+1,:r:- :i':',,,: ils:'''.:' "', i'' i i::0,,pi, Frt 1.00 1.00 FIL„F',i'OtePte40:::::::i ,,,,t-Y95:', ;'it'S::,-..::,=:::', ..;:i:,,, ;..'„; :: :;1;-ss,".:: ',.:,::;',,is,f,',.1400':E-i;',?'-':. Satd. Flow (prOt) 1770 5068 FifF.,O,(P...„,:: 7;V:,-: Satd. Fiow (perm) 1770 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions 6 77.6 Lane Grp Cap vp) 255 v!s Ratio Prot c0.09vis Ratio Perm 0.16 We Ratio 0.60 0220 Progression Factor 1.40 1.00 Delay (s) 60.3 3.1 400t: Approach Delay (s) 60.3 Hcm Volume to Capacity ratio 0.27 *OtiON0*0:0:dif:woya2,:sm1000 Intersection Capacity Utilization Err% "j; '15 c Critical Lane Group ICU Level of Service _ GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHR012010 PM Future Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 3/26/2007 Hail Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE 3rd Street & NE 2nd Avenue 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Tota Traffic Conditions 4\ *.yr .1. • "4, p Lane Configurations + + 00At,''.!..Fg*:(9.141101)::?:;..:,':;::;ii!:::119().gitikli:90.9',:'.,19..:PP,..;.:;.:E.,,I.:999::::!4190k.NE!.:1::9q.Qi0;i19pg:6.E1.,909,,:::i1900.:':-:;.:1.:900ii,i:.,31;90.0.1,.-.1E:19..00 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 top*UtiLFacto-t.'',,:,,!:.::;.,:,..,,,,,.:: ,.......,ii',':::zii;:.:,..,:::::,...,.:..-::::;::::::!;:,..',iE',t,.,:r.:':,::;',.:',:,:..,:i:,,:;;;,:;.,::::::•:...':::::.'::::i:ri,::(): ... Frt 1.00 0.93 Eit':PtOfeaed.Satgr:s,;::::''it•:::;;Ti.,':.:,;:,;::;,tiii!t:Rn:5ti, ''''?''..,.0 .......,' ''''''):E,'!;::,;,:t''.!,'.,';:::,.! .,,..:4::':g;,65:141001::i.i.',:.!;:'....A Satd. Flow (prof) 3493 4730 Fit PertflttettOtz'mla",,, Wtl:Et' ...... • ..,:,•,,....„,-...,.::„:,...7........,,,,,..... <,:.... ,:,:.4-.4;4,..i..., ,, . ,,f,.5:..,' .„,,,..,,,..,:..,..„,,, 00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3493 4730 2:::04071010,60;tgag,:::'.::',:}1:!,::Si''40.4P.'!.4::';.i0iPqf .., , 500,:ft4E:'„:0Z:;:elt:'.6:::::;;;';':;N:40:*1':i:'gif::',.i;ICieggiOlig4:1:;5:t-,:ti%$. Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.85 0,85 0,85 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.80 0.80 0.80 Adj. RO*:t:010:lttllititia,E:qn:g:'qpMegSg0g:X:fqltit!;i4jgSRtgQ.4oc:q,s2:!:,rgs,:;r,q4..T;14g:E„:ggg:R'.:epamMi44: RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 VA*P100.0:*:N.Otlawit603,-ii..8003.1;ti.&:::,40.9Nfiticr.4..gi$::v3.4-0NOiC.T.,:z6z,426%:.ii:i34..x.o:,:y-g:,):ksto:l.giii8.59-2:RIg::: Turn Type perm :.''.LAoto:::',PAoo:ecg.tiioi::gn*e,ai;:'A-:z,it;v,a:go;.4,,,o,:.,,,t::z:N,j,RKtiivg,p:N:g:m.3',:::!,g;::yA:':'gtAE:-.E1:i:'f,,.:,,:,.4't:tA:::cia4ieo,.ii:RAF: Permitted Phases 8 :.:000togAtookiG teavog,,-;iiiwc:j:',::::::ggiip117,::',14;N:QT1INPR::'..:.. filii,',ZMINS7L,NEF'ZiggiWii;,0-4.51;1Vi.71.8Y-IIME Effective Green, g (s) 20.2 71.8 ;:::,....,„..PPCOtc1134,t*fggaEK:KkgKtg:::kRg:;OZ:t::.!:;:tg4:filg:glcpQMVgm,:.,::,..:,''e:j;:,:e5,::t!jF;.ATz,;::.;:-.Aiaik Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension ..,,Ea:,,,,,,,,;i:,,,, -i':,.:,:a3,,,ggiitaAti-E22::!eg:!,,E;:,5;;EI:':,3:,:.:4N.4Zilt,:.;t:":,,f:A.':-P...,,,A4:g.,i.,::45;!:ii:.:4,4.4,:erZar,'::;';,-',, Lane Grp Cap (vph) 706 3396 qkg;evolp:fomz,,,ExtasmfFvmgir,.ij'i.,-;1:w;,:.::,si:,,g5,t Tiettgogmgggktsvoxfwig,givatvitgfioniHwgoFztpw v/s Ratio Perm 6.16 WgSO#§AptipfPtif.figriRtjfVSEU;NEP; :tegrfig*oq..,:6,A =:!R13:ti'39:'Agimtn::EtggeaiixrllijNq',,Agf::,...0.25 ..,:.,„ Uniform Delay, di ..„ 37.3 .„... 4.9 Progression Factor ''"'''-;Vk;;:Vi!A'i-09g.tAiat:KO::::RA:*:tir:--gOE''ZVti!:ee:::,;%;Alir),,„,:!:.,',A1:iei1 Incremental Delay, di 3.7 0,2 cl,<:".00$401140ntitigy.'4fligg,i'-K-i1.5-FigiFe0s.;',4e:.!ktiRe:::,,fig2,',Kt:;$8A,,,:,,, :::;z:5t.:;:lii.M.SQC:E.,:i065,10.0.FIgt1,2k;E:00$0INSICI Level of Service D A i10:q§*ci::§jkf:liki2A-SIg,Ntatfi:9*C:ti,:.,';-1:Asif-gEia!:igioioA,*;ioiggq.g;iFiNotg:::f,gl:'gqAitRAVV:g5:Neeig:':', Approach LOS A D A A KntYllt--Xe '4W..t:ir4g4:-ZAV5:11.IFWW",::;4FWV4rfS't5,k'n:P*V:W'*e*-2%h'''Ia''t;914P4M':Z;:f:ej'V't.W:aeif -,-"tiNf"41.1gra"-alS144-f-'"WO".; HCM Average Control Delay 18.1 HCMLevel of Service 700f Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0... Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Analysis Period (min) 15 c CritcaI Lane Group GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2010 PM Future Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE 4th Street & Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) 1 Lane Config i 0: Total Lost tip ..... ........... Frt Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.64 0.64 Tum Type PermittedF Phases Actutir; Effective Green, g Actuated Clearance Time (s) 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions .64 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, di Incremental D`e1a Level of Service Delay, d2 Approach LOS 623 36.6 1.1 4660 0.24 4.8 0.2 HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle 1nterset0nif Analysis Period ength (s) 40.,y t i of (min) 13.6 HCM Level of Service 00.0 Su 5 of lost time (s) eve ; f S rviei 8.0 G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHROt2010 PM Future Total:sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimsey -Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCMSignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 4th Street & Biscayne Boulevard. Southhcund Lane Configurations Total Lcsst time • Lane Frt 611 3221 169 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions 4.0 6366 l Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 .9 RTOR Reduction (vph) Turn Type Prot ct Permitted Phases Effective Green, g ate Clearance Time (s) custo 4.0 Perm 4.0 9.1 4.0 72.9 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) vfs Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 Incremental Delay, d2 Approach LOS 308 615 324 0.07. 0.05 33.1 ry 33.0 34.4 0.1 0.0 0.4 4641 4.4 0.1 HCM Average Control Delay i .M Iu y a cot ra Actuated Cycle Length (s) tizati Intersection'; ap c Analysis Period (rein HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) GA043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO12010 PM Future Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3f 26/2007 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE 3rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard (Northbound) f 1. 4— Lane Configurations Ideal;;F"IcAy= .v Total Lost time Frt 0 t. 0:� 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions 411 4.0 8 0.99 4/ 00 Peak -hour factor. PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction Turn Type Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Aefiai Clearance Tiri-ie(s) v is Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm w ✓ V v1c tat J`':` Uniform Delay, di Incremental Delay, d2 . U Level of Service Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay I -IC ti -; i)ur = Capacit r t Actuated Cycle Length (s) WOW*. o apac t 1til z ti i Analysis Per Critie 4.4 :40 100.0 5 Perm HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ovet i 76.0 4752 0.31 4.1 24.0 G i043100000 e 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO\2010 PM Future Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 3rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard (Southbound) 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations Tote Satd. Flo Satd. Flow Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 1610 3390 6200 1610 3390 6200 .88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 31 Turn Type rot Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Clearance Time (s). Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s t% tw zt vfs Ratio Perm Perm 16.0 16.0 4.0 4.0 Uniform Delay, d1 lo ress Incremental Delay, d2 Approach LOS 258 542 0.02 35.4 38.2 0.0 0.6 76.0 tr7f 4.0 4712 3.6 0.1 HCM Average Control Delay Actuated Cycle Length (s) I itei s ctt t Utif Analysis Period (min) 12.5 HCM Level of Service 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) eccsi't 15 8.0 G:1043100000 - 330 SiscaynelCalcs\SYNCHRO12010 PM Future Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HOM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 22: NE 4th Street & Exit Driveway p 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions Lane Configurations nt Grade Peak Hour aG Pedestrians walking Speed (fill Right turn flare (veh e Median storage veh pX, platoon unblocked v >confl€cting volume vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2'coi f of l ` vCu, unblocked vol p0 queue free % cl= w........ ... s otu Volume Left Volume:%Riga cS I -I of rte;t pacEf Queue Length (ft) ri` trot Delay ane LOS ro Approach LOS fp at 700 64 100 40 700 857 0. 5 0% tit 179 95 64 98 Average Delay ]nte sectiotr pa' t It zai Analysis Period (min 2.3 G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs\SYNCHRO12010 PM Future Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Unsignalizec tersection Capacity Analysis 20: NE 3rd Street & Service Driveway Lane Config Sign: onto Grade ctie>'(ve1hf1 Peak Hour Factor Pedestrians nee, Walking Speed Per ent BIoc Right turn flare Fsetha 1 Median storage veh) .lstream;siga1;(t)'':; pX, platoon unblocked vC>confl t :v(lurt e: vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked Vol tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % Fait Volume Left .................... . Volume cSH ol Queue Length (ft) ControlCgfitri*PeleY ( Lane LOS Ap e ath et Approach LOS (v. f ee 0% 0%.. :8:<:;: .92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 335 359 100 700 1700 833 0% 347 179 100 98 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions Average Delay Itesectio apacit;Etllizatiir Analysis Period 0.4 15 vel'o G:\043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Caics\SYNCHRO\;2010 PM Future Totai.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kirriey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis NE 3rd Street & Exit Drivewa Grade .uT' e i Peak Hour Fac Pedestrians es . Walking Spee ercni right turn flare edai_ Median storage veh 1p trearn g l ( pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol u: stag ft uCu, unblocked voi , 2 stage (s) 88 p0 queue free % 100 Volume Volume cSH Volume t ; G a%c t Queue Length (ft) Contro Lane LOS tact. Approach LOS 1700 1700 944 944 88 94 100 82 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions Average Delay lr tersOcf o - Analysis Period 4.4 G:1043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Caics\SYNCHRO12010 PM Future Totai.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007 HCM Unsignlized intersection Capacity Analysis 17: NE 3rd Street & Entrance Driveway Lane Configurations Si Grade Hoak Hour Factor I o ry o ue (vph) Pedestrians alking Speed ':ereer Right turn flare ediai;ty Median storage veh pX, platoon unblocked vC 1, stage 1 conf vol 0% 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 vCu, unblocked vol 380 tC, 2 stage (s) t,, s p0 queue free % oturn Volume Val rne;i cS H t turne j Queue Length (ft) C;orttro wDela (.}. Lane LOS picy<:t Approach LOS 100 1700 1700 0% 92 0.92 224 124 100 100 2010 PM Peak Hour Future Total Traffic Conditions Average Delay InterseWn Analysis Period 0.0 G:,043100000 - 330 Biscayne\Calcs'\,SYNCHRO\2010 PM Future Total.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3/26/2007