HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Resoa i onin
oar
esolutlon o.: 07-0073
Monday, July 30, 2007
Mr. Joseph H.Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO AMEND PAGE NO.
36, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401,
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM SD-16.2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN-PARK WEST
COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO SD-16.2 SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN-
PARK WEST COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WITH AN SD-19 DESIGNATED
F.A.R. OVERLAY DISTRICT, F.A.R. OF 4.6, FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 525 AND 533 NORTHWEST 2ND AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED
AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin Away
Mr. Ron Cordon No
Mr, Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Away
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina No
Mr. Cornelius Shiver Away
Mr, Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 5
NAY: 2
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 3
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 5-2
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 07-00795zc Z.7
LAEXH
LEGAL .DESCRIPTION:
The North 100.00 feet of Lots 4, 5 and 6,
Block 65-N of: "MIAMJ NORTH'
according to the Plat Thereof as recorded in
Plat Book B at Page 41, of the Public
Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The South 5OE00 feet of Lots 4
Block 65-N of: "MIAMI NOI
according to the Plat Thereof a
Plat Book B at Page 41, of the
Records of Miami -Dade Coun
5 and 6,
TI-1"
recorded in
blic
, Florida.
Circle appropriate condition .5
When pertaining to the feioning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shalt show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed chance is h harmony with the establ shed land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
0 The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to .adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
1). The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) it is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already perm,: g such use.
Motion: r onsidering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinan , I move that the
reque t d item # be recommended to the City Commission f approval) ,tdenial).
1g
Print Name
\
Agenda Item /
- ei
Date