Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibitRevised Draft P08-243 :4mcndi►j Ar0501358 AMENDMENT 141 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT By and Between The Cit- of Miami, Florida and Edward D. Stone. Jr. and Associates. Inc.. dlbia EDSA This Amendment No. 1 ("Amendment No.1") is entered into this day of , 200 (but effective as of , 200_, being the "Effective Date") is amending, reinstating if necessary, continuing, and extending the Professional Services Agreement which became effective January 20, 2006 (the "Original Agreement") by and between the City of Miami, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, whose address is 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 10th Floor, Miami, Florida 33130 ("City") and Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates, Inc. d/b/a EDSA, a Florida corporation whose principal address is 1512 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 110, Fort Lauderdale„ Florida 33301("Provider"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Commission of the City of Miami ("Commission") (i) by Resolution No. 05-0038 adopted on January 13, 2005, accepted the recommendations of the City Manager approving the findings of the Evaluation Committee pursuant to Request for Qualifications No. 03-04-028 and all addenda thereto (collectively, the "RFQ") which designated Provider as the most qualified to provide a Master Plan for Virginia Key for the City's Department of Parks and Recreation (the "Plan") and Revised Draft 08-243 1 authorized the City Manager to negotiate a Professional Services Agreement with Provider. (ii) Resolution No. 05-0372. adopted on tune 9. 2005. recognized that :he City has committed to a broad range of master plans (which include those involving the Plan) that will result in more predictable, better balanced growth and pledged to citizens of Miami that the Master Plans and the Capital Improvement Projects will be implemented and completed in a timely manner and maintained at a high level to meet the demands of growing urban areas and will be ongoing to keep pace with growth and related issues by a regional approach, and (iii) by Resolution No. 05-0606, adopted November 3, 2005, authorized the City Manager to enter into the Original Agreement with Provider (a copy of which is attached hereto, made a part hereof, and incorporated hereby as Composite Exhibit A) under the terms and conditions set forth therein in an amount not to exceed Seven Hundred and Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($775,000)(the "Original Approved Maximum Amount"); and WHEREAS, the RFQ, Resolution No. 05-0038, Resolution No. 05-0373, Resolution No. 05-0606, and —the -Original -Agreement-contemplate (1) that due to the nature of the Virginia Key Master Plan processes, additional public meetings and follow- up with the City and the public, which in turn require related increased Services from Provider, may be necessary, and accordingly the Original Agreement may be amended and extended beyond the original 18-month period in order to complete services, and (2) that such additional services may require additional cost to the City beyond the Original Approved Maximum Amount; and WHEREAS, the City Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 08- adopted , 2008 has authorized the City Manager to execute and the City Revised Dian 08-243 2 and the Provider both desire to enter into this Amendment No. 1 to the OrOnal .acreelnenl in order to clnc°nd. reinstate 1t nece? n . continue. and extend the On,)ina1 ,Agreement term through September 30, 2008 and to increase the Original Approved Maximum Amount by an authorized amount not to exceed One Hundred and Forty -Five Thousand Dollars to a new total authorized amount not exceeding Nine Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars (S920,000.00) (the "Approved Maximum Amount") as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, Provider and the City agree as follows: TERMS: 1. RECITALS AND INCORPORATIONS: The recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Amendment No. 1 to the Original Agreement. The Original Agreement and all attachments thereto are hereby incorporated, made a part of this Amendment No. 1, and attached hereto as "Composite Exhibit A", including: the City's RFQ as Exhibit "A" to the Original Agreement; . the Scope of Services, including the Budget, Schedule and List of Sub -Consultants as Exhibit "B" to the Original Agreement; the Insurance Requirements as Exhibit "C" to the Original Agreement; Provider's Corporate Resolution as Exhibit "D" to the Original Agreement, and the Compensation as Exhibit "E" to the Original Agreement.. Amended Exhibit A, Amended Exhibit B, Amended Exhibit C, Amended Exhibit D, Amended Exhibit E, and the City's Resolutions No, 05-0038, No.05-0373, No. 05-0606, and No. 08- as Composite Exhibit F are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Amendment No. 1 to the Original Agreement. Amendment No. 1 and the Original Agreement, Revised Draft 08-243 3 including all Exhibits to Amendment No. 1 and the Original Agreement. shall collectively be referred to and shall collectively ion;; the "Agrec°me;;t-. 2. TERM: Section 2 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended, reinstated if necessary, continued and extended as follows: The term of the Original Agreement is hereby amended, extended, reinstated if necessary, and continued past the eighteen (18) months originally contemplated by the Original Agreement, and shall terminate on September 30, 2008 (the "Amended Expiration Date"). In the event that Provider is engaged in any Services on the Amended Expiration Date, then the Agreement shall remain in effect until completion or termination of said Services. No new Work Orders for new or additional services for costs beyond the Approved Maximum Amount shall be issued after the Amended Expiration Date; however, the additional term of Amendment No. 1 may be extended or amended past September 30, 2008 by the sole authority of the City Manager by written agreement of the City and Provider in order for Provider to complete the Services within the Approved Maximum Amount. Any new or additional services (a) that are not contemplated by the RFQ, or (b) that would increase the costs for the City beyond the Approved Maximum Amount in Resolution No. 08- adopted , 2008, shall require City Commission approval in order to extend, continue, reinstate, or amend the Agreement. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES: Section 3 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended, reinstated if necessary, continued and extended as follows: A. Provider agrees to provide the Services as specifically described, and subject to the special terms, conditions, budget and schedule set forth in Amended Exhibit B Scope Revised Draft 08-243 4 of Services hereto ("Amended Exhibit B'"), which by this reference is incorporated into and made a part of tllr' Agreement. All 1°1"mats t it the Services are t0 ne adirected m writing from time to time by the City's Project Administrator. B. Provider represents to the City that: (i) it continues to possesses all qualifications, licenses and expertise required for the performance of the Services, including but not limited to full qualification to do business in Florida and full-time professional architect(s) licensed and working in the State of Florida; (ii) it is not delinquent in the payment of any sums due the City, including payment of permits, fees, occupational licenses, etc., nor in the performance of any obligations to the City, (iii) all personnel assigned to perform the Services are and shall be, at all times during the term hereof, fully qualified and trained to perform the tasks assigned to each; (iv) the Services will be performed in the manner, at such times, and for the budgeted amounts described in Amended Exhibit "B", and (v) each person executing this Amendment No. 1 to the Original Agreement on behalf of Provider has been duly authorized to so execute the same and fully bind Provider as a party to this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement. The Provider and the City acknowledge and agree that all other terns, conditions, representations, warranties, and covenants of Section 3 of the Original Agreement remain in full force and effect as amended, reinstated if necessary, continued, and extended by this Amendment No. 1. 4. COMPENSATION: Exhibits B and E of the Original Agreement are hereby amended, reinstated if necessary, continued and extended as attached hereto, incorporated hereby and made a part hereof as Amended Exhibit B and Amended Exhibit E. The Provider and the City acknowledge and agree that all other terms, Revised Draft 08-243 5 conditions. representations, warranties, and covenants of Section 4 of the Original Agreement rernaln :;: 11.1ii tore(' and e.ttect a, amended. reinstated i1 .7ec ssai continued, and extended by this Amendment No. 1. 5. UPDATES OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CORPORATE RESOLUTION. Provider has updated its insurance requirements as Amended Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof and its cotTorat. ; esolution as An -,ended Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF ORIGINAL AGREEMENT REMAIN REINSTATED IF NECESSARY, CONTINUED, AND EXTENDED. The Provider and the City acknowledge and agree that all other terns, conditions, representations, warranties, and covenants of the Original Agreement remain in full force and effect as amended, reinstated if necessary, continued, and extended by this Amendment No. 1., including all Exhibits to both the Original Amendment and this Amendment No. 1, to form the entire Agreement.. This instrument and its exhibits and 'attachments constitute the sole and only agreement of the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and correctly set forth the rights, duties, and obligations of each to the other as of its date. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations, or representations not expressly set forth in this Amendment No. 1 and the Original Agreement as they collectively form the Agreement are of no force or effect. 7. COUNTERPARTS: This Amendment to the Original Agreement may be executed in three or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original but all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same agreement. Revised Dafi 08-243 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be eNeculed by lhelr respecn\i 01 ;C above written. ATTEST: Priscilla A. Thompson, City Clerk ATTEST: Print Name: Title: (Corporate Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Jorge L. Fernandez City Attorney ll reulilo duly authorized. i] the day olio \ eL: "City" CITY OF M1AMI, a municipal corporation By: Pedro G. Hernandez, City Manager "Provider" Edward D. Stone, Jr. & Associates, Inc., d/b/a EDSA a Florida corporation By: Print Name: Title: (Authorized Corporate Officer) APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: LeeAnn Brehm Risk Management Director Revised Draft 08-243 7 COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A" (10 he included upon document e?;eculion) Inclusive of : Original Agreement with Exhibits: A — City RFQ B — Scope of Services C — Compensation ll — Insurance Requirement E — Provider's Corporate Resolution Revised Draft 08-243 AMENDED EXHIBIT "B" - SCOPE OF SERVICES including Fees. Schedule and fist of Sub -Consultants SCOPE OF SERVICES Virginia Key Master Plan Due to recent changes in direction from the City of Miami to integrate increased public participation the planning process will be expanded to include up to two (2) more meetings/presentations, pre -meetings with staff and government officials as well as extended planning and design services. More specifically, the proposed scope of services for additional services will involve the following: Task 1: Preparation for Additional Meetings o Compile and summarize Public Feedback gathered through the Project Website and other sources (i.e. e-mails, faxes, letters, etc) o Manage and produce any presentation materials (i,e. Image Boards, Power Point, etc) o Manage discussion of the additional meetings/presentations, including the meeting agenda/format and coordinate any additional conference calls o Coordinate and attend up to four (4) additional pre-meetings/briefings with the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County, Key Biscayne, and other staff, prior to the last public meeting and the meetings/presentations of the Final Master Plan to the Planning Advisory Board and City Commission. Please note that EDSA will rely upon City of Miami staff to schedule the meetings and to coordinate meeting outreach and venue. o Coordinate and facilitate presentation of project updates and schedule o Coordinate with team members attendance and preparation for each additional meeting/presentation o Update the Virginia Key Website with meeting announcements and other pertinent information Task 2: Additional Meetings o Coordinate with the City of Miami and the Project Team to attend and facilitate up to two (2) additional meetings/presentations. These meetings will be to the Planning Advisory Board and the City Commission. Please note, we have included the following consultants for the additional meetings, EDSA (2 staff members), ERA (one staff member), BRV (one staff member) and ATM (one staff member). Task 3: Additional Planning and Design o Refine Image Boards and Conceptual Land Use Plan per the extended public feedback process o Identify and refine project Preliminary Master Plan Alternatives/Concepts Revised Draft 08-243 9 o Produce any additional supporting diagrams and graphics demonstrating, the alieniaiives. process. land Use. etc. °ordinate and scilydule up to SIX 101 a(iilllional llilcliial deS11211 IC\'le\\'s meetings, and reviews with City Staff o Coordinate and manage planning effort and project team SCOPE OF SERVICES EDSA Virginia Key Beach Park Trust Specific Area Plan We understand that the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust would like to examine planning alternatives to develop a "critical mass" of potential park development to increase the viability of success for the proposed Museum in the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust lands. Working in conjunction with ERA, EDSA will examine and develop up to three (3) preliminary land use alternatives for areas associated with the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust (as indicated in Exhibit A) which will then be refined to one (1) Final Master Plan Concept. More specifically EDSA will: • Coordinate with the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust (including City Planning and Parks and Recreation staff) on potential program ideas and concepts. (Initial meeting (1) to coordinate EDSA / ERA in Miami) • Coordinate with ERA on the economic viability of the proposed Museum (Internal EDSA / ERA) • Develop up to three (3) preliminary land use alternatives with the goal of increasing the economic viability of the proposed Museum. Preliminary design review meeting with City Staff prior to presentation to VKBPT (City / EDSA / ERA) ERA can be conferenced in. (1) meeting.) • Facilitate and attend a design review meeting with Virginia Key Beach Park Trust (including City Planning and Parks and Recreation staff) on the proposed preliminary land use alternatives (meeting (1) EDSA / ERA in Miami) • Refine the three (3) preliminary concepts into one (1) Final Master Plan Concept for the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust lands (as indicated in the attached Exhibit A) and incorporate into the Virginia Key Final Master Plan (Internal EDSA / ERA) (Please note, the timing associated with the inco►poration into the Final Master Plan will for scheduling reasons happen independently of the Virginia Key Master Planning Process) • Facilitate and attend a design review meeting with Virginia Key Beach Park Trust (including City Planning and Parks and Recreation staff), to present the refined Master Plan alternative (meeting (I) EDSA in Miami, ERA can be conferenced in) Revised Draft 08-243 10 • Presentation of Refined Master Plan alternative to Planning Advisory Board and :Miami City Coi-nrnission (2 rneetinps in Miami) Deliverable Final Master Plan Concept to be incorporated into the 'Virginia Key Final Master Plan. Please note that the project includes the facilitation and coordination of meetings with the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust staff, Parks and Recreation Staff and City Planning staff of up to six (6) meetings as described above. Additionally, please note, the above Scope of Services does not propose a complete re-examination or Master - Planning process of the Virginia Key Beach Park Trust Master Plan, merely an examination of a portion of the previously prepared plan that currently indicates an open field area. Please see Exhibit A that indicates the area of study. ERA Virginia Key Beach Park Trust Museum Viability Study Project Understanding & Scope of Services Economics Research Associates understands that the City of Miami, Florida wishes to establish a unique museum experience that inform and enlighten the public on African American culture and history in the United States as part of the development of Virginia Key in Biscayne Bay. Due to the quality and level of experience envisioned for this cultural attraction it is unlikely that all of the operating costs of this destination attraction would be covered by earned revenues generated by the potential visitor market size available to this museum. Therefore, the City of Miami wishes to understand what level of funding would be required to sustain the gap in operating expense requirements for the museum and to identify where and how these funds could be generated from other activities recommended for Virginia Key by Economics Research Associates in there prior "best and highest" use assessment. To achieve this gap funding analysis, ERA would recommend creating a benchmark model for a potential museum concept including potential visitation, space and staffing requirements and sources and amounts of potential earned revenue. From this benchmarking concept ERA would develop a pro forma operating budget for the museum concept, project the potential gap in operating funds and match these funding needs to potential revenue levels provided by the alternative recreational uses identified for Virginia Key in ERA's prior study. To address these study needs, ERA has developed the following proposed scope of services. • Revised Draft 08-243 11 Phase Tack' 1. Orientation At the beginning of the project, ERA will meet with the client to discuss the study objectives, review the scope of work and schedule, identify key contacts, identify client responsibilities for the provision of data, and to discuss other aspects of the project that will help guide the consultant team to complete a thorough analysis. At that time, ERA will also review all past assessments, petitions and efforts (as available) for the development of a museum or cultural attraction within the City of Miami and Dade County. ERA will document the past studies chronologically and match the assessments to concurrent population and cultural conditions that existed at the time of the studies. We will then identify factors for consideration that would impact or direct the development of an African American experience museum on Virginia key based on the current market conditions. Task 2. Analysis of Local Museum Experiences ERA will assess and document all selected relevant museum destinations within the City of Miami and Dade County to gain an understanding of the market demand and performance of these cultural destinations. Data point will include the type of museum experience, the level of attendance, earned revenue, staffing, operating budgets and facility size. This information will provide the basis for determining potential demand available in the Miami and Dade County market for a new museum on Virginia Key. Task 3. Comparable African American Focused Museums Assessment ERA, in consultation with the client, will identify up to five (5) comparable African American Museums experiences currently operating in the United States. As possible, ERA will identify museums in communities with similar populations sizes, demographics profiles and cultural requirements and offerings. We will interview these institutions and their managing authorities to gain insight into their: sources of operating funds; facility and venues size, market strengths and weaknesses staffing and operating costs, to contribute to the establishment of a benchmark museum concept to use in the assessment of a museum to be offered on Virginia Key, Florida. ERA will identify conditions and situations among the surveyed museums that are similar or different to the conditions that will affect Virginia Keys potential museum concept. Task 4. Creation of Museum Benchmark Model for Virginia Key Based on the findings from Tasks 2 and 3, ERA will compile this research to create a benchmark museum concept including venue size and potential attendance that, in turn, will be used to create a hypothetical pro forma operating budget. The pro forma budget model for the Virginia Key museum concept will reflect stabilized operating conditions for the concept museum including: ■ Estimated annual revenues to be generated from earned revenue sources. This will include ticket revenues, and depending upon the program recommendations, also may include food service, memberships, and event space rentals; museum store; special exhibits and "second gate" visitor experiences. • Annual costs necessary to operate and market the center. Revised Diafl 08-243 12 • Total estimated annual operating gap funds required from public and/or private source The funding heap (or surplus) identified will provide the basis for assessing the viability of other revenue generating activities identified for Virginia Key to assist the sustainability of the museum concept. Task S. Museum Funding Feasibility Assessment Utilizing the pro fonna operating budget created in Task 4, ERA will review the alternative "best and highest" use alternatives recommended by ERA in its prior Virginia Kev assessment report to identify those revenues activities which: 1. Can sustain their own operations and maintenance of facilities; and if possible; 2. Can completely or partially contribute to the annual operating shortfall identified for the Virginia Key museum concept Should none of the alternatives completely cover the operating funds gap for the Virginia Key museum concept, then ERA will quantify the remaining annual funding gap and what it would require to cover through public or private funding including an endowment alternative based on current market rates of return. Task 6. Final Report and Presentation (Deliverables) ERA will compile the findings and analyses from the prior tasks and provide the client with a written report that will summarize findings, recommendations, and budget requirements in a draft written report for review by the client. The report will include all back up analysis and the best practices identified for the Virginia Key museum concept based on the comparables assessment. Upon receipt of a consolidated set of comments on the draft report, ERA will make any necessary revisions and submit one digital and ten hard bound copies of the final report. ERA will also present a summary of its findings and answer questions in Miami to city officials and other interested parties designated by the city at a time and place designated by City. Schedule and Staffing During the course of the work, ERA would expect to meet with the client as described above. Meetings in Miami will include ERA Project Manager and Sandy Bellamy, Principal, International Heritage Resources: at the beginning of the project, at Preliminary Design Alternatives presentation and for a presentation of the Final Report to PAB and Miami City Commission, for a total of 4 meetings in Miami. As described in the EDSA scope, ERA will participate in phone conferences during: Preliminary design review meeting and presentation of the refined Master Plan alternative. ERA will coordinate with EDSA as needed to accomplish project goals. Revised Draft 08-243 13 Any additional meetings requested by the client would be billed on a time and materials basis 3i standard hourly rates based ('ar)ro\:1 of a `oJk AUI hoJrJa:lon Leiter" by the Cit\. Based on the anticipated detail and analysis involved with this study. ERA would expect this project to take 90. days from acceptance of the proposal to the delivery of a draft report for review and comment by the City of Miami. Fees: invoices will be processed monthly based on percentage of completion of specific tasks identified in the aforementioned Scopes of Services. Sub -Consultants remain unchanged from the list provided in the Original Agreement being amended, continued, reinstated, and extended by this Amendment No. 1. Revised Draft 08-243 14 TO Be Checked by Risk Management AMENDED EXHIBIT "C"—INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -Edward D. Stone, Jr. Associates, Inc., d/b/a/ EDSA I. Commercial General Liability A. Limits of Liability Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability Each Occurrence General Aggregate Limit Personal and Adv. Injury Products/Completed Operations B. Endorsements Required $1.000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 City of Miami included as an Additional Insured Employees included as insured Contractual Liability Independent Contractors Coverage Waiver of Subrogation I1. Business Automobile Liability A. Limits of Liability Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability Combined Single Limit Any Auto Including Hired, Borrowed or Non -Owned Autos Any One Accident $ 1,000,000 B. Endorsements Required City of Miami included as an Additional Insured Employees included as insured III. Worker's Compensation Limits of Liability Statutory -State of Florida Waiver of Subrogation IV. Employer's Liability A. Limits of Liability $100,000 for bodily injury caused by an accident, each accident Revised Draft 08-243 15 S100,000 for bodily injury caused by disease, each employee S500.000 for bodily iniur: caused'-\ disease- neliCV limit V. Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions Coverage Combined Single Limit Each Claim General Aggregate Limit Deductible- not to exceed 10% S 1,000,000 S 2,000,000 The above policies shall provide the City of Miami with written notice of cancellation or material change from the insurer not less than (30) days prior to any such cancellation or material change. Companies authorized to do business in the State of Florida, with the following qualifications, shall issue all insurance policies required above: The company must be rated no less than "A" as to management, and no less than "Class V" as to Financial Strength, by the latest edition of Best's Insurance Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Oldwick, New Jersey, or its equivalent. All policies and /or certificates of insurance are subject to review and verification by Risk Management prior to insurance approval. Revised Draft 08-243 16 Amended EXHIBIT "D" — CORPORATE RESOLUTIONS (10 be included upon document e'ecittlon) Revised Draft 08-243 17 AMENDED EXHIBIT E — COMPENSATION Pursuant to Resolution No. 0S- , adopted , 2008. the Seven Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Dollars and No Cent ($775,000.00) original authorized amount is herein amended and increased by One Hundred Forty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($145,000.00) for a new amended authorized maximum amount not to exceed Nine Hundred Twenty Thousand and No Cents ($920,000.00) (the "Approved Maximum Amount") Revised Draft 08-243 18 COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "F" it0 be included upon document ey:ecutioni Inclusive of : City Resolutions Nos. 05-0038 05-0373 05-0606 08- Revised Draft 08-243 19