HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Resoa onin oar
esolution o.: 07-0084
Monday, September 24, 2007
Mr, Miguel Gabela offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED DENIAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION
TO AMEND PAGE NO, 30, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL FOR THE PROPERTIES
LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 5711 NORTHWEST 2ND STREET AND 212 & 220
NORTHWEST 57TH AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY
ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Bret Berlin,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin Yes
Mr. Ron Cordon No
Mr, Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza No
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez No
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Away
Mr. Cornelius Shiver No
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 5
NAY: 4
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms, Fernandez: Motion carries 5-4
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secre ry
Hearing Boards
File 1D#: 07-00790zc
Z.6
Exhibit A
Lots i 6, i 7. i.8, t9. and 20, Block 19 of WEST i AGLGR PARK'', a ;cording the
Flat thereof, as rec ded in Plat Book 8, at Page 96, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade
County. Florida.
Circle appropri ac conditirar
r,.
When pe idinriq to the rezoning o! land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicabie, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scaie with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to, adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No, 11000 . a.._
request o p da item # be recommended to the City Commission for (approval)(denia
Sign/ure Print Name
Agenda item
Date