Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board Resolution No.: 07-0105 Monday, November 19, 2007 Mr, Bret Berlin offered the following resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION TO AMEND PAGE NO, 9, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-9 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 7300 NORTHEAST 6TH COURT, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Upon being seconded by Mr. Miguel Gabela, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. Bret Berlin Yes Mr. Ron Cordon No Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Away Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez Away Mr, Juvenal A. Pina Away Mr. Cornelius Shiver Away Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes AYE: 5 NAY: 1 ABSTENTIONS: 0 NO VOTES: 0 ABSENT: 4 Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 5-1 Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Sec Hearing Boards File ID#: 07-01152zc Z.2 EXHIBIT "A© THE EAST 123 FEET OF BLOCK 6, OF BELLE MEADE OF M1AM SECTION 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN THE PLAT BOOK 56, PAGE 27, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAN1-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. MIA 179735479,11 9.17/2007 Circle apprt priaie condiiionis When penal; it g to the re2on np of and under application made under Particle 22, the report and recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered, where applicable, whether or not: a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Cornprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment, b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district. d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc. f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to .adjacent areas as the existing classification. I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance 00, I move that the request on agenda item # be recommended to the City Commission forte :(denial). Agenda Item Date