HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Approximately 7300 NE 6th Court
CASE NO: 07-01152zc
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an
amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
The subject property is comprised of several lots fronting NE 6th Court (A
complete legal description is on file at the Hearing Boards Office) from and R-3
"Multifamily Medium- Density Residential" to C- "Restricted Commercial".
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that in this specific area, the character of NE 6`h Court is residential,
specifically R-3 "Multifamily Medium -Density Residential".
• It is found that a zoning change at this location may set a negative precedent and
create a "domino effect" in regards to future zoning change applications south of the
subject properties.
• It is found that the requested change will represent an intrusion of commercial uses
into a medium density residential portion of 6th Court.
• It is found that the "R-3 "Multifamily Medium -Density Residential" designation
allows 65 residential units per acre and the requested Cl-"Restricted Commercial"
designation will allow a maximum density of 150 residential units per acre.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending denial of the
application as presented.
Yes No NIA.
n
L
n
n
®
nalysis for
t
File ID: 07-01152zc
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood
or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density
pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities
such as schools, utilities, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change
necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the
neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not
affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the
existing classification.
(� k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to
adjacent areas as the existing classification.
®
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the
adjacent area as the existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accord with existing regulations.
l n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as
to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the
protection of the public welfare.
I
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited
under existing zoning.
E n p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.