The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutExhibit42/4/02 r • RE'SOLUTICN NC. 0 2 - 144 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE F.ECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED IRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "3" DESIGNATED PROJECTS FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY IN RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A" FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS. • BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Feo'1est for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional engineering construction management services for Public Works.Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2C04, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: The Corradino Group, Inc. 2. Nova Consulting Inc. 3. Marlin Engineering Inc. 4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc. 5. Cam$ Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. PBS&J (ALTERNATE) r., V r r r, • ••.. r ^ , ;..: .• e; P. , iu CITY COMIIISION MEET of FEB 1 Zi 2002 13,401 :um tip ?'.et.y.nage= to approve the findings c, the selection committee, pursuant Request for rrcoosals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional ADA requirement services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 20�4, __sted herein in rank order, are accepter: . PBS6J 2. R 0 Architects .y Planners, Inc. 3. Gur=_ Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE) Section 3. The recommendation of the City Manager tc approve the findings of the selection committee,, pursuant tc Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architedtural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Consultants, Inc.) 2. Indigo Service Corporation Section 4. - The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architecture services for Public works Category "B" designated projects. for 2002 through 2004, fisted herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. Gurr_ Matute PA 2. Zyscovic) , Inc. 3. R.J. .'-'eisenbottle Architects, P.A. 4. R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc. 5. BernelI_o, Ajami. a Partners, Inc. 6. PBSJ (ALTERNATE) Page 2 of 7 (ALTERNATE) 02- 144 recommendat.ion- ....of.... the.. Citt`.: approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms tc provide p=ofessiona: environmenta_. engineering services for Public Wcrks Category "B" designated projects foz 2002 through 2004, 14sted herein in rank order, are accepted: ,. ATC Groap Services Inc. 2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 3. URS Corporation 4. BND Engineers, Inc. 5. Nova Consulting Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of :he selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide orcfessional general engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 2. Kunde, Sprecher & Associates, Inc. 3. Metric Engineering, Inc. 4, pss&J 5. Marlin Engineering, Inc. 6. FRS Engineering Corp. 7.- URS Corporation (ALTERNATE) S. Ximiey-Horn, and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 7. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 3 of 7 02- 144 f r .e�....architec ure�= se�vices--:_f�o_:.._�-Pub =_c.�_.ij,t=,, , �;„..'..:�.�.� ��, Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: Falcon & 3•.:eno 2. Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. 3. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4. EDAW, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 8. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional mechanical engineering services for Public Works Category "P" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A. 2. Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc. I Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE) Section 9. The recommendation cf the City Manager :o approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional structural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. San Martin Associates, Inc. 2. Avart, Inc. 3. EAC Consulting, Inc. Section 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection_ committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 4 of 7 f194 A A es px,o f e ss or a.l.... surue.ying,. and, map.p_ng..,...s.erv.ice.s:_..;_ Categ�=y "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. Fernando Z. Gatell P. L. S., Inc. 3. Weidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A. 4, Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc. 5. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. 6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc. Section 11. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc Request fcr Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional value analysis and cost estimate services far Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, '_+seed herein in rank order, are accepted: ;. A2 Group, Inc. 2. PBS&J 3. Grace & Naeern Uddin (ALTERNATE) Section 12. The recommendation of the City •Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide professional air conditioning services for Pubic Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is accepted: Grace & Naeem Uddin Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide Page 5 of 7 02- 144 p_r9` A,1, 4, l ..k.5.a ? ,y_.se.rvice..; es P.uA 1c.. 11017.ks... Category..°`.�"... designated projects for 2002 through 2C04, listed herein =s accepted: 1. Gurri Matute, P.A. Section 14. The recommendation cf the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc Request for Proposals, as to the most Qualified firms to provide professional roofing services for Public Works Category "3 designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 3ullding Diagnostics Associates, PA 2.=rterr.ationa_ Logistics Group Section 15. The City Manager is authcrizedl' to negotiate and execute Prcfessional• Services Agreements, in a fcrm, acceptable to the City Attorney, with each firm .in an amount not to exceed the amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each specialty for each firm, with funds al-ocated from individual project accounts. :he herein authorization .s further subject to compliance with all requirements that may be imposec by the City Attorney, including but not '_irr.:ed to those presnribed by applicable City Charter and Code provisions. Page 6 of 7 02-. 144 1 Re.sodu.ti,on. immediately upon its ac.option and signal. re c. the Mayor.V PASSED AND ADOPTED -.his 14th ATTEST: Sy1v4 Scheider Acting Cit -lerk A= PRD D A: TO ,FORM AND CORRECTNESS : day of February 7/',!. ANDRO VILARELLC .+. ATTORNEY 15975:_E , 2CO2, M?NUEL A. DIAZ, MA If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective a= the end of ter. calendar days from the date it Was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolu=ion, it shall become effective immediately upon override o: she ve:o by the City Commission. Page 7 of 7 02-- 144