HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Resoa
Zoning oar
esolution a.: 07-0062
Monday, July 9, 2007
Mr, Juvenal A, Pina offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED DENIAL TO AMEND PAGE NO. 35,
OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401. SCHEDULE OF
DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-
3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN SD-12 BUFFER
OVERLAY DISTRICT TO C-1 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-25
SOUTHWEST 8TH STREET SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT, FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1118 SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET; FROM C-1
RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-25 SOUTHWEST 8TH STREET SPECIAL
OVERLAY DISTRICT TO SD-14 LATIN QUARTER COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL,
AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 1151 SOUTHWEST 8TH STREET; FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY
MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN SD-12 BUFFER OVERLAY DISTRICT TO
SD-14 LATIN QUARTER COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL, AND RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICTS, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1152
SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET; AND FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL WITH AN SD-12 BUFFER OVERLAY DISTRICT TO C-1 RESTRICTED
COMMERCIAL WITH AN SD-25 SOUTHWEST 8TH STREET SPECIAL OVERLAY
DISTRICT, FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1124, 1136 AND
1140 SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY
ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Angel Urquiola,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin Yes
Mr. Ron Cordon Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia No
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Away
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Cornelius Shiver Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE:
NAY:
ABSTENTIONS:
NO VOTES:
ABSENT:
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 8-1
8
1
0
0
1
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 07-00049zc
Z.4
1
.EGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 4, 5 AND 6, LESS THE NORTH 70 FEET, BLOCK 30, "AMENDED PLAT OF
BLOCK 30 OF EMORY J. CARTER'S RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 27 JP.. 30 OF THE
LAWRENCE ESTATE LAND CO.'S SUBDIVISION" ACCORDING TO THE PLAT ,j
THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 40, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORID/V
LE AL E. pT!O.�_
LOT 14, BLOCK 30,
AMENDED PLAT OF BLOCKLKV RE OF
EMO Y J.
LANCOCARTERpS
RESI BDIVISIQN OF BLOCKS 27 & 30 OF THE
SUBDIVISION" ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THE
REOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
6, PAGE 40, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-LADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF, FOR ROAD PURPOSES,
LE AL E SCRIP
LOT 7, BLOCK 30, "AMENDED PLAT OF BLOCK 30 OF EMORY J. CARTER'S
RESUBBIVISION OF BLOCKS 27 & 30 OF THE LAWRENCE ESTATE LAND CO,'S
SUBDIVISION" ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
6, PAGE 40, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 3 LESS THE NORTH 70 FEET, BLOCK 30, "AMENDED PLAT OF BLOCK 30 OF
EMORY J. CARTER'S RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 27 & 30 OF THE LAVVRENCE
ESTATE LAND CO,'S SUBDIVISION" ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 40, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAM1-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA,
Circle approp
a u cono
When pertaining to the rezoning of and under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable; whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, I ove that the
request on agenda item #, be recommended to the City Commission for (approval) denial}:,
S gnature
Agenda Item
Print Narne
Date