Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Notice of Filing Affidavit of Steven ColiaizziIN THE CICRUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO 07-19493 CA 27 JERIN ASSOCIATES, INC. A Florida Corporation Plaintiff, Vs. THE CITY OF MIAMI, Defendant. NOTICE OF FILING AFFIDAVIT OF STEVEN COLAIZZI IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER'S WRIT OF MANADAMUS THE PETITIONER, JERIN ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida Corporation files this, its Notice of the Filing of the Affidavit of Steven Colaizzi in opposition to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and in the Support of Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregeing was sent vial U.S. Mail to Henry Hunnefeld, Esq., Asst. City Attorney, 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 9th Floor, Miami, FL 33131 and by fax to 305-416-1801 on this 5th day of November, 2007. By: GUY SPIEGELMAN, ESQUIRE Counsel for Plaintiffs 28 West Flagler Street, Ste. 400 Miami, Florida 33130 Tel: (305) 373-6634 Fax:(305) :73-6638 /Lk GUYI 7 ELMAN, ESQ. FL BAN • 169689 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO-07-'Tick CA f GERNERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION JERIN ASSOCIATES, INC. VS. CITY OF MIAMI, ET. AL. AFFIDAVIT OF STEVEN COLAIZZI STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE BEFORE ME, a Notary Public authorized to make oaths in the State of Florida, personally appeared Steven Colaizzi, who upon being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. My name is Steven Colaizzi and I am the President of Real World Services, Inc, a Miami, Florida based Information Technology and computer consulting firm. Along with other relevant training, I am a MicrosofP'M Certified Professional and also a certified MicrosoftTM Desktop Support Technician. 2. I have been engaged by Jerin Associates, Inc to opine as to whether the response by the City of Miami to the Public Record Request made by the Petitioner in this action for specific emails of delineated individuals was responsive to the request; whether the requested response conformed with Submitted Into the public record inconnectionwith item on %/ Priscilla SAT Industry recognized standards; and in conclusion whether the response was directed at complying with the request or obfuscating the focus of the request. 3. The request for emails was specific and succinct enough to have permitted a qualified IT tech if he had sought to, to have identified the specific emails requested, including the complete "Mailbox" for each user with pertinent emails in their native folders. These items are needed in this format to establish a chain of transmission and detect if any items are missing, deleted or sanitized. 4. The response was laden with 6,244 easily identifiable quarantined mail notices, resulting in the delivery of thousands of patently irrelevant emails. 5. The format that the response was delivered in rendered it impossible to determine the validity of the e-mails received. More importantly, condensing the data into one large file and not leaving the e-mail in their native folders raises questions regarding whether other relevant, identifiable emails were not provided. 6. The inclusion of the 6,244 quarantined mail notices raises the inference of an effort to engage the recipient in a proverbial effort to have that recipient engage in a wild goose chase, as the need to delete those 6,244 emails was patent, calling into question whether they attempted to avoid the delivery of the requested Public Records Request i.e., emails. 7. It is my professional conclusion that the City of Miami's response to the Public Records Request was not responsive to the request and was Submitted Into the publie recorci in connection n item b z 11on - Priscilla A. ch C rz delivered in a manner rendering it impossible for the recipient to verify if not obsficate the ability of the recipient, Jerin, to receive the requested emails. Not providing the entire "Mailbox" for each user with pertinent emails renders the response fatally incomplete if not purposely evasive. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NA Steve SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIB NOVEMBER, 2007. N GHT. ON THIS `) DAY OF Public State of Florida A arge SAUL CIMBLER MY COMMISSION tf DD715715 ` EXPIRES September 18, 2011 {107) S18b153 FlorldallotaryServlce.com