Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Impact Analysisraf mpa.ct Analysts Pr r Submittal to the Miami Element Miami, Florida Preparedfor: BCRE Elements, LLC Miami, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 2007 Kiitlk:y-i-! n and Associates. Inc. J iiu ry 2007 043070000 • eyHori Associates tc, • Traffic Impact Analysis for Submittal to the City of Miami Element Miami, Florida Prepared for: BCRE Elements, LLC Miami, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 02007 Kin-lev-Horn and Associates.. Inc. January 2007 043070000 • TABLE OF CONT NTS CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY .............................. ...........,,..,.,....,.,.........._......... .... , Level of Service Standard .... Transportation Corridor Level of Service et odo o,..................................................... 7 Intersection Level of ServiceMethodologv........................................................................ S EXISTING CONDITIONS (2006) CAPACITY ANALYSIS 9 Transportation Corridors 9 Intersections . .............. .......... ......... ........ .................. ................. ........................ ...... ........... 1_ BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 14 Background Area Growth 14 Committed Developments______ 14 PROJECT TRAFFIC 17 Existing and Proposed Land Uses 17 Project Access 17 Trip Generation 18 Trip Distribution and Assignment 19 TOTAL (2009 WITH PROJECT) TRAFFIC 21 FUTURE CONDITIONS (2009) CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2, Future (2009) Background Traffic Conditions 23 Future (2009) Total Traffic Conditions 26 PROJECT DRIVEWAY ANALYSIS 29 TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PLAN 30 FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 31 CONCLUSIONS a 2 U:\04 07:;000'--Element M1t'SP\Report'TLA2 doc Pa_f.:e - Janua:r; 007 K miey•Horn and Associat LIST OF IIEN ICI C Appendix ". :Methodology Correspondence Appendix .ti: Traffic Count Data Appendix C: Miami -Dade Transit Data Appendix D: .Existing Conditions (2006) S C.1Iif fi.0 Outputs Appendix E: Growth Trend Analyses Appendix F: Cardinal Trip Distribution Appendix G: Volume Development Worksheets Appendix H: Future Conditions (2009 Without Project) SYNCHi. O 6.0 Outputs Appendix 1: Future Conditions (2009 With Project) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs Appendix J: Future Project Information LIST OF FIGURES Figure .i: Project Location Map .......................................... .......................... 2 Figure 2: intersection Lane Configurations 4 Figure 3: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes6 Figure 4: 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic 16 Figure 5: Project Trip Distribution & Assignment �0 Figure 6: 2009 P.M. Peak .Hour Total Traffic `?2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds 8 Table 2: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes 9 Table 3: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions -- Biscayne Boulevard 11 Table 4: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 12 Table 3: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 13 Table 6: Proposed Trip Generation 18 Table 7: Cardinal Trip Distribution 19 Table 8: Future (2009) Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 24 Table 9: Future (2009) Background P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 25 Table 10: Future (2009) P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 77 Table H: Future (2009) P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 28 0: {)4 070(i00 Eienien ;titi'SP Repot-C,. '.€in_ Page - u janu+EE 2007 N`RODU R N BCRE Elen`ie;nts. LLC is proposing to ConStruet a residential development located at NE 31st Street, near NE =r Avenue, I Mta 31?, Honda, Figure 1 depicts the location 0 Inc project. The current site plans show that 470 residential condominium units are proposed to he constructed. This analysis conservately assumed =I25 condominium units to allow for minor fluctuations on the proposed site plan. Construction is expected to be completed h'' the year 7009. Kiley -Flom and Associates, Inc. has completed this traffic impact analysis for submittal to the City of Miami as part of the Major Use Special Permit (MU?SP) application. The purpose oi' the stud- is to assess the projects impact on the surrounding roadway network and determine if adequate capacity is available to support future demand. The study's methodo€oav is consistent with the requirements outlined by tse City of Miami for traffic studies. This report summarizes the data collection, project trip generation and distribution, and capacity analyses. An initial methodology meeting was conducted with the City of Miami's Traffic Consultant on July 5"', 2006. All methodology correspondence is included in Appendix A. It should be noted that this project was previously referred as ICE 2, G:l 4.J07()t7()(1-EcmentN1USP' epc>rt,'fLA.2.dcc P`i,ye - f January 2007 Kimieyl or(i and Ass at ✓ u. ?),,y,t7i,Ir.., DATA COLLECTION A study ar a was examined for this tr ffic imp act an alvsis commensurate with the anticipated increase in traffic associated with the project. The study area for this project rs defined as; 1-195 (north) NE 20th Street (south) 1-95 (west) Biscayne Bay (east) Additionally, several intersections were examined within the study area including the following: • NE 33rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard ® NE 31s` Street and Biscayne Boulevard NE 79°i Street andBiscayne Boulevard i NE 30th Street and NE 4th Avenue • NE 31.s' Street and NE 4`i' Avenue The following corridors were identified for ara:alysis; • Biscayne Boulevard • NE 29`h Street Lane configurations for each of the examined intersections within the study area are provided in Figure 2. Ci:V_ -007000(i-Element MIS ;Kepnrt0TIA2.dcr_ Page - 3 January 2007 1 ) 1 0 A NE Nd St;f3c-t NE. .32rid Street 01 4. „oe 4 NE .31st Stree slop 41 V NE 31st etrace NE 30th Street Lf 4 vly o ° 41 m NE 29t.h Street FIGURE N RS!.1 c Yvy LEGEND LANE. CONFIGURATION MINI Kimley-Horn and Associates, In Kimiey-Hom PM, peak period (MOO PM to 6:00 P.M.) tUilliTW 1110Veillellt counts \\ere collected at each intersection under study on July 11, 2006 (Tuesday). The study arcs peak hour was determined to occur from 5:00 P.M. to 6:00 'P.M, The traffic count data is included in Appendix B. The MOT peak season conversion factor was applied to the traffic counts to adjust the traffic to peak season conditions. The appropriate peak season conversion factor for when the traffic counts were collected is 1.07, The peak season conversion factor table is also provided in Appendix B. Figuro 3 presents the 2006 peak season transportation corridor volumes (person -trips lflcludn7g transit riders) and peak season turning movement volumes at the study intersections. GA045070000-Element NitISP\Report\TIALdoc Page -5 January 21)07 255 298 (D O f1- J 17 12 4 35 Ni 33rd Street 27 36 27-4 J O W O N m n car.j0' NE 32nd Street ..3 5 24 4---- 42 LEGEND 37'--'-"ti e v N N OD 28—? 22-� w- 0' rn 0, 4.— 26 N 61 as 9 Z R1 E_... .31J :1..f S NE 29th Street FIGURE3 2 P 2I2 PEAK 1-101JR VOLUMES (VEI-IIC{. ES} X,XXX P.M. PEAK HOUR VOI.1JM1-5(PERSON-TRIPS) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Ki r fates. 'snr CAPACITY AN 'SIS METHODOLOGY Level of Seice Standard of service (LOS) 1s the l sure Genera used in trafli impact analysis. Levels of service range from LOS A (free flow with negiieaible delays) to LOS F. (heavily congested with long delay's). The City of Miani has adopted LOS E its minimum level of service standard. Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodolo2v Transportation corridor traffic conditions were examined applyinsz the methodology outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. This methodology considers the person - trip capacity (including transit) for transportation corridors rather than evaluating only the vehicular roadway capacity. Level of service analyses were performed to assess the capacity of the transportation corridors evaluated in this study based on a comparison between person - trip volume and person -trip capacity within the corridors. The analyses of person -trip volumes and person -trip capacities account for both passenger vehicle and transit service within the corridors. Table 1 illustrates the level of service thresholds for each study corridor. The corridor level of service thresholds_ measured in volume (v) to capacity (c) ratios, were developed from the 2002 version of FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook. 0:\D 1 07000)-Element ?:1I. SP\Re �ort0T1A? d c i'c e' - T January 2007 Table 1.: 'Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds LOS Bisc' t3oute v r°d €j NE 29tt' Peak Hour Directional Volume Ratio Thresholds A Peak Hour Directional 'Volume Thresholds Ratio (1) {11 650 0.38 8 480 €0.5 9 1,510 0.88 760 0,94 1.720 1.00 810 1.00 t _ (1) Cannot be ad >1.00 >1.00 even per "Table. 4 ' from FDOT's 2002 Qtaca1i?v/Leve .t'tien'a Intersection Level of Service Methodology Level of service analyses were performed for study intersections using Trafficware's SYNCHRO 6.0 Software, which applies methodologies outlined in the I-Iiglava , Capacity, Manual, 2000 Edition. r ,043O70O0-E]cmen< JSPvReport T PaSe- 'dnuary 2007 Kimle,y43orn and Ass ates--, inc: EXISTING CONDITIONS (2006; CAI Transportation Corridors y%ehicu!ar road Isis Irons and L[ n t i di 5shipf were examined LAj Ui termi e cui ent 1 of service for the transportation corridors examined in this stud', Tabic 2 presents the unadjusted 2006 P.M. peak hour directional trail - volumes, peak season conversion factors, and the 2006 peak season P.M. peak hour direction ? traffic volumes for the study corridors. Corridor count data is included in Appendix B. Table 2: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes Roadway Segments Direction 2006 P.M. Peak Hour i'i Volumes FDOT Peak [ Season Adjustment Factor 2006 Peak Season P.M. Peak our Voila e Biscayne Boulevard NB 1.070 ? 1.07 I ,145 SB 858 9 t 8 NE 29th Street EB 170 1.07 182 Existing transit conditions were examined considering the ridership on and capacity of the Miami -Dade Transit (MDT) bus service operating in the corridors. MDT staff was contacted to obtain the P.M. peak hour ridership and capacities for the bus routes. The only information readily available was the ridership by route on a typical weekday. Therefore, additional research was conducted to determine the transit ridership and capacities in the study corridors. Six (6) Miami -Dade Metrobus routes presently serve the Biscayne Boulevard corridor during the P.M. peak hour. • Route 3 operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. • Route 16 operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. ▪ Route Biscayne Max operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. ▪ Route 95 operates with variable headways in the northbound direction. • Route T operates with 20 minute headways in the northbound direction. • Route 62 operates with 20 minute headways in both directions_ GA04-30700 )0-Element M SI- Kepor-Cv IA2 uric Pagc - 9 January)' 2007 'BiscayneB crship data wgas not Iva able c .• - t .i p; f l' `'e 36. ate. i" heret ors'. ,Route 36 v, as not In;luded in the tr nspor t ation con- dor rinal Vs, s. It should be noted that NE 39'h STrect served by any transb routes In the study area. MITI' staff indicated that Metrobus routes on the studycorridors uti ize oiffcrent [pus types or the sarne ?"oute \viih vsIo at ae capacities. For purposes of this analysis, an a era Te capacity for each route was determined usingdata obtained from Miami -Dade Transit. The ridership capacities for the bus routes were calculated -tor the P.M. peal: hour using the appropriate headways and capacities. Metrohus route maps are included in Appendix C. Table summarizes the transit capacity calculated. Data were obtained to determine existing P.M. peak hour ridership for the identified Metrobus routes. The data reflect typical ridership on the routes using the most recent ridership data available. Table 3 presents the existing P.M. peak hour ridership on the routes studied and the ridership data as obtained from Miami -Dade Transit is included in Appendix C. In order to determine person -trip level of service for the study area's transportation corridors, total person -trip volumes (vehicular and transit) were compared to the total person -trip capacities. The person -trip volume to capacity (v/c) ratios were compared to the person -trip v/e level of service designations outlined in Table I. Table 4 presents the existing transportation corridor level of service. As indicated in Table 4, the transportation corridors have excess person -trip capacity during the P.M. peak hour and operate at acceptable levels of service. C= 430700 1-F !m(Ail li'.5i",RLpon' 10 e-doc ,°'a_ c - I(I ..1 liar y 2007 an : tes, Inc 3: 2006 Pe % . Peak 1-tour is ai4)ade Transit ;ond t s iiscayne 3 Transit Route Information Route 3 Direction of Travel Northbound P.M, Peak Buses Hour per .Headways i Hour nuteS age S Capacity (riders) 58 P.M. Peak Hour Directional .Person -Trip Capacity 232 erage Directional Route Ridershii 140 (35 riders per bus) Sou bound 15 minutes 58 131 04 (26 riders per bus) Route 16 Route 95 Northbound 15 minutes Southbound 15 minutes i 4 53 Northbound Variable 8.5 53 22 212 451 60 (15 riders per bus) 56 (14 riders er bus) 0 (0 riders per bus) Southbound No P.M. operation within the study area Route Biscayne Max Northbound 15 mia`autes 4 60 240 40 (10 riders per bus) St uthbound 15 minutes 4 59 236 Route T Northbound Route 62 Northbound Southbound 20 minutes I 3 53 20 minutes 20 minutes 56 58 159 168 174 52 (13 riders per bus) 45 (15 riders per bus) 27 (9 riders per bus) 12 (4 riders per bus) Total Northbound 26,5 outhbound 15 1,474 854 312 (12 riders per bus) 224 (15 riders per bus) 0 A043€1'tl()()!?_Element Mt SP\ttenort' ) 2.c)o. Page - 11 January 2007 • Kiimley-Horn and Associates. Inc Table 4: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour' Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions 7raffir Imjmrt7.^1r�zllsi� l rincipal Roadways Peak Season Peak [our Roadway Volumes P.M. Peak flour 'transit Rielershi p P.M. Peak Hofer Total Volnnie (V) Person- Tri s P� 1)i:rectional flour Vehicular Capacity Peak Person- Trips tl' p•. P.M. Peak hour Transit Capacity P.M. Hour Total Capacity (C) P.N.I. Peak Hour Excess Ca➢pacity Person- p.. Trips 1,967 1.753 P.M. 1:lour of Service WC Ratio 0.49 0.46 0.22 0,26 PeakP.Me Levei t �S 1D 1) C C: Vehicles Person- Trips (11 P Person- Trips p Vehicles Person- Trips 1 Person- Trips p. 3,882 i r1 NB 1,145 182 213 1.603 1,285 255 298 312 224 - 1,915 1,720 1,720 810 810 2,408 2,408 1,134 1,134 1,47.4 854 - Sit 1,509 3,262 1?13 W11 255 298 1,134 1,134 879 836 - (1) Volumes (vehicles) were convened to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Mianri standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2002 11)(11'Quality/LOS handbook and the Miami -Downtown DRi. Alr , 0700o0-lilr'inent MI ISI'1Repo t\TL\2.doe !'rxge - 12 January 2.00-7 Intersections 11 e`v"HO P.M.. peak hour capacity analyses were tt sC) performed for the .swwd� i e sa ' ions, Table presents the results of the analyses. The signtl zed interse s are currently operating at LOS B or better and the. majority of the stop -controlled approaches at the remaining unsign dlized intersections operate at LOS B, The stop -controlled approach of the intersection created by Biscayne Boulevard and NE 31.s` Street (westbound) is shown to operate at LOS F. This result is common where a stop -controlled minor approach intersects with a high -volume major street. Detailed S)WCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix D, along with existing intersection traffic signal timing plans. Table 5: 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Intersection 2006 P.M. Peak H.our Overall Level of Service (Existing Timings) LOS Delay (s) t Biscayne Boulevard and NE 3 3" Street J 1 A 6.6 l Biscayne Boulevard and NE 31' Street F (1) 99.6 � Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29'1' Street B 16.1 NE 31' Street and NE 4'`' Avenue B (1) 10.3 (1 ) NE 30''' Street and NE 4th Avenue B (1) ( 1.1.0 (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided fbr tvvo-way stop -controlled intersections. The worst minor street movement is indicated. G:10 O7OOOU-Eleiicat MUSP,RcporiffI_ 2.doc Page - 13 January 2007 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Background traffic conditions are defined as the expected roadway network 1,, the Year 2009 (correspon contt )ns can the stu o total buildout) without development o the proposed project. The background traffic v-olurnes are the surn of the existing traffic and additional "background" traffic to account for expected traffic growth in the study area. Background Area Growth Future traffic growth on the transportation network was determined based upon historic growth trends at nearby FDOT traffic count stations. The following FDOT count stations were referenced for this analysis: • Count station 0143 is located on SR 5/US 1 south of NE 36m Street • Count station 5058 is located on SR 5/US 1 north of NE 29th Street The growth rate analysis calculated a growth rate of -3.06 percent (-3.06%) for count station 0143 and a growth rate of -0.12 percent. (-0.12%7c) for count station 5058. However, a growth rate of 0.5 percent (0.5%) was applied annually to existing traffic volumes to attain future (2009) background conditions. Historical traffic count data and growth trend calculations are included in Appendix E. Committed Developments City of Miami staff was contacted to determine if any projects that have been approved but not yet completed in the vicinity of the project site should be accounted for in this analysis. The Real Estate Development Database was reviewed and thirty (30) major use special permits (MUSP) projects were identified: • Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) • Onyx on the Bay (Biscayne Bav Lofts) • Rosabella Lofts (Edgewater Tower) Star Lofts (Bav 25) e Biscayne Park 6 :\O430700OQ-Eiement 49i SP\Reper\TlA?.doc Pcge - I4 Ja 1 uaSy 2007 l~a ley -Horn evar 2 C)WCFSs 4 • Distract Lofts (Biscayne Condos) Lima • Mondnan Mia.rn (Gallery Art Condominium) • Onyx Paramount Bay (Paramount at Edgewater Square) • Park Lane Tower The Platinum Condom iar iurr Platinum on the Bay ! Soho • Soled (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) • Vista Biscayne • Midtown Miami: (Tract A) The Shops -North Block • Midtown Miami: (Tract C) The Shops — Mid Block West • Midtown Miami: (Tract. D) Mid -Block East • Midtown Miami: Four Midtown Miami (Tract F) • Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miami (Tract G) ® Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miami (Tract H) • Buena Vista East Track D (Parcel 6) • Buena Vista East Track E (Parcel 5) ▪ Buena Vista West Track G (South Block North) ▪ Ice Phase 1/ Edgewater • Ego • Sky Residences ® Aja on the Bay The projected traffic from the above projects was added to background traffic in the volume development worksheets, G-`O43070000-EIerneni ort\TIA2.doc Page - 15 January 200 cb 0 0 CJ1 2 7 - . m v o N L1 CA Cr 1 8 -- 61 - ®._.,,_..._. 21 Cn cc, 6/ CJ, V1 "- rn NE .33rd Street 12 27 4 - 19 10 G! C7 J € ---- 26 9 1 V - 72 NE 31st Street. NE :52nd Street • NEI 3O h1 >er lace 4.4.__....m_ 446 LEGEND CO - m G! Cn (J1 -_ 24 — 68 71 CO - 29 -.- 46 13- NE 29th Street FIGURE 4 -L66 (217C)9) r! 8 na_ 1.-a.11 PEAK; 'rPC.iuR P,M. WEAK HOUR VCIUMES (VE.H[CL.€S) P.M, PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (PERSON--TR€PS) Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc, titn PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic is defined as the vehicle rips expected to be generated h the project, and the . distribution and assignment o.ie' this traffic over the roadway network. Existingand Proposed Land Uses As previously indicated, the project proposes to construct 420 residential condominium units. Approximately 100 units are proposed on the north side of NE 31' Street and 320 units are proposed on the south side of NE 31' Street. To allow for fluctuations in the site plan, this analysis conservatively assumed 425 condominium units. The buildout and occupancy of the project is expected to occur by 2009. Project Access Access to the site is proposed via six (6) driveways. The 320 units proposed on the south side of NE 3.1' Street will be accessed via three (3) driveways, One (I) driveway will be used to enter the site (the middle driveway) and two (2) driveways will be used to exit the site (the westernmost and easternmost driveway). The additional 100 units proposed on the north side of NE 31" Street will be access by three (3) driveways. One (1) driveway is proposed along NE 31s' Street will provide a drop-off area. Two (2) driveways are proposed along NE 32nd Street to provide access to the parking and service areas. It is important to note that the intersection of NE 7111 Avenue and NE 31" Street was not analyzed as part of this report. NE 31s` Street currently terminates immediately east of NE 7`h Avenue at Biscayne Bay. As a result, no vehicular traffic utilized the east leg of this intersection. Furthermore_ the Edgewater development located northeast of the Element site proposes to covert this portion of NE 31'` Street into a plaza, eliminating all vehicular traffic on this subject section, (]:A043070000-Eitme EUSP\Rcport;TiA.?.dor. Rog:-- ?7 January 2007 Trip eneration Proposed ye, contained in trip g .neion tor %hi project was calcuiateu using rates and equa nstitute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. The trip generation for the proposed land uses was determined using ITE Land Use 232 t.H.=gh_ .Rise Condominium/Townhouse), Project trips were estimated for the P.M. peak hour. ITE trip generation assumes a vehicle occupancy rate of I.2 persons per vehicle; however, the City of Miami has determined that 1.4 persons per vehicle are more appropriate for the local area. Therefore, vehicular trips were reduced by 16 percent to adjust for these vehicle occupancy assumptions. The vehicular trip generation calculations for the project are presented in Table 6. Table 6: Proposed Trip Generation ota re Laud Use (ITE Code) Scale 1 P.M. Peak 1-lour Driveway Volumes Gross Total Trips Internal Capture Reduction Net External Trips Pass -By ' Capture Reduction Net New External Trips Entering Exiting % Drips % Trips IHi.lh-Rtse Condominiums (32) 425 d.u. 160 N/A 160 160 E 6-27c 99 38(7r 61 Total 160 160 160 99 vph 61 vph ITE/Miami vehicular occupancy adjustment (16% reduction) 134 vph 83 vph 51 vph Person -Trip Conversion (1.4 persons per vehicle) 188 p.t. `i' 116 72 t u� = person -trips 30 7000O-Eierneni 1 Si'! port\Ti 2_-doc Page- - 18 January 2t Kirrley Horn Trip . istribution and Ass n r ent Th . i e]v distribution of protect traffic ific was forecast for trips expe;: ted tc be generated by th project. The trip distribution was based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2005 Cost ,-Aft«rdable Purr for the project site's traffic analysis zone (TAZ 504). The cardinal trip distribution for TAZ 504 is provided in Table 7. The detaiied cardinal distribution is inc tided in Appendix F. Table 7: Cardinal Trip Distribution Cardinal Direction Percentage of Trips North -Northeast 1 1.43 % East -Northeast 4.1 10 East -Southeast 5.05% South -Southeast 4.25% South -Southwest 21.36% West -Southwest 23.94% West -Northwest 13.27% North -Northwest 16.56% Total 100.00 %7c- Figure 5 shows the project trip distribution and assignment at the project driveways and adjacent intersections. The project trips (vehicular and person -trips) were then distributed and assigned to the roadway network. As part of the directional person -trip distribution, the maximum possible directional project traffic assignment was determined for the entire transportation corridor segment. Ci:10.. 5070000-ikmcnt MUS \Repor.1Ti `,I.doc Page - 19 January 2007 NE 33rd Str et NE 32nd Street NE 31 st Street 15X/13 — t--21%/11 21X/10 5X/3 ---15%/18 33%/16 0c m 22X/18 ro A W L 5%/4 -.—� 23%/19 48X IN/44 ----♦ �— 48% OUT/27 48%/2 --- 21 %/11 5X/4 22%/18 26X/13 53X/27 73X/61 —♦ cn LEGEND XXX/XX XX> NEW DISTRIBUTION/NEW ASSIGNMENT [N XX PERSONTRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT (MAXIMUM) +----- 11 X/6 4----- 69X/35 XX% / 4- - 10%/5 4% 1N+13X OUT'9 .-- 33X/16 4X/3 NE 29th Street 0 0 A 4X VN I- 3% OUT/9 10X/, -_- NE 3OthTer NE 3Oth Street E NGURE,5 TRIP DISTR1 u11ON AND ASSIGNMENT Kimley-Nora and at Kim ley TO s (2009 'IT PROJECT) TRAFFIC Total traffic volumes (vehi Eiar and person- tri.)sj conside4'cd in the future year f2009i analysis for this project are the sum of 2009 hackeround t.raf'ic volumes and the expected project traffic volumes. Figure 6 presents the 2009 total traffic for the study area. Total t .rnar;g movement v�_ lume development worksheets for the study intersections are included in Appendix G. 1ant.ar, tf)i)? G:\O 3(;70000-Eicment MUS "acport\TIA2.doc Page- 31 66 4 'Ill 67 NE 33rd Street 27 27-- 1Tf 5 tp cn $' o? 5. 5 ro 45 z rh N.) 04 .p 4 n C.1 J .--. 46 34 in 4,, r. 4' N 6, G tO) �. G4 4--- 76 87 0, N 6 .32nd Street N � 1 CA Ot to 4------ 32 37 28 31-- 22-4, 441 rri 26 9 N p N d- r. 0 4- --- 6 4 4 27 --- �) 4,, fk 4.6 27 5 4 tll 485 LEGEND P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (VEHICLES) P.M. PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (PERSON -TRIPS) So E 30th Sti6(?, NE. 29th Strec. FIGURE 20199 PEIAK YlJ `AL E.'. 6;' It. Kirniey-Horn and Associates, Inca Kimiey4+ rn and Assxiates, FUTURE CONDITION 2 09 CAPACITY i ' PSIS Two separate fut}ure conditions peak hour capacity analyses were performed. A transportation corridor (person - trip) capacity analysis. lneersection capacity analysis was performed at the study intersections. The future conditions analysis were performed for (.1) the 2009 background traffic conditions and (2) the 2009 total traffic conditions, which included the 2009 background traffic and the new trips expected to be generated by the project. Future (2009) Background Traffic Conditions Table 8 presents the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2009 P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. As indicated in Table 8 the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or better). Table 9 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2009 P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. The intersection timings were optimized to reflect the change in traffic patterns in the year 2009. The majority of the intersections operate at LOS B or better. The stop -controlled approach of the intersection Biscayne Boulevard and NE 31.'1 Street (westbound) is expected to operate at LOS F. This result is common where a stop -controlled minor approach intersects with a high -volume major street. Detailed SYNCIRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix H. C3 ;04307000)-Eiemeat MUSP\Report ';TIA2.doc Pagc - ianua 200 Kim#ey-Horn and Associates, Inc. I'rq,!3r Itvrpere.rl�uat si.z Table 8: Future (2009) Background P. leak Hour Trans (illation Corridor Se ment Conditions Principal Road way ra z NB S13 EB WB 2009 P.M. Peak If our Background Volume to 1,944 1,532 Committed Peak 11lour Volume 12' Person - Trips 2009 P.M., Peak flour Total 'Vienne r§' Person - Trips 2,339 1.920 225 481 169 471 2009 P.M. Peak flour Total Capacity (C) (4) Persou- Trips 3,882 1,134 1,134 2009 P.M, Peak flour Excess Capacity Person - Trips 2009 P.M, Peak Flour 'Total .'eve of Service Vf( 1,CiS gtt:io 1,543 0,60 1) 1..342 0.59 t� 653 0.42 663 0.42 C" 1) An annual growth ra (0.5 percent) was applied to the 2006 P.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2009 hackgtrund vol 2) Total traffic generated along the corridors by committed devehaprncnts 3)'l he summed mn of 2009 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. 4) Total capacity determined in Table 4. O:10430700))0-Element MUSI'1RcporI\l'1A2.doc rge - 24 .t.rn ra a r k :? 0( ;evvHrm and As ;iales, Inc, —able 9: Future (2009) Background .P.M rs n Conditions intersectionOverall Existing Timings 2009 P,NI. Curet Peak Hour of Service LOS Delay (s) Biscayne Boulevard and NE 'd Street B 13.8 Biscayne Boulevard and NE 31'' Street Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29`'' Street NE 31'` Street and NE 4a Avenue B (1) 10.4 (1) NE 30`1' Street and NE 41r Avenue B (1) ! 11-1 { 1 Optimized Signal Timings Biscayne Boulevard and NE 33'd Street B 10.1 j Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29th Street B j 18.3 I) Overall intersection LOS not provided .tor two-way stop -controlled intersections. The worst minor street movement is indicated. GA ti4 ()"ii()00-vtemen t l SP'Rcpoxrt\TIA2 dcc Page '. January 2€)(i7 Kimiley-Horn :Asmiciates, t urt (2009) Total T ate c Conditions Table 10 presents the r is the transportation co ridor capacity analysis for the 2'009 P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. As indicated in Table 10, the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate °at acceptable levels of service (LOS D or he-tt ,r). Table 11 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2009 P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. The intersection timings were optimized to reflect the change in traffic patterns in the year 2009. The majority of the intersections are expected to operate at LOS B or better. The stop -controlled approach of the intersection Biscayne Boulevard and NE 31" Street (westbound) is expected to operate at LOS F. This result is common where a stop -controlled minor approach intersects with a high -volume major street. Detailed SYNCHRO 6.0 outputs are included in Appendix 1. G:04_ 07000-Element MUSPyReportTIA2.do.. Page - = Januan' 2 7 Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. Table 10: Future (2009) P.M. Peak flour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Ira fwerel rue�i.ri, Principal Roadway 2005 P.M. Peak Hour Background Volume t�) Person- Trips Committed Peak Hour Volume tzr Person- Trips 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Volume t'�I Person- Trips Project P.M. Peak Hour Distribution (Maximum) Project P.M. Peak Hour Assignment 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Volume(V)`'.4 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity . ac°it C'}''�',YCesS p ( Person- Trips 204)9 P.M.2009 , Peak Hour Peak Total capacityof Service Person- V/(:` Trips Ratio Hour Level I.A..) ti Person- '['rips Person- Trips Id Ti z NB 1,944 395 2,339 43% IN 39 2,378 3,882 1,504 0.C)i t) :l ai c 81.3 1,532 388 1,920 43% OUT 24 1,944 .3,262 1,318 0,60 D i 1:,8 259 225 481 48% IN 44 525 1,134 001) 9.46 L W.E3 302 .169 4i 1. 48%. OUT 27 498 1,134 (36 0.44 1 1 ( I) An annual growth rate (0.5 percent) was applied to the 2006 I.M. peak hour total volume to determine the 2009 background volume_ (2) Total traffic generated along the corridors by committed developments (3) The summation of 2009 peak hour background volumes and committed trips. (4) 2009 P.M. peak hour total volume (V) is defined as the sum of the project P.M. peak [tour assignment and the hackgrs)urrt.l v0ir.m10, (5) "Total capacity determined in 'Table 4. 6:1043070000-Element M€ISP1ReportAT1A2_cloc. Page - 2 1a„ut ry ?.(5)7 KrIey-Horn nd Assiai . Inc, Viable 1l t Future (200.) Psi , Peak Intersection 2009 PAL Peak }lour Overall Level of Service LOS Delay (s) Existing Timings Biscayne Boulevard and NE 33i° Street B ; 15.0 Biscayne Boulevard and NE 31' Street F (€) 282,5 i f Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29`h Street E 76.3 11 NE 31' Street and NE Ye, Avenue B (1) 11.5 (1) NE 30th Street and NE.4"' Avenue B (1) 12.3 (1) NE 31' Street and West Project Driveway A (1) 9.4 (1) NE 31 s` Street and Middle Project Driveway A (1) 9.3 (1) NE 31" Street and East Project Driveway A (1) 8.8 (1) NE 32 Street and West Project Driveway A (l;1 8.5 (1) NE 32nd Street and East Project Driveway A (1) 8.6 (1) Optimized Signal Tunings Biscayne Boulevard and NE 33'd Street B 10.8 Biscayne Boulevard and NE 29th Street I3 18.4 (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two ay stop -controlled intersections. The worst minor street movement is indicated. (i:\040t )t)(}0-Elern ni w?f`SP\Repori T tA2.doc f'[rge - January 200 PROJECT DRIVEWAY V AY ANALYSIS As prevwusly indicated, current access to the site is via six (6) driveways. Four driveways will connect to NE 3is' Street. Three of these dri eways will provide access to the south side of the site. One ( ) driveway will be used to cuter the site (the middle driveway) and two (2) driveways wilI be used to exit the site (the westernmost and easternmost driveway). The other one (1) driveway along NE 31's- Street will provide access to the north site and wilt be used as a drop-off driveway. In addition, two driveways will connect to NE 32nd Street and will provide access to the north site. One (1) driveway will be used as a full access driveway and the other one (1) driveway will be used as a service driveway. No entry or exit restrictions are currently proposed for the project driveways. As a result, no onsite project traffic queuing is anticipated. Therefore, a project driveway queuing analysis was not performed. G \O4 070000 Elcme t ML'SP\Reportt\TIAZ.doc Pzt - 29 January 2007 iniey Horn ! and Associates, in TRANSPORTATION CONTROL ME &SURES PLAN A Transportation Control Measures Plan is required for this site t demonstrate how the developer plans to -alleviate traffic from the proposed site on the surrounding roadway network Miami -.Dade County provides public transit in close proximity to the project site. In addition, other measures of transportation control carp be used by the developer to encourage, people to use public transportation, promote bicycling and kvalking, encourage carivanpooiing and offer alternatives to the typical workday hours. Examples of these incentives include, but are not limited to: Provide transit subsidies for residents of the site Provide transit information within the site including route schedules and maps Provide convenient and secure areas for bicycles Provide other transit -oriented amenities The applicant intends to make the site pedestrian- and transit -friendly and features for incorporation into the site. consider these Cs 1Oy3t�7OOOQ Ekrnent 1t'Sit[�eportlrl.�..dtoc Page - 3(i January ZOO ad Associates, inc. FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROY E. TS As part of this traffic: mpact anals=s, future transportation mproverrients ed and planned;) were identified within the corridors adjacent to the project site... Proiect documentation .s included Appendix 3. The followinai projects were identifleci: Premium Transit — According to Miami -Dade County Long Range Transportation Plan (2030 LRTP), there is a project that will provide premium transit service between Downtown Miami and the Broward County line along the U.S.11 FEC Rail corridor. This project is a Priority IV project scheduled for implementation between Years 2021-2030. G: 043070000-Elenicnt iti€ st'\Repor1 i IA2,doc Page - 31 January 2007 Kimle°y-Horn lees. Inc. CONCLUSIONS This traffic imptict study assessed the impacts of the Element project on the surrounding t a �sportat.ion network. die analysis was conducted in accordance th the City of Miami requirements and included data collection. project trip generation, distribution, and assignment: transportation corridor segmenI capacity analysis and intersection capacity analysis. This report is being submitted as part of a MLSP application. Transportation corridor- capacity analyses and intersection capacity analyses were performed for the existing 2006 peak season conditions. Results of the analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and major intersections in the vicinity of the project site operate at acceptable levels.of service. Trip generation calculations indicate that the project is expected to generate 134 new vehicular trips and 188 person -trips during the P.M. peak hour. These trips were assigned to the roadway network based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2005 Cost Feasible Plana. Capacity analyses were also performed for the future {year 2009) with project conditions. Results of these analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and major intersections will continue to have sufficient capacity and operate at acceptable levels of service. The stop - controlled approaches at the remaining unsignalized intersections are expected to operate with acceptable parameters with the exception of the intersection of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 315 Street. In conclusion. this project is not expected to have a significant traffic impact on the regional roadway network. G:A043070000-Eiernent 7t`SP\Report!T( 2.Uoc Page - 2 January 2007 • • • APPENDIX A: Methodology Correspondence Memorandum To: Mr. uazi Masood, E.3., URS Southern Corporation From: John J. McWilliarns. P.E. Date: July 5, 2006 Subject: Element Residential Development MUSP Traffic impact Analysis Methodology The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the MUSP traffic impact analysis methodology as agreed to during the July 5`h meeting. The proposed development is bounded by NE 315` Street on the north, NE 30th Terrace on the south, and Biscayne Bay to the east. The proposed development includes 320 residential units. This subject was previously known as ICE Phase H. A location reap is attached. The following items were discussed: Trip Generation Trip generation calculations will be performed using ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition and the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. Trip Distribution Trip distribution will be determined using the cardinal distribution from the appropriate Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). According to Miami -Dade County's TAZ Map, the project is located in TAZ 504. Committed Development The City of Miami will be contacted to obtain the most recent edition of the Large Scale Development Report. Projects currently under construction or approved will be included. Projects in the application stage who have submitted a traffic study will also be included. I OP .,.d ,any Ft. Lowe w.a, Fiord-5 2247 Kkmii=ev-1-1 n and Associates, . Qua5k Ma od, E.s.: =%iV =.�i 5. 2�;, n Study Area The study area for this project is boarded by' I-195 on the north, NE 20th Street on the south, Biscayne Bay on the east, and Interstate 95 on the west. Within this study area. five (5) intersections were identified for analysis: * NE 33`1 Street at Biscayne Boulevard (signalized) * NE 31' Street at Biscayne Boulevard (unsignalized) • NE 29e Street at Biscayne Boulevard (signalized) O NE 30t Street at NE 4th Avenue (unsignalized) * NT 31' Street at NE 4th Avenue (unsignalized) The following corridors were identified for analysis: • Biscayne Boulevard O NE 29`h Street Data Collection PM peak hour turning movement counts will be conducted at all identified study intersections. 24-hour machine counts will be conducted on all study corridors. Ali traffic counts will be adjusted to reflect peak season conditions using the appropriate FDOT adjustment factors. Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses will be conducted for the PM peak hour at all identified intersections and corridors. Intersection analyses will be performed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology. Corridor analyses will be conducted using information from the Miami DRI-II (i.e. person -trip capacity) and the FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook. In addition, all project driveways wilt be addressed in this analysis with respect to access (controlled/uncontrolled) and queuing. Site parking information will also be provided in the report. Loading area maneuverability will also be addressed. Documentation The results of the analysis will be summarized in a report. The report shall include all necessary supporting documents including signal timings, lane geometry, and software output sheets. G:1043070000 Elemesst MLS1'1Cosrespondence107 05 06 URS hlesnn.doe • 25 ..... 27 ...... Element MUSP Location Map E.. 36th,, §t 36th St NE 35th Terrace MagnolisPark.., NE -30th Terrace E 3Oth St NE, -29th Terrace .. 29th - St N ;,28th St E:-:27th --Terrace CIE: 27th St NE., 29th =St NE.::26th....Terrace w L 0yright fs0 198t3 2cU3 Mtdrosori Corp. ahrk.r. its suppliers_ AO rrghrs reserved. http,Nwvnv.rnicrosoll,corryslreets (0Copyright 2002 by Grsngraphic Dala Technology, Inc. Al righrs reserved CO 2002 {navigation Ter;hnoiopies, Aft rights reserved_ This data includes informaffor (SfP,t+sbos Canada unr90nr Gr(nrpatics Canada), all rights reoervod, 0 yds 200 Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserva< 400 n wtth permission from Canadian authorities © 1991-2002 Government of Canada 600 • ohn From: Sent: To: Subject: Quazi_Masood@ URSCorp.com Monday, January 15, 2007 1:25 PM McWilliams, John R : FW: Element MUSP Methodology Memo As per you folloi,_ng ex,edanation, if the projPctproposes to convert the dead-end street to plaza area, then an alysis of this additional intersection would not be rem .._red. _ *o ld recommend you to inc de this expa__atton into _rse Site Access art_cie. hanks Quaz <John .McWilliams @ kimley-hor n. con> 0 ;15/2007 01:08 PM ,Qnazl . <Quaz _Masood@URSCorp.cer> To CC <Raj_Sh an=aamg RSCorp.cor> Subj ect RE: FW: Element MUSP Methodology Memo This intersection (7th and 31st) is actually not much of an intersection at all. 31st dead ends immediately to the east of 7th. Therefore, no traffic comes for the easternmost approach. Furthermore, the Edgewater project (located northeast of the Element site} proposes to covert the dead-end portion of 31st into a plaza area, eliminating vehicular traffic on this leg altogether. With that said, will it sti11 be necessary to examine the intersection? Thanks, John �rigina' Message------ __om: Quazi_Masood@URSConc.com ,mai-t.o:Quazi_`asoot:@Ur SCorp.cor Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 11:32 AM To: McWilliams, John Cc: Raj_Snanmugam@URSCorD.com n ex_. rho opera.. u 7; condition o7 an. additional fLerseCj o , _ 7th Avenue;`NE pis think this new ___; e 'sec v 7c__ should be analyzed to see whether or not the traz_j.c; tac'Y- na it's operating condition. Thanks _iaZ1. Subject Q azi: WOH <John . cWi l 1 tans 1mi ev--born . con .b ne rear Hf_ne t.__o_- report includes ,des 01/15/2007 07:42 <Quazi_Masood@ SCorp.com> AM MW . Element MUSE' Metnodoionv Memo Good morning_ The Element t SP project (previous methodology memo attached) has been redefined to include an additional 100 unit bu !aina immediately north of the 320 unit building prey=iously presented to you. The additional 100 unit building is located on the north side of NE 31st Street :List west of NI r, Avenue. Please let me know ±1 we can utilize 4110 e previous rre 'odo - ogv parameters to perform the MUSE study with ie addotlo__al 100 nn:cs. We „__ of course examine the separate driveway planned for the new 100 unit b' __ding as well as the 320 unit buitd:na 2 Sent: Wednesday, J»» ?a: McWilliams, John SLr-ect: Re: 21 eat MUSP Metho I John, Looks good to Thanks G asi <Joh n.M illiam J mcl -ho .cow ?o a± Message sooa2,5Rs2o .cam [ ?±«o:% z: Masoo6G. SCor2.cao} 05, 2056 :0:5C AM zee 00.05Z2006 10:12 <Q a::_Saco ursco .ccm> CC <Maria.Anayadeyeats@kimley-horn.com > Subject Element MUSP Methodology Memo az±: Please see the attached. Please Iet me know if you have any chanoes/corrections so that I car order the traffic counts asap. 'hanks, John Suite i09 ~^ 5230 NW 33rd A oe Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 : 954-535 5106 fax. 954-739-2247 zoo . «T11i s32imi-horn.com This e-mail from K miev-Sow and Associates, Inc. and any tiles transmitted with it may contain confidential information. 2t is intended solely for the individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete is immediately. Any other use or distribution is prohibited. (See attached file: 07 05 06 URS Memo.pdf) (See attached file: 07 05 06 URS Memo.pdf) • • • APPENDIX B: Traffic Count Data Intersection Turnin Movement Counts fl i 24 t ar0enia Terrace, Delray Beam, Honda 33444 Phone i561 272-3255 Fax, (561) 272-438 NE 33RD STREET 8. BISCAYNE BO'U EVARD/Li$,, , ., b,. MIAMJ, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUiS PALOMINO SIGNALIZED Groups Printed- ALL VEHICLES CAYNE BOULEVARD!US NE 33RD STREET BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/S From East Time North From South Jte. i-t � TS7}e Right Thro ("fit � .��� %.,;_ �„ ?ugh. • Tnre Left Aa:: plc Yt9 7 `;i'J Lett 7hr;, 04:00 PM . 6 179 3 0 188 4 2 7 0 13 9 250 12 0 271 2 1 04:15 PM 2 158 6 0 166 ' 3 8 7 0 18 5 228 11 0 244 0 4 04:30 PM : 4 174 5 0 184 3 2 5 0 10 5 209 6 0 220 3 3 04:45 PM 3 162 4 0 159 3 0 4 0 i 4 241 6 0 251 5 5 Total 15 673 19 0 707 13 12 23 0 48 23 928 35 0 986• 1 13 File Nacre : 33ST US1 Site Code . 060180 Stare Date : 71111200o Page No . NE 33RD STREET From West T.. _<,. To!a= 5 0 8 480 7 0 11 439 6 0 12 426 90 19 ..... 446 27 0 56 1791 05:00 PM 2 146 8 1 157 8 1 4 0 13 6 251 8 0 265 5 9 5 0 19 454 05:15 PM 0 199 5 0 204 4 0 9 0 13 6 218 19 0 243 8 7 4 0 19 • 479 05:30 PM 5 182 2 0 189 2 8 10 0 20 17 190 10 0 217 6 12 11 0 29 455 05:45 PM 2 152 6 0 1802 2 10 0 14 11 160 17 0 188 6 6 5 4 17 379 Tata! 9 579 21 1 710 16 11 33 0 60 40 819 54 0 913. 25 34 25 0 84 1767 Grand Total 24 1352 40 1 1417 29 23 56 0 108 63 1747 89 0 1899 35 47 52 0 134 3558 Apprch % . 1.7 95.4 2.8 0.1 26.9 21.3 51.9 0 3.3 92 4.7 0 26.1 35.1 38.8 0 Total % . 0.7 38 1.1 0 39.8 0.8 0.6 1.6 0 3 1.8 49.1 2.5 0 53.4 1 1-3 1.5 0 3.8 NE 33RD STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: LUIS SIGNALIZED 3L? ALM L Ei'( I1 J_ 624 Gardenia Terrace, Deira , Beach, Flo`ida 33444 Phone (561 )2 7 2-3255 Fax (561) 272-4381 BISCAYNE sC L'LEUARDILtSr,1. PALOMINO BISCAYNE B EVARD?US 1 From North ?'f Time Rgtit Thru Leff 5c run. Right. Thru Peak Houi Analysis Frorn 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hoer for Entire Intersection Begins a; 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0500 PM 05:15 PM 05:3G PM Total Volume 14 App. Total PHF 3 162 2 146 0 199 5 182 10 689 95.8 500 .866 4 0 8 1 5 0 2 0 19 1 2.6 2.1 .594 250 1691 3 157. 8 204 4 189 2 719 17 32.1 ............. .881 .531 NE 33RD STREET From East Left BISGAYNE BOULEVARBIUS From South .. ?ig Thn_ eH, ; 0 4 0 7 4 1 4 9 73 0 9 4 13 6 8 10 0 2017 9 27 0 53 33 17 50.9 0 3.4 281 .675 .000 .663 .486 241 6 0 251 251 8 0 265 218 19 0 243 190 10 0 217 900 13 0 976 92.2 4.4 0 ............. . ................... .896 .566 .000 .921 F e Name : 33ST US1 Site Code 060180 Start Date . 7/11/2006 Page No 2 NE 33RD STREET From West Thru Left : 5 5 9 5 9 5 8 7 4 6 12 11 24 33 29 27,9 38.4 33.7 .750 6a8 .659 a C'J 1L1 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD;US 1 Out In Total 946 : 719 : 1665 10 689 19 Right Thru Left U-Turns Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM ALL VEHICLES • 0 Left Thru Right 1-1.-Turns 43 900 33 0 740 976 1716 _..Out In Total SISCAYNE 6C}Eit FVARPS)' 1 2 a a o Int Toni 0 19 446 0 19 454 0 19 479 5 29 455 0 86. 1834 0 000 .741. .957 Id11:11?SILIEij SA 624 Gardenia Terrace, Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Fax (561) 272-4381 NE 31ST & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 MIAt%M, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: N1CHOLE BOWEN NOT S GNAUZED BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 From North Start Time Rijn. ru 3i r,-, =.=� r���i Right "rhru Left 04:00 PM 4 `8 r Left 0 04:15 PM 3 155 5 0 163 04:30 PM 1 184 6 0 04:45 PM 1 17.3 5 0 179 7 Total 9 699 23 0 731 • 30 198 8 0 7 7 0 7 191 8 0 5 0 0 24 NE 31ST STREET Groups Pnnted ALL VEHICLES BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US From East 9 From South C) )C.,c7 App. TalAl •F;igh: Thru Left ;..E✓.M..li • F;Egt;? 15 7 265 2 0 274 7 14 8 228 2 0 238 5 13 1C) 209 2 0 221 7 12 6 226 3 1 238 9 54 33 928 9 1 Q71 28 File Name : 3IST_UUS1 Site Code : 060180 Start Date : 711//2006 Page No : 1 NE 31ST STREET From West 1 R u-= 6'-'u nt_ kcal 6 0 13 500 1 0 6 421 4 0 11 436 4 1 15 444 15 45 1801 C5:00 PM • 5 141 9 0 155 • 10 0 5 0 15 • 7 251 1 0 259 12 0 8 0 20 449 05:15 PM 3 209 6 0 218 8 0 7 0 15 14 253 5 0 272 15 0 6 0 21 526 05;30 PM 4 191 6 0 201 • 4 0 5 0 9 25 218 9 0 252 14 0 1 0 15 477 05:45 PM 11 162 5 0 178 11 0 5 0 15 14 188 9 4 215 15 C 2 0 17 426 Total 23 703 26 0 752 33 0 22 4 55 60 910 24 4 998 56 0 17 0 73 1878 Grand Total 32 1402 49 0 1483 63 0 46 0 109 93 1838 33 5 1969 84 1 32 1 118 3679 Apprch 14 2.2 94.5 3.3 0 57.8 0 42.2 0 4.7 93.3 1.7 0.3 71.2 0.8 27.1 0.8 Total % 0.9 38.1 1.3 0 40.3 1.7 0 1.3 4 3 2.5 50 0,9 0.1 53.5 2.3 0 0.9 0 3.2 Ce Yee e , , 624 Gardenia Terrace, De ray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Fax (561) 272-4381 NE 31ST & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US I IVIIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: NICHOLE BOWEN NOT SIGNALIZED BISCAYNE BOULEVARDJUS - BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 1 From North From South ime? ' Thru Left ,,-, Right i .rj Left_.. .._ i �� R'gh hr � yi ,2, Right h ���__..,r_. kE,;: Ta::f FZig'-, Prt: Left s, ._•.s Right T!7 �°° Leii d i x :v-a3 np- Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 1 173 5 0 179 7 0 5 0 12 8 226 3 1 238 9 1 4 1 15 444 05:00 PM ; 5 141 9 0 155 10 0 5 0 15 7 251 1 0 259 12 0 8 0 20 449 05:15 PM : 3 209 6 0 218 8 0 7 r0 15 14 253 5 0 272 15 0 6 0 21 526 05:30 PM : 4 191 6 0 201 4 0 5 0 9 25 218 9 0 252 14 0 1 0 15 477 Total voivme 13 714 25 0 753 29 0 22 0 51 54 948 18 1 1021 50 1 19 1 71 1696 ° App. Total 1.7 94.8 3.5 0 56.9 © 43.1 0 5.3 92.9 1.8 0.1 70.4 1.4 26.8 1.4 PHF .650 .854 .722 .000 .864 .725 .000 .786 .000 .850 .540 .937 .500 .250 .993e .833 .259 .594 .250 .845 .901 File Name :.31 ST l:S Site Code : 060180 Start Date : 7/1 1/2006 Page N) : 2 NE 31ST STREET From East NE 31ST STREET From West ry 01 1 0 A L 6 , Q � BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US OUP In.... Total 996 753 1749 13 714 25 0 R€1ht Thru Left V-i urns Peak Hour Data North • Peak Hour Begins et 04:45 PM ALL VEHICLES 4 Lett Thru Right U-Turns 18' 94854i 1 786 1021 1807 Out _...fn Total Bt ACAYNP.a0u1 FV.ARDLUS 1 Eqj S E . 1 S, ' �$ 624 Gardenia Terrace, Dei,ray Seaoh, Florida 33444 _ Phone t156 1) 272-3255 Fax (561) 272-4381 E 29TH STREET & BISCAYNE BOULE1,dAR`t`�.1 Sil—ii.1t'<ft/i <rtt-lic,.g �.'tt7> Fc.t'aaaE M AMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: CHRIS PERALTA SIGNALIZED BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/LtS 1 From North Start Time • Si9rt Thru Left a. r .....Rigr. 04:00 PM , 27 171 2 0 200 3 04:15 PM : 18 139 5 0 162 7 04:30 PM : 20 185 2 0 210 04:45 PM 16 171 1 j 189 Tota l 81 669 1 ....1 761 . 12 NE 29TH STREET From East 9 12 4 Groups Printed- ALL VEHICLES BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 From South Left c oa: Rich! Thi LeftApp. i Right Thu 18- 10 242 10 0 262 7 9 10 0 23 6 213 7 0 226 8 11 23 0 34 7 208 15 0 230 10 12 10 ...0 14....... 5...205... 11 ......G 221..... 7 ...._ 5 46 0 89 28 868 43 0 939 32 37 6 0 05:00 PM 17 135 3 0 155 1 7 6 05:15 PM 17 188 7 0 212 4 16 15 05:30 PM 9 189 5 0 203 4 6 11 05:45 PM 16 170 6 0 192 7 10 22 Total 59 682 21 0 762 16 39 54 Fie Name : 29ST_LiS1 Site Code : 060180 Start Date : 7 / 11 /2c006 Page No : NE 29TH STREET From West 18 21 20 24 0 34 514 40 451 42 516 3€ 460 152 1941 0 14 10 226 11 0 247 10 9 22 0 41 457 0 35 7 242 7 0 256 8 9 25 0 42 545 0 21 8 272 15 0 295 7 7 21 0 35 554 0 39 14 210 12 0 236 10 12 18 0 43 507 0 109 39 950 45 0 1034 35 37 86 0 158 2063 Grand Total 140 1351 31 1 1523 28 70 100 0 198 67 1818 88 0 1973 67 74 169 0 310 4004 Apprch % 9.2 88.7 2 0.1 14.1 35.4 50.5 0 3.4 92.1 4.5 0 21.6 23.9 54.5 0 Total % 3.5 33.7 0.8 0 38 0.7 1.7 2.5 0 4.9 1.7 45.4 2.2 0 49.3 1.7 1.8 4.2 0 7.7 624 Gardenia Terrace, Delray Beach, (or;da 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Fax (561) 272-4381 NE 29TH STREET & B SCAAYNE E3�l�Lc' �P I Sd, rrr.Ifd-s.jr'aE.'9 6acr,`ibt{.<=»s; M(AMVM'i, ' i OR(DA COUNTED BY: CHR(S PERALTA SIGNALIZED SCAYNE BOW EVARDIUS E(SCAYNE B ULEVARBdt35 1 1 From West From North Frorn South Start Time Right Thru Left .,,- :P, r7.� Righ, T hru LeE; a.T,rs Right MR,: Left A T Right Thru- Left i iM TO:Oi Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour tor Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 17 135 3 0 155 1 7 6 0 14 10 226 11 0 247 • 10 9 22 0 41 457 05:15 PM ; 17 188 7 0 212 4 16 15 0 35 7 242 7 0 256 ' 8 9 25 0 42 545 05:30 PM 9 189 5 0 203 4 6 11 0 21 8 272 15 0 295 7 7 21 0 35 554 05:45 PM . 16 170 6 0 192 7 10 22 0 39 14 210 12 0 236 10 12 18 0 40 507 Total Volume -...59..__682 21 0 762 16 39 54 0 109 39 950 45 0 1034 • 35 37 86 0 158 2063 % App. Total 7.7 89.5 2.8 0 14.7 35.8 49.5 0 3.8 91.9 4.4 0 • 22.2 23.4 54.4 0 PHF .368 .902 .750 .000 .899 .571 .609 .514 ,000 .699 .696 .873 .750 .000 .876 .875 .771 .860 .003 .940 .931 Pile Name : 2OST US1 Site Code : 060180 Start Date : 7i11/2006 Page, No : 2 NE 29TH STREET From East NE 29TH STREET ti© t-'1 co CO BISCAYNE BOULEVARD/US 1 Out !n Total 1052 762 1814: 59 552 21 0 Right Thru Lett U-Turns � t• Peak Hour Data Astir North Peak Hour Begins at 05.00 PM ALL VEHICLES Lett T nn. .i�i kt lJ-Turns 45. 950'. 39. 0 771 1034 1805 ©ut In Total BISCAYNE EOM EVARR/US 1 rn. co' Z µi: .. U 0• r co b _.. A rTi N ©-C 7 C t4 S Q E` e.I_LE , 624 Gardenia Terrace, De ray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Fax (56 272-4381 NE 31ST STREET & NE 4TH AVENUE FLORUQA COUNTED BY: SUSAN MALONE NOT SIGNALIZED, NO STOPS 1 ALGREEN'S DRIVEWAY From North Groups Printed- ALL VEHICLES NE 31ST STREET NE 4TH AVENUE From East Time f�gh: � hru Left _ r f�1Sn Thru Leh FG �Jt3i'f 04:00 PM • 1 0 0 3 0 4 1 1 6 04:15PM 0 5 0 5. 1 0 2 1 4 04:30 PM 0 101 0 11 0 1 0 0 04:45 PM 0 3 1 0 4 • 0 2 2 0 4 Total . 20 3 0 24 € 7 5 2 15 File Name : 31ST4AVE Site Code : 060180 Start Date : 7/ 1 1 /2006 Page No : 1 NE 31ST STREET From South From Wiest Thru Left ;:- rr� : t-,: Rignt Tnru Left ,:_-s �,,, .> >n. T,Yai 2 2 0 5 2 2 4 1 _ 23 0 5 4 0 9 3 0 2 1 6 25 0 2 3 0 5 8 1 1 0 10. 27 1 2 3 0 6- 2 2 0 1 5. 19 2 11 12 0 25 15 5 7 3 30. 94 05:00PM: 1 3 2 0 6 0 7 1 0 8 1 7 1 10. 5 5 2 1 13 37 05.15 PM : 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 4 0 5 5 6 3 0 14 6 1 3 0 10 33 05:30 PM 1 5 1 0 7 1 1 1 0 3 0 8 4 E 13 7 1 9 0 17 . 40 0545 PM 1 12 0 0 13 0 2 1 0 3 0 17 5 1 23 3 2 11 0 16 55 Total 3 24 0 30 11 7 0 19 6 38 13 3 60 . 21 9 25 1 56 165 Grand Total 4 44 6 0 54 2 18 12 2 34 8 49 25 3 85 36 14 32 4 86 259 Apprch % 7.4 81.5 11.1 0 5.9 52.9 35.3 5.9 9.4 57.6 29.4 3.5 41.9 16.3 37.2 4.7 Total 89 1.5 17 2.3 0 20.8 0.8 6.9 4.6 0.8 13.1 3.1 18.9 9.7 1.2 32.8 13.9 5.4 12.4 1.5 33.2 NE 3 1ST STREET & NE 4TH AVENUE IA€11, FLORtDA COUNTED BY: SUSAN MALONE NOT SIGNALIZED, NO STOPS SitilltOty S, 624 Gardenia Terrace, Daisy Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272--3255 Fax (561) 272-4361 i iie Name : 31ST4AVE Site Code : 060180 Start Date : 7/1 1/2006 Page No : 2 WALGREEN'S DRIVE fAY NE 3IST STREET NE 4TH AVENUE NE 315T STREET From North From East From South From West Star: Time Rign? T Right 'hru L 7,r Rich Thru Left a .;,�T-'a' Ri ht Thri. Lei? ii.; 4 r..� h , 1- PeakThru i_� F a - } � Cat.. _... ,,a RFi. :zl = rc Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak : o` 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 1 3 2 0 6• 0 7 0 8 1 7 1 1 10 5 5 2 1 13 : 37 05:15PM. 0 4 0 0 4 0 E 4 0 5 5 6 3 0 14 6 1 3 0 10 33 05:30 PM : 5 1 0 7 i 1 1 1 0 3 0 8 4 13 : 7 1 9 0 17 40 05:45 PM i 1 12 0 0 13 : 0 2 1 0 3 0 17 5 1 23 3 2 11 0 16 55 ................................................................. . Tota: Votume ' 3 24 3 0 30 ' 1 11 7 0 19 6 38 13 3 60 21 9 25 1 56 165 %F,pp. Total : 39 80 10 0 5.3 57.g 36.8 ....3.3 21.7 5 _. 27.5 16.1 44.6 1.8 PIF . .7500 .500 .375 .000 .577 .250 .393 .438 .000 .594 .390 .559 650 .750 .562 .750 .450 .568 .250 _824 .750 "rota! WALGREEN'S DRIVEWAY but In Total 64 30 34 3 24- 3 0 ........................................................ Right Thru Left U-Turns Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM ALL VEHICLES Left Thru Right U-Turns 13 38 6 3 52 60 : 112 ow : Total NF NTH AVENUF Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc. 624 Gardenia Terrace, Defray Beach, Ffcrida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Fax (561) 272-4381 NE 30TH STREET & NE 4TH AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA, COUNTED BY: JACKIE CASSIDY NOT SIGNALIZED File Name : 3OST4AVE Site Code : 060 180 Start base : 71 i 1/2006 Page No : Groups Panted- Ai.,l VEHICLES NE 4TH AVENUE NE 30TH STREET NE 4TH AVENUE NE 30TH STREET From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Toru Left - Right Thru Left Ri:g t Thru Left Ricr,t Thru eft „.n�N in: Tca7 04:00PM 2 6 0 0.... R........ 5 1 0 7 ... 3 3 3 0 6 5 nr.0 0 1E 35 04:15PM: 3 9 0 0 12 1 5 4 0 1 1 1 6 4 0 13 1 3 0 0 4 40 04:30 PM 4 11 1 0 16 1 2 3 0 6 4 4 5 0 13 4 7 0 0 11 46 04:45 PM 2 3 0 0 5 1 8 3 0 12 0 5 2 0 7 2 6 1 0 9 33 Total 11 29 1 0 41 4 21 11 0 36 8 20 14 0 42 13 21 1 0 35 154 05:00 PM 1 4 3 0 8 0 7 0 0 7 3 6 6 0 15 2 9 2 0 13 43 05:15 PM 0 10 3 0 13 0 4 4 0 8 5 6 4 0 15 : 4 11 5 0 20 • 56 05:30 PM 3 11 1 0 15• 0 5 1 0 6 2 3 7 0 12 3 13 6 0 22 55 05:45 PM 2 11 2 0 15 1 8 3 0 12 9 11 7 0 27 3 9 14 0 26.i 80 Total 6 36 9 0 Si 1 24 8 0 33 19 26 24 0 69 12 42 27 0 81 234 Grand Total 17 65 10 0 92 5 45 19 0 69 27 46 38 0 111 25 63 28 0 116 388 Apprch % 18.5 70.7 10.9 0 7.2 65.2 27.5 0 24.3 41.4 34.2 0 21.6 54.3 24.1 0 Total % 4.4 16.8 2.6 0 23.7 1.3 11.6 4.9 0 17.8 7 11.9 9.8 0 28.E 6.4 16.2 7.2 0 29.9 Traffic Survey Specialists, Inca 62: Gardena Terrace, Delray Beach, Florida .33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Fax (561) 2 7 2-4381 NE 30TH STREET & NE 4TH AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA COUNTED BY: JACKIE CASSOY NOT SIGNALIZED File Name : 30ST4AVE Site Code : 060 180 Start Date : 711 1 /2006 Page No : 2 NE 4TH AVENUE NE 30TH STREET NE 4TH AVENUE NE 30TH STREET From North Frorn East From South From West e Star'', Time .Right Thru Litt ,:.�Ts av ra_,: ttign: Thru Left ,f.a R?fir Thru L e`t S,_., T., .yh_ ihr's Left '.' ,;: ;' r :✓<`al. �. Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:4 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour ler Entire intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 1 4 3 0 8 • 0 7 0 0 7 3 6 6 0 15 2 9 2 0 13 : 43 05:15 PM 0 10 3 0 13 0 4 4 0 8 5 6 4 0 15 4 11 5 0 20. 56 05:30 PM 3 11 1 0 15 0 5 1 0 6 2 3 7 0 12 3 13 5 0 22 . 55 05:45 PM 2 11 2 0 15 1 8 3 0 12 9 11 7 0 27 3 9 14 0 26 • 80 Total volume 6 3€ 9 0 51 1 24 8 0 33 19 26 24 0 6° 12 42 27 0 81 : 234 App. Total 71.8 70.6 ....9 3 72.7 24.2 0 27.5 37.7 34.8 0 14.8 51..9. 33.3 PHF 5,00 .518 .750 .000 .850 .250 .750 .50E .000 .688. .528 .591 .857 .000 .639 .750 .808 .482 .000 .779 .79 N NE 4731 AVENUE Dui In Total 54 . 51- 105 6 36 a 0 v. Right E hru Left U-Turns 1 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM ALL VEHICLES ett Thru Right tJ-Turns 242619 0 56 69 - 125 Out __. In__. ... Totaf.. NF 4TH AVFNt lF Intersections Diagra V T. 041'004 Flo( \ALI 1O,2.oO hawM Loki S FkLovtik-'‘ vC,o 1)/ 3\sr c � Kese RcsTo vkkt`ak,:‘ PLo(?c .l ut,Ly Io 1 2.00c cIacum 'Polo o tk0- S ig 1A0a.As zec, d -Tull 10 12.00 Co claum LtAis Polovtki o jQ 1 L1z 1461-0 1 irg A SSG K_ LoY v Oici,vtC IFS(cclok TALv to ;zoo s cdii,wK f9j Ltik.is PaLavt.i vi o ro T S i1 a l 24-Hour Machine Counts Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc, 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Tor_als Page 1 ***************************************************************************** Data File : D0712002,PRN Station 000000071006 Identification 000058410067 000058410067 interval : 15 minutes Start date : Jul 12, 06 Start time 1 00:00 Stop date : Jul 12, 06 Stop time ; 24:00 City/Town : Miami, Florida County : Dade Location : Biscayne Boulevard South of NE 31 Street ******************************************************************************* Jul 12 Northbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ---- ________ 15 98 44 26 25 11 25 55 104 157 171 156 178 30 88 44 35 28 10 26 70 130 155 173 157 194 45 71 48 32 21 16 25 78 130 152 179 174 191 00 78 38 15 16 11 29 88 151 158 201 184 217 Hr Total 335 174 108 90 48 105 291 515 622 724 671 780 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 242 236 253 228 242 253 287 230 207 232 227 166 30 226 256 235 303 259 321 273 198 187 218 213 153 45 239 241 214 293 255 289 221 171 169 228 207 147 00 243 227 247 272 238 283 205 190 231 223 172 114 7_7_7_7- ---- ---- _-_- ---- ---- ____ r Total 950 960 949 1096 994 '1146 986 789 794 901 819 580 24 Hour Total : 15427 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 876 Peak hour factor : 0.90 PM peak hour begins : 17:15 PM peak volume : 1180 Peak hour factor : 0.92 ******************************************************************************* Jul 12 Southbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 44 22 16 18 8 22 95 207 238 259 226 188 30 39 25 13 20 12 33 116 209 225 214 221 192 45 34 18 9 14 18 48 166 271 241 237 216 199 CO 30 15 20 22 13 74 190 231 265 228 206 222 Hr Total 147 80 58 74 51 177 567 918 969 938 869 801 End Time 12 13 -------- 14 15 16 15 223 208 220 193 218 30 207 237 169 185 174 45 248 231 211 225 201 00 235 230 209 207 206 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 232 211 125 138 93 84 36 253 162 181 146 102 57 52 227 181 159 123 93 65 36 204 178 148 82 80 42 35 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 14r Total 913 906 809 810 759- :916 732 613 489 368 248 159 24 Hour Total : 13411 AM peak hour begins 08:15 AM peak volume : 990 Peak hour factor : 0.93 PM peak hour begins : 12:30 PM peak volume 928 Peak hour factor : 0,94 ******************************************************************************* Traffic Survey Specaiists, Inc, 624 Gazdenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (661) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Pace 2 **************************************************************************** Data File Station Identification Start date Stop date City/Town Location Interval : 15 minutes Start time 0000 Stop time 24:00 County Dade : Biscayne Boulevard South of NE 31 Street ******************************************************************************* Jul 12 Total Volume for Al]. Lanes D0712002.PRN 000000071006 : 000058410067 Jul 12, 06 Jul 12, 06 Miami, Florida End Time -------- 15 30 45 00 -------- Hr Total 00 142 127 105 108 01 66 59 66 53 02 42 48 41 35 -*-- 03 43 48 35 38 04 19 22 34 24 482 254 166 164 99 OS 47 59 73 103 282 06 150 186 244 278 858 07 3/1 339 401 382 1433 08 09 in 11 395 430 382 366 380 387 378 386 393 416 390 390 423 429 390 439 1591 1662 1540 1581 End Time 12 13 14 15 15 465 444 473 421 30 433 493 404 488 45 487 472 425 518 00 478 457 456 479 Total 1863 1866 1758 1906 16 460 433 456 444 1793 17 18 19 **** 20 21 22 23 485 498 355 345 325 311 574 435 379 333 320 270 516 402 330 292 321 272 487 383 338 313 303 214 2062 1718 1402 1283 1269 1067 202 205 183 149 739 24 Hour Total : 28838 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 1727 Peak hour factor : 0.89 PM peak hour begins : 17:15 PM peak volume : 2075 Peak hour factor : 0.90 ******************************************************************************* Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc', 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 **********************************-x*********************** Data File D0712001.PRN Station : 000000071005 1dentf±cation 009603860100 Start date : Jul 12, 06 Stop date Jul 12, 06 City/Town : Miami, Florida Location NE 29 Street East of NE 2 Avenue **********************************************************************.k******** Jul 12 Interval : 15 minutes Start time : 00:00 Stop time : 24:00 County Dade Eastbound Volume for Lane 1 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 -------- 15 5 2 0 0 0 2 9 21 30 4 1 3 2 2 4 13 28 45 1 4 2 2 2 4 31 32 00 8 2 1 1 2 3 24 34 Hr Total 18 9 6 5 6 13 77 115 121 114 107 131 08 09 10 11 32 27 30 28 38 29 29 26 29 31 29 37 22 27 19 40 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 44 32 44 39 40 43 50 21 30 20 15 8 30 38 41 50 43 33 37 40 24 18 14 11 9 45 48 48 27 40 64 46 32 26 19 17 9 7 00 45 47 34 38 38 39 33 31 19 11 7 9 Total 175 168 155 160 r1-7-5, 165. 155 102 86 62 42 33 4 Hour Total ; 2200 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume 159 Peak hour factor : 0.83 PM peak hour begins : 13:30 PM peak volume : 189 Peak hour factor : 0.94 ******************************************************************************* Jul 12 Westbound Volume for Lane 2 End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 7 2 1 5 0 0 12 25 24 38 31 38 30 2 5 2 1 3 4 10 28 34 29 28 36 45 5 1 1 4 2 5 24 16 36 28 26 32 00 5 3 0 1 3 11 25 29 26 31 36 51 Hr Total 19 11 4 11 8 20 72 98 120 126 121 157 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 44 50 41 28 45 60 49 16 15 21 17 30 50 39 32 37 40 55 38 21 31 11 17 45 41 37 27 47 41 55 33 16 14 11 12 00 58 27 40 36 55 45 28 18 13 15 5 7 Hi- Total 193 153 140 148 181 216 148 71 73 58 51 31 22 23 4 15 5 24 Hour Total : 2230 AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 177 Feak hour factor : 0.87 PM peak hour begins : 16:45 PM peak volume : 226 Peak hour factor : 0.94 ******************************************************************************* Traffic Survey Specialists, Inc_ 624 Gardenia Terrace Delray Beach, F orida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 ******************************************************************************** Data File Station Identification Start date Stop date City/Town D0712001„PRN 000000071005 : 009603860100 Jul 12, 06 Jul 12, 06 : Miami, Florida Interval : 15 minu Start time ; 000D Stop time : 24;00 County : Dade Location NE 29 Street East of NE 2 Avenue ******************************************************************************* Jul 12 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time -------- 15 30 45 00 Er Total 00 12 6 6 13 01 02 4 6 5 5 37 20 1 5 3 1 10 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- iii_ 5 0 2 21 46 56 65 61 3 5 8 23 56 72 58 57 6 4 9 55 48 65 59 55 2 5 14 50 63 48 58 55 16 14 33 149 213 241 240 228 66 62 69 91 288 End Time 12 13 14 15 88 82 85 30 88 80 82 45 89 85 54 00 103 74 74 ---- ---- 15 16 67 80 87 74 85 73 105 93 17 18 19 103 99 37 92 78 45 102 65 42 84 61 49 20 21 45 49 33 32 41 25 28 26 22 23 32 28 21 12 12 24 12 16 Total 368 321 295 308 356 381 303 173 159 120 93 64 24 Hour Total : 4430 AM peak hour begins : 1/:30 AM peak volume : 336 Peak hour factor : 0.92 PM peak hour begins : 16:30 PM peak volume : 393 Peak hour factor : 0.94 ******************************************************************************* F T ' eak Season Conversion Factor Report _ `C'"l�i� Del) lent of ? 71 L'wzspo';�7t?€i[i Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Peak Scaswya Factor Category Report AM DA. N "1°11 teg rv: 8 70€3 e'- Dates 81 1 01/0112004 - 01/03/2004 1.00 2 01 /04r 2004 - 01/ 100004 1.00 3 01/11/2004 - 01 1712004 0.99 4 01 / 1 S /2004 - 01!24/2004 0.99 5 01/252004 - 01/31/2004 0.99 5 02/01/2004 - 02/0 7 /2004 0.98 • 7 02/08/2004 - 02_/ 14/2004 0.98 * 8 02/15/2004 - 02/21 /2004 0.97 * 9 02./22/2004 - 02'282004 0.97 * 10 02/29. 2004 - 03/06/2004 0.97 * 11 03/07/2004 - 03/ 13 /2(304 0.97 • 12 03/14/2004 - 03/20/2004 0.96 * 13 03/21/2004 - 03/27/2004 0.97 * 14 03/28/2004 - 04/03/2004 0.97 * 15 04/04/2004 - 04/10/2004 0.98 * 16 04/11/2004 - 04/17/2004 0.98 * 17 04/18/2004 - 04/24/2004 0.98 * 18 04/25/2004 - 05/01/2004 0.98 19 05/02/2004 - 05/08/2004 0.99 20 05/09/2004 - 05/15/2004 0.99 21 05/16/2004 - 05/22/2004 0.99 22 05/23/2004 - 05/29/2004 0.99 23 05/30/2004 - 06/05/2004 0.99 24 06/06/2004 - 06/12/2004 1.00 25 06/13/2004 - 06/19/2004 1.00 26 06/20/2004 - 06/26/2004 1.01 27 06/27/2004 - 07/03/2004 1.02 28 07/04/2004 - 07/10/2004 1.03 29 07/11/2004 - 07/17/2004 1.04 30 07/18/2004 - 07/24/2004 1.04 31 07/25/2004 - 07/31/2004 1.03 32 08/01/2004 - 08/07/2004 1.03 33 08/08/2004 - 08/14/2004 1.02 34 08/ 15/2004 - 08/21/ 2004 1.02 35 08/22/2004 - 08./28/2004 1.03 36 08/29/2004 - 09/04/2004 1.04 37 09/05/2004 - 09/11/2004 1.05 38 09/12/2004 - 09/18/2004 1.06 39 09/19/2004 - 09/25/2004 1.05 40 09/26/2004 - 10/02/2004 1.03 41 10/03/2004 - 10/09/2004 1.01 42 10/10/2004 - 10/16/2004 1.00 43 10/17/2004 - 10/23/2004 1.00 44 10/24/2004 - 10/30/2004 1.00 45 10/31/2004 - 11/06/2004 1.01 46 11/07/2004 - 11/13/2004 1.01 47 1111412004 - 11/20/2004 1.01 48 11 /21/2004 - 11 /2 7/2004 1.01 49 11/28/2004 - 12/04/2004 1.01 50 12/05/2004 - 12/11/2004 1.00 51 12/122004 - 12/18/2004 1.00 52 12.'19'2004 - 12/25/2004 1.00 53 12/26/2004 - 12'31/2004 0.99 1.03 I.03 1.02 1.02 I.02 1,0I i.0€ 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07'. 1.07 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 3.09 1.08 1.06 1.04 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.03 1.0 1.02 Note: "*" incheatcs ak seasin 'week Page • • • APPENDIX C: Miami -Dade Transit Data Route Maps OU e WHEELCHAIR ACCESSD3LE NE 199 St DIPLOMAT MALL Hallandale Beach Blvd 192 St Cswy NE 172 SI Aventura Blv Z NE 171 St NE 167 St 163 St Mali Government Center Metrorail Station Flagler S Q.) SW!SE 1 St DOWNTOWN BUS TERMINAL NE 163 St RE IV IX a Pa livmAcy.$ AV NTURA MALL NE 7 Terr = t11' u OMNI BUS TERMINAL OMNI 0.. t_ • NE 4 St O vs a Wal-Mart North Map not to scale .(02 outc WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE' Government Center Metrorail Station , !. Downtown Bus Terminal North Miami Miami Shores El Portal NE 17Terr OMI 15St— — us � B Oj� Bus Terminal I_ .--1 m m 0 60 Elagler S SW/SE 1 St UNE14St N Bayshore Dr North Miami Beach North Map not to scale METRO AREA EXPRESS MAKES ALL LOCAL STOPS NORTH OF 163 ST 0 Limited Stop MAKES ALL LOCAL STOPS SOUTH OF 19 ST Government Center Metrorail Station 1 91 St 99 S c. -10 ® Aventura Mail 163 St 151 St 146 St 135 St 123 St Cr will Sans Souci Blvd 107 St 96 St 79 St 62 St 54 St 36 St 29 St 19 St Downtown Bus m Terminal c Flagier St.] 3 ¢' m SW/SE 1 St L:IE 17 Terr OMNI 15 St OMNI BUS TERMINAL L ? Z co rNE14St ccs North Map not to scale NORWOOD Golden Glades Park & Ride North Map not to scale 12/05 AM VIA SR 836 NW 39 S VA Hosp ■ NW 17 St Jackson Memorial Hospital NW 16 St NW 199 St Civic Center 95CIVIC CENTER/ NORWOOD ALL BUSES ARE WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE NE 183 St MMOMM NO If PM VIA SR 112 NW 39 St VA Hosp ■ 17 St I 16 St , NW 14 St SR 112 Jacks Memo Hospit n rial al ou e Legend Weekend On y NE 38 St NE 36 St NE 29 St NE 19 St To Boot -1 HAULOVER PARK MARINA BAL HARBOUR Evening & Weekend Short Tum MIAMI BEACH Julia Tuttle Cswy Government Center Metered Station Downtown Bus Terminal NE17 Te r NE 14 St 1.1.1 z OMNI Omni Bus Terminal INE 4 St MDCC Downtown Campus Flagler St SW!SE 1 Si 6 —t SURFSiDE <3 0 72 St 0 North Map not to scale HIALEAH a) wnr- E 9 St 0 '6) 0,5 W/E 3 St North Map not to scale NW 64 St NW NW Martin L. King Jr. Metrorail Station NW 62 St Liberty City NE 38 St NE 36 St a) NE 17 Terr Omni Bus Terminal NE 14 St tn NE 62 St NE 61 St ou e WHEELCI1Alti ACCESSIBLE MIAMI BEACH Rush Hour Only Julia Tuttle Causeway 41 st dershi ata Route 3 1 Day Monday Friday Date 11 i22/2004 812 i /2 004 . Number of Time Passengers 1704 24 1626 2 Direction NB SB Seats 38 38 1 i Standees Capacity. 15 53 I 15 53 Monday 3/10/2003 1747 Monday 11/8/2004 3 1540 45 SB NB 43 43 NB SB Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity 35 26 58 58 20 20 63 63 Route Day Tuesday Date /31 /2005 Tuesday s 5/31/2005 Thursday 4/15/2004 nesday 6/4/2003 Friday 1/3/2003 Friday 2/7/2003 Wednesday 12/10/2003 Time 1624 Number of Passengers 12 1653 19 1603 1559 1640 1536 1524 Average Per Direct -to NB Ridership 5 Capacity 56 SB 14 53 • 28 9 Direction SB NB N13 NB SB SB SB Seats Standees ; Capacity 38 15 38 15 53 38 15 43 20 1 63 38 38 15 1 53 15 38 1 15 53 53 Day Date Time Tuesday | 3/192003 1651 Route 95 CivicCen #r Number of | | Passengers DirectionSeats Standees Capaci 0 NB 38 15 | 53 NB SB Average Per Direction ( Ridership Capacity - 53 »0[Vg! ! #D VZG Biscayne Max 93 Day Date Monday /2005 'umber t f Time Passengers Directio 1554 SB Seats Standees Capac 38 53 day 7/11/2005 Friday 2/2712002 6 554 -13 38 42 20 62 Friday Monday esda3 12/27/2002 @ 1755 14 6/7/2004 1607 20 9i 17/2003 1605 SB SB SB 42 38 42 62 15 53 20 62 'edz esday 3 9/17/2003 1625 19 'edr;esday 6/11/2003 1737 9 edriesday 6/11/20{i3 1755 Average Per Direction Ridership Capacity NB SB 10 13 60 59 • SB 42 43 43 20 62 20 6 20 63 Da any: Thursday Thursday Route T ! ) Number of Date } Time raker Direction Seats Standees Capacity 4/91200 3 : 1710 19 NB 4/1012 3 1 1624 17 SB 4/10/2003 1651 NB 43 } 20 3S 15 63 53 Average Per Direction NB Sa Ridership Capacity 15 17 53 63 • Tuesday 9/23/2 sda 8/6./2003 619 12 Seats Standees Capac 15 5 5 53 42 2 B 38 15 53 38 15 53 559 1 EB 38 15 53 sdav 6/19/2003 1723 5 EB 43 20 6 dnesday 6/18/2003 1713 5 VB 43 20 63 6/17/2003 1605 4 WB 43 20 63 Tuesday 6/17/2003 1758 EB 43 20 63 Thursday 5/1/2003 1726 13 EB 43 20 63 Monday 4/21/2003 1658 EB 38 15 53 anday 1 4/2112003 1705 17 WB 38 15 Average Per Direction Ridership 1 Capacity EB 4 58 WB 9 56 • Summary Rogge . ..... ... . Route • ute 16 Biscayne MAX 93 • 95 wa/E« SB/W verage Ridership Average Capacity Average Ridership 35 10 58 26 56 : 14 60 53 0 a Capacity 58 0 • ute T Route 62 Total Ridership 15 4 79 53 58 17 9 79 63 56 • w 0 APPENDIX D: Existing Conditions (2006) SYNCHRO 6.0 Outputs 3598N2417 3598 us 1 & NE 33 ST TIMING FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) PAGE 4 TIME PT OFF NSG G Y EWP Y S Y M CYC MIN: 20 12 0 11 30 67 1 4 14 4 90EARLY NI 15 21 0 30 1 4 12 4 6 51NITE m2 115 23 0 30 1 4 12 4 6 51LATE NIG 500 19 0 30 1 4 12 4 6 51DAWN M2 545 1 30 67 1 4 14 4 90AVG M2 0 615 2 40 66 1 4 15 4 9OPRE AM M 745 12 59 61 1 4 20 4 90AM PEAK 845 16 46 88 1 4 13 4 110MID MORN 1200 17 49 88 1 4 13 4 110NOON M2 1345 10 49 88 1 4 13 4 110AFT M1 0 1545 9 45 93 1 4 13 4 115PRE PM P 163_ 1r8- __3_8._.E3_1. _A 13 4_ 115PM PEAK 1800 3 32 52 5 4 25 4 T9GPosT PM 1900 1 30 67 1 4 14 4 90AVG M2 0 2130 11 30 67 1 4 14 4 90EARLY NI ENTER NEXT PAGE # (1 DIGIT), DAY # (2 DIGIT,99=HELP) OR ASSET # (4 DIGIT) 2417 us 1 & NE 29 ST TIME PT OFF NSG G Y MIN: 20 0 11 75 61 1 4 15 21 0 30 1 4 115 23 0 30 1 4 500 19 0 30 1 4 545 1 75 61 1 4 615 2 70 63 1 4 745 12 86 59 1 4 845 16 98 84 1 4 1200 17 103 82 1 4 1345 10 103 82 1 4 1545 9 101 90 1 1630 18 101 90 1 1800`3- 76 61 1 1900 1 75 61 1 2130 11 75 61 1 ENTER NEXT PAGE # TIMING R EWP Y R 14 1 18 4 1 1 14 4 1 1 14 4 1 1 14 4 1 1 18 4 1 1 16 4 1 1 20 4 1 1 15 4 1 1 17 4 1 1 17 4 1 4 1 14 4 1 4 1 __14_..__ 4..- ._1_ .... 4 1 18 4 1 4 1 18 4 1 4 1 18 4 1 (1 DIGIT), DAY # FOR DAY # 4 (SECTION 3) S Y M CYC PAGE 4 90EARLY NI 6 55NITE M2 6 55LATE NIG 6 55DAWN M2 90AVG M2 0 90PRE AM M 90AM PEAK 110MID MORN 110NOON M2 110AFT M1 0 115PRE PM P 115PM PEAK gopOsT PM 90AVG M2 0 90EARLY NI (2 DIGIT,99=HELP) OR ASSET # (4 DIGIT) Page 1 ‘.1 r-- tD. 00 Q. \ 2006 P.M. Peak Hour Existing Timings 3. NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Bouievara HCM Signalized intersection Capacity _Analysis Lane Con f€gurati ns Ideal Flow (vpbpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util, Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prat) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tnterseci�t�r� `Surr�rriry f ESL 1900 27 0.92 29 0 0 Perm 4 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group EBT " EBR WBL 1900 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 0.96 0.99 1761 0.89 1592 36 27 35 0.92 0.92 0.92 39 29 38 14 0 0 83 0 0 Perm 4 8 10.5 10.5 0.09 4.0 3.0 145 c0.05 0.57 50.1 1.00 5.4 55.5 E 55.5 E 6.6 0.36 115.0 45.3% 15 1900 4.0 1.00 0.96 0.97 1749 0.65 1176 12 0.92 13 1, 58 HC PM Peak Hour 2006 E ? i sd g Traffic Conditions t 'BR ".NBL NBT 1900 1900 1900 4,0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1770 3514 0,34 1.00 639 3514 17 58 876 0.92 0.92 0.92 18 63 952 0 0 3 0 63 996 Perm 8 2 2 10.5 96.5 96.5 10.5 96.5 96.5 0.09 0.84 0.84 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 107 536 2949 c0.28 0.05 0.54 50.0 1.00 5.5 55.5 E 55.5 E 0.10 0.12 1.7 1.00 0.4 2.1 A Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 0.34 2.1 1.00 0.3 2.4 A 2.4 A NBR BU ;SBL SBT 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 -1.00 1770 3532 0.28 1.00 514 3532 43 1 22 727 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 47 1 24 790 0 0 0 1 0 0 25 800 Perm 6 6 96.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 0,84 0.84 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 431 2964 0.23 0.05 0.06 0.27 1.6 1.9 1.00 1.00 0.3 0.2 1.8 2.1 A A 2.1 A A 8.0 A 7119/2006 G:\043070000-Element MUSP\Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kirniey-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne E3oule,vard HCM Sionalized In ersection Capacity Analysis Vement BR' Configurations ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Ft Protected Satd, How (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perrr.) PM Peak Hour 2006 Existng Traffic Conditions Volume (vph) 10 Peak -hour factor, PriF 0,92 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) Ws Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection' Suliimary 7/19/2006 GA043070000-Element MUSP\Calcs\SynchroiExisting.sy7 Kirriley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard Timings s PM Peak i--lour 2006 Existing Traffic Conditions Lane'rup ESL E 4BL BT NBL NBT ; SBA .SST Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 27 36 35 12 58 876 22 727 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 IVMinimum Split (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 98.0 Total Split (%) 14.8% 14.8% 14.8% 14,8% 85.2% 85.2% 85.2% 85.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize7 Recall Mode None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max 4 8 Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.60 Control Delay 50.5 Queue Delay 0.0 Total Delay 50.5 LOS D Approach Delay 50.5 Approach LOS D Intersection Surmaiy Perm Perm 10.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 0.09 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0,53 0.12 0.34 0.06 0.27 49.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 D A A A A 49.5 2.5 2.3 D A A Cycle Length: 115 Actuated Cycle Length: 115 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.60 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: A ICU Level of Service A Splits and Phases: 3: NE 33rd Street & Biscayne Boulevard i2 - 04 6 08 E.. i ... _ ...,.,_ ......... ... ...., i 7i 19/2006 G:\043070000-Element MUSP\Caics\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 9:NE3lstBuse HCM Unlit r iize= iMtnie,me Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cS H Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS interedtia"risSiiiii a Biscayne Boulevard ntersectien Capacity Andy 18 0.89 20 EBT EER Stop 0% 0 0.89 0 None 60 0.89 67 PN Peak Hour 2006 Fxistir Traffic Conditions B`WBR' .N ,1 NBL.. 'NET B 414 Stop 24 0 35 4 26 0.89 0.89 0,89 0.92 0.89 27 0 39 0 29 None 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.00 0.97 1567 2147 437 1742 2125 583 0 873 1554 2151 389 1734 2129 583 0 839 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 0.0 4.1 3.5 68 63 EB`i`.. 88 20 67 203 0.43 50 35.7 E 35.7 F 4.0 100 42 B 1... 66 27 39 97 0.68 86 99.6 F 99.6 F 3.3 89 592 3.5 40 45 4.0 100 43 3.3 91 456 0.0 0 0 2.2 96 768 Free 0% 974 0.89 1094 363 64 0.89 72 NB 1 1JB 2.. NB 31 1' .'Si3' sE'3 29 29 0 768 0.04 3 9.9 A 0.2 730 437 31 563 310 0 0 31 0 0 0 72 0 0 28 1700 1700 595 1700 1700 0.43 0.26 0.05 0.33 0.18 0 0 4 0 0 0.0 0.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 B 0.4 28 0.89 31 1166 1166 4.1 2.2 95 595 Free 0% 752 0.89 845 438 Average Delay intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 4.6 41.6% 15 ICU Level of Service A 7/19/2006 G:1043070000-Element MUSP,Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Ass cia es, Inc. 9 NE 31 st Street & Bis,ayne Bou evar; HCM Unsi naiized intersection Ca a itv Anode Mci merit SBR PM Peak Hour 2006 Existing Traffc ;icon Lat+Canfigurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 Hourly flow rate (vpn) 28 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftis) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free °�% cM capacity (veh/h) Direction Lane # 7/ i 9,12006 G_1043070000-dement MUSP\Caics\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 6: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Bouieva HCM Signalized Intersectt$on 'a a M.Oue0 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpi) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prof) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tura Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Prot Ws Ratio Perm vic Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tnteiS'ect100 Surxn 4 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 0.97 0,97 1760 0.71 1289 92 40 0.93 0.93 99 43 0 9 0 173 Perm naisi PM Peak Hour 2006 Existing Traffic Conditions EBB T ER...'' i,` WT:'WER NM_ N`f" NBR S. SBT SBR 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 0.95 0.98 1,00 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1782 1770 3518 1770 3497 0.72 0.32 1.00 0.23 1.00 1310 593 3518 427 3497 37 58 42 17 48 1017 42 22 730 63 0.93 0.93 0,93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 40 62 45 18 52 1094 45 24 785 68 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 120 0 52 1136 0 24 847 0 Perm Perm Perm 6 4 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 4 14.0 15.0 0.13 5.0 3.0 168 c0.13 1.03 50.0 1.00 78.0 128.0 F 128.0 F 16.1 0.49 115.0 55.1% 15 8 14.0 15.0 0,13 5.0 3.0 171 0.09 0.70 47.9 1.00 12.2 60.0 E 60.0 E 2 2 91.0 91.0 92.0 92.0 0.80 0.80 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 474 2814 c0.32 0.09 0.11 0.40 2.5 3.4 1.00 1.00 0.5 0.4 3.0 3.8 A A 3.8 A HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 1900 8.0 6 91.0 92.0 0.80 5.0 3.0 342 0.06 0.07 2.4 1.00 0.4 2.8 A 91.0 92.0 0.80 5.0 3.0 2798 0,24 0.30 3.0 1.00 0.3 3.3 A 3.3 A 1900 7/19/2006 G:\043070000-Element MUSP\,Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 6: NE 29th re t Biscayne Boulevard PM Peak Hour 2006 Existing Traffic. Conditions Lane iGr up Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Tun Type Protected Phases EBL EBT WBL W T 92 40 58 42 48 Perm Perm Perm NBT SBI. SBT 1 017 22 730 Perm 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 Total Split (%) 16.5% 16.5% 16.5% 16.5% 83.5% 83.5% 83.5% 83.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ali -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vie Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 1ntersectiori'Surnma None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max 15.0 0.13 1.03 122.3 0.0 122.3 i= 122.3 r 15.0 92.0 92.0 92.0 92.0 0.13 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.71 0.11 0.40 0.07 0.30 68.1 3.1 3.8 3.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 68.1 3.1 3.8 3.0 4.1 E A A A A 68.1 3.8 4.0 E A A Cycle Length: 115 Actuated Cycle Length: 115 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.4 intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1 % Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service B lit s and Phases: 6: NE 29th Street & Biscayne Boulevard t 02 "o4 s.. .......:...... o6 8 9 7/19/2006 G:t043070000-Element MUSP\Calcs\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. 13: NE 31 st Street HCM Uisi na1ized tvloveirter3t Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (vehih) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft!s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh(h) & NE 4th Avenue intersection Anal sis f Phi Peak Hour 2006 Existing, Traffic Conditions EBL EBT` 'EBR : W'BT`.WBR °.NBA. NBT N .... SBT SBR 4 4. Free Free Stop Stop ti% 0% 9°r 9% 28 10 22 7 12 1 17 41 6 3 26 3 0,75 0.75 0.75 0°.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 37 13 29 9 16 1 23 55 8 4 35 4 17 None None 43 159 139 28 173 153 17 17 43 159 139 28 173 153 17 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 98 99 97 93 99 99 95 100 1600 1566 757 730 1047 722 718 1062 bifedttar , La(e i; B . Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tersscticp 80 37 29 1600 0.02 2 3.5 A 3.5 €B.1 27 9 1 1566 0.01 0 2.6 A 2.6 NB 1 85 23 8 759 0.11 9 10.3 B 10.3 B SB.� 43 4 4 741 0.06 5 10.2 B 10.2 B Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 7.1 18.9% 15 ICU Level of Service A 7/ 19/2006 G:1043070000-Element MUSPICaIcs\SynchrolExisting.sy7 Kimiey-Horn an Associa es, Inc. 19: NE 30th Street & NE 4th Avenue HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hour 2006 Existing Traffic Conditions -*i T EBR WBT; WBR NBL TNBR SBL SBT :'B Lane Configurations 4 44 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0 % 0`'i�- 0% Volume (veh!h) 29 45 13 9 26 1 26 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0,73 0.73 0,73 0.73 0.73 0,73 Hourly flow rate (vph) 40 62 18 12 36 1 36 38 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 243 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 37 79 246 212 71 258 220 36 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 37 79 246 212 71 258 220 36 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 99 94 94 97 98 92 99 cM capacity (vehlh) 1574 1519 642 663 992 630 656 1036 Direction, ".Line Volume Total Volume Left Volume Flight cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tniersctrnrl urnary B :4CB7 ;';NB1;:SBA 119 49 101 75 40 12 36 14 18 1 27 8 1574 1519 719 678 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.11 2 1 12 9 2.6 1.9 10.8 11.0 A A B B 2.6 1.9 10.8 11,0 B B Stop 20 10 39 6 0.73 0,73 0,73 0.73 27 14 53 8 None None Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 6.7 21.2% 15 ICU Level of Service A 7119/2006 G:1843070000-ElementMUSP\Caics'\Synchro\Existing.sy7 Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. • � APPENDIX E: Growth Trend Analyses • FDOT Historical Count Information 0 iiansp...m.auou T S ranspo.Mtion Statistics Office 2004 Historical A4DT Report County: 87 DADE 0143 Descriptions SR 5/US-1, 20 ' S NE 36 . 1 ar =AADI Direction 1 Direction 2 K Factor 1 Factor T Factor 04 C" 38,000 ; N 21,500 S 16,500 0.09 0,53 4.40 2003 C 43,500 1 N 21,500 S 22,000 0.09 0.58 4.00 2002 C 46,5001 N 22,500 S 24,000 0.10 0.52 4.00 2001 C 39,500' N 19,500 S 20,000 0.08 0.54 5.50 2000_ C 47,00 1ti` 24,000 S 23,000 0.08 0.53 3.20 1999 C 40,000 N 22,500 S 17,500 0.09 0.53 4.90 1998 C 47,000 N 24,000 S 23,000 0.09 0.53 2.50 1997 C 38,500 N 19,000 S 19,500 0,09 0.65 2.30 1996 C 35,000 N 16,000 S 19,000 0.09 0.53 2.90 1995 C 34,500 N 16,500 S 18,000 0.08 0.63 6.70 1994 C 40,500 N 20,000 S 20,500 0.09 0.60 5.50 1993 C 41,000 N 21,500 S 19.500 0.00 0.00 0.00 1992 C 38,000 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 36,330 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 34,615 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 39,580 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 35,420 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 36,371 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 36,604 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 34,067 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1984 30,047 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1983 31,810 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1982 35,630 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1981 37,135 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 980 35,927 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 979 35.203 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1978 35,121 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1977 27,090 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 28,598 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1974 27,190 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1973 29.291 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1972 27,691 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1971 30,967 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1970 24,942 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manual Estimate; F = First Year Est; S w Second Year E st; T =Third Year Est; X= i mkn o Pate 1 Transportation Statistics Office 2004 Historical AADT Report Coatity„ Site: ear 5058 Description SR 5`US-1, 200' N NE 29 ST /NADI Direction 1. Direction 2 K Factor D Factor ` Factor G004 C 43,000 t. N 21,500 S 21,500 0.09 0.53 6.20 2003 C 37,500 11 N 18,000 S 19,500 0.09 0.58 6.60 2002 C 38,500 N 19,000 S 19,500 0.10 0.52 3.40 2001 C 39,000 N 19,000 S 20,000 0.08 0.54 5.30 2000 C; 42.5pt1 { N 23,000 S 19,500 0.08 0.53 3.10 1999 C 38,000 N 18,500 S 19,500 0.09 0.53 3.10 1998 C 41.000 N 21,500 S 19,500 0.09 0.53 2.50 1997 C 35,000 N 17,500 S 17,500 0.09 0.65 2.30 1996 C 39.500 N 23,500 S 16,000 0.09 0 53 2.90 1995 C 30,500 N 14,500 S 16,000 0.08 0.63 6.70 1994 C 35,500 N 17,000 S 18,500 0.09 0.60 5.50 1993 C 39,000 N 20,000 S 19,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 1992 C 35,500 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1991 33.470 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1990 31,754 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1989 32.594 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1988 31,272 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987 32,181 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1986 36,425 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1985 36,854 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1976 29,670 N 0 S 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 • AADT Flags: C = Computed; E = Manua Estimate; F= First Year Est; 5 = Second Year Esi; T =Third Year Est; X = Unknown Page rowth Trend Analyses Vehicles/Day 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 g 25000 20000 - 15000 > 10000 5000 0 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5/US-1 -- 200' S of NE 36 ST County: Station #: H hwa Observed Count � Fitted Curve e �E R o. 1 S. 2000 2005 2010 Year 2015 Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2004 to Design Year): Printed: 1,400 29.8% -3.06% -3.49% 2-May-06 Straight Line Growth Option 2020 2025 Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 �i rni-Dade 87-0143 SR 5/US- Traffic (ADTI DT) Count* Trend** 47000 39500 46500 43500 38000 45700 44300 42900 41500 40100 2006 Opening Year Trend 2006 2007 N/A 37300 2007 Mid -Year Trend N/A 35900 2008 Design Year Trend 2008 N/A 34500 TRANPi AN Forecasts/Trends *Axle -Adjusted 50000 TRAFFIC TRENDS SR 5/US-1 — 200° N of NE 29 ST County: Station #: Highway: Ka= 45000 40000 _T. 35000 > 30000 - t25000 - it 20000 15000 L. > 10000 5000 0 2000 Observed Count Fit ed Curve 4 +- -F. 1 + 3 3 3 I Jr- 3- 1 1 F- ) 2005 2010 2015 Year " Annual Trend Increase: Trend R-squared: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: Trend Growth Rate (2004 to Design Year): Printed. -50 0.1% -0.12% -0.13% 2-May-06 Straight Line Growth Option 2020 2025 Aimi-Dade 87-5058 SR 5/US-1 Traffic (ADT AADT Year Count* Trend** 2000 42500 2001 39000 2002 38500 2003 37500 2004 43000 2006 2007 2008 N/A 40200 40200 40100 40100 40000 39900 2007 Mid -Year Trend N/A N/A *Axle -Adjusted 39900 39800 • • • APPENDIX F: Cardinal Trip Distribution Interim " 0 ? Cost • ORIGIN DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION SUN, RY CARDINAL DIRECTIONS TOTAL ZONE NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW NNW 496 TRIPS 129 41 46 111 144 155 il; 89 832 PERCENT 15.50 4.93 5.53 13.34 17.31 18.63 14.06 10,70 497 TRIPS 161 64 55 123 193 198 146 136 1076 PERCENT 14.96 5.95 5.11 11.43 17.94 18.40 13.57 12.64 498 TRIPS 638 658 345 853 1426 924 576 607 6027 PERCENT 10.59 10.92 5.72 14.15 23.66 15.33 9.56 10.07 499 TRIPS 225 93 79 191 331 303 202 247 1671 PERCENT 13.46 5.57 4.73 11.43 19.81 18.13 12.09 14.78 500 TRIPS 678 183 300 780 850 1284 624 649 5348 PERCENT 12.68 3.42 5.61 14.58 15.89 24.01 11.67 12.14 501 TRIPS 389 164 142 317 355 633 386 402 2788 PERCENT 13.95 5.88 5.09 11.37 12.73 22.70 13.85 14.42 502 TRIPS 344 150 116 244 291 613 325 386 2469 PERCENT 13.93 6.08 4.70 9.88 11.79 24.83 13.16 15.63 503 TRIPS 1343 521 570 957 1490 2194 1403 1706 10184 PERCENT 13.19 5.12 5.60 9.40 14.63 21.54 13.78 16.75 "-4.504 TRIPS 617 222 274 229 1153 1292 716 894 5397 PERCENT 11.43 4.11 5.08 4.24 21.36 23.94 13.27 16.56 505 TRIPS 934 380 570 400 2148 2499 1567 1502 10000 PERCENT 9.34 3.80 5,70 4.00 21.48 24.99 15.67 15.02 506 TRIPS 732 277 254 434 719 1304 893 909 5522 PERCENT 13.26 5.02 4.60 7.86 13.02 23.61 16.17 16.46 507 TRIPS 593 309 290 197 1085 1232 1107 927 5740 PERCENT 10.33 5.38 5.05 3.43 18.90 21.46 19.29 16.15 508 TRIPS 45 101 79 10 53 238 146 74 746 PERCENT 6.03 13.54 10.59 1.34 7.10 31.90 19.57 9.92 509 TRIPS 339 134 88 47 589 847 705 631 3380 PERCENT 10.03 3.96 2.60 1.39 17.43 25.06 20.86 18.67 510 TRIPS 18 23 10 3 17 73 54 44 242 PERCENT 7.44 9,50 4.13 1.24 7.02 30.17 22.31 18.18 - 34 - 111 8/05 APPENDIX G: Volume Development Worksheets • 20116 Existing Traffic utk Season factor 2006 Volume Conversion sion Background Growth Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Towner) Onyx on the Bay (Bisacayee [Say Lofts) Rnsabella hafts (l0dgewatet Tower) Star Lofts (Bap 25) Biscayne Park the Boulevard (Avant Tawets} © trier Lofts (Biscayne Condos) i..irna an Miami (Gallery Art C'on(lonriniurn) (0tyx 2 Paramount Bay (Patantoomt Edgewater Square) Park Lane Tower The Platinum Condominium Platinum on the Bay ?nho Soleil (3 t(10 f3iscaynu float levard) Vista Biscayne Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops Midtown Miami: (Parcel (1.3[5) The Shops !Midtown Miami: (Parcel f)) Mid -Bloch. East Midtown is4insni: four Midtown Miami(Parcel 4, Tract f) )Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Mianri(Parcel 3, Tract (i) Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miami{Parcel 2, Tract lit) Buena Vista [last Tract 3 (Parcel 6) rta East Tract F. (Parcel 5) na Vista West Tract (i (South Block North) lee Phase 17 Eduewnter Ego Sky Residences Aja nn the Bay 9 Background T'r)LPfie 21709 TO[nl Traffic VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET .............. Biscayne Boulevard & N1'. 33rd Street PM PEAK HOUR l;- t Siscn ne Boulevard Snu[hbound r LLft 1)rra h litchi Left NE 33rd Street Westbound Thr6jaIL Riee.hl 33iscayne Boulevard ?Vfarthbonnd )Gil lhrUtnth Right fret[ iti 33td Street E:,6stl301001 _Ris'.hi lhrsIFAh., I -'I 070 II , 5.1 8ld .5) _. 3.1 55 107 E. 07 1 07 1.07 107 1.07 1.07 1.07 i 07 107 1.07 i .07 I.07 I 22 727 10 35 12 17 58 876 23 27 36 27 it 5. 0 `''n d 0 S ) It i.i) 0 5'.o tt c a 0 ca_o 0 5°,: 0 5 0 72 _ r o I} 5<>0 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 € 13 1 0 1 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 Il 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fi tl 0 E3 0 5) 0 0 0 0 f.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 El [} () 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 Il 0 0 0 0 IS 1} f3 E9 0 r 5 ll i) 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 0 t) f) E) 0 0 (l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r} 0 0 0 0 0 E) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 1.1 15 f.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5) 0 A 0 0 0 35 0 0 19 30 0 0 19 0 13 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 1) 0 0 00 [) 0 0 i) 0 41 0 f 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 010 0 0 1'I 0 0 6 0 i3 0 0 a 0 r) 0 O 0 5) 5) 1) a 0 a n 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 00 5) Il () 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 0 0 I) 5) f} 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 I) 0 (I 5) 0 0 O 9 0 0 0 0 O 0 5) U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i) 0 0 0 I.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 [ I 0 I1) 5) S 0 3 0 00 5 0 0 0 0 0 f1 0 0 fi 0 0 0 0 (1 5) [0 0 2 0 0 0 5) i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5) 1) 5) 0 0 0 0 l 65 8111 111 67 21 55 65 956 64 27 48 27 18 17 11 __� [ 83 827 l6 67 _____ 21 66 65 966 64 27 48 27 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Biscayne Bled 8z NE 3lst Street 1 i PEAK HOUR 6F?cscri}iliaaa 2006 Existing Traffic Peak Season Factor 2006 Volume Conversion Background Growl Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay lower) Onyx en the Bay (Iiisarsayne Bay Lolls) PIosabeila Lofts (1'ligewatter Tower) Star forts (Bay 25) Biscayne Park 5Ire Boulevard (Aunt Towers) District Lolls (Biscayne (' sOns) Lira :Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condominium) Onyx 2 Paramount 13ay (Paramount Edgewater S()1€xre) Park Lau. Tower The Platinum (ondeminiwn Platinum as the Bay Soho Soieil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard). Vista Biscayne Midtown Mianri• (Parcel A) The Shops Midtown isi'mmi: (Parcel (5 0) The. Shops Midtown Mianri: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 1Midiown four Midtown Mlarni(Parccl 4, "tract F) Midtown Miami Three Midtown Miarri(Pareel 3, Tract 131 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Mia€ni(Parcel 2, Tract 14) Bticna Vista East Tract D (Part:el6) l9a€ona V01U Gust Tract G (Parcei 5) Brleyra Vista !Vest Tract (7 )Shutt Block North) Ice Phase IJ Edgewater Sky Residences A)a on the 13ay fi09 flnekgroun d '1 raPfic 2009 TOI+,d TralTir Biscayne Blvd $ouchhonnd Leff Fr rough Right 07 07 1.07 N '. 3 I s! Street Westbound Leli 'through Right 07 ! 07 I.07 Biscayne 134ed Northhornrd E Turrt eft 'Chrouah Rruh1 4 _. r 010 C,u E 67 1 07 1.07 [ 07 5 [I 3Isi Street Eastbound cR Through [2fµ)rr 1.07 1.07 I.07 28 752 25 24 0 35 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 {I 0 15 0 I) 6 0 0 0 0 (l 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 CI 0 (I 0 0 (5 O tl (] 0 10 () O O 0 {I (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 o t) i1 0 U Il 0 0 I2 5) 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 (1 4 26 974 64 vo,, 0 ., 0. 0 15 0 0 0 0 Il {) 0 {I (,I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5) 0 {l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fl 0 0 O II E3 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tl 0 0 I) 0 0 f.3 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 rI 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 I) 0 IT I) 0 1) 0 0 - 0 Iy I) fl O f) 0 (1 0 h f) 0 0 0 0 0 9 6 O 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 (,) {I 5) 0 0 (I 0 0 (I O 0 0 11 0 I) 0 0 0 0 11 0 CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 {) 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 27 2 0 0 0 tl 0 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 f) 0 (1 0 (7 {) IR 0 60 I] 9 0 0 O 0 1) () 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i) 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 [3 0 U 6 0 1) 0 0 0 0 ] 0 0 0 (7 O r5 0 0 © 1) O 0 E) I) O 0 0 0 0 0 28 803 2_ 36 4 26 1033 67 61 45 1103 2 4 0 46 26 103"t 69 1r1 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Biscayne Blvd & 29th Street PM PEAK HOUR Description WalgruliS Driveway Slit1,611 nt Left Iron h 3ii ht Leh NE 2911 Street Westlio1131d Ri ,ht heft BAGEyIIe 111vd Northbound th I..efi ' i 29ih SEfc'ct Esoi13606d Throagh 01510 i'hreu h Through h 20I36 Existing Traffic 2 I 68.1 54 to 16 45 ns_n .....Ri to SF. 37 Perk Season tractor 107 1. 0'7 107 107 I07 L07 I07 1.617 107 1.07 1.07 1117 2006 Volume Conversion 22 730 63 58 42 14 48 1017 42 92 4)) 37 1 , _.._... l4ack{hound Growth 0 c. ,, 0 0 2115 0 0 C°o (1 0 5154 1 11 5 5 0 0 n 0 j) Sab 0 3 552, 0 0 52'i 0 (i 5".4 0 i! 5". ( 0 0 553, 0 liluo Condominium (Fliscryoe 13a,v Tower) 0 1) 0 0 0 0 (7 0 0 0 0 0 Cloys on the Boy (tiisseayne fine Lalls) 0 (7 0 f3 0 f) 0 f) 11 11 0 0 Rosahel1J Lolls (Edgewater 'Power) 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) t) 0 Slar Tons (Bey25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 3) © 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The i3nuleyard (Avant Towers) 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 © 0 0 District Lofts {Biscayne Cnro31m) 0 7 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 3) 4 Lima 2 0 E) 5 10 © 0 .. 5 2 13 O lnndrian ?ALUM(Cia)lery ,AlrCnndominiunr) 0 13 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 O 7 Onyx2(1 10 9 (1 0 D 5 5 1) (1 i) 10 0araasn nt flay (Paramount fidgewater S<{uare) 0 23 3) 0 0 Ed 14 26 0 0 3) 17 1'ark Lane Tower 0 34 6 0 [3 0 0 35 0 11 0 0 Dtc lr1 n m Condomiaiain 0 0 02 3 0 0 I) 1'1a€in13ns on the Bay 4 0 0 2 €0 3 0 0 5 0 11 (7 Soho 0 5 0 0 © 0 6 .r 0 0 f) Soiei1 (3100 Biscayne 13oulevardj 0 0 0 E1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 7 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 7 0 2 t) Midtown Miami. (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 6 0E.3 () 0 3) D 0 Midtown Miami. (Parcel L'+-E:)-l'iEe Shoos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 M3ltossm Miami (Parcel D) Miff -Block East 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 Midtown Miami. i'unr Midtown NI oi(Parccl 4, Tract 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) Midtown Miami Three hii(i)crwn Miami( Parcel 3, -tract Cr') (I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <) tl 0 f) Midtown 11 atnri. Two Midtown Miami(3'nrcel 2, Tract 14) Il , u 0 0 00 0 0 0 Li Buena Vista Oast Tract 13 (Parcel 6) 0 0 0 0 00 7 © 0 t) 0 5 Buena Vista ISost "Pratt E (Parcel 5) 0 1) 13 0 0 13 7 0 11 0 11 S (soma Vista West Tree( li (Soul') Block North) 0 1) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 13 1) Ice Phase l i Edgewater- 0 9 10 2 1 00 i3 3 re 0 F.go 0 € 5 fl 0 0 0 5 9 (1 f) 9 7 Sky Residences 0 0 0 0 9 r) 0 0 0 23 0 0 Aja on the Bay 0 6 11 01) 0 1 c 0 1) O .. 2009 03ae6grolutd Traffic 35 865 79 71 60 24 €09 1147 65 121 75 103 (..,_., (1 n u Its 11 fl 6 3 ) 21309 "Eulal "bailie 35 87d 79 37 76 24 109 If 55 92 121 58 -_,__ 103, -___ T)e. script 0On 2006 Existing Traffic Peas: Blown factor 2006 Voiumc Conversion 1)ackuround Growth Blue Condominium (Biscayne Ray rower) nyx on the Buy (llisocayne Bay lofts] Rosahclla Lolls 115dgewater Tower) Star Loh (flay 25) Biscayne Park c Boulevard (Avant "Ibwers) District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) lima Mondrian Miami (C1a)lery Are Condominium} nyx 2 Pnrnmount Ray (Ir2Flmouot Edgewater SgaareI Park bane Tower The Platinum Condominium Plat €110Eil on the Bay Soho Soleil 0100 Biscayne Boulevard) A�rSta Biscayne. Midtown Miami_ (Parcel A) The Slings i0lidtown Miami (Parcel E'..^.6) Ile Slurps Midtown Miami: (Parcel 0) Mid -Block Fast Midtown Miami Four M011O vr) MiarrtifBerael 4, Tract F) :Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Mianri(Parcel 1 Tract G) P.lidtown Miami: Two Nhdfow11 Mianli(Fareel 2, Tract 1)) Buena Vista Fast -tract 0 (Parcel 6) Buena Vista hest Tract P. (Parcel 5) Buena Vista West Traci 0 (.South Block North) Ice Phase 11 Edgewater Ego Sky Residences A}a on the Flay 009 Background Traffic 2000 'l olal Traffic VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 4th .Avenue & NE Mt h Street P 1 PEAK 1101'II Leff �! ath Avenue South howrrl L,efi NF. 30th Street Westbound Right l.,e1 N1'. 71h Avenue Northbound Throug.ii Right Leh? _NE 301h Street Eastbound Right Throa)gh Rig.irl Through Through ) ifs ti is 2/ 1 7,l 0. 11 _r 42 t? I O7 I 07 1.f37 E. 07 1.07 t. 07 07 1.07 1.07 I.07 07 I.07 Ill 39 6 9 26 1 26 28 20 29 45 13 5°,. 1 n 0 S°o I) 7 11 Y0, I) S°,, it i r it c , / _ , 0 21 1, 11 2',, tl Sn. Il I 0 0 0 D O 0 O 11 € I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f3 0 0 0 (I 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 11 0 0 f2 © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 f) 0 0 0 0 (1 i) 0 f) 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i) 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 0 0 0-0 0 0 0€.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 t) t) f) 1) 0 0 00 0 00 0 11) 0 1) 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 1) 0 1) 0 0 0 0 1) t) 0 11 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) i) 1) 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 11 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 (1 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 00 I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3 0 ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 f1 0 0 O 0 t) () (1 0 0 2 0 {) 0 0 0 I 0 {) 0 0 0 i) t1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 11 0 0 E3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 © 0 0 10 43 6 9 26 1 26 44 20 29 46 13 1) 14 11 0 it 1, an 0 .. =1 0 0 r ti u 0 i1 i) t) 1) tr 1) Il 111 67 9 9 26 1 .26 ______ S4 20 31 46 13 _.. mm VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET NE 4th .Avenue & NE 31st Street PM PEAK HOURI Description .., _w ^_ ],eft NE 4th Av@rltle Snnttihound Tliruu RE E11 _ mm 1.erl NE 31st Street Westbound _Through Right Left_._ NE 4th Avenue Northbound ihrOnett m ._]t.lri' i_,..L..., 7.Cft 00 31st Street 1'.a5111o1131d 'I hrone11 Right 2006 Existing Traffic .?41 7 i 1 €!r 3g 6 ... si71 Peak Season Factor 1 07 1 07 16'7 107 t. 07 1 07 1 07 1.07 107 1 07 107 1.07 21106 V611110e Conversion 3 26 3 7 12 1 17 ��. 41----__..... 6......F......_ 2R 10 22 l3ack0roun l Cirox)l 0 c . 0.. 0 sii„ 0 0) 0 a 0 s ,, 0 0 sin, 1) 0sii 0 0 shs 0 0 5°., 0 05°1 11 1 is,.0g 6 0 0she, tl 131uc l'ondortlkniulat (}3isc lyitc Bay Power) 0 0 (} 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 El 0 i7ny.e all the Bay (Li isacaync Bay Lofts.) 6 0 0 0 El 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 I:osaixtlla 0 431 (Gdgewaeei Taw r) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L) 0 0 0 'Star Lofts (Hay 25) 0 0 0 0 0 0 E1 0 0 0 11 0 Biscayne. 001)3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) f) 0 0 I) 13 0 E7 0 0 0 0 0 DiSlroct L,ufls (Biscayne Condos) 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 Tuna 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Aol Condominium) 0 0 0 00 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 Onyx 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 1) Pal amoulnl Bay (PRramoimt 1_(lgcw'nrar Square) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !1 0 Park Laite rewor 0 0 0 0 fl 0 0 1) 0 0 6 0 The Plat rhino Condominium 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platinum on the Bay 0 1) 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Soleil (3100 Biscayne Bon€evard) 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vista Biscayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 Midtown Miaini: (Parcel 12+E) The Shops 0 if i) 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 ft Midtown Miaini: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 1) 0 0 0 tl 0 0 0 0 0 0 C3 Midinwn Mliaini: Foot Midtown Muurli(Pacreel 4, Tract P) 0 0 0 0 0 () 0 0 00 (1 0 Midtown Mirada: Three Mtdtewri Miann(Pirrcel 3, Tract Cr) 0 0 0 0 (t 0 6 0 0 () 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midtewlt Mi;uiti(Pxreel 2, Tract t3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista Fast Tract D (Pared (h) 0 t3 0 0 O (I 6 0 0 0 0 0 By1e11n Vista East Tract F. (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista West Tract G (South Block North) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 00 f) Ice Phase 11F4gewaiet 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 git 0 fi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shy Residences 0 13 0 0 00 0 f3 f) 0 tl E3 A s on the Buy 0 0 0 !) 0 f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 2009 Background Traffic 3 _..... 26 _....... 3 10 19 1 17...._........._41 12............_. 28 12 22 .. Ti. i'rii lr t lr 0 El 2009 Total Traffic 3 .._._� 26 3 37 32 1 17 ..,.._.__ 41 ��_ 54 2R ��� 3E 22 VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET \Vest Driveway & NE 31st Street P117 PCs;\K 11OUR Etf.StYlt]PIOr6 V..W w ....._ W u Wes: Driveway Sun#Etbuurrd Rah( Left NE 31st Street Wesihound Thrpuph Righ( Left West 13riveway Norihtsoond TISTounh Rteht Left NE 31st Street )1nsi bound thtoneli Rl(tht l:efl._...._..1hrounh, 2006 Existing Traffic II i) I} (1 I'} t1 C' 0 ti IS U Peak Season Factor ! 07 l 07 1.07 i 07 I.07 1 07 1 0'7 1 07 1 07 107 1 07 1 0'7 2006 Vohlanc Conversion 0 0 0 0 20 (]�.. 0 �_....,. 1) �....,. 0 ..__ �. 0 19 .. .. .t._ .... n a .. , r. $' 3)3. 'r)0, ( 1)0 I) ", 1.'5-u 1l5, i1S"J {)O, Gym,, Background (13030ii3 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 Olue(10eflo1ni m (E3)_0Gayrie Bay "lower) 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 (3 0 Onyx on the Bay (€Bisacayne Bay 1.011s) 13 11 0 O 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 Rosalvalia 1, 333 (Eidgewater Tower) 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Star Louts (Bay 25) 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Ed 0 0 0 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The. Boulevard (Avant "Cowers) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Lois (Biscayne Condos) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Loon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mondrian Miami (Glille.fy ATI Condominium) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (I 0 0 O 0 0 Onyx 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 Aatan000nt Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 0 Il 0 0 0 0 0 1) I) 0 fl 0 Park lane Tower 0 11 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () t he Platinum Condominium 0 0 0 0 {) 0 () 11 () 1) 0 () Platinum on Ilse Eh y 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 () 0 1) f) 0 Soho 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 Soleil (310) Ttiseavne I)ouleva(d) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) Vista Biscayne (7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 Midtown Miami. (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami (Parcel (,:'. B) The Shops 0 0 0 0 0 fl r) 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami' (farce) 1)) Mid -Kock East 0 (') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f1 0 0 Midtown Miaini. Pour hiiaitown hlusmi(Parcei 4, Tract 9) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Midtown Miami: 'Mime Midtown Miami)Pareo1 3, Traci GI 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 r) 0 Midtown Mori 'Two Midtown Miami(Paros12. Tract 1)) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buena Vista l:,ast Tract 1) (Parcel 6) I) 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 !0 1) 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 31 1.30010 Vista West TPIC) (3 (South Block North) 0 0 I) 0 0 11 0 t) () 0 0 0 Ice Phase 1! Edgewater 0 (I 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 r) 8 0 Ego 11 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 Sky Residences 0 0 (I 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 i) A.j.e on the Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 i) 0 0 0 2009 Background"C'e atilt 0 0 0 © 30 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 erceivo Isai;e 0 1 _ (1 5 q I) 0 61 1i f',,, Is% ilall'i, 1.) ?I i Il I.' 11 11 ti 13 0 !' 2999Tot ol'Tenni (i 0 0 © 65 0 5 0 0 0 88 2006 0xisling Traffic Peak Seaserr Factor 2006 Volume Conversion Tmai flack coons( Growth . hie Condorninivrn (lie -icily -no Bay 'lower) Onyx e❑ the Bay (Bisacayne Bay I..n0s) Rosabella Lofts (h:dgewaler "Tower) Star Lolls (Bay 25) I scavae Park The Boulevard (Avant Towers) District Lolls (Biscayne Condos) una Mondrian Miami (Gallery Arl Condominium) Onyx 2 Paramount Hay (Paramount Edgewater Square) Park Loire" Tower he Platinwn Condominium Platinum on the (lay Soho Solcil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) ista Biscayne Midtown Miaori (Parcel A) The Shops Midtown Miami. (Parcel C 14) The Shops Midtown Miami. (Parcel I.3) Mid -Block Fast Midtown Masnti. Four Midtown Mimni(Parcel 4, Tract F) Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miami(Parcel 3, Tract Ci) Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Mianu(Parcei 2, Tract HT 13ucnn Vista Fast lrsc,'t 1) (Parcel 6) Buena Vista East'l'race 0 ( Parcel 5) Buena Vista West Tract G (South F3lock ?North) Ice Phase it Edgewater (l1151 Sky Resirliinces Aja on the (tan 2000 Background "Finnic 2000'10l n) Traffic VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Middle Driveway & NE 3lst Street PM PEAK DOUR NGddlct) seasiy South hound Fell NE IlslStreet Westbound Throuuh H€ghi. Middle Driveway Northbound I e0-Claouah Rlulu tell viP:3F0 Street 1io 4hound Right eft F'hror€gh Rsght Throh 0 t1 0 €s) 0 11 fl ri (1 10 _ 0 I.07 107 107 1_07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 i 07 107 1 07 107 €F 0 0 0 20 IF 0 0 0 0 19 0 (, c o 0 }°a (. a (i: ,, 0 soon o Ssii +0 vrs i) via, ii 5"n ri gr0 0 i°i iii i,, 0 o o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (.! 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 1'I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r;l (1 0 0 t7 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 0 1) II 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 iF 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 I) 0 0 0 (1 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 o 1) 0 0 0 0 o I1 0 0(,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 Il 0 t) l) o I) 0 0 0 o El 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 90 0 0 00 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 i> 0 0 0 0 (i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (I () 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 0 0 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 u 0 0 0 0 (I 0 0 0 141 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 (I ii o 6 0 0 0 0 0 r) 0 0 (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 t) 0 O 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 1) 1) I , its r) I I) 6 1 it eO 0 tll l 3 46 0 i8 IF 6 t 27 60 Description 200€i Existing Traffic Peak Season facuu 20€R1 Volume Cnvverrion Background ((rowth (.Flue Condorrsinhne (Biscayne Bay Tower) Chlys 011 the Bay (Bisacay)10 Bay 1.1S1s) Resabella 1.,.33 (Edgewater fewer) Star forts (Bay 25) Id3scayere Park The Bouiesord (Avant Towers) Diatricl Lofts (Biscayne Condos) lilua Mondrian N1iamni (Gallery Art Cealdulooiowol) Onyx 2 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) Park lane Tower The Plalinunl Condorniniurel Plaiinarq on the Bay Soho Soleil (31(30 Biscayne Boulevard) Vista BiSc0yne Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Slleps i41'uttown iMiami• (Parcel Cill) The Shops Midtown Miami: (Parcel F)),Mid-Block F01 Mkdouvl 1 liana( Four Midtown \lianli(Parcel 4,'Tract 19 Midtown Miami Three Midtown Mimi -APE -Ire -el 3, Tract) (vfrliatni two Midtown Miaoli)Parcel 2, Tract N) 30ena Vista East Tract (7 (Parcel01 Buena Vista East Tract E. (Parcel 5) 3uerrr Vi-sta west Tract G (South €liock North) ce Phase If Edgewater go Sky Residences Ala 011 the Bay 2009 llackgrnrurd Traffic 4)09'iolai ),afli VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET Fast Driveway & NE 31st Street PM PEAK 1101. eft East Driveway Seelhbovnd Right l efi NE 31 st Street Wesllrourrd Through Rlghr Letl East Driveway Northbound F hroo)th Rieht Left NE 31 st Street Eastbound Through Right Throu 0 !: 0 11 I'1 t) 0 C t} 11 10 it 1.07 1.07 1 07 i.07 1.07 1.07 1 07 107 1.07 €. 07 1 07 1.07 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 11 0 0 19 6 11 313 it 1"., 013' 0 c".e i1 so 0S^.a 11 S='b (1 ,� (1 ('0 +1 5°.i> (1 1 05,.i, 0 0 00 ©� 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 l) 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 E:1 0 © 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 00 0 0 0 0 0 (1 O (1 0 0 fl 0 0 D 0 0 1) 0 0 11 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fl 0 1) 0 9 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 {) 0 0 0 O 0 6 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 (3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (.i 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 1) (} 0 0 0 © 0 00 11 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1/ 0 0 1) 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0(1 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 9 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 (7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E3 0 ) 0 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 q 0 () 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 O 0 0 0 27 0 tl it (i 0 o b 19 11 0 it (1 11 I3 0 0 {I 0 q 13 it 0 0 p 0 0 0 39 0 10 0 5 O 27 2006 Existing Traffic Peak Season (-actor 2606 Volume Conversion 'iachground Growth 1': ()hie Condominium ((l )scayne 10ay Tower) Onyx on the Ciao {Etisncayne Bay lofts) Rosaheiia ),olis(Fklgewaier lower) Star Tells (Bay 25) Biscayne Park The Boulevard (Amu"( Towers) District Lolls (Biscayne Condos) t8 -aloha)) Minn)) (oralicry A6 Concfominiom) Onyx 2 ammonia Bay (Paramount € dgewater Square) Park lane Tower 'he Platinum Condaminiu,n Platuwrn on the flay Sohn So1ei1 (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) Vista Biscayne Midtown Miami: (Parcel A(1 he Shops Midtown Miami: (Parcel C-Ei) Tlx: Shops Midtown Miami_ (Parcel I)) Mid )(Rock Ease Midmwn'0-1 land: Four Midtown Miaoni(Parcel 4, Tract If) .Midtown Moo Three, Midtown hlranli)Pace€ 3, Tract (;) slidtown Two Mddtown Mionei(Parcel 2, Tract 1i) Buena Vista East Tract 13 (Parcel h) E3uena V ista East Tract 6 (Parcel .5) Buena Vista West'Tract G (South Block North) Ice Phase If Edgewater Lipe Sky Residences A}a on de Bay 2001) Background T'rx£Tic VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET West Driveway & NE 32nd Street PN1 PEAK li(WR t.eft West Drivrtctrv= Sotkth6ound Through Ii34}4t l..elt NE 32nd Street WrWhoudJ Through Right E.41. West Driveway Nord bnnn_,..li iltrou$h Right E.efi NE 32nd $trcet Easlbound Right Thr0wzh 0 it (i 0 ., I1 ,> { fl it [) 0 07 I.07 1 07 1,07 ! 07 1. 07 1.07 I.07 1.07 t. 07 i.f)7 1.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0s"� fig,. o. ',, u 05°=, f,S", 0" 77 OS"i, I ),,, )5',., 0 0 t3 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (} 0 E.l 0 1) 0 0 (1 0 0 f) 0 0 0 E1 0 0 0 t3 0 0 0 (3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 11 0 0 0 fl 0 f9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E1 0 t0 0 fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 (.1 1) 0 0 0 0 (1 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 fl 0 0 0 0 IS 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 0 )3 0 0 0 0 (3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 E3 it 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7) 0 © 0 0 0 (1 1) (3 0 0 0 0 0 )7 0 O fl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) 0 (i (1 (1 0 0 .1 0) 0 f� 0 7 3R 9 C0 G 0 0 tl 0 (i 0 1] fy 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 44 0 6 0 4 kS CDracrlion 2000 Existing Traffic Peak Season Factor 2000 Vohs me Conversion iackgrmrnd C,i3'owrh Blue (.endpminiran (l)iyc00 re (3<ry Tbzver) Onyx on the Bay (Bisccayae Bay I..ohs) I1415atr l)o LoOr (F(1bewtrter jow rj Star I..ol)s (Bay 25) Biscayne Park the Boulevard (Avant Towers) 14istric€ L.nfis (Biscayne Condos) Lima Mot -ninon Miami (Gallery Art Condominium) Onyx 2 Paratrwtxn Bay (Paramount Edgewater Sgraare) 'ork Lane "Tower e Platinwa Condominium Billion, on the I3av Soho Soleil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) a Biscayne rchown ilrrlrnr: (Parcel A) the Shops idtown Miami: (Pared 0 -0) The Slin}ss idlown Miami: (Parcel 13) Midiftlock Fast Midtown Rlianc'r Four Midtown Miami(P,arcei 4, Tract F) idtown Mono "Three Midtown Mianri(Parecl 3, Traci (i) Midtown Muni? Two Midtown Mlanti(Parcol 2. Tract'N) 3ucna Vista East Tract L) (Parcel (i} 3nena Vista East Tract 1: {Parcel 5) 3uena Vista West 'Trac) fx (South Block North) ce Phase 1! l (ee 7rtel fig() Sky Residences Aja no the Cary $0U9 Aarlcgrnund F'saffir 009'Tnial'1'rnllic VOLUME DEVELOPMENT SHEET East Driveway & 1rF. 32nd Street PM PEAK HOUR Lef! East Driveway `outhlround Through, Right Left NE 02nd Sisoot '6'esl bound Flight Left East Driveway Northbound R€uht I.ef) S1r. 32nd Street Eastbound Tight Through ThFolIgh throe€uh 107 1 07 17)7 L07 i 07 107 i D7 1.07 1.07 1.07 1 07 1 {17 (I a a 0 0 a 0 {.i Sib 0 1 o 0 5 7 ., o 1) 5.{., 0 0°.., 0 '1 o o; i) s{,, 0_ o fl . ., i1 5 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 f) 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 i) 0) 11 0 0 0 0 0 I) 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 15 0 a 0 0 (} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a (I 37 0 0 7) a 0 a © 0 0 a 0 (1 0 0 fl (} f3 0 0 0 0 0 0 t) (3 0 0 1) 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 © D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a (1 0 0 0 a a 3) ll 7) © 0 0 0 0 0 0 f) 0 0 a 0) 0 0 0 1) 0 © D 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a 0 (1 O 0 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ll 0 CI (1 0 0 0 (3 a 0 0 (5 0 0 0 L) 5 0 © 0 0 () 0 I} () i3 7.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I} 0 0 0 0 0 0 E) 0 t1 0 f) 0 0 0 a 0 (} (} 0 0 (1 0 a a 0 (1 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 i) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t3 0 0 0 3) 0 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 (7 0 I) i) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 a 0 0 O 1) (I U 0 0 l} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 7) 0 0 0 (I 0 0 0 0 0 0 l} (} €I 6 0 a 0 0 0 --___�_n 0 a a_ n a a 1) 1 0 r] 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 S fi 1 a I/ PEAK HOUR DETERMINATION STUDY AREA INTERSECTION TOTALS Description 133scayiee Boulevard Si. NE 33rd Streei Biscayne Boineuard & NE $ 1 si Sireci Biscayne Boulevard & NE 2903 Street_ NE 41.11 Averwe & NE 31s( Sfl-CC NE' 4th Avenue &. 1113 30th Sireet PM Peak .Hoci- 40.7., 4:15 4:30 :45 5:00 5 530 5:45 480 439 426 44e 454 479 455 379 500 421 436 444 449 526 477 426 5 i4 451 516 460 45'7 745 554 507 23 25 27 9 ri 33 40 55 43 49 60 46 59 39 72 93 1559 1355 1465 1415 1410, 1661 1598 1461 5824 5731 5944 6166 Kunley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Copy,s4Jhr ,e) 2004, Kimey-i4s-mi uncin2,50(,,11",,, irn•. Peak finer 5:00 1'ri/1-6:00 PM Committed Peak Hour Volume (Person -Trips) Project N isay! NB arcs NE 29th Stree EB B Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower} ;32 13 Onyx on the Bay (Bisacayne Bay Lofts) 0 0 itosabella Lofts (Edgewater Tower) 0 0 Star Lofts (Bay 25) it 0 Biscayne Park 0 0 The Boulevard (Avant Towers) 11 18 District Lofts (Biscayne Condos) 11 11 Lima 7 5 Mondrian Miami (Gallery Art Condommit rn) 11 20 C nvx 2 15 20 Paramount Bay (Paramount Edgewater Square) 45 40 Park Lane Tower 46 40 The Platinum Condominium 5 2 Platinum on the Bay 3 4 Soho 9 11 Soleil (3100 Biscayne Boulevard) 7 10 Vista Biscayne 7 7 Midtown Miami: (Parcel A) The Shops 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel C±E) The Shops 0 0 Midtown Miami: (Parcel D) Mid -Block East 0 0 Midtown Miami: Four Midtown Miami(Parcel 4, Tract F) 0 0 Midtown Miami: Three Midtown Miami(Parcel 3, Tract G) 0 0 Midtown Miami: Two Midtown Miami(Parcel 2, Tract H) 0 0 Buena Vista East Tract D (Parcel 6) 7 5 Buena Vista East Tract E (Parcel 5) 7 5 Buena Vista West Tract G (South Chock North) 3 3 Ice Phase 1/ Edgewater 29 21 Ego y 14 22 Sky Residences 7 12 Aja on the Bay 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 20 15 7 4 10 5 17 19 11 6 11 5 18 15 6 6 0 0 16 8 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 5 7 5 7 3 3 19 11 7 5 0 0 2 1 282 277 61 121 Committed Peak Hour Volume (Person -Trips) 395 388 225 169