HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 07-0010
Monday, February 26, 2007
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO,
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED DENIAL TO THE MIAMI CITY
COMMISSION TO AMEND PAGE NO. 23, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM "C-2" LIBERAL COMMERCIAL
TO "SD-6" CENTRAL COMMERCIAL -RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1603, 1611, 1615, 1621, 1631
NORTHEAST MIAMI PLACE AND 1604, 1622, 1630 NORTHEAST 1ST AVENUE,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS
OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Angel Urquiola,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin Yes
Mr, Ron Cordon Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela No
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Away
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia No
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 5
NAY: 2
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms, Fernandez: Motion carries 5-2
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-02072zc
Z.1
•
•
EXHIBIT A
MAX M I AM I
Major Use Special Permit
1603, 161 i , 1615, 1621, 1631 NE Miami Place
1604, 1622, 1630 NE 1 sl Avenue
Legal Description
Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 12, Block 8 or ROBBINS, GRAHAM, AND CHILLINGWORTH
SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book A, at Page
491/2 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, less the East 10 feet of Lots 5,
8, 9, and 12 and less the South 5 feet of Lot 12.
TOGETHER WITH:
Lots, 1, 2, and 3, Block A, of T.W. PALMER'S RESUBDIVISION, according to the Plat
thereof, recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 60 of the Public records of Miami -Dade
County, Florida, less the South 10.00 feet of Lot 3.
CirciE appropriate conditio
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a pan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on Tight and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I). The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as tha
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion; After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 110QO 1 move that the
request on age items ! be recommended to the City Commission for (aprovai),(denial).``at
tI YG° e' -
Signatures' Print Name
2 2
Agenda Item Date