HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No,: 06-1256
Monday, November 13, 2006
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CHANGE OF ZONING AMENDING PAGE NO. 14, OF THE
ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401,
SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FROM R-3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO R-
3 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN SD-12 BUFFER
OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 621-
625 AND 645 NORTHEAST 64TH TERRACE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED EXHIBIT "A"
(HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Angel Urquiola,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr, Ron Cordon No
Mr. Miguel Gabela Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes
Ms, lleana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Ms. Chloe Keidaish Away
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
AYE: 6
NAY: 1
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 6-1
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 06-01433zc
Z.6
E..UIBIT 'A'
ADDRESS: 621, 625, 545 N_E:_ 64th TERRACE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33138 and
LEGAL DESCRIP1]O�t:
Lot 3 & 4 of ARLINGTON SUBDIVISION according to the put thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 44 of the
Public Records of Dade County, Florida, now known as Miami —Dade County, Florida.
AND
Lot D less the South 7,5 feet thereof, in LEGION PARK, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 39,
Page 93, of the Public Records of Miami —Dade County, Florida; and
Lots 1 and 2, less the South 7.5 feet thereof, of ARLINGTON RESUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof,
recorded in Plot Book 7, Page 44, of the Public Records of Miami --Dade County, Florida; and
A portion of Subdivision "C" of Government Lot 5 of Section 18, Township 53 South, Range 42 East, according to
the Plot thereof, as recorded in Plat Book A, at Page 1, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida,
being more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the Northeast Corner of Lot 1 of ARUNGTON according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat E3ook 7,
at Page 44, of the Public Records of Miomi—Dade County, Florida; thence N89'44'50"W, along the North line of
Lots 1 and 2 of said ARLINGTON for 112.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence NOO'00'DO"E for
25.00 feet to the intersection with the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot C of AMENDED PLAT LEGION
PARK, according to the plot thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 39, Page 93, of the Public Records of Miami —Dade
County, Florida; thence S89'44'50"E, along the Westerly extension of said Lot D for 112,00 feet to the Northwest
corner of said Lot D; thence SOO*00"OO"W, along the West line of sold Lot 0 for 25.00 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
Circie yap io i"ir31e condition
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
I) The proposed change has the same or similar impact_ on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning,
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: Ift considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance NN 09, i move that the
regte t da item # be recommended to the City Commission for rev {denial).
Print Name
Date